The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 070604r . 1 -2~ -J -/ 1 , i' i Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 6th, 2004 5:30 pm Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda in Council Chambers) - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - (Please note that all times provided are estimates only) 1. Call to Order at 5:30 pm 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the June 15th,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1 ] VI. Sketch Design Plan (5:35pm - 5:50pm) Property Location: Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2631 Bear Trap Road Applicant VMDA, Mark Donaldson Owner: Shane Bohart [Tab 2] Description: Victor Mark Donaldson is proposing a sketch design to add an additional dwelling unit to an existing single-family home on Bear Trap Road. The property is zoned duplex and this dwelling unit is the second unit. The concept for this application was presented to the Commission during the Work Session of the May 18th,2004 meeting. VII. Sketch Design Plan (5:50pm - 6:05pm) Property: Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3055 Wildridge Road Applicant: Andrew Karow Owner. Andrew Karow [Tab 3] Description: Andrew Karow is proposing a duplex residence on Wildridge Road in Wildridge. Proposed materials include: stucco, wood siding, aluminum window cladding, stone accents, and asphalt shingles. The design would require a significant amount of fill (addition of soil) in order to locate the structure where proposed. Each unit of the duplex totals approximately 3,800 square feet. Vlll. Amendments to Zoning Code & Design Guidelines (6:05pm - 6:45pm) Public Hearing Property Location: Town of Avon Applicant: Town Staff [Tab 4] Description: \n response to comments and feedback received from the building community during Public Hearings with the Town Council, staff was directed to clarify and improve the design review and building permit processes. Changes proposed include clarifications to the building height definition, PUD process, and public notice when reviewing Preliminary Subdivision plans in conjunction with PUD applications. Various amendments to the Design Guidelines are proposed and include: new sketch design plan requirements, appeals process revision, consolidated final design checklist, building height clarification to match Zoning Code, retaining wall definition, and a revised scheduling section. Posted on July 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions XI. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) XII. Adjourn (6:45pm) Posted on July 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions 1 Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission June 15, 2004 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Chris Evans, Commissioner Terry Smith and Commissioner Bob Trueblood. Commissioner Terry Smith arrived at 6:10 pm. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Amendments to the agenda include Item VI, Final Design Plan, Property Location: Lot 11, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5720 Wildridge Road East, Applicant Er\c Johnson Architect PC, Owner: Charlie Viola and Item VII, Final Design Plan, Property: Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2100 Long Spur & 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop, Applicant/Owner: Phil Matsen, both moved to Consent Agenda. As well, moving of Item X, Minor Project - Duplex Design Change, Property Location: Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision/4040 Eaglebend Drive, Applicant: Er\c Johnson Architect PC Owner: Todd Grzywinski, for presentation prior to the Mountain Sage PUD, Item IX. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Struve recused himself from Item IX, PUD Amendment, Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East, ApplicanUOwner: Jay Peterson. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Didier motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the June 1st, 2004, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; movement to the Consent Agenda of Item VI, Final Design Plan, Property Location: Lot 11, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5720 Wildridge Road East, Applicant Eric Johnson, Architect PC, Owner: Charlie Viola and Item VII, Final Design Plan, Property: Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2100 Long Spur & 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop, Applicant/Owner: Phil Matsen. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VI. Final Design Plan Property Location: Lot 11, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5720 Wildridge Road East Applicant Er\c Johnson Architect PC Owner: Charlie Viola F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\061504.doc Page 1 of 6 Description: Eric Johnson is proposing a custom single-family residence on Wildridge Road East. The building has approximately 3,500 square feet of livable space and features a 3-car garage. The proposed design makes use of boulder retaining walls to access the site and a structured wall extending from the easterly garage door. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingles, copper flashings, stone, stucco, wood, and stamped concrete. The sketch design plan for this home was approved at the May 18, 2004 Commission meeting. Application moved to the Consent Agenda. VII. Final Design Plan Property: Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2100 Long Spur & 2250 Saddle Ridge Loop Applicant: Phil Matsen Owner. Phil Matsen Description: Phil Matsen is proposing a duplex residence at the intersection of Long Spur and Saddle Ridge Loop roads in Wildridge. The corner lot under review is quite flat compared to the other remaining developable lots in Wildridge. Proposed materials include stucco siding, wood trim, stone, fieldstone, and asphalt shingles. A Sketch Design Plan was approved at your June 1, 2004 meeting. Application moved to the Consent Agenda. VI11. Sketch Design Plan Property: Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision/5039 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Dantas Builders, Inc. Owner: Dantas Builders, Inc. Description: Dantas Builders, Inc. is proposing a duplex residence with the two units totaling 9,012 square feet (living space and garage space). The building materials will include stucco siding, stone veneer base, decks with wood railings, and asphalt shingles. The proposed maximum height is 34'9". Ken Kovalchik presented the staff report. He discussed the site topography. Railings for driveways were discussed and would be addressed at Final Design. Michael Pukas, architect for the project, approached the podium for commissioner questions. Commissioner review included conversation of the steepness of the site, the view of the breezeway as a duplex connection, parking/driveway issues, and additional landscaping to enhance open area. Commissioner Didier motioned for approval with the five conditions as mentioned by staff. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion to include the conditions: 1). Retaining wall would be structural and registered engineer designed with three cross sections along the driveway; 2). Below elevated party wall, engineering on the retaining wall and proposal on railing; and 3). Retaining walls cannot encroach along the 10-foot drainage easement without application for a variance, 4). Sloping, snow storage and drainage easement shall be indicated on F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\061504.doc Page 2 of 6 2 the survey and site plans, and 5). The window plans shall match the floor plans. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. IX. PUD Amendment - Public Hearing Property Location: Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East Applicant/Owner: jay Peterson Description: The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of duplex and triplex zoning. The proposed amendment is to change the zoning to single family and downzone the total dwelling units of the properties to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) separate lots. The Commission has tabled this application at the applicant's request to this date to seek additional input from the neighborhood and the Commission before proceeding with a revised application. He would like to receive input on several different concepts as discussed with the neighbors before proceeding with this application. Tambi Katieb presented the Staff Report. He read into the record three fax letters: Carol Tyler for support, Michelle Mayne for denial and Carol Morton for denial of this application. Jay Peterson, applicant, approached the podium and discussed the 3 changes to his original concept and encouraged direction from the public as present to get feedback on his designs. He began with presentation of Plan #1 that shows the current zoning of 11 units. Plan #2 was for 8 lots and single-family lots with access from Longsun Lane. Plan #3 (the proposed concept) would have 3 single-family lots off of Wildridge Road and 5 single-family homes on Longsun Lane with the road no longer an extended cul-de-sac but a private driveway to the homes. Public Hearing Opens Mac McDevitt, Lot 54, approached the podium. He felt the new plan was better than the other two and could see salvaging the plan by eliminating Lot 5, and secondly, he would have Lot 5 on the east side of the driveway (up the hill), and thirdly, truncate the lower area. Rick Petrillo, owner of Lot 62, liked the proposed concept better and suggested similar square footage for each lot size. Dave Power, Lot 51, was against any extension of Longsun Lane. Bernard Black believed 7 units would be better than 8. Buz Reynolds stated that the three singles on Wildridge Road would stick out and felt the nestled look would be preferred in the neighborhood, and mentioned that value in the property was preferred with single-family units rather than a triplex. Michael Haze, Lot 52, cannot support the application due to increased traffic although the new plan with single-family homes on Longsun with less F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\061504.doc Page 3 of 6 density by the Wildridge Road access was positive. Lynn Young, 5161 Longsun, voiced the new plan was better and voiced concern regarding the non- developable land and preferred the lesser density on Longsun Lane. Barbara Bright, representing Michelle Mayne, discussed the traffic, the breakdown and extension of the existing cul-de-sac and was opposed to the development. Genita Mayne voiced opposition to the increased traffic. John Schwartz, 5160 Longsun Lane, was strongly opposed to Plan A, the original application. Tami Marto, 5134 Longsun, was opposed because building in an un- developable area leads to precedent and was opposed to additional traffic. Brian Nolan, 5191 Longsun Lane, Lot 53, asked why un-developable land exists in Wildridge. Buz Reynolds responded elimination of switchbacks was on lots defined as un-developable. Mr. Nolan preferred the single-family units to the original Wildridge PUD Zoning. Grant Rogers, Lot 59, 5164 Longsun, was concerned with the increase of traffic on Longsun Lane and is opposed to the application as originally presented and is encouraged with Plan #3. Jay Peterson mentioned that the original plan would create greater asphalt, it would be the extension of Longsun, create parking in the road, as the road is an access easement but preferred the single-family units. Bernard Black stressed consideration for un-developable lots. PULBIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner review began with discussing traffic, use of un-developable land as a precedent, pursing the new concept (Plan #3) to minimize the traffic and seemed more acceptable to the neighborhood. Concerns with the non- developable land and the use of the original plan were discussed. Jay Peterson asked for tabling of the original application in order to work on the new plan. Norm Wood, as Acting Director of Community Development, voiced that the application is either withdrawn on the application or acted upon by the commission. Jay Peterson proceeded to withdraw the application in consideration of the residents of Longsun Lane's comments. As the application was withdrawn, the commissioners took no action. X. Minor Project - Duplex Design Change Property Location: Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision/4040 Eaglebend Drive Applicant: Er\c Johnson Architect PC Owner: Todd Grzywinski Description: The Final Design for this project was approved at your May 20th, 2003 meeting. The applicant is proposing a duplex at 4040 Eaglebend Drive. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\061504.doc Page 4 of 6 The residence is approximately 6,200 square feet in size, includes bridges and decks, and sits on the Eagle River on Eaglebend Drive. Some of the materials proposed include: lap siding, asphalt shingles, and stucco. The applicant submitted plans for Building Permit on June 2nd, 2004 and there have been design and architectural changes made to the residence since the approval of Final Design. Application has been moved to the Consent Agenda. XI. Minor Project - Additional Parking Spaces & Landscaping Property Location: Lot 11, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3078 Wildridge Rd Applicant: Fred Hiller Owner: Fred Hiller Description: The application under consideration requests approval of 3 additional parking spaces and landscaping modifications. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Fred Hiller, applicant/owner, approached the podium and defined the lot in question. Home occupation standards for the use of the premises as a limo service needs to be addressed as it is not permitted in Wildridge. Commissioner Didier moved to deny based on the commission review criteria outlined in the Staff Report. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. Motion for denial passed unanimously. XII. Comprehensive Plan Update and Public Input Topic: Comprehensive Plan Update App#cant: Town of Avon Description: Staff will update the Commission on the progress of the Comprehensive Plan project. The public is invited to attend and submit oral and written comments on what issues they consider important to address. Mapping and information received at Steering Committee Meeting #3 and #4 will be reviewed. Tambi Katieb discussed the Comprehensive Plan Maps as presented to the commissioners. The maps presented alternative land use of areas within the Town of Avon. June 29th is a Public Open House and the progression of the plan to date. It is intended to take the plan to the neighborhoods for comment and public understanding. XIII. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) A. Update on Anticipated Amendments to Design Guidelines, Zoning, and Review processes. Tambi Katieb discussed the design guideline changes and changes to format. There were changes to the technical direction of the plans that will be submitted. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\061504.doc Page 5 of 6 XV. Adjourn Commissioner Smith made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Didier seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Andrew Karow Acting Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\061504.doc Page 6 of 6 Staff Report ....57 SKETCH DESIGN PLAN AVON COLORADO July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date June 28,2004 Project type Addition of second dwelling unit to duplex lot Legal description Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 2631 Bear Trap, South Introduction This sketch design application proposes to construct the second unit of a duplex zoned lot. The final design for the existing home was approved in 1994. The applicant is proposing to construct the other unit totaling 5993 square feet. The connection from the existing north unit to the proposed south unit will be via a foyer/entry gallery, the south unit will have a separate entrance- the foyer entry gallery will be used to access the north unit only. The proposed party wall connection for this duplex will be 10 feet wide. The applicant is proposing to use building materials for the new residence that compliment the existing home. Both the applicant and owner have met witi Staff on two occasions prior to submitting this Sketch Design application. On May 601, 2004 the applicant/owner met with Staff and submitted for initial review concept site and elevation plans to construct a second duplex unit on Lot 30, Block 2, south of the original structure on the lot. On May 13th, 2004 Staff met with the applicanâ‚¬owner for a second meeting. The applicant and owner attended your May 18*, 2004 work session meeting and presented design Option A and B for your discussion. It was unanimous among the Planning and Zoning Commission members that they did not feel the two design options presented to them met the criteria for a duplex connection as stated in the Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines. Likewise, Staff continues to believe that the proposed connection between the two homes is marginal at best and does not meet the duplex zoning for this lot, particularly as it relates to the criteria as stated in the guidelines: "Duplex development must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site." Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 rmlitFUThe \.\1.1.n Town of Avon Community Deve ent Page 2 of 5 â€¢ Allowed use: A duple. nome is an allowed use for this lot, ho....er as proposed, the duplex does not appear to conform to the zoning code definition of being a "detached building containing two dwelling units" but instead proposes two detached buildings marginally connected. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units (duplex) per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project proposes site coverage of approximately 2.8%. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25 foot building setback for the front lot line and 10 foot building setback for the side and rear lot lines. â€¢ Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. There is a front 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement; side lot 7.5 foot Utility and Drainage Easement; and rear lot 10 foot Utility and Drainage Easement. â€¢ Building Height: This design does not appear to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. The slab elvation is 8179'. The roof plan (Sheet Al.3) indicates two roof ridge elevations over the 35' maximum allowable height. The roof ridge at 8221'-7" would be 42'-7" in height and the roof ridge at 8216' would be 37' in height. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. â€¢ Parking: Six spaces are required for this project and 9 spaces have been proposed by the applicant. The existing (north) residence provides four parking spaces (two inside the garage and two in front o f the garage) The applicant is proposing 3 spaces in the garage and two spaces in front of the garage A,r the south unit. Only one parking space will fit in front of the garage (using the Town if Avon 9'x18' parking standard) without extending into the existing driveway. iherefore, four parking spaces can be provided for the south unit which still meets Town parking requirements. â€¢ Snow Storage: A snow storage area was not indicated in the Sketch Design. It appears that an adequate snow storage area can be located on the south side of the south unit. This will be reviewed at Final Design. â€¢ Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be reviewed at Final Design. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist for the proposed second unit, however, the proposed 'duplex design' does not conform to the design guidelines and challenges the zoning code definition of a duplex comprising of"a detached building containing two dwelling units" by essentially proposing two detached buildings only marginally connected and not creating an integrated and unifed structure. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon Community De ' iment Page 3 of 5 â€¢ Site Development. o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site as proposed, however fails to comply with the duplex guidelines. o Site Access: The north unit currently exists and is accessed via an asphalt driveway. The proposed south unit will utilize this driveway for access. The existing grade for the driveway does not exceed 5%. o Parking and Loading: The number of parking spaces currently provided for the north unit and proposed for the south unit will comply with the parking requirements for the Town of Avon. However, maneauverability may be difficult for the north unit. It appears that an adequate turn around area in front of the north unit garage will be difficult (22' wide turn around area). Vehicles exiting from the north unit will have to back-up (uphill) approximately 220' before reaching Bear Trap Road. o Easements: This project is in compliance with all platted easements. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. o Drainage: Positive drainage must be provided away from the structure. It appears that the area in front of the proposed foyer and entry gallery and the existing garage may be a problem area for drainage. As exists today, all drainage can freely flow to the west side of the driveway. The proposed foyer and entry gallery would block all drainage from flowing away from the north unit and will be trapped at the north unit entry and garage areas. No drainage features were indicated on the skectch plan to sh.,w how this problem will be alleviated. At Final Design detail will also have :o be shown regarding how drainage will be provided under the proposed foyer and entry gallery and how this may affect the retaining wall to the west of the foyer and entry gallery. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design does not conform to the duplex development guideline, particularly as it relates to creating an integrated structure on site. Also, it should be noted that the angle o f the existing residence does not appear to be correct when one compares the residence on the site plan (Sheet AS1.0) to the West elevation (Sheet AS2.1). o Building Height: As proposed, the height of the building does not comply with the 35-foot allowance. It appears there are two roofridge elevations that are over the 35' height restriction. The lower level floor plan (Sheet Al.0) indicates an elevation of 8179' and this elevation would be considered the most restrictive (finished) grade. The roof plan (Sheet Al.3) indicates two ridges that are over 35'. One ridge elevation is 8221'-7" (42'-7") and the second ridge elevation is 8216' (37'). o Building Materials and Colors: The north unit currently exisits and the materials proposed for the south unit will match the north unit. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The proposed connection of exterior wall planes does not create an integrated duplex design. Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon Community Deve ent Page 4 of 5 o Duplex Deve,upments: The Town of Avon Guidelines .._te that "Duplex Developments must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. Two single-family residences 'bridged' by a breezeway or other non- structural and non-habitable connection does not meet the intent of a duplex design. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms, and landscaping. While 'mirror image' duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family home." While the proposed entry gallery and foyer could be considered habitable and structural, the two units are not an 'integrated' or 'unified' structure on this site. The proposed connection for the duplex units appears to be two single-family homes bridged by a breezeway, which is a connection that is not allowed as stated in the Town of Avon Design Guidelines. Staff Recommendation Though there are a number of technical issues in this Sketch Plan submittal that the applicant may be able to address prior to submitting a Final Design, the primary issue with this application as proposed is whether the connection for this duplex meets the criteria for a duplex connection as stated in the Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines. While the applicant has argued that the foyer/entry gallery may be structural and habitable, the two residences still appear to be 'bridged' which does not meet the intent of a duplex design as stated in the Design Review Guidelines and this report. For these reasons Staff is recommending Sketch Des: gn denial for the proposed duplex residence on Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision If you have any questions regarding this project or al y planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respeitfully submitted, i ULLIE Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon Community De ' iment Page 5 of 5 9 I . C -*..Â·,* 4Â· -fre~, . .4.4 34 ...: 0 â€¢ .*7 .P; X -- I.V./4, i*.t.:/ '7 - ] 42 I. 1, lA -i,+f 1. .- 14 .- . 14" f 7 41- 1 4.1 .7 'r ../ ~'4i Â·Â·. ,364:.1 94 '. I 1,,f-:4 L . ..1 1./".46'. .4 1 Â¢ d + 1,1 1 19.:.-.-1~. - 20 #+ 'a. Area of proposed entry gallery/foyer and proposed duplex addition. ~ Â»un-- --r -. i *: i :0Â£41*//72%32. .Â·LÂ» 1, - U - 413 . - I'v"*TWFFE..92410"Â·-*-' ..~th' ~ ~' +10.51 r -t 3 4 7- i - 2. , ; 7 - 4 6 , . 4- I B ri; 1 . 4. 4.- I. 1 .1 *11 1,1 ....V ..i . ... '11, 2 .'iÂ·Â·Â·4' ./Â·Â·'' 9 2 4 a Area where proposed duplex addition would be located. Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 1/4 Staff Report ATEN SKETCH DESIGN PLAN COLORADO July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date June 29,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 3055 Wildridge Road Introduction Andrew Karow is proposing a duplex on the downhill side of Wildridge Road. The building is approximately 7,800 square feet (including garages) in size. The proposed building materials include: stucco, wood siding, aluminum window cladding, stone accents, and asphalt shingles. The design would require a significant amount of fill (addition of soil) in order to locate the structure where proposed. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Review . Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project appears to comply with this requirement and would need to be confirmed at Final Design. The total impervious coverage for the lot appears to approach 23%. â€¢ Setbacks: All setbacks are labeled on the site plan and the entire building envelope is contained within the platted setbacks. The boulder walls located in the 10' setback should be removed. â€¢ Easements: A portion of the driveway is located within the front 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. Staff recommends that this area of the driveway and the associated boulder retaining wall be removed from this easement. â€¢ Building Height: It does not appear that this building conforms to the maximum height allowance of 35'. Although difficult to determine since the roof plan (sheet A2.4) ridge elevations do not match the ridge elevations called out on the building elevations (sheets Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 \RI' 01 the V.\1.1.!A I Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Karow Duplex Sketch Design Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 A3.0 & A3.1), the building must come into compliance by final design submittal. To help determine height, the roof ridgelines must be shown on the site plan and all roof ridge elevations shall be called out on the roof plan. â€¢ Grading: The Design Guidelines state that "site improvements should be designed to conform with existing site topography to minimize required grading and effect on adjacent properties." A significant amount of fill (addition of soil) is required with the submitted site design in order to achieve the desired massing. Additionally, the existing grades indicated on the elevation plans (A3.0 & A3.1) appear incorrect. In some instances the existing grades appear to be off by up to seventeen feet vertically. This should be addressed by final design submittal. â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and it appears that at least 7 functional spaces (including garage spaces) are provided on site. â€¢ Snow Storage: It appears that sufficient on-site snow storage will be available for the proposed site design. This design requirement will be reviewed at final design for compliance with Town standards. Areas are reserved on either side of the driveway and between the two units that may be used for snow storage. â€¢ Landscaping: A Landscaping Plan will be reviewed at Final Design. All landscaping must comply with the revised landscaping guidelines. On the Site Plan it appears that there will be areas of turf grass behind the structure. No more than 20% of the total landscaped area may be irrigated. Compliance with this requirement must be demonstrated with an irrigation table at Final Design submittal. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. A single-family or duplex may be built on the property. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The guidelines state "buildings should blend in with natural settings, be stepped in appearance where practical....and not appear to intrude or project from a lot with no relation to the surrounding landforms." It does not appear that the location and massing of the building complements the existing topography of the site, nor does the building appear to be designed to step with the existing (natural) grades. The Commission should review this criteria before action. o Site Access: Entrance to the site is provided with a relatively steep (approaching 8%) driveway. All site access grades appear to comply with Town requirements. The access should be perpendicular to the Right-of-Way. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Karow Duplex Sketch Design Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 As stated, a portion of the driveway and a small boulder retaining wall are located within a 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. Staff does not support the current driveway layout within this platted easement and recommends that the driveway be moved out of the easement by final design. o Parking and Loading: The parking spaces provided are in compliance with Town standards. It appears that there is adequate turnaround space for vehicles leaving the garage doors. Additional spot elevations should be provided 20' out from the garage doors to ensure compliance with Town of Avon driveway grade requirements. The grades leaving the garage doors appear to exceed the allowed 4% maximum grade in these areas and there appears to be a 6" drop from the garage slab to the driveway. These items should be clarified by final design. o Easements: As mentioned, a retaining wall and portions of the proposed driveway are located within the Town's 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. o Drainage: All drainage appears to comply with the Guidelines and the proposed grading should function properly. There is a drainage arrow on the driveway that is incorrectly labeled near the 9.8% grade. o Snow Removal and Storage: It appears that snow storage can be accommodated on-site. This will be reviewed at Final Design. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The guidelines state that buildings should be orientated to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors. This design is taking advantage of view corridors by staying as high up on the lot as possible. o Building Height.' The building appears to exceed the allowed building height of 35'. This must be addressed prior to final design. All roof ridge elevations must be depicted on the site plan by final design, and the ridge elevations on the roof plan must match the elevations on the building elevations. o Building Materials and Colors: Materials and colors will be reviewed at final design. Indigenous natural or earth tones are required in residential neighborhoods. According to the provided material legend proposed materials may include: stucco, wood siding, aluminum clad windows, stone accents, and asphalt shingles. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: Architectural interest is provided on each elevation of the structure. All proposed roof pitches equal 6:12. The proposed roofing material is asphalt shingles. â€¢ Landscaping: Landscaping will be reviewed in detail with a final design submittal. An irrigation table will be required on the site plan on the final design submittal. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends sketch design approval for the duplex on Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge with the following conditions to be resolved prior to Final Design submittal: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Karow Duplex Sketch Design Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 1. The boulder wall and area of the driveway located within the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement must be removed. 2. The roof plan (sheet A2.4) ridge elevations do not match the ridge elevations called out on the building elevation plan sheets (sheets A3.0 & A3.1) and the building appears to exceed 35' in height. This must be clarified and the building must come into compliance with the maximum height requirement. Roof ridges must be shown on the site plan. 3. The survey provided is in excess of 3 years old and needs to meet National mapping accuracy standards. The snow note in not acceptable and the topographic map should be re-certified. 4. Boulder walls must be moved from the 10' side building setback. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Z.+=Rk Matt Pielsticker Planning Technician L â€¢ .iD 2*26.22Â£22 . t - & I. ew 44. ali; r.1- Â·4 _ 1 1 m -- * f ' Â«1~f . 97 , 4,9 'I *Â·t , }. . 1 , . ..10 *.Â· /3 I. . Al, I : .. Â· Â·. jv..* *1 + '.b, t .3 ' 4 6. 11 4 -4 Â·IS... , 1,i i. ./ 48,#A , I :-1. tv, On Lot 106 looking South towards neighboring duplex on Lot 105 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Karow Duplex Sketch Design Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 ...............EL.' -14&.*, 11-1 â‚¬ 7. % 4.1..... . . , . * , 31 .#9 <4~1 - %04 On middle of Lot 105 looking west towards the rear property line . 't, Ir< 7 1% 2, 7.2.,j ..! Y : - 7, * 2. 4 . qu, ... : 1 1 I. *>o .rl'|,. 4 r *402 . p . a.2 7.' 1Â·Â· 4Â·ft , 1, 2 .....0 4 0..0. 'jr 1- + , . 4, r I '~Â· '4~" , - u~' 4 / t.. , ... 4 ' 2% A , 2,v /4. On middle of Lot 105 looking north towards neighboring duplex on Lot 107 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Karow Duplex Sketch Design Plan July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 9 . ./ - 1. 1 6 . , 4 +I '..... .~A.'Alli./ -9~~ . Â¢ -Â·. 4 .r. i --4~4Â£94 ..1:0 -.1 '11.4-,5,(r.<057.2 4.77,:tkÂ· -'*14 L,4:~tÂ·;Â·jj~t:Cli *t .f~gul*4- :tw Â·64...'..2. ~.g ~ ~;).~.*.2:#ij#~'~i~~.4,Â·< tt j* '.4.....1.i*84''t)~,472.74<i{'9;7t' 1:),S.f;Â·:t,, 44*.: Â·-ii:~: ; ' : ~Â»4*i;**~Wih**;~ 1 '.Af'M.t,~.&~~1**t,;41444Â£.Mi: 040Â£2 1 .~ - .lkÂ» p>Â·~,r:~ily#16;Vi*(5 W On rear property line looking east towards Wildridge Road Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Tambi Katieb, AICP, Community Development Norman Wood, Acting Director Date July 1, 2004 Re: Proposed revisions to Design Review Guidelines and Municipal Code Background Attached to this memo are two resolutions being forwarded to you for review, discussion, and recommendations to Town Council prior to adoption. The changes presented in each resolution are the result of several meetings with Town Council and the Building Community wherein an exchange on how we can revise/improve our process in both design review and zoning code matters. At the same time, staff had considered and discussed several of the proposed changes outside of those meetings over the last year an effort to continually improve our process while remaining protective of the need to regulate development to the desires of the Town Council and citizens. Resolution 04-19 proposes to amend the Avon Municipal Code with respect to the following: â€¢ Building Height Definition: Clarify the measurements within and outside the structure proposed, to avoid continued confusion and changing interpretation by staff over the years. â€¢ PUD Submittal Requirements and PUD Amendment procedures: Establishing minimum submittal requirements for all applications, addressing applications proposed in conjunction with a development agreement, and setting forth several new submittal requirements. â€¢ Development agreements and PUD applications: Establishing the use of development agreements and PUD application minimums. â€¢ Coordination of Public Notice provisions with Preliminary Subdivision applications: Avoiding confusion (as recently experienced on several PUD applications) when sending public notice out for Commission and Council public hearings by consolidating the notice for both applications. â€¢ Clarification of existing parking standards for Commercial Land Use: Correcting a typographic error in the new codebook for Shopping and Convenience Goods (retail). â€¢ Revised SPA/PUD definition in the Subdivision Regulation: Coordinating the consolidated public notice approach with PUD applications to match the language proposed in the PUD regulations. Resolution 04-20 proposes to amend the existing Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines with respect to the following: â€¢ Revised Sketch Design Review Application process (and review procedure) â€¢ Revised Scheduling Process â€¢ Consolidated Checklist for Final Design â€¢ Building Height clarification (to match Zoning Code definition) â€¢ Clarify topographic survey definition (to meet National Map Accuracy Standards for vertical and horizontal accuracy) â€¢ Retaining wall definition (non-structural walls and diagram) â€¢ Site grading clarification and requirements â€¢ Appeals process to match recent update We anticipate that the Commission, building and design community and members of the public will have questions on the proposed changes during your meeting. Accordingly, we have anticipated holding at least two meetings with the Commission before moving these matters back to Town Council to hold subsequent public hearings and final adoption of the codes. Staff and the Town Attorney will be available at your meeting to answer any questions that you may have on the proposed amendments. F.\Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2004\DRG and AMC CHANGES 2004.doc TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-20 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VARIOUS REVISIONS TO THE TOWN OF AVON RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES TO TOWN COUNCIL AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS, AND CLARIFICATIONS OF DEFINITIONS, PROCEDURES AND CHECKLISTS I I THEREAS, Titles 2 of The Avon Municipal Code establishes the Planning and Zoning ~~ Commission as a design review body; and I I THEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission adopted the current Town ofAvon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines in 1996, and realizes the document should be periodically updated to reflect revisions to the zoning code and continue to serve the public interest; and I I THEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the attached revisions VV (â€žExhibit A") to Resolution 04-20 Series of 2004, and held a public hearing as required by the Avon Municipal Code to review the proposed amendments; ~~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council the approval of changes set forth in Resolution 04-20 Series of 2004 in order to amend the existing Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines as adopted. ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-20 DRG Revision Adoption.doc *, 6,#2 14; -' -F Vt } -m -2 , AVON COLORADO TOWN OF AVON RESIDENTIAL, COMME RCIAL. AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW GUDELINES PROCEDURES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED NOVEMBER 6, 2001 (REVISED AUGUST 10, 2004) Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 1 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 Table of Contents Sections 1/ Purpose and Intent Page 3 2/ Authority Page 4 3/ Definitions and Standards Page 5-9 4/ Residential Development Guidelines Site Development Page 10-15 Building Design Page 16-18 Landscaping Page 19-22 Miscellaneous Items Page 23-24 5/ Commercial and Industrial Development Guidelines A. Site Development Page 25-31 B. Building Design Page 32-37 C. Landscaping Page 38-41 D. Miscellaneous Items Page 41-42 6/ Application Requirements and Processing Page 43-44 7/ Planning and Zoning Commission Review Page 45-47 8/ Miscellaneous Regulations Page 48 Appendices 1. Recommended Plant List Page 49-52 2. Town of Avon Noxious Weeds Page 53 3. Sketch Design Plan/Final Design Plan Application & Checklist Page 54-58 4. Pollution Control Plan Page 59-62 5. Stormwater Control Plan Page 63-69 6. Example Color Board Page 70-71 7. Example Site Plan Page 72 8. Fee Schedule Page 73 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Community Development Staff: Ruth Borne, Director Tambi Katieb Eric Johnson Planning and Zoning Commissioners: Chris Evans, Chairman Andrew Karow Paul Klein Greg Macik Michael McClinton Brian Sipes Ron Wolfe Funded in part by a grant from: Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 2 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 COP> 1. Purpose and Intent Design Philosophy The general design philosophy for the Town of Avon is to preserve and protect property values by creating an aesthetic quality throughout the built environment of our community. The Town should continue to be perceived as a contemporary mountain town, complementary to the natural landscape and unbuilt environs. The Town should appear as a cohesive unit comprised of simple building forms, subdued colors, and predominantly pitched roofs. In residential areas, the relationship between buildings and the natural environment should be harmonized rather than dominating. Landscaping should blend the surrounding natural environment and the home, not hide one from the other. Form, scale, proportion, and materials should support the natural environs and reinforce those characteristics that uniquely identify a neighborhood's built environ as it relates to the Town. - ,~fwir/:400.- !. -11Â¢, =I-~11715~4 ktrl- . 4 M~ --41 4-1141 1. 4, 4 1 .1. ff-.L AE#- 1 1 7.Rq....'-,1.'*ii**h'MitIU~14& #144rt'*'41111* r- 7 - I 1 .739 -1 + t.66 * ef49 1 <-f.T;1444.T.*11:,30~: 9*-L..;4 1144'L : 1~14't< -, 1- i-4-6-24 411 f.11-,111 4*1* r i#-!1 1111~1 *10~ 11 - J,'h.;rf i ~--i ~ 4.fiki Lk@lfâ‚¬5-4 .- 1,%: 11?A, (1141.14:Til -I 1,~.r"--#--,h.-L . te,11 2*141>61116,,1 .1 ~-131â€¢ILI VE. C,11<~4~,~-~~~,*Â»- Typical Wildridge Vista : From Wildridge Road East Looking South towards Beaver Creek. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 3 Adopted November 6,2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 2. Authority The authority to enact 'Design Review Guidelines' is granted by Chapter 2.16 of The Avon Municipal Code, which specifically states: C. The objectives of the design-review function of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be as follows: a. To prevent excessive or unsightly grading ofproperty which could cause disruption of natural watercourses or scar natural landforms; b. To ensure that the location and configuration of structures, including signs and signage, are visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and structure and that there shall be conformance to the master plan o f the town; c. To ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the town's overall appearance, with surrounding development, with natural and existing landforms, and with officially approved development plans, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located; d. To ensure that plans for the landscaping ofproperty and open spaces conform with the rules and regulations as prescribed by the Town and by this chapter and to provide visually pleasing settings for structures on the same site and on adj oining and nearby sites (Ord. 83-11). Purpose and Intent To establish procedures, rules, and regulations by which the Commission shall receive, review, and rule on applications for the design of any proposed alterations to real property, including land and any improvements on that land, within the Town o f Avon. Scope The scope of these procedures for design review includes but is not limited to site grading, excavation or fill; the location and configuration of structures on a site; the architectural design of structures including color and materials; landscaping of sites including number, size, placement, species of plantings and provisions for maintenance systems of same. The Commission shall review and act upon the general design and appearance of any building, construction, paving, grading, or landscaping proposed on any lot or parcel of land within the Town, including municipal and other government projects. It shall be unlawful to begin any such work prior to approval by the Commission. Compatibility These Rules of Procedure are in accordance with Section 2.16.070 of the Avon Municipal Code, and details the procedures for approval of development plans required by Section 17.12.020 of the Avon Municipal Code. These Rules are intended to complement other ordinances of the Town, and shall neither duplicate nor supersede them. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 4 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10,2004 3. Definitions and Standards Access: The place, means, or way by which pedestrians and vehicles shall have adequate and usable ingress and egress to property, use, or parking space. Accessory Structures: An accessory structure ('building' or 'use') means a subordinate building or use, which located on the same lot on which the main building or use is situated and which is reasonably necessary and incidental to the conduct of the primary use of such building or main use. Access Grade: The slope of a road, street, driveway, or other means of access, as measured from the backside of pan along the centerline of the means of access. Annual High Water Mark: The visible line on the edge or a river, stream, lake, pond, spring or seep up to which the presence and action o f water are so usual and long conditions (with a recurrence interval o f one (1) year or less) so as to create a distinct character with respect to vegetation and the nature of the soil. Applicant: An owner or owner's representative who is authorized to represent and/or act upon any application or submittal. Architect: An architect licensed in the State of Colorado. Architectural Projection: When an architectural projection (i.e. chimney, cupola) physically projects beyond the plane of a required limitation (i.e. height). Best Management Practice (BMP): A structural device designed to temporarily or permanently store or treat stormwater runo ff in order to mitigate flooding, reduce pollution, and provide other amenities. BMP's include wet ponds, created wetlands, filters, and infiltration trenches and galleries. Berm: A mound o f earth used to screen or separate one area from another to reduce visual, noise and similar impacts o f development. Berm may also mean the act o f pushing earth into a mound. Building Code: In the Town of Avon, the most recently adopted version of the Building Code shall apply. Building Envelopes: That portion of a lot within which all buildings are confined. A specified area that does not alter or otherwise affect existing setbacks or easements. Building Height: The distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point to the top o f a flat or mansard roo f or the highest ridgeline o f a sloping roo f. Note: Building Height is always measured from the most restrictive grade, either existing or proposed (finished) grade. All elevations must be labeled in numeric form. Existing elevations must be shown through the structure on the site plan. Building height means the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point outside the building to the top o f a flat roo f or mansard roo f or to the highest ridgeline o f a sloping roo f. Within a building, height shall be measured vertically from any point on a flat roof, mansard roof, or highest ridgeline (for sloping roofs) to the existing grade directly below said point. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 5 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 ' Maximum Building Height Interior Section / f 11.T.S. Maximum Building Height Original;Existing Grade Maximum I Building Height i 'er- - Building Setbacks: A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on a lot. Construction (Activity): Work done on a job site that produces an altered or new structure. Includes excavation, assembly, and erection o f components. Construction Staging Plan: A site plan submitted with final design plans showing, at the minimum: contractor parking, construction materials storage, limits of site disturbance, snow storage, refuse storage, sanitation facilities, project signage, and construction trailer(s) location, as applicable. The staging plan may be combined on the same plan sheet as the Pollution Control Plan. Development: A form of activity that requires some form of permit or other approval pursuant to these regulations, including: 1/ The building of a new residential, commercial, or industrial structure, 2/ The alteration or modification of an existing residential, commercial, or industrial structure, 3/ Grading or excavation activity that is intended to prepare a construction site. Drainage (System): A built system of pipes, channels, or trenches, or finished grades utilized to convey wastewater or water borne waste in a collective and organized method. Driveway: A paved all-weather driving surface on private property which provides access to dwelling units. Duplex: A detached building containing two dwelling units, designed for or used as a dwelling exclusively by two families, each living as an independent housekeeping unit. Dwelling Unit: Any building or portion thereof for residential purposes, including single-family, two- family, duplex, multifamily dwellings, but not including hotel, motel, or lodge (accommodation) units. Easements: A conveyance or reservation of an incident of ownership in real property for one or more specific purposes, public or private. Exterior Storage: Storage outside of a building or dwelling unit. Exterior Walls: The outer wall surfaces of a building, structure, or dwelling unit. Fences: Enclosing framework for exterior areas, such as yards or gardens. Final Design Plan: A hard-line plan which meets the requirements indicated in Appendix 3. Frontage: The portion of a lot that fronts on a public or private street. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 6 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 Fireplace: Opening at the base of a chimney in which combustible material, such as wood or gas, can be safely burned to produce heat. Specific designations of fireplaces by type are as defined in Chapter 15.40 of the Town of Avon Municipal Code. Grade (existing): The existing or natural topography of a site prior to construction. Grade (finished): The grade upon completion o f a construction project measured on the outside o f a structure. Gross Floor Area: The total surface floor areas of a structure, including habitable and non-habitable areas unless specifically noted. Hard Line Drawing: An architectural or engineering drawing produced by the use of computer-aided graphics, or other mechanical implement, which does not represent free-hand drawing. Landscape Area: The area of a site not covered by buildings, driveways, and covered walkways. Areas such as water features and other similar features appurtenant to natural landscape areas shall also be considered part o f the landscaping area. Lot or Site: A parcel of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a use, building, or structure under the provisions of Title 17, Zoning Regulations, and meeting the minimum requirements of Title 16, Subdivision Regulations. A lot or site may consist of a single lot of record, a portion o f a lot record, a combination of lots of record or portions thereof, or a parcel of record and described by metes and bounds. Minor Project/Minor Modification: Certain forms of exterior development and improvement that are exempted from the public review process by the Director o f Community Development. Multifamily Residence: A building containing three (3) or more dwelling units, not including hotels or lodges, but including townhouses, condominiums and apartments with accessory use facilities limited to an office, laundry, recreation facilities and off-street parking used by the occupants. Owner/Owner Representative: The owner of title to a property, or his/her designated appointee and representative for an application. Designation o f a representative must be made in writing as part o f any application. P.E. Stamped Design: A design that is stamped, signed, and dated by a Colorado registered professional engineer. Planning and Zoning Commission: A commission established in the Avon Municipal Code 2.16.010, to operate in accordance with its own rules of procedure as provided for in Section 11.2 of the Town Charter. Retaining Wall: A wall designed to maintain differences in ground elevations by holding back a bank ofmaterial. A Non-Structural retaining wall is less than 4 feet (1219mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II or III-A liquids. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 7 Adopted November 6,2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 Retaining wall (non-structural) Finished Grade N.T.S. -C Three tiers maximum considered non-structural 9/f/- X 1-0 E -E Maximum Slope of 4:1 2 -C CD -C E .E X 4-foot minimum distance m E 0 1-foot minmum 2 layback .t -C fo E Finished Grade 15 2 4 Setback: The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured horizontally to a line or location within the lot or site, which established the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site. Sketch Plan: The first formal application for design review. Sketch plan must be approved prior to applying for final design review, and after a pre application meeting has been held with Community Development staff, and comply with requirements indicated in Appendix 3. step in the design review process. A sketch design must be reviewed by Community Development and the Planning Commission prior to proceeding to Final Design submittal. Single Family Residence: A residence building containing not more than one dwelling unit occupied exclusively by one family as an independent housekeeping unit. Site Coverage: The ratio of the total building and disturbed area on a site to the total area of a site, expressed as a percentage. Site Plan: A drawing that shows, at a minimum, property lines of a building lot, elevation information, compass direction, length and scale o f property information, and the locations o f structures to be built on the lot. See example site plan in Appendix 7. Snow Storage Area: An area equal to twenty percent (20%) o f impermeable surfaced area upon which aboveground construction does not occur shall be designated as a 'snow-storage area' and not developed in a manner inconsistent with such use. Landscaping shall not be considered inconsistent with such use. Any designated snow storage area shall be not less than six feet (6') wide, shall be adjacent to the impermeable area from which the snow is to be removed, shall not be included in any parking area required by the minimum parking requirements, and shall be contained in such a manner Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 8 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10,2004 6. Application and Processing Submittal and Review Process The Design Review process is broken down into three distinct tiers: Pre application Meeting, two stages: Sketch Plan Review and Final Design Review. Community Development shall review all material submitted for either o f the three design review tiers to determine whether an applicant has met the minimum submittal requirements prior to the scheduling of a meeting or public hearing. A pre-application meeting is strongly encouraged prior Minimum submittal requirements are attached as a 'checklist' for each required application, and should be reviewed carefully. For Sketch and Final Design Review, i f the application and supporting material is found to be inadequate, the Community Development Department shall not schedule the application for consideration by the Commission but shall notify the applicant of any inadequacies. Such notice will be provided in writing within 7 days o f receipt of application. The following outlines the entire design review application process: Pre-appliGation-Meeting The applicant shall prepare at least two (2) copies of the following for staff review and comment prior to Pre application Meeting: 1. A Survey ofthe property, prepared by alicensed sun'eyor, showing property boundaries, area, easements, building setbacks, building envelopes, topography (at 2' intervals @ 1"-20' eng. scale), and any significant natural features such as watercourses, mature tree stands, and rock outcroppings. 2. A Conceptual Site Plan, Architectural Plan, and Proposed Elevations (1/1"-1'0" arch. scale) including all property boundaries, proposed building footprints, casements, and driveways The applicant is requested to bring the specific information itemized above to a scheduled pre application meeting with staff for review. The intent of this meeting is to provide sufficient direction for the applicant to be prepared to submit a Sketch Plan that meets all requirements. Sketch Plan Review The applicant shall submit feeF-(4*-ha~-line two (2) copies of the following for a Sketch Plan Review: 1. A Survey of the property, prepared by a licensed surveyor (stamped and signed), showing property boundaries, area, easements, building setbacks, building envelopes, topography (at 2' intervals @ 1"=20' eng. scale), and any significant natural features such as watercourses, mature tree stands, and rock outcroppings. No survey will be accepted if it is more than three (3) years old or does not meet the standards outlined in the Section 3 for horizontal and vertical accuracy. 2. A Site Plan (1"= 20' or 1" = 10' eng. scale) which clearly indicates existing and ppepesed grades, all property boundaries, proposed building footprints, easements, and driveways. and proposed driveway grades, limits of site disturbance, all building ridgeline clevations, and any proposed detention structures. 3. Architectural Drawings (at 1/1"-1'0 arch. scale) which clearly indicate dimensiened fleerplansi exterior elevations with all ridge and grade elevations labeled, roof plans, matefial the general placement of materials and use, and the overall building dimensions, and building height calculations. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 44 Adopted November 6,2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 A specific 'Minimum Sketch Plan Review Submittal' (Appendix 3a) checklist is provided with the application, and the applicant is requested to review and check each item carefully to ensure a complete application prior to submittal. Final Design Review The applicant shall submit four (4) hard line copies of the following for a Final Design Review: 1. A Survey of the property, prepared by a licensed surveyor (stamped and signed), showing property boundaries, area, easements, building setbacks, building envelopes, topography (at 2' intervals @ 1"=20' eng. scale), and any significant natural features such as watercourses, mature tree stands, and rock outcroppings. No survey will be accepted if it is more than three (3) years old or does not meet the standards outlined in the Section 3 for horizontal and vertical accuracy. 2. A Site Plan (1"=20' eng. scale) which clearly indicates existing and proposed grades, all property boundaries, proposed building footprints, easements, driveways and proposed driveway grades, limits of site disturbance, temporary/construction trailers, all building ridgeline elevations, and any proposed detention structures. 3. An Architectural Plan (at 1/4"=1'0 arch. scale) which clearly indicates dimensioned floorplans, exterior elevations with all ridge and grade elevations labeled, roof plans, material placement and use, overall building dimensions, and building height calculations. 4. A Landscaping Plan (1"=20' eng. Scale) which clearly indicates existing and proposed grades, all proposed landscaping locations, landscaping materials employed, required irrigation table, erosion control placement and type, and any required revegetation for disturbed areas (by type and placement). 5. A Color Board that clearly indicates all materials employed on the exterior of the structure, including but not limited to: siding, stucco, wood, finishes, paints and stains, roof materials, window and door type and easement colors, and so ffit and fascia treatments. All materials will be indicated with a representative sample from the manufacturer, including the model number/name, and shall be keyed to placement on the Architectural Plan elevations. Color Board must be no larger than 81/2 x 11(Please reference Appendix 6). 6. A Lighting Fixture Cut-Sheet, provided by the manufacturer of the product, which clearly indicates the type of fixture being used. All lighting shall be keyed to placement on the Architectural Plan. 7. A colored elevation ofthe design submittal, as closely as possible representing the type, placement, and accurate representation o f materials being employed. A specific 'Minimum Final Design Review Submittal' (Appendix 3b) checklist, in addition to minimum requirements o f the Pollution Control Plan and Stormwater Control Plan/Drainage Design Manual, is provided with the application and the applicant is requested to review and check each item carefully to ensure a complete application prior to submittal. Applicants are encouraged to ask staff for direction or clarification with the minimum submittal requirements at any time. Additionally, the minimum submittal checklist may be updated on occasion, so applicants are encouraged to contact the Community Development Department to ensure that they are utilizing the most recent checklist available. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 45 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10,2004 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the application and supporting material and shall approve, conditionally approve, deny approval or continue the design review of the project within 45 days o f the date o f the meeting at which the complete application and supporting material is first reviewed by the Commission. If the Commission determines that advice or assistance o f pro fessional consultants is needed, or that additional information is required from any source, an additional 45 days shall be permitted for action by the Commission. General Approval Criteria All applications must meet the following general regulatory and planning criteria to be approved: 1. The project complies with the Town of Avon Zoning Regulations, 2. The project has general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains, and 3. There exist adequate development rights for the proposed improvements. Sketch Plan Approval Criteria The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of all sketch plan projects utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Sub-Sections A through D of these guidelines, the design philosophy, and design intentions listed herein. Sketch plan approvals shall not be vested, but may be applied towards the submittal of a final design plan for up to six (6) months. Staff will prepare a memo to the Commission highlighting anticipated areas of discussion for the submitted materials. The Commission will take no formal action. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Final Design Plan Approval Criteria The Commission shall evaluate the design of all final design plans utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. That the final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. B. The compatibility o f proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. C. The appearance ofproposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. D. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. E. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town o f Avon. Final Design Plan approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from the date of approval, with an one-time extension permitted for up to one year at the applicant's request. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 46 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 Basis for approval or denial of project design If the design of any project is found to comply with the purposes prescribed in these Guidelines, Regulations, and any applicable Ordinances o f the Town o f Avon, and the design guidelines review criteria prescribed in Section 7 0 f these Regulations, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve the project. If the Commission determines that a conflict exists with the purposes Design Guidelines, or any other provision o f these Regulations, or any Ordinance o f the Town o f Avon which would prevent approval of such project, the Commission shall disapprove the project. If the Commission determines that conflicts exist which are subject to correction, the Commission may conditionally approve or request changes to conform with the Design Guidelines or other provisions of those regulations. Any disapproval, conditional approval or request for changes shall be in writing and shall specifically describe the purpose, statement, or design guidelines with which the design of the project does not comply and the manner of noncompliance. Notification of an application decision shall be made by the recording secretary and transmitted in writing to the applicant within 7 days o f said meeting. Time limitations The time limitations contained in these Regulations shall be interpreted as requiring the Commission to conduct a review or make the determinations or decisions required by these Regulations. Failure of the Commission to act within the prescribed time limitations shall be considered as conditional approval for design of the project subject to conformance with all applicable rules and regulations o f the Town o f Avon. Scheduling The length o f the development review process, from the acceptance of a complete application by Staff to the actual hearing, shall provide the Town with a minimum review time o f 7 working days (or no later than 5pm of the Friday one week prior to the meeting) for a Sketch Design review for all residential projects less than multi-family, 12 working days for final design applications on all residential projects less than multi-family, and 21 working days for Final Designs for all other residential or commercial projects. Scheduling requirements, timelines, and commitment goals are available in the office of Community Development, and may be updated periodically. A ' fast track' review process is available to those plans that are determined by the Community Development Staffto be in compliance with the Town's development standards at the pre application meeting. Contact the Community Development Department for scheduling. Meetings The Commission shall regularly meet on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at the time and location designated on the official meeting agenda. The Chairman may call special meetings of the Commission when deemed necessary. A notice and agenda of each meeting shall be posted in the o fficial posting places o f the Town at least 48 hours prior to any meeting of the Commission. All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public. The printed Record of Proceedings, prepared by the Recording Secretary and approved by vote of the Planning & Zoning Commission, shall constitute the only official record of Commission meetings. All records, including proceedings of meetings, applications for review, plans, reports and resolutions shall be maintained in the Community Development Department by the Recording Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 47 Adopted November 6,2001 / Revised August 10,2004 In all instances the applicant must (with no exception) be in attendance for the scheduled meeting. Notification of Action by Commission Within 10 working days following action o f the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commission's decision to approve, conditionally approve, deny approval or continue design review of a project, shall be forwarded to the applicant and his designated agent by first class mail, and posted in a conspicuous manner in the Community Development Department. The decision shall become final i f no written appeal is made to the Town Council by any aggrieved person within 30 days following the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scope of Approval All approvals are site specific. Variations and changes, without Commission approval, are not allowed, except as otherwise provided in these regulations. Appeals & Notification of Action Decisions of the Planning and Zoning Commission may be appealed to the Council by the applicant or any interested person or may be reviewed at the request of a majority of the Council at any time before the decision becomes final. An "interested person" is an adjacent property owner or a person entitled to have notice of the hearing mailed to him in association with the action of the Commission (Section 2.16.160 Town of Avon Municipal Code) A decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission may be appealed to the Town Council by the applicant or any aggrieved person or at the request of the Mayor at any time before the decision becomes final. (within 10 days after a hearing). Not more than thirty (30) days following the filing of an appeal, the Town Council shall review the action of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council shall, in writing, confirm, modify or reverse the decisiel of the Commission urithin thirty (30) days follo 11. ., ing the commencement of review. If it deems insufficient information is available to provide the basis for a sound decision, the Town Council may postpone final action for not more than thirty additional days. Failure o f the Council to act within thirty additional days shall be deemed a granting o f the approval, unless the applicant consents to a time extension. Any decision by the Town Council which results in disapproval of the Planning and Zoning Commission decision shall specifically describe the reasons for disapproval. Within five (5) working days following action of the Planning and Zoning Commission, notification of its decision shall be deposited in the United States mail to the applicant or his or her designated agent. The decision shall become final unless a written appeal or request for review by the Mayor is received by the Town Clerk within fifteen (15) days of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Not more than thirty (30) days following the filing of an appeal, the Town Council shall review the action of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Town Council shall, in writing, confirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Commission within thirty (30) days following the commencement of review. If it deems insufficient information is available to provide the basis for a sound decision, the Town Council may postpone final action for not more than thirty (30) additional days. Failure of the council to act within thirty (30) additional days shall be deemed a granting of the appeal unless the applicant consents to a time extension. Any decision by the Town Council which results in disapproval of the Planning and Zoning shall specifically describe the reasons for disapproval. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 48 Adopted November 6,2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 . Any appeal must be presented to the Town Clerk at the Town office, and each appeal must be accompanied by a processing fee of fifty dollars ($50.00). (Ord. 92-12; Ord. 83-11; Ord. 04-07 (part)). Term of Design Approval Final design approval for a project, as prescribed by these regulations, shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of final approval unless a building permit for project construction is issued. If a building permit expires more than 2 years following final design approval, the final design approval also lapses and becomes void. The applicant may apply only once to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of a maximum extension o f one (1) year for any final design approval. Sketch plan approvals may not be renewed, since they represent only conceptual plans that shall not be considered valid towards a final design submittal beyond six (6) months from the date of approval. Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Page 49 Adopted November 6, 2001 / Revised August 10, 2004 EXE-=agiiÂ«-1 SKETCH DESIGN MON Sketch Plan Fee: $ COLORADO Applicant: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell #: Owner of Property: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Proj eEL_ Lot: Block: Subdivision: Project Street Address: Project Name: U Addition U Single Family U Duplex O Multi-Family O Commercial U Industrial O Other: Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft., height, materials, colors, unique features): Signatures_ I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town ofAvon in connection with this application as true and correct, that I (we) understand the Town ofAvon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates Applicant as indicated to act as owner's representative in all application submittals related to this project. Applicant: Owner: (Print Name): (Print Name): Date: I)ate: Community Development, P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 1 of2 Sketch Plan: Minimum Submitial_Reaui IniITUIT Project: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Project Plan Set: O Conceptual Site plan O Conceptual Materials and areas of application O Topographical survey with signed RLS stamp O Two (2) - 24" x 36" plan sets (all areas over 40% slope shaded) - less than 3 yrs old O Seven(7) 11" x 17" plan sets - one weekpriorto meeting O Conceptual Building elevations (all elevations) Notes: *All drawings must be to scale and legible. *The applicant must (with no exception) be in attendance for the scheduled meeting. Reviewed by: o Complete o Incomplete Date: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 2 of2 rimxifJIGEâ‚¬Ulil FINAL DESIGN AVON Design Review Fee: $ COLORADO Applicant: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Owner of Property: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell#: Project Lot: Block: Subdivision: Project Street Address: Project Name: O Addition U Single Family O Duplex O Triplex O Other: Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft., height, materials, colors, unique features): Signatures-_ We (I) represent that all information provided to the Town ofAvon in connection with this application as true and correct, that we (I) understand the Town ofAvon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates Applicant as indicated to act as owner's representative in all application submittals related to this project. Applicant: Owner: (Print Name): (Print Name): Date: Date: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 1 of3 Final Design Review: MillimumtubmittaIReguirements Project: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Project Plan Set: O Site plan O Three (3) - 24" x 36" plan sets O Topographical survey with signed RLS stamp O Color board 81/2" x 11" (all areas over 40% slope shaded) O Exterior lighting fixture cut sheets O Floor plans O Eighteen (18) 11" x 17" plan sets - one week prior O Building elevations (all elevations) to P&Z meetings O Landscape plan O Colored elevations - one week prior to P&Z meetings Site Development Plan: O North arrow & scale (1=10' or 20') O Existing utility lines, manholes, transformers,etc O Vicinty map with adjacent lots O Driveways, parking and turnarounds OTitle block O Driveway grades (spot elevations) o Property lines w/bearings and distances O Streams, if applicable O Setback lines (labeled and dimensioned) O Riparian zone/wetlands, if applicable O Easements (labeled and dimensioned) O Fire hydrants (location on site or distance and O Adjacent rights-of-way direction from a known point) O Existing topography (dashed lines) O Culverts, ditches, detention, etc. extended through building O Utility service lines (general locations) 1 Proposed grading (solid lines) o Snow storage area (include sq. footage) O Limits of site disturbance O Walkways, stairs (dimensions) O Building footprint with roof plan and ridgeline O Building and area lighting, by type elevations and driplines (dimensioned to p.1.) O Fencing, retaining walls (including specific O On-site detention structures, ifapplicable materials & colors, T.O.W. & B.O.W. elevations) O Significant landforms/outcroppings O Trash enclosures O Existing structures O Wall sections (if retaining walls proposed) Site Plan Summarv Table: O Current zoning O Garage and surface parking spaces available O Number of dwelling units O Area and % of site > 40% slope O Floor area for each dwelling unit O Area and % of building lot coverage O Total floor area of all units O Area and % of site landscaped O Building height allowed and proposed o Area and % of paved surface O Off-street parking spaces required and proposed Building Elevations and Floor Plans: O Floor plans, dimensions and areas O Location of address(es) on building or site O Building elevations (labeled) O Location of exterior lighting fixtures, by type O Natural and finished grades for all elevations (numeric) O Materials and colors labeled on elevations O Numeric elevation ofall roofridgelines O Summary table of specific materials and colors O Utility meter locations Landscape Plan: O Location of plantings O On-site detention structures, if applicable O Location of existing shrubs and trees O Sprinkler system location and type O Limits of site disturbance O Plantings summary table O Location and type of erosion control measures O Existing vegetation, general O Irrigation Table O Rain Sensor Note Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 2 of 3 Construction Staging & Pollution Control Plan (Temporary and/or Permanent): (Separate Sheet in Plan Set) mTâ€¢11~ O Snow storage O Refuse storage O Sanitation facilities O Construction trailer(s) O Limits of site disturbance O Project Signage O Construction materials storage O Contractor parking O Appendix 5 O Pollution Control Plan that conforms to Appendix 4 ofthe Design Review Guidelines Note: A Stormwater Management permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment may be necessary for construction with disturbed areas greater than 1 acre. Contact the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment at http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/permitsunit/wqcdpmt.html or at (303) 692-3500. Note: All drawings must be in "Hardline" form. Reviewed by: o Complete o Incomplete Date: Community Development, RO. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev. 6/24/2004) Page 3 of3 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-19 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 04-XX, AMENDING TITLES 16 AND 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE TO THE TOWN COUNCIL AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICTS, DEFINTION OF BUILDING HEIGHT, AND PARKING T I THEREAS, Titles 16 and 17 of The Avon Municipal Code require review and revision on a ~~ periodic basis in order to continue to serve the public interest; and I I THEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission is appointed by Town Council to review, make recommendations, and render decisions on all zoning applications; and I I THEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the attached revisions VV ("Exhibit A") to Resolution 04-19 Series of 2004, and held a public hearing as required by the Avon Municipal Code to review the proposed amendments; ~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council the approval of changes set forth in Resolution 04-19 Series of 2004 in order to amend the existing Avon Municipal Code as adopted. ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-19 Zoning Subdivision Ordinance Adoption.doc Exhibit "A" to Resolution 04-19 ORDINANCE NO. 04-XX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLES 16 AND 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICTS, DEFINITION OF BUILDING HEIGHT, AND PARKING BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO: TITLE 17 ZONING Section 1. Amendment. Section 17.08.160, Chapter 8 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended as follows: 17.08.160 Building height. Building height means the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point to the top of a flat roof or mansard roof or to the highest ridgeline of a sloping roof. (Ord. 91 10 Â§4(paM Building height means the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive) at any given point outside the building to the top of a flat roo f or mansard roo f or to the highest ridgeline o f a sloping roof. Within a building, height shall be measured vertically from any point on a flat roof, mansard roof, or highest ridgeline (for sloping roofs) to the existing grade directly below said point. Maximum Building Height Interior Section jM 11.T.S. Maximum Builing Height ///// 6/ U 6 Original/Existing Gracie Maximum Building Height I Section 2. Amendment. Subsection (c) (3) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended as follows: (c) Development review procedures. (3) An application for a PUD approval must be submitted to the Department of Community Development at least thirty (30) days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. A report of the Community Development Department staffs findings and recommendations shall be made at the initial formal hearing before the Planning Commission. A report of the Planning Commission stating its findings and recommendations, and the staff report shall then be transmitted to the Town Council. The Town Council shall consider the special development district in accordance with Section 17.28.050 of this zoning code. (3) A complete application for a PUD must be submitted to the Department of Community Development at least thirty (30) days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting o f the Planning and Zoning Commission. A report o f the Community Development Department findings and recommendations shall be made at the initial formal hearing before the Planning Commission. A report and resolution of the Planning Commission stating its findings and recommendations, and the staff report shall then be transmitted to the Town Council. The Town Council shall consider the PUD District in accordance with Section 17.28.050 of this Code. Section 3. Amendment. Subsection (d) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (d) Submittal requirements. Submittal requirements may vary depending on the complexity o f the proposed development as determined by the Community Development Department, and whether or not the PUD is being requested in connection with the review of a development agreement pursuant to Chapter 17.14 ofthis Code. Generally, the following submittal requirements shall apply for all new PUD applications and proposed amendments to existing PUD districts: (1) Application form and filing fee; (2) A written statement describing the nature of the project to include information on proposed uses, densities, nature of development proposed, contemplated ownership patterns, and phasing plans; (3) A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor no older than 3 years from the date o f application, indicating existing conditions o f the property to be included, to include the location of improvements, existing contour lines, natural features, existing vegetation, watercourses and perimeter property lines of the parcel; (4) A complete set ofplans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations), if applicable. A complete zoning analysis o f existing and proposed development, to include a square footage or density breakdown o f all proposed uses and parking. Where a structure or building exists, a complete set of plans depicting the existing conditions o f the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations), if applicable; (5) A vicinity plan showing the proposed improvements in relation to all properties at a scale not smaller than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet. For projects larger than two (2) acres in size, the appropriate scale shall be determined by the Department of Community Development; (6) Evidence of available utilities, such as water and sewer service, as provided. (7) Proposed site plan showing the approximate locations and dimensions of all buildings and structures and all principal site develepment-*atefee. Proposed site plan showing the approximate locations and dimensions ofbuildings, or approximate building envelopes and all principal site development structures or features. For projects less than two (2) acres in size, the plan shall be prepared at a scale not smaller than one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet. For projects larger than two (2) acres in size, the appropriate scale shall be determined by the Department of Community Development. Additional submittal requirements, as determined necessary by either the Community Development Department or the Planning and Zoning Commission, may be required and include the following: (8) Preliminary building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than one-eighth (1/8) inch equals one (1) foot in sufficient detail to determine floor areas, circulation, location of uses and general scale and appearance o f the proposed development; (9) Photo overlays and/or other acceptable techniques for demonstrating a visual analysis o f the proposed development in relationship to existing conditions; (10) A site-massing model depicting the proposed development in relationship to development on adjacent parcels; (11) A preliminary landscape plan showing existing landscape features to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and landscaped site development features such as recreation facilities, bike paths and trails, pedestrian plazas and walkways, water features and other clements. For projects less than two (2) acres in size the plan. shall be prepared at a scale not smaller than one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet. For projects larger than two (2) acres in size the appropriate scale shall be determined by the Department of Community Development; Environmental impact report; (12) Preliminary drainage analysis and grading plans; (13) Economic model of the proposed uses and densities where an application proposes uses that may impact the ability o f the Town to provide adequate public services; (14) Any additional material or information as deemed necessary for proper review of the proposed PUD. Any additional material or information as deemed necessary for proper review o f the proposed PUD or PUD amendment. Four (4) complete copies of the above information, with the exception o f the massing model shall be submitted with an application for a P UD. Section 4. Amendment. Subsection (h) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (h) Design criteria. The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each o f the following design criteria or demonstrate that one (1) or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Design Criteria. The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD District. It shall be the burden o f the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each o f the following design criteria or demonstrate that one (1) or more o f them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Where the PUD District is being requested in connection with the review of a development agreement pursuant to Chapter 17.14 of this Code, not all design criteria may be applicable, as determined by the Department. Section 5. Amendment. Subsection (k) of Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (1) Amendments. Requests for amendments to an approved Planned Unit Development shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described above for approval of a PUD. Amendments. Requests for amendments to an approved Planned Unit Development District shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described above. Amendments that propose substantial changes to land use in connection to existing development agreements and development plans as outlined in Chapter 17.14 of this Code may require additional information and/or development agreements and amendment to development plans. Section 6. Amendment. Section 17.20.110, Chapter 20 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended by the addition of (m) to provide as follows: (m) Preliminary Subdivision Application with PUD Where subdivision approval will be required to implement development in a proposed PUD, a Preliminary Subdivision Plan application must be filed concurrently and in conjunction with the PUD application. The provisions and procedures for public notice, hearing and review for a PUD as prescribed in this Title shall apply to the Preliminary Subdivision Plan application. No development may be implemented in a PUD prior to approval and recording of a corresponding Final Subdivision Plat. Section 7. Amendment. Subsection (c)(2)(a) of Section 17.24.020, Chapter 24 0 f Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: (2) Commercial Land Use Minimum Requirements a. Shopping and convenience goods retail 4400 4/1000 sq. ft. GLFA TITLE 16 SUBDIVISION Section 8. Amendment. Section 16.08.150, Chapter 08 of Title 16, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to provide as follows: Specially planned area and/or Planned Unit Development means a subdivision controlled by one (1) or more landowners to be developed under a unified plan which does not correspond in lot area, density, lot coverage, open space or other requirements of existing subdivision or zoning regulations; it shall contain sufficient total area in relation to the intended use or uses to permit effective application ofplanning principles to protect the landform, reduce street and utility costs, preserve open space and provide a superior human environment. (Ord. 79 9 Â§1.10) Specially planned area (SPA) and/or Planned Unit Development (PUD) means a subdivision controlled by one (1) or more landowners to be developed under a unified plan which does not correspond in lot area, density, lot coverage, open space or other requirements of existing subdivision or zoning regulations; it shall contain sufficient total area in relation to the intended use or uses to permit effective application of planning principles to protect the landform, reduce street and utility costs, preserve open space and provide a superior human environment. Where subdivision will be required to implement development in a proposed PUD District, a Preliminary Subdivision Plan application must be filed and reviewed concurrently with the PUD application. The public notice and hearing requirements shall be combined and run concurrent with the PUD public notice and hearing requirements as prescribed in Title 17. INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED POSTED the 27th day of July, 2004, and a public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council on the 10th day of August, 2004, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, PASSED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED POSTED the day of ,2004. Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John W. Dunn, Town Attorney Staff Report MON Minor Project COLORADO July 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date June 28,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Deck Addition, Painting, Minor Repairs Legal Description Lot 56, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Address 2245 Old Trail Road Introduction The Final Design for this project was approved at your February 4th, 1997 meeting. The duplex units are each approximately 1,836 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing 6'x14' deck on Unit A and replace it with a larger 12'x28' deck, make minor stucco repairs, facia repairs, repairs to the flashings and attic vents, install gutters and downspouts, and repaint both duplex units. A color sample will be available for review at your July 6th, 2004 meeting. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in re', iewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. A variety of quality, durable building materials is proposed which include: . This application also proposes earth tone colors, which is encouraged by the Town guidelines. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. No negative impacts should be experienced as viewed from adj acent properties. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. As proposed, the deck addition, painting and repairs should not impair monetary or aesthetic values in the vicinity. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. As proposed, the deck addition, painting and repairs appear to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town and appears consistent with the Design Guidelines. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 mIYET;TTE-nLL-in Lot 56, Block 1, Wildridge Subdi n, Minor Project - Deck Addition, Painting, & Repairs July 61 2004 Planning & Zoning imission Meeting Page 2 of 2 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the following action be taken for Lot 56, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision: 1. The deck is approved, however it shall not encroach into the 10' building setback (which will be located and flagged prior to construction). 2. New sod and landscaping are not approved until sufficient square footage and irrigationrequired have been clarified. 3. The paint color is not approved. A second color on at least one elevation of each unit and an on-site mockup is required before approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4017 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 41 45-4111/ Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Abstract Summary July 6th, 2004 12:00 pm Commission Site Tour - No tours by Commission members. 5:00 pm Commission Work Session Discussion of Items on Agenda in Council Chambers. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order at 5:35 pm 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest - Commissioner Savage with the Lot 30, Block 2 application and Commissioner Karow with the Lot 106, Block 1 application. V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the June 15*,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. VI. Sketch Design Plan (5:35pm - 5:50pm) Property Location: Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2631 Bear Trap Road Applicant. VMDA, Mark Donaldson Owner: Shane Bohart Description: Victor Mark Donaldson is proposing a sketch design to add an additional dwelling unit to an existing single-family home on Bear Trap Road. The property is zoned duplex and this dwelling unit is the second unit. The concept for this application was presented to the Commission during the Work Session of the May 18*,2004 meeting. Summary: There was no discussion. Action: Applicant requested to table the application to the July 20th planning and Zoning Commission meeting so a letter they submitted to Staff with their application could be included in the Commission packets. The item was tabled to the July 20th meeting by the Commission. VII. Sketch Design Plan (5:50pm - 6:05pm) Property: Lot 106, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3055 Wildridge Road Applicant: Andrew Karow Owner. Andrew Karow Description: Andrew Karow is proposing a duplex residence on Wildridge Road in Wildridge. Proposed materials include: stucco, wood siding, aluminum window cladding, stone accents, and asphalt shingles. The design would require a significant amount of fill (addition of soil) in order to locate the structure where proposed. Each unit of the duplex totals approximately 3,800 square feet. Summary: Applicant made brief presentation and stated that the home was cited on the lot in the proposed location to respond to the driveway access grade requirements. Commission review began and revolved around: height concerns, potential for construction material storage and on street parking during construction, consistency in the belly band to break up stucco on each elevation, native stone application, the need for entryway definition, and window cladding material. Action: Commissioner Trueblood motions to approve with strong emphasis on the included 5 conditions in the staff report. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and all Commissioners were in favor. The motion was unanimous. Vlll. Amendments to Zoning Code & Design Guidelines (6:05pm - 6:45pm) Public Hearing Property Location: Town of Avon Applicant: Town Staff Description: In response to comments and feedback received from the building community during Public Hearings with the Town Council, staff was directed to clarify and improve the design review and building permit processes. Changes proposed include clarifications to the building height definition, PUD process, and public notice when reviewing Preliminary Subdivision plans in conjunction with PUD applications. 1 Various amendments to the Design Guidelines are proposed and include: new sketch design plan requirements, appeals process revision, consolidated final design checklist, building height clarification to match Zoning Code, retaining wall definition, and a revised scheduling section. Summary: Discussion on the amendments was had by the Commission, and focused on the PUD requirements and clarification of building height definition and diagram. The design review changes were also discussed, as well as the need to clarify the scheduling times and the follow up to the sketch design review. The discussion was opened to the public, and Chris Juergens approached the podium with several questions on the proposed revisions. The public hearing was then closed. Action: The matter was continued to discuss at the next Planning & Zoning Commission hearing. IX. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) A. Minor Project - Deck Addition, Painting, Minor Repairs Property Location: Lot 56, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2245 Old Trail Road Applicant: Mark Pribramsky Owner: Mark Pribramsky Description: The Final Design for this project was approved at your February 4th, 1997 meeting. The duplex units are each approximately 1,836 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing 6'x14' deck on Unit A and replace it with a larger 12'x28' deck, make minor stucco repairs, facia repairs, repairs to the flashings and attic vents, install gutters and downspouts, and repaint both duplex units. Summary: Commissioner Karow did not feel all landscaping requirements were completed from the 1997 Final Design and asked Staff/Commission if this could be a requirement of this application. The Commissioners did not feel the applicant should be required to finish the landscaping considering he bought the property after it was built and issued a CO. The landscaping requirements should be the completed at the time of construction by the owner/builder of the property. It was determined that the Town, prior to landscaping being completed, issued a Certificate of Occupancy. Commissioner Trueblood asked the applicant if he could provide alternatives to using new sod, such as xeriscaping, All Commission members feel the applicant should use two color schemes for his painting proposal and requested the applicant to resubmit with a second color. Commissioner Evans asked what types of gutters would be used and what color they would be, and that this would need clarification before action on the repainting proposal. Action: Commissioner Trueblood motions to approve the deck and table the painting of the duplex and landscaping until the applicant submits additional information to the Commission. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and all Commission members were in favor. The motion was unanimous. Miscellaneous: Staff updated the Commission with the Comprehensive Plan neighborhood meeting dates. The first neighborhood meeting will take place at the next meeting on July 20*,2004 at the Wildridge fire station. The following meeting is being scheduled to occur in Eaglebend apartments, in the meeting room above the daycare facility (August 3,2004). Both meetings will allow for the neighborhood to review the 'storyboards' and related information on the Comprehensive Plan update and provide additional input to the Commission on the process. XIV. Adjourn (Adjourned at 7:40pm) 2 COVER SHEE I 27.276 NORâ„¢ 1/4 COR SEC 35 NORTH ~/4 COR SEC 35 2SAZI 34 35 .11 1 35~0 - WILDRIDGE , a,irT. S . a : ./ 1 . . - I. il I .. â€ž I A DUPLEX RESIDENCE I . 17 I FOFI 9 â€¢ 1 Â·Â· WILDRIDGE I ' I. SUBDIVISIO N . I KAROW ' :/ I ~ WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION 0.- -- 9 -,1. , I LOT 106, BLOCK 1 1 4/ . 11 1 .... 0 Â® I ~ST 1/4 COR SEC 35 ~ 55< .2-- I C.- '. C. 1.0 1 0- I EASÂ¥1/4 COR SEC 35 1 .- --------- WEST '/4 COR../. 35 . I . I. . . - EAST 1/4 COR % 3/ . 7 , e G Â® I - 1 RECEIVED ... . 0 SITE WILDR1D0E . SUBDIV1SJ0N I - .. I . , . . .. .. . --A ...4 -A ' DESIGN REVIEW JUL 0 2 2004 . Â·~ Â· Â· u \ 'f , DOCU IVI E NTS Community Development . WILORIDGE , -I SU BDIVIS] ON ->33% . L ri .1 - r/v-\ El> ,./ ---- -li 1 i 3435 35.36 A -- 1 21 SOUâ„¢ 1/4 C01 ~C 35 SOUDI 1/4 - IC. 35 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION: BLOCKS 1-5 SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP COVER SHEET SHEET 1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (BY OTHERS) SHEET 2 V - 500 FT SITE PLAN SHEET 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS STRUCTUAL PLANS DATE: JUNE 25th, 2004 P \04025\dwg\Work\04025COV. dwg, 6/25/2004 11:47:44 AM, Win2POF pa . ..f.2.'. 1 -. 15*..4 - 1%.r \ Â· BENERK: SEWER MANHOLE R;W ACCROSS FROM SE CORNER Of GY 109, ELEV - 8180.35 ' TOPOGRAPHIC MAP , \ \ \\: ~ , LS 3â€¢â€¢7 \ r " /0..0 REB*? ..0 CP \ >ff'' \ I LOT 106, BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE TOWN OF AVON/EAGLE COUNTY 1 1 1 \,30,< \ 1,\\ COLORADO \ \ O-4 \ J~ SLOPE T, DRAINACE I \ ./0 SID / TORAGE ISEWENT \\\/ \\ t4 \ \ 1 \ \ \ 1 :\\ \ \ \01 . of\ / . \ '\\\> 3/'\\ 1 X .31/ SACLE 1. = 10 \\ 2 2--, M. a. 85.9, ~ ' \ ~~--r-- SUAO/NG RETBACK---6~- Â·~ \ ' 25 ~ 'i ' Q\ . EDGE oF PAYEMENT / \. \ i \ \1 \ \ i \ i .\ \<00- \ \ 6 = 05-56'10Â· 1 \ \\\ R = 1325.00' , UMUrr AND De,-G~ ~-1 l~- ~ '' ' L = 137.28' A A 1 ,\\ r \ \ //- \ \ 1 \ 1 \ 1 0 Â· I \ I \ \ \ \ , 1 \\ \\ 1 1 \ 1 \ \ /1 1 \ ~5 FOUND REEW AND 040 C? \: \ --1 \ \ i ' O 0 \\ 4 \1 i Â· 1 \ 1 1 . \ \\ 1\' a \ t \ . \ 1 \\ ~ GENERAL NOTES , Lk \\ l 1 1 *A ! Dete of 8-F M. 21,1991 - t -A 4 \.1 7 1 \ 1 â€¢ JFÂ£'NG FOUND. 6,07}WV6 SET 1 Bal<Be-1/ Fromthit,Propert,eorneâ€¢orLotl06/the,-terÂ»ropert,corner of lot 10Â£ tb, b-Ing being 7,38Â·59,1-W, between found . 1\ \4 8. Coot-- In--1 -2 \â‚¬ \ 14> 1 1 \ \ . 25\/ i An not-*eÂ¢ 10/h on U- Ft:~1 Sub~~hicm Pht <Bah*N =I **bik ~ ~ ~ 6 \ ' .1 ~ Illl/Ty Pro. 8. Th~ prop,/4 1, -bjeet to *pac,bl, iI,tree- co.-nta. '00'~ \ \ 8. No h,adi. -r. .,cbtB. on thi, lot x the d.te ot ...ey. \ 7. n . t~ \ 5// ~\ /// SOUTHEA51 OF [ASTERLY PROPERTY . Â£01-71NG f/RE NAÂ·D-,VT 127Â· CORNER. ON 5001,ERLY SIDE OF W(LOR'OGE RG'KO \ \ \ 1/ 1 =nmltmmt b d tide Wo-tion. ~ ~ " . .Â· 1Â·" ' Â·ft C / .40. ~ 1 t \ ./9 h \ 1 \ h \ \\ 9. Bed==t 5,-M.H RI=Ele,â€¢tion â€¢ 8100 381**,docK][ENA-ba.dateds/81. M.H. ~ . \\ 1 4 1 ~~\ \-1 \ ii -- \ \Ul 7. 6 \ \ \\\ 1 \, 31 .1 0 Â£ 106 '; N- r.4325 6. 66~ 4\\ \44/// 2 \ , ~Â·Â·Â·Â·-- UnUTY ANC) 1~4/N4GE 42Gaa \ EASEMENT \ LÂ»" 1 // I ././.- 1 \ 9 ALPINE f , 1 =&4.AA:21/1 . === I ~Liti 6, S =- \ Ofs\ RIM EL 8142.80, m. EL 8135.95 ENGINEERING INC. S,â€¢N. SEWER MH. EDWARDS BUSNESS CENTER â€¢ P.0 BOX 97 ' S EDIAADS. COLOAADO 81632 DIATO.ora i.... plc 0,10â€¢0.r 05/37/.2 0,Â·,5 0 303 928-3373 , FAx 926-3390 â€¢ J08# 76874 GENERAL-NQIES:- 1. The Contractor shall provide erosion control in conformince with Tcwn of Avon Master Droinage Study. -EDGE OF ASPHALT line withou'l approval 01 the Owner and the Town of Avon. 2. The Construction limit line is the controct limit line. Do not disturb any existing 105 ' TO FIRE HYDRANT trees or mgetotion designated to remain or locoted outside of the construction limit I -W (50 FT ROW) e 8162.0 mo WILDRIDGE ROAD 3. Contractor to verify existÂ·ing site information. including structures, utilities, property lines, limits of roodwo>,5, and curt>/ ond gutters. thot moy effect the scope of work ------,Â¢22==Zzlitar--Â»Qg-gE-GRAMEL*--- prior to begmeg site construction. O or - 8162.4 _---2-- 77'~--w--I 4. Existing utilities cre indicated for information only ond not intended to show exact J 5 1 / EASEMENT (TYP) L=137. MFPI~>433*YERAGE-PV.~~v. 12~il.'31 61~__L~V_ 0 locotton. The Engineer is not responsible for the locotion of underground .litities or W- structures or not shown or detailed end instolled by ony other contract. The z SK ~ Con tractor shall locate oll utilities Ind mainton the location during oil phases of the / L.S No. 5447 work. Contractor shall be responsible for ony damage to utilities or structures ond ony --1-- TOW 60 -- R=Â·1374 An ---- inkries therefrom. Restorotlon of any utilities damoged by the Contractor shall be 01 BOW 58 -- -1 \ 02-9/3 .t>Â«47 FOUND pIN & CAP the Contractors expense to the satisfaction of the Owner. 5. Conform to Eagle River Woter ond Sonitation District specificotions for woter and [k: FOUND PIN dc CAP V w-'~'A '146 i. 5 - . px.:.F ' va sewer construction. Maintain 10 feet minimum separation between woter ond sewer 1. S. No. 5447 . TELEPHONE PED, underground service pipes. Woint'In sever, feet minimum cover at underground water 4 11!kiwt.4.:.~~.D..4..4~0.14* tw~'394Â¢1:.0.2.6'#i.t~{*~.k-.t#~4~~Â·it~lii~ service. Sewer service shall have minimum cover of 5'-6-. Prowde sewer clean out i with location to be reviewed by the Engineer. ~ti?Rt?t--,*.i~~Â¢GiPfai.,p,&4~'6<~.~'~~~~~A,.~,~P~,~~1<~~#~â€ži~~~~~7~2.~~~,~~~~1.*iyr -. --r-- =' NLT~~L~1fULDER 6. General Contractor to provide drawing showing proposed utility service con/ections EXISTING GRADE -â€¢24. ED# County ond the ToÂ¥,n of Avon~ for the Engineers review prior to construction. GREATER THAN 40% F.;"'Â·Â·'~ 4Â·:Â·-,6-Â·Imie -:ETfÂ·A~x"~543.3fi~%9flUE':3~93*j~.P~*Â»Â·*,9433 - 'ti-:../1.. f (BRO* SANDSTONE) *p:.M, 11Â·22 7.-l~~,~81&~i}i! 1225:22-!.:E i!-21!1Â·EL/1-1:1 ,~.,+ElbU:.~ :ificitclu~:-i;:2&118 :-:.;::i:~Ar;I;Â·5;231.~ 1*..494*823:7..4 -- 1. '' / 7. Rood cuts ond ony other construction in rood right-of-way sholl conform with TOW=8155 TOW=8161 BOW=8152 9. Provide wr'Men notification 01 011 discreponcles between existing ond proposed site 1&39.7. El=IN{~)12;li~:,f:333.-~7.?&~ BOW==8158 8. All Compactlon shall be In accordance with the Soils Report prepored by the Geotechnical Engineering. , .__ .~ Â· I,'.;-,I.~-7:Â·i'. â€¢'i.Â·....Â·'ll.-;.-'" ./.4.1.-:.....:, ..=..â€ž....h -1. 4. BUILDING OUTUNE ... .4 - --/:/99'Sicedfi~9} fi~-= -=itulite,6,*~&4/ELÂ·~: --- Â· improvements. _22-4+'~a-'Â·342.4Â·Â·Â·..U~ i#r./-... - . .; 2~J-,- ,-w,:.e.q..-8..4.e.../. 1/,1 1 m..-:2.13*Mti*[*21Â£103,4~ 10. Controctor(s) shall toke oil necessary steps os required to properly protect ond maintain his work for the duration of this contract. TOW=8152 ..1.:. SEE,BAC Â· --Â·.32 sE;Â·'2.',E' 7 -2*'/Â·Â·213.'.6/./. 54: 1â€¢â€¢.Â·râ€¢Aâ€¢.-.....i ./ 11. These drawings do not specify sofety moterials, equipment, methods or sequencing, ~ Q " .;32.259-FRON.' Â·Â·BifIEDING'.149 Â· 149 D.I.kâ‚¬71*WAYâ‚¬-,-Â·.4-,R.:l'â€¢Â·-- 1 BOW==8149 1, 14-i- .- f~'. 914:r Â·Â· :246@,4.4#4/: '21Â·k,1.94*fl 7 -- 1 to protect persons and property. It sholl be the Controctor's sole responsibility to (Y =19 till,N'24(t: 4?:. Â·. Cont/octors, the pubtic and o! WR --121 _fr#2 Wiei*tÂ· 2=:edÂ· _. Â·-r r:,rtÂ·i;743t~~A if: Â·..~71!;2Â·YÂ·- direct and 'implement safety operotions ond procedures to protect the Owner, other 1 -2 . ~ ~ 1 Bull.DINC OUTLINE- 9 r d 82#-- ~ Â·Â· 7'Â·r' ~M~fÂ·*M~0Â·1-9'1,~20.:i-t,0 12. All work shall comply with all applicable codes ond ordinonces. ~~ 0 I - , SNOW STORAGE ~ 13. Contractor(s) sholl employ o licensed surve,or to establish oil work lines. 40 â€ž C. 1 7-71 .17 .1.i}ir ;;i#ileib'*i@:;1?i;i; _ i_Â·_ - - - 1 1 \ \\1 4 BOUNDARY LINE (TYP) ~ 2/ -/ 0 14. Controctor(s) shall stake out 011 areas, including walks. povements, walls, pools ond 0[ M O fences ond shall obtoin the approval of the Architect prior to proceeding with the work. 15. Notes ond details on specific drowings take precedence over general notes and --- .4921-1.R*.273;Rl, C -- - 4 ."-I . ....... t>licol details FF=8158.00 16. Conflicts or discreponcies with grades sholl be brought to the attention of the O> 7 +18, 0% 05 1 LOWER LEVEL=8147.00 ~ 4/'06 - Architect immediately and prior to proceeding with work 10 r â‚¬ 17. M finished grades sholl provide for naturol runoff of woter without low spots or 1|~ -7---Ng ---- -8140|-0-T 1 06 ---- -4 ff i tr pockets. Set flow lines accurotely Ind provide a minimum 2.5% O 1- grcdient unless otherwise noted. 19 o 1 1 18. Grodually round off tops ond toes of all planted slopes, unless shown otherwise in J 1 1 1 groding details. 11 1 19. Grode owoy from oll buildings at o minimum slope of 10% In 2 . 20. Cleonouts shall be provided for 011 changes in line and/or grode for the 1 1=< De -- 49.9 unpoved oreos ond minimum slope of 2% in paved oreos. 11 BOW=8138 7 FF=8159.00 719-J son itory sewer service. - -Â·-LOWER LgVEL=814&00 2]E.A~-SUMMABLIABLC. Â» 3 Â¢, - \ 11 'P % - - - -- -- -- -- ...... Il i 1 /4 â„¢- -%. 4 - CURRENT ZONING DUPLEX 16 -3/- LOT 105 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS ALLOWED 2 - -- 0, - --M jp NUMBER OF DWELUNG UNITS PROPOSED 2 O -- 0 FLOOR AREA (sq. n.) 'PROPOS -- 0 - - - - - 4 YARD AREA - TOTAL FLOOR AREA (sq. n.) 3890 -12 (TYP) -Â·- ALLOWED 35 BUIWING OUTLINE , 11 1< BUILDING HEIGHT (ft.) '4 -- PROPOSED 34.8' \ 11 i W -- - 0 :/1 - - PARKING REQUIRED 6 0 - PARKING PROPOSED 8 LOT 107 7, l 11 1 14 TOTAL SITE AREA (TSA). sq. ft 22216 ~'~-- ~~ ~ | SITE > 40% SLOPE 3140 AREA (sq. ft.) % TSA 14% - 813Q - BUILDING LOT COVERAGE el. ---- AREA (sq. ft.) 1953.43 % TSA 8.8% 1 1 SEVER WH % TSA 14.4% 0 AREA (sq. ft.) 3199.20 x PAVED SURFACE RIU ELEV= 8131.9 SITE LANDSCAPED Z | | ~ (BASIS OF ELEVATION) % TSA 51.5% O INV ELEV.= 8125.2 AREA (sq. ft.) 11434.97 AREA (sq. ft ) 2442.03 SNOW STORAGE 7.5' DRAINAGE \ & UnLITY 1 , ----_-- / 1- EASEMENT (TYP) \ ~ EXISTING CONTOUR S 1/' (TYP) - ----- - PROPERTY -1 /- 1~i~ - - F-ME-- s -___ / SETBACK J~ / h<-/ ,-/-7 Â· _ 8- pf-0 5.35% 3- Z_--- s 10;\SIDE BUILDING -'* --T - - -<- 1~- \ f --L '- N SET8A* FOUND PIN & CAP L S. No 5447 | 1 ----1---1. ////- ~ - CATV PED. I FOUND PIN & CAP \ LOT 98 L.S. No. 5447 \ ts-~3677 w -1- 1 CATV PED. ------ - ,\ 1 JOB: 04025 ~ DATE: 06/25/2004 155.71' f ADJACENT ~ LINE (TYP) GRAPHIC SCALE FOUND p IN & CAP ~~~- PROPERT LOT 97 1;~~~~~ 20 -215.55' - 8- PVC @ 14.7% L.S. No 5447 ' SH EET F c IN FEET) 3 LOT 96 SCALE: 1=10 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0-1-1 Â©NIÂ¥33NION3 0â‚¬9,8 COV NOAV 3Â©al Z9OL X *LZO-9*L NV1d SNOIS//M P:\0402(dwgmork\04025-SITE.dwg, 6/25/2004 11:45:16 AM, Win2PDF.pc3 74-2 36'-llt 37'-2- 5'-1- ' 16'-11* . 14'-11* 24'-7* . 12'-64- 1 4 E-----' 1 1 1-------1 ~~ WALL ABV. ~-- WALL ABV. FAMILY KM. l I 1 1 to 1 C W BEDROOM I BEDROOM 2 " BEDROOM I MECM. -N 1 \ FF===2 \ BEDROOM 2 0 - 1 4 1- Â» . __ 1._-' - /\ 1 WALL ABV.m . Â· BATH f ... I I- - --41 CLOSET i -- 4 CLOSET \ FAMILY KM. rtL CLOSET C-- * ~BATM 2/ , Al/ - - EY-1 +5148.0 4[1 l====.. .. mA 0--n 1- 12 1 11 .-' l i! uP, 1 2 CLOSET -.---21 BATH I f, il LAUNDRY KM. 5 Â· \ d BATH 2--cla] 1 + 11- Revisions: D || W | 4 ~ +5147.0 9=#4 1 4 Upe MECHANICAL RM, LAUNDRY RM. r-*N D ||W | 0 -- .c UNIT 'B' UNIT 'A' Date: 1 LOWER LEVEL Project No: 1/4*=1'-0Â» Drawn by: Checked by: X31dAC AAOB' '>1 Ud ZIJUICIU 11/n JJUC A -,Le 36 -11~ 19 -2~ to'-11- 1.-gr. DICK -1 22==. -=F-*--=---z==re' -EÂ·Encuj * -- DINING KM. 0 110 .1 DECK 4 N 01 ~ LIVING RM. 7 t LJf DINING RM. 0 LU Q 83 Â° L LIVING RM. 4 - -1 9 ~ o KITCHEN -__ O- i FANTRY 1 4 21 --- D Z D.W. ~ REF. n iF=Â«= 1 2 r |- 1Â§46 1 :.- Â»Â»9 + Li 2 \ ;, I ~ ~...~. KITCHEN 22-0- . 0 i PANTRY 7 -~-ar----_ POWDER i GAKAGE - 2, YE ENTRY +8159.0 +8159.0 DN - j 01 0 5TORAGE ----=--~Â»4 L=14349 22-0- , 4'4Â· , Flk , %4 r 1 1 1 g 11 - 2.-= U / I 1 1 ./ GARAGE || POWDER 1 l: E--1 - -6-H +8158.0 ENTRY +8156.0 DN' Revisions: 1 / 1 . 1 0 Ph up, . 1 1 '.1 s E--4 10- -,1 11---1 1 1 1 1 0 7-1- . 22'-07 22'-0- 0~ 8'-2* . 5-0- .1'-9" 15'-2 44'-3~ 36'-11~" UNIT 'B' U N IT 'A' Date: 1 MAIN LEVEL Project No: 1/4'=1'-0~ Drawn by- Checked by: 1 1 A2.2 1 1 NOISIAIDEInS 3DaIZIall/V\'l 30019 '90 1 101 100'kINROD 319Â¥3 DaIMallAA 550â‚¬ ~ WALL BELOW -L_ 1 1 p WALL BELOW OF TO B W '0 1 1 4 N 1 1 1--- 2 1 3 1 0 0/0 . 1 Dwo 1. 1 5 MANER BEDROOM ~ MASTER BATM -0 -4 1201 - 11 \ 11 It 11 OPEN TO BELOW Â« - 1 0 1 WALL BELOW ~ -] 7 0-1 1 : ac=,Sn h 11 11 . % *M# 11 MR 1 N .T WOTER BEDROOM | .. 11 MASTER BATH .F=it=- 9 12 It J H 1 11 11 It 13'-3. 1 7-7Ujit DN ~ lf'-'t 1 1 BEDROOM 6 | , MASTER <| | u-~1~ J~U "~4%~f 1 -- 4 01 A ~~ 1 CLOSET ~ L-J ,/ .~1 |; 1 1 1- 11 1 --t DN / 11 BATIi --4-1 1 1-rE==j - let-lt 13'-3' An H LI [-----1 11 . *-8170.0 L__ I 1 ~ | ~ BEDROOM 6 \> ill BATH --i_J 1 1/11 r- 1 1 // 15 L" -- -1 | k 01 h / 11 /DECK UNIT '13' UNIT 'A' Date: 1 UPPER LEVEL Project No: 1/4'=1'-0' Drawn by: Checked by: A2.3 NOISIA~19(IIN~~413 9 90 1 101 avoW DECK BELOW -a DECK DELOW -7 1 2 11 6:12 G: 12 (D ' 1 / 4 11 1 1 FLAT 1 \ ./ f E /1 ' X \ G: 12 a 6:12/2 \ A \IN / 1 U.1 1 /1 Im / Jsa 1 12 2 / - \ 1 go 9 / \ I / i / -1 - / / 08 1 1 ! ; -EL 1 0/ V / 14/ 1 In 4 19 / 3% 12 1 N / 1 \'.,// 2 1 RIDGE: 81 74'-3. x / 70 . , 1 0 / / 1 1 7 I ! ... 0, i . 1 1 ,/ \\ G:12 1 \ 4 I A G: 12 / .1 'i i ' m ~~1 i~/ 1 \ N 1 9 / 1 12 1 N Revisions: | RIDGE: 8 175'-t O' iD l G: 12 G: 12 / / \ 1 1 / 1 / 1 114 22 11 le f 2 / G: 12 G:12 1 ---- G: 12 1Â£11 DECK BELOW 6 1 2 UNIT 'B' UNIT 'A' Date: ~ UPPER LEVEL Project No: 1/4~=1-0. Drawn by- Checked by. A2.4 NOISIAIGSnS 390 IZIall 19'90 1101 00Â¥30100 'AINROD 319Â¥3 ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. Â»355>~* . %Â» t // / 1 STUCCO /7// - '-'NG- Innill LDPER LEVEL +8170.0 455'-& 0 -\.%3Â» 1. 0 00 - @ 6 23 STUCCO STO - 1 0 413 1 ~ ELECTRIC WETEFS X GAS METER L_-,1 MUM-6&1Lin--- LU JQ D Z CLO 2 SOUTH ELEVATION (SIDE) EXIS TING GRADE 1/4-=1-0- 0 FINISHED CRAAF -- 1 L-1/ L-OWER LEVEL +8148.0 UNIT 'B' 12 RIDGE: 8183'-10>N ,'3/5/- \\RIDGE: 8182'-1 1/2Â» . RIDGE, 8171 -0" < ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. \ Revisions: \ / \ li _ -\-~1, RIDGE: 8177'-2"~1. s~uccol *4- 1 \\44 \ 1 ~\04~~~---3 RIDGE: 84,741Â»~ 1%440. 1 16. \. 1 \ -., RIDGE: 81711 Fl'r - , 0 UPPER LEVEL +8169.0 171 \..... GAS METER ~~~~~~~~ -Lorilill MAIN LEVEL +8158.0 EXT. MATEEPALS COLOR SCREDUUE STUCCO CASA BLANCA, SW 2060 Date: TRM BANDS E 8ODY COUNTRY BAQNBOARD L--74 -ASCIA COUNTRY BARNBOARD SOPPfT COUNTer BARNBOARD Project No: FAILNG COUNTRY BARNBOARD ASPWALT SNINGLES ELK- 300LB ANTIQUE SLATE Drawn by: WNDOW CLADDNG ALUM. -BRONZE Checked by: NOTE: . NORTH ELEVATION (SIDE) -ALL EXTERIOW METAL TO BE PAINTED BLACK. E-'r-i| LOWER LEVEL +8147.0 ~ LI Â«Â«\-- 1 U i 1/4-=1'-0- A3.0 -0,9, NOISIAIC]EinS 35)(~1(]~~~IM 550â‚¬ OaÂ¥30100 'kLNROD 31DV3 '1 30019 '90 L 101 0001 03040 cO _RIQUE: _818321101 ------- 1 RIDGE: 8182'-1 1/2" tÂ·.RIDGE: 8181'-0 ---- buct L -1.r~r . ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP, i - RIDGE: 8177'-2 1 -~ ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. ,/'/ ./ CZ~~1_1_J--- Â·. \<Â·. 1Â«- L RIDGE: 8175'-7 OOD SIDIN L .\~DGE: 8174'-4 I--*566--mial 1 1 11-----1 ,//\4\ 7 SIDING 04=ukup UPPERLEEL_+8170.0 UPPER LEVEL +8169 0 STUCCO 00 STJCCO MAIN LEVEL +8159.0 MAIN LEVEL +8158.0 _____14_Im ifII 1 0/0 13 E X LU -111 9 0-110 Dll f - ----_ 1111= --------- - -- ----_-- -EXISTING GRADE a li E LOWER LEVEL +8148.0 LOWER LEVEL +8147.0 L-JL-1 FINISHED GRADE -I-I-I-I- 2|l~ i iA,iT 'n' OIl 2 ==~ ~ WEST ELEVATION REAR RIDGE: 8183'-10" RIDGE: 8183'-5'- RIDGE: 8182'-5- - ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. 1.. \ \ \ Redsionz - - - - - - - - - - -37.-f,t- - -21k= - - - - - -ASPHALISHINGLELIYE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -Azi _ -i-Ii--- \ ~/ RIDGE: 8177'- 11 3/4- \\ 4/ / , Slucco F ' n / rjfri - an-lunic-- \0\ V Ek- iii- \\j=- SIDING 1--2>1 SIDING STUCCO ~1\ 1~I I~ Lam .Â» UPPER LEVEL +8170.0 -ux<1>JUILI~ UPPER LEVEL +8169.0 P~~~ XXOOX 0 GAS METER R 1 sTucco 1\ 3 GAS METER MAIN LEVEL +8159.0 MAIN LEVEL +8158.0 FINISHED GRADE UNIT 'B' UNIT 'A' 1 EAST ELEVATION (FRONT) EXT. ATERIALS COLOR SCHEDLLE STUCCO CASA BLANCA: SW 2060 Project N 1/4"=1-0. TRIM BANDS gB DY COLNTRY BAQNBOARD FASCIA COLNTQY BARNBOARD Drawn SOFFIT COUNTRY BARNBOARD RALNG COLNTRY BARNBOAQO Checked ASPI-IALT St-4NGLES ELK- 3OOLB ANnQUEE SLATE WINDOW CLADDING ALUM -BROI\[ZE NOTE: -ALL EXTERIOR METAL TO BE PANTED BLACK. M 550â‚¬ NOISIA~ '~MA 43~'90 1 101 111 I'll'll'll'll'll//1//lill'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'lin/l~1...11~9NU 1 \ 11"NA'OSON 2631 BEAR TRAP, SOUTH ~ LOT37 /au } ~ / LOT51 - j jh \1 LOT 30, BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION LOT36 LOT31 (,ab,4;12 \ ReD e AVON, CO 81620 -- ( j L0T28 -9- COUNTY OF EAGLE 0 / 1 / \ /, LOT29 ,- STATE OF COLORADO _ ~ L0T23 ARCHITECTS SUBJECT < *18Â¥22 1* 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD LOT30 SUITE 201 PROPERTYi BOX 5300 MATERIAL SYMBOLS: eENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: SENERAL NOTES: 1 AVON, CO.81620 1. lie emeWL CON-OTOR Re AL T,WeD -U IP,l To ALL STRUCT-L 01 D. r. .cal. cbr=*.9,Â· I MRMS ATTACIC TO Tleme FLNe IN ORPE- TO ALLÂ·r PET-â€¢,Pe me â‚¬2 ..111.1/11./1-, =-- /1,11.1.1 / / 8/15041'UATIONS -1 ALL MATmIN.6 t,B~ all â„¢15 Pl,XeCT. 1, 71431 -23,1,=42=:19=1=:M,9 *r- ma / 04-100. ...... .422 Al,r Calâ€¢FLICTS OR OMSS,Cle Ittle P.Ale OR SPECIFICATTONS IT IS Tle -I mial-!Tr OP TIE le-M. CONâ„¢~Tai ll GONTACT Tne A~HI- 2--M. do--8.4 1 C 1 LOT19 910.949.5200 2 LOT20 vmd@Ovmdicom TEDT Nal/OR TIE OWLEA TO-SOLVE 11* 1082. ~ *1- M-'19 2 Â»aLAT)* SHAW- 61 211HEK PAPB FACED MeNWL,56 *7180 I,OCH Ba,AN. Ce ; LOT21 _ ~__ TI~~ GR A~~iMM<Al Cf / * BATTS NO *60 FOAM -CH 19 UZZA#. 0/' 88,64. TO TIe SM-e M Vkle. me.-0 1900/ *rwmE To el -50 04 fbi --1,0. 0. to foci OF .b,d FAX 949.5205 INT~OR KILLS B-11 / /-11 leÂ·'ACE 00~cr,~ lop OF pl'.-d, or top or ..1.... ap-/0" ~~M~ ~MV# ~141 F'"to' cr b.11â€¢ wi"" 01*wn-0 1,1,0(*e SHALL ae Â·LOM eÂ· MÂ·RATE= Br ne MAN,â€¢c:rtle# AU. BMI,$:OM :000- 9%42 80 ite(LA10*BR MTH INS&&Am, N.be Ge 10,Â·0*1, all *-#**# -d.&. c.1 ma,AL TO 11 FU E,O,a to JIV Qu Mc*1-mÂ¢â€ž,b,d flir-.t-tÂ», VICINITY MAP - ~ fATIMT e,-1,0 IN MICal AIC> DOORS 30,1. Be TI-Ir TO DE MEATIet,Vv Mkt 90 AD TO NOT AL.LCM L..B~KAae AT AMY JOINT S ,LL M,fc*,6. POOFâ€¢S, *,OF JOINTS MO OTHF ,9,0+ 018%(r TO Molm,122 06 0--*- -r to Mmor0- Nr-r - = 1,~ *641. 01 -7,1!~Lr ML~*110 MITH A No,+Caâ€¢,~M Ftâ€¢-1140 )4Â«CH ..... ARCHITECT: = = A...0.1 â‚¬.1.19 111. ,â€¢eTS U.mgo arAM,AMI,6 AND OHALL NOT LE,K <, 02".O*Te Fler,â€¢EAT,et 01 0*.-,--6 -r'M-pl-Im-- '' 4. ALL STÂ¢Â»E ,Â«5*10< ve,~ m,ALL R MTTE, /â„¢ TIE T,ee AS GAL,LE, CUT IN ne ..... VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS. MEIEIM -/./- 134 No )1410+1 VILL ALLOM STale TO i FIRED malÂ»eÂ¥ IMTO FLAGe VIÂ«Le 5-* SET. /Â«x/ IWI- AID CONSâ€¢â‚¬11 VIALLS Tro Ac/89 Irrle ve,15 29*AUL 00 Coe*-- all * - m,ch-,1 fner- / POIDox 5300 52 COVE,ReD MTH A MATE-4009 teep,4â‚¬ Cr A IX-an-11-7 Alâ‚¬3 eFWE 90 AS To AVON COLORADO 5\620 ~ MOIST-e INâ„¢101/H AMP TO PlneÂ·rtÂ© Cote,k:Tk,NI *W. mi//Mfd i-,4 ~ corp" ./.400 ...9/ q-10-444-5200 5. .4.2 PAI<TICLE BC]AMP *IR M.nâ€¢IC,CU elÂ·EAnnee stl~il 1 FIrrEP MTH A â€¢rMI<â€¢ @1 r~~=1= ER-Dlle *- AC<C-Ulte To HNEFACTIÂ¥-5 -3019(ATIONS. OIl yo* oli-,al Milill 1 111- lkâ€¢â€¢ d liI-- C,d qUo-944-5205 FAX 8. ALL NBcIA â„¢Â»4 AIO VINM_e eximelole LIÂ»Â·emE S,6~1.-L me NO 1 4 VISIBLE ARAPE, CONTACT, CHRIS JUEReENS -le OF l,â€¢1614Â·Lr Â»10,8, 1-Â·PI~, AlÂ© 01â€¢OMMIT- r,(104 MAY KETi. MICM Tle +MleST /Burr LOOK ~ Tle HOISE. * OR/~* M.* Wâ€¢~1- NÂ»Â· ON .... 7. Tle CONTFâ€¢ACTOR miALL M-,SH MITH ne HOUPE. ALL MATERIAS ,+IGH MAT -*Mdmiv#..##21* STRUCTURAL ENe I NEERI Ne: 0 *. 0â€¢e rITH ma-Â·etr, Mll- 1,42(8. HK#,El,ta- 040 5rm-8 IrÂ«CLUm[Me M,42,0Nllm, or 1-= CÂ»l M~M,ALS. Alâ‚¬P TIE IMDTALL.meS 4 1,-- 1-2 Alâ‚¬, AP[CRESS. ALL- 11 1,t th. I-* th,*Â«.1//1/'i d,/c- or *Â«ic,- 1, DRAWING INDEX: 5GL--T, 8-rme- m,enâ€¢- Alt, MIUm:25 0Â®TALLE> 010LL I,AVE A PAN,41,1 cr A cle re- HI# 9 ,â€¢Wal,flm. 11Â·e C<*79,~Te= MuRT,~ Mil~e/trrs AGAIN,r 23 - C.A.- For C-rÂ·â€¢,BOM . - 19 .AU-,2 C, ALL V*Â¢116 878-Â® le *-TN..Lm Calel'Mal.TE, OR GALâ‚¬MP TO me 4,=~&~15.~ 4~6 @-C L J A 02 ATTN,E, F ZCk/IT M,~NIAL ND C<*Wn,GTION SPECIFICAT1010 FOR MORE DETAIL 12 11- 0-â€ž4 04,/Mokr -1 b, -0-110 Nr 71 TITLE SHEET UGSâ‚¬,9 INDEX, NOTES, Era mo 1,Â®TALLE, MOR T,e ,-00 0, O,2 YE-. ,W-â€¢ ,â€¢ râ€¢'pa..4 ARCHITECTURAL DRAMINeS luPOÂ®RAPHICAL SUR*r *rwEERSE,- 1 0 U :*6 EXHIBIT - 1//9,4-0 0-,11//lil// c,-m 6-4.0-* g,%â€¢r,ma,â€¢J- Al.0 LOFâ‚¬R LEVEL PLAN 4,14 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAaE SUMMARÂ¥ EE66'.:44*;27e PROPOSED SOUTH UNIT All MAIN LEVEL PLAN S Thi 6-r< C- r=tor <d WIntracter, 1- fli44 Al.2 U'FEE LEVEL PLAN4 -MO --- 8!-01 Aha POCE PLAN LOPER: 161618 SG.FT. eARA<32 4 MORK ROOM: ~ EXTENIOR B.EVATIONS EXT-NOR ELEVATIONS 0-0-1 MAIN: 2008 50.FT. 880 Sa.FT. .........9 <O RECEIVED UPPER : 1107 M.FT. TOTAL: 5<Ve SG.FT. 1~ 2955SrU~:Ze:ZZ:2~2 STRUCTURAL ID>1~MINeS - JUN 2 9 2004 EXISTINe NORTH UNIT m 48 B Al Fâ€¢~tÂ¥13 aid kitailal-kit. fililâ€¢ct Â» U, b.â‚¬a,0-a 0, g ENTRY eALLERY: 518 SG.FT. . a #*-1- 1=~ -1 I --*c, * 11. ABBREVIATIONS: -.-** 1- 0.*...* 11. U//or/ m..4 6- D."al-,rm tk Z J- Community Development <, Faff- 5 Efel..- E -- -6 //d al,1 //4/ . ...........Pro-1....... Z 6.0 I **c~,rb ,~mm ~pro,al *44,"04- i ~24-4 -- J rl ~ E al. 9 22* .4 ==W ~' ~714:*t~:~.:UN*2- Fip- ***0" le ~ E; 27 w OF - a,s,Nt,64 Or cÂ»v- 0,11,' to Â¢Omtruck,011. 19 1///1/r /1-0/ /// M M 0/0//*-d *h L//// T)/4/2/ p//19/ =9' 0-1 =v mÂ£_~ 04 ~T ~*_1 E E- 20 k *M, Â» a Miud,1 of - 0~,t~, râ€¢ Id-4 1b Â» 6kliv,tood 1hot 41//r,pmo- 4 -- 0/1-n - doc-,- ald N EMZ & == r EL- 5 EE =*ES~'t:=3214 ...."'I:=== ...... /4//lg ///16,1/I. Th/:/ W~# b/,/4 //ci CODE REVIEW - BUILPINe TYPEE, 122&515!ENTIAL SINSLE FAMILY-TYPE V-8 co.mIC.,5. OCCUPANDY FRS, U - BETPEN THE SAIRASE ANC) 1-1Â·â‚¬ REE#PENCE MATBRIALS APPVROVED FOR I HOIR FIREE RE\'ISION 01Â· z EEr FMESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION ARE REGURED M ~ w g*-4 aN TIE Â»8Â»E SIDE OZY TO THE IN holto.1 -tai 2%; r ~~/0~ ARE To i SOLID MOOD NO LESS THAN I LIDEFBDE OF ROOF: 51~ICTURE DOORS E Â¤%:2Â· RAM =, l,40 um/- mtod al,n- oft A BOLIP OR HOErÂ«re CORE STEEL 11.11,0.. Â·rrl k.,001 5/8' THICK, A 20 MIN FIRE RATED DOOR lr~.-I'- DATE 6:11:04 EXPOR NOT LESS TH,N 1 3/8' 1Â·HICK. M. pm- p.re.... foe *1T OP-*-- SEEE 511~CTURAL NOTES, 91 FOR PRÂ»litte, FASTIâ‚¬RS. *NED JOB NO. 0401 LATERAL LOAD CONFECT1093. A *;D clo-t Â£ ear Q ~,/.,c:. TITLE SHEET SV ==1 LAM 1-nal (1) .Fer r-Grc. (41, (bil :r= GENERAL NOTES FaGO rÂ»c,*id SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL SHEET NO. Tl 1431 38 Ilill IM'pli R,ME:Pumqi;23%,CE n#Rl toi N BONBDISaN MEI 39alklaliM tial@Â¢,5*efifiS 8 1592 82- 2 1:32 @E LEGAL DER - TOPOGRAPHY 1,3 1:12% Lot 30. BLOCK 2, Wddridge as recorded ot reception No 184525 on July 12, 1979 in Book RE: 2.: 1% I 288, Poge 124 in the office of the Eagle County Clerk ond Recorder. Eagle Co. LOT 30, BLOCK 2, w E -c, 3 - 2 8 49 I8.=1=x= WILDRIDGE < EL _ 0-5 0 x I TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, : 22 3 5%51; 9 : #%22 1 432â‚¬ STATE OF COLORADO = h ' i# 11 i f Off 119444- 4 D \\1 92% 2 2% 7 8 <Â£#:i 68 2 8 ts::Â§80 *M 8 4 21.8.I 54.0' 4 %0 7 9Â¥1111 FFE 8197.82 : 1,1 \\ 111 1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING -Â·<5\ \ ~111~ ~ 5 5' / 41 BY ALPINE ENGINEERING -~~~ 23,1, . r lili to / lili C o. lili .-4 25.4 Cl) 1 > 54 r % 2 \ :~~ LEGEND K o 0 \ )1# E 1 ' INDICATES A PROPERTY LINE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING 1 /1 2 * - --- -- ----- INDICATES A BUILDING SETBACK LINE W wi \ BY ELDRIDGE SURVEYING --1 1 11 Lb -- -- -- ----- UNDICATES A UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE Q ~ 1 11'REPIT 8181 0 1 11 Ce w m LOT 30 J / 1 j' 2 INDICATES A 2' CONTOUR -0 0 i -0 4 \ \ k 1 BLOCK 2 1 - - INDICATES A 10' CONTOUR 73 5.76 ACRES 11 : (22) lili \ W c . GRAPHIC SCALE \\111 2 C.F"kg.4. .: \ T; M A--IB W 44 -4 t i 'f ~ , 1 1 2 - 0 /- W 1 14 1 1 Al -, ( IN FEET) +98.59 1. . 11 I 1 inch = 20 ft S $ 1: \ f~ fit{ i *~#~.<p~~<~~0 -~11 of N 14'28'01"E. for the line connecting the south east corner and the northester 99 28 NOTES: DRAWN BY: G.JE 1.) Date of Survey. April 26, 2004 1 1 DIGNAME 040011 OPO | | D*IE 04/30/04 2.) Contour Interval: 2 Feet JOd NU 04011 \ 11 1 1 3.) Elevation Dotum: Eagle River Water and Sonitation District Asbuilts. Sewer REVISIONS Monhole #0840 Rim Elev.= 8203.00, located on Bear Trap Road. IREK, \ 00.12 1 \ 4.) Basis of BearIngs: The hearings shown hereon, ore based on o calculated bearing ffli dE \BE L E R[ G ~~ ~ 5.) Street Address. 3621 Bear Trop Road, 11 most corner of lot 30. Monuments were found as described hereon. \ 11 \ RETAINING --3 \ AP 8 CRt WALL 6.) No Title Commitment wos provided for this survey, 7.) Eldridge Land Surveying LLC, is not responsible for the integrity of digitol information that may be supplied with this survey. Digital information in not to be \ relied upon for construction purposes. 3 1>JJ j 1 . . ts rf f~~ Â°Â°-W - /3 1 \ 8.) The legal description shown hereon. is bosed on the subdivision plot Wildriage 0 1 recorded of reception No. 184525 on July 12,1979 In Book 288 at Page 124 in thi Eagle County Clerk ond Recorders office. 1/ , 9.) Lot Area = 5.76 acres $ 11/ oUT 8,88 SITE BENCHMARK / SEWER MH-0840 j 1% i / 4 f TOP GR 8203 00 RIM ELEVATION= 82 0' 01 19Â·# O LU \ 2/ TOP CR Ime 1 V 519.7 CERTIFICAT~ON --7 --1-1 -1-1.1111-11- Tan=82.09 knowledge and belief. 0- 64 - U C 6 09 ~- 10' SLOPE MAINTENANCE, ORAINAGE // AND SNOW REMOVAL EASEMENT I, Gregory J. Eldridge, c Registered Professional Land Surveyor licensed under the lows , of the Stote of Colorado. do hereby certify to Shane Bohart ond The Town of Avon, L / 2 /1 09 R R=125.00 the contours os shown hereon, ore based on o field survey performed by me or L=145.27 .16"'.11.1,14,4> under my direct supervision on April 30, 2004 and are accurate to the best of my 0= 6=66'35'16" O N DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT g GUARD RAIL : 1 1 3009â€¢ 1 2 R N8136'22'W 224.45' 1 4 M "4 LAND %32 / S - e Â·. : Â¢- 4 9 Gregory J. 70@418.-Â·.El<#UN 0. 30093 "#'ll,Itte SHEET NO. 1 F*ID SURVEY MONUMENT 1.51 ALUM. CAP PLS 5447 OF 1 ON 5/8 REBAR paloq u 91.1*-9Z6 (0Â£6) 0(V /109 -p U,04 , 0 ". ..04/ u.:/049/0 /4 SGUVM03 'ZON 1!Nn '9 AVMHDIH 666/ OVOM dÂ¥bll 26Â¥38 VI UOaJ04 DNIddÂ¥11 DNIAiIANAS A3AhIA *+10-926 (OZ6) 3NO N08"39'51*E 50.000 ir- JOBS'/Uli.....'-mb~diâ€žON!*2//72jU AM "D.... jl~44,1~,1 V:Â·.T.,1 MANK ~''NALD<ON 0 WZIÂ£ 1 V~ ~ --------- M. 19.2 LEOS L 1 / ----- -- nt=t ----- / 2 095- L -- * ) .W RE'/8/ar .'W.' ' I H \ \ ir -*Ar \ 41 ~M--DIA-Wr 101ll/al ,/1 d~k ARCHITECTS 0048 E EAVER CREEK BLVD -- - SUITE 201 <- 4 -\ BOX 5300 g- --1 3 *A -Ii h#- \ - M / - - AVON, CO. 81620 -i\\ - -- -- - 1%1 1 -- .--\ \ -\ 910.949.5200 -- 1./ i. - . -*I- - vmda@vmdicom -- W -i---I- ----- -1 -- \ ~ M FAX 949.5205 // ./1 3- / A.----r hi - 4- ./ -- -\- / 4*8%<14 \ , - rÂ©Â»1*Â» ,\ . -- '3462 _ 39\ - W.~ .. V 3 4,i' 9*944 -. h.J \ -W-- N .."N klf \\ \h / - N \- L ) --- - _ 4 - 7 .7 '*-274 Def-Â· , 4 \.--# - \. r-- < * #' 4.1Â«.Ir N: - %- ... fill- ~- -- Ii- - ~ % - ----- ~Â·44 -- -) /1*1221 - - -- - -- _ --p'16Â«+3.246- --- - 1 4 \ 'Vw 12Â·f , I -Â«2- - -- --- / 24.7 - - ---- . a.ope -------- - --- --__14_i~ -la >Â·...' _--- \7 .1 - I \ - - ----- 11___74 - -42* isho moaliti - -FF- - -- 4- -m= - - 1 I--i ---- - - -,-, 0*6tt~ Â£,4%JIT- fiff --- - < -----~---------- ---- ---U ---- -- -- -< NPAII*IMAL LU h- - -- -- - H - - %--- ------ -- --- -- ,-i /04 ------ -- 4 --- -K - - - - - -- / --- -- --- -0 -8 Tifi_ - __i-- 22* -- - r. -* ---- --------- --~-- - - ------ 1- - --- -- K *.- - -~li----- ---- - - ------- - ---- / ----- ----- \ / Â£ -I.. -- -- ---- - - - ---------------- CR -- / - ./ - _------- -- 00 % - -0 X -Â· M y~/9/mIN!' - - ---- mIFIAN-IMBIW~ -- * A milmÂ» MR al.3.301.0* ~-=.mâ€¢L 90'81* - - L --- -- -1 0,0,/0, ------117 la-tormaul.la le-1,1. G .. -- ----- ---- --- I - - / - Ii- D VIA' - - -i - ./2/'-lfrAumm "Al --- -- - - -- -- e ...0 << $ /~' I ~~p ~- ~le--po- 8.4 -- --- 01.4. , -- --- % ---0-- -- -K --- 0 t"041 .7 0"4"liumy........A I --------------- k M - H .4 0Â»0,=rp--moro=A 4 -- 1 =2401 1/"vul ---- M.AMON.in,>4~man -- --- -- -000 -r.lorM.tor,4*Â»1140*-- -- -.-1---- -- ...LOrl!40*MI."1 --- - 6:11:04 -* -- --- - 0401 0 - / ~--i--- -- - - - --- - SITE PLAN 0 - - % i --- 4Â»49-09-8 A-IE Y-0-H F L A-N-8 wivillrtriff-- SCALE 1"= 10-0" r- SHEET Ni j ~ Hinois~~li a v38 1592 OCIVE,0103 39alklallM 11111!11 a SE]B MEN 18 0Â£101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOPOGRAPHY 3381*ititi. Lot 30, BLOCK 2, Wildridge as recorded ot reception No. 184525 on July 12, 1979 in Book :Eal :FAI 2 F' fE<5 288, Poge 124 in the office of the Eagle County Clerk ond Recorder, Eagle Co. LOT 30, BLOCK 2, :8133..ine. Ficm :31Â§ WILDRIDGE TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, O X O 4, O - ~~- 5.3,3.@i kE @ZE STATE OF COLORADO Z EE -a * Â·0 I J m x o i 22 %0= 41 &2 1 5 22:WI- Er Xy "":5 3# O 10 * 5 8 0 9 8 #0 7 M"il Project 04011 SLOPE ANALYSIS Fri June 11 2004 :. 14111 Range Statistics Range m. 40.00 17752.79 24.8 End. Arec Percent 2 40.01 100.00 53825.68 75.2 FFE 8197.82 f 1 1, 111 / 11 1 B~ ~HE&=El <fjj -i) 3- f}- - \\11 1 2 CL 0.4 Al-i Â§3 LEGEND o . 11 1 1 1/ . 1 ) ID 1 INDICATES A PROPERTY LINE 1 Mix f \ TOPOGRAPHIC 61APP!NG A 11-1, * 1 8 2 4 Ill ill ---------- INDICATES A BUILDING SETBACK UNE f Â» g W 8 \ BY ELDRIDGE SURVEYING \ C I -3 'Ill. r . -1 - L ----------- INDICATES A Un LITY AND DRA[NAGE EASEMENT LINE u 25 5 LOT 30 , ... W -1 .. - INDICATES A 2' CONTOUR ir :*Â£ 1 11 \ . -- -9 1 1: o \ 1 1 r - INDICATES A 10' CONTOUR BLOCK 2 ... 1\11 l,l i iii 0 \ 5.76 ACRES 0 : \\ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 . 1 \ L\l 2 N r i :.--4 1 I El ( IN FEET) 111- - 1 / 98.59 '11! 1 1 1 S *' 13 . 1 1 I 1/ 1 inch = 20 fl -1 3.- f.j_---i-*1-j~-95 -\-- 1: --_-1},- \(\(lif~ -00 ~.1.~i 1 1 \\ : I 1 1 1 S \ f 1 NOTES: TRAWN BY (UF % 1. \ 99.28 DWGNAME: 04(KI WPI 1 ) Date of Survey: April 26. 2004 AA:E: 04/30/04 2.) Contour Intervd: 2 Feet 49 NO 04011 REÂ¥SIONS. 3.) Elevation Datum: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Asbuilts. Sewer Ann * 91 APF eATCH Manhole #0840 Rim Elev.= 8203.00, located on Bear Trap Road. *REFÂ· 4.) Basis of Beorings: The beorings shown hereon, ore bosed or o calculated bearing most corner of lot 30. Monuments were found as described hereon. of N 14'28'01"E, for the jine connecting the south eost corner ond the northestern ~ ~ ,CONC- 1 5.) Street Address: 3621 Beer Trap Road. \ ... . 1 6.1 WALL, 1 \ \ IRETAINING - J 6.) No TiUe Commitment was provided for this survey. \ .7 1 1- 3 7 BW 85.74 1 ~ -00.95 1 7.) Eldridge Land Surveying LLC, is not responsible for the integrity of digital , - Uih - =. ' Â· 1.7 1 information that moy be supplied with this survey. Digital information in not to be ,//1 reiied upon for construction purposes, 11 -' - 8.) The Segol description shown hereon, is based on the subdivision plat Wildridge \ recorded ot reception Ne. 184525 on July 12, 1979 in Book 288 ot Poge 124 in the \ Eagle County Cterk and Recoroers office Â® INV CUT ... SITE BENCHMARK. SEWER MH-0840 9.) Lot Arec = 5.76 ocres / RIM ELEVATiON= TOD 9 8203.00 82 CN Â«Py Ul d LU 1 119 -11Â· Er , ..--.L 1 gog 1. 1 0 N]PIGR 8,9.7 991 IE~E ~.~ . 1 .- 1 / CERTIFICATION 10' SLOPE MAINTENANCE DRAINAGE 1 - 1 AND SNOW REMOVAL EASEMENT 1, Gregory J. Eldridge, a Registered Professional Lond Surveyor licensed under the laws 232% ... a : ~ f b. / // ~~ ~~.~ of the State of Colorado, do hereby certify to Shane Bohort and The Town of Avon, (DO' R R=125.00 the contours 's shown hereof, ore based on o field survey performed by me or L=145.27 - Tan=82.09 E y under my direct supervision on April 30. 2004 and cre accurate to the best of my O- 4 ,. knowledge and beiief 1,~11?:.1. 6Â«Â«for flf: f~ 6=66-35.16. CL BUILDJN - ~ //' 0 ..0. 1 R GUARD RAIL / A 4, 4.<- -3 - .00992.L'Â· /0 2/ E - LsÂ·*,df dhegoryl. eld,r,Ae c'!-S. No. 30093 SHEET NO. - F D SURVEY MONUMENT 1.5 ALUM. CAP PLS 5447 OF 1 ON 5/6 REBAR .,OP Ul J SJOI/( Ual OVO@ dÂ¥81 p I'la U OWS 09DowpaD @4 SohIVM03 '2028 lINA '9 AWAHDIH 666+E BUIXâ‚¬,A.Ins 209 18 00 NABAS GNÂ¥9 A3AMA 1-lun~gNÂ¥ 3935ND S't. N08'39'512 50.00' 1. h ' ; rÂ·Â·Â·Nal U:.ON \\~Lj/) il a e W." 0 1 11 ARCHITECTS I -1. 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD , SUITE 201 , BOX 5300 012Ill/Ill/*1Â¥41 AVON, CO. 81620 I . , - -7 i,i ZI/--*....r--- - . I .- 5-U.--t---1.-=.4 /\ . 910.949.5200 --11 11.--Im -li 1 1 vmda@vmdicom , 1-1- ~ '----1 2 F--1 ~ FAX 949.5205 & 54*Wr 9* i --AR ~99=i A=L7 Cal. 1~ =~|12 ARV= u...=#frful~= 4.-i....111 - ---r 1-Tn--r,rÂ·rrrI IL-,A~/ 11 1 1 1 1 .FE...[1401111.1--th-3 1 1 . 1 , 4 J= =-- ---Flf/:27... I t:>,5~ - - li & 4 1 I - -55/ 11 '5>/ aw&*L 4/ 11 --== ==6 - . *v 4/ /08>>--- 3 4/ ':9/ .8/Â« .=r -= Ljux,7 2 /.55- /1 0 11- .. 1-lvi V. . I".P .11. ,Â»41./ â‚¬34 ---. -0 - ' ' ' /85 -Ze> 4-4 I ..ler , 63- cn LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN \2-7 SCALE: 1/8- - 1%-O. 2021 SQ. FT. 6:11:04 - 0401 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMUTTAL SCALE 1 /8" = 1'-0" SHEET Nt ). Al.0 & H100$3'JIV~ 3V39 tE9Z O0Vk,0100 390IhIalIM NEIG En=1 MaN MOO18 0Â£101 V...T,:, 1, 4.< N i, 6,;NALDSON 4 = J = ARCHITECTS ... I 0048 E BEAVER CREE BLVD 841. I . SUITE 201 , an-=r,1,1 BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 . . I 910.949.5200 E- h vmda@vmdicom FAX 949.5205 , 1 40"81.- i I = 91 I IL Itmigr --4 -EL-El L= =r~11 'r--1 trin, 1 14*im@ 1 1 2: 48 EIL*13~~~ ---2,1 0 - -- It : = 1791 1â€¢~ ]Puu./IU)&.EaEEEEE r --1 r-*-1 ~4*a~L____ I=- 0 - 1,11 LE--aae HEEE // M 001Â«~E // r--- --11 .....U -0 / 1 ----1 AONO'. imar ./ 1 \ 2 4/ 11 1 --55 // -------------- r I I /'' Â«vÂ« 02<~ / /7 /0 : '04 1.1 / 1 ' . .4 0 , // // 7 \ 2 \ /jh MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C.-/1 OCALE. t.. I i./ 20,1 8'L FT. --. 6:11:04 0401 MAIN LML FLOOR PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL SCALE 1 /8" = 1 '-0' SHEET Nc). Al.1 NaaISm:1 MaN 0018'0â‚¬101 V38 IE9Z \ D':NALDS ON 1 ~ \4 lili ID 1 ARCHITECTS k*/ 0048 E BEA8 CREEK BLVD SUITE 201 e "ir M' Rn '0'w- BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 1 970.949.5200 Â¥mda@vmdicom =0.0 1 *6*-* FAX 949.5205 1 / 1 â€¢â€¢s=--/~Wp,~11[1/-~ /Â»55$5%/ ..I - 44 riall 1 1 M-~ 1 1 1 . 4 -- ASAE P-7 .: i riiiâ€ž, _- 48 1. 1 1 1 0 =, -il------- i 11 .Mr 1: T 2*lic--4 1 L-__-2 L----------J //~#/r -A~J W=-=1 -, 1.- .a- -?trÂ·a._m__ 1 1\ ~ ///- - 1/,96 44 \401Â«~ 2-ZIZZ~--1 . WI 1 - 1.4 1 Num, 441 \\ Il -%-5/ fly .-957 .71 - 1 U // P 4 4 4 ~ 2527 96Spi'=7 < <-0 tr, ill-- L~?C==40.=.3(~ z Ul O ~ -1 ril{ 9 4 It /L,IN$,--1 , 0099211Â£427 an JO r-31'0-4 9 9 2 r-K f :-ts, 7 Â»bÂ»=97 00 N cih UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN/DRIVEWAY PLAN Salâ„¢ l,4rrl -1 se,r. â€¢ 8- ea rr. Ovwavx"K ROOM NOMIN l,1/. Dle 62'r. .-...119... 6:1104 0401 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0" SHEET N{ I. Al .2 BONBOISEIkl MEI Z MOO18'0Â£ illiiiiiliilii I IJLI IC,H,; 'dV31 3 oavuo-loo ae , C NA C'JON \ 1 /jh 13 - ARCHITECTS 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 207 BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 910.949.5200 1rl ' r-7.I-=.i,Â£-0--~41.) vmda@vmdicom 1 1 4-L-11, . 1..E<'3 FAX 949.5205 -.4-22Â«*P 4 2 *943 1 I .4 1 1 but 1 -1 ---_1___1 4-1 1 p / W 1 fi 4 1 1= 1 = - r-- -1 / / / â‚¬ 1 % 9, L__________________-1 \ / / / / \ 1 0/ 0 1 2 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / 3 / / / / / 6:11:04 0401 \- ROOF PLAN SKETCH PLAM SUBMUTTAL SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" sHEET w Al.3 HlOOS dVal V38 1593 30 BaISEW MaN OCIVB01OO 3 alkdalIM 3- -~iq %-'I"'ll# --I Av< vik- - -9=z/Lit# 2 ry-E2J~90/13~k . .1 - ARCHITECTS SUITE 201 =i 0048 E BEAVER GREEK BLVD BOX 5300 1 ILII--I-11_-1 11 I LUJUJJIL=16=el--*-fil -lu====ULR- AVON, CO. 81620 -- - - ------- ---I.--I-- 910.949.5200 -- ---'~ -Ilqkim-1--R----- .11~111[-1-Il-vl~-1*~2f +----Â»---- vmda@vmdicom 1/ FAX 949.5205 -------"rt----Trpr"WilitefF/-4/- 1_-7,124/6/4,0("Mitil_kE]______ - =6 Ilit- /i\SQUIBELEVATION '-1--1-0 191=1 -le *=-1-1- -- 1 10--~.--------------------- --- jilfÂ«~DE~U_ - i --- -------- ---- ~ZrIZE . -12--- -~329[[Lf-[[14-4 2 tÂ»Â»99 0 ~ '12 - 7 -- - --- --- I ----- '-1GAL r<'ti-------- --r - 70 --j - __ -I-- - __ - ----- -- 11-1- --<324~&5--.'- -70-- , er-1 - ,==70-7== =P -0-- lili 7Ef*FfÂ«Â· 6:11:04 - 04M 1 lili .*-- /*\WEST ELEVATION ----- ELEVATIONS 'i--1-3 SKETCH PLAN SUBM UTTAL L.223" =11-011 -1 plw I| HlOOS di 3V38 IE9z BON S hi MaN oavuO7O0 Eleai Z ~3018 '0â‚¬ 101 1 1 +1 v ' '.T:, ', 1.1.Ak :i ~ PoNALDSON i .. 911, , 1 L".IiIÂ·NI - , 1! 1i, ARCHITECTS ---------- 9-'ll - -- .i-- -Itar------- 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD -liuookÂ»Â«-1 . -gfilf,-0.0//2-1 SUITE 201 Fillil.*2~9091;m.illifis 'M.-tii~.''4..ill/--WV.44~4 BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 ---------------- ------- - ------ il- vmda@vmdicom -lill ----- -- - - 1.-il ---- -0M66----------_JEL L --,--~3~.2--7--*â‚¬------------------------- FAX 949.520Â§ -Ii-----Ii--Ii----- -IMST----------------------- ---+I------2.2------------------ I.Ul -------------------- ------- --- illf--------------- rn NORTH ELEVATION 0 LL,/ SCALE: 1/r - 1'-0= 00 <90 1 I"*19'011~~ le/:0 1 ...r -/7441 ....1.-= ./9/. - _/2 _--- i#4 . '--- -*Ii I.-1 --I- -ill .-1-- I-li lill -1-- ---1.1,- =6:64--1 721 u, 82 4Â»L ; 1 i On-JO 10 1 -1 ' | F., ~ i 1 1. J 1. . :2 9 i Iii 1--! -- . 1 1 1: 0 I.*-~--1 --lilli 11 '11~111~ in nn A--r-t N -i--.-i------ 11 1 1 -= 0000-â‚¬ Le-5 Z7ZWC1 ==1 1 -Ill-----------I-i----i-Il.-----------------------i*I----I-i- ...U. ~_______-_________-_________-______________-_________ ~6'11~~ 0401 /*\EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS L,/ SC..a 1/8- - 1'-0- SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0" SHEET N(). A2.2 |||Ilmmm111 || HinOS? 0