The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 072004- July 20,2004 *------- r 1 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 20,2004 5:30 pm Special Meeting Held At: Wildridge Fire Station 2120 Saddle Ridge Loop Meetings are open to the public 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda at the Fire station) -REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - (Please note that all times provided are estimates only) 1. Call to Order at 5:30 pm 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of I nterest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the July 6% 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] VI. Sketch Design Plan (5:35pm - 5:45pm) Property Location: Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision/1031 West Wildwood Road Applicant: Stephen Richards Owner: Steven McDonald [Tab 2] Description: Stephen Richards is proposing a sketch design for two triplex units on West Wildwood Road. This lot is zoned for six units. Proposed materials include: wood siding and stucco. Each unit will be approximately 2,500 sq. ft., including garage space. VII. Sketch Design Plan (5:45pm - 6:C Jpm) Property Location: Lot 30, Block 2, Aildridge Subdivision/2631 Bear Trap Road Applicant VMDA, Mark Donaldson Owner: Shane Bohart [Tab 3] Description: Victor Mark Donaldson is proposing a sketch design to add an additional dwelling unii to an existing single-family home on Bear Trap Road. The property is zoned duplex and this dwelling unit is the second unit. The concept for this application was presented to the Commission during the Work Session of the May 18*,2004 meeting, and the application was tabled to this meeting from the July 20,2004 meeting. VII'. Comprehensive Plan Public Input (6:00pm - 7:00pm) - Public Hearing Topic: Comprehensive Plan Update App#cant.- Town of Avon [Tab 4] Description: The public is invited to this special neighborhood meeting to provide input and feedback on the proposed update to the Town Comprehensive Plan. This is a special neighborhood meeting where the mapping and story boards provided at the first public open house will be available for review and comment. IX. Special Review Use - Public Hearing (7:00pm- 7:15pm) Property. Lot 61 PUD, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/75 Benchmark Road Applicant: Skyhawk Rugs Owner: IDG 3 LLC [Tab 5] Posted on July 16, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Description: Skyhawk Rugs is proposing to operate a temporary retail rug sales business on this lot from August 5th - 15th. The hours of operation will be from 9:00am to 7:30pm daily. The applicant will have a cargo trailer and display racks on-site and parking will be provided within the lot. X. Minor Project - Fence (7:15pm - 7:25pm) Property.- Lot 1078, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3063B Wildridge Road Applicant: Michael & Sandy Horning Owner: Michael & Sandy Horning [Tab 6] Description: The applicant is proposing to construct two new decks and install a split rail fence for dogs. Staff approved the deck portion of this application and the fence requires approval by the Planning Commission. The applicant is proposing to install a split rail fence 4 feet in height on the north side of their property for their two dogs. The length of the fence appears to be greater than 14 of the length of the perimeter of the property by approximately 10 feet. XI. Design Modification (7:25pm -7:45pm) Properly.' Lot 22, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5588 Coyote Ridge Applicant: Ruth Miller Owner. Ruth Miller [Tab 7] Description: The applicant is proposing to add an additional dwelling unit to this duplex-zoned lot. On June 14*, 2004 the applicant submitted a minor project application proposing to construct a detached two-car garage with an apartment below. On June 18th,2004 Staff notified the applicant that the application was denied because the application does not meet the definition of a duplex per section 17.08.240 of the Avon Municipal Code. The applicant is appealing the Staff decision. XII. Amendments to Zoning Code & Design Guidelines - Public Hearing (7:45pm - 8:15pm) Property Location: Town of Avon Applicant: Town Staff [Tab 8] Description. In response to comments and feedback received from the building community during Public Hearings with the Town Council, staff was directed to clarify and improve the design review and building permit processes. Changes prop ised include clarifications to the building height definition, PUD process, and public notice when reviewing Preliminary Subdivision plans in conjunction with PUD applications. Various amendments to the Design Guidelines are proposed and include: new sketch design plan requirements, appeals process revision, consolidated final design checklist, building height clarification to match Zoning Code, retaining wall definition, and a revised scheduling section. The amendments were reviewed at the July 6,2004 meeting and continued to this hearing. XIII. Other Business XIV. Adjourn (8:15pm) Posted on July 16, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission July 6,2004 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Savage recused himself from Item VI. Sketch Design Plan, Propeny Location: Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2631 Bear Trap Road, Applicant VMDA, Mark Donaldson, Owner: Shane Bohart; and Commissioner Karow recused himself from Item VII. Sketch Design Plan, Property.- Lot 1 06, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3055 Wildridge Road, Applicant: Andrew Karow, Owner. Andrew Karow. V. Consent .Agenda Commissioner S-nith motioned for the approval of the Meeting Min: ites from the June 15th, 2004, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; Commissioner Didier seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously, with Commissioner Evans and Commissioner Trueblood abstaining due to absence at the meeting. VI. Sketch Design Plan Property Location: Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2631 Bear Trap Road Applicant VMDA, Mark Donaldson Owner: Shane Bohart Description: Victor Mark Donaldson is proposing a sketch design to add an additional dwelling unit to an existing single-family home on Bear Trap Road. The property is zoned duplex and this dwelling unit is the second unit. The concept for this application was presented to the Commission during the Work Session of the May 18% 2004 meeting. Mark Donaldson approached the podium to request tabling of this application due to the omission of a "critical" portion of the packet. Commissioner Trueblood motioned to table this item on the applicant's request. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\070604.doc Page lof 4 VII. Sketch Design Plan Property. Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3055 Wildridge Road Applicant: Andrew Karow Owner. Andrew Karow Description: Andrew Karow is proposing a duplex residence on Wildridge Road in Wildridge. Proposed materials include: stucco, wood siding, aluminum window cladding, stone accents, and asphalt shingles. The design would require a significant amount of fill (addition of soil) in order to locate the structure where proposed. Each unit of the duplex totals approximately 3,800 square feet. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Andrew Karow, applicant, approached the podium. Questions related to height restrictions were discussed. Mr. Karow was looking for feedback from the Commission regarding design. Suggestions included upgrading the entrance, garage location, gables and seeing soffits, unintentional post elimination, and consistent banding were suggested. Commissioner Trueblood motioned to approve the Sketch Design Plan with the five conditions as presented in the staff report and that the height would be resolved at Final Design. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor VI11. Amendments to Zoning Code & Design Guidelines Public Hearing Property Loc ition: Town of Avon Applicant: Town Staff Description. In response to comments and feedback received from the building community during Public Hearings with the Town Council, staff was directed to clarify and improve the design review and building permit processes. Changes proposed include clarifications to the building height definition, PUD process, and public notice when reviewing Preliminary Subdivision plans in conjunction with PUD applications. Various amendments to the Design Guidelines are proposed and include: new sketch design plan requirements, appeals process revision, consolidated final design checklist, building height clarification to match Zoning Code, retaining wall definition, and a revised scheduling section. Tambi Katieb presented the Staff Memo. He began with reviewing Resolution No. 04-19 that recommended amending Titles 16 and 17 of the Avon Municipal Code as it relates to review of Planned Unit Development Zone Districts, definition of building height and parking. Mr. Katieb continued with Resolution No. 04-20 that recommends approval of various revisions to the Design Review Guidelines along with clarifications of definitions, procedures and checklists. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\070604.doc Page 2 0 f 4 OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Chris Juergens approached the podium to discuss Resolution No. 04-20, making several suggestions on language proposed. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner comments included the use of the word 'generally' in the PUD requirements as being too vague, wording for building height restrictions - "height should be measured from any point to existing grade directly below set point and at no point can it exceed 35 feet." The terms of "may" and "generally" need to be focused on whether there is flexibility. Utility availability for up zoned structures was discussed along with clarification to the building height diagram. Revision to the "Acknowledgements- in the Design Guidelines was encouraged. Commissioner Savage motioned for continued discussion at the next meeting, with Commissioner Smith seconding and all were in favor. IX. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) Minor Project- Deck Addition, Painting, Minor Repairs, Lot 56, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, 2245 Old Trail Road: Applicant: Mark Pribramsky Owner: Mark Pribramsky. Description: The Final Design for this project was approved at your February 4th, 1997 meeting. The duplex units are each approximately 1,836 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing 6'x14' deck on Uni' A and replace it with a large ~ 12'x28' deck, make miner stucco repairs, facia I epairs, repairs to the flashings and attic vents, install gutters and downspouts, and repaint both duplex unns. Ken Kovalchik presented the staff report. Colors were distributed for Commission review and guidance. Questions were asked regarding the original (1997) landscape plan and the existing plan. Irrigation requirements were the primary focus of staff. The current owner stated that not much of the original landscaping plan still existed on the property. Commissioner review included discussion of colors, a color to break up the massing, color scheme to be used, what type of gutter and its coloring, and fascia color. The current landscaping of the lot was a focus, but, since the owner was not the original owner, it was deemed unfair to force him to fix an issue especially as the project was issued a Certificate of Occupancy. Commissioner Trueblood moved to approve the Application for the deck only, and tabling of painting and landscaping for additional information. Commissioner Didier seconded with all in favor. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\070604.doc \ Page 3 of 4 The next Planning and Zoning Commissioner meeting will be held in Wildridge on July 20th, 2004, and the following meeting will be held in Eaglebend (August 33 to allow for Comprehensive Plan public input. Tambi Katieb was acknowledged and congratulated as the new director of Community Development for the Town of Avon. X. Adjourn Commissioner Trueblood made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Didier seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\070604.doc Page 4 of4 Staff Report -NYVi//~b, SKETCH DESIGN PLAN AVON COLORADO July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date July 12,2004 Project type 2 Triplex Units Legal description Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 6 Units (multi-family) Address 1031 West Wildwood Road Introduction Stephen Richards is proposing a sketch design for two triplex units on West Wildwood Road. This lot is zoned for six units (multi-family). Proposed materials include: wood siding and stucco. Each unit will be approximately 2,500 sq. ft., including garage space. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: Two triplex homes are an allowed use for this lot, which is zoned multi- family for 6 units. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 triplex units per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. No lot coverage was indicated on the site plan, it appears to be approximately 40% coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25 foot building setback on alllot lines except for the lot line bordering Lot 9. â€¢ Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. There is a 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. â€¢ Building Height. This design appears to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. The maximum proposed height is 35'. An ILC at foundation and framing will be required to verify compliance with the Town' s maximum allowable height requirement. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 FTFTEFJTTE--1-411-1-] Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdi. ...-n, Sketch Design July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 â€¢ Parking: Fifteen spaces are required for this project and 18 spaces have been proposed by the applicant. â€¢ Snow Storage: It appears that an adequate snow storage area can be located on the west side of the lot between the two units. This will be reviewed at Final Design. â€¢ Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be reviewed at Final Design. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. Two Triplexes are an appropriate density for this lot. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. Excluding the boundary with Lot 9 there is a 25' building setback around the perimeter o f this lot. O Site Access: The driveway access width and grades appear to be in compliance with Town standards. Proposed grades for the first 20' is less than 1 %. The steepest grade proposed for the driveway is 6%, which will be located in an area between the two units. o Parking and Loading: Parking spaces are provided in front of each garage. There are four additional spaces proposed for guest parking. o Easements: This project is in compliance with all platted easements. A variable Roadway Cut and Fill Slope Easement exists on the Wildridge plat. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. Through field visits and review o f the survey, the platted Roadway Cut and Fill Slope Fill Easement does not appear to correspond to the toe o f slope in the field on the southeastern portion (behind Unit F) of the lot. Because o f this descrepency, all proposed retaining walls in this area shall be constructed as structural walls. o Drainage: Positive drainage must be provided away from the structure. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design conforms to the general design character. o Building Height: As proposed, the height of the building does comply with the 35- foot allowance. A framing ILC would be required. o Building Materials and Colors: Colors will be reviewed at Final Design. Indigenous natural or earth tones are required. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Sub -..sion, Sketch Design July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. The use o f predominantly indigenous building materials such as native stone, wood siding, and timbers is encouraged in the design guidelines. The east elevation (main floor and/or upper floor) should include the use of windows to breakup the exterior walls. The wall planes on each elevation o f this project appear to be broken up by the use of different materials, horizontal siding, stucco and additional bumpouts. o Outdoor Lighting: It is recommended that the bulb for the proposed lights be less than 1000 lumens (or equivalent to a 60 watt incandescent bulb) in order to comply with the Town's proposed lighting ordinance. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The landscape plan will be reviewed at Final Design. A note referring to the use of a rain sensor must be added to the Landscape Plan with the Final Design plan submittal. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Sketch Design approval for the proposed 2 triplex residences on Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be address prior to submitting a Final Design: 1. All retaining walls located in the southeastern area of the lot will be structural and shall be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. 2. All drawings shall be hardlined for Final Design submittal. 3. The lot coverage shall be indicated on the site plan. 4. The electric transformer located on the north end of the lot shall be indicated on the site plan. 5. Direction of drainage flows shall be indicated on the site plan and landscape plan. 6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, /L_ Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 im Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivt...-n, Sketch Design July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 3%. * 4 21, I I . ... 44 - r 5 .C. :; 440+ 4 1. .4 .,Â·C ..7~:.2 2 ' . -4- ...2,fit, i.%1'tÂ· , :.4.1 .4-4%41.2 Proposed driveway entrance to Lot 8. .... . I 1, . 4.6 'JÂ¥ .- . --,---.-7-4-..6724:â‚¬*6-:32#~,illib::hr-.LET.-.F .6- .â€¢#. . f.2-*.:. .Â·tÂ·â€¢Â·dr.:1566/Il. 1 ....,1 Â¢...r.-9 47@., -7/Elimill.............-- .;tl' , -*Â¢14& $,A, 1 2//9 9... f 12: 1 -t., .9%:4ki. :t,1 , Lot 8 from above Wildwood Road. Driveway entrance into the lot will be on the right. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 8, Block 5, Wildridge Sub-.. ision, Sketch Design July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 - .12 1,5.4:1%4 -uq~.19~&1~~f~~~~~4~~~~ ~Jut, -r U .....i'.E--,?3.9,747>,vaj,/////56A/&4////////f//// *r Â·Â· Â·â€¢ 78' (/9- e. . ......... 1/0,â€¢'r . ..,0 *Â·44, i :24~ ....2,/:--2//:.w/:.â‚¬'*.. /.47 1 I I . 14-4./ 9,4.':.,4.-094 b r Â·. . ' t l. 91= 141. , t.:' 4- , " 1,1 1. - r. I I. ,'.1 b. - . ' r. I 2 416 . UP L . -4 Â· 1 , y a.9.- .3 #6644.**4-#-3.4..!.t A.i.... .Â·'Â· . / I 4*764 .-,6.t., ...0 .71.:4(6*'14 ... 2:. e..Â«~IiÂ»~Â·.4~*AÂ·,Wt, i . I. + ' 04-N,Â·A '. 1 2.K-IN Â·=-41- Photo taken from the southeastern corner of the lot. The Road Cut and Fill Slope Easement is in the foreground. -- ..., I :.'934Â·%3~-*Â·92Â·116*.-Â·2.<66 9 I. 4, 4 4.4 -///A,.r~b,*14* 20 4' 1.:?R ., I y -9 4.1 I . , , .0 .4 . *: I. - . 1. '. I 1.31 * ' t. -'. '1Â» - - , .. '42 . - ...6 : Area of Lot 8 where south triplex unit will be located. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Devetur Communiti . 4 % 4 . . 1 I I ... . t I .. . 1 A 1 . .e . I ,. I . 9 I. I 0 4 3 , L , 21 6: . ' APPROXIMATE LIMITS :5,0 - I ' I â€¢ i *. r . OF ROADWAY CUT AND Â· .. I . I , . . FILL SLOPE EASEMENT. .FOR THE PURPOSE OF *. I - . ACCESS AND MAINT. * ' e , ENANCE BY THE Ik I 1 65, ;1 1 I TOWN OF AVON;) Â· ' . I . - . I . . ... I I . . .. . . Staff Report SKETCH DESIGN PLAN COLORADO July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date June 28,2004 Project type Addition of second dwelling unit to duplex lot Legal description Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 2631 Bear Trap, South Introduction This sketch design application proposes to construct the second unit of a duplex zoned lot. The final design for the existing home was approved in 1994. The applicant is proposing to construct the other unit totaling 5993 square feet. The connection from the existing north unit to the proposed south unit will be via a foyer/entry gallery, the south unit will have a separate entrance- the foyer entry gallery will be used to access the north unit only. The proposed party wall connection for this duplex will be 10 feet wide. The applicant is proposing to use building materials for the new residence that compliment the existing home. Both the applicant and owner have met with Staff on two occasions prior to submitting this Sketch Design application. On May 6th, 2004 the applicant/owner met with Staff and submitted for initial review concept site and elevation plans to construct a second duplex unit on Lot 30, Block 2, south of the original structure on the lot. On May 138,2004 Staff met with the applicant/owner for a second meeting. The applicant and owner attended your May 18th, 2004 work session meeting and presented design Option A and B for your discussion. It was unanimous among the Planning and Zoning Commission members that they did not feel the two design options presented to them met the criteria for a duplex connection as stated in the Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines. Likewise, Staff continues to believe that the proposed connection between the two homes is marginal at best and does not meet the duplex zoning for this lot, particularly as it relates to the criteria as stated in the guidelines: "Duplex development must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site." Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 \Rl'Al th' \ Al.[.1.) Town of Avon Community Development Page 2 of 5 â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex home is an allowed use for this lot, however as proposed, the duplex does not appear to conform to the zoning code definition o f being a "detached building containing two dwelling units" but instead proposes two detached buildings marginally connected. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units (duplex) per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project proposes site coverage o f approximately 2.8%. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25 foot building setback for the front lot line and 10 foot building setback for the side and rear lot lines. â€¢ Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. There is a front 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement; side lot 7.5 foot Utility and Drainage Easement; and rear lot 10 foot Utility and Drainage Easement. â€¢ Building Height This design does not appear to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. The slab elvation is 8179'. The roof plan (Sheet Al.3) indicates two roof ridge elevations over the 35' maximum allowable height. The roof ridge at 8221'-7" would be 42'-7" in height and the roof ridge at 8216' would be 37' in height. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: Six spaces are required for this project and 9 spaces have been proposed by the applicant. The existing (north) residence provides four parking spaces (two inside the garage and two in front o f the garage). The applicant is proposing 3 spaces in the garage and two spaces in front o f the garage for the south unit. Only one parking space will fit in front of the garage (using the Town of Avon 9'x 18' parking standard) without extending into the existing driveway. Therefore, four parking spaces can be provided for the south unit which still meets Town parking requirements. â€¢ Snow Storage: A snow storage area was not indicated in the Sketch Design. It appears that an adequate snow storage area can be located on the south side of the south unit. This will be reviewed at Final Design. â€¢ Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be reviewed at Final Design. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist for the proposed second unit, however, the proposed 'duplex design' does not conform to the design guidelines and challenges the zoning code definition of a duplex comprising of"a detached building containing two dwelling units" by essentially proposing two detached buildings only marginally connected and not creating an integrated and unifed structure. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon Community Deveiopment Page 3 of 5 â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site as proposed, however fails to comply with the duplex guidelines. o Site Access: The north unit currently exists and is accessed via an asphalt driveway. The proposed south unit will utilize this driveway for access. The existing grade for the driveway does not exceed 5%. o Parking and Loading: The number of parking spaces currently provided for the north unit and proposed for the south unit will comply with the parking requirements for the Town of Avon. However, maneauverability may be difficult for the north unit. It appears that an adequate turn around area in front of the north unit garage will be difficult (22' wide turn around area). Vehicles exiting from the north unit will have to back-up (uphill) approximately 220' before reaching Bear Trap Road. o Easements: This project is in compliance with all platted easements. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. o Drainage: Positive drainage must be provided away from the structure. It appears that the area in front of the proposed foyer and entry gallery and the existing garage may be a problem area for drainage. As exists today, all drainage can freely flow to the west side of the driveway. The proposed foyer and entry gallery would block all drainage from flowing away from the north unit and will be trapped at the north unit entry and garage areas. No drainage features were indicated on the skectch plan to show how this problem will be alleviated. At Final Design detail will also have to be shown regarding how drainage will be provided under the proposed foyer and entry gallery and how this may affect the retaining wall to the west of the foyer and entry gallery. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design does not conform to the duplex development guideline, particularly as it relates to creating an integrated structure on site. Also, it should be noted that the angle o f the existing residence does not appear to be correct when one compares the residence on the site plan (Sheet AS1.0) to the West elevation (Sheet AS2.1). o Building Height: As proposed, the height o f the building does not comply with the 35-foot allowance. It appears there are two roofridge elevations that are over the 35' height restriction. The lower level floor plan (Sheet Al.0) indicates an elevation of 8179' and this elevation would be considered the most restrictive (finished) grade. The roof plan (Sheet Al.3) indicates two ridges that are over 35'. One ridge elevation is 8221'-7" (42'-7") and the second ridge elevation is 8216' (37'). o Building Materials and Colors: The north unit currently exisits and the materials proposed for the south unit will match the north unit. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The proposed connection of exterior wall planes does not create an integrated duplex design. Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town o f Avon Community Develov lAi ent Page 4 of 5 o Duplex Developments: The Town of Avon Guidelines state that "Duplex Developments must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. Two single-family residences 'bridged' by a breezeway or other non- structural and non-habitable connection does not meet the intent of a duplex design. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use o f compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms, and landscaping. While 'mirror image' duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and " architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family home. While the proposed entry gallery and foyer could be considered habitable and structural, the two units are not an 'integrated' or 'unified' structure on this site. The proposed connection for the duplex units appears to be two single-family homes bridged by a breezeway, which is a connection that is not allowed as stated in the Town of Avon Design Guidelines. Section 17.08.240 of the Town of Avon Municipal Code states a ' Duplex Dwelling means a detached building containing two (2) dwelling units, designed for or used as a dwelling exclusively by two (2) families, each living as an independent housekeeping unit.' This application appears to be two detached buildings that are connected, rather than a single detached building containing two dwelling units. Staff Recommendation Though there are a number o f technical issues in this Sketch Plan submittal that the applicant may be able to address prior to submitting a Final Design, the primary issue with this application as proposed is whether the connection for this duplex meets the criteria for a duplex connection as stated in the Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines. While the applicant has argued that the foyer/entry gallery may be structural and habitable, the two residences still appear to be 'bridged' which does not meet the intent o f a duplex design as stated in the Design Review Guidelines and this report. For these reasons Staff is recommending Sketch Design denial for the proposed duplex residence on Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ot, 6= ci ,4 Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon Community Devetopment Page 5 of 5 $ C .,5 4. 4 91.13 61. 1-: 'DÂ· 1 %5 ,Â·,efÂ· Â·Â· 0,64 4, I. 6 1 ' , 2 ~â‚¬111. a . i b,H - ec=k- 4 - wt 49&594'ah : . - ...2 1 *4442 r % . A Area of proposed entry gallery/foyer and proposed duplex addition. I. '41154_ - - -0-,ieii-<)-i~~~*8.-D-,fib . 3071- 7 ".7, 1 - e . i ,4 r 1 .1 i.& Ful . . .6.' 4.11.. .t Id 4 4 - 0 L 14&*161# 2~i. ,~F' 4, ..7, 4 1 31 , i ' 2 1 3 - 4 1 v -' 44 , I , r -342 '44& I 0 4. Li -8. 21601% Area where proposed duplex addition would be located. Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 vr 0048 EBEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 207 Box 5300 June 11,2004 AVON, CO 81620 970â€¢949â€¢5200 vmda@vmdo.com Town ofAvon FAXâ€¢949â€¢5205 Community Development Department Staffand Re: Sketch Plan Application in connection with a Planning and Zoning Commission Members Town ofAvon ARCHITECTS Duplex Development for 2631 Bear Trap Road Avon, CO 81620 Please consider this letter a part ofour Application for Sketch Plan review for the above referenced project, and distribute accordingly. There has been much discussion regarding the suitability and conformance ofthis project to the Town ofAvon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines (adopted November 6,2001). According to the aforementioned Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design ofthe project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use, and other provision of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed Use: Residential. â€¢ Density: Two Residential Units. (Duplex) â€¢ Site Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in conformance with the Zoning Code, proposing 2.8% site coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: The proposed design is in conformance with all setback requirements. â€¢ Easements: The proposed design is in conformance with all easements. â€¢ Building Height: The proposed design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum building height. â€¢ Grading: The proposed re-grading is in conformance with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: Six parking spaces are required for this entire project; 9 parking spaces (including garages) are proposed. The existing residence maintains its' four parking spaces (2 inside the garage and 2 in front ofthe garage) and the proposed residence proposes 3 spaces in the garage and 2 spaces in front ofthe garage. â€¢ Snow Storage: The proposed design provides sufficient snow storage area for this project. It is anticipated to be to the South side ofthe South residence as shown on sheet AS1.0 â€¢ Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be provided for review at Final Design Review. -1- |DOh I- Vy 2. The general conformance with the Goals and Polices of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub area plan which pertains: This project complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate residential development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD. This proposal seeks entitlements for the second of the two allowed dwelling units. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements submittal requirements. Site Development: â€¢ Site Design: The proposed building design is compatible with the site and technical building requirements. â€¢ Site Access: Access to the proposed and current residences is provided via the existing driveway. The existing grade ofthis driveway is less than 5% throughout. This construction ofthe proposed residence will enhance the current condition ofthe driveway through a slight enlargement at the South Unit and new asphalt overlay throughout. â€¢ Parking and Loading: Parking spaces provided are in compliance with the Town ofAvon standards. â€¢ Easements: The design complies with all easement requirements. â€¢ Site Grading: Grading has been minimized in this design as the home meets grade at the lower level and the existing driveway location and configuration maintained. â€¢ Drainage: Drainage will be addressed at Final Design Review. â€¢ Snow Removal and Storage: The snow storage will be accommodated on site as indicated on the site development plan. Building Design: â€¢ Design Character: The building orientation and design take full advantage of view corridors and solar gain as prescribed in the Guidelines. It also preserves the views corridors from the existing North unit ofthe property. The location ofthe proposed second residence has virtually no impact on views or solar shading of the existing residence or on the neighboring properties. -2- The building design appears as a series of several smaller roof elements integrated into the site rather than a large single "block." The hipped roofentry forms identify both the North and South residence entryways and help to distinguish this as a two family duplex residence and no longer a single-family home. This architecture and design responds directly to the site conditions of topography, existing built environment, solar access and view corridors. This design has been developed to respond responsibly and intentionally to the aforementioned criteria and conditions. The new companion South residence will enhance the value of the existing residence and adjacent properties. This design proposal will allow each duplex residence to function as independent living environments within a single structure. The structure as seen from the West, East, North and South, is a strong integration ofroofforms, materials, window treatments, and mass. â€¢ Building Height: The proposed structure is in compliance with the 35'-0" Height Linitations. The building ridge elevations are labeled on the site plan with corresponding grade elevations, to further illustrate conformance. â€¢ Building Material and Colors: The proposed building materials for the new residence have been designed to honor and complement the existing North Unit and include asphalt shingles, EIFS, vertical and horizontal wood siding, peeled log accents, judicious use ofnatural stone accents, and identical color schemes, which are to be earth tone in nature as encouraged by the Town Guidelines. â€¢ Exterior Walls. Roofs. and Architectural Interest: The design ofthe exterior walls is compatible with those in the neighborhood and the existing residence. The mix of vertical and horizontal siding with large expanses ofglass to the South protect property values and take advantage ofthe views that are unique to the Wildridge PUD. The hip roofed entry element provides architectural interest to each the existing and the proposed South residence. Large windows are provided at South facing walls to break up large exterior walls and provide exceptional mountain views to the South and take advantage o f solar gain. The roollines are broken to add interest to the project and to constrain the massing ofthe structure. Roofpitches are proposed to be 6:12. Roofoverhangs are typically 2'-0" throughout the structure and the fascia lines match that ofthe existing residence. -3- Asphalt composite shingles are proposed and will be ofa neutral color and tone. These will be ofhigh quality and be rated at a minimum of300 lbs per square and match the existing residence. The use o f similar materials, treatments, massing, color, and texture allow the South residence to become an integrated companion with the existing residence. â€¢ Outdoor Lighting: Lighting fixtures will be presented at Final Design Review and shall be in compliance with Town requirements. â€¢ Duplex Development: This project unifies the existing residence with the new South residence and meets the intention ofthe Guidelines. This is accomplished through, among other things, the use ofcompatible building materials, architectural entry elements, similar scale, unified architectural style, detail, compatible roof forms and color scheme. The total proposed structure and the site are integrated through minimization ofsite disturbance and use ofexisting access. The proposed solution connects the two homes by creating a new enclosed Entry Gallery for the existing residence. The new Entry Gallery takes full advantage of the views to the West. This connection enhances quality and property value to the existing residence via a subtle blend of structures with while presenting the well-placed, unique entries. The new Entry Gallery for the existing residence is both habitable and structural. New structural foundation walls and roofs will be integrated into this addition into the new proposed South Unit making the structure unified in function and appearance. The shared access drive, like entry element features, and separate garage areas further distinguish this from a single-family residence and establish this property as a well-crafted, functional duplex residence. Landscaping Landscape design will be submitted for review at Final Design Review. The landscaping plan shall further integrate the proposed structure to the site and the existing residence as well as complying with Town requirements. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with the slope, step building with the slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration to existing topography. The proposed design is compatible with the existing site topography. The orientation of the structure follows the topographical lines and the building steps down to reach grade at the lower level. As this is a sloping site, great care was taken in the placement ofthe South Unit to minimize impacts on grading and site disturbance. By accessing offthe existing driveway area, the need for additional and extensive grading for this unit has been purposefully avoided. -4- 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, and height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The architectural style and massing ofthe proposed structure is compatible and suitable with neighboring properties. The structure reads as a unified collection of smaller roof fbrms and elements integrated through primary rooftine, materials, window treatments, scale, massing, and color. As viewed from adjacent properties this project will be a positive improvement for the neighborhood and is deemed extremely sensitive in design, and with minimal impact to the existing and neighboring structures. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This project is not so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity. Monetary and aesthetic values should not be impaired by the construction of this duplex, but rather shall be improved. The stated purpose and intent of the aforementioned Guidelines is: Page 3 ofthe Town ofAvon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines 1.Purpose andlntent "Design Philosophy: The general design philosophy for the Town of Avon is to preserve and to protect property values by creating and aesthetic quality throughout the built environment of our community. The Town should continue to be perceived as a contemporary mountain town, complementary to the natural landscape and unbuilt environs. The Town should appear as a cohesive unit comprised of simple building forms, subdued colors, and predominantly pitched roofs. In residential areas, the relationship between the buildings and the natural environment should be harmonized rather than dominating." BASIS FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL "Ifthe design ofany project is found to comply with the purposes prescribed in these Guidelines, Regulations, and any applicable Ordinances ofthe Town of Avon, and the design review guideline review criteria prescribed in Section 7 (Items 1 -7 above) ofthese Regulations, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve this project." For reference, this project's orientation, massing, materials, texture, placement, scale, and color scheme are all derived from the Property Owners' and Design Team Members intention to create a companion unit to the existing residence on the property. Proper care and consideration were given to the Guidelines throughout the design process, to create a structure that responds and integrates with its site. This project is not a typical big box duplex design, but rather an integrated structure oftwo independent living environments responding directly to these site conditions. This proposed residence enhances the property values for each ofthe two residences via innovative architecture -5- and design and further preserves view corridors in this development and residential C community. The architectural design further achieves and important "privacy" feature to both residences (North and South), which is deemed important for true independent living environments as prescribed by the duplex definition. This Sketch Plan Application is a direct response to the unique site conditions and the desire to meet the Purpose and the Intent ofthe Town ofAvon Residential Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. In conclusion, the proposed duplex is in conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. This project is in compliance with the Town Guidelines and further meets the Intent of the Guidelines and merits consideration for support by the Town Staffand approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Sincerely, Chris Juergens VMDA Enc: Sketch Plan Application and related materials CC: Heather and Shane Bohart Legal File -6- Memo TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners & Public From: Tambi Katieb, AICP, Community Developme- Date July 15, 2004 Re: Neighborhood Meeting at Wildridge Fire Station to review __ Comprehensive Plan update Background: We are holding the first of two neighborhood meetings in Wildridge on July 20'11 2004 at the fire station. We have also reserved the Eaglebend Apartment meeting room for your August 3,2004 meeting for another special meeting focused on the Comprehensive Plan. The intent of both neighborhood meetings is to provide a convenient venue and additional opportunity for citizen input on the Comprehensive Plan update. We will have all the 'story boards' and mapping available for review at both meetings and both steering committee members of the Commission and staff will review the concepts and principles behind the update. The public is invited to attend and provide input on the process and preliminary concepts discussed at the steering committee meetings and first public open house held on June 29111,2004. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2004\CompPIan Special Meeting WR 7.20.04.doc [iiiliti-67-kini.1.1.) ~ Staff Report .6,~7 SPECIAL REVIEW USE AVON COLORADO July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date July 12, 2004 Project type Temporary Retail Rug Sales Legal description Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek - - Subdivision Zoning PUD (Planned Unit Development) Address 75 Benchmark Road Introduction Skyhawk Rugs is proposing to operate a temporary retail rug sales business on this lot from August 5th - 15th. The hours of operation will be from 9:00am to 7:30pm daily. The applicant will have a cargo trailer and display racks on-site and parking will be provided within the lot. The Lot 61 PUD indicates 'retail stores' is an allowed use. Criteria for Review According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application for a Special Review Use permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. The proposed use otherwise complies and 'retail sales' are a use by right. 1. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan. The following goals/policies appear to apply to this application: Goal B2 - Establish the Town Center Area as an inviting, vibrant and safe pedestrian- oriented cultural, retail and entertainment hub. Albeit a temporary basis this rug sale operation will provide a retail use. Policy 82.3 - Encourage a range of uses in the Town Center, including retail, offices, hotels, recreation, tourism, and entertainment. Albeit a temporary basis this rug sale operation will provide a retail use. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Special Review Use for i umporary Retail Rug Sales July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 2 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control Of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, tra#ic, safety, etc. The retail rugs sales operation appears to be compatible with the adjacent uses, which are commercial, retail and lodging uses. Recommended Motion Staffrecommends approval of the Special Use Permit as set forth in Resolution 04-21 for Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision to allow for the use o f a temporary retail rug sales operation as described in the plans dated July 8,2004 with the following conditions: 1. The lot shall be cleared of any trash and debris after the rug sale is completed. 2. A parking area shall be designated on the lot. -- - --- --- 3. Any signs/banners advertising this rug sale shall require a permit by the Town of Avon. 4. The applicant shall apply for a business license and sales tax license with the Town of Avon. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 02-44 4-* 42 0 Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-21 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A TEMPORARY RETAIL RUG SALES OPERATION ON LOT 61, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO HEREAS, Skyhawk Rugs, applicant, has applied for a Special Review Use permit for a temporary retail rug sales operation, as described in the application dated July 8th, 2004, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and T I THEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of ~~ the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and -HEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; and C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. 7 TOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of ~IN the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use permit for a temporary retail rug sales operation, as described in the application dated July 81 2004, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town o f Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: 1 1. That the proposed use conforms to the requirements as imposed by the Town Zoning Code. 2. That the proposed use conforms to the Town Comprehensive Plan, particularly with respect to Goal B2 (Establish the Town Center Area as an inviting retail hub); Policy B2.3 (Encourage a range of uses in the Town Center, including retail). 3. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses as planned and approved through the design review process. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot shall be cleared of any trash and debris after the rug sale is completed. 2. A parking area shall be designated on the lot. 3. Any signs/banners advertising this rug sale shall require a permit by the Town o f Avon. 4. The applicant shall apply for a business license and sales tax license with the Town of Avon. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Adopted this 20th day ofJuly, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-21 Lot 61, Block 2, BMBC Rug Sale.doc 2 Staff Report Minor Project AVON COLORADO July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date July 12,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Fence Legal Description Lot 107, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Address 3063 B Wildridge Road Introduction The Final Design for this project was approved at your June 4th,1996 meeting. The applicant is proposing to install a split rail fence 4 feet in height on the north side of the property for their two dogs. The length of the proposed fence is approximately 128'. Staff approved the deck portion of this application. The applicant is proposing to construct two new decks. The west elevation has an existing deck and will be rebuilt. The proposed deck dimensions will be 26' x 10' and will be supported by 8" x 8" posts. The proposed 'breakfast' deck dimensions for the north elevation will be 10' x 8' and will step down from the existing walkway. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. A variety of quality, durable building materials is proposed which include: log posts and high quality wood material for the fence. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of the fence may have negative impacts as viewed from neighboring properties. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. As proposed, the fence should not impair monetary values in the vicinity, but may impair aesthetic values in the vicinity. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 rm-ihe / \[ i 1 3 Lot 107, Block 1, Wildridge Sub sion, Minor Project - Fence July 208,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 3 The Town o f Avon Design Guidelines state that 'Fencing is discouraged, and will only be permitted where it compliments the character of the property, existing grades and landforms, and compliments the landscaping rather than contain the property. Fencing that delineate property boundaries are not permitted.' The area where the fence is proposed is on a steep portion of the landscaped area. It does not appear the fence will compliment the character o f the property and exisiting grade due to its large size and the grade it will be constructed on. It also appears the fence is containing a large portion o f the property. Staff Recommendation Staffrecommends denial ofthe fence for Lot 107, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision: 1. The fence is not approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4017 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, K~ =th G Qi f Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 107, Block 1, Wildridge Sul=ppision, Minor Project - Fence ~ July 20*,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Paoe 3 of 3 5 â€¢ ./... , I . ....: ~ 2 ./ .... . r.' Â· Â·. 1. ./ 4 . *4 .:, C ' e..: 9 .-I. 4Â· 7 0 .... .-4 ~r. . . . 1 r . -.'. Â· 4-47 -Â·" P : :. ' l .Â¥.' - r. 9- F.*I . - I *-.M. - I .0 - .. f //I- ./ -t North side of residence where fence is proposed. -- 41. I:- 4 -.~ 4 I .........-.. $ a I I. ; 4 1, d. 4~4*44**VA/1 . 4:. Â·*' -Alithil#A -1-.La,1,6 , .:- .---.6..~ ..Â£ 07Â£5%*/0 1 -5:4260*jib ilwooin" - Section of lawn that would be enclosed by the fence, the trees indicate the property line. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Fencing and Screening Fencing is discouraged, and will only be permitted where it complements the character of the property. existing grades and landforms, and compliments the landscaping rather than contain the property Fences that delineate property boundaries are not permitted. Requirements: 1. Fences, walls. or similar type barriers shall have a separate approval of the Commission, except that functional or decorative fences or walls may be approved as an integral part of a building and landscaping design. Wood fences are generally more acceptable than metal. Limited use of fences, such as to screen trash areas and utility equipment, is encouraged. 2. Fence materials shall be compatible with the site and the materials of the structures on the site. No chain link fences shall be permitted in residential areas, except for use as d temporary construction fences or for use in public recreational facilities. The use of chicken wire, or metal screening, with split rail fencing is discouraged. However, should the fencing comply with the requirements of this section. the fenced area must be less than 1/4 of the perimeter of the property and no more than 4 feet in height. 3. Where noted by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW). accepted wildlife corridors shall be accommodated to a reasonable degree on all properties when considering the layout of site disturbances. 1- - All/"m/*11/. / ' 41 01. & f Â¥ .... '4.* lll . .4 h 4 .14 . . , 4 WID / C. 6 4. ' : Fencing should not delineate property lines. This type offencing is no longer acceptable Erosion Control Erosion control is essential at all building sites. Design plans must indicate the type, method, and placement of erosion control structures on the property. A surety may be required to ensure proper installation and maintenance of these items. Required erosion control techniques and Best Management Practices (BMP's) for small residential projects are listed in the Pollution Control Plan (Appendix 4). All other projects will need to reference the Avon Master Drainage Study. available in the Community Development Department. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 20 lueludoleAea *1!UnUIWOO J I (A MOZ 0 0 lor 2 5 agA'gogy 4 l< W 4 /9 *1 . E )3'. 1 .'. a i.1 V 17- 1 I ./. 1,1 1 Lk- 1- 1 J '12 2 1 t R 11 Ip 1 A 3 N /10 At- 1 '41 1 411 ;U 0 ID I 4 1 0, 9 ;3/ i k el o J 1 - ---- -- .--4 -.- - 1 131 1 2- - 1 '0 3 - 4 0. 6 19 = 1 a - F --,0 3 1 rn - , i J 1 1 1 . 0 Il j li I i 71 -> 4 29 1- 3 b _1.-â„¢o 2 1 I - --- *Ft-0 50 â‚¬ED ' Sge-0 -1- bN LLS I 29 . 1 -1- 11 Staff Report Minor Project Av B h COLORADO July 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date July 14, 2004 Project Type Minor Project - Detached Two-Car Garage and Dwelling Unit Legal Description Lot 22, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD - Duplex Address 5588 Coyote Ridge Introduction Ruth Miller has requested the approval of a detached two-car garage and associated caretaker unit on her property, which is duplex zoned and constructed with an existing single-family residence. This application was originally submitted on June 14, 2004 as a minor project, and staff denied the application because it proposed a detached second unit under the garage and the detached dwelling unit does not fulfill the duplex zoning requirement of the lot. The design of the structure appears to be consistent with the Design Guidelines in terms of building materials and colors (to match existing construction). However, the addition of a detached dwelling unit would violate the definition of a duplex according to the guidelines and Avon Municipal Code. Ruth has submitted that at least two other duplex properties feature a detached structure on Coyote Ridge- Lots 23 and 28. Staff has reviewed the building permit files for both projects and determined that the separate garage on Lot 28 was not approved with a dwelling unit on top, and the dwelling unit on Lot 23 was considered 'attached' at the time of approval. The Wildridge PUD does not feature 'Primary/Secondary' zoning, which would enable Ruth to construct a detached caretaker unit, essentially what it proposed in this application. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: The lot under review is located in Wildridge and was allocated 2 units (as a duplex) per the Wildridge PUD. The zoning allows for either a single-family or a duplex residence. Duplexes must be attached per both the Avon Municipal Code as well as the Design Review Guidelines. â€¢ Lot Coveraget With the addition of this structure, the lot would remain in conformance with lot coverage requirements. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 -,TUTRETTL11-3 Lot 22, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Minor Project Application July 20th, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 â€¢ Setbacks: The structure would not encroach upon any setbacks. As proposed, the detached building would come within approximately 20 feet of the property line. â€¢ Building Height'. The height of the proposed structure would be approximately 29 fee, which would comply with the height limitation of the property. â€¢ Landscaping: A generous number of trees and shrubs exist on the property and the plans indicate that all existing trees would be protected during construction. 2. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. According to the Residential Design Guidelines Section D, "any accessory structures on the building site shall be compatible with the design and materials utilized for the main building structure." The guidelines also state that accessory structures should "generally be attached to the main building." The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed are compatible with the existing log home on the property. 3. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The proposed improvements should not have any negative impacts as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties. The massing, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors are all appropriate for the property. 4. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The proposed separate structure is separate from the building, which is similar to Lot 28 separated garage structure. 5. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This proposed separate caretaker unit does not appear to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town because of its conflict with existing Residential Design Guidelines and the definition of a duplex per the Avon Municipal Code. Staff Recommendation Unfortunately, the Wildridge PUD does not permit separate caretaker units to qualify as the 'second dwelling unit' of a duplex-zoned lot. Likewise, the intent of the existing design guidelines is to encourage attached structures and avoid a proliferation of separate garage or other major accessory structures. Finally, the proposed caretaker unit qualifies as a 'dwelling unit' under the definition in Avon Municipal Code. While we understand the need to create more usable space as well as acceptable garage parking, we have and continue to recommend that the applicant revise the plans to either completely remove the proposed secondary unit, or alternately, propose the structure as attached to the existing single-family home. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi Katieb Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 4. . 742Â»:, Re..U.*44*ul,tfird '4 .4,47~ ~ ' // 4% C.4 1:*4?2 .4,* 4<>v. , 6 ... .- 74 4 % ' j~13 - ~922 .~ 2%*P~Â·Â· t: Â· q : - . #; 4 5-- : 4, I ~17 *p .1. . 7#he '., - 0~.1 4." $f Â«'*mpi ~~e~,~g*9*Â«fÂ·4931*:Â«Â«flt *I I N f. . > . 1 1 *1% .i..2 Elt-- . ..05'.. t '5 4.-1. f. Â· I . d...24*: 044: Â· 4. + i .Â«r?~1 14 - Â·9 .4' I 11*101*111 1!11.4 - . - . -L - * % & - 4.... I 1 W-=lids Aigmr. I . 4: 8 .'..1. 'll & *'*I:' I, I * ' :~ , r. *,t:f, ' Â·F E ' :>:I'.4 ' . aÂ·Â·Â·â€¢ . V f V.f ..S~ %, Â« * 1 . . 28,4 /4 *, 11 .,0.-t --t# 1.............. 1.4, i Ir- * 3- r . 7 *9631/4221Â£ I. ./r -. ' '01.:4 . V lu P . .4.-I "2Â·5' ' *r''r I .Aft.%~, ., 4 July 12.2004 To: Town o f Avon From: Ruth Miller 5588 Coyote Ridge PO Box 6622 Avon, CO. 81620 RE: Approval of plans submitted for garage and bedroom at 5588 Coyote Ridge Dear Avon Town Planning Department and Board Members, Recently I submitted plans to build a two-car garage with an extra bedroom on my property. I feel that this is very necessary because my house as it is now, greatly lacks an acceptable amount of garage space. I currently have 3100 sq. ft and only a one-car garage to accommodate the structure. This is not nearly enough covered parking space for so nice a home. I feel that it is vital to get these plans approved in an effort to value my home at a more appropriate price. I have also included another bedroom underneath the proposed garage. You will notice the pictures I have provided of two other structures on Coyote Ridge that have detached garages with extra bedrooms on top. My plans call for putting the bedroom on the bottom so that there will be minimal impact created by the total structure. This will be much more environmentally friendly to not only my property, but the neighborhood as well. My home sits on one of the most beautiful lots in all of Wildridge and the fact that it has only a one-car garage is a deterrent to my overall property value. I believe that this situation can be easily rectified with your help. 1 have taken great pains with these plans to assure that they would be considered acceptable to the Town's requirements. I also believe that they would be a true enhancement to this property. Please approve these plans. Thank you for your consideration, Ruth Miller RECEIVED JUL 1 3 2004 Community Development ... 4 .Te ~'3~k "02. 74.-% :"03* 1,41.2-1% 4 16 4 1. 4 25--4 . k .1, - 0 -11.1 , -- 1- *,rt,&0., 11.41 .1. I . . I L * =424:*44..Â· ~..4*.flr fl ...1:Â¥1- ':11, 1,11.0 Â¥, 1 .J ;t * -A#US:JAJLf. *50/ :I ::.-Â°cÂ·.2.,# Al.'14,4:,fic#~,A Â¥ ** 4 "~' *. t 2 P,-Â·* t 1 . .. Av-ov 41 10 H{whimi?Â·11 14 ),Ll "r/'.,4 /6 b I 9.0 -43 bqq, () R 91 944 41 Whn June 18.2004 Ruth Miller P.O. Box 527 Avon, CO 81620 Via Facsimile: 845.8275 (hardcopy tofoHow) RE: MINOR PROJECT - STAFF DENIAL FOR ADDED 2-CARGARAGE/APARI'MENT LOT 22, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION Dear Ruth: Staff has reviewed your application for the following modifications at 5588 Coyote Ridge, Wildridge Subdivision. Proposed Modification: Addition of a 2-Car Garage with "Grandma's Apartment" below. Colors to match the existing structure on the property. Action: Denied As discussed, the submitted application does not meet the definition of a duplex per section 17.08.240 of the Avon Municipal Code section. Please find the attached definition. Please contact me at 970.748.4413 if you have any questions or require additional assistance. Kind Regards, Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician Cc: File (M-DR2004-21) F:\Design Review\Wildridge\WR Block 4\L22 84 WR 2-car garage & grandma apartment denial.doc U-V 1 4-* ----4"4::m t / 0He, \ f j -r*1 !-4,0(, 4 ..=.0 2 M. /24â„¢ 3041 ..9 -4/.0 .' 9,4 & 2- 5-0.5 - 1/04111 6,â€ž .V , y > ) 1 0.4/SH .,V,,- - 1 - Â¥ 1; -- \ <7Â·43~ 26 v:J -03 0,2+6= . I . .1 * . 5, BUS:-0<-Ri.#74,1490 .- --I- . . '.4 -Â·.- vn. , C. 4.* 1,- , -*.-Â»- ' ' 4, , â„¢ 4 82 + --IP -I - . . /7893741 \ -3.1 Jit=,1 111-6. -21913*ty;i,;f/.7 10' gus-,\ t. 4,Â£ - - ' 1 '; *.1+DA--,ANe,&- r~iz Â· ,re* ~.. ~~.'*~'~t Â·~ ~-~ Â·-to i.--,05.-~~bj~~ 4/AftÂ·--... 10,0' 0.'' 1.4 - f ; rn lipÂ» 4â€ž1,0. .... i A. / HE) Â«Vil~0' el ,*1 49 ' w . :\ r#/ -i~wAA /01;_2 i ~ 1 %#'-â„¢ 10* 81Â¥-1 1 Â¢ r.nt" %. 2.1 : ---- 4.0" wf:kG UÂ·-FiÂ·.1 \ 144*M~> -2,1.'9 , t .'01 n.:>. i./. I.- ..41.,4, 3 - i r. ' & 0.54 1 - 2 .2'' :. > A,a 1 1 ./ 0 L 2 -- \1 \ Â· 4,6 4 . * I Ot.-CE:- .<U ~ 0,29 / - +--~ NVERT 0.;10 1.C CMP 1 Â·Â·% .... I .* Â·-*.v----- --- -â€žâ€žj-.*--...#VI. ./ 4 . '4* 694<041/?6.,4 i#Ajowk- i .11 0.2, 00* Â· v + s r & 7, : 4 1 1.> < '4Â·J kil-1': ' 4 -.â€¢A#/ 'â€¢Â· d' , ~ â€¢ A.,/ - ,-Â· 136 I. -1. - -. . 1 *xÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·h .,b i -Â· n râ€¢ , 1 ; . % ft I 3 1 .... \ E.:25 7 2%13}:N:3 1SpiÂ·?-fl:- l i i ! i.'. ... 10.0, _- -T 339.f 4 - N 1 , v. , InT 1 1 , 11 Â£ lili I lim , EX ' L_1 63 -0//.6/, 0 .t.7311 1 \\ 0 7 6/4 . f) ET,fid 1 1 1,1 h P:/ I ...7=t, \,% 4 1, v.a, 41 -' 2-1 -h .11' r . 2, I Ed--,4, ~,Â· ~ ~'Â·4-:-Â· C F Â·2Â· r.1-0 4 - 1, .1- U ./ 21 11 \ r /- 1 #F,7,-f -. - r ' l.2xxf\> A tÂ· % P. -V- -1~-r- - F TI t, 0 Â· 41-1.14444=01 -Jil 1 11.224%9 .2*911 1 1 - 1 ~ 6 1 Ai:Re'111 1)*1* : : STE ~ \r--CciÂ« Â»~0< 8 - -AL ya ! r~ Wifill ~ i 19)i , 1 Â»tix j 4-241, .iFFjIi AWil uillill * 1 1 r '1 - NOI1VA313 1SV3 -'. NOISIAIGBF ~ 39all=I alIM k >10018 i 101 029 LB OaÂ¥130103 NOAV '39Cm:I 31OAOO 8899 NOIllaaÂ¥ HONIIN 30N3D IS3EI El 311 liN lit~ , Xhxlâ€¢---* 23Â¥ 44-97..7--. f 1% l - .4 7 M .1.-14. lib\ 4 III 1 2 1,1 .11 i .1 1 .1 h . b .8 / 7- | 5 ; 1 -0 X'.1(23-T. -C.3,Â·.*, 3-L.-1 Ill.. r, a 1,9 1 1/2/7 + \L fy, 1 1 /. 7 -r=-Â· r 43Â· I ' 44 1141 Â° LU 1 / 1 11 + '.\ *21 f rfE ;5 24 -i.Â· 130-En tdj- %.2 Wa V'a- 49 1 9/4~1513~5~dr1Xe - 922 Cm Womow 0 4( i f\Uiltff ifÂ©42 / 7 32 \OX-,34-4- S g 9 / 1 11 1 [ 12*Rk.-231("Ul 04(ll i ?frftp- ----------- ----1-------------==- 1 /= -C- A- 11 . 1793 . \1 1.-r . 6 6 05 \\0 In In cr *9% 1 gi -t - lie 808 W â€¢ 0 I 1,1 k b 0 E W-k ~% 2 0 - = ic, 0 . 0 2 SDI .0-,02 .0-,9 U J 429 z * ij. Wib E 41% c-~6-1 1 - D.D...... I + , I .... . 1/ . * ' D . or i i i i i ' 4'0 + /1 I ' â€¢ D â€¢lit--4 , D . . , 'd@ i ~ . ' D D D ' I , 0 0 + D , 6 3 c, i m 5% 820 f 0 04 W3 0.1 - 0 22 1-- ONI1SIX3 133108d S33B1 ACCES ROOF OVER LOWER ENTRY NE TER~30 V -1*3 NO '850 65,<~ 1N3n3AVd Shl3AVd ASPHALT =l..... .1..... 2.1.... 1, 4/ -................~....~I'lili./.~..............:::::W tilluliBi:(#e:/demi:ill@IIIIIIIILWJ::fkrill~:.. t '1192{.H~,2.Trig/Em# mm=.... -0 .1......... Â·ififilifie~TILJ'.:.,""",.Tri) 4:1;:::I:illili . ~----- 1......... ......... .... Memo TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Tambi Katieb, AICP, Community Development Norman Wood, Town Engineer Date July 15, 2004 Re: Proposed revisions to Design Review Guidelines and Municipal Code (Public Hearing) Background Attached to this memo are two resolutions being forwarded to you for review, discussion, and recommendations to Town Council prior to adoption. These revised versions reflect the discussion had at your last review on July 6,2004. The changes presented in each resolution are the result of several meetings with Town Council and the Building Community wherein an exchange on how we can revise/improve our process in both design review and zoning code matters. At the same time, staff had considered and discussed several of the proposed changes outside of those meetings over the last year an effort to continually improve our process while remaining protective of the need to regulate development to the desires of the Town Council and citizens. Resolution 04-19 proposes to amend the Avon Municipal Code with respect to the following: â€¢ Building Height Definition: Clarify the measurements within and outside the structure proposed, to avoid continued confusion and changing interpretation by staff over the years. â€¢ PUD Submittal Requirements and PUD Amendment procedures: Establishing minimum submittal requirements for all applications, addressing applications proposed in conjunction with a development agreement, and setting forth several new submittal requirements. â€¢ Development agreements and PUD applications: Establishing the use of development agreements and PUD application minimums. â€¢ Coordination of Public Notice provisions with Preliminary Subdivision applications: Avoiding confusion (as recently experienced on several PUD applications) when sending public notice out for Commission and Council public hearings by consolidating the notice for both applications. â€¢ Clarification of existing parking standards for Commercial Land Use: Correcting a typographic error in the new codebook for Shopping and Convenience Goods (retail). â€¢ Revised SPA/PUD definition in the Subdivision Regulation: Coordinating the consolidated public notice approach with PUD applications to match the language proposed in the PUD regulations. Resolution 04-20 proposes to amend the existing Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines with respect to the following: â€¢ Revised Sketch Design Review Application process (and review procedure) â€¢ Revised Scheduling Process â€¢ Consolidated Checklist for Final Design â€¢ Building Height clarification (to match Zoning Code definition) â€¢ Clarify topographic survey definition (to meet National Map Accuracy Standards for vertical and horizontal accuracy) â€¢ Retaining wall definition (non-structural walls and diagram) â€¢ Site grading clarification and requirements â€¢ Appeals process to match recent update We anticipate that the Commission, building and design community and members of the public will have questions on the proposed changes during your meeting. Accordingly, we have anticipated holding at least two meetings with the Commission before moving these matters back to Town Council to hold subsequent public hearings and final adoption of the codes. Staff and the Town Attorney will be available at your meeting to answer any questions that you may have on the proposed amendments. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2004\DRG and AMC CHANGES 2004 72004.doc -7 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-19 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 04-XX, AMENDING TITLES 16 AND 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE TO THE TOWN COUNCIL AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICTS, DEFINTION OF BUILDING HEIGHT, AND PARKING T T THEREAS, Titles 16 and 17 of The Avon Municipal Code require review and revision on a ~ periodic basis in order to continue to serve the public interest; and 11 THEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission is appointed by Town Council to review, make recommendations, and render decisions on all zoning applications; and TI THEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the attached revisions ("Exhibit A") to Resolution 04-19 Series of 2004, and held a public hearing as required by the Avon Municipal Code to review the proposed amendments; ~ TOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council the approval of changes set forth in Resolution 04-19 Series of 2004 in order to amend the existing Avon Municipal Code as adopted. ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-19 Zoning Subdivision Ordinance Adoption.doc Exhibit "A" to Resolution 04-19 ORDINANCE NO. 04-XX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLES 16 AND 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICTS, DEFINITION OF BUILDING HEIGHT, AND PARKING BE IT ORDAn4ED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO: TITLE 17 ZONING Section 1. Amendment. Section 17.08.160, Chapter 8 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended as follows: Building height means the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point outside the building to the top of a flat roof, eF mansard roo f, or to the highest ridgeline o f a sloping roof. Within a building, height shall be measured vertically from any point on a flat roof, mansard roof, or sloping roof highest ridgeline (for sloping Feefs) to the existing grade directly below said point. Maximum Building Height Interior Section ~ 11.T.S. fiÂ« Maximum Bui-g HeigN 4/ \ OriginalÂ£=tr, Gracle Maxrr*.Irn Building HeigH Maximum Building Height Exterlor Section Showing Envelope N.T.S. Imaginary line runs parallel to existing grade limiting building height Area exceeding height limitation when measured to finished L-1.L exterior grade 4 Proposed finished grade t Existing grade / * Height 0/1-- / measurements e -I - Proposed finished grade at walkout Section 2. Amendment. Subsection (c) (3) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended as follows: (3) A complete application for a PUD must be submitted to the Department of Community Development at least thirty (30) days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. A report o f the Community Development Department findings and recommendations shall be made at the initial formal hearing before the Planning Commission. A report and resolution of the Planning Commission stating its findings and recommendations, and the staff report shall then be transmitted to the Town Council. The Town Council shall consider the PUD District in accordance with Section 17.28.050 of this Code. Section 3. Amendment. Subsection (d) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (d) Submittal requirements. Submittal requirements may vary depending on the complexity o f the proposed development as determined by the Community Development Department, and whether or not the PUD is being requested in connection with the review of a development agreement pursuant to Chapter 17.14 ofthis Code. Generally, the following minimum submittal requirements shall apply for all new PUD applications and proposed amendments to existing PUD districts: (1) Application form and filing fee; (2) A written statement describing the nature of the project to include information on proposed uses, densities, nature o f development proposed, contemplated ownership patterns, and phasing plans; (3) A survey stamped by a licensed sun'eyor no older than 3 years from the date o f application, indicating existing conditions of the property to be included, to include the location of improvements, existing contour lines, natural features, existing vegetation, watercourses and perimeter property lines o f the parcel; (4) A complete zoning analysis of existing and proposed development, to include a square footage or density breakdown of all proposed uses and parking. Where a structure or building exists, a complete set ofplans depicting the existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations), i f applicable; (5) A vicinity plan showing the proposed improvements in relation to all properties at a scale not smaller than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet. For projects larger than two (2) acres in size, the appropriate scale shall be determined by the Department of Community Development; (6) Evidence of available utilities, such as water and sewer service, as provided. (7) Proposed site plan showing the approximate locations and dimensions o f buildings, or approximate building envelopes and all principal site development structures or features. For projects less than two (2) acres in size, the plan shall be prepared at a scale not smaller than one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet. For projects larger than two (2) acres in size, the appropriate scale shall be determined by the Department o f Community Development. Additional submittal requirements, as determined necessary by either the Community Development Department or the Planning and Zoning Commission, may be required and include the following: (8) Preliminary building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than one-eighth (1/8) inch equals one (1) foot in sufficient detail to determine floor areas, circulation, location of uses and general scale and appearance o f the proposed development. (9) Photo overlays and/or other acceptable techniques for demonstrating a visual analysis o f the proposed development in relationship to existing conditions; (10) A site-massing model depicting the proposed development in relationship to development on adjacent parcels; (11) Environmental impact report; (12) Preliminary drainage analysis and grading plans; (13) Economic model o f the proposed uses and densities where an application proposes uses that may impact the ability of the Town to provide adequate public services; (14) Any additional material or information as deemed necessary for proper review o f the proposed PUD or PUD amendment. Four (4) complete copies o f the above information, with the exception o f the massing model shall be submitted with an application for a PUD. Section 4. Amendment. Subsection (h) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (h) Design Criteria. The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD District. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria or demonstrate that one (1) or more o f them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Where the PUD District is being requested in connection with the review of a development agreement as pursuant to Chapter 17.14 of this Code, not all design criteria may be applicable, as determined by the Department. Section 5. Amendment. Subsection (k) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (1) Amendments. Requests for amendments to an approved Planned Unit Development District shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described above. Amendments that propose substantial changes to land use in connection to existing development agreements and development plans as outlined in Chapter 17.14 of this Code may require additional information andfor amendment to development agreements and to development plans. Section 6. Amendment. Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended by the addition of (m) to provide as follows: (m) Preliminary Subdivision Application with PUD Where subdivision approval will be required to implement development in a proposed PUD, a Preliminary Subdivision Plan application must be filed concurrently and in conjunction with the PUD application. The provisions and procedures for public notice, hearing and review for a PUD as prescribed in this Title shall apply to the Preliminary Subdivision Plan application. No development may be implemented in a PUD prior to approval and recording of a corresponding Final Subdivision Plat. Section 7. Amendment. Subsection (c)(2)(a) of Section 17.24.020, Chapter 24 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (2) Commercial Land Use - -- -- - --- - Minimum Requirements a. Shopping and convenience goods retail 4/1000 sq. ft. GLFA TITLE 16 SUBDIVISION Section 8. Amendment. Section 16.08.150, Chapter 08 of Title 16, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: Specially planned area (SPA) and/or Planned Unit Development (PUD) means a subdivision controlled by one (1) or more landowners to be developed under a unified plan which does not correspond in lot area, density, lot coverage, open space or other requirements of existing subdivision or zoning regulations; it shall contain sufficient total area in relation to the intended use or uses to permit effective application o f planning principles to protect the landform, reduce street and utility costs, preserve open space and provide a superior human environment. Where subdivision approval will be required to implement development in a proposed PUD, a Preliminary Subdivision Plan application must be filed and reviewed concurrently with the PUD application. The public notice and hearing requirements shall be combined and run concurrent with the PUD public notice and hearing requirements as prescribed in Title 17. INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED POSTED the 27th day o f July, 2004, and a public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council on the 10th day of August, 2004, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, PASSED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED POSTED the day of ,2004. Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John W. Dunn, Town Attorney 5>i TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-20 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VARIOUS REVISIONS TO THE TOWN OF AVON RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES TO TOWN COUNCIL AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS, AND CLARIFICATIONS OF DEFINITIONS, PROCEDURES AND CHECKLISTS HEREAS, Titles 2 of The Avon Municipal Code establishes the Planning and Zoning Commission as a design review body; and II THEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission adopted the current Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines in 1996, and realizes the document should be periodically updated to reflect revisions to the zoning code and continue to serve the public interest; and TI THEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the attached revisions VV ("Exhibit A") to Resolution 04-20 Series of 2004, and held a public hearing as required by the Avon Municipal Code to review the proposed amendments; ~OW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council the approval of changes set forth in Resolution 04-20 Series of 2004 in order to amend the existing Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines as adopted. ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-20 DRG Revision Adoption.doc t C> Exhibit "A" to Resolution 04-20 AVON COLORADO TOWN OF AvON RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES PROCEDURES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED NOVEMBER 6, 2001 (REVISED AuGUST 10, 2004) HEARTofthe-VALLEY-1 Table of Contents Sections 1. Purpose and Intent Page 3 2. Authority Page 4 3. Definitions and Standards Page 5-9 4. Residential Development Guidelines A. Site Development Page 10- 15 B. Building Design Page 16-18 C. Landscaping Page 19-22 D. Miscellaneous Items Page 23-24 5. Commercial and Industrial Development Guidelines A. Site Development Page 25-31 B. Building Design Page 32-37 C. Landscaping Page 38-41 D. Miscellaneous Items Page 41-42 6. Application Requirements and Processing Page 43-44 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review Page 45-47 8. Miscellaneous Regulations Page 48 Appendices 1. Recommended Plant List Page 49-52 2. Town of Avon Noxious Weeds Page 53 3. Sketch Design Plan/Final Design Plan Application & Checklist Page 54-58 4. Pollution Control Plan Page 59-62 5. Stormwater Control Plan Page 63-69 6. Example Color Board Page 70-71 7. Example Site Plan Page 72 8. Fee Schedule Page 73 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Community Development Staff: Tambi Katieb. Director Ken Kovalchik Matt Pielsticker Planning and Zoning Commission: Chris Evans, Chairman Andrew Karow Terry Smith Bob Trueblood Buz Didier Tim Savage Phil Struve ;L 1. Purpose and Intent Design Philosophy The general design philosophy for the Town of Avon is to preserve and protect propertN values by creating an aesthetic quality throughout the built environment of our community. The Town should continue to be perceived as a contemporary mountain town, complementary to the natural landscape and unbuilt environs. The Town should appear as a cohesive unit comprised of simple building forms, subdued colors, and predominantly pitched roofs. In residential areas, the relationship between buildings and the natural environment should be harmonized rather than dominating. Landscaping should blend the surrounding natural environment and the home, not hide one from the other. Form, scale, proportion, and materials should support the natural environs and reinforce those characteristics that uniquely identify a neighborhood's built environ as it relates to the Town. 1. -- '*V I Â· ..li,Â·t 4*Â·12Â· f 4 1, ..: i./ . 1, 0 ./ Typical Wildridge Vista : From Wildridge Road East Looking South towards Beaver Creek. 2. Authority The authority to enact 'Design Review Guidelines' is granted by Chapter 2.16 of The Avon Municipal Code, which specifically states: C. The objectives of the design-review function of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be as follows: a. To prevent excessive or unsightly grading of property which could cause disruption of natural watercourses or scar natural landforms; b. To ensure that the location and configuration of structures, including signs and signage, are visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and structure and that there shall be conformance to the master plan of the town; c. To ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the town' s overall appearance, with surrounding development, with natural and existing landforms, and with officially approved development plans, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located; d. To ensure that plans for the landscaping of property and open spaces conform with the rules and regulations as prescribed by the Town and by this chapter and to provide visually pleasing settings for structures on the same site and on adjoining and nearby sites (Ord. 83-11). Purpose and Intent To establish procedures, rules, and regulations by which the Commission shall receive, review, and rule on applications for the design of any proposed alterations to real property, including land and any improvements on that land, within the Town of Avon. Scope The scope of these procedures for design review includes but is not limited to site grading, excavation or fill; the location and configuration of structures on a site; the architectural design of structures including color and materials; landscaping of sites including number, size, placement, species of plantings and provisions for maintenance systems of same. The Commission shall review and act upon the general design and appearance of any building, construction, paving, grading, or landscaping proposed on any lot or parcel of land within the Town, including municipal and other government projects. It shall be unlawful to begin any such work prior to approval by the Commission. Compatibility These Rules of Procedure are in accordance with Section 2.16.070 of the Avon Municipal Code, and details the procedures for approval of development plans required by Section 17.12.020 of the Avon Municipal Code. These Rules are intended to complement other ordinances of the Town, and shall neither duplicate nor supersede them. 3. Definitions and Standards Access: The place, means, or way by which pedestrians and vehicles shall have adequate and usable ingress and egress to property, use, or parking space. Accessory Structures: An accessory structure ('building' or 'use') means a subordinate building or use, which located on the same lot on which the main building or use is situated and which is reasonably necessary and incidental to the conduct of the primary use of such building or main use. Access Grade: The slope of a road, street, driveway, or other means of access, as measured from the backside of pan along the centerline of the means of access. Annual High Water Mark: The visible line on the edge or a river, stream, lake, pond, spring or seep up to which the presence and action of water are so usual and long conditions (with a recurrence interval of one ( 1) year or less) so as to create a distinct character with respect to vegetation and the nature of the soil. Applicant: An owner or owner's representative who is authorized to represent and/or act upon any application or submittal. Architect: An architect licensed in the State of Colorado. Architectural Projection: When an architectural projection (i.e. chimney, cupola) physically projects beyond the plane of a required limitation (i.e. height). Best Management Practice (BMP): A structural device designed to temporarily or permanently store or treat stormwater runoff in order to mitigate flooding, reduce pollution, and provide other amenities. BMP's include wet ponds, created wetlands, filters, and infiltration trenches and galleries. Berm: A mound of earth used to screen or separate one area from another to reduce visual, noise and similar impacts of development. Berm may also mean the act of pushing earth into a mound. Building Code: In the Town of Avon, the most recently adopted version of the Building Code shall apply. Building Envelopes: That portion of a lot within which all buildings are confined. A specified area that does not alter or otherwise affect existing setbacks or easements. Building Height: The distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point to the top of a flat or mansard roof or the highest ridgeline of a sloping roof. Notex Building Height is always measured from the most restrictive grade, either existing or proposed (finished) grade. All elevations must be labeled in numcrie form. Existing elevations must be shown through the structure on the site plano Building height means the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point outside the building to the top of a flat roof, ef mansard roof, or to the highest ridgeline of a sloping roof. Within a building, height shall be measured vertically from any point on a flat roof, mansard roof, or sloping roof highest ridgeline (for sloping roofs) to the existing grade directly below said point. 1> Maximum Building Height Interior Section ~/ H.T.S. -Â«4 Maxifium Bu,ldr,g He,ght Original/Existing Grade Maxirnum Building Height Maximum Building Height Exterlor Section Showing Envelope N.T.S. Imaginary line runs parallel to existing grade limiting building height Area exceeding height limitation when measured to finished /In L exterior grade ~ Proposed finished grade - 1 Ex}sting grade / meamiremenm '\4 77 -- ~r---~ Proposed finished grade at walkout Building Setbacks: A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on a lot. Construction (Activity): Work done on a job site that produces an altered or new structure. Includes excavation, assembly, and erection of components. Construction Staging Plan: A site plan submitted with final design plans showing, at the minimum: contractor parking, construction materials storage, limits of site disturbance, P%!16 snow storage, refuse storage, sanitation facilities, project signage, and construction trailer(s) location, as applicable. Construction Staging Plan: A site plan submitted with final design plans showing, at the minimum: contractor parking, construction materials storage, limits of site disturbance, snow storage, refuse storage, sanitation facilities, project signage, and construction trailer(s) location, as applicable. The staging plan may be combined on the same plan sheet as the Pollution Control Plan. Development: A form of activity that requires some form of permit or other approval pursuant to these regulations, including: 1/ The building of a new residential, commercial, or industrial structure, 2/ The alteration or modification of an existing residential, commercial, or industrial structure, 3/ Grading or excavation activity that is intended to prepare a construction site. Drainage (System): A built system of pipes, channels, or trenches, or finished grades utilized to convey wastewater or water borne waste in a collective and organized method. Driveway: A paved all-weather driving surface on private property which provides access to dwelling units. Duplex: A detached building containing two dwelling units, designed for or used as a dwelling exclusively by two families, each living as an independent housekeeping unit. Dwelling Unit: Any building or portion thereof for residential purposes, including single- family, two-family, duplex, multifamily dwellings, but not including hotel, motel, or lodge (accommodation) units. Easements: A conveyance or reservation of an incident of ownership in real property for one or more specific purposes, public or private. Exterior Storage: Storage outside of a building or dwelling unit. Exterior Walls: The outer wall surfaces of a building, structure, or dwelling unit. Fences: Enclosing framework for exterior areas, such as yards or gardens. Final Design Plan: A hard-line plan which meets the requirements indicated in Appendix 3. Frontage: The portion of a lot that fronts on a public or private street. Fireplace: Opening at the base of a chimney in which combustible material, such as wood or gas, can be safely burned to produce heat. Specific designations of fireplaces by type are as defined in Chapter 15.40 of the Town of Avon Municipal Code. Grade (existing): The existing or natural topography of a site prior to construction. Grade (finished): The grade upon completion of a construction project measured on the outside of a structure. Gross Floor Area: The total surface floor areas of a structure, including habitable and non-habitable areas unless specifically noted. Hard Line Drawing: An architectural or engineering drawing produced by the use of computer-aided graphics, or other mechanical implement, which does not represent free- hand drawing. Landscape Area: The area of a site not covered by buildings, driveways, and covered walkways. Areas such as water features and other similar features appurtenant to natural landscape areas shall also be considered part of the landscaping area. 19 Lot or Site: A parcel of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a use, building, or structure under the provisions of Title 17, Zoning Regulations, and meeting the minimum requirements of Title 16, Subdivision Regulations. A lot or site may consist of a single lot of record, a portion of a lot record, a combination of lots of record or portions thereof, or a parcel of record and described by metes and bounds. Minor Project/Minor Modification: Certain forms of exterior development and improvement that are exempted from the public review process by the Director of Community Development. Multifamily Residence: A building containing three (3) or more dwelling units, not including hotels or lodges, but including townhouses, condominiums and apartments with accessory use facilities limited to an office, laundry, recreation facilities and off-street parking used by the occupants. Owner/Owner Representative: The owner of title to a property, or his/her designated appointee and representative for an application. Designation of a representative must be made in writing as part of any application. P.E. Stamped Design: A design that is stamped, signed, and dated by a Colorado registered professional engineer. Planning and Zoning Commission: A commission established in the Avon Municipal Code 2.16.010, to operate in accordance with its own rules of procedure as provided for in Section 11.2 of the Town Charter. Retaining Wall: A wall designed to maintain differences in ground elevations by holding back a bank of material. Retaining Wall: A wall designed to maintain differences in ground elevations by holding back a bank of material. A Non-Structural retaining wall is less than 4 feet (1219mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II or III-A liquids. Finished Grade Retaining wall (non-structural) N.T.S. - a, E Three hers maximum considered non-structural E 5 Maximum Slope of 4:1 2 2 5 E 4-foot minimum distance 1-foot minmum lay back . Finished Grade~- ~ E f rs E 3 r 1 2.2 Setback: The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured horizontally to a line or location within the lot or site, which established the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site. Sketch Plan: The first formal application for design review. Sketch plan must be approved prior to applying for final design review, and after a pre application meeting has been held with Community Development staff, and comply with requirements indicated in Appendix 3. Sketch Plan: The first step in the design review process. A sketch design must be reviewed by Community Development and the Planning Commission prior to proceeding to Final Design submittal. Single Family Residence: A residence building containing not more than one dwelling unit occupied exclusively by one family as an independent housekeeping unit. Site Coverage: The ratio of the total building and disturbed area on a site to the total area of a site, expressed as a percentage. Site Plan: A drawing that shows, at a minimum, property lines of a building lot, elevation information, compass direction, length and scale of property information, and the locations of structures to be built on the lot. See example site plan in Appendix 7. Snow Storage Area: An area equal to twenty percent (20%) of impermeable surfaced area upon which aboveground construction does not occur shall be designated as a 'snow-storage area' and not developed in a manner inconsistent with such use. Landscaping shall not be considered inconsistent with such use. Any designated snow storage area shall be not less than six feet (6') wide, shall be adjacent to the impermeable area from which the snow is to be removed, shall not be included in any parking area required by the minimum parking requirements, and shall be contained in such a manner that runoff is directed though a treatment facility (when required). See 17.50.100 'Snow Storage' of Avon Municipal Code for additional design requirements. Slope: Shall be established by measuring the maximum number of feet in elevation gained or lost over each ten feet (10') or fraction thereof measured horizontally in any direction between opposing lot lines. The relationship of elevation or vertical measure as divided by the horizontal measurement shall be expressed as a percentage as a means of quantifying the term "slope". Staff: Town of Avon Community Development employees. Staff Approval: Approval on a minor project that is reviewed and issued by Staff, without public hearing. Survey: A land plat survey, stamped and signed by a registered Colorado Surveyor, showing contour intervals at engineering scale of 1"=10'. No survey will be accepted that is older than 3 years from the receipt date of design review submittal. Survey: A land plat survey, stamped and signed by a registered Colorado Surveyor, showing contour intervals at engineering scale of 1"=10'. No survey will be accepted that is older than 3 years from the receipt date of design review submittal. The survey must be tied to USGS elevations and meet National Map Accuracy Standards for horizontal and vertical accuracy. Surveys with notes that do not conform to this standard will be rejected or require resurvey prior to final design approval. Table 1.0: Residential Access, Parking, and Engineering Standards Standard Single Family Duplex Multi Family Other: Driveway Min: 14 feet Min: 14 feet Min: 20 Over Duplex Curb cut Max: 18 feet Max: 18 feet Max: 24 upon review by Town Engineer Driveway 4% maximum 4% maximum 4% maximum Heated area Grades for first 20' for first 20' for first 20' may not adjacent and adjacent and adjacent and encroach perpendicular perpendicular perpendicular to beyond to public way/ to public way/ public way/ 4% property line. 4% maximum 4% maximum maximum for for first 20' for first 20' first 20' adjacent adjacent to adjacent to to garage/ 8% garage / 10% garage / 10% Maximum Maximum Maximum Permitted 1 Permitted 1 Permitted 1 Permitted (6 Additional Curb Cuts DU's and under) points of access must be approved specifically Parking 2 spaces per 2 spaces per Studio: 1 space See Zoning Requirements uniU 3 spaces unit/ 3 spaces 1 Bedroom: 1.5 Code for per units over per units over spaces specific 2,500 sq. ft 2,500 sq. ft All others: 2 requirements (not inc. (not inc. spaces (section garage) garage) 17.24.020) Parking Stall 9' x 18' 9' x 18' 9' x 18' See Zoning Size minimum / 7.5' minimum / 7.5' minimum / 7.5' Code for Minimums vertical vertical vertical specific clearance / 90 clearance / 90 clearance / 90 requirements degree parking degree degree parking (section parking 17.24.020) & guest parking requirements 1 LD B. Residential Building Design General Design Character In addition to the stated Design Philosophy, and General Design Compatibility, a residential building must conform to setback, building area ratios, and height limitations of the applicable zone district. Buildings should be oriented to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors, where possible. Additionally, building design and location should generally minimize impacts on solar and view corridors of neighboring properties. It is preferred that residential buildings be designed as a composition of mass elements rather than larger single 'blocks' that appear unrelated in form and context. '....i#di..Â£.I-:i;... The height of structures, unless otherwise specified in a planned unit development, shall conform to the Zone district limitations stated in Titte 17: Zoning Regulations. The definition of height is set forth in the 'Definitions' section of these guidelines. No exceptions to the height requirements shall be made, except for penetrations that add architectural variety such as flues, chimneys, cupolas, etc. Building Height The height of structures, unless otherwise specified in a planned unit development, shall conform to the zone district limitations stated in Title 17: Zoning Regulations. The definition of height is set forth in the 'Definitions' section of these guidelines. No exceptions to the height requirements shall be made, except for penetrations that add architectural variety such as flues, chimneys, cupolas, etc. Penetrations to the height limitations must be in scale with the structure and surrounding property. (DELETE PICTURE) Building Height will be determined by utilizing the site development plan and elevations. All ridge elevations, and numeric existing and proposed grades must be labeled on the site plan to accurately determine height. Additionally, the elevation plans must show existing and proposed grades (also labeled in numeric form), such as the illustration above. Building Materials and Colors The intent of these guidelines is to provide architectural control to ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the town' s overall appearance, with surrounding development, with natural and existing landforms, and with officially approved development plans. These guidelines should represent the minimum standard to achieve this goal, without being so cumbersome as to not allow varied high-quality design that meets this intent. Requirements: 1. The use of high quality, durable building materials is highly encouraged. 2. The following materials and wall finishes will not ordinarily be permitted on the exterior of any structure: asphalt siding, imitation brick, asbestos cement shingles or siding, imitation log siding or plastic. Metal siding, concrete or concrete block will be permitted only with specific approval of the Commission. Each building must use a minimum of two materials. 6. Application and Processing Submittal and Review Process The Design Review process is broken down into three distinct tiers: Pre application Meetingi two stages: Sketch Plan Review and Final Design Review. Community Development shall review all material submitted for either of the thfee design review tiers to determine whether an applicant has met the minimum submittal requirements prior to the scheduling of a meeting or public hearing. A pre-application meeting is strongly encouraged prior making application. Minimum submittal requirements are attached as a 'checklist' for each required application, and should be reviewed carefully. For Sketch and Final Design Review, if the application and supporting material is found to be inadequate, the Community Development Department shall not schedule the application for consideration by the Commission but shall notify the applicant of any inadequacies. The following outlines the entire design review application process: Pfe-application-Meeting The applicant shall prepare at least two (2) copies of the following for staff review and comment prior to Pre application Meeting: 1. A Survey of the property, prepared by a licensed sun'eyor, showing property boundaries, area, easements, building setbacks, building envelopes, topography Cat 2' intervals @ 1"=20' eng. scale), and any significant natural features such as watercourses, mature tree stands, and FeeleÂ·etttefeppings: 2. A Conceptual Site Plan, Architectural Plan, and Proposed Elevations (1/1"=1'0" arch. scale) including all property boundaries, proposed building footprints, easements, and drive'ways. The applicant is requested to bring the specific information itemized above to a scheduled pre application meeting with staff for review. The intent of this meeting is to provide sufficient direction for the applicant to be prepared to submit a Sketch Plan that meets all requirements. Sketch Plan Review The applicant shall submit feup-Â¢4*-herd-line two (2) copies of the following for a Sketch Plan Review: 1. A Survey of the property, prepared by a licensed surveyor (stamped and signed), showing property boundaries, area, easements, building setbacks, building envelopes, topography (at 2' intervals @ 1"=20' eng. scale), and any significant natural features such as watercourses, mature tree stands, and rock outcroppings. No survey will be accepted if it is more than three (3) years old or does not meet the standards outlined in the Section 3 for horizontal and vertical accuracy. 2. A Site Plan (1"= 20' or 1" = 10' eng. scale) which clearly indicates existing end-ppepesed grades, all property boundaries, proposed building footprints, easements, and driveways. and proposed driveway grades, 22 limits of site disturbance, all building ridgeline cle:'ations, and any proposed detention structures. 3. Architectural Drawings (at 1/1"=1'0 arch. scale) which clearly indicate dimensioned floorplans, exterior elevations with all ridge and grade elevations labeled, roof plans, material the general placement of materials and use, and the overall building dimensionsran~1Â·-buikting-height eatettlatiet:H+. A specific 'Minimum Sketch Plan Review Submittal' (Appendix 3a) checklist is provided with the application, and the applicant is requested to review and check each item carefully to ensure a complete application prior to submittal. Final Design Review The applicant shall submit feup-(44 three (3) hard line copies of the following for a Final Design Review: 1. A Survey of the property, prepared by a licensed surveyor (stamped and signed), showing property boundaries, area, easements, building setbacks, building envelopes, topography (at 2' intervals @ 1"=20' or 1"=10' eng. scale), and any significant natural features such as watercourses, mature tree stands, and rock outcroppings. No survey will be accepted if it is more than three (3) years old or does not meet the standards outlined in the Section 3 for horizontal and vertical accuracy. 2. A Site Plan (1"=20' or 1"=10' eng. scale) which clearly indicates existing and proposed grades, all property boundaries, proposed building footprints, easements, driveways and proposed driveway grades, limits of site disturbance, temporary/construction trailers, all building ridgeline elevations, and any proposed detention structures. 3. An Architectural Plan (at 1/4" or 1/8"=1' arch. scale) which clearly indicates dimensioned floorplans, exterior elevations with all ridge and grade elevations labeled, roof plans, material placement and use, overall building dimensions, and building height calculations. 4. A Landscaping Plan (1"=20' or 1"=10' eng. Scale) which clearly indicates existing and proposed grades, all proposed landscaping locations, landscaping materials employed, required irrigation table, erosion control placement and type, and any required revegetation for disturbed areas (by type and placement). 5. A Color Board that clearly indicates all materials employed on the exterior of the structure, including but not limited to: siding, stucco, wood, finishes, paints and stains, roof materials, window and door type and easement colors, and soffit and fascia treatments. All materials will be indicated with a representative sample from the manufacturer, including the model number/name, and shall be keyed to placement on the Architectural Plan elevations. Color Board must be no larger than 81/2 x 11(Please reference Appendix 6). 77 6. A Lighting Fixture Cut-Sheet, provided by the manufacturer of the product, which clearly indicates the type of fixture being used. All lighting shall be keyed to placement on the Architectural Plan. 7. A colored elevation of the design submittal, as closely as possible representing the type, placement, and accurate representation of materials being employed. A specific 'Minimum Final Design Review Submittal' (Appendix 3b) checklist, in addition to minimum requirements of the Pollution Control Plan and Stormwater Control Plan/Drainage Design Manual, is provided with the application and the applicant is requested to review and check each item carefully to ensure a complete application prior to submittal. Applicants are encouraged to ask staff for direction or clarification with the minimum submittal requirements at any time. Additionally, the minimum submittal checklist may be updated on occasion, so applicants are encouraged to contact the Community Development Department to ensure that they are utilizing the most recent checklist available. F Li 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the application and supporting material and shall approve, conditionally approve, deny approval or continue the design review of the project within 45 days of the date of the meeting at which the complete application and supporting material is first reviewed by the Commission. If the Commission determines that advice or assistance of professional consultants is needed, or that additional information is required from any source, an additional 45 days shall be permitted for action by the Commission. General Approval Criteria All applications must meet the following general regulatory and planning criteria to be approved: 1. The project complies with the Town of Avon Zoning Regulations, 2. The project has general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains, and 3. There exist adequate development rights. for the proposed improvements. Sketch Plan Approval Criteria The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of all sketch plan projects utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Sub-Sections A through D of these guidelines, the design philosophy, and design intentions listed herein. Sketch plan approvals shall not be vested, but may be applied towards the submittal of a final design plan for up to six (6) months. Staff will prepare a memo to the Commission highlighting anticipated areas of discussion for the submitted materials. The Commission will take no formal action. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Final Design Plan Approval Criteria The Commission shall evaluate the design of all final design plans utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. That the final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. B. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. C. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to 73 architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. D. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. E. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Final Design Plan approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from the date of approval, with an one-time extension permitted for up to one year at the applicant' s request. Basis for approval or denial of project design If the design of any project is found to comply with the purposes prescribed in these Guidelines, Regulations, and any applicable Ordinances of the Town of Avon, and the design guidelines review criteria prescribed in Section 7 of these Regulations, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve the project. If the Commission determines that a conflict exists with the purposes Design Guidelines, or any other provision of these Regulations, or any Ordinance of the Town of Avon which would prevent approval of such project, the Commission shall disapprove the project. If the Commission determines that conflicts exist which are subject to correction, the Commission may conditionally approve or request changes to conform with the Design Guidelines or other provisions of those regulations. Any disapproval, conditional approval or request for changes shall be in writing and shall specifically describe the purpose, statement, or design guidelines with which the design of the project does not comply and the manner of noncompliance. Notification of an application decision shall be made by the recording secretary and transmitted in writing to the applicant within 7 days of said meeting. Time limitations The time limitations contained in these Regulations shall be interpreted as requiring the Commission to conduct a review or make the determinations or decisions required by these Regulations. Failure of the Commission to act within the prescribed time limitations shall be considered as conditional approval for design of the project subject to conformance with all applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. Schedunng The length of the development review process, from the acceptance of a complete application by Staff to the actual hearing, shall provide the Town with a minimum review time as follows: â€¢ 7 working days (or no later than 5pm of the Friday one week prior to the meeting) for a Sketch Design review for all residential projects less than multi-family. â€¢ 12 working days for Final Design applications on all residential projects less than multi-family. 2 6 â€¢ 21 working days for Sketch and Final Designs for all other residential or commercial projects. Scheduling requirements, timelines, and commitment goals are available in the office of Community Development, and may be updated periodically. A 'fast track' review process is available to those plans that are determined by the Community Development Staff to be in compliance with the Town' s development standards at the pre application meeting. Contact the Community Development Department for scheduling. Meetings The Commission shall regularly meet on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at the time and location designated on the official meeting agenda. The Chairman may call special meetings of the Commission when deemed necessary. A notice and agenda of each meeting shall be posted in the official posting places of the Town at least 48 hours prior to any meeting of the Commission. All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public. The printed Record of Proceedings, prepared by the Recording Secretary and approved by vote of the Planning & Zoning Commission, shall constitute the only official record of Commission meetings. All records, including proceedings of meetings, applications for review, plans, reports and resolutions shall be maintained in the Community Development Department by the Recording Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Commission. In all instances theapplieent the applicant and/or applicant representative must be in attendance for the scheduled sketch design plan meeting, or the application will be tabled by the Commission to the next available meeting date. Notification of Action by Commission Within 10 working days following action of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commission's decision to approve, conditionally approve, deny approval or continue design review of a project, shall be forwarded to the applicant and his designated agent by first class mail, and posted in a conspicuous manner in the Community Development Department. The decision shall become final if no written appeal is made to the Town Council by any aggrieved person within 30 days following the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scope of Approval All approvals are site specific. Variations and changes, without Commission approval, are not allowed, except as otherwise provided in these regulations. Appeals Decisions of the Planning and Zoning Commission may be appealed to the Council by the applicant or any interested person or may be reviewed at the request of a majority of the Council at any time before the decision becomes final. An "interested person" is an adjacent property owner or a person entitled to have notice of the hearing mailed to him in association with the action of the Commission (Section 2.16.160 Town of Avon Municipal Code). A-deeisien--ef--the Planning and Zoning Commission may be appealed to the Town Council by the applicant or any aggrieved person or at the request of the Mayor at anytime before the decision becomes final. (within 10 days after a hearing). Not more than thirty 79 (30) days following the filing of an appeal, the Town Council shall review the action of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council shall, in writing, confirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Commission within thirty (30) days following the commencement of review. If it deems insufficient information is available to provide the basis for a sound decision, the Town Council may postpone final action for not more than thirty additional days. Failure of the Council to act within thirty additional days shall be deemed a granting of the approval, unless the applicant consents to a time extension. Any decision by the Town Council which results in disapproval of the Planning and Zoning Commission decision shall specifically describe the reasons for disapproval. Within five (5) working days following action of the Planning and Zoning Commission, notification of its decision shall be deposited in the United States mail to the applicant or his or her designated agent. The decision shall become final unless a written appeal or request for review by the Mayor is received by the Town Clerk within fifteen (15) days of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Not more than thirty (30) days following the filing of an appeal, the Town Council shall review the action of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council shall, in writing, confirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Commission within thirty (30) days following the commencement of review. If it deems insufficient information is available to provide the basis for a sound decision, the Town Council may postpone final action for not more than thirty (30) additional days. Failure of the council to act within thirty (30) additional days shall be deemed a granting of the appeal unless the applicant consents to a time extension. Any decision by the Town Council which results in disapproval of the Planning and Zoning shall specifically describe the reasons for disapproval. Any appeal must be presented to the Town Clerk at the Town office, and each appeal must be accompanied by a processing fee of fifty dollars ($50.00). (Ord. 92-12; Ord. 83-11; Ord. 04-07 (part)). Term of Design Approval Final design approval for a project, as prescribed by these regulations, shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of final approval unless a building permit for project construction is issued. If a building permit expires more than 2 years following final design approval, the final design approval also lapses and becomes void. The applicant may apply only once to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of a maximum extension of one (1) year for any final design approval. Sketch plan approvals may not be renewed, since they represent only conceptual plans that shall not be considered valid towardsÂ· a final design submittal beyond six (6) months from the date of approval. /74 g L-, 1 III:\R r o f Ille \\11.1 3 1 SKETCH DESIGN MON Sketch Plan Fee: $ COLORADO Applicant: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Owner of Property: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Pro,j ect Lot: Block: Subdivision: Project Street Address: Project Name: O Addition O Single Family O Duplex O Multi-Family O Commercial O Industrial O Other: Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft., height, materials, colors, unique features): Signatures I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town ofAvon in connection with this application as true and correct, that I (we) understand the Town ofAvon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates Applicant as indicated to act as owner's representative in all application submittals related to this project. Applicant: Owner: (Print Name): (Print Name): Date: I)ate: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 1 of 2 Project: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Proiect Plan Ket: O Conceptual Site plan O Conceptual Materials and areas of application O Topographical survey with signed RLS stamp O Two (2) - 24" x 36" plan sets (all areas over 40% slope shaded) - less than 3 yrs old O Seven (7) 11" x 17" plan sets - one week prior to meeting O Conceptual Building elevations (all elevations) Notes: *All drawings must be to scale and legible. *The applicant must (with no exception) be in attendance for the scheduled meeting. Reviewed by: o Complete o Incomplete Date: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 2 of 2 RketchrlaniltiilimmÂ£SalmiiimLEd4WÂ£~mculs HEART of the V.\1.1.11 FINAL DESIGN Design Review Fee: $ COLORADO - Applicant: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Owner of Property: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Proj ect Lot: Block: Subdivision: Project Street Address: Project Name: O Addition O Single Family O Duplex O Triplex O Other: Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft., heinht, materials, colors, unique features): Signatures We (I) represent that all information provided to the Town ofAvon in connection with this application as true and correct, that we (I) understand the Town ofAvon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates Applicant as indicated to act as owner's representative in all application submittals related to this project. Applicant: Owner: (Print Name): (Print Name): Date: Date: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page l of 3 Final Design Review: Minimiim_31*mittal_Reg#irements Project: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Pro,ject Plan Set: O Site plan O Three (3) - 24" x 36" plan sets O Topographical survey with signed RLS stamp O Colorboard 81/2"x 11" (all areas over 40% slope shaded) O Exterior lighting fixture cut sheets O Floor plans O Eighteen (18) 11" x 17" plan sets - one week prior O Building elevations (all elevations) to P&Z meetings O Landscape plan O Colored elevations - one week prior to P&Z meetings Mite De, elopment Plan: O North arrow & scale (1=10' or 20') O Existing utility lines, manholes, transformers,etc O Vicinty map with adjacent lots O Driveways, parking and turnarounds Cl Title block o Driveway grades (spot elevations) O Property lines w/bearings and distances O Streams, if applicable O Setback lines (labeled and dimensioned) O Riparian zone/wetlands, if applicable O Easements (labeled and dimensioned) O Fire hydrants (location on site or distance and O Adjacent rights-of-way direction from a known point) O Existing topography (dashed lines) O Culverts, ditches, detention, etc. extended through building O Utility service lines (general locations) O Proposed grading (solid lines) O Snow storage area (include sq. footage) O Limits of site disturbance O Walkways, stairs (dimensions) O Building footprint with roof plan and ridgeline O Building and area lighting, by type elevations and driplines (dimensioned to p.1.) O Fe, cing, retaining walls (including specific O On-site detention structures, if applicable ni terials & colors, T.O.W. & B.O.W. elevations) O Significant landforms/outcroppings O Trash enclosures O Existing structures O Wall sections (if retaining walls proposed) Nite Plan Summary Table: O Current zoning O Garage and surface parking spaces available O Number of dwelling units o Area and % of site > 40% slope O Floor area for each dwelling unit O Area and % ofbuilding lot coverage O Total floor area of all units O Area and % of site landscaped O Building height allowed and proposed O Area and % of paved surface O Off-street parking spaces required and proposed Building Ele, ations and Floor Plans: O Floor plans, dimensions and areas O Location of address(es) on building or site O Building elevations (labeled) O Location of exterior lighting fixtures, by type O Natural and finished grades for all elevations (numeric) O Materials and colors labeled on elevations O Numeric elevation of all roof ridgelines O Summary table ofspecific materials and colors O Utility meter locations Landscape Plan: O Location of plantings O On-site detention structures, if applicable O Location of existing shrubs and trees O Sprinkler system location and type O Limits of site disturbance O Plantings summary table O Location and type oferosion control measures O Existing vegetation, general O Irrigation Table O Rain Sensor Note Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 2 of3 1, D 1 11 k., lilli It O Snow storage O Refuse storage O Sanitation facilities O Construction trailer(s) O Limits of site disturbance O Project Signage O Construction materials storage O Contractor parking O Pollution Control Plan that conforms to O Appendix 5 - Stormwater Control Plan Appendix 4 ofthe Design Review Guidelines Note: A Stormwater Management permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment may be necessary for construction with disturbed areas greater than 1 acre. Contact the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment at http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/permitsunit/wqcdpmt.html or at (303) 692-3500. Note: All drawings must be in "Hardline" form. Reviewed by: o Complete o Incomplete Date: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 3 of3 '21% Excerpts from Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionarv Tenth Edition UNIFY: To make into a unit or a coherent whole; UNITE UNITE: la: To put together to form a single unit lb: To cause to adhere 3a: To become one as if one 4: To act in concert INTEGRATE/INTEGRATED: 2: To form, coordinate or blend into a functioning or unified whole 4a: To unite with something else 4b: To incorporate into a larger unit Excerpt from Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Duplex Developments Duplex developments must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. Two single-family residences "bridged" by a breezeway or other non-structural and non-habitable connection does not meet the intent of a duplex design. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms, and landscaping. While "mirror image" duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family home. Excerpts from Avon Municipal Code - Title 17 Zoning: 17.08.240 Dwelling, duplex: Duplex dwelling means a detached building containing two (2) dwelling units, designed for or used as a dwelling exclusively by two (2) families., each living as an independent housekeeping unit. COMMENTS Opportunitv Constraints Label old cabin on Nottingham Lake Preferred Alternative Where is the recreation?? Sports, fields, ice arenas, track, playgrounds Area 9 should not include confluence & Hurd Lane/Eaglebend Any consideration given to a pedestrian mall? A section o f town reserved for pedestrians w/0 autos. Mid-size boxes do not encourage "way-finding". Our core especially, and The Village at Avon too, do not need more mid (or big) box retail. Utilize our key natural resource - The River - as much as possible. This needs to reflect what we want in a perfect world, not just what we have. This means you need to tell us what all areas will be in comp plan not just priority areas. Do not put high density next to existing residential. Keep residential next to residential next to parks. Move low density residential on valley floor, school on valley floor. The Main Street idea sounds good the right mix o f uses (excluding any generic box-type retail that is un-unique) will bring "way finding". Strongly agree with keeping parcel 21 per approved PUD. This "Regional Commercial" cannot include box commercial meaning, allowing huge retail commercial sq. footage in one establishment. This should be defined as high density mixed use facilities of smallish storefronts (i.e. River Walk). Rec. Center is not park/O.S. Suggest more emphasis on highlighting and/or restoring historical sites within Avon. Preserve original Nottingham home sites. Soft trail along the entire Eagle River. The area between the confluence and the river should be developed parkland with the undergrowth removed. Strongly agree with strengthening overall pedestrian orientation. 1 i Categories for comp plan need to align sufficiently with zoning categories in order to assure uses prohibited by zoning. Don't creep in under comp plan (e.g. - no hotels in high density residential.) Preferred Alternative Cont. The Village at Avon should not reflect existing zoning but our desires for its future. Example, a usable sized school parcel (>2 acres) should be on the north village valley floor (away from RR, Eaglebend Dr., East Beaver Creek Blvd.) near ice rink, community center, park, etc. Agree CDK Village at Avon school site needs to be back on the valley floor (like it was in 1998) and should be near compatible uses (i.e. gov't. buildings, residential not commercial) (*and 10 acres to be wishful thinking) Preferred Alternative Sub-Area Planning Principles Sheet Prioritize in numerical order #16 & #20 - Existing zoning should not dictate. #8 - Also serviceable parking. #10 - Yes to lift access from Confluence. #21 - RMF- 1 can stay, but the school must be back on valley floor. #22 - Is NOT a school site, Community Park now; and it shouldn't be. #3 - Also, save the Homestead Barn (collapsing) riverside @ Red House. Thank you for recognizing the cultural/heritage elements. Transportation Issues Yes! Lift access from Avon. Bring parking, families, ski rentals, hotel, aprts-ski, etc. to us! Love the chondola - we're servicing non-skiing activities here?? Show a bridge/RR crossing accessing "Regional Commercial" at #ZZ (Parcel M) which is the best use for this Eagle Vail commercial like parcel. Monorail or fixed guide hub. Eaglebend/Hurd lane should not even rise to level of primary secondary or thru street access. NOTE: No frontage road access East to Parcel M. This federal open-space must be preserved. East Swift Gulch Road should not carve off a parcel that is un-usable as park (on Planning Area N in Village) this road needs to be visually appealing too as it is a gateway to Avon from I-70 views and travelers. I agree with below. Road should be as close to highway to allow max use of adjoining parcels which should not be bifurcated. 2 There should be a Pedestrian Bridge or underpass from Buffalo Park for school children and residents to access The Village core and valley floor school site. Transportation Issues Cont. Stonebridge Drive, Hurd Lane and Eagle Bend Drive are "quiet" residential service streets and should NOT be used to connect to Lindholm's potentially commercially dense Village at Avon. Even ifhe puts residential or mixed use on the valley floor, it should not be accessed from this existing low-density neighborhood. Eaglebend impact - Remember how we struggled to keep Lindholm from crossing the tracks? Remember why this is a maior proposal. Visitor Based A grid would be a very nice change from what currently feels like "tumors of development" i.e. shopping centers. This is an architectural comment more than a planning comment but instead of leveling the land for big boxes (Home Depot) we should encourage boxes stepping up and down our natural landscape (i,e. Italian hill towns, Greek hill towns) especially on the rolling stones ofgravel pit. Today the fact that we have hills and mountains is one of the only things that can help us maintain/create identity-unique for a reason - not unique for unique's sake. Build on the hills below Buffalo Ridge and I-70. Is the grid at all realistic? What in the past 20 years of planning was good that could be reinforced rather than abandoned for the next new trend? Framework Map Don't want a seasonal ugly structure to provide access to Beaver Creek Village - Bachelor's Gulch is bad enough. There must be a lift terminal at the confluence!!!! Agree CDK. Yes -the chondola is a good idea i f we can get Beaver Creek and Bachelor Gulch pedestrians/guests to our services (i.e. will Vail Resorts do chondolas all the way up?) The #1 item that will establish Avon as a truly desirable place to live, visit, shop, etc. is the connection to Beaver Creek. Buy parking lots - build urban buildings - consolidate parking into vertical lots. Don't be afraid to say URBAN. Its suburban office park, boat buildings floating in parking lot sees with flotsam - jetsam landscape islands that got us into this mess in 3 Avon core! Don't be afraid to end a strong axis on a building! (Parks are flat! !) Even a flag is a better axis termination than an alpine park. This is not road configuration. Change on all maps. Full Service Where is the school? 4 COMMENTS Opportunitv Constraints Label old cabin on Nottingham Lake Preferred Alternative Where is the recreation?? Sports, fields, ice arenas, track, playgrounds Area 9 should not include confluence & Hurd Lane/Eaglebend Any consideration given to a pedestrian mall? A section of town reserved for pedestrians w/O autos. Mid-size boxes do not encourage "way-finding". Our core especially, and The Village at Avon too, do not need more mid (or big) box retail. Utilize our key natural resource - The River - as much as possible. This needs to reflect what we want in a perfect world, not just what we have. This means you need to tell us what all areas will be in comp plan not just priority areas. Do not put high density next to existing residential. Keep residential next to residential next to parks. Move low density residential on valley floor, school on valley floor. The Main Street idea sounds good the right mix o f uses (excluding any generic box-type retail that is un-unique) will bring "way finding". Strongly agree with keeping parcel 21 per approved PUD. This "Regional Commercial" cannot include box commercial meaning, allowing huge retail commercial sq. footage in one establishment. This should be defined as high density mixed use facilities of smallish storefronts (i.e. River Walk). Rec. Center is not park/O.S. Suggest more emphasis on highlighting and/or restoring historical sites within Avon. Preserve original Nottingham home sites. Soft trail along the entire Eagle River. The area between the confluence and the river should be developed parkland with the undergrowth removed. Strongly agree with strengthening overall pedestrian orientation. 1 1 4 Categories for comp plan need to align sufficiently with zoning categories in order to assure uses prohibited by zoning. Don't creep in under comp plan (e.g. - no hotels in high density residential.) Preferred Alternative Cont. The Village at Avon should not reflect existing zoning but our desires for its future. Example, a usable sized school parcel (>2 acres) should be on the north village valley floor (away from RR, Eaglebend Dr., East Beaver Creek Blvd.) near ice rink, community center, park, etc. Agree CDK Village at Avon school site needs to be back on the valley floor (like it was in 1998) and should be near compatible uses (i.e. gov't. buildings, residential not commercial) (*and 10 acres to be wishful thinking) Preferred Alternative Sub-Area Planning Principles Sheet Prioritize in numerical order #16 & #20 - Existing zoning should not dictate. #8 - Also serviceable parking. #10 - Yes to lift access from Confluence. #21 - RMF-1 can stay, but the school must be back on valley floor. #22 - Is NOT a school site, Community Park now; and it shoutdn't be. #3 - Also, save the Homestead Barn (collapsing) riverside @ Red House. Thank you for recognizing the cultural/heritage elements. Transportation Issues Yes! Lift access from Avon. Bring parking, families, ski rentals, hotel, apres-ski, etc. to us! Love the chondola - we're servicing non-skiing activities here?? Show a bridge/RR crossing accessing "Regional Commercial" at #ZZ (Parcel M) which is the best use for this Eagle Vail commercial like parcel. Monorail or fixed guide hub. Eaglebend/Hurd lane should not even rise to level of primary secondary or thru street access. NOTE: No frontage road access East to Parcel M. This federal open-space must be preserved. East Swift Gulch Road should not carve off a parcel that is un-usable as park (on Planning Area N in Village) this road needs to be visually appealing too as it is a gateway to Avon from I-70 views and travelers. I agree with below. Road should be as close to highway to allow max use o f adjoining parcels which should not be bifurcated. 2 There should be a Pedestrian Bridge or underpass from Buffalo Park for school children and residents to access The Village core and valley floor school site. Transportation Issues Cont. Stonebridge Drive, Hurd Lane and Eagle Bend Drive are "quiet" residential service streets and should NOT be used to connect to Lindholm's potentially commercially dense Village at Avon. Even i f he puts residential or mixed use on the valley floor, it should not be accessed from this existing low-density neighborhood. Eaglebend impact - Remember how we struggled to keep Lindholm from crossing the tracks? Remember why this is a maior proposal:. Visitor Based A grid would be a very nice change from what currently feels like "tumors of development" i.e. shopping centers. This is an architectural comment more than a planning comment but instead o f leveling the land for big boxes (Home Depot) we should encourage boxes stepping up and down our natural landscape (i.e. Italian hill towns, Greek hill towns) especially on the rolling stones of gravel pit. Today the fact that we have hills and mountains is one of the only things that can help us maintain/create identity-unique for a reason - not unique for unique's sake. Build on the hills below Buffalo Ridge and I-70. Is the grid at all realistic? What in the past 20 years of planning was good that could be reinforced rather than abandoned for the next new trend? Framework Map Don't want a seasonal ugly structure to provide access to Beaver Creek Village - Bachelor's Gulch is bad enough. There must be a lift terminal at the confluence! 11! Agree CDK. Yes -the chondola is a good idea i f we can get Beaver Creek and Bachelor Gulch pedestrians/guests to our services (i.e. will Vail Resorts do chondolas all the way up?) The #1 item that will establish Avon as a truly desirable place to live, visit, shop, etc. is the connection to Beaver Creek. Buy parking lots - build urban buildings - consolidate parking into vertical lots. Don't be afraid to say URBAN. Its suburban office park, boat buildings floating in parking lot sees with flotsam -jetsam landscape islands that got us into this mess in 3 Avon core! Don't be afraid to end a strong axis on a building! (Parks are fiat! !) Even a flag is a better axis termination than an alpine park. This is not road configuration. Change on all maps. Full Service Where is the school? 4 r Preferred Alternati iub-Area Planning Principles â€¢ Develop as intense mixed-use that provides a strong bed base with a mix of primarily guest serving 13 Town Center: commercial uses â€¢ Develop a Main Street in the existing pedestrian mall right-of-way (per Town Center plan) â€¢ Strengthen the overall pedestrian-orientation â€¢ Develop and incorporate a new/expanded transit center â€¢ Develop additional private/public structured parking facilities â€¢ Create public gathering spaces â€¢ Strengthen pedestrian connections to East Avon â€¢ Create strong pedestrian and auto connection to the Confluence site â€¢ Develop as mixed-use development consisting primarily ofbed-base development with supporting #9 Riverfront commercial development (Confluence) . Develop a lift facility to Beaver Creek and/or Bachelor Gulch â€¢ Create strong pedestrian connections to the Town Center and transit center â€¢ Create an auto connection to Town Center via an at-grade crossing on the western edge and links to Hwy. 6 via a new bridge â€¢ Create linkages from Avon's core areas to the Eagle River â€¢ Anticipate potential transit facilities within the railroad ROW. â€¢ Develop as mixed-use development consisting primarily of commercial development with supporting bed- #14 East Avon base â€¢ Reconfigure specific parcels to create a functional modified street grid pattern that functionally extends Main Street across Avon Road and create view corridors to anchor retail stores â€¢ Redevelop older, underutilized buildings adjacent to Avon Road into mixed-use buildings that are compatible in scale to existing develop on the west side o f Avon Road â€¢ Accommodate anchor retailers, but do not create isolated boxes surrounded by large expanses of parking. Ensure individual buildings and their uses are integrated into a larger, unifying framework. â€¢ Develop public/private structured parking facilities â€¢ Create public gathering places â€¢ Strengthen pedestrian environment while ensuring convenient auto access to commercial businesses â€¢ Create strong auto and pedestrian connections to the Village at Avon via both East Beaver Creek Boulevard and Chapel Place â€¢ Create a pedestrian bridge over Avon Road to link the Avon core's east and west halves #2 Avon Road â€¢ Use build-to lines and other means to create visual intercepts for those traveling along Avon Road and view corridors into Avon's east and west core areas. â€¢ Limit building heights fronting Avon Road to existing heights to avoid a canyon effect and to preserve Beaver Creek views. â€¢ Create public gathering spaces â€¢ Develop per approved Village at Avon PUD as mixed-use village center development with strong #16 Village at Avon residential/accommodation component to increase bed-base (east STOLport): â€¢ Create a seamless transition (compatible building orientation, scale, massing, sitting, etc.) with existing Avon core development - Chapel Square and City Market â€¢ Create a strong auto and pedestrian connections to existing Avon town core â€¢ Create a strong pedestrian environment #20 Village at Avon â€¢ Develop per approved Village at Avon PUD as a mix of medium/high density residential neighborhoods (west STOLport) with regional commercial and services associated with the interstate interchange â€¢ Accommodate limited/accessory residential development that supports principle industrial/employment #4 Metcalf Road land uses â€¢ Strengthen as the cultural and recreational center of the community to in part act as Main Street's western #8 Nottingham Park anchor and Municipal â€¢ Develop cultural/recreation amenities such as an amphitheater, concession stands, etc. to activate the park Center beyond the normal level of passive recreational activities â€¢ Enhance the Hwy. 6 right-of-way as a landscaped boulevard/parkway to provide a sense of arrival and #10 U.S. Hwy 6 departure for those traveling to and from Avon and to strengthen Avon's overall community image and identity. â€¢ Limit development of south side of Hwy. 6 to guest service facilities near the Village Road intersection and to neighborhood supporting commercial near the Prater Lane intersection â€¢ Strengthen association between Avon and Beaver Creek through compatible streetscape elements, efficient access and cooperative visitor information center â€¢ Explore potential to annex VA employ housing (River's Edge) #21 Village at Avon â€¢ Develop per approved Village at Avon PUD as medium/high density residential, a community park, and a (north of 1-70) school site â€¢ Develop per approved Village at Avon PUD as regional commercial medium/high density residential, a #22 Village at Avon community park, and a school site (Tract M) â€¢ Identify and preserve significant cultural/heritage resources present on site. #3 US 6/24 & Town â€¢ Develop a pedestrian connection using the railroad ROW linking the Confluence site and East Avon. Gateway â€¢ Preserve 'Red House' as cultural/heritage amenity. ~ Economic & Planning Systems f Visitor Based Alternative Land Use Planning Principles Avon is a destination resort offering outstanding yet comparably agordable accommodations and amenities that draw visitors to Avon in both winter and summer. â€¢ Strong pedestrian-orientation #13 Town Center: â€¢ Develop intense mixed use commercial development â€¢ Strong pedestrian and auto connections to east Avon, use railroad R.O.W for east/west link â€¢ Strong pedestrian and auto connections Confluence site â€¢ Create Main Street â€¢ Develop public structured parking â€¢ Expand and improve Transit Center â€¢ Create public gathering spaces â€¢ Develop intense Mixed Use commercial development #9 Riverfront â€¢ Build lift to Tames/Bachelor Gulch (Confluence) â€¢ Create strong pedestrian connection to Town Center and transit center â€¢ Integrate potential tie to new transit on existing railroad R.O.W. â€¢ Build new bridge connection to Hwy 6 â€¢ Develop public river access â€¢ Demolish and redevelop older existing buildings to create extension of Town #14 East Avon Center's Main Street across Avon Road â€¢ Reconfigure parcel boundaries to establish new modified street grid. â€¢ Strong pedestrian-orientation â€¢ Increase density and provide mix of residential and accommodation (hotel, timeshare, etc.) units â€¢ Develop public structured parking â€¢ Create public gathering spaces â€¢ Develop strong pedestrian and auto connections to the Village at Avon â€¢ Re-engineer to facilitate better east/west auto and pedestrian connectivity #2 Avon Road â€¢ Ped. Bridge over Avon Road â€¢ Use build-to lines and other means to create visual intercepts and view corridors that draw attention into Avon' s east and west core areas â€¢ Create public gathering spaces â€¢ Mixed-use with strong residential/accommodation component to increase bed- #16 Village at Avon base (east STOLport): â€¢ Strong connection to existing Avon town core â€¢ Walkable pedestrian environment #20 Village at Avon â€¢ Medium density residential development (west STOLport) â€¢ Limited regional commercial at interstate interchange â€¢ Gradual change to all residential #4 Metcalf Road â€¢ Neighborhood commercial at intersection #8 Nottingham â€¢ Develop cultural/recreation amenities in park such as an amphitheater, concession Park and stands, etc. Municipal â€¢ Redevelop municipal buildings to include other commercial/residential uses Center â€¢ Redevelop U.S. 6 as a landscaped Blvd. #10 U.S. Hwy 6 â€¢ Limited development of south side of Hwy. 6 #21 Village at Avon â€¢ Leave per PUD plan (north of 1-70) â€¢ Provide recreational amenities to Buffalo Ridge #22 Village at Avon â€¢ Medium to High Density Residential. (Tract M) â€¢ Pedestrian connection (RR crossing) to East Avon. #3 US 6/24 & Town â€¢ Pedestrian connection to Confluence site (via RR ROW). Gateway â€¢ Preserve the 'Red House' as cultural/heritage amenity. ~ Economic & Planning Systems Full Service Based Alternative Land Use Planning Principles Avon is a full service regional center meeting the daily needs of the Valley'sfull time residents and its visitors. â€¢ Develop safe pedestrian walkways #13 Town Center: â€¢ Develop mixed use commercial development â€¢ Create Main Street â€¢ Create convenient auto access to east Avon â€¢ Expand and improve Transit Center â€¢ Develop high density residential development with supporting commercial #9 Riverfront â€¢ Connect to remaining Avon core areas via a transit loop (Confluence) â€¢ Integrate potential tie to new transit on existing railroad R.O.W. â€¢ Develop public river access â€¢ Develop regional commercial retail shopping center #14 East Avon â€¢ Redevelop select existing buildings to increase their utilization of existing parcels â€¢ Improve road alignments to crate view corridors to retail anchors â€¢ Enhance convenient auto access to commercial businesses while providing safe pedestrian walkways â€¢ Develop auto connection to the Village at Avon via Beaver Creek Boulvard #2 Avon Road â€¢ Use build-to lines and other means to create visual intercepts and view corridors that draw attention into Avon's east and west core areas â€¢ Mixed-use with strong commercial component and limited residential #16 Village at Avon â€¢ Connected to existing Avon town core via Beaver Creek Blvd. (east STOLport): â€¢ Regional commercial and services associated with interstate interchange #20 Village at Avon (west STOLport) â€¢ Low density residential development to the east of regional commercial development â€¢ Keep employment generating uses #4 Metcalf Road â€¢ Intensification of uses to include commercial uses at intersection #8 Nottingham Park and â€¢ General enhancement ofpark's recreational amenities Municipal Center #10 U.S. Hwy 6 â€¢ Limited commercial development on south side of Hwy. 6 â€¢ Commercial with limited housing. #21 Village at Avon â€¢ Move school site to STOLport (north of 1-70) â€¢ New northern frontage road #22 Village at Avon â€¢ Regional Commercial, warehouse industrial uses and other employment (Tract M) generating uses. #3 US 6/24 & Town â€¢ Redevelop ' Red House' site with convenience commercial.. Gateway ~ Economic & Planning Systems TOWN OF AVON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Recent Transportation Improvements and Their Impacts: 1. The opening ofthe I-70/Post Boulevard interchange including the Post Boulevard link to US 6, and 2. The opening of the I-70/US 6 half-diamond interchange The new access opportunities for the east end of Town and Eagle-Vail have begun a redistribution of internal and external vehicle trip patterns. The extent to which trip volumes on Avon Road and East & West Beaver Creek Boulevard have changed will be better quantified when the Town's annual summer traffic counts are compiled in mid July. Volumes on Avon Road in 2003 were down 10 to 15% from the 2002 counts even while volume on W. Beaver Creek Boulevard east and west of Avon Road during the same period appears to have leveled off. If this trend were to continue when the 2004 data is in, it the Town may wish to re-examine the travel demand for Avon Road and perhaps Beaver Creek Boulevard, to determine whether or not it would be possible to reduce their design capacity and what i f any benefits would result. A second key variable in the transportation future is the disposition of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. I f sometime in the future it becomes possible that the tracks were reduced to a crossing that deserved the attention and formality not unlike the numerous light rail crossing situations in and around downtown Denver, this would greatly increase opportunities for improved mobility throughout Avon. All modes (car, bike, pedestrian and transit) would reap considerable benefits i f this condition could be realized. Evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan's Two Alternative Land Use Plans The Full Service Alternative This Alternative features a compact Town Center and maintains a degree of regional commercial along with neighborhood commercial in the Town core. A significant portion of this growth in regional commercial is anticipated to shift to the Post interchange area. The easterly extension of Swift Gulch Road to the new interchange is the main roadway improvement of this plan. Assuming the Post Boulevard intersection is at least 600 feet north ofthe existing 1-70 WB ramp intersection, this would accommodate regional commercial pad development on the north side of the interchange. Achieving this future scenario would not require much more in transportation improvements that what is already planned. This alternative responds to the present Avon theme o f strong east-west travel and limited north-south travel opportunities. The Visitor-Based Alternative This alternative recasts the Town Core into a pedestrian-friendly street grid that provides strong links to the Confluence site and Hurd Lane neighborhood commercial area on the south side of the railroad tracks. Bachelor Gulch and Beaver Creek villages would be linked to the Avon core by an aerial conveyance that ties in with the new Tarnes lift terminus. Possibly, the mountain ski lifts would be selectively modified to function as a chondola similar to that used in Mountain Village (outside Telluride), to provide a four-passenger gondola cabin every 1 08 grip for pedestrian transport. Regional commercial uses are concentrated at the south side of the Post interchange area. The Swift Gulch Road extension would primarily benefit residents living on the north side of I-70. Hence, the intersection with Post Boulevard could occur where dictated by topography more so than commercial pad development. To achieve this plan, Avon Road would function less as an important link between two state highway facilities and more like a spine feeding access lanes and pedestrian ways on either side. The degree to which this is possible will depend on how much through traffic load is being shifted to the two new I-70 connections described above and, how much residual capacity needs to be preserved for infill development in the Core. To effectively tie-in areas south of the railroad tracks to a new pedestrian friendly Avon Core village will mean a considerable change in the way the railroad corridor currently exists and operates. At the least, the Town should have a clear vision for this scenario should the opportunity arise. ~ TDA Colorado,inc./ .le"/1....a iwigALÂ¥9 . . 4 Â·. - -8:mâ€¢-7,12,r . 11 . ... . .. 017 t lINE.kele'lfeet : I Iii , M Â£â‚¬ 44 - I. .* '9*42 11 +-r,-,40.- 4 m 4~ â‚¬ 4 1 j- 11 4 . I I / 1 16 11- - :Al :.4.6 - . I ... -r ,. Â· Â·4, 34 Â· . .,ill;li;. ' I :' Il . .. . 0 1 0. Nb Â· . Ir: . . . 1 . 1.0 $ #t . 4 + ~t ;Â«~' '~iÂ· . .. + 4 I , ... + .4 . . *14 + 1 I . . $ I . .. 1 . . .- i + : 44,0 1...1, 1 4 fÂ· .5 4 i:ill + J 1, . .. . - 1. 7 , Mer mi , ' 'a..a.ar * .., *k. 1.0 .. . . . I I . . .4 49. 0 1 + i -. . 1 . . ..... - C Â¢0 1-- . 4 + - 4,4..L .. L - =t -- 2 111" fil'Â¢I~|~~ '.641""4&,LA'J'~t,' .... 2 4,0 . #â„¢*9111 'Ail# - U 0, 4 - h ls@*038 I ./Â·Â·~ #2#Qffi~:..... :.mil :11,11 : 11 ..... I , i It ..40, . :1 + 1 j . * . .2 Â¥ . . 'i . . *'*41: ,/ 40.* 44& 1-0 1 . - /0 ky.Â¥ S- 0 4.i. .. 7- 7 1 :1 4 4, #f,Â«2.E + 1 Â·''t ... ' -4. . 9 . I I Â»L = U k - 4 . i i -~~je*A.4.%4 82 , 41 1, 1 - 1 ,4.i . , -L. -F . W G 11 I ; . Â¥ 1 - . . . 24/444$ f#-; 03.4/ .Â·Â·~Â·4~4;,~t.:t : -Â· 74 24* 'tr~ .. *. 1.1 i. "'inii.3 ' <9<1.--eÂ·~~t~.Â·.* 11. % $3- 4 1% 19#1 . ... 0 Fr.*.-196 â€¢Cd- .tfi .. 1.k-44 o .- e - 2 1+1.-h I .1 -4 .*+ , Ift,b 1 Ul 4 - 1 1/ I 111 21 1 -4 T.- - 1~4/// --0 Â·Â· rf, 1 1 I. 1. I . 1. " 1..... 4 *1 -11 1 - It.Â· - 1 4- 1 & i 8~; . 0*:Me t WEE . *S? 4.1-ifi. 'MA & 719 & . - 4 .4 . 7.Xâ€¢ Â· 70'jf 1 f:9 ...f -64 + A 2 .41 .D; :4(t. 0%.... .- I. I : :4,3... 444 1 .i-----'ll- '& ' t*& I i. I - I -/UR.- . 11 111 .... ~(4 RT . 'Sp . - + .1.-1 *'34 /0 4 - Â£1--1 4 . ...24 m ::% ... :.1 1 11 I . >*. .1: *; ... I % 1/ t . -i- â€¢â€¢ L. I. .. 0.: L...Â¥ /1/ 1- ....... . 1 r. 1 1-r I .4 . ..r I 1 -4. .9,"m"-WW *. 1 $ 1'. 9 .. -. 4. '81*". I .+ A. Â· . 4 , 1,1 IL. A . I . 2 1.1 1/1 41. Ul i ....1,62 Â· -:=1/ I 4, 1.. h.- 1 .aw# ./.01948.2 .: I 0 9} 4 -1 : . ... 1 6:.4/.: + I . - 1 - 1 ....<--: ..4 - ...5 .. 4 ..1 al. 1 4&-41:11'r.. -+ ..4 e. ..' **f*1*r-Â·~ I . ' A 1 MÂ£2 I -........ 9. . . tri: I =- . 1 + :* 4 + fll'IN? I + ...t:'Â·â€¢iÂ·.E /- ... 1 ..1 1 1 . 4 .. 1 1 6 + .. ' . r ./ f q .1 - $&. . 1 4/EL . + r..t - g 1 ..D I 1,1 1- 0 : 41 4 1~1 I ...r , I. 1/ , e.: A + - 1 . t. 40Â£.. ake, 1.: 44: .#:h *' *e .4. tallip' I. 4,1/* .ti - $... â‚¬77*F Â· a~*TE ;41'11' 15Er.,Â· 11-,0 :* 2.u!uu - '9.//, I 1. *//I - ... - 1 74â€¢ --'r - 2- = 1 ~.ill'IP' * -.61~~P'. ++ . - . I . b I l 4 22* ' f I , 4 . 241 1, -* .. -- . .$ Â· 4 : Â·Â·w- 1,1 2 ..Â¢ 4.- I * - 4: ./ IF 1 7 1. + 7 I .1 ' , 4 1 :12,2 4 e I . 1.1.. I <0 . . . . ..: Ill. . . .+ IM. I Â£ i 41'kt /~i P . , t 4. Â· r: + E~t..7 f .4. + 41 1- :, I . . I. b + *Allimb 1: r *. 9/2/6.. 1 '. P .. . 1 ' , . + I .+ 1 I . 4 . : . 1 , . 1. *0 ..1â€ž.0 , 1 ... 4. 1--t"I.. : ivâ€¢.. 4.8 9' - â€¢ . -71Â·4 -Mlilllig 3 ' At. 0 % * $ + I 1. e ...':. I . .9-9 â€¢ ... Â·Â· c.: I. :- D . . Â¥, 1 6 I r I. - * . 1 +4 . .. 1.64< 1-/3 ./ I * 9.. maÂ¢ 11 + f .. 4 5 . 1 .. :.4 $ 1 . e I. 1 . . : 4 , :n . . ... . 1 4 .1 I. .... . . 1 . 0 . I. 4. i'l 4 . I. I -1 ; + h I ... . I 4. I .EL-1./9 .. . I " I.....==., . . 4 ,/ ....9./.Immel t,=.0 0 . 4 I # :.. 4Ki,.; .. . * ~41 . 9: ~* *~ 1~ + - , I. - Â· - - M. 4 2 0 & .9 .4 -- . 4 . 4 y.... .1 - . .. . ... 1 I . . . U +. 11 1 + ..... 1 .4 .:1. 1 .,b. I i $ 15 .4 , . 4 4 ./ . . .. -7 ..... f ./ ../ â€¢ 4 . t . 46 -. 1 6:,illixille:: I *:~ ... I /1, i : :licilimit.: /illillj,2. 1.. . .. . . 4,12/gr 6/"Illip# . 1 '1 7. 0 +A' 1 4 â€¢ : f r f . 9 1 4.6-41,1."Il.: -I/:'' . . ' . 1 r . ... A 2.1'll",plf..t.41""/. t.zillib#a#j'llailid.Lit.11*ir 34 L 1.1 K/ Olan... ..... It. /4.... I . *41 2.2 1 0 0 - 4, - + j=!1~4*0*: 2..~~~.'.7.4" 91*4/~R,~//Z Z 4: 4 1 +4 â€¢r,* F. '. * . * **~af?.g~ :. $ * 3141&41:*I* . 122. .' :f 7* .. i. 1 lili 4:: t 4 . S , . .1 . t.j 94.Qi I 1 0 3 : ** . 1 1.4 . r *141 4 I . 9 . . .:61 + . .. * *9 i * I 1 1 01 441 : ;41 " 9 : 1 U 4 1 60 94 1 4 . I ' 1 I ---K L , :Â· + r 1 . - . fu + t d + " . & p. 1- 9 - I % I. N 5 1/ I . .1 I .* 4/,Ab : *-4 .. I.,/IF. I *1.4.4 0,1. I * '*4*09425* ; .:9 * , 3 + i. ** .. +. I -li di -I. 4. 0 19 21'.4 . . I / 4. " p. 4-Il V #.0/44[ i w : i.. 9 0.'4 I , 'F . Â·K 1... I'ly * Iii */961., CZ : . 0 - + m + GJ i. .4 1/killillibili O.. 4 4 02, I p t : 4, ' I I. 9./ 1 . .0.*.ae + + .2: I/~i/'U .. . 4 + ... + + . 2 0. 4. . 4 , m. . . P ./ 3 .?. 4 ./ 4 ./,9 . e 0 0 4 I , 8. I 1 + *g y ~*~2 4 At 4 . I I + .Â· . 1 I &â‚¬ 4 + Â¥ Â·1~2* 1 1.Fl . . .. 1 . .4 . 1 Gill*,1~ . r.eli .9 .... V .1 . 1.. 1 â€¢ Â·n .. . 4, . + i ,#te:; d iL 4/he i 4 ..1 ,-4 . . . + I . :. 6 9% 4 -- . . #081 . 1-1. 111 11, 8 2 4. ... I ..4...e. e I . . r . - 1 + i + Â· I & 4 *445 G..in. I ... 01. 94- 1 ... r.â€¢., r r~ . .r .- #2* <**** 49 Â¥ 49,1...?r-1,2~Emi ./ I. 75 9,~81 . ... F V. I I ..'"I 79 :2 O 0 :3 *AA' Lm U 7 # ./ + :2 {,r * 20 1 + r. a I /7' .7 .. t- .....'- a. . 191 ;1 g. .. FÂ«+ . - 1.1 28 Â¥~' Â®. 2 '1 . 61% & 1 1. .4 $ . L. I - t. . $ I Â· + P 1 1 1- - + . e Â£ C .6, fo 2. - 4 m a W ' U) it U 44. = CC tn **E e . 1 *. t: . *1! 0 0 .O 5 2.2, 4. 4 C 3 /1, 1. 80 e I 1. - 0 .... 0... I b ,Â£2. 10 5 I - 4,. 9#5 1 ... 0 6 + 7. 1 I. . I . . C + 3 {g I jr .9 . li . 9. - 1.. . 4)051 + 1 2 -4 . - 0 0 .. Â£ d . 4.* + ..,Â¥: + E.b - 0, 4. .- L.A. W I . th Â£ C W ti 4., . .4 . ep . * Â·C ~M . 4 /0 . + *A 4 .:81 . . ' Â·#A r. . 4,0, a 1 . :C . 1 0 .. , I I . I . ..9 - C ..7.4 *.1 t..il .a .0 ... 4 r .. . 0 *14.0 1 6 6.1 .,. 9 1- . ."!1/ *jM - ... .. .1 Â£ 4 4 . .+ u....al */i . . 4- .. Â¢0 k + 0 41*.14 â€¢1 4 4 6' 1% 4.1 . 1â€¢ I I . .. 4,4. 1 - .. Â¥ 1.7 , I I . + + I .. ..2 + - ....4.' 1 t + ./ 1â€¢â€¢ 92: I..r- S'Z""- Ila 'll'll/ ... . I I .. . Â· .ti. 1 t, ., 1: - 4 .1 - ..,41 + - . I I . Â·* it ls@MOOS oletaile cteristic *. F 31*,r-: .rful'llig:-1/'ll"5& *7#1// , 44Â¢ I.~---1:a,~. 5Gi:if " -1:Â· * te ISF I . 1 US...... inv Â·. â€¢,r.Â· ..... i 3 r 4 'Cli + ; *IE 4 4 e b / , -\ rui~ ' *N . C/J 3,>. I Itt U 7 4% 4 0 a Â£ 9 0 44 4 t *I U :.:i-111.4 51) 3.12 1 2. # A b .1 1.1 1 + b22 U 1. I lill' s# 3, 8444/' 94#0 ..13. .4 44 0/... * . 1 6 112 +4 .. .0...1 14 1 i 0 ..: 'FHA,,44 P.4.-0166,0 - f 4! 3 2 it@'h w L.- f.Â¥* 1 + I A.1 1?Â· 0 4 ~ + ~ A-D 31 NSI 01 %3 f *im W 11 , 20 = + t . ..2- 91 6 01 B C E 1 0. e. 0.. A.. . I . 9 4% &(*71 --&*20 - '6.t -+ 0. r. I .0 *FRI -.r ..0 ljÂ¢Câ‚¬ \ iwi I . - 1. 2 @fama 1-61 W 4 0 + ...1 - 1% u & 1,a &4<38*10 :p. 4 3 13=lk,eyw /g ~ . I - 1---'. 4.02 . . 46. . ..4 .1 i Nav, RAMMAA// .. + â€¢1 ;. '122,1 fl.-Â· 839. mal#+I, 7 1 1 1. . : 20 1 ..1--Ar1 .. . 4 1 1 44 + .:.itil 4 4 .1- . $ : ..4 -7 + . 11*42:-1 1. ' 2 54.: 4. . 1 '=l . t... . e:/ . /3*Â·f -Â·/ :Pe....~ ' 6, . -9â€¢r . . ,2 + . . =,Z== ... I. ha . : -/ / 21 *62 I . .2-11.1 1 - [~ 1,1 -4 / 4-; 1 .Tril. 71??h .1 74,Â·,~~, HUMN-rr-~ri- 7--- -7-,Tâ€¢rr- . '-r r 11 '1=.11 1 1 1,41 "0" 11 11,49 - "*IE, â€¢4 41 Jil- ../6 1 ..1 1 1 16$ 72,9 + 4 21 1 . E E 2/Ef Â£â‚¬9 - ...: ..2 1 %2 1,1 m L b 2 c 6 1+ a. al.. l3e fi 2 41 1% 41 # Â· 13Â¢Ek 1 . 1 \\L / I ** I. * 'r 0 t. .S 2Â¢UC & R 4 m 23 0 0 1 ~ 111 UD 9, m - U 50 009 R 4 - 2 20 LU In 1~ 2 \ # PC) 2~ f > LU LU .*I 1 .7*0 Al f mo- ti 201 1 . e k T v 2 2 0 4 +0 4,0..4 4. . 7. . . + 1. . I . + t . I $ . th + Â· ./,T 4, C 6- J. ac m e .. , e 0 2.6. Un + r:*:4 Â·w >4 0 0. * I . " 14. r m U i Â· 14 ... .. - $ 4 0 + + L . - I .G + i .. .m. 4 - 4. -1 I . >t44â€¢ 0. I /4/ + & 5.36 - IM . w + , . ....r. U) d .. . . . .. .1 .=,le. S.'*.~ + + -:+ 1. 2. . Ev 00 + 4 + I *. : I. f 41.. . 4 + . . I 4/ . 54/ A fÂ·* ' 1: $. . I + +1 1 + ..Air . G.' ** + : Nr:' L : ;.4 4 4 .. 4 -15 . . ..... c m>. . 04 4 AF... 4. : Ilimill""/* 2 22 - + I . /8-.P .. 9.,G. + : 3 2 *14. + ,Â· 2.044.All,604: j . .. t. aollt 0 - 001WIN tn - VNVNÂ¥8 - 1 74/I.#M,<WIP.*9 2 53"'lliol 'Rry/"14- :fÂ· i ' â€ž} *. u : --1. + ;E.y#. . .1 m .6 Â· ~2 019(*41~4: * IiÂ· . 1 : 4,6.03 :-4 .2 . -41- 41#11~ + + 44 j-12- ... 1 .. 8 . $ 5.t 4114 ,-14.1 1-4 . 4 1 1 1 r ta .,1 - it .*7. 1 1 4 7 -le .lig.le.9- 4 ...6.,-51.1. I + ,- .41. -- -+ 11: . :16... D.% C- -Â» . * 6 1 = r I 4 ~. "~ A,-re ~6 1,#,S. 4.lit li t 1.1. F - ./ r.... . 11 - + Â· * .44. 11 ~ .-7 6 I. 7.1 nre~. Aix;*.All 2 0 14 41,1. Afl 1. 4 3 4 ... .AU..4 H , 21 51~Â· '~ .... 2 < fl~*~ - -- . a 7â€¢ ~ 1:f thip,~a,t- $ . + Â· + .0 '11//ta1r#. . 4 4'.4- -- 0. 11 9,1.1. . :Sd 41#16 + *' ... J . . 1.. .411 N Â£1 11 1 It - -LK 1 ///.#-'.'-I./ I 1. .. 19 1 - 10* 'i ,1*7 + . 4 6 , .il I . i '~ i.2.te-, -f.. *4-li):i 3 UR.,22 . 9 . 4% I 1 11Â¥ 1 + 4 - - * - t P - .....1.-'. .1 I . #fle.5....Irmr . fili . .g. + 2,1., 9... - . .,1 4'' . 4 Â· . 9 1 1- 1 4 . 9- Wi T.. -246 1 ~:- . 4 Â· Â·' t: i:)./4< , * . : 0 . 4 %. . .1 . 1 9 .:. d . . :*: r ~ Â·.f .. 4 Ni 4 : t.: e .4. I ... 4 : A I ....t 1 1 . 4 I Â¢ Â· 4 i f p 1, f. ../ . f . /4 I . I . + IM -* I 04.1 + + I + . -4 . e . 2 80 . 41 . . . I ....1 . . .. . .1 I. 4 I , 1 /,1 I . 4. , ..46.2 $ 4,4 : *Â· I i,4 . . I I " ,7 .r. 4 .Â¥. :. . 1. . ': . AC ---* 4/" .. . 4 I I . 1, ' Â·1 * 2 *â€¢ 4 : . ./. I * I. ..r. I 4 1. 4, 1 - I j:Hillial6964'~li % 4 *. x.Â·.:re . .: ,:lib . 4 . . :4. 1 .. . $4*~** ik ~Â· *aÂ· . .9 2%. 43 .1,!. + - + + .2*1:* .... :44: 1 Eft Ft, 1 ..k--*la- I . -% Â·Â· Â·-. I .:Rf/4/1/lit.*Â·1 + 4 . ... 4 - .. .4 2. rys ... Â· d 4% 17 5, 4,0. 22 e 26 - + 1. I + .....:Ill~. ; 'Al; 4 + 4, I P Â· -- 21.110./A-j ...1- '462* , 1)*/ Aduw.,/61}.1 Â· i *:12'IMI" I . te=.:m le:./ 1.1=2136 07: f . â€¢--11/71//:*/FR#, Ji~ ..... 1 Avon's Plan bjective ~11 1'f /4-7 .1 2 Â· :Tai#'l.ti/.6/"ini' 94/1- .t.... AW'll<*141 4 â€¢a~ C:e f t.:,~-..:** *:: - - .41-37*. . 1.. pr: -9 k+ I - 4,2 .. .te- 0 - 4.4 12, ..A 5&- ..1. c . :74*N Â· :Â· '4*9Â£22Â· 4 .. .=. I - /1 , + I 4... 9 - 4%. . 4 +. & . u It te.4 1 .....4 7 0 . *A'. 11321/ Aur- - L % + e--4 -'.:'11*-Ii . I 1'. 1-2.-- -:1. 1 + i â‚¬-1 p + 1 11'llt////1/'Lk'*1 6 14 .t,L . ... ~....L . Â·-mil#m- JAI .d~ -r 5. 4 â€¢ :â€¢ 4 - â€¢+ 1-- -3-iF*94. Il.rs i k . i~*fs. -' .: ... aâ€¢rilt:Al 11 e . - IZE,-CÂ®42-- . 4 I f.-- 1 - $ ' Â· Irfpnt.261.16 + 4 -- .14- * * ..34Â·-=.e*BL ..1 4.. . + -hi le'~ffâ€¢-9, -- -=9: i 9. I + -- . 4â‚¬ .. . . 4 I. . 0 #1~22Â£. - 8.1.< - . I 4 . I + . 1 .. .3.<4#ik- . . :%-Â¥rN'll 2 4 1 . - . 1 . I . 1 a .4 . 0 I . ....96-1. . .Tâ€ž....21 . + 4# 64.4.- -1 I . #. 0 . a. I + . I. bdili-- r.. 0 0 I C t . 4 a - 1 , . 4 ,.4. 7-. 1 4.1 b. i . . I.- 6 2â‚¬ U - e .1. 18, + . 4 I + . I . -1 0 . r e ... 9 I . .. 21 3 'i:= 165 1 . .. .1 t. 4 -= 4. 4 1.I -, .9..; 1. - . 3, 2 * ... I + + I t.. I. .1 ... .86.3. I ~,~.t.2,al"/lil&. )rehensive Plan Topic 1... .1Â¥4 :, 9 + . :11 2 .r." .el- , Â¢ 1 ; 22 + .,r.:7 .ls- r :,Fas,4. . + + 3. 1,-1 . 1- 0-47 + t I t... - A . L 2 . 4 $ I . 11. 49 2(Gott .f 1% .4 * + 277Â· -a,Â· . . ,Â·.-. 4 $ 1.. .9 0 .le dit:, Ciliblik + 1 4..: I + .â€¢ Â·,~Ct . 0 1 + .. ./.4 + i - 4. ..4 C - + 1 1 . a.b . ... Ar. + + . 1. + I L . +23.. Â·eÂ·Udz. 4 .t .. ' 4; . I. 3:' E 2 ~* ..12., + 4... . . C 7 =4.2...det + 1,&':4 I . ..42 4 r . 1 0{ IN:imill-/4 0 5 â€¢* *;p:Â·e. 9:. , t.. + . 1.- :Â· + *6. " m. 1. 17 h * I i.* 1. I . f /4 ... . I I I . -- 1 .. . . ..... 2 - I I !9 *1 ./Di :11 ' *Â· Â· 4*.- ill. 0. 11,Â¢,001'llt J:ill . ...4 + 04. . I. I ./ 14. I .4 b, . . ....3,4 + ..9 7 . : .4 .... I. 1 .10 in: k.: : $ 91.2 . . I. . . 4. I. .2 1. fo rb. 0 . 1. . I . .. + . 11.6 t' 4 + + . P. .Al e : ... 4 1, . 0 .+. .+ './.4 .. ./1 . 1 I, 2 4" ~ +47- tv A k= 139,5 tw 7.- 2 I :y.': -:f:' 5 ..Â·:7'*71'9~' : * --* 1 , 4 Â·Â·Â· " I + -Â· Â· . -Â·i . $ i...6 1,1 . 2Â» I + 90& + + 4 4.0 4..4 ....2-. , CE=-1. . - Â· Â· I *0-3 04 Â· '-41 ILL ~r Â·Â· .r + I + I I -K,4 + : 41 i . .4/ I. 1 - t- I + Er . . 34...':, 2 f.1, 1-i: ls@M 002 1 >IJOMBWe i*ivi;i'.. .,Â© ..4, I .... I .04.1./4 312 19/P -- r~ + ' Â·- -00.hii.eÂ· 4/"157 fl + 4.. 0 + . 2: 1, 2=4 4. 1 . a.- . .- U Ill +9 . 1 -- I 1 . 'Lial,Mt ij â€¢ I. . l I + ?111 1 r' 25 . 4 1 ..412'- 0 I e.. ~p I. I.---I . ,A t ?,3 iF. --4 - Iii 1 . 0 -1 + . 4. 1/ . il :& 1 /1* .1 .9 11 2 3 ... &1 + 9 7 + 7 + S. . 7 9 '' .,1.. . 1 -* 64 0 ..i " 4 11 . - + 11 ~tr ,;J 9=> . 4'+:t LL -, A 1. -1 - F â€¢â€¢EZ . . t . n :t Â· ' 1, 0 1 .1 I . ~1% 1 4/ 2 ... 5108â€¢: . I 0 + -' N- 6: 'M 1...1 - f u / 1 C V U , ... + .. 2 , - 1!; - i / 4 0 ----//-' -* ~ 3,0 SÂ®.: t V .. I + ..71.- 1 ...4 + . = 4,1 +. V:$7%/ t : Â¥b<.42 Â· Â· i I . : .- 2 . I . I ... C.-3 1 - .4 . 7~5,1 .....* + Â¥ 8-,. h .yl 4 42 r is -17. 16 + + 1 . 1. + 2 7 E : /:2 5 8 + . 4,/ I * 48 - + m : i + b le ...:f4 Ul I * fki* 1 C D I â€¢t*. ....10 1 .1 7 .14.%4.,A- . -- 1 0 > otc. . ...1, I .* . * I + . .0 ... I -: ;7. 0. 0 . I.,~, /.g - ./ .lip . 4 3 41/ ... a a I. I + 3 40 5% I. i & ..~lit..li Aw Â·Â·Â·tv. .. . -4 . 6 i . . 1.1. 1 6/: 1 + P + I .. ... I /1 + + LE&/66961Â£16460 : . . E I ./ + . . .1. 2,9. ?1 : "4 -1 - I + 7, ++ Policies .*t - 7 4 :1 - ~I SN IiI ledl/VO. -0*t- 4 11 4 12 --ttl~~ + U.'r 4 Â· 47 :Â·~ . "-e.........~-I . 114 t" & 7... I 9-mue â€¢r 297' . 9/.$ . ... 1 a.. . 121-1 Vi, r. f 4 . / r au. 2% E 34 . -r -1.-. 4 *: -t :. 1 7- i: Â¢]Alf -I i. 9 . h P .4 1 I ..' 4/4/ . Â·,4//*//,r. I m. 1. .F ..........=-I'.'... I. * . 4 , . I .L. . .++ ..;i * . !11 ! 73"KI"*WE 6 :.1-..4:4119: , : . + I + 41 - Agi {A 7 41â€¢ 881 2 0. L. 32.Z ' a. E 4* 9.. re . g 34 u &2 ' CC . 1 2: I + 44& -4. 4.Ape( 1. 99.alg * + ' 23.Nt'â€¢. 42 .4 4 .... rr . I =4 12.4 2 Â·- m O Qi MS 0 Ell *'.: 71/liem:'..41 1 Â® 0 0.1, I :14Â· I. 6 <Â¥# M . .e:. Cw- . .1 . I. + Â· 1 142 t = + .1 40 ....le + I - . - . .,., . e Â£1 -I A ellilll"b/t . 4~~~~~~~~~~24~1: ta,Â·41&#/I~~~~~~Li: .' i.: ,Â·, 1~eUK.'4 : 1 119./.14 + J.Â·21/ - 4..1 :i~itiki ?'Ingmk . .#: 1, 1sok,6 08 , , I. he Land Use Plan . 4 r R:. ' -:G 11 i.....=u:. Ly-f :be,..Cif . - :.."i-rÂ¥ - - . 4-Le =mt.E .el - e VI Â·1 ': ' Â·t, i B: & ' . I . 1 6 1 Rk 1 11 . I l â‚¬ I % 1 v <:r- M g , r.. 3 9. > : 2 3 ...............1 ..., el, . .:1% 1 . 6 7 0, 4 liz '4 Z .1 1% iii e E Â«1 , Â§ 41 -4. 311 â€¢ in . - -, 1 1 .. 4,1 -11 9 1 4 1 I. I. 1 tÂ·*2 : - 1 - 4,61 7 1 I *il ': I. , .1 46 .1 t . V. . -w Â» 9 | 4 I I .8 4 Â· i : 1 4, 6 = h , / / 15:It #* 3 t..... u. --- 1.. .... . + 44-1 I - .4Â·1'21*. 7~ Â· Â·:Â·)449~-+ 11Â»,1/9*7 ....1 ..:.K...4,6 r.,1......1...'le. 4 f 'labl 6.&.*Â· . I .. J=. 2* .. tal'lizillim - A I :.t Â· Rik Â· .....â€ž 4.- + . C .& 121.. - + 46 I. 15.. 4.111= 41 5../4.23= 8 E E : 7,1 0 - * 38 * E 2 i . I g22 1/&'Berem L . D - m e . i.4:2â‚¬1 -::, I. lul I I ...t . 1111,1- . Â·Â· E e .. -:i, i ........i 0 I - Â· 4 I *e 11 1 + -6. I . 1 34 + U â€¢10 64 J 2 e + + . 3 . . 0. 0 + '0411* Â· ' E/1 .rt-I~ Â¥5/. + i ... I . . . 0,= -L. I .,, + Shill........liaLL/Aill'lill.*Ii/12: Â· .44.42'lli) ./.I 6. 'mi-4.01/ 33~ 2. I. 'â€¢F Â· ~ V'~~ . $ 29eF,â€¢* 4 + the Lind Usa Â»lart 1,Â· It IV.03 NOAV ID NMO N OF AVON C< V.PR; Ailillillillillilililillillimmi, itt : â‚¬ / b :.â€¢32 1 It $4/:.Â· *17'- f ir â‚¬ U IL I 01 Â·* 6.1. 50 + .. + I. . ... 10 I ./ . I , I 0 : 14 C C.W # co#Ec 0 9 7 . P . 0 0 2 .... 4&*" . 16. F + U Itt E - U T. . $ , 0 â€¢;t/ . . W.9 4, E g . .: ilt ,-11, . $ till~:..&Â¢ -' fi filij~#- ,- O 4, e : 1 o :01:1 111: o :ISE; lile ~ .- . 7Â¥â€¢ - - .t 1 - 1. r.. .. . 1. 1.. ..ptâ€¢.r./.,2 ./4 <3 .1?i::4. ., I li LUâ€¢â€¢P'4:f'Â·" + ...8.- 0 4,51' ir + . ika'llimillill + 'll-linw :2 4- I. / . 1 I . 1. â€¢eve 1 Land Use , @Allel *del@Aep SEM - 3/.SIF~FfZ::. ..7. 0:1~ lili I 4 I .1 . 1 .+ ...0Â£Â·*-:4 - Â· ..M..L.. Cr 1.1'.94 . r. 2.6 - .te 1..2...a- 6-+7-11- 1 â€¢.1..- Wt.: . 4. it1116 + $ Â· Â·C- : 6 - - Â£:f - 1.. $. -4 r -/ 4 + ~I 1,1. .... i 1 a Illâ€¢Gift/1/ k â€¢â€¢ .:21 7 i A'-d~-9- . . ' 0 -2- 1 4-0 -2 -=Edk r 0, i- a - f Z .1.5 + /4 == f .1 r â‚¬,Â£ F â€¢ : 10: 83 :U' -03 -.%7* Uy RE. . .. . 3 I. . U 9, 61 - . a... 1%}P i '. 0 -' 44 i 2â€¢c 4 0.- . > ., U 4 + .:1 7. a 2 5 3 IL i ..r 1 + 4 t'. 1, * 7.'' I 434*i'.. .,:., 0 t.7 â€¢ . - . 1 . + 1 + i .'461- ~f 2 :...t SOACODS Land Use S"F "' '7799 - 1: ..7. .... . .1.1 8'.=-. 1.:wÂ¥1- 9 r '4 *mÂ·+''t-*V I. .. 4 51 , V. 4.14% r . 9 +1Â¢ â€ž94*141 I . .* , 4. . ...' i I + .4 . ..44 Â£ . I + 14.40.1 . 7, t. . , i. r 3 4 4.4 - . ) + 4 33.*-1 f f 3 ./ r 1 44.2 + '* I i 6. 4, 1 + I. .>i *jR.W.... + 2 +11. ' ~ 1 0 3 44 11. 50 0, 4.&* U: IF. a. * $ 9. 09 .11 I .....1 , - 4.t 41* I ** 1. 4 Â· 1,2# i. . " 4 4. ..... f 4 t'Â·r:,4*A. tâ€¢*k. + 4*404.... 4.2*,i. + 2 H'*314.'*m .41,1.*WT,44:i., ' -. 4 . . : !'23.-1.~4-.Ia'- , Â» 2;.t.: 4 ..1.94 #a 8 4.3,1 di .. - .44 ; ***~~ - + .-74&* . 1, 7 . .4.: 0, f :. 4,â€¢' * 0 . 4 - ., I. 1* I .. 4 . P . . F .. " 1 / /1 i.7 0.#A# Â¥Â¢t: P 1 .Â· L ; 0 i i.* A + 4 4 - + 1 44* k 4 â‚¬ .4, - + 12,3 5 $ . 0 0. 1*.f ..4â€¢16 1 *ilyÂ¥*:1 .: n :* 7:11; i. 1.. 4 J f RrÂ¥ .f 4*Â·fr +in. Â·r P it. in:* C 4 $ t . -49Â·-5 ..5 *. .6. = 1 : 11'Trill RUP'"18- 3 / 9*~.t'!*Câ‚¬ 6* )9. 9/ 9. 44 11-12 . FI:*/~ tit. 4 . I *i...4.*49.1 . . &7 - 1 f * .4 4 :. . 1. I .â€¢ f- , Â· ~ *,~â€¢ 4~ V ~*~7- 2;Â·~ti Al . **; E. 1 0.: 4: 11;k I. Â·4 . *Zilk 0 JA/8011FfiMp: r 0. 4 4- g .1 , tz. 9 I + .'r' I 4 - 7.4 , ar. A - I. . . 4% .1 1 - I . , ...... ..1 . .t=@ + 7 - + 1% 1 S ... . . - N - . - 2 + I .. Si:* 1. I + 0,1 u n .-- -,ment .g-vi-r.7-py--- . I + . .T â€¢ 1 703 U .. Sh 9 '. : .. 1 *M-E-JffSM~ Jid Â» 0 bl %2:/38 -- ....I- aWÂ¢:'d:% + A .112?37-0g7 6-. 2,3%5% [ 00 1- 11 6- Alic#WCAU ,(.El A g - 9,%4 4 0 4 0%*E 2 FE. 41 w m@%11-- - 4. . I -, I . 3 1 - r j M. 3 Â·' i litillilli~ir .. .If -4 1 'L, .4 04 e . - 1- it %% I . 0 al + ~~~ ~<~7 --~ .} 1 - ' - -- 0 ki 44%17 9,21 = , 09 i plk: C h . . 4 0 2 2 -I + -1 i &+ 41; Itt . .49 4 I IfY- ~1 . I /*"a Irm= 6% -4 t . 9 t - ++ I al r CL , Z ' 3,2 - It . A. n: m \ 9 J 3... 8 :44 . U) a 4 12 7 . 4 -8/ : 4 m *b f Lt /14. a . 01 F tr=,4 1 11: i -''f + .El; + ..~t. -= ':*i, 5 0 4. 4 46'"~v'Z'PI'" t : I. 7.. t.1//117 . 0 01- W . 4 il .-0. Ak A ' . 4 4.0 * 1 S o M 60. 8 42-1 f ' 3. 5 I Y 0k=94- lili 111 q 1% 1/3 no a, E 4. 9 .... > 1' O '4* ti Ail' . I. ..1 gl ~4 0 .pu, GopeJOIOO Val 1 Slualsis Buful:Id 9 MIU0U033[ / -j N M for and to the * :SeRna 3!JpadS citizens of AR f the Â¥ , EY . , I + â€¢â€¢ -.. 0 - - 4. - + ' C./0 - Â· -6 -t M Â¢N r. 0 - IN E W .alâ€¢il-/:7 -2~ + I - /..t ~213-' 14. ++ 0 1 . lit S 49 - '4 /1 0 +.2 0 .. .3*2. 4 , Â£ 2 + :1.0. + 4 - 14 , 1 - - , 0. 4.: -. 14%79â€¢.' . I . .. 1 ... -= -- + F.LE- . I + ':. 4 + .... 4. '-- - *12 1 - ..1 6%. ./ e + ...... 4 - .re I * ., . 41 + -2- ... -% illiz 4 - t=_ : 2 . . 76' I .*t .21 + I . I -...../.Ill - - .... I .. : -2 Wn': 11* ,-1 - -- 4 1 â‚¬*1 1.4 I 4 11<K f . I ... 1 // . C . 4 U. 00 2 .1,4 .'. *' -:,4, $ . 4 ..r 4 0 . ' . . e . 1 â€¢ I ..14' 1, I . + . fil , . ./ - I I .. t ..41. 0 0 . . . 1 i .= ... 6. â‚¬ . . E k I . la. : I . 0 4 . 1. . . - dg I 6. I .1 ..t. :. . 4.1, N . . 4 I " 1 4 75. ... 4 4 . .4. h.'. 41 r ./17///Ill I CD Â·, 1 . â€¢ '* 4* . ~:~.*B:*EJA/ < ty > :. + . , E--4 , 4 ' 0-4 : . . N.. . ++ . k ,#e-1 3 . + I ... 11;k- IliIA:magm:::::li:i:: 3 T.1. 32f i~ Â·~'' . ~2:~ ..'â€¢1'Â¥ 2/ky 11~~**i ik 41 - I . "02 Jaq w.'40 1- Oust 17, 2004 =0 000> â‚¬ e. E 2 2 -r .C 0 O IE Â·S _ 4.' .5 25: c 88 â‚¬ 0 P Â£ 2 2 1 2% U) Â·* 00 CD 6- - 2 -W .- CO S 5 Z ..9 9 2 24&1 Â£ 1 .2 0 0 6 1 :& 2 26 & 2 0 42 Cli 2 5 E co 2 > 0 h (0 .2. 15 0 tx o M 16 1 :t: < W g .2 .6*821 1 1 ~ 9 C ... 0 0 m Ill i â€¢ m & 4 0 0 1 '1 ...4 ./ 84 1 T? N bed base to establish Avon as l to capture 30-35% of Vail Valley lodging) /guest serving retail. 9 Avon 2004 Comprehensive Plan Critichl Mass: e c side of A on Ro ~single area - ix - F%B, retail, and Avon Town Core Key Targets nity Drivers: CreeldBachelors Gulch Leverage recreational and cultural 2. Establishing Community Drivers ,~~~00~~0~~~~ m Park, Eagle River) 10!49!P 01 sqnq le!0JeUJUJOO * S,UOAv 6uplu!1 V 'louisla Buiddolls 'aouenuu 'Jelue UAA01) (uoge}S u.1846umoN euis eleeJO seBe#u!-1 Buneels seeie 6gpunouns ell; U! 6quessel al!4AA 9100 Jeweo UMO.I. 041 u! 146!04 pue X}!suep st! Jo siwel u! >lead pinolls l.luoi leolsxqd s,UOAv â€¢ se!1!A!pe 145!u pue Xep 4}Oq 819010 le4; se! 1!ualue pue sao!AJeS 'Sesn JO X 1.!SleArp e ep!Aoid pinolls eeie eJOO UMol s,UOAv â€¢ Aq pajeiguet; spueulap 6upped Ou!6uelp elepol,Ult]0008 01 8300 UAAol 841 ;no46noilll Pezlue630-83 pue pedoleAep eq pinolls se! 1!liOe, 6upped â€¢ 1. Achieving Critical Mass seBe)lu!-1 BuneeJO â‚¬ Sell1041 pue suo!,ejep!SUOO Je4;O Xep 041 ino46no]41 sesn lueie#!p ' V k'.,1 1 \ '10 ~.ION 2631 BEAR TRAP, SOUTH ; L0T37 /LOT32 x Ei \ M LOT51 -~--*- \1 LOT 30, BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION L0T36 ~ L0T31 ~T52Â». W' h \ 1-0 AVON, CO 81620 I -- LOT28 COUNTY OF EAGLE 1 22- 0 /\ 1 / LOT29 ,~-- ARCHITECTS STATE OF COLORADO / L0T23 SUBJECT ;16Â¥22 - ~ .4Â« 0048 E BEAVER CEK RVD LOT30 SUITE 207 PROPERTY A-- -- - BOX 5300 MATERIAL SYMBOLS: eENERAL SPEGIFICATIONS; eENERAL NOTES: 1 AVON, CO,81620 8- 1. le 08139*L CON,R,<>Tce MO ALL TRKâ‚¬JeS 114*LL FI/m To ALL- f,REÂ©11,~L 01 Dll~ltill AT~aE: TO 71-1 ,6,48 *t C-- TO MLLY OETIJ 4* TI / sPeCIFICArk:Â»0 â„¢CR ALL MAT-,ALS ..ON THIS .0... n./ & LOT19 910.949.5200 Ml Altr co-L,OTS CR cÂ»Â·156,al IN -ne FL,le OR -es-,CATIÂ©,8 1, e 11* 0 0 11* 1,9-& CLA<flk,5* 10 CONTMT ne A-,1- -,--M- dica......2.4 Â·rET NÂ«3/CM 1% GÂ»Â·1,~ 7O1I1l(LVI 92 1-t 7 LOT20 vmd,Ovmdicom 0.- M..9 IP/â€¢-0, 1 I~LAâ„¢~t 0HALL I Em- PA/8< Nam MiE~liMS DATTSÂ® ING* IgUAL 1 LOT21 ---1 FAX 949,5205 TIE A-VALLE MATE, OR A COPIBIIATION 0- P* mATTS AlÂ«P MMID /0/14 AICH 93 -M**- Ah-9- ICIAL TO - INÂ·e B-V~UN. =--MN 1 0- 04 - w N,0/ 0 c/"c-0 2,1.- al'="- nolod. 2%'CA ahLD *1 - Nrl//* )1/7.1.6 -41 / MÂ¢â€¢1 l//'*CAD :=:=*.===1= -- :=t- =-,cal =~ avallpk.- -bia'.--- MICae SHALL me 'LOM P hl i*nl W 11 1*+LFAC:n~ Al exr-log POOM 904.1. m ],eLLATIE: 0,- rITH IMISU.429 IOes Ge ==91-==~=11.-*=p E-4. TO 112 MI~D<Â»a ..â€ž.9 0.1.1.1-in-d Mill.-UNI.44 VICINITY MAP 0â‚¬ATMA< 8,1,/970 N MIC-l~ Al,2 DOC- m,41. 12 T-r 10 1% - ),An- Alt, 1002 10 ,/ TO NUT Al.,1 -*AT "Cr JO*fr 5 ~UL )000*11. POOF&~ *,OP .10*â€¢TS ~Â® Crn- *W0ET TO MO,911,= 00 Od--d,- *'M-,1-*-r - MM*10,4 IHALL - -MI,LY PLMI- PIT,H A 101+6,Â»-,M PILAIM, I -CH ./1.- ARCHITECT: = Nel. u./0 arAIOAMI:/ *0 /0,L NOT t.,4< CR OET-C~*Te -Â»r,â‚¬AT~IR 4. 041. 8Â·,CÂ»e M,K Ve~ *ALL Be MITIE, MTH TE T,00 ,~ CALLE, CUT 1,1 TIE ..... VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS. - 154 NO r,Â«CH )11.1 ALLÂ£Â»'l er/Â»ee TO 81 reft 101/er INTO FLACe mile P.OBox 5300 ImÂ» 2Â·r. Mc=, M<,#41- Ale Cal,c:112,â€¢#aiIi TO ACC-T STCÂ»1 4,15419 5Â·,bi 00 Co~-ab, all d-lic/ c- =,0,1-,1 m-- Di 50 Cove~P ,*TH A MAT~-x, reâ€¢0*Ble Or A tx)~aL[rf Ak dM.,le Â® AS TO AVON, COLORADO 81620 F--Ir 1,1018Tt- INT.,181011,41, TO ~Tlerm, C<-19.ICTION -le. 11-1 / Fâ€¢b- - M-~ ill C,p. 970-q49-5200 5. ALL/MITICLE 80/JI 4/CIM,LÂ·r7/00 IteKINI,I 0,44.1 - MTTE, MT,4 A prn-<â€¢ @1 Bud./8,) PI<M AÂ«<,Pell TO MK,4/Zn-- 9/BOMC.4110- 011 -lu *-1 -*Â« -1Â»~ Nr * .*-- -0 470-444-5205 FAX 6. ALL *Ae<DIA -14 04Â«7 VIN/2 EXT-10* UDâ€¢~ 81/1 * re.1 8 ,Aela_e .6,0/ IVI 0/ Lle-in-Â·r IcNITA n,Ire KIE, oVE=IMMT- AllcH IMY c=Â·rm MICK T,0 ~711<0 -~.1.Ii. p-INâ€¢d In - CONTACT, CHRIS JUEReENS Hle,-T liALITY LOOK <r ne Halle. STRUCTURAL ENeINEERINe: 1.110 collâ„¢,MICI -01.L M/NUM MI,TH T,e HOU-. ALL M*r-ALS -CH MAY c<Â», MTH MUJ-â€¢-T, ~-Ul,46- 00*10/lbiV MO 5197-â€¢8 Ill,UE,le )1*B1~.INT-5, - **WO Tle #Â®TALL-Â§ 0 ,-Ma .Ne A,0 ACC)~Se. ALL 11 M.....1...........1.1......1-1, DRAWING INDEX: 89-â€¢017,0,Bee, PI>en~ MU *~LIAIC- lerAUE, 8,~LL MAVE A PINM,4 - G...1- F. -*... - = El-,~10.-1 , A 0,2 're* 10. , ),All#,Inre 1,2 colfÂ·m,crc* MlrY,Â· M ,0-/Btr, Al.I,-r 23:rÂ»"Â·M~:~ /Aule , AL VME,ale SY,Tme le Ier,LL.m Cae,NUOTE at GL./218,3 TO II 4*42> 6 *CED 4 02 ATIN+E, -0.EÂ·r HA,&04- Me Coleâ„¢UCTION SPICIPIC.aTICÂ»0 â„¢5* 1â€¢ti PETAIL. Â¤ 11,0 0,-* 0-0- - bâ€¢ r-mâ€¢Alâ€¢ Nâ€¢Â· T.' :R@6~ttl;~Â¢,ex, !â‚¬TES, ETU m,u.8 -E Tie â€¢=130 {, O,2 72- ARCHITECTURAL DRAMINGS 4,;22+3Â£6- 4\ 0 U 2* 50Â«err 1.0,/ I'- CÂ»-SIÂ·~1/r'.1- A UlaA- AL O LO~- LML FLAN ~ N PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAeE SUMMARY 9-41-9~...~..,---* "*91/ 4,-a' "c/-0-14 Fl/4 MAIN 1.-Eva- Fâ€¢L,AN PROPOSED SOUTH UNIT . 11. *i,-4 G./,=9- .de,IrA,/.0/0. *ald .tz ll-M LEVEL MAN W -M AL.5 90<Â» M.AN LOPâ‚¬R: 161(:18 Sa.FT. eARAGE 4 MORK ROOM: EETE--*--~*-- EXTERIOR E.EVATIONS 1 060 MAIN: 2005 %.FT. 880 561.FT. ......1 ~.2 EXTERIC,R E.EVATIC*IS m <0 UPPER : H 01 SG.FT. TOTAL: 5<343 SG.FT. 14 Al,-r- vit ** PIÂ»II Â» W DiaÂ¥,lid 9 0, STRUCTURAL DRAMINGS M I./. 00- LU EXISTINe NORTH UNIT 8-1-1 G- DNEQ /4- 4 -9,--9 ////~câ€¢4 ENTIer eALLERY: 518 Sa.FT. D :lorme==:-*ig-'P'... ABBREVIATIONS: ..........r.-1.... Mir F E EF' A E 21 =- . 0.- 4- P-- ..."- 6 <KQ . RECEIVED m Jo E 5*Z- k g= s ar Z ul 0 Di F ~:~~~- E':~1.. Pv =.-g M 2,-**0~*w-0,~ JUN 2 9 2004 M R F Eh r =00 00 i ==W * 527Â£52-*3~-=-* DG -"d ./. N mt = P EÂ· Community Development =:91 -41 â€žLV mÂ£--0 p Er- E EL- B N - / a r-,del 4 e 0-1/9 ri /d-4 * / e,/*s,140,1 CODE REVIEW - En *EP 1. not .1 -epoot 716 '04-- ~~ M~~*# b///d pm 0-*...... 0....h-- -1-7 K <4* #6 -or ..i e. M.Â©&*1 BUILDINS TrFE, RESIOBETIA- SINGLE FAMILY-TYPE V-8 .-- h"dw ~6-r*d-al' to d.,r.p.-4- â€¢ th- ...4/ cnd ./ â€¢1-,3 cordÂ¥.... OCOPANCY FRS, U - BETÂ·pâ‚¬EN THE *ARAeâ‚¬ AND THE ResloENCE *k.* 4/ Wi:'"t'//. MAT-IALS KPPROVED F<JR I HaR FIRE REUSh )N Co-"1 Jo- ON 11â‚¬ 6-Ael SIDE Oftr TO THEE RSISTIVE CONS-q,1011014 ARE REalliE] g 27=-1 2 EFy Uâ‚¬Jele,DE Â©F Fâ€¢00/ 619#ICTUIE DOORS T- *FE TO me SOLID MOOD NO LESS THAN I ~4 ~I *In* WM ~n~od olWn- 58â€¢ â„¢ICK, A 20 MIN FIRE RATED DOOR M A 5(JUP OR Hoter'COMe CORE STBE D/Â·TE - P...0. 1,01//rÂ·Â·r POOR MOr LESS THAN I We' THOK. m =:.,0-aclor -i--- SEEE STRJOTteAL NOTES, 91 FOR F'RAMINe, F~SlleRS, AND J.-'B N. i. I E C.-6 G *:12 3, 5=a.~ LATBRAL LOAD CONOGDTIONS. SHEET N #. Tl L.14 ...1- 0, TITLE SHEET ltv Â¤'53, E Em- D E- GENERAL NOTES SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL TEREEP:.11#1Â¥34SBQNS*#Â§:eli:il:IN'iwiliii: foin i.< D yalli.mmulfi. OOVyO1OO .. llllllllllllll b I LEGAL D IPTION TOPOGRAPHY BE'250-. Â° 1,11&2. E-02-22Â·"96 Lot 30, BLOCK 2, Wildridge as recorded ot reception No 184525 on July 12, 1979 in Book F.... W- 258. Poge 124 in the office of tne Eagle County Clerk ond Recorder, Eagle Co. LOT 30, BLOCK 2, :&3:â‚¬Erâ‚¬ C WILDRIDGE NE Â£1 f-:1 u c TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, 5i**ilii:,3iI STATE OF COLORADO 1 Z E bill - go G 990.144~ V -11 \ 41 5 =ST *11*NE i 1 Â§41'i 'Â°Â· FFE 8197.82 51 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING . 55' BY ALPINE ENGINEERING 5Â£ 23.1Â· 1 I C O Â·-4 25.4 0 t & N . LEGEND / 0 ~ *80 \ \ INDICATES A PROPERTY LINE = MES 83 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING < f t~; it \ BY E_DRIDGE SURVEYING <\ LOT 30 1 14 '1111 EM INDICATES A 2' CONTOUR / ---------- INDICATES A BUILDING SETBACK LINE -do T p. 3 :i i:b \ 8,8,/0 ----------- INDICATES A UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE BLOCK 2 \\\ - INDICATES A 10' CONTOUR \ 1, 5.76 ACRES ' <1 ' : p '2 N GRAPHIC SCALE \I\ \ 112 w . C 1N FEET) 08.59 e \ \11\ 1. â‚¬ 1 inch = 20 R iki Ells Z 1 \\949\1\ 1% 1 .1 ) M \10 11\. \\: NOTES: DRAWN BY GJE 1 ) Date of Survey: April 26, 2004 22&*Eiaim~EUZZI DATE. ,)4/30/34 2.) Contour Interval: 2 Feet JUd NO 04011 REVISIONS. 000 2 Manhole #0840 Rim Elev.= 8203.00, located on Eeor Trop Road. 3.) Elevotion Dotum: Eogle River Water and Sonitation District Asbuilts. Sewer \ *REF 1 \ \\ \ \ 1 li I , 1\: t \\\\ + TW 9 10 002 1 1 4.) Basis of Bearings: The becrings shown hereon, ore based on a calculated bearing Â£ ~ 8, 881+~ 1 1 k #8 \\\ lit\ CLJC < < l l \ ff of N 14'28'01"E. for the line connecting the south east corner and the northestern *A CMG most corner of lot 30. Monuments were found as descrbed hereon C,RÂ¢\ ' A \ 5 ) Street Address: 3621 8 ecr Trap Rood. ~ RETAINING J 1 WALL - 1 6.) No Title Commitment wos provided for this survey. 7.) Eldridge Land Surveying LLC, is not responsible for the integrity of digital \ -00.95 11 \ 1-\- information thct mly be supwied with this survey. Digital information in not to be relied upon for construction purposes. --1 recorded at reception No. 184525 on July 12. 1979 ;n Book 288 ot Poge 124 in the $ OuT ./. SITE BENCHMARK. fit i 1 ~1 1 V - Eagle County Clerk ond Recorders office 9.) Lot Area = 5.76 ocres / SEWER MH-0840 < RIM ELEVATION= TOP . 8203.00 ni O 9 O Ltd 2 1 -li~85 1 / -6 1 -1-CO~E \ 1 U k,fil ' O 0 0 1 / 819 7 991 0 9 0 -1 m CERTIFICATION CO N 5 jit/9/ il 0- -ag 1, Gregory J, Eldridge, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor licensed under the lows U) JL L. i / Â«22 ------~ - -3YLL~5 L L~pl ~ - - w knowledge and belief. 0##0> E / /O x- 10' SLOPE MAINTENANCE. DRAINAGE <j f f ~> 2%â€žREMOVAL EASEMENT of the State of Colorodo, do hdreby certify to Shona Bohort ond The Town of Avon, 2 ,- Â§4 the contours as shown hereon, are based on g field survey performed by me or under my direct supervision on April 30, 2004 ond ore occurate to the best of my C DRAINAGE AND UnUTY EASEMENT r W I ul 9Â¥ C 1 - % W 8.) The legal descristion shown hercon. is based on the subdivision plot Wildriage CD 9 --- *Ii / /2 0/ 11 E i 1 30ogi~ rn; ~; GUARD RAIL 6:4244Vg.ftl- , N8136'22.W 224.45' 1 10.0' ~ . 1 Gregory JVW,L.84% 0. 30093 4 1t LAND 9?9> 1 / SHEET NO 1 6/ 1 Fchtl[)'SURVEY MONUMENT // 1 1.51 ALUU CAP PLS 5447 kiD DJU@ ao OUJUU'I 1311ON Atillin TNQ 1 N3~135Â¥3 *111!L 13/\El A Od01 Nl)839'51Â»E 50.00 11031,111" V ON 0 .06 1 tf \1 --------------------- M. 19.21.fOS ______ A -- 4\ ----------------- g- 441 2 1 â‚¬ / / - 80="i' Ab"im ---- ---- --- & 0% ID - - --0-7 ---- 1 \ \ \ ~ DIIIPIII*rwjll** M-' d,+ ARCHITECTS 0048 E BEAVER CEK BLVD 1 P- N~ r .r SUITE 201 w- ~, BOX 3300 --0---- \ 1%\ I ' - -- AVON, CO, 81620 I - / 910.949.5200 ; â€ž 4 - 1 \\\ -- -lil- --_-2/4 -- \ I , - - 1 - 4 \ ----- -1 \\ 1---- -- \ Â¥md@0Â¥mdicom --- 4 -- - - - - \ FAX 949.5205 3 -7 70% I - ex / 7- 45 .. Â·0- \ ' ft.hvt\..r Â·Â· 1 \\\ \\N % \ " --- ' ~ ttftiti-(4 -Â·I . 0 1 , :47 - 10 1 ty \ --- - , i 4 1 - -- \ 2=2 - --24-=-- ,-- - -----2 . / -Â·I f osic.3 N \ -\V-% J . N. - + - 4 >11 \ 1 1.18 --* ---- 1 --4 \.\ - - - *I"H 11/7 1 - , 4 - --- 0 .0- - - / ' \7 \ - - -\ -\ - - - - 44* no + ---- 69'60. - 0 * -....>-t ------ W 4 -.I.-I - ------- 4 9- .--1 -------- 02% --~~ - & --- ----a \ -------------- * *- -.Il---I- ----- - --- - % 1--= 0 A MR --1- 1-Im-= - . IND. 0----- , ----- lopill/ le- 6 ./ 1.-- ------I--Ii---I- --- -- 0 10. Z -- IILD-1-Ir M.Lam -4 2 1 -- P . r & - --- 0 01 0-Iner li~eilll~ 0 H .40 O-0".igp.......1 4 ./.9,1.='I.. -0-4-- - 1 .249 7~WÂ® * 0/ Ull)4I ILOI0 - / -- ---- ----- JI.--- ---a-I. 01*~LOr/40*all'WI -- ---- --------- - - 6:11:04 --- --- ----- -- SITE PLAN -------------F- 8% ET O H-~P LAN 8 U#Mly~-------Â· SCALE V = 10-00 --- - SHEET N, Â· P~8~ ~121|11 H=El'AA 48 34?VAT138 358* 33Naa 32:1 MEI 11111!11 3 18 '0â‚¬ 101 lllill11l BV~8 1Â£92 1%:2:Z j i. LEGAL DESCRIPTiON TOPOGRAPHY tifii{{tl 3/81&- e Lot 30, BLOCK 2. Wildridge as recorded at reception No. 184525 or, July 12, 1979 in Book 288, Page 124 in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder. Eagle Co LOT 30, BLOCK 2, E:B,ENg, :3:21=.:E WILDRIDGE Wei- I- 82:its Ii 1 :95:10 rE TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, ..........C- C 41.:3:8:33-5- STATE OF COLORADO ' 1 - - t It Z m O 26 : ,gg 11 ~1 7 F h~Zi 59 Egr ?I!/Im AÂ° 1 * 2.93-2 , t \ 11 :8 8 2 2 g W a 0 / <0 T 31]111 Pro;ectÂ· 04011 SLOPE ANALYSIS Fn June 11 2004 1111 1 Ronge Stctistics End. Arec Percent \ \*fl . 4 2 Ra~ge 08:09 40.00 17752,79 24.8 2 40.0 100.Oc 53825.58 75.2 FFE 8197.82 11 11 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING -<C~ BY ALPINE ENGINEERING 11 11 \ ~ -- LEGEND \ 1 A 11/ \ 111 INDICATES A PROPERTY UNE ill 1, \ TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING -- -------- INDICATES A BUILDING SETBACK UNE 81 11 J! 1 , 4, â‚¬3- $ BY ELDRIDGE SURVEYING F &) 88 M : 2 C. 2 " 2 91: 'I,1/~1 ----------- INDICATES A U-BUTY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE LOT 30 1 :f \\ BLOCK 2 ' - ill i' - ~DICATES A 2' CONTOUR .0 aid :g 11 a. 4 5% 11 - -- INDICATES A 10' CONTOUR .1 1-% 4 111 m / V - 2 5.76 ACRES = 9 -3 (ED N - GRAPHIC SCALE .. .1 : 2 , i ..1: 1 -â€ž ; :..1 1 !4= .. .9 1 6 1~98.59 ~ I CE ~'~Er ) , 1 ... 9 - 4-2 --- :1 K--21 .C.- 11 2.- -Al,---1:.4\ C % \ \ 5 #.I -..5.2 \ a 1'9 DRAWN fry {1 F -....-1.~j - 1- lii.2---(23:; Ir --4...p.i- '0 ' - L 77 F - ~ DAIF 04/30/04 1 ~ch = 20 ft Z S 0 1.) Date of Survey April 26 2004 2.) Contour Interid: 2 Feet JUS NU 0401 3.) Elevation Dctum Eogle River Water ond Sanitation District Asbullts. Sewer ~nn M . AP: -ATr,1 \ REIONS 91 1 111 1-% goo Monhote #0840 Rim Elev.= 8203.00, located on Bear Trap Road. GE 1 - 1 IVT,12.0 0~.12 j 4.) Basis of Beorings: The bearings shown hereon, cre based on o calculated bearing - #.1~"1 9.-88.1+ 1 1 of N 142801-E, for the jine connecting the south eost corner cnd the northestem 11 \ most corner of lot 30. Monuments were found as described hereon. - 1 - 2 - -V CONC 1 5.) Street Address. 3621 Bear Trop Road. . \ RETAINING 3 04..../.4 t.16 1> 2 - A 6.) No Tiue Commitment was provided tr this survey. -00.95 1 7.) Eldridge Land Surverng LLC, is not responsible for the integrity of digital / Â£ 32.7 information that moy De gipplied with this survey Digital information in not to be - -- â‚¬:r -- 1-3 y ..gi.: i>u - 1\ \ relied uoon for construction purposes, 80 The legoi description shown hereon, is based on the subdiv,sion clot Wildridge - T < recorded ot reception No. 184525 on July 12, 1979 2n Book 288 ot Page 124 m the \ Eagle County Clerk and Recorders office. / / .v ou, ...~x -- . SITE BENCHMARK ' -.... ~,/ NL-Â·Â·Â·' SEWER WH-0840 9.) Let Area = 5.7â‚¬ acres top 8203.00 . CNI RIM ELEVATION= 4 cir) Â·2Â£ O LU th> 0 008 0% Imi It / 0-0 9 CERTIFICATION 10' SLOPE MAIN INANCE. DRAINAGE Â· AND SNOW REMOVAL EASEMENT t. Gregory J. Eldridge. c Registered Professional Lcnd Surveyor ;,cer,sed under the lows 1 :,0 1 of the State of Colorado. do hereby certify to Shone Bohort and The Town of Avon. CDO, R 422& I i L=145.27 under my direct supervision on April 30, 2004 and are accurate to the best of my 0--' R=125.00 the contours os shown hereon, cre based on o field survey performed by me or ./ 02020/, 0 --------L_, . Tan=82.09 - knowledge and beliet *3, 6=6605'16' CL /:13 +641( c BUILDiN --------- A DRAINAGE AND u nUTY EASEMENT ~ A = 6 v "Â·Â·, c 1- ------ i GUARD RAIL N81'56*22'W 4 0 ----343* mt..ktq- 64 224.45' l. 10. ' dregory iÂ·JER!ridgeÂ· rÂ©P*.S. No, 30093 SHEET NO, 1 F D SURI Y MONUMENT 1.5 ALUM. CAP PLS 0447 OF 1 ON 5/8' REBAR *04' UOI'03~1!1~0 S0UWMO3 'ZOZe liNn '9 1Â¥/AHOIH 'WP 41 Luo/; ~;; 0914 OVOU dVbll hIV39 UO,Je4 Bug@A.Ins puwI 0NlddVIN DNUG{A A3AkIA *+10-926 0Â£6 Zf~9 0: srut-Â·P3 *ILt 91,1,-926 COL N08'39'5CE 50.00' V - "h ' % _J ON \ )11 9 == ARCHITECTS ' 0048 E BEAVER CEK RVD - SUITE 201 ' I BOX 5300 mloall'llm"'Imu AVON, CO. 81620 I . 1_ .#TE=zfz =-=311 -. I I li...~-4-#r I - :=--t-- -r Â¥=E IF \ 910.949.5200 P-u.""e./-"mR -7 1 -- 1 1 11 L 'h,<00' Â¥mda*imdicom 2 - 11.,1 4 i = ..4 -*WWL---4 / ,\ " FAX 949.5205 LL--L=r /1 1 ~t U r~ ///Mil/- . --1 7--- --IN Ij 1 1 Eak *a Ii-41 , 00. -IA -7 - EFIEK ..1 1 1,7 - -----1 ' -V~Prr,4-rrn, ; 1 3=-11111111111 i 7- r- -- 1 1 '-~~"~3*Yiu.w.LU_-.~~~--'' 11 1 1 - -7 &Â»-= ~L..2-_1~ --1- i u ik-i r =.-++-1 =217-/2--1 1 , IFI.-----1---------------I-----1 i 1 =1 11 i :- ...... -- -1 ~==.~ li li -- '---I ; -- <== = = =b .i -1 D .rfigffi. 2 44 / 4 - It 4 , , . I 0 . 1- . I .. -I%4'3Â» /Y:}j /05 - / . /I'll/ 4/ ' ' i/// -N. . 4 4 * LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8- - 1'-0- 1021 SQ. FT. - 0401 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMETAL SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0. SHEET Ni Al.0 4 HinOS dval 3V38 1E9z BONJOISEn:1 MaN Z ~3018'0â‚¬101 Oavk!0103 Elealkial,M V 1.- ON 1% ARCHITECTS , 0048 E EAVER OB RVD . -2 . , SUITE 201 I I BOX 5300 , I AVON, CO,81620 4 - I I | r-z|| r--499/fit 970.949.5200 h Â¥md80Â¥mdicom FAX 949.5205 e . i Fggrs,Mi .=4-li.8 rl . - -1 -ffILLLLU.U.LU_J gl 11 i -----1 I~-Ii- â‚¬\J-Â»19 , 4- -- / / 11 =12-6-10,0-23*1 9 // i ----1 ' /5/5- /- / ~ /5 / 2 5 I .. /9 /7 .1 '. I I 91 libÂ£ , 2/--1 , 0/5'' ./4 lu Ba.. /7 , ..P , .4. . Ill < /7 . , ... 0 / I I ..0 . ' 0 A- // // 7 \\ ril MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Uj OCALE. - .i- 20,1 0.- PT. .... 0401 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMUTTAL SCALE 1 /8" = 1'47 SHE-T Ni, Al.1 OCIV8O1O3 39alklalIM . 8190 HlnOS 8 1/93 1 018 '0Â£ 101 V ON \ 1 ARCHITECTS 004; E EAR *El( BLE SUITE 201 BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 970.949.5200 ' Â¥md80Â¥mdicom 61.- 1 "- 4 t FAX 949.5205 /6 --- 1,~11Â®/ 1 1 1*==171}Â»! "um W | I :Â»11 _37*Â£ 1 , 1 ~ fri-9.7.-- r-in--1 \ t\421.3 - - 1 \ 41 ." \ -L \ V -- 1 \ / / 0/ 0 / 11 .,Al ~ 17/1.9 9 :-- 0/M / " 6<1- 0 i ' - I 2- -2 - ....... 2 L.\ z UJO OjJO 40 N CT) UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN/DRIVEWAY PUN eamÂ·1 *16 1-1 â€¢aft â€¢ 0- Ba Pr. d,Al*AidliALICK ROCK NaRIW Uttâ€¢ DIâ€¢ 8-r. UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL SCALE 1/80 = 1'-0' SHE-T N' i Al ,2 HinOS 'dV OCIVhlO1 O Elealkl BIONBDISBB Z MOO18 1 41 V ON ARCHITECTS 0048 E *MR CREEK RVD SUITE 207 BOX 5300 AVON, CQ 81820 910.949.5200 v mdi 0Â¥mdicom IL_| FAX 949.5205 # re- -------- Â¥ 1 1 \1 . -4 1 / / // \ / . 7 .' 1 ---1 / 1 / / i 1.i / 1 / / / 1 1 *ff.4 1 / â‚¬\ L__________-_______-1 \ U' 44- M / 9 06-0 / Ul < / / \ \ / / \ \ 2 \ al< \ \ 2 6.1 \,\ \ \ \ M \ \ N / \ / 3 / -- / / / 6:11:04 0401 Â» ROOF PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMOTTAL SCALE 1/8' = 1'-e SHEET \ Al ,3 iiiliilililiil Hlno 00Â¥210103 390â€ž101:M 1 018 '0â‚¬ 101 V.......Ill. N k=-1 -1 ARCHITECTS -1,11 142-â„¢ r ' '777T-13Â·â€¢7 1~~-JEEUE***EF~~0~1 i , -L 0048 E EAVER CREEK RVI) - E- -1 19Â»ype=*fiÂ»323=Z==2 rs=*1--fi~ ~,-1~- ..1-/ .4/M/EC- SUITE 201 -- 1 1-1 1,1151 11 1/27-=-- --- BOX 5300 11 Lk-u=ri uulm[E[IEU IF--'IJ-UNTT TTZ- AVON, CO. 81620 -111. L __ _7_7_7_DE~ 910.949.5200 2 3 -IE--IDI----1 -1-'F=1111+ 2 2 -111 1----7Z - -â€¢â€¢(6- - FAX 949.5205 Â¥md80Â¥mdlcom - - - -*pdr-- ~6â€¢ i-74. .-0... in.- ~ 4-09 N =28 - -242 ~2-41,~21 I--2/~ ..= 1-1- '7. -I- 1 -Il r=T I=rer-- n. --I------- -04*16/-- 81 <FIQ 4Â»-dcho -'--7~-Ill-&--. _ . i-<p ~-~I~- . - --r--- W.nut...9-- - - ...11. Z 11'1' Ok ga JO - M R '.Â¥,L 089- In _ 1 - 1 ' --- I- +..F'/- >Â·=-2 6...- 3'===74IE--â„¢. - N ---- -- 2 L 232 - ----I----I"i*il-- -1=ilii.r-=%=rEZE 1~1. -0-0 - --L..4-d~c.. im ---25*9232-Prr- 811.04 ~ 1- Â»____ .~ 0Â«M 1 .... -1- -0- +WES-LELEVATION ELEVATIONS SKETCH PLAN SUBMUTTAL L-EEy = 11-0â€ž ! V 4 _ ON 1.1- - \-b ARCHITECTS -------------------------- 004!EBEAVE OB BLVD SUITE 201 BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 910.949.5200 ----------- +INF-222222223EIC[*133525CIZIEJECIZEILIFIEZIEJEEL-_222222 - - ind*mdicom ----------- - FAX 949.5205 - 1 /-4./.4- C =:- lili "Ir -----------------------NI------------------------ ././1 ----------------------------------------- -â‚¬C---- --- i/JFT--------------- /,1 NORTH ELEVATION 0 LL,/ SCALÂ£: 1/r - 1.-O. m~o-,1,-1 ~ 0/ :0 1 111 4.- fl 1 - /--1 ---- 1 28~ ZUBS 97>L #-9.Â»32Â»Â«Â«4,2 00 -1 2 -i - ---r+-~ zib J-M - f.= M 4 ~- uu- ='1Â« I:TinITI)-iftijz: :'w L -- 1 , 11.1 11 1 lillil N --- Â·,= W#=AlliTIL -_-_1-JOIL --------- --1. V ...I--- AT STUAC)WAL x_Qui______ mn_ ___ -3134221_1 103Â« 111 1-1 -11 _______- ----- .... 0401 â‚¬\ EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS ~ SCALE: 1/8- - 1.-7 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL SCALE 1 /8' = 1'-1 SHEET N' ' A2.2 390111(11:M HlnOS C I Â· r . - 1 1 - --; --- 1.)71/,Ap....3 43 -- - Â© 7- 8078 --- ----- -~ . f ' - '11:,Â¤IT -- . - 5 . 1. U 70 â€¢- .. - _ â‚¬ c; r- #_- -4' fr - # 5274 ----Ill- -- - -- - , ---- A Uff 2 -4.-,- 2.1 - ----------- 0 - --Frif - -- .- N -_-70 ' - p . 1 - -~-- Elf,7 -- 4--------'......... 6 dk N Â£ r --.---6066 - 7 i'f' k 4.. Ml- N--- il ,---- el r,JOO-r r--00002)0~BUL AeÂ»*A.4/.+----e - . - .-- -7---- -- .0396. i --- 1 ' -- /21 -4 .-' VaÂ©Â°1~Fc-#--- - t 40 1-0 Â· i L - 6.9,0 , *(PRANT'' A /,61 1 ,\2..A-j -- 42" 90...2 WAU.4 -- -11 r - .., ".-- . . 4 --~ - EM- 1 4- - ./- 62 1-0 : U--Â· r. C ;'5.42<Z / 74 -1.-69:Ekii&,-+ * 4 4// Al +-...*- 1------ . flD trÂ· / 1 , -- 9.. Wi), ----- l-#:2 - - W 1 Gl - - \Ary->. ---- - L, /- ~-- -----60 1 / 57 - 9045 4 leo 5- X~~ t - '. -- EASEMEâ€¢lf 1 6 142-9;4 9- -~ r ,_ 11 1 -9 1 11 , P Â«/ - AS r U X, : i f i. i r--/ ~4 - 't- :t,i -t--,1--; * fit / // -- rÂ· .t: JA/-1- --.1- :. i li. 5- -1- .8044 \ 4 l.1-- 2 /* f -i.1 . -6Â·- 42? gl- 7-- All&7 ' ~ I e 4 f . -- -2 - - /4 U ---- 1., 4 / i \7,7<,4,3-Â»*m.. ,- -3 4 - 1-1, -- ' 2 -4 4.1 - ,- - -f; - 1 - F V _ . j. Ap& -+S:. 1- -Al K 1 h r _i, *.T 1 - -< . 44/ ---105 1 -- ;6 1 . ! L h ., - I -=. _ If ' /1 / 8 U -, - ~ 47 ---0 . 4 1 - 5060 --- / ..0/ --.91 I / I \\ 0 -' 8- -1--- - y / . -*--/-*- - - Â·A - A'. 1 . / 4- 0 r 2 -- .r 421 Â·42 - . - L .- M , 1 -% 5 / - 0 / C, - -g --8246-- -:- ./ 4 3 - ..Â£ 0 e/44 / 0/ 1. 6 / i . 1 - 1 bel J. , 4- - I 5 4 .-------7 . -- ..6' W . 94 ~~---------Z -- - L : 7 4. 00 h 9 )- -5-1 -~CE.-1-1.- -6801Â·0-= 1.3 . \ - 0 . 0-40, 4 -- .._ 5038 --9 i i./3 1 / - 41/, . - , e 4.' ~-I---Iqi-.-~ -3---7 n 0% 1, / - ' + .... 1 . . .*9*. -- 4/4 4Â£12'-S-- 8034 --- , .~ 46 0 ~t~/ I.I .1 ----7-"8032- 1 9/1.- ---- - - ' --Â· t, p & A,4 1/l - .. . 9 . . r . - -.I - 1 1. 1 - i. -2 - / ~WE 41Â£ HEAE tjf- 41 ~rÂ· '2:, .--'-' STAI - Â· rÂ· r:--4 , j .~ ., i - WILOR,INE < - 0-3 m RECEIVED - t. C - , 3 /T --- 9 14 r.:- VT JUL 1 2 2004 Mj 1 Â« JEST-LD-*3 ~ROAD- _,~~ _ Â¢ - f P. .- SITE DEVELOPhENT FLAW V NoT-r,â€¢44 f+Ati -=ERL G/29/69 14 Community Development ~.. - K.; O.F.,2â„¢17- 2...11< - V-rul-14,25-- ~ 74 r F Al C.2/3 1/5. (Et !0 /vo w.a s> 1 . Warteâ‚¬A- OF OW:LUI< U.irs - G - - , 4 -A /:*. 1 Drf - 514â‚¬T FA/,C-,4/ - R/QU12Â£C" 12.-" FÂ»fc,/to /6 GUILO,6-14 41'41?T- 1 - Ativw'c> P,12' r,2.Â®Fe.Ec, 86' 2-r J g .RECER AftenÂ·rEcluhaL DAA;AN B L AUR - 1.1 4=RES 25 1 LOT 8, 2,LDCA 5, WILDRIC),sa SUSDNISION , Avou 5 ./1-F P 0 80.1114 Â· 4/Inclbiooo- Â· El'Je Cdocco81631 â€¢ (303)328428: " EÂ·4~ ; 6,~' 77 , i 'INT LIMS --4-'8:.Waer 3-Â·...4. T 1 N:11% 11 . LL ---1 PEAK UUÂ© CONal/ANTE Na PEAK L... al,VEY,Kl Ne ' R. O.W.) ST WILDWOOD ROAD (50 *im #-OOP Vt CO le, Goes T ---r- ....i-- V RIN ELEV -8070+4 SEWER MAN+IDLE // mU/~-.2- - Â»IVERT ELEV.-80514Â· 1 I INVERT /1 4/2.5 / SCALE: 1=20' / r DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: 07/10/98 &=&4 +E: ' / -7- \\ / \ 4.73, h I L Delta=204'27'11" , R=95.00' l \\\\ r SEWER LINE 1/ - !/ / L=339.00' EmEd THE 216&19 80,37 DE TOWN Of AVON OfP ) NOTES 4 Z 4 [\ (11 37 1 PEAK LAND SURVEYING. INC, DID NOT CONDUCT A TITLE SEARCH ON OR AROUND â„¢E PROPERTY SHOWN HERON FOR OYIERSHIP'S. EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR 540 ENCUMBRANCES. NO TITLE COMMIâ„¢ENT WAS PROWDED BY THE CUENTÂ· EASE/ENTS SHOh ARE PER THE PLAT ONLY. 2 BASIS Or ELEVAION FE*ER WAN,#OLE #0(8, LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST / FOUND PIN & CAP CORNER Of LOT. RIM ELEVATION - 0082.3', INVERT ELEVATION - 8072.8'. SEWER MAIIHOLE -3 ~ 1 | ~ -1 INC- No~ ,6836 Lri U- I-.:Al' 3 1 I 807.9 SHOWN IN IrS APPROXIMATE LOCAION HEREIN. THERE WAS NO NOTABI ROAD CUT- 20 3 ROADWAY CUT AND FILL SLOPE EASEMEN7 910Â¥N CÂ»t PLAT NOT QUENSIONED AND AND ALL SLOPES IN nOD EXCEPT AS NOaD OZ 4 NOmi ACCORDING TD COLORADO LAW YOU MUST CONMENCE ANY LEGAL- ACTION BASED 9* UPON ANT DEDICT IN THIS SURVEY MTHIN THREE YEARS AF YER YOU ARST LOT 8 CIR. ICATION SID- HEREON. id 2 DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT Â· IN NO SIENT. MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROW IHE DATE OF 2,1-11 EDGE OF ASPHALT \ 1.20 ACRES CXI 1031 W. MIWOOD RD. L.--- 10Â· 1-,0." O 1 I Il Il . \ SURVEÂ¥ORÂ·S CERTIFICATE Â¥ 1 +.07- 911:RiNTEM:PEL=S:89.1.Ic:N'?R*A:%7&20,7,cli:: OF 1,\E-~) C t\\li 1/% SETBACK \ 1 Delta=27'42'12" ~~~E~ ~~ Â·~p ~~RIF~YINZUE:k AND n lAT THE MAP 15 ACCURATE AND R=425.00' L=205.49' DATrÂ· BRENT BIGGS F&Â°r?% %,il.778.8 PEAK LAND SURVEYING. INC. APPROXIMATE EXISTNG _1-4-11 I TOE OF SLOPE It / H Co g f.80'g,1 9 1 26 -'~ ~ /-=BUILDING Â£ 1 SETBACK P \ is. O 111 1 L 1 .\.0 -' Â»'9=11-52' \ '01 REVISIONS: tiva' 1 00 \ \\ APPROXIATE EXISTING \\ TOP or SLOPE RECEIVED i 0 e *\\\ 4 \\ \ 1 1, 5 i i c \?% 1 10 808, ..# \ S \\ % 0 \ \ YELEPHONE PEDE 51*1 0 SEWER MANHOLE Delta==22'55'04" * t 1 2 2004 \ 1 m ELEV.=8082.3 PROJECTS.M INVERT E LEV,-8072 8 f \ 6- R=150.00' 10&2 r L=60.00' ~ \~ FOUND PIN & CAP L S. NO, 16413 US' 0 ommunity Developr~ 1~ ~ Â»* 1 ~~ 4,"4 -166-1 ' r SEWER LINE t $ LA L *f APPRO~(IMATr ...5 OF -- S7T'42'20"W - RIDWAY CUT AND f ILL DESIGNED: SLOPE EASEMENT FOR to 8 - TOWN OF AVON REVIEWED: BRENT : 'EIVED THE PURPOSE OF /CESS DRAWN: JOHN SEWER MANHOLE - LOT 9 746,.903006.8' I + PLC JOB#: 590 >01 - AND AINTENANCE & tHE FOUND PIN & CAP LS. NO. 16836 DATE: 7/10/99 E ' , 2004 CAR PEDEST. SHEET I 590T . 3Dcllkla OIHJVWOOd01 00Â¥130100 1.INA00 319Â¥3 ( 09) 0Â¥08 OOOMallM O-33 5 Zâ‚¬09 6 - 12- d L - -. -12<L.. -- ~. -12.1 -01 I . - 12- -O 11-O 1 ' 1, / , -21 3645- 3,6,48 -z- .Â»lle -1 , .fltlge,6. I I -IH------lt---litatm. -_+f~ 1 5% O 1 W I 41 -2 11 2 4 21 -/1 1- 3648 -- 1 (5 -Z? 111 - 9 -- ---- @53 - TZ I. 2---FrICI -LI--7 m Â·R i of 10 ' 1. 0 --- 1 O 0 7 ~0Â»h - 0 , 19 4 2 1 HArD-==' n + , 1:1 /1~ I - ocli IJ/// 1~023~1415.41 =1 l' 'll -1 3648- L .4.4 -6 .-1.. N.4 11 j m , EÂ· 1 01 ' BR.'2- f f . 2~1-,vrlÂ¢j~5 0 k I ' 1 11=plia: ! F k . 2 | 1 , Izi' cut.~=41-94 -Â®13:Jal*~tÂ¢- 4 j -U 1l 1 - 0 i' i 4\31= a 1 r .L, - ~- %*~:ted"-FIL}JPY.' Â·-4 M I j D. o f..1 [1XI 111 â€¢-el- ' ino h r \ ty. 9 y 1 -6, 1 3 0 A j . 1 -639 EDIA - -9 r i N ~'1 1 '7 / . , I zd-0. 111:111.1.2 -7- -- - -- 2.0-6 - - , 201 -O,1 - -~- 1 1 , 72 4 2 BASEMENT PLAN &( 44 5 110 --- .Eyst,Â·1Â£.1-r__ ARLA Pee.-UNIT- = le)9 G + 9-8*M) â€¢ &Â£9~9 OPOJOI00'91003 Mont 'Yos//10<BPC -33[3+341/ ry/ . 5 -72078-1 S 4- 24'-0 24 La p I 1 1 L 0 _ Â·350 GO 0 - f -I:91 - -Tr-= _1 , 0 1 0 11 -,35 9! 1 I- _ ~ 6 g "=222. - 1 - 410' D -4 2 , 0 --n=-----1,34,CED -3 M --r ~ ./-Yer - I./i ! , 2 i 1 - Â·Â· 4 11=Lib=,1 .371 1 , 1 li -1 7- 11/ T , r 1. - 7 0 Z. 1Â·' Elt - -:- 92 ,. Â£ r - a 00: 1 e[ 0 'Â«01 1 o O vi -- , , i - - 1111 1 = r --- f ~~ - Tr-11---- 2 - 0 . M 1 - O - L_f-. + _ ..A !1. 1 ; 1. Â· .Ar .1 00 p - PlNE _.. _._-_L__ ___._ LIVING 1 '1 2/ 0 04 449. N 0 1 O o i 1 -~ 1 11 'llo -Itli =9 1 -5 222=1 * 1 K. - I ....C n.... Â· '9 8 le.M. i ...2 - 1.~3ZE~~7 k 1 (N)/ I '-4 Ji 00 ' IiI 41 -- / p. LIP 1. 1 11 1 (El: A p ' ' U44.4*_Â®'Im.1 00 _L--3,41 bdi-- .-Ii k 2=- rt I- -- JED 0: 2. 1 1 1 9 N 2 '4 1 1 ,(El .. =*n'~ 11 54Â¢ 1 - 1 - -722 6AR,lGE I ri 21=..1 1 16'%50 D H 1 9 i| 1 1 1 1 10 5.1 . 1 Â£llc> - I 8-0 , t 20-01, 1, 4'-0" ~ 4'-0 li ll'11,1 DE-O' 4 ' , IMAIN -2-00 R PLAN 5E 14 "= l lo " - MAIN Floog AREA PER UN,117- <07Â£2 4 GARAGE AKEA Pet UNFT-= Hum 4 - --Â·-- - _ --_1-23-TAL LIVIKIG ACZA PE.E= 2/hlrr= 2/5.4 41 - Â£969-@ze (coe) Â· LMgop,JOIOD'91803 â€¢ Architect JAJOI' - Noj)ty ' NQ/SM)â‚¬90$ 9031*1-81* ' 9 -3;003â‚¬ ~ 9 -191 11 , I ,2 -6, 4-d' 5'- 2~ , .1 -z,2-0,1 4-0 , 7.- o 4'-o" : 2,5 - 0 I * 4 I ~L----- ................ <7 .. (35 /'/ m p===1 6(31 Ok I [29 1----1 1 l=r W) I 1. r==9=3- 04 9 1 , 1 1 00 0 . I ...... 1 bwl'gns_-- .- P 1 i 9/ o U U le. ~%1 L <i _=-Â·U~- -~FGAE-11 --47~1 H - 11-, -9- -MASIER 1 D mr=TA 11 t.11 f-e,1 5-5 0â€ž , 4.-0,1 , W Loâ€ž .A - 1-1 Lo:' ~ G - n. --83-1 -,1 , - 17 UPPER FLOOR PLAN .56. >4 I f -0 UPPEÂ£ FLOOK AREA PEE UNrr - 191* h,-,L. Fitpu a 90 FIQue ~ 3 Reete SE - E 1 21 leg: E 11â€¢ 2 f --; --- 8 0 CO , - m - W __ ---21----Â·-276.-'/-9Eriâ‚¬-fEr-- ------ --- --1 - 6<29/of - - -- 1 -- ~ ,4 -ak 1 1 --h/- E.,51% 4"ADE 1 . _1.ZE?. 24 .- -61-02 A- 6-c =227Â£*ST S Ck, = 1/4 '6 J 1-0. I x.h i ' 1210'te 10 9, blae BS.â‚¬ - 11- 67 1 lE*E a 81 ..,.24--/ - // â‚¬[f# 81 tkESEE=EEnt===CRAP i 000 077 - 1 -- - - + RE 78 0 ~ 8 Iii ' 60 - -9 â‚¬ 4 - G --- 1 4/, - I ~'|i r- El,5Â·r. (CAPE . Â«,6,~ 6 A- 6 -C L 1 -bux... A- 1%-c _aftÂ«334931iftÂ«-NO K7 â‚¬040â‚¬. 41. 1 120 7 ~:pbl~_..,iUEEE*RE3!E_lhEELQ-Lkw - 1105Â¥ 248/9181(1905 9UZial\9(\ 1 9 -1-Â£- 4 2245Â£910 . T goÂ¢Â£ 6 82,5* 121(74Â£.21 2,96Â£ 0 87 afl- J .W T /0 - - i - al C,wie'79 I . 1 12 "1 --- ..11# ~ B C - 1 G -# 4 1/ -- -I-- -- --I W P -- I lit- -Â« 1 1 -2419-iL,L -~-' A- ' -g- Cs/7-9(9 1 f : 1 -F -1 Der*. 402:ADâ‚¬ 0 0%2 69 1 '9 - -2 , . lili -_i---- --7491 3 5Â«Â«WEIST 7-143--~~ -- ----- RIOÂ¢.090 - 1 1 tÂ©04â‚¬- 0 90 Ricâ€¢Â£ (98..9 1 81 &11,0â‚¬-0 27 R,24'te :7 1 .V 1 - 1Â· -li- 1 --- --- F 1 -1 - 1 , . ~ 119 j D i + f M i, 1 1 44 ' M 6,4 6 455 40 1 1 1 11 1 1 1*'r, 1 ----1--- 'Eaot:~Oaodav-0- FL 009 L4 Â· A- 8-0 - 8,04 4-8-4 --4-2Â«7<Â«61-2 0 -343-912UIM_ 50 14 3--1 1.-- 0 tez9-920(Coc) â€¢ LCOLQOPO,oloo'elsoa Â· tÂ£EENESE' VILL *0121.Â·chhi4 905 -- 338135-1171 1 , 4 -1 4,99 te 6 4-94â‚¬0 6 Fial---4- T g 12147<'E e 39 1 1 , -'I. -, W 11 - -- . :- --------- . "141,1 62/21/04 - 6 1 7 -- --- ~C--1- 1 K/% 4(ADE i i / 500 0 93 --- 1 -21--7- + 9-LA-6 T 13,24 0-16- P RIP<te 0 ,C %04Â£ 886 ---~-------1-- 1- - - la-Kr-- KALâ‚¬ 2 :1*428 I r - 453212121_21 - 8> , 1 '41 4 ' -Â·- a 7 ELE - - 1 .. ..1'll 0002 LED 4. f 273 I r., 1 )-1' 4% *WG - -2-7- '1 .,tr - la I 0O 61 7 7/, 1 ~ '21 9 13Â·Â£Â·C* D-E- F - r-- ex,5Â·r. CCAPE _NORTH-Â«_Â»/ko- - --- 0 Â£929-92Â£(â‚¬0Â£) â€¢ X9lgOPC,op)'91803 - 6â€¢19*]048 puoulp Â· IM NO/* N-G/â‚¬823835Â·:,-Pel3<111 Â£ 1 79 Le 86 -~ ZurÂ£ E g f. 1 J FiT-*- . .. -- U 1, 2 . 1, m 8- C \ 4 1 - i' \- 1 '' 41 1 Co itT/O - ~ f i. - b , ' 1 1 .1 - ex,STÂ· 4â‚¬56DE -m Â· , ed,â€¢r. e ,Â£_ 111 - 61 7 . 77 fl~ 1 AIPE 2 e 84 e,c,#te _ 0~_ gmite 84,4- ' 89 7 210.1 .25 12.<<24Â£ 689 - j ': LIEJ K1 #1 i L. F- -- 1 1 1 0 M 1 // 41 - CL 1 N -- B ' lili ~ ' i <40 /16.4 2 J 1 -- 1 - - i 4 1--60- 91--11-- dj- 2 - ~I OL]' 1U~~9 .-* E D-E- sAâ€¢en, 9 e ~ -4 - - *- - - 1- 7 - 5~ ~ ~~ ~~ J~~03&1DCT-10--E:>-p - - , t ~ ~N91Â§34)I V Hilitl