The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 060104June 1,2004 f \ f Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Junelst,2004 5:30 pm Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road 12:00 pm Commission Site Tour (Meet at the Community Development Department to visit any of the application sites as requested by Commission members) 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda in Council Chambers) and discussion of meeting decorum with Town Attorney. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA (Please note that all times provided are estimates only) 1. Call to Order at 5:30 pm 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the May 18th, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] VI. PUD Amendment (5:35pm - 6:35pm) Public Hearing Property Location: Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East ApplicanUOwner: Jay Peterson [Tab 2] Description: Jay K. Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of duplex and triplex zoning. The proposed amendment is to change the zoning to single family and downzone the total dwelling units of the properties to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) separate lots. The proposed PUD amendment will not only change the zoning of these four lots, it will also change the existing access conditions. Currently, lots 89 and 90 are only accessible from Wildridge Road East (and also share a reciprocal access easement along the right of way frontage of both lots). Lots 54 and 55 are likewise only accessible for access from Longsun Lane as currently entitled. Access to the 8 lots is proposed to occur exclusively from Longsun Lane. Also, the existing open space (non-developable areas) are proposed to be reconfigured with this amendment. VII. Appeals Ordinance (6:35pm - 6:50pm) Public Hearing Topic: Amend Avon Municipal Code to consolidate the appeals process Applicant: Town of Avon [Tab 3] Posted on May 28th, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Description: The proposed ordinance would amend Titles 2,15 and 17 of the Avon Municipal Code as it relates to appeals from decisions of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council recommended adoption of this ordinance on the first reading at their May 11 th, 2004 meeting and are referring it to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review. Second Reading (and adoption) is scheduled for the June 8th, 2004 Town Council meeting. Vlll. Final Design Plan (6:50pm- 7:00pm) Property Location: Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/ 5170 Longsun Lane Applicant. Lynn Fritzlen Owner: Robert Moehring [Tab 4] Description: Lynn Fritzlen is proposing a "mountain lodge" style duplex residence on Longsun Lane. The building is approximately 9,636 square feet in size and each unit features an attached 2-car garage. Proposed materials include wood siding, stucco, and stone. A Variance application for retaining walls in the front setback and a sketch design was approved at your April 6,2004 Commission meeting. IX. Final Design Plan (7:00pm - 7:10pm) Property: Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5749 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Miramonti Architect PC Owner: Frank Hamel [Tab 5] Description: The applicant is proposing this final design plan for an uphill lot on Wildridge Road East in Wildridge. The design is for a custom single-family residence. The residence is approximately 3,500 square feet featuring stucco, natural wood, and asphalt shingles. A sketch design was approved at your May 4th,2004 meeting. A Variance was approved at your May 18th meeting for the proposed boulder walls in the front setback. X. Sketch Design Plan (7:10pm - 7:25pm) Propedy: Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2100 Long Spur & 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop Applicant: Phil Matsen Owner: Phil Matsen [Tab 6] Description: Phil Matsen has resubmitted a duplex design for the intersection of Long Spur and Saddle Ridge Loop roads in Wildridge. The previous sketch/final design plan was denied at your May 4th, 2004meeting. The design has been modified since the last submittal with material changes and architectural interest being added to all building elevations. Proposed materials include stucco siding, wood trim, cultured stone, fieldstone, and asphalt shingles. XI. Sketch Design Plan (7:25pm- 7:40pm) Properly Location: Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD/ 1910 Hurd Lane Applicant: Architectural Services PC Owner: Nancy & Mauri Nottingham [Tab 7] Description: Architectural Services PC is proposing a single-family residence on Hurd Lane. The building is approximately 2,903 sq. ft. in size, with a 574 sq. ft. garage and 1919 sq. ft. unfinished basement. The style of this house will emulate a country farmhouse with 10:12 roof pitches, horizontal siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. XII. Minor Project - Fence (7:40pm - 7:50pm) Property Location: Lot 8, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision/4720 Eaglebend Drive; ApplicanVowner: Catherine Bentley [Tab 8] Posted on May 28% 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Description: The applicant is requesting the approval of a four-foot metal fence in the rear of her property. The fence is proposed at four feet tall to compliment the existing railing on the deck above the proposed "courtyard" area. Attached you will find a site plan and some recent photographs showing the approximate location of the proposed fence and the design of the existing metal railing. XIII. Comprehensive Plan Update and Public Input (7:50pm- 8:00pm) Topic: Comprehensive Plan Update Applicant: Town of Avon [Tab 9] Description: Staff will update the Commission on the progress of the Comprehensive Plan project. The public is invited to attend and submit oral and written comments on what issues they consider important to address. XIV. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) XV. Adjourn (8:00pm) Posted on May 28*,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2004 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. Earlier in the day, Patty McKenny, Town Clerk, swore in Phil Struve as a Planning and Zoning Commissioner. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There was one amendment to the agenda to bring two points under Other Business to the beginning of this meeting. The first item was a discussion with Phil Matsen on concepts regarding the Sketch Plan for Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, 2100 Longspur and 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop, that received denial at the previous Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting and review of the on-site mock up previewed during today's site tour of City Market so that timely direction may be provided to the builders regarding colors. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Karow motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the May 4, 2004, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioner Struve abstaining due to his absence. VI. Other Business A. With reference to the Amendment to the agenda, Phil Matsen approached the podium regarding his project on Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, 2100 Longspur and 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop that was denied at the last Planning and Zoning Meeting. Mr. Matsen was unable to attend the meeting and is looking for direction from the Commission on the project. The east side of the duplex will be his primary residence. Without drawings in hand, Commissioner Trueblood recollected that it was too similar to other residences in the area and voiced concern that Sketch Plan and Final Design Review were presented together. Commissioner Didier thought that the entry of the home needed to be enhanced. Commissioner Karow thought the project looked too similar to other homes in the immediate area and he recalled denying another project in the area for the same reason. Mr. Matsen asked what made it similar and Commissioner Karow said the exterior presentation and the floor plans. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\051804.doc Page 1 0 f 6 Chairman Evans felt it was a redone plan, thought the unit at the opposite corner from this location was a duplicate, he felt the design was boring, and the north elevation was too massive with its back up to other homes. Commissioner Smith voiced concern that there were too many just like it. Commissioner Savage liked his product but it is too similar to others, thought the east elevation was great end thought Mr. Matsen could do better. Chairman Evans thought the break up of the massing would be beneficial and that the plans submitted were technically incorrect. Chairman Evans felt there were better designs available for this site and he suggested that perhaps a color board would be beneficial. B. City Market mock up colors were discussed. Tambi Katieb provided the colors to the commissioners and discussed how commercial projects typically do not submit final colors until the project is underway. All blue trim areas currently on the City Market will now be done in brown. Commissioner Trueblood thought the colors were okay and will look better than what they had. Commissioner Didier doesn't like the body color tone and would like to see something different. Commissioners Karow and Evans thought the colors were within the guidelines. Commissioners Smith, Struve and Savage were okay with the selections presented. A vote was called and all commissioners were in favor except for Commissioner Didier. The fixtures and light bump outs are to be red and the commissioners found this acceptable. VII. Sketch Design Plan Lot 11, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5720 Wildridge Road East Owner: Charlie Viola Applicant: Eric Johnson Architect The applicant is proposing this sketch design plan for an uphill lot on Wildridge Road East in Wildridge. The design is for a custom single-family residence. The residence is approximately 3,500 square feet featuring stucco, natural wood, and asphalt shingles. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Eric Johnson, architect, approached the podium. He began with the site's difficult access and the use of the boulder walls to reduce the site's impact of grade. The site's 15 feet of elevation gain necessitates the use of boulder walls. Mr. Johnson asked that a boulder wall be permitted, to access the site, that is 2 to 6 feet above the asphalt of Wildridge Road East in order to keep the driveway. Grading on the site is unavoidable, but kept to a minimum with the design. He mentioned that the side boulder wall might be eliminated. Commissioner Savage liked the design and asked to see the color board. Mr. Johnson will be utilizing two stucco colors to eliminate mass. Commissioner Smith asked about the retaining wall not being structural and Mr. Katieb responded that it was not necessary as the wall was less than four feet in height. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\051804.doc Page 2 of 6 Commissioner Karow agreed with the staff report. Commissioner Trueblood liked the layout. Commissioner Evans agreed with commissioner comments and as a condition of Final Design suggested there be some catch type curbing along the lower area. Commissioner Smith motioned to approve Sketch Design Plan, Lot 11, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5720 Wildridge Road East, with 4 conditions as stated in the Staff Report. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and all were in favor. The motion passed unanimously. VI11. Variance Application Lots 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5749 Wildridge Road East Meremonte Duplex Owner: Frank Hamel Applicant: Gerald Meremonte A Variance application for Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge is proposed for boulder walls located within the front-yard setback. This Variance must be approved in order for a final design to be approved for the proposed site design. A sketch design for this project was approved at the May 4th, 2004 Commission meeting. Access to the property is difficult, with existing grades equal to 25% along the entrance to the site. This Variance seeks relief from the Town's setback requirement. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No members of the public voiced concern. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner review began with Commissioner Didier asking Norm Wood, Town Engineer, his opinion and Mr. Wood felt is was necessary for site access. Commissioner Karow moved to approved the Variance Application, Lots 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5749 Wildridge Road East, Meremonte Duplex, as outlined in Resolution No. 04-15, with the two conditions as listed in the Staff Report. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. IX. Special Review Use Lot 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/910 Nottingham Road Owner: Vail Resorts F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\051804.doc Page 3 0 f 6 Applicant: Vail Recreation District The applicant is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) Permit in order to continue the operation of Vail Recreation District's indoor sports and arts gymnasium in the Mountain Center Building located at 910 Nottingham Road. This use is proposed to operate until October 1, 2006, when it will be relocated back to the Town of Vail. This establishment has been in operation at this location since August of 2002 and continues to operate on the site today. This facility was established as a temporary use in cooperation with the Vail Recreation District, with the understanding that a Special Review Use Permit would be required to continue temporary use beyond two years. Kenneth Kovalchik presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Savage asked how much of the building is occupied and Mr. Katieb responded that it is mostly vacant, at th:e time, with Vogelman, Capco and the VRD as current tenants. Commissioner Evans voiced that he didn't see a parking problem when dropping off his children there. Commissioner Didier questioned the new construction in the area and Mr. Katieb mentioned that it was not going to affect this space in particular. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No members of the public voiced concern. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Dominic Maureillo represented the client, Vail Resorts, and asked the Commission if they had any questions. Commissioner Karow moved for approval of the Special Review Use, Lot 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 910 Nottingham Road, Resolution No. 04-15, with its two conditions as outlined in the Staff Report. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and it passed unanimously. X. Lighting Ordinance Adoption Regulation affecting all property within the Town. Applicant: Town of Avon This is a resolution recommending that Town Council adopt a Town wide Lighting Ordinance that would minimize light pollution and preserve access to a clear sky at night. Numerous public meetings and discussions have been conducted at recent Commission meetings. The new lighting standards would be added to the Building Code and a Users Guide will be available to assist residents and F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\051804.doc Page 4 of 6 businesses in understanding the ordinance and to help identify compliant lighting fixture options. Tambi Katieb reviewed the updates of the ordinance. Specifically was the applicability to three years, the curfew of sign lighting, temporary lighting was addressed and separated out the permanent lighting, and a lighting plan for residential was discussed. Mr. Katieb recommended the commission approve Resolution No. 04-14, Lighting Ordinance and forward it on to Town Council for their public hearing, discussion and final adoption. Commissioner Trueblood asked about a variance for this ordinance and how it would be handled. This ordinance is being included to the Building Code and as such there are appeals available via the code. The Commission requested to clarify the variance process in the Ordinance. Commissioner Evans commented that the second page, section 15.30.020 (c) regarding sports lighting should be amended to add 'or' rather than 'and' for event lighting in the sports lighting requirements. Commissioner Didier voiced comments for the Town Council that there was not much public and business input for this ordinance and he felt that the public might be alarmed by the lack of inclusion to the process of approval. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED Dominic Mauriello thought the ordinance did not address commercial lighting. He asked about the height of poles and its lighting. He commented regarding the need for exemptions for sign lighting for businesses. Commissioner Karow asked about a curfew of lighting on residential locations. The issue of emergency vehicles and finding residential locations might be problematic. Timing of sign shut off was discussed. Commissioner Evans suggested incorporating the items and sending the ordinance to Council. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Enforcement of the ordinance was discussed. Commissioner Karow moved to approve the Resolution 04-14, recommending to Town Council the adoption of Chapter 15.30, Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, formally amending the Town Code, as presented in the Staff Report with the amendments that pertain to Section 15.30.020 (c), to be amended to include all commercial and residential sign lighting and lighting not used for safety purposes must be turned off by 11:00 pm or no later than one hour past the posted closing hours; Item Number 8, all permanent sports and event lighting shall be equipped with a glare package; and a variance process will be copied in that is similar to the sign code. Commissioner Didier seconded the approval. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\051804.doc Page 5 of 6 XI. Comprehensive Plan Update and Public Input Applicant: Town of Avon Staff and Commission members will review materials discussed earlier in the day at the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee meeting. There was no discussion or public input on this issue. XII. Other Business Wildridge resident, Greg Samson, who wanted to get a screen fence around his hot tub for privacy and to insure the safety of neighborhood children who have been playing with and around the hot tub, contacted Ken Kovalchik. His neighbor submitted a signed letter of approval for the screen. Mr. Kovalchik sought guidance from the Commission. The Commissioners determined this project did not need to go through a minor project application. Commissioner Evans requested the screen be painted with a color that is compatible to the deck or building. Commissioner Evans asked that a member of Town Staff be included in all meetings with Mark Donaldson. Builders Work Session was discussed and how the process is going. Staff has been meeting internally to facilitate discussion on our existing processes. Another builders work session is being held at the next Town Council Meeting to follow up the discussion on May 25,2004. XIII. Adjourn Commissioner Trueblood made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Didier seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 6:55pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\051804.doc Page 6 0 f 6 Fi@Rfolth:*ALE!23 Staff Report ,~,-!m/7 PUD Amendment AVO Z COLORADO June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 26,2004 Project type PUD AMENDMENT to the WILDRIDGE PUD Legal description Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Current zoning Lot 54: Duplex / Lot 55,89,90: Triplex Address 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East Introduction Jay K. Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all o f which are located in Block 4 0 f the Wildridge subdivision. The new PUD is being referenced as the "Western Sage PUD". The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units, and include the following existing and proposed zoning designations. The new lots and proposed zoning represent 8 single family units on 8 independent lots, which do not correspond to the existing lot boundaries and will require a Resubdivision o f the properties. Lot Number Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning New Lots* Lot 54 Duplex Single Family Lots 1&2 Lot 55 Triplex Single Family Lots 2,3&4 Lot 89 Triplex Single Family Lots 7&8 Lot 90 Triplex Single Family Lots 5,6 & 7 Note: There are eight proposed lots that do not correspond to the four existing lot boundaries. Portions of Lots are shared between existing subdivision boundaries, and the PUD will require a Resubdivision to establish the new lot lines proposed. The proposed PUD amendment will not only change the zoning o f these four lots, it will also change the existing access conditions. Currently, lots 89 and 90 are only accessible from Wildridge Road East (and also share a reciprocal access easement along the right o f way frontage ofboth lots). Lots 54 and 55 are likewise only accessible for access from Longsun Lane as currently entitled (Lot 55 is only accessible via a platted access easement from Lot 54). Though the application seeks amendment to the Wildridge PUI) for zoning o f these lots, it is important to categorize the distinct areas that are the larger focus o f this application (and/or the result o f final Council action on the proposal): Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 11 â€¢ The reconfiguration of existing and platted "Non-Developable Area" with the reconfiguration o f the lots and zoning entitlements. â€¢ The "down zoning" of existing duplex and triplex lots to single family dwelling units on separate lots. ' The reconfiguration of existing access to two ofthe four lots, causing all single-family lots to be accessed from an existing cul-de-sac (Longsun Lane) in place of Wildridge Road East and Longsun Lane in combination. With this change is an expected reconfiguration of anticipated traffic patterns for the neighborhood that was originally conceived as a cul-de-sac. m Design and technical considerations of the new lot configuration related to the existing Sewer Easement across Lots 54 and 55. Particular consideration should be given to the buidability o f the lots being proposed. The applicant has submitted a thorough narrative alongside the actual development plan proposal, both attached to this report that should be reviewed in concert with the application. The narrative includes an introduction and a review o f the PUD approval criteria as outlined in Section 17.20.110 (K) of the Avon Municipal Code. The accompanying reduced plans include a cover sheet, topographic survey, preliminary plat, site plan, utility plan, and open space (non- developable area) map. Background & Discussion Benchmark Properties created Wildridge Subdivision in 1979 shortly after the incorporation of the Town of Avon on February 28, 1978. According to the Wildridge Final Plat application for Wildridge and Wildwood Subdivisions, the overall development concept was for "abundant open space recreation areas around lots" with a density of"barely one dwelling unit per acre". The land was identified with no particular hazards for development except in areas with slopes of 40%. The development plan recognized that lot sizes are a function of land slope, buildable area and road access; smaller lots are concentrated on lesser slopes with easy access and larger lots are on steeper slopes where buildable area and access are more restricted. In 1981, the Wildridge Subdivision was completely replatted with a total of 849 planned development units and is the foundation o f the current zoning in Wildridge. Over the years, there have been several PUD Amendments and transferring of development rights. To assist in organizing the application review discussion, this report is being 'categorized' into the four major issues associated with this PUD amendment. 1. Non-Developable Areas and the Wildridge PUD Staff have recently reviewed the Wildridge PUD plat and found a total of 33 lots (out of the entire subdivision) that contain a "non-developable area" within existing lot boundaries. According to the plat note: "No development shall occur on the non-developable area without written specific approval o f the covenants committee and the Town of Avon. Development shall include buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading. Non-developable areas shall be physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state except for approved access and utility easements". Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 11 Of the 33 lots that include a non-developable area designation, approximately 22 have been constructed and 11 remain vacant (including the 4 that are the subject of this application). Of the 22 lots constructed, fifty percent appear to have been constructed below the 'allowable zoning' (i.e. single family built on duplex zoned lots). This application proposes no 'net loss' o f non-developable area, however, it does propose a reconfiguration of the areas to permit the proposal as laid out. Important to also note is that the application proposes to include the entire utility easement into the calculation ofproposed non- developable area. In evaluating the merits o f this application, it is important to recognize the potential change that may occur to all existing non-developable areas currently platted as a result of action on this application. Though there is limited documentation in the original Wildridge PUD application as to the premise o f these areas, the existing plat note language and the actual location of the areas as they exist today appear to have resulted as a consideration of steep slopes, locations of utility easements (sewer, water, and electric), and the creation of open space buffers between private properties and between Wildridge and public lands o f the White River National Forest. This application appears to break the continuity o f non-developable area buffers in order to accommodate site design. 2. "Down-Zoning" of the existing Wildridge PUD & Character of adjacent neighborhood zoning Recently, there have been several PUD Amendments in Wildridge wherein development rights have been legally terminated and the configuration of these lots altered and replatted - the most recent of those include Lot 47/48, Block 1, (Ordinance 02-13); Lot 10/11, Block 2, WR (Ordinance 02-12); and Lot 42/43, Block 4, WR (Ordinance 02-11). None of these proposals included significant alterations to traffic patterns or to existing platted "non-developable areas". In comparison, this application proposes to separate duplex and multifamily dwelling units zoned for eleven dwelling units in total. The new configuration will also reduce density by three dwelling units in total, however, create a visual massing of eight separate structures instead of the four contemplated and approved by the existing PUD. Though it could be argued that the duplex and multi family structures would be o f a size and mass much larger than the proposed single-family homes, the increased disturbances required for each lot and the doubling of buildable 'structures' should be a significant consideration in review of this application. The application contends that there are a significant number of single-family residences constructed in Block 4, and therefore, the 'character' of the existing zoning of these lots (collectively) is not in keeping with the existing zoning o f the neighborhood and the constructed 4, residences. The application states that one of the positive impacts of approval will include... maintaining and enhancing the existing residential quality, character, design, and scale o f the neighborhood". Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 11 To clarify this point, please review the following zoning summary for Wildridge Block 4: Current Zoning: Single-Family Duplex Triplex Fourplex Total Lots 2 77 3 1* Constructed+ 1 53 0 0** Notes: *Lots 42 and 43 rezoned from 2 fourplex lots to 3 duplex lots in 2002. *Lot 64 rezoned from fourplex to duplex in 1988/ Lot 39 zoned fourplex or 2 duplexes per the Wildridge PUD (currently vacant). ** Lot 39 is currently vacant and zoned fourplex. + Constructed does not reflect zoning (i.e. duplex lots constructed with single-family homes) Though the table is not a zoning certification, for purposes o f this report it does demonstrate that that the 'character' of the neighborhood (which staff considers to be Block 4) consists largely of duplex zoning, with a slight variation towards multifamily rather than single-family zoning. This basic application premise may be overstated in this regard, since there is nothing to preclude any of the existing single-family residences (or those currently featuring a lock-off unit to count as a second dwelling unit) from redeveloping the properties to avail themselves to the current zoning and development of the additional dwelling unit. 3. Reconfiguration ofaccess to subject properties, adding of potential additional traffic to Longsun Lane. The application proposes to create an engineering solution to the proposed lot reconfiguration by accessing all lots from Longsun Lane. Longsun Lane currently provides access to Lots 54 and 55 only. Lot 54 is zoned duplex and Lot 55 is zoned triplex for a total of five dwelling units. The application, as proposed with a total of eight single-family lots, would increase traffic by a total o f three dwelling units. The Town Engineer has studied the potential increase in Average Daily Traffic to Longsun Lane as a result o f this proposal, and by standard estimates, each additional dwelling unit will add an average of 6 trips per day on Longsun Lane. This would result in an increase of approximately 18 trips per day according to this estimate, however the Town Engineer estimates the impacts of the change to be minimal due to several down-zonings along Longsun Lane over the years. As currently platted, a shared access easement to Lots 89 and 90 is in place for the use ofboth lots in establishing access to the 2 triplex buildings. This proposal will clearly remove traffic from Wildridge Road East where the access is currently platted and increase traffic on Longsun Lane. Though the net effect may be negligible, the proposed access configuration was not approved in the original plat o f Wildridge. Clearly, the extension of Longsun Lane (or any cul-de-sac within Town) is not without some impacts to those residents that purchased properties under the impression that a limited amount o f development and traffic could be expected by build-out o f their respective neighborhood. As submitted, the extension of Longsun Lane will increase the non-conformity of the current road and require approval o f a variance from subdivision standards because of the increase length and Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 11 total number o f dwelling units served. That application has been filed for review with Town Council. 4. Design of new PUD and technical considerations Although the application appears functional and addresses the PUD Criteria, the most overriding of issues with the application as proposed is the precedent it may set in Wildridge to 'move' not only density, but more importantly, the platted "Non-Developable areas". There is nothing to preclude more developers from requesting the same privilege being sought with this application. The movement o f platted and existing lot restrictions that are relied upon by residents and considered to "add value" to their decision in purchasing residential property and live within the Town is a serious undertaking. It is far more than an exercise in engineering and trading of"like for like". In this case, the trade includes an already platted utility easement to make up the difference. Consequently, the owners of all lots in Wildridge that feature a "non-developable area" (as outlined herein) may elect to move these boundaries to more effectively construct a new home, a remodel of an existing home, or the addition o f un-built density. Though the number o f lots purchased with this restriction does not represent a large majority, it would appear that moving those areas without specific rationale and tangible community benefit may open a "Pandora' s Box" of PUD amendment applications. Additionally, though some may find the triplex zoning out of character with this area of Wildridge, these lots have been zoned and o f public record since the final subdivision plat o f Wildridge was approved in 1981. The fact that some owners have intentionally built less than allowed by zoning (primarily on duplex lots) is a matter o f personal choice and site consideration, and has little to do with the original approval or expressed design for this block of the subdivision. As previously mentioned, while the existing zoning for triplex and duplex units may be considered out o f character, this should be reconciled with the effective reduction o f massing that 4 total buildings would have versus 8 total buildings on 8 total lots. Since triplex units are typically built smaller (as the market dictates), it is estimated by staff that the effective 'bulk' of the existing zoning would be less than the proposed single family residences (proposed as 4,000 square feet of'building area'). The text of application proposes that the actual size of homes shall not exceed 4,000 square feet, and that the 'approximate' home size could range from 2,800 to 3,200 square feet in size. The proposed Longsun Lane extension appears to double the area on the site with slopes o f 40% or steeper. Only two of the proposed lots appear to have access commensurate with the existing access to Lots 54 and 55. As a result o f the proposal to extend Longsun Lane, it appears to staff that at least 3 0 f the lots will be difficult to construct, with access equal to or possibly worse than existing access to Lots 89 and 90. Because there is little room for error on these lots (average effective depth of 80 feet and width of 115 feet), the future homeowners may deal with less than desirable parking and loading circumstances. As already cited, the increased length and dwelling units served by the revised cul-de-sac will further exacerbate the non-conformity of Longsun Lane. Separate applications for Preliminary Subdivision and Variance from the Subdivision Codes is being reviewed by the Town Engineer, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 11 and should the PUD Amendment be approved, a final plat reconfiguring the new lot layout and private access drive would require approval by the Town Council. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution is consistent with the public interest. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The fundamental reason for having a Comprehensive Plan is to generally communicate where and how land uses may and will occur in the Town. The land use plan is based upon these goals and polices. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. This proposed PUD Amendment produces a "mixed bag" of compliance with the following goals and polices o f the Town Comprehensive Plan based upon the following: Policy All Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. The current Wildridge subdivision did not contemplate development Of additional single-family dwelling units on any of the lots in this proposal. In fact, the original Wildridge subdivision appears to have specifically created larger lots on steeper slopes, because the buildable area and access was identified as being more restrictive. This also included the placement of 'non-developable area' restrictions in Blocks 3 and 4. While the downzoning appears supportable in concept, the revised configuration of the lots and the requisite loading of traffic onto an existing cut-de-sac is not appropriate for those in the neighborhood that did not anticipate this additional trajfic. Likewise, those neighbors that purchased homes in proximity to these lots (particularly Lots 89 and 90) did not expect the non-developable areas to be changed and may have relied on these areas as 'view' corridors or development buffers established by way of these platted areas. Poliev Al.3 Flexible zoning such as PUD should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. The applicant is proposing to improve the character of the neighborhood in this application. In addition, they are proposing to a uniform treatment Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 11 of the homes architecturally (though not adopting specific design guidelines). Additionally, the proposal calls for limited building areas with a 4,000 square foot maximum building area and a 40% maximum site coverage. The development standards being proposed are more flexible on Lots 1-4 to accommodate the single-family residences on the new lot configuration, which includes a 10'0" front-yard setback rather than the standard 25'0" front-yard setback. The purpose of this front setback is to accommodate drainage, snow removal, adequate maneuvering and site distance for vehicles and maintenance. To vary from the existing development and subdivision standards (by a private road) to create new single-family properties has not been adequately demonstrated in the application, and only appears to be a by- product of the engineering plans and the existing physical constraints. Policv Al.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. As aforementioned, the purpose of creating the Wildridge PUD was to create a residential subdivision that focused on the preservation of open space, limited density and avoidance of development on steep slopes and in respect to natural drainage patterns. As evidenced by the survey, a large portion of the collective property under review exceeds 30% slope. The most significant issue is the 'swapping' of platted non-developable areafor a like amount of non- developable area with no rationale behind doing so. Open space areas in Wildridge should be reasonably relied upon by existing areas as remaining intact and as originally platted. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. Again, a good portion of this project is proposed on 30% slopes and demonstrates that in order to improve the access and create the new lots development and subdivision standards must be modified to accomplish. Goal Cl Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. The application contends that it will provide for a single-family residential development that will maintain and enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Also, it notes that "the present and project supply of multiplefamily structures... has been satisfied". The Town of Avon affordable housing program utilizes the median family income limit for a four-person household in determining eligibility for deed restricted rental or sale housing. In 2004, HUD adjusted this number to $76,700 per year. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 11 The average home size in the application is anticipated between 2,800 and 3,200 square feet. Though the application correctly notes that needs.for lower-income and seasonal workers may currently be satisfied, it does not guarantee the nature of the single-family housing proposed and more specifically in the Wildridge subdivision. It fails to offer or provide any assurances or guarantee that the single family homes provided will meet the stated goal of providing ".. for middle income and year-round residents . Without any assurances or price guarantees, staffwould consider the construction of multifamily and duplex dwellings to more adequately meet these needs in Wildridge Goal Fl Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space central elements to its identity and structure. Open space areas in Wildridge should be reasonably relied upon by existing areas as remaining intact and as originally platted. The proposal appears to assign a value judgment to the platted non-developable areas by way of reallocating the same amount in a different configuration on the lot. Staff does not support the movement of such areas. regardless ofthe ability to compensate a similar area on the same property. Policy Fl.2 Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. The non-developable areas in Wildridge provide platted 'breaks' in development for visual relief and steep slope protection. In Blocks 3 and 4, it is apparent that they also serve as a development buffer to Tract H, which is designated as "Open Space, Drainage, and Access . To remove or otherwise alter the existing open space does not appear to meet the original intent of environmental and visual buffers. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The application may meet the design guidelines of the Town, however, the suggested treatment of the single-family units is not proposed as a 'design guideline' specific to the project. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. Though there may be merit in the application of single-family homes in this block of Wildridge in place o f multi family dwellings, the requisite changes to traffic patterns, bulk and massing, existing buffer zones, and character o f the area are not positively affected. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposed uses do not appear to provide a compatible and efficient relationship with the surrounding uses and existing residences, particularly on Longsun Lane. Several of the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 11 lots proposed are highly constrained and may create access and loading problems for future residents o f these properties i f approved as submitted. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. The application does not appear to negatively affect a known geologic hazard (no documentation has been provided) 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The site plan and location ofbuildings and open space do not appear to be responsive to natural features or the existing PUD. This may include an impact to the overall aesthetic quality of the community, since the number of structures will double i f the rezoning is approved. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. Please refer to the attached memo from the Town Engineer. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The landscaping will be reviewed through the design process should the PUD be approved, but it appears as though it can be designed to preserve the views and function of the Western Sage subdivision as proposed. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. The phasing plan submitted appears to be a logical approach to the PUD goals; however, the build out of each lot is not specified to occur in any particular order. A preliminary subdivision has been submitted in conjunction with the application for review by Town Council. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. Adequate facilities are available to service the proposal, and the new 'extension' of Longsun Lane is being applied for as a private road. No extension to municipal services is being requested by the applicant. Please refer to the attached memo from the Town Engineer for specific comments on the proposed utility and drainage improvements required. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. The proposal appears to comply with capacities originally contemplated in the first Wildridge PUD approval. 12. Development Standards Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 10 of 11 Development standards have been submitted for the PUD amendment as proposed. A few technical issues, such as the clarification of buildable area and/or maximum buildable square footage and a clarification o f building setbacks by lot (in the standards, not referencing the development plan) are required. Should the PUD amendment be approved, staff would request additional notes be brought into these standards from the existing Wildridge PUD Development Plan (Final Subdivision Plat). Staff Recommendation Staff commends the applicant for making his own efforts to inform and invite public comment on the proposal outside ofthe requisite public notice process. Though the correspondence sent (Section VI of the application) to interested parties does not fully describe the extent and significant amendments proposed (such as the revised access from Longsun Lane and the reconfiguration of existing non-developable areas), it does make an effort to begin a dialogue with those most affected in the immediate neighborhood. This PUD Amendment application presents significant stumbling blocks for the staff to recommend approval, which have been outlined in this report. The issue of utmost importance is the precedent being established by this proposal without any guidelines or policies for doing so. This precedent is most clearly related to revising access and increasing traffic on a pre-existing cul-de-sac, and the moving of platted non-developable areas in Wildridge. While the application makes a reasonable case for 'character' issues, it fails to provide evidence that the single-family proposal can be constructed without substantial changes to the existing access and open space configuration (which includes the counting o f an existing utility easement as 'open space') as proposed. That the proposal can be engineered to 'fit' as submitted does not compel staff to support the amendment itself. Along these lines, the technical issues outlined herein associated with steep slopes, buildability, housing goals, subdivision variance, development standards, etc. are secondary to the overriding issues of approving this type of amendment to an existing PUD in the Town. When contemplating the implications o f changed policy direction and revised zoning entitlements in a rapidly growing community such as Avon, staff considers the dependability of public development documents that the community relies upon in investing in our municipality. Be it in Wildridge, Benchmark or the Village (at Avon), to dramatically change or deviate from the approved zoning and development plan of a project (particularly in a residential neighborhood as mature as Wildridge) requires that the decision be made carefully, transparently, and in full consideration of those most affected. For these reasons, staff cannot recommend approval o f this PUD amendment as proposed. We would recommend that the Planning & Zoning Commission hear the application and public comment, and forward this recommendation to Town Council. The Town Council should consider the applicant' s testimony and application, the public comment and neighborhood input, and at the same time be mindful o f the implications o f a decision such as this on future policy makers and future residents o f the Town. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 11 of 11 Recommended Motion " I move to approve Resolution 04-17, recommending to the Town Council to deny the "Western Sage PUD" for Lots 54,55, 89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, as more specifically described in the application dated May 4,2004." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectf~ly submitted, ,*Â»u-2nLI --) Tambi Katieb, AICP Report Attachments: A. PUD Application dated May 4,2004 (Revised) B. PUD Development Plans for "Western Sage PUD" dated May 6,2004 C. Memo from Town Engineer to Planning & Zoning Commission dated May 26,2004 D. Compilation ofPublic Comments Received (to date) Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-17 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE WILDRIDGE PUD FOR LOTS 54,55,89 AND 90, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO HEREAS, Jay K. Peterson has applied for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to create eight (8) single-family lots on Lots 54,55,89 and 90, Block 4 known as the "Western Sage PUD", as more specifically described in the application dated May 4,2004; and HEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town o f Avon; and ~~~HEREAS, said application fails to comply with the PUD criteria set forth in Section 17.20.110, which include the following: a. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives has not been met as required by 17.20.110H(1). b. The overall design concept of this PUD Amendment fails to conform to the existing non-developable areas with the proposed building locations. The movement o f these areas will alter the character and be detrimental to the neighborhood. 17.20.110H(2) c. The existing development rights on Lots 54,55,89 and 90 are compatible with the immediate scale and character o f existing properties, and the existing access conditions, and platted non-developable areas, while the proposed decrease o f density to 8 single-family residences are not compatible as applied for. 17.20.110H(3) d. This PUD Amendment application is not responsive to the existing topography and natural features of Wildridge. 17.20.110H(4) e. This PUD Amendment application does not create functional or optimized open space that is responsive to existing views and buffers to open space. 17.20.110H(8) f. This PUD will further increase the non-conformity o f Longsun Lane, and the traffic and number of dwelling units projected onto the existing cul-de-sac. 17.20.110H(11) ~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends denial o f the application for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to rezone Lots 54,55,89 and 90, Block 4 from duplex and triplex zoning for an existing total of eleven (11) dwelling units to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) single-family lots (Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 & 8), reducing three (3) development rights, as more specifically described in the application dated May 4,2004. ADOPTED THIS 1st DAY OF June, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-17 L54,55,89,90 B4 WR PUD Amendment denial.doc Memo TO: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Norman Wood, Town Englneer I Â«70 Date: May 26,2004 Re: Western Sage P.U.D. - Preliminary Subdivision Plan A Resubdivision ofLots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane and 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East Summary: Jay k. Peterson has submitted application for Subdivision Preliminary Plan approval in conjunction with a PUD Amendment Application for Lots 54,55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge. The proposed PUD Amendment would convert a duplex lot and three tri-plex lots to eight single-family lots. The Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application shows the proposed layout ofthe lots, street extension to provide access, and water and sewer service extensions to service the new lots. The purpose ofthis review is to determine whether the proposed subdivision conforms to these and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines and whether it represents good planning practice. The issues identified with respect to the proposed Preliminary Plan for the resubdivision of existing lots include: 1. Non-Developable Area - A note on the Wildridge Plat states, "No development shall occur on the Non-Developable Area without written specific approval ofthe Covenants Committee and the Town of Avon. Development shall include buildings, fences, signs, roads and grading. Non-Developable Areas shall be physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state except for approved access and utility easements." The existing Wildridge Plat shows a significant Non- Developable Area on the Lots proposed for resubdivision and the proposed resubdivision includes building areas, roads, grading and utilities within those existing Non-Developable Areas. The Preliminary Plan proposes to replace the existing Non-Developable Areas with a relocated Non- Developable Area ofequivalent size. However, the redefined Non-Developable area does not appear match the apparent intent ofthe originally defined area. The original Non- I:\Engineering\Subdivision\Wildridge\Western Sage PUD\Prel Subd Comments.Doc Developable Area appeared to establish a continuous expansion ofan open space tract in a major drainage way. The proposed Non-Developable Area appears to break this continuity and loop it around roads and buildings to be constructed in the previously protected area. Approval to change the Non-Developable Area from that shown ofthe Wildridge Plat should include asa minimum, approval of a Resolution by the Town Council specificajly approving development in the identified Non-Developable Area and establishing a redefined Non-Developable Area on the Final Plat for the Resubdivision. 2. Longsun Lane (Cul-de-Sac) - Longsun Lane currently is approximately 1720 feet long and services 55 residential units per the original Wildridge PUD. PUD Amendments have reduced this to 51 residential units per current zoning. The proposed PUD Amendment and Resubdivision would extend Longsun Lane approximately 600 feet and increase the residential units serviced to 54 from the current 51 units. Town subdivision regulations limit cul-de-sac lengths to 1000 feet and to service a maximum of20 residential units. The 600 foot extension is proposed as a private street and the 54 total residential units serviced by the cul-de-sac with the 3 additional residential units added by the proposed PUD and Preliminary Plan is stillless than the residential units served under the original Wildridge PUD. The impacts ofthis change should be minimal or essentially non-existent, but they do increase the non-conformity ofthe current subdivision and will require a variance approval. The Applicant has included an application for variance from the subdivision regulations for the increased length ofcul-de-sac and additional residential units serviced by the cul-de-sac. 3. Buildable Areas - The proposed extension ofLongsun Lane appears to approximately double the area on the site with slopes of40% or steeper. This has the effect ofreducing the actual building area significantly on some ofthe proposed lots. In addition it appears that access to at least three ofthe proposed lots will be about equal to or possibly worse than the existing access situation from Wildridge Road East to Lots 89 and 90. Only two ofthe proposed lots appear to have access at least as good as apparent access to Lots 54 and 55 from the existing cul-de-sac on Longsun Lane. Based upon this assessment, access to the property is at least as good ifnot better under the current subdivision than under the proposed resubdivision. 4. Drainage Easements - The proposed road extension plans include a culvert that drains across proposed Lot 1. This will require the addition of a drainage easement on the final plat. This drainage easement will divide the proposed building area on this lot and will significantly reduce the effective building site area. 1:\Engineering\Subdivision\Wildridge\Western Sage PUD\Prel Subd Comments.Doc â€¢ Page 2 5. Other Issues - The proposed resubdivision appears to adequately address the following: a. Water & Sewer - Proposed improvements appear to be sumcient subject to approval by Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sewer District. b. Street Extension - Application indicates that Longsun Lane extension will be a private street and as such will not increase operation and maintenance costs ofthe Town. A homeowners association must be established to provide for street maintenance prior final approval and recording of a final plat. The proposed street section appears to conform to Town Subdivision regulations with the exceptions identified above requiring variance approval. Recommendation: The above issues have been presented for your information and should be considered in your evaluation of the Proposed PUD. The final recommendations with respect the proposed resubdivision will be tailored to correspond with the final action related to the PUD. 1:\Engmeenng\Subdivision\Wildridge\Western Sage PUD\Prel Subd Comments.Doc â€¢Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant, Jay K. Peterson, is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the four residential properties located at 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane and 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East, which according to the Town of Avon, are legally described as Lots 54,55,89, & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. According to the Wildridge PUD, the four residential properties are currently zoned for three triplexes and one duplex for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units. The applicant has met with a number of the surrounding neighbors and residents of Wildridge to gain their input on the amendment. In response to these meetings, the amendment application has twice been amended to respond to the desires of the neighbors and residents of Wildridge. The proposed amendment will have a significant positive impact on the neighborhood surrounding the development site by; â€¢ down-zoning the properties and permanently reducing the residential density in the neighborhood, â€¢ preserving existing views from adjacent properties, increasing the amount of open space and non-developable areas in the neighborhood, and; â€¢ maintaining and enhancing the existing residential quality, character, design, and scale of the neighborhood. Of greatest importance, however, through the approval of the PUD amendment, the goals and policy objectives, as outlined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, will be achieved to the benefit of the community. The specific amendment includes re-subdividing Lots 54, 55, 89, & 90 and creating eight (8) new single-family residential lots. The new residential lots will vary in size from over two-thirds of an acre to nearly one (1) acre in size. Future development of single-family residences will be restricted to a maximum of 4,000 square feet of building area with a minimum landscape area requirement of 35% of the lot area and maximum site coverage allowances of 40%. These development standards are more stringent than existing allowances, and as such, ensure the least amount o f impact to the existing natural landforms and vegetation of the site. The new single-family residences will be developed in the traditional-style of mountain architecture. The new homes will be complimented with a mixture of stone, stucco, wood siding, and heavy timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting. Two and four car garages will be carefully located on each of the lots to minimize the unintended consequences of providing vehicular access to the home sites. 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 The key elements ofthe amendment include: â€¢ Compliance with the goals and policies as defined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan â€¢ A permanent reduction in residential density as a result of the down- zoning â€¢ Additional pedestrian access to Town of Avon owned open space â€¢ Preservation of the existing residential scale and design of the neighborhood â€¢ Protection of existing views from adjacent properties as a result of clustering development down on the lots â€¢ Preservation of the existing residential character of the neighborhood through the elimination of multiple-family structures. 2 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 ZONING ANALYSIS Existing Conditions Proposed Development (Residential Duplex/ (Residential Single-Family) Residential Low Density) Square Footage Breakdown of Proposed Uses: N/A 4,000 square feet per lot Parking: 3 spaces per unit/2 spaces per unit 3 spaces per unit plus required guest parking Maximum Densities: Lot 54 - 2 dwelling units 1 dwelling unit per lot Lot 55 - 3 dwelling units Lot 89 - 3 dwelling units Lot 90 - 3 dwelling units (11 dwelling units total) (8 dwelling units total) Minimum Lot Size: 0.25 acres/0.25 acre 27,750 square feet Maximum Building Height: 35 feet/35 feet 35 feet Minimum Building Setbacks: Front: 25 feet/25 feet 7 10 feet/25 feet Side: C-* 7.5 feet/7.5 feedâ„¢f-D, / 66*4h o~Iart , 7.5 feet Rear: 10 feet/10 feet 20 feet Maximum Site Coverage: 50%/50% 40% Minimum ...I/Â¥ 1 /1 Landscape Area: 25%/25% 35% j Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 0 06 1 : I i b m I 0 , 10 0 ' I. . 1 1 ' Ill O , , 9 , ul 10 L.J -- 7 - i 17-1 - = 6.-}f ~ :*w..1-'-_ -54#x: I .d---4 ( . 8(/)3n -WIA' ., 0-,- 0 --J CC--1- )-Joa) - I. 2 2 2 112 ir V =11 --1 . r I L i :3Â«m & 1 / \'\ 11 e guir 3 9/ r. ,// S>iÂ»,11 j , 14,/ / --~441/1734 1 1 !10 / 1 1 '' ' '' 4#* 4, t'.:-M i:,li 11% \1 2:,\1 1 r * d %12 j r z 4.-1-0. . hit! f T f I , / / : / ~,2 4 I, ..1.I '?.1 11,1 // 1,1 ," 44.1 11. 4 iti Ii'Vi i;? a AB *&5 8 9 4â€¢ 8 :1 'ST i j;ill ' 2*2 VAN F * 8 * 1 .i'. r:,1Â· 1 i e'Â· i # 4 Â·, . 0 0Â£ 0~ ; ,: i '/3 Â·' ' 13; '. -Clh\'t :\ 3. .it,i t. .3.8 3 3'-;"'F:14-: 21[rl.,1 4 ",0,14, - iii IRN{ i f i J , 7'''-tz ~11*.4,4- -. -29:1i4.-ILL- r q i ,~ i :i'. ~ .ji/,foÂ· 5 , 8.1,=uÂ·: /VT&*. 0 1- 1 - 3,= I ME 002. s s :=4 0 : 14,Z 3,296 4 4 16- 2 0 Â· 9.Â· I I ./: I Z 11 ./ Ill!'// iâ€¢/f 1 1 1 1 , . 1% 1 11, IE :, t '' i ; .1\96~\11,;1.1 iti: ~jÂ·QT< x,13 t.,5 1. 1"1-44,0 , 1 . 1 1 15 6 Z 3 1 1 1/ 00 9 ' ft' iikÂ·Â·~~;Aybr-Lf.k'!Lft.:,i:.11 'IN' Ill:wir):1.1''ll.b..IN'01 \1 , 1 11111" 1 3 , I 1 1\ 2, \40\ :, :111 1~~flt'1[44- All~~,11; 1,#':' ~j')1IT:'tlitttl'.1.*1 4%.. ILl ~\' '1\'n,1, .1,111 , 1.-'.-i:\ --%1!/ 1 151 . Nvl'' â€¢,Â·1;~' 'Itt: '' ' i' , ' , ' Â· .':11 : 1: .i.1 'i: 111: ' :.N. '* 'Al 1 51 li: ' i \ ' . 11 ' Vt , A li'1111.2,; 1 lili If \ 1 , 1 1 1 Â·,4,40'1 \1;:11!:1~11; Â©,fli 1 n: di,1,11' il ,!3011, q.r//./l 1. f 11"111:U.t.,. ./01Â· i , .1,:,~g . ' 1 ' 'i' / : i~ 14< .8.,li t': 1. '1'~,1;1 : 1 . 1 I -. /\2 \ i ,"F 40+ E.\14.,it>Dvhl t~\ '\\LÂ·'1'Â·-\Â·~1Â·-,/Â·Â·\;.'59.-â€¢ Â· B.Â·,ri,i''j,i p , ,,*, ,. 1,: , %:A , ,\ 2,\\' 1 4, 'il .,14%~Cf< I' : t',1,~ 1,\3~4 1,1 \4*, ~2. V .17 .% 4\ \6 ., 41 ' I. 17 4, Â»4.i~\IN!\, \.L.?..00,..4 Â·j~~~,~L : 0 glyâ‚¬ \ + 1 4321.-*9453*'-~\ vÂ·,~-~1 -9,\1 1.\\\\.,6\~:.\2. . ./ - ~Â· Â· '. 'Â· a-LUI Uff V 3/ P :82*-I Â£2%343 19(4'A 'M#A'i 'Â· '~~'Â·'A',1 +P'\<~, , \,~..1, ..\,t,~~\\'1' 'f '.l .U I 441.to: o H 4%\P'~'.f, \'' ,~. ,/.~'Â· 6,\,. i \ d .,1 t.\ , 3 I 9 2 C 8fI .- j 0 .-110. 1 11 0 . Ok V.... I : 12,-r.-9 1 - 0 . Ay , 3 4.01 . .,6 SIS,11VNV 3d0nS 70# / 13/\NllS 0!H ' UGVS) HUB 28â€ž.4 ' 1-OV-j HOAV ' NA [11 fC 101 LOT 57 â€¢hp.,-2,9 â€¢- 10 0â€¢9 "1 01 1>-1,03 .....' Ili M .B-# I W,p,i.~Mi ..) ia, lo,Â¥ .9 gO 54 iâ€¢ a i i. Aaâ€¢â‚¬5 -.*.Aa E ~140 AS LOT 88 I 4, i râ€¢ 2,9'.â€¢ ./.â€¢Ill ...' I'l "'Â· :Lm ./.1, 0- I aÂ·fe ' li I. 4.'- 'Ii,u I III. PUD AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The applicant is requesting a final review of an amendment to the Wildridge PUD, pursuant to Section 17.20.110K, Amendment Procedures, Avon Municipal Code, to permanently reduce the residential density of the PUD by allowing eight new single- family dwelling units on the development site in place of eleven dwelling units (three triplexes and one duplex) which are currently permitted on the site. According to Section 17.20.110H, Design Criteria, Avon Municipal Code, the following criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD amendment: 1. Conformity with the Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives Applicant's Response: The PUD amendment is consistent with the Town' s Comprehensive Plan. According to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, the development site is designated as "Residential" on the Overall Land Use Plan. Pursuant to the Town' s Comprehensive Plan, "the Residential land use is an area intended for permanent and seasonal residential land uses, including single-family houses, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, apartments, condominiums, and mobile homes. The density of development and unit type vary within the Town in response to market conditions, site constraints (such as topography and accessibility), compatibility with existing and proposed development and zoning regulations. Residential areas should be located in convenient proximity to areas Of employment, recreation, and open space. Neighborhoods should be within walking distance to daily shopping needs and employment centers, and near a public transit stop to Â°ffer a convenient alternative to automobile trips. Vehicular, bicycle, and public transit routes should be easily accessible, yet residential areas should be separated or protected from heavy traffic." The PUD amendment to allow for the development of eight (8) single-family residential dwelling units on eight (8) individually platted lots is consistent with the prescribed land use designation of the Overall Land Use Plan. The allowable maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per lot and the single-family residential unit types are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the existing single-family and duplex residential development surrounding the development site. Furthermore, the various elements of the PUD amendment are consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the Town' s Comprehensive Plan. According to the Town' s Comprehensive Plan, in part, "The goals and policies of the Plan will be used by the Town to: 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 â€¢ Establish the standards and regulations necessary to define the limits and conditions of private sector development; and â€¢ Provide a clear focus for coordinating public, private, institutional and individual efforts in the development of the community." Upon review o f the adopted goals and policies of the Plan, the PUD amendment achieves and addresses the following goals and policies of the Town of Avon: A. LAND USE A fundamental reason for having a comprehensive plan is to clearly communicate generally where and how land uses may occur in the Town. The Land Use Plan is based on these goals and policies. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. Goal A.1 Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community, and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Policy Al.1 Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. Applicant's Response: Development within the PUD amendment will be single-family residential dwellings. The maximum allowable square footage of each unit shall be f 4,000 square feet. Single-family residential dwellings are more compatible with the scale and intensity of the neighboring uses than are triplex dwelling units as currently permitted. Policy Al.3 Flexible zoning such as Planned Unit Developments (PUD) should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. Applicant's Response: A minimal front setback variation allowing one-story tall garages to encroach within the front setback is requested. No other variations to the Town' s standards zoning requirements which are less restrictive than currently required are requested. The applicant, however, is proposing variations which are more restrictive than currently required. For instance, the applicant is providing an increase to the minimum lot size and the minimum landscape area requirements and a decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance. The increased minimum lot size ensures that the character of the built environment of the area remains unaffected by the residential development and the forty percent (40 %) increase to the minimum landscape area requirement and corresponding 2 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 twenty percent (20%) decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage C allowance assures that an ample amount of natural landscaping and open space remains in and around the development site. These variations to the standard zoning requirements result in the most effective use of land, benefits to the community and are compatible with surrounding development which in turn achieves the most effective development for the community. Policy Al.5 The community will include a wide range of residential uses including large-lot single family and duplex, small-lot single family and duplex, multifamily, and vertically integrated residential. Applicant's Response: The requested single-family residential uses will add to the already wide range of residential uses existing within the Wildridge PUD. Policy Al.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. Applicant's Response: As a result of this PUD amendment, more than 145,055 square feet (3.33 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area will be preserved within the Wildridge PUD. The protected area is on steep slopes, adjacent to a Town of Avon open space tract, or adjacent to existing development. Goal A.3 Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty of the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Policy A3.1 Development should first be directed in areas within and adjacent to established neighborhoods and developed areas. Applicant's Response: The PUD amendment is an in-fill form of development within an established neighborhood and developed area. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space whenever possible. Applicant's Response: As previously stated above, more than 145,055 square feet (3.33 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area is protected within the PUD. The protected area is on steep slopes, adjacent to a Town of Avon open space tract, or adj acent to existing development 3 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 B. Community As the community moves into the future, striking a balance between a And Economic healthy, diverse economy and a livable residential community becomes Development both increasingly challenging and increasingly important. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve that balance. Goal B.1 Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential community and regional commercial center. Policy Bl.1 Residential neighborhoods should be maintained to a high standard of quality through effective maintenance of streets, utilities, parks and other public facilities, and through consistent application of design standards. Applicant's Response: All future residential development on the development site shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon for compliance with the Town's design standards and applicable code provisions. C. Housing As the community grows, demand for housing of all types is increasing. While there is an ample supply of housing for second homeowners and upper income residents, there is a shortage of housing for middle income and year-round residents and their families. The following goals and policies are intended to help meet the variety o f housing needs. i Goal C.1 Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. Policy Cl.1 Maintain and enhance the character of the residential neighborhoods of the Town. Applicant's Response: Future single-family residential development of the site shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon for compliance with the Town's adopted design standards. Single-family residential residences are more compatible with the existing character of the surrounding residential uses than are multiple-family structures. The nearest triplex dwelling units or multiple-family structures to the development site and surrounding neighborhood are located near the intersection of Wildridge Road and Old Trail Road. The Town has recently acknowledged that the present and projected supply of multiple-family structures needed for seasonal and lower income workers and their families has been satisfied. Single-family residential development of the site will maintain and enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood. 4 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 Policy C1.2 Infill residential development should be compatible in design, scale and uses with existing neighborhoods. Applicant's Response: The single-family residential development on the site will be compatible in design, scale and uses existing within the surrounding neighborhood. The design of the homes will be two and three-story tall structures with two or three-car garages. The architectural style of the homes is intended to be reminiscent of traditional mountain design (ie., mixture of stone, stucco, wood siding, and timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting). The maximum allowable size of the homes shall not exceed 4,000 square feet. However, it is more likely the homes will be constructed to be approximately 2,800 - 3,200 square feet in size. The square footage will be spread over two and three levels, depending upon the topography and orientation of the particular lots. Maximum building height shall not exceed thirty-five (35') feet with the height ofthe home conforming to the existing topography. Existing uses in the neighborhood are residential with a mix of single family and duplex homes. The proposal to construct single-family I residences on the development site is compatible with the uses in the neighborhood. In fact, single-family residences are more compatible with the existing uses than are multiple-family structures such as triplexes. Overall, the PUD amendment results in compatibility with the existing design, scale and uses of the surrounding neighborhood. F. Environment Avon is a very desirable place to live and work largely because of its exceptional natural environment. In a very real sense, the economic and social health of Avon depends upon the protection and enhancement of these resources. Goal F.1 Make Avon' s unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to its identity and structure. Policy Fl.1 Future development and redevelopment shall minimize degradation of the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas. Applicant's Response: The layout of the eight (8) single-family residential lots is particularly responsive to the environment. As designed, degradation to the site and environment will be minimized. For example, the lots have been designed to create the most desirable site planning and building placement outcomes. The building envelopes ensure that all future residential 5 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 development is oriented parallel to the existing natural contours versus being oriented perpendicular to the natural contours. A paralleled orientation results in a building design that relates to the natural topography of the development site instead of a building design that "fights against" the contours of the site resulting in excessive cuts and substantial retaining ofthe slopes. Policy F1.2 Development should not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. Applicant's Response: The layout of the eight (8) single-family residential lots was designed to avoid steep hillsides and minimize visual degradation. One of the design intents of the future development is to minimize excessive cuts and fill conditions and to prevent unsightly grading of the property which results in unnatural scarring of the land forms. The homes sites have been located away from areas of steep slopes. The applicant has intentionally placed the areas of steep slopes into a non-developable area surrounding the site. Furthermore, as a result of gaining vehicular access to the development site via Longsun Lane, the steepest portions of existing Lots 89 & 90 are forever protected from environmental and visual degradation as a result of development. i Policy F 1.4 Development and redevelopment will accommodate wildlife habitat, including deer and elk migration routes, or otherwise mitigate loss of habitat. Applicant's Response: Future development on the site will accommodate wildlife habitat, particularly deer and elk migration routes. Through the creation of a non- developable buffer zone on the site, the existing north/south wildlife corridor on through Tract H will be maintained and enhanced. The area of non-developable buffer zone immediately adjacent to Tract H is over two (2) acres in size. This additional two (2) acres, while not being dedicated to the Town, will serve as future open space. G. Parks, Parks, trails and open space enhance the community's quality of life. Recreation and Open space preserves wildlife habitat and view corridors; trails offer Open Space walking, jogging and bicycling opportunities; neighborhood and community parks serve as places to gather and recreate. Goal G.1 Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure time needs of area residents and visitors. Policy G1.2 The Town will continue to evaluate and acquire parcels or easements for i open space, trails and recreation. 6 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 ( Applicant's Response: In the initial application, the applicant had offered to grant a perpetual easement for pedestrian access across the development site. The easement for pedestrian access would have been platted along the southerly edge of Lot 1 to provide a pedestrian connection between Longsun Lane and the Town-owned Tract H to the west of the development site. Within the easement, and at the sole discretion of the Town, the applicant was offering to construct an unimproved pedestrian path from Longsun Lane to Tract H. The pedestrian path would have ensured future access to a parcel of town-owned open space thereby increasing future opportunities for recreation in the Town of Avon. However, in response to input sought on the easement from adjacent property owners and residents of Wildrdige, the applicant has removed the pedestrian access easement. H. Community Community image is a combination of natural setting, architectural design, Image and density, design of streets and walkways, signage, public art, community Design facilities, and the care and maintenance of neighborhoods and businesses. An attractive community image not only fosters a sense of identity and pride in its residents and businesses, it is critical to its long-term success as a tourism destination. Goal H.1 Establish and maintain a high quality visual image of the Town. Policy Hl.1 The Town's streets and walkways shall be designed and maintained as safe, attractive public spaces. Applicant's Response: The applicant will construct a private road through the development site off of Longsun Lane. The private road shall be constructed to the standards prescribed by the Town of Avon. The private roadway shall be of a sufficient width to safely accommodate vehicular traffic as contemplated in the Town's development objectives for private streets in Wildridge. I. Communication While most citizens are finding less time to attend town meetings, review development proposals, and generally communicate with the Town government, the need for citizens to be informed participants in the community has never been greater. Avon' s small size, high land values, well-educated population and seasonal economy means that development and other local governmental decisions are often complex, and generally have greater impacts on the community than they would have in a larger metropolitan area. For these and other reasons, effective communication systems are fundamental to sustaining Avon' s high quality of life and economic health. 7 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 Goal I. 1 Establish and maintain clear communication between the Town and its citizens, business community, visitors, and other public entities. Policy I1.1 The Town Council and Planning & Zoning Commission will actively seek broad public involvement on key issues and decisions. Applicant's Response: In addition to fully complying with the Town's requirement for public notice pursuant to Section 17.12.100, Hearings - Setting Date, Avon Municipal Code, the applicant, has sought input and comment on the PUD amendment from the surrounding neighbors and residents of Wildridge. The applicant on numerous occasions met directly with the neighbors and residents to present the plans to them outside of a public hearing and at their convenience. Written comments on the amendment that the applicant received from the neighbors and residents has been included in Section VI of this submittal packet. As a result of listening to the input from surrounding neighbors and residents, the applicant has twice made revisions to the application for the PUD Amendment. For example, the overall residential dwelling unit density has been reduced from ten (10) units to eight (8) units. The average lot size and amount of non- developable areas have been increased resulting in a greater amount of " "open space area around the homes. A private road has been incorporated into the plan to prevent any potential increase in cost of road maintenance services to the Town and its taxpayers and the potential negative impacts of a pedestrian easement on adjacent property owners has been eliminated through the removal of the proposed easement. Policy Il.3 Public meetings, access to documents and development proposals, and other interactions with the Town will be open and as accessible as possible. Applicant's Response: As previously mentioned above, the applicant met on numerous occasions with the neighbors surrounding the development site and residents of Wildridge to gain their input and comment on the amendment. In those instances when meetings could not occur, every attempt was made to facilitate an exchange of information to ensure that the development proposal remained accessible to all those seeking knowledge. In addition to being in compliance with the goals and policies above, the PUD amendment request is consistent with the recommendations for Sub-area 18, Wildridge, as outlined in the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the recommendations for Sub-area 18, integrated design themes for development that achieve a more unified overall appearance and the continuation of developing roadways as rural-type roads without curb and gutter, roadway lighting, or sidewalks will be achieved as a result of the PUD amendment. 8 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, sub- area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. Applicant's Response: The future development of eight (8) single-family residential dwelling units on the development site will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission for compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. One of the design intents of the future development is to minimize excessive cuts and fill conditions and to prevent unsightly grading of the property which results in unnatural scarring of the land forms. This goal will be achieved by allowing for a deviation from the required twenty-five (25') foot front setback requirement on the downhilllots (Lots 1- 4). As proposed, development on these lots will allow for a ten-foot (10') front setback for "one story, side-loaded" garages (non-habitable area). All other portions (habitable areas) of the residential structures will be required to comply with the required twenty- five (25') foot setback. A twenty-five (25') foot front setback requirement is proposed on the uphill lots (Lots 5-8). The reduced front setback requirement will reduce the negative affects of providing vehicular access to the residential units by minimizing the distance vehicles must travel on the lots to access the required parking areas. To minimize any possible negative affects of the one story, side-loaded garages in the front setbacks, a minimum amount of required landscape screening will be provided. One story, side- loaded garages are preferred over front-loaded garages as they eliminate the presence and dominance of garage doors facing the street. A second design intent is to ensure the creation of building envelopes that result in structures designed to match the contours and topography of the existing site. As proposed, the lot layout has been designed to maximize the orientation of the structures to the contours of the landforms. This design intent and lot layout will minimize the amount of grading and retaining on each of the lots and ensure compliance with the adopted design guidelines. Specifically, each individual residence will respond to the topography of the site to ensure that the residences become an integral part of the site rather than structures which are out of character with their surrounding landforms. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. Applicant's Response: Future development will be designed to be compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. All future development will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission for compliance with the adopted design guidelines. To that end, the exterior design of the individual residences will be a mixture of indigenous materials such as stone, wood siding and timbers. All residential development within the PUD will be limited to 4,000 square feet of building area to prevent the construction of residences out of scale and character with the neighborhood. A request for a deviation from the 9 May 4,2004 Wildridge PUD Amendment maximum allowable building height as permitted by the Residential Single-Family (RSF) zone district is not requested, and therefore, residential structures shall not be permitted to exceed thirty-five (35') feet in height, as defined by Title 17: Zoning Regulations. To ensure that adequate buffer zones are provided to create separation between existing uses and the proposed future development, a twenty-five foot (25') wide non-developable buffer zone is proposed along the southerly boundary of the PUD, adjacent to existing Lot 53. Two additional non-developable buffer zones are proposed along the westerly and northerly sides of the PUD. The one-hundred, ten-foot (110') wide buffer zone along the westerly side of the PUD is in addition to the already existing open space buffer created by the Town-owned Tract H. The northerly buffer zone is intended to prevent development from "creeping" up the slope and thus having detrimental affects on the grading and topography of the development site. A total of more than 145,055 square feet (3.33 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area is provided within the PUD. 4. Uses, activity and design which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Applicant's Response: The uses and activities within the PUD will provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activities. The development potential of the PUD shall be similar to that permitted by the Residential Single-Family zone district. No deviations from the "allowed uses" of the zone district are proposed. As such, pursuant to Section 17.20.050, Zoning Regulations, only "one 4 family dwellings" and "accessory buildings and uses" shall be permitted with the PUD without consideration of a special review use permit. According to the Official Town of Avon Zoning Map, the areas adjacent to the PUD are zoned: â€¢ East - Wildridge PUD/Residential â€¢ West - Wildridge PUD/Residential/Open Space â€¢ North - Wildridge PUD/US Forest Service â€¢ South - Wildridge PUD/Residential The single-family development of the PUD is compatible with surrounding uses and activities and results in the permanent down-zoning of the property. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD (amendment) is proposed. Applicant's Response: No natural and/or geologic hazards affect the property upon which the PUD (amendment) is proposed, therefore, no mitigation or avoidance of the hazards is required. 10 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Applicant's Response: All future residential development on the site shall be required to comply with the adopted Town of Avon Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, and as may be amended from time to time. The design of the future residential development will be oriented to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors to the south and west of the development site. The lot lay out of the PUD has been designed to ensure compliance with the prescribed residential site development guidelines (ie, site design, site access, site grading, easements, drainage). For example, the lots have been designed to create the most desirable site planning and building placement outcomes. The building envelopes ensure that all future residential development is oriented parallel to the existing natural contours versus being oriented perpendicular to the natural contours. A paralleled orientation results in a building that relates to the natural topography of the development site instead of a building that "fights against" the contours resulting in excessive retaining of the slopes. The building site locations have been proposed to ensure that existing views from private property adjacent to the site are not negatively impacted. The residential building sites ( have been clustered low on the development site and away from the exterior perimeter of the development site. This design intent achieves the goals of the Town' s development regulations without negatively impacting any existing or potential development on the adj oining properties. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town transportation plan. Applicant's Response: The circulation system has been designed for both vehicles and pedestrians and is compatible with the Town's transportation plan. As designed, a private road will be constructed across the development site to provide vehicular access to each of the residential lots. The private road shall be constructed to comply with minimum Town standards for road construction. Additionally, subject to adjacent property owner consent, an easement for pedestrian access will be platted along the southerly edge of Lot 1 to provide a pedestrian connection between Longsun Lane and the Town-owned Tract H to the west of the development site. Within the easement, and at the sole discretion of the Town, the applicant will construct an unimproved pedestrian path from Longsun Lane to Tract H. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. 11 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 Applicant's Response: Landscaping and open space have been provided within the PUD to optimize and preserve the natural features, recreation, views and function of the development site. As previously stated, more than 145,000 square feet of non- developable buffer zone area is provided within the PUD. The non-developable buffer zone area will ensure the preservation of the natural features and vegetation existing on the site and add to the aesthetic quality of the surrounding areas by providing more undeveloped area. The additional area, while visually pleasing, will also be functional in that a pedestrian access easement could be provided to allow pedestrian access to Tract H which is a Town-owned open space parcel. Currently, the only legal means of public access to Tract H is from Wildridge Road East. Individual plans for landscaping will be submitted to the Town for review and approval as part o f the approved plan set for development on each o f the lots. The individual plans shall be designed to fully comply with the minimum requirements for residential landscaping as prescribed in Section 4C, Town of Avon Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. At this time, subsequent to Town approval, the design intent of the landscape plans is to create harmony between each of the building sites and the natural topography and existing vegetation on the site. This intent will be achieved by selecting plant materials that are adaptable to the area and are compatible to the various climatic zones found in the Valley. Plant materials such as Colorado Blue Spruce, Rocky Mountain Juniper, Pinyon, Quaking Aspen, Serviceberry, Snowberry, Mountain Mahogany, Alpine Currant, Potentilla, Western Sage, Rabbitbrush, and other similar hardy species are proposed. The applicant is not requesting deviations or I variations to any landscape area requirements. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the (amended) PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Applicant's Response: A workable, functional and efficient plan for development within the PUD will be achieved. As proposed, the first step in the development of the site will be to construct all necessary infrastructure on the site. The applicant has received preliminary approval from each of the public utility service providers for access to services (ie, ERWSD, Holy Cross, Public Service, etc.) This includes the extension of public utility services (sewer, water, gas, electric, cable, telephone, etc.) with stub outs to each lot, and the installation of the required fire hydrants. With all the necessary infrastructure construction complete, each of the residential lots will be ready for future construction and no reliance upon the completion of future project phases is necessary. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, police and fire protection. Applicant's Response: Adequate facilities are available to serve the eight (8) single- C family residential lots. Longsun Lane provides vehicular access to the development site 12 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 with a new private road providing access to the lots from Longsun Lane. Longsun Lane 1 is a platted public street maintained by the Town of Avon. As an infill development within an existing platted subdivision, no annexation request or requests for expanded municipal services are required. Adequate infrastructure and platted easements exist on the development site to ensure the provision of necessary water, sanitary, and utility services. A thirty-foot (30') wide utility easement traverses north-south across the development site. This easement along with the creation of additional easements for utilities and drainage will serve the needs of the residential development on the site. The present impacts of Residential Duplex (RD) and Residential Low Density (RLD) zoning on public facilities and services, including but not limited to fire, police, water sanitation, roadways, parks, schools and transit are based upon the allowable development potential granted by the existing zoning regulations. Pursuant to the existing PUD, a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of a multi-family and duplex-type are allowed on the development site. The existing development potential will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria as the it is decreasing in density by more than 25%. Similarly, the future impacts of single-family development on the public facilities and services, including but not limited to fire, police, water sanitation, parks, schools and transit will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria. Most importantly, because of the net reduction in total development potential as a result of the proposal, a reduction in demand on services is expected. 11. That existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed (amended) PUD and vicinity of the proposed (amended) PUD. Applicant's Response: The existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the PUD and the area surrounding the PUD. On several occasions the applicant met with Town staff to specifically discuss traffic impacts. Pursuant to the Town's Transportation Plan, both Longsun Lane and Wildridge Road East are designated as local-street types. As local streets, these two streets are already designed to accommodate the average daily trips (ADT) generated by residential development. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineer' s (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition, one (1) single-family residential structure generates six (6) average daily trips. An average daily trip is defined as the average number of vehicle trips generated leaving from and returning to a designated land use for the purpose of transportation planning. 12. Describe the proposed development standards. Provide justifications for the proposed standards and describe the benefits to the Town if they deviate from Town standards. Applicant' s Response: The proposed development standards for the PUD are: 13 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 , Underlying ( Zone District: Residential Single-Family (RSF) Allowed Uses: 1. One family dwelling; 2. Accessory buildings and uses. Special Review Uses: 1. Home occupations; 2. Aboveground public and private utility installations; 3. Church. Development Standards: 1. Minimum lot size: twenty-seven thousand, seven hundred & fifty square feet (27,750 sq ft); 2. Maximum building height: thirty-five feet (35 ft); 3. Minimum building setbacks: Front: ten feet (10 ft) or twenty-five feet (25 ft)* Sides: seven & one-half feet (7.5 ft)** Rear: twenty feet (20 ft)** 4. Maximum site coverage: forty percent (40%) 5. Minimum landscape area: thirty-five percent (35%) 6. Maximum density: one dwelling unit per lot 7. Outdoor lighting: a maximum of eight (8) outdoor j lighting fixtures shall be permitted on each residential lot. With the exception of up to two (2) decorative lighting fixtures located at the front door entrance to the residence, all other outdoor lighting fixtures shall be downward facing '*lly Cut-off' fixtures which do not permit light to be emitted in an upwards direction from the fixture. All other Town outdoor lighting requirements shall apply** * See Approved Development Plan for the minimum front building setback of each lot ** Unless noted otherwise on the Approved Development Plan Note: All other development standards and development requirements not specifically listed above and as prescribed by the Zoning Code of the Town of Avon shall apply to development within the PUD. The proposed deviations to the development standards are justified by the benefits they provide to the Town of Avon. As previously stated, approval of the PUD amendment will ensure that the goals and policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan are achieved. As a result of the amendment, development on the site will be responsive to the topography of the area and future development on the site will be compatible with the surrounding existing and potential land uses. Specifically, the increased minimum lot size ensures that the character of the built environment of the area remains unaffected by 14 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 the proposed development and the forty percent (40%) increase to the minimum landscape area requirement and corresponding twenty percent (20%) decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance assures that an ample amount of natural landscaping and open space remains in and around the development site. Additionally, the reduced front setback requirement for garages (non-habitable area) will create a more desirable streetscape appearance and prevent the unnecessary scarring of the site that often results from providing access to the site. This deviation will allow site access to be blended with the natural contours of the site and thus avoid the unintended consequences of gaining vehicular access to residential dwellings. At the same time, however, the negative impacts of multi-story development is prevented as only one-story tall garages will be permitted within the front setback. 15 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT In keeping with the intent of Goal I, Communication, Goal I. 1, and Policies I1.1 & 1.3, of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, the applicant sent a letter along with the public notice for the required public hearings on the two development applications to the adjacent properties. The purpose of the letter was to introduce the applicant to the neighbors and extend an invitation to contact the applicant so that the applicant could answer the many questions that no doubt would arise and hear the concerns of the neighborhood. In addition, to sharing the PUD amendment with the neighbors, the applicant also sought input and comment from many of the residents of Wildridge. Attached in this section of the submittal packet is a copy of the applicant's letter sent to the adjacent properties and the written public comment received on the amendment. 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment May 4,2004 Jay K. Peterson 108 South Frontage Road, Suite 208 Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Adjacent Property Owner, The purpose of my letter is to introduce myself to you and to inform you of an application that I will submit to the Town of Avon Community Development Department for an amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) in the near future. I am the owner of four lots in your neighborhood. The four lots that I own are located at 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane and 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East, which according to the Town of Avon, are legally described as Lots 54,55,89, & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. According to the Wildridge PUD, the four residential properties are currently zoned for three triplexes and one duplex for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units. I do not believe that multiple-family structures such as triplexes are the appropriate type of development for the neighborhood. The purpose of my application to the Town of Avon is to forfeit existing development rights and re-subdivide Lots 54, 55, 89, & 90 into ten (10) single- family residential lots. The lots will vary in size from slightly over one-half acre to nearly one-acre in size. Future development of single-family homes will be restricted to a maximum of 3,500 square feet of building area. The development standards I am proposing are more stringent than existing allowances, and as such, ensure the least amount of impact to the existing natural landforms and vegetation ofthe site. My intent is to build the new single-family residences in the traditional-style of mountain architecture. The exteriors of the homes will be complimented with a mixture of stone, wood siding, and heavy timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting. Two and three-car garages will be carefully located on each of the lots to minimize the unintended consequences of providing vehicular access to the home sites. In my opinion, the proposed amendment will have a significant positive impact on the adjacent properties and neighborhood which surrounds the development site by, 1. Complying with the goals and policies as defined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan; Wildridge PUD Amendment March 1,2004 2. Permanently reducing residential density as a result of down-zoning and forfeiting development rights; 3. Preserving the existing residential character of the neighborhood through the elimination o f multiple-family structures; 4. Maintaining and enhancing the existing residential quality, character, design, and scale of the neighborhood; 5. Providing additional pedestrian access to Town of Avon owned open space, and; 6. Preserving existing views from adjacent properties. Given the most recent proposal whereby a developer tried to increase density from four units to ten units, you will no doubt have questions about my application. In fact, I would be surprised if you did not. For that reason, included with my letter is a reduced copy of my proposed site plan and my personal contact information. Please feel free to contact me with your questions at your convenience. You can reach me most easily by telephone at (970) 476-0092, via fax at (970) 479-0099, or by e-mail at ,ikp@vail.net. I look forward to talking with you about my application. Sincerely, Wildridge PUD Amendment March 1,2004 February 15, 2004 Jay Peterson 100 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Proposed Resubdivision in Wildridge Dear Jay: Thank you for sharing your plans to resubdivide three tri-plex lots and one duplex lot to create ten single-family lots with me. I appreciate the opportunity to understand the proj ect prior to hearing about it from other neighbors or seeing it on the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda. As you are aware, Diane and I live just down the street from the subject property. I was a little surprised to find out that the lots were originally programmed for tri-plexes and duplexes given the low-density nature o f this part o f the Wildridge Subdivision. I was equally surprised that the existing access to some of the lots is from Wildridge Road, which seems inappropriate given the steep slopes adjacent to the roadway. I am supportive o f your proposal as a neighbor and as a pro fessional planner because you are not seeking to increase the number of dwelling units and are in fact proposing to decrease the density overall. Additionally, I believe the proposed access is more in keeping with the neighborhood and more responsive to the topography o f the area. I believe single-family lots in this area will improve property values, improve the aesthetics o f the neighborhood, and is more compatible with adjacent low-density residential uses. SincerelyA 0 Dominic and Diane Mauriello 5601 A Wildridge Road Page 1 ofl Jay Peterson C From: "Phil Struve" <pstruve@clientec.net> To: <jkp@vail.net> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:16 AM Subject: Wildridge Plan Jay, I am the owner and occupant of the east side duplex at 5780 East Wildridge Road (Lot 4, Block 4). I support you planned changes. Please keep me notified of the progress (or the lack thereof) in getting your plan approved. I am available to attend and speak in support of the plan. Thanks, Phil Struve 970.390.7090 pstruyÂ©@.clienteclnet 3/10/2004 View Townhome Association 2170 Saddleridge Loop C Avon, Colorado 81620 March 10,2004 Dear Jay: On behalf of the four owners ofthe View Townhome Association, thank you for taking the time to share your proposed plans for the amendment to the Wildridge PUD with us. In light of recent applications for amendments to the Wildridge PUD, we are pleased to see that your proposal will actually reduce the residential density permitted in Wildridge. As residents o f Wildridge, we believe that opportunities to reduce density, when associated with good land planning and design, should be supported by the Town of Avon. Further, we believe that the proposal will maintain property values in Avon, continue to improve the appearance of the area and ensure that Wildridge remains a great place to call home. Please understand, however, we remain opposed to amendments which increase density. Again, thank you for sharing your plans with us and best of luck with your project. Sincerely, Tifult 6 (juda-) Meredith Raub, President View Townhome Association CHARLEY AND ARIANE VIOLA 5774 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON COLORADO 970-949-5215 May 21,2004 Town of Avon Recording Secretary PO Box 975 Avon CO 81620 Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing regarding the proposed re-subdividing of lots 54,55,89, and 90 by Jay Peterson. I strongly support this project as proposed. The benefits to all of us adjacent to this project are substantial. These benefits are as follows: Single Family Residences: By changing the zoning to single family from the currently zoned multi family residences there will be a positive impact on property values o f all in close proximity to the development. Correcting a poor decision in the original plat: All of the current residences in the upper area of Wildridge are either single family or duplexes. I am not aware of any triplexes above the intersections o f Wildridge Roads East and West. The original zoning on these lots provides for triplexes. Triplexes do not fit the character of the immediate vicinity and would have a negative impact on the property values of all surrounding properties. Reduced density: An obvious goal o f the Town o f Avon benefiting everyone by reducing traffic and creating a more enjoyable living environment. The minimal impact of adding access for three additional residences on Longsun Lane is insignificant relative to the positive impact created by having single family residences adjacent to the existing properties. I think that the applicant has reduced the density to a sufficient point to justify approval. Sincerely, \1 eMR Charley Viola RECEIVED M AY 2 4 2004 Community Development May 19,2004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon P. O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Re: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR1N G Meeting - Town of Avon, June 1, 2004 Dear Sir/Madam Unfortunately, my husband Herb Pozen and I will be out oftown and unable to attend the meeting on Tuesday, June 1,2004. We wish to be heard on this matter by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon by sending the following statement. Once again, we see that Mr. Jay Peterson is attempting to disrupt our neighborhood. Longsun Lane is a cul-de-sac. Those of us who live there would prefer to have it remain that way . Our position is that we have no problem with Mr. Peterson building on Longsun Lane. However, we do not want to see it made into a thoroughfare. Mr. Peterson can gain access from Wildridge Road East. Even though it may cause him hardship at first, in the long-run it will make everybody happier if he builds his property and gains access only through Wildridge Road East. We clearly do not want to see Longsun Lane overbuilt. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 1:' 14 RECEIVED i '. r w h i ft / " tur 4 6 4/i. 1 , uÂ·o'._,lit. Cd i li -r v., v , 1 . + MAY 2 4 2004 Mildred M. Gold~tein 5171 Longsun Lane Community Development Avon, CO 81620 MMG/al April 15,2004 Recording Secretary, Town o f Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Lots 54,55,89 & 90 Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Planning and Zoning Commission: I am writing to express my support for the zoning changes proposed by Jay K. Peterson for the above mentioned lots. I believe this proposal will solve several serious problems with the original platting of this area. Specifically: â€¢ The steepness of the grade of the lots bordering Wildridge Road would make an attractive design o f three and four unit complexes almost impossible. The amount o f retainage needed and scope of the excavation would result in an unattractive project completely out o f character with the surrounding neighborhood. â€¢ I do not see a way to create a driveway exit onto Wildridge Road that would not be a blind entrance in at least one direction. The result would be dangerous and require a large amount of unattractive retainage. â€¢ I feel that in its current state o f completion, the Wildridge subdivision would be better served with single family homes. Sincerely, Michael Rowe ,/7 / - -7 -ZL_- -- f /L C +1(2-:â€¢7 ei Ch 033 _D /f774B Wildridge Rd. - Avon, CO 81620 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2004 Community Development - 1 Michael C. Hayes 5183 Longsun Lane P.O.Box 904 Avon, CO 8]620 ph 970 949 4132 fax 413 832 3110 email: h:off aol.com RECEIVED Recording Secretary Town of Avon AFf? 1 5 7024 P O Box 975 -.- Avon CO 81620 Community Development Re: Response to Mr. Jay K. Petersen's request Legal Description ofProperties: Lots 54,55,89 & 90- Block 4, Wildridge subdivision. Address of properties: 5190 and 5196 Longsun Lane, and 5767 and 5775 Wildridge Road East. Dear Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Town Council members, and Mr. Pielsticker: I am the homeowner and resident of 5183 Longsun Lane. Since becoming aware of the - proposal by Mr. Petersen's request I have taken the time and expended the energy to educate myself as to the different benefits and disadvantages in front of me. In speaking with my neighbors and Mr. Petersen, I have come to the conclusion that I do NOT support Mr. Petersen's proposal. In my conversation with Mr. Petersen he had indicated that he could consider reducing the number of units from ten to possibly eight. Even with such a reduction I will NOT support this proposal. My reasons are as follows: I begin with the obvious increase in traffic. My home is at the end of the cul-de-sac. It was a compelling location to purchase as I have a small child and I am expecting more children in my home. Any increase in traffic beyond what I knew was slated when I purchased my property is not welcome. I also have great concern with this proposal because Mr. Petersen' s project requires the development of land that is designated as non-developable. This is a very big concern because I believe we risk setting precedent that negatively impact the landscape of development in our neighborhoods. With regard to reduction of density- the direct impact is an increase in density on Longsun Lane. This increase in density impacts the residents of Longsun Lane unfavorably. I appreciate the opportunity to voice my concerns and again want it to be clearly understood that I do NOT support Mr. Petersen's application and project. Best regards, 060----3Â« . 6,00/0,~ Michael C. Hayes 5110 Longsun Lane P.O. Box 1120 Avon Co 81620 May 25,2004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 AVON Co. 81620 Dear Sir, I am writing this letter in support ofthe rejection ofthe PUD amendment regarding lots 54,55 89 and 90 in block four Wildridge. I feel that this new plan will increase traffic congestion on our cul de sac lane. The original plat would have five units accessing our lane, the new one eight houses. The increased construction traffic as well as the additional home owner traffic, after the completion, would be hazardous for the many children. I am strongly opposed to the "swap" ofthe undevelopable land which separates the upper and lower lots. This area contributes the open space which Wildridge is noted for. Shifting of the location in this manner,to my knowledge has never been requested or been granted. There is already access to lots 88 and 89 from East Wildridge Road. Changing Town policy on access to non developable land to ease a contractors' access to me seems frivolous. Our Town Map states states that these areas prohibit any road or house footprint to impinge ofthem without special approval. To do this will set a precedent for the other lots which have "non developable" land on them. Yours trulyâ€ž il 632 #41_ ~s 1-2 0Â« 67% ~)berta Schwartz V. \-36/K~~~ RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2004 Community Development To: Town Clerk, Town of Avon Date: June 1, 2004 Ref.: Jay Peterson Wildridge PUD Amendment I am writing this memo solely to address the issue of precedence as it pertains to this application because the developer has misrepresented it and the Town of Avon has downplayed it. There is a notation on Town of Avon Lot/Block maps of"Non-developable" land. "Non-developable" land is an area of a lot where no road, or development footprint can encroach unless the Town gives special approval. There were 33 lots in Wildridge with a non-developable land designation on parts ofthem when Wildridge was laid out. 22 ofthose 33 lots have been developed and until this application, to the best of my knowledge, the Town has never been asked nor granted permission to build on the non-developable area on any of them. 11 lots remain including the four under consideration here. By virtue of this application, the developer is asking the Town of Avon to approve a precedent setting variance. P&Z and the Town Council would set a precedent ifthey recommended approval and granted a variance to allow this developer to intrude on non-developable land as he is requesting on lots 55,89 and 90 and of course the pipe stem driveway off ofthe Longsun cul-de-sac is his means of accessing lots 89 and 90. If the Town allowed access and therefore broke the precedent of not allowing non- developable property to be built upon, then it is reasonable to expect that the remaining seven undeveloped lots, mostly on upper Wildridge Rd., might also ask for a similar variance of their non- developable area. Perhaps even existing dwellings might be altered to take advantage of this variance. It opens up a can of worms and is clearly not the right thing to do. Finally with respect to this issue, it is disingenuous on the part ofthe developer to refer to the non- developable area as "open space" on his drawings as though he could simply trade this for an equivalent area within the four lots of his choosing. Please do not allow this precedent setting variance. 44 42 Mac McDevitt Lot 53, Block 4 5191 A Longsun Lane To: Town Clerk, Town of Avon Date: June 1, 2004 Ref.: Jay Peterson Wildridge PUD Amendment I am writing you to voice my major two reasons for opposing the proposed PUD Amendment before the Avon Town Zoning Commission. First, when we purchased our home on Longsun Lane we contacted the Town of Avon Community Development office to ascertain the potential development of the undeveloped land surrounding our property. We were please to find that a large portion of the land between us and Wildridge Road was designated as "non-developable"and therefore would be left natural. This land creates a large buffer between Longsun Lane and Wildridge Road guaranteeing us that the natural environment that surrounds our property would be retained and we can continue to enjoy the natural wildlife that use this land. Second, in the past, we have bought several properties located on cul-de-sacs. We prefer them. Allowing a street to go off ofLongsun's cul-de-sac changes the nature ofliving on a cul-de-sac. Having alllots, 54,55,89 and 90, accessed off ofLongsun Lane would increase the traffic on Longsun from that of five dwelling units to that of eight dwelling units or an increase of 60%. The reason that we bought on a cut-de-sac road is that the traffic is limited to those who live there. We have made a major decision based on the information we found at the Avon Community Development Office and quite frankly would feel as if we had been stabbed in the back by the Town of Avon if this PUD amendment were approved. Please rejpct this application. cimu4140Â«- Karen MeDevitt Lot 53, Block 4 5191 A Longsun Lane Law Offices Richard S. Jalovec & Associates, Ltd. 1021 W. Adams Street, Suite 1 02 Richard S. Jalovec Chicago, Illinois 60607 Daniel G. Austin Phone (312) 829-2300 Far (312) 829-3729 May 24,2004 Recording Secretary rown of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon,Colorado 81620 REI June 1,2004 Meeting Jay Peterson - Amendment To Whom It May Concern: We are the owners of 5156 B Longsun Lane, Avon, Colorado. We strongly object to the above amendment. I f granted, this would increase traffic and set a dangerous precedent of allowing development of land previously set aside for open space. Our area of Wildridge is rapidly building up. There is no reason to increase the size of the area to be built upon by allowing this amendment. We are unable to attend the meeting but urge the Planning and Zoning Commission to reject this proposal. Very truly yours, kÂ« 00, Kvt Jennifer Ann Jalovec /7 -# A k R Richard S. Jalove-c~~~ 'J l/vu' 1 \A. JAJ&RSJ/kr RECEIVED J UN 0 1 2004 Community Development C- Gore Range t,+~ Surveying, Lic RECEIVED JUN 0 1 2004 6/1/04 Community Development Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Re: Lots, 54,55,89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge To Whom It May Concern: I am not only a resident of Longsun Lane in Wildridge, but also a Professional Land Surveyor. I have reviewed the proposed PUD amendment for these lots and have the following comments both from a professional standpoint as well as that of a resident. Fourteen years ago when I purchased my lot on Longsun Lane there was only one house built. Mine was the second, and over the years many more have been constructed. Along with each home's construction was the never ending flow of construction vehicles and trucks associated with the project. However, we (the residents of the street) all knew that someday this would cease once all of the lots were developed. The related impact on our lives from the new construction had a limit. With the construction of the proposed extension of our road and increase in lots and building sites, this endpoint of construction impact extends far further than previously established and accepted. The long term effects of this project will affect the residents of the area for many more years to come. This is not just a question of changing the density from eleven units to eight, and making the current established lot configuration more convenient and profitable for the developer, it actually will increase the number of overall construction sites from four to eight. Currently the lots are zoned for a potential of eleven units total on the four lots combined. These units would be constructed on four building sites in the form of four structures; one on each lot. Two of these would be accessed from Wildridge Road East, two from Longsun Lane. This proposed new development would actually increase the total structures and construction sites utilizing Longsun Lane from two to eight. What may appear as a decrease in density and overall impact will actually be a considerable increase. It has a far more significant impact on the established neighborhood that will be felt for many years to come. When a subdivision is approved, the overall plan for land use, density and lot configurations are established. These lots have established access points and developable areas. Changes to established building sites, access points and traffic flows greatly impact all that we were lead to believe when we chose to live here and build where we have. One of the primary roles of government is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. And while this proposal may not affect the health of the community, it does have a 953 South Frontage Road West â€¢ Suite 106 â€¢ Vail, CO 8i657 ' (970) 479-8698 â€¢ (970) 479-0055 fax negative impact on the safety __ welfare. The extensive increase in tra_. caused by the additional construction and the additional residents and their associated guests and services will increase the risks and hazards to children, pets and all of us considerably. Welfare is not just a protection of the financial value of our property, it is the protection of all that we value. Views, privacy, traffic, a feeling of comfort and safety are all values that we have. We chose this street for our homes with full knowledge of what to expect for development and potential negative impact on our lives. It is the responsibility of our representatives in government to protect these rights. Our rights, beliefs and lifestyles need to be protected first, before the desires of a developer to create a development from which he is the sole beneficiary. We all purchased our land with the belief in these established items. Changing these lots and open space areas would take away those rights we currently have and are due. The design and layout of the subdivision approved and accepted for Wildridge did not include a potential extension and increase in structures on Longsun Lane. Approval of such would be a denial of the rights, benefits and privileges due to all of us. Sincerely, Sam Ecker 5129 Longsun Lane 05/31/2004 19:44 412887 ---0 JOHN SALKO - PAGE 01 L MAY 30, 2004 TO: TOWN OF AVON RECORDING SECRETARY Regarding Peterson development of lots 54-55-89-90 Meeting Junq 1, 2004 I was the first person to build and become a home owners on Longsun Lane. 1 choose the cul-de-sac because of limited traffic. I oppose the change suggested by the developer bringing lots 89 and 90 onto our Longsun Lane traffic. It should stay as planned for to be accessed off Wildridge Road. It would not be fair and totally wrong for the present homeowners on Longsun Lane to pick up that extra traffic. That is not why we build here on Longsun Lane. Not only would we have excess traffic, but the property value would go down and the safety on the road for us and especially the children would be greatly impaired. I also oppose any change to the present law of non-developable land. The Town of Avon as it also shows on the map prohibits any road or house foot- print to interse, t these parcels. If the Town Council should allow access and therefore break the pre- cendent of not a Jlowing non-developable property to be built upon, then they do not look out jor the right thing to do as elected Town Council, they would fail to govern for che present homeowners and the Town Of Avon, but they would help Peterson developer to ruin our area of living. The developer does not care about present homeowners on Longsun Lane,, he wants an easier building site. He wants to enhance his own financial gain. In closing, I would like to remind the Council that I have lived on Longsun Lane since 1988. I really oppose the Peterson project. Sincerely yours JohI141 9*4 FROM : M FAX NO. : 17753247321 <-- Jun. 01 2004 01:04PM Pl J U rt O 1 2909 5 ov A u (QU ~a: LAP } L- O fUn LE 401 (\A-teÂ» n zo-A 3-6-rt..013 k# N -70 1 re.Lorollaw EX..V Li---Â«Â» -ED LA410 f. Ovun 4 U J G.,1 2,-19 (A no 0 (~Ul*-, 0 -Â¢2 S- 41 (-P nj Sun Lot Ac- A d A IAR OFF D 24 40 -446 |Â«D Gl A.vt Â»J T .304\04- lA Lce- 4 ~ 4 */ 64 (AÂ»-ul MN. 0 --' d a yvi CO A LU'r\2. 4 (4712 Â£--~ \E O--C a JLUL t~bÂ· 9-611(L 4-+ ocpou M 4/ r.\91Â¥Â»fl Va \Â»26 4 + 82Â«cÂ©U-~ 0-4 01 /Re/ C,/v, 3. Dll gAC e.Â£+, 9-le,0 j L GU -1 (Â·~~ /Â·a (Â»44-u 40 09Â£4/7 ..59 i> ~A-' 43Â»-0 -*,eÂ·a:. C7r SÂ¢,CA, D C- 4091' C.X ~%~-~1~3 (1112*~ c/ 44- 4 1 6 Â«30\A L Â« 9-\\j fK -l-Lx FulÂ»Â·n C 2 Urd \ 5,1 0 ~ L LA C.-,LAA ~ ~ Â»~_ ~Â¤ 498 + 10, f C tu- Ch 0 1/ -4 v f <1 6-1 cA .2 4 -Â£ I g~BUJ 2 Â°f 44-ZT u~ 62 64 C l-A LXY) UL_ ; L 43 LL-jz, i '4 ---- /-7 - --1 - 1 0,1 1/ r.001 . r 1 1 7 /1 Â£ I ... ~SMOL Memo TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Af#j From: Tambi Katieb, Community Development .6~ COLORAD Date May 27,2004 Re: Proposed Appeals Ordinance - Resolution No. 04-18 (Public Hearing) Summary: Town Council recently passed Ordinance 04-07 on first reading and has forwarded it to you for a recommendation before finally approving the amendments listed to Titles 2,15 and 17 of the Avon Municipal Code. I have attached a cover of the memo to Council by the Town Attorney that summarizes the proposed Ordinance for your review. The intent of the Ordinance and proposed changes are to consolidate the appeals process for a number of items that you render decisions on. The proposal is not intended in any way to limit your ability to approve zoning and design review matters, but instead create one consistent approach to the appeals process for all decisions of the Commission. Recommendation: Staff recommends that you approve Resolution 04-18, forwarding the proposed Ordinance back to Town Council for final reading and adoption. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Resolution 04-18, recommending to Town Council the adoption of clarifications and revisions to appeals processes (as outlined) formally amending the Town Code" Attachments: A. Memo to Council dated May 6,2004 from Town Attorney. B. Resolution 04-18 recommending approval of Ordinance 04-07 C. Proposed Ordinance 04-07 amending Titles 2,15 and 17 of the Municipal Code. Appeals Ordinance (Amending titles 2,15 and 17 of the Avon Town Code) Resolution 04-18, Recommending Adoption to Town Council / June 1, 2004 Page 1 of 2 HEART-ormEXALLEY-1 MEMORANDUM TO: TOWN COUNCIL FROM: TOWN ATTORNEY RE: ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION a DATE: May 6,2004 You have on your agenda an ordinance which is intended to clarify and consolidate the provisions for appeal of decisions of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Under this ordinance, there will be only one provision governing appeals, contained in Section 2.16.160. Most of the subsections of that section are set forth in the ordinance tendered to you. As you can see, subsection (b) defines "interested parties" as adjacent property owners or persons who received notice. Provisions for call-up by the mayor are currently in the code. Subsection (c) sets the time for appeal at 15 days. The code currently provides a time for appeal of either 30 days or 7 days from delivery of the decision to council and the applicant, depending on what the Commission acted on. The amendments to subsections (d) and (e) are "housekeeping" amendments which are not substantive in nature. The remaining sections of the ordinance repeal other appeal provisions and a duplicative provision with respect to obtaining additional information. Because this ordinance in part amends the Town's zoning code, it needs to be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and recommendation. I recommend - 8 4, that council adopt this ordinance on first reading, refer it to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review at their next meeting and schedule final reading on June 8. t JWD:ipse 4.K, % I. 4 -1.4 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-18 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 04-07, AMENDING THE APPEALS PROVISIONS OF TITLES 2, 15 AND 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE TO THE TOWN COUNCIL I -I THEREAS, Titles 2, 15 and 17 of The Avon Municipal Code establish appeals procedures ~~ from decisions o f the Planning & Zoning Commission; and I I THEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission appeals process is proposed to be consolidated so duplicative and confiicting appeals provisions are not subject to confusion by the public; and I I THEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the attached Ordinance 04-07 Series of 2004 ("Exhibit A"), and held a public hearing as required by the Avon Municipal Code to review the proposed amendments; 1~ TOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council the approval o f Ordinance 04-07 Series o f 2004 in order to amend the existing Avon Municipal Code as adopted. ADOPTED THIS 1st DAY OF JUNE, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-18 Appeals Ordinance Adoption.doc 4 Exhibit "A" to Resolution 04-18 ORDINANCE NO. 04-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLES 2, 15 AND 17, MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON, AS IT RELATES TO APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING AND ZON[NG COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO: Section 1. Amendment. Subsection (a) of Section 2.16.160, Chapter 16 0 f Title 2, Avon Municipal Code, is amended as follows: ia) Appeal of any decision o f the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be governed by the provisions o f this section." Section 2. Amendment. Subsection (b) of Section 2.16.160, Chapter 16 of Title 2, Avon Municipal Code, is amended as follows: "(b) Decisions o f the Planning and Zoning Commission may be appealed to the Council by the applicant or any interested person or may be reviewed at the request o f the Mayor at any time before the decision becomes final. An "interested person" is an adjacent property owner or a person entitled to have notice o f the hearing mailed to him in association with the action o f the Commission." Section 3. Amendment. Subsection (c) of Section 2.16.160, Chapter 16 of Title 2, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: "(c) Within five (5) working days following action ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission, notification of its decision shall be deposited in the United States mail to the applicant or his or her designated agent. The decision shall become final unless a written appeal or request for review by the Mayor is received by the Town Clerk within fifteen (15) days of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission." Section 4. Amendment. Subsection (d) of Section 2.16.160, Chapter 16 of Title 2, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: "(d) Not more than thirty (30) days following the filing of an appeal or the ~ request for review by the Mayor, the Town Council shall review the action of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council shall, in writing, confirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Commission within thirty (30) days following the commencement ofreview. If it deems insufficient information is available to provide the basis for a sound decision, the Town Council may postpone final action for not more that thirty (30) additional days. Failure of the council to act within the thirty (30) additional days shall be deemed action confirming the decision o f the Commission unless the applicant consents to a time extension. Action o f the Town Council shall become final immediately." Section 5. Amendment. Subsection (e) of Section 2.16.160, Chapter 16 of Title 2, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (e) Any decision by the Town Council which results in action modifying or reversing the decision o f the Planning and Zoning Commission shall specifically describe the reasons therefor. Section 6. Repeal. Section 17.12.110, Chapter 12 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is repealed. Section 7 Repeal. Section 17.36.080, Chapter 36 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is repealed. Section 9 Repeal. Paragraph (5) of Subsection (b) of Section 15.28.090, Chapter 28 of Title 15, Avon Municipal Code, is repealed. Section 10. Repeal. Section 17.36.090, Chapter 36 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is repealed. INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED POSTED the 11th day of May, 2004, and a public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council on the 8th day of June, 2004, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, PASSED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED POSTED the day of ,2004. Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John W. Dunn, Town Attorney 111Â·\RI- ot the 1 9.1.n Staff Report FINAL DESIGN ~~N COLORADO June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 27,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 58, Block 4, WildridgeSubdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 5170 Longsun Lane Introduction Lynn Fritzlen is proposing a "mountain lodge" style duplex residence on Longsun Lane. The building is approximately 9,636 square feet in size and each unit features an attached 2-car garage. Proposed materials include wood siding, stucco, and stone. A Variance application for retaining walls in the front setback was approved at your April 6. 2004 Commission meeting. Access to the property is difficult, with all grades exceeding 40% or greater at the front of the site. A sketch design plan was also approved at the April 61 2004 Commission meeting. The retaining wall configuration has been revised since sketch approval in order to allow for additional landscaping areas adjacent to the driveway and between the boulder walls. Design Review Considerations According to the Town ofAvon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex home is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 20% lot coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: A Variance was approved for the retaining walls within the front yard setback. The entire structure is located within the required setbacks. â€¢ Easements: The design is in compliance with all platted Easements. A Variance was approved for the placement of retaining walls within the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage easement. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Fritzlen Final Design June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 7 â€¢ Building Height. This design is in conformance and equal to the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. An Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required at framing as well as at foundation inspections to confirm height compliance. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and it appears that 7 functional spaces (including garage spaces) are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage'. Sufficient on-site snow storage is provided with 1,630 square feet. Approximately 1,112 square feet of snow storage is required for the proposed driveway area. The snow storage areas exceed the Town's 20% ofpaved surfaces requirement with 29% provided. â€¢ Landscaping: The Landscaping Plan appears to recognize the drought conditions that prevail in our region with the use of an automatic drip irrigation system for all shrubs and trees. However, staff feels that additional landscaping is necessary between the driveway and first retaining wall in order to lessen the substantial appearance of the walls. Approximately X% of the landscaped area is irrigated, which complies with the Town's maximum requirement of 20%. A rain sensor is proposed (and required) for use with the irrigation system. All proposed trees and shrubs are low-water use varieties. and no sod is proposed with the landscape plan. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. The site layout takes advantage of mountain views, while also considering passive solar use with plenty of southern exposure for the driveway and motor court areas. o Site Access. Access is provided to the site directly off Longsun Lane via a steep (10% maximum slope) driveway. All driveway grades are in compliance with Town standards. A culvert at the entrance to the lot is required and must match the Town's standard culvert detail. This must be addressed prior to submittal for a building permit. As stated, retaining walls are necessary in order to gain access to the site. Additional landscaping would benefit the appearance of these required walls. o Parking and Loading: The parking spaces provided are in compliance with Town standards. An 8" curb has been added to the edge of driveway at the motor court area. o Easements: This project appears to comply with all Easements. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 , Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Fritzlen Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 7 o Site Grading: A significant amount of grading is required with this design plan. All grading appears to comply with Town standards, and occurs within the property boundaries. The guidelines state "where finished grades require retaining wall placement, a series of lower retaining walls with landscaped terraces is preferable to a high wall with an unbroken vertical face." As proposed, the lower retaining wall has an unbroken vertical face. o Drainage: A culvert is necessary at the driveway entrance and it should match the Town of Avon standard driveway culvert detail. This may require additional grading that is not indicated on the site plan in order to comply with Town standards. Positive drainage is provided away from the building and appears to function on the site. o Snow Removal and Storage: As stated above, ample snow storage is provided on- site adjacent to the driveway. o Sidewalks: There are currently no sidewalks on Longsun Lane. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The building takes advantage of solar gain and view corridors. Building design and location should not affect adjacent property owners. The project design is generally compatible with the intentions of the design guidelines. A variance application to allow retaining walls within the front yard setback has been approved to allow the proposed design. Staff is still concerned with the resulting appearance of the retaining walls as viewed from the road and adjacent properties. Additional landscaping should be provided. o Building Height: As proposed, the building height is equal to the Town's maximum 35-foot height requirement. Compliance with the height requirement must be confirmed with a framing ILC. o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (wood siding, stucco, and stone veneer) comply with the guidelines. The submitted color board appears to comply with the Guidelines. Indigenous natural colors are proposed and encouraged by the Design Guidelines. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The use of indigenous building materials such as native stone and wood siding is encouraged by the design guidelines. Architectural interest is provided on all building elevations. The north elevation plan (sheet A301) has been revised to include more design interest. The guidelines state that secondary roofs shall have a 4:12 minimum pitch, and metal roofs shall have a 3:12 minimum. As can be seen on the roof plan (sheet A203), a 2:12 metal roof has been proposed for use on the north facing roofs. o Outdoor Lighting: Four different light fixtures are proposed with this application. The proposed fixtures types are as follows: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Fritzlen Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 7 Type 1 - Cast aluminum step lighting. These fixtures are proposed for use at both front stairway entrances to the units. This fixture would comply with the proposed ordinance with a bulb output of less than 1000 lumens. Type 2 - Pole mounted path lighting. These fixtures are proposed to accent the driveway access at the base of the first retaining wall. This fixture appears to conform to the proposed lighting ordinance being partially shielded with "honey opalescent" glass. This fixture will comply with a 1000 lumen or less bulb. Type 3 - Building mounted hanging fixtures. This fixture is proposed for various locations the building elevations. Again, this is a partially shielded fixture utilizing "honey opalescent" glass. With 1000 lumen output or less bulbs, this light fixture would comply with the proposed ordinance. Type 4 - Up lit address placard (landscape) fixture. This fixture would not comply with the proposed lighting ordinance. This type of up lighting is prohibited and a down lit fixture would better comply with the ordinance. o Duplex Developments: The proposed duplex is designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site and appears to comply with the intention of the guidelines. The design creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish the duplex from a single-family residence. â€¢ Landscaping.- o Design Character: The Landscape Plan recognizes the drought conditions that Avon is currently facing. However, staff feels that additional landscaping is necessary between the driveway and first retaining wall in order to lessen the substantial appearance o f the walls. Native grasses and wildflower mix is proposed for all disturbed areas of the site. A note on the Landscape Plan indicating "all seeded areas to receive temporary irrigation only - by owner." Staff would like clarification to determine if the owner(s) or the builder would install this temporary overhead irrigation. o Fencing and Screening: No fencing is proposed. o Erosion Controt. Silt fencing is proposed on the entire downhill side of the project to help mitigate erosion and runoff. Hay bale dams are also proposed at various locations to protect the potential runoff experienced prior to the native seed establishment. o Retaining Walls: The proposed walls utilize the "Keystone" wall system. This product provides a consistent quality and appearance. Retaining wall cross sections have been provided with the application and stamped sections will be required for building permit submittal. Walls over 4' in height must be certified by a licensed engineer (P.E.). 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Fritzlen Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 7 The design appears to be compatible with the site topography. The orientation of the structure with the slope is appropriate, and the building steps with the slope of the lot. Retaining walls are necessary to access the site. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The architectural style and massing (including height) ofthe proposed development does not appear to adversely affect adjacent and neighboring properties. High quality materials and earth tone colors are proposed for use in construction. As viewed from adjacent properties, this project should be a positive improvement for the neighborhood. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The improvement will not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity. Monetary and aesthetic values should not be impaired by the construction of this duplex. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed duplex is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this Final Design for the duplex located on Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. Additional landscaping shall be provided between the driveway and the first retaining wall. 2. A driveway culvert will be required and the installation should match the Town of Avon standard driveway culvert detail. A detail must be provided. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 4 Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 0 .:0 . . .1 . . 1 .. . 0 0 - r I I ..4 ..4..i -7 Â»--/â‚¬.4 $. 10 Â· A -7*4**Â·u:- J ..... '74242: ~ , ~ C ~ ~7 0Â«14* 1*r - a '31*~7-,j -bil*4-0 â€¢3.44 44*.9Â·'4*+A*14"I,4424-~1,~F: 1â‚¬I~"' 21*,4,-1,1-K 4~23 ' %244 *-* ff?~ ..4.- r. TA,/:F *., 14, 44:2 3 1.:11< f'fr-~9 -Â·3; 9,Â·< 49p. 47* '1 3 . 1 . 4, .''f. . Â¢*Â¥et, 1 7. 01. ill ' *1 1 UJ'.a'all- *411 i Â·-.c. < I. ./ al , ,~ el .E:, ..7*: WOCil r.,~R# 3.,1A,4 th r y ftÂ©]ke '016 / 1. 3~&4 ;~' , m' 1710 ;r % ./.;&/ :'#1.JI . I ~: 4... .&Fll ..' ./ 4 ..:* 0 ....... . . .. I 1- . .. - . 0 .: .0 0 . . .... I. Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Fritzlen Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 7 _4-, 4, -1 ,; Â· ~'~~Â· . Ate 1, I Li %2/4 ~t", 744-4- Â»2'p- 2-1.-29/9*brÂ· ,Â© .... r -1 1 6- 1 1 14' '104 1.11.' 1; 41'Ua .: ... .Â· Â·Â· â€¢ rl'' Â· + ;* I Â·-' ' : 024. 99Uy*.Lf..i. .0.- â€¢ 4'4f4. 1(1; , -Â· .... *. - I.LÂ·20 I -' 1 ' a. /2,3 ' i X â€¢ Standing onbuilding site looking South. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report Am FINAL DESIGN COLORADO June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 27,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 units) Address 5749 Wildridge Road East Introduction Gerald Meremonte is proposing a duplex residence at 5749 Wildridge Road East. Unit "H" (west unit) will be 3,812 square feet, with 441 square feet unfinished. Unit "P" (east unit) will be 3,337 square feet, with 588 unfinished. The total proposed square footage for the duplex is 8,178 square feet. Materials propsosed include: stucco, wood siding, moss rock, and asphalt shingles. The Sketch Design was approved at your May 41 2004 meeting and a variance was approved at your May 181 2004 meeting, allowing a boulder retaining wall over 4 feet tall to be constructed within the front 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Snow Storage, and Drainage Easement. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex home is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 22.9% lot coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design incorporates boulder retaining walls within the front 25-foot setback and 10-foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. A variance approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the May 18, 2004 meeting for placement of the boulder retaining wall within the setback and easement. â€¢ Easements: The project appears to comply with all platted easements. Two boulder retaining walls will be constructed within the 10-foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 ~ HÂ¢UEJUCTIEG-)1 , Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Sub ,on, Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning iommission meeting Page 2 of 5 Snow Storage Easement. The side 7.5' Utility and Drainage Easement has been labeled on the topographic map, but not the site plan. â€¢ Building Height: The design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum height requirement with a proposed height of 34'11". An ILC will be required at footing and framing to ensure compliance. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project and 10 spaces are proposed (including garage spaces). â€¢ Snow Storage: There does appear to be sufficient on-site snow storage with 825 square feet provided and 777 square feet required. The provided storage areas exceed the Town 20% of paved surfaces requirement. â€¢ Landscaping: The landscape plan is in conformance with Town guidelines. Ten percent of the landscaped area is irrigated, which complies with the Town' s maximum requirement of 20%. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. â€¢ Site Development. o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. Due to the steepness of the site the building will be stepped in appearancnce, which should help it blend in well with the site. The majority of windows will be south facing and will allow for passive solar use. o Site Access.- Access to the duplex is provided via a steep 12' wide driveway. The first 20' of driveway complies with the 4% requirement. The driveway grade is south facing and will receive additional amounts of sun. o Parking and Loading: The number of parking spaces provided complies with Town standards. There is a motor court area provided for the two units to use for a turn around area. There is also adequate space in front of the garages for turn around. o Easements: All setbacks and easements must be labeled and indicated properly on the site plan. The 7.5 foot utility and drainage side easement is not indicated and the 10 foot slope maintenance, snow storage, and drainage easement is labeled incorrectly. A retaining wall will be constructed with the Town 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. All other easements will remain unobstructed. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Sut ion, Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning commission meeting Page 3 of 5 o Site Grading: All grading appears to comply with Town standards and will occur within the property boundary. o Drainage: There are two inlets for drainage at the edges of the driveway to ensure proper drainage o f water around the building. At Sketch the applicant was aked to show additional details on the location of discharge from the inlets. This information was not provided as part of the Final Design. Staff is requesting the applicant show the drain pipes for the two inlets and how water will be diverted around the building by building permit submittal. o Snow Removal and Storage: There does appear to be sufficient on-site snow storage with 825 square feet provided and 777 square feet required. The provided storage areas exceed the Town 20% of paved surfaces requirement. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: A Variance application was approved at your May 18th, 2004 meeting to allow boulder retaining walls in the front setback. The project design is generally compatible with the intentions of the design guidelines. o Building Height: The height of the structure conforms to the Wildridge PUD limitation of 35 feet. The proposed building reaches 34' 11" and will require an ILC at framing as well as foundation. o Building Materials and Colors: Materials and colors comply with the indigenous natural or earth tones required in residential neighborhoods. The preferred stucco color is Coast Point, with the alternate color Western Reserve Beige. The wood siding color is Canyon Brown. The color of the metal trim around the windows and doors is Quaker Bronze. The color of the roof shingles is Barkwood. The base of the residence will be wrapped with moss rock. Colored elevations are available for review. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: This application proposes varying roofpitches of 4: 12 and 6: 12. o Duplex Developments: The design appears to generally conform with the intention ofthe guidelines. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The project is in compliance with the Town's maximum irrigated area requirement (20% of landscaped area). Ten percent of the landscaped area will be irrigated. Trees and bushes are proposed within the 10 foot slope maintenance, snow storage, and drainage easement. The Town discourages planting of vegetation within this easement. o Fencing and Screening: No fencing is proposed. Some proposed landscaped trees will help to screen the duplex. o Erosion Controk None indicated. Erosion control will be necessary and shall be indicated on the construction plan at building permit. o Retaining Walls: The retaining walls are greater than 4 feet in height and have not been shown to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Sub on, Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Lommission meeting Page 4 of 5 Wall sections must be provided in the plan set and were not included. Top of wall and bottom of wall elevations shall be indicated on the site plan. â€¢ Miscellaneous: The window plan for the main level of Unit P, east elevation, does not correspond with the elevation plan. The elevation plan shows moss rock and the floorplan shows a set of three windows. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The site is steep and the design appears to compatible with site topography. The building is stepped in appearance and the orientation of the structure with the slope is appropriate. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. When viewed from East Wildridge Road only the upper level of the building will be seen. Due to the downsloping lot, much of the building will be below the road elevation. The high quality materials and earthtone colors comply with the Town Design Guidelines. The architectural style and massing (including height) of the proposed development does not adversely affect adjacent and neighboring properties. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The improvement should not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity. Monetary and aesthetic values should not be impaired by the construction of this duplex. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed duplex is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this Final Design for the duplex located on Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. The 7.5 foot utility and drainage easement and 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Snow Storage, and Drainage Easement shall be labeled correctly on the site plan. 2. Outlet drains shall be indicated on the site plan for the two inlet drains at the edge of the driveway to show how water will be diverted around the building. 3. The address sign lighting is not approved and the wall mount lighting shall not contain any exposed bulbs. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Sub on, Final Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning uommission meeting Page 5 of 5 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, tul 40(<C Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Â· Â·. .I'*.Â·2 - .f tÂ·'Â·~ 92.fit :Â·< .f b ; 1.11 11 Iii f. 2 ~ 3-4,6..632*-4--â‚¬Â·399Â«6 >r?1: 47:21* I .7 1 , . S 1 I ... 'I . :4,6.1,4*41'Â©:I=*44 .ty, 8,., .... p' '... A ' '~* Â·':At. f'?t~ Â·Â·.Â·Â·-4..Â·*. ivÂ·':*D}Â·y.*i.~~~ '..1 . . Â· r,s.': ' Â·41,i ':- ..... 25 T*'vy,' . 03: 6 7AA=:7.7:4*6,$'AC~4 ,;... . $ il//'$*4,446:.. 4,44 *--44 *- IÂ·'; h. *. 37:.CA:.4*4:.04â€¢ SWK,12<Â·41,2*-0 ..4.~f . .1.11,52.,r .~?bÂ·*- Â·Â·4 . - 1- .A ./. '*'r#â€¢d.- 'vir... l.... ..~.Â·02.J' 1 1 6- i .'ip > Lot 86, Block 4 looking north from Longsun Lane. Z . -- . .*211.2.f= 1 . . I ....... '12'4441~*kA& 9 - 1=~ . ----I--I.-BI-.... le*421.-34841.Â·rk<,TE,t.Labeeie. 9 ---- 44 . I 74,4.. ?.4 Â·-EAil-'~. / 1.... bl '# Ji~~<41 i , t.2:2*. 4.-749&7# Ak , I 't:, ... ~-. - 4.1 .â‚¬ . f. Â· . .tE,/4-....I-E, ..â€¢-*Â· 40. ..../*Â¥.... Lot 86, Block 4 looking south from Wildridge Road East Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 4?'4* APPENDIX 3(b): Final Design Plan Application & Checklist RECEIVED FINAL DESIGN MAY 1 1 2004 AVON Final Design Fee: S Community Development COLORADO Applicant: MIC,>t..'rQU-1-1 A:&11-11+90+ Pc Mailing Address: Ek:27< 'Sty:142 City: 65./27,4 State: a 3, Zip:814,20 Phone #: 94=f I I *D Fax #: =149 2111 Cell #: Owner of Property: F t:z>U# 1-1Â»MEL- Phone#: 6/45 I Â·88'5 110' I Fax #: 4,4 I ASS I 4 33> Cell #: ~ Lot: Be Block: 6% Subdivbion: WIL.PIZI OG~e: ~ Project Street Address: 4-74'9 WIL--12124 1292- $2.2,42 E=Â»41- 3 Project Name: 1451Â«112'L,/ 132E:12-UÂ·606,2 F2-Â¢610E=Â·kld-4;46 O Addition J Single Family a Duplex ~ Multi-Family O Commercial 0 Industrial J Other. Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft., height, materiab, colors, unique features): 61-EX/E L & 1 6,9- 44<461 Â£= tp u pt-eg 1 WI/4-1- d Uo 161+Lut:, = 61 Â» &642pue V#W IJEE* 'FÂ»â€¢be AA# & 42+A L- ALL-QI,<.1412>LE 1-|t. - 5441'apte e,â€¢Â·, IJUI+, I.LU l-1-"14" le Â·:58, 1,25Â£:1' + 44 Irl| 0klplUI.5Ale UU'-|- "12" 14 :3$:b~--7, 63:11 + 655Â©Ct' UllpikIPE>145:t:p. -h* dewot]Ut> 4-MAIJ LibÂ·*106 Atze=51*1=> 00 +NE IJpull.L 12-ie -It> 4%]e. #Ae6 93,24 6up We (T) represent thatall information provided to the Town ofAvon in connection with this application as true and correct that we (T) understand the Town o f Avon regulations applicable to this project. and understand t)/|~~2/6,~mirtal., will delay applicatio,i rewew. Ouncr designates Applicant as indicated t{fct ~0~~~ntativ~~11 application submittals related to this project. Applkant~~~ Owner: (Print Name): 4*e*k.ok, MaZE*49 Ultirrint Name): 1*%6440- 1-1Â»Mel- Date: Date: Community Dev elopment Depatuncnt. P.O Box 975.Avon. CO S] 620 (970)748-4030 Far (970)949-5749 Page 1 01 2 Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 54 - -- --Â·--- - - Adopted November 6, 2001 MIRAMONT AR CH~TECT PC MIRAMONTI POST OFFICE BOX 5820 AVON COLORADO 81620 T970 949 i!38 F9709490117 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LIST & NOTES HAMEL/PERUSSE RESIDENCES 5749 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 05/11/04 ROOF ALL PITCHES: ASPHALT SHINGLES, 50 YEAR, "PRESTIQUE" BY El_IC BARKWOOD FLASHING 16 GAUGE: PROVIDE AT ALL ROOF COMPONENTS & AT ALL HORIZONTAL INTERSECTIONS OF CEDAR TRIM MATERIALS & STONE CAP DETAILS CHIMNEY CAPS 16 GAUGE GALVANIZED ALUMINUM WITH 6" THICK CAP & BASE, 18" TALL LEGS & OPEN AT TOP AS SHOWN. PRIME & PAINT TO MATCH STUCCO FASCIA RS (ROUGH SAWN) 2x 6 CEDAR, ON RS 2X 10 CEDAR, STAINED A: " SUPERDECK" CANYON BROWN DB-1907 OUTLOOKERS DF (DOUG FIR) 6 x 18 TIMBER AT MAJOR RIDGES & SHOULDERS DF (DOUG FIR) 6 x 12 TIMBER AT MINOR RIDGES & SHOULDERS STAINED A: "SUPERDECK" CANYON BROWN DB-1907 SOFFITS RS CEDAR, T& G 1X6 V-GROOVE CEDAR: STAINED A INCLUDES UNDERS[DE OF DECKS & CANTILEVERED FLOORS STUCCO TRADITIONAL TWO COAT SYSTEM ON WIRE LATH ON 15# FELTS, WITH ELASTOMERIC PAINT, COLOR: "COAST POINT" SHERWIN WILLIAMS sw2053 LINTELS IN STUCCO 8" OR 6" x 2" THICK STUCCO, WITH 3" REVEALS AT JAMBS, COLOR TO MATCH STUCCO & SLOPE TOP TO WASH SILLS IN STUCCO 3" THICK WITH 3" REVEALS AT JAMBS, COLOR TO MATCH STUCCO & SLOPE TO WASH WINDOWS & DOOR LINTELS IN STONE DF 8x 10 TIMBERS WITH 4" REVEAL AT JAMBS, STAINED A WINDOW SILLS IN STONE BUFF SANDSTONE APPROX. 2" TO 3" THICK X VERIFY WIDTH, SLOPE 1/2"/FOOT 3" REVEALS AT JAMBS HORIZONTAL SKIRTING @ DECKS RS CEDAR 2x 6ON 2x1O CEDAR, STAINED A % MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC 4 MIRA MONTI POST OFFICE BOX 5820 AVON COLORADO 81620 T970949i!38 F970949 0117 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LIST & NOTES CONTINUED HAMEL/PERUSSE RESIDENCES 5749 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 05/11/04 TIMBER COLUMNS DF (DOUGLAS FlR) 4-8 x 8 TIMBERS, WITH 3" IRON BAND, SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS: STAINED A TIMBER TRUSSES DF 6x 18,6x 12&6 x 8 TIMBER TRUSS COMPONENTS, SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS: STAINED A HAND & GUARD RAILS DF 8x8 TIMBER NEWEL POSTS: STAINED A WITH IRON CAP TErrURED WROUGHT IRON TOP & BOTTOM RAILS TEXTURED WROUGHT IRON BALUSTERS @ 4" CENTERS HORIZONTAL BAND RS 2x6 CEDAR ON RS 2X 10 CEDAR: STAINED A DECK COLUMN BASES STONE: MOSS ROCK CAP: 2" TO 3" TH]CK BUFF SANDSTONE, MITRE AT CORNERS, SLOPE '/2"/FOOT DECKING MATERIAL 2 x 6 REDWOOD BY "TREX" NAIL SPACED, SEALED NATURAL WINDOWS & DOORS "SEMCO" ALUMINUM CLAD, STANDARD BRONZE FINISH CUSTOM FRONT ENTRY DOOR: STAINED A CUSTOM GARAGE DOORS & TRIM: STAINED A STONE VENEER MOSS ROCK TO BE LAID UP AS FOLLOWS: 75% HORIZONTAL TO 25% VERTICAL 1" MAX GROUT JOINTS, RAKED 1" MIN DEEP STONE CAP BUFF SANDSTONE 3" THICK X VERIFY WIDTH, RANDOM LENGTH, MITER CORNERS & SLOPE 92"/FOOT COVERED PORCH & TERRACES BUFF SANDSTONE 1" TO 1 3/4" THICK, RANDOM SHAPES MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC MIRAMONTI POST OFF!CE 8OX 5820 AVON COLORADO 81620 T970949 I138 F970 949 O I l 7 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LIST & NOTES CONTINUED HAMEL/PERUSSE RESIDENCES 5749 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 05/11/04 GENERAL NOTES 1) ALL RETAINING WALLS OVER 4'0" IN HEIGHT TO BE DESIGN BY A LICENSED COLORADO ENGINEER 2) A MOCK-UP INSPECTION & APPROVAL IS REQUIRED ON-SITE PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF ANY EXTER[OR MATERIALS 3) ALL VENTS, METERS (GAS OR ELECTRIC) &/OR ANY REL-KrED SUPPORT CONDUIT TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING EXTERIOR MATERIALS 4) ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOT SHOWN ON THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS TO BE RECESSED CAN LIGHTING IN THE ROOF OVERHANG SOFFITS OR RECESSED STEP UGHTING LOCATED IN COLUMN BASES AND/OR NEWEL POSTS AT DECKS/BALCONYS 5) ALL AREAS OUTSIDE OF LIMMS OF DISTURBANCE AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN SP-1 ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION BEGA 1 . WAL-4 Mou#4- t AL-k **1 . .. Wall luminaires with die cast aluminum radius bracket arm and canopy. ThreeÂ·ply opal .. 8 glass with screw neck. COIN: Black of white. . 0 A I r I C . j . Lamp < Lumen ABC ~ 6590 Wall 1 60W At19 890 10'A 141/6 12'K. 6548P Wall 1 13W PLC 860 109. 141/b 120. 6393 Wall 1 100*119 1750 15Â¥â€¢ 2744.270. 63948 Wall 1 SOW EÂ·17 HPS 4000 15Â¥4 27Â¥,4 27Â¥,0 -- I .. .1 a , 1. Wall luminaires with Ilared shade, die cast aluminum radius bracket arm and canopy. Three-ply opal glass with screw neck. Color: Black of while. .A. .6~&2662- â€¢ C â€¢ Lamp Lumen A B C 9 .. 6491 Wall 1 6OW AÂ·19 890 12Â¥4 14'/6 134 ~ 6492p Wall 1 13W PLC 860 12Â¥,0 144 134 6493 Wall 1 10OW AÂ· 19 1750 197,0 2744 2746 64948 Wall ' 1 50W EÂ·17 HPS 4000 197,4 2746 2746 81 93'f#%..1,-4,~... ;k---j..~g c.. 4.4. BEGA P . WA 6.6 Meu #4 Q AL-+ 44 z f , Wall luminaires with die cast aluminum arm ana canopy ~,0~~~A ThreeÂ·ply opal glass with screw ,-1 Â£=12-1 neck. Color : Black or white, t. I -1--4. c Â® , -2=2=~ - I ...I./.- Lamp 4 Lumen Â· A B C / 6290 Wall 1 60W AÂ·19 890 1074 104 12%40 82.P Wall 1 13W PLC 860 10'/4 10'/4 12Â¥i. 0291 Wall 1 100W AÂ·19 1750 - 15'Â¥. 1544 20 02928 Wall 1 50W EÂ·17 HPS 4000 15'44.15% 20 )094';:' f'lot'~r.AW â€¢11',Â·ltÂ·.-- ' - I I. :1.:YV:' ./ . .4 , A F.Â·WMAE,joi,Eaj* . . 0 Wall luminaires with die cast aluminum arm. canopy and while guard. ThreeÂ·ply opal glass with screw neck. 2 ' Color: Black or white. C . . A â€¢ 9 11 4'P. r.. 1 Lamp Lumen ABC 15'' 4,5 0432 Wall 1 60WAÂ·19 890 10'/â€¢ 10'/â€¢ 12Â¥,0 G433P Wall 1 13W PLC 860 1094 107. 12Â¥,O 0434 Wall 1 100W AÂ·19 1750 15'Â¥- 15Â¥. 20 6435S Wall 1 50WEÂ·17 HPS 4000 15'44. 15Â¥â€¢ 20 i.vÂ·'S.iÂ·'.AN#do*84"*Lit' . 84+-h~ QN. lacÂ·.~...1"~ .. 79 JUL-15-2003 14:44 FROM:MIRAMONTI 9709490117 TO: 8457'710'3 P.004/004 BEGA 4 1'.Â· *W l--l -41:*Li~2*E~3-L . m Bollards and beacon luminairee for ' pefrnarâ€¢ent rnounting (above). Die cast alurnint.rn to,A,ers and etched glass diflusers Heavy .125' wall extruded aluminum post with die cast aluminum base 12V units supplted â€¢Aâ€¢ â€¢C, with #1142, 18W, Sa lamp. Color: Black or white. Beacon Lamp Lumen ABC 7655 le 1 18W S8.12V 264 39> 79> 49 .. 7656 360' 1 18W 68,12V 264 31 799 4'h 7555 ,80â€¢ 9 lialistormer 1 18W 2.12V 264 39 9 49, 7556 360~Viransto,mer 1 18WS812V 264 3,9, 9 40 4 755#P 1 7 gWPLC 515 34 9 435 .- 755OP 360' 1 9W PLC 575 34 9 40 Â¢ 60=1 -. 1. 1- 9055 180' 1 laW SS.12V 264 3W 24- 4 W 9056 360' Â¥ 18WS8,12V 264 379 24 499 9655 180~ 9translorme, 1 18W 38.12V 264 3'.4 24Â· 4'4 4; 9650 3600 'fuanglormer 1 18WSS,12V 264 30 24 4;4 965SP 180* 1 9W PLC 575 34 24 414 965*P 360' 1 9W PLC 575 314 24 43 803A Anchorage for above units supplied - e Beacon luminaires with stake or stake ana stem for portable 404 Through wiring box Â¥ adaptor plate 19 above units . - 'Aâ€¢ instanabon (below). Die cast aluminum touvero ano Â¥19 etched glass dillusers. 'H' ver,lons supplied 9 w IP nipple lor permanent mounting. Require ternote12Â¥ trinatormer. Supplied with 01142,18W, 88 lamp. Color: Black Or whtÂ». Beacon Lamp Lumen A B C 7851 1804 9 Stake 1 18* S812V 264 399 64â€¢ 8 A iÂ· 6 .... -- N C '~ ' #i Od ' 7751 364 '9Slake 1 18W 38 129 264 38 6Â¥â€¢ 8 1Â·'t-'.'. 4 54/48*p. 14 ' : 7651 M 160' 4' 4- I P noote 1 law 58 12Â¥ 264 30 6- 941<~.4 Â· .4.1.:,2 0... 776â„¢ 360'4/'81 P n,pole 1 18W 58127 264 3'4 k 7 2 41 ..1 -Â·44.-; 0.2 7650 - 1800 , mem 1 18* 5812Â¥ 266 3.. 14 8 1 18* 58 12V 264 34 14 8 I. . 7750H 360â€¢ 9Stern & M- 1.P 1 18W S8,12Â¥ 264 3'4 14 . 121 FROM 9709490117 OF 7/14/2003 2:58 PM Page 4 JUL-15-2003 14:43 FROM:MIRAMONTI 9709490117 TO:8457003 P.002/004 BEGA l -1,1.4,4 L.41 Wi \ A 6+ * 2 -11-~ .%4*,EÂ·9 -i . / - I.*-~' 2%<filawki~#~49% *kikt*44Â£2..53:- ~< Â£~LWI,ArT,3 $~Wi,/,i Louvered garden honts constructed 01 heavy die cast aluminun with mainlees steel .4.jik tasteners Clear prism glass 111 0 c Color: 81*Ck with white louvers. =<%>97 . I. . â€¢ Aâ€¢ 01â‚¬.- ...r..14~~4~4& p , Â® 0 1 Â· ')6~224,i}M@'24 2 - 4.2114Â¥462**8** , 2.'*,MWAWT- I . Â·: ~ftÂ·,,,lÂ·;â€¢,36&914+VIâ€¢; -- te'ter<q~of#Jgt / 4 ' i.9- L.amp Lurner, ABC 4,2,1- :,7.' ir.:41512*aeâ€žlk,U 7331 Gamen light 1 66* AÂ· 19 890 64 94 114 4*6Â·-Â·Â·Â· 'â€žt. *.49~'-7Â£ Â£i 7332 Garden light 1 100W AÂ·19 , 750 744 1214 11'44. /0.. 1 1. 1 . 4 4 :,*32â€¢krgfeU?31~. Â· ~ -Â· ~'~-' fi'.4.Jiw ' ..I: euoi# 7"- 1 ... b Garden rev, neck. : Black or . te ...Â·.9 1. 3 j / 4 h 2'' 1 ' . #, 594Â£ ,26i':, t.-93. 24=2 '*t -, 1 1 /0/ 41* 4/4/69 y~;Â¢: <:-9(*MiSM** i. S' ' 2 1*416 , r 4 -0%,.,), M 7,14'2Â¥ 9 P L Ael ~ 7031 'fuake Id & plug Â£ BOW A 19.90 13â€¢ 41,0 12 . 703$H Perm tmount, 5/.St KW AÂ· 1 890 13Â¥4'Wo - w w~:~iu=**W*~2*Â» 1Â·,1 g;0.1 ...a,waa#~4,1 y 126 FROM 9709490117 OF 7/14/2003 2:58 PM Page 2 9 *24=k -1 I 4 BEGA . . 1 11, *#44 1-4 IN 9 1 A 0.+, 4 =s !l 1. . 2. :~ 4%29Â·'Fi.:0.-f.. 1.0 1 lw . . t . C ' 1.<-2.,A,Wf IA. Bollard with symmetrical light . f distribution. Impact resistant pc>lycarbonate plastic lens. . f 2 4 8581 requires remote 12V transformer. 8581T has integral B transformer for 120V supply. 20W 04, Bi-pin lamp supplied. Color: Black of white. ecâ€¢ 4 . , P /4~i ' Ntâ€¢; Lamp 1 Lumen A B C 8581 Bollard 1 20W (34, 12V 350 43/. 31 +6 4%46 4 8581T Bollard 1 20* 64,42V 350 4 44 31% 4Â¥,0 .. 894A Anchorage lor 8581 supplied - =7 f -"Â·Â·Â·EÂ·7.:d,!:92Gli - -, I :1~1....i~1 47,11...,1 .....8.1 r ' 70/61 + '41 . : .r 0. 0 Bollard with asymmetrical light distribution. Impact resistant pressed glass spread lens. PI 8680 requires remote 12V B transformer. 8680T has integral Iranstormer for 120V supply. 50W GY 6.35, Bi-pin lamp ' supplied. = Color: Black or white. . 1 1 2. 7 Lamp Lumen A B 8680 Bollard 1 50W GY6.35, 12V 1000 44 31+6 I 8680T Bollard 1 50W GY6.35 12V 1000 4+6 31+6 894A Anchorage for 8680 - supplied .6*hi~-F,Â·:,6:*~,974*,ifi;%94;~&/*4~ 123 BEGA A pogess S Â£ g N i A LA * 1 â€¢ Floodlights for stake, nipple elli 9 9 or accessory mounting 4 Fully adjustable 90' from vertical. 1 01 Supplied with three feet of #16 wire and connector for attachment to #12 SPT/3. 12V power cable. . V Tempered clear glass with 0-ring oCâ€¢ .A. gaskel. MR16, GX5.3 Bi-pin, BAB .....7 wide flood lamp supplied. ' Color: Black or white â€¢ Lamp Lumen A B C D ./ 7351 9 Stake 1 20W MR16 850 8 37â€¢ 3Â¥â€¢ 7 7351H w/ 'h' Nipple 1 20W MA 16 850 2Â¥. 37. 3Â¥â€¢ - 7350 9 Stem & Stake 1 20W MR16 850 2% 147. 7'4 7 7350H Â¥ Stem & W Nipple 1 20WMR16 850 2Â¥â€¢ 1474 78 7354 Head only 1 20W MR16 850 2Â¥, 374 3Â¥â€¢ 7354H Head Â¥'h' Nipple 1 20WMR16 850 2Â¥4 37â€¢ 3Â¥â€¢ 288 SS tree screw tor use with 7354H 248 Pole cap for 2%' 0 (2- pipe) forusewith 7354H 735 45' Cut-off shield for 7350;'7351,7354 /Canopy f light for di t ((61 A F. A A 0 / mount,110 wall, ceillgor i r.eir / wiringkx. Fully adi~table 900 ~ I == llc=1 " fror,~6rtical. Supg~d with / in~ral transforir for 120V / 90Wer supply (053) or witho/ pansformer f/connection /ow ~ voltage (121power cabl~7352) / Temperec~flear glass wt 0-ring / gasket ~916, G)(5.3 /pin. BA wide 1]~d lamp sup~[ed. Col Black or wh /f / Lamp Lume A t , 735~6Transforrn9~ 1 20W 16 10 2Â¥â€¢ 74 4Â¥f 73~ â„¢TransforrÂ·6 1 20W R16 0 23/ 69â€¢ 4546 97 p.0. Box 2494 AVON.CO 81620 PROJECT HAMEL/ PERUSSE RESIDENCES 1-n JOB NO. 0304-04 PH 970.949.7100 FAX 970.949.3377 SHEET NO. 1 OF 2 CALCULATED BY JPL DATE 05/11/04 , ~-1'llutions in c SCAI F 1/2" = 1,0" ENGINEERING , 2-6" MIN. v 0 " ili /46.<b;3PLUA'r- TOP VIEW mile t. u / 1 7 -2 //571*M*P, - -2\ -m;pl , 2'-6" MIN. , * D SIDE VIEW MIN. BOULDER DIMENSIONS , 3'-0" MIN. , / * 1 l f L-- FOUR COURSES OF BOULDERS MAX FOLLOW SOILS ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS v 2'-0. MIN , FILL AND FILTER FABRIC, FOR AMOUNT OF GRAVEL 1 BEFORE / ~ SLOPING GRADE 2 NOTE: BOULDERS SHALL 1 r- 1; 1 11 1 -1 1- lili NOT BE ROUND IN SHAPE & 1,1 1 FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM SOILS ENGINEER. 1'-0' MIN , TYP. SIX FOOT MAXIMUM SINGLE TIER ~ BOULDER RETAINING WALL DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" = 1 '-0 XVIN 03 L ' ' 1 '-0" MIN. , 6'-0"MAX. 1-HE-ART-6ithe VALLEY Staff Report SKETCH DESIGN PLAN Am COLORADO June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 21,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units (Duplex) Address 2100 Long Spur & 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop Introduction Phil Matsen has resubmitted a duplex design for the intersection o f Long Spur and Saddle Ridge Loop roads in Wildridge. A concept for the two driveway access points was approved at the April 20th, 2004 Commission meeting and the previous sketch/final design plan was denied at the May 4% 2004 meeting. The previous submittal was denied based on the following review criteria: 6. The appearance ofproposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality o f materials, and colors. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The comer lot under review is flat compared to the other remaining developable lots in Wildridge. Proposed materials include stucco siding, wood trim and siding, fieldstone, and asphalt shingles. The design has been modified since the last submittal with material changes and architectural interest added to all building elevations. Please find the attached Memo from the applicant regarding the design modifications made since the last submittal. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex home is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the Zoning Code, proposing 33% lot coverage. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Sketch Plan June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 â€¢ Setbackw: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. Two 25' building (front) setbacks are required for this lot. â€¢ Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. â€¢ Building Height: This design appears to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. Two o f the roo f ridgelines, one on each unit, approach 34'9" in height. An ILC at framing will be required to verify compliance with the Town's maximum allowable height requirement. Additionally, the location of the decks (and supports) must be confirmed with the framing ILC. â€¢ Grading: Staff has identified some inaccuracies with the proposed grading on the site plan. Contour 8218 does not appear to be indicated properly. It appears that the contour should extend through the building. Proposed grading also exceeds 2:1 (2' horizontal to 1' vertical) in some areas. â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this proj ect, and it appears that 8 spaces (including garage spaces) are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: Adequate on-site snow storage is provided with 640 square feet. At least 560 square feet of snow storage is required for the size of the proposed driveways. â€¢ Landscaping: It appears that the Landscaping Plan is in conformance with the Town guidelines. The proposed plan proposes 1,406 square feet o f spray irrigation and 789 square feet of drip irrigation for a total of 2,195 square feet of irrigated area. The total irrigated area proposed is in compliance and equal to the Town' s 20% maximum irrigated area requirement. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The proj ect generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. A duplex is an appropriate density for this lot. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development. o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. Two access points allow more design flexibility and help to break up the appearance o f the two units. Garage doors are on opposite sides of the building. O Site Access: The driveway access width and grades appear to be in compliance with Town standards. Both access points blend well with the natural contours of the site. Additional spot elevations must be provided on the driveways at the entrances and adj acent to garage doors to insure compliance with slope requirements. o Parking and Loading: The "hammer head" turnarounds and the areas immediately adjacent to the garage doors should be extended in order to allow for ease in vehicle movements in and out o f the garages. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Sketch Plan June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 o Easements: This project is in compliance with all platted easements. o Site Grading: Some of the proposed grading appears incorrect. As mentioned, contour 8218 must be revised and some of the grading appears to exceed 2:1 slope. These grading issues must be corrected prior to final design submittal. o Drainage: Positive drainage must be provided away from the structure. It appears that the drainage arrows indicated on the site plan are incorrect. This would need to be addressed prior to final design submittal. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design conforms to setback, building area ratios, and height limitations. o Building Height: As proposed, the height o f the building is in compliance with the 35-foot allowance. A framing ILC would be required. o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (stucco siding, wood lap siding, vertical board and batten siding, fieldstone, cedar trim, and asphalt shingles) are high quality and appear to comply with the guidelines. The proposed colors are earth tone and encouraged by Town guidelines. Since the last design submittal, additional batten board siding has been added to each elevation. Addtionally, the stone base has been carried around the entire structure. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The use of predominantly indigenous building materials such as native stone, wood siding, and timbers is encouraged in the design guidelines. The wall planes on each elevation of this project appear to be broken up by the use of different materials and additional bumpouts. Varied roof pitches are proposed with the supplied roof plan (sheet A-5). The massing of the structure remains substantial and unchanged since the last design submittal. o Outdoor Lighting: The proposed light fixture is in compliance with the current Town standards. It is recommended that the bulb for the proposed lights be less than 1000 lumens (or equivalent to a 60 watt incandescent bulb) in order to comply with the Town's proposed lighting ordinance. o Duplex Developments: The proposed duplex is designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site and appears to comply with the intention o f the guidelines. The design creates a unified structure with variety and architectural interest to distinguish the duplex from a single-family residence. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The landscaping plan recognizes the drought conditions that prevail in our region. The tree species proposed are tolerant o f drought episodes. A note referring to the use o f a rain sensor must be added to the Landscape Plan with the final design plan submittal. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Sketch Plan June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 o Erosion Control-. Notes referring to silt fencing, project sign, limits of disturbance, and hay bales are included on the site plan. A separate construction staging plan is required for final design submittal. o Retaining Walls: One small retaining wall (2' tall) is necessary on the south elevation for garage access. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Commission review this sketch design plan for Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision and determine whether or not the revised design has been sufficiently modified to meet the two criteria as cited as the basis for denial at last review. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 7 CIL./ / ...52=Zh Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician --- Â· P - '__ f-&: b,~... ~Â·.:W#i.~*4~...3. :~:-j#E-:.~14, I~~ff?.5:~:~Â·i >~Ii?*u MÂ·Â·t:,Â·: Â£4~t. 2~~i.t~~~Â·ff ~:Â·.?3<~'~~,<9~Â«~~' ;~ ~~~ ~~,4.;,-- / D. .//710/EM/*444"49 Â·4:. L e .'& :4*442 .1 .... 4,0 . . 04 .1 . j_'*4*har:-4, ' a,Â·871 .614&:#41:5' - .- 14//~~//~t, 5 t'~ir Â·. d'Â·.3.62 t .. .7, 1.4. ., .1 Â·ff . . . r Ila , ....5 Â· i ~h., M''- M:-Â·/-' . . . I N....1-,99 1': -:h 1 / . . 4Â·Â·iÂ·lut,44~i 'Â· wii' 9.Ne,Â·Â·'I.- ' '-~.3.:4~3*4Â·t,4.i~At.1.rli~Â·.p~;A:.4,; ...4-.1 :.f~Â·I.'~ f 'Pit: 0-i.y U.1Â·N~NE.~ 40'N-'' i.-'iNK li~~.2 + - 2 View of Lot24 from trail access point across the intersection. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 t Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Sketch Plan June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 ,.. *4*%0-22,0.: Â·~L. . . 1 42* f.-- *4,4.it ...â€ž 1<**~ 1- -Â«421 r-I Â·Â· . I -r v Â· .Â· ~ , ./ .:9. .1 .' ... -Â·~ r. 4 ' 4:.: .%4 . ~4~-/ 9,4~, f :Ii.t.~ 1/..' #f!12.~ .jff.3 ., 4.. , 1&. 4-' : 1%'' 1 :4:1'~ 'r... Â·Â·Â·P/~'f 'u- 72 40&/Whir<"14 . . -- --"'c '///-//'*4 /&'1/im % i.,7 E //4 F' + 9 CÂ· 9 .â€¢4. ' View from middle of lot looking east. I Â· - ..4.- ~-~~ -~- *E =- rb 1,1- - - ~~ . ..t e.,a,2.G..:-*4, rr,r E;*=6, 47 iN , -IA'/M, idi/42 *Wki-*P&7/#.iok /111. ., 4 * ....U,2 1~ :* 7 .7-11,51, 1 i - 20 . #*04Â·'Â·., 0151 *.r , 9 4 -IPS=ER- - :ir,#41. 9... Â·116. . . '3 7 ..p. 4'.*braw*.4~0&<*Aits:#i*KI l:% s.Â· 4-1'.I '. 4 %-I p.9 Â·Â·Â·i, .. ' hant '' 2' '4 -Rl&*620.fli' 1* - View from middle of lot looking north. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 - Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Sketch Plan June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 1.1. I. 4, -= 1.--6 - . ,-2 - = % ~'. 4 . 4948' '1 VA. 19â€ž.7-,4 10 .. /13.6!9. 6 ... 0. 1 44., '.. ' I f 43' w~%' ,%17Â£1A414' 4975. +~ 1~;1. -4,~ 191* rel, Ar -1 1 4 + -'0*:12' 2 1_ -t.4 1 .W 1 k, 1!A.' 'G ... 1 G m / 4,4 1'' E . 9. '1&, Â·Â· 1) 4- â€¢ 2 I View from the middle of property looking south. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 1- 3 *' . I. I ': * . . 4 4, i I 4 24 &. . +1 3 -- 4 j I -- :i 1 -: 1- F 7-1. 311 IÂ· 44.:~ /4%2 -' ' ...>Â·Â· 4 -- Â· Lot 41, Block 1, Wildridge - 2121 Long Spur Road ; 1 Â· ..0,-" Jâ€¢- 9.-4:2 -11179'~~~I - .51*f,7 Â·-.4,5.:Â·2*.-*i:.â€ž. â€žd~ r. 211@ 23/tie / fn %96*16 ** 4% -'t t.9} 1#IR :-/ . A i 4 4 4.-i â‚¬3201Â·43-Â·- , Â·1,Â·NS:_a,~ ....1 '. h $ .1.1@I?to-;~- 4.4,2*jffi~W. *6.AU:,A*-* * 'I:*.I: Q ./ ,; Â·Â·47 Â» r<- ~ 4 '~- Â· "gay,.ir,LF+Ted,r'<61* Lot 75, Block 4, Wildridge - 5601 Wildridge Road East 9 1, ..f --7.Â· I..m .... I *I ~' .my .:awk>'. I I =.-1 -BLI';. 1.,1! .. - : I 4. k ./Iliw. - i. 1 :'41'<ft :twitok. 7,06, 9;'-f U-Â» - teÂ·:1':-&09.2 r. : Imdek/,t.0 - "39.i , ..~ *mi. . ;:4 4?Â·: 'o, 4.fo'* 11--1~ 1 Â· â€¢ Â·4 /'4 *ir :12 '1-1...1.4/,El'.32~1,~Mai =~'3 Â·,p"M#&*.. r ./ k Â¥27 A.. Lot 100, Block 1, Wildridge - 2290 Old Trail ' 4 PHILIP JAMES MATSEN P.O. Box 7796 Avon, Colorado 81620 970-376-2766 RE: New Duplex Construction LOT 24 BLOCK 1 WILDRIDGE Avon, CO 81620 PLAN CHANGES ON LOT 24 BLOCK 1 WILDRIDGE SOUTH ELAVATION #1 3' FIELD STONE WAINSCOT WITH STONE CAP #2 BOARD & BATTEN ON ENDS & POP OUT #3 EXTRA ROOF OVER GARAGE #4 JOG IN ROOF LINE ON LEFT SIDE #5 POP OUT WITH SHED ROOF ON LEFT SIDE #7 LARGER TIMBERS ON ENTRENCE WAY #8 BOARD & BATTEN ON SHED ON LEFT SIDE TOP ROOF #9 HORIZONAL LAP SIDING RIGHT SIDE NORTH ELAVATION #1 3' FIELD STONE WAINSCOT WITH STONE CAP #2 BOARD & BATTEN ON ENDS & POP OUT #3 MOOR WINDOW TRIM DETAIL #4 MOVE WINDOW ON LEFT SIDE #5 ROOF LINE JOG UPPER RIGHT #7 LARGER TIMBERS ON SHED ROOF ENTRENCE WAY #8 HORIZONAL LAP SIDING LEFT SIDE EAST ELAVATION #1 3' FIELD STONE WAINSCOT WITH STONE CAP #2 BOARD & BATTEN ON ENDS & POP OUT RECEIVED #3 MOOR WINDOW TRIM DETAIL #4 MOVE WINDOW ON LEFT SIDE MAY 2 7 2004 #5 ROOF LINE JOG UPPER RIGHT Community Development WEST ELAVATION #1 3' FIELD STONE WAINSCOT WITH STONE CAP #2 BOARD & BATTEN ON ENDS & POP OUT #3 MOOR WINDOW TRIM DETAIL #4 ADD TWO WINDOWS #5 ROOF LINE JOG UPPER LEFT & RIGHT #7 LARGER TIMBERS ON SHED ROOF ENTRENCE WAY #8 NEW POP OUTS WITH SHED ROOFS ~ HEART â€žt' the \Al .1.1\ Staff Report -=M-~,- SKETCH DESIGN PLAN AVON COLORADO June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 25,2004 Project type Single-family Legal description Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD Zoning Residential Single-Family (RSF) Address 1910 Hurd Lane Introduction Architectural Services PC is proposing a single-family residence on Hurd Lane. The building is approximately 2,903 sq. ft. in size, with a 574 sq. ft. garage and 1919 sq. ft. unfinished basement. The style of this house will emulate a country farmhouse with 10:12 roof pitches, horizontal siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A single-family dwelling is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for one family dwelling and accessory buildings and uses per the Nottingham Station PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project appears to comply with this requirement and will be confirmed at Final Design. â€¢ Setbacks: As stated on the Nottingham Station PUD: front setback - 25 feet; side setback - 7.5 feet; rear setback -20 feet. There is also a35 feet stream setback on this property for the Eagle River. â€¢ Easements: As shown on the site plan the project appears to comply with all platted easements. There is a 10 foot drainage easement on the west property boundary; a24 foot access easement which extends into the property from Hurd Lane; a 7.5 feet drainage easement on the east property boundary; and the Metcalf Ditch easement on the north property boundary. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Nottingham PUD, Sl Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zoni v 'ommission meeting Page 2 0 f 4 â€¢ Building Height: The design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum height requirement with a proposed building height of 33.9 feet. An ILC will be required at footing and framing to ensure compliance. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: 3 parking spaces are required for this residence, and 3 spaces are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: h appears that ample on-site snow storage is available. This will be reviewed at Final Design for compliance with Town standards. â€¢ Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be reviewed at Final Design. Ail landscaping must comply with the revised landscaping guidelines adopted last year. There appears to be a generous amount of existing landscaping to remain after construction is completed. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies wit the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Nottingham Station PUD for the proposal. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development*. o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. o Site Access: Access to the residence is provided with a 12' wide driveway. Lot 5A and 5B share a 24' access easement. The driveway appears to be 10 feet wide at its narrowest point. It may be appropriate to increase this width to 12 feet. The parking area in front of the garage is facing north, which may require additional attention for snow maintenance. The existing gravel drive will be asphalt paved. o Parking and Loading-. Parking spaces are provided in front of the garage and there appears to be adequate turnaround space for vehicles leaving the garage. o Easements: No building is proposed in any of the easements on the Sketch Plan. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. All grading appears to comply with Town standards, and occurs within the property boundaries for Lot 5B. Grading will be completed, as necessary, for the building and to control drainage. o Drainage: Positive drainage around the building is provided and all drainange appears functional on the site. Water from the asphalt driveway in front of the garage and landscaped area on the north side of the building will be diverted to the east side of the building and drain to the rear of the lot. Water west of the ditch will flow into the existing ditch and be diverted to the west side of the building and to the rear of the lot. o Snow Removal and Storage: It appears there is adequate room for snow storage and all snow storage can be accommodated on-site. This will be reviewed at Final Design for compliance with Town standards. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5B, Nottingham PUD, Sketc sign June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning 6ommission meeting Page 3 of 4 â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The proposed residence will be designed in a country farmhouse style and is generally compatible with the intentions of the design guidelines. o Building Height: The height of the building conforms to the Nottingham Station PUD limitation of 35 feet. The proposed building height reaches 33.9 feet and will require an ILC at framing as well as foundation. o Building Materials and Colors: Building materials will include: wood siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. Building colors will be .greviewed at Final Design. o Â«Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. The roof pitch proposed with Â» this application is 10:12. The south elevation roof plan appears to be large in 11~.,mass.~: There is a metal roof proposed above the entry porch (north elevation). J./1 Â·=4 Exterior walls will consist of horizontal wood siding. Staff Recommendation E 0 Staff recommends Sketch Design~pproval for the single-family residence on Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD, with the<following conditions to be resolved prior to Final Design submittal:--- I---- 1. The survey shall be revised and note #7 deleted. 2. The site plan indicates a shed will be relocted but does not show the new location. The new location of the shed shall be indicated on the site plan at Final Design. 3. The roof plan for the Final Design shall indicate elevations for all ridgelines. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project Or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, rD<V/ \\ Kenneth Kovalchik ' Planner I / 1-- ''j / , / 147 1/ C -4 1 : 1 i lilin -h 1 .r : -I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 ANTENNA . Lot 5B, Nottingham PUD, Sk Design June 1,2004 Planning & Zonins Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 1, 1 '11 . 41 0 , 1 .1 N 34*342.- e . ./ ..:421:ME;.... .'4â‚¬) 1 gr , *ija - Lot 5B, looking south from Hurd Lane 'f, 1 91 60" . y *r 20 3* . .I.. 4A1~* V. , Â«4. ... I 4, . ,-1 47. r :,Vul fy~ .-.-< > I . 1 .L:*Ft,ti-Â·.CLe'*:CI,j ..4.,~ Â· . . 1 ..Â·..4.4.Â·4*42--Â·43.Â·: 0*Â· ..I:t Â£22.2-tz ~-t~Â»- .Â·M~.-Â·17#46+E44909fil Lot 5B, interior of lot looking southwest Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report -Feate.7 Minor Project- Fence Av[]\ COLOR An (1 June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date May 18, 2004 Project Type Minor Project - Fence Application Legal Description Lot 8, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Address 4720 Eaglebend Drive Introduction The applicant, Catherine Bentley, is requesting the approval of a four-foot metal fence in the rear of her property. The fence is proposed at four feet tall to compliment the existing railing on the deck above the proposed "courtyard" area. Attached you will find a site plan and some recent photographs showing the approximate location o f the proposed fence and the design o f the existing metal railing. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. According to the Residential Design Guidelines Section C, fencing is discouraged "and will only be permitted where it complements the character o f the property... and compliments the " landscaping rather than contain the property. The guidelines also state that "fence materials shall be compatible with the site and the materials of the structures on the site," and "should the fencing comply with the requirements o f this section, the fenced area must be less than h of the perimeter of the property and no more than 4 feet in height." It is staff's opinion the proposed fence does not delineate the property boundaries, and that the fence materials are compatible with the site. The fence should compliment the existing landscaping with use o f stone to break up the fence sections. The fence area proposed is less than 1 /4 the perimeter and is 4 feet as proposed. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. No negative impacts should be experienced as viewed from the adjacent properties. The style of the fence will match the existing railing ( fence) on the second story deck and would be the same height. Staff has requested approval of the fence from the duplex neighbors. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. As proposed, the fence should not impair monetary or aesthetic values in the vicinity. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 [liEkitilf-the VALLEY Lot 8W, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision, Fence Application June 1,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This fence appears to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs o f the Town and appears consistent with the Residential Design Guidelines. Staff Recommendation Staffrecommends approval of this fence application for Lot 8W, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision with the following condition: 1. The fence may not encroach upon the platted 30' Metcalf Ditch Easement. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, c__ t/') - Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 FINAL PLAT, A RESU LOT 8, BLOC EAGLEBEND DRIVE (50') TOWN OF AVON. EAGLE COL EAGLEBEND SUBDIVISIC *--- dji .E /â€¢/ 2/52/ 4720 EAGLEBEND D 1 -,O...4 8.. Cl Â· 1 - s .* 1 0 .1 4 7,134.1 I '50(,1 + 2 Â·21 i 1 *0&.1-177- ----fry i \ \ EASEMENT /<4*~X 7 1 1 ..0./. 1/ a 4.- 1 -#b.-Tach,10/trl 20 3 1 1 Ilrl p SCALE IN FFFI ' R 12 . Ru 1 1//J5Â¥2~P~L-3,F'- ---7 Cz,IxÂ£,Â£,1:,Of RE 'rh, und~ret, .....4â€¢/ An ... I p. 210*â€¢de, Ckerk ' "1-/din//" 1// 1 ' 1 ~....bae \L_37 7 # -*-------1 1 11 1 4 1/ 0 coow. 0, EAGLE *TAÂ¥* or co!Â»nco It\ Z . /1 I bi VICINITY MAP "hâ€¢ forâ€¢goin 1 1 SCALE, f â€¢ /000' A.D. 1/92 by J I thi. 54Â· dav ; ; 111 1 - B - - -. Li A J . 8 i 1 1 1 1 -..I- f Â»r e...into 1 I i .4 4 1 7 .1.n'-â€¢ my ' f I Lor ... 1 1 C -,fl & Arlo . 6,62;6 Sq Ft 9,378.9 S, F,1 k 0- 3, 0.152 At. /772 1 1 ~ ~ 2 i f AJ~: 8-E 14 1 \ 0.215 Ac / i 1 1.4 2 K I \% & k U .1 1. 1 U ' bt W - *ar le,V Â·5 .... mys,~ - .,T I In -' % 4332. , i . ' PIA .. .. UNE OF LOT 8 -- O.VE OF SR.hâ‚¬, '96 0,7 Or eweLE RueD/AM l ' I... â‚¬2/3 - orâ€¢ov. sr./. Foor-/*?/Air 2 f , . k 1 . --- -- Â¥'02** fME i cert ify-i--ir-EF MiU-QnnEICA 1 milaM#alleESE.I 770.,1 . ""ined a 0,4 1, titil .0 â€¢uct- -- -- / Datid thiF. ' 145 ~--30' METCALF DITCH EASEMENT - < 5 03!, -- I.----- t 2,~- .Li -UUm--__ --,IL# 1-F, ~7624-Elitil;f.â„¢ 1. 1 1 I : w D 2 / , 1 2 , if i A - R.M WATERÂ·iNTAKE 5 4./ruRE EASEMEâ€¢1'T - / 1/ i 14 - / 12 -*- L 11/0 4 ~ 1 8 1, Delhi â€¢85'loorâ€¢ . 03 1. 1 k 3, 22 / 1 7-- m=XUal=RI l NRN* th.t 1 -91~tâ€¢â€¢â€¢11 1.n' , 0. -- 6.-42 4 U,/Â£/Pr 4ND- A MI'lr,DIVSâ€¢rON , ' /1....4, lidia. , 0/4'*4 Ge - ..d corr"tly In accuratâ€¢ .ur 2 H"Unt Â¥ eu 4-/ents and . . . EASE# -% -- thi subdivt/ton S 69.55' â‚¬Nr upon tnâ€¢ ground EAGLE k g 110.88 ", 4 LLV. , Mov /1 11!0 02 --11,~U21:, 'NG DISTANCE 4 4 L R !7.W 11.77 J /%.14*Hpth; Elovolotmerlt RADIUS Anc CZ"O tMORD BRO TINGENT ITICE: A,Â¢ordlil ti Color~de 14'0, You -,5 0--,c, 329 DO 70 90 70.76 . 78'!5'01.W 35.99 ry le,/1 actl- bil,d upÂ·ouu difect / thit 'ur.,1 .7/'5.00 41.42 , j.79 V 80 'â€¢11'49 ~W 20.94 .tnin 'hrie y./ri ift'r ./ 0 Jrit ..to..r .ch W.C. I -SCL 0 1 9Â·323 5 I 1/ 4 -MI, -y 'rry act/011 //ed wpoâ€¢ /4<11 /feet / 329 00 29.08 29 07 4 74'33'50'W 14.55 thi sur.,y . co-Pnced ... th,a till ,/ir. frol th, 1linter-Mountain ut, Of the clrt///10/ Uâ€¢o- her-â€¢1. 1 :20, ............. W.--1 C.. ... jEngineeringua 1.......... .-- &:~Â·~ 10'UFF/. -1 1 , OF, 1 Ur#LiT f IND DRA/4/ E EA5Â£ MENT - 7 00.00.. 171.30 S 18. N U . . 2, 62 - , ?j.It.. I ' I '4 -- t. 44't * '$ 1,7 . 'I 6. /\~A h. .: ' I. I. 4,7 2 45. . -1. I t > 1 '4 y 6 kiertra, Rf+ILIUG o AI 21 515.Y DEck V I 2. '19 f '7 h I 1 1 -" 'â‚¬.â€¢i# 4. â‚¬ . I 4 -1 - -<41 1% 7 ry. f - 4.44 . 0 9, 4 ~ Llf...~.4, 1~ -, 42 40, - -7 6,164.,,.3 . 01-0 - "..-8 &Â·6 .3,2.4?'...0,Â© , 4.' ' . r-MAE.Â·Â£ 3. Â· I rqf 6 2 / 9977/. te,rt 71Â£1â€¢tÂ¥& PROPÂ«ED "r BETUrEEJJ PedLE â‚¬ sertal/; 3 12 -4 . ~4- , 41 f. Ul l 4 Fs Â·1 1 1 f I i *Ft . 14* ,Â· At . , 1 4 / .:6 7/. , 1 1 $" 4 V .3, L , :4 4 t . . 6- . 1 ~ 1 f in â‚¬, - . a t. 1,4 44., . t $ .Epp rr t.t,58-=-â€ž1~ 1 . --4 - <I' 0... t.)%7'L ..2 + ,> 4* 0 r i ~- y- -4 ....4 4. - r -0 -Â· . 12:'-- I' 40-If,~t/- ' ... I. 9 .... . I ..It 0 9, tal ~.; o,-3'7<~ b7/< + 1 --- - 16+ 36>~ :' i.$ v Â¢ m.,1 te.. Af# :44 ,: 4+ ' . M.-t" 4 , W + - 41/%777../La:1*41Â¥114 ...14 -r. . b '-4 L I. I. 1-;,1,2 ku . , , *1***~ :.. 11'Efau*Â·7 @~ ~~ / '' Â·t '112. , . 32 2 1 FAI.Q, h ' 1 2-7 Â·41 1- .44 4 1 :reÂ· 5-26-2004 8:54PM FRO DI/DR STEIL. PRES. 651 482 0 -3 P. 2 25 Robb Farm Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55127 May 26,2004 TO: Matt City of Avon FROM: Lyman & DeAnna Steil RE: Approval Request Please be informed that we approve the proposed request for additional patio rai ling made by our neighbor Vanessa Bentley at 4720 Eaglebend Drive, Avon. If you have any questions, we can be reached at 651-483-3597. Best reg~~ 4 Af 1--/7. , le J Â£/ Lyr~~ DeAnna Steil- Staff Report Minor Project COLORADO June 1, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date May 26,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Shed Application Legal Description Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Address 950 West Beaver Creek Blvd. Introduction The applicant, T. Horn Enterprises Inc. is requesting approval of an 8 foot by 8 foot shed to house the computers for the weather station building. The building for the weather station currently exisits and the shed appears to be compatible with the existing building. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The materials proposed are of high quality and will consist of 4'x 8'x 3/8"rough sawn plywood. Over the plywood will be 1" x 4" batten cedar. The siding will be stained a dark brown color and the entry door to the shed will be white. The roof of the shed will be metal. Attached you find a site plan of the proposed location of the shed on subject property. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. No negative impacts should be experienced as viewed from adjacent properties. The size of the shed is small compared to the existing building on site and the materials and colors will match the exisiting building. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. As proposed, the shed should not impair monetary or aesthetic values in the vicinity. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The shed appears to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town and appears consistent with the Design Guidelines. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 rTENTTICIX[Lu Lot 2, Avon Town Square, Fe ipplication April 20th, 2004 Planning & Z g Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this shed application for Tract N in the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following condition: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, -Â«.241*130 Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 3 4 0 .1 Â· 34 1 v..,1 ..f d \ 3 9 7 ..11 9 0 4 . ' .4 f, 4 Â·,0 - '0 L., 11 40 % A. 0 .1 -3 2 3 0 - 4 4, 0 4 -* 11. 4. 41 A..0 /Q Â·Â·Â· A ~ O tj . 4 .Ii ce -JI , ;- R. - f.- - rEt d .)0 - - D * 413 -3 Eli b. Bo 0-1 4- Â° . I (M -1/ Â« (21 _1Â£ 9 3.. 1 (5 1 Kx On c 6 - 7% r{ 1\ RIP -- f" 4 j - A Â»1 /0 0 -4 . 1 , j ! 1 1 - ... -- /3 7 E P?34\\ 10 41-\ 1 / p ! 1 11 0 04 ,Â·-.7 1 - W , 10 C 1 6 4\2 r 60%-- /1 914 5 on R.& p e 4 + A con c L Fu- ps I V jO-0 5 , ,.Â¥)3 8 r-Â· rt 1 r -b I 9 , 3 P *1 0 i /1 /3 â‚¬70 X lf' -3- \0 \ 1 t "f 00 1 -1 t t- 0 -2 ABO 3 h x I 1 j 21, 1 1 --1- ID 00 1..0 0 h 0 ' '1 & i CO U 1 U 2 - -1 OD n f Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Abstract Summary June lst, 2004 12:00 pm Commissioners Struve, Didier, Smith and Savage met with Staff at the Community Development Department to discuss projects on the agenda. 5:00 pm Commission Work Session Discussion of Items on Agenda in Council Chambers) and discussion of meeting decorum with Town Attorney. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order at 5:35 pm 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest (Commissioner Trueblood with Other business (shed at ERWSD facility) and Commissioner Struve with the Wildridge PUD Amendment application). V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the May 18*,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes VI. PUD Amendment (5:35pm - 6:35pm) Public Hearing Property Location: Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East ApplicanUOwner: jay Peterson Description: Jay K Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of duplex and triplex zoning. The proposed amendment is to change the zoning to single family and downzone the total dwelling units of the properties to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) separate lots. The proposed PUD amendment will not only change the zoning of these four lots, it will also change the existing access conditions. Currently, lots 89 and 90 are only accessible from Wildridge Road East (and also share a reciprocal access easement along the right of way frontage of both lots). Lots 54 and 55 are likewise only accessible for access from Longsun Lane as currently entitled. Access to the 8 lots is proposed to occur exclusively from Longsun Lane. Also, the existing open space (non-developable areas) are proposed to be reconfigured with this amendment. Summary: Staff presented the application, and the applicant requested to table this application until the June 15% 2004 meeting in order to respond to the Staff Report, which he received on the Friday before this meeting. The applicant stated he needed additional time to compile information to respond to Staff concerns over the proposed amendment. The public hearing was opened, and comments from the public were heard. Action: Commissioner Didier motioned to table the PUD Amendment until the June 18~h, 2004 meeting. Commissioner Karow seconded the motion and all other Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. VII. Appeals Ordinance (6:35pm - 6:50pm) Public Hearing Topic: Amend Avon Municipal Code to consolidate the appeals process Applicant: Town of Avon Summary: No public commented on the proposed Ordinance. Action: Commissioner Trueblood motioned to approve the Appeals Ordinance. Commissioner Smith seconds the motion and all other Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. Vlll. Final Design Plan (6:50pm- 7:00pm) Property Location: Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/ 5170 Longsun Lane Applicant. Lynn Fritzlen Owner: Robert Moehring Description: Lynn Fritzlen is proposing a "mountain lodge" style duplex residence on Longsun Lane. The building is approximately 9,636 square feet in size and each unit features an attached 2-car garage. A Variance application for retaining walls in the front setback and a sketch design was approved at the April 6,2004 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Summary: Commissioner Savage commented on the maximum site coverage. Commissioner Karow had concerns with metal roof and pitch and that the improvements to the landscape plan appeared inadequate. Commissioner Didier had concerns with the turn around area for vehicles. Commissioner Evans stated a landscape plan should be submitted and there should be additional trees included on the plan. Commissioner Evans also had concerns with some of the proposed outdoor lighting, particularly for the address sign and driveway lights. Action: Commissioner Smith motioned for approval with the conditions listed in the report and that a landscape plan and lighting plan shall be submitted back to P&Z for review and approval before a building permit will be issued. Commissioner Trueblood seconded the motion and all other Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. IX. Final Design Plan (7:00pm - 7:10pm) Property: Lot 86, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5749 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Miramonti Architect PC Owner: Frank Hamel Description: Gerald Meremonte is proposing a duplex residence at 5749 Wildridge Road East. The total proposed square footage for the duplex is 8,178 square feet. Materials proposed include: stucco, wood siding, moss rock, and asphalt shingles. A variance was approved at the May 181 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, allowing a boulder retaining wall over 4 feet tall to be constructed within the front 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Snow Storage, and Drainage Easement. Summary: Commissioner Trueblood stated it appears to be a lot of structure for the lot but had no major concerns. Commissioner Evans commented he would like to see additional landscaping and that it appears there is no proposed landscaping on the downhill side of the lot. All other Commissioners stated the application appeared to comply with Town Guidelines. Action: Commissioner Smith motioned for approval with the conditions listed in the Staff Report. One condition was added to the Staff Report. Additional landscaping shall be provided and will be reviewed and approved by Staff prior to a building permit being issued. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and all other Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. X. Sketch Design Plan (7:10pm - 7:25pm) Property: Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2100 Long Spur & 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop Applicant: Phil Matsen Owner: Phil Matsen Description: Phil Matsen has resubmitted a duplex design for the intersection of Long Spur and Saddle Ridge Loop roads in Wildridge. The previous sketch/final design plan was denied at the May 4f 2004 meeting. The design has been modified since the last submittal with material changes and architectural interest being added to all building elevations. Proposed materials include stucco siding, wood trim, cultured stone, fieldstone, and asphalt shingles. Summary: Commissioner Karow stated this appears to be a better design and not so similar to other duplexes in the area. Commissioner Smith stated she is satisfied with the improved design and that it does not appear to be similar to other duplexes. Commissioner Didier stated he believes this is a better design more in compliance with the guidelines. Commissioner Struve stated this design is a big improvement. Commissioner Savage agreed. Action: Commissioner Didier motioned to for approval with the conditions listed in the report. Commissioner Karow seconded the motion and all other Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. XI. Sketch Design Plan (7:25pm- 7:40pm) Property Location: Lot 58, Nottingham Station PUD/ 1910 Hurd Lane Applicant: Architectural Services PC Owner: Nancy & Mauri Nottingham Description: Architectural Services PC is proposing a single-family residence on Hurd Lane. The building is approximately 2,903 sq. ft. in size, with a 574 sq. ft. garage and 1919 sq. ft. unfinished basement. The style of this house will emulate a country farmhouse with 10:12 roof pitches, horizontal siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. Summary: Commissioner Evans requested that new versus existing landscaping be indicated on the Final Design plan when submitted. Action: Commissioner Karow motioned for approval with the conditions listed in the report. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion and all Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. XII. Minor Project - Fence (7:40pm - 7:50pm) Property Location: Lot 8, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision/4720 Eaglebend Drive; ApplicanUowner: Catherine Bentley Description: The applicant is requesting the approval of a four-foot metal fence in the rear of her property. The fence is proposed at four feet tall to compliment the existing railing on the deck above the proposed "courtyard" area. Summary: Commissioner Savage inquired on the length of the fence. The applicant stated the fence would be approximately 30 feet long. Action: Commissioner Trueblood motioned for approval with the conditions listed in the report. Commissioner Didier seconded and all Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. XIII. Comprehensive Plan Update and Public Input (7:50pm- 8:00pm) Topic: Comprehensive Plan Update Applicant: Town of Avon Description: Staff will update the Commission on the progress of the Comprehensive Plan project. The public is invited to attend and submit oral and written comments on what issues they consider important to address. Summary: No updates from Staff. No public input received. Action: No action taken. XIV. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) Minor Project - Carport Property Location: Lot 37, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Applicant: Scott Rella Description: The applicant is requesting a carport addition to the existing Parcel A garage and would feature a rusted corrugated steel roof and wood siding to match the existing structure. The project also proposes a new temporary parking area finished with gravel extending from the existing paved driveway. Summary: The architect representing the applicant stated the gravel parking area would be a temporary surface and would be paved after a period of 1 to 2 years. The architect also stated that the owner might build an additional structure over the driveway in the future. Commissioner Savage stated he is not in favor of the proposed metal roof and he believes a variance would be needed for the proposed gravel parking area. He also inquired as to how the neighbors to the in the duplex felt about this project. The architect stated they approved of it. Commissioner Karow stated that he feels the Commission should not approve a gravel surface for parking. If approved, it should only be for a temporary period and that the surface should be paved by the completion of the carport. Commissioner Evans stated that pavers were acceptable. Action: Commissioner Karow motioned for approval with the condition that the gravel parking area will be paved or otherwise improved with pavers within 1 year. Commissioner Savage seconded and all Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. Minor Project - Shed Property Location: Tract N, Benchmark at beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant: T. Horn Enterprises Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an 8 foot by 8 foot shed to house the computers for the weather station building. The building for the weather station currently exists and the proposed shed appears to be compatible with the existing building. The materials proposed for the shed appear to be compatible with the weather station building. Summary: Commissioner Evans inquired about the need for an additional building for computers or weather equipment. Action: Commissioner Karow motioned for approval of the project. Commissioner Smith seconded and all Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. XV. Adjourn (Adjourned at 8:00 pm) / i P. 1 k \ /Â« ELEVATION 1454' ON â„¢IS SITE PLAN ~RRESPONDS TO .c; 0. 1 :-/ 12" CMP INV=-7544.38 1. DATIM ELEVATION: /1 / -44-- An 1,-Itr ELEVATION 100'-0Â·ON THE FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS 4 . EkenceS. 49 // 7\/4/ , 0 , 1- 1'3- 2. TOPOGRAPHIC Â¢ SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY: /// APL-INE ENG.IMEERING, iNE. EPINARDS. COLORADO Â©1632 EP------~3 AEl CONTROL 4-10-q26-3373 e (f r- P.O. BOX 4-1 .OF 14. ELEV=145Â®55 -108 /544361 5825 ATTAOHED ./.49 / / i / ,7\\f, 11 1*~~4, - -%. l.\ 2* \10% 1 ~ 42 e 3. PROJECT ADEPRESS N LOT 58. NOTTINGHAM STATION PUD 4.Sol 201- 4 Avok Â®LORADO O r- BOULDER FNALL 1-li , IMO HJRD LANE 1 11 , 5049 1 th---f CANYON RUN EULDINeS 840 ie LOT 4. NOTTINGHAM STATION, RID AMENDMENT No. 4 SITE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE: : BOOK 110 PA(be 555 0 1 OURRENY ZONINe PLAÂ»ED UNIT DEVE_OP/ENT (PUD) /2 t it MMBENt OF= Drâ‚¬LLING UNITS I > Ln ( /n\- . .EU) 4% 1 ABV 0Â£ i BUILDINe HEIGHT ttlrn Y ALLOVâ€¢ED 35 FEET -\ , PROPOSED 33 q FEET $9 OFF-STREET PAFEKINe / . 03 . - ~~3,1, /~ LOT = 30,405 50 FT ~~ L.21 4 REQUIRED 3 \ / 14120 ' f, V ~-~4~~DeE , P9[POgED 3 4 0 N x * i f SITE C,OVERAGE (96 Or LOT) 096 0 0- A I SITE COVER,/E 41 RIDeE / C) 1 +43 Loâ‚¬RUENEA. . 14Â·44 / 14.EA-14119 , b.~ x # â€¢ DRIVE/MILIC 1 / R WmUNER ..P,EE 1 \ / ./\ / / 9/,4 /7 *~-/ - 1\ / â€¢ BL-De = 2,651 9 FT uPiRMR LEVWL . 1465.15' . , RID~ <*j 7 / i 4tx x. u#J-til - 0-000 4Iz.Lu - * \ c Ke \\\ TOTAL LIVINe SPACEE 2.408 0 FT SITE COV = 5,505 90 FT <41 = 2,542 0 FT 4/9 \/0-\ / = FT C Ill r / ///4/19 k | I /94Â« ##--41 4210496 Â·Â·â€ž. 5 -7=42-\-3.42 - 0% 1208 aUILD#Ne SQUARE FOOTAaE i RIDGE , -0 MAIN LEVEL- 1,444 Sa FT 7 7458 , ,/ ~ 1.IPPER 1.-EVEL 454 90 FT 1 ' 7 7484.4 A 5Â¥,-O +Fr. *_r 4 1-c 9~:T ---*tf-x . f *pla, *I: BARAaE 514 Sa FT UNFINISHED BASEMENT 1 , 4 14 SQ FT 1 4 R Ill- 1,0- 11 '21- \ 4/ CURB INLET RIM EL=1461.11 01 (~L ~+6~k l %-- -.70& 4 ff 9/0 ~\.1 ASPHALT - EXISTINS SIED lim 4 1 4< ~ \ iÂ·=t t ~ ~ - ~ * W ALK 4Â·-V~ ~ 2 ye \\ 4. / #'f-Ii 12<-----~ o L< / Mf%423~5'3t--1, e / 1 / 1/ 333 11 1 \ GRAVEL DRIVE TO ~5~ PORTION OF EXISTINe 1 0 42 M t l '1 1 1 -' . , BE REMOVED -- --- EXISTINe TREE LEeEND 4- COTTOIONOOD 799Â»7 EXISTIN16 ef~VEL \~ A Â» 4 0\,4 /rib / \ 11!O ~, ~*~f BE PAVED. 0 - EXISTIN6 SHED - , 1 / / / ; I # < f -15 TO REMAIN -~ ~ ft GOTT- I . , 1 0--1 ikl eÂ· COTTONWOOD >- 0-0 \\Â»J ; ~-- Bull.DINS CANTILEVER ~ , ~ /~~ ~ ~ 0~-~ ~ ~ RIM XE~ / , Z - 9 601-TODIUOD ~ = , DRIPLIME -794\ \ \ \ 0 DO , I ROOF ASV 1 1 \ . f 3/ / / 1006 / 4% ~ LOT 54 10 PINES 6- TO -4-\- 9 --- \ 122 COTTON;loOD / 12 elI),6 OUrLIME '*4 .9\ Z 5> 20* COTTONVOOD 38. OMP INIV.=7450 e,Â·4' - ----~ , 1 1 - - 24' COTTO-Â©OD 552'0251"M 4./*..462*- 1 2 -2 \'/ / 7.40' < 472, 423 e FPINE N55Â·03'2372 21.85 -1/ 1 ' / sITE PLAN 7 *61-X 1 1 1 2 - 6. PINE 9,4 2\.1 // , SCALE, 1' = 10'-0' NORTH 2 1 1 {3 8. PINE LE(SEND x r 1 1 1 if ---1 M /1 1 <3) 94, 1 0 4Â· ASPEN Â® SEMER MANIÂ©LE / O, 6 Date: 04-23-04 F AspeN UE,MT POLE / 7 4, f / / 04 -28.04 05-14-04 8- ASPEN ~ FOUND 5/eÂ· RE-BAR AND 1 1/7 ALLMIN.H CAP. LS . / / ~ SKETCH PLAN / / aas-2.944 49 FOUND 5/8â€¢ RE-BAR AND PLASTIC CAP. LS *26626 133 1 2 N GRAPHIC SCALE 10- ASPEN ' D.,4 Â® FOUND 5/0Â· 12!3-BAR AND 11/2Â» AUHIMJM CAP, LS *24325 RECEIVED 122' ASPEN - 4 FLO)Â·t-lhEE OF DITOH 1 Sheet Number 144 AffEN ----- EXISTING CONTOLES / 4 MAY 2 5 2004 CONTOUR INTERVAL=2' Al.1 1 -h - to lt. Par#Offs) UXONS. Community Development â€¢ 019L-9Cb (OLb) X eggle oavao-log 'G INVHâ‚¬Nll-LON IblnÂ¥ 0=1 NONECIGEIV and NOI1916 HVH@Nll-LON 'GIG 103 1 . 58'-0â€¢ STAIRS TO DECK I Â¤ ~ LIME OF DECK ABOVE 92< 111-1 1,2. 141-0 117 | S A t~ e U Q A k. I r-=1 1 im b 5Â¤6e ) / 8. 31.0. 04 1/7 51/7 80 k h % Â£04'INISHED 08~t:Eht[ LBE OF CANITLEVE~EED elIÂ» ABOVE I C+IASE ABOVE -ANN.E I is STRUOTURE - VERIFY ;2 *TD. SLAS UP ~ 1 b k Ue E= 2 . SLAB ABOVE o eARAGE b % S E 11- - Ill LA 01- /0 -1 Z b Date: 05-14-04 SKETOH PLAN 2-*W e-1 V7 7-ave 2-0 2-7 t,0-07 Sheet N,mber BASEMENT PLAN ~ A2.0 SCALE, 1/4' - 1'-e 14/ Se FT PLAN 4/1-le,- 8,88-10 NORTH 74 639 Ce?le OCD,alO1O0 'SCIEVMCIEI 0192-9Cb (OLb) XV=1 6091--9Eb (OLb) NHel CAct NOI1*19 HYHONI11ON 3NV1 ChIAH Olbl AVON, COLORADO 69-0 37-4' W-O vr 24 1 11 POOD 97115 J =1== 0 TO 6RADEE --------1 \- T r 1 M 4*-- GAS 5718 - -VERIFY LOG. X 0 ../0.*ER 0 -1 mo Z O r /wn 1 0 t 1 i........Ijr 51/2 . 11 1 o. di /72' X 422' 7 am!----=%=3â€ž 281<FST 1 4 DaÂ£*E) 10/13,041.1. OF'le--\ 1 -'3Â§. i '~25/4'<151~ .4. 1 11 0-8 U, 11'-51/7 Z 4 ~ ~59 3,1 1 .iÂ¥& 51/r 0 U.1 11 - STEAM SI#*'-#'\\ i k, -1-92AIN IEAIr VER]Fr KITO+el I/FI BEDROOM 4/ 0 921**1'40,6 ,- Elpf k : ,2-A / U 1 1 61** HEAD 9 - # 4- - VALTED I lint ]SLAIâ‚¬ Â· RE2618~221 ARC+ED 0â„¢6 ~BOVE 2 a____ 7 1 J 9 k N -'\ l - 4 **rÂ·-UL_ -171 - j'* & I 1821108 -LL Kimt= &44 21 E--- *- 2 â‚¬ *TO. DECKINS EL . ~00'-0' no/ 4- 1 E t I = c F 7 6 z U~- OPEN RAIL- 51/7 . 49 310;~~3142â€¢ ~-7 ~ ~~EEBE~Earamamu L _~ . ZZZ 9 1 - 11 :02 - 1 SVT -- 71 I ---*El-OPED CLe O r WZEge ~~~~~~~ k .7---- &85,24 r. r~~~~- -IUO INAG CHASE - / 11 2 err. , C Va-= 110/0. 1 / . Â£11 Z In \ Â£32:BEnl I 9===.== 21Mlied.Ii//71Â£ .< ' >- I \ 5 -*~-v/RE,4CH 0-c< DOORS \\ 1 - 222 I i : i 1 tr 542 h 1-"-U 1-1 4 E z /' 1 N MASTER SUITE 11 - 4 0) 2057-2%2898 ~~ GARAGE 1 111 lIb / N O H / 1 -1 9 ~1 / \ Ra I \ 11 11 L 1 / T//-3 SLOP'ED V CENLINB 1 I -hr *- ... Date: 05-14-04 SKETCH PLAN 2-01/4. U-1 Vt 7-01/4~ e-oÂ· 44'-6 \,7 2-e .-e 2-7 b.0~ ~ 05-24-04 W-O' 2-7 Sheet N,rrber to-0 hEZES, Â· 0 AU- SHELVINS TO BEE DESIGNED Err 0 0- ~,U-0 0 AS. 1 0,2 SHELVINS CONFIGURATION AT ALL 16 CLOSETS WO-ER BEFORE PURCHASINS ANC) INSTALLING MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4' - 1'-0' 1,4*1 Sa FT Ptl,44 /1 574 Se FT O 6,4~GE NORTH 3=E g 7,1 6391Ahes 1Â¥Wlloall N 163Â¥ Câ‚¬919 Od 0191.-9Eb (OLb) XV =1 6O9L-grb ( Lb) NHcl Cnet NOI1916 aÂ¥210100 'NOAV \04001Nottin ham \4001FP01.dwg, PLOT (B), 05/25/04 08:43:36 AM, C4706B.pc3 1 0 i 1 5VT .-4,vr .6. 24'Vr 540' De 94' 53 /7-5 1,7 k - Z li 0, le m=LQI! ' ATT10 Ul , 4 .â€¢r/PÂ£6 r -'' 11 9 0110 " 4 a:BUI Ya ,--- J ,%,3, 1 I 1 N.OPE 2 VOID SPACE RA[L 1~ OVER MASTER + , - BEDROOM tm ~ *TO. DECKINS -J -ON EL.= 110'-1 3/4' Â®40' 12>R ATTIC A .6 i 1 1.1 0 . 1 /0.98 4 --- 1 1 1 0-1 I IL713 \ j 1 1 1 ==ms=-1 L - v =33- 1 5% 1 1 1 " 1 N:~ -14 I BONDS 1 of :n/155 ~ 1 .// 1 1 1 0 k 1 1 1 1 & SLOPED GLOPEZ) | - Cell-ING CELLINS -1 1 1 In r -1 L. L _r | CEILINa - | ,.il | ~1<MEIDâ€¢~ALL ----1 F P.ALL | | I'lili S 1 11 . 1 ' 111 525 Vr 14+17 4-# 841 4-8 31/7 164 VT 154 10' 1-7 Date: 05-14-04 SKETCH PLAN NOIES, to# 1. ALL SHELVINS TO BE DESISNED Err OFNERS. VERIFY All- ROD/51â‚¬LF AND SHELVINS CaF16URATION AT ALL CLOSETS WO,*ER EEFORE PURCHASINS Sheet N,rnber AND INSTALLING SECOND FLOOR PLAN ~ 2. ALL MINDOVe AT THIS LEVEL HAVE A -7'-0' HEAD 1â‚¬16+17- MLESS OnfRNISE NOTED. SCALEâ€¢ 1/4'- 1'-O. â‚¬64 Sa Fr PLAN 1Â«3RTH A2.2 Oct gOIAhes WVHÂ®Nll.LON IhinÂ¥14 $ AON BO=123N3algabl Câ‚¬glg OCI~O-103 019L-grb (OLD) XY=1 9091.-9Eb (OLb) NHd anc! Nollvls HVH@Nll ON 99 101 aNÂ¥1 aNAH OaÂ¥310-100 'NOAV 0 0 - Mrl- 6UTTER MTL DO~*ISPOUT --2 1'-6. OVERHANS trrpJ -7 1# - r------7 to/12 10/12 â€¢,01 0 +~*ia v F o p 1 1 y el 1 9 < 1 1 1 --illill-----------Ii-------1 RIDGE | 10/12 1 mo f-- 1 Fl 4 11 i; 1 1 1 1 1 1 IO/12 MRSH \IV----//2%---\4\ i 1 1 1 1 Mil. GUrTER - A RETAINING NALL J ea.-0,4 10A2 i _9Al- 1 | ~-- GARRY PAST . PITCH 0 01 1 , , 1 -7 1 - grL DO'Aerc,3, ~ 1 1 Â¥A. 93â„¢54 ----~ Date: 05-14-04 SKETOH PLAN Sheet M,mber A2.3 ROOF PLAN ~ SOALE, 1/4' - 1'-<7 PLAN 7,1 93902 6 INVHGNIi.LON IhIAVH $ AONVN VO=I 20Nmalgabl Câ‚¬91â‚¬ c~~2~0~00 'S a EINV-1 C[NAH Olb PHN M70) 426-7605 FAX M-10) 426 anct NOI1*16 INVHÂ©NlllON '99 101 OaVE!0109 'NOAV [ill -. . I.......Ii'IIA ... ............Al.... I . I .. 4 . L â€¢ -1.- , ... . 0 4 ..1............1.........i -9..m."al"ir. . I. .. ....1.,- â‚¬_i."-m~ , .. ... --.-.i Iimilf illill::Ililli~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~lililillillili~I::~Il:::::Illilli ilill'.1~1..1.11.11'llillillil - ~~.11111111111~1.1 ---1 ..- I ' I ... - 1 . --.. --=..1 I- . . . -I. - -iliI.~pM.lil--Illili---*......â€ž............... . m I........â€¢Ilâ€¢-~Z--lo'-11â€¢Il'11'"110'0.'IN~El"'1â€¢~I'll.'11'll r.1.=1/â€¢mat~9.--Vall.-1...'1...Ill''ll..'.1.'6,1.'/4"i'11 ' I...7:la"lifol/50;...iwil'Bia,1:::66:ir:&69::1&95:Mal::0:95:1,7::1:9:10 i - 4,â€¢i.WMI,Y-di.Ii-v~,11*1W21ldWI:AW:~AWIinWIn:MaXaWkA D . ........................................ ..A ....................2................... - A.........M.Ar..........60...............................1.1.... - , /051/m"0/*Ill'll'll./.le,k~ - . m. . - 2. : . 0 0 . I .' .- 0 1. I -Il - '...1.. lililil I . . . .. 1. - - '21 221 _ _ 12 - ILL I. - - . Ill,mli=.Jilll_I '1- â€¢Ilâ€¢'ll'_Illililli lililill' 11 11 ;. . 2- IWJ I ~1~liTP" ' ""imm â€¢limitelâ€¢ â€¢emnm,m- l /f'.9-=;*all IL ---|_~~WI~UIEI0JilglU ,~~I~,0,~ IMi I.- . - i il.'-ill#Ma-= -1= -I------ .... A .. ... . . I . . 1 %. ... as:VANâ€¢:imflmlâ€¢&01:18â€¢miâ€¢.1,4.. *. 0.. I BUrli/'5%,avm~ ''..: .. "01â€¢aDAâ€¢,~dâ€¢â€¢"'~4â€¢'M*=I~i,Aâ€¢~4'1â€¢60:,AL,<,p1(â€ž,Â£â€ž,I~~~- 0 / 1.......1.............1.~./1.........................../1/////.......A .- . 0 ,. : 4 .. . 0 - I .. - 1 -m,I-r . =--Illilillill--ill--1 il- IIIIIILI==I=li~ill-1 --Il......1/l~~:lilillilillillilililillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillillillilillimill'llill'll'll'll'll'llilll - I I 1.1 il[ ..- .. ... ... 3 1 . ... . --. 4 . . . . a ..................................................................1 mi/" 1/1//I'lâ€¢'ll/elgll/mul-lilâ€¢'ll/â€¢illl-Iâ€¢Iâ€¢â€¢1â€¢1â€¢â€¢Ill-//1-1â€¢1- 111.1"."'al:re,Fle,I...Ill'&'.1,"Illill".8:....i..'Ill~'I".inil'.Ili.. 7~//1// ///// */ /// / i//1////// //1///////k - A.in:guid,Leem'":""'~:':9:'~':'"':':':':'12,VA:dig::::9::0:9:::89.:i:9::169::m:9:::i,i. - 42~///////////â€¢/~d&1W't~U,Wid,~â€¢lek - .. .0.- 0 , ... I. - - AptihiB~*-fmLtIP-t'JIL'-0-'al.,~~.~ -.- . 4 1. .. - ..P):6:..In.1 .1- I.- I . . A.1.1~ r ... .milll,1:1'â€¢â€¢Iml-'I ..1 I. ant Al... III..=immr".AIR=====.-=00---- . ... . 111'Mull@11'En@2 5-; .TERÂ¥OUNTAIN LS 26826 SURVEYOR'S NOTES =J Z a 0 - EL-741117 4/ 1 DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY 19. 2004. , /2 2 BASIS OF BEARING: PLATTED BEARING OF N 66Â·01'31-W. 199 54' ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF HURD LANE BETIEN FOUND SURVEY MARKERS AS SHOWN HEREIN \ ~42><j 0. nilE INFORMATION. 44> 1- .44:- )\ 4. ELEIATIONS ARE BASED ON ALPI,IE ENGINEEmNG INC VERTICAL CONTROL ESTABLISHED FROM NGID 1929. J SEE FIRST AMERICAN HERITAGE n TLE CO. COMMITIENT KS1 2643804 (DATED JANUARY 9. 2004) FOR ALL 5 THE PLATTED ADDRESS IS 1898 HURD LANE. THERE WAS NO POSTED ADDRESS AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY 404,0 6, ALL NOTES SET FORTH ON FINAL PLAT. LOT SA AND LOT 58. A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 5. NOTINHAU STAION f Â«7Â»'2\ 44.42,~2~t PUD. RECEPTION No. 7,2770 ARE APPICABLE 7 DUE TO 1-2' OF- SNOW COVER AT â„¢E TIME OF THIS SURVEY ALL IMPROVEMENTS WAY NOT HAVE BEEN 1 - 8 IMPROvEMENTS SHOWN ON LOT 5A WERE FIELD LOCATED IN JANUARY 1999. LOCATED. -AÂ· t* 0 \ -%19 -*/1>CY ."Â· - -- 0-4 //// C<-....0,- ---- Il .\ \ ZI \ 4.2 kfk / LOT 4 N .Z CANYON RUN BUILDINGS 8&C \ , LOT 4. NOTINCHAM STATION, PUD WENDMENT No 4 '1 ~ \ / SOOK 710 PAGE 355 ... & 4gle lf,j i 2Â« \9 ..NES / C TO 12~ / -- /2> 2 =ADER .AU 0-/7 70/- 4-3 f ,-k E /8 2 LOG GARAGE + --/2 Â¥015%!92Â¤.1 '1 0//3/46 ff ;,C. ,...J' - .\ :,RHANG<T-) /1/ L LO -9 AED CONTROL PA ELEV- 7â€¢36 M f / Â»--// //1 At!O 050 '- M 8 &: . /4...... //4. -4 -29/ 1 a -11/0 993' 4 800* 465 PAGE 310 3 00:J S57005* /7 - - /14 2 LOT 1 7.90. EAGLEBEND FILING No. 4 n ,-IL /LOT 58 3 It' 1- JZILI 44 t.-L 0 698 ACRES J % /) / or 1:'h ,5/ < 1 4. .Â»1- 3 sf 18\-J'~~ ~~~~j-// // 4 .3 NOTINCHAM STAION PUD AMENOMENT No 2 0 8 / ~ 4- COTTONWOOD 019231Â©fq .000 F..6. // /ju TREE LEGEND 40 - a //1 A RESUBDIVISION oF LOT 3 NOTTINGHAM STATON . 4.25 . BOOK 672 PAGE 130 g 6- COTTONWOOD 8- COTTONWOOD 4, S 24.3 10- COTTONWOOD 12- COTTONWOOD 4.0 8 Â§:tr OVERM-,glvp) 20- CONONWOOD ; 0 C -D . I 24- COTTONWOOD 18 1 : I -- F / 4.43\ /// .0 4- PINE / Â¥ 1 / 94. 4 LOT 5A ---1 Â»: 37' e 6- PINE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE l 4 1 e .5 8- PINE 1 Dono B. Spigener o Registered Professionol Lend Suive~r in the Stcte of Colorodo. 4%16; do, hereby certify thot this Survey is true ond occurote to the best / my knowledge. inlormotion ond beliel. 0~d thot wid survey is / accordonce â€¢ith opplicoble stondords *3=6 4- ASPEN . the time of th' surve, Tbis c.tilicate is not o guoro~ty or worronty, enher expressed or implied. 3/06 * 6- ASPEN EX: ~ 8- ASPEN i~ 8. DO=8 'py,21,81....,aw/J> immE 1 le:- 10-ASPEN \ 1 - / :2,2 \ 1 0 12. ASPEN 1 \. h i ./ G !Ei: 24 / \ 4 v,-0.4 4 \ * 14- ASPEN I '1=0 0 8-5 4 kil \\\ . / 1 no. : cm 1 \\ \ / 4 / 13~6 : m ./1 \\ \/ LEGEND ,Â§*109, r. W 0 h \ 40 :5 1 \ $ SEWER MANHOLE Q f t LU O LIGHT pOLE J ..\ ./ J ~ . ALUMINUM CAP LS /4974 1 \ \ O FOUND 5/8- RE-BAR AND 1 1/2- 5 .\ 0 FOUND 5/8- RE -BAR AND PLASIC I t\\\\ \ 4 ) LS /26626 ,- : O \ /- W A I Â® FOUND 5/8- RE-BAR AND 1 1/2- ,- \ ALUMINUM CAP LS /24325 -1. . / 2 .\ 0 - 0 FLOY,UNE OF DI TCH / GRAPHIC SCALE 20 .0 80 C IN FEET ) SHEET 1 inch = 20 IL 1 OF 1 ' CONTOUR INTERVAL=2 26 11Â¥1 Â· Uff -926 0Â£6 â€¢ 69. W 252*0%â€žÂ¥ao] 19â„¢; -ON BOr ~ Â¥0/f 1/,0 :030SSI 31V0 3NIDN3 NOUVIS 'Z 'ON .LNBAC]NEVVY . 1Â¥011 AN' DN'./0 1$,IM ./ . 00Â¥,0Â·103 01 ONIONOIDV ~33110~4 S80 E 03M]3H0 0@ *8 NAAVNO lewagneay V 035. NOU. ANâ€¢ AVM 'â€¢10, ./.UND ] SNOISIA]H 31V0 -ON NO UND'11,08dMI 666k Aalln,Â¥r 0300Â¥ 8 Nva 'HurOS G dIHSNMO ' L N0403S 092 1008 013:3 -8210- -- - pro e 03 ck (Â» 6Â»f I ~ NE--OR --- BUILDING Â£ 1 1 ~~~~i\\~ LOT 25 9â‚¬ f. 1 /Ret j j ~. LOT 22 \ waE ZONING INFORMATION 3 j PEI)ESTAL LOT 24 BLOCK 1 WILDFUDGE W PEDESâ„¢- / 7 3 r' \ \Uoy 16,380.9 9 LOT SIZE 39 AC f f < 0- =,11 ./21 - 8216 8214 82,12 S 89054'56" E 169.74 8210 ~ O 8208 5217.2 A -O l ~, MAX 8190.45 SF FND PIN * BUILDING - 2.642 SF e\ IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE NED PLASTIC CAP - LE; 5447 DRIVEWAY = 2,800 SF I .41/* 8217.1 Â· 1 --9 l . 131:7* \ av. 8205.8 PROPOSEDIMPERVIOUSLOTCOVERAGE 33% pror i \ 0% \ 4\3 -0------ \ U. -- 5,442 SF /-$-*.- St;Toâ€¢AL~ ) 1 - BU]LDING H]GHT - 35'MAX Â£ \ h ---// \ 8217 '4 storage:>4~\, - - \. 34'9" PROPOSED 4 - - ' I -1-K Lf-J Nx 40 - EZ~ . -- . Iw<: ------< Â· 8210 }~~2122: poRI,OF 2181.0(311 SHAU,NOTEXCEED 20%0FTHETOTAL LU 00 -- i../.* , drainaae j ~ X 3 0 i--241 Â«27 r I : - Â· - 'l,W> f~1 --1-\ i-<-&&& ' . - ~ ~4Â»-32*---- LANDSCAPE AREA, OR 1195 SF i *5 i 0--&2184. ~ r----91---1 P.,- .-:Â·3.Â»AL ---- 10 0-_- LANDSCAPED AREA PROVIDED 1Â©75 SE =67% OF LOT. &218.8 Ii---- *- SPAY AREA FOR SOD 1,406 SF 10 D %8 1. ./1 1 IL,-1--ZE>-2-Z-- LL--__-___--_-,7-1,4.- --:2* DRIP AREA 789 SF --Â«8212 <U --1. 3\ DWELLING UNITS 1 --it h 2 DWELLINGSALLOWABLE 2 Â» ' 41 ti ar \- D- -_----__ - O 7 1 -- 0 1 i - 41 -- - ---- --- f 0 2 DWELLINGS PROPOSED 1 eli i ===F: 0 9 ~ 1 -AI 1 1 -1 .4 E-----1* 01 ----42 - / * 11 f -1.-13.-, 1 -%-d .. 38 11- 4 11 Â£ ' --N. 8214 4=17.04'40" ' -4 17-\$!.1 11 -0 LOT 23 1=96.87 1 1 I. .1 . . - O Rf .--aL---1- ~t- ----'*.~%.~rOPOFRIDGE-82511 - 1% R=325.00' i -6 - '1 c C LEN=96.51' 1 ----- TOP OF RIDGE - 8~325 I \-- 81 4 r h. . -1 P 1 BRG=N 05026'54- W Â· 4 / \ 11-7----- i t, L 111:. Ll 61 =- - - --7.-- 3 PA]UCING TCP OF WOME - . i, A-/-1~ I 9 4 / \ 1 2 ! lib - 43 - 825025 i 0 3 SPACES REQUIRED PER UNIT =. 1 ..1 ~-- - . --- 1, .1 ............ 3 SPACES PER UNIT ] 8 u'Hum ..1- 9 4 1 ' 6 -finz~ - --21. 1 --- 12 - . K .TOP OF... 1 4 1 SNOW STORAGE ~ ~ 1 j â‚¬ /252.1 I 1 Ill 1 1â‚¬21 -- 1/= 1 - EAST UNIT 320 SE 5 1 2:9 8.12 "h =--7--==-y~Â»crr---=il\ WEST UNIT 320 SF It 1 L-__2 11,1 ------Gil I - 4 67% 10 975 SF 1. 1 1 - k. 1. - --4 - LANDSCAPE 8220. .2./ Y. -I~. i 612 1 312>1; i , i i i J. -71.1 L-2---I'-----~~ - -- 2-9.14 14, G PROPERTY LINES = LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SITE DISTURANCE CONSTRUCnON SIGN TO BE PLACED ON SOUTH WEST CORNER OF LOT. ~ ----7- . 1. 7/=>' 1, ' BUILDING ADDRESSES U - - - %- 1 - - ... . f :I I ...... 2.Ij - ...I . - ..... - ..:7518*1 8Z..5 ' EAST UNIT TO HAVE ADDRESS ON ENTRENCE GABLE. aLs- - ~ace 1 s / WEST UNIT TO ItAVE ADDRESS ROCK BY DR]VEWAY AT ENTRENCE ~ Revisions: Stay - 1 ,<P . ) 25 / FROSSION CONTROL U *~ / S]LT FENCE ON NORTH & EAST PROPERTY LINES HAY BALES SHALL BE USED AT DRAINAGE LOCATIONS ALONG CITY ~ 1 Wri*?*ablpuâ€¢,- EASMENTS NÂ©7100/ to N 00005'05" E 1 SLOPE IAA#<INANCE. ORNI/(E -- FND. Ptl & 9.56' 1 & SHON SillAGE EASEMENT -- 0 / , A ------682iÂ» 1 8216 AUA.*]ht CAP 11 LS 5447 8222.1 8222 ---i-- STUB _189*3456=.*-- 7 *2--3 \1 -- \,1 4. ~~Zl.4 -- l ~21~ j._24-1.-7-m-X7 - - 1 F7733 ASSORTED GROUND 4\/. - --Ii-/. IÂ»241 COVERING 9 <52-*-- C-â€¢ -6 8211.5 H#Ur 8221. sET I~Na,1 ----2**pa__ X B -i,azz>~ 37) -,9- 482 culvert fc-- TOP OF WESTERLY FLANGE 8220 8220.3 821 e 8Â»r--- ' h N ~~~ NATIVE GRASS BOLT ARE HYDRANT: 522133 8216 8214.7 ~ 8212.7 ~ Frzm SOD AREA/ -22'T '1 - $---- )-%-i \ EDGE OF L221 SPRAY AREA RAT '__....~~--E ~ SADDLE RIDGE LOOP T ~ 2" min. caliper aspen 20 total count (VARIABLE WIDTH RAW.) 1 ~ 6 ft. min. evergreen 8 total count .1 E:22.la[I FAST UNIT ~ Existing vegetation UPPER LE'.EL lose SF IPPER LEVEL 1255 9= MAIN LEVEL 19039: MAIN LEVEL t303 SF Project No: GARAGE UMEL \246 Se 6ARABE LEVEL 1366 9 GROSS AREA 364-7 SF 1 0/E 1204 1 -------- EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC 6ARAeE C..Â¥ -642 SF eARAGE Ohn.X -762 EF Drawn by: TOTAL PEST SIDE 30* SF TOTAL EAST SIDE 3162 SF SITE PLAN NEW TOPOGRAPHIC SDALE: 1"= 10 Checked by: 1 A-11 (MON ,09) 2 n d S DN01 X 14,4/1. 52 11 -lit . 1 1, ., â€¢Al 1 1 2'x 2' 2'x22' HECH * T.05.1005" -2, 6'e"'3' B 35'-4' 3 113. 12: 23,J-cr, . 18Â·-0. A , 1-1 ' ~ '' , , .4. 1 4~4 ~ 1 DASHED LINE Of= }NNÂ·L ABOVE ~ 1 ' A 2%,4, 1 9 0 f 10'xe' ' -11: e Top OF= st.AB Â· ~.Â£~ 5 80 0 82155'=107 - h nom - ~ I l |EN-Â·RY- ~ - 1.-1 L_l_/-L E 1 -==- 01 2'x 2' 2'*2' _11-. I I eif- i rET- i L 2 0 1-0.5= 100 * CONGRETÂ·E Â« nufl ~ 2Â£21 h 01.05. = 1021 {11 - A E f-y *w 6/26' N Er k ~ eARAae I U. 2. im lilli 1 915 : 9 11 - 1.-0 1 ):AMILÂ·r RMJ Lap 1 Â§E 1 2921 > 1- IM - 4,04' :-11 3 1 f. -21 L 42 -L -1. - 4*2 ---1 2 4+x4 =r=-3% - e TOP OF SLAB 22165'-00â€¢ . P.\ 113#7.1. \ 1 4 Revisions: ..k - 1 1 s'xy X . 1 'tx v 3 ~ 25<2 , do O Â· : r : 7 -21Â« . . -4- ---Ii ~ 1 / '0 / e TDS. 10250 EAST UNIT = SCRPT. * 4 ./. ' 1/ Bb<4' 55<4 , 222 2tx2' -9 p- - . I I M , 1 1 1 17' v 1 1 14 + 111-1* 1 ./ 1 .' 1260 SaFT. 33-6~ 4 Â£2-0' : \ DASHE[7 LINE OF PECK AeOVE ~ ' EAST UNIT 5y Ir-IllÂ· 53. 1.-4- 54 UPPER LEVEL 1255 SF 11 MAIN LEVEL_ BOB SF // /. GARAGE LEVEL 1366 5F GROSS AREA 9424 SF 12'-O. , 33'-41 1 GARAGE ONLY -762 SF / 0 TOTAL EAST SIDE al62 SF HEST UNIT ~ UPF~ER LEVEL. 1048 9= MAIN LEVEL 1399 9= GARAGE LEVEL- 1246 SF (*053 AREA 364-7 SF |~ Date: 1/26/04 6ARASEE OILY -642 SF TOTAL NEST SiDE 3025 SF ~ Project No: ~ Drawn by: NORTH ~ Checked by: GARAGE LEVEL PLAN ~7 SCALE: 1/4'= 1.-O. T 1 A-2 Im? - 11-7-- 11 -- - 1 7 - --- ~ . '' -' --- T- -1- -- -1 --- - -'- '' rr'___ _-LL 11 - - .3......Â·i .111..... . T-TEr Â· -' _ ' - A . - - 1.1- f INall/\A 4 33019 +E Vil 103'Al.NnOD BS.LVIN 54Â· 12.-0. ,/Â£ l Iq'-113. -- 1 1 1'. 12'-0. .4 14.16â€¢ 5'>4 12Â·_0. 1-1 1 2'8 3'x3' 1 1 IBEDROOM ~Ult- 5 x4 lili . 1 iu~Z:i r---4 DAÂ· Ill-LF#--___-7 -----1 20(36' 250â€¢ l.. 16.~~ lilli ' 38 PANTRY , I~TOMEN I I ~_____~ Ft D ; 1 . 1111 1 1111 1 ~------r--1-1-r-r--4=Â¥===3 :-3 1 111111 b up TV-- 10110 w - .1 ' 6,1* LN.~Â©tiÂ·r- LU [9.Uol - REF. 11111111\ 00 - 1 1,1, '11, 1 1 LL' 00 6 xe' Uuu 2 %5 LAU,Â©er 1 T 1 1 .0 -U ~ ~DINING I 1 REEF. CLOSET U 1-29 23* O dE 1-Â£1 111 0 U.1 i I Z r' i ' Â® TOP OF PLI)=110 BLIDER DED,<=log'6Â· 0 TOP OF 45<4' *f= M. 2 MAIN LEVEL EAST l,INi T - 0 -1 1. 1 - -~~--4 IKITC -11+ h---- - _ON DECK 56 ' 1 -L-Â£11.1 % TOP OP PLâ„¢OOP=[12 3'# 1 0 1. MAIN LEVEL- 1 ~LIVINS 1 1 6'xeÂ·e. reT UNIT lili /\ SUPER 1 b - - SLIDER- ~ 3'*3' O 1.1 51. .* 1 -1 b Revisions: i IDIiNG 1 i r ''' 35<4' 6'/5 5Â»41 5'73' . F- 1 1 /1 1 1 ROOF OVER ~~ HANG DECK 35<4' 6'xe' SLIDER 3'*4' El i .-----1 12'-0~ 56. % r 1 0 0 TOP OF 9 X J DECK=1096" 24 33'-4. 0 0 0 11 - BAST UNIT 12~_0' UPPER LEVEL 1255 9 MAIN LEVEL- 1305 SF - -7 Â· GARAGE LEVEL- 1366 SF eROSS AREA 5<L24 51 33'-4Â» eARAGE Oter -762 OF TOTAL EAST SIDE 3162 SF Pâ‚¬EST UNIT LPPER LEVEL. 10'Re SF e.dZ!2 t:3tt !1&55 GROSS AREA 3647 9= ~ Date: 1/26/04 ~ BARAer ONLY -642 SF TOTAL NEST SIDE 902Â·5 9: ~ Project No: NORTH MAIN LEVEL PLAN ~ SCALE. 1/4â€¢= 12-0â€¢ 1-7-.-6 E | ;71 -11!Il 1NnO ----1----1 '{4 31---1--------------1 4'13 5'*4' 3'>(4' 1 r--NY-- 1 ,-n11 r-------------- -1.-- -- --- -_ -___Jtt3* 1 't DASHEP LINE OF STAIRS BELOM 5'x4' 3'2 i ~e,ZE v I L -_ _1_ -_ _ __ ---i -g7 1 1 I-----4 1 lilli 6% LINEN . 4/11 = 11 :16=== =1=1 *===44 4 1 1 1,11, 4* . Et I L.. 11-' ' r1 == L _ I ~ --7 1 11% /1/11 Iii: R : - 1 3 ri Iing. 1 ~ Ed 1 1 00 . 1 71 1 1 1 | faEDROOM I 7 0 - {?111 E 2 1 f==1== ==- == ==r =il ID M 1 r------- 1111) | L/1 ~Â·x 1 1 I i -1 U 11 r------1-/----â€¢ CLOSET 1 1 11= 1 I i " 2 10 i A O 0-+ 1 11 1 ED 1 1 g 1 1 -JJ [MaOSIT~ 1 1 1 22_ 11 00 0 46 9*8Â· ' h/ - lillit 1 BED;ROOM I UPPER LEVEL | i i i i ~ 11 zi E NEST UNIT LFPER LEVEL E - li % 2 d 014 DÂ¥4 - 7 EAST UNIT ~ ~ H ME 1 II 11 ~ 13.41 2')6' ~ 2 lilli ' 7~1 11 ),th M. BEDROOM j Lr---4 *TOP CF 4'J<4 --1--' |Kpr-, li~~ | M BEDROOM i .-L 1 1 FLIOOD=120' 141 1 Il I 11 I! 1 1 0 E ------- -al 1 1 1 1 01,01'01= 11 a - 1 L PLÂ·rhDOO=522' STORAeE Revisions: | PASIED LINE OF ROOF ABOVE 5 I | 1 5*4 65<25' 95<41 .1 / \ ~ STORAGE / | 7,<4 a,ce'aÂ· 2'x4 M' 1 p L 1 - l 1 L _3 DASPED LINE OF DECK BEL..BY 32'-5' , f> 1 56. 1 1 01 3 ' 35'-4. , DASHED LINE OF PECK BELOM â€¢ EAST UNIT ~ 2. F- / e'-4Â· 56Â· UPPER LEVEL [255 9= 2. MAIN LEVEL BOB SF I. GARAGE LEVEL !366 9= GROSS AREA 3424 9 333/4. I , eARAee ONLY -162 EF TOTAL EAST SIDE 3162 9= ~ NEST UNIT U'=i= ISC 3 1/26/04 'I GARAGEE 246 ~ Date GROSS AREA 364-1 SP eARA(ME ONL.Â·r -642 59 Project No: TOTAL rEST SIDE 30~5 5, Drawn by: 6% NORTH ~ Checked by: ~ UPPER LEVEL PLAN ~ SCALE, 94Â·= 1'-0' ~ A-4 | _ ....r~--xr~CZJ-Czz:~~~ i 11111Â·1 0103'kLN 1 r - - -+71 1 4 4 1 -1 T - - --Tlt- - - ------~~~f---7 ~ â‚¬ 1 '1 11 --M--- ---7 11 ' c 11 LL-------------- 7 t O 0 1 '1 IL 1 LU I r------71 14 fl 1 14' I li 10 g1 11. Ilt' 1 11 1 114& i 1 l i t 1 1 6 1 FY A L|~ 4,12 || 1 1-1111 eT.O.R. = 8251.25 r 1 11 9 lip 1 11 1 1 1 il T.O.R. = 8253.25 1 1,~ ' 1 || -1, -/ 0 '111; 1 11 1 NE 1 1 N m â„¢ 1 1 11 1 Ill - 1---- 1 01 aw 0 = 6250.25 1 Er--------- 6 |I~V T.(5~~~~~~ 1 il A NIX 1 1 ; 1 lili Â· ---- --3 1 1 lili 1 2 T.O.R. 1 1 8,12 _822 | 1 = 5252.25 ~ 1 | 1~ -,1 1 11 1 ~vi$ions: 1-______ 3 2 1 1 Iii . . ' -Aj K 8.12 -unz--1-3-9 1 - 1- -[ 1 1- - - El 1 L | Date: 1/26/04 E Lâ€¢ Drawn by: i m NORTH ' - ROOF LEVEL PLAN ~ . r SCALE. 1/4-= 1-0- (Ff) rapvul,IllÂ·r 1 A--5 1 Â¥101 D 'AlNAO ldIAC N3S1VVW Mall ' L )0018't,Z# 101 Ixb 2x:2 TOP OF RPSE 1369' 0 -' *4-lk Gk,â‚¬6 TOP OF RIDeE 84'q" ~ ~ 0251.25 li - 11 N 1 1 1 1 Â£ i.9, 11-1 9 111 1 r--1 0 /1 lilli 1 1 1 1 11 111 1111 Ul 122' UPPER 1 .- t#.622'2 .L 1 -1 22 AR t'L Â·. ~ ' _ r-- 1 11 1 1 * E - 2<12 R.5. CEDAR 1 lilli IJT -1 1 I 0 r 112- MAIN * - T- 000 STUCCO D ~ ~10 A \06.- - - P 1 1 N 16 AA J ,| jii}P; 1 |!2 :1-1 f 1 - 00 1. GO . EXBTINe IRADE 848 1 L.1 0 Im 1 _ _ LM] * S Im - ~-gic-LO Â· fiPil W- Ill e ALUM, 6ARABE POOR - /1 8.01 8.6, 102' 6ARAGE 3 9 7 2 \4 =00 1 4 , COLOR= BROMN C - -- -- ru / L -- ~ --~ 0(90 G - --- PROPOSED GRMDE MEET UNIT go 0 - A; Ik gonÂ£ 11 r c 100' GAFt~el 7----------------------- - ---------------4 T--- .---I.--i-- FROPODED> eRADE SOUTH ELEVATION d i fult Â£404\ - 82165 EAST UNIT SCALEâ€¢ V44 1'-0â€¢ _ISP e-Ri29Â£-!EZY TOP OF RIDE 1344Â· - 11 1 15253.25 1 , 1 11 , 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 + 11 1 )(002< 0 Ort ~/4.4 1 0/1 -2 1 01 . 1 .f 1 / 4.-â€ž 4 -c - -202PPER - - 122 UPPER - a my ~ l pl (--Slucco--0 om ~l 4 lili 13(61 R 5 42*41 . 2 L.j &61, en 110' MAIN | -1 --- 1 ' Â£ 1 -1 , IC' MAIN 10---10 6*4060 ,- 44.00 1 9 COLâ„¢=- 11 0- INCP - 0191 1 993* ALUM. 6ARAGE DOOR 12-1 _ E [62-----Uji~ - < EXISTINe GRADE 1~ --- -1- 1[30107 --- - 1/ 1 r r 100' BAFeE - - 1[Drawnby:~~ 102 eARABE i#-- - - -il. --- PROPOSED GRADE - - - FROPOSED GRADE ..P~!~11/9 1j EX15TIN5 eRAPE 8210.5 122E1-======11 EASTUNIT 1 - 11 -LIELIE- --------------------------- FIRST UNIT NORTH ELEVATION JEJEEJEEI~_5 - - 5GALE: 1/4â€¢= 1'-0â€¢ 1313 1IAA ' L >I)018 'tâ‚¬ a NBS.LVIN 103 ALNROD 31DV3 - ---- li li TOP OF RIDGE 134Â·NL_ 825125 \ L__ - '' 1 13 g.ri 2 6.,Aa - ---- - 1- r -- - 4 0 1 1 1 -1- - 1- Qp . ~ filll -< 0 - Â» 1 100' BARABE- 00> PROFOÂ©ED 63â‚¬ADE 5216.5 1 1 -1- - - _ exiSTINe ef~E~E 1 1 C-_1323232222322223313223232322223223=223222[~_5 - 1/ tE ~1 EAST ELEVATION EAST UN I T SCALE: 1/4-= 1'-0- - j 51 5211 069- loP OF RIDGE -/ Wil---I.i-- Il----- Ili-- 525925 1. 1 1 1 1 11[- 11 111 - - 1 6 - =7974- -=R-==Ir-1 -- r P- 11 fYi ~ Revisions: - 6 ---- p q Hi 1 . 11 1.1 1 lilli It 6 1 -- lili i i 1.11 1'1 _- - -- 122' UPPER L_____1 5tatc-o 1 1 1 LI LI 1 0 1 --- DE) m 81 --- EXISTIND eRADE ~ 'DaterfÂ»m C r - 1 2-I--; E)~ _j L â‚¬9__ F____ - yEp j 1 [Project No: ___~__~ 82185 \02Â· eARAG,E 1 1 11 PROPOSED aRADE 1.~===== $ 01 Drawnby.~~ Il 1 1 1 12Â£25-----im INEST ELEVATION *EST-UN!.I -- fcÂ·Al-E: 1/4.= 1.-0. - -f--- 1 00 --9 I alIM ' L >I.3018 D'Z# 101 STAiSARD ABBREVIATIONS DRAYING INDEX ADMINISTRATIVE INFO. ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25,2004 =5: 22== eller â€¢ Plle<All,YION 1 8*-trrAL limMITTAL BLORTTAL 180UA,Ce 5I-70 LONBSIN LANE MAY 26,2004 T.OA SKETCH TOA SKETC+4 T.0* 01<ETCH /lealll<16 T.OA -6,6 SKETCH SUBMITTAL 1641 D-CRIFTION , Ple,miTY, . EEPa & Sgr 021004 000204 05204 ~1404 LOT 58. BLOCK 4, MILDRIDGE SUBPIVISION eINAL SUBMITTAL XE,MMFY P. ~r ----- ADOO COVER S,arr FFA O 0 0 0 AVON, COLORADO 81620 0101 CIVIL SURVEY FLAW .... ~ 211 = 0,511'. - ~~- - --- BUILDING OODE SIMMARY 01.0 POLWTION CONâ„¢Â£)L PLAN PLD . . . . 1.101 LANDSCAFC PLAN -1/1 - ----- 2003 IBC 5 ~ ~~AVe -- --- - -Â·------ A'01 SITE PLAN FFA 0 0 0 2*11 2~11"T A102 CONSâ„¢UCTION STAGING PLAN RMI =4 210/'Hhdth&222/ 5 -- = ~LE 1&46 *200 LOPâ‚¬R LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -A . . . -K --/ r=Ead=L ~. ~Le ~ = o:,..,m~ A201 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -A . . . &11 ZENIM *202 UF'FER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -A 0 0 0 A ~=ON & M='.2 A2OS ROOM 19-AN - ... G~ TYPE V-B 1. a ~- * --I---- A~N A204 LOYâ‚¬R LEVEL RUP -A RES. 1740 UNITS crr Wager - r ~205 MAIN LEVEL. ROP -A E ~-4& - -I -8-jj â„¢ID UNITS DEr. DETAIL *206 1-81 LEVEL RZ- FPA P ~aili 11,042 RAD. R,â€¢0118 - 00\ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AO. . I &65) an& A502 EXTERIOR ELEVATIOId PPA . 0 0 0 ev Rzalle~ ---- 0. lessiim reÂ·r U,UT, EAST UNIT, k ~IBIN JOINT RESIL mjUNT A9O9 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -A en RETAINI~ --- u R Se Pr, 1106 1.-â„¢ M Pri 1204 hT. F,Sf :7 %57 â€¢904 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -A L MAIN M Pr, 2536 MAIN Sa PT, 1129 A400 BUILDÂ»k, SECTIONS . 0 0 *401 auILDINS SeCTIO,he . 0 0 1.Or~ M PT, 1805 LCÂ»'./. /*/ PITâ€¢ lilit F /0,WcÂ», P. 16 *AR,'e M PL 630 I~ M Pr, 686 2. MWFM TOTAL Se Pr, Â®071 TOTAL M Pr, 5015 EL Ea<EN --- -- ~14022 818 12Â· i*Mv PPT im~ a ==.TOM al\Lt,!- H/1-tr ALLÂ£Â»eD. 35 Fr ~1 PLAce igfÂ· F~~~TE TMIL NO 'ROO,t 35 Fr Er ~= m 3 SPACES PER UNIT 5. - TO*OF VRL _ 2886'h.-~1 3 SPACES PER UNIT ~ P TOP 0 1â€¢~ALL - LL.1 *i8 _ ~__~__ alâ„¢~40* + -Alle, 19519 50 FT - 25.-1, r- EM/ZML.& ~, M ;~11. VIâ„¢IpleD CLAY FIFE A-A ARD * OP -208 LOT UNINF. 4730 SO FT - 196 L VINYL COPPOSITION TILE un 1,11 l'EATM MZ KAÂ·,81 CLOSEr ------~ -__ _ AIUEA_AND j OP Â§172 L.&,D~-m, 21,308 59 FT - 405% ~AllON MF. IDE FLANIE <or _ ___ --- -- - AREA MO 1 0/ PAV~ allf*el, 5Â»4 Sa FT - 103% 0 26*m. Wifi~*( Vip. -Â® - 38. JINCION Box 0 MIT,0,;T ---- -------Â·--Â· Mamm/36".abilid269/Ub MISC. ABBREVIATIONS __ ~- ~, TELLURIDE - ADOBE THIN STONE VEhEER ROUND STUCCO, 1<FNAL - HARVEST TAN - 7153M ~REES - SIDIN/1 SEMI TRANSPARENT STAN - ASPEN SREEN ------ â„¢lw, SEMI TRANSPARENT STAN - DARK GRAÂ¥ MIZOPERTY LINE ABO~ LINE ~~~~~~~ ~ LA,~i'"'(,.1- / IRRI~ATION, DRAWING GOhMENTIONS Im..ATIONâ€¢ RAIN SENSOR TO BE INSTALLED 0.~ 0-1."I.OR 2.-~ SOD / lip DISTURBED AREAS TO BE NEEDED PLANTINIA PLANTINeS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ "10'M '"I'le.TOR /LD' S=TI.4 0//.AMR =ST V..1 NATIVE SHRUBS AND 6RASSES Ck=== 1 6nk - NAJE PROJECT DIRECTORY Q~ Roletr MOEMINI *=%"AraN 06*\ P.O. BOX 515 164 RAILROAD AVE. SUITE 290 MINTURN, CO 816Â·45 /20/0/ v41"--tz. V--- FRITZLEN RECEIVED AMÂ¤4ITmDT, LYÂ»1 -Tn.51 -INGPAL IN C+AhZ ~ M* Wl D--~TOR ~312)~'~Im. MAR 1650 E. VAIL VALLEY DRIVE, 61 PIERCE MATERIAL SYMBOLS MAY 2 6 2004 FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS VAIL,COLORADO 8[65-7 P, 970.416.6542 F: 110.4-76.41OI E, LÂ¥NNIVAILARCHITECTS.COM imoe-T MOmRIN, Community Development P.O. BOX 515 MINTURN, CO 81645 . CO-ACTED BALK~ILL ."Ima ...... roll I UNNUMUL ' 432%28%Â§ ./ ..%.%: ~9243 f PAlm.. eXISTI- r. LL .LY).330 PARTICLE BIA=D TlM BOYLE ARCHITECTS 143 E. MEADOW DRIVE *3410 VAIL, CSLORADO BIÂ®51 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrid, C-1 P: 1-70.476-2I-70 Wil (0 011657 ~ ailarch,tri.8 1 0,13 C.I.P. Co~C-/ IT. Sno )%4.L .MOU. LIC F: 470.476.4388 &.970,4-6-4901 1970 /6-6342 E: BOYL.EENSNOGS.CÂ·OM 132% DEE 4998 COVER BATT 1,8,LAâ„¢ON .1/10 1,01"TOI 041 SHEET Ie~HANICAL m-[liElS<. PeS,N BUILD 341;'1quilil .. .. I. 4 111'11'J'll! 'Tohe COÂ»*5'21/ PLATMOIl hILORIDOE DUPLEX A000 0#ABÂ»* â€¢Ze =F.01,10 ..... 0 0 11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. Im X31dna DaINalIAA oZ9 L9 Â¥250103 'NOAV 56Â£0 # 133[ONd 1 NASDN01 78 frix.;Â·Â· ' ISSUE RECORD 36 1:#.:S -- - 11 -----~--pf-~L~,T<~~.-1 >- - -------- 42'-5â€¢Â·. MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL 1 1 Â·Â·Â·..,.. 6 F., \ \ 97.5, ' 36, 0~~~/ ~ ~ ~~ r=~ROOF-DRLECINE 74 MAY 26, 2004 FINAL SUBMITTAL i ---- - \ \\ /\4 .t \ Â· \ /2--BUILÂ£)1%6.-4.[NE -tâ€¢.~ -. Â·Â·. .. IN...1 - -4 h -1 72 \ 1 4/ . + i F. 34011\\- P .... 1 11 1 1 :, : E i i r , ..4 1 1 E i , ,. h. .Iii ~te~*p ~ (Â·.L~ 6 ~ I 60 -, Â·Â· ,.... ~~ .. 4 1/ Ir \\11 -70 4 2.8,Â·.f \ :*22* 84.tb ~ .,L-- .. 34 ~Â· \Â»Â·: 1 1 1 ,IT I hlo.Â·RIDGE, i"Â·d I -.0 RIDSE'Â·Â·. ~'7'Q. 3~4*b.. 68 v 1 1 .\ 1 'Â·1 1 1 1 1 1 'PÂ·Â·i_ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ . AX N..,1 Â£\ 1 ~1Â·1. lili AlÂ·.111 r ..*.. .... 52 64 f diÂ·.43Â·oÂ«-Â·- 1. . 1 '.C : t. 1. 11 . 1 1 . 2 60 \\ .. .. 1 .......~ 41 1 30 ... 1 !\. ..1 1 jl ..... 1#14.*.4.' + ifÂ»...Elbee?.4- i .7 +.3."R .....~ . / /- - .t! :gA 1 . 21 0\ 58 1 A.... ,+ rÂ·'., DECK ~ 1 CA/~ 1 ~ .......... LL- 1. 1 I I L:-~ . ... _ r 4 - 56 . 1 111 - H[,111 .. ...7.1 - / i U Â§ ' ..f. i ' h U 54 / . 4. 1 =Â·-0Â· ... 4 - - 52 -*- P- UTIL 1 . ..4. 1 2--50 LoT 59 ..emIERS c, 5524 0' J~ ~ T6O~ RID)~SE Ti-s>4 ~~ Â·Â·Â·~~ 48 26 411 - r--1 1 5....1 D -114. TO ''Â·MT. B.O.041. 1'''ro:Â·691VEAAY . xj'~ 2 Y '-'*"'-Â·Â· ...ah 8580. ' . 1 Â·l. AYLI6HT-- ---262...2- 8525'- 28.?.=......m.= 30 -- -- --- --r - 46 mp, cirl/<Â£ 24 h...1. ~ %0 1,4 0. \1 1 '07 - z 44 5 -1- A...... Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·......2>..â€ž~ ~<A q / .- ud 4222Â£2~ /, '~--85Â§~Din I.T.. ...... J D= ... 42 zo --Â·LE.1_ 1, . 1.1 1\.........1 ....,., 1 P-~~ / '0 41 1 31 t . I .- -94 461AQLPRIVE 1 144<7 ,,. 1 . ~ h~*2*.oa._ ..... .......i \- /1 1 -1-1-- U i il -Â·Â·Â· ... A Al - . 3 1 .... m -Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·.2 20 -#_ ~.k 852*U -..../.-- 44 h~~ 38 ~ ... FND PIN & CA -EY#620- 7019 - - if. -36 'a:c:~~ 8522 0 --~__~__~L ~ 34 OLE B '.AÂ·.Â· ...,. ,... \ \... B.O.Ar-*40 -- \ 2 32 L Â· 26 ... 20 .<4 11 N .....-.28 -- I ...1 \B Â·. 24 Â£ .1 1 f-%-- - EVENT 'a#44-%- 1 I ...... x, I ~e Â«--U SNOA 97Â©9AGE_L--2~~~Lifi-~-~-~ ~~~-uL ..... 2 -- .... ... 22 in<---AREÂ·69-2-*30 962 FT ,--1- Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· 0 Â· 20 141--21 1 - - 1 i \ 17 -- L- - . - 18 .. 6 14 ---- 9----- c.s FRITZLEN / 1 - 12 1 1 0 1 lu\,111\ /~ . \- . #5447 P PED -- PIERCE ~ T.O.M. /\ 705901 1 j . . 8502.4' 5.4' 43503.' ' M - ' 8514.5 08 s 850., 8501.3' 4 -1--- 85001, SITE . ADDRESS BleN Fl/ 8514.0' ELEC. X - ~ 8506 5 SPOT LIGHT ~ T.O.141. TRANS. T.O. PAVINe ARCHITECTS =34Â°56'11" 02 . EDGE OF ASPHALT R=275 00' ~ 8506.8' 1650 E.Vall Valley Dr. Fdlridgi C-1 'n, B.O.M. Vail, C O 81 fir> 11" hitecbcon, fax(970) 476Â· 4/1 ~070) 476 61Â·12 SITE PLAN PLAN SCALE:1"= 40 '-O " A'01 X31dAa 3Dalklall/\A Â£59 LR 00Â¥11010 0'SSE0 # 103(Okld ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25, =004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL MAY 26, 2004 FINAL SUBMITTAL .... --0~ 1 1-7'10. 11;-4. lei-8. (33 (3) 00 0 0 9 7 1 I - - 158-0. â‚¬Â«L h - 1 1- 4 - STOM~ L . 11 ~ 1 11 --1 I 9 g 16 MI'.O 1 (/1 X .h .51-0~ 1 --Il 9 T/.//. .5- ...... Tru--4 u= 3 _A- I Â«_Â« I t--1 2 m D E - =21 29 -- --00[ 1 .1 'l al L 6 0 BATH- LU on )441 12' 15=la i i ..... 5 u E ' 0â€ž1 8~'-10' X /E 0 1 1 -22-19-1~- - - 00f@ ~ l yp| T/. /'. ~ .~ .1\ 1 4 es.,40â€¢ 1 16 Rje~S .1 6.- 1 -1 . T.O. /'. 1 . ~ ' 24-= tzy 1-- . 1 e 1 9--- I k1 I I-11-'r----j ~ -91, Jâ‚¬ 7 2, 1 2 e-- 1. Rls=8 F $1:rk.-1 - - ~ 8- 7 TO./, â€¢h /581'-oÂ· 7 a~1 M TO P~. 9 L .....'- m . --- 0 4 8501'-O. 9 TO./P. 01 - T g IiÂ« ~25/ * --A--44 + T FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fulridge C-1 Vail. CO 81657 , allaiâ‚¬ hiliÂ·t b WIT fax,970)4764'*11 ,9-(h 476 6~42 ~ FIRST FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLR FLAN SCALE: 1/1 6" = 1'-O A200 iINVI DNASDNO 0'65Â£0 C 103 '1IVA ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL FNAL SUBMITTAL MAY 26, 2004 (33 k) 94 + 0 E T M.-1. :21'-22Â· 11./ --4â€¢ 1 ] ////9 -1 1 -I 1 / crroe. 1 Fyi -- - -1--- -2 1- 1- 1- -~ 02- 1 1 ..... 9% 1 1- 0 16 ....5 1 ..... 1 8 14 To. Menâ€¢Â«P 0 M ------ - -2 - -~ CE 0 7/ LLIE : 2 1 - 1 i 1 92 .3-fl 1.......*I '490=-,i~ _ i _ r m Mis# &E& 1 14~56d ~=:=~~i= ,-~ LU _82@ W Â¥*90 f ..1 9-0= L.0/k~ 72--~ . 1.-1 0(DLJk~ 7- 1 0 ~-- Ll_r 4â€ž1..10- -4 06 -: 11 7, 1 h U -5 CL I (29= 016 4 f =571Â· , Drnt ? .... -09Â£za ---, -1 1 1 1 11 - -- ~ 1- Y-\ PECK ~ 1.-4 10 8 0 - 4 1-4 15/ FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vail Valley Dr. Fallridge C-1 ~'0-) SECOND FLOOR PLAN fax(970) 476-4901 (970) 476-6342 Vail, CO 81657 vailarchitects.com - 1-1 SECOND C..,9 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" FLR PLAN 4201 X31dna 3NVI ON ISSU RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL MAY 26, 2004 FINAL SUBMITTAL FE) 1) 81 + 09 a T Ill--fr .1,2. - -1 1.. 27*. le'-8. T 1 1 - - 1.1-0. ~-,------ -------------'..1.- -1- I -1 DO . 1 LCIZED- W I - 7<-1Â»~ BLQM câ‚¬ 117- ./. -1 .EL 9 BLDG BELOW le RISERS â€¢ 16Â· -RIDeE ABOVE I â€¢h T/.% / - 1-3-A F-1 --1-2 - 12y - -- Icul -- 1_ _z l A L c*Â» - r.-m i i m\/ 439 -7,- 'Fill -Ilr T ' i Y.-j=_I_ I Z A H~IA RM ,n LD - UL 1.VG--7 12 Â°0 un 88E ~ BLDS BELOK 1 1 \ rED g 1 | 3% 1 . 1-=-- - L ROOF BELOIN 1 - - , 26:* -- co.00 0-ho l 1 1 9 255 0Â· . a /1 A- RIDae ABOVE t 683 IFIF=-- 1 1 RIDSE ABCÂ·VE 4 1 1 kk~T bl U -4 1- - -49 Â§ rt | 1~ jd=IlÂ£2 i - RIPSE ABOVE ROOF BELOW-1 ,=.oser- Fl ~ i i 1.1 1---2.L--- 1 A 20 -4 L OPEN TO ~ 81.06 BELOW BELOM 7 LRQOF 9/0, A l- ----1 .... (~~) iÂ« YA-409 * "49 i 41 Â¥ .F FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS Vall, Cl)81657 1,1,61'Â£ hite' b c 0,11 ~ THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1650 E, Vall Valley Of. Fallrld, C-1 fa,9-0 4-64901 l./0,4-6 6341 TH I RD SCALE: I/le" = 1'-O FLR PLAN A202 Tr f X31dna 3Dalzlall/v\ 3NV1 DNASDN01 OZ LE ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTA. (3) 9 40) 6) 1 9 rINAL SUBM- MAY 26, 2004 Y 1.L-7. ./. 25'-0. ... 171-0. 1,4. 1.1-16. 4I-< t Au|F51 , - - 1, , I 105'-0. . . I i --94-J I P I :i f ~ 11 OTJ-i- 71 -f ------4 1 ...ill= ...2 - - - 1.-0- illillik .1/i i r H ikbi I ' rl" E. . $#rÂ·It.~â€ž" 3 -ne a l: 11 SE" 41#BE 48560.0, 1 RIDSE \ 8 h" ' 212 3~ 1 # ' : ' 6/12 Z--1~ RIDBE 1 \ - 31 ----4-Â» -Roor 6/12 6/12 / - BLDG BELOW ~ ~~8538 -0" 9 RIDGE \ 8/12 , /1 - L- -1 1 1 f- l K 1, 1 it i 48564'-O" 12/12 Z . 1 -al~ ._1.-Â»-+ 0 0 0 0 $ . /7'*"5/- b me m UNE ~ r <le 1 1 ; . i 6/12 8558'-Â®" ~ 1 14 C j C _f_ ___-_ ?fj- --4 i .85# e Â· h RIDE ~ LI-1 *EE 1 1 1 - 1// 1 6/12 -1 - -4-6 -4 -~-- - -FE Ud NE 11 / 6/12 IRIC=GE \~ 2/12 : 6/12 ' 12 -1" 1 Ug 6/12 6/12 68 10'-0,1 ROOF BELOA .6556 Leâ€¢ .1\ 62 -% 1 2, R . 04 v *1-3 RIDGE \ / ~ STAIRS OW i 3 Q /1 11 \ fIFA B -IJ (3*9 3 A .8%0.7 l 4 WAÂ°62 1 71-0,1 1 U 4' BLDG BELOPX â€¢t 9 /1 12/1: 1. ... ~ lJ 4 + '4-489' A-401 .-4101 T My pl FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS ROOF PLAN 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrid~e C.1 Vall, (0 81657 , a JKM.4 b MI' 1=970 476 4901 (9701 47(il' ROOF ~-00Â·00~ SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0 PLAN r-,202 X3ld na O'55Â£0 # 133[0>Id Ol 0Z L S ISSUE RECORD VIARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL MAY 26, 2004 =INAL SUBMITTAL 8566'-O" ~ ~ _D566'-O 8563'-4 ~ ~ T.O. RIDGE * 8563'-el T.O. RIDSE T.O. RIDGE 7~ ~ T.O. RIPSE j * 8560'-O. TO. RIDGE 1 1 1 -. 1 1 1 0 4 1 1 1 - L 1.-[ BILE 1 8551'-O. / 4 EXISTINe SRADE Y mmpm# -1114 - , UPPER LEVEL F.F. ' 8541'-OÂ· * MAIN LEVEL F.F. ~< LU -II' 8531'-O.A LOWER LEVEL RP. /-3 NoRTH ELEVATION a 1- 1 LU / <**~ SCALE: I/le" = I'-0 (3 8: Q MQi Cki C a B ~ * 8566'-O 8566'-O T.O. RIDSE 8584'-211 \4, / 1 T.O. RIDGE ~ 8563'-4" T.O. RIDGE -1. 8560'-0" T.O. RIDGE i , ~ ~ T.O. RIDGE E ' 8556'-6 ---1 1 1 1 .... /1 ~A ILL-3 1 1.1 .- 1 - 4,3 1 . . 85311-0 1- -31 T--Fil 03-173-1 ~1'r 11 1 / 1-ER LEVEL- F.F$ fEE 'tr Ing il>31- 9 Â¤ .81-J IET-J.1 1 U=2 11: FRITZLEN Emlilll ~i i PIERCE Â¥ %.& 1 ---/ r L,Â·94:f ----Â· + _4-1-- tÂ£*4 4 #& 1 N ~ i~~- -7---i ~U r--77-- ~ P /Â£ ' 7-lll 1-Iii : 'i :d I i 2 -4-1---Al 85*I'-0" 4 1,1 MAIN LEVEL F.FJ Ill i -1 1 , EXISTINS SRAPE -7 1 1' * 853-0 LOWER LEVEL F/. ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallridge C-1 Vd,I. { O 81657 SOUT'H ELEVATION fleD) 4764901 (970) 474-6142 ELEVATIONS SCALE: I/le'~ = I'-O A301 0C9 L9 (X]\/30103 OAV ESFO # 133 fO}Id ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 * 8566'-0" ~ 8562'-5' ~ * 8564'-2" * 8566'-0 SKETCH SUBMITTAL MAY 26, 2004 i T.O. RIDGE /' T.O. RIPSE =INAL SUBMITTAL , / E-1 % 5560-0 T.O. RIPSE 7 \44 40 M,x 1 Â·:,411?W I rr=~,10-1 i t~ W.--h~ r...': 11 1 0 9--r-tr _-:?=*--O up'IER LEVEL F.F. 11 ~li- f -Â«= 1 11 11 IL t. 4 - -1-Â· m-+ EXISTING GRADE i 241'-0 n fill,111 111 -6.1 011 a :i a * MAIN LEVEL F.F. 8531'-O'~ LOMER LEVEL AK X 1.-LI D Z E LUE % U ~ (9 9 ~ SCALE: 1/16" = 1 '-o" 2 AEST ELEVATION < III' B 1./-Â«3>JEIR-- / 137*2> 7- jrrli N.~ 1 4%21 >A -F --71 \ - Â»4/ -\. 8551'-O" - 9 111:/ 111 11 / - d - FRITZLEN Ff-11 '11--]11 - PIERCE ,-6-L--- 1-011 -2 8541'-0" MAIN LEVEL- F.F:* ARCHITECTS Basil-0.. LOWER LEVEL F.M. 1650 E. Vall Valley Of. Fall,Idge 01 Vail CO 81657 QUir hu"ct> Ii," 8 EAST ELEVATION fax{970j 476-4901 ,!9701 4-6 6341 ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-O 4502 55Â£0 #grild I SITE -7 $ ,â€¢f '' 6, 4 . *. b Â· 9 f:â‚¬. 21: 32 .... t'/ u., '1'r 'S . I ;. 1. 1 : . r. i 4 1 , I 4 0 , .1 . *:.'....st::407, Â¥ 1 1.1 4 .. 1.11. ,#7# 11..~ .cy~ 4 " ' 1. '-C ':\ .1 4.4.414 - A- v i: - 16 a , . 1 ... , b I ; I COVER SHEET 44,-:.)74<>.1 2 1 ..4.-74%89Â«I/ /- =,--4\41:fr.~,liTY,51551<Â«,Â· + iL. I'' ~ . '.I: i '.I. ... i 3 -LÂ«>' - . 2 f ' 3 L u.-_c.: *i--L $:.Al'.:N. ~ 9.* ''. 11 9, 4,11 7 /4. P=.4 / 1-'PWA# I \03 f .// 4 / 4- Gret; .\ f '.. . 1 WESTERN SAGE P.U.D. l .'' . ...li 1/FIT.~<-L-:*,:64 .+1 .: , , $ - LOTS 1 8, TRACK A, BLOCK 4 t. A F.jiÂ·\\ h./,4----1-7 1* lia:1 1 1 K Â¢7 1 â‚¬--217:Â«- - 9 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION 49Â¥ 1/â€¢ el % I .â€ž ./ -r ... 4Â» .....'* ~...) P ' ...>*--,-â€že... - - - '4' 1/â€¢ 46' 41. . 1 1 '-*' - i * 129: - '~~- Li/2./-1 T~L<6.Qlf,;7*- 'Liz:' % c. =Â£ \ \ TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO , \ 1 -.e t *i ./.-S\?<ti \\CTÂ»/, '1{/0<42.. Â·.,)4 :'~ 'Ch .... ... I. 1,11 . 2, xi> ..: 4.144 y . & fl - /~01 CERTIFICATE oF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP ..71.LAÂ·>14- 5 / *%3 -I =c?*13 1 -**4-y,l .Â·~-Â·.-Â·.Â·bz3:4-*4*.\ /1-Â·f ji KnoÂ¥Â¥ ,â€¢* moo by trtese piesent* thal Jay K Peterion, St,4, owner in fee m.rr,ple 01 al' thiat feat plopely dest;:ibed *B kilfl*ws: t otsM, 55,89 and 901. Block 4. WdiliNSee, TÂ¤.m ef Av<~rt. E~*i,}4, Coi,~~t~r. Cok~ratlo, 1%*i;eptk,i tâ€¢.;. i .\It / 1 *ree te develop the Plan as depiuted on tht, site itan I .*.f- I . \'. iv 1 - $ < v fil k - 1 42.1-~Â£.__3 -'-- â€¢ 0..le;rvtÂ· c: 3 :>'.Â»~14~rf. A*-43/ f 108 S f ront,we Kd. Slkl E 708 ' VAIL- CO 81657 - 4 *8#4271.4: Xi%< 1 i \23\ PI: f- ~ .I ..i<dirj~P 4-333 4 V 1204 : 01 I , 14..... t.' I. I ... 9. I. St * 1 D. STATE OF COLO!*ADO N W,2 5 RIDGE SUBDivISION: ELOCKS 1-5 , SS COUNTY Of EAGLE ) me thiS day & A.D. 2004 4 IABLE: (LOTS 1-8) The forego,ng 04,dical,on wis *Knewledwed bet,re RECEIVED hetrati,e d PU, i inle-t Â», 20 1â€¢,4,Â·tÂ· 1+,*c-.-1,740 4%4't 211 02â‚¬?-operâ€¢â€¢At tJANg|*~2 the 4)'FC;â€¢Â·49*'1 01 tt'â€¢ r.â€¢ 1.Â·,2.Â·Â· de,j.:r. rhÂ·w,ir!â€¢ .1, .~. 'â€¢â€¢ of v~.r r-~.1''t, .!,6.1:i, piâ€¢w#:~E~tiÂ©fÂ· ~ ~ ~ ~~_~ *~ MY Comm,swon *,*p,to* VICINITY MAP ed t.Â·.,â€¢,Â®14 01*0* NÂ·er, 04,1Â·arst , rrl- 0.,el. aâ€¢,4 tha pefini,nent red.ct.gn u/ r - 500 FT MAY 0 6 2004 ~eÂ·, 3,0,Â·Â» tio~ Â· ty . the ** Â·* 1.In ;11/1 C.In,fa l/* arv. I./ell,ly 1/,Ill Winews my ha,ld and %*al ' - P/'â€¢ Al# 41><* - 1,640*-1/f.*1 0.4.44 64/1, Community Development 14â‚¬:Â»rit# 4/Mat,1 Â·2* 0*Â£LLPIS Uf#*S 8 9.01 r f 40% r ClÂ»KNI AU'JÂ·Â·it 6 ,/ I.%411{94 09 *S mr##Go*9 ->-"---'-- 1 1 L "'75 U,APr reÂ»i#.Â·1 011-.144*â€¢t - 4,000 Iluic,0 feet of t.*14-7 1,0 per Â»t 001!940 â€¢â‚¬3001 . (ft ) 35 ..1 U.i. rn.- SHEET INDEM Ttib, PkM,ned Unit t:,Â· 9, *lerr ,ilit ant the Ultes, 701'1,ng st,indaills and der,"" al' TOWN CERTIFICATE 1.17 jlke r IA'â€¢Fri. Â·.Iâ€¢*â€¢.25 AIN, AÂ·,1 4 approved for tbe R-*Â«ft,di.Â·Ae:,Oft{Ms 54.:.5.89& 9'). INOâ‚¬' 4 PIJO. {of,1.vince ONÂ·. k - PER Te# LODE SARM,f. PAP.Fie, AV'l AP T COVER SHEET SHEET 1 bÂ¥ the Town Couned of Ihir town t.{ Aven, County of tag'{3, St,,to of Cothrotle, Ai-*--* d. -. .......â€ž..20,04 toititing wÂ·,Itithe Ck:,k. and Rccoider - ; IM tâ‚¬w, ;0.4 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 2 of m. county 01 Eagle Sakf up{,r{*al shi,# in no â€¢vay 0!21 gate *,e rovâ€¢n of A,gi lot **AU 84'Â»12 A.4.ABLE Â·Â·Â· PeR 10*/ CD * SITE PLAN SHEET 4 9,9 dâ‚¬Kwit*â€žblkin {tiating tituÂ¢*. POSSIBLE PLAT SHEET 3 any *viriwt* mils mift approvE,1 of thin site pfan by 1114 Tow,1 15 a Comment only mild 8040]1411 lOT Le'LIA * 5 id ki be : 15**1 as a n approval 01 the toch,wcal os,rectnesâ€¢ 01 thts plan of - APEA (*4 ft.) 401 TIA UTILITY PLAN ' SHEET 5 s< 244,31'JAÂ¢'ED OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT SHEET 6 WITNESS MY #lAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN Of AVON' A AREA (*:71 11 1 10{ 2 10% CDCâ‚¬ 9,0* S TOR,9 411 4 N. 11 j PER ~Â©24 12(x/ TOWN COUNCti OF THE 10*NOF AVON ; * of F.... Are*C; 5Â£'IDAL. #' ... Mayor I t.k 'IM 1 Â·Â·. Â·,-Il , - Rece FER ..14,1 Â¢ :.1. .Tiwegr,p ---.-....-.*-- Anest NOTE: rÂ» A IMM,(3% PÂ»t *pirÂ© i â€¢, pi *+*â€¢Â»..i â€¢Mi~t>,tt l,w ,Â¢:4'Ug. hit,di, *{*â€¢ VI,1 ur,4 4-* 91 Aven #gii,*t:# 1 ..1- 6 -:ia#n,â€¢tiÂ· â€¢h<;* 2,*Ftiy .: DATE Arall 28.2(*M MeN=â€¢tw.*.C-4 M, :me.,1, 042f:20Â¢ 4 â€¢' t ..43 Af, 0 -1 . 0 0 N 0 0 0 E g h I. / ' 7 0 â‚¬ W 98 7 Â«f 1 94 , 4 / 0Â£1 4 00 h 7/ 0< 0 'th / .*-~-. - '- . I ..... E e *mâ€¢*23Â» t -9 /52.- R.,moo' i LÂ»290,00' i... >Af . \... LOT 88 T-t46.72* > ~t~~24- W ~~-*- ' /' ...I-/ / /t'~' 7 I. / ..:b 'j 4 ''' ' r., O -I . i I. *9-4 Â¢ -- ff . L~w-.*-#-~..i * .Â»1 J illy 4 4-,4 q -1 X I ; t./ 0 ./. .\ t..1 0 G =73 * .:'g /# . ~~~~~~~~~~*V -I-// ~ >" - '* m'- &.7 - % #-* - 1Â«10 'g i J I ... f . m. .''I 1 m .. U %,il - - .,, / 0 1% . 1 -I - ~-I ~~~ -* ./ I.- + 2 - 4\\ .-V,t).: / / d . â‚¬7 . .. y. IV ./ I t./. . - --- . . U.... .. .- '~ Â· t# Â· "~ ' "Â· ~ '-Â·Â· - - -Â·Â·Â· -431Â»-.--w -- - -- Â· I . /-.. P ) -.- . I I . . it a o : A.... . %: CA ..2 7.. . .. ~ 1 , . Ir ,.. - 2#2 2iw <.. 1 ... . - ~ . .. ./, 1 .4- 4- :WIF K 1:- . 1 / - .. ... Nt; -0 +I - I . .- r v, - in (3 .. 1 Â· Â·v .. .....Â·Â·Â·Â· 7 'k,4611*jet H oc 649 4 18* / l-5480' 00 / . 23 - .. . .. -4 J E . .,1,0. , eRG-N 45'48'09' E / LONOSUN LANE . - ......4 .../.--=. ./ *.').6/.- I. 2 â‚¬4 --96. . I. . 04 .. - I * / 5 DeEL/_ s,Â·io*---9/9'/-. 50' ROW m - ..\:IL.. - . I Â· Â»1--* ./*). #. 1 k I.-I 4 - 2 - -- v " \. r tve/---* . ,% / A L. . .....1. 4 2 61 ' 1 \"1 T , . *1. '.411* ''.//MICKE 2-4 2 4 41: 14'4 41â€¢. 8484 7 + . ./ /1 .IiI 1.. . 1 ... 34 11 I . . 14* ic ~Â·~ ~'. :ep . .. v. - 1 ' . /7 e - Â· '07.11 - ...LP "414'UU-5,- 4....v Â· -- -Â·.- .' *7" ' . r . 4.t., . - - - -- -- 7 -;,- 'T Li *-LRIP..... - -I- i 14 ''. 04.' '17 -/.I - - I I * : - . f -- .~14 l . 1RACT H .6-,- .......\ ......... ... .. 1 W. . - ,- r.j./6 râ€¢ . 0 â€¢â€¢ . I.*.. . -* - -. *~V it. ' ...'..-. . i 1 Â».2.7 22 M . 1 , .4 . Â· . rÂ·--._ - -. It, -.Â·1 A - .... . ....... . ' L . 4. 50 . <IM#a Sf~*1 W ;,Af,~R>t Â£ t>Â» 3 .. - ... 4 . e.wa. \ r . . + Â· ~. : E :n% V [t) I ./' 1 'rn - . r-â‚¬- U 1 . I â‚¬,6 -% \I / nes .le. 210% .. Â· ' 4 1 v 1 - ... 1. 1 / ./ ./. 1-31.3/ -1 -1 41*0* 0 1 44<Â·#k C liN.51.47* ~ . . I. . I. .-Ibl. -- / tr I 1 - Â· , I. el - 4.9 f he. ~....>P ' , 11 ..., .*-.Â¥. .1, O â€ž , 4- *4 r. - -----Â· ---Â·- f. . 4 le 1 8 C .hed' UPÂ» . Â·Â· 4 1 l.' U.9% 11 . ALL~ 4444 X 9.Â· i h 01.' '~ ... .'*'~- 4. .4~ -, yger t., -,1--N Â»~ 'PS, 41 LOT 53 Â« t. 4 %.0 ...# r . . I .1.-.. A ..it 84&1.9 1 It 0 GRAPHIC SCAUÂ¢ 8.r,CT 4 41 -2 . I. , 4 4 - ..4:.4- 1 .. -- - .. fi Y . -I , I. Fâ€¢* I *â€¢F 6.* -I- .& - - ' 1 0// 116&*45 JOB. Cth'.4 litÂ· 11 84.'lith'04 1 7 n, r ) . /.b . 4/ 11 SHEET 2 e '5/,CA, 26/nxÂ·0.04 1. 4 'NOAÂ¥ ION3 NIONVIN A)Awns 00Â¥230100 'NOA POW.>*e/74"15// ~iÂ·Ff'~e-:1 3/,/t. 3/77't :ti' 2~*A Att 0 POSSIBLE PLAT _ O afESTERN SAGE DEVELOPMENT 01 0 0 LOTS 1-8, TRACT A, BLOCK 4 W-ILDRIDGE 0 of iD h id O O A RESUBDIV1SION of LOT 5.1, 55, 89, & 90, BI.OCK 4 VVILIDRJUGE 1 W Â¥~. 0 41 8 , Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado 1 t Z Xe 6 3% 1 Z,1 % , $ 14 h i t Zi \ \, -7 O b . \ 14 .. . 1 / ts g 0 0 10\ 7 / ' /4 /4, li \ \ / i / 0 t :r Eu... 4 1 1.-*f 1 1%44 / i i 1 4. m -1 V.A i , --* , 36 t.' 4 * 10' SIX el{11Â©th: a. 0, /*.râ‚¬Â·iS ./ , *. kl / SCIEAÂ« LINE 94 J 1 $ '. A 1 /41 Â£ E t\1 92 \ /*-*-{7) 0 Lt .p W 4 11 . I 94>*>ter , L. 4, 1 hÂ» 1 1 10 z -3 LOT 7 - *~ 1 Â·14 ~ / 097 Ac,â€¢â€¢ '04 -1 Â« .- Â», .-â€ž47.â€ž' - } 10 1- if V N . -I . *.4 1 14~ B h , 7.9 91.* D#:4#.44 AND / /,4 44.t / ,ful<,TY L#.St.â€¢Int i.4 0Â¥0) J ~ ~ toi B . t 4 . Y /- 9 \~ \ ffli / f . 1 4* . 6 1 )44 - { i -w*,4 0 * -51.8-MN"W / 9 002\ -\%tty -27 33 / 77 + hâ€¢ ter) 7'1 1- ~ ./\ 4-4 - / r /39 DJ0 % h. 1 6 - \'h--1 ~ Ch< ':.01 -\ 1 1 \ --1 47 =#22,-%Â£06*21*/ 1.41.3/ K . 82 46 12t52 ' 0-/2 U , 1,08 AÂ¢Fem Nlsy)10 0- , LONGSJN LAME/ ~,Â· 45 30 50' 14 OW < *30 43 w-Â«-' 1-56 m - 1 1-202 26 rk.ACT A 0 I We .4 : 1,-.59>41- , 1 a 60.46<18- 0.73 ACT " Â£ CeÂ·*55 709Â· 12-* R Â·45.00 + I.- .fl '. i I ItT ANC} ,/,2 Ce.. /0 18 4 DRA,f,AU Â· 11 itut (17) 2 2/.4 K~ ~-31131~ '- 0...Â· 1â‚¬,3-w i t~~ Â¢ 1 Â·/ 1 4 \ <...4- b ."'. '- ~ </1 | X 46 4Â» 19 /1 r iÂ·Â·Â· uo 4 f , 1 \,1- / / 0231 *t,\ . ..E. Ity - - 6â€ž-2 :3' - ij/q----~n,-45&: : 1.4...9 '4 / / , f.'c A.48BI - 4 / .6, 2 , / t/43'rj,r~~** f /vi' .~â€¢ .T91 ~ ~ 11 : t d . 1 0-45.00 , Â£,1. /, j q ..r- 1 1 t.,2.(n L 10' fROIÂ·41 Bt.;I#*6 1/ 1 -4.--:171 ytiL...il ....4#7~ C --- ."*.-~'. ; ht i 1 t / i 44.24 1 l 1 165133*CK i IN{ AN i z tB :Nâ€¢$'48'54-* LOT 5 * 0.7,5 4.Â¢#.*is 01-33 4* IMÂ» h 14 i * 14 r t'-0 " Ill u hi.'. i f i 1 Ii:d 1 -0Â¥**Stit> .3~ pli ~ h, 1 . SE*ER â‚¬ Aitut,Nl ~ 1 j# ~ M ' 1 f 6 i : Iii 1 'n, 4 -- :24 L. f .' t LOT 4 91 1 191 9 * L- -- -1~# b - - Ule-- 1.'% E f , lu I LO~ 3 1,1 4 1/4 .1 i t , 0.67 Aire, UP, 0 KU % 1!1 f , 31 ./ ' .,- -A f +a lip 11 1 it - tel 2 6 1 0.69 Act# li i , i ------Â£-- -.--it ~ i. P 11 1 i lof 1 *:I:-/ f 11.11 0.0 41. 111 , GRAPHIC SCALE -Â»---I-K /, 1 000 03- 4,14 ...3 I - - ---1# ~- 2L-- i t)4'48;fO4 '/PE' 12*47 t le # U. ) '... s 40 k --- Â«:- Ul , - ~ SHEET t 3 VaO100 'NOAÂ¥ '30012:10-liM 18/SSOd '*9 SIC)1 45 ceÂ«i*eâ€¢Â«30'. sts<Tr/t: râ‚¬ _:. 4 *Aml#'TWA ' a f . .. 0 -- i 111 "'Â£ 'va, 4 [ 4) th 1 W O C, r: h. I I. 61; i j 1 4 Z 9.+ 4 1 -.* 4 0% 4 '1 60 p /v - u /./. , W 20 1 r L,0 0 t<J / ' f , / 4,1 9,7/ ,~~/./\\ ti~ t \ 1 0 6 \ lr.lab i t.*t 2 I 0 .0, : I . ..H' Il" . % . 7 .: I I ... ./ 1 1 1 r. 1 2 0 I- 4 ir i .1\4 . - 0 V, V -,1 ,â€ž... ..... ~ # f k XZ*/U#--iâ€ž -23< ..0 I .Ul,"# , .uv ./ I .a 7 / t ' I L t i 9 U -- 7 0 ./.. -, , , / A / Let 50 ". V 2 4 . 1 ..A. pÂ·.0 0â‚¬12 Alle' ., i / I. 11 m O ~KA , i E~ 1. E i .r. . - -. I + pt - - I I -& *.V -- I ./ * / , 16 ..6 - I - W --- '0 0 . ./.-' . e * V . W I * , ....+ ...$ .Â» I", *" 0 tri i .... I'. ./ Ii-.. .W W V - . 1 '.0 - - ./0/ 00 + 7- - I -#b v .. ~7 / ~*"/ , , ~ -L Â·~ ! Â· - 1 /< Â·~Â· .. z '.C 7- --- -117. Â·t . --Ce, '...,/. .-' ~- " - ,~,~ / - - - 1 / / -OBSâ„¢% INâ€¢.4*1 1 ' ---- 9-- - -- .. -1 0 I /7 , 1 0 ..I- H-/A-.:4 -- --â€ž --' I -.g-Â·-Â· ' #Â·-~Â· ... .Â·Â· lot 66. N. r./ . . - -,4 - i h 1 6 i %Â·*A 1% -1 *. ) I .. . 1% V f W /1 4 1/0,11:U ... , poSED 1' DEEP , 2 1 ..y, /-Â¥011Â¢il t , ~~ 1 1 ; IIi -/ % C-.: r:/--4---*-~*..:). /+ ... I#-.-- . 1.-- ' 13/ \P A . leâ€¢Â· I .*V -9. Â· 1, r -I - .. . -/ I- I - - -- - I - /-9 - - 'J; M..1'.NL ... fift*â€¢050:. ASPetti T * ...... Ar ....Â·...~-r,Â·'Â·t:xn,-=:azierÂ·=.Â·=re:t...#- -M- .. *-- :1 . 4 1 6 i. b 5 . 1 .--. '. . #- , *t'Â·Â·47~--Â·EL----Â· --Â· "_-_.~4.... 0,\,4et~C'.40~ i - l 0 - -~ ~ - * ' LOT 5 , . + - M -I +B#./ -1 ,#3.73 -*1 .r 10-* -- . . 1 . 5. 1- -' 51_ _ -- 2-2 -7-~ro~ VE~ Â»-22432--inTAI zo---Â·:~[j~-~-ttfy->~fit---- -L--- -,~.e -f~~ -hi Â¢ 1 ~i f - 4. -& . 4- - I - N - . . n . 4 -DV. -W---n'* V-* 1 . I ... 4, W.,3 1 U=--â€ž-64,2 7-"-2,2.- i - U , '1.~- h./ 4 . Tr- --'Lf#- tw.tf'Z- 22-~- 1 - .w TW 3 752----E<--2 -- -# -/ M - u.- . 6 .. I -t k.. -- 4 - ---22 /7 ..1 1 -=ms o. - -I- 1 Ul... 1 , . ..r Â· %-0-1 1 1 - Â· - -*-- -1 -v--v - + -- - .- 'w--.1 . 069 Acre'. ....Â«4~ /1~ %14. 4. - -- u.., , ;'Â·4,4.~ ' - j 4214.-4 2--14 -Â»-1- 1.7..RÂ«-9-*----i .~~ --1-1:441 1 -1--f -7 71 Â·-37> I-22 10 Â» , Â¥ -, 7~77 93 ) .ZIr. 1 7 â€ž- R.-.-*-Ii-*--*ti~ .---4- -*:*21- .~.1 ~~~;~~ 11<ACT M L i ore. sly.fr -, 1. Â»,7 ...h, ....... 20Â§ 0-025 -'/ f (SAll 4,28/24 :GRAP]11(3 SCALE %=6Â©0 - -7 -1 le . I 1 ~~ ~ SHEET 1 F F ..7 1 -"I # .A * 40 1/ 1 4 < t Dll D 0100 ' 0018 *06 '* S1O-1 937Â· f t:/ SH E 5.1*N 64/8/.0:34 Â·' r Si ,0. 0 -3 / 00 â‚¬4 - /' 0 0 / i / \ 1 7 " 4 / f Z io h W O 0 04 1 ' C f ~~ 1 C,~ W / 1 Z v) . n n u 4 U , 4 i 6-31 / t) t.' r.':t . ' ~ ' ; ~' / 'I -: Z u / 0, 1.11'AUT 41-032 -\ 4 0 6 + // I > 2. / ./7 A 1 , W 06 ' Wâ€¢{ 5* 1 410. LA\ , / /*X' d '*0 0/ /Â£\ ' 7 1 4 ./7 . ir d ,\24\L~ 1 E * jt I '1:Cd. 01'' / WA: UNE -i 1 1 M 't f *'7 TI.4 9,â‚¬47 f \11\\ 94\ 7% \\ 0 U *94*1**1 fA 142 h 9 ..â‚¬ff//*// 4r 0 Â£ 4 1 Ve. / 7 91\ . -W- --4 F.g- * - i. *-~15' -,> â€žA-' W., z 6 1 / 6 < 0, 4 ./4 : . Â· 2 N J 1 t 13 ./ it' \\ Lor z 4 21 Â£2<Â·1 57 /1 1 0,92, Ae..1 , 9 * k ..1. ' 1 1 Vi A . 5 E -4 LOT 5 , 1/Al 1 \472-kt ~ r'i ~ 1 4311#Â¢~4 5" tle i 1 1 0.84 AÂ«*S / lic f / $ I j 3,19 WATre i t:Â·4 f , ff3* '.-4 /# 0 A Â· dÂ·J # +2- 1 01 l ; 't $4#2,/IN,9/0 t..Fi R 11 Lit tl 1 H \:+ b\ 1 \/ U.,t,Otf (1-&.) , 4..,0 0 \\\ 101 6 -1 105 Aerel ppÂ·,poÂ· m. 411-R ~ let U ..: 1 -4, 14 +1 't> 1 kit. mis / r#Opt Â» 'Â·tr WA lt.N 101Â£ --1, , ' - W, TI $4 "Ati A .500/ -j ' ( -h. *-2// . )4 \IN?- >\ jb GO WATER .,Ae# EX:l.Nao,4 \ . ~Nt*Atit ri,2*ba 1 . . ./4 /2. - f.0.-_1 -3--- - zi:-U . - '1.v-42ri-izT~-~L - --_- 1 4% I + I I RE 610 Â· f ANG> 1 Â· 4,0 714 h, it . 4 T fil Â·016 % .. - 3; 'l4 -44 - 11 / Fil . fil Â·. 7 I .0,/ >0 > f I ,â€ž(*2â€ž'20 /4 3 :I- -- V i -Pv WL: 84#>9 1 " Â· i, -__. --- -1 1 I L â€¢ . :i . '.1 At * u <4 3 SCAUÂ¢ t,At; 0 *15: .-1 --.-- / r -~ TE -* if 1 441 , :.Â·-1 -5 1 13 ~' Lei 5 ew*310 9*t R /' J ' -- 11 0 7b Ar.,re, WN,1021 -1 141 ~~ A ~~- _ 1* 14 I J U. cr titÂ»At\*044 1' N f- p# *\ 114 Â£*94*,1 61Â¥41[ Mif D- 31 1 // 11 ?1~ 144/, .1 2/ fill - 8460 2 ~ 0 / f./ >, 21 *4Â¥ * 045,9.1 91=.,L: i i --td#* IN# 1 1~ { i 1-- U, [ /1 IN ~ - ,#12*00<n) St M 1.- / 1 1 0 1 (/fr - .,ne in') 1 t, f j/ f U* 11*9; 1 : Â¥ u;t 53 ~. 4 Loi 4 t i j --~ E.b 4 t 1 0 61 *Cr" ~Â» h J f F , f ti i a- -/*%- aL - =11.v , 1 - -22 -2~ LL- '2-*~21121%â‚¬ pq Lt 11 r [12Â¥Â«9-- st* / -12 4 tor 1 1/2 0.67 *cr. 1 :t te. f h, /4#- -- FI SI;-9..TA. Onr;o sc~,ce .i, p..~ 3 --- --21 -0--1, 1 4--- 9 1 ) LOI 2 0.69 Kerel x *u - 84 54 7 .V ..: 1>*51 9 2 3 -- +2Â»01 1- 1.or 1 --- f! 1 - N 4/ 21 4 , -----J L 1 / / JOB > 03-034 GRAPHIC SCALE t. } , 1,4,E 4/26/W - -4.~---11 1 / - ' < w n rt) SHEET ; '2/4. I u . n I I * f 00Â¥k;0100 'NOAV .30 NMOi '30018(311/A Â¢ Â· i.... 7.:Â» 3:-1. 1.r.*: UT:F C. AN + ..3 â‚¬. 7 234â‚¬ AN O -1 1 1 1 -1 0 i , /1 1, 4 0 / 1 Z - N r / 1 . 1 ./ *4 41 r# 2 'd d R ' ; O 6 LOT 88 / LOT 58 h : 3 i / e. i 1 . C C 1. 1 / 1 f . t e # li Y~/Ft,NE { 1%,r) ~f ; A + 4/7 1 1 ryÂ·}si*6 107 T # / IC ~ --~ .-1 \ tnt ra \ 2 i dc '' 0, C / k. lOT 7 2 0 / 1%.POP:/fr. :.1/ a,2 Aer. ' ' i ~ ' 103 57 i V. , 4 f .<.4*-'4 0'*~17~,ir, (121 5 ~~*1~\~ 1 4 4 D '- \1 1 1 ' \ a, c 'i. 4 / \2 :- ~ % ~t l 'A 0,84 An, M '/ / Z LOT 8 ,-% ./.t -' f i - . 1 ' . / Â¢OT 56 I I. ,~ LOT 90 2.41 % A--2-2272- i--> ~% / '' 9 4 . 4 : C C LOT 6 : 1 ~>P-"Ul X . ..Er >ET 8-2 11' < LOT 52 t.05 Acre,m f , &/1 . 9 50' R:OW : . g w .~0 t a < ' :~ . '*~ . >44:.'4: 4 5. ..'*71 A , ,*0'T~-31----- .-- .0 1 Or,flf;!Jlf 1 ANE i --0-4 i t 11=29-----1.3-9.Trf-rfu- 1 6 , ..0 11 1 01 -'5 t i i 'f. e ./ & t -1 j:fr -Â»- 11 , t : 3 i k $ R !1 LO; 54 --- ' - M '11. â€¢14 â€¢t I 1 ,1 L CT 1, i ;1 , ..6 1 .. ... I ./ 06'Acreâ€¢.... .'.IÂ· .'. .Â·. . i.- 4 1 -1. - I . , 1 -- - r , 1. ......Y:,2A..2 .i~~: .6 Lig.Â·ouni"- .0 Â·--'-12 $ . :+ 1 N â‚¬ . .. . 1/ i ../. tiÂ¥(1 It . . -U .Â· \ 0.80 86- t ' f toot 0<Ni ExisTING OPEN SPACE 3.33 ACRES / 4 -, F GRAPHIC SCALE TRACI H .Ir,Â¢4 - 030 01 4 4 /21, e . . ~---~ PROPOSED OPEN SPACE 3.33 ACRES *6964..213 L_ 1 f m 'En ) I t,-6 - 49 A SHEE e M..- ./.1..# i: coy Â¥ >10018 99 '*9 Slon 1BIHX3 33Â¥dS 3dO m // 4 111 9 5'-C \11 , 3'-0" MIN. , 71 Z~ "r-,4 / / 6 -~4,1 114,~111Â¥ 1 > Z ~ I Â»e X LEVEL GRADE m - 1 -* I 1 4.1*m@@imm~~ . ~ im-t fil FOUR COURSES -it OF BOULDERS 1.Egâ€žEMÂ®1# 0$ I~~~L._11 V=al MAX. GEOGRID PER GENRAL NOTES 61 2 //- @ BOT BOULDER COURSE I - )** 61-011 Q 6~49% FROM MID. PIONT OF > . LOWER BOULDER - =1 0 . Â£â€¢:2~~~ FOLLOW SOILS ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AMOUNT 5 ti 09 6 - GEOGRED PER GENRAL NOTES Sl @ BOT. BOULDER COURSE l ~~~- AMOUNTOFGRAVEL_ FILL AND FILTER FABRIC Z \ 1 J' - --11~RoJitiD- ploNT op 2.5 --Â£00= LOWER BOULDER , 3'-0" MIN. =/ f . le==-~rK-1/12 - 0 -I.....-- 11*3565812*5- I 0 6" COMPACTED - 1/ / 1'-0"MIN. FOUR COURSES -~-1 , 2-6" MIN. 60 e O c/) C - /1 / / 0 >IO BASE > F rn 03 820ULD[ERS Il.~ ~ -~~ -,1- 1- Z . > 02 F 0 m X - -- GEOGRID PER GENRAL NOTES Sl @ BOT. BOULDER COURSE 0 1-rl C - tO FROM MID PIONT OF ' - m - LOWER BOULDER ~ - i<Q U OJ - % 41=SEN &--- FOLLOW SOILS ENGINEERS 11 -< 1\0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AMOUNT TOP VIEW -1 AMOUNT OF GRAVEL FILL AND FILTER FABRIC 6 7 2,_0" MIN , 1 - GEOGRID PER GENRAL NOTES Sl @ BOT. BOULDER COURSE 6 l BEFORE / < ~ 0 ---- --I ~ SLOPING GRADE a Z 1 [--~/FJ~*$12*EamlEE3 LiEil FROM &11[).PIONT OF O Al=imME1 ~~' LOWER BOULDER , 2'-6" MIN. , , -n NOTE: BOULDERS SHALL SIDE VIEW NOT BE ROUND IN SHAPE & MIN BOULDER DIMENSIONS 6' COMPACTED BASE 1'-0" MIN. 6 , FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS A , FROM SOILS ENGINEER. IN ~ TYP. 12'-0" MAXIMUM DOUBLE TIER BOULDER RETAINING WALL DETAIL SCALE. 1/2" - 1'-0 42 1 4 1 0304-04 FAX 970.949,3377 PH 970.949.7100 AVON,CO 81620 PROJECT HAMEL / PERUSSE RESIDENCES p.0. Box 2494 NIIN â€žO-, L ' XVIN â€ž0-9 2'-6" MINI JPL DATE 05/11/04 1 I ' 1 \01./ ' â€¢ POL.. a- .... =U.It+~Z~- 4 r'.JI . ' I il /2,23'*-/"Ctlj r/,NÂ«/, It ' - ,Â¥V/-lâ€¢A 2-*l Â£ 197KA+ANy 1 -/>t' 1. , / . /A. L..-- 2Â«3~9-Â·ups~7 - Â·Iv~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â£Â»99.7- Â· rÂ« /9L.1\ -~Â»PRkâ‚¬*=7 r/. Prili"IMEFK/My- 1/ S 5-1-1(79Â¥f.-7 PUD Prd %\ -1-13*47>47 - 1- l,/ 1 ' ~ r-Â·lit.,v ,- b 2. \ 1 / L A V tra . 4.... I -1*CE su,01*/ . \ - P \ i i \ li -I... -1 PUD \ \/<4 , 4= a ... Â· Â· 42, %---.29/ . I. /1 \ ch 4 \N \ vicÂ»Ii-FY MÂ»r 11674>-â€¢Le I 014 40 - - 1 - \â€ž\ X li 1 19Â«212924=kaÂ« 1 \ - $2BJÂ»Â·Ueâ€¢Ju- .9.4,-Â·Â·p-,Â· eJPÂ·F 4 \'.60~ 1-24-2- 27~~-~ \- \ 1 4 -. - . -El----7--..- -hÂ« 1 4-Ut:-+ove 34/L-pe=52- 1,JAW-/-, *Â¢r ~ .et .U,-1,1=.I PE=+BIL- .A % 2 Lk \ --r-) i *21-- --_ - -1 %.2-Lb -2-40 - Th --- 441\ \\ ----1 / 42 , 421 \ -\ -Sh,adl,- 44 4. Llk-t~"gÂ».er \ -21% Wit-4.1 rÂ·11Â·te .*--p.~t?*e pultxfjo Li- 3~42 -- +505 0%% 1.- - - 'e-- ..1.11 --Ill- ... *\- /,1 . ' \\ 5 8:,-8.Ck .. 0 0.24 ' . 0/+ . '1. Â·Â·Â·Â·~62* \ 1 ) 2 _ 40-- 3 \ 10 : le 'Â©D J \ -- .- / 7--, -Â»1415 4 J MMIÂ»*-r - j ; .t. / - L.09'e~* 1.-Â·Â»-* *trÂ·Le. 00Â· to:â€¢WA-LWL. J;,4*â€¢> ! 2 e>JIL.ei /0 AR=6:,U+Â· A.-up,.Me. : 41'O' -- tel Mi i , el 1 7...11â€¢1- â€¢5~~Â·Â·-- We..1.'v ' I \ E-- -gal,-0, 61Â£,1 14E1=364 F;'0-re-Â®p 1 51'110 ./. .1.6 r'-0*1* - FeÂ¥-eev 3: -,5 9. , 7-74*j- * , /-% I *4.- W. , , #-e * 1/4 ,~,zeÂ· 4% 0'.pÂ· -Fc--ve 5.-Â£,= : 45*6,74 :24% 15 j -A 'a ,*Se/. 4/9 6+25 L.-AUC;--Â·Â»â€¢~per 1 7444.0, 142+ :N - 2/ 2=14 -Â« 9 2\7 Â»\ - . 24 - ,u=,gÂ»*eÂ»- JurlÂ·'H' Ftâ€¢*64*8:192.2,6 v -, dit I ; 4625.01 f I.*A. ' ./. r Â¥u,4 44*et a*'r h~â€¢**Â» '~'en.4 UN.F...#. 1 4*!.2 21 --1- ... 3-4 --. u,Hu,4/4/,/ 1 12173,2 tlth,1-te ; 1506... 14 20,4Â»3 Ft.-=-1Â» IUMUIV : 1*1.-74 -0---Â£-ju.. ) , X. 1 - --20+1*- 1 .,J .-I --- 3- 4 - 7-3-94-- -9 - I .-. 1 -- 4Â«rÂ« - fl --.~2-9---Â·- X- 62% M JAL- &61.4-ES }21-->61 -- - 4//4*5.â€ž,~ ' -*4 fo'/8 kj>Â¥4 84- ~Â¥'eÂ·Â·gÂ·4Â«58Â· Uee\0Â¢AlaeÂ» L=+ 2Â», el--65- 4 b.yt..4- WIL-520...... 1-- - Â»-Ip,1 --.. -t.84â€¢Je= 1. M#-8 . \-A- - -Â», p'-p ,C-guag- --- --- .-. Â© 2/-4 91*#M-â€¢+1 ~,-4++Â·n=c}-Ft -I A.1-,A --- r - % - - 7.r - r- - / .-. . HAHE:LfectÂ»:be o n,.La -4-, 12 eÂ» 10 22Â§16 84 - 1- ot * BED j et-Dz-* 44 k r-r ..0..... ...le'.... ... 1.1. SP1 4-7 Â·41 WIL-0121,7,51:sE== EZ=Â»12 EsÂ»-Â«P t.-404 1 Â£-OU-OÂ» >0 0 " 9/Â·â€¢ES .9 :Ji' a.- .O/.~ 6,-ec-rwl,--/ I .9/2 -~ I f< / 3/1 6 0 1 "Un n Â·' 1Â· ~u~Â«\~~~,<~ A~<~~~~Â»-33;'~"jrf\,n-* S -1- 'A*2 - /Fdll.E.Ir-t-/..21 - 4. -i h ~I u 12> L ! - 1, . \ri . 1 1 P Mij'WIL suabiv,sow l *P A - 4,7 .S E Â»07 PUD \ \A\44 1.~Â·T- AGÂ©Â·< 7 444/ vic-lut-1-9 MIÂ»r *%he . \ 7- 4-1 2 de----~*-- \ _ f 11 \1 4 U N.ce=-=2 74:m>J--2--*2-- _-- -4#de JAMZ- 64~Â·Fâ‚¬- 2-W+ 4'9.-+00 4102 4#64.6I 11 .2 ---- I ------- -\. h -tvt' Â·Derfl =45,#se. Ct-t>,L- 414 -\. \>\\ CN-IN - -)$% \ I . 7\ Â· 7\ ~141~\ Lf---13 Â»ir.'.---*.rirr.- .r~#rit ir-* t. 1 , 1% K. -Â· 1./* I -- l 1-,/ ; 1- <7 â‚¬L, ~+ 0<-1.-=NX)4 42~ 4. - - 7~ 440 41 -2 'f . Fgfi _Chie, .,i< p f. - 0:1Â·. *200 7.27 Ch. fil luX\Â·Â·:fl - I. lilli ... *p= - #1246,/~ /\\ \\ 3/.7-k - A/ 0 (137 91.-2,70,Â«6 y \ .46+ ... 2 1444 kn -- - 1 -7. 0.. r--k + --. N - tE- ***44 - / ..1%.=7. '4.4-9\. tar..1- , 1% - ./.- r\.AV -- .-L .1 Â». ..... .M . 1-3 , #be= ss / ~ ~ ~~Z~~~~M ~Â£~~~ ~80-+Prra.%942 , - '51* . ---- N' 1 6, --1-N 4'46.40 M MIÂ»Â»â€ž \ I.2/r ' AÂ»k NO )1412-6.0 I\/C, F'--\Uj<4tfx <,1 4.Â·UpÂ·ele~~+ I./*UU *19 1. 42Â· r-4-036, JN}+-9 2 jrK/.Ch\ ../..tleâ€¢ #21:Il.A#- .,LÂ·u,Lâ€¢t. 241 .11 1 --41-- g JIL-Â·C. Uu Ue,a w-4 FÂ·Â°r"e'. --/ N ,# i.-1,= -*-*- ge.~u'=ee ' e 2'.I: h--1 / , , - r=rer.:cr..15:7% Z .--4- .A Â»$415> 4~ ./.4- Ge-/E='-Ilt 460 24 4 F-Â» -; -if ; r: 41* - ,6-t.-4~Â«+es= ~--uoÂ·w:-Â·-F= ; 74:w,ot Â»4 f - 0 . - -/ - - 10- i--k-\ I , 2/4 /-- fiy /44. --\ ,'L,*'12 Â»Fe# & 14 *H' Ft*Â»te %61.-24 Lâ€¢44.~â€¢â€¢ *V F-=..*W ; 6/05./1 Â·Â· . I -- i.... tÂ«f 7 - __i-)4--IL-_- /~ 0 1--:CC ' 21 #Flulâ€¢%$Â·1te : â€¢506.0 Uâ€¢IA...ltv : 4,1.. ILâ€¢,0,1,4. U,bÂ·k 'r, Fl,Â»212 :48â€¢r,.4 / 4 /75 --- -1- - 0 4 /6 PL=â€¢=paa>Â·02Â» AUPht=P 1 '09.-74 4 \ L]UPIU.'12=N 1279.2 -4 1-*- Nizi-TL--k 27Â»4-LOfeftÂ»iriqi .-1- - .- 70 --1-#~I---I )- --- -1 ---h - 4...119.-- L-271 1-- - -->- 2Â£1-- - 1- \ 2/ -IN- --4 ,- - ---z/ i - /'fl t>-1661.- â€¢614-E; 15=,L->d ------- Ledâ€¢6+Wdehed e|Â»11 0,9 P.-6,4 - 41 - C 4,2, a - - 1,B=Ue. MB...O.. I Hswe:-6 /1~e.NÂ·.se Weeit:>,E:raaÂ» L=>Â·r eelli.....4 '4.-1 2 *,>pt ....0 / U' -<%- --- - 0 :00. >417-4Â·1 b-4,4-watic- . & 19.4 I-- f 1-1 - --- -01.7 i----i .... r-- --- / I,I>H Ek:: l.- AF E=:562.Je,eer Â£~0+3==~h .-r Â£ 12 e:al 132 FIL.Uc- 84 - 1- opt- * De j e:,1-06* *4 k F#7Â· Â·>â€¢'0,-le= Sp~. El 4-741 WIL-OCI,76085 WDÂ»12 eÂ»Â«-F ..........â€ž'......, tj*/42 h...~ ~ z:-~PL----21;2-Â»ty~2 ; f Â·2 2.1; BENCHMARK- SEWER MANHOLE . 8 =12*00'30- RIM = 8658 5' 0. WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST R =775.00 g TOPOGRAPHIC MAP e INV = 8652.1 t'* 50' RIGHT OF WAY L =162.43 4 a % 06 T =81.51 \ e CB =575-26'25"E LOT 86, BLOCK 4, \ CD =162.13 --0- - . Wildridge Subdivision ----1--A---~I--------- - ----___- _-~72TZp---~2--292~-DER -109/ 4- __r Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado il--- - , - --L 10' ~SLOPE MAINKNANCE - DRAI WAGE ~- Ne 865 1 AND SNOWSTORAGE EASE MENT _ _ ' 1) Survey Dote March 20,2001. ----1 --- ------ - -- Replot No. 2. Finci Subdlvision Plot of Wildridge~ recorded October 08. 1981. In Book 330. at Page , -- - -- 1 - 78, in the Eagle County Clerk or,d Recorders Office ond Survey Monuments found ot the tirne of LOT i /-----Ill ----.. -- ~ __ - this survey os shown hereon. This Survey does not constitute a boundory survey nor any , ,-- -- ' investigation into record eosements or encumbronces ossocioted with this property_ ----â€ž1------- 22-2--=-1 1 ; 4 ---%-- -- 't 3) ELEVATION DATUM: Benchmark elevation of 8652.1' for the sewer rÂ·nonhole invert with o rim 2 ' BUI LDI G SETBACK ' 1 1 1 0040 ' elevotion of 8658.5% as shown hereof, in the right of woy for Wildridge Rood Eost -- -- ----- -- ~ i, 41 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 foot. 5) Utilities ore shown approximately ond should be field verified prior to execvotion. 1--T------- -------------- PLANTED ASPEN & F]R TREES 1 - 4" CALIPER i i - 6) Meyer Land Systems does not warrant or certify to the integrity of c}ny Digitol Data supptied (TYPICAL) l , , Â· In con),nction with this mop ond survey. 1 1 - -- -- , 7) STREET ADDRESS: (not posted). ROCK RETAINING WALL 1 1 e S 1----I -- ------~ 8) View corridors were opproximately located end should be field verified a \1> . 1 J --- , ' , , FENM4%8Â·--- --- '' ------ 1 Â» '1 - 8630---~ $ 0, - i , certify thot this TOE'OGRAPHIC SURVEY wos done by rne or under my direct supervision. and thot -- -- 5% , , it was performed using the standord care and practice used in the area at the time of the - ~ L-.8 2 * ~ i . survey. The Notes hereon ore o port of this certification. 2 , ROCK ; 1 -- , 1 1 1 --------- STAIRWEL 9 --1-4-- , W 1 1 -- 1 1 0 e 1, I i , Meyer Land Systems, Inc. , % &.I , , ----- - ---8Â£1---4--~-------- ' 1 APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF BOULDERS z--*1 0 ./ l / 8620 . 1, W--E- (TYPICAL) LOT 86 , t ~-- -Mil LOT 87 3 A , 1 LOT 85 1:, ---- , , ---W- , , 1 4 /1 2 1 6%- 1 1 / l-- -------- 1 1----1 S ,-4 -_ , ~ 1 t 1 1 1 , 8010 -------------I--r- I--- ----6 -------------- liz \ 1 --1- 1----- ''W 1 k 11 1 1.-1--W-8 ------------- -- ---1----1 1 1 . , W ---I------- - -I-~I- ----- - - - -~----------- -- -- ' -- u 21 Location of Improvements, Lot lines. Building Setbocks and Eosements ore bosed upon the - SIGN- 1--r----- ------------ t ' 1 prior to construction_ -- 4 ----------------- 1 ' , , I, Matthew S. Slogle, 0 Registered Professional Lond Surveyor in the Stote of Colorodo, hereby , 1 --- --1- 1, 0 1 ------- 1 - --1- , Matthew S. Slagle RPLS 34998 El , - 0.85 ACRES 0 --- e,/ ----i--6-----1-1-- ~i--B- 1 , 0 1 . â‚¬: 1 W -- ----1-------- 1.- -+-- :--- ------------------ ------ GRAPHIC SCALE Nvt//- -- - ------- ----- 114 '1 - 6.6"4.Wi,9.-4.-A- ----- 1 1 4 1 00 0 J --------------------41--1-- 5-- 1 -- --I--1- # ' 1 0 U~1__1 _CD _____- ,=-6---- Z --'..... > -----h f f b .1 , 4 ( IN FEET) - 0 -- --1--6------- --- *J--1.--6.-- lk------------------ linch- 10 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I. 0600----~ __ __-- -- 91 '' & In MLS I 0 MEYER LAND SYSTEMS , , 1/) 1 i 1 ---- __--_------------r--r------ --------------Â·------- Professional Land Surveys ---- -- , 1 ---- ' 1 1 i -- ----- 902 Grand Avenue 136 E Thrd Street X ----- ---- , 1 --- --------- -- -------- Â· Â· Eagle, CO 81631 RHIe, CO 81650 - 11 ' ' NonCE: ....9 to Color.... I- .., con.....any i.gl (970) 32.4900 (970) 625-2770 - ---/1- 1 1 ~ oction be-d ulper, ./. d,Nct k. thi -r-y -Rh. thill >-ors (970) 328-1901 FAX (970) 625-2773 FAX -- ------- 1 X crft- >,u flrlt {bco-,d -ch defect. I no .-! moy Iny <--*z-859H-=- --. 1 1 ---------1---- , 1 ' ' ------ t ~ then In >,er, 1-, th. dot' 0~ c,rtiflcot....0- her-1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP octlon b-d upen any def,ct . th~ -r-y b- cÂ«nm--d fner' -- -- LOT 86, BLOCK 4, , , ---- Wildridge Subdivision Town of Avon. County of Eagle. State of Colorado 1 ' FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT .------- ' ' - ORANN 8* DAlr 23 Mor 2001 MSS ----- -------------- -------1--t 1 1/2Â» DIAMETER ALUMINUM -------- ------- ' 1 FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT i , CAP ON REBAR STAMPED --- - 1 1/2- DIAMETER ALUMINUM -%A)---- CAP ON REBAR STAMPED CHECKED BY. TJA i LS 5447 'KKBNAJ_----------- - DRA,ING Na: 01034TOP 1 LS 5447 Â»KKBNAÂ» ---- --- --- , 1 Rev.rock outcrops SAH 18 June 01 410 Na 01034 Der 1 of 1 i - - - ...172.- =-=flÂ»Â«-v_11::. __-- - -= --_=-a;~=-=------1222_2-10. BLULDING SE*SAâ‚¬*- --_ _____ _5<./52-- ----.----.,----------- ---- 111 490 1 N 20'33'50Â» E 't +45'2 --+54'2. /3:AÂ«\ 1.6/ ef +40'20 ' 11 .. +441 +4*lei ..1 HAV IÂ»=L L 1 =07 =,=Â£4=1Â· \Â»:21!: i i .EEZE El@1-" -<F ~ â‚¬>ilL_221==---TI*,==44, I i *CAE} 1 444*122:31;69,-1~26, L---1 L n ' 1 "-i,Â£:2,1&17t-1-~-11-wrht' e*lml â€¢4 i -Welit -w ~11[- PRÂ« I _142 1.G :11 4 V ~11.2- i ..1 rlaw i ~ 41 Lingd WP- ~ ' +,s, t' 4410 - - F, f C Muâ€¢4â€¢*â€¢2 - - I. ' -- es. Â»huc, 3,\ \\. 1 L *~39* m""H= my +6~ lue'uuc-~ 77 - -- --- I - lithJNW =Â·914* I i k--161 --/ - 4 -- . le - 1 1 - - ./.1/m~'ll, ' 1 .;/1 '1 1 1 j , 1 _L 150Â»*F el.-evÂ»-1-i G,4 lAi #*44- EL/A4>+10.1 " }7" 44â€¢2:01-144Â£ - 4 11=il/ ~ 4,45*L.+1441 -140=11=11 \A>,Atu IVEWOKe we~pe:06-Â»'6â€¢ L.+ er. 1 BLB 4 e:--1- 1,dIL-,2.Â»412.0,ep 69 02,4---9.-9 0 _Â©2.ew,4 1Â·411*,â€¢Â·+UU-|-1 Â»uall-PEÂ£,+ a- 41 11 14 1 .1 1 - -- -T- - 1 -f- -1 -T - T 1 1 1 1 1 1 il 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili I 1 1 1 -= J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 r---------- 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 lili i 2 UNIT .P I 1.659 125 50 F 1.499 375 /01 I -1 F lE -f --D- -1 1 1 /1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 10.- 9 P.UFCH R61 4 - - 1 . 2 7'-7- 1 3.-11 '/2- 1 1 1 1 1 1 r - -- - 4-1 --H LikRY ||~ ~ ~~~~fÂ¢==Â°I~9:)1- j. ! 1. r 81 -f 17 7 | | | | | | | 1 | 1 ~~r1 1 L~==4 9 .xr f. 2- -1 AUNDRY 1 1- 1 S-. 1/. r- 7 5,27-2 1/4~ 7Â·-7- -1 23 -8 1/4- 5-1 1/4 111-0,/1- 3.-6- 1 - '4,16 . /'1 b -173 ft.3-1--O- , - N f <91. : n. N I 2Â»Ut--- 7- 1 2. - 4 -- 4 - --~ -- --- -- Â·Â·-- Â·---_l- --__ _4_ __ -2 -L _* _I ~ (__ 1 - ~ I 1 1-11- 9- 42-Â»L- 1 -. 111 1 lil ~ ~ f - -]-Â· ---- -Â·-9 ---- --- ---5 -L~4__ _1_ .-_- 6- n--,=1~LAi 1, 49 1 L__, 1 ' 5 1/2 1 . P Al -IN 1 1 l_J 24" 1 I * -1 1-3 1 1 4-9 . 4 | f ,-If I ff -=.cr, 1 1, - I I 7-4 4'-6 3/4- 6'-0 :-' '24- 2 -5- , 8'-6-1 ( 2-3 1/7*Â·48 1 12-1 3/C ~ 0 1/2,12 04/; 1 11 . .rr==1=j '77--1731.. t IH-1,~Al K.IN 11 . D ~4,8~111 1 1 1 11Â·-61,/2- 1 I Ill/2/I 11'-6 1/4. 2'-iD 3/.r | Â·- . . 1/7 1 B 9 1/4 11'-11 3/4 3 k_- In_--1 1 . -2 6 MI -- J 2=[*EM 1 4-1 111 6L | Aw # .r-5914.1 ib ifrf==09 34 -g- ... --I- 1 .L-- +4 - 9 --211- -4 - -4- -==' -4 --_~ 1-~4- --1 11 .1- 1 11 fN . IN=Ek - '41 1 2.-0 1/2. l'E= 1.11 16.-9- - f 1-0 '/4- ) 1, 16'-8- 7'~,C- 4 ~ic.22'.1 r/5 1,6-9- 2 1 34 4=-1-==2, 1 ----*-Ie===? - -- - 1-1 V.f--14-' I~ irÂ·-61-+ .â„¢ 114 1 1 .1 1 --1 -- - - 1.-1 Ir- 10'-C 1/4. -Et, p- k r-12.-0 1/]- +32 -0 1/2 118 M â€ž11/21 1 G L.Kiwe CZI 1 16--g- f-'; --=-+ +__ _ 2& 1 l 1 -1 ~6.- 8 , poRCH i 1-1 1 [41 2.-0,1/2 1 . 1 \21 1 1/2 f -0 '/2- . - - -iL-, 49-4-,1- 1 1 _El 'Â°'8 0 1 8 o /3 1 1 ...15..r 1 4==._=:.7 0 5 " 1/0.1. 3-2 â€¢/2-1 6-0 1/2- IS-6 1 dt 'Ft,-1 4.-6 3/4- ~F mitplp,: .-2 3/4 1 111 0 1 1-6 1, t-Â·~ f i 61-6 1/2 9-0 1/2 '244 PORCH 2'.0 1/2- 15'- fi |15.-2. Â§*P '1 .53 + =-1 --= I ~01 1 n I [0~~71 1 I i --1.4 II----+a.--6~. 1 6Â°'/tl / 1 id'# 1/2- 10.-9 112- 1.1 1 + "-6 1/2. li ./ 1{ . 3,!F .. | 41/2~ 31 9511 2 6'-7 1/2 5-7 1/:. 2.-4 4-8- 4/ 2.-4- A C Â·1'-10 4'-10- 2% : 6-4 6'-: 2-4 4'-10 4.-10- 2.- 4 1 1 1 1 1 18'-5 1/2 5.-9 1/4- 35 -2 ' /4X 18 -0 '/2 12.G 15'- 0 12Â·-O 8'-0 3/4 - 2.Â·/4 6 0- .2-6- - w././*, .......c, pic DATE: GROUND LEVEL PLAN --CE ao* 0810 : Miramonti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 5749 Wildridge Road East A 1.1 I- cot.0-00 /1.. SCALE 1/4-= 1'-0- - . - I. -- East Wildridge T*70 - t,Â» r,70 ~, 01,7 Avon, Colorado C 1. f 6. 1 9=31 E.-1 2 11.-6..1/,LI ~~ ~~ ~-YUEST B-k-j-~ Â· ENT 1 I i .Â©Â·19 -2 1 -T 1 +14 1 lilli 8 | Mot |1 PAW EST BDR ' -tÂ» ~7-71.7 3 1/21: 5-7 0- 1 . - 1.4 -. ....1 =1 - - If NUEST BATH ! f u :thi -~ 3/21]1 1 -1 --9.-1._. 1 1 - 1 Liu.37 BEE.. 1 IN ... 7.#I. .--4 --, --11- 14--\0.-=, -- -- +L-V.- ----- 1 Il,-4 1 F-2 1/2- /2Â· 4 31 H.,/2- , -1 ZE-lar 110* >,4-Â« 1 , J I I It "-iTORAG I ~ ~21=5.- f-1 1/7 7 ~" A.:kl e: 490Â¥-11 H~GUEST BOR ~2 ~ ~ lu j 1 D. I _-Par,4 3 J 7 K-i-7=10 1.-6- y-9- y-64 1/2- ' -=t--2-77 . INIT -P & OVE E=KLICilEa 0- 1 1 1.824 625 SO.F F 1.557.625 SOM. 0 _kgoilf-TH]1--431_ _I__ 4 . E-u& 2# i-- . IiI. 1 ..,221 27'-5 A 77.-4- 9 r 5 ~ T. 34 Im : Iii_ 4 - _ 1 I M I I --- 3-4- 4-1 2- .c-2 1 FR- f- --Cli~T- ~~ '0 t--4 0 L*-9-03 P-PCÂ·â‚¬R FU 'H r--4 r. CE~20 ' ElÂ® 1 L_-1 11.110 - OVEl _ _11_Â· M=-KITH ...0 H-CLOS[1 1 - 444 4- 11 / 1 - - 1 [--rj- ---111-- Ill -1- -7-- t&4 ~ #Ak#* - = iff-Â©-r l= 2-U ET- -1 1 I ' , 1/4 2-0 4 -0 1 5Â·-6 1/2 1 .Â·-0- ./Â·_0- 1 U _ : 1 -i- }t -1 4 1-0 -- -/1/2 -â€¢ 51 , 10' TO 1/4- , 5 1/2 110 25~-lr ~ -tz, EP] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0~ LI Â®'< | h 6 5 1.02~ k -. 16.3 3/4. 250-101 ] 4. I. l . -51/4- L --1?243 731.4~-4- ZE-12:- f UE ~__-EAL-lf. 174 Al <Il - 0.1 a .. A 1 11 -, 1 . -4.- ~- Â« . 1/ el e Ir Â¢ ASTER BDR 1% 1 1 91= 1 L E- T i 71Â«+9 - ~ z__- _j_ - -4 1 -4- titH-rrFtÂ©----Â·~4- "' ' 1 l-7 I rÂ·-7 .0 k - 1221 - \121= .0- -1- - -.. 1 -- ~ - -- - 1 6 1-- LTT11464..3,41~2~/1 IL./ ~ lip H-MASTF~ CI OSFT 7 H-MASTER BOR T ' '}44 8--~fi--)fffl 2--AIfILd*.1-.4 i:: 1- - j-fliz,02-42-~2- ~ 2-2,+ 4 ~ 2-0 vt Â·- I ,-1/2- 4 | 6-0 17+-6 1/7 b 3 IF/9 -5 1/4 7-1 4-: f = 11 lit.Â·-3 ,/4- a--A ' : 1 -r -4-4 _I. _7=22 12 6.,-11 &7 41172[ j 6.-2 1/4. t.-8 3/4 9 /25~-~1- 61 .. 1 ]1.-04/2 1 2'-0 1/2 2.-tr -J 'I 1 ./- -FE --i.1-==...33.-Hi Â«-2 3/4 1 | n ~ 2Â·_/2 2 dll 53 1 7 | | | I . W l'-12 72 3 2 -0 1/'1 4Â·-0 1/2 2-5- 1 1/24~ --3. t. I f. 1/21 4 1121 25-10 13 1 - 1. ; k . ' .. I . 71 . ZE 12,42, 2-0 1/2 7--0 1.- i Z - LI'-6 -/2~ i~_5 3/4. -1 4 1/2- 2Â·/0 3/4- 1 2 0 25'41 1 --27.- n 1 E I 1 60-91 1 1 1 ELIÂ« 11 1/2- 2-0 1/ Â· < 1 11,41-9 3/2- 10'- Air/ZG '1/ 1& 4'-t 'I:1-~1ff2~ 7'-1 1/2 7-1 3/4- _.~ 10Â·_; ,Â·-41 5 -4- 5'-4- ,-, p 6.-10 6.-10- . 5- C . 5-4- 8'-0 3/. 2'-6 6'-2 3/C 6.-0 *1 - 6-2 3/4- .-6 '/2 18'-5 1/2 14'-8 3/4 1.-9 3/4- 15--5 1/2- 8-6 1/2- 6'-2 3/4 12'-0- 6' 0 2 -6 8'-0 3/,- -UNn *VICr FC DATE: IMAIN LEVEL PLAN posr ornc~ eox s.,c ~ Mirarnonti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES ORS 05-18-04 5749 Wildridge Road East A 1.2 AVON COLORADO I 1 â€¢IC 3 -.......................... SCALE 1/4"= 1'-0" 0 1 - -7 -- I -- East Wildridge Avon, Colorado / \ \ F Â·Â· 0 \ 1 -r%\ - 11 141-7 h 2 0 1/a ,= 42- e 6 I - - --- 11/14 -1- --- -- - C- - 1-4 It XI 1 1 1/ liti/ 1 -1 ! 5 E 1 1 1 1 -1 - ---- -* 1 | i | | 1 < ' 39'-6" 39'-7~ T -1~>11, 1- 9 11~/2- 2'-0 1/2 21'-51/2 . \F 1 1 c. r I 19 -11 _ -44 -j--- \4.. V T 1 0-, li~ IÂ·lf- L '11-2_ Â¤ !1[*/// 'a - mu - - -Â» 17_,14Â£-T 0 2 d'121 =2.-Ir R==-11* 1 1 -1 7643>dll. ~ ~ ~~iEL~._~_~ PRiyELWAY 1-- -/214- | 38% 1 1 38'-0 -=â€¢,38Â·a 1.-4- 5.-1 1/4- I i r. 1 Ull \ *H UNIT -F Â© 1 1-4 285 SOFT ~ 2805 SOFT .1 //--- \\\ -~'~72_ :1 _ ~_~ __ . *El'/:-:I--9 '1 :<i'- ~ 1/2-12'-0-I.-; TO'-6 34 1 6-0 10'-7 3/â€¢ 2 -3 31'-01/4 I . I .... 33-4 94- ./ . L 0- ~5|Â·Â· 0 1/2- / .1 1 | P-FOYER 11 - -- . - 4 38'-1- 1 Â« El/2 2- 0 2-~- 4-8 1/2 - r'â€¢ 2 \\14 7 I of- 1 7-- -1 94 f z I f 7 1' NCV ' I .1 43 /-~3 1/2.-Â·41Â©_-___ 2=2~ 1 r- 1 -1111- -1- 1 L 0 1 00 - 4/ 3.- 7 1/2- 72- r --4 1/2- | 9~-7 .4.-99. 2.-9- .1 6 1 117 ... --A- ~' 1 ~ , ~ 1 1 L 4 - - fz--4 -4- 48, ~ - --4---47~2*ft -- -11 /4 3 1 L -R - -f- - -1- -21- - -Â»'. 1 Â©-1-9-- f.. 4 - ----Â» - --lai- 1 | - OPEN TO BELOW - - -) 1 /1 4 .35 1 33.-6- / I .*':d ~~UF _~L - 94 ~ < IIi gi l I . 1 11 1 Â»4Â» 4 424?- [H L Â·kâ€ž*k -Al . 1 11. 11 --- - 3'-7~/2- 1 2'-r Â· ~ HBO ; 9 2- 1 1/ 6 -O- li T /1 1 1 1 Y , 1 2: :%9 4.1:~4Â·.: r/-/ 1 Z 122~1 5'-9 1/4 6'-0 1%11 1'-11 1'-1 f -4 -- -4-~--1 - -1 - 4- f=4~ -1- -AL 1,1 -3- -/111 lET /['11 1 1 1 - 1 1 ~1 1 1 : 1 1 , 1'1 1 1 11 2 )----f P ILL b 11 ..: 1 - 1 -1- ..i-~ 1 4 --1- 7/14- ~ .fut .1 lik Â£ 73 . C 9-2 1/4- L i. ;5-4- 5 El- p. 1 -~ - 2'-9 1/2- |~ , bÂ·-0 inÂ·-4-6&- / .Â·-6 ,>21 * 724:/9 12Â·-0 1/2- 1 3.-11 1/2 1 / 9 -O 1/21 7 2~-0 ~2- 2'-0 1/2 ~ 3% C . OF li ;L:11- L111 1/: 2 --4 11 , 1 4 ..1 1 14)7L4-1 1 34- 6 4 1| L 692 1 1- * * f ' k. 4 42- 4 1, 41 7 -, 111 .2 1. 4':2- 11-- it ' 1 7 -9 n/ 1 -5, n>/ 5 2-0 1/2 2 -0 1/21 2'-0 1/2- , 7-0,/2- 1 11 1 ]4.-2 1/2- .l'r r 4 . 4.-2 1/2. ~ 1 b 2"-0~2~ ~ 3 . .C j : 1~-6 1/2>' i'-6 t/2/ 11 1 11 11 1 2Â·-0 +2 ,-24 1 Ill 1L . - ii 5521.lbzl~3$4 6~4- 1-6~6- 1 1-4 .41 Ill/2 'k/3-0 ~-A WJ) ly-Â° '/4-2 . | 2-0~:/2- 1 2--I Â·,/4- 84 3/4- 2.-6- 1 6.-0- J 12'-1 1/2- 1. 6.-or l. M'-6 1/2- ~ 18-5 1/2 ~4.-8 3/4- 14--9 31: "-5 1/2- 8%-6 1/21 6'-0 .-2 3/A~ 6%2 3/4 2-/ 8'-0 3/4- 2 â€¢ ---/.411 .....'WT 'C DATE: ENTRY LEVEL PLAN .0. /FnCE = - I 1 Miramenti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 5749 Wildridge Road East A 1.3 - COU~R*00 I, 8:20 : SCALE 1/4"= 1'-n" O - - -1=nt=e=%- - East Wildridge Avon. Colorodo ~..9.7-11 ROOF NOTES 9 RAKES. O.H. ARE 2'-O' rROM I.F O S u U I Eigk O.H. ARE 316' FROM IF.O & EXCEPT AS NOTED ALL ROOF PITCHES ARE 6.12 EXCEPT AS NOTED -- -- - -- - - - #0& *. FA.. 5=) t| 1 1 1% ill 1 E /10.Â· 4 55 -8. f li 1 1 1 1 111 - - TOF 4-1 10/I +39-r 1 11 1-=__J~rt: *IfILJ_ | T OF +36-: ...1 ||| )1 78--- 4 1 ~11 -_ 1 11 1 1 111 J 1 11 1 [- XII 1 , iNT 0111 N UNIT I 1 -1-- 9 - 0 01 UN, 1 -P" 1 - - r C - FEn- --- 1C-- - - t - - ts 1 e | le---= =iÂ«=i=:41-1 -4-1 1 i \ty~JI 1 1 1 3 2 - - -t- T -- fet I 11 1 1111 7/ 11 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 14'/ 1 '11 VENÂ¥ , F.F: +38.-1- Ila - _~_ -__~_ 3/~2~~~-4---1--32---1 1 111 [- 4------,f--4---4--T--1---r-[*1===-ig--fp-T-T---4-~11- J:/12 1 011-= - - nfl 111 111 p./,/ 1 / i r TO.C 36'-6 111 1/ 4- -4 -- --P j.x* - Â«E 1-~ ~- --4 - 4- -- -4 -- 1 111 12 11 4/ 11 1 F.I.: 36'-7 ICI 1 RJOGE: Â·Â·- - 11 1 9 -/ Ill.8 111 /1 F 12 -1 1 O . = i pi=9-==:ir - 4 - \Cow: +81-0.-1 -=9 3 -1 .1- -1 =r--1~L-- 7, 1 1 1 1 1 1 b 1 M Z 12 lEi # 1 1 1 ~ ~ =EI--Il-4-~~~ ~~=~~7 1 1 ..14: - --9 4=Â« - --+7 11 1 lili 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -2=EÂ«k-a== __d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --MÂ©/In -c,Ir,Il pc DATE: ROOF PLAN OFFIC' Box VIC : Miromonti Architects PC HAMEL dc PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 5749 Wildridge Road East : A 1.4 mON /0/0~00 8,620 : SCALE 1 /4"= 1'-0" East Wildridge Avon. Colorado | RIDGE *51-2 17'67 +00-0 RIOGE~||*43'-8 / -litrik*:WIÂ·DI=*TU -'~~**%*s-eg*yt *1-* *~1~1A~ -*-~~~~~~%k. Imimitii,â€¢illin*Ii,*914â€¢,I1Ihil,i~:~Id@~ -lt-2..aL.-11"'~ 2Â»--314-7-~#EZ Â°2 2 St- :119=1~It#~:1':? 2143*Mil*th-8.-liIATRhII~.1:2&iii. -.,-9.3:,IitÂ£,~~,-~.i'tlâ€¢~11*0}. ~la, Ilattlemilliminil:limilim.:im::Hing:W:i::~Mi9:im:'19/MAIWikiwit -mâ€¢â€¢1~1!1~=â€¢uma~-=,=~~e=~v, ...1111,1.111.11.1.111.11.1.- 1-..~1111'Im'1111111111111111111'vill'llim'lli~11~ -le" .............1-1.....111 *:inâ€¢WAâ€¢WANâ€¢:151"At'NA, 6 .IL Em-f=-m--ma=-m /=-9--Mpiâ€¢".â€¢11"â€¢11.â€¢41â€¢11.â€¢1 1- _-Â·~limmillimili ii i i iii lim I~lini'Wimil.mmimlit*~k ... A . A . geegeee*Zai**22@Fawatif,36,.,Â·., Â«------<St--Â«~.--=.:"*",~ :fiAT/AUTAT~inrimip'ELED/trWL'.1/HY,vit aa-eifeye~9r-~ ..1.....1.1-1 E. ...i'-11--~1-L ==_- 1~2J .., 1.1 =.i-- .1 1. -I im .1 ... . 0 . 1= 1 .... lili I. ta-&5= ==Â·=fl ... 12~ r *Ma#203:51~ 1 a --1 - - ~*Aux SCALE: NONE // 1 - 1 1 , I , 111-[FUlfE][1 1 - t~7O.RAG,Â£ r.00â€¢ ~h . râ€¢TRY ll-vEL 4 le,M~ID GRADE --W.. -- 1 -il) I L--------1 4---- - -- - - ExhliNG GRADE - 1 - 1 1 FINISHED GRADE - i | 1â€¢AIN irvll 1 -ill - + 25-11 4--- J -1 EX,InNG GRD[ - - - _ CROUND IVE A 4 15'-3" .1/ UNIT "/1 1 ..11 -H PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION - "H" 1110Â¢~1 POINT + 5,-8 - *Â»39~1111 1 RIDGE ! INF -2 1 i 50'- 2 1 , [tt VMMWI' 1 H==- /ax 0 CAR 101 /* E-NTRY /nirl . 38-, r.1/ID GRADE = - _ _ -1 1 EXISTING GRADE - 0 7271 - 1 PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION - "P" 3 - Extsms GRADE CROUNO "*L _ _ DATE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS S Miramonti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 .M- COLO-00 el//0 5749 Wildridge Road East A 2.2 SCALE 1/4"= 1'-0" East Wildridge Avon, Colorado 1 1 1 -2-2 1 I,-51 2.0141 / /Â«3Â«th - -- . .5 8 I 9 -5 F In. 11/r 1213kbal[Ubri,YTUL*lu-Ut-hpAMepp~~0- 74 1 r- ----- 7 1 1 L_[_1 U LI L LI J LI L 7 - rÂ·'414-i 1-u ri rer -1-HIT' 22 . :.67 ,- U i ,= u i u LU 1 -jul u u, 11 1 ' REf646 u.r~]4yc u ,91 2 - _ ..... flOOL.et-rl -FY Lpt WEDÂ·r=:7- 1.:r=â€¢----~=. . 38'- 1 ~ - - r -1 re=r-/ CUID ,/ ..__ Im i.-.ft...-tt<*Fltr- ----- 13 /4/5149''00- '"'SHF. GRADE - ommMN - 1-T-Â£=9 7 G-Â·Lm==1 ~_L=7=1 .. 0 ..1 1 F , + 27-5 1--tltÂ«- --'-0 CR~ 7 plaf--11~-1-EÂ·4 1 EXISTING GRADE - #31-2/ 1 UNIT-P- UNLT -p- . EAST ELEVATIONS FINISHED GRADE - Ir,ne#uu ,-7 I = 4 HISIEST POINT RAMEL~au=2 =K=* 57. wn,t=KEXE,OADIAST * 54 -2' AVOI'UlADO 0/41. tfilittattltrttltYNdtdÂ»9*i- RIDGIF L.'NE jit-- + SO-2 RID(K. 1.- :51-- + 48-8 ....... ; ._ -ifcnfrc5crPdm-HatY~Â¥1 ............---a..- 3%9111'L Ir# 1 Iii 1 . 43'-28Â· lilli RIDGE LINE .....11.-I.--A .......Joco S 14- :69 I UTE FIXTURE --3 .'....=U..'Â»I 8 Ellmv *- - - - 4 36'-7 r!141/HED GRADE Â»3'V -4.,H WML''tp' 1 1 1-Â£ - - - -- Â«>ti-i--*flo 23 EBE *2 -_ ..mal"-D'.il .......n.......-- 12.-1 --- -*---- ING'ED GRADE T--1-0/.*-0.- EXISDNG L/ li -- ~ -?41*i-~ =ca- - -W--=X--A 'Al LEVEL + 25'//1 -aÂ«Â»-Â»43 D----I<.Il-..--I-- 1\442=.r~E-F i --= --1 GAOUND LEVEL Â£ . .. WEST ELEVATIONS H UNIT 4- .- FiNISHED GRADE . DATE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS M - m.... : â€¢irornonti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 5749 WAdridge Road Eost A 2.3 A.ON COLOeâ€¢CO I ' 88/0 . -.------9-I.-- SCALE 1/4"= 1'-0 % ......='.==0=.........4.- East Wildridge rro ... 1, " rro .. 0,57 Avon, Colorado r PLANT MASSING PAPER BIRCH - BETULA PAPYRIFERA (3) ~ QUAKING ASPEN - POPULUS TREMULOIDES (77) 0 WHITE POPLAR - POPULES ALBA (2) * S -14- WEST HIMALAIAN BIRCH - BETULA UTILIS (1) '~ \ 1 tw CAPPADOCiAN MAPLE - ACER CAPPADOCIUM (210 i #\IL 8 48 ; 9 Ac I SPIRAEA NIPPONICA (2) b SPIRAEA VANHOUT1EI (1) CO tl.>rul@(4 3- 1 1 â€¢S= 2 28222 1\ ... .40 - 1 -1,0* < 4-T#All-- - \ 221*Â£*M- 4-\ BLUE GRAMA AUREA CAREXELATA 04" <tatair ---')+Irl--a-- ./.- %.... STIPA GIGANTEA Â·S-nPA GIGANTEA BIG BLUESTEM ANDROPOGON GERARDII ge/,41â€¢â€¢dâ€¢,Jw- 4,4-r-- -IPÂ·â€¢ ~ ~ 4 -r L.,Trz.-/3.....i,/rigril..:e/8.:*:=<u- 7-----r-5/ ----- ----, -h~ BLUE FESCUE FESTUCA CAESIG 4-dc-hÂ»Je: D-UL.Câ€¢C:-- wÂ»L--64, 3 N.4 74.-2---- -\01 1 FOUNTAIN GRASS PENISETUM ALOPECUROIDES -tvr : Â·Â·ts SuuÂ»Jeer- 0,=40Â»â€¢,~ PERENNIAL~>.,,1 r<... 27- --- - /=, I ----- r=,2 th-\1\ AL 47/--2 - -- 7 1 .Af PLUME GRASS DANTHUS RAVENAE INDIAN GRASS SOROBASTRUM MUTANS 2Ng==Futa- - \ - --- 4.- -~--- ly-MI'll- // . 41_~ -44 SOD-AREL 7-9-1.1+ 4-Â»t-IMI+-4 0/ pâ€¢*hj~Zkh~* ~ SHRUBS NOT TO EXCEED 5'-0- IN HEIGHT r UX-4-- 1/5 - -- 3 * 4 ALL DECIDIOUS TREES - 2- DIA. MIN. .W EVERGREENS - 6'-0~ MIN. ,- 3.,0% .-\ --- .=..1 At_L GRASSES TO BE TALL FESCUES, TURF TYPE, AND 4 4 Â»Â«112*i DRYLAND SEED GRASS MIXES. \... - -- a -\ N *-- ----3 1/ - \ t \ *. .h .... -- MUST USE WOODCHIPS,TO REDUCE EVAPORATION, WHERE . APS.. Â£ -- ' - I- APPUCABLE. 44, X~ 1./. - --- 17 \- - .. IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS, SOIL MUST BE PREPARED W/ THE --1 - ADDITION OF ORGANIC MATTER. 1% .e 0 '751,2 3-64' - JUNE 30. 2005 O ANTICIPATED LANDSCAPE COMPLETION DATE: - 1 / 1-- WILL PROVIDE THE IRRIGATtON SCHEDULE GRAND JUNCnON PIPE, INC. (53%/1/ 71 ./ N 4 / - le, i 17 + MAX IRRIGAnON AREA NOT TO EXCEED 551 ) -h Chi -/. , 4 ./De~ - + DRIP SYSTEM - PLANTING BEDS 24 , .1 OVERHEAD SPRINKLERS - SOO AREAS 1 - '. 3. --- IÂ¥. Ila. - 0 1,2L-6-- IRRIGATION SYSTEM NO-TrS; 44? -4 -- /9 : ILÂ· --tk 4 - i . f , â€¢ Â· ty. -4 2 f- C U - 0 -, le _ 1. A RAIN SENSOR MUST BE INSTALLED W/ THE 7 4 - i IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 12. -- . - , f .#b.Ct'~ .. i. i 2. THE SYSTEM SHOULD PROVIDE FOR MAX]MUM H2O 7 i - : , Â· FLOW OF 12 GALLONS/ MIN. AN MIN. PRESSURE Of 40 lA -Â·- LE./ SQUARE INCH O THE STREET. rÂ« 22 - 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM MAY NOT BE PLACED IN â„¢E .--45*.rry. - --- - -7-4- -- - ROAD RIGHT-OF -WAY. %- -# FUMNÂ» OF t:'1Â·9+O~e-kE *NL.--9-- 4. PERMANENT SYSTEM WILL BE UMITED TO THE AREAS TO RECOVE SOO AND PLANT BEDS 14-1 _ ~ ~ 5. ALL IRRIGAnON IS A SUBICT TO THE WATER ' SCHEDULE AS IMPOSED BY THE EAGLE RIVER WAER ..2~~27-2 -32*-11 . 1 AND SANITATION DISTRICT. ,-- li _ -lil W N 089011;82[_HQIES - --1- DRYLAND GRASSSES. 1. EXOSTING VEGELATION - NATIVE SHRUBS AND -- h _bbi,1 1 2. AT THE PRESENT TIMEM TREES OR OTHER PLANTS - ARE NOT PRESENT. --_ 7- 1 2- -F 7-%-- aw F-FA //ele. - 1\ / - f-- 1 ----- - li-~ LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE % / sofT. -- - i-I AREA OF LANDSCAPE 20% / 7, 434 +/- SQ.FT. r----.L TOTAL- IRRIGATED AREA 10% / 3,700 SO. FT. r.- SPRAY AREA O %/ SO.FT. 2 % / 740 SOl T DRIP AREA --- - - -,[ SOO AREA 3.7 Z / 1.000 SO.FT. './.,0.n .'C=D.'IC' IC DATETÂ· LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ Wiromonti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 AVOWCOLO-DO ~,~20 5749 Wildridge Road East L 1.1 SCALE 1"= 10'-O" 2 - .....I------Ill'....../..., -Il Eost Wildridge Avon, Colorado \ Q / 1 - '0 -30 - I - 1 is 1 / 1 /0 1 4 D 1 4~ LEGEK Â¥ Rain Bird 5006 Plus PC w/ 2.OLA Nozzje $ Rain Bird 5006 Plus PC w/ 1.5 RC Nozzle * Rain Bird 5006 Plus PC w/ 3.0 RC Nozzle â€¢ 1/7 Sch BO Riser For Drip - Rain EN 100-OVF-A 1Â· Remote Contiol Valve Â· 3/4' Manual GÂ«der V,Ne or Quick Col,pler - Rain Bird Xerigation Control Zone XCZ-Â·075 e point-of-Connection 3/4- â€ž Reduced Pyessure Assembly 1. Â® Controller - 12 st-n Mi 1-25 inch Schedule 40 PVC Mainline -72 1 I .1....... J ...e... 0. spe e 0. 1 1 / I 1 1 ....... .......c, pC DATE: IRRIGATION PLAN 0/r= ./...0 ~ Mirornonti Architects PC HAMEL & PERUSSE RESIDENCES DRB 05-18-04 5749 Wildridge Road East L 1.2 Â»'C- COLO-00 /1 .0 : SCALE 1"= 10" 0 1 #.:4- East Wildridge r* Avon. Colorado