The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 0907040 - 7 -- -- 4 . Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting September 7,2004 5:30 pm Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda) -REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - (Please note that all times provided are estimates only) 1. Call to Order at 5:30 pm 11, Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] VI. Final Design Plan - 2 Triplex Units (5:35pm - 5:50pm) Propetty Location: Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision/1031 West Wildwood Road Applicant: Stephen Richards Owner: Steven McDonald [Tab 2] Description: Stephen Richards is proposing a final design for two triplex units on West Wildwood Road. This lot is zoned for six units. Proposed materials include: wood siding and stucco. Each unit will be approximately 2,500 sq. ft., including garage space. The sketch design was approved at your July 20,2004 meeting. VII. Final Design Plan - Duplex (5:50pm - 6:05pm) Property Location: Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5650 Wildridge Road East ApplicanUOwner: Tripp Plavec ITab 31 Description: Tripp Plavec is proposing a 6,000 sq. ft. alpine style duplex. This duplex will be accessed via two driveway entrances. The north unit of this duplex will share a driveway entrance with Lot 17. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding and trim, stucco and stone. The sketch design was approved at your August 17, 2004 meeting. Vlll. Sketch Design - Duplex (6:05pm - 6:20pm) Property Location: Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/580 Nottingham Road Applicant'. Jerald L. Wuhrman Owner: Jux and DW Family Trust [Tab 4] Description: Jerald Wurhman is proposing two alpine style side-by-side town homes with a central corridor entry. Each unit is proposed to contain 3 bedrooms and 31/6 baths. Each unit will have a single car garage and surface parking. Proposed materials include rough sawn natural cedar trim and textured white stucco exterior and cedar shake shingles for the roof. The proposed maximum height is 35' and each unit will be approximately 3,000 sq. ft. IX. Minor Project - Fence (6:20pm - 6:30pm) Property Location: Lot 258, Block 1, Wildridge/2110 Longspur Posted on September 3,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions ApplicanVOwner: Matthew Kamper [Tab 5] Description: The applicant is proposing a 4' high split rail fence on the rear and side property lines. All fences require specific approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission. X. Minor Project - Landscaping (6:30pm - 6:40pm) Property Location: Lot 45, Block 1, Wildridge/2400 Saddle Ridge Loop Applicant/Owner: Vera Miller [Tab 6] Description: A minor project was approved in July 2003 for landscaping improvements and a new deck and stairs. All improvements have been completed and 10 aspens trees have been planted along the rear property line in Spring 2004. The trees were not indicated or approved on the original plan. A site plan was submitted to Staff with the location of the trees and will be available review at your meeting. XI. Other Business XII. Adjourn (6:40pm) Posted on September 3,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission August 17, 2004 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were three amendments to the Agenda. Item VII, Final Design Plan - Duplex, Property Location: Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road, to the Consent Agenda; Item Vlll, Final Design Plan - Single Family, Property Location: Lot 58, Nottingham Station PUD/ 1910 Hurd Lane, to the Consent Agenda; and Item XI, Minor Project - Landscaping, Property Location: Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/70 Beaver Creek Place, Applicant: Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Owners: American National Bank., to the Consent Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Evans disclosed a conflict with Item XI, Minor Project - Landscaping, Property Location: Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/70 Beaver Creek Place, Applicant: Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Owners: American National Bank. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Karow motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the August 3rd, 2004, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; Final Design Plan - Duplex, Property Location: Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road, for approval; Final Design Plan - Single Family, Property Location: Lot 58, Nottingham Station PUD/ 1910 Hurd Lane and Minor Project - Landscaping, Property Location: Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/70 Beaver Creek Place, Applicant: Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Owners: American National Bank, be approved on the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and the motion passed 6 to 1 with Chairman Evans abstaining. VI. PUD Amendment - Public Hearing Property Location: Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East, Applicant/Owner: jay Peterson F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 1 of 9 4 Description: The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of duplex and triplex zoning. The proposed PUD amendment is to change the zoning to single family and downzone the total dwelling units of the properties to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) separate lots. This application will not affect the original PUD access from both Longsun Lane and Wildridge Road East; however, will require a reconfiguration of the platted non-developable area. The Commission reviewed a previous application, which was withdrawn by the applicant after the Commission and the applicant, on the concept for this application, considered public input. Tambi Katieb presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Mr. Katieb disclosed a clarification on Condition 1 B to exchange the word "maximum" for "minimum" for the record. Jay Peterson, applicant, approached the podium. He discussed the changes from his original application with 5 lots off Longsun Lane and 3 lots off Wildridge Road. Commissioner Trueblood asked about the turnaround situation of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Peterson responded that he would approach the Fire Department upon acceptance of his plan but he had briefly discussed it with them. Commissioner Didier questioned the setbacks and the driveway access. Chairman Evans questioned the Open Space and the building envelopes. No driveways will disturb the Non-disturb Areas. Commissioner Savage questioned the design of the homes as cottage style and Mr. Peterson, in his previous application, desired a cottage look in those lots that were steep, now it is more relaxed with fewer homes being built, he believed a commonality of materials and design would be most appropriate. He also said a homeowners association would be created for snow removal. He also disclosed that he would probably sell the upper three lots and he would develop the lower 5 lots. Commissioner Struve asked about the access easement to the Open Space and Mr. Peterson said he would develop it if the owners on Lot 53 were okay with it, as the access would be right next to them. PUBLIC HEARING OPENS Mark Marto, 5134 Longsun Lane, approached the podium to discuss the cul-de- sac and the size of it. The road extension would actually be a driveway for emergency vehicle turnaround and not an extension of Longsun Lane. The new driveway would cut the current cul-de-sac and be maintained as a private driveway. Michael Hayes, 5183 Longsun Lane, Lot 52, felt the current plan, as submitted tonight, met with his approval and support. Brian Nolan, 5161 Longsun Lane, F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 2 of 9 mentioned that today's plan meets with his support and approval and agreed with the removal of the 4,000 sq ft restriction of living square footage per home. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Karow and Commissioner Didier agreed on retaining the limitation of the living square footage. Commissioner Smith believed Mr. Peterson did a good job on the revisions with the 4,000 square foot living space in place and stated it could be removed. Commissioner Struve remarked that the 4,000 square foot living area should stay with the top three lots and be removed from the bottom five lots. Commissioner Savage was in favor of the motion and that a limitation of square footage should be 4,500 square feet. Commissioner Karow brought to light that other developments weren't constrained to a limited living square footage. Commissioner Evans mentioned that with the non-disturbance areas, there should be limitations on the building size and the smaller lots would benefit from smaller footages. Commissioner Karow commented on the issue of size and value to fit the neighborhood in fairness to those existing similar lots. Commissioner Karow moved to approve Resolution 04-22, recommending to Town Council to approve the Western Sage PUD Amendment for Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East, specifically described application date of July 1 gth, 2004, with the inclusion of all staff recommendations except 1 B. Commissioner Trueblood seconded the motion. The Motion passed 6 to 1 with Commissioner Didier opposing. Mr. Nolan brought to the attention of the audience that formal Public Notices were sent for the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting to owners of adjacent properties and are not sent for the Town Council meetings. Should there be public concern, it can be addressed with Town Council at their next meeting. VII. Final Design Plan - Duplex Property Location: Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road, Applicant.' Scott Turnipseed, Owner: Greg Samson Description: Scott Turnipseed is proposing a duplex on the uphill side of Old Trail Road near the intersection with Draw Spur. The building is approximately 5,800 square feet in size and would include two (2) 4-bedroom units. Proposed materials would include: cedar board on board siding, stucco, and asphalt shingles. The sketch design was approved on August 3,2004. Moved to Consent Agenda. VI11. Final Design Plan - Single Family Property Location: Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD/ 1910 Hurd Lane Applicant: Architectural Services PC, Owner: Nancy & Mauri Nottingham F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 3 of 9 4 Description: Architectural Services PC is proposing a single-family residence on Hurd Lane. The building is approximately 2,903 sq. ft. in size, with a 574 sq. ft. garage and 1919 sq. ft. unfinished basement. The style of this house will emulate a country farmhouse with 10:12 roof pitches, horizontal siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. The sketch design was approved on June 1, 2004. Moved to Consent Agenda. IX. Final Design Plan - Duplex Property Location: Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision/5039 Wildridge Road East, Applicant: Dantas Builders, Inc., Owner: Dantas Builders, Inc. Description: Dantas Builders, Inc. is proposing a duplex residence with the two units totaling 9,012 square feet (living space and garage space). The building materials will include stucco siding, stone veneer base, decks with wood railings, and asphalt shingles. The proposed maximum height is 34'9". The sketch design was approved on June 1, 2004. Ken Kovalchik presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Savage commented that bridge design was still present and had hoped it would have been hidden with larger trees or a facade. Commissioner Struve remarked that it was a bridging design with its bridge supports on the drawing and couldn't support it the project. Commissioner Smith voiced that no modifications to the design was apparent as requested at Sketch Plan. Commissioner Karow mentioned that it conformed to the Design Guidelines. Commissioner Didier agreed with Commissioner Karow but thought the trees needed to be larger to hide the bridge. Commissioner Trueblood commented that the initial connection presented at Sketch Plan was better design and believed this lot had good flexibility and more could be done with this design to omit the bridge. Commissioner Evans agreed that there are other solutions for the drainage and the bridge, thought the closets were a good design; the tall trees couldn't fix the bridge issue as it would still be a bridge and questioned why there was excess parking to require a larger driveway. Commissioner Karow motioned for approval of the Final Design Plan - Duplex, Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision with staff conditions 1 thru 9 as outlined in the Staff Report with Commissioner Didier seconding. The motion failed 5 to 2 with Commissioners Evans, Smith, Struve, Savage and Trueblood opposing. Commissioner Savage motioned to deny the Final Design Plan, Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision due to the bridge design architectural feature. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Commissioner Savage amended his motion to table the Final Design Plan - Duplex, Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision/5039 Wildridge Road East, pending revisions to the appearance of the bridge-like element as discussed in the Minutes of today's meeting. F.\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 4 of 9 Commissioner Smith seconded this motion and the motion passed 6 to 1 with Commissioner Karow opposing. X. Sketch Design Plan - Duplex Property Location: Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5650 West Wildridge Road, Applicant: Er\c Johnson Architect PC, Owner: Tripp Plavec Description: Er\c Johnson, applicant, is proposing a 6,000 sq. ft. alpine style duplex. This duplex will be accessed via two driveway entrances. The north unit of this duplex will share a driveway entrance with Lot 17. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding and trim, stucco and stone. The proposed maximum height is 35'. Ken Kovalchik presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Commissioner Evans questioned the Staff's concern of the shared driveways on Lots 17 and 18. Mr. Kovalchik replied that the concern was with the access maneuverability of Lot 17 and the drainage issues. It was discussed that the south driveway would benefit from access off Coyote Ridge. Commissioner Trueblood questioned where off of Coyote would the driveway be placed and Mr. Kovalchik responded that since Coyote would be a flatter access, it would have several possibilities. Commissioner Karow questioned item 4 and the 24-foot area and is defined by the guidelines of a clear back up to the retaining wall. Tripp Plavec, developer/applicant and owner/resident of Lot 17, next door, approached the podium. He discussed the 10-foot easement and the retaining wall, the elimination of massive retaining wall and the movement of the driveway from the intersection. He felt that the double driveway helps with creating a 6,000 sq ft duplex and allows for landscaping on the corner of the intersection. Commissioner Trueblood asked about the movement of the driveway to Coyote Ridge. Mr. Plavec responded with the road impacts and that this submitted design permits a backyard and enhanced views. Commissioner Evans requested the north arrows on the plans be in the correct direction and questioned the one car garage situation. Mr. Plavec responded that the garage would have a lift in it to garage multiple cars. Commissioner Trueblood requested that Mr. Plavec look at access from Coyote Ridge prior to Final Design. Jerry Herman, 5531 Coyote, house across the street from this project, would prefer the driveway from Wildridge Road rather than Coyote. He continued that the lot is very small and thought it should be a single- family home site. Commissioner Didier appreciated the design and mentioned that the south side driveway was tight. Commissioner Karow commented that this Sketch Plan adhered to the sketch plan considerations of the guideline, however, he voiced F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 5 of 9 concerned with the maneuvering space. Commissioner Karow continued with the drainage issues and the building height. Commissioner Smith and Commissioner Struve voiced that the plan conforms to the town's design requirements. Commissioner Savage was concerned with the driveway on the south since it was close to the intersection and commented that it does meet the design guidelines. Mr. Kovalchik commented that grading is not permitted in Right of Ways as Commissioner Savage suggested grading the southern portion. Commissioner Evans commented that a concrete block retaining wall is not desired. Ken Kovalchik presented the technical issues that required consideration to Mr. Plavec. There were: 1. All retaining walls over 4 feet in height shall be structurally designed or certified by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer. 2. The survey shall be updated to indicate the location and grades for the existing driveway to Lot 17. The extent of the access easement shall be indicated on the survey. 3. Top of wall and bottom of wall elevations for the retaining wall along the entry walkway for the north unit shall be indicated on the Site Plan. 4. Retaining wall detail shall be provided for the wall between the entry walkway and driveway for the north unit. 5. No grading shall occur outside of the property lines. 6. A vicinity map and summary table shall be indicated on the site plan. 7. The finished grade shall be indicated on the north elevation. 8. As the design is proposed the following issues must be addressed in proceeding to final design: a. Drainage flows toward the north entrance and the entrance in located in a hole with no drainage outlet. Additional spot elevations on the driveway and stairway at the entrance to the North Unit need to be indicated and drainage needs to be directed away from the entrance. b. The retaining walls on the north side of the north unit appear to be structural and will need to be designed and construction certified by a Colorado Register Engineer. In addition, there appears to be an extra-proposed contour line at the north side of the property. c. The structural block wall along the driveway will need to be designed and certified by Colorado Registered Engineer. Wall design shall not allow encroachment into the 10' slope maintenance, drainage and snow storage easement. d. The proposed grading in the Right-of-Way is not acceptable and needs to be revised. In addition, the proposed grading along Wildridge Road does not direct drainage to the proposed culvert and the culvert appears to be ineffective. e. Guardrail along Wildridge Road may be necessary and will need to be determined at Final Design. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 6 of 9 9. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Staff requested tabling so that the concept of the driveway and technical issues would be reviewed and addressed. Commissioner Karow moved to approve Sketch Design Plan - Duplex, Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, with all the memos, technical issues and discussion items to be satisfied by Final Design. Commissioner Didier seconded this motion. The motion passed unanimously. XI. Minor Project - Landscaping Property Location: Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/70 Beaver Creek Place, Applicant: Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Owners: American National Bank Description: Remove approximately 17 mature trees and prune other trees and bushes to accommodate change of Mountain Medical Building back to a banking institution (as American National Bank). Reasons stated for removal of vegetation are: public safety, increased visibility for bank, and overall maintenance. Mr. Donaldson approached the podium and introduced the team working on this project. Commissioner Karow discussed the Consent Agenda placement and Mr. Donaldson requested the opening of the application with concerns on visibility and signage. He requested that the commissioners walk the site to thoroughly understand his concerns and the concerns of his team. Commissioner Struve moved to remove this application from consent with Commissioner Smith seconding and all commissioners were in favor. Mark Donaldson, applicant, requested discussion on this application. Tambi Katieb presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Tambi Katieb provided a full size plan for commissioner review. Mr. Donaldson proceeded to comment on the removal of the trees and addition of bushes and flowers. His need was to reclaim the site from the overgrown trees so that the entry feature, visibility and signage could fit appropriately. As a doctor's office, the serenity of the trees was beneficial. Mr. Donaldson continued that these trees were impacting and damaging the sidewalk, foundation, sewage and drainage of the building. The four trees proposed to be removed from the parking lot pose a security issue, one tree is half dead, another overhangs the roof and is causing roof damage, as stated by Mr. Donaldson. He mentioned that the conversion to a bank requires good commercial visibility to promote their F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 7 of 9 identity. Andrew Podridcky, G.H. Daniels, approached the podium to discuss the trees as potentially dangerous due to its size and soft wood, he wanted to install a drip system from the current spray system and use of bushes and flowers as an enhancement to the site. Commissioner Savage agreed that the trees are nice but messy, agreed that public safety was a consideration and agreed with the removal. Commissioner Smith agreed that the drive thru and parking area trees, as well as the root problem were a concern. Commissioner Savage discussed incremental tree removal, review of the site and further discussion. Commissioner Trueblood agreed with staff and their comments. He believed that the applicant should have presented the entire picture of the site to the commission. Commissioner Karow agreed to the tree removal and the landscape plan supported the guidelines. Commissioner Didier was concerned with public response. Commissioner Savage motioned to approve Minor Project - Landscaping, Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, landscaping plan which is limited to the removal of 14 trees, addition of sod, pruning and planters. Commissioner Smith seconded and all commissioners were in favor. IX. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) The Varecha residence, Lot 11, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision and the non- compliance with their approved landscaping plan. Recourse would be tearing out sod and replanting. Discussion revolved on the area to be irrigated and sodded. Neighbors complained about the hydro seed and not the sod. Suggested remedies included clarification of the area sodded. Commissioner Trueblood believed that permanent irrigation was the issue. The issue is that the sod is down, irrigation is installed, and is there a way to overseed the sod for the temporary irrigation or be removed. Commissioner Trueblood suggested that the owners find suggestions on this issue by contacting Mike Bauer, ERWSD Water Conservation Specialist. The Commission requested the owners return with a solution to the exceeded permanent irrigation of this property. Commissioner Evans shared with the commission a call from a neighbor in Wildridge regarding the neighborhood children building a tree house in the woods and its impact on fire danger. X. Adjourn Commissioner Didier made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Karow seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 8:15 pm. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 8 of 9 Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\081704.DOC Page 9 of 9 Staff Report 1.-re p FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON COLORADO September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 31,2004 Project type 2 Triplex Units Legal description Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 6 Units (multi-family) Address 1031 West Wildwood Road Introduction Stephen Richards is proposing a final design for two triplex units on West Wildwood Road. This lot is zoned for six units (multi-family). Proposed materials include: wood siding and stucco. Each unit will be approximately 2,500 sq. ft., including garage space. The sketch plan was approved at your July 20,2004 meeting. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: Two triplex units is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 6 dwelling units per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project appears to comply with this requirement proposing 26% site coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25-foot building setback on alllot lines except for the lot line bordering Lot 9. A retaining wall on the southeastern corner o f the lot is proposed in the building setback. â€¢ Easements: As shown on the site plan the project appears to comply with all platted easements. There is a 10-foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. A variable Roadway Cut and Fill Easement is located on this lot for the purpose of access and maintenance by the Town of Avon. A portion of the retaining wall located on the southeastern corner o f this lot will be located in this easement. â€¢ Building Height: The design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum height requirement with a proposed building height of 35 feet. An ILC will be required at footing and framing to ensure compliance. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 ~11)J Lot 8. Block 5, Wildridge Final Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: 11 parking spaces are required for this residence, and 16 spaces are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: It appears the required on-site snow storage is not provided. 3,659 sq. ft. is required and 1,500 sq. ft. is proposed. An area equal to 20% o f the total impermeable surfaced area o f the site, upon which aboveground construction does not occur, shall be designated and developed as a snow storage area. The Site Development Plan indicates an impervious area of 18, 295 sq. ft. â€¢ Landscaping: The Landscape Plan appears to comply with Town Guidelines. Numerous trees and shrubs are proposed. All plant and tree species indicated on the Landscape Plan are drought tolerant. The applicant is proposing to irrigate 6,207 sq. ft. and 6,847 sq. ft. is allowed. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. Excluding the boundary with Lot 9 there is a 25' building setback around the perimeter o f this lot. o Site Access: The cross slope on the driveway entrance is approximately 10%. The driveway entrance cross slope grade must match the grade on Wildwood Road. Proposed grades for the first 20' is less than 1 %. The proposed culvert at the driveway entrance must be lower to allow for 12" o f cover. o Parking and Loading: Parking spaces are provided in front o f the garage and there appears to be adequate turnaround space for vehicles leaving the garage. The steepest grade proposed for the driveway is 6%, which will be located in an area between the two units. o Easements: No building is proposed in any of the easements on the Final Plan. A variable Roadway Cut and Fill Slope Easement exists on this lot. A portion of the retaining wall on the southeastern corner of the lot is proposed within this easement. It shall be the responsibility o f the property owner to maintain and replace this wall should it be damaged or destroyed by the Town while doing drainage, snowplowing, or utility work. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. Grading will be completed, as necessary, for the building and to control drainage. o Drainage: The contours on the east side of the driveway at the garage entrances for units C and F create steep slopes. Grading on the driveways need to be Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Final Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 revised to direct drainage away from the structures. Retaining walls along the driveways may be necessary and need to be indicated on the plans for review and approval. o Snow Removal and Storage: Adequate on-site snow storage is not provided. 3,659 sq. ft. is required and 1,500 sq. ft. is proposed. It appears that the additional snow storage area required may be difficult to be accommodated on-site. 2,159 sq. ft. of snow storage is still required to be accommodated. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design conforms to the general design character. o Building Height. The height of the building conforms to the Wildridge PUD limitation of 35 feet. The proposed building height reaches 35 feet and will require an ILC at framing as well as foundation. o Building Materials and Colors: Building materials will include: cedar wood siding/trim and stucco; aluminum clad windows; and asphalt roof. Colored elevations have been submitted and will be available for review at your September 7,2004 meeting. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The roof pitch proposed with this application is 6/12. The use of predominantly indigenous building materials such as native stone, wood siding, and timbers has been utilized in this design. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The design character of the proposed landscaping is appropriate for our climate. A note referring to a rain sensor utilized with the irrigation system is included in the Landscape Plan. o Erosion Controlt It states on the Construction Management Plan that hay bale erosion control will be provided along the entire length o f the downhill section o f the disturbance line. o Retaining Walls: Structural retaining walls will be required on the southeastern corner of this lot. The Boulder Wall on the southeast corner of building F appears to be 5.5' in height (finish grade elevations) on the South Elevation plan and 3' in height (finish grade elevations) on the site plan. Plans need to be revised to have site plans match with elevation plans. â€¢ Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures: No accessory structures are proposed with this site design. o Signs: No indication of an address boulder is indicated on the Site Plan for placement near the driveway entrance. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Final Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 Site disturbance is only done as necessary for the building and improvements. The two triplex units are designed to step with the slope o f the lot and are sited appropriately. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of this structure from adjacent and neighboring properties should be appropriate. 7. The objective that no improvement is so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This design should not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed design is in conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Final Design approval for the two triplex units on Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. The driveway entrance appears to have a cross slope of approximately ten percent. This cross-slope should be reduced as much as possible while still allowing for a proper tie-in with the road. In addition the driveway grading directs drainage towards the units. The grading for the driveway needs to be revised and additional spot elevations should be provided for review. 2. The Road Cut and Fill Easement indicated on the site plan shall match the survey. 3. The culvert depth needs to be revised to provide the minimum required 12" o f cover, per the Town o f Avon Standard Culvert Detail. The bend in the culvert must be removed and a straight section o f pipe installed. In addition, the location o f the culvert should be revised to provide proper drainage in the ditch and reduce drainage flow across the driveway towards the structures. 4. The retaining walls on the southeastern corner of the lot shall be structural and designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. 5. Additional snow storage area equaling at least 2,159 sq. ft. must be indicated on the site plan. Snow storage on the uphill side o f the driveway is not recommended due to potential drainage issues. 6. The contours on the east side o f the driveway at the garage entrances for units C and F create steep slopes. Grading on the driveways need to be revised to direct drainage away from the structures. Retailing walls along the driveways may be necessary and need to be indicated on the plans for review and approval. 7. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 8. Block 5, Wildridge Final Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 40Â«2 44 CO'{/r Mot i L Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I P- -5 1 - :4241*1*4 R - 46 K 90'..'. 9 NONCI A# 11. TR-:'':.- Proposed driveway entrance to Lot 8. - + f '21~ :... finy,1,17:3â€¢4.~*~51Â£31*~#0,45-7.'.~ ~ n~* 3'1054*&~47r4jip <44,--f.klii* .Â£ C 'f< .::MEr-4**91#L#TW+ 7ks ./ .''LI . o : 4 z >* Â·1,Â· F'.tÂ·Â·Â·.~Â·**D. Â· . 'Â· - dr. Lot 8 from above Wildwood Road. Proposed driveway entrance located on the right. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 14. I 1% q V Lot 8. Block 5. Wildridge Final Design September 7.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 '-94 -41, . r 4,4 ~ I _J- . 2--/ ./ *24. ..c 7 ' -:Â·-4: i?i.IL.QÂ·Â·'~ + <,ji#/21 ' ..:ALJ- i . ~ * C Â· - 'ft Photo taken from the southeastern corner of the lot. The Road Cut and Fill Slope Easement is in the foreground. . 94. 4 ;*2~i U ~ I Â·+444.~2Â·I 4 - k.. . rt * a.99 ./. - 9 11 4. 4, ..P .... * t .> - Â¥8 ' . , I , I. 4. I. * 4 Area of Lot 8 where south triplex unit will be located. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 it { 3 1 0 -1 U 1-03 J i H 8 ZE .9 c->B &6 0 2 6 00 + .Lit 38 =* Â»"1*7 h . k CO lah- W 160 .-00 4 Wilia 1 $ 1 EME *@& LI hi iii Itt Izili: ~ 6 %449 ,-1 -3 4 i b L f b ... * -0 Â·XY,1 .0-,0 ' ~)(Â¥11 .0-.A ,.0-,l' I * , .0-09 >eol lueludoleAea Al{UnwU,100 11002 2 0 419 a3AI3038 %2Â·f 0 0# gop ON~ 'SINÂ¥110SNoo Â¥13@ 8*IU'mILO Staff Report ~ FINAL DESIGN PLAN COLORADO September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 31,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units Address 5650 Wildridge Road Introduction Trip Plavec is proposing a 6,000 sq. ft. alpine style duplex. This duplex will be accessed via two driveway entrances. The north unit of this duplex will share a driveway entrance with Lot 17. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding and trim, stucco and stone. The sketch design was approved at your August 17,2004 meeting. Design Review Considerations According to the Town o f Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage'. Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project appears to comply with this requirement proposing 18% site coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25' Building Setback along Coyote Ridge and Wildridge Road East and a 10' setback along the property line with Lot 17. The proposed deck on the south unit is located very near the 25' building setback. â€¢ Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. There is a 10- foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement along Wildridge Road East and Coyote Ridge and a 7.5 easement along the property line with Lot 17. â€¢ Building Height: This design appears to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. The maximum proposed height is 35'. An ILC at foundation and framing will be required to verify compliance with the Town' s maximum allowable height requirement. â€¢ Grading: Proposed grading extends beyond the west property line. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 . 4 Lot 18. Block 4, Wildridge Duplex iÂ·inal Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this residence, and 8 spaces are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: 733 sq. ft. of snow storage is required and 750 sq. ft. is proposed. â€¢ Landscaping: The Landscape Plan appears to comply with Town Guidelines. Numerous trees and shrubs are proposed. All plant and tree species indicated on the Landscape Plan are drought tolerant. The applicant is proposing to irrigate 1,500 sq. ft. and 1,600 sq. ft. is allowed. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The Guidelines state 'Excessive grading and/or the use of engineered-designed retaining walls is discouraged when an alternate site layout would minimize such disturbances.' o Site Access: The Guidelines state 'Residential projects with 6 or fewer units shall be restricted to a single point o f vehicle access from the public right-o f-way. Additional points of access must be specifically approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, with the finding that additional access points are required for the project to otherwise conform to these Design Standards and other applicable Town regulations.' Lot 18 has two access points off o f Wildridge Road East, the shared access easement for Lot 17 provides access to the north unit and the south driveway provides access to the south unit. The culvert under the south driveway entrance appears to be ineffective as proposed and does not meet the design criteria. The grading should be revised to either install a culvert that meets the standard culvert detail or a drainage facility should be provided at the end o f the retaining wall to drain to the southwest side o f the driveway. o Parking and Loading: 6 spaces are required and 8 are proposed. o Easements: No building is proposed in any of the easements on the Final Plan. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. Grading will be completed, as necessary, for the building and to control drainage. Proposed grading extends beyond the west property line. One hundred percent site disturbance is proposed for the construction o f the duplex residence. Although this is a difficult lot with two 25-foot building setbacks, Staff continues to believe that site disturbance can be minimized if a driveway entrance is located offo f Coyote Ridge. o Drainage: The inlet elevation on the west side o f the south driveway should be indicated. The applicant should consider relocating this inlet and revising the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Duplex Final Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 drainage for this driveway so that it drains to the southeast corner o f the driveway and around the house. This should reduce the overall maintenance o f the system and prevent ponding or ice damming adjacent to the retaining wall. o Snow Removal and Storage: Adequate on-site snow storage is provided. 733 sq. ft. is required and 750 sq. ft. is proposed. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design conforms to the general design character. o Building Height. The height o f the building conforms to the Wildridge PUD limitation of 35 feet. The proposed building height reaches 35 feet and will require an ILC at framing as well as foundation. o Building Materials and Colorst Building materials will include: aluminum clad and stucco siding; asphalt roof; and moss rock stone. Colored elevations have been submitted and will be available for review at your September 7,2004 meeting. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The roof pitch proposed with this application is 6:12. The use of predominantly indigenous building materials has been utilized in this design. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character. The design character o f the proposed landscaping is appropriate for our climate. A note referring to a rain sensor utilized with the irrigation system is included in the Landscape Plan. o Erosion Control. 11 states on the Construction Management Plan that silt fencing will be utilized along a portion of the property line with Lot 17. o Retaining Walls: Structural retaining walls are proposed along the uphill side of the south driveway, on the south side o f the north driveway, and along the entryway for the north unit. A Colorado Registered Professional Engineer shall design all structural retaining walls. â€¢ Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures: No accessory structures are proposed with this site design. o Signs: No indication of an address boulder is indicated on the Site Plan for placement near the driveway entrance. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. One hundred percent site disturbance is proposed for the building and improvements. The duplex unit is designed to step with the slope o f the lot. Alternate site designs could minimize site disturbance. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Duplex rinal Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 The appearance of this structure from adjacent and neighboring properties should be appropriate. 7. The objective that no improvement is so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This design should not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed design is in conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Final Design approval for the duplex on Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. All retaining walls greater than 4' in height (from toe of footing to top of wall) must be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. This pertains to the retaining walls adj acent to the south unit driveway and the north unit entrance. Details and cross sections related to the site plan need to be submitted for review and approval. Construction of all structural retaining walls will need to be certified by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. 2. No grading shall extend beyond any property lines. 3. The inlet elevation on the west side of the south driveway shall be indicated. The applicant should consider relocating this inlet and revising the drainage for this driveway so that it drains to the southeast corner o f the driveway and around the house. This should reduce the overall maintenance o f the system and prevent ponding or ice damming adjacent to the retaining wall. 4. The culvert under the south driveway entrance appears to be ineffective as proposed and does not meet the design criteria. The grading shall be revised to either install a culvert that meets the standard culvert detail or a drainage facility should be provided at the end o f the retaining wall to drain to the southwest side o f the driveway. 5. A drainage path shall be provided in front o f the north unit entrance to prevent ponding and ice damming. 6. The irrigation table shall indicate the total irrigated area (drip and spray). 7. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions o f approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, / I Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design Plan September 7.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 - 0 â€¢*AL .47: Â·3 , .QI:54'S.rgi - - J.01'*'IRIE== - '.. I . , , 2.2.- ./ As '40*; , 1/ $1/hi. '. Im.â€¢"'Pfâ€¢ irÂ· /:0 1 47 F k f -4 '-r .0. S 1 ' - S: 1.91 1 1 ..3 1. I fy/*6â€ž a ....... 4 4,Â¥k.. ..... â€¢, t-: J'I .. "717,/1/ri/NE , < . . f . t.. ...34/, ... / 4 7'.1,1~ . 13*Â·.Â· :,ic.Â·~Â»2V.Â· , Ziu - . 14 ... I. . '41* 1 .- ' r Â· Looking west from Coyote Ridge on the southern half of Lot 18. - v.e~ - 4.*:'*941*7 ' 7,6,1,421*4 - a ...717-~10..r...: 9, F.2 31' t 0- -,4 -1- Fli"-1/- i 4%Â«4*r.Â»449Â»*:>4,+ 9<'* (~I'.4~*749 1!:44-*-9# 4- 414; 9-â€ž .,1,""'"1. Â¥ '.. 1... J ''1:4. 416'./:~.fllfÂ¢iÂ· 1%4''ikep. ' 7845'Â· :.)Â£ 7011#K'ry.1-~ iPÂ·ff.kÂ¢*/ I .'~. .' Looking west from Coyote Ridge on the northern half of Lot 18. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 t,7~ 111Â· \K 1,4 ihe \ \1 1 1 N Staff Report ATi[N Sketch Design COLORADO September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date September 1, 2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning 2 Units Address 580 Nottingham Road Introduction Jerald Wurhman is proposing two alpine style side-by-side town homes with a central corridor entry. Each unit is proposed to contain 3 bedrooms and 31/6 baths. Each unit will have a single car garage and surface parking. Proposed materials include rough sawn natural cedar trim and textured white stucco exterior and cedar shake shingles for the roof. The proposed maximum height is 35' and each unit will be approximately 3,000 sq. ft. Staff Comments This sketch design application is being reviewed under the revised Design Review Guioaline process. On two prior occasions the applicant has submitted designs for Lot 70A. In February 2002 a final design application was officially withdrawn and in February 2003 a sketch design application was officially withdrawn (Exhibits A and B). In reviewing both applications Staff stated technical issues that should be addressed, such as concerns with positive drainage and retaining walls, driveway grades, encroachment into the side lot setbacks, and that drainage may be inadequate to carry storm water runoff flows and debris flows that may occur from the slope located to the north of the proposed building. This sketch plan application is proposing the same floor plan and massing as the prior two submittals. There are two distinct differences in this submittal compared to the two previous submittals: 1) the exterior architectural style has been changed from a southwestern style to an alpine style and 2) the driveway access to Lot 70A is being proposed to be closer to Nottingham Road. In 1984 a variance for Lot 70A was approved for encroachment into the side lot setbacks (Exhibit C). This variance lapsed in 1985 due to construction not commencing within one year of the date if issuance and diligently pursued to completion. Considering the sketch design submitted is using the same floor plan the applicant will be required to apply for a side lot setback variance. The applicant must demonstrate that a hardship exists on this lot for the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve a variance. The Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Sketch Design September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 2 Staff believes the applicant should redesign the duplex to fit within the side lot setbacks and property lines so as to not require a variance. Staff does not favor approving a variance for encroachment into the side lot setbacks for this lot. Upon reviewing the current sketch plan application it appears the applicant has not addressed many of the issues that Staff indicated in the previous two applications (Exhibits A and B). Considering this design is very similar to the previous two applications Staff would request the applicant to review and address the issues stated in the two letters before submitting a final design application. Design Review Considerations The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. Staff will prepare a memo to the Commission highlighting anticipated areas of discussion for the submittal materials. The Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Staff will provide full plan sets for you to provide written comments and guidance to the applicant at your September 7,2004 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, K , _4-L< D <V-- Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Att: Exhibit A - letter dated February 6,2002 and letter dated November 7, 2001 Exhibit B - letter dated January 7,2003 and letter dated October 4,2002 Exhibit C - March 8, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes and March 8, 1984 Staff report to Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 111 \1<1.01 Ilic\.\111) WON )LORADO February 6,2002 Mr. Jerald Wuhrman 154 Commodore Drive Jupiter, FL 33477 Via Fax - 561.745.7347 (Mail-copy to follow) RE: Lot 704 Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Final Design Plan submittal Dear Mr. Wuhrman: On November 6'h, 2001 the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission formally : adopted new Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines. As of January ls'' 2002 all final design applications were required to comply with these new standards and application procedures. Your application for final design review of Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek was not yet complete or sufficient and therefore not scheduled for review with the i Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the adoption of the new guidelines. Additionally, the application has been inactive for over 3 months and is being officially withdrawn. We understand that a new design is being prepared for submittal on this project. Please be advised that your new submittal will be required to conform to the standards of the new design guidelines (available online at www.avon.org). Please contact me at 970.748.4002 with any questions you may have. Kind Re9i[dar--Â· Tambi Katieb, AICP Community Development CC: File F-DR2001-35 Anne Martens, Asst. Town Engineer Post Ojfice Box 975 400 Benchmark Roftesign Review\Benchmark at Beaver Creek\BMBC Block 1\Lot 70A Bll BMBC Withdraw.doc Avon, Colorado 81620 970-748-4000 970-949-9139 Fax 970-845-7708 TTY 1-liGREFiL-FREiE-1 AÂ¥*liN COLORADO FILE November 7, 2001 , Mr. Jerald Wuhrman 154 Commodore Drive Jupiter, FL 33477 Via Fax - 561.745.7347 RE: Review Comments on Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Final Design Plan submittal Dear Mr. Wuhrman: The following are sufficiency review comments on your Final Design application for a duplex residence 540 Nottingham Road, Avon, Colorado. Once these items are resubmitted, reviewed, and deemed corrected by Staff, the file will be scheduled for the next available Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. Please address the following: â€¢ While you have attempted to correct and differentiate existing topographic lines from proposed lines, the plan is still unclear and in certain areas, proposed grades do not appear to work. Please redraw the plan so it is clear that all proposed topographic lines 'finish' (such as proposed 7526 across the parking area). â€¢ You are required to 'shade' areas over 40% that exist on this site plan. These areas are to remain undisturbed, yet according to the plan submitted, this design requires significant grading in this area. Additionally, the proposed grading at the back of the home appears to exceed a 2:1 slope in several areas. â€¢ Please revise snow storage to provide the 25% amount required by the zone district (Residential Duplex). â€¢ There still remain no inlet, outlet elevations, or sizing dimensions on the proposed culvert at the driveway. Additionally, the culvert does not correspond to the topographic survey of the existing asphalt driveway and will not work as proposed. The exit of the culvert is not adequately designed to capture the drainage flow, and will potentially result in flow sheeting across the access drive for Bristol Pines and Beacon Hill. â€¢ The window proposed on the east side of the structure is buried below grade. Additionally, drainage on that side is flowing right into the window. Pow O/ticc Bor 0,3 . Drainage is towards the rear and side of the structure. We require positive 4(,O Benchmark Road drainage away from the structure, even with the installation of a French drain. trim. C 'ah)/Â·8/0 4/420 970-744-4(HH) 970-949-9 l 39 Fax 970-845-77014 TTY â€¢ The retaining wall at the east side of the structure will require grading beyond the property line. â€¢ The driveway grade will not be permitted over 10% in slope. It is currently at 13.5% in places. Heating the driveway will not be allowed to intersect the existing access for Beacon Hill, since the poured concrete will not 'pan' as asphalt and cause vehicles to bottom out upon exit. Additionally, the driveway on Lot 70 needs to be indicated on the site plan in order to review how the driveway and grading ties into the existing conditions. â€¢ The drainage swale on the west side of the building is shown incorrectly. The finished grades are pushing the water towards the side of the home and stairwell, and there is no method to carry drainage across the driveway and below the parking area. â€¢ The proposed stairwell on the west side appears to encroach into the 7.5' setback and the 7.5' drainage easement. Please clarify and label and dimension this stairwell and its associated retaining wall. â€¢ The extent of the use of moss stone is unclear. Please clarify. Mr. Wuhrman, there are yet a number of outstanding issues related to this submittal that will require modification of this design plan. Additionally, we will not schedule this application until we receive (in writing) a signed agreement from the Bristol Pines and Beacon Hill Homeowners Associations approving the intent of moving the existing access easement to your proposed location. Additionally, should you receive design plan approval with the new access as proposed, you will be required to vacate the existing easement and confirm the amended easement via an amended plat for Lot 70 and Lot 70A prior to the issuance of a building permit for this project. Thank you for your submittal. Please contact me at 970.748.4002 if you need further assistance or clarification on what submittal items require correction. Kind Regargs, 2.--- 1-\. C-- - U- .V Tambi Katieb, AICP Town Planner 11 CC: File F-DR2001-35 Anne Martens, Asst. Town Engineer FAirt B i lili.\141.01 the\Â·\11 11' m )LORADO January 7,2003 Mr. Jerald Wuhrman 154 Commodore Drive Jupiter, FL 33477 RE: Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Sketch Design Plan submittal Dear Mr, Wuhrman: Your sketch design plan application for Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek has remained incomplete and inactive since October 4,2002 and is formally being withdrawn. It is the policy of this department that all incomplete zoning and design review applications submitted and without activity for over 90-days shall be withdrawn. At such time as you are ready to resubmit this application or another application for this property, please be advised of this policy. Please contact me at 970.748.4004with any questions you may have. Kind Regards, n Ruth O. BArne Director of Community Development CC: File S-DR2002-15 Anne Martens, Asst. Town Engineer Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 8142Nbesign Review\Benchmark at Beaver Creek\BMBC Block 1\L70A Bl BMBC Withdraw ll.doc 970-748-4000 97()-949-9139 Fax 970-845-7708 TTY IlliART t,1 ilic \ \1.1.1Â·A WN COLORADO October 4,2002 Mr. Jerald Wuhrman 154 Commodore Drive Jupiter, FL 33477 Via Fax - 561.745.7347 (Mail-copy to follow) RE: Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Sketch Design Plan submittal Dear Mr. Wuhrman: Thank you for your submittal of sketch design plan for a duplex project on Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. Unfortunately, we are unable to schedule this application at this time due to the following issues: 1. The variance approving the side-lot setback has laphed. The variance was approved in 1984, and per the Town Code (as adopted under Ordinance #81-9) at that time 'The variance shall lapse if construction is not commenced within one year of the date of issuance and diligently pursued to completion". It is this department's determination that per this code requirement the variance lapsed in 1985, requiring this design to conform to standard setback requirements. Additionally, the building also appears to encroach on the western side-lot setback when scaled. 2. Parking spaces proposed do not meet minimum size requirements of a minimum width of nine feet and minimum depth of 18 feet. Additionally, it appears that the hammerhead does not provided adequate back out space for the parking stales. 3. A revised topographical survey stamped by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor needs to be provided due to recent debris flows. 4. There is no scale on the elevation plans. The 'observation deck' appears to encroach beyond the 35-foot height maximum. 5. The west side lot boundary line in incorrectly labeled as N 01Â° 30' 00" E. This boundary should be labeled as S 01Â° 39' 00" W. 6. It appears that the drainage provided around the north portion of the building is inadequate to carry the storm water runoff flows and debris flows that may occur from the slope located north of the proposed building. 7. The proposed driveway for Lot 70A, Block l, BMBC is not within the approved access easement provided by Lot 70, Block l, BMBC for Lot 70A. 8. Details need to be provided for the culvert size and invert elevations located under Lot 70A's driveway. 9. The Drainage and Utility Easement, Building Setback Easement, and all adjacent Town of Avon Right of Ways need to be shown and labeled on the site Post Ojfice Box 975 400 ReneÂ·hniark Road plan. .'11'0,1, Colorado 81620 970-748-401)0 970-949-9139 Fax 970-845-7708 TTY - 10. The Drainage and Utility Easement shown adjacent to the west property boundary is only shown to be 7 feet in width. This easement width needs to be 7.5 feet for the west property boundary. 11. It appears that proposed grading extends beyond the property line and outside of the access easement. 12. Existing toi)ographic grade lines should be dashed and the proposed topographic lines should be solid. It is very difficult to read the site plan and unclear which is topographic lines or other elements. 13. Top of Wall and Bottom of Wall measurements need to be provided on the site plans for all retaining walls. 14. Proposed grades cannot exceed 2 foot (horizontal): 1 foot (vertical). 15. Positive drainage needs to be provided away from the building. This is of particular concern for the north and northwest portions of the building. 16. Spot elevations need to be provided for the proposed garage slab elevation on the site plan. 17. The boulder retaining wall shown on the South Elevation Drawing is not shown on the site plan. The site plan and elevation drawings need to be consistent. 18. A graphical scale needs to be provided for the elevation drawing. 19. The proposed and existing grades need to the shown on the elevation drawings. 20. The Lot, Block, and Subdivision need to be included in the Title Block. 21. The driveway grades on lot 70 needs to be indicated on the site plan in order to review how the driveway and grading ties into the existing conditions. 22. The driveway slopes exceed the maximum allowable slope of 10%. 23. Window located on the east side of the structure appear to be below the proposed grade. Jerry, a number of these comments carry over from our review of your previous submittal (November 7,2001 letter) and appear to remain unresolved. At such time that the above-listed items are finally corrected, and the plans revised to conform to setback and height requirements, we will schedule the application for sketch plan review with the Planning and Zoning Commission. As always, please contact me at 970.748.4002 with any questions you may have. Kind Regards, LEÂ«Â«-- Tambi Katieb, AICP Community Development CC: File F-SR2002-15 Anne Martens, Asst. Town Engineer F \Design Review\Benchmark at Beaver Creek\BMBC Block 1\Lot 70A 811 BMBC Sketch 2002. doc 1 , 2ht Li C Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes 3/8/84 Page 2 of 5 Coldwell Banker Sign, Lots 29-32, Block 2, B.S., Con't. Cole made the suggestion that the lot on which the sign is placed may be sold shortly and will then remove the sign upon closing of lot sale. Any further signage for those lots would come before the Commission for approval . Cuny motioned that the Coldwell Banker sign met all criteria placed upon it in the motion for approval of the January 12, 1984 meeting. Watkins seconded. Meehan was opposed. Motion carried. Lot 7OA, Block 1, B.S. - Sidelot Setback Variance Norm Wood, Director of Public Works, presented application. Watkins stepped down from discussion due to financial interest in 1nt. Tom Maron of Maron and Associates, represented applicant, Steve Erickson, owner of lot. Maron stated that variance is to allow construction of the type of building being presented, which is long and narrow. Wood stated that Lot 7OA is adjacent to Tract B, which is an open space tract. Setback requirements are 25 feet from front lot line, 10 feet from back lot line, 'id 74 feet from side lot lines. Proposed building location is 25 feet back from the front lot line, but balcony extends out over the setback line. Setback re- quirements are that space be open from the ground upward. Leon Lowenthal made public comment that he objected to the variance. He is owner of western most unit in adjacent development to the east. He felt he would lose his view and this project would be too close to his property. Bill Stroop made public comment that granting a variance would be detrimental to the lot because there would be no control of building size. Pierce and Commission reviewed and discussed Approval Criteria, 17.36.040 and Findings Required, 17.36.050. Pierce questioned if this was the smallest lot in the general area. Wood answered that it was. Steve Erickson, applicant, mentioned that there was a 74 foot easement on original plat, but Town Council requested that it be removed at time of re-plat and the variance request was in conformance with Town Council's intent at time plat was approved. Cuny motioned to grant the variance request of Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark Sub- division to allow building construction to the easterly side lot line due to the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances of the site in accordance with Section 17.36.050, Findings Required, number two of the Avon Municipal Code. Exceptional and extraordinary circumstances consist of there being a 50 foot wide drainage easement across an open space tract adjacent to the easterly lot line, and there being no drainage and utility easement on the lot adjacent to the easterly lot line. Meehan seconded. Landauer and Blair opposed motion. Motion cart-ied. . f * 1-- 1,~I~ ~ 4,1 1 A I Â· A.,1 4 I. It . :<Â°*. Â· Â·522 it.-:Â· STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/8/84 Variance ReGuest - Sidelot Setback Requirement Lot 70-A, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision Lot 70-A, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision is zoned RMD. Setback requirements for the RMD zone is 25 feet front, 7.5 feet side and 10 feet rear. This variance request is for the elimination of the 7.5 foot sidelot setback requirement from the easterly lot line. ~pe_ci al. Cypd~i_tions_Related to Request: 1. Easterly lot line borders Tract B which is zoned OLD; 2. The 50 foot wide area of Tract B, adjacent to the easterly line of Lot 70-A, is designated as drainage and utility easement; 3. The easterly side of Lot 70-A does not contain the 7.5 foot drainage and utility easement as provided on moqt lots in the Town of Avon. Prior to making its decision, the Commission shall consider the following factors: 17.36.040-_App/oval. Crite_j-ia Before acting on o variance Application, the Planning and Zoning CommiÂ·,sion shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses anci stru(.1.lir,Â·S in I.he vicinity: B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcements of specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege; C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, tranlport,ILion and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety: D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. (Crd. 81-9 51(d)). Further: 17.36_Â·flÂ®_ _ F_i_npirgs_ fir?3_u-i-git The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings before granting a varionce: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/8/84 Variance Request - Sidelot Setback Requirement Lot 70-A. Block 1, Genchip.ark Subdivision 17.36.050 __Findings Re99_illeld,_Con't1_ 8. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improve- im-ints in the vicinity; C. Tliat the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, 2. 1-here are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone, 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (Ord. 81-9 61 (e)). A motion granting or denying a variance should contain the specific criteria and findings upon which the action is based. The granting of a variance may be conditioned on action by the applicant. Respectfully Submitted, 0 -49 8-,Cr Norm Wood Director of Public Works Plann_in-g__a.nd Zof'ing. _Act_ip_n: f i Apnroved as Recommended: , 1.-1 <--/ 2 Aparoved with Modified Conditions: Continued: Denied: Dated: - --9 / ~ i~ '.1 1 r/1 C --.~ -3,1- - - -fli ~~ (\3=--- - - V <r,'t/':1,4Gle- CLINt W,Jtkins, Secretary NW/mml 3/6/84 Staff Report /7////3~ VON Minor Project - Fence ATORADO September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date August 31St,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Fence Legal Description 25B, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Address 2110 Long Spur Introduction Matthew Kamper is proposing to install a split rail fence (4 feet in height) on his property. There is a 70' section of split rail fence that exists on a portion of one of the property lines. The length of the additional proposed fence is approximately 135'. This is a duplex property and permission has been granted from the neighboring property owner. A site plan showing the proposed and existing fence is attached for review. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The guidelines state that "wood fences are generally more acceptable than metal." The applicant is also proposing turkey wire screening to be used in conjunction with the fence. Guidelines state "the use of chicken wire, or metal screening, with split rail fencing is discouraged." 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. There are a number of split rail fences in the immediate vicinity. Some of the split rail fences in the area use metal screening and most fences in the area delineate property lines. The height of the fence, four feet, is consistent with the guidelines requirements. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. As proposed, the fence should not impair monetary values in the vicinity. Aesthetic values in the vicinity could be impaired. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 \Rl .,1 the \\111 ~ Lot 25B, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Minor Project - Fence September 7: 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 The Town of Avon Design Guidelines state that 'Fencing is discouraged, and will only be permitted where it compliments the character of the property, existing grades and landforms, and compliments the landscaping rather than contain the property. Fencing that delineate property boundaries are not permitted.' It does not appear the fence will compliment the character of the property. It appears that the fence would be containing a large portion of the property. There is a note on the plans stating "fence to be placed as close to property line as Town of Avon permits." Staff Recommendation Staff recommends one of the following motions for the fence application on Lot 25B, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision: 1. Denied due to conflicts with the Section 4C of the Residential Development Guidelines. or 2. Approved with a smaller fenced area that does not delineate property lines and no chicken wire installed. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4017 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician t I Â· +~ 6 4 + .4. 4 . ..1,1.1/ . 55 +M:F- 1/ 4.An - . ~1 L . . 11* ..ly r %.3:a + -4 :--4.Wid. - $ 4/.~1 - . 2 P./8/1//r~di.Wi/ ... S /1 9 .. . . .: 4 i.. . /1 I Â¥ . 4. . 1. .+ 1 1 ' Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 .. FIlm - . Cl 8 1/ Po p , \\\,1 \\ 1 61.0 . in. to. -/31\14\14\ N- I \\31 1- \% L Â·, 3:>t x1~243 C 4;SG O;O 0%300044 13\\4 . . 1 A -1 POUIG, I W 1 \\ e\\ \\ 1/1 '4.:% . w k.1 W Q r 1 ** 141 13?~f Li N g 0 77 zzz NIUN 0019 (RON -1_> UN_h_ \ \ 4 0. 9 61 m Nele - <Â¥0.90.005 O 0 j I , 6.910 deRP -2- -1 d d 12 4 7\, 6 ' U. 0 34 3 1 9 20 - L 1 ./.- j \ /0 ,-2 7.6 O ?Â· ~- 4 r. . ! Â£ r. r - 1 7 --1 3 i <t \\ 1 \ S 12\\ -1 2--4- 0% \ \ 73 3 2 ------- \ \\\ 4 . r 0 ,-~ - .4 . 00.-1 / 1=1 Â» / r 71 10/ O k, / / O 1 5 M g 8 8 N V I 9. / /8 -/ 1 tâ€¢ 1 'QN r 0 -1 N ...n / 1 di~ r ~ '0540 11 \ Y! LENGTH TANG BEARIN~ .00'*Z - 3.*Z,LS.6~~~0~~,/ Staff Report ~i~ Minor Project - Landscaping COLORADO September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date September 1St, 2004 Project Type Minor Project - Landscaping Modifications Legal Description Lot 45, Block 1, Wildridge PUD Address 2400 Saddleridge Loop Introduction The applicant, Vera Miller. received partial approval at your July 15,2003 meeting for a new deck and entryway, along with various landscaping improvements. Most of the work for the approved design changes has been completed. In early July of this year staff was informed that a row ofaspen trees had been planted along the rear portion of Vera's property. Aspen trees were not part of the design application from last year. The trees (15 total, approximately 10' tall) were planted along the fence line behind the house where "3' wildflowers" were indicated on the plans. The installation of the trees is being treated as another design modification and is now under review by the Commission. Attached to this report is a letter from a neighboring property owner. A site plan showing the location of the trees will be available during your work session. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. Aspen trees are included in the Design Guideline's Recommended Plant List (Appendix 1). 2. The appearance o f proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The residential landscaping guidelines state that landscaping "should harmonize the building site with both natural topography and existing vegetation." One of the landscaping requirements is that "consideration should be given to use of landscape material for snow fencing, visual screening, and wind breaks." As evidenced by the attached photographs from a neighbor, the trees do create a visual impact as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties. The guidelines state "fences, walls, or similar type barriers shall have a separate approval of the Commission." A row of tall trees may be considered a 'barrier,' requiring specific Commission approval. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 .I ,!i~\ \1 Lot 45, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Additional Landscaping September 7,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 Aesthetic values appear to be impaired with the placement of the trees. Monetary values should not be impaired with the additional landscaping. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The Residential Guidelines discourage landscaping improvements located in easements whenever possible, and state that improvements should "compliment the landscaping rather than contain the property." Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval ofthe revised landscaping for Lot 45, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. The applicant must remove some of the aspens out of the platted easement or relocate some of the aspens into groups, in order to compliment the landscaping rather than contain the property. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. I f you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4017 or stop by the Community Development Department. Container Respectfully submitted -21.Zâ€¢+-2 Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician .*/ + ' ' ~' ~~~ &.4.:Â·tÂ·,5 ... 3619..& - . - 193 .. 1 .. =C: - ....LIke 2-1 9 . Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 lhe Yoders 213711 Longspur, PO 80\ 516 Avon, Coloigdo 81620 August 12, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon P. 0. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Dear commissioners, Please review the attached pictures which were taken from our back yard. They clearly indicate the new trees which were planted by our neighbors to the west sometime this spring while we were not at home. Deciduous trees are useful in the summer for shade and thus for energy conservation when a residence can be at least partially shadowed during the day. These same type of trees would provide privacy only during the summer season. As you can see from the pictures, there are mature trees growing adjacent to the residence which provide the benefits noted above. We believe the recently planted trees along the property line serve no useful purpose except to excessively block our views to the west and are definitely in violation of the spirit and intent of the fence restrictions even though they are not "man made". Si~c~rely, r 42--fL David and Jud,/Voder 04 ' A-,1 ~' -$'ll +Ill. - 69 - p A . Â·2 'r , 2. 4 1% - r.=0 Ir f , r 1-~1 71, 11 11 ': - r =.11 ./ 1. ' 1 1 4 |11 . I 11 A. Â· * 2-r ::: '11 4 4 453 Â· Â·Â·,~*-4 , 4. ' 39 h 4 . 44 '.2*<4%Â£10*642 IÂ· Â·idMF 1 Â· C,*. 1 4 i i 74%03>,0 4 , .4 9 t.-9 t. 1,4 =24 <Â· -~ - - . '' Â·' Â· k'Â·3; I . 4 t: 4 â‚¬:6.. 1 >, , r '4,):'-9 4 .,re I ./ f>Â·~ .4., t, f .4 0 M ". . , , 93; 1 *â‚¬<ftâ€ž.446484.. :ill'+I.-- . *036221"KA,. -'f42.5* qu frâ‚¬ 4, : f I : . 49*7:/11924#39~1:,biall//1/el#:::ililill'/WINA'mill'ill'll'IM *29*244 G Â· - f .*(".9 -9.3,7 - -3#117441; - 3 ':t: 1-529*0........9.Â·. -. t. . ~. ~- S 15.9951~f7i,-: r- 4& 8*4 - /7- - *94-* r Ir 9 5,91 -f, 29.4-Â»M -;1 - 1- 1 -41 ... P . 1 ./* IA, 1 -- .48&/ lE u 190.47'-2 - ...2. 14 J. 34Â«.. -9413.Â·: 1 12- 4 : I 0% 4444-t.Â·-r~ Â«p-:-i. Â·; .. Â· *41 ,=L The Yoden 2137B Longspur, PO Box 516 Avon, Colorado 81620 August 12, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon P. 0. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Dear commissioners, Please review the attached pictures which were taken from our back yard. They clearly indicate the new trees which were planted by our neighbors to the west sometime this spring while we were not at home. Deciduous trees are useful in the summer for shade and thus for energy conservation when a residence can be at least partially shadowed during the day. These same type of trees would provide privacy only during the summer season. As you can see from the pictures, there are mature trees growing adjacent to the residence which provide the benefits noted above. We believe the recently planted trees along the property line serve no useful purpose except to excessively block our views to the west and are definitely in violation of the spirit and intent of the fence restrictions even though they are not "man made". Sinferely, 4*D 14 id and Judy Ader 44Â·:4 1 - ; >. .. ..24--- I I. I -.'. 9. 4 Ir I b =429 , '' :04,0 Â· d. 9. /4.,411: k I , -1Wn/, - 6 - -1 â‚¬ F, 7... 2 43.Wifi* - '- -:AUM;2Xr ; ;# 1 1 :â‚¬*.Al : P?. e. . . . -Ill.,4 I ..Â·.-- . 1%Â·.. I . 1-1 111 9.1 111 . 1-1 W 1 43 1 ?*4. 1/FtÂ·?f'Â¥1te ' + -Â·Â·1;â‚¬&2 Â·:1114 91 -* MÂ· Â·?Q ~~Â·** ..13/ Â·Â·Â· 4.45 +1 adil . Ilt= Â· Â·330~ A. i Â·M. 1 1 - I 1 - .97* 94.= V 11... . 1 1.4 ./ 1/ . - ..9.4//9/4/f///1/2/9 //~//1,1a. ///, .=,~ +[/B 2, -'e- Ze k syâ€¢ .1Â¥N22Â· f , - 61 Z.- a*Â¢Â»Al. T ~ .r , d, E.' ..9 At'*N -1 d ..1 - 1-- i-WiN->MMERI-/ -4~*+ ,04 ,#4%: a. f I . Li-- b Â· 'fZI '1 - # ft 1- 1-- I . >*3% : ...d, .,22=!*222024 / . 1 4 .... 1-4 51 k ./ ... ': * " ..9*6 201 7,Â· 51,2 .0 1170*1 . , MI.--I R.*. ' Mi~~ __2' r Â·~~ Â· Â·fÂ·f~~:,~~fJ- r ..~ .1 0 9:94â€¢.4 .f~ 11:~ : , 11'*j . -1.11 - = 96/ 7 11/limil/"Wi t % I 4 -%4. 4.1 .2- ,Â·. 4- -j --v- I Â·Â·Â·- i '.1434* ..i . 04:.40.....,0.-853.99-6- 1.1~.-0,--I"e,iâ€žwi'- 4 - ..A.â€¢Â·. Â· $*97#:.' .1 1.-Ar-/0.: . - . ,<: . ./.11'-t'.2,1,~.fitf~%11~ 4*w..5 9 ..{Eff..1 .1 -- I ...1- 1'â€¢kÂ·Â·Â·-'I ./.Â»6Â·'--taa.dinW0E#//0e$/I'l.",2///"/IM./015*& Â¢4'9-5 ' '4&1 7., A :*-ry'*L#MA------Â·-a@%3i 9/44 9 y. ... ' o #4/9es>s,=0*,1 '-Â· :7:;f* 1,1,1 - 1 ' '. A.,4 2' 7 . i.. 3-0 .1'' 03*2 ' . 1 2 2:: . â€¢4Â·.. - Â· Â¢ 9@ -44 Sep 07 04 12:15p M ,1 7esign Inc 1 479 0507 P. 1 September 7,2004 Mr. Matt Pielsticker 'I'own Of Avon Community Development 1).0. Box 975 Avon, CO 8162() Re: Minor Project - Landscaping modifications Sent Via Fax Lot 45, Block 1, Wildridge Dear Matt: As discussed by phone this morning, we are requesting that the Town Council approve a delay in the public hearing scheduled for this evening. In the early hours today Eric's father was admitted to Vail Valley Medical Center's ICU unit. We feel that it is important for us to be at this hearing, but with recent developments make it impossible. Please let me knc,w as soon as possible the approval for re-scheduling. Thank you and the Council in advance for your understanding. Respectfully, 2*4 71Â»0 Vera Miller (970) 390-9062 Suzanne L. Fontanese P.O. Box 695 Edwards, CO 81632 970-845-9110 font@vail.net TREES - NOTES 9/7/04 Avon P&Z Commission Meeting 1) The planting of 12 aspen trees along our west property line/easement in direct view from our back window is of great concern to me as a property owner. These trees (approximately 10 feet tall now-with the potential to grow much taller and certainly fuller),the height of the house (built about 5 years ago) and the 6 other cottonwood trees planted approximately 2 years ago by the previous owners, eliminate all mountain views from 2137A Long Spur. It is also possible for many more aspen trees to appear as feeders from the roots of existing trees. I also don't want to have an aspen grove blocking my view. I am concerned that if the trees are all grouped together, they will be in the area in which my only view remains. I have lived in this home for 13+ years and have steadily watched the Saddleridge Loop property directly behind me deplete more and more of the main reason I bought this property - the views ! 2) The new aspen trees were planted while neither the Yoder or Fontanese families were home nor did they discuss this idea or plan with either family prior to planting the trees. Under those circumstances, we were not given the opportunity to address our concerns prior to the trees being planted. 3) I feel this does decrease the potential resale value of my property. With no mountain view remaining, the huge picture windows I have all along the west side of my home now face their house and their trees. This definitely negatively impacts the appearance and the desirability of the location of my home. 4) Their views of our backyards are already blocked by the cottonwood trees planted alongside their home and along the newly built back deck which holds their hot tub (these trees will grow to be quite huge and I protested about them at the time to previous owners as I am very allergic to them). The additional aspen trees are not necessary to help with those aesthetics. Ruth Weiss From: Ruth Weiss Sent: Tuesday, September 07,2004 8:38 AM TO: 'AndrewKarow@alpinebank.com' Subject: RE: 8 17 04 p an z minutes Of course and thank you for bringing it to my attention. Ruth -----Original Message----- From: AndrewKarow@alpinebank.com [mailto:AndrewKarow@alpinebank. com] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 8:19 AM To: Ruth Weiss Subject: 8 17 04 p an z minutes Hi Ruth: Regarding the minutes from the 8 17 p and z meeting, will you please amend the first paragraph on page 3 after the words "Public Hearing Closed" from "Commissioner Karow and Commissioner Didier agreed on retaining the limitation of the living space...." to something to the effect that "Commissioner Karow did not support the square footage limitation of 4,000 sq. ft. per unit." I'm not sure what Commissioner Didier said. Thanks. Andrew A. Karow, Senior Vice Presidant / Manager Alpine Bank 141 East Meadow Drive, Suite B178 Vail, Colorado 81657 970-748-5740 970-476-2366 fax 1 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting September 7,2004 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda) 1. Call to Order at 5:35 pm 11. Roll Call All Commissioner were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Amendments: Items VI & VII were moved to the consent agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest. V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes; Approval of Final Design Plan for Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision/1031 West Wildwood Road with conditions listed in Staff Report; Approval of Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5650 Wildridge Road East with the conditions listed in Staff Report. VI. Final Design Plan - 2 Triplex Units Property Location: Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision/1031 West Wildwood Road Applicant: Stephen Richards Owner: Steven McDonald Description: Stephen Richards is proposing a final design for two triplex units on West Wildwood Road. This lot is zoned for six units. Proposed materials include: wood siding and stucco. Each unit will be approximately 2,500 sq. ft., including garage space. The sketch design was approved at your July 20,2004 meeting. Action: Moved to consent agenda. VII. Final Design Plan - Duplex Property Location: Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5650 Wildridge Road East ApplicanUOwner: Tripp Plavec Description: Tripp Plavec is proposing a 6,000 sq. ft. alpine style duplex. This duplex will be accessed via two driveway entrances. The north unit of this duplex will share a driveway entrance with Lot 17. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding and trim, stucco and stone. The sketch design was approved at your August 17,2004 meeting. Action: Moved to consent agenda. Vlll. Sketch Design - Duplex (6:05pm - 6:20pm) Property Location. Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/580 Nottingham Road Applicant-. Jerald L. Wuhrman Owner: Jux and DW Family Trust [Tab 4] Description. jerald Wurhman is proposing two alpine style side-by-side town homes with a central corridor entry. Each unit is proposed to contain 3 bedrooms and 3+6 baths. Each unit will have a single car garage and surface parking. Proposed materials include rough sawn natural cedar trim and textured white stucco exterior and cedar shake shingles for the roof. The proposed maximum height is 35' and each unit will be approximately 3,000 sq. ft. Discussion: During work session comments were provided by Commission to staff on the design of the application, and the proposed duplex home not being well sited for the lot were discussed. Staff noted the fact that the project encroaches over the property line. The applicant was not present for the sketch design review, and the Commission directed staff to forward the same concerns noted by staff in previous correspondence on the application as proposed. Action: Commissioner Trueblood motions to table the application and Commissioner Didier seconds the motion. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion was passed unanimously. IX. Minor Project - Fence Property Location: Lot 258, Block 1, Wildridge/2110 Longspur Applicant/Owner: Matthew Kamper Description: The applicant is proposing a 4' high split rail fence on the rear and side property lines. All fences require specific approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Discussion: Applicant explained reasons for fence and location/design to the Commission. Commissioner review included discussion of other fences in the area, the chicken wire portion of the fence, fence location in an easement, and delineation of the property lines. Moving the fence out of the 10' setback sounded more agreeable to the Commission in general. Action: Commissioner Savage motions to approve the fence, with the revised smaller perimeter as indicated on the site plan by the applicant and with the condition that no chicken wire be installed. All Commissioners were in favor except for Commissioner Karow. The motion passed 5-1. X. Minor Project - Landscaping Property Location: Lot 45, Block 1, Wildridge/2400 Saddle Ridge Loop Applicant/Owner: Vera Miller Description: A minor project was approved in July 2003 for landscaping improvements and a new deck and stairs. All improvements have been completed and 10 aspens trees have been planted along the rear property line in Spring 2004. The trees were not indicated or approved on the original plan. A site plan was submitted to Staff with the location of the trees and will be available review at your meeting. Discussion: Dave Yoder and Sue Fontenese, both neighbors to the East of the subject property provided public input to the Commission Views were being obstructed and property value was being affected. The Commission discussed tl e following issues: trees located within an easement, communication between neighbors before and after trees were planted, design non-compliance with the already approved landscape plan, and the letter received from applicant requesting tabling the application until she could make the meeting. Most Commissioners were in agreement that adding more trees was acceptable if moved out of the easement and blended with the landscaping more. Action: Commissioner Trueblood motioned to table the application until the applicant could be present. Commissioner Didier seconds and the motion passes 6-0. XI. Other Business Tambi Katieb updated the Commission on the Comprehensive Plan and Lot 61 concept review scheduled for the upcoming Council meeting. XII. Adjourn Meeting was adjourned at 6:35pm. TRACT B BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK TOPOGRAPHIC MAP MATCHED AREA IS AREA 9.th-,- f OF 40% SLOPE OR GREATER LOT 70-A, BLOCK 1, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 70, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK PEDESTAL ..821MZ-MAÂ·#L>V-tmMXPU*-W*u'l>i>Loth, Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado FOUND all'lly '0111"XMT | tmh=PUM-A>~U-iPek->-6ikx>O-croo-- \ ./ \/ I-< \ r. / I-y \ /-/ . I F I F I rn rn /7 r . 7.ra--2- 19â€¢. - 1 1 ~n -- -I ''-11.-- SURVEY NOTE& 1) *Inâ€¢, 0- 13 Au, 2004 , 23&000,* of In,fow,Ii,Intz w *4 Ea,Im,nto am,=04 M. mi 1 BRISTOL PINIS Fbd Pld of A R.â€žb,I,*I= of &4 70, Im-w-k * 1-- 6-k -4 4' CALPER I anil W-m-tl found U -- hor-n. Ido -oy d- not TOWNHOMES DEON)UOUS TREE _16------ i . - - I - I - 3) ILIVATION DATUM: 7830.4' A,r thi *4 0 thi 11/2' dinn-m ol I - - r-r, (LS I.W. *-Im mof-4 - -I- comer of --- ' IMB- 06- re-,hom~ \ 1 1 --- 4) CONTOUR ILTERVAL: 2 foot. CENTERUNE 30' ACCESS - I I . EASEMENT FOR LOT 70.-A = S) UUI- â€ž 11-1 Ilroilinald, md *add bo R- Ill p- to SHOVN ON CONDOMINIUM MAP .40: FOR BEACON HILL PHASE NO. 1 IÂ¥~1 [33 3 9,~ ' 1 ~ ==:. ~ p L/nd */0/,Il *0 -1 w--t w -re/1 â€¢ - â€¢â€¢Irlt, 0 , D- lilitad h 0-)-Um ilh -i mq -d -rw, - I - I -' I ./ 7) SIET ADORESS: 10,1 poita 1_-_-14 1 0) lillo- *M not 11,1/lgow 41/*,0 Ihi OO~, Of IIWI adrvi, --0-- 1 #-1 8 : j 0 The r ... 0,1 - 4.4/ 0 -â€¢Iâ€¢tâ€¢ of 0 â€¢h - - W 1 '. Il - . . - 1 -1----444- , 11 1 =Na,- RECEIVED ---- FOUIÂ® *ImjEY MONUMDIT ---'*4. =2.7-7 gp*Wrie -*C.".Il-'t- 1 1/2' AU,-IN CAP * -- LOT 70-A BENCHMARK AT TRACT B I SEP 0 1 2004 4 BEAVER CREEK i i, Mati,wâ€¢ 1 1~4 0 I.Ii.*44 P,of,-84 Laid b.0,0, * mi li#*4. -~ -A *,2Â¥f-2 71 M -1, \ 11 1 1 ./ (BOOK 3~6. r.= of Colorado. hir,6,0,rti& thet thll TOI*OORAPHIC RJRWEÂ¥ m dani by REC. No. 273210) **4 1 AL-- 0 1 ---- D : 1 -t---r. ..... .... -â‚¬.-1.- U. - .... -r-- -t ... t... -, ... .---1~ , 2'Zr~Z ~~'L~~IE0,-,#. -0~~.~I,~, 4--Community Development 'E'Ea'A,/"0614_ - I â€¢ 00 of "111 01'vil=*. 1 1 1 I I lf-- - -I=. Il.. tw EN.~ . % --h- m al %. 1 , I *.#tll-//* I I ' 1 f\r~ T i I 'l':""I. 1 -'00 -LO 300' ~CON 11!LI. ~~ ~~ i- -I'lf.- CAUPER 74-- _ 50' DRAIDI~GE AND UTILITY EASEMENT | ...r und ..m. .O. ~(eK 294 PC 748) | AR TREE * -- 1 ~777 \ . 1 1 ---- PHASE NO. 1 ' t.,1 1 ./.~-50' I- 1 1 r- - -- 1 --- I I I ''' - -1-- ~ ~%- --- I. -- ' ' - I PROPOSED ACCESS , 'T -1 e-- / l I -- : '/ -- EA-ENT LOCATION --- --- 1 GRAPHIC SCALE WATER 6.----- .06 , 4 1 r*. VALVE 9 ; 4' i=<. u 1 / 1 t- 3 PEDESTALS. 1 =- NA ,-------- ----- - 9 l HYDRANT Re-on - S- not, 0 USS 0-31-04 -- ---- h-, W WATER 4 - 0'442/ EDGE OF ASPHALT TOPOGRAM= HAp VAL-~E R - 480170' 0/fim/,WM~,#69MMP~ MARCIN ENGINEERING LLC T -32.80' .... ...... 0.-a..... a... 0.1... NOMINGHAM ROAD (60' R-O-10 L - 8&000 09 - N-90449 P.O. Box 1062 PO. Box 5018 NO112 A-r-1 t, Cai- Ili ,- IllIN 2-â€¢ion- Iny li/ 01 - 8101 -I' USS .,. 13 Aug 2004 AVON CO 81620 EAGLE CO 81631 (970)748-0274 (970) 328-1900 0.- mil-*. -h ./* 1. - 0-4. ma,.1 SRW a .2 0109)topo2 (970) 748-9021 FAX (970) 328-1901 FAX .- -ed -In .My WI ' - all,4 . e'll'In'."I,Id mor. 01098 ..,1.1 Z.\01096\01096slope.dwg, 8/31/2004 5:27:18 PM, HP Desk.Jet 1220C Prmtera.pc3 t =St-"-6 uNhon, RM.,tat] Site Summary Schedule A... 7..1 CURRENT ZONING DUPLEX C NUMBER CF DVELLING UNITS, 2 M . s . r--~ b FLR AREA AT EA DWELLING UNIT, 2884 S.F. (PLUS 430 ENTRY 6 GARAGE) o o , TOTAL AREA BOTH UNITS, 5768 SL (PLUS 860 GARAGE & ENTRY> ' ' L~' BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 35'-0- / PROPOSED, 34'-8.3/4' 6.-1*29.v.lh pos,th. ....00 (u RECEWED OFF STREET PARKING RED 6 / PROPOSED 6 Se, toll elâ€¢vat,or h 0 AREA OF SLCPES OVER 40% .. 940 S.F. / 9.9% TOTAL LOT AREA . 9.438 S.F. BUILDING AREA ... 3.340 S.F. / 35% PAVED AREA ON LOT, 2,095 S.F. / 22.2% BRISTOL PINES TOWNHOMES - uftt ,-'--I.=ti" fi- SEP 012004 PAVED AREA IN EASEMENT 614 S.F. SNOW STORAGE REQ 120% .. 541 S.F. SNOW STORAGE PROVIDED ... 574 S.F. 7- &37-In C 1-k 6 WALKWAYS ... N.A. Community Development railroad tlâ€¢ TOTAL LOT AREA .. 9,438 S.F. ~QU~t=L (SEE PLAN> .. 940 S,F, ./tal.Ing wal AREA OF DISTURBED SOIL ... 8,498 S.F. (90.1%> I........i 11 0 NOTE, TRASH REMOVAL PER CONTAINERS TO BE SET OUT FOR REMOVAL O Ilne Of' original acces, oas,m/nt--1 .. Â·rÂ·a,ircid tie a i U ..Â¥~1~ela: 1 4~ U 4 Â§1 N i r...1-Ing ....0./ - il ~L~'1 2 2.1 1 4 1 1,1 5. er *ZE - 11 *Ulf 6 & ip ... 1 1 \ 11 7- 13 1 50'-0' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 I Epi 2.2 f /, -px"'- - -~- 1 existing asphalt drive 1 4 to remain undisturb/01 0 ) YIELD .C.1 I .. 91. 74 E U BRISTOL PINE TOWN HOMES ZÂ¤ â‚¬9 J,fr .-, LJ m r \ . - ca BLDG SITE ~ slope at center line of 9 --Â«7--- W - ~NÂ¥ 0 ac ss road <5'0' In 62'7 3 -1 340 101!01@l RI M SNOW RUN TO#'H[BES 1- 1 LJ u ' _----- -,--27#mU""/U/"U////////A -- BEACCIV HILL PHASE 1 ~ ~ X paved are on property, 2095 s.f. 1 L / O 63 paved are in easement: 614 5.f, M UL lin D POTTING- RD \-c==n 7-- ..1.Pne .19. ..2 --S - DOW :,C..~ a OaK 1 -- 2 1 - U --- \ 11 - +,1 z L C L -11-4 /0 z I b INTERSTATE HWY 70 1/., %5 -= 4808 7 L= 65.00' - I -il - - 50 ASHPALT PAV[NG --. I 1 h. ...... I........I 12' c.p / -------------- 34) VICINITY MAP 0,- NO SCALE --/ M-f NOTINGHAM ROAD <50,0' R-O-W> SITE PLAN .. 1" = 10,0' dat. 8-23-04 0.0 J.Ct RCK 0-t 1 0/ 4 .Ir'S,I 3.00,08 s--1 -r--~eE21~---- 73010 WiNA03 319V3 'NOAV - ~~-0*44~ RECEIVED 1 1 Ill- - [Il ~ lili ED lili El[-1 SEP 0 1 2004 .=21 44%-1 1 1 1 44 ./1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ Community Development 7,900 4/r ' 7543 ]111111111111 7,37,33 - _. 1 1 [I]- 1:1-1-11-1-,paT ' ' ---- 1 7533.66 I.........i 1 11 Uni of gracie 81*w......c.,67-TED-------0----- L--1 0 | ___ 1 North <rear) Elevation 1 7527 1 -0 111 111 R 1 1 26 20 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 East 8/&2 848;?t E.&r.Atm vation 1 0 T E 1 3 1 *i; b f 11 U Z LJ A _ _ -0,<fir f\\\31 1 1 ixh 0 1 1-0-46 5.-21 LU 2 jil -- - 3 r\24 1 00 - 1 â€¢1 7543.00 3- 4 - 1 - 1 - 1.1 Y i i i i ~ 1.... -- -ll-:[ I. lili â‚¬L----I--L-IL-L 1-i.. 11111Ir~L__52-lull~kâ€¢Elli 7 3.46 .T--- 7-- - Ir-lir-,1 O -- 1 @ lilli PE- ~ -.- ?927. -- Une of gracie at louRcling clntir Il South <front) El,vatton 26 1 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 East (left â€¢101â€¢) Elevation 1-t Flr LIving Aria 1418 AREA end Flr LIving Ar.a .., 1621 Garagi .............. 1 267 1=t Flr Porch ......... 120 2nol Flr Porch ......... 326 Shar,01 Entry Hall ..... 262 AM 0-23-a4 Elevations ,,, 3/16 " - 1.-nu proj,ct 0- REC .-t 2/4 F~ ~ 1-N,~0337,~~ FLFEi ~~ - 27'-6, 27'-6' I,1 1 1 /1 7 1 1 -- | - M BATH BATH A li BR 2 BATH j BATH BR 2 Y-% 17'-3' 1 >< W, 1 17'-3' 1 1 -1 1 1 1 2 1 -1= i 52 -- - 1 1 4 1 4 8 - 9.1 i- f BR 3 .. 0 BR 3 9 , 1 0 + a <23 . -1 . ...... 1 15'-2' 15'-2' ' ~ 1- 1 - 1 -1 liz o L n' .1 1 r. 11 <2 - ~ ,J i '19' " " 12. FOYER 1 | FOYER U * -111 0 I i I ll, 1 1-1 1 i i! 11 1-1 i 11 - U 0 1 n--10.-=211 4 10'-0- I UTIL .UTIL FAM ~ -i__-,~ ~ - i FAM 1 M al - 4 . 11'-6- 11'-7' 11'-7' 11'-6' 1 chev chev lumIna ' 10 luntna 1.-- F. --1 - 1 MI 1 . - 1 .. O I i w %1\ 10 1 1 1 I N al 1 GAR GAR 1 0 4 2---------n 1 1 1st Floor Plan 0 1st FLOOR PLAN ,.. 1/4' = 1'-0' .il. -41 r' 1 11-- - 3 oN.3~~~~i~l=== ~ ~ as l 1'-0- 27'-6' 27'-6. 1'-0~ 1 1 B i I - - - - 1 I --1 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' BR 1 ' BR 1 ' 1 1 1 27'-B' 27'-8' 1 1 1 I f 1 -- 1 1 1 1 7 1 . L 1 1- 4MEDIA MEDIAN ~ w=Im 11 1 i 1 I il *1 1 6 1, 1.1 iii u lit 1 Â· 13'-8' ~ ~ - 13'-8' 0 - --1--4, . . 2 - 3 GREAT ' LJ 0 NE U -- -4- 2~ted- il 4 ROOM: 0 5, 7- KIT- : 11 92 10'-5- 1 16'-3' IGT D %2 alternote plwi sho,n mw a.3 I I b 1 Of. cobereal I open Di 1 32 : Porch 3.Porch . 21 n Y F .11.=, . 1 -.1 Â°J I 2nol Floor Plan Alternate kitchen plan shown . 111 -4.. 1st FLOOR PLAN ... 1/4' = 1'-0' I......... .#/I'IT-.5 ! .,/I'TI-.St / / F / / / \ \\ AG \4/, 60 2 2 3 + \for I 1 1 .++++++.+ .t tyÂ» I / 4/ 4 0 4 4 + + _1 28590.4 1 4/ + + +Â· Â·li91.9 -b~o / I 44/1 \ 1 3- 2185901 97.7 Â¥b589 9 p \\35> -14595.40 8597.0 . +A, I.+:5~,;, \ / + .>1:I:jl~+1Â« 0 +01 5fiKV 53 0 -Dt 1 / 43':t.<8214*4/ + ' O n - .-,1- liwi- - Mimi- -- I - 85 -r . .; â€¢.1 Â·32&* Â·18 F96 9/ - 3, i [_01\1 * I ..'. *-3.-/. <Clb<Â« -'.. EASEAÂ£Â« 04 0 \ 1 1 . "85955 $ / I 1 -CÂ¥- ,<,4 . 10' SLOPE MAINTENANCE. DRAINAGE ~ 9\ 1 -O & SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT / 2:; X O / f Â·Â· 96,4- 8 RISERS . Ad 5 0 4' WIDTH 4/. -"19 e. Â·Â·' :''Ef-- , ,/90 / / M 89.1 A \ I 12- TREAD 2 2 e- - \ STRUMURAL RETAINING UTIL. , * /' 64 2<2 lÂ» j 1 WAIS PER ENGINEERING Â« Bu / STUB Ilil Ki I j t. . - -15' . i - /4./.. .r /, /*/-7 - - 11 1 / \\ 0 4 .x, 42 4 \\ / / , -yz -1 + ' e 1,32 , Â· ' ' . &59â€¢.0 â€ž 64\/ 595 9 Â· / / i / / /13 Soll , - / 7 1 2 , / . * P \ 44 1 / / 1 4) to /1 8593.0 /- 1 #% -' : .- I gkv./ Â· f. ,# 4/ 1/// ~ ' " T-BUILDING ~ 1. I VICINITÂ¥ MAP ...%*&e/-95./ 859>44- -2=-- / bow---~-tr~=2*.- /1 L / 1 ./t~~- 91 ./ .21&:f< 04f ./ 3 Cp'll / / NO SCALE: / !8591.0 :r / 1 / / 4/ \ 8 -9 SETBACK,' NOTE: Ke,stone block rel ing 8591/ 1Y YA.: // 1/ 10*1= ki# IX -7 96 , 00 mox he t ft - Bow, ar i i Â«Â»ty, e\\\ / *8591.7 -/i / / / \ f ' 4 9%~ // , ~- HW/~zzz W -#w V ~Hy . /~ / ~ 2 1 4<r 614. <51% / EDC W o Gj.. i / mal 8586 / tow / ASF 8.39 1 / 1 i te.. gg Bl~ / / A /~ f ~09~a.4 .~ \ 00 0 0 / . i / 1 \,1 \~ NA ~~ gor~ 8588 / i ~ -/ FOUND No. 0 REBAR WITH 00 0935,3 Â·11 04 ~ / ric V / / ~ upp. 8596 11 \ l' ' -/ / '' EAST / / yLE TR~ffS. 1 ALUM. CAK L.S. No 5447 / CD ~ E & 1/ AU / j < r.4512 /ill /1/ i l lÂ»IN.~ 4 8567.4') / 8590.3~ / 448' 'ti ' lower 8585 / /1, i , 1 1 .2.M ) / 1 / // 2 41 5~ % 4 tow RADIUS = 375.00' < /4 / 1 k / I.,E \ L---/ 7 / >\ / 0. / DELTA = 31-56'18" -~ ~ Â·-,- 48- 9 j 8584 7 .e /1, <-1 ARC = 209.04' ~ / 344Â« 1 1 \ i l /1 / / Ce / 671.5 / 5 1 / / 7 84 9 />414 9 411) 8596 1 8 /4 A / H 30 INV = 8585 858f : // 1 / 8585 / 00 /13/ //7-1-~il--1--ftÂ«--4- LE 1/ ~'0~4 ///#~gf~ / 1 0 1 4 4/ / Se-= / 1 7 / / / G /--, GA Â·Â·j.~_._ 1 7 <~~~ / 8572.7 \ 1 j/ 147 -/ / / 1\ \ / ~8573.7 ci~ / 0-71 V 49 / Lower -L ' 7-9 + 1 / I-I TE-- "El-IM. 8584.Y- lE LOT 18 / - SE -R,Â·M~NHOLE Mt!~340 <RADIUS = 475.00' 8576 / / j I.V. 4 ~~j 11.-/& -~, ~.' 1 #*2 1, , 11 0.453 ACREF - / RIM ELEV. *78572.1' DELTA = 3-37'07" , WEST - / \ 1. 15 L.On . 1 .. 1.IdÂ« . i / / // INV. ElÂ£934 8565.0' I ARC = 30.00' STAIP 1 1' 1 1 i.', 4 1 1 j 3 \ (BAS15'OF"ELEVATIONS) / STOIRA /85881 45, 7/->742 / / / +9226//1 - / / .1 / \ ~ // C tic. re'll. 'cm / -- ~*8575.2 32.5 LF OF li' 1 :/a / / ~ SLOPE = 3 \ / INV = 858.53 DECK - \ / 12 DATE, \ 24 AUGUST 2004 \ 1 < / ~8576.5 PERMIT SET 1 1 1 / I-* - ---I--- / 37Â» - / V /1/ 1 1 1 1 L - REVIS![*6 Il_ 1 SITE DATA ,//8577,7 1 1 f.... 1 ZONING RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX -i-- ---- i--* \// DINELLINe UNITS 2 UNITS \l l/ - RADIUS = 195.00' / /%009 BUILDINe HEIGHT ALLOWED 35'-0" / N DELTA = 57-07'22" -94Â» BUILDINe HEIeHT PROPOSED 35'-0" - ARC = 194.41' PARKING 4 COVERED / 4 SURFACE - FLOOR AREA UNIT A 2455 0 - \1, ------ / // Coles 7 .0 FLOOR AREA UNIT B 3153 $ GRAPHIC SCALE 6108 2 SHEET 0 / *~80 6 M,/*- TOTAL FLOOR AREA --- - - BITE PLAN SITE DISTURBANCE ENTIRE LOT \ 1 - - U-3-.-9->--- L8585.3 EUILDINS LOT COVERAeE 3665*/20530* = 15% 32->-- *ii~18 r â€¢ 10Â·-0Â· . ~ - AREA OF LANDSCAPE 8000Â®/205300 = 34% 60 -1 - NOTE: /5,130/1.0/.*-*~c.Z:rn AREA OF PAVED SURFACE 30<14*/20530$= 15% LOT SLOPE < 1(095 SNDISE[a iN 28Â£5*06Â£ (0Â£6) 770 - LBLL-5,8(0Â£6) BOIdAO - 039I8 03'NOAV '51 XXOROd DIRAVId 3921019 NOISIAIGHAS 3DGrHG'Il TIM OL CO Z 40 j. - et 9. 4 4 00 [13 P 6 4 9, Cj T. . FLR Z ~[7 EL: 16 0" RP et BEDROOM 2 4. i 12 x 14 '36 9. #A 'n Â»-3 _1 -O ATIO 04 1 0 el 4>â€¢ 3 M 5 >go 1%' / 6. 0 a /if W med PATIO E- 2%8 5.0 f . 19. e e, 1 0 2 . BEDROOM 2 24 .1 I EL: 76'-0' t. R. 01 . .5 0 TO. FLR 14 x 0 * v. , 9, * EPROOM 3 6, â€¢ ~ 4' e 4 9%. i * 40 BEDROOM 3 14 x 14 I ks. 6. 4/ tÂ· ~â€¢ 6< . 12 x 14 MC : y. 4 W + 2. bb>. 5. 1. 4)Â· 6, -5. t th -te 4>. At. 6. 4366 -Gâ€¢ 2 *, 51 9, a . V Â· BEDROOM 4 RECREATION a. 0 B3 4. A p â‚¬ 5. ROOM ba. 12 x 14 Con05 43. 0 t. I. " . 18 t. 0, 4 MSÂ· O/ 4 BEDROOM 3 4' ** v 4 STORE 4 14 x 14 9. 0,2~ gi. *MEO 43 4. $4 Sh: s + \ 0/ 9 36 P . t. R CREATI *T.O. FLR 6 ==au t. 49 : 4) 84908 e. ROOM 4 + EL: 16-0" 1\ r , ) *p # 0 x 20 ~ _0 T. O. FLR 4 EL: 76'-OÂ·' f \ 3,4, 9 TV &12 M 51 * MECHA CAL .9, 429. 4 1 - 19. r >8g< RO M 5'-11/8. im:g a. x 24 CA T O L 7. - 00 a, =~[7 EL: 81'- " 0-1 - 64 0 "*LL- d. E- STR STORE t. 4 6 5 ~ Â£j T. O. FLR 6 y. IV EL: 21'-CD" 6 t. <& y. EL: 76'-O" 0 T. O. FLR /0 G 0 TO. FLR STA- EL: 86'-O" el & 0 a. 40 ,34 'P DATE, 24 AUGUST 2004 PERMIT SET 6. REVISDâ‚¬. y LOMER LEVEL PLAN 1/4Â· = 2-0Â· NOTE: SIEET I A2.1 019 1 8 OCI 28Â£9-06[ (0106) 1733 - L6LL-9*8(0Â£6) 30!dd 0Z9 IB 00 ' AV '5IA XOE! Od OISIAÂ¥'Id 39203{) NOISIAKIEIn HONEIG /. 9, 4> v 4 19 6 6 6 9 B J 46. * In CO 0 1 45 r~ 4 Â® 9. GREAT ROOM \.4/ 20 * 20 I ./ T Ir. .ts. eREAT eREAT ROOM DININe ROOM 6Â£ DECK 0 0 1 20 14 x 15 POINDE e- 4 6, 26. 0 a T. O. FLE 4 ~ EL: 86'-0" 4/ .. 23. 9 - A o 1. O. FLR EL: 56'-O" KITCHEN D OFFICE 14 x 16 49. 4 -1 a KITCHEN IX)'4+4 1 16 x 20 0 0 9 80Â¥. 2 CAR eARAGE 4 18 x 20 4 /6 To. 2'-10 2'-\Ow .[7 EL: 81'-0 5-5 FOVER ' rh T. O. FLR 4 *p EL: cir-on 4 * T. O. FLR . EL: 56'-O" 6 6i y COVERED 6 0 0 '7 V STORAGE ~ ST- * 4/0 ' 6. 4 EL: 86'-O" 2~ * T. O. FLR 43' 4 4,@A DATE, 4, 24 AUGUST 2004 PERMIT SET e. 4 REVIS]CNS, -2.. MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/4' = 1 -0~ SICET I NOTE: A2.2 SNDISHG iNONVal HONEIGISERI 32[AVT[d 039 I 9 OCIVEIOO ' 0703 NOAV 38â‚¬9-06[ COL6) T'Iao - Â£62-5,8(0L6) Obi:[O - ddn[.1 039 IS 03'NOAV 'REXOHOd OBAY'Id 39*059 NOISIAICIE[n aING IM f NOO'IEI 8 I 107 iSV3 4 0 6. 10 u y 0. 4 6 0 â€¢r, 3; 5 m 44, 95, 45 0 T. O. FLA .3 9<49. 4 2< EL: 8$ T 'S) 9, 0 TO. FLK. 4 El: 86'-o' TO. DE E EL: 96'-0' '-5 1/ CO E 9, 5'-5' .e. a C tz O 8< 6. â‚¬ 4=0 Ul Q a O * T O FLK ~ ~ &4 3 EL: 96'-0Â» 4 4 NE8 a up,Mi 0 0 T. 0. LR. 4 1/ EL: 96'- ' r 6 / 1 0 Â»441 4 ... 4 4 0 9 .. A d'# '' Â«--1- 0.,Â¢ ----9 d / 4. P *1.0.FLK. EL: 91'-0 '6. y 0, 1 - *T. O.U. 2 EL: 96'-0' . 0 4!0 4 TO M. 4 0 EL: 99/7 4 6 DATE, rP 24 AUGUST 2004 PERMIT SET 9 42 6, 4> 1 REVISIONS, 6 ey' UPPER LEVEL PLAN 49. 1/41â€¢ = 1Â·-0Â· NOTE: SHEET * A2.3 SNDISE[C[ .I.NOKV*kIELL HONE[GIS 0Z9I8 OCIYHO'100 'NOA ZEÂ·06Â£ C0L6) TIaJ - LBLLÂ·5,8(0L6) 331:110 - ddIMi oZ9[R 03'NOAV '6 1*EXOHOd JIHAV'ld RE)NORD OEIS 8 I 107 V4 Ri[)613 ELEV 114'-O' EZIDeE EL_EV 112'-0- RIDeâ‚¬ ELEV 106'-0~ RIPe E ELEV I lei'-156â€¢ LifILLE+121 0 PLATEE HE!6HT O 0'-tlsâ€¢ M a E O Ul -_--2122322 - 1~ - -t- - -5 0. 8 2 21 -f MASTER FLOOR / ge>'-314' 9, 302 OLiVER&MANvAN '9 4' 4///0 W mot 0 r- 4<26 19 --------- -2*J \342% Iâ€ž ENTRY ELEV O 41'-3' ,>/44Â«1Â»Â«129~ 4% 8 - - MAIN FLOOR O 86'-116- 1.9 - L---- , - /9 EXISTINe - 21601,*2&01Â£0Â»>102&2222222 6RADE A - 1 Frf=3--1 -.---4 \ - NORTHELEVATEON M 1/4- = 1'--0~ /'0/79;;5333*22\/4~;34. NOTE: RIDGE ELEV 114'-O' ---- - -- - - ---- - - -- -- - -- -- - --- - Il.-~-~i-- -- - -- Wi~5 -1---& - - RIDeE ELEV tly-4 -- .~li.---- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- -il- -- - -- RIDeE ELEV 106'-0' - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - ~IW~j Rl[Â»E ELEV !04'-0' - 1-*-------- -------- -- - i.li- SNUETOPE CAP ~~ - _MASTER FLOOR O 46'-334~ 0 --- STUCCO FACED CONORETE RETAININe #IAL.1- . greÂ· - -- --- 1--- - - - - -~-j~-- -- -- -- . ---- DATE, 24 AUGUST 2004 PERMIT SIT ExISTING ' I e**DE MAIN FLOOR O 86'-116~ REV1St[Â»IS, -23-P â‚¬ =1_1 1' 0 al 11-1 FINISHED eRADE 1 -C -1 E d 1 - 01 ~ r--1 [(=142EF=t] Efil >imE- 0 212./ ~rÂ·'ETER~ 1 11 191 L lal I ,-rl---1~~~=maul==E-UIEIT]ElE]Ile[1*1Ile'[17' 21*[EL-_Ely_.E SHEET * SLAB FLOOR -16'-0' -----# ----- AE.1 *mal I Emam mET[Em=m m rn_- - 1 Emama]T[ mkmamemat*[[am=-=I I lamam F m-~ art EAST_ELEVATION 1/4' = 1Â·-0Â» / NOTE: t-1 SNDISS[CI INOWVHN EDNE[GISERI DE[AVE[d 0Z9 I 8 OGYHO OCIVHO1O0'NOAV 286-06Â£ (0Â£6) 7730 - L.6LL-5*8(0L 0291 8 03'NOAV '9 1 FE XOH Od 313Ayld HIDMORD 11 1 14 NOISIAICIEinS EIDGING'TIM t NOOTIE BI J.01 ISVE! CIVON 3{)anIGE[Im 0L9Â§ COLOR TABLE STUCCO PRATT LAMBERT 2050 Ch HAVANA CREAM __ ---------- -------~---- __ Fapete ELE'V_r'-Â°- 70 STUCOO TRIM PRATT LAMBERT 2052 RIDGE ELEV 112'-0' 0 SIDING SIKKE-NS 012 -- ------- - -- - ---~------- Â»~ BUTTERNUT M ALUMINUM CLAD SIDINe BRONZE COLOR ANDOWS SEMGO STONE MTOMING MOSS he COLO. DUFF SANDSTONE TOP RIDGE ELEV !06'-0. ROOF ASPHALT SHINeLE 30112_ - -- --- - - --- -- - --- --- --- --------- --- --- --4----------- H~ BARKNOOD *=86 0 m Al AHE M 519 MASTER FLOOR o gb'-3,94Â· met ----- E--1 Â£28 8 0 go Im 0 0 MAIN FLOOR o Be>'-116â€¢ Q -0 0- 6 rp=F==il B 0 Â»>*Â»9Â»47 73*47>Px x x/ SLAS FLOOR 76'-0' ~1 [fr] Il illumi 17<~ -4------ REES . vt/<Â»245~ 936Â»714Â»4~/h '~,4'4,5<~4~~~9~~344~71/Â»99Â«4,4,~Â»3~Â»~10,6Â»,95,>g ENE8 BOUTH ELEVATION -> EXISTINe 09* EZ 1/4' = Go' eRADE 1- .1 O NOTE: >8:< RIIÂ»E ELEV 114'-0. <I<-1 r- --------------- ---------------------0------ 400% RIDIE ELEV 112'-0' - 1 H 0 11 1 RIDeE ELEV 106'-O' ------------ RIDGE ELEV 9 lei'--86 N5/Fl + 0 STAMP PLATEE HEIGHT . 15Â·-116Â· MASTER FLOOR 0 â‚¬16'-A. 0 r Imeil ENTRI ELEV â€¢ 91'-3' 24 AUGUST 2004 - ~~/~fi~~~~ ~~~; 1% O.50 - MAIN FLOOR ' 86'-116â€¢ RE VIS 1[NSâ€¢ Nuit~ F 1 - --- ----> ST#6* 1 SHEET â€¢ REST-ELEMATION SLAB FL~ mt_ AB.2 9>4997384>~ ------------------------------------------------------ ./: It--- 1/4~ = 1'-0' NOTE: 0Z9I8 28Â£5Â·06Â£ C0L6)TIHO - L6LL-9,8(0L6) AV '51,[XOE[ Od 013 rid 3DMORD NOISIA / /-* / \\\41 4/, 1 1 8589 77 . r.+++ ..03, + + V -O +44 - 1 1 492: ./. / 1 1 710 , 1. .4...\+ 1-*32 / PM'/1 ......+I-eoo + + 4 + + + + j5919 97.7 444 + 2 4 + It. \\ 1 8596.40 8597.0 /+4+IX / f r 2 0/: -0+4 +1 / LOT 17 ++4 ..r/+:+4% 1/ 6.93-Â·R: I :,i +3rl 4 4 At,6 â€¢ 1. 7 i J ---. 5/6: ~990457. ++ , 21 85 RA . 2",I.-VI .25 / 1 '$95 ...Pr. . LOT\1 boc / / *~95.5 / X 1 EASE'24 , \9\ 10' SLOPE MAINTENANCE. DRAINAGE ~ -1 -0 & SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT 134 Er r. , . A:< 109 1 1 - 4' WIDTH 8 ISERS Ir" 40 Ir IREAD / 04 8 em \\ \ STRUCTURAL RETAINING UTIL. , ~ 1 ' ~ 22 2 ,(2594.4 ./ <--- WAUS PER ENGINEERING ' 0 - STUB x - ' - 8995 20 0 / on tÂ©KEâ€¢AWNs / \ \ 0 e./L, /0 1~ / 0 / 4*439-=-i *-cohtiomfor 1 >1* ..0+ dr*-3 / i ' \ 7. 9 0/ ,/*127*Xe-~.-=.- : F#B:lipg,-- 1 - #=10/00==E=t=.== 1 1/ f j Xma y a. 21. 1 / Fâ‚¬ 420<*41 /fbi, / / / *8593.0 <ed// / / 10 â€¢ / \ trzz=*g:6,Lz-k**litili <,'~7--Â· BO / '464 1 / Vt.4=-t''L'iLZms.,7 i~ f / 4 l // 5, 0\ I tone block ret ing " 59 / / / TOW= /X Â·/ 9 "--- BUILDING ~ ~ / (9 ~15â‚¬> ~1-SETBACK,' , #4 mcx he ht ft . // Boy ik \ \ /1 //1 M 1 *8591.7 , 1 %.. . .Nn /58t~ // / / UL $4/ // /1 -i / . 1 0 8 4 k w 1 1 1 / 1 / 0 / 45 / 40/ 8*1 / /<3 - r ,#, <4 1// / ASE Â»nt act , 4L v ~j 11 1 1 8586 Il NE 40Â¢~A-/ -4. 7 / i ..... ,/ 1~ ~per 8596 FOUND No. 8' REBAR WITH Ndz / tar ng f ' ' 8,1, / aug /' EAST / / ALUM. CAK L. S. No. 5447 / ~ %- = / / .41,6612 / 1 (ELEV70 8567.4') / / 15 ./ / 022 -4 / / -- 1 1 1 1 1 F \ / / 09<= 46 1 -RÂ·M Â· Â»3 7--1 / o RADIUS = 375.00' < v= 30 | / 8576.0 1 / /2%/ a r.- U DELIA = 3156'18" / ~ 0/ \ 1// ARC = 209.04' ~ / / 64.9 Lpâ‚¬ 3 -1 \ t/ E // Toilet / 1 r.7 1 8 1/ 21612 1 1 1 0 / DA. 1 1 // ~ INV = 8585 / 1 Trasti '~114(~ / | 25/ f /0/3 6/ 1 4 r 1 ~589 2 Â¥*dn /~~~ / / 8572 7 8586 1 1-\li 2// / 1 / // 1 4 I I ' Loâ€¢er -L ' 1/\1 1 J *576 j / \ 8588. 1 /Â· -ter- /4/8 2 ~ ~<4 1 1 \l/\ / ~11 -4 --858~ LOT 18 ) 1 , SE R.,MA OLE Mt!,~340 Q, ~ RADIUS = 475.00' / 0 &514 - 1/ 0.453 ACREF R\ ELEV. -=Â«8572.1' DELTA = 3'37'07" 9 1 - i , \NEST / ELEV.01 8565.0' / ARC = 30.00 Gil.. \ - ti 1 -- ---0Â·Â·ufftr DEF BASI<OF'tLEVATIONS) / / :/02 \ / / 1 \ / X .. 11 - 94/3 +429 U I / 9 32.5 U OF / l"..+~232Â©3323-3Â¢3;27-.-~ 1- C conc. ret. wa , 1 -54% s. 'f arki // / ~*8575 2 / SLOPE = 3. j =r==Â·~~EE--772=-=1 r<- iDECK /' -Â·~5Â» /3/ / INY = 1 / 1 2[f-----------=--f~'--------------(3ImÂ«-7 / - -A 1 1 1 1 / DATE 24 AUGUST 2004 //- 1 /A 8576.5 PERMIT SET / 1 1 / 48587.0 / 1/ /0=~ a.2 - 1 RE'jSZ[~S /* 857-7.7 1 1 ~586.7 ~ ----/5 1 l- --- RADIUS = 195.00' \ DELTA = 57 07'22" 8579~ -Wort 1343 - ARC = 194.41 ---- - (60 -7 - SHEET â€¢ p 1 X / *280.6 CONSTRUCTION STASINe PLAN - --1% \ - 1-> -*8581 8 1. = 10'-O. 06-1 ---- \*8213 1 - NOTE: SNDISHG INOW ONE[GISERI 03[AV 28Â£5-06Â£ C0L6) 7730 - 06,LL-Â¥48(0L6) 301:id 03916 03'NOAV '51*[ RAÂ¥ d 8, MOED 0Z9I8 OGYHO NOISIAICIEIRS EIDCIRICITIM ' / + 4<+ I 8589.77 -- +++4 g-1 + * + ~ FI . #9 5. '*k / i /469&10 6 / / 4/4 + . \ 4.% 1 7/a.. + + . + . .1 Â¥'8589 9 597.7 44,4 + /..... f 8596.40 /'. 8597.0 p .4'' %Â°44' ' * + . "* ' v. \\ /2 1. h t: 2 2/:.4,2 :2 - Ar: v: : :hf . . .... I LOT 17 /\ . ..4/ I 3/ 49â‚¬1 41'44* 1 <hr'-1 â€¢ â€¢' ?r + + + + 2,<\ 0 / 3-Â· 70.1. ArÂ«le:", . 4 185 -Â· 44 + ..4 + f LOT\1 A *~95.5 EASEDIErÂ« 10' SLOPE MAINTENANCE. DRAINAGE ~ \9\ l 2 *4 J & SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT W / --1 1 M 62 Londscape Flontings Tcble Irrigation Table f <I" Â® Colo. Spruce 6' h. C}TY 7 - /4 ~ 8 RISERS Each Unit : 3 Zones ~ 1 Drip for plontings . 12- TREAD tclur~IZ.11.1, .,4 1 -Â»3:440/ /. \ / 4' IDTH 5 20 8 6 k===1 t: Hrs:S=:d cree / 49 - p. . /. \ . / / M m e m 1 Roin sensor - \ STRUCTURAL RETAINING UTIL. , ' 1 - E- 2%2 Â® Potmt- 5 Col. Min. OTY 12 ~ ~~01/5 Clock/Water ~45go ~ i. 1 WALLS PER INGINEER]NG / \ PLANS STUBy< \ Existing Vegitotion consistes i / S / . N \ / 0 of Soge Service Berry and .9 -h Â·~ / ,/*52: 0 notive grosses ' - / at B.\\ / // Site disturbonce: Entire site Cf- 4. ' / 2% \1 / /" X $ S 52, . 2\ ' / >6e # b.:.e ,.,\ . Â£*) ** 18593.0./ / toâ€¢ / TOW 91 E. 43 0,14/ \ 43 %,11 / / / M' 1; .1 80 Â¥' J / 1 09 u/ / - ---=c_ I -re. m 4 \ 44/\ 41,5, (6 / 8591.0 1 - tow /j**#.ilt/** y4/ 8596,/ ~~'~ Keystone 92 1=t t~~ f 8598*t~7:'Mt*9fA /411 -%32 / / 1 -TOW= / / 5 807 e\.\ , / /[i] 1/ .7 Ash \ / ./I l M 8591.7 ' . 1 i / e <:4\ I.'ll. / c /Ar// I / - low / f f 1 main 8586 f / EDC , ~ / 1 / / - / Â« 4 4>~ / ASP / 8589 - 0. / \ / / rpge 8604 ~- ~ / E-*33 / \ / ,% FOUND No. 5' REBAR WITH O 3 upp. 5595 K 1 / - I \ j / f / / Bel, / / r 12 /~DE-m i / /4 ALUM. CAK L.S. No. 5447 \ ~ ~, ' EAST/-- * n yLE -(1*S. \ j =4 1 / / j <? / / (ELEV>, 4 8567.4, 1 / 6 222 1.12 Box I#r i / RADIUS = 375.00' . i ..09* \ I y - *. ' e,be - 1 / BSâ‚¬: j % ~~~~ ARC = 209.04' ~ \, / 1 / DELTA = 31'56'18" 2 / 0- t / h i .., .r / 7 ,..84. \1/ - / -8 g Â©i< Ridge / 1. 2-2 0 40 1 Â» " 4 . 49 1 / / //-1 <if> \ / 1 f L- /- i.*Jf.j 7 -/ \ , //// / 1 i-01 18 / / Lower 2 4*~-~-~~* -/O'5/ / --- c-C_ ~~- SE -8-Y2I~N~O~'E MH~340 Q~ 8576 / 1 1- 1 ~8573 7 RADIUS = 475.00' -- -A -*--V . RIM ELEV. =Â«8572.1' DELTA = 3'37'07" / 0.453 ACRE / INV. ELEV. /04: 8565.0' / ARC = 30.00' STAMP 1 Aran 1 / i %.Je -- / F idg,\ - 78588.1 ~ 52 ~719'4 / \ /1 \ (BASIS'OF<LEVATIONS) / / / e / i 26, , *: 1 -%- 1 32.5 1-F of- ~ I7- 4' cor,c. reA. woll i- / / Nt .3.6 // // / l.-4- / 1 LDECK 1 444k~Ki / Â® - /Â©m. , - -A I 1 \ \ \\ I / .9 DATE, l \ \ .9. ~ -c-fe@_-1-7/ C /- 0-9 3-1 -- 24 AUGUST 2004 ~ 8576.5 PERMIT SET 1 1 1 f -- - L/ 1~8587 0 ~ REVISIONSâ€¢ 1 / 4*1 - / / It -- 0/~ 8577.7 -- ---7 ~8586.7 ~ - ----- RADIUS = 195.00' .. -/'\DGE DELTA = 57-07'22" 8579~ .toÂ« 7 lei 1 \ - ARC = 194.41' - /.00 , %.0. -- <90 \ ---- - -/7 // - GRAPHIC SCALE *~585.9 \ SHEET I - *1;80 6 - - . 7.. LANDSCAPING PLAN - ~8585.3 \ -/ .,~ & L=I -- 1. = 10'-C 8582.8 NOTE: 8584 2 1 inch 1- SNDISE[(I INOW HON 28[5-06[ C0L6) 1733 - LULÂ·9*8(0L6 0Z918 03'NO d IDWOEID 029 1 8 OC[YHO 1SVH NOISIAIGanS E[Da A - - 1 ' ~Af E- ). r=- r) 11.4 b ..,11 f.../ R ..1 9 5--Â· e 1 - & b 1 - , I. i f.- f t.m v liffE- ~ ~ ~1~~~~ l hui. j R. rf :F - - - Â· f D- :d. v ~ --- ,~ - - - M--/ 13 . 1 -1 .- ---=, ----->TY 7 i ' ..e~ 1, . 10 1. -- -./ . 4 --- 4-- -1 -- 1 t. , =,r "-1.-Â»4 t.r- . --- -- ----- v 1- - --Â· 78078 ' lintir.Â·tpi, f- -Â·- -I i ...,- Y.;~_ ...:n,â€¢i====n=-5-,YALL.4-al./.*MM.=-f'.-.-r-M - .:pa.JtÂ·Â·Â·. 0,. -sr- = -'TP.,7. P,Â·rlk... AiTMEPT , 1 . 4~Â·Â·Â· -~* 14; 4 / . - 8076 -- -- Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· ---- -5:ir:0- 6.Irlâ€žPh- - r.Â· __ --- --2- te' ~- r. t 01- -9 + I -I- ... I 1 , - -1 -- - .en-71 - 807 ft _TE:r =>-=--re.- .. n - A - 00 ENT 2 - - 4. -- + - -, ..0071.06 1 Bdp- r ' t f / rl 6068. 2 44' AF y.. -. Gr-UCIDâ‚¬Â»IDC) InG:4:' - 1 E -.-- . - // . 1. I 4/ _-â‚¬r>-9.J- 71 \ 1 60 1-0 --CArllitbi~~-=-w'~2.41.P--13--i-,r, Â«=Z=f~ T #. .,..--r-Â·--Â· -----:.- L./ --707--h \-- -Tri#--%.K--.----*.FEE,(ip. r --- X *YOUNT.Z . .~., -- Â¢Â«' - - - ill-lbi 1 4 - ~Add;==:i. 4 - W f -<* -M sotf I -â„¢~ *- 4' - --------- - 42 gauumeR u,Au,~4*4- ~--~ r -- 7--4 -' -Â· I %16' . 654. . I#*FABItÂ· - Â·*-- --00_.. - d e peeD K ' /'6,17~ ~ . // /.. 1 ENE 2 C - --4- / 1 - -- - t-=-, k 41.2 1 - f- ; CS ---- EAÂ¥EMEâ€¢rr 1 1. Dil 4. V. iCl -- i \25!4 ---,2-.. r' il-1 \ 1 - A.y 9,9D .:- 5 - 'L i * -- ----. --- .4--- ---- - tt. 47 PO Z . Â£060., fl -- 41 &Â· I, . L- 44 - 1 1 r~_ ~- -/ 61. ' , J 117---' f - - - L 1 1 4 -- Ct , t4F r-7 4,-2 4/ -Al-80 -O/ - 0 tv.= 3/ 1 8004 f r --- 7 *49 . - - ,41 0- C - - 1, /1 , -2.Â» - .- *2Â» 9, l 4 11. t. 1 + 2 - 41 0.0.F... 1/ -,4.4*944~ /5 7. , /\ i 44- -~ ' 1. 12 0 1 p iÂ·. ; n.. 41 Â· - .* )4 37 - 4 / --fIL l . 1 6 -*- / -- - *1 - -9â‚¬Q o - 7 & 217- 1 -1 - - <f W. 1 17 -,1. I -f~+ /7- - - r --1 04 . i 940- - +* ..... 1.=â‚¬ ... I .A <6\47-7 4 \ & 1 IN. I -4.4 --- W l- N.Â»L \ *f.----.4--- 411 1 Â· 4 k - 2 'ra 1 / \\ 1- - ....g,a- - 43 4 - re= .- ./ 1- %4 1.. w I '- 12 l-~ - & - /- * nh~44 A. 1 j e' &04/ 7 A r '*(,g~ ~:~~~ ~L r .4 ~_- :*. .- 4, * ;--r-- 1.-Â«,---- ---- 8048 + 0, i.. 0 - 0 - -~ 0 -L- 44. 4 1 4 00 7 -- p , 6'4,:.-- +V - I ..11 U ti .- ' - 4 / lt)& 1 7 . -- -P--- -"8044 <. - 1 i ... .4 , 1 J 40 - le> 44 t . -i 80 , 4% 8 0 A --..66â€ž :-217 804 0 Â· ~Â·-2-Litit i r 41 / - d / 9 / )I 8038 " -Z---: . 1 B 7 1 06 41 4, - ' .. . I- ------ 8034 --- - 7 0 0641 0 44 }11 . r * Â· 0- -59'L:U--- - r -- f e . -- \4//2 30 t.-AL 497 Â· ..1 . j - C , -- /1-1 ./.a rfi,fÂ· e . Â·:FU, A :,6-0- i -- NIa UNT.~ i i.1 --r>3121*27' 07 6* 2- RECEIVED na f WE 4 RE HeR,8 '5--- , - 1 flif i . . -$- )- NoRZE ~ l.~ -1- Â©-Â·---- - i~-- 11-7--- ~si~/,~~vil~g~ ptopÂ© -4'Il ~ - AUG lall 2004 0\ U n ~ 141Â£.DkleeD f*Ae w nvivelooment 415) TE DEVEf3*42% ' 1 _ . - 7 ?Nch,INct â€ž 1-/w' â€ž PLAN M WorTâ€¢44 11-AM _Ba__ ~ s(.i.Â£- i. 10 -O r "-Ki '79 1 . .,77~ T.,Tr.-1.Tik--râ„¢ 7-1 1-r, r........,7: -r= ='FM' . - = 3Â¥w::Iv./Tin*1:-*U7~r ai ' wri-i Ix'::4'4 4,, i A .. ...4 - i ,. 1 4-, Â·IM - --- Â· I .......... ---,6.- ......-------I---WI_-_........ ..... * ....____--I..._..____. 1_.- .-0 1,1-I.......T 1:/8 SL/SP/VISiON , Adotd ~ ' llf P O. 8<3% 1114 â€¢ 4thanderoadwoy Â· Eagle. Cdorodo 81631 Â· (303)328,6287 131'W i 2-0,4tkiâ‚¬ - 1196 1 ENCLAVE L,TWILD@DOD 1 1 1 6/29/49 1 Stephen-1?lctiards j WuplaiR_ OF OWLLUU< U.., tr~ - 6 - 4 / 9 - 5-raccr- FAL<11 - REQUIeED' IL-Â· Frzo POUO /& '<UP Su,LO'.14 1+2,414T- Â· - Au.0-ED ~ imâ‚¬*II a_ - M.L raort,SED 84 z/ , 0 -u i i>Â·d i UD ed 020 RO..LD ~CBITTECIQJIULL I)Â£&7.UNS ~1_ AUR - 1.1 AcRES 1. > 401 Su51>t.' "= â‚¬$ 7 _.~ LOT 8, 8LOCK 5. WILDRI ( 1 d. 18~equver J 7, 4134 / ' 1 1 1/3 ARE i / k-552:i,_, -4/ ..A / i dIERE /, i , '_-- 1 Ir-1 f./ C.. 4/ 1 1.3 /7 L. 7 1 7- I rij - 0 WIi.DRIDGE j :{ ~ 1 :St & To 3' x â‚¬ i (111 42 MOUNTAIN 2< 61 REP SANDSTONâ‚¬ GOULD>Ef2% ' ' STAR \ 0 G. .1 iNd , 527 EACM COU<SE 2-2.e-k- 1 :11 0 l Z :J: 1 .C 0 1 /1 - #-1 1 5% 1 li 14 1 Â£ -- Â· i AVON 0, Fi,.: t. . b.~.~/1.1:7 STONE- ~ - bÂ·JALL ,Â©42'Â©- i t 133 - 1 . C .... ) \ /-7 --- 1 4 Â» -PARK ~ 0 V 0 I. C , i. 11 JA- 0 1 J J P ~ . ..re:~; - Â·Â· r _-4-<*--M~ i 91 -17-Â·8078 ---L-37-3-~r,I"'87 .- ... .-24.-1- 1 ----8076 -- m'< W.U9..: _ ---- )-.-'-_ e.ii--1 ~ --- \ r Enre .im,ry: Ers,Holf =-7=77=:- ~ ' ~~~~~~-~42 -2.. ~~--- Â£ FIAL :.1 , ,:.r 1- 1':. C t.1,0. ki ~ ~T \ 4 11 /42'. /... - - *4094_319914 2,1 ------. ------Â·-x - 6, 2 5.4-", r O J --..:-,-3~5(fJ>3~91*11-I- \;9, 'kii,ii.. s.,â€¢ft ),99, ~~~~. 1 1.41 -- \< A. -,-7< l-23=.edao.f-- Â·---4444<1~.33 90 -- 1. It .1 01 1 >0 8 1 ..l 1 /2 ; Â©t, 4 4' - _~_-1,-- .- -~_~ ib.(Â»411 â„¢\1/ -r --Â·---?14AW.1 1 ~~ M 5 --3 - -iyoeÂ® 1 5 IAT 4,2 & f ,~0-Â· '#4*,*4 91 &.. i4- 64(&-,4~ --- 1 --*-- viff *i,r, 7 f-& .:vâ€ž~hy 11- fLJ 3.-- tim ti 0-3 ~\,,-~ f.:~-- ~1 ,~i<-~..1, ~x~ / ,&/--rf~;9 - ~- -01,~,'~~63-=3_ ff,t*~~-~~I --77Â«~344 . ----- +Â· i e. Cri ./ I. 5 - --4 Â»-ttf , A -1- V tr V 94 9 </___ 'r' 9----'* (N- . 6<942-frÂ«1 4 4 0 7 ,--~*3 .2 / 1-44 Â» . 4, Â« A-LE 49 f 1.- 1052Â·Â· '0Â£0 . --1-t ~ .0 4--7Â« 1/ N *M 1:. 0,7...4 - --1 .ybiZ 'h)< : .*: -\ 11\ L.-3 -in Â· -/22%5 47Â«9+ 9 - -- 4 4 / N,4:/ 44< \\9 r.. / 2.3 CY \\ / i /ly / ..fl ._'-fff--- W :efy.. - . r. 1 --+Ill--%-<~ /10Â» -7 -7. _. _ _. _ 8041 --=--'- \ f n 4 7 1. 1. 4 , l \\\ Â·-- - * -- -.4.4 &234 - Â· 7 p -'- -a--5-4:a- -------___---233--- - C fill.7 , \ -N- ///Â»'....7/ --- . . , .. r ....4.----'.----- --7- %---- 1 - 63) 1 4.2 E .- * AS -r.., 1 3 Cd EKE'Â·.7 -04,<24 - Mdir-1--51:Â·ACE - 6 -lp.,-6 .7-1 Ul -- - PRIPOSE'.. - 2 74-PLE> 23 U 14 1 7 A -A , R :64 J. 1.6, - - -- _ --_- -fi-Ef-T -wlwooD- ROAD-Â«v r-- r.~.lf~~ i d i, Tel L w< 2-4Ee = 11184 '5'fi 1 519 1 1-1.-1 -7 .OUILDIKIC PrE/4 47 - 39 4 ulow - â‚¬ 6, 840:'DUE P Aj â€¢ O. p -3 TV Â·67- fASIÂ·,44 - It 'RECON.10 - 16 .f,J- 0-22.-. 0 1 ana& A -744.2 '0Â· 1 lus/= s o C :--â€¢ ... .1 .I \ 11 Laâ‚¬ L.Â·'' i '-2 Â·Â·Â· -2, - 3â€¢11 231 - -p,- L.01- Â·13/5Â·.2 ,â‚¬ - 5,1 2-Â·_0 '32; - '2%5'4 :.L,-â€¢-, 1, JO/) 1â€¢417 viouc .. 85 L, 6676 51<. ./ - j. /0 i DNE].0 *TOU/.2- 2 ,Â·300 3.fs, 1 -- ---- - ---- --- --- - -- --- -- - ~~__;ITE-LDEVELLOPMENT- --PLAN -Â·ciek -zo'-2 ,~,2 ~;mas i L LAGLy !22= %91Â§3 11 1Â¥21I1DILIIIC)~g~ ]HIC) 53 9*v 1. , .1 . 1 12 - O 12 0 IL-O 2. -O . rE-o 4 J 21'421 5146 -# 30 3-0-1 E--In - P Ir----- - 3- 01 0 0 D B .C 1 05 .1 25 -/1 -- 16,45 6642 , g ~ D l und- inft--C .c 0 2 GO -3 0 U .' In - t) JQ.9 cuzzoi.- ,FT-. ra 0 - 2-11:01.12 /,1 1,47 3.4,42.- E 3<.46 '0 [ 1 A IZ~] 0 E-Z]h--1-_ . O---1 '' - ' ~~'ii- -iJ --~ - 172 (%3) cz__z~ (13 cg~6z-222 ~ 3 L 93-0 M. 13 6 k e 2 9 00 8 0 : =11(21 1-~ /yip, f. , H td __ _21 -0-2 =IN-=11, 1 , 1 0-3 0 U 40,1 - -4 .1 de -Â·=3 0 1 =ret. -1- 1, -- -1-3 1- - U tri , ==1 (PAC 'KJ-I- L}JPW.. 4 ._1 Do i Lai - ~ 1 (2\ 6 -J - 0 Â·1\I 0 \\ .1 1 .- MEDÂ·IA j- f.-) -SE 1- 1.J - - 20 -cO 22)Â·C L J - 0 - i. 72'-0 - f 4 00--4 10 E- Fl E; 1 i I 0 1 iF.1 P .it GE' , Ii- mr '' 1 p L, 1' ; , 0- 4. (-O bAs:MEN-1- A.1Â£,1 Prg. uell- i 1096 + $ liEVE Â· 2-4 -0 ' 21-0 , 1 L 0 *11 0. 4, 1 226 4.0 -1 *7612116, 311 y. ' 12 1 D t r- --7 94 9 -#-le W -1 L '' In ? , 11 Q ' 4. Lo'. , - 20 ID-- 2 , 0 1 I , r ,#f __ ..:scock:0 -3 P yt *SH 1 21 4 -0 1 111 5%.7/ 1., , ~ !39 Ji -T ' i i 9 1 00 {- F i uP 1,4 1111 Ept li j N f 412.1- 00:.1 i . 4 Ill B- SAFB N Â· 61 :00 44.[4 -... - - 3$GO-D 00' 3-----Â« (211 1 (*11 --O U Illa 1.-1.- B- etÂ·:triÂ·i.:.NA.. 'I Â© 8//4./01 1 lof Im- i 1 1 27.F' 4 m:.1 1 00 1 . *91 liT '*1 PINE _ ---â€ž..... _- __. Ltv.IN(13 1 I ie Ah ' 11:1, 0 0& 11 1 6-1 ~bo ~fj[ ~ __ O 01 f ' =b , i L I 0 F Ell - 4Â·= 1* A j. .. S Ice" 8' IN. U K L , 49 !~ 00. W op ~ it I CD " Â£ 1 / i il , i .IT-- ~ 1! . 100 1(31 tle,= - - -=IN-INt - li:.1 , , 100 _.3 - i. - L En -1 /2 11 ~ V 1 7 1 12] A- 4 11 1 42 1- 1 , 1 . -,~ -~ '~metÂ·- Â·Â·0.4 C#lm =~ --uzz_<Â¢27 6Â« O.1-I --3 ; 1 i ' -- f ~ 10 1 \(2 1 2 1 -P 1 L/ 1 .- 1 9- 4 1. 1 3.9 1 / ' | 6 --V-Il/,1 u Â«1591 1 -- 1-_21.GARAGE i 1, _-1 --Ell. 14 1 & 19 03 4 ig i Ic& 4 aHb I i.? !1 0 t' 11 Â£ TT l-Ll U-1,'00 1 1 Eli -0 1 Jf -3-1 - - ti 51 1 " - :1 1 0' . 20'-0 . 8' -O . Â£0 -O 6 20'-O " 1 4-0 0 4-0 .......66.11 72-0 3 - MAIN - FLOOR PLANI 1 1,4 11 l L o " 1111,4 FLOOR #REA PER UNIT- = 6700 4 6006Â£ AKEA Pet UNT= *LC> 4 .,i===U=/&&. lbTAL LIVIUG AZZA Fur 21+JIT-= 21,4 4 J.2-0' ; dol. tom-eze((02) â€¢ le,OP'.FO' PU,txogÂ·Od Pwcutr ' J'Â·42/5)/1)CSDS DIDO-)â‚¬ ~ --- 410â€ž . 7.V .LO" , 4'Â·G" 5- olf 4'-0" , , 1 .1 i I 20 r O , / ./ 1 -t- 1/1 f- E 4 0 0 N 1 g ill L 7 P 35 . th ./ 1 1 2-4-14 liD '. I " 1. Fy=-4 -i U 0341lf ir g/--3 . 0.~ whe f 1, ..4 * --- 7 r U 0 12:Ek ---i i 75- r.---11 9 11 f - i i- 2-==41Â»-CLIC t 1-7 1. 2 - .'r-'-.+1~/ t=li; 0. 1 1 2 - ~ .EL- t i'l j 1 01 T.=Cn=: 1/1,~=211.,arl 01 A + 11 1 0 Iii '11Â«0 2 1 1 .0 - 1 ./1371 U D --3 r _# 99 -Â· -3&4%- S- - - 1 Fdde==--- 1 0 1 g 1 19 . 1 1, 1: li 1 1 -2.. D 1. C=~11 J _1_1 1% 62 4-01 -UUE 7- SC,48 -3Â·-7-- - 72 ~6 3 <4 4- 1 19 Cho 1 1, -,-~ -MASTER j - _1-KE /1 9 - 6 - 0 Or l_LI en 1 0 - D Ll_1 i -- --- 3,~48 -2 -- - .LE 1 4 1-L- I 14 1 0. L- - -1Â£110,1 - _ 7 (2=2Â¤- 8.1- A -0 , 6-0 , 1 - 4-11 1. 1 ~1 4 Â·1 1 11 '' , UL-lkli UPPER F PLAN 23.11 ./-O" UPPE.2 Fu=:cl< .AAEA Pa UNCE . 19 1 + .:=a...:Ga; , 164 Â£969-8&0 (COC) â€¢ 409LgoponooÂ·ele[)3 â€¢ ~0/â€¢Pools puo 419 â€¢ 96 LI x08.0.d ..ke, No/rf ' ~70/ $ 'AICSPS '51 700-79 ' 9 ,---,/iE--'-~-- 1~LaY,i/WAI Â¥10{L'DINA -, ;.1( i - i 32-,~i- 121 94 G 9 0 tr. ' RIA) 1 0 1 X . 09 BE& v~.7 1 2 1- L \20\ , la,7.1, GS,7 - ~ X.E. 1 W - 141244\ -1 E- . - =Ir<*266 -rrk/)- -~~~~~~ ~~~~~ , ~~ il //Izz (41 04\v- -- 1 -7 1 F 7 -- 12] 2-Lit-fo -fl E - W +~--- - L J - r i ------ 1-1-0 r ---- ~--4,2 1 ! , L J -_ LJ ! A -_14.4,/_94_ ...pl~- 6/21/6 f : 1/l4/19 1 EN CLOSED _ ____ - El-Belf<-IC. Ait-rEAS - Â«r--1 Alli'. 4/2APG EXT-ER loR >fATER U LS # ' Â¢00'F ASTRALT ' H 4 A. FROP, LE ' AlÂ£,41-1 <CREED WooD . , P.iscIA R.5 14 /Rs 2.10 ciEDÂ¢A o Ly. a 713 | SDEFll- Râ‚¬ c Â£'PAR " 8Â·71-3 sts>ING ;25 1 r S. =14*JNEL \-*Ifi O AL W ILLOW MUSE j-= 1Â·. 1.122Â· 8 - Tal.1 KS 2-r 6, CEDAA 6. sr.... 11 MA I. IUIX; . +FT-Â· -- AJ,61 CADLUS ALu m -, C.4-7 WOOD 4,412 GLO C -- 591 9 ,&-P,-c -tRIM KS 2 w G LEDAL 07 -F L,Â· Â·,ST .=7 - 824-15 Al-IP 12,4,L.6 , 70513 , Dooil5 OCM * loG sW<a EL.AST. FIN/IpÂ·+ 01_y, wAVAJO LJ WITE C. moRS, RS 1145UL, WOOD 0.0. UL.Ill,LOUU 01(67 HA#Munt 111-04 1. --~- 10 24- 023 Flgfie 85.9 1 //39143\ /.<524\ w 1-1 *EA Â«Â»919Â« 2 In 58, 3 81 ~234 - 0 (li 121.6/9 86 ' ArgfiT--- IEL -_453 -1 v '19 - 1--i 11 ~---0' 1 1 - - - 0-1 8 2 -- - 0 77 i 13> 8 9 --1 1--- --4 1 -- 1 <If -3 3 2139 1 LofLA ~ | A-EL._ . 73 4- 1 -~ 24 ' 1 1 i 6% U--1 1 00 ' 5-4- FE IL_: Mi ..7 E- FXIST. CCID' .--/la-,/"I=/0 --k-- 6 A- 8-6 -- - -- - - - ..I=- fr'rÂ·r: --- -- ----- ------ -- NO *714 ELD< 41-2-C â‚¬02(-2 44-b'/ A- - dpii. 2-Zg-gge(toe) . LYLBOPO,0103'810031 â€¢ AOMpoijapuoulp â€¢ FiK*08'0-d .:6ki - rÂ· 37)~-f~-7101â‚¬fdcs - 10 -14>9'40.-4 Voll-r>144 BE,< HT 0-'Pite 90 OIl h glÂ·04;Â£ Â¢28:,gy -_ 124 04 E â€¢El / ~ U 87. Â¢ 1 All>GE(&7 \\- Al U I fipâ€že79 ~C - 2 4 ,& 1 ----IM--.-1.-----~g--Ilillui-;W --I----~- C ' -----2.y' 0)2 - -~----- 1 ------- - ---- -- --- -------- - - [-~ i~1<- - ------ - =-* 4 ~Aj<1.4 --- . - ~- --~- 2/ -I 1- ---- ---4 ------=f---i 1 //1, 1 -flbill_â‚¬1- ---- - - 1-- ==-==ILE - ---- - ---= ---.-- . \ C./2-Ve.-1- a /4,9/07 ' 4 u -- 1\ 1 8/191-Â· 4*<ADS I I '\ - f lilli 11 13,LO4 A-6-c ---1 1---0 -0---fi=WEST ------ .... sazip 4,-14 'A 1 9 ll\, 1 11 RICÂ¥,6,90 _J-L 10 4 37~,CU & 90 - - ._nop/4>IN'unt /LOILS,â€¢44 +12%01Â·r- 211(- / - -- - --g . INr- LK 41 -I. 1\- 841>4 â‚¬- e :7 ,/ ----- - ST 24; f e Z 7 111 11 - Ill >h 13> U 4 --- 0-77 -171<' 0 11 1 1 - Â¥ Ual--11 3 r-r-.---3 - 1---] -- 3 .--1,2 1---3 -== 12=. 1 - / 1 k UN AR CE[ 4 M 1 - - 1. - r f.; 111}1 /9 1. ---- 1 H t=- 11-1 1 8 1 -___L < 3--;=rsm -2 .-'.-~1 -155I.i I' MA,â€¢4 8 665; 1 --7- I 1 1I mud .-I . 11.,~ILIA 'I - SAE-F-â€¢â€¢'rl-3-55--~~>--- . A- 8-0 - - -Â°94Â¢nl 17# 16 - f --0 -8 L.04 A- 8 -C L 11 19.1 ' 1 ,@a_Lete-aze(coe) . LMigapi/'Â¤0'0'803 â€¢ Ac,Â¤câ€žf Puo ut,. It Al, *09.0 d OPE----19957.A-%1993- --'Im--i@i-li~i~ 1 1 , E idi' 4l ..r , -- - - -- ~ h 'U. / 1 M 0 41 8 J I L D, ?44 +26 3 4 Â£ â‚¬0 f.,9 -I i.li- -,--, . 1 i ' ~,EN<, r '11 074Â£/86 â‚¬lou e ! 42-124're & 4 /51\ 193 1 622 39-4 Â»/Â»0Â«\ t:1 turi.ee SE ...1 Â· . 1 , 41':'' 1 1 I ./ A 11---' \ \0\ -Â· [5 - - \94160-- 334-\ - r M i ff ---- - - I \\23\ -- -31 2 1 ..81= . i <5221Â· Â»12Â»\7Â«- - - -9-12~31>i~, ' E --7 1 \7 0 i. 1- ---. -- Sajo /13 r -1 L j br----'unte 1.91-2 I 101 1 -222Â£16*Biz:.:. L .J L_---1 1- - 9/21/04 i -214'* G I et :/(6/0.\ Â£/cl=Â£O 1 - ' .-- - ELECT<k. Al/77-026----------Â·- - ---- 1 ~'*1_ E, 139Â·, 4/2.APE ~EXTER COR ..MATERAA-LEIN' 1-- 1 mooF; ! ASFAALT 11+64,4- FRIMPI LL ' 1 WEA-rHERED woop i 1 FAsenk , RS 1,G /Rs 2-lo..CED,44. [ .0.-7. 071-3 ... 9tâ„¢713%33~3 '--- - , - a. 77_3 SDFAT ' 21 4 {gAR GIC>ING ~ 125 !,r ~ =MANNEL LA-f, ! DLY, Willow r.-1/SE U TA'MI j RLS 2-x 6 =EDAR l" W)61[Â»Wi 1 ALU,71, CL-Â·Ap woop p*472 84-4 _812.Ir : *4 - ---- Val-24 D-E-F .truM 1 gs '2, 6 625}4(t -2- - 94Â·AceÂ· 14"V/.cr 52*â€¢16 | ANP 124ll-6, ?DST3, Doo,(S .. : ely, *906 . ----EA-ST Slucco ~ ELAST. FIN jÂ·5p* O,7. HAVAJ O log,Tt 0 C, PADRS, ~ RS lk,150&, WOOD O 4 9. 02.4- CLU Al f 67 ' MAF. 0.94.4Â·fl-Â· ~ - tziocieSG Ap, E e 84.5- 19 924 Â£ 2 26 :26izzercerr Â·239.Le 83 13 -=122- i Il-J W. 0%1 ~'t /Â«Â»21/1- 15~ t#Â£5215---1 -35 - h319// 44,4\1Â« 271 T, h w 11- 1 1- -1 GÂ»5__.__~22 - Â«5Â«1---0 179 1 Vi' 1 1 11 4 1-- 8 8 -- . - an $ LJj 3 -3 1 -- -- -- 2 7,5 22-1 - ---1 4 1 1 1 _1 + MIC. . R.-9 0 4 .-ul. 1- 1 1 - ,1 , - -- I ---I -- i Lt- ..0. 0 - 1 -mi , . ' hi_1 9 --- -- 1 1. 1 . - i _i_1 00 1. 0.1221- --- ---9.. ri,ai Â·f FLDS D-E- F -_air Ex'ST ce:.pr - NORTH- â‚¬xs Vt.= 1'- 0' - C) Â· 1Â£9MOPOJOIOE)'eiSOG Â· (Ff- " Nolgltia - .k_ -~ J 12'20.& 8,G> 04 #TIS:,3114 tat (9 84' I 9. 4 2/- - K/042 2 8% - - FiT- e G - a - - 4.-/ - -- 1 9 0 ~~1- ---i-------- U 1 1- , I. - i'-- I fic--3 4/---'.141, --- ~1-2 ---11- - u ' m. -- -- - 1----4- ------ Gfa,;09 / 1 g f l L 21 4- --1. 1 :i f ExiurÂ· 44092 ~ ~~ 0,5,Â»ne - I -W..Ilifil.- I \ - Â£ E-@<ISTÂ· <1204/E -- - --6 LE>4---DrE- 9- 4Â«WEST -22-cap- je*-~*,_0 - 1 ' 01 42 etÂ» . 804. VTÂ· {21[24 E e ..#. -1,92 2 e BC - r. sci. 2'24Â£ e 84,â‚¬- - -- 0 4 Elâ‚¬Â£11.2.L .~ - me,1 /82 â€¢ \81 --- 91 0 1 â‚¬ 4 '46% 1.84 \1] 1% 3 F>: 0 -21 V -- 713 IIi- - Ul - ] 21 f , 1 1 lii UJ Q !21 ' 2 *44/4 (265 i . 1 ' 11 --- U0 .-/ 0 0-1 00 6 -a [fl O- -Od-= 1-- -Â« 1~ '' h :.A 191 ; (100 Es,wn 653 ~ 84&â€¢mEATe 1 el 7 iL~L.C.,-- Â«33712=3339"00714 -2443= El-CkS D-E-P *b{-1- LE?-~zt (toe) L - u Â»OFf 1 / h- // i / - -===221-- - ---------- --/ - -PLTAid kIATIVE VELE-rk-Tiod - ----r (9*1? jR R WATE) ---- CON STAJC7204 - -j.- Liel r'r 3 1 oF $~$ - 29--29CCE--6221 *IAN7104~-'FNe:NaL - 80--ip ~ \ -- 94 1 - i 5%913-0*64 41~r Voile - -- -Ir-r<Kh - ------ 40Â»*bfYÂ¢14~ tict?ectz=409- h - /,0 - /A -4, )-/- -Sy~ 211*tr~73-,--2---(gl,1 .-1 --6.0-.. rv---v-~-~-=./ v-v-YÂ·-<2:r- \44.Vt ,au,427 -/9-/ / 16) 9-2 --~ 634- - i,~LA-I rr.Â»'-I z 6 j' 44 9/4 /ix-De ...gra th< 4. 1. u W qâ‚¬Zj Ke ~ -2 \P/pr~in- / \/, CSI' 4/, lier///1 5, 4 -- D -0 1%711ALT OB-IVE ~ ' U (D ~/40 o , 1 42â‚¬41 ZAL-- e- ~ 1Â«a c,1 -Â»b *49 + / --24/249Â«Unoni- 44.B ~ -- M VÂ» 1.- 9-41 L--ed,o -- Â·r--- - 4 S â‚¬>Â» 9-Ckt/ 4-1Â£316 SOC=' - f Â»1 *20 0 r 7 j Code. 3/ - 4Lkz. %340//1/ 1 0 2- 7 5 1 A-,- 12- 2 \ U \\ - 1 , 1 40 -1 847 - / 1â‚¬ 1-0 ~ 01 1 , A 4 6X 1, 2 -ActjA P j// . 4 .. . / t 8 /Y _4/a4 grÂ» 24 . \ 1 k. - - - ty f.i'% LA-= u.u f C N 12 -1 \ (5uou-1 AA ~ 11 5 . <313% \ //-1->\\ owBATE) rw â€¢ 4 Lf ' liÂ·,%1**E %41 41 g . 9 1*4 1 - 4 0 r? 0 1 Y <49442\-Â»A 1 \39141\ I--- #% - - -------m // - -F 1!1 -~111 1 /7 --- 13 + 1 -+. e @.F ) 4,8-2- -----jk~--~~ 4 1 1.-Le P ~ -Â· le.t.~v". h,1 ----2,~ Ea-i-,4.111 NATIVE ..vaGETATIoi_-=1 1 . 11\' 1J 9% 4 --- , v--! . 47-42* 1 JE %~ M%>i/iN\ \4 2 \41-- -\ O1\1 / . K- / ' \91 9- 1 - --1 V - ..f 1% 1 # - / .7 11-3- 1, , I rh 1 1,40.ltÂ·a -2 4/2 9/4, 1 14Â»1 951%4 1 '499'IR.3 ---,--/-- .2 , \\- - -- , 1.. ----- - -- 07 3 *5.,g.h iÂ«/2--1 /-y 1 Â· , -4 -- 1 1 -- 11 . /V / 141 . 941Â·63%~%%3141 *4 .*wv< <2*32~ -- - 11._ 79 . \121! DC .*x 2Â£t[0 4,=~77--7!11-UA 1 ~,t,Irr- OF =404% -1,77-39 7 OK) 13 \4:id*27 j Â· \- / 154, U - ./ - Ast % 41 '#944/.: t.- 3-k- 991331_ / INIAÂ· ~j- LH i . 501> / 1 19 \ 1 1 ! 4 Al :4] C- - - Â¢ 975 ~ - 19 ---/ -â„¢4*, , C.Re, ~~~ rjU Â·,4.2 ~ '" , 7 - m 4 ___1 -- 1*Witrakk~*vhwk#'~t/47.&:Mk/C,/(-%u--Ii_ _ ;' I 8205/0,4 -pfaUL '19 -1/ ( ft_-3.-- _-+Ay-*AL,Q: , ., - 2/ , 'flilf , N.-/hh-- 41131 M cL_--'---~ -Ul'[tuljf~U)1121'i~I[61111!11,1,l~litlit'llit(till!-lili:'13% / - - . - 421 71 Mj 1-1 11]1 E L Z i1 CLL__ -- 6,21 1 1 IE' --- -1/3-7/ - 1-{-1 kil ~ - ~ ----~6~T--~ILOLJOOP E.YO , il-Ii. 1... |: 1 4 bA PLANT MATERIALS -- - l.4 JO %---il-/I:-- \~ \\ - G Green Ad Fraxin,19 prnnsylvanica 21/2"cal 6 KEY ((-}MMON NAME BOTANTCAT NAME SI717 14<) _~_ Â·1 1 ~Â·El 1 Rorh' Mt Timir,Â·r 1,Inipem ~con,ihinim 4' -6'ht 6 LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE - 1-=10.-0,4 P Ponder... Pile Pint' pondcrosa ' 1 11 M Am=Marle Acer Zinnal, lin" cal 10 S Colo Blne Spnre ricen Iningens 6'-8'ht 3. NOTES Total landscaped area - 34,239 sq. f. - 65.556 ofsite 1) All cons[ruction materids to be stored in drive ared during construction Total irrigated area - 6,207 sq. ft. = 18% oflandscaped area SilliUBS 2) Automatic sprinkler./drip sys,eols to be installed in all planting areas except Total spray area- 4,496 = 13% Sod to be a drought resistwit nix of fescues, P| Ciqtena Plim Prlinits cklena i gal 9 1 native vegetation - 9>STEMI -To INCUIDE RAird SE.Ns>ott DEViCE. Total driparca-1,644:6. ft.=5% "A"perennials (low water usage) to include: asters. blackfoot daisies, daylilies, Po Cinquefbil Potentilla 6,]ticof 5 eal 11 3) Overlig all tree and bhrub holes two times ball size and replace with a mix of Total sod area - 4,496 sq. ft. = 1 39'6 blue jlax, gaill,Jia, iris, poppies, purple coneflowers, scarlet gilia, yarrow Rr Redleaf Shnibrose Rosa nibrifolia 10 val 11 topsÂ°il and organic materi.1 se s.~~~'c~ern, 5 eal 7 '-B" perennials (average water usage) to include: columbines, crocus, daffodils, Sh Servicehern' A nirlanrhier alniti,lia 10 pal 8 4) Afulch all pereania! beds witi, al bast 11Â·0 inches of organic mulch <ALL Â·EDD AND FLO, 02,2 22'DS ---0 HAVE daisies, delphinium. lupine, Rocky Mt. penstemon, poppies, siâ€¢ouÂ·-in-summer Prlimis hÂ¢Â·Eievi L = 1 Wildnower and native grass nni ta in.lude: blue flax, Rocky Mt. penstemon, Sn Common S nowhÂ·ny Swniharicarros alhtis 5 ual 3. 5) Revegetate all disÂ·turbed areas to remdin native with topsoil and a mix ofnative BZCADC*57 SPAIN ICLERLS. ALL /Â·771Â£25 gaillardia, blackfbot dabics, yarrow, western wheatgrass, crested wheatgrass St] Three-kaf Sumilc Rhiâ„¢ trili,hata 5 fill 7 - grasses and wildflowers. r/14. 79 -3 -721:11<1 ERâ‚¬3 FÂ·.h-, .~ "~ ..:# - 1 2 14â€¢ :Pli .11Â·.1 Ar a on,Â· , r' 1, tees[:bli:h 1 splot'0!M ueqaets <31.4, .;;.&:c&~LWLVOP[Joloo'emood . Ao/~poe g DUO 417 ~t X0~ 0 d ,ol:ki 4,sr /1*,Ir/ 703<&m& ~Tii:~71 4 F:FOOUUY M QLE \ .,2/25 25</ r .d:211_Q>y~ ~ L 6- 2~LES FLUED, & CONTOUR 1. 4 1 *4- n,0 Aked' slm MaÂ¢ETL-09 29 Sl,MES ; 0' ;0 r .ro ./ CROU*. 2. Â§115 rt-1 4 NI M nd,r r=9F=11 .-,4 U ..- r 'Inc....5 Noms - 1. 11,4-, ,hell b. Nec.id. /. to. a I .... .. .. .. ..tavf di , m. 4 -" 1/064 ch'/f" th. **C-'t I.=. I I.â€¢â€¢'â€¢Al #..I-/â€¢0~orÂ¥/ I p'~â€¢ I. Â·..k '-â€¢ .... 01 ..m:. 4.-. An.' .....6 .....'-0. 0-A 6,0. '-d&re-4 U, pr..104Â« LM U, .1 % ;UN 8 -0./ A.~.........Cr I 'le. '0 -gh>' pl,Il Unt'. ~r9â€¢/In I ./. I.'CU;*>â€¢d - e.gre,fla,1 -&/ 4. I. bele' ./,h../.Â·â€¢ul.y .....,d dural ./ f El I -4 .. - r-,0./ .Ir ..... u've ./. ,-'viac' I../ d to led~ cr ;....wn' I. gr .011.. HAr BALE DETAIL Wo *CAL.40 -__l D m , 1 + 9 \IVE 4..1-1 341 . W o ~ZZ-I---I--- -7--,LaÂ« m m ---/4 p C f r -- I .r-----99' 2- 8078 --- 111 --- t 1 P.Â£9 9 / 5 M- .- . U f "0,0) , --traingrp -i=*an wi)-x--oecir. 1 -r 1 lus/6-/7--Trl-- 62Â»7.~//-/r,--q-Â·-- LJO .. I. --1 ., r - /155 1 I' -1 -Â·Â·-- D /. 9 1/ -Â« C R'-1,#zf,:2,15LT*,b~Th,-222,3'-- 1IL918~ 16i=~--3 4 i- 0 -- - 74&re#AC & 7~-.--- -r - it . ---Â»9\911UB?199-- vi,~*i>t----e*~1 j,4 11- -21 P 4,-f-224Â« / 2 AffÂ·94-~11>1 -\ 0% /,125, , p ''r/*0.-'-J*47 4 - .r-.Ll - ~ 74----- ---1~Â·4 -~Â·--Llit<:43*Jh L - 40 -/- r D .1.-2747 L> /- ~*L.r-*- 1 111 9,4992.- --- Sa--4 Y 7- HAN,Ll r, _i r \ 0 -- \--Â£22>---/------23Â«-- ns---- Â»Â»44 --Â·- ---------- 8048 ---- (ID t? 4 17' 0 - 1 F ~ /1 'A \, 1 1?t<.1 ._aÂ· CV' CO 1 -- 111 :0,1Â»2Â»-7 -- U.f, e / 37 37 j.,5 v- - - 4 - -2-12_BUA14-2--~r-~ <. / 7 /Â»64/ li .....rer---~Z_=801[)--iUl. ~ -dn: * * .4470 f f k \ 4.1 0 -1/1:13449 -7- if \11 â‚¬L. 6. -1 'b/ ./Â«04. ,>737.1,4,/3-'.** 22."31 -,.,~ ~ P =u---- 8032 - , ~ --iu- -*#27â‚¬2 620$10}4-~=.iu~~;-eFF~-'f--__----Â·----~15*i- -" 2--Clt--~.--r- 1 , ceirrzou_n -- -i'23~Jz,e~&5% - I# E~ AL 4 4,%\.2-4.. - ---- 1 4 4 --iqufff/'m/64730*---.-c---5Â¢A=. i~,p:f';~~~~fÂ»,~7'~/4~~~~~ ~f / - --- -- -- 111 J.i J F L .. -1 ---- Â»-0 \13 --- Sll il 1:r Li-1.1 , EEC 1 11 Pi.4 9 0 21_ -__- ill '' LJ - .a: f_L-- Â«~~t NOR,LCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTÂ« PLAN " 5L2 j = 10 - 0 .1 ,-...... Jl~.-4 --- CIM 6, Lge-eze (CCE) Â· 0&9 opinm'eibe . ADvome p UD 41 ' 'MxogÂ·0'8 .rl.ki,~.