Loading...
PZC Packet 081704August 17, 2004 I . I f . Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 17, 2004 5:00 pm Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda) - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - 7 (Please note that all times provided are estimates only) 1. Call to Order at 5:30 pm 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] VI. PUD Amendment (5:30pm - 6:10pm) Public Hearing Property Location: Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East ApplicanVOwner: jay Peterson [Tab 2] Description: The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of duplex and triplex zoning. The proposed PUD amenement is to change the zoning to single family and downione the total dwelling units of the prope ties to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) separate lots. This application will not affect the original PUD access from both Longsun Lane and Wildridge Road East, however, will require a reconfiguration of the platted non-developable area. The Commission reviewed a previous application, which was withdrawn by the applicant after public input was considered by the Commission and the applicant on the concept for this application. VII. Final Design Plan - Duplex (6:10pm - 6:20pm) Propedy Location. Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road Applicant: Scott Turnipseed Owner: Greg Samson [Tab 3] Description: Scott Turnipseed is proposing a duplex on the uphill side of Old Trail Road near the intersection with Draw Spur. The building is approximately 5,800 square feet in size and would include two (2) 4-bedroom units. Proposed materials would include: cedar board on board siding, stucco, and asphalt shingles. The sketch design was approved on August 3,2004. Vlll. Final Design Plan - Single Family (6:20pm- 6:30pm) Property Location: Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD/ 1910 Hurd Lane Applicant: Architectural Services PC Owner: Nancy & Mauri Nottingham [Tab 4] Posted on August 13, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main lobby • On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Description: Architectural Services PC is proposing a single-family residence on Hurd Lane. The building is approximately 2,903 sq. ft. in size, with a 574 sq. ft. garage and 1919 sq. ft. unfinished basement. The style of this house will emulate a country farmhouse with 10:12 roof pitches, horizontal siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. The sketch design was approved on June 1, 2004. IX. Final Design Plan - Duplex (6:30pm - 6:40pm) Property Location: Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision/5039 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Dantas Builders, Inc. Owner: Dantas Builders, Inc. [Tab 5] Description: Dantas Builders, Inc. is proposing a duplex residence with the two units totaling 9,012 ~ square feet (living space and garage space). The building materials will include stucco siding, stone veneer base, decks with wood railings, and asphalt shingles. The proposed maximum height is 34'9". The sketch design was approved on June 1, 2004. X. Sketch Design Plan - Duplex (6:40pm - 6:50pm) Property Location: Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5650 West Wildridge Road Applicant: Eric Johnson Architect PC Owner.-Tripp Plavec [Tab 6] Description: Eric Johnson, applicant, is proposing a 6,000 sq. ft. alpine style duplex. This duplex will be accessed via two driveway entrances. The north unit of this duplex will share a driveway entrance with Lot 17. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding and trim, stucco and stone. The proposed maximum height is 35'. XI. Minor Project - Landscaping (6:50pm - 7:00pm) Property Location: Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/70 Beaver Creek Place Applicant: Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Owners: American National Bank [Tab 7] Description: Remove approximately 17 mature trees and prune other trees and bushes to accommodate change of Mountain Medical Building back to a banking institution (as American National Bank). Reasons sta ed for removal of vegetation are: public safety, increase i visibility for bank, and overall maintenance. XII. Other Business XIII. Adjourn (7:05pm) Posted on August 13, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby . • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main lobby • On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission August 3,2004 Eaglebend Apartments Conference Room 0010 Stonebridge Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:30 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were two amendments to the Agenda to move Item VI, Sketch Design Plan - Duplex, Property Location: Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road and Item Vlll, Minor Project - Snowrun Townhomes, Property: 43, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/520 Nottingham Road, to the Consent Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no Conflicts of Interest. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Trueblood motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the July 20th, 2004, Planning and Zoning Corimission Meeting with one correction on page 2, Item VII, Sketch Design Plan ~:or Lot 30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2631 Bear Trap Road, to remove the Public Hearing Open and Close headings, since this application was not a public hearing item; and Item VI, Sketch Design Plan - Duplex, Property Location: Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road and Item Vlll, Minor Project - Snowrun Townhomes, Property: 43, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/520 Nottingham Road be approved on the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VI. Sketch Design Plan - Duplex Property Location: Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/ 2440 Old Trail Road, Applicant: Scott Turnipseed, Owner: Greg Samson Description: Scott Turnipseed is proposing a duplex on the uphill side of Old Trail Road near the intersection with Draw Spur. The building is approximately 5,800 square feet in size and would include two (2) 4-bedroom units. Proposed materials would include: cedar board on board siding, stucco, and asphalt shingles. Moved to Consent Agenda. VII. Master Sign Program Amendment F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\080304.DOC Page 1 of 4 Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/Westgate Bldg., ApplicanUOwner: Helen Bird Description: Helen Bird (Joe's Liquors) has submitted a sign application requesting: 1. Amendment to the current Master Sign Program (MSP) for the Westgate Building for monument sign design and first floor tenant's sign design; and 2. Approval of a new sign design for Joe's Liquors that would conform to the proposed amendments. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Monte Park of Sign Design approached the commissioners to present the colors and options for the signs. Ms. Bird, applicant, and Sharon Leveers, co-owner, discussed the lack of visibility of the current signs and thought the recommendation of staff does not provide full visibility. Ms. Bird mentioned the monument sign and the six tenants to use it, and that the building sign would be different from the monument. Monte mentioned the acrylic signage would be more obvious with internal lights and better visually through the foliage and setback. Ms. Bird also commented on the recommendation of staff for landscaping by the monument base and that there is sufficient landscaping at present. Commissioner Savage asked if the staffs recommendations were geared towards consistency and received a positive reply by staff. Monte responded to commissioner inquiry on specific coloring of the individ, lai panels. Commissioner Tru.:blood believed the sign should be subtle and not appear flashy or cheap. Corimissioner Didier asked about the current lights ard when they were due to be :eplaced and Ms. Bird responded that replacement occurs every two years or so and they were due to be replaced shortly. Commissioner Karow questioned if it might resemble a 'strip mall' and asked if the sign code authorized 40 sq ft for signage in general. Tambi Katieb read from the Town of Avon Municipal Code regarding monument sign size. Commissioner Trueblood moved to approval all 6 recommendations by Staff and Option #2. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. The motioned passed 4 to 2 with Commissioner Savage and Commissioner Didier opposing. A letter of landlord approval was requested by the commissioners prior to placement as an agenda item and said letter is forthcoming by the applicant. VI11. Minor Project - Snowrun Townhomes Property: 43, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/520 Nottingham Road, Applicant: Ronald & Marci Tribelhorn, Owners: Stephen Hyatt (Unit A); Stephen Smith (Unit B); Ronald & Marci Tribelhorn (Unit C) Description: The owners of Units A, B, and C are proposing to make improvements to the West, South, and East sides of the three units. Existing deck structures will be repaired or replaced as needed. The existing stairs would be replaced with pre-fabricated steel stair units with grate style treads. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\080304.DOC Page 2 of4 Moved to Consent Agenda. IX. Comprehensive Plan Public Input - Public Hearing Topic: Comprehensive Plan Update Applicant: Town of Avon Description: The public is invited to this special neighborhood meeting to provide input and feedback on the proposed update to the Town Comprehensive Plan. This is a special neighborhood meeting where the mapping and storyboards provided at the first public open house will be available for review and comment. Tambi Katieb presented the Comprehensive Plan to the commission and public. He requested input so that feedback can be brought back to the Steering Committee. Amy Phillips, Steering Committee member, asked if there were ideas generated at the last meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission at the Wildridge Fire Station meeting. Some ideas included use of Nottingham Lake for commercial projects. Commissioner Savage mentioned that the town offices and police station could be moved by trading the lake area to a piece of land in the Village creating a more active town center. The Vassar Meadow (part of swap) parcel was brought up regarding its zoning and its future. Brian Sipes, Steering Committee member and Town Councilman, discussed the West Avon parcel as open space. He also discussed using the Comprehensive Plan t ) direct the development of the Village of Avon for Magnus Lindholm. Mass transit and the movement of the public/traffic, Nith Vail used in the comparison, should be incorporated into the final pial. Integration of the , population, tourist and local, needs to be considered as a local would drive and park, and visitors would access public transportation for its convenience. Brian Sipes thought a blend of pedestrian rights of way and cars are permitted but secondary. Finding the middle ground on transportation was considered necessary. Conversation continued with comparisons to Steamboat Springs, Aspen, Boulder, Lowry, and moving Avon towards a mesh of the development in these towns. Tambi Katieb gave insight to the process to finalization of the plan in order to work within the approved time guidelines. He requested continued input of comments regarding the plan, and informed those present of the schedule of meetings before adoption. IX. Other Business (Other business as may come before the Commission) X. Adjourn Commissioner Karow made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Trueblood seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 7:05 pm. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\080304.DOC Page 3 of 4 Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Andrew Karow Vice Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\080304.DOC Page 4 0 f 4 & Staff Report ---~ PUD Amendment AVON COLORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 12, 2004 Project type PUD AMENDMENT to the WILDRIDGE PUD Legal description Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Current zoning Lot 54: Duplex / Lot 55,89,90: Triplex Address 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East Introduction Jay K. Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The new PUD is being referenced as the "Western Sage PUD". This submittal is a revised version of a prior application that was heard in June of this year by the Commission. During that application review, which featured access to all of the proposed lots from Longsun Lane and a significant reformatting of the platted non-developable areas, the applicant provided a revised concept (the basis of this submittal) for input by the Commission and the public. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units, and include the following existing and proposed zoning designations. The new lots and proposed zoning represent 8 single family units on 8 independent lots, which do not correspond to the existing lot boundaries and will require a resubdivision of the properties. Lot Number Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning New Lots* Lot 54 Duplex Single Family Lots 1&2 Lot 55 Triplex Single Family Lots 2,3&4 Lot 89 Triplex Single Family Lots 7&8 Lot 90 Triplex Single Family Lots 5,6&7 Note: There are eight proposed lots that do not correspond to the four existing lot boundaries. Portions of Lots are shared between existing subdivision boundaries, and the PUD will require a resubdivision to establish the new lot lines proposed. The proposed PUD amendment will not change the access conditions of the existing densities. Currently, lots 89 and 90 are only accessible from Wildridge Road East (and also share a reciprocal access easement along the right of way frontage of both lots). Lots 54 and 55 are Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 [7404.-ni i i Lots 54.55.89 & 90, Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment August 17. 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 9 likewise only accessible for access from Longsun Lane as currently entitled (Lot 55 is only accessible via a platted access easement from Lot 54). Though the application seeks amendment to the Wildridge PUD for zoning of these lots, it is easiest to categorize the submittal in three distinct review 'areas' for consideration: . The reconfiguration of existing and platted "Non-Developable Area" with the reconfiguration of the lots and zoning entitlements. . The "down zoning" of existing duplex and triplex lots to single family dwelling units on separate lots. • Design and technical considerations of the new lot configuration. Particular consideration should be given to the buidability of the lots being proposed. The applicant has submitted a thorough narrative alongside the actual development plan proposal, both attached to this report that should be reviewed in concert with the application. The narrative includes an introduction and a review of the PUD approval criteria as outlined in Section 17.20.110 (K) of the Avon Municipal Code. The accompanying reduced plans include a cover sheet, topographic survey, preliminary plat, site plan, utility plan, and open space (non- developable area) map. Background & Discussion Benchmark Properties created Wildridge Subdivision in 1979 shortly after the incorporation of the Town of Avon on February 28,1978. According to the Wildridge Final Plat application for Wildridge and Wildwood Subdivisions, the overall development concept was for "abundant open space recreation areas around lots" with a density of "barely one dwelling unit per acre". The land was identified with no particular hazards for development except in areas with slopes of 40%. The development plan recognized that lot sizes are a function of land slope, buildable area and road access; smaller lots are concentrated on lesser slopes with easy access and larger lots are on steeper slopes where buildable area and access are more restricted. In 1981, the Wildridge Subdivision was completely replatted with a total of 849 planned development units and is the foundation of the current zoning in Wildridge. Over the years, there have been several PUD Amendments and transferring of development rights. To assist in organizing the application review discussion, this report is being 'categorized' into the three major review categories: 1. Non-Developable Areas and the Wildridge PUD Staff have recently reviewed the Wildridge PUD plat and found a total of 33 lots (out of the entire subdivision) that contain a "non-developable area" within existing lot boundaries. According to the plat note: "No development shall occur on the non-developable area without written specific approval of the covenants committee and the Town of Avon. Development shall include buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading. Non-developable areas shall be physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state except for approved access and utility easements". 2. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54.55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 9 Of the 33 lots that include a non-developable area designation, approximately 22 have been constructed and 11 remain vacant (including the 4 that are the subject of this application). Of the 22 lots constructed, fifty percent appear to have been constructed below the 'allowable zoning' (i.e. single family built on duplex zoned lots). The original application proposed no net loss of non-developable area, however, a reconfiguration of the areas to permit the proposal as laid out which appeared to correspond more to the needs of the proposed development than the overall context and original intent. In evaluating the merits of this application, both Council and staff realized that it was important to recognize the potential change that may occur to all existing non-developable areas currently platted in Wildridge. As a result of that discussion, Council adopted a set of policy criteria through Resolution 04-25 (attached) that set forth basic considerations for a developer, neighbors and Town staff in reviewing applications that proposed to amend existing non-developable areas. The applicant' s revised submittal appears to conform to the guidelines set forth in Resolution 04- 25, particularly when reviewing the revised configuration of the proposed area. Though Lots 4 and 5 present the largest 'change' to the existing area, it appears that the revised 'corridor' below Lots 6,7 and 8 compensate this loss. Staff recommends that the interior lots (Lots 1 through 5) have a decreased front setback from the private access road (10' rather than 25' as proposed), and the Wildridge Road lots decrease the front setback from 25' to 15'. In combination with a platted building envelope, the applicant can further minimize the required disturbances to lots as proposed, create a larger buffer to non- developable areas as proposed, and contain grading on the uphill lots. 2. "Down-Zoning" of the existing Wildridge PUD & Character of adjacent neighborhood zoning Recently, there have been several PUD Amendments in Wildridge wherein development rights have been legally terminated and the configuration of these lots altered and replatted - the most recent of those include Lot 47/48, Block 1, (Ordinance 02-13); Lot 10/11, Block 2, WR (Ordinance 02-12); and Lot 42/43, Block 4, WR (Ordinance 02-11). None of these proposals included significant alterations to traffic patterns or to existing platted "non-developable areas". In comparison, this application proposes to separate duplex and multifamily dwelling units zoned for eleven dwelling units in total. The new configuration will also reduce density by three dwelling units in total, however, create a visual massing of eight separate structures instead of the four contemplated and approved by the existing PUD. Though it could be argued that the duplex and multifamily structures would be of a size and mass much larger than the proposed single-family homes, the increased disturbances required for each lot and the doubling of buildable 'structures' should be a significant consideration in review of this application. The applicant has proposed to limit home size to 4,000 square feet, and staff is further recommending that all disturbances be contained within identified building envelopes. Also, to allow maximum flexibility to the lots proposed along Wildridge Road East, reduced setbacks should be considered to facilitate easier access to driveway and garage loading and minimize grading down the slope. 3, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54.55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 9 3. Design of new PUD and technical considerations When reviewing the original application concept (wherein all proposed lots were accessed from Longsun Lane and the non-developable area was a by-product of the development sites), no policy precluded more developers from requesting the same privilege being sought with this application existed. The movement of platted and existing lot restrictions that are relied upon by residents and considered to "add value" to their decision in purchasing residential property and live within the Town is a serious undertaking. It is far more than an exercise in engineering and trading of "like for like". In this case, the trade includes an already platted utility easement to make up the difference. Consequently, the owners of all lots in Wildridge that feature a "non-developable area" (as outlined herein) may elect to move these boundaries to more effectively construct a new home, a remodel of an existing home, or the addition of un-built density. Though the number of lots purchased with this restriction does not represent a large majority, it would appear that moving those areas without specific rationale and tangible community benefit may open a "Pandora's Box" of PUD amendment applications. As a result of extensive discussion that occurred during the original application review, Town Council adopted certain policy considerations related to the movement of non-development areas in Resolution 04-25. The policy guidance provided in this resolution protects both existing residents and future developers from the haphazard movement of these platted areas, and stresses the need for applications to meet the best interests of area through a significant reduction in development rights. This revised application appears to be in conformance with the policy guidance set forth by Resolution 04-25, balancing developer interest with community interest and consideration. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution is consistent with the public interest. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The fundamental reason for having a Comprehensive Plan is to generally communicate where and how land uses may and will occur in the Town. The land use plan is based upon these goals and polices. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. This proposed PUD Amendment appears to comply with the following goals and polices of the Town Comprehensive Plan based upon the following: Policv All Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. The current Wildridge subdivision did not contemplate development Of additional single-family dwelling units on any of the lots in this proposal. L{~ Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54.55.89 & 90, Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 9 In fact, the original Wildridge subdivision appears to have specifically created larger lots on steeper slopes, because the buildable area and access was identified as being more restrictive. This also included the placement of 'non-developable area' restrictions in Blocks 3 and 4. The proposed down zoning is appropriate to the scale of the neighborhood, not affecting anticipated traffic patterns and providing a rational basis for the movement of platted non-developable areas. Policy Al.3 Flexible zoning such as PUD should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. The applicant is proposing to improve the character of the neighborhood in this application. In addition, they are proposing to a uniform treatment of the homes architecturally (though not adopting specific design guidelines). Additionally, the proposal calls for limited building areas with a 4,000 square foot maximum building area and a 40% maximum site coverage. The development standards being proposed should be more flexible; creating defined building envelopes to minimize any site disturbance required through construction. Policv Al.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. As aforementioned, the purpose of creating the Wildridge PUD was to create a residential subdivision that focused on the preservation of open space, limited density and avoidance of development on steep slopes and in respect to natural drainage patterns. As evidenced by the survey, a large portion of the collective property under review exceeds 30% slope. The most significant issue is the 'swapping' of platted non-developable area for a slightly increase amount of non-developable. Open space areas in Wildridge should be reasonably relied upon by existing areas as remaining intact and as originally platted, and also conform to the policy provided by Town Council resolution 04- 25. This application appears to conform to the intent and goals of those policies. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. S. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 9 Again, a good portion of this project is proposed on 30% slopes and demonstrates that in order to improve the access and create the new lots development and subdivision standards must be modified to accomplish. Goal Cl Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. The application contends that it will provide for a single-family residential development that will maintain and enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Also, it notes that "the present and project supply of multiple family structures... has been satisfied". The Town of Avon ajfordable housing program utilizes the median family income limit for a four-person household in determining eligibility for deed restricted rental or sale housing. In 2004, HUD adjusted this number to $76,700 per year. The average home size in the application is anticipated between 2,800 and 3,200 square feet. Though the application correctly notes that needs for lower-income and seasonal workers may currently be satisfied, it does not guarantee the nature of the single-family housing proposed and more specifically in the Wildridge subdivision. It fails to ojfer or provide any assurances or guarantee that the single family homes provided will meet the stated goal of providing ".. for middle income and year-round residents". The development standards on the PUD plan and in the narrative should clearly limit the home size if that is what the applicant intends. Goal Fl Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space central elements to its identity and structure. Open space areas in Wildridge should be reasonably relied upon by existing areas as remaining intact and as originally platted. The proposal appears to conform to the policy guidance provided by Town Council Resolution 04-25. Policv Fl.2 Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. The non-developable areas in Wildridge provide platted 'breaks' in development for visual relief and steep slope protection. In Blocks 3 and 4, it is apparent that they also serve as a development buffer to Tract H, which is designated as " Open Space, Drainage, and Access . The creation of defined building envelopes, pulling the disturbed areas closer to both Wildridge Road and to the private drive, would further support the preservation of hillside areas and create an increased buffer to the non-developable areas proposed. 6. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55,89 & 90. Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment August 17.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 9 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The application may meet the design guidelines of the Town, however, the suggested treatment of the single-family units is not proposed as a 'design guideline' specific to the project. These guidelines may be contained in the PUD plan and augment the Town design review guidelines, assuring the developer that a cohesive and aesthetically appealing project be constructed. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. The proposal appears compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties including the proposed conditions of approval. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposed appear to provide a compatible and efficient relationship with the surrounding uses and existing residences, particularly on Longsun Lane. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. The application does not appear to negatively affect a known geologic hazard (no documentation has been provided) 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The site plan and location of buildings and open space are responsive to natural features or the existing PUD. This proposal may impact the overall aesthetic quality of the community, since the number of structures will double if the rezoning is approved. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. The proposed subdivision will not affect the anticipated circulation system, creating no change to the access and density conditions as currently exist. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The landscaping will be reviewed through the design process should the PUD be approved, but it appears as though it can be designed to preserve the views and function of the Western Sage subdivision as proposed. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. % Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54.55,89 & 90, Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 9 The phasing plan submitted appears to be a logical approach to the PUD goals; however, the build out of each lot is not specified to occur in any particular order. A preliminary subdivision has been submitted in conjunction with the application for review by Town Council. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. Adequate facilities are available to service the proposal, and the new 'extension' of Longsun Lane is being applied for as a private road. No extension to municipal services is being requested by the applicant. An outline of proposed covenants related to the private access is anticipated for review in concert with the platting of this subdivision. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. The proposal appears to comply with capacities originally contemplated in the first Wildridge PUD approval. 12. Development Standards Development standards have been submitted for the PUD amendment as proposed. A few technical issues, such as the clarification of buildable area and/or maximum buildable square footage and a clarification of building setbacks by lot (or the creation of building envelopes and reduction of setbacks as proposed by staff) are required. Should the PUD amendment be approved, staff would request additional notes be brought into these standards from the existing Wildridge PUD Development Plan (Final Subdivision Plat), including the typical drainage and utility easements as well as the restriction related to non-developable areas. Staff Recommendation The original PUD Amendment application submitted presented significant stumbling blocks for the staff to recommend approval, all of which were discussed at the June 1St, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The issue of utmost importance during that application review was the precedent related to revising access and potentially increasing traffic on a pre-existing cul-de-sac, and the moving of platted non-developable areas in Wildridge. The applicant subsequently withdrew that application and submitted this revised plan. The proposal does not change contemplated traffic patterns, retaining split access from Wildridge Road and Longsun Lane as currently platted. Likewise, the revised non-developable areas appear to comply with the policy guidelines set forth in Resolution 04-25: meeting the interests of the community through a reduction of density while creating an aesthetic and functional area. To further the goals of the application, staff is recommending a reduction of setbacks in the PUD in combination with the creation of building envelopes. Both recommendations may assist individual lot owners in lessening the amount of grading required, particularly on lots accessing from Wildridge Road. 8. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54,55.89 & 90, Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 9 Recommended Motion "I move to approve Resolution 04-22, recommending to the Town Council to approve the Western Sage PUD for Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004 with the following conditions: " 1. The Development Standards on the PUD Plan will be revised to include the following: a. Maximum Square footage of homes shall be clarified as 4,000 square feet. b. Building Envelopes, featuring a maximum front yard setback on Lots 1-5 of 10 feet, and a maximum front yard setback on Lots 6-8 of 15 feet. Building envelopes will be specifically defined to contain all require site disturbances. c. Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be placed on the PUD plan. 2. The PUD site plan shall be revised to add the following: a. The non-developable area restriction from the Wildridge PUD plan shall be copied to the PUD plan. 3. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon concurrent approval of the corresponding subdivision Preliminary Plan. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, .-. 7 C c hy 3 Tambi Katieb, AICP Report Attachments: A. PUD Application dated July 19, 2004 (Revised) B. Memo from Town Engineer to File dated August 6,2004 C. Resolution 04-25, a resolution relating to proposed amendments to existing non- developable areas in the Wildridge PUD D. August 9, 2004 review correspondence to Jay Peterson E. Original application submittal site plan, dated May 26,2004 F. Resolution 04-22, recommending approval of the Western Sage PUD G. PUD Development Plans for "Western Sage PUD" dated July 19, 2004 q. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 - EKH<BIT A MEMORANDUM To: Tambi Katieb, Community Development Director From: Jay Peterson Date: July 6,2004 Re: Revised Wildridge PUD Amendment and Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application Submittal Enclosed please find a completely revised submittal for my applications to amend the Wildridge PUD and for a preliminary subdivision plat review to re-subdivide Lots 54,55, 89, & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Included in the submittal are the required application forms, four copies of the submittal materials per the PUD and Subdivision application checklists (ie, full sets of plans, reduced plans, written response to amendment criteria, etc.), adjacent property owners r lists, stamped and addressed envelopes, and a letter describing each of the requests. A written response to the non-developable area criteria will be provided upon the adoption of Resolution 04-25 by the Avon Town Council. Please review my submittal materials and contact me with any questions or concerns that you may have. You can reach me most easily by telephone at my office at (970) 476- 0092, or by cell phone at 390-7067. I am hopeful that upon review of my submittal materials you will schedule my applications for review with the Planning & Zoning Commission on Tuesday, August 3rd. Thank you again for all your help and I look forward to hearing from you soon. (0. Wildridge PUD Amendment Jay Peterson July 6,2004 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant, Jay K. Peterson, is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the four residential properties located at 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane and 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East, which according to the Town of Avon, are legally described as Lots 54,55,89, & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. According to the Wildridge PUD, the four residential properties are currently zoned for three triplexes and one duplex for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units. On numerous occasions applicant has met with a number of the surrounding neighbors and residents of Wildridge to gain their input on the amendment. Additionally, the applicant has appeared once before the Avon Town Council and twice before the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission to publicly present the amendment. In response to each of these meetings and input from the neighbors, the development applications have been amended three times to respond to the desires of the neighbors and residents of Wildridge as well as those of the Town Council and Planning & Zoning Commission. The proposed amendment will have a significant positive impact on the neighborhood surrounding the development site by; • down-zoning the properties and permanently reducing the residential density in the neighborhood, • improving existing views from adjacent properties, • reducing vehicular traffic on Wildridge Road East and Longsun Lane, • increasing the amount of open space and non-developable areas in the neighborhood, and; • maintaining and enhancing the existing residential quality, character, design, and scale o f the neighborhood. Of greatest importance, however, as a result of listening and responding to the concerns of the neighbors, Commission, and Council, an approval of the PUD amendment achieves the goals and policy objectives, as outlined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. The specific amendment includes re-subdividing Lots 54, 55, 89, & 90 and creating eight (8) new single-family residential lots. The new residential lots will vary in size from over two-thirds of an acre to nearly one (1) acre in size. Future development of single-family residences will be restricted to a maximum of 4,000 square feet of building area with a minimum landscape area requirement of 35% of the lot area and maximum site coverage allowances of 40%. These development standards are more stringent than existing allowances, and as such, ensure the least amount of impact to the existing natural landforms and vegetation of the site. 11. 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 The new single-family residences will be developed in the traditional-style of mountain architecture. The new homes will be complimented with a mixture of stone, stucco, wood siding, and heavy timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting. Two and four car garages will be carefully located on each of the lots to minimize the unintended consequences of providing vehicular access to the home sites. The key elements of the amendment include: • Compliance with the goals and policies as defined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan • A permanent reduction in the residential density of Wildridge as a result of the down-zoning • Preservation of the existing residential scale and design of the neighborhood • Protection of existing views from adjacent properties as a result of eliminating multiple family structures along Wildridge Road East • Preservation of the existing low density residential character of the neighborhood through the elimination of multiple-family structures. • Enhancement of the open space areas of Wildridge through the reconfiguration of the platted non-developable area, voluntary increase in landscape area requirements and reduction in building site coverage allowances. 12· 2 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 1 I III. PUD AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The applicant is requesting a final review of an amendment to the Wildridge PUD, pursuant to Section 17.20.110K, Amendment Procedures. Avon Municipal Code, to permanently reduce the residential density of the PUD by allowing eight new single- family dwelling units on the development site in place of eleven dwelling units (three triplexes and one duplex) which are currently permitted on the site. According to Section 17.20.110H, Design Criteria, Avon Municipal Code, the following criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD amendment: 1. Conformity with the Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives Applicant's Response: The PUD amendment is consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, the development site is designated as "Residential" on the Overall Land Use Plan. Pursuant to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, "the Residential land use is an area intended for permanent and seasonal residential land uses, including single-family houses, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, apartments, condominiums, and mobile homes. The density of development and unit type vary within the Town in response to market conditions, site constraints (such as topography and accessibility), compatibility with existing and proposed development and zoning regulations. Residential areas should be located in convenient proximity to areas of employment, recreation, and open space. Neighborhoods should be within walking distance to daily shopping needs and employment centers, and near a public transit stop to ojfer a convenient alternative to automobile trips. Vehicular, bicycle, and public transit routes should be easily accessible, yet residential areas should be separated or protected from heavy traffic. The PUD amendment to allow for the development of eight (8) single-family residential dwelling units on eight (8) individually platted lots is consistent with the prescribed land use designation of the Overall Land Use Plan. The allowable maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per lot and the single-family residential unit types are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the existing single-family and duplex residential development surrounding the development site. Furthermore, the various elements of the PUD amendment are consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, in part, "The goals and policies of the Plan will be used by the Town to: 13. 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 • Establish the standards and regulations necessary to define the limits and conditions of private sector development; and • Provide a clear focus for coordinating public, private, institutional and individual efforts in the development of the community." Upon review o f the adopted goals and policies of the Plan, the PUD amendment achieves and addresses the following goals and policies of the Town of Avon: A. LAND USE A fundamental reason for having a comprehensive plan is to clearly communicate generally where and how land uses may occur in the Town. The Land Use Plan is based on these goals and policies. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. Goal A.1 Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community, and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Policy Al.1 Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. Applicant's Response: Development within the PUD amendment will be single-family residential dwellings. The maximum allowable square footage of each unit shall be 4,000 square feet. Single-family residential dwellings are more compatible with the scale and intensity of the neighboring uses than are triplex dwelling units as currently permitted. This assertion has been substantiated by the Planning & Zoning Commission and the surrounding neighbors at previous public hearing on the amendment application. Further, in response to concerns expressed by various neighbors on Longsun Lane, Town staff, and the Commission, the regard to an increase in traffic on Longsun Lane, the applicant has revised the application and placed the vehicular access to Lots 6-8 off of Wildridge Road East. This revision, in conjunction with the elimination of multiple-family development at the end of Longsun Lane, in the opinion of the applicant and several of the Commission members and neighbors, will actually reduce the amount of vehicular traffic on Longsun Lane than is currently anticipated today under present zoning. This belief was largely based upon the amount of additional traffic generated by multiple-family development, as witnessed by an earlier application (Fred Hiller, Lot 11, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3078 Wildridge Road) considered by the Commission on the evening of June 15th. Lastly, the Town staff expressed a concern that "... those neighbors that purchased homes in the proximity Of the non-developable area...may have relied upon these areas as view corridors or development .buffers !4. 2 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 established by way of these platted areas." That said, a review of the application demonstrates that the amendment actually increases the amount of non-developable areas adjoining adjacent properties (Lots 53. 56, and 88) and support for the amendment application from some of those neighbors (Carol Tyler, Brian Nolan, Buz Reynolds, Karen McDevitt) with the most direct views of the existing non-developable area have been stated. Policy Al.3 Flexible zoning such as Planned Unit Developments (PUD) should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. Applicant's Response: A minimal front setback variation allowing one-story tall garages to encroach within the front setback is requested. No other variations to the Town's standards zoning requirements which are less restrictive than currently required are requested. The applicant, however, is proposing variations which are more restrictive than currently required. For instance, the applicant is providing an increase to the minimum lot size and the minimum landscape area requirements and a decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance. The increased minimum lot size ensures that the character of the built environment of the area remains unaffected by the residential development and the forty percent (40 %) increase to the minimum landscape area requirement and corresponding twenty percent (20%) decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance assures that an ample amount of natural landscaping and open space remains in and around the development site. These variations to the standard zoning requirements result in the most effective use of land, benefits to the community and are compatible with surrounding development which in turn achieves the most effective development for the community. The Town staff has stated that the request to deviate from the minimum front setback ...has not been adequately demonstrated in the application and only appears to be a by-product Of the engineering plans and the existing physical constraints. " Keeping good land planning and site design in mind, the applicant has made the request for a front setback requirement (25') on Lots 1-5. As a result, site disturbance is lessened, site design can be improved, and drainage, snow storage, site distances, and adequate maneuvering are all provided. f 51 3 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 Policy Al.5 The community will include a wide range of residential uses including large-lot single family and duplex, small-lot single family and duplex, multifamily, and vertically integrated residential. Applicant's Response: The requested single-family residential uses will add to the already wide range of residential uses existing within the Wildridge PUD. Policy Al.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. Applicant's Response: As a result of this PUD amendment, more than 145,055 square feet (3.37 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area will be preserved within the Wildridge PUD. The protected area is on steep slopes, adjacent to a Town of Avon open space tract, or adjacent to existing development. As a result of the amendment a portion of a platted non-developable area will need to be reconfigured. At the June 15, 2004, public hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission, spent a significant amount of time discussing the affects of the amendment on the existing platted non-developable area. The applicant, neighboring property owners, and Commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of reconfiguring the platted area. Advantages identified included greater protection of visually sensitive, steeply sloping hillsides, increased "open space" areas adj acent to existing Town-owned open space, and increased buffer areas between the applicant's development sites and existing adjoining properties. Potential disadvantages identified included property owner expectations and the creation of precedence. Upon directing the applicant to proceed in a direction towards amending the PUD to eliminate the possibility of multiple family structures being developed in the area, the Commission and neighbors acknowledged that reconfiguring the non-developable area was likely to occur. However, the Commission and various neighbors urged the applicant to ensure that an equal amount of non-developable area remained as a result of the PUD amendment. Goal A.3 Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty of the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Policy A3.1 Development should first be directed in areas within and adjacent to established neighborhoods and developed areas. Applicant's Response: The PUD amendment is an in-fill form of development within an established neighborhood and developed area. 4 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space whenever possible. Applicant's Response: As previously stated above, more than 145,055 square feet (3.37 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area is protected within the PUD. The protected area is on steep slopes, adjacent to a Town of Avon open space tract, or adjacent to existing development. The applicant, like others, agrees that "... the purpose of creating the Wildridge PUD was to create a residential subdivision that focused on the preservation of open space, limited density and avoidance of development on steep slopes and in respect to natural drainage patterns. According to the Town of Avon Development Standards, development of single family residential structures is permitted on slopes of 30%. When comparing the slope of the existing development site to that of the amendment application, it is clear that, with the one exception of the steepened man-made slopes along Wildridge Road, the slope of the site is very consistent and uniform with no clear excessively steep slopes or flat benched areas. In fact, contrary to the expressed purpose of the Wildridge PUD, the non-developable area identified on the plat does not reflect an area of steep slopes or natural drainage patterns nor does it have any affect upon the overall density (dwelling units per acre) of the Wildridge PUD. Based upon the historical reference of several persons involved in the original platting of the Wildridge Subdivision by Benchmark Properties in 1979, the purpose of the originally platted non-developable area on the development site was to the prevent individual property owners of the four lots affected by the restriction (Lots 54,55, 89 & 90) from creating winding access driveways up or down the hillside. Additionally, it was likely never contemplated by the original subdividers of the Wildridge Subdivision property that one person would own all four lots collectively, thus allowing for a land development plan that effectively could improve upon the design of the originally platted non-developable area (ie, increased buffer zone adjacent to adjoining properties, increased non- developable area immediately adjacent to Town-owned open space, etc.) Or, maybe it was actually contemplated by the original subdividers of the property which is why provisions were established that allowed for non- developable areas to be amended by the Town of Avon or the Covenant Control Committee. Pursuant to the notes of the Wildridge Subdivision plat, in part, "No development shall occur on the non-developable area without written specijic approval of the covenants committee or the Town of Avon: B. Community As the community moves into the future, striking a balance between a And Economic healthy, diverse economy and a livable residential community becomes I9. 5 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 Development both increasingly challenging and increasingly important. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve that balance. Goal B.1 Enhance the Town' s role as a principal, year-round residential community and regional commercial center. Policy B1.1 Residential neighborhoods should be maintained to a high standard of quality through effective maintenance of streets, utilities, parks and other public facilities, and through consistent application of design standards. Applicant's Response: All future residential development on the development site shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon for compliance with the Town's design standards and applicable code provisions. C. Housing As the community grows, demand for housing of all types is increasing. While there is an ample supply of housing for second homeowners and upper income residents, there is a shortage of housing for middle income and year-round residents and their families. The following goals and policies are intended to help meet the variety o f housing needs. Goal C.1 Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. Policy Cl.1 Maintain and enhance the character of the residential neighborhoods of the Town. Applicant's Response: Future single-family residential development of the site shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon for compliance with the Town's adopted design standards. Single-family residential residences are more compatible with the existing character of the surrounding residential uses than are multiple-family structures. The nearest triplex dwelling units or multiple-family structures to the development site and surrounding neighborhood are located near the intersection of Wildridge Road and Old Trail Road. The Town has recently acknowledged that the present and projected supply of multiple-family structures needed for seasonal and lower income workers and their families has been satisfied. In fact, according to a newspaper article published June 28,2004, in the Vail Daily, one of the biggest issues facing the Town of Avon as it contemplates its future in light of updating the comprehensive master plan is "the surplus Of ajfordable housing" (source: Town of Avon). Single- family residential development of the site will maintain and enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood. /2 . 6 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 Policy Cl.2 Infill residential development should be compatible in design, scale and uses with existing neighborhoods. Applicant's Response: The single-family residential development on the site will be compatible in design, scale and uses existing within the surrounding neighborhood. The design of the homes will be two and three-story tall structures with two or three-car garages. The architectural style of the homes is intended to be reminiscent of traditional mountain design (ie., mixture of stone, stucco, wood siding, and timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting). The maximum allowable size of the homes shall not exceed 4,000 square feet. However, it is more likely the homes will be constructed to be approximately 2,800 - 3,200 square feet in size. The square footage will be spread over two and three levels, depending upon the topography and orientation of the particular lots. Maximum building height shall not exceed thirty-five (35') feet with the height of the home conforming to the existing topography. Existing uses in the neighborhood are residential with a mix of single family and duplex homes. The proposal to construct single-family residences on the development site is compatible with the uses in the neighborhood. In fact, single-family residences are more compatible with the existing uses than are multiple-family structures such as triplexes. Overall, the PUD amendment results in compatibility with the existing design, scale and uses of the surrounding neighborhood. F. Environment Avon is a very desirable place to live and work largely because of its exceptional natural environment. In a very real sense, the economic and social health of Avon depends upon the protection and enhancement of these resources. Goal F. 1 Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to its identity and structure. Policy Fl.1 Future development and redevelopment shall minimize degradation of the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas. Applicant's Response: The layout of the eight (8) single-family residential lots is particularly responsive to the environment. As designed, degradation to the site and environment will be minimized. For example, the lots have been designed to create the most desirable site planning and building placement f q. 7 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 outcomes. The building envelopes ensure that all future residential development is oriented parallel to the existing natural contours versus being oriented perpendicular to the natural contours. A paralleled orientation results in a building design that relates to the natural topography of the development site instead of a building design that "fights against" the contours of the site resulting in excessive cuts and substantial retaining o f the slopes. In evaluating the merits of the amendment, the Town staff states that "The proposal appears to assign a value judgment to the platted non- developable areas by way of reallocating the same amount in a dijferent configuration on the lot. Staff does not support the movement of such areas, regardless Of the ability to compensate a similar area on the same property." While the staff' s position appears understandable, the staff' s position fails to take several important aspects into consideration. For example, the result of reconfiguring the non-developable area actually increases the direct benefit of the area to Lots 53,56, & 88 by providing a buffer around these lots that far exceeds standard setback requirements. Additionally, the reconfiguration of the non-developable area makes a significant reduction in allowable density on the combined area of the development site and ensures the preservation of the character of the neighborhood remains intact through the elimination of the construction of multiple family structures. Further, as the staff points out, "...it is apparent that they (non-developable areas) also serve as a development buffer to Tract H, which is designated as Open Space, Drainage, and Access. ", the reconfigured non-developable area actually increases the development buffer adjacent to Tract H. For these reasons, the applicant believes that the proposal to reconfigure the non-developable area is justified. In fact, contrary to the statement of staff that "... to remove or otherwise alter the existing open space (non-developable area) does not appear to meet the original intent of environmental and visual buffers.", the application clearly demonstrates that the reconfigured non-developable actually enhances and improves the environmental and visual buffers of the development site and surrounding areas. Policy F1.2 Development should not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. Applicant's Response: The layout of the eight (8) single-family residential lots was designed to avoid steep hillsides and minimize visual degradation. One of the design intents of the future development is to minimize excessive cuts and fill conditions and to prevent unsightly grading of the property which results in unnatural scarring of the land forms. The homes sites have been located away from areas of steep slopes. The Applicant had originally and intentionally placed the areas of steep slopes into a non-developable area 20· 8 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 surrounding the site. Furthermore, as a result of gaining vehicular access to the development site via Longsun Lane, the steepest portions of existing Lots 89 & 90 would forever have been protected from environmental and visual degradation as a result of development. Contrary to what is clearly good land planning and site design, the applicant has amended the application to respond to traffic concerns of the several property owners on Longsun Lane. Policy Fl.4 Development and redevelopment will accommodate wildlife habitat, including deer and elk migration routes, or otherwise mitigate loss of habitat. Applicant's Response: Future development on the site will accommodate wildlife habitat, particularly deer and elk migration routes. Through the creation of a non- developable buffer zone on the site, the existing north/south wildlife corridor on through Tract H will be maintained and enhanced. The area of non-developable buffer zone immediately adjacent to Tract H is over two (2) acres in size. This additional two (2) acres, while not being dedicated to the Town, will serve as future open space. G. Parks, Parks, trails and open space enhance the community's quality of life. Recreation and Open space preserves wildlife habitat and view corridors; trails offer Open Space walking, jogging and bicycling opportunities; neighborhood and community parks serve as places to gather and recreate. Goal G.1 Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure time needs of area residents and visitors. Policy Gl,2 The Town will continue to evaluate and acquire parcels or easements for open space, trails and recreation. Applicant's Response: In the initial application, the applicant had offered to grant a perpetual easement for pedestrian access across the development site. The easement for pedestrian access would have been platted along the southerly edge of Lot 1 to provide a pedestrian connection between Longsun Lane and the Town-owned Tract H to the west of the development site. Within the easement, and at the sole discretion of the Town, the applicant was offering to construct an unimproved pedestrian path from Longsun Lane to Tract H. The pedestrian path would have ensured future access to a parcel of town-owned open space thereby increasing future opportunities for recreation in the Town of Avon. However, in response to input sought on the easement from adjacent property owners and residents of Wildrdige, ' the applicant has removed the pedestrian access easement. clf. 9 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 H. Community Community image is a combination of natural setting, architectural design, Image and density, design of streets and walkways, signage, public art, community Design facilities, and the care and maintenance of neighborhoods and businesses. An attractive community image not only fosters a sense of identity and pride in its residents and businesses, it is critical to its long-term success as a tourism destination. Goal H.1 Establish and maintain a high quality visual image of the Town. Policy Hl.1 The Town's streets and walkways shall be designed and maintained as safe, attractive public spaces. Applicant's Response: The applicant will construct a private road through the development site off of Longsun Lane. The private road shall be constructed to the standards prescribed by the Town of Avon. The private roadway shall be of a sufficient width to safely accommodate vehicular traffic as contemplated in the Town's development objectives for private streets in Wildridge. I. Communication While most citizens are finding less time to attend town meetings, review development proposals, and generally communicate with the Town government, the need for citizens to be informed participants in the community has never been greater. Avon' s small size, high land values, well-educated population and seasonal economy means that development and other local governmental decisions are often complex, and generally have greater impacts on the community than they would have in a larger metropolitan area. For these and other reasons, effective communication systems are fundamental to sustaining Avon's high quality of life and economic health. Goal I. 1 Establish and maintain clear communication between the Town and its citizens, business community, visitors, and other public entities. Policy Il.1 The Town Council and Planning & Zoning Commission will actively seek broad public involvement on key issues and decisions. Applicant's Response: In addition to fully complying with the Town's requirement for public notice pursuant to Section 17.12.100, Hearings - Setting Date, Avon Municipal Code, the applicant, has sought input and comment on the PUD amendment from the surrounding neighbors and residents of Wildridge. The applicant on numerous occasions met directly with the neighbors and residents to present the plans to them outside of a public hearing and at their convenience. Written comments on the amendment that the applicant received from the neighbors and residents has been included in ¢21. 10 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 Section VI of this submittal packet. As a result of listening to the input from surrounding neighbors and residents, the applicant has twice made revisions to the application for the PUD Amendment. For example, the overall residential dwelling unit density has been reduced from ten (10) units to eight (8) units. The average lot size and amount of non- developable areas have been increased resulting in a greater amount of " open space area around the homes. A private road has been incorporated into the plan to prevent any potential increase in cost of road maintenance services to the Town and its taxpayers and the potential negative impacts of a pedestrian easement on adjacent property owners has been eliminated through the removal of the proposed easement. Policy Il.3 Public meetings, access to documents and development proposals, and other interactions with the Town will be open and as accessible as possible. Applicant's Response: As previously mentioned above, the applicant met on numerous occasions with the neighbors surrounding the development site and residents of Wildridge to gain their input and comment on the amendment. In those instances when meetings could not occur, every attempt was made to facilitate an exchange of information to ensure that the development proposal remained accessible to all those seeking knowledge. In addition to being in compliance with the goals and policies above, the PUD amendment request is consistent with the recommendations for Sub-area 18, Wildridge, as outlined in the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the recommendations for Sub-area 18, integrated design themes for development that achieve a more unified overall appearance and the continuation of developing roadways as rural-type roads without curb and gutter, roadway lighting, or sidewalks will be achieved as a result of the PUD amendment. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, sub- area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. Applicant's Response: The future development of eight (8) single-family residential dwelling units on the development site will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission for compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. One of the design intents of the future development is to minimize excessive cuts and fill conditions and to prevent unsightly grading of the property which results in unnatural scarring of the land forms. This goal will be achieved by maintaining he required twenty- five (25') foot front setback requirement on the downhill lots (Lots 1 - 5). As proposed, development on these lots will allow for a twenty-foot (25') front setback for "one story, side-loaded" garages (non-habitable area). All other portions (habitable areas) of the residential structures will be required to comply with the required twenty-five (25') foot 11 23 · Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 setback. A twenty-five (253 foot front setback requirement is proposed on the lots located along Wildridge Road (Lots 6-8). The front setback requirement will reduce the negative affects of providing vehicular access to the residential units by minimizing the distance vehicles must travel on the lots to access the required parking areas. A second design intent is to ensure the creation of building envelopes that result in structures designed to match the contours and topography of the existing site. As proposed, the lot layout has been designed to maximize the orientation of the structures to the contours o f the landforms. This design intent and lot layout will minimize the amount of grading and retaining on each of the lots and ensure compliance with the adopted design guidelines. Specifically, each individual residence will respond to the topography of the site to ensure that the residences become an integral part of the site rather than structures which are out of character with their surrounding landforms. While the applicant is not proposing specific design guidelines for this development, as previously stated in this narrative, development on each of the individually platted lots will be required to be submitted to the Town for review and approval of the residential plans for compliance with the Town's adopted design guidelines. That said, future development on the lots will be treated just like the rest ofthe residential development in the Wildridge PUD. 3. Design compatibilily with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. Applicant's Response: According to the Staff Report to the Planning & Zoning Commission dated June 1, 2004, the staff states that "Though there may be merit in the application of single-family homes in this block (Block 4) of Wildridge in place of multifamily dwellings, the requisite changes to tra#ic patterns, bulk and massing, existing buffer zones, and character of the area are not positively affected. The staffs comment acknowledges that there is merit to the application as it relates to "this block (Block 4)", and then suggests that the requisite (ie, required) changes to other various aspects "are not positively affected. " The applicant believes otherwise. Future development will be designed to be compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. All future development will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission for compliance with the adopted design guidelines. To that end, the exterior design of the individual residences will be a mixture of indigenous materials such as stone, wood siding and timbers. All residential development within the PUD will be limited to 4,000 square feet of building area to prevent the construction of residences out of scale and character with the neighborhood. A request for a deviation from the maximum allowable building height as permitted by the Residential Single-Family (RSF) zone district is not requested, and therefore, residential structures shall not be permitted to exceed thirty-five (35') feet in height, as defined by Title 17: Zoning Regulations. 24. 12 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 To ensure that adequate buffer zones are provided to create separation between existing uses and the proposed future development, a twenty-five foot (25') wide non-developable buffer zone is proposed along the southerly boundary of the PUD, adjacent to existing Lot 53. Two additional non-developable buffer zones are proposed along the westerly and northerly sides of the PUD. The one-hundred, ten-foot (110') wide buffer zone along the westerly side of the PUD is in addition to the already existing open space buffer created by the Town-owned Tract H. The northerly buffer zone is intended to prevent development of Lots 1-5 from "creeping" up the slope and thus having detrimental affects on the grading and topography of the development site. A total of more than 145,055 square feet (3.37 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area is provided within the PUD. 4. Uses, activity and design which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Applicant's Response: The uses and activities within the PUD will provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activities. The development potential of the PUD shall be similar to that permitted by the Residential Single-Family zone district. No deviations from the "allowed uses" of the zone district are proposed. As such, pursuant to Section 17.20.050, Zoning Regulations, only "one family dwellings" and "accessory buildings and uses" shall be permitted with the PUD without consideration of a special review use permit. According to the Official Town of Avon Zoning Map, the areas adjacent to the PUD are zoned: • East - Wildridge PUD/Residential • West - Wildridge PUD/ResidentiaUOpen Space • North - Wildridge PUD/US Forest Service • South - Wildridge PUD/Residential The single-family development of the PUD is compatible with surrounding uses and activities and results in the permanent down-zoning of the property. According to the Staff Report, the staff suggests that "The proposed uses (single family homes) do not appear to provide a compatible and elficient relationship with surrounding uses and existing residences (single family/duplex homes), particularly on Longsun Lane. " It is further stated that, "Several of the lots proposed are highly constrained and " may create access and loading problems... In response, if single family homes are not compatible on the site to the surrounding residential uses it is unclear what uses staff believes are compatible. As previously mentioned, the adjoining uses are low density residential uses. The applicant is proposing to further reduce the residential density in the , area by eliminating multiple family structures an area where no multiple family structures exist today. Based upon discussion and input provided at two previous public hearings of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the Commission members as well as the majority of 13 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 the public in attendance indicated their desire to see single family homes built on the site rather than allow multiple family structures to be built in the area. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD (amendment) is proposed. Applicant's Response: No natural and/or geologic hazards affect the property upon which the PUD (amendment) is proposed, therefore, no mitigation or avoidance of the hazards is required. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Applicant's Response: All future residential development on the site shall be required to comply with the adopted Town of Avon Residential, Commercial and Industrial Desifrn Guidelines, and as may be amended from time to time. The design of the future residential development will be oriented to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors to the south and west of the development site. The lot lay out of the PUD has been designed to ensure compliance with the prescribed residential site development guidelines (ie, site design, site access, site grading, easements, drainage). For example, the lots have been designed to create the most desirable site planning and building placement outcomes. The building envelopes ensure that all future residential development is oriented parallel to the existing natural contours versus being oriented perpendicular to the natural contours. A paralleled orientation results in a building that relates to the natural topography of the development site instead of a building that "fights against" the contours resulting in excessive retaining of the slopes. The building site locations have been proposed to ensure that existing views from private property adjacent to the site are not negatively impacted. The residential building sites have been clustered low on the development site and away from the exterior perimeter of the development site. This design intent achieves the goals of the Town's development regulations without negatively impacting any existing or potential development on the adjoining properties. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town transportation plan. Applicant's Response: The circulation system has been designed for both vehicles and pedestrians and is compatible with the Town's transportation plan. As designed, a private road will be constructed across the development site to provide vehicular access to each of the residential lots. The private road shall be constructed to comply with minimum 2 L. 14 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 Town standards for road construction. Additionally, subject to adjacent property OW-1-ler consent, an easement for pedestrian access will be platted along the southerly edge of Lot 1 to provide a pedestrian connection between Longsun Lane and the Town-owned Tract H to the west of the development site. Within the easement, and at the sole discretion of the Town, the applicant will construct an unimproved pedestrian path from Longsun Lane to Tract H. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Applicant's Response: Landscaping and open space have been provided within the PUD to optimize and preserve the natural features, recreation, views and function of the development site. As previously stated, more than 145,000 square feet of non- developable buffer zone area is provided within the PUD. The non-developable buffer zone area will ensure the preservation of the natural features and vegetation existing on the site and add to the aesthetic quality of the surrounding areas by providing more undeveloped area. The additional area, while visually pleasing, will also be functional in that a pedestrian access easement could be provided to allow pedestrian access to Tract H which is a Town-owned open space parcel. Currently, the only legal means of public access to Tract H is from Wildridge Road East. Individual plans for landscaping will be submitted to the Town for review and approval as part of the approved plan set for development on each of the lots. The individual plans shall be designed to fully comply with the minimum requirements for residential landscaping as prescribed in Section 4C, Town of Avon Residential, Commercial and Industrial Desifn Review Guidelines. At this time, subsequent to Town approval, the design intent of the landscape plans is to create harmony between each of the building sites and the natural topography and existing vegetation on the site. This intent will be achieved by selecting plant materials that are adaptable to the area and are compatible to the various climatic zones found in the Valley. Plant materials such as Colorado Blue Spruce, Rocky Mountain Juniper, Pinyon, Quaking Aspen, Serviceberry, Snowberry, Mountain Mahogany, Alpine Currant, Potentilla, Western Sage, Rabbitbrush, and other similar hardy species are proposed. The applicant is not requesting deviations or variations to any landscape area requirements. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the (amended) PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Applicant's Response: A workable, functional and efficient plan for development within the PUD will be achieved. As proposed, the first step in the development of the site will be to construct all necessary infrastructure on the site. The applicant has received preliminary approval from each of the public utility service providers for acdess to services (ie, ERWSD, Holy Cross, Public Service, etc.) This includes the extension of 27. 15 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 public utility services (sewer, water, gas, electric, cable, telephone, etc.) with stub outs to each lot, and the installation of the required fire hydrants. With all the necessary infrastructure construction complete, each of the residential lots will be ready for future construction and no reliance upon the completion of future project phases is necessary. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, police and fire protection. Applicant's Response: Adequate facilities are available to serve the eight (8) single- family residential lots. Longsun Lane provides vehicular access to the development site with a new private road providing access to the lots from Longsun Lane. Longsun Lane is a platted public street maintained by the Town of Avon. As an infill development within an existing platted subdivision, no annexation request or requests for expanded municipal services are required. Adequate infrastructure and platted easements exist on the development site to ensure the provision of necessary water, sanitary, and utility services. A thirty-foot (30') wide utility easement traverses north-south across the development site. This easement along with the creation of additional easements for utilities and drainage will serve the needs of the residential development on the site. The present impacts of Residential Duplex (RD) and Residential Low Density (RLD) zoning on public facilities and services, including but not limited to fire, police, water sanitation, roadways, parks, schools and transit are based upon the allowable development potential granted by the existing zoning regulations. Pursuant to the existing PUD, a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of a multi-family and duplex-type are allowed on the development site. The existing development potential will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria as the it is decreasing in density by more than 25%. Similarly, the future impacts of single-family development on the public facilities and services, including but not limited to fire, police, water sanitation, parks, schools and transit will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria. Most importantly, because of the net reduction in total development potential as a result of the proposal, a reduction in demand on services is expected. 11. That existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed (amended) PUD and vicinity of the proposed (amended) PUD. Applicant's Response: The existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the PUD and the area surrounding the PUD. On several occasions the applicant met with Town staff to specifically discuss traffic impacts. Pursuant to the Town's Transportation Plan, both Longsun Lane and Wildridge Road East are designated as local-street types. As local streets, these two streets are already designed to accommodate the average daily trips (ADT) generated by residential development. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineer' s (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition, one (1) single-family residential structure generates six 2-/ 16 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 (6) average daily trips. An average daily trip is defined as the average number of vehicle trips generated leaving from and returning to a designated land use for the purpose of transportation planning. 12. Describe the proposed development standards. Provide justifications for the proposed standards and describe the benefits to the Town if they deviate from Town standards. Applicant's Response: The proposed development standards for the PUD are: Underlying Zone District: Residential Single-Family (RSF) Allowed Uses: 1. One family dwelling; 2. Accessory buildings and uses. Special Review Uses: 1. Home occupations; 2. Aboveground public and private utility installations; 3. Church. Development Standards: 1. Minimum lot size: twenty-seven thousand, seven hundred & fifty square feet (27,750 sq ft); 2. Maximum building height: thirty-five feet (35 ft); 3. Minimum building setbacks: Front: twenty-five feet (25 ft) Sides: seven & one-half feet (7.5 ft) Rear: ten feet (10 ft) 4. Maximum site coverage: forty percent (40%) 5. Minimum landscape area: thirty-five percent (35%) 6. Maximum density: one dwelling unit per lot 7. Outdoor lighting: a maximum of eight (8) outdoor lighting fixtures shall be permitted on each residential lot. With the exception of up to two (2) decorative lighting fixtures located at the front door entrance to the residence, all other outdoor lighting fixtures shall be downward facing 'Iully cut-ojf' fixtures which do not permit light to be emitted in an upwards direction from the fixture. All other Town outdoor lighting requirements shall apply ** * * Unless noted otherwise on the Approved Development Plan Note: All other development standards and development requirements not specifically listed above and as prescribed by the Zoning Code of the Town of Avon shall apply to development within the PUD. 42-9, 17 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 The proposed deviations to the development standards are justified by the benefits they provide to the Town of Avon. As previously stated, approval of the PUD amendment will ensure that the goals and policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan are achieved. As a result of the amendment, development on the site will be responsive to the topography of the area and future development on the site will be compatible with the surrounding existing and potential land uses. Specifically, the increased minimum lot size ensures that the character of the built environment of the area remains unaffected by the proposed development and the forty percent (40%) increase to the minimum landscape area requirement and corresponding twenty percent (20%) decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance assures that an ample amount of natural landscaping and open space remains in and around the development site. A written response to the non-developable area review criteria will be provided upon the adoption of Resolution 04-25 by the Avon Town Council 30- 18 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 VII. NON-DEVELOPABLE AREA REVIEW CRITERIA On July 27, 2004, the Avon Town Council adopted Resolution No. 04-25. Resolution No. 04-25 was adopted to establish specific criteria and policy direction for the community related to the non-developable areas that exist in the Wildridge PUD and applications that propose to amend the shape, configuration, or use of non-developable areas. According to the adopted resolution, the three specific criteria established by the resolution must all be met to amend existing non-developable areas within the PUD. The purpose of this section of the PUD amendment application is to respond to the three specific criteria established by Resolution No. 04-25 and demonstrate how the application complies with all of the criteria. 1. The proposal to amend the area is in the best interest of the citizens of the Town through a significant reduction of existing density or development rights, as demonstrated through the application and hearing process. Applicant's Response: The existing dwelling unit development rights of Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90, Block 4, ofthe Wildridge Subdivision is eleven (11) dwelling units (one duplex and three triplexes). In keeping with the goals of the above-stated criteria, the applicant is requesting a significant reduction of existing density. When approved, the overall allowable density for the combined area of the four lots shall be reduced by three units or roughly 28%. A review of the Town's files demonstrates that no other PUD amendment in Wildridge which proposed to vacate existing property lines and re-allocate developments rights has ever proposed such a significant reduction. In fact, no other application ever proposed a reduction greater than 25%. The applicant has complied with this criteria. 2. The basic area is traded on a one-to-one basis so that the land designation is not reduced or diminished. Applicant's Response: According to the stamped surveyor's information, 3.33 acres (145,055 square feet) of non-developable area exists with the combined area of Lots 54,55, 89 & 90. As demonstrated through the specific site development plan and development application, 3.37 (146,797 square feet) acres of non-developable area shall remain upon approval of the requested application. Given the applicant's proposal, the non-developable land area is neither reduced nor diminished upon approval. Instead, the non-developable land area is actually increased by nearly 1,750 square feet. 3. The aesthetic character, contiguity and general location across public and private properties, natural conditions and intent of the existing area remains 1 3 /, Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 intact, as demonstrated through the specific site-development plan and application. Applicant's Response: The aesthetic character and natural conditions of not only the existing non- developable area but the entire 7+ acre development site is mainly a south facing mountain hillside of relatively consistent grade and natural vegetation. No significant natural features such as rock outcroppings, stands of trees, or stream courses exist anywhere on the site. The existing location of the non- developable area is mainly through the center portion of the site and along the ! Town-owned open space tract (Tract H). A copy of the existing survey information has been included in Section V of the Development Application. The existing non-developable area is contiguous with Tract H and Lot 56. According to the applicant's request, the reconfigured non-developable area shall not only remain contiguous with Tract H and Lot 56, the area adjacent to these parcels shall increase in size as well as become contiguous with Lot 53 and Lot 88. A review o f the reduced plan set in Section V demonstrates that a significant non-developable buffer is created along the entire northerly i property line of Lot 53 and nearly 50% of the length of the westerly property line of Lot 88. In addition, as presently existing, an east-west non- developable area shall remain between the upper and lower developable areas of the development site. This area shall serve to maintain the physical and i visual separation that exists between the two areas of development. 2 Based upon the review of the criteria above, it is clear that the proposal to amend the size, location and configuration of the non-developable area on presently located on Lots 54,55,88 & 90 meets all of the criteria establish by Resolution No. 04-25 and preserves the intent and character of the existing non-developable area. 2 02 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6,2004 i 6% 14(811- 8 MEMORANDUM To: File From: Norman Wood, Town Engineer I)ate: August 6,2004 Re: Western Sage P.U.D. - Preliminary Plan Review Resubdivision of Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Variance Required - Section 16.40.330 - Each lot shall have a frontage width on a dedicated street of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. a) Suggest reconfiguring Lots 1 and 2 to provide 25 foot minimum frontage to cul-de-sac for each lot. b) Suggest eliminating Tract A and replace with access and utility easement. 2. Variance Criteria - Section 16.12.020 (a) Whether a strict, literal application of these subdivision regulations would result in an undue hardship to the subdivider due to the purpose, size, shape, location and character of the proposed subdivision; (b) Whether the provisions of the regulations from which relief is requested are not materially important, in a planning sense, to the orderly controlled development of the tract in question; (c) Whether the granting of the request might adversely affect the use of the land in the immediate area of the tract in question. 3. Public Improvements - Section16.20.190 (b)(3) - Underground distribution of gas, electrical power or communications are required and a description of the system or systems shall be shown. 4. Water & Sewer - 16.20.130 - Before final action can be taken by the Town Council on any preliminary plan, evidence of approval by the appropriate utilities (including water and sewer) shall be supplied to the Town Council. 5. Covenants - Section 16.20.150(12) Additional information shall accompany the preliminary plan as follows: g. Brief description of proposed covenants. S 3. C:\Documents And Settings\Tkatieb\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK24\Comments Memo-3.Doc 1 SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS: Sheet 2 1) Topographic Survey must be signed and sealed by professional land surveyor. Sheet 3 1) Revise Lot 1 boundary to provide 25 foot minimum frontage on cul-de-sac. 2) Eliminate Tract A and extend Lots 2,3,4&5 across area. 3) Define area designated as Tract A as Access and Utility Easement across Lots 2, 3,4 & 5. 4) Eliminate side and rear setback lines. 5) Add Utility Easements. 6) Add Non-Developable Area with dimensions and bearings as required to define. 7) Define Building Envelopes based on front setbacks, easements and non- developable area. 8) Show 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage & Snow Storage Easements on Lots 1,2,6,7&8. 9) Change Title from "Possible Plat" to "Preliminary Plan." 10) Add Drainage Easement on lot 1 to accommodate drainage and pipe across access drive. Sheet 4 1) Note: Access and turnaround configuration must be approved by Eagle River Fire Protection District. Sheet 5 1) How does Lot 6 access Sewer? 2) Note: Water & Sewer Plans must be approved by Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. 3) Note: Electric, Natural Gas, Telephone and Cable TV Should be included and Plans must be approved by the applicable utility company. Pq. C:Documents And Settings\Tkatieb\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK24\Comments Memo-3.Doc 2 Ext#(8 17- 2 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 04-25 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING NON-DEVELOPABLE AREAS IN THE WILDRIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, The Town of Avon has determined that existing non-developable areas should remain intact and in a natural state, however, also recognizes that from time to time application may be made to amend these areas; and WHEREAS, Town Council recognizes and strongly affirms the value o f existing non- developable areas as they exist in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the restrictions associated to development or encroachment of development in these areas as contained on the PUD subdivision plat; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the merits of any application that proposes to amend the shape, configuration, or use of non-developable areas in the Wildridge PUD must continue to provide an overall public and community benefit; and WHEREAS, the Town of Avon hereby affirms general criteria and policy direction to the community related to the non-developable areas that exist in the Wildridge PUD; and WHEREAS, the Town Council sets forth the following specific criteria to all be met by an application in order to consider a proposal to amend existing non-developable areas in the Wildridge PUD: 1. The proposal to amend the area is in the best interest of the citizens of the Town through a significant reduction of existing density or development rights, as demonstrated through the application and hearing process; and 3 5. 2. The basic area is traded on a greater than or equal to one-to-one basis so that the land designation is not reduced or diminished; and 3. The aesthetic character, contiguity and general location across public and private properties, natural conditions and intent of the existing area remains intact, as demonstrated through the specific site-development plan and application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO that the Town Council hereby sets forth criteria as stated herein in order to preserve the intent and character of existing non-developable areas as contained in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED THIS 476- DAY OF 3\U,3 ,2004. 09622~2:tr» ,«623\\ oF 4,2« TOWN COUNCIL 0 4 . 4/ TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO t.4 4 . 1, //n, #4 : 7/1'' 4 2-€--2- -02 a V k te-LA-~to 6.i»64 I ./. .2 i /1:- 1 J Mayor ATTEST: 9:(ft CRE»' ANES:253,7- 23 -5 flc- \°1 Town Clerk Resolution No. 04-25 NonDevAreas WR PUD v.3 3 4 Page 2 of 2 £.K K g e fT- wj) 97,> 41 -0, Ant ( 'tri,·, ' 8, n 97 € 400 Bcm. huuul Rood 11.ORADO 470-949-9/39 F,n 47()-,<4.5-7-0,4 171 August 9,2004 Jay Peterson 108 S. Frontage Road, Suite 208 Vail, CO 81657 RE: Lots 54,55,89,90, Block 4, Wildridge- PUD Amendment, Variance, & Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review Comments Jay: Thanks for coming in today to review the revised Western Sage PUD applications with Norman and myself. The revised application concept appears to respond to the concerns of staff, the Commission and the neighbors with respect to the new lot layout and the treatment of the non-developable areas. To review, our comments on the application that will require clarification or revision prior to final Council action are as follows: 1. Provide the sealed survey copy for the file. 2. Delete setbacks as proposed (since the non-developable area essentially limits your disturbance), and instead create defined building envelopes. Also, I will also recommend that the front setbacks of the interior lots ( 1 through 5) be reduced to 10 feet and the front setback on Wildridge Road be reduced to 15 feet. As we discussed, this would provide better flexibility for construction and may minimize the 'creeping' of grading down the lots and provide additional buffer to the non-developable areas. 3. Reconfigure Lots 1 and 2 to provide the 25 minimum frontage for each lot to the cul- de-sac, thereby lessening the extent of variance being requested. 4. Clarify the 4,000 square foot restriction. Is this a buildable area restriction or the maximum home size? There are some conflicts between the PUD plans and pages 2,13 and 17 of the application in this regard. 5. Carry over the plat restriction from the Wildridge PUD related to Non-Developable areas to this PUD plan and the final plat. Also, add the dimensioned new area to the PUD plan and final plat. 6. Eliminate Tract A and create it as a common access and utility easement across Lots 2,3,4 and 5. This includes a continuation across the easement of the property lines as we reviewed. 7. Provide a brief description of the proposed covenants with the Preliminary Plan, particularly as it relates to the access easement. 8. Label the 10-foot slope maintenance, drainage and snow storage easements on Lots 1,2,6,7 and 8. 37 1,1 'ht· \ \111 & 9. Change the title of "Possible Plat" to "Preliminary Plat". 10. Clarify sewer tie in to Lot 6. If access is contemplated across Lot 7 to tie in at Lot 8 boundary, provide the appropriate easement by final plat. 11. Clarify underground distribution of public improvements required, and a description of the system(s), per Section 16.20.190 (b)(3) of the Avon Municipal Code. 12. Evidence approval by appropriate utilities before Council action on Preliminary Plan, per Section 16.20.130 of the Avon Municipal Code. 13. Add utility easements to Sheet 3 of the submittal. Add drainage easement on Lot 1 to accommodate drainage and pipe across access drive. 14. All design statements and square footage restrictions should be contained in the Development Standards of the PUD Development Plan, which are located on the first page of the PUD plans. If your intent is to create a cohesive feel to all properties accessed from Longsun Lane, you will need to place those restrictions or minimum standards on the PUD plan so they can be used in concert with the Town design review process for each lot. 15. Lighting exceptions proposed (i.e. that 2 fixtures on the front of the house are not shielded) will not be supported. We would recommend, at a minimum, partially shielded fixtures that meet the intent of the Town design guidelines. 16. The increased minimum standards for landscaping are supported, however as we discussed, the maximum permanent irrigation requirements of the existing guidelines will continue to apply. This application is scheduled for hearing on August 17, 2004 with the Planning & Zoning Commission. Jay, if you have any questions about the above requested items please don't hesitate to call me at 748.4002. Kind Regards, h Tambi Katieb, AICP Community Development Director Cc: File Z-PU2004-3 S-NW2004-4 Town Engineer Town Manager F:\Correspondence\External\PUD Letters\Wildridge PUD Amendments\L.54 55 89 90 B4 WR WesternSagev.2 reviewltr.doc 392. 74.LU-/.4-.CO ~ 1 DC@Le O,3/82"100 'NOA¥ 00¥hl0100 'NOA¥ 80 NMO.L. '300 IhIO-liM · 4 Z,Ol XO9 Dd * >100-18 '06 09 82 'gg '*g Slo-1 i . W w /1 B ' 6 C 377 ONIhl33NION3 NIOhIVA 18**3 30¥dS Nldo f J 9 ..6.'I .vo 1 )9 . ; t , ' MIC . 1 *I , -- .- /0 F- 4- 1 -- 1 p --- 1 · / \4 1 02 C. t l L--t-- -. - , , i / 1 1 1 , 76. . \ i LL- , j, 1 L / , A- -- / - ; 1 \ - _ _ . »- I. '22 2--4-1' 2 -/ to uly ~ 44- 2- ·36.-: 1 -1 ./' 0 1 11 + 1 11 i . :L ' 1 / ...., 7 17·.74 . , 1 1.1 k. J , ... j J»/Cl / 13 //,\ =1- - ---- 1 - t , r. -*» \. -- 1 V:.3491€-:~ 4:-4. 1 '01 -- \ € h . So 16 \\ \ 9 . 4/ / 0<V / , 1 . 1 \ 7 - / 1 7 \ :1 ,- . ' l j , . i r h----I n 11 . 0 1 , .1 '- 1 , 1 1 . 0 b'/1 1 2 . \\ \\~ O \ Al, 2 4 1 /, t. 1 6 1 1/7,2 3:13 \ A, 42.4 J €3/ I. ..'' / / / / 1 CD \\ 1 \ 1 m 0 \ .-*. 9 - 9 G.- f < 1 1, 3 11 2-J H>43 twe : gor 13 HS £9 101 tOi 58 LOT 56 E45™*; M 1 S)Niv k F 31)VdS '11.10 ')NI]% 9 JeD¥ a i 3-31 1 .-4 %, I . EKA (BIT F TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE WILDRIDGE PUD FOR LOTS 54,55,89 AND 90, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO HEREAS, Jay K. Peterson has applied for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to create eight (8) single-family lots on Lots 54,55,89 and 90, Block 4 known as the "Western Sage PUD", as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004; and HEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and HEREAS, said application complies with the PUD criteria set forth in Section 17.20.110, which include the following: a. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives has not been met as required by 17.20.110H(1). b. The overall design concept of this PUD Amendment conforms to the intent of non- developable areas with the proposed building locations, and also conforms to the general policy criteria for alteration to these areas as contained in Resolution 04-25. The movement of these areas will not significantly alter the character or be detrimental to the neighborhood. 17.20.110H(2) c. The existing development rights on Lots 54,55,89 and 90 are compatible with the immediate scale and character of existing properties, and the existing access conditions, and platted non-developable areas, and the proposed decrease of density to 8 single-family residences is compatible as applied for in the PUD amendment. 17.20.110HO) d. This PUD Amendment application is responsive to the existing topography and natural features of Wildridge. 17.20.110H(4) e. This PUD Amendment application creates functional or optimized open space that is responsive to existing views and buffers to open space. 17.20.110H(8) NO. . f. This PUD will not increase the non-conformity of Longsun Lane, as the access proposed is private, and the traffic and number of dwelling units projected onto the existing cul-de-sac will not be increased over the existing PUD. 17.20.110H(11) ~OW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval of the application for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to rezone Lots 54,55,89 and 90, Block 4 from duplex and triplex zoning for an existing total of eleven ( 11) dwelling units to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) single-family lots (Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 & 8), reducing three (3) development rights, as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004 with the following conditions: 1. The Development Standards on the PUD Plan will be revised to include the following: a. Maximum Square footage of homes shall be clarified as 4,000 square feet. b. Building Envelopes, featuring a maximum front yard setback on Lots 1-5 of 10 feet, and a maximum front yard setback on Lots 6-8 of 15 feet. Building envelopes will be specifically defined to contain all require site disturbances. c. Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be placed on the PUD plan. 2. The PUD site plan shall be revised to add the following: a. The non-developable area restriction from the Wildridge PUD plan shall be copied to the PUD plan. 3. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon concurrent approval of the corresponding subdivision Preliminary Plan. ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF August, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-22 134,55,89,90 B4 WR PUD Amendv2 Approve.doc 41. ~ HEART of the \ 11.1.11 Staff Report FINAL DESIGN PLAN ATh COLORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 11,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 2440 Old Trail Road Introduction Scott Turnipseed is proposing a duplex on the uphill side o f Old Trail Road near the intersection with Draw Spur. The building is approximately 5,800 square feet in size and would include two (2) 4-bedroom units. Some proposed materials include cedar board on board siding, stucco, and asphalt shingles. The lot has a consistent 25% grade from the road to the back lot line. Currently, the property is covered with sagebrush and is surrounded by vacant lots on either side. The proposed design stretches from one side of the lot to the other, with decks to border both side (10') building setback lines. Retaining walls are proposed behind the building in order to allow for decks and a flat area behind each unit. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A duplex is an allowed use for this lot. • Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project appears to comply with this requirement proposing 33.5% coverage. • Setbacks: All setbacks are labeled on the site plan. Each unit o f the duplex proposes a deck that would come within inches ofthe side (10') setback lines. • Easements: All easements remain unobstructed with this design submittal. • Building Height.' It appears that this building conforms to the maximum height allowance of 35'. The maximum building height proposed is 29'11 3/8". Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 92. Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Turnipseed Duplex Final Design Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 7 • Grading: Grading on the property appears to be done only as necessary for building improvements. Both existing and proposed grades are indicated on the Site Plan. The architect has moved the retaining walls away from the northeast/southeast corners o f the building to allow for positive drainange. Acceptable grading at the inlet and outlet o f the culvert has not been provided. The proposed berm needs to be moved out o f the Right- o f-Way and 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage and Snow Storage Easement. The proposed grading for the driveway culvert does not provide the minimum allowable cover of 12" inches over the 18" culvert. A 6" hump in the driveway to provide 12" o f cover is not acceptable. • Parking. 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and it appears that 6 functional spaces are provided on site. • Snow Storage: It appears that sufficient on-site snow storage will be available for the proposed site design. The site plan indicates a 240 sq. ft. snow storage area on the north side o f the driveway. 1,296 sq. ft. of snow storage area is required. It appears that additional snow storage can be accommodated on the west side o f the driveway. • Landscaping: The Landscape Plan appears to comply with Town Guidelines. Numerous trees, shrubs, and a sod area on the east side of the building are proposed. All plant and tree species indicated on the Landscape Plan are drought tolerant. The applicant is proposing to irrigate 1,800 sq. ft. and 2,536 sq. ft. is allowed. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town o f Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. A single-family or duplex may be built on the property. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. • Site Development: o Site Design: The building appears to blend in well with the natural settings. Slope retention is limited to the rear o f the property in order to allow for a small flat back yard area. o Site Access: Entrance to the site is provided with a 12' wide driveway. Access grade for the first 20' of the driveway entrance is 3%. The grade of the first 20' of driveway adjacent to the two garages exceeds 4%. The grade of the 20' in front of the north unit garage is 5.7%. The grade of the 20' in front of the south unit garage is 4.7%. This shall be corrected by building permit. o Parking and Loading. There are areas on each side o f the two garages that provide hammerhead turnaround areas. o Easements: All easements are labeled correctly and would remain unobstructed with this project. The Guidelines state that landscaping improvements shall avoid placement in easements whenever possible. Numerous trees are proposed to be planted within the fron 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage and Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Turnipseed Duplex Final Design Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 7 Easement. It shall be the responsibility o f the property owner to maintain and replace any landscaping that is damaged or destroyed by the Town while doing drainage, snowplowing, or utility work. o Drainage: The architect has pulled the retaining walls away from the building and this should allow positive drainage away from and around the structure. o Snow Removal and Trash Storage: The site plan indicates a 240 sq. ft. snow storage area on the north side o f the driveway. 1,296 sq. ft. o f snow storage area is required. It appears that additional snow storage can be accommodated on the west side o f the driveway. • Building Design: o Design Character: The guidelines state that buildings should be orientated to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors. This design is taking advantage o f view corridors. The building design should not impact the solar or view corridors o f the neighboring properties. o Building Height: As stated, the building appears to be in compliance with the 35' limitation. The maximum proposed height is 29' 11 3/8". o Building Materials and Colors: Colored elevations have been provided. Indigenous natural or earth tones are required in residential neighborhoods. The proposed color for the duplex contains a large amount o f green color. Staff recommends using at least one alternate color to break up the color pattern. According to the application form and provided building elevations, proposed materials include: asphalt shingles, a stucco body, and cedar wood decking, fascia, and board on board siding. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: Architectural interest is provided on each elevation of the structure. All primary roofpitches equal 6: 12, with some 4:12 pitches above the garage doors. o Outdoor Lighting: The applicant has provided a sample exterior wall lantern which will be used. The lantern will be available for review at your August 17, 2004 meeting. The lantern appears to comply with the lighting guidelines. o Duplex Developments: The development appears to be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. Compatible building materials, architectural style, scale and massing are proposed for each side of the duplex. • Landscaping: o Retaining Walls: The plans show two separate retaining walls behind the structure that would run from one side lot o f the lot to the other. Landscaping is proposed between the retaining walls. Top o f Wall and Bottom o f Wall elevations provided on the Site Plan indicate some of the proposed boulder walls are structural. All walls over 4' in height shall be designed and stamped by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. o Design Character: The proposed residence is generally compatible with the intentions ofthe design guidelines. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Turnipseed Duplex Final Design Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 7 o Erosion Control'. Silt fencing detail has been provided on the Pollution Control Plan. • Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures: No accessory structures are proposed with this site design. o Signs: An address boulder is indicated on the Site Plan for placement near the driveway entrance. It appears the address boulder is located in the 50' Town Right of Way. The boulder should not be placed in the 50' Right of Way. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. Site disturbance is only done as necessary for the building and improvements. The structure is designed to step with the slope o f the lot and is sited appropriately. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of this structure from adjacent and neighboring properties should be appropriate. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This design should not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed design is in conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Final Design approval for the duplex on Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge with the following conditions to be resolved prior to a building permit being issued: 1. Colors are not approved as submitted. Colors will be resubmitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission before final approval. 2. It appears some o f the proposed retaining walls are structural. All structural retaining walls shall be designed by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer. 3. Existing contours 8092 and 8094 on the west side o f the property indicate that they intersect with proposed contour 8090. The proposed grading for existing contours 8092 and 8094 need to be provided and meet the design guidelines. 4. All ofthe elevation plans or plans that relate to the site plan (i.e. Sl) need to be revised to match the revised site plan submittal. 5. The 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement is mislabeled on the site plan and should be corrected to match the platted easement. 6. The building elevations should be labeled North, South, East, and West. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Turnipseed Duplex Final Design Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 7 7. The proposed grading for the driveway culvert does not provide the minimum allowable cover of 12" inches over the 18" culvert. A 6" hump in the driveway to provide 12" o f cover is not acceptable. Acceptable grading at the inlet and outlet o f the culvert has not been provided. The proposed berm needs to be moved out o f the Right-o f-Way and 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage and Snow Storage Easement. 8. The grade of the first 20' in front of the garages exceeds 4%. The driveway grade in front o f the garages is not approved and shall be changed to comply with Town guidelines by building permit. 9. The address boulder shall be moved out o f the 50' Town o f Avon Right o f Way on Old Trail Road. 10. The proposed decks on the north and south sides of each unit shall not encroach upon the 10' Building Setback. 11. The snow storage area shall be increased to 1,296 sq. ft. comply with Town of Avon standards 12. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Rempctfully submitted, 1 ) < KN c 4 p«Lut/6 11\(-«jk lo- Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I r Hi : ." t..9 i / .7 *stz t·. . 2,:#-· 72-- ~ ~ .. : I 034-66/ 01• · .. , 11; ¥ ... Standing across the street looking directly east at the entire property. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Turnipseed Duplex Final Design Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 7 1 0.1 - d Al - r . .. D. 1 .. . · ., ... % 5.- . . ht i . 4't J . 4? i , .11" . 1 4/ 4ud:. 4 7. ./~* 2£:: '. ~.t*~ ~tfk~ ,~.~~/ k*, .0·~in ; :· . 1'¢: kir·:4 ·'.efr #kf i . , . . .,r 7 11 tf · .....il :41- i,·.N.r .4:3 .,'*511' 2 ' ~c '64: , 4 ·· 1,(162 :4:. 44&..4.~ 4 ,¢kF .1... 2;6·. * ·"~vii#.23/8;,(·7t;L E74 -4 :9.77 ~ :,jift~'!1*k690-727 571*29:;,a :1,47 L v #*? Atd.# il t. 1 4 ...... '4;--I~~ $ I ..::4'%, t>.t . 14 6$45.i.»,;1, d 44<:(fely''r . 0 1,:tu.-2~51*64 1.12 it>L.'; *i $ A., t€ I lm'.*. On middle of the property looking towards existing duplex to the east. . I ~40.5- 4.4.1 ' p. ~ 4'4 -4 f :at #,1,9 44.-R-. 1.1 42 J 144 .. B 40,626 .:. .t,h , 9. 4 i t..'f >fr l'f~:t · , 1, v :I r *I 1 Standing on middle of lot looking north. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 92, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Wildridge Turnipseed Duplex Final Design Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission'meeting Page 7 of 7 3..542 I 4, C.-T:. 3 1 k 5 4 I L 1-,te//I./././:...m . , 1 ne I I. On middle of the lot fat soil test site) looking west. .%~,tru~L-~~*~ ' · 7,*pii."0,7 ~4". .-: < , nt. f :*4: 16 .~'U.. Ai~.?444 >4~ · i <. 4%' ,-46'I,~,11,1,6-~,:-R~WU444.2.. r . .. I *4 Standing on middle of the property with view to the south over vacant lot. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report ~9////57 FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON COLORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 6,2004 Project type Single-family Legal description Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD Zoning Residential Single-Family (RSF) Address 1910 Hurd Lane Introduction Architectural Services PC is proposing a single-family residence on Hurd Lane. The building is approximately 2,903 sq. ft. in size, with a 574 sq. ft. garage and 1919 sq. ft. unfinished basement. The style of this house will emulate a country farmhouse with 10:12 roof pitches, horizontal siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbaeks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A single-family dwelling is an allowed use for this lot. • Density: The lot is zoned for one family dwelling and accessory buildings and uses per the Nottingham Station PUD. • Lot Coverage.- Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project appears to comply with this requirement proposing 18.2% site coverage. • Setbacks: As stated on the Nottingham Station PUD: front setback - 25 feet; side setback 7.5 feet; rear setback - 20 feet. There is also a 35' stream setback on this property for the Eagle River. • Easements: As shown on the site plan the project appears to comply with all platted easements. There is a 10 foot drainage easement on the west property boundary; a 24 foot access easement which extends into the property from Hurd Lane; a 7.5 feet drainage easement on the east property boundary; and the Metcalf Ditch easement on the north property boundary. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD, Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 • Building Height: The design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum height requirement with a proposed building height of 34.6 feet. An ILC will be required at footing and framing to ensure compliance. • Grading: The driveway grades do not appear to allow for adequate drainage to the east side of the house. The 56' spot elevation on the west side of the driveway, near the retaining wall, should be increased to 57'. This increase in elevation will allow positive drainage to the east side o f the house and then drain to the south side o f the lot. As the plan currently exits ponding will occur in front o f the garage. This shall be corrected by building permit. • Parking: 3 parking spaces are required for this residence, and 3 spaces are proposed. • Snow Storage: It appears that ample on-site snow storage is available. 1114 sq. ft. is required and 1950 sq. ft. is proposed. • Landscaping: The Landscape Plan appears to comply with Town Guidelines. Numerous trees, shrubs, and two areas of sod are proposed. All plant and tree species indicated on the Landscape Plan are drought tolerant. The applicant is proposing to irrigate 2,309 sq. ft. and 4,966 sq. ft. is allowed. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Nottingham Station PUD for the proposal. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. • Site Development o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. Since sketch design approval the building footprint has ben changed. The building footprint has been moved closer to Hurd Lane by approximately 10 feet. Mr. Nottingham requested the building to be moved in order to preserve the vegetation on the lot that is in the vicinity of the 35' stream setback. o Site Access: Access to the residence is provided with a 12' wide existing driveway. Lot 5A and 5B share a 24' access easement. The parking area in front o f the garage is facing north, which may require additional attention for snow maintenance. The grade for the first 20' in front o f the proposed garage is approximately 2%. o Parking and Loading: Parking spaces are provided in front o f the garage and there appears to be adequate turnaround space for vehicles leaving the garage. The existing gravel drive will be asphalt paved. Three parking spaces will be provided which meets parking standards. o Easements: No building is proposed in any of the easements on the Final Plan. Landscaping Improvements are proposed within the 10' Drainage Easement. It shall be the responsibility o f the property owner to maintain and replace should Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD, Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 the landscaping be damaged or destroyed by the Town while doing drainage, snowplowing, or utility work. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. All grading appears to comply with Town standards, and occurs within the property boundaries for Lot 5B. Grading will be completed, as necessary, for the building and to control drainage. The grade of the driveway will have to be changed in order to provide positive drainage to the east side of the driveway. The 56' spot elevation on the driveway will have to be increased to 57'. o Drainage: Positive drainage around the building is provided and all drainange appears functional on the site. Water from the asphalt driveway in front o f the garage and landscaped area on the north side o f the building will be diverted to the east side of the building and drain to the rear of the lot. In order for this to be accommodated the 56' spot elevation on the driveway will have to be increased to 57'. o Snow Removal and Storage: It appears there is adequate room for snow storage and all snow storage can be accommodated on-site. 1,950 sq. ft. of snow storage is proposed which exceeds the Town requirement of 1,114 sq. ft. of snow storage area. • Building Design: o Design Character: The proposed residence will be designed in a country farmhouse style and is generally compatible with the intentions of the design guidelines. o Building Height The height ofthe building conforms to the Nottingham Station PUD limitation of 35 feet. The proposed building height reaches 34.6 feet and will require an ILC at framing as well as foundation. o Building Materials and Colors: Building materials will include: wood siding, shingle siding at the gable ends and a stone base. Colored elevations have been submitted and will be available for review at your August 17 meeting. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The roof pitch proposed with this application is 10:12. The south elevation roofplan appears to be large in mass. This elevation will be facing the river and not Hurd Lane. There is a pro panel II metal roofproposed at the entry porch and bay (north elevation). Exterior walls will consist of horizontal wood siding. • Landscaping: o Design Character: The design character o f the proposed landscaping is appropriate for our climate. As mentioned, it appears that the proposed irrigated areas are incorrectly indicated but should comply with the Town's 20% maximum requirement. A note referring to a rain sensor utilized with the irrigation system was added to the Landscape Plan. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD, Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 o Erosion Control: k states on the Construction Management Plan that erosion control and debris fencing will be provided along the entire length o f the downhill section of the disturbance line. o Retaining Walls: Non-structural retaining walls are proposed on the west side of the driveway. • Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures'. No accessory structures are proposed with this site design. o Signs: An address boulder is indicated on the Site Plan for placement near the driveway entrance. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benehing or other significant alteration of existing topography. Site disturbance is only done as necessary for the building and improvements. The house is designed to step with the slope of the lot and is sited appropriately. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of this structure from adjacent and neighboring properties should be appropriate. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This design should not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed design is in conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staffrecommends Final Design approval for the single-family residence on Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD, with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. The 7456' elevation indicated on the driveweay shall be increased to 7457' to allow for positive drainage to the east side o f the building. 2. A vicinity map shall be provided. 3. The survey appears to indicate the north property line length incorrectly (indicates length to be 9199.54, it should be 199.54). 4. The address boulder shall be placed out of the Metcalf Ditch Easement. 5. The proposed 7458' contour for the west side of the re-routed ditch should be indicated on the site plan. 6. Additional detail should be provided for the existing on site 38" CMP. The entire pipe location should be indicated on the site plan. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD, Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 7. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions o f approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. bnlitted, „ Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5B, Nottingham Station PUD. Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Pace 6 of 6 1- 1 + 9-4 + , 1 2.1 Al: ;. 1 .9. 4....Uka '--/.- .tal: ·..· ,.*-~~~4iNee°-... #-.. * 19¥**TI~St.:•: .·p~*4#.id:~ + .* 11 5~ ..Lt.. Lot 5B, looking south from Hurd Lane 11 1 ... 4 9.- 42 1* /4'f j 7 .: . I. y . 0 ,ffr·.:eL.f,5 11 2.2.9.:i....i- :...1.- ',T »'4*·..: 7.1 .1.-~·fl. 4-·.643~411' , 71·~f.I. ....:. 9 . .. 9€.rf46.-(~r~ .- · T ..4*1:9;299.. I.'*448..e' . a.=.7.~Ul-' N'.... 05*- ,~'~:·e•· FLA 4%*L-Lty:...=:£*Pr#.1.C.~ , ' -I ->*+ :,·f-7;fi·;131~~~'4'.4...../. .3,·Re:/ 2*2+58/~;2*NO#WgU/j*r. ,/·0·g .A-• -zy • Lot 5B, interior of lot looking southwest Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 A. 111 \1<14111 \\1 1 1 Staff Report -/ r~//b,- FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON COLORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 11, 2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units (Duplex) Address 5039 Wildridge Road East Introduction Dantas Builders, Inc. is proposing a duplex residence with the two units totaling 9,012 square feet (living space and garage space). The building materials will include stucco siding, stone veneer base, decks with wood railings, and asphalt shingles. The proposed maximum height is 34'9" above existing grade. The topography of Lot 5 provides difficulty in developing a structure on this site. The lot is very steep and the area of the lot with less that 40% slopes and adequate building site is limited. This is a downsloping lot and the access to the lot will be very difficult, with retaining walls required on the upslope and downslope along the driveway. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A duplex home is an allowed use for this lot. • Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project proposes site coverage of approximately 13%. • Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25 foot building setback for the front lot line and 10 foot building setback for the side lot lines. Boulders are proposed within the front 25 foot setback. • Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. There is a front 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement; side lot 7.5 foot Utility and Drainage Easement; and rear lot 10 foot Utility and Drainage Easement. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design August 17. 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 • Building Height: This design appears to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. Two of the roof ridgelines, one on each unit, approach 34'9" in height. An ILC at foundation and framing will be required to verify compliance with the Town's maximum allowable height requirement. • Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. • Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and 11 spaces (including garage spaces) are proposed. However, maneauverability may be difficult. • Snow' Storage: It appears that the required 20% of the total impermeable surfaced area of the site designated for snow storage may not comply. 1,848 sq. ft. of snow storage is required and 1,725 is proposed. Adequate snow storage area is lacking by 123 sq. ft. • Landscaping: The Landscape Plan appears to comply with Town Guidelines. Numerous trees and shrubs are proposed. All plant and tree species indicated on the Landscape Plan are drought tolerant. The applicant is proposing to irrigate 3,427 sq. ft. and 3,979 sq. ft. is allowed. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. A duplex is an appropriate density for this lot. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. • Site Development: o Site Design-. The building appears to be compatible with the site. o Site Access: The driveway access width and grades appear to be in compliance with Town standards. Proposed grades for the first 20 feet are 4%. The driveway then slopes from 8% down to 4% in the turnaround area in front of the garages. o Parking and Loading: Parking spaces are provided in front of each garage. The west unit has two additional spaces and the east unit has one additional space. However, maneauverability may be difficult. o Easementst This project is in compliance with all platted easements. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. o Drainage: Positive drainage must be provided away from the structure. The drainage for the driveway slopes to the middle of the driveway. The water will then drain underneath the elevated partywall for the duplex to the south side of the lot. • Building Design: o Design Character. As proposed this design conforms to setback, building area ratios, and height limitations. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5. Block 3. Wildridge Subdivision Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 o Building Height: As proposed, the height of the building is in compliance with the 35-foot allowance. The building height proposed is 34'9". An ILC at framing and foundation would be required. o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials include stucco, stone veneer base, cedar trim and asphalt shingles. Indigenous natural or earth tones are required. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The use of predominantly indigenous building materials such as native stone, wood siding, and timbers is encouraged in the design guidelines. o Outdoor Lighting: It is recommended that the bulb for the proposed lights be less than 1000 lumens (or equivalent to a 60 watt incandescent bulb) in order to comply with the Town' s proposed lighting ordinance. o Duplex Developments: The proposed duplex is designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site and appears to comply with the intention of the guidelines. The design creates a unified structure with variety and architectural interest to distinguish the duplex from a single-family residence. • Landscaping: o Design Character: The proposed residence is generally compatible with the intentions of the design guidelines. o Erosion Control'. It states on the notes for the site plan that a silt fence will be placed at the limits of disturbance to prevent erosion and sedimentation. o Retaining Walls: The proposed retaining walls have been designed and three cross sections have been submitted by LKP Engineering, Inc. The cross sections are included as part of this Staff report. • Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures: No accessory structures are proposed with this site design. o Signs: No address signs have been indicated on the site plan. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. Site disturbance is only done as necessary for the building and improvements. The house is designed to step with the slope of the lot and is sited appropriately. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of this structure from adjacent and neighboring properties should be appropriate. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 This design should not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed design is in conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending Final Design approval of this duplex residence located on Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. The retaining wall cross sections indicated on the east/west elevations submitted in the Final Design Plans dated August 2,2004 shall be replaced with the cross sections designed by LKP Engineering, Inc. and submitted on August 10, 2004. The revised elevations shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, for review and approval. 2. The retaining wall plans for the wall adjacent to the two garages and under the elevated party wall shall be submitted. This retaining wall shall be designed by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer. 3. Irrigated landscaping is not recommended between the retaining walls and must be reviewed by the Engineer o f Record. 4. The lower boulder wall (on the south side of the driveway) is not indicated on the West Elevation Plan. 5. The fire hydrant location (or distance and direction to the fire hydrant) should be provided on the site plan. The following conditions of approval shall be completed during the construction phase, after the building permit has been issued: 6. The retaining shall be constructed as per the designs submitted by the Engineer of Record. 7. The soil and ground water conditions shall be verified by the Engineer of Record in the area where the retaining walls will be constructed. 8. The Engineer of Record shall inspect the construction of the retaining walls and shall provide written documentation and certify that the conditions and wall are constructed per the approved plans. 9. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Resppctfully submitted, , «=44 6-41 0 Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 - 3.i#.' . *<: 2,%. te-/ • €'- -15-. *mINJEr<fi~*1347~JI. ,-- 3 fi:g: .0.- B.~.-#.-il 0. *.9,4- 4 3:~-W~ ~4;·f 1"t/-· € - : 42:L :*7,9.-•~· 3 .1 21'etr . ~ ~~~~~~*1 g~*, ~~. IS44. ..t'~ ~7;~ - 2 F,c'·0*,'97929 .. I e€-r€3 f.·.t-<.6,·*>EPIG;4*WP.-..iw"*ftqgFU&/ ~~Ktt 4•11&'4 · f ':»01 ... Ir F t. 4 1.yr, I npA,raW€448,11 + 14 z 4....9&944*.lili 4 *4 '/4 1 k. 23:ritillive.*aillinii-,1 gliallill'lits.Wi.lI". 7!!~4 Looking at the side of Lot 5 from just below Wildridge Road East. ../ 4, U 1 ' . 45 9 V . 3, . i'·.1.413,2,JOW.. L. h I. /4 11*im)*81/4-fs- ' -~~~ r 1 .3/'r...Ele'll:Fliblie~4,9-<,-3:3~->79>1:t:64./.1f. ir.-93 1 5-11-·7. tc .- "·43 & 41*57-1 ::M /2 +~ · 2:;ptlt«- t; *1*=1, 'EN; 0·39·0 + 1 . . .fal'WRKLi.ft,JAN '39'44...::32*~r:...- 2 3 '•"··· 0,1.4·.€ 41 .4 / « . Looking down Lot 5 from Wildridge Road East. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 U KP Engineering, Inc. CIVILGEOTECHNICAL August 9,2004 Mr. Dave Dantas RE: Boulder Wall Details Dantas Builders, Inc. Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge P.O. Box 4015 5039 Wildridge Road East Avon, CO 81620 Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado Project No. 04109 Dear Dave: At the request of Mr. Mike Pukas with MPP Design Shop, Inc., we have reviewed the boulder walls on the site/grading plan for the Speculative Residence, Job No. 0405, dated August 2,2004. The boulder walls are retaining the slope between the north side of the driveway and the road above. Individual segments of the boulder walls range in height from zero to seven feet. Some of the walls have a lower and an upper layer and at the east end of the driveway they have three layers. We have prepared three details. One is for a single layer wall, one for a double and the third detail is for a three-layer wall. All three designs are subject to verification ofthe soil and ground water condition at the time of construction. Also, we reviewed the soils and foundation investigation report by Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc., Job No. 03-145, dated October 14,2003. They had excavated two test pits in what appears to be the middle wets part of the lot. In the test pits they had encountered about two feet of topsoil underlain by two to three feet of sandy gravelly silt underlain by two to 2.5 feet of medium hard, siltstone and sandstone bedrock. A portion of the slope above the boulder retaining wall on the west side of the driveway, has a proposed grade of 1 -1/2:1. According to OSHA Excavation Standards, these types of soils are stable when graded at 1-1/2 (horizontal) to one (vertiact.) If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, LKP Engineering, InEN>P ' '». '€4• RECEIVED 29526 -L,1 AUG 1 0 2004 tfo O n,\'P'41» : L.J. Luiza Petrovska, P.a *. . 44 2 Community Development President It......0.....1,7 Enclosure Cc: Mike Pukas at fax #926-4212, original mailed C:\Documents and Scttings\Administrator\My Documents\WP 1 0-LK®04 I 09BWS LOPE .wpd P.O. Box 2837. Edwards. CO 81632 (970) 926-908% Tel (970) 976-90*Q WAY BOULDER RETAINING WALL FOR SINGLE WALLS UP TO 7 FEET HIGH --3.5 ft-4 - 1 " EXISTING GRADE 6. Impervious Bockfill 12» 7'max Granular, pervious backfill, depending on site conditions. Filter Fabric, Mirafl 140N _& t_ or equivalent 1' PERIMETER DRAIN LOCATION AND DETAIL, DEPENDING ON SOIL AND GROUND WATER Compacted backfill CONDITIONS. ~,~ ? ETRO>:,fix ba: 3 8-9.049124 .€00 /7 /icl NOTES: 1. THE BOULDER RETAINING WALL SHAU BE CONSTRUCTED WITH BOULDERS GREATER THAN 2 FEEL FOR DRY STACK WALLS, THE ROCKS WILL HAVE AS MUCH FLAT SURFACE AREA AS POSSIBLE, TO INCREASE THE FRICTION SURFACE BETWEEN THE BOULDERS 2. THE BOTTOM BOULDERS SHAU BE THE LARGEST AND SHALL BE PLACED ON NATIVE, UNDISTURBED SOIL, FREE FROM TOPSOIL AND ORGANICS, OR ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE SUCCESSIVE BOULDER LAYERS SHALL BE OFFSET HORIZONTALLY BY A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES FOR EACH VERTICAL FOOL 4. A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OF UNDISTURBED SOIL COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE 14/ALL 5. THE COMPACTION OF THE SOIL BACKFILL SHOULD BE TESTED BY THE ENGINEER OR IT CAN BE BACKALLED WITH CLEAN, CRUSHED ROCK. 6. THE ABOVE DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOULDER WALL INSPECTED, BY THE DESIGNER AFTER VERIFICATION OF- THE SOIL AND GROUND WATER WATER CONDITIONS. BOULDER RETAINING WALL CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL PR(XECT NCU SPECULATIVE RESIDENCE 04109 V,Kp 3 Engineering, Inc. LOT 4 BLOCK 4 -DRIDGE SC4lt N. T.S P.O. Box 2837 Edwordz CO 81632 5030 ~DRIDGE ROAD EAST td (970) 926-9088 fax (970) 926-9089 701,N OF AYO< EAaE COUNT); COLORADO DRANNG Na: 1 BOULDER RETAINING WALL 2 1I 12= INSTAU FILTER FABRIC (MIRAF! 14ON OR 2' to 6' EQUIVALENT) BEHIND T. BOULDERS - 3' min. - 2 1 mi 1 , COMPACTED, / GRANULAR BACKFILL SEE NOTE 05 6, 6. PERIMETER DRAIN LOCAnON 12" / AND DETAIL DEPENDING ON Driveway / SOIL AND GROUND WATER COND/71ONS. 1- ~~ PET*628 'wi·'9 0-98~i-·01 · 29526 12' 444 . 67%,D/MiE 2/ NOTES: 1. THE BOULDER RETAINING WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH BOULDERS GREATER THAN 2 FEET. FOR DRY STACK WALLS, THE ROCKS WILL HAVE AS MUCH FLAT SURFACE AREA AS POSSIBLE TO INCREASE THE FRICTION SURFACE BETWEEN THE BOULDERS. 2. THE BOTTOM BOULDERS SHALL BE THE LARGEST AND SHAU BE PLACED ON NATIVE, UNDISTURBED SOIL FREE FROM TOPSOIL AND ORGANICS, OR ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE SUCCESSIVE BOULDER LAYERS SHALL BE OFFSET HORIZONTAUY BY A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES FOR EACH VERTICAL FOOT. 4. A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OF UNDISTURBED SOIL COVER SHAU BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE WALL 5. THE COMPACTION OF THE SOIL BACKFILL SHOULD BE TESTED BY THE ENGINEER OR IT CAN BE BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN, CRUSHED ROCK. 6. THE ABOVE DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOULDER WALL INSPECTED, BY THE DESIGNER AFTER VERIFICATION OF THE SOIL AND GROUND WATER WATER CONDITIONS. BOULDER RETAINING WALL CIVnt/GEOTECHNICAL PROECT NO.: SPECUIATIVE RESIDENCE 04109 ~LIa~ Engineering, Inc. LOT 4 BLOCK 1 -DRIDGE Swit N. TS P.a Box 2837 Edwarde. CO 81632 5039 NURIDGE ROAD EAST t.1 (970) 926-9088 fax (970) 926-9089 70»N OF- AVOV. EGE COUNT); COLORADO DRAIB Na: 2 BOULDER RETAINING WALL 2 h 12~L~~~ 2-4' max l 2 11 6 12= INSTAU FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 4-6' max 140N OR EQUIVALENT) BEHIND THE BOULDERS -4' min. - 2 1 1' mi ta O , COMPACTED. // GRANULAR BACKFILL SEE NOTE *5 -•./Le *~ 6' max 12(4?404+ | ..i 29528 ~a~ 12" PERIMETER DRAIN LOCATION \~0/2.714&flv / AND DETAIL DEPENDING ON 9 / SOIL AND GROUND WATER 10 4-0.......2~.Sdf/ ) - ~~ CONDITIONS 7' mi 1- NOTES: 1. THE BOULDER RETAINING WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH BOULDERS GREATER THAN 2 FEET. FOR DRY STACK WALLS. THE ROCKS WILL HAVE AS MUCH FLAT SURFACE AREA AS POSSIBLE, TO INCREASE THE FRICTION SURFACE BETWEEN THE BOULDERS. 2. THE BOTTOM BOULDERS SHAU BE THE LARGEST AND SHALL BE PLACED ON NATIVE, UNDISTURBED SOIL FREE FROM TOPSOIL AND ORGANICS, OR ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE SUCCESSIVE BOULDER LAYERS SHALL BE OFFSET HORIZONTALLY BY A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES FOR EACH VERnCAL FOOL 4. A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OF UNDISTURBED SOIL COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE WALL 5. THE COMPACTION OF THE SOIL BACKALL SHOULD BE TESTED BY THE ENGINEER OR IT CAN BE BACKALLED WITH CLEAN, CRUSHED ROCK. 6. THE ABOVE DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOULDER WALL BOULDER RETAINING WALL CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL PRAZECT NCU SPECUIATIVE RESIDENCE 04109 U,Kpl Engineering, Inc. LOT 4 ELOCK 36 11109£)GE SCALE) N. 7.S P.O. Box 2837 Edwords, CO 81632 5039 VALDRIDGE ROAD EAST t.1 (970) 926-9088 fox (970) 926-9089 ?D»N OF A•OV, EADZE COUVT). COLORADO £*Al-G Na: J ADM@NJO Staff Report SKETCH DESIGN PLAN COLORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 10, 2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units Address 5650 Wildridge Road Introduction Eric Johnson, applicant, is proposing a 6,000 sq. ft. alpine style duplex, This duplex will be accessed via two driveway entrances. The north unit o f this duplex will share a driveway entrance with Lot 17. Proposed materials include: asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding and trim, stucco and stone. Design Review Considerations According to the Town o f Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A duplex is an allowed use for this lot. • Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project proposes site coverage of approximately 25%. This will be verified at Final Design. • Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. There is a 25' Building Setback along Coyote Ridge and Wildridge Road East and a 10' setback along the property line with Lot 17. • Easements: All platted easements remain unobstructed with this design. There is a10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement along Wildridge Road East and Coyote Ridge and a 7.5 easement along the property line with Lot 17. • Building Height. This design appears to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. The maximum proposed height is 35'. An ILC at foundation and framing will be required to verify compliance with the Town's maximum allowable height requirement. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting ~ Page 2 of 5 • Grading: All proposed grading does not appear to comply with the Zoning Code. Proposed grading occurs in the 50' Town Right of Way on Wildridge Road East. The Tow no f Avon residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines state that 'all grading shall occur within the property boundaries'.. • Parking: 6 spaces are required for this project and it appears 8 spaces have been proposed by the applicant. • Snow Storage: It appears that an adequate snow storage area can be located on the south side o f the driveway for the south unit side and on the east and west sides of the shared access driveway for the north unit. This will be reviewed at Final Design. • Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be reviewed at Final Design. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the Town o f Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. A duplex unit is an appropriate density for this lot. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. • Site Development.' o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. O Site Access: The driveway access width and grades appear to be in compliance with Town standards. Proposed grades for the first 20' of both driveway entrances is 4%. The south driveway access is in close proximity to Coyote Ridge. Driveway access is preferred from Coyote Ridge. o Parking and Loading: The proposed number ofparking spaces meets the Town parking standards. Manuerveribility will be difficult on the south driveway. o Easements. This project is in compliance with all platted easements. o Site Grading: Existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan and elevation plans. Grading is proposed in the 50' Town Right o f Way on Wildridge Road East. The Town of Avon Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design review Guidelines states that 'all grading shall occur within property boundaries'. o Drainage: Positive drainage must be provided away from and around the structure. There appears to be a drainage problem on the north driveway. Drainage flows toward the north garage and entry area, which is located 5' below the driveway with no drainage outlet. Additional spot elevations on the driveway and stairway at the entrance to the North Unit need to be indicated and drainage needs to be directed away from the entrance. • Building Design: o Design Character: As proposed this design conforms to setback and building area ratios, and height limitations. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 o Building Height: As proposed, the height of the building does comply with the 35- foot allowance. An ILC would be required at footing and foundation to ensure compliance with the 35' height requirement. o Building Materials and Colors: Colors and materials will be reviewed at Final Design. Indigenous natural or earth tone colors and high quality building materials are required. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The use o f predominantly indigenous building materials such as native stone, wood siding, and timbers is encouraged in the design guidelines. o Outdoor Lighting: It is recommended that the bulb for the proposed lights be less than 1000 lumens (or equivalent to a 60 watt incandescent bulb) in order to comply with the Town's proposed lighting ordinance. o Duplex Developments: The proposed duplex is designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site and appears to comply with the intention of the guidelines. The design creates a unified structure with variety and architectural interest to distinguish the duplex from a single-family residence. • Landscaping: o Design Character: The landscape plan will be reviewed at Final Design. A note referring to the use of a rain sensor must be added to the Landscape Plan with the Final Design plan submittal. o Erosion Controt. Notes referring to silt fencing, project sign, limits of disturbance, and hay bales shall be included in the Final Design submittal. A separate construction staging plan is required for Final Design submittal. o Retaining Walls: A concrete block retaining wall is proposed along the driveway for the south unit. This wall has a maximum proposed height o f 4 feet. A stone retaining wall is proposed along the entry walkway for the north unit. No top of wall and bottom o f wall elevations are indicated for this wall. Elevations for this wall shall be provided at Final Design. It appears a retaining wall will be required along the entryway for the north unit. The elevation drops 5 feet from the driveway, in front of the garage, to the entry walkway for the north unit. Details for this wall shall be provided at Final Design. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends tabling the Sketch Design for the proposed duplex on Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision for the following reasons: 1) Staff recommends driveway access from Coyote Ridge and not Wildridge Road East due to proximity o f the south driveway to the intersection with Coyote Ridge. 2) Significant grading will be required to construct the two driveway accesses from Wildridge Road East, also grading into the Town Right o f Way as proposed. 3) The lack of maneuvering space in the south driveway i f it is constructed as submitted. Staff does not want to see similar problems associated with the driveway and maneurving as occured on the adjacent property (Lot 17). Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 4) As submitted there appears to be a problem with drainage on the north driveway. Drainage flows toward the north garage/entrance and the entrance is located 5' below the driveway grade with no drainage outlet. The design should be revised and resubmitted to provide for driveway access from Coyote Ridge. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, C D <1 Kenneth Kovalchik Planner I =- t - 4 1 2- , I J. f.10>1 4.1 :949£40* - . 4 . 43%4.·2. 4 7~· 4% y 1. .6 *40':.'**14. 124/ f.~*..72,~ 6,6..ki#lif5/9 '·2 4 ~0'~¥*1*~I q:~:p~~~~~;~-2.~~..'04#43'74 . ..0 ~f*-tj~,J'v.J~F:.#,i·ri , 20~*=64*J·',·2 kr ·.Abrit~• " ' ~~ ~~~~~ ./ . ... 4- ; b . UG. 31' /t J:il".i..'-*·'' /~ 4 7 " . irl Ad · 1 -2 4 Looking south onto Lot 18, from Lot 17. Area where shared access driveway will he located Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 18, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Duplex Sketch Plan August 17,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 y ' 1*r. ~ A 2- --- Ird.4--7- - v- 2-*28 C///r'~:1 ling//J//~/*-L- r ..,.1:,Ad--4 f 7 .k'..1,4~42 4,1 4 1. . #.. ..z.~ Ar:-ify.*:4*:rk·i... f ..k:+A -i, 1 3. . #MIC~*-42£;~.,~, i.,"~f'.1. € »*2,,~ J -' . rs., , .. 0 - A.ilts, 3/1*0421*94*70·9 174*. 1 2.Ci , '73:. 4 9%470. f - . •, !..: I .... t 4*~n<21,<544''~~4 Looking west from Coyote Ridge on the southern half of Lot 18. ...· 4 .'"'·t ·· ~,P*,~,PJ;g~v~I"A*:' 1~n# ':39 : c..V - .·80....Ft.":2'44: -61 4-:All'- ~...:. 12~34 f..?».«1.7...&~f .1- t '. .A.t~' ,t'*.19217..~ 4 :..1 -*112,5/~ 9\271 .\InG*,·/53 -itc = I « . /, A £ 34 1 2 -4. 1 2 03 .p/........3JL , 1 ./"21~ ·-4.•• -ft.ittih ·;02· PL--tyrf,f:b:~4/.*i Looking west from Coyote Ridge on the northern half of Lot 18. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report Minor Project COL.ORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date August 9,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Landscaping Modifications Legal Description Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Address 71 Beaver Creek Place Introduction The applicant, Mark Donaldson, has applied for a minor modification to existing landscaping to this property on behalf of American National Bank. The lot was originally approved as Empire Savings and Loan, and subsequently transformed from a bank with a drive through to a medical center. American National Bank is beginning a tenant finish to reestablish a bank at this location, and would like to remove existing vegetation and a number of mature trees. The application proposes to remove 17 mature trees, a mix of cottonwoods and pines, as well as 1,000 square feet of existing sod and the large shrubs in front of the building (facing Beaver Creek Boulevard. The trees proposed for removal have been flagged with blue tape. Staff will provide a full size landscaping plan for review at your hearing but recommends that you individually visit the site if not acquainted with the extent of mature trees that currently exist. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The proposed revised landscaping plan will not affect the structure. Improvements to the structure that affect the exterior shall be separately applied for by the applicant. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. While there is certain necessity to removing several overgrown and mature trees to create visibility to the site, staff questions whether or not all 17 trees require complete removal or instead if some of these trees may be sufficiently trimmed to create sufficient visibility. That being said, the Town does not have a tree preservation ordinance and the necessity of increased visibility (for safety) to the bank is an important priority. However, it may be prudent to approach a project like this incrementally and remove only those trees and mature shrubs that are absolutely necessary. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 i thi \\Ill Lot 70. Block 2. Benchmark ar Beaver Creek Subdivision, Minor Project August 17.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The proposal to remove mature trees may impact the aesthetic values if all trees proposed are removed, since the site is so prominent from several different view. The landscaping continue to have a 'mature' look and curb appeal without impacting the operation of the site. The guidelines state that "Landscaping should accentuate a project design, not hide it from public view". All in all, we would recommend taking a hard look and cautious approach to the removal of any mature trees from the site and recommend that the civil/maintenance work occur without the necessary removal of as many trees as proposed. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. As proposed for approval, the project appears to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town and appears consistent with the Design Guidelines. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the revised landscaping plan for Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. The following modifications are approved: a. Removal of the large cottonwood in the curbed island of the last drive through lane only. b. Removal of the two cottonwoods and large shrub area in cobble on South Elevation (facing Beaver Creek Boulevard). 2. The pruning and maintenance of all trees and srubs without removal. Individual trees may be subsequently reviewed for removal by the Commisison in concert with a revised sign program for the building that places the visibility needs of the new tenant in context. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4017 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi Katieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road An),1, Collin kic ) 97()-748-4()(M) COLORADO 97()-()49-l)!.i() t·~i~ 97()-84.5-77(;S 77-}' August 3*,2004 CERTIFIED MAIL Return receipt requested #7003 2260 0002 8928 1534 William Varecha 2325 Interstate Grand Junction, CO 81505 RE: Landscaping Non-Compliance Lot 11, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision 4500 Eaglebend Drive William & Debbie: This letter is to inform you that you are currently in violation of your approved landscape plan (stamp approved on 6/28/2004 by Community Development). After inspection of your property it has come to our attention that the entire property has been landscaped with sod (with exception ofthe 'rock garden' entrance areas). According to our calculations, you may irrigate a total of 1,975 square fee-of landscaped area for the propaty. After subtracting approximately 50 square feet of ir, igated area for the trees and shri bs, you would be allowed td have a maximum of 1,925 6 quare feet of sod. The approved landscape plan called out two separate 57' x 15' (855 square foot) sod areas, which has been exceeded with the recent sod installation. This situation must be remedied within 30 days (by Friday, September 3rd, 2004) or fines may be imposed by the Town for violating your design review approval. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us at 970.748.4030. Cordially, Matt Pielsticker Community Development Inspector Cc: Tambi Katieb, Director of Community Development Planning and Zoning Commission F:\Code Enforcement\Zoning EnforcementiL ]1 Bl Fl EBND Landscaping NonCompliance aher CO.doc . 1• 1 1 1>C y, 01 E. I .t· · 1 <AN i, I./l, 01 L· [-»--1 1 --P-4 '01 C)'1•/.30100 'NOAV .4 .2 4,·101 ~ 0 Le: 4 0,1 1-t 1 1--L F.\ lil I Ji ·I 4,"·3 01: 1.-'···. ~(4·01 2,1·...iP) L 30 N:,411636 K „317:VA - gl':,C'LO ¥2 + i £ vii > un f M€, M<- • 1.-AOT 1 L~O2 1 - N J,·-IA JUS ONS€id-107.1 - I ONC,4· 1: 101 W % z f..1 'S'/31,1.1 ).V . el C t 1,1 ct--1\92-7021 , ... 201\73(31523 Vi-IDEINVA be 6 6 r' I C . 51 6 -- 4 1\ f - R £ I #01 1 1 111 j in i, h 4 1 C 2 5 13:2 -2 1 11 6 9 2 3.30 -==f- 1 at 51. 1.j i 4 U - > r 9 Y & 1,/ Ul In 2 9 I R My a / 1 -:Siff [_£• C >- I 1 88 £ maillis J ·. 6... 4 4 .6 (b-=11, 7 EE'.i 4 Wihi k 0 I k 441 M:n a € ..iw ~ b . r. El ~ -J E p 8 r ZE¥ 6 44 & M VE?FOUR 6 1 11- 29'Un . :54 5/r#=Saw M 4 11/ , .U *1-3 5 6:/19? *B Fig MIZE:CzE. RIA - 4 I @il r , 5.- r, 11 '' 1 5 I 3212 f f#flteig' ,~ Li ..00,8 J. :0-i.' ...161>L.z 1 li l 1, , p:.r3*1, : 2::31: :5 2*18 i .th 1 6 82& >,i A. r.£ r, os•r,g , -"r o:i. 0£462542 Cp .,1 038822 15 5,2 €4:rmo# \: H-- P- -glil 1 - irl \5 3, A /N. *C¥ + :pU O 6 s:1,< E St'KNE:3 r .., \- ijactdo 263; ES* c .r·,mr.w•< i , <66' , f 954 .,/'9 </ \1 - .f I 2 - h ..6,1 3 1 45 y , \ C U i / 00' \ ¢09?63-/~ 6TF4~ ~< 4 21 07.\ ..... f /144 1, 1 -0 1 9, /7 ~ ./.< ~ .4,4 5 , 9 - \ U / \-->/ U.%/~ -0. / h 1 -»t» i/\1 1 + 1 4 i: 145\ 2121 Ely ly:.. h , I :t' I '' r // 41 \C ·. . 1 1 kit« : ,\/ . . / I q I . ''. - - % 5 4/ :+ .0 - d .j f tz / ' '1* 77 - -<:. ' ) 2 ' + '\ _1 , F./.. P.. f 2/ / ~ // 1- /43. / 1 1/ i %-31€'... 3 / /1/4 ./ t . 4./. 9% .il / 04\ 7 .1111,< 1 :4.'.(AF.1.>110'h' 2 ' t..\ . /7 9- 1- 1· / 1 .A.14 1 '' r\.42. . . r..561-1.,1 . >11 1-,5/ or,/ ..../ f U. "9<·>j 2 Ve\ ·, ..1... 0/FAL ' '1, ",i'-AE,# / * '#' /-- t ; 1 4,4 <, / / I / 1 -Ii .. 1 %-3..1 1 1 / \7 534 /) ill : 1 9 « +:42*0£12520 ,, + ..,4 .74" e.virr O ./' /,/ ON \\ t-\2 / ..7,\4,1/ttjv*Mt.60 P 64.1 4 400>2 C' ; 9 1 /1 ~ j,ki O,7~'9.</.0'4..: -2 :.:, 1/ ' c 7, , V J\.1 11 / 4./ 4 >3\ \ \ /434 {0» 9 11 >Ily> 9 .7 //:Ii ~ u «f , 1 - PLANT MATERIALS 1»42 jae, 9339,119 0329!i 261€NOO ' MHd¥39 30 VOSCN¥-1 (•...3..... -Al;O /15 ..- ~10*ELL .,PL I -- / 'f ~ ' " Af' 2-1338 -9(4 -_ ./ C l. <105 te. ) j / 1\ € - 24]06 0097) // 5 £ 4 j /// /5 Af,0 1/52 3 \ 6 d< 1 4 - ·03119 !.Sp [ 1, . 0 1 0 . ~ \ 58024 as- p rp 4 N 1 .4.4, / r '4•· 4/, r, 1\ A / \ 41 \ , 6 0 .4 / h 4. , 1/0 , i , ' tr / 9 96 /,fi r 431% ...0,04 ./ / t I. , i -» I I il * , C / 1 . 1 4 *63 . valt\\ 3 1 X67*r' C< .. -1.. . / i ..+4 i t ...2 + , 4 4. 1 I . / 7.& Ix \ . /, % 01- 12:. j , h/2\ / / , /9 ) ~-144 L ili,! 9, 7 51. I 'f/- /\\,I@ 3£743/* 1 1 ii < ~ t<1 3**8 4\ \2>/ 03 ;1 60 " \ ;51 / 4> Nal,1/1 1,1 H 1/iill -4 0--li F /1(1 14~141.@ 1,: 9/ MMUEW IN-/ L' ) ~1 I /*! #/('jijg'Tr<¥ . 9 41* .-98 44 2 2, 1. 1 2 44£25= 2 2 i.21 1 34 wal f' fi, 9% 7 411 91 3,1 m 1 4. t:jiN. 2. r; 0 / Z 4/ 1 & Ci25 1 I, 64 gi 4 .i i i li ; 2% .9 b a I U] 70 p 1 1 e , I 1 M E 1 . AM i ri" a - L_L_ 1...4-1...1.------·· 1 -0 Sa~ VARECHA RESIDENCE cO 03113) A ~ ~ LOT 11 - FIL NM I - EAeL.FEBE%90/;vlf.1,0414 -F[-r--H Chr-k·tie I.o·.4, 6···o.~.·t ·3(,·to ·L-* ARK. 1 5'IEC TS. INC. Al 4 *1 1304,· 7 - VARECHA RESIDENCE 004-1 E. EMavar <,·eek Mve. .. imt 01 101 31¥06 0{HdYND 7, 4- 1 Post ()fficc Box 975 Avo z (ldon,/1,) 6,/620 400 Benchmark Road 97{)-748-4(1(k) ('(1IOR.·11)0 970-949-9/39 /·cn· 97()-67.5 - 77<),r 77'} August 3rd. 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL Return receipt requested #7003 2260 0002 8928 1534 William Varecha 2325 Interstate Grand Junction, CO 81505 RE: Landscaping Non-Compliance Lot 11, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision 4500 Eaglebend Drive William & Debbie: This letter is to inform you that you are currently in violation of your approved landscape plan (stamp approved on 6/28/2004 by Community Development). After inspection of your property it has come to our attention that the entire property has been landscaped with sod (with exception ofthe 'rock garden' entrance areas). According to our calculations, you may irrigate a total of 1,975 square fee: of landscaped area for the property. After subtracting approximately 50 square feet of irigated area for the trees and shri bs, you would be allowed to' have a maximum of 1,925 s quare feet of sod. The approved landscape plan called out two separate 57' x 15' (855 square foot) sod areas, which has been exceeded with the recent sod installation. This situation must be remedied within 30 days (by Friday, September 34,2004) or fines may be imposed by the Town for violating your design review approval. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us at 970.748.4030. Cordially, Matt Pielsticker Community Development Inspector Cc: Tambi Katieb, Director of Community Development Planning and Zoning Commission F:'Code Enforcement\Zoning Enforcement\L! 1 Bl Fl EBND Landscaping NonCompliance after CO.doc m y P 136 12eM 0.103 ~9 irl la TA (4 0 . . 1 r.1 'll ¢ S *) i --- 1 81 IZT' 1 1 4 ft/-1 ./-rE 'r.:5hlk, ".. .4 -1, 1 - fer / 0 -*1 6 I_ II-v - iv. 131'P r /, 71 171 7. EXIST. 505 1 r- /TA _£ A - - - 77- L 3 EA Lf 4 1,049- [[ 1 F-- <'*Ml- ~D,em,-£6fi,- i ,./.. 1/ f.r 0 1 M JA 11 3 MA- * ---- r.--- , i ..9,4 1 Juu i f.,07 (j \ - in - C. p i 0 2 3 , t 23 1 114~~41- ./0-4 3% V (1. a ,#le'.1 / V 20' sf f \ / f.. ,- 4 -*tr: *S B>< I err 1 KI a 9 17/ 8 J , 4 41 -ECOLUE.~-S TO l70•30% stia 3/711, ADD. n€ 11 1* >~7 ) \Fra,se-el/;4* 1 <- - ff'llbA fleg 9 '9, 22 Fav ~-fffA= 1 /(171 Ek' 57 . C -146< , .00 6*01'.0- .. FA,ee €901 - 1 1 1 £ A r.,~ 50pl Le ¤5-241.1 Mp<1511 ht/= r- ap,em- 2 1 /n 1\ (4»/2 --- 4210»FE exlsrlkIL- 04€M¥P'.41 St!Fll.5 + L.4.6 1ULIC . FE-Fl-Ace Wl. r H 1-1844 itilir.-- 1-f,4 51-lkle:5 4 *44:. MllcH (>4-1- Fle'35) 1 4-/ 00,1 4/ t,0/ 41, · "h .A 7462- 1 --1 F.0 1 '- -3'77 ya '1 ~ * 1-0 136 12€M OJED ~19 tr< laTA ld~ 4 5 21 41=al . - .-~-10 -.---# I#-.-d .- '-- .-.*I- -.---- - -- I -#.*-. - .*-*--*...*...V---'I.-*.- --- 3. .. . 1 I //' + ./ 1 8/ isTI[16, f,ir-7 r#-PE r.:3~1\ 2< . .4 -'' 1 i' cor - 4 , 1,~1 1 F ? / 7. EXILT. 600 2 7 r - -4 - 3 tA 1-1 [{,1~ 7,4.1)„- [[ )/4 4 MIJAU 1 ''A- 171 / f... Pr .pe #,A- 379.%-1 V 1- - /12 0 L.5.FAA dFl F 9 # 1.-,Arr f -, =29.0 y 'l 4 0- b 20'.Sf 'ft 1 ri~-*439*E, P<le'rthia 91, / 41 -•.-¥ Me,€1*TION 1M 3 /1 L *op -p/LDE.ltS To < . \\ 1 <AMIC- 391r. - lutte , 0 0 849, NI79,91 , -- 1/ .C \,1 . 5001 A *f,ki + M>4 5-11 W. r 4 1 15.P64£lt - - t jn #7610,4/ te><UE:rlklf. 048!G,PMI SHFU#5 + 4/ 3 L/»dA M.Q=+C . KE.Fl»ce W.1- r H 1.18,4 i h *\5\ \ C Ublf A-k 1_~ 131#1455 4 *114:=. M 11=H (>N-L Freco) 16.-'6U V (dh -Val T Ll-- -L ~~14Wl#96;Tr . m 1 -- ..M .1 1 *131 1 146 5,0 D 0 / -- - ./ I 1 t 9 . --1. i i \1 I /, I 0 , 1, 1 - '' 11 . :./ I '- d 1 i.. //1/ f / i. m.),1.15-[ 5/:07 / e 1 3 C C lit if 1 / // / 0 1\ <3 00 '...t.-/£ ..# . 07 - Dut''tbFliNg.-, ~ - 50 /: , 4-0/.*Id- t ,#72*eh+11'kt PED Tic./ 61 1 */3 0 26 44 a i 1 1 24-1 / :-f:. I. %:..0 .. r ...... . G j' Tf·+p. .... Ellte!25 *Cd'll./6*......p o (: 4413/1 < ; 3 r, ,4 2 :. 14 /./All ~ /1/ J -1-47«3 t.5.NkliAL BrED -----2- _ -1- -4& - 1 -y. E 12, =.9.~ . , - i ,; •FJN' j , 41 -19 ./96 11; )./ , { 1 8,/-' i.. r /1.1/' ~ / / 94\ i ' 2.L. 1 1 A L r ..t.. I -,b. ...11'lt - r.- 1 Ist:.E 1.164·-:~,- rEP :¥ 4 r -- /Aa I e i i 1 ' 1 \4¥ flat . 1 1 1 /*It 1 1 1 53< 6-1~ 104 -- . 9*Ar- e 0454- ·44 2 gy 1 A- I-Mli' i 6 U.' 417-2 €mt'll. 4041*•k 1 - O 'C 2 1 -WA -Mil&#.:3'-8-9/1/'Bil b . / . /\13...1.- 1 WILD R.1. ,BOULDER ~/ 63998 10 , , 1---13643 31-3\- Ji 1// WALL ---'' 3~7-\..\--40 61;, pA no ~ V O 8589.33 / ..0 / , .. 3,14 - # 4 -1, 85 - \0 4/199, / t .4 8591 03 M- 4- .00 w - 01=~ · 6> ~ : 8596.40 8596. »-219 -6.0, \ 97.7 8595 0 ~1>· / *%4 80. 14 *o. , ' \ \0 FF GARAGE &-- L 7 8401 - .O 4/ / 859683 ~f- = 8589.7 659550- 16 Jug-- /* i l _-1 3% '92- 49 -22240-- - *8595.0 / \ i /30 $ -, 0 1 ./9 0 GRAPHIC SCALE - - - - -4 - - V - 70· -93. - 133 - --2 L ij~&11 -=21 . p FF GARAGE ~~'~~ ~ SLOPE UNNTENANCE. IRINACE -371, 9- 4 1 = 8590.1 & SAO»' ST 35_ ORAGE EASEMENT \0 8595.5 ---27-- 1459 1 ' G ( IN FEET ) 12.5 w 1/ 1 ineb - 10 .--br---- - --_ -·r--4.g ' \0 L, --- ---2 -1.-- ------ -9- (.A • 7%33-- 0 .01 STRUCTURE - 93 - 4.0, 861319,/// - L WOOD FRAME DUPLEX e f O • 18.0 P h / --. \ + \ 0 4 / - -- -1, , .% 3 RECEIVED - 0- / / 1 \ 9 \(D . 0- \0 80-_3 0#Ai- - -- -- --4 -- \00 ... - 4 Fu *Q LOT 17 AUG 1 1 2004 - 3 C --- - V - 18.0' ..1 ' We e 4 . 4 y /- 4434:8*- -polk-- 2-2-- / ' -Ul #0 . ' 1 Community Development Y re- , , 3.24,<44'k ,/ 1 -_ - --72.2.-1€-- / 2 OA L 17 U TIL ..:. b«k .•tr' I··· / t ne* be i·'~4~i~~ ./ .=·-70..: - 9 -- - - STUB ...N - -4 ''e o YEQ *8591.7 42 \ 0. M M 02 0 - 4.9543=-:»92»-1 /9 ,<0. 6 *® 8596 m,<, 8591.0 t / - 2,9/- --Er--,2.-Stl ./ 6 - 21 6 9 3 ' / w.?it~- 24741 .L. / V \ 4 - £ · 7 4 - , *./·'b. / 1 t. ~4#9592<2221~~1 1 M Dl@Zo RADIUS = 375.00' / 1 -- F / Puftir---41 - / ''' 1 WA C~ gA 0-0 fl/ DELTA = 31'56'18 , uppe• 85% :a - -1.{I 9-70 '14.-f-\\ 80/ED/NG / r = 209.04' ridg~&12 / mon, 85 / A Ck SETBACK -- r P. IND E , 05*5 wme // FOUND PIN AND CAP e / 1, 0. /0 > ~4 -ai-- / / / v 4 rn ' , w~ 8556 ®OPE MAIN EN EK, DRAI ~& 1 4 / 1 42.. / / 19 r· ge 8604 / 6/1.41 1 / \ n., 4# - ~«3*31221 --,_- / 1 i 03 7.r'--_ ,- SARD x«-- / f ~ ~~ .cf~ --9-~41, "221-~-- -iii-- <gs,- \ / / '~AG EA ENT ;Nv / \ lower 8r>86 i = 8585 A SPHALT 8589.2 - 1 "t, EDGE OF Er C 40?ANS. , N 8575.0 1 8596 1. 2 1- -- / 9 :- 1 / ./ 1 1\ 1 -- - O S'die 8,2 - 0.4 8588 - -2 - -- 32'-21 -- / 1 ... i / -- - IR-4.D 414/1 RE Ati~f/,-- 1. / / 8586 7 ---,9 - -- / 401.4 / ... /40 - / / - 1 - i / 43 / /./RADIUS cAP L.S. O. 5*« / // i / 1. 2 , O- 8569.49 / to. / / /(®--13 l* / ARC - - 1077 cre des# hcorporo teel / 1 - 1 J , ~ LOT 18 4* / / / f~~71 5 0 Copyrjght 2004 Eric Johnson Architect, / /// DELTA - 47: P.C 0 453 ACRES //- Thi, doc-ent, the Idecs \ / 1 1 1 ...1 1 1 ~ 4*-1.16 4- 8584 0~,/ ~ ' ~ her-In. as kn *,str~-ent / -- 0340 66 - 85.36' Johnson Architect, P.C ¢EWER •'L / of professkir/k ser,kes 1 / 285727 95) TAN - 42.80' Is the property of Eric - "fANHOLE M < RADU-4<& ~ ~59,2.1' / / f-/14/W ELEV 03433 / / 4 8578.0 / p-- ond Is not tobi used. In // / whole or h part. for nny /7//6/ / oth-· project .ithout written Iuthortitton of ..4 - --'..,t-2 - AS-LS ELEVA DON~---y ~ DELULF\475,00' BRG - C DATE, INV. ELE -=5 8565.0' A ,*8573.7 26 MARCH 2004 251°21'2 - - ~~~-303~'07"-1 / 455~0 / / 7- - - --~--- 1 1--- 1 / / REVIStONS, 1% \ 1 / 1 V - /-/ / 1 \ /l / I / . / \ 7 --- - V586.7 / '8575.2 / - 1 1 / / -- -- - M \/ 1 - N / .2 \ / / / /*8578.5 - // i \ / - \ \ \ 1 ---- 4/ DELTA = 57'07'22" RADIUS = 195.00' \ \ -% \ - - - - 7- / 85»7 1 14/33\ i - ARC ,/ \ - 194 41' \ - 857%#- -'- YOTE RIDGE --- -,43 -- - -- - - 00 R o.\14 -1 SITE PLAN ---- (56 1 8582.8 - - «-%67 -- - - -«85808 - ~- - ·~ SCALE: r = 10'-0' NOISIAIa N001 6 8 I 107 DaI 8 03 '[loAY 91*E xog '0*d ONPId ddul q 04 \ \ L . U'.598: I - ' .& /. -- · r..1 1 i··49 4 - - ·· 1 .. - h .: ··. ··t../,I' I.· 2- 1/1 / - , 1 P.44=riA»*4.- . - . ,€- , . . .1 -2 C : 11, A 1 . 4,96 8 - ;7 0 6*- 4·4*0*449:3 ",-349.l,$4'·:i:i,- 4$2 i &3 ..'9,62*~i»-44 42--·''*~~ c c *12 23 2 =p+ZI. - 3 -- 1,4311./1...11'M(4496$... r414 flf£24 "2''bRF =tril. I .. 3- f / /1 1 3 \ ,1.-11+TI -- ...«4 - C '3*$'f.. 3 £ *595 5. ~ / I C'-0 3 0' SLOPE 1/h NTENAN(.1 ORA!NAGE 00. & ENOW STORAGE LASEMEN' 1 \ \E>/ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1\ l-/ 1 1 7 055.-%- . ~1 0.---~~~- 1 (1N FEET ) I f linch = tO " 47- , .glMiaaillimillillilillid LOT 17 , . 34/ ~4. . 49./: / yfrp/ f XO *% f '49 / limpM--Illizil-1.e=ynall-li--1- / / 1 .--m..--.m™..™GM~~ --1·~~ *&€~:Ep Ii-4~ 04 7 *rl, 7 .4--~IFA~I:~~IZIlilltil.~-~rflid 1 - 1 1 240/9 J/1 0 Z l l 4/ 5 90 .1-4/ f 1 %38 RADIUS = 375.00' , 1/ 7 / // 1 DELTA = 31*56'18" 71.\*r , ~ ~ LEGEND ME = 209.04' 1 / -- ~ /f f ~ ~ ® MAN'OLE (SEWER) ~ MEW POIN 1 (SEE DETAILS) l 2590 *8 // ./ R / 'j / / // ~C#.--0. 2,- FC•eND 13'N A<- 7,0 832E CK] EliC, METER/IRANS -U- STOP .jGN EASEMENT EDGE Of ASPHAI T , 1 / 1 7.»21\ ta Clmou , ---- - -- 'NVELOPE./STIOACK O PROPERTY I INI 1 ' ./.I '11 - - - PRO'IE PIY LINE (AD O N"/(1) . 29"W _ - -_ - FLOWLINK OF DirCH / 11\ li \ 1~ A ---7 // 0 / , f // / /2 (147 / 4 /0.-- -4.---- .4. / N 8589. 2 1 / B >572 7 4 / VP, 1 1 91 \/// 1 i - 475.00' I / .5~,7 1-DELTA = 3'37'07" ARC = 30.00' 0.453 ACRES / / /4 £ Er j\} C / 9 //f f f /9 / / / NOT, S 185881 / I ~ f //2/ / N & , 89? 5 2 1) DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY 12/1/2003 2) BASIS OF ELEVATIONS- SEV¢ER MANHOLE MH0340. RIM ELEV. = 8572.1'. INVERT ELEV. = 8565.0' 1 J / / / 3) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THE SURVEY W'Fl HiN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT IN NO EVENT. 0 f // f 4 -- - FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. d K - b 0, --7 // 6 MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT TN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS J .0 .l /- ~*8576.5 ' 8 3 ./ 0 42 THE BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ARE PER IHE RECORD - PLA FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. \ | / , 1 d 5) VERIFY CURRENT BUILDING SETBACKS AND RESTRICTIONS WITH THE PROPER GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 0 8587.0 - - 9 0 SUR\'EYER'S CERRFICATE . Eli ~8577.7 ·5& •: 5~>86 7 1 1 19 RADIUS = 195.00' !, SAMUEL H. E CKER. A PROFESS (:NAL LAND SI:RVEYOR RE¢ NTERED UNDER 1,41[ LAWS OF III[ SIATE C / / i - I DELTA = 57-07'22" 8579.2 ev OF COLORADO. De HEREOY CERLF7 THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHI.. MAP WAS WADE BY UE AND U+-DER MY ~ ,*~) SUPERVISION, AND THAT TIlE MAP IS ACCURATE AND CORREC 1 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLE:,GE. \\\ ARC = 194.41' .4 4 uv*.:.· · 1 41 3 liw:,P,t / ,.nullul /, 09 8,+-M.£46 a 0 6-1 SAMUEL H. ECKER t~[ i ---------_22-*«._--117424-342-1 'esso./ COL ORBOO P L S No. 3009 3 .fftz/.1-.ee#~ ~ / *1~80.6 - / FOR AND ON BEHALF OF 2 \* 8585 3 - --- 8581.8 GORE PANGE 55::RVEriNG FiC X.,1.4[ ik~~ ~ v- i #+7"lliu# -- i R 4 4500·629 (026) x?J OGYPIOU 70¥3 6~43 dVIN 31 eric CO//trull.. piesent itk•' P.O Box 2088 Vail, Colo,do 81658 Tcl: 970.926.5192 -x FI: 970.926.5293 r Cell 970.390 6b98 BEDROOM 2 / 0 T. 0. FIR ./1\ 12 X 14 1 El: 76'-1 / , PALO \ BEDROOM 2 10 X 28 \ 14 X 16 / A 48:Alzsl .5 ~ T. O. FLR Mol / BEDROOM .3 .,4//9 WI'-6- BEDROOM 3 EL: 76'-1 I AR. 1059.6 f-T~ 2 1 1'[RiMET [R 1 G/'-5· 14 X 14 o\ 12 X 14 \ / ---/14 /PO 8 2 14 9 1 w U l 01 RECREATION / j BEDROOM 4 j RECREATION BEDROOM 4 1 STORE ~ '83 83% ROOM 12 X 13 ROOM 12 X 14 16 X 18 0 T. 0. FLK - 1 0 0 ca e O U.1 4 10 X 20 C j T. O. f LK // EL: 79'-00 / ~ CD MECHAINICAL Tv - j o z 1 - 2 0 1 1. « 10/ i i ROOM F « 2 K 01 < /1 T. 0. Mut\\ Ul 1 -,7 EL: a 11-0\ \ STR +to STORE / 1 CAR % ¢ TO. FLK / EL: 81 1-0. GARAGE 24 X 24 0 T.O. FLK EL: 76'-0' SOG T. 0. FLR EL: 86'-0" . Co•Fl't 2- T. O. fLK / 0 EL: 91 '-0' a :-1. n„„... /./.:/'..AO..=C: GiLfT.~. TO. FLR -4 -1 .0 . 14.•. 69 EL: 89'-7 := Uwr=: 0 T. 0. FLK 2==t--w* [L: 9G'-V .TE: 20 ALI 2004 REV]11011· A 2.1 LO-WERLEVER_PLAN Clj SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0· 1091 44= + 1 1 41 4=* 1 159 0 £74: NORTH NOISIAIG fins ZIDanIal Im f NDOUS 8 I 1.07 isva (InIC['[IM LUL DE918 03 'NOAV '114£ XOG OI DI.AVId 39230':19 eric 1 -/.9, construct:on p'n-tollon PO Box 2088 Vail, Colorado 8[638 Tct 970.426.5292 Fax. 970. t16.5293 Cen: 970 390 6698 GREAT RIM 61 4 9-1 1 / T. 0. FLK. Q TO. FLK ~ El: 86'-0. ININ/d DECK 97 EL: 56.-0$1 Vt / MASTER *T. O. DECK Z 8£&820 M 1\\\ iN GREAT R 14 x 18 E E 0 M A.**ER ' BEORDEM ~ 2 ' OPEN BELOW El % 16 x 13 /« / -1- - 0T.O. FLK. i f EL: 96'-0» i KITCHE ./Gift RM 0 4 1 //7 9 2 8 8 OPEN T. 0. FLR. U#no DELD 1.-1 EL: 9G'-0» ~ W C 12 , 20 \ ~~~ 1 559% 7 x 12 - 1 1 Iii < 0 E \ 1 4 04 #1.rE. i k E \10 1 9 41\C f /4/ e---- ATTIC 8 x 12 ~ FOYER STORE / 0 T. 0. FLK. EL: 91 '-0" 1 12 x 24 2 CAR\ 9 EL: SG'-O T. O.FLK 0 GARAGE Er' ..... lilliect. 22 , 24 5.':32.....7........#Ir 0 TO. FLK. 1.-zie 47 EL· 96'-0' It~- gro,~ct .t-,1 2=tz~=re.t.1 0, .1. 20 .1/ 2004 "EVIstols• + A 2 UPPER LEVEL PLAN k--I-/ SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' 1 /co eF + 9% 6 +P . 1 1 9+ 6FN0RTH ISVE[ GVON 00919 03'NOAV '5!DE XOR Od DIA¥'Id 3911020 39 8 I 101 eric ~ constructic' I-entotier, P.O. Box 2028 Vail, Cotorado 81650 Tcl: 970 926.5292 Fax: 970.926.5293 Cell: 970.390.6698 . 1\\ 43 €j DECK ~E AT R M t.1 I 20 X 20 GREAT RM f 1 - / 18 X 20 ' DINING RM \ DECK DINING RM 14 X 18 / 6 X 8 FICE ARE:~. 1 324 FT - 14 X 16 AKEA 1 1 80 FT - 2 13 5 rt~METER I Gz-a' 0 T. O. FLK EL: 89'-0" f«f FERIMCT[K IG ' OEM 9 X 12 -. 4. 4(2 ZEM 1 0 T. 0. FLK \\4 ,// U.lozo EL: 86'-0" d /\0 1 ; DO 16 x 20 0 UD ~, FOYER KITCHEN~ ~ 203@ LU J '·'21 14 X 16 -· 4·\ 00 KITCHEN J . DOM4 \ 1 -41 0 - 00 C / 1 M Z \\»/ V 0*00 - 34 52 > DOWN J COVERED a m R: < 5 R. 2 CAR GARAGE · 0 T.O.f 1 A E 0 T. O. FLR EL: 8 1'-O» \ ENTRY EL: 91 '-0" 3< » C » {/1 24 X 24 FN r FOYER ~ U D <C~ i~h TO. FLK EL: aG'-O· 0 T. 0. 1 11 11 4 EL: BIL 9 /%1 / // 0 COVERED M £9/ 6/ : ENTRY / il 0 inly'.=.,„.. It I.*.-Mt. I. -Il 1 CAR I.'I•/C~ I.Cht/Ct. PC 11 X 20 EFEEE,r rh To. FLR 97 EL: 86'-00 *JLLY 2004 RE VisIt»ls; 4x des¥ DECK X# MAIN LEVEL PLAN /1-0/ 4_. SCALE: 1/4· = 1'-0- 11 80 er + 1 624 el== 2-S©4 +F. NORTH NOIS GUIAA / PO 0191 8 02) 'NOA¥ 66 I VE XOW Od DIAV'Id HDMOED %'CLEI 014 -0- Ee El[V *12'-0- eric £)4 ELI v..r°15 ~ 9,G /O .... El]*11-111!11Ut _1],Ji[LI 11 2-I_] L ----I--- 1.1-1 11-1-211Ll.El]-13 LJI_131_11_1-LIE-11 -1 LU-1111-!,In 1~--41-L u..ELLil LUULL des'71 111_{1 -111UL-1111_LitliLUUUE[-11_11-[1]L_[1]11[ i - 'LLULNJUU]1UU1111]1[-lL]UU_11111¤111-UL Const,/clk. 1-11%%Ylf-[-%>JUflthidfi[-j]-uu Ull-]22£1L].211UU] ~2 ELEV 006·-cr Presentotk,1 1]11U1_[flULLL[1_]LL[1-L[t-1-1-1L_11_ttL_U-1- ..L[LU_] . 9,004 P.O. Box 2088 Vail, Color.do 81638 E]1_1111_{Li_: -11_11-jt[1»111-Ulll-1.1 jl-11] LI-1 L ].1 L_El t . .. L-l}11-11~6?i]~2%194Ffitll 1_8111111 _11U_[LLLI]_][_1111_-1 i-[1 -fl Tel: 970.926.3292 Fax: 970.926. f293 Sree,2- - -ill. 111~~jf€»A]1.11-_11.U_11..d_lil--,1.L[[ 11.j 3111 11UL_[1-[LiULLE Ellit.11_111[-1[3]-ELILI · L.11111.-llylk{L · ~ Ce) 970.390.6698 -1_N_1111-1]_11-[ 11]111_ 1 1] ElLIi-[1 11 1-11.1Lt UNUU]·-j]..I-1--IL-[Ut ~1_11.1-]_IL_fILLI[1[11]U I _ ~Ilt[L]11]-2-1111-11_11-] 11. 1.i [[-1]- 1 ' :ILI11[1Ulll[-1-11.-12111.-11 131 111.I_11_[1111LiUU 1.ELLI 1111-[U[_11 {L LU! 1.1 3 i I [ . 11_11-1.H 01]_1.1131 11[1-1.1-1 -Il-11 [1--11.111L]111 ELE¥ 96'-0- Un'i L~UL~tl]_[1_11 [Llf. ~ 1,] d L 1 I ~ -r-- f U-Zr~ 1 U.i_»141]]- [1].1-fl· ~1[Uj_[llLIJ_]11ULU . - . _[[El 311121_U_1~LI-i_U , LULL11JULLLEU_11_1111 %59§8 1 : . -877 4-- 1--23~- , 1.. .. .. a . li .. f. 1 I . -11 lili lilli 1 . I 2~6 ELE¥ 86·-0· 1 / 7% . ----- -CZES--- -021 -22~229 - Z \ . . 0 292*6 . ~---- ~-+~~--- ~jo- --~--~-~--- : W p U E tz · 21 9. 753 0 . ... gIl I O E eG city 76.-O- 20 4 - C j'J ;f _ -3;Elb - --- ----- a~vas 7 Exit,r,He, 03 5%Oi I. . SOUTHE-LEVATIOL_-_~__2Md~_ N@28% SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' NORTP :; 52 f./ 2 ELEV Nt4'-0' 8 lott 5 0% 4 3 [_11-11..11 1-11[_111-[1_11_1 i 111_il _11-1 LI I_11.L -11 L ELEV 112'-0 31-}10 11]1UL.[tiL[! lili 2211[9 1140-!UU=J-isidilj)1L1--11- 1 66,; g 11_111[12 1 ~ 1-11-3-Ill-11-]UULLL[l-Lut-liI[trILifulatikiL18111 Ul_]13 LI.L] 1_-ILLOI_11-1-1.332[jilj_LI]_i i Tri nIT-11 Tri T Li-[If In 1' i , -O-1 , Ul_]t_0_1-1-_]I 111-Il-11.11_11_IUUL[1111_11]_[Ll[UtlEUL1[11]11U11L]].11 Liat_LI L J.EL] 12]_1[ 1!-LI_[[_d_LE[_-[21]211-[1.1[jUUz[UUUMUUUL].1- 11. L ~i I 1 _11 1 j _1.LU- .-_U--[1.I _11_11 -lili _LLL[ - LiLLL!]J ELE¥ 106'-0 U il I I %911-11 . 800<0 . 1.1----- IL!' 1 -13 ·· 1 , Ell] 1_11 4 111]lan-UL_ Umt» 1 i 1 41 I ... .... ft I . ./ 1 C¥V 1-79 2,-7-?r- Q ELE¥ 98' -c- u l ill: · 3*02-53740 u~ 89 10 . -'. ..... 1 -r-v (») L. 0 7--27-%23 ' ~ '22.J 1 U 1 111 - ET##795 - -Pri --*-- <*53 414*6 0 ~00 1 . -4-0 d~ ' • i ./t-4 -A-*.... O E./ J.... I . . E . 4 0 ... 1 -... ELEV 86'-0~ MEL '6 .. .. 9484 - - REVI:10* . .-I-.--Il-\ - - EX1911 4/f€K eR,NES UX} C 1 L.r .. O 1132 c b'f -, 9 ¤7~ ELE¥ 76 -0~ - ~ ~ ' Ah All ELST-ELEF. 8-INL________._=12= SCALE: 1/4.• = I'-0' NORTH DE918O ELEY 114'-0 eric ~ 6#2!4- ELEV 112'-0' --- -*- --------------------------------- --1£-1TZ>N --- ---- - -- Se 19- -1 ELOY :10'-6- ----0---------------- tad=1= , \63»»03021t---_______ -113» I -= .41,1 -0-*4 1 11 43=U=Fl= ' - -~ 4- - - -0,10.e ELE¥ 106'-0- »C«©40-119 -- - -qll------- -r- . . >« hu --* -- -- .-1-6---J Vail, Gor•80 81658 8902. 065'OD 1 rr PO. Box 2088 El=3 -=5 -_ _ 0--2- 3- 1 lili 1.-1: /..4=93#«21- 33-3.-lat Tel- 970.926.5292 Fu: 970.926.5293 Cell:970.390.6698 3. plj- .. 1614=«tn=4492411 0/1*$991->~-~ 9 J_ Ii--ime:gin*8 ham 121=_ » 1/431[4 «931 ---- i =37.- i -r· ..» 4. 7~7- :·fit MCA ,!. .1 N - ELEV 96-0- , 1 73 \-<2461- - 1 -4 - I- 0.5-»r AR»0 11 - · ne -Ir' 5 - 0 I %-1 =====. (09 A ir .- -- 3 -) . . 4 01 E 53 Unc DE -I--..di:. .. ,ifi Le 4 1- 6 4 4 · | CONCRETE WALL . 0322 . ELEY 86·-0- · • p.q 66 80 It ----ili1-1----- IJI- L» -ul '_2_9 - - - - _ __ | ___~~~1_/2* In~ 1 _~.„,~_~_ __ L_ -_ __ __ .. - --==- exlei-#4& . -A I + 4 .. I. 192*23» - -Veece :4. 054 1 . . ?A g.w <C)>Clepan ~pr-, pr"Ar~-~C~ .- 1131 . . te,-1 . I.-14 Zi< 8 #1 :2 AQ o Eq . ELEV 76'-0~ -1--- . -2870 -4 a O 02 Lf--- ----_--_--------- 03 52/2 -- 4//- NORTH ELEVATION - ~@38 C/) 2 50 SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0· NORTP 424 O#00 Be· El/V *14'-0- 53#4 -~T-Ul_JL~.1.11 --iri lu j~i~IJi-ji j~ 3 lj- jj [D Uu-Unl L[.1} 10_[1 JitfI~E LL- - -1 _0&/2- 0 0 111111 11'1-1-1-[-[[1-11-mT I Ill ull Illill lilli 11 Illlillillili ilill 2,9 ELEV 11,2·-0 -1'Flilli[-lf]-t]7|Ill il '! I Il inT-Ii-i-Ill[-1--1[30=~1 11 H lili 1 111.11 ! H illili Il Ill Illili It 1111 2 Ue,rt<3*f[-f[- T-1-1-199111[-n--11--1~~1 [lf--1-1 [i[1;~Ii .·1~ti-'-rmi 1 -ui ii n-~r--i--n-u i-T~- 777*~ F'hi' T j'frl- AP 1 '«-4-1LL1f9&~Fll IZ II H U I -41{-Ir-1091[ 111-~ p,ek-1-1111[TT E-9-F 111 If- 9-1 fTP-[[1111-ITT-111-[- 1--11--ill 4\+/ · 11-1-11Til--{flir Trl[-16~ 11 11 it-~>11 lil i I HI Hlu'Illil INNII Il 1 -F-i[ tnrn 970 ELEV .06'-0 Ihi "Ii" illill £11%-1 " 1 11111 j Ill I li 111 l 11 1 ! 11 -1 - 1] 31-]TE[-[[ ~ 3 6€20 'ULL[[ L[Il,LILU LI!-111Lli _L]1_1111 -11-11_LL· .__ - - -7EU[-1141-11-11-} F- ~[-1-1-11-1[ 1 [11 li }-1-1,1- fliT[u85>0~D4-f_- --ILJI -1-_1_. LL -I-F[13[TT-[T T[IMTH==- : · i f¥i] [1.. FE[-f[3[fiT[-ITT[fi-Inflt-1[11-11-T -[-1-EltTE[ T[-[-Of-[fT-1[11-1- -[ETE[Ell--HT[- TI I NT--IT[ [19[ [-11 -Fll-112€>r - 1. 1 k -1 \746411 11 11 11 li l l i ... ·E ..&&047 . J lili 114-Ill Il MI l il HI Il HI Il HI ll Il- i llil ll PH Il Ill TIT-Nl 11-[En--11- ITITIi--11'~,-R- [t-1-1-1[-1[1 ri [Ii,[A>r ii i NUJ-1 Il ll i ' ' 1 : 11 - Il 11 Ill I Ill I Ill 1 911 j IiI HT" '~ "~~ 11!_LE-2~3 11:lilli [[-111' f--11 »/ / [ !1 lili 1111141.11 7 , ·S· d -- «--r=-Z 11 1.111 ,3...I . - -i 41,r l.. 1.11 -771 . ¥ -tict ~*f . 615£14:, 0 11 1 U===4%- 2,19 ELE¥ 96.-0- .-- -'wri - li ilt 9#h i .. ..r'.6.-,„ ----- #=4*19~ / ~ ,,~>fiticitilt- <f/7-< <e>< ~_-=J- - *:;7 - .,r-- 1 li d : -7 ----7 . - : 41 33 - rh=7*-- ==:r=te,7 95 ELE¥ go'-0- it ' . i . 13220.,LE> 2, ---0--~4-~-------1-----L________-_---T--------- . */r==F/AM ~---t.», o, .TE• .. 72 20 JAY 2.1 4 B <'>-3 \-__ -----22 7---2»a ," :... 111 ii. I lill:ell i 8G $69 ELEV 86'-0~ 1..134- . 2,-r-.F-- - -·· - --4 .111111 --H-4 1, ii I 1 -:1 »+ I 11,1 L i 0 -.---* -~ - 9 -----7---- - ---4-- 41#~9729~2-1--- - _r------c- -7 -~-I'll.--=31=95\ 2%<671 91 1{*-S-·-;ZI/_---gr <'ll--' -*-- -2//71---cu h~ >21 ,-««---.3/1. 135/ , __~r It>c>-tp---:=m~,ap---3 =f=i-t : :..- i ./ -t ; 10 4..it 042,5¢E .. :. 1 *71 4 .· t ./ ... - 4 ----r- i - 84 ELEV 700- ~b«S-·J 64=1 ~ | ~ 86-16, --. 4-0---*- -..-I-/--- ------I.* *'.-*.- 1/ -0--M - _dx A 3.2 £l/ EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' = I'-0' NORTH r-- r-- I--- NOE (101 'N AV 'RvE X08 Od JIAV'Id 3{)MORD Staff Report Minor Project COLORADO August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date August 9,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Landscaping Modifications Legal Description Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Address 71 Beaver Creek Place Introduction The applicant, Mark Donaldson, has applied for a minor modification to existing landscaping to this property on behalf of American National Bank. The lot was originally approved as Empire Savings and Loan, and subsequently transformed from a bank with a drive through to a medical center. American National Bank is beginning a tenant finish to reestablish a bank at this location, and would like to remove existing vegetation and a number of mature trees. The application proposes to remove 17 mature trees, a mix of cottonwoods and pines, as well as 1,000 square feet of existing sod and the large shrubs in front of the building (facing Beaver Creek Boulevard. The trees proposed for removal have been flagged with blue tape. Staff will provide a full size landscaping plan for review at your hearing but recommends that you individually visit the site if not acquainted with the extent of mature trees that currently exist. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The proposed revised landscaping pIan will not affect the structure. Improvements to the structure that affect the exterior shall be separately applied for by the applicant. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. While there is certain necessity to removing several overgrown and mature trees to create visibility to the site, staff questions whether or not all 17 trees require complete removal or instead if some of these trees may be sufficiently trimmed to create sufficient visibility. That being said, the Town does not have a tree preservation ordinance and the necessity of increased visibility (for safety) to the bank is an important priority. However, it may be prudent to approach a project like this incrementally and remove only those trees and mature shrubs that are absolutely necessary. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 11. Lot 70. Block 2. Benchmark ar Beaver Creek Subdivision. Minor Project August 17.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The proposal to remove mature trees may impact the aesthetic values if all trees proposed are removed, since the site is so prominent from several different view. The landscaping continue to have a 'mature' look and curb appeal without impacting the operation of the site. The guidelines state that "Landscaping should accentuate a project design, not hide it from public view". All in all, we would recommend taking a hard look and cautious approach to the removal of any mature trees from the site and recommend that the civil/maintenance work occur without the necessary removal of as many trees as proposed. 4. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. As proposed for approval, the project appears to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town and appears consistent with the Design Guidelines. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the revised landscaping plan for Lot 70, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. The following modifications are approved: a. Removal of the large cottonwood in the curbed island of the last drive through lane only. b. Removal of the two cottonwoods and large shrub area in cobble on South Elevation (facing Beaver Creek Boulevard). 2. The pruning and maintenance of all trees and srubs without removal. Individual trees may be subsequently reviewed for removal by the Commisison in concert with a revised sign program for the building that places the visibility needs of the new tenant in context. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4017 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, / 12.-(5,6-li:~. Tambi Katieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 RECEIVED AUG 1 1 2004 Community Development F.7=7-37-7 Tf€fF@(r----jil,1.'-CEF.i:.11,7...,1,1':,1- •---1---EFIE'ju':-gikx:-i-~ 1 11-- 1-.7241094641 1.1..lili'l'f - 2*,Ld&, 11...11.429@111,1./1 - 1171 . J'liU~ViUm'#17444..1. J-.78ilii "1~-,Wh I lilp b-i ' Ad' ../ l.-1 J --,r'U e~ph' -1 '1:h 21"2 -17. 2 - ill 1 6 1.' · - - L'11. 14-1 1 111 t.1- i 111 1 -94#F .p * .1' - / 1.Aj-i~-~~ ,~~~ ,~~,i~, ..IL, III *+4 ®[1 < P - -- p-\'t d. . - .3- ' 1 1 - - UN · Luuff#-4.1 - Ek] - -- -U mr - ,-42 ) 1 550 4 111 , 0 - 4 ' -0 [10 11?ip ~ » 2 --7 - J 10 00 0 4-2 - - b r.2- 1>1 116')f 43 Speculative Residence 1 -1 1 TOUUU=I- A10 6eneral Notes 4 .•tbreviatiores mpp design shop - Al.1 Site /1// - Lot 5, Block 3, Wildridge 9.1 Lower 4 Main Level Floor Flens Kll Upper Level Floor Fla, 4 R//f Fle/ 34999 Highway 6, Unit G201 Avon, CO 81620 e.1 Eabt 4 North Ele'/ion' PO Box 4227 ~31 /1652 • South Bevt Ions. Building/Site Section Edwards, CO 81632 tel - 970-390-4931 fax - 970-390-4931 RRB-final-Reign--2!*mjeler! August 02. 20(24 039 l8 OD 'UOAv eSPuPHM 'C >IDC)lEi '9 101 - 556®isek@Xi*iin55* ABBREVIATIONS 6* * - - = a ..51. - - - - - - - - I - r 2, E-M # ---k - #*-> -- -- -'-Ir , -L, W.LL...L - V¢ W- -- 4.- I *--I=. r d Ah@% 6.a-I.&.-t- f-.- ---W 0 c 91 ' m -C.- RS: - 2.95 1 --- 7 -- r - i i== 0. mrne- .Irr#...r- •r - 1€ 0- =0 == - a -5•r -- -- - - I - - - D€. K- - - - - GENERAL NOTES 1) All woric shall M 08 4,ec,ned ald In a=ord-,ce with all N.ic'll. su£, ./ La:al Codes. Le,26. Permits /:d 0-dir-ces. /la shell b) performed to // h1®est st-,derdD or cralli,/*ship Iyert of the apprwriate trades. 2) These dec-e,~ #re nit irtended to lr,cklde & il//. msteri•16. /*I~ment. and le:¥ices reallred to complete . u=k described heret,h The Ge~ral Cc,ltrasltar (6,0 6hall verW, 011 dirrw:rek;f,5 2-*:1 ste c<,r~itic,6 before st-Ung UkAL 31 It is the re,Spf,15kility of thi 6£· to bring to The *ter,1,12 / the Ar,hilect -9 c.orrditic,8 -ish will d permit co•structic,I acc</ding to the Irte,ltions & these C<:,ltr~Lt Doc-els (GC7sj. a,d to nctlf; the ~rchi~ect 0t Once I an, dlea·ep-,cia appe, 'the C476. or betpeen the /275 -d ex]/4/Irdltle»/. i 16 tre resp,ribibilit, d t.h® Architect to pra,idc dets,Th e,td/or dire n, re,dIng des!~ ),tert u,here It 1, aaered 4 existing c<Jn'Itle,~e or where netectcd / the document' 4, P. O~: A ,•411 'Imenbic,·15 take pre,eder•le mer 'caled /]mem.- B. Al pkarl dirrer/10// are to face oF concrete. face & stud. Ed "r"r Nne o¥ ca**Vbesm./0/. C Floor to floor /imensicis ere from top oF p~u,rd £7· top / co·~Grete. 0034. 9 The 6£1. 5/1/11 be re s"Or,5*le for the 64/4 /1/ care / 2*ijacclt pr=pertles aur·Ing u:r,6truotlon. For compllznce with feder-al -¥~ st,ta O.SIA re,J,~lons. and For th, protecticlrl of all 4©rk urrtll It 16 delrvered ~Jrr~eted to the cu,·*:r. 6) The 60 4,811 verify arld c.ocrdir;ate all openin,5 thra.ligh Floors. ceinre. 29.I wai' ul'h all Arch'tectural. Stn.,ctural, Mech~11081. Pk/Mbing. 1/d Elestrical dralinp. 1, The.kt sle shall be m,Ttained in a dem. crderilicrditic,I, Free Gf debr-15 ark, iltter. and s~911 net De u,re=Dc,lably e,~4•nbered. mach SLb·<Lontracltcr shan rm™>,e 80 trih m·,d debris a / r-¢91,1/ 5 his/her c¥eration wra, completle' 0/ h./tier work. N The! 6. sh..m* .1 rezess·-w /17cking. backir·19 0,!d Frz,mng k*- Ii# fixturek eledricai Ilits. AC. equir:•ent. rec.essed items. #ther items a reqUired. co F•rovi. smoke detectors in accorda,Ge with 1€¥r, uac; sec# 310.91.4. la) The 6.6 shan p-e.fide eros,or, Corerol ~, ca-rform2,162 with Tcu,; Of *. guidennes. 19 The (c//truction limft fl~e / the c.arrtract line. Don//d/turt, Eng ex/ing trees cr ~eget0tkn des,·,ated to remmn or located (,wt&ide ¢f the construalon I mt }bne wilhcd ~veval & the Tal·,1 or /•vo•1. 12 The G C. shall ver#% exist*,g sit• Wmr-tion. inck.ding .drel. Irtilltiek 7///gs. /71" / roealle.// curte //4/kn U=t m/9 8//lthe "//2 OF Wor·k Frlor to beginnll 'Re r.<,rEbtructlon. 13) Exi~tk,g utilities are ~dic,~ed For informatk,1, cr,Ig and not i,tended to 'haw exact k,catk;,1. The Irth,leta I... resp<.sible For the k>catic• oF u,ilder,(11/ utilitieb or 'truclures. 0 2,1~:,thing not shaun cr detalled =d i~stalled by e•'!Il olher contract The 6 c. 02,11 locate all utilitles 2,ld mair£a. the lasib during 811 "ase' of the work -The G./. shall be res'ximible For any d,nages to utilities or- struc.tunes 2,Id 2.3 kjwries therefrc•n. R.estoration oF 344 //tee d//¤,ged bg the e.C sh,~1 be at the 6.0.9 exper,- 14) C<mfon,1 to Eagle Rlver 'Wter a•,d en'lu,tlal 016trict specIFk,atlor,& for wier and sauer constructic,L Ma~.ta,1 10 fee~ mi,Omum separat#een w,¢er 0„d seller *er.a,rd service pipes Ma'tain level Feet m'ni"rt,n ce'er . under,-a,d w~er lerviu. Sewer Mrvic.2 shall hal,¢ m././.-er ./ 5.6·. pro,ide se,ler lk:,n ./. wRh kx,e,k. to le revieued *a ....ed IM Ir-Bel 15) The 6.0.. shall //'ide dr-ing, shavirl, propoeed I.*ilitu scrvice corneak=re Fc, I c.~tined CMI enp,eer, re,,iew pric,· to constructicm. 16) "ad cuh "0 -4 other u~tru,bor, 6, rcid ri#-ef-·waW shal Gc,IF~nn to Tiue of /1/.4/elm. Tl) / cc,MF==lks,i sh,11 be in ==cord/·/se wlth the Soils Report prepe,-cd 5,1 the Issue Date laotechricaA In*necr. F..1 De..1 060*- 129 ///0* 1,1·IX= nctift/le„ & MI /15/re,-=.les t,ctueen exist),0 -i propoied Ile *1///emer~. 19) All Sut>·C€,trectorrs) shill take all recess,w Btap* as re/5/red to prope,19 protect // Inar,tain his u,ork Fa ther aurtki oF thi cortract. 20) The,e dr-0•, do rla ®pecl, 6,0 ®41 r™~cri-. e~*Iipl,-. method, or 684£-,0 to prete,t pet„C•$ 2,7/ propert¥ 1 5,98 be the 60.b respor..1.1/ to drect md 'nplemert -fet" Oper~lons .1. procedures to protect le 0.1,1//, c*her (cr,tractori. the Filblic. 0/0 /*hers. 21) All 'Arrk mhan c.ompl /Ith $ applicable codee -1 or#/16·es. 22~ Tr~ GL. 9-1 emplq, I licersed ~Jrvewor to establiN, all wcrk * :a) ,etes -d details c~ spech. dravn,s take precedence over gerera ™ctes and t,pt' det0.. *lk:b or dis,LrepE,Ide~ u,ith ,·ades ah,NI be -* . the 2tter£k~ . the _Job runber /403 Archltect -dl'.# I.'-10, to procced~g with uok. Drat. ty ./. :5) Al] nn),hed.ndes 'hal! provide For r~*,r~ rvls,f or w-r- w,th,4 - Ists Checked by: cr pockets Set Flow 'res ==Lr~21, 'd provide I * r 1596 4.lert WOA Pra.ing Title 26J er,a-10 reA,d oFF tcpo -Id tcess . all pt-rted ,lopes. u.0- General Notes :70 "ad, I""1 f¥-cm, Ill Ex,ildln, M a minirrun Blope of 1096 Ir, LIT/.0 arias =d 4 Abbreviations m»,1~n 'lope of 296 / peved -ca6 20) Cle-afts st- be prrveed for 011 oF=nges in line,6 1,1/or grade or the .2,#t-¥ Sewer se rvice Sheet *der: Al.O 11,/ 1,&%,pihiwithn,&11 E LE¥-9th 1 1 1 : : 1 0 1 1 1 * 4 i i I 1 2 2 i 4 [8 03 'SPJDMPE !un '9 ADMLISIH 666ft 05p!.PlaM 'E )Pole '9 101 'dolls US!sep ddu] eouep!seN GA!+Dinoeds 039 8 OO 'UOAV /-1 n u = 143.25 ARC = 258.92' - -V 'I / 9-]r ~ 4 TANGENT == 72.00' ~ T.AiN(JENI/-- 139.95' \~8376.1 f----WUR-1-00-0--001-0---0-'A-5-1- - r 8380.0 1 83833I CHORD = 142.88; ~ 49109-[1 - 24-9.46' 8371 8 11- - -\ BRG = f\J 74000- .~~%BRO = i\J 86 0() 9, (50' R. o. W. ) \ \ 8381.8 1 \ 8377.3 0 *8962 8369.4 ~ 4.€-=Me \ ~*1%. - O*-7* ~ 8386.1 \ 8373 9 ,6"04-0,8.- ~21- 1 ~~O~~it: 6, -c,4 8366.8 -4 3 .,~~I<~,: '2 1~2<-11--- - 12!=-0-7(~~~''tpt-Z~---4 - J, ci- 390 .Ba>4 zc,9•18+ X ---- 8 0 - _ ·rgs,Cr =.0 - M / -% - -21 - O 6-2'B -\ .- I.Len :zi. -,1 ~ 6.*- 895.3- L - - _ 3 5 I. / -- >r .... ---- r.,- 293u z /- 8364.3 % Z V -- I -N - R©CR€ # /:r L . · 8370.6 - -- -- 9 BO- *ICA -aN•f Ch 8367.4 0/// EL+I -9 . ~ /8...I- aes.- - - - \ 0- -- -- V C. 1%\ --- - le·'r- 00 ./ l NU - :SE. 5 - I ---- .On 5-3 * - Ple FD·ICE \ ....05'. 1 ---- 4/ - - 30.- 6.696 .M,4, ~ assby · -- -- -- - 8365.0 / 841 -1··-- - / = 1 / 1 - 8 2 / ...-: '4 . r . - ./5.0. - - - · - - I T ---- .h essi, - . 1 .... +W %- .. . ~j----21<060 - - - - ----2- . v \ P · ---~21TIVCTOR MlnER149 STORA615 ---==,9 _ C_I- /r - - - <anh . /7 - cc»itk.•CrOR , _ j 70*107 %-- . 2 OL 2-~ A IRKING %- '1 - Z - -ff N \ 1- 9 - \ . %-Mb.$--i '., Ne2%6LET 451.OPE ,\ - - '1.------ - 5 3 -2 i - DIE 1 .-1-- \ b.n h - ~ ~ ---I----~'~ LE]4ibl -L«-1»~-- .~-64 ---k··Er ' ~ ~~~ ~~4...:...'.1:015% -41 -- ...2 4 · ..E,lt. &2 - \ 1 - ~- / 2- 1 i a. . 4 / -- -- - . 1 H . -\-- 04 - - --- ly-t. I. - I - - - 4.,4 ,- -FL-_ -~-- --~ .. -- - -761,33,;0*'~ f--4..*1..raie / - , 0,}*4 6.4 k .49111- - . re J r.>-I~ ·u ---„- - ' 4--P 'p/_-»' I_1>~__ E 1 -1- F»- 14=47 - Ti*41-42--- -- - 1 1 - L - - I 1 - I - ' 7.-DJ57 - }teg*--74 ,------1 #~1----Th 1 / - st -1/ 1 /9.EE_ 1*1- 4 - / -- -- - 9 - m . , %--11 - 9/ 3 - I 1 --- - - - /->2 - -- 73 1-1 7 -- - u \Low CD - --1_ N --- t./M.St.t/2. 1 / FEDa-17#177-- g h #ID 46. . -» 7 - i br --- -- ~-11 -,0~ r-~ -/ /»a--.63*·-yl/2=~_'L 1 +1 --.VT='.06E 1*. C /1-rn •G-//37 - / 14 -r--3 ~/ 1 / // . - -- 'a/=16.-29,/ I // p I w--22174/f'' 1- 3 -/ /1 / -· 1 - - -- - - 11 _»-1.. 46-7*i - r. --)- 1 19 - I (mar--- ---- F . c--7921 7 4 _ - _ 1 - *pDA-»,5· /' '-W> 26# -Ezfzur-02«4-- -1--1-2 2-4-=-un-IUI.- -2 -7-2--1-2,-*vt a - "41.17 1/ --- -0- M --- - - ~4- 2 ~ - 1 -4~ 72 4 5/ gaei lp-,4 - - 2 i 11 ~-u<?t,11&2,- 1 --r. 1.. 1 L - -L= -1-9-1 ---- ------i- - --12,0r-·===,nor31 Y ---- - -7647343 1 1- - / 8 11- 078: 2[- -- / -- . D ACCE-02 - - j / ~~___~~~~~ ' j~~~~-t=- 6~~L//r=+144-7391---- --- , /140'Fy - ,-// -- -829„-2 2-1- /4 - - - \ - - - i *12- - 10.00,3 -=r -% 1-- ---- ---- -- - -Jezvf - - - h - _ 0, Ebiall er- | 1 . 44lw¥. -- / 48;21 1/ZA, i - - - -- - - 1 2 ----1---- -Tri=- T-t-Yrcl,p02» - - i-- i r ~iff _ -1--.1 7.50'-7- _ _ - - - r- f L---/ 1 ~_-4- 66#£44~--- --- - - --- - 9,8< --r < I - - % -__ _-- n - , - *lill --1- - -- < i - - *lir'----~31,~* ~~1 · 64~6XCRES. 2 - -- 3840- - - ___-- ---1- , 1----7 / , .9-4 / ...% y- -- - 2-4/ / . 1-I#~/- -tx / ~ ~0~. ~ ~ -- - Issue Date / - K ----- ,/ \ - of) ------ -- - ~M- -i- %%~ - -- / 0 ...-* 06/02~04 / -- - 1 I --- I-& 0 -< - - -*4** 7.- I -'-7 --'/ - - c . 1 - ----- -Ki %0 - ---_ c}1 -- CD \ 1- - 32 -- / r ---- 01 '---03 -- 7-Ll SPRUCE GENERAL SITE NOTES SITE PLAN SUMMARY Sa FT SUMMARY / 7-1- 27% (PICEA PUNSENS) 1) EX]ST[NG SITE IS Ce/ERED FITH LOT 5 AREA - 632 ACRES/11.Odle SQ FT Each Unit (12) - 6' TALL COLORADO BLUE 4-_ 4 ---4---2' t--chj,q (12) - 2" CALIF'ER QUAKING ASPENS SADEBRUSH AND NATME 6FRAE€ES earage 618 sq ft 1 , / 2) ALL SEEDED AREAS TO HAVE SEED MIX CURRENT ZONING - DUPLEX REEOENCE k.4 \ / (FOFULUS TREMULOIDES) USHTL* RAKED INTO SOIL AND NUMBER OF D,YELLING UNITS - 2 Mechalical 152 sq ft r-- -- 047 / - / GENEROUSLY MOISTENED. BUILDING HEIGHT ALL.CrEEP - 35 Jcb number: O/05 Lower Level Living 1,302 54 Ft 11 3, SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED AT LIMITs OF BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED - 34'-cr Main Level Living 1,DE>4 94 ft Drawn by. -P (36) - 5 GALLON MIXED SHRUBS - DISTURBANCE TO FFREVENT EROSION AND REGUIRED PARK[Ne SP,Ce - 5 PER UNIT - 6 TaTAL Upper Level Uving 1.310 saft \31 2 1 --- SEDIMENTATION. 6,RAGE PARKING 9,AGES - 4 Ohesked bw: @ - - - - SERVICE BERIKY (AMELANCHIER 4) GENERAL OONTRACTOR TO RESEED ALL EURFALE PARKING SPACES - 1 -- ALNIFOLIA) DISTURBED AREAS. PAVED SURFACE +FREA - 4.-16-1 SQ FT - 196 Tatal Livinq per unit 3.136 94 ft Dral,ing Title: - Total M ft per unit 4,506 sq Ft Site Plan 5) AUTOMOATIC PRIP IRRBATION TO BIZ AREA OF SITE> 4096- 53.585 Sa FT - 75% --- , SNOMBERRY (SYMPHORICARPOS PRe/]IPED AT ALL NE»1 TREES AND LANESCAPED AREA - 19.596 Sa FT - 2296 LO 1 ---t- LIRMsimft.,AN T----- OREOPHILUS), SA6E BRUSH SHRUBS IRRIGATED AREA - 3.421 53 FT - - - - ou-3-7 \ \<_pat..53.-9.4 3 (ARTEMISIA TRIPENTATA SPP FROVIDED AT ALL 915TURBED AREAS TO SFRINKLED AREA - O 6) TEMPORARY IRRUSATION SHALL BE PRIP UNE IRRkSATION - 3.42·1 SQ Fr Total Building Project / + 4% SOD AREA - Sheet *Htert VASEYANA) BEE RESEEZED. Total living on site -7,412 54 n + * 1) A RAIN SENSOR F'011 BE FRe/IDED Total sq ft in site 4.012 54 ft 1. + .1 ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE - 411,2 RESEEPED P'/ FESGUE MIX NORTH 1 - Ti -- - - - - --- ---- .... --- .... - ----- --/ 0 Al.1 PRIP LINE ws us!sep ddul eouepiseN GA!+Dinoeds 39,£~ile&'40:4 4%94 KY 121 1, 16'0- 20 '71-0 02: bot.~ /4- ./ . f__L_ 11'4- raILTRIC, PHONE 4 -rV 2 ---T--r n UTILITY IC)(*rkIN | i gu Int} u I 6~5 METER TION r-Ul \=i · ·L F ' 24 7.1, + 1 %1 1 - - - ./. LOCCAT'.4 - * 1 :' ~ ---- ---- 1- ?73-DI-»=1- 1--/i.~t-- 2-4- 1 arCria/. PHOME 4 TV - 1 -tilt:<tr- 4 & ibl ,29. i 1 011,12% 'i UTIL.Irr L.CC.•DON 1 ->71-530 u.fip 1 4140 00.11 -I. 4. 1 r# 1 9- --- - --- .IV --- 14 --' et ---1 -- 9-- gr «21-4 4 304:-1 4 1 4 GARAOE - fu-- CHEN *eurz ~E£*7- r 4- #6~ - - )1-- - -- -- - M 11 E-41 - gn FAIil -C~ - »71 #!IBI 1- - 2 1 , 1 / -- -2 9 : KITCHEN 4 U Ir-11 4 2 -2 1 1]151*3 „ 4 ?? 51-6*E III-~~~ 1111 1111 i 1 A l p R _8 1 1021 3 0 I 11 0000 1 -- . 2 LU I~ 1 4- __j _ monn _ _ 1 -- k - I# - - - I - --- ~- ~¥-- ·- * . 0000-7- - 1 I / 000 Cl - - - .- - ? LVINe ROOM I• 1 .-- \ -4 -1 - I . 1 --- -DECK - UVINe BOCM 1- 1 1 DECK L n - 16'-C- 20 27-0- ./. 2.-O- =-cr 20'-<r le<r 66'<7 i -43 ~ MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN L../4==7==al- 2 ~3.2 J 58# 55 C i 16'-O- 2 2.-O- i.· 5 11-7 16·# 8'-O- . 8%0- --------ik-- i-------- -- 9 /4»·OR·r 9 1 n 152 sa ft 1 --- y~·r ME¢•MICAL E---- - - - - - - - -- -7 EM i i L____ ~ n ----1 MEeg*= 1 ISSUegate - ------ --- -- - ---CO//f l --·-- -- -- -- --7 F./ Pcs*/ IO6/02/04 3 2/1/ MIM 9 " 8 - =2221 4 - 11 1 Slic= E~EPROC*•1 i m. 81 - - - 952ie22. _ 1- 1 1 * 2 - I_ raIP - 9 1 -< ,h EL - 1,339.15· .] 7---- 19 Job rurber· 1 0... 91 / 1 E=PE__4_ -p --U-M---- Checked by= DECK ' 19 Drming TItle: 1 9 1 Lower 4 Middle Level L-_ i. F_-- __ _- ___- *m==021= 1 Floor Flans 3 1647 t-0 =21-a -20-q ie-o· 55-0- 55 e 12\ Ft LOVVER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SCNE. 1/8- .1'-O- Z [ZP-936-0£6 LOE I A '9 ADML]6!H 666fe eSPUPUM '£)POIS 9 401 ' ows uS!sep ddlu eouep!sehl @ANDInoeds -0-,9 039 18 OD 'U0Av I | 32'/ -0-,te y 1/ I -4 6 *89 I. J 1, 1 Pill 1 1 - -1 02 - -- - --4--- - ---- - C 9 1 a 0 - A 1 1 3-- r-~r-_1_< u -- 41P . 5288% 71 A 1 1 0 9 8 ' - ---- 1-2-27-t 2 -f- r -1 -, a -125 I. 9 1 -- ---- - ---- - -- . 1 1 1 BO-- hk .k T o. ROIE I ..2/ 9 84 - 837-7-417 » d 4-re U~ EL - e316·+21/7 I \ .h To. .loGE I 9 EL - %r,4 1/2- 8 1 1 7 EL - 837·101/7 ~ i ,1,re Rl/6E 1 EL - 8316'-2 1/7 1 1 1 rk ~ - /•hu>.ROOFEDGE ~ ~,LO ROOFED,GE N .. „ -3"= 1 1 EL- 9.-2 1/7 -1/ 1.- 2 I _1 _~ _ 7 a. - 8.... 1/2- --4 --- 2% --- 2 6 i f ·. 7 a. - aa-n·-,0. .0 --- I 1 41.0. RooF.»E b b. 21 1 EL - 236.-8 1/y pi 7-6: 11 -0 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 7-9 _,7.6-4 1 ROOF PLAN ) SCALE: 1/2>- = 1'-O- 4 58-7 16'-2},- 56· O- I 16'-<7 ./.3 I llc . 8.41 4 2-<7 . 222-<7 , 2(,icr ' , ~W··C7' ~ v /Jt ' /4 ~, 14 ,· ./. 7-0- , 84 , 7-<7 ,-6- 7-0- , I 11·~· , 'l l 1 | ~~~ -- -~ --- -- --- I~----7- ------ I 1 2 2-31- - i==Jftil .---0-. 1 ; r-771 -9 F ,- 9 ------- 71-1 3 -1- ---#bl ~ : ~ L. Moo·, %1. 1 : .\ / or 1/ 10_ Issue Date ; 1 14-L=7 -Cutrl , F. Pe.1,1 O%*. 9% k UPPER L.M~ 7 EL - 836/ J 1 11 C b · p / O 0 ~-glm Ill!2 - r '1 -.21 1 3 3 -1 1 11 96€~I ~ *&27#I 9 BEDROOM 1 ----130 - T-=ful--jl i. :; -- -- : BEPROCM 4- -~-~--IFI_j _----1, --11-~toi «141 9 - t Job r-mber: 0405 i Dr"ir' by: rill 11 . I. 9 ' Cheoked by I h · Praling Title: Upper Level Floor Plan 4 Roof Flal w.a· I 204, I =Ie . 8# >i S# . p# . .1. . le-<7 . ...' | ' Sheet liert 12) )UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 937 A2.2 /~ SCALE: 1/Er . 1'-0- &6%-0 „2/1 e-9LE' - *48!H 66609 96pupl!M '£ MOOI'8'9 101 Lls l.16!sep ddlu eoue'0!set' GANDinoeds N9[8 03'lloA¥ .O·.¥G L:Zk: - 1 --1--1-11 -1--1 1 1 111 1 HI 1 11 H_ // _1_ ---- 6 *35&53 F - 1 111 -L 11 -- 1 _r- - -11_ 1 1 Mi~ C D ' -- ' W -f- -x©0646 0120. R'DeE 1-----11... :N==$ o r- 2 1 1 1.11 7-02_ FLE-14 - Ci =89*2 - 2 0 0 B 01 TO ROSE,h TO. REDGE 4 -NT 91-Il.-- ---_ C 1 W EL •8076 2 1/2- 7 1 corp' - - i ,14;1 ''·j '71:fr'·'i_~~.L, '*:·4~i.,1~i~., by~w<4~,i,'At) f ' 11.1.1 4 -1 •h To. ...E 2 0.- 78- •83-C+~__t=.._liffi;mill:=~,mrFT~irt=Il-7.4-tio~ c==:=sf~·~.li:. 1 ~|h T.O lit»E ..Ir,--IV 1,- .......Z. - "»rrT*f p.=1 L 7'T338367=r -111 - -,qi&&)/~f~q~*l j~* 11* ill.!]~ I T- & CED* /40,™14' , EL •8386'-11/2- 9 19*4+~. -, 1 : ~-- - -- --JambM,~L-- 1 1.*'Pm LEVEL T.O. Pl.»•030 4 Ill It I Ill I 11 'r ·W * 7/-11 EL 4367-0- LM 16»=re.1 - - . . f==Prf Ikt ErUC€-OrlINDC»NkIEO i ~tiEit*j=- 1 1 1 -El -- 304=F-~ =-*fUL-=--~---~~ BEAMS. 4 TRUES ~FIR HEAW 4 SILL TRIM Cry/) 1 TIMBER COL.LMNS. 51 "LA' blvINe i 1 1 // 1 p STONE VENEER 84/ING - .1 + C'OfF) 14»*f«fil>3914-1 OOL 44&39«42' i i 4 BEL T O. F,-n,OOD 1 EL +835/41- ' L . -4... '1 .'' ' ·- 4k*47*140*4441 DITR¥,e/ELTO~p~ - --~ - --- -"UM=-4- // 11 \X 171- 1 1 -/11 0 10,5 LEVE. T.O. COf. 4- _ -1 __~ 6 1 --1 1-4 ---4-[-ff_L 11 51-•8340'<7- g 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 lili 1 1 1 111 1 11 1111 r--1 NORTH ELEVATION \37 SCALE: 1/3- = 1'-0- \-\1 111 0 -- 15-i-i--~L--_ i__~__----___ ,IN Lo. Rpel MATERIALS SUMMARY 7.-•earT-4 V, : 4*44*74)-- -3 EL •82"C'-2 la ~ TO. RDIE j EL •85-16'-21/7 'P CED'/RN<E™I~------_~__**6,*L/BAAMBE. ...~I.IL-2- rIOOD TRIM - aer),•R .h T.O. PL.AW~~™ g EL •8311·# L- - 611.1.11'13~~ 1 I /. ROOF STRUCTURAL YUOD - DOUG FIR T.a. Ft•TE .---410=l 1 E»»6 - (FOR ALL F4OO2) Issue Date a •8361-4- STAN - CANTON #41 STONEE VE*laQ St»46 uppet LevaIh~=~ FEATHER OP 1 1 TIll %11,111 Jil f .1. 1111 11 -2-0 SH[NeLES - ASPHALT ELK FRESTIGUE ...... ./0- - 80/LE)[3/ R./ANNS 11 Nh ELACTOMB210 PAINT Et 1 SHERMN MLUAMS COLOR - SFY 6113 INTERACTIVE CREAM - Mml.EVEL T/. 4,7= a STUCCO TRIM - ELASTOMERL FANT E eas/-0- . SHER.rUN }41LLI»IS COLOR - ~r~543 1--- u- -- -l --_i_--7-yl 91 6114 STONE VENEER - HOES ROCK FNINIX»6 4 DOORS - ALUMINUM CLAD Job M.feer· 0405 COLOR - BRONZE Drap' 4 -P 1.01'€R Le//L T.O. CC»IC,KETE .h EL-+BE>4674 "4 Checked * Drawing Title: Elevations 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 3 ti East 4 North Sheet 4.Irrter C-hMEST ELEVATION AS.1 E~..,~ MALE -8- = 1'-O- 45!H 666PE eBPPIDI!M '£ )Polg '9 401 Isep ddlll eouap!9031 @ARIDinoeds Oa [9 00 'UOAv 00\11 + 11i 11 11 1 1 k 1 111 1 N 42.=19 - --11_ -- - -4 -1 1 1 1 1 m-F) F.'L. reoll" T.w T.O. RIPe€ / /HORIZONTAL- F'kXO EL •837-r-2 1/7 IF 1 / /1 /10«6 mrp, - 7/I-*5/6-2 1/. -11- 4- 741 - _11 ~·F EL.5370'-21.7 011!..lili , m I 1 . / 1 J 11. h ' .9 ·1 · i /, i '1 - .I' ' 1.~'97~Er £r~ RfeeR_.--- _ - ,·L .4.1. . -1 % -70.-~,PSE...h It . 41 11'lf 1!111 - KIEE•/36.-~ - 1 111 111~ -1 1 1 11 -1.11-:11 lilli 1 - -1 11· Cl CED./ .SCIA TRM 1 - - - frrp; 1 " ~ 1 1 --' 1 1 11 1 •h UPPER LEVEL T.a F'L.·~002_ _ | i 1%Illilll-__ _ina e EF EL •8362-0- _ 1 - »~ ~'~~~~EL™94- ®%11*2-3 - 6 -- _ _ L.L. - 0¥aQ LEVEL T O. Pt,rk•~30 /1-~ U U U £IEL!211_ / su ™IN, rn•,9 1 1 ~ Cm 1 -- 'Tucco SID,Ne rrfFU - UOU b *REL T.€. PLI·FLL 1 ENT,©ruvEL T.O. Pt»•000 2 ----&.... I.EL +8357-<7- 1 n P4100O RAILNeS. -- e 't 11-1 POSTS »10 1 BALUEree I PECK 9 0 1 1 0 1 0 rer-p) F Loret LEVEL T.O. Cc~CR-TETE _ 1 1 11 1 VE 242-0. 1 1, L -- -------- ----- 1----- ---- ---- El-./34.-l '~ ---- STONE VENEER BASE I AU.£XUMNS M LI (*~ SQUTH ELEVATIoN _ c / SC•~LE: 1/Zy = 1// El-;Ell¥73>97- 1 Ull L£*et LEMEL 1-0. 6,0~DR€m-,1~. 11 1 11 1 lilli 11 10/9 11 4/11 ~ 1-ft--~j- /44€'Ir .-/4-4-4 .1," 1 *... De,E 7 EL+5377-4 1/2- \ .k......E 7/E-1/3-16·-2 t/:r 143464 #T.O. FLAT·E 1'~ .el 1 -I.'32-16 ~t:J:iRdia Ty:ZIESTig - --- | ~* 4 5'4 - T.D. PLATE # TO. ~LATE ~h aIitiEP-7 1 1.,11 - - 4-0. 10- - ' +M - 1 -E-:BE¥77- 7 EL •5362>'-•r .k T./. PLATE ' 1 /. ~ / P.% 1 1 1 1 1 1 k r.'ii'"4~60'IA'.-i,44.1 . 4-ok --- ---- 1 0 ~ CA.DES 7/ED'/6/// /1000 RAU.N. * Issue 1 Date fairfmA-_ _ ;9: .11'4.4:p~h·' ~' POSTS .kuppe~ ~e.e- T.£1 Axx, -1 r,t'jt,~.')##fif,"d 1, 1, , , 1, 1 · 111 , 1 1 1 ' -- cat*ErE-RETA-e : 7EE-*324--332-- - 1¥ ·· t -1 - -- / 1 m , / BleNE___4,221 1 4 -- 11 1 6»~6E 1 / 1 11 11 - D / STORAGE .9 / \ 4 EN™YLEVa- T.O. FLYrecOD 1 I -1 #EL T.O. AC> , -- 7 - - 7.-4,351/p / 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 Ji-L _ 1 / 11 1 11 1 1 Erl--==~--223 LMLEVELIC CONs. _- _-L -- - 41.£/,MIEVET./.CLID - _ - - ---- -D...47--1.-4.- i 7/LE*a<. B )11 4 1 4 1 11| Checked *: | Drauing Tltle: Fleet 4 South Elevations Sheet $"V"r: GiBULLRIMP_/SITE_SECTION__ - EASIBLEVATION AS.2 I 1 (2 SCALE: 1/8. 11'-0- (<1 SCALE V,r. 1'-0 r--1 .0 L £6¥-06 £6 0 3 13¥-936-0£6 J 389 [90 'SpJOMP3 LOEE) liu ADM45!H 666PE eSP!·IPI!M '£ Moom '9 101 oqs u6!sep ddl.u ~ eouep!§83 eA!4101noeds 039 [9 OO 'UOAv SITE 7 ...76 i :,08. i,0, COA SEC. .. loen, 1/4 COA SEC 35 m. 34 35 1 1 . 1.1\. 1 . 1 ' 35[' . 1 •,LORIDGE '~,1 / • 1 \\ . 1 \. 1 --SUBDIVISION,1_ ---«%----1-- .1/'14-Ilgl. I COVER SHEET 1 -./ 44--9--p pm« f Ivt.Vt y w #Thy/. >~~/ . .4 1 1 3-f - ~ C\L-M11/ 1 : / 4/7/9-2-»toi 3 «3/0443-jr.%- 1 7 PO»«_.344 47 0 - (c·f--9.3/.:--f l w /.3-2-5/ 477.\ - «- L-- W lt. DRIDGE Yi ---- 11 -9.=.rl-1 /- ./0.¢VISION - / 'Ar ull H E 12 / :T'T \.1~,~~ WESTERN SAGE P.U.D. // 34 -1 C /. L.L. j -,A L-Ht-:F---f I LOTS 1-8, TRACT A, BLOCK 4 - fRI«u~int»-1/ 1-471 7. 1 1 -Sl.71\// WILDIRIDGE SUBDIVISION . 1 ke' r :/0% 4. .2-·····»6 /1 4, 2 L h It ~049 _" 231_ _ -'·,tm *54·'»1.61 ./ST l/4 CIR, SEC· 35 i ««/\\ ..1/4 COR .. 35 7 . 1.~ . 4.' ·1 t ~hu-~ .,1 1 9.-Off 1 - h F' - - -1- \. /0 .sr ,/4 COR SEC 35 EAST 1/4 CCE. SEC. 35 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO 11 ---- 14-t«.~ 9 ·29 h -4 -. su.01/1.10/ I WILORIDGE -46~9«-*»f~~-4-~«»-5.2»~_ f l I .-r v, / CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP -'»ti - P--- 87 .Il~¤4439>fl.''~\\ \ -\ Know all men by these presents that Jay K. Peterson, sole owner in fee simple of all that real property described as follows: Lots 54,55,89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, Reception No. 9399// .4 1 I agree to develop the plan as depicted on this site plan. ... WILOR'DIE SUBDIVIS ION 1 \ 2 *22\-1.1 / (, 7 zi -. 1 , % 0 90% 132 -. tr>~439 -7#I~A--cig~~~, F 1 108 S. Frontage Rd., SUITE. 208 C ) /\ L-/.-4 Owners Representative: * - , ' - <.prr-,vejej~j, 1 + VAIL, CO 81657 1 7-1\\ 1 ~/3-I-~3-,-\9«393 -· Icl- % 1 34,35 1 3 zn STATE oF COLORADO ) SOUTH L/4 COR. WIC 35 SOUT}1 ~/4 CDR SEC 35 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION: BLOCKS 1-5 ) SS COUNTY OF EAGLE ) LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE: (LOTS 1-8) The foregoing Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of A.D., 2004 by Narrative of PUD's Intent - PUD Intent. Single-Family Residential Development ensuring the protection of VICINITY MAP the residential design, character, & scale of the neighborhood; preservotion My Commission expires of eAisting views from odjacent properties; and the permonent reduction of 1" - 500 FT residen tiol density in lhe neighborhood RECEIVED Permitted, Conditional, ond Accessory Uses Witness my hand and seal - Permitted Uses - Single-Family Owelling Units PROPOSED NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - 8 SINGLE FAMILY JUL 1 9 2004 Notary Public CURRENT NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - 11 UNITS SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWN Community Development - 4,000 squore feet of building or" per lot BUILDING HEIGHT (ft.) TOWN CERTIFICATE - 35 feet Maximum SHEET INDEX This Planned Unit Development and the uses, zoning slandards and densities are 0FF STREET PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE approved for the Resubdivision of Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4 PUD, (Ordinance 04-_) - PER TOWN CODE COVER SHEET SHEET 1 by the Town Council of the Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, GARAGE PARKING AVAILABLE this- day of 2004 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder - PER TOWN CODE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 2 of the county of Eagle, Said approval shall In no way obligate the Town of Avon tor SURFACE PARKING AVAILABLE POSSIBLE PLAT SHEET 3 any improvements and approval of this site plan by the Town is a consent only and - PER TOWN CODE is not to be construed as an approval of the technical correctness of this plan or BUILDING LOT COVERAGE SITE PLAN SHEET 4 any documentation relating thereto. - AREA (sq. ft.) 40% TSA UTILITY PLAN SHEET 5 Sl IE LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT SHEET 6 WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN OF AVON: - AREA (sq. ft.) PER TOWN CODE SNOWSTORAGE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON - AREA (sq. ft.) PER TOWN CODE % of Paved Are¤ By: SETBACKS Mayor - Front - PER TOWN CODE - Side - PER TOWN CODE Attest: Reor - PER TOWN CODE Town Clerk NOTE: For all standards not specifically oddressed above, the Witdridge Subdiviston Plat and Town of Avon Municipal Code requirements shall apply. DATE: JULY 15,2004 P.503034\dwg\Work\03034_COV.dig, 7/15/2004 4·30 47 PM, 1050CMERGE 9,3 0 /9- 60 / 27.3. SET PiN I 0 ALOW. m / 26598 8=21·26'23- h R=775.000 4. L=290.00' LOT 88 2~-7288.310 ~--.._~<25 ~ / 1 .. x BRG=N 3608'24 . * WATER l«/ /00 A D 170 4../:,0 0 EDGE OF ... 1 1 - A,PHALY - 1.9, \ 4 CONCRETE WALL 4 7 27 WARD ./L -/ G i.'55 6.·LE.,0 0 ·· SET PIN I FOW LOr 89 ~ 4 . I .. 1!61=KE-- - f JI--i_ ··~ - _. -1-- „ -- - - -' iff .-WATER ~ D.W. CAP //r« LS 26598 9- 4 \ 4 47 . / * 1. \ 9.59 / L „---i-&4~10' , 9MOT 52'74 - -* ..-z *.4., -. ~ +~· -Um. I IA -l ..„ .'' 1- pip· I CAP \\2. \ 0- 1- . ..6~,69 771•EN - Lfu. 39. r - - i - I - 41 CRAINAGE e \,· 1 / // LS 2447 . . - -·'EASE~ENT , X 1 / - - 1 ' · . - · C. 4./. --1 -... , - - LOT 56 Belibel~ '~ --- . LS 26598 ~ 3 5„_-- -- 14: - 2.5, Ag. - - ~.#33)~4: ~-- . . -- N•·01 •br I 4,1,E ~ - - - - 6=69'46'18» - , 2 - . / 41/ R=45.00' - 7 ),1 - .1 1 V..\L -4 - .. / L=54.80 pi„ •w C LEN=51.47' .//.1 11 1. - 4-%.3 27 *~ < I . . / -E TRAMEN ~AR*ER . BRG=N 4548'09» E FWD ALUM ., . ---4-- t--1 - ./' k CAP EDU €y ~ 50' ROW » ·' · i.' :%:f:& n.# . i-. i-p I. co L. -..2 t \: f , -- -- -·- -- -- -- ··-- - -- -- -- -- - --fr---r€Ei~It- ff=f.,-- -{212134/elix= e., -M.I. I $ 1 ORAINAGE / r.-or . --~ - ..< - :5 0+ ' 4 ---, PEDESTAL -.-- id- .... 1 L < ~ . ..1 1- 1 1~22~INk'J>VN M.Ixti~LE »,4143~ ..1 A- '~#~ . - - ~.„AL .- . - - - <~ AMLA r... -1 .IiI - - . I "10 .... / T=31.37' i -- 1 / LONGSUN LANE EUCTRIC GAS ; Ls S447 · M-/ASPMALY 1 .?')>022,~ --· - + ~ SE™AC~r -- 1 . 0£.se'EN, - ~ , 1~\ EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 0-4 -- - - - - -- ~~- ~~----- ... --i- ,3u. c ~* Jl MEAS. Rl~A El_V. 8485.5 MEA'. :NV E.v 8470 4 7-9-45<9(.6-11•27,Es™._- -;I ··- SE.ACK ·- LOT.55 --··0460.- .--·&.. ~ /49 MEAS. INV. ELV. 8480.7 . .~ i i . --04.10--· - -*.. 1.91 AC. --' --' -' -= - ~ ~ ~ - - - 'J" ·--- ·EXISTING SEWER.-MANHOLE D-3.1- / he// 4~·C- r -1 --·- -MEAS. RIM ELV, 8466.2 . _ . r./ - - COT 54 U 1 1 mci - '\. · \4-· ./iN,v -ELY..8459,1 ·-·------ - - -··- ./INT - . . - r I.-0- LANDSCAPE 1.14 AC.._ _ ./' .0,53 .-4,11- -- --1~\Ill k- TRACT H ·-~~ -~->~ - -----:~ 'li-i~14{11<«j~i~ *~_ ~~~-_ 4, - -- -A -. - - /M o 1·'*1 111 ¥~~L®~BLE ·· - - -- - LOT 53 FNE) A-0.11 ._~ ---1501 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ----_ N 1 ........ 1. - 4249-444=:6442... 3/97 -41 .... -7. --1 .I'-4.-- . 1 \.2.--- Unt- t~,-r»_ I li. 0 - /.1 8/4./. ... -·- *-+' I--,-i-f,554.~~~~..- 1.--~~~ ~_ - : - -~I·· -, -t.11.-1.-~ _-- -~ li ~ 1· ~<~2.-2 <- e~· ~7-«-fl MEAS. RIM ELV. 8459.7 .. . - ..... ...1: IP' 4-1 f.-fi.1...1-/...4-1. _1!j/ EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE D-3 ...... f.7*7;tWhs•'91>5 ~ - AREA - PEN PLAT - .. -~1 MEAS. INV, ELV. 8451.9 -282.cii- >% - - - 22:.2 -1 1 1 / k// - FT--11911 GRAPHIC SCALE TRACT H ..._...-- - 1 / U %447 DID. AU.I PiN I CAP •0 DATE: 07/9/04 -- . 03034 JOB ( !N FEET) 1 inch = 40 fl SHEET 2 KD 10/16/03 2848TOPO.DWG lh133NION3 NIOEIVM X3AhlnS DIHcIVE!©OcIO-1- 390 L X08 10018 '06 69 '99 '*G 9101 ' 00¥260700 'NOAV OCIVE!0100 'NOAV .30 NMO-L '3©alhlall/A SNOISIA3U POSSIBLE PLAT TW-E-TENN SAGE DEVELOPMEA, T LOTS 1-8, TRACT A, BLOCK 4 TWILDRIDGE A RESUBDIVISION of LOT 54, 55, 89, & 90, BLOCK 4 W-ILDRIDGE Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado O 00 f f f 6 ~ /1 \\ b 0- . 1/ Z 0 /l \ CE> i - \4 \\ <4 I / N \\ \ Lot 88 Lot 58 \\ / 1 / I. ./ / \ / I + A /' / \ ip. 4 \\ M .30' ACCESS EASEMENT ~ O \\ 0 -,1 R=775.00 1 J TO BE VACATED i L=290.23 --1 1. h Ton=146.83 ----4 \ A=21·27'23 3 0 //// 9944 --- - 44 L - - - -1-----i~ , de 1 4 tix€3 li w 4 -Cy) ~-SETBACK LINE (TYP) \ 1 100 SIDE BUILDING f N ~ -GL / 1 1 mc) 0' ~< Aff r.,. / \ 1 0£0 e \ Lol 57 ©36< GAN \ %4>/ ) 8 iri % LOT 8 \ 1 LOT 7 1.202 Acres .- .. 96,610 14\ 0.738 Acres - a. 10 K rte- : ..\\ -\ 1 ------ / .\6\ \ 7.5' SIDE DRAINAGE AND .A \ \\ I / \44 \\ r-unLITY EASEMENT UNE (TYP) i.gi % 1 1 9 + \ ·A u - SETBACK LINE (TYP) ~~ 4 44\ 4 0 - v/ ~_25' FRONT BUILDING / Lot 56 1 S 05'11'32' E / 4yjal- ./ Lo[ 52 / LOT 6 , \\ S 84·48'28- W \\\ tri 0.733 Acre: L916·51'31 0 -* L=34.72 ~ , LONGSUN LANE~ 1 m R=118.00 %71-32, 0 - R=45.00 / 50' ROW ~ ~~X~\ 10}' REAR SETBACK 39.57' ,§*7 - gre- _ W-- i // J<<~la 0571'32- ~~ - - - ..Ujuglp~-y-_=.9,2~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ L=32.84 -2 N 39'48'02 E.36- _ 5->» a.- S=41 4841" ~ ~ Tor=17.19 \ / 11 39 59 N'% #LV#17#Mn /0,5 *10464 2FT.81-- - & UN- TRACT A - s €192'2~E_12524. /-11 --1 1-_fil f ~-- - - -7 ~r - - 37,- - O.455 Acres ~ 1 10' FRONT DRAINAGE , Jr-~~ - 07/L-- - R=45.00 / 11 145.21' 6 4-@ 66/ 16.85 EASEMENT LINE (TYP) lilli -- ---- $ \-AND UTILITY / 1 116.66 21- i \\ s 09383?LE-rE€ - -441 Itt' 11 kill \ LOT 5 te27·57'37- ~ 1 I lEi 11 L=21.96 - /~ / 19 I mi 11 Tan=11.20 0.860 Acres \.1 Pif 0 1 11 1 li 1 14 I 010 - [iiltlli lip I lili IO 11 1..• I AJ Z 121 lit \ LOT 4 JI"i d 0.780 Acres | Lot 53 \ - 1 0.737 Acres 1 N-420 13,31'42~E - 0- 0-92--2 -\ N~~2 4 LOT 2 lili 0.753 Acres ~~ LOT 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ~ ~ 0857 Acres 11 1---IN---- - - 4714-~/ // f DATE: 07/15/04 782.00 J08: 03-034 TRACT H --GLL C IN FEET ) OPEN SPACE ~ 1 ..h = 40 fl - -11 / - / SHEET / 3 J / Dll ONIh!33NION3 NIO 03969 OC]VE 29OL X *9 slol 17£go-8-t'L-0 00¥&30100 'NOAV .30 '3© a l 23(11 IM SNOISIA]M 84€---2:0011£BLN /1 1 \\ l 1 \ /. 1 \ /. -/ 1 11\ c \ j / . 1 / \ , / h ./. 1 \ i / 08 1 + 1 Z 0-- /\\ -z \ \ 00 \\ '# 4 « \ r > \ Lot 58 , 5 Lot 88 C-I .2. 1 ~ / 1 --- I . ...1 * / »to ./ 0 -- --- ---1\\ >t \\ - ---- Z - \ / /// -,0. - - € U / J Lot 57 - 5 % 1 9 ~~----~f~ ~-). W / a // M- - ·0.738..Acres *~ .. -*-./ ..-- .-- t~~ fl-.. 7-- --- --- + -- .--- .- ----- --, - - -1- - -/r- - f~~_ --Ill-lig.-- 4.-- - to - ---- 1 - 5-. / \ 1 v~- :'·-· ---1- '' b' CONCRETE·RETAININd WALL --X ·-- - --- ··~--··- - · - . 4 L-EXISTING ASPHALT - · 1 - . */ FINISHED FACE- -N- ..2-1.-2 - I. 77 -- · >,-(SEE..STRUCTUReL DRAWINGS FOR- DETAIL) 2-- --i..._ .-- - ..2- 1' -- 0 -·~ "BOW=13. ..22- .i.Ily.6:-1-J~ L.... - # j j \ O ._ --PROPOSED 18' WIDE- '- Lot 52 J .. ._ -ASPHALT.DRIVE LOT 8 ·- ~0.733 Acres *5*3#1: a- - / w l PROPOSED 1' DEEP /--DITCH m , /BOW=16 - - /111 -.- - - 4 6 8% 41. . - · X I 1 2+004=r=f--L- 1 L ... -EXISTING ASPHALT -X \ \ 1 '-~ ~-···,/ PROPOSED ----- LOT 5 ,-· ~- -- 0.860 Acres ' . ,, *. '~ ORAINAGE CULVERT - ~ ~-- --- --- ./. ™ -PROPO-gED LOT.. - - -/ *. / -- . - - - + -· 1).780 Acres Lot 53 1 - I GU--- --- - ~ · · ---1-#. - * 0.7.37 L. )' - -- 7 ~ ~~ 0 2- -- 1 -/ 7- 12 LOT -2 --=- t,V · 0.753 Aeres -..~ ... - -~ - - - - ~- -- -- -- , - LOG -- -0.867 Acr. - --f. 1 / -~ *~ TRACT H 03-034 OPEN SPACE .1 JOB - - / DATE: 7/15/04 GRAPHIC SCALE -. n . ~--~~2 342'0-- -- --r B --- ~ SHEET 1 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 /L / 4 Dll ©NI&333NION3 290 L XO8 * Moo-18 '06 9 68 0391 00*Bol t,LEO-8*L-OZ.6 OC]VMO-100 'NOAV -30 NAAOL '3©alk:la-lIM SNOISL'\32 31¥0 -ON P·\03034\dwg\Work\03034 _SITE dwg, 7/15/2004 4 5332 PM. 1050CMERGE pc3 f:/1 2/1 / 1 (\1 0 O -/ I 1 / X 0 / 6 EXISTING FIRE 1/2 7 7 ,/2 Z L - \ - Z HYDRANT FH-002 / 9 \ 00 > Lot 88 1 44 Lot 58 ;43 "/ <06:,4/ / 1 X EXISTING 8* DIP .Ld// / 11 1 ; \ EX~TI~~~DA~~~~E 11//// 2 1 //// // / \42\ 1 \ 4 \V, 2 %/ / / 1\ \ l. \ \ _ I ./4 1/ 9 ./1/ ,/ 60% - \41\ 1 1- h 4, / Lot 57 141 \\ 4 0.738 Acres ~~ * LOT 8 »4 1 \ LOT 7 1.202 Acres \\* ~, ~. in ~ 43 1 6 9/ EXISTING 8- DIP' 1 1 ~ \1 <\6 f // N ~ WATER ONE f , 1 Lot 56 \ / \/C HYDRANT ASSEMBLY \\\~-1.- 9 7 Lot 52 PROPOSED FIRE - 1 1 LOT 6 ---,--/ 0,733 Acres ~~~ ~- -~ w _--w -:~,* -1-0-.*-1 PROPOSED 8" DIP , - PROPOSED WATER \ ··· - /- SERVICE (TYP) TIE INTO EXISTING / WATER ONE / 1 \ i \ 251--1<4- 14/4. - -, r --¥--2. - WATER MAIN EXTENSION / 1 1 r i <· N A N , /<22 2-<2 /- - 1 -7 /» --. / 4- -- /,14 . \ /5/ 2 . - \ - -1 4 EX)ST]NG FIRE N. HYDRANT FH-026 \4 PROPOSED 142.1 L.F. -~~ ~ EXR'S~TNMGH8S04EMJE7R2RPE A~? \\ ~ - EXISTING SEWER MH D-4 - i SEWER MAIN @ 85 INV OUT = 8476.9 / RIM = 8486.5 H~-~ ~- PROPOSED SEWER // S~ / INV = 8480.7 U)T 5 0.860 Acres ~rh*~46- BASIS OF ELEVATION: lili 1 1-7 X ''iiI P sk«skss--·~e,11-111 / RIM = 8466.2 INV = 8459.1 \ PROPOSED SEWER ~ ~ 0 F Val (JXW) -k 'S.-- b.€- / il li I -g- SERVICE mp) -1 /1 /~ EXISTING SEWER · r~ j z LOT 4 .96- 1% 1 / Lot 53 0.780 Acres PROPOSED 163-7 L-F- ~~ '~~ ~ ~' 1~ ~ ~_ _ _ _ 9. ': SEWER MAIN O 8% LOT 3 |~ | ~ 111 0.737 Acres 11 11111 / LOT 2 / 0.753 Acres ' \R»A = 8459.7 < 1 \. Ek\SING SEWER -1 D-3 INV = 8451.9 --«> \-11 2 1111 11 LOT 1 1 ~ 0.867 Acrea / 11 i IRACT H JOB. 03-034 GRAPHIC SCALE / DATE: 7/15/04 / / ( IN FEET ) ~ SHEET 1 inell = 40 1 - ? 5 j 0-11 ONIE!33NION3 029 Le OavE!0300 MOO-18 '06 68 '99 '*9 S.101 N¥ld Allnlln ODVEJO-100 'NOAV _30 N/V\01 '3©alhla-lIM , ~f' f jNvt ~*Nii-i- « SNOISM38 1 1 ! I N / 1 1 1 1 / I.. 1 \ 1 1 1 -.I $ I ,/ / I N f \ 1 / \ / 1 1 \ 2 \ / i & 1 \ i 7 \ mo ' 99 / \ /.r. 49 1 L. \ \ 1. 1 / i 1 4 9 N LOT 88 / LOT 58 2 F 6. 0 N 1\ 1% I : 1 j / 1 \ \ 1 - 1 \ I ~\ 1 h 9: / ------- \ 1 , EXISTING LOT ..~ \ . ' LINEE (TYP) ~4.----- \ : 0/ LOT 89 x G / ; i 1.55 AC. '- , 0 *. 1 , ~PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYPO . 8 9*p LOT 57 0 MU '4 LOT 8 - ! LOT 7 1.202 Acres - '. 44 0.738 Acres i // L C) 1 1 00 -// - LOT 56 .. 1 / . l LOT 90 1 1 1- 2.51 AC. %, , . 0. 0 ./ .' I ...' LOT 6 0.733 Acres - / LOT 52 / i LONGSUN LANE , \.. 50'ROW J --- 4 - » TRACT A 1 / m \ I. #I ./ . 1 \ '. I..: ..' 0.455 Acres , ' b .* I \ -~i'- Zil-'-' h -* u' Z / \ 0 ..-1 , u, -- .' , 1. 1 1 1 1 1 5 ' ac i w LOT 55 i . 0.860 Acres~ MAC i ' = 1 i. 1 . ./ '' , ' LOT 54 1,14 AC. i I I. ' . . li 1 . , TRACT H ' ' ; LOT 53 , , ' LOT·4 .. 1 0.780 -Acre, ~~~'·;' ~i ~ % - - ~ - f i ' ··' j 1 '. , LOT 3. ' .~' , 1 0.737 kres :.~\. LOT 2 -- .' l'·.A ' '/f , 3 - ~·.0.753 Acres·. h \ /1 - .LOT 1 - ~. ' i ~ ~ 0.867 Acres -· p. ; h 7 ./ L 'O. J EXISTING OPEN SPACE 3.33 ACRES GRAPHIC SCALE TRACT H ' 1 80 00 1- -~ PROPOSED OPEN SPACE 3.37 ACRES -- ' DATE: 7/15/04 1 / JOB. 03034 ---- i C F FEET) 1 inch = 40 EL / . r-------~------ - SHEET 5 .' Dll ONIE!33NION3 NIONVFN ll8IHX3 30VdS N3dO OZ9 L9 Oa¥33 100 'NOAV 390 L XO M0O18 '06 '99 »g slol *LEO-8*L-0£6 00¥&30-100 'NOAV .30 NA,\01 '300101 IM 31¥0 ON P:\03034\dwg\*ork\03034_ OPENSPACE dwg, 7/15/2004 4.57:12 PM, 1050CMERGE.pa 1 1 1, Ill 1 , \ 1 / ~ ~ ~ iti~t~~/,x /4 ~ ~~ ~ < ~ 511-E PLAN SUMMARY TAOLE // / I. NOTES: LOT 4 ALLO-D 95 FEET SECTI0N5 OURRENT ZONING PLA»ED UNRELOFMENT (PUD) \- i 1. DA1UM ELEVATION, ' 74% ---i i f n f),LinTZ 12- CMP INV=7544-58 1-1BER OF= D;€LLIN6 UNITS I ELEVATION 7457' ON IMIS 94E PLAN CORRESPONDS To DUILE>ING HE leHT ELEVATION IOO'-O- ON THE FLOGIZ PLAN5. ELEVATIONS • 1 h j\ 7- j l "-4 PROPOSED 34.6 FEET CAMON RUN [BUILDBIES B :C 2. TOPOORAP MIC 4 SURVEY DATA PROVIDED B¥. /// 9 3-- 1 / LOT 4, NOTTINeHAM STATION, FLU AMENDMENT No. 4 OFF+STREET PARKING ALPINE INGINEERINO ING C 17 4 /// BOOK 1\0 PAG!£ 355 REGUIRED 3 P.O. BOX q-1 AEI CONTROL SITE OOVERAaE (% OF LOT) P'ROPOSED 3 ED».RDS, COLORADO 81632 410-426-3373 7 ~/ -4 r .op 1,1. ELEV=145655 LOT . 90.405 60 FT 1013 * 543®1 \ 0-- E~OUL[PER ~NALI , 2.611 SG FT 85% OF SITE PAVEP SURFACES WON, COLORADO SITE CeVERABE: 3. PRO-ECT ADDRESS= , e ELDe = 2,6/1 9/ FT 0 8% OF SITE PROPOSED BUILDINe LOT 5[3, NOTTINGHAM STATION FUD L . P.IVE,HALIC 1*10 HURD LA,E , ' 1/ /4 ./ / 1// 9 te UMI~Or ~ILE f ;f f/>//Ir . s*Eps = 282 60 FT O.4% OF SITE EXIST»46 9.EDS , 2 0 SnE GOV = 5,5-14 512 FT 18-2~ TOTAL. 4. CONTRACTOR TO VER,F¥ ALL EXISTIN6 unLIrr LOCATIONS AND CONDITIONS, ED<!Sn,16 ON THE JOB SIT~'PRIOR TO Ce*ENGINe ANT' HORK. 77 --4 LFPER LEVEL 454 90 FT y BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE ASPEN TO BEE 5 0/ ig REMOVED MAIN LEVEL 1,94' 6/ FT SEE SHEET LLC,·~FOR LANDSCAPE iNFORMATION. ./ 0 4~,/ ;'f i, t/.4°f el.;01 ~L-z / TOTAL LIVINe SPA<LE 2.103 Se FT 6. SEE SHEET Aio FOR GENERAL_ C~NST·RUCT1ON P.24 1 ~AN. NOTES. 0£ CO 4 / /7/ 0/ =mor $ /4, / eARAE€ 514 SO FT 7. SEE CONSTRUCTION HANAGEMENT F'LAN FOR DEBRIS ¢ EROSION C<)NTROL lNF=INI9·ED BASEMENT 1,q,q Sa FT >< t / FEN©!Ne *LD SNOM STORAGE AREAS CURINe CONS™UCTION 1 ir PLAIN / 1 64 -- 4 0 32** , 940¥4 STO~RAGE 1,6150 EG FT ' -1 0 / / BOULDER rIALL I / i-#1b3'l -/ gp t. ' /2~ 1.'-r < //p- r< 1'-6' M,~< HEE1(5HT 20 /\RIDGE *\-9210'RE-ROUTED .42•GRAVEL / DRAVYING INDEX: 19 W - ~ I~ ,i~~ de /~~ < < ~ # ~ /0 ~ --.-\14-143'1 - * -- PITCH LOCATIO - / BORDER 1/ 97 .2 / / ''c> \-- --* \ 1 5 I 4 1 1 I' 9 #17 - - h---- > 42.09, f - 11 2 /FROPOR~RF:4112212 t - 7 --*K TO:*16 *.-·.- .- - Al , SITEPLAN ARCAH I TR>TWRAL ¥ 3 / / f/l 2 LOWER L RIDGE / i k =141/ 58' ->,bit 1 , UPPER LEVEL ©6715' 4 58 C.MP coNSTRUCTION HANA€,EMENr PLAN / / 6/93 / 94_ 2: / / MAIN LEVEL = 1451'/ \ LI.O LANDSOAPE PLAN I \9 14\ Ai~Ilhak ~ \\« \. A2.0 BASEMENT PLAN 1 GENERAL CONST NOTES 12 813' % RIE»E -\ / 23\ \ *9' f Cliff : 1 MAIN LV[ 29 / C ~f~ 4 / \ 7 0-> 5-Rol=D -%+ TO.leALL.r A:2.1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN % '4 -- _><~~ 5-1' . 0 0--=22-=11-=P --9-- CURB INLET RIMI EL=1461.Ir 57' __21».2-2<Zll·6*I pothrr A 2.2 UPPER LEVEL PLAN PECK *-' -\ -' V - O PVO TO ™h. PROPOSED F'AR~f,> 4/ T -~ r X~17,-loVED;~ . B./ BUILDING ELEVATIONS *2.3 ROOF PLAN RIDaE SPACE -3 THUS 4,/ <----7-~- < -3 ~ 1<j ~ - 1% \41 1 X ,(46 74732 7456 4 Aa. 2 BUILDINe ELEVATIONS I , / 401»44*44 411 # f ~ l=* MALL h ~ 1, 51' < 6 6. 6, - /\\0k f 5 /0/ 4 /€ 4~2 DRIVE - D ~ ExTENZIOR LIOHT 4 3 7- 2 - / \ 1 Xi - GAS ME 4, 1- O o NARROVEST Pt~ M j y ELEC. METE*) BRICK HALK~444>~19 2 \, / 0 2 ;54*b- -/r » We L 4/ \«\»/ f PORTION OF EXIST . r 4 , 4-111 - \ /F i LOT 55 40 A ZQ- 1 VELEC. TIW49.A -4 0.62 ACRES ~~0· t~ / ~p··---::~pi// 1 1 BE REMOVED ~ 5+1001 STORAGE /~ , 1- EXISTING 1-£* 7 EXISTINe GRAVEL_ ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION ,/ 30 r. ~\\ COTTONF©O[2 DRIVE TO DE PAVED'rv .4 ~- EXISTING SHED ,/1 , COMPLETE / 1 < LU A TO BEE REMOVED - 1 \..3 / HALT - 11 1. 44 < . TO REMAIN- \ 1 , 2 1950 9 -1 / %y, / 1. 24 EXISTIN6 TREE LE6END -N\\ \\« , k : 1>- [£ 0 0 30 L- BUILDING CANTILEVER '~ 1 -f --\-114 11 mil'l 1 0 -1 1 \ RECEIVED 1 95 E DRIPLINE -j 10 E><1577NG 7461.06' ~ R.OOF ABV , 2 / AUG 0 3 2004 Z O-> e COTTO¥4nOOD ~ LOT DA - \ -1. FINES 6- TO 12- ~ , F 4% h 02 \\ 1/~f 1 7\ 3 C / EM_[26 <~m-11«Z 1 / Community Development al 11 e COTTO»OOD .0 1 1 1 3~ CMP INV.=1450.64' 5 1 1 12· COTTO»loop 552°02'51"M '~t)G -4, ke;--c, I 21 COTTO»100!> i.qo· - L/-7 @ 1 SITE PLAN ~ ------j' g~: 24~ GOTTO¥44000 )65.039.-E 2105' 1 E 4• P,hE 64\«c u 2- 41 1 ir·- SCALE. 1. = 10'-0. NORTH EXISTINS eAS LINE *l ·· p.~ LEGEND 1 1% 4 32 1 1 ® SE»62.-IOLE LIMIT OF SITE \ DIS·URBAkKE ' ~ ~~ LIGHT POLE 941. 1 Im 29 *i 4~ ASPEN 4 1 / O FOU® 5/0· RE AR Al€) 1 1/7 ALL»-1,~Ul CAP. LS •4414 6' ASPEN FOI ND 5/8' RE-BAR AID PL~TIC CAP. LS *26626 /~~~ < ~ 05-I4-04 STO€ ADDRESS SKETCH PLAN B' ASPEN ® 4:- FOUNIP 5/8- RE-BAR AND 1 1/2' ALUMIN.*-1 CAP. LS *24325 06-03-04 FLOilf OF DITCH . / / REVIEW FINAL DESIeN 10· ;epal / - EXISTING CONTOURS li /4:P 12- ASPEN 1 ** GRAPHIC SCALE XN PROPOSED COMTOURS COR~ER 1 /* 4 -40 -7./. I 14= ASPEN , BOULDER RETAININe NALL - 3' MAX HEIGHT 273'.6 1 / 12 Sheet hbrnber 1 lach - 10 ./ \ 9 EXTERIOR LIeHT FIXTLEE / CONTOUR INTERVAL=2' ALI , , 1 S / 0 019>9Eb (OLb) XVN 6092-€b (OLD) NH VEJO-100 '66 INVHeN Il hIO=1 NONBOISEibl NOIi¥16 INVH@NI110 N 'GIG 101 \./. 11 1 \ i 7·»- IRRIeATION SUMMARY TABLE: NOTES FLOPER BEDS ¢ {DIROUND COVER SOAKER HOSES gao 5/ FT i PATU··1 ELEVATION: ,' ELEVATION 7451' ON ™IS Srr E PL_AN CO0EESPONDS TO PRIP IRRIDATION ELEVATION too'-O ON THE FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS 4 / LOT 4 , oF NErl TREED & SE<;TIC>hIS. '-7 - f / 4 , 1 0 OF HER SHRUBS 16 j CANYON RUN BUILDINeS 846 LA·IN MOD) 2. EXISTINe LANDSCAPE, TOP06RAPHIC 4 SURVEr DATA F'Re/ID[ED W LOT 4, NOTTINeHAH STATION, PUD AMENDMENT No. 4 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER 1325 6€2 FT ALPINE ENeINEERINe INC. 44 09/~ 7--tal BOOK 710 PAaE 555 P.O. BOX 17 /./7 EC)}NARDS. COL.ORADO 51652 C / 4 410-428-3373 Joe * 54361 e At 'O 8 1 4 - - UNTIL SELF-SUSTAIN®LE 3. FUSHES, TREES AND SHRUBG TO BE HATERED WITH DIZIP IRRIGATION AND SOAKER HOSES / l~ f 'l / F\\4 j///1 i i 'bo=fe~ 4*u- 4. FLOPERS AND eROUND Ce/ERS TO BE MATERED BY BOAKER HOSES. O 0 7-52 1, / r--- EXISTINe 1 f i K LIMIt OF BITE / 1 !4 DISTUIEBANCE/ 5. T}to SOC) AREAS,·40 BE NATERED & AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER 91·STEM PI/ CL E C X 1 RAIN SENSOR. / H] a CHERmr »\\ 1--44-h f, i b /// ./7 / /1/ +7€ i /9/I 1 S r. 1%1 It it \ J 6. AREAS DISTLMRBED BY ~>NSTRUCTION TO BE % 6 / - RE-VEGETATED ;NITH NATURAL eRA5925, 2 0 1 31 0/ ..7 /0.-34 / 4 1 «BE REMOVED--7 4«7--a . 'n X 75/ 1 ASPEN 1. SEE SHEET i j FOR SITE INFORMATION. - «114-u \/ , / 8 . 1 U/&-I -'\ -/ -1 O m 1.-\ (B,4 -5 4 00 3X \-ru 1-. / 0 / re K< [1- ; k / 40 1 1- --- Imf P .22<0 i/ i/ I~IWN LVL \ - h-\ 0 \ I < K /7 -\ -r- \C , i. .< Lu / 20 0 b» -2Ix 12.85' / ly i / 18/1 , BRiok rIALK - ~ 7458 / / 043/ / 1 ~"CIL.42 - Jo,£», \\ / --- O >44 ' 132 ->43/ f 2 - 1 FLO~€RS 4 6fROUND COVER. 0,/~ 1.- NE .L 41,4-· 5.~ eOULPER NALL- Ly - 446 0« »01 - \ 41 16// 1 h im#4 f / ASPHALI. 2-3 %111 r<1'-$-9.- 4. 14'.9~~ ~ /1 .4/0 R 1\ 1 ·2'3 ·jety»'.19*- ~ h °/ e- fw.0 4 Qok / L¥ F / - ILIB INLET RIM EL=-1461.W 0 04\1 lili - . / 3?g \ i 9 ~ 14 *11 1 491*6 641 11 /,2 / 6 & i.·Int-i-,14· r LOT 58 1/4 371\ 01\ 0.698 ACRES ~f < 4 If , /»*PAE« «23 1 1 11 111 4 442-\ \ le , 1 0 1 L IE-Ii L-+ Fl - ~ k \ =t- EXISTINS SHED - , 111 A 5 ' TO FREMAIN -- - ' Z <C ~3'%2'%;4242*YES ;~~ 0~~ , \ 1 \ i\ 11 / 4 [k< 1 \ -6 \ / -- 4.4 , Le / 40/1 lik EXISTING TREE LEGEND E~~E 42 1 1 -to /1 3-239*\\1 7 0 -1 - \ .tty Mi f li 6 0% 8 4' GOT·TON)'10/D - f )/ // (60-7 ' Bot-rn-AS O»nl-292- ~ ~~ ~ 1 -14£>I.06 <[Rog T- -t-~--=-- ~ j ~/ , ,; ~~/ RIM ELEV / ZE I 6. COTTON)·©00 - (RIPLINE -2 8' GOTTON~NOOD 9.OOP ABV , / zof> ~0 ~ LOT 54 - FINES 6- TO 12- 1 4 10 ExISTINe \ / 1 e E 41~6 Vun-0 eli>e OUTLINE / L - 5/ \/0 , 1 V 4 /10 '4*,·2<C / 0 20· Cono»©OD E G \0 0 f 1 1 % 1 * 1 COTTONP©OP 2 1 ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN 4' AWE ;24<ALE, 1.= tO'-0. G * 6. P»/ LEGEND NER PLANTINe LEGEND / / 6 / B. 71% PROPOSED TREES - 8 TOTAL: \ 1 1 // Pt : 1 65€R HANIOLE - ASFEA - 0·0<ECHERRY 4 0 y, / 4. ASPEN LIGHT POLEE - SPRUCE 941, 1 O t) %* il car-TO:¥~OD / FOAD 5/8= RE-BAR AND 1 1/2- ALIM•1!hUM CAP. LS *4414 4 6' ASPEN LIMIT OF SITE ~ 0 PROPOSED E*,9-IES 1 902106 - le TOTAL, FOUO 5/5• RE-BAR ANED PL-enc CAP. LS •26626 - SERVICE BERRY' 72 5/ Date: a· ASPEN - CINGUEFOIL 08-03-04 m' I Fot.IND 5/e' RE-BAR ANCE> 11/2· ALUMINJI CAP. 19 *24325 - RABEMT 812JSH FINAL DESIeN E>Ta·E ADDNESE, MARKER ~/ ~ RE·41En 10» ASPEN FLOPL INE OF PITCH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~- ly /~PEN - EXISTING CONTOL•*S 14~ ASPEN O PROPOSED GROUCCOVERS - 614 se, - SEDUM / GRAPHIC SCALE PROFOEED CONIOURS - MNT . I BOULDER RETAININIL - 3' MAx }EleHT - PH©POSED 9010 - 1325 9, , - BLLE(>RASS 1 1 - RED FESCUE / 2 8 (= m=) Sheet Nurnber M 1 -b- 10 1 9 EXTER'OR LIGHT FIX·rURE 1 /4 U.0 1 1 CONTOUR INTERVAL=2' ,&?78 ; ty*z/·/ PROPOSED F·LO~ER BEDS - 341 9 2 / 4.ale . ' %2597 i ' O19L-grb (OLD) XY=4 6O9L-9 b (OLb) NHcl bio-109 ' INVHGNIJ.LON 13!AVIN P d EONESIGht ariel NO Il¥16 INVH N '96 101 6 8 *08*001*m 119 / \ 17,4 \ \2 ..41 99\ r i \ h 0 / , CON-TROE ANIP I~~I , / 0 ) NOTES: « 44 FENCINg oble EAT~ LENE,™ AAE / A '3. - A I. THERE MILL NOT BE A CONSTRUCTION TRAILER / 1 // 1 (-3 / DO+HILL DEC.71 1fof/ '1/ .1'' 41 \ 0151-u'367'2E Ll* / 2. ADDITIONAL- CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE PARKING / < 1 9 ALONe PORTION OF DRIVE ON THIS OPNERS / | 9 f / PROPERTY. , PERMANENT SNON STORA(DE AREA. / M / !8 r-\ r\ 3. AREAS MARKED ARE FOR SNO}'4 STOeAGE ./ S A [?URIN6 CONSTRUCTION. SEE SITE PLAN FOR 1 40-910- - (49. «14\*\- 0 04\ 444) 0£ CO f P 11/1. o§ //f / 1 /9/ . / €) i, \ / r )\ l\, /79 f ~ //1 \ \7*0 W W {-4 / A / 13-*2« 22 3 \\\ i C U. // v--7 : ¥ 15 2 ---- / ntt-'V \\ .Ned I \ 1 0 \ 4 - U / / i. - 1 9 8\*\ r-N,_ f ~ f>42/< /4.9/ /\ 9 / C /#IJ \~ 9 - if N N\\ I.# 2 Z I \\ r \\\ \ L CeNTRAcTORE' -) C I /-- N ; if / 11 (/C 34/ \ 414\; C# L /F/ -9 <h \ / 07 . < /2<:MCH~x f / PARKINe 1 \ u>< go~ El ADDIC MA 2 I 1 1 N- 11 \'./1 -- : . AN«22*44~) , / 11 \\L )149\ - \ \ \ i. /1/\\-94 4411*MM#WRNMMT/51,/ ~ m \1«/ L*- ' 6&jiliINIv 1 1 1 \ 1 1 DUMPSTER Y 11 1 /1 LU O e -10 1 1 / i + 10\ EXISTINe TREE LEGEND , Po~r·r , / // 0.90 / I k. 9 6 1 4' COTTONINOOD ~ 61 OOTTO»looP Ji 1 4. h./9»2:.U / / / 1 ZO U. > Z - 14« ~/ W- I 5· COTTONNOOD £/- \1 \\ -6 , \/ \ ..1/1 *%4\\ 1 1/ f 1 10• COTTONMOOD 413 ~ 4\. \\\ F 12244 9 0 6 / / 111_18 ~~ 12- COTTONIOOD B G / C <Ki \< \\\ //SleN ., / 1 7 ~ht - 1 I 20~C0TT0Nn00D - / CONSTRUCTION G / / f MANAGEMENT 24 COTTONr«JOD 4• PINE 4 PLAN E 1 1 / ED 1 1 42 1 1 / 4 0 / / SCALE# = 10'-0' bEDRTH i U y PIME + M// \ / Q- 2 \ 40 ASPEA ~ /1 9 14 ~Date: 05-05-04 FINAL DEE,leN W ASPEN · 1/ i REVE¥1 1 1 e ASPEN GRAPHIC SCALE -- 1 X / 1 / 14' ASPEN ' Sheet hUr,ber i / ' 1 Inch - 10 n. / : OMP / ~~ CONTOUR INTERVAL=2' 1 2 / / 0192-9Zb (OLb) XY=1 E€91 Od*hIOZO INVHeN IJ.LON 0143(16 ancl NOI1*16 INVHGNI / *08*05)19 7 T HOOD DECK COLam - SEEE STRUG·REE 1 1 LINE OF DECK ABOVE -- - 1/ y-51/7 * q·-4 3/4. € 1 4'-4 W 7 2 3,4 1 STAIRS TO PECK f 1 i . ABOVE - VERIFY <O 9 T.C. REER BEFORE .. 32 4 lu 14'-01/2' fo 1 STARTING WOREK - --1 W, 1 1 ¢-83/4 € 6·-5 W € 1 +7 1 3-43/4. 9 5'-4 34 r-'° r 6-21/4- . ~ 9*1-4-- 46 0 0- . FREEZE PROOF ~ f '3042 6ENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 20 · HOSE Ble!3 - . 1 911 11 k 1 ' -- 1 4 1. ALL WORK WILL LE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST ~~£! 101. 1 · ADOPTED EDITIONS OF THE 'UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, UNIFORM I ~-0---5-Z %1 - 5 - .8. =56 PLUMBINe GODE», ·UNIFORM MECHANICAL COPE·, *NATIONAL ' ELECTRICAL GODE• AND TO)*1 OF AVON aUILDINB AND ZONINe e - r==-1 DEPARTMENT CODES AND ElEGULATIONS 10 1 1 ~ . .{ 11-1 5 Qk~ 1 4 5 - 2. COOTOR TO VERIF=Y ALL EXISTINE. UTILITY LOCATIONS AND I ..6 i CONDITIONS ON THEE Joe SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANT- kNORK ANTIGUE ENTRY POOF: · 3. THE CONTRACTOR 15 TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND NOTIFY THE 87 Or+tER - PROVIDE 0· ARCHITECT OF ANY' DISC·REPANCIES BED€EN THE ARC-HITECT1ERAL /EAT}·ER ST!2IPP!46 0-4 VI AND ST121JCTUI~1_ PLANS. 111 1 9 :1 , . 4. AREAS OF CONFLICT OR DISCREPANCIES MJE>T BE FULLY R RESOLVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION CONTINJES IN THOSE AREAS. 1 1 1 EXTERIOR LleHT El 0 - 5. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF WOOIL> 012 CONCRETE 9 - UNLESS OTHER}NISE NOTED. 0 6. ALL BATHROOMS ARE TO DE VENTED TO THE ExTERTOR MITH A FAN 9 AND DUCT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE 5 AIR CHANIOES PER HOLMUPER 9 COLUMN 071- ~ 9 a E- SEE SEC. E/A4-3 R SEE STRUCTURAL k CODE (MININUM). FOR STAIR PIMS ---~ UNFINISHED ~ DRAMIN<35 - 1 /1 1 :41 . BASEMENT -1. ALL INTERIOR DOOR OF'!ENIN65 ARE TO BE CENTERED IN P4ALL 0.-[-111 - LINE OF . FACE ORB· (MIN) FROM »(ALL FACE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERF'USE. CANTILEVERED HAND RAIL- ~ d 1 8. VERIFY ALL PLUMBINe F IXTURE ¢ FC TTCHEN APPLIANCE LOCATION 1 BLDe AeovE 1 1 0.-0. 88* - 7-0 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2 1 ANeLE FLUE IN .L_·:%94. ~ 1 4. PROVIDE FIBEReLASS BATT INSIM_ATION AS FOLLOVE,• CHASE AeOVE - FLOOR · A EXTERIOR P·(ALLS R-Iq MIN U 8 ROOF/ATTICS R-38 MIN VERIFY c ® CONG FDTN PqALLS o LIVINe SPACE R-Il MIN (UNO) E D o FLOORS OVER ORA}1-SPACE AND> R-30 MIN 1 L \ 11. A /1 0 r, 7 ! * \413/ CANTILEVERED FLOORS 51 LJ 0 1--Ef D-----1.1 1 10. PROVIDE FERIPETER DRAINE PER SOILS REPORT. III// & Ll-1 0 L_ VE€IFT' FNALL 11 FECNIE>E UNDER N._AB KADON VENTING SYSTEM AT LOWER L EVEL IF 7 <[ 1 le HetgHT AND 42 .r,~ PE =2 - 1 1 DEEMED NECESSARY 87 90!LE. REPORT. to RAILINe DESIGN _~ WONNER BEFORE · 12 CRAILEPACES ARE TO BE VENTED FEI2 CODE. JO FRAMING 0 -1 1 0 1 >- DE O . MINDOM NOTES: 0. 20 F 6 . P- 1. SEE BUILDINe ELEVATIONS FOR VENTING OPERATION. ALL VENTED Z i 49/ /1 -a <C 0 6 FUTURE ~2 UNITS TO BE PROVIDED WTH SCREENS BATHROOM-~~ ~ ' 0- 1 . Or , 2 1 SLAB * VE e 2. THE TOP' OF Rot»,1 OPENING ELEVATIONS ARiE FROM TOP OF 6ARA6E I ST-RUG/At_ FLOOR SHEATHINe e MAIN LEVEL & UPPER LEVELS Z O 0- > 2 1 AND TOP OF SLAB e BASEMENT LEVEL. Z - <C rf, . 12 |* 4 4 ORDERING. O IIi 16. 1 3. WINDOF{ SUPPLIER TO VERIF¥ TEMPERINS REQUIREMENTS BEFORE · A 4. All GLAZINe SHALL BEE INSULATED GLASS SUITABLE FOR IL In 1 1 0" 117 l INSTALLATION ABOVE -7000' CALTITUDE) AND TEMPERED KHERE - · REal,RED W CODE. 1.Ll b 3/7 I 31,7 RER/5 - 5. ALL }NINDOPe ARE TO BE a_AD, UNLESS OTHER,NISE NOTED - O _1 I 8· 44 8· COLOR= r#-11-TE BY' ·SIERRA PACIFIC WINDO~e- OR EGUAL. 22~e 2rr 2- · 6. MINDOT·1 MANUFACTURERS MMBERS NOTED ON FLANS ARE FOR 1 ·SIERRA PACIFIC CLAD HINDO»6 UNLESS /TRER}NISE NOTED> l .8 V 7- ALL NNDOM AND SUrnhle DOOR R.O. ARE BASED ON MERRA PACIFIC' CLAD HIMPOPIS AND DOORS. IF ANOT}ER MAhUFACTURER 11 1 1 1 ROUBH OFENINeS AND NOTIFY THE 04*ER OF AN-r DISCREPANCIES. IS USED, IT IS THEE CONTITACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO (SORDINATE 7. SENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUPPLIER TO CROSS REFERENCE b PLANS AND ELEVATIONS FOR MINDO,1 6UANTITIES. SIZES AND · LOCATIONS. NOTES 7-7 1 4 1 7-T - 1 8. WINDOW SUPPLIER TO ADvISE GENERAL (BACTOR IF 1. ELEVATION 100'-0. ON PLANS, ELEVATIONS Z~C~ 2,-7 FI*AMINe. AND SECTIONS CORRESFOD TO El_EVATION 7-6 W 8-1107 7-81•r ADDITIONAL REBFORCEMENT 15 REGUIRED AND CHANOES TO R.O. Date: 05-14-04 1457' ON THE SITE PLAN ' SKETCH PLAN 08-03-04 2. ALL SHELVING TO BEE DESIGNED BY' ONNERS. te-7 FINAL DESIeN VERIFf ALL ROD/9€LF Ato SHELVINe REVIEH 1 1 COFFIGURATION AT ALL CLOSETS NOW{ER BEFORE FlECHASINe AND INSTALLIN6 3. ~1~ P·EE,A~T}-i~~IF¥'1?46 AT ALL 4 EXTERIOR DOORS. BASEMENT PLAN ~ Sheet Number SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-O' i,gig Se FT PLAN fU,11,05•ED BAse·e·rr) NNORTH A2.0 j ! '0'cl 630IA336 1 HVH€Nll,~~NIN~-~L~ 1,~fl-1@NI11 C€9Ig 00Vhloloo ' 01*L-92:b (OLb) XV=! GOeL-grb (OLb) NHc! 19-16 NESIghl LA) t€h i « Uill '3€7 -\<2-7 1 1 1 60'# 37. ira l· W. g .-r€,. 1 1 t 11 11 111 1 . 1 1 Bed DECK CENTER WINDON TO BEE A HOOD STEPS ] FIXED /INDOk,1 26-X54.- TO BRADE --h E TO »0:0+100.rE 5'-4 3/4- E £ 6.-21/4, DU~Ni233td;INML.--- - I 1 4 - -3. | i ; ,-6AS +Ve . , O 40//€R I . + rt! , 0- --FREEZE PROOF HoeEE ----7-Ur~jj==~*715 ' 2 0 ~ 81% (VERIFY,) . ~~ 4 Blf-1"9506 h f I w~00.-. : M. 10· . R 5 0'1 . . -1- 2 1 6'-0 UF j 0-4 11'-5 F ~. _ DENCH , -ILASS ENCL. ARC·PED ... U 2------ 34 :12 C 111 1 51/ 3'-2 3/4' ...lfuu 31/7 3101 _ __ Er* - HAND HELD 11 5 17 k 5 Ul h / |T__ _ BEDROOM 4/ ah.- VERIFY KITC+EN I --1 SIUM - ~ rj~~-~z~ WO)-*EiR~ UNPER VAN--2-- 41%29=r . 7-7 L 1 - . 517 + I Prt 1 161_AN[ - | MASTER (r r- h . A.CEED 0 0 6 · OF>NE. ABOVE · 082 ED CAB - | 6 ~~ ~ -421 $ I ~~UNTER ----n- 1 ~| rn 1.1 117 5.-0. 1 2,4 1 & 1 ah b 3'4 | ."/ 3'-0 1/7 It. Il -- 1 ©° i- F€ED CAB T --- -- Il PA -- . k .1 ''E~ <. , 9 1 J .: 1 .- 30' RANNE ®REAT | t.1,9, r: / \ r-»- 3'-4-1 11'68 5,ef'/2. /' -1 \Rf'// -, IikELD h BQ 2M . & U,>= 1 1 p 183 - 5 u 3 Uy ''.0,&W k <.4 / 2< 9 1 . g 9 -1 U, . 7 POk€>ER ROOM & 61-4. 1 5 N ..., 3- potivES IEEE SEC E/AI.3 · OF'NS EJ.1 - FREEZE PROOF= i ARDHED :. __LL *IQF //LIT-/ 1 oa {fl 1 - 2 HOSE BleS Ch FOR STAIR IDIMS ~-~~ 9 f . - 212 -Te DECK)146 OD LAUNDRY 2 -~ z 5 1/7 I I. ; 4'-6 '7 f,3-1375.-0. 3 1 - - 1.7.i 20 ~EL. = 100'-0' 10 L _ ~ 1 -a ~ , StHIC N> E- LAIJNDRY - _ .1 1.3331©~_.. 4-_.- _+5.U~- .._.. 14' -1 + 11~El--5[1>_ .irIJAZ'Z-%.3 L_MUI-°°11. flu=;tr=-3 - ..- 5---1 · -197 h' LA 2 - - 81 - 24.60 :T . Cil Q Ljyi.mt I» 41£gast ' r--r,4-~· h' 2 AN ...312 2-J-42__-w_EljLUIL-' ----- __,-_.. 4. 1 ki --_p Dic 2 r . ./. 12·/ 3 .· / i le < - H'VAO OHASE - . N 51,'7 7,1-111 1 \L- HOSE BIBB .422. / 41-1 e VERIFT SIZE 1 I WEQU)F~ENT ~ 2 STY. 1 d 9 \--20 HIN DOOR . - ~ \ ,·USMOKE SEAL, AUT® CA..OBURE AND 1 PEATHER-STRIPPING( ~- T E 02*C ~ DININS/LIBRARY I lai . z 1 , GARAGE . : M'-6 1/7 Z O U- 3 g 122 -4 1 1 1 4 2 8666>-2 . . FD - SUKFACE MalJNTED 11 Ln \ EXTER/R LIGHT 0. 6 MASTER SUITE EN™Y PORCH U · ~ / /. 0-r r, 27-/ 224/ I 5 luz 5 07 5W i i 5 VT ~ &1 . / /-6.h I l- :Mil / - i \ 2, CEILINe ---2 5,(PED ' 1 ~1~77~7 1 |2.0. SLAB 1 Ble ON JOIST .VEL. = looto. '14/ SAVAGE) 1 - Date: /ALL HcurrED --*t-J 1 - 6 1 ' JO , Z.®Ve e!-1 V7' .8 v. r 7-7 1 17-6, 1 T.7 5. L. 5-T -/y.r 05-14-04 NOTES: '' SKETCH PLAN 1. ELEVATION )00'-« ON PLANE. ELEVATIONS 08-03-04 AND SECTIONS CORRESPOND TO EL.EVATION . - 127-107 .. ~ 25-7 PlliAL DESON 1457' ON THE SITE PLAN . REVIEN tu-·0· 2. ALL SPELVIND TO EE DES.16»NED B¥ Or+ERS. VERIFr ALL ROD/9ELF AND 9·EVINe CO,FleURATION AT ALL- CLOSETS WO}+IER BEFOREE FURCHASINe AND INSTALLING LAN , 6 3 )27 3. PROVIDE FEATHER-STRIFFING AT ALL , r EXTER]OR DOORS. MAIN LEVEL PLAN Sheet Number 4. VERIFY CEILINS CONFIGURATION r,/or{NER A2.1 PRIOR TO DRN}«LL_ MSTALLATION SCALE: 1/40 = 1'-0~ 1,4441 EG FT PLAN 5-14 6/ FT o BAR/~E NORTH '0'd 6301Ah136 1¥'HA,LOEU INVH€Nlil BONEICISE[hi 01929Eb (OLb) XY=1 6O9L-€b (OLD) NHd C€919 001*a0100 'Schl 54 1/2, 3 T ,C/l Eli EN¥1 031 M W f 461/2. L_« Alf,7 'cy 11 1 1 1 )0 £ E i 1 1 : 5 10 9 1 1 1 9< A 4 81 XHO i 620 b < 1 ta-0 - 5 Vr ·Z-4, VPV, . e 3.-6. . 94 3.I 3LT I 5/' 13'-6 9 0.-4. 5,7 - 1 6REAT ROOM BELOW 14ED CAB -14. ATI·16 r - .4 1 .1 Aftfn, 1 . , , . 1 / 0%917 / I 21 ~t BATH XXAN BEDROOM 3 / 1 1 1 543% . / 1 . 1 1 i:2.---f:: L « 0 C- 0 SEE SEC E/All S -PEN . 1,1 FOR STAIR 0 1 RAIL , ' 2 2866 11 l 'HATCH pENO·nES.~\ DIMENSIONS VOID SPACE .4 5·--1 I~•-_ Lp~ /-8.0,; , UNDERFRAME - ' 4 4, f# 2. OVER MASTER SEE SEC. F t St! 31,70(60 1/'/~,/·- 7 .0 \ / & 3 I ¢Lf-r~~5l'12~ 11.ifff·~9,7 / . , ;fl;& 73 438'/ b - \ 1 1 ,21 \ 0 1 1 r--, , I Y , 2 LI-1 0 1 sh--1-T» . 1-71* f /11 --- e I tn z <C 3 2-2 1-"97.-11-_LE€-~ill -f~ S~~11=- r- fi °i 9 i ,~- RIDGE 3 Ul'N L .--3 - - | ~ BEDROOM 2 4x 2~1 11 4 12 : ·. .' < 2 -_u >·- I HO /0 - 1 ROU/H - IN I L -1 2 2 09 PO - I.-4.-.- - 1-.-L/1 PL081% FO~ / Vfy IFUTUIRE BA™a 4-1 - -el g Z 1 1- 6'-4 1/4' .·# .1 M'-6 U2~ I . 4 2 0. 5.-1. 1 5 1112.r R El i <[ ~1 8 4 5 17 31/2' ' 517 -=4=1 31,2· ZOO-> 102.2~5'l T- - - - -1 ir- - . . 12 7 - <1[ 1 Il-M-<-1 --- I n. 1 grllc 1 1 i F.-36 L AUESl 0 00 : \=-+ HATCH IDENOTES i | ~ --- ': 11_ 10 INDERFRAME OR i· 9 ~ 1 BorroM of Top 9 k i i GORD- SEE SEC. F 2 1 0 . 1 1 91 ' SLOF'ED -1 1 4'-5 W. 1 ' CEILING ~ CEBILI-46 1 . -1 1 - ' c-A LINE OF= D'-Ok' -- 2 1 | Cllt~~ -*9 | ' 517 4'-1 VT 3#U | 1 31,12 4 2 I/7 . SI/7 1 1 1 1 1 I ___ ,A 1 , 1 | : .;' - .1_ 222 k EG m In . Date: NOTES: 'E 05-14 -04 1 4'-2 Vr 6-e 2/ 1 ELEVATION 100'-0- ON PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS CORRESPOND TO ELEVATION SKE-FC, PLAN 7451· ON THE 5,TE PLAN 05-03-04 e.-4 1/4. 6'-411,4' 0-41· i 20.1/7 : . 74 FINAL DESIGN 2. ALL SHELVING TO BE DEke,ED Er OWNER5 To nve fam . REVIDN VERIFY ALL ROD/SHELF AND SHELV]Ne tO# 0014=leURATION AT ALL CLOSETS ,4/0-ER DEF=ORE FUQCHA51NS AND INSTALLINe la O 3. VERIFY CE:Llte Ca#~teURATION WollER PRIOR TO ORYLL INSTALLATION. 9*7 MO SECOND FLOOA PLAN ~ Sheet Number SCALE, 1/·P = 1'-0' 454 SG FT P'LAN NORTH ~ AS.2 019L-9Eb (OLD) XVH GOeL-grb OLD) NHd ,9-,9 .Ul 1.-,QI 014 2 4 TO BLPI BELOPI ,UIG .¥fs r,l IN¥HeN Il-LON IbIA¥ BONESIGZ[al and NO11*1 21 /03 »411/ NE,1 ROOFIND NOTES - | 1 1 ALL Roof=S ARE TO BE 5TONE-OOATED STEEL ROOFINS 111 UNLESS NOTED OTHERM;SE. 2. ALL RID>6EE ELEVATION MARKERS ARE TO TOP IF ROOF 9-EATHINS. 1 1 3 ALL ROOF OVErMAN6 AREE 18~ (PROM · ~ til EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD TO END OF O f:O RAFTER OR EXTENTED TOP CORD OF | 1 iti i TRUSS) UNLESS NOTED DTHERMISE . i~ 11 X 4. ALL VALLEY. EAVE AND HALL - MIL WTTER FLASHINe; OUTTERS AND ·, | *~ 18 1 3 m D>Ople/OUTS; AND ALL ROOF \ D RIDOE PENETRATIONS ARE TO BE {TX'P) 20 BALVANIZED METAL /AINTED 2 /EL Ill--51/2' · 1'4" OVERHANS 1-T - \~ Tl- DOF~LUT -\\ 3 1-- 1 1. r -- n 0 Q. E OR T12.EATED),UNLESS NOTED OTHER'£ ·. W 10/12 3082 / 5. VERIFT LOCATIONS OF ALL ----- LINE OF~ PLUMBINe VENTS,/PENETRATIONS RIPBE Prto / .1% SNOM 02!OR TO INSTALLATION -LOCATE EL lie-2 5/6- \* ~,/ 61.IARDS <0 L 13UILDIN6 AWAY FROM ROOF VALLErS. 1 1 1 BELOFI (TYPJ 6. PROVIDE ATTIC VENTS AT eABLE PiALLS AND 4 EOFFIT VENTINS 1 £ 9/ 1 PROVIDE EXTERIOR OUTLETS FOR FUIURE HEAT TAPE. ; T-p j ~ - ROOF OUTLINE 8. VERIFY TYPE AND LOCATION oF |*8 · / SNE*N GUARDS :NITH Ok+IER _I_______ 1.1 , /1 1 1/1 .. -1 1 - FIREPLACE 1 » T~INATION | 1 1 1 0%11 1 1/ 1 1 · Ble 1 0 13 - -1*20 1 1 1 1 < 1 10/12 1 . RIPSE | *~EL 124'-11 3/8. 11 +EL- 1 8 RIP6E 1 1 "Tal - \49/ 1 1 L | 10/12 || F _1 ~ LLI R 7 \ I i I il - 1 My_1 016 1 | rt ~EL 124-5 IN V- · | . I 21 ~- I W o 1 1 1 1 . 15 9 -0--- li /4\4 Z O 5-> )082 10/12 » 1 ATCH 1 * 2 r - - -\ b~- -- -- --«- -t--_ _hl~~ 1 fi z - < / 1 0% | 12]PGE = EL lie-2-5/8- \* I 1,14' Al C_z METAL IKOOF AT _ /EL 122-21/2' RIDGEE ~ 0 10/12 1. :O/12 . 3 2 ENTRY PORCH z-73 1 loA2 RETAINING ;NALL In E 4--*GE- 11.-f-*Tl i ... L-1 rr -P\ ° fl , - 7 1 -1 ill 1-1 -,p-*1 \L- Mil pok,Spour ~ ~-v- < Int. eurTER --~ L____----------b-I METAL ROOF AT BAY ROOF lpate: NOTES: 1 1 1. ELEVATION too'-0' ON FLAN5. ELEVATIONS 05-14-04 AND SECTIONS CORRESPOND TO ELEVATION · ET PLAN 08-03-04 7451' ON THE SITE F'LAN 1 1 FINAL DESIaN REVIEH 4 ROOF PLAN Sheet Number SCALE: 1/4· = 1-0• PLAN NORTH AS.3 '74 9301 INVH€NillON IbIRVIN d BONESIGE!" C€919 Od¥210109' a*Mag 019L-grb (OLb) >Ogg GOeL-grb (OLb) NHcl RIDGE 7.2=Ree_ giF A 141146 T EL 121'-11 3/5» L:~' i! i .CliLf; 110:· ·-· ·- ; · '4' ~fur~ --------- Arr,O VENT PrPICAL 1: :~. .'~i~- |t' -|*-n 111,| 1:k -F. Ir .1-,~1., lr ~ 1 O eABL E INALLS _12 RIZE --- SToNE coATED STEEL E20OF -4-12.-52€LMEMTHING _ - - SHAKE PATTERN »FICAL) li :1 1 r -- T EL. 122-2 1/2. -ft'.'..'..,·A.:-i'13'F-[LF.11.../.:.t! i: 1-2.1~I :pv ~itt:I.....31-31 J.t~i;~'.-: ~~fl-~~,-i~.-f,tdal -4-- 2)<6 RAKE TRIM (n·PICAO , a RIDGE iR T.0 ROOF EHEATHINe i_144;"--- ..;~~~~~~ ,~~:2·-.·--Nk-43 4 LT-.: fI~%4%2- -yt-it rl-Fi : it----3. 14;· :!1~1-~il.... 12[Y-Lflfjvft ~--- i...~ EL. 117'-3 1/2. X 1 1 4 5 12'1.111-[110_LE 'Lift--·-£-.1:-2.1.11.:L ------- ---- - ~-t--I H-1--1 u-p~ v:p$ v..LTE-I;i#I,:2.,1-1. 2 --I --=I=-ill - ID BEAM - SEE / STRUCNEAL O EXTERIOR LIIHT 2 13 ·r~ . 3......'-4/ r. 411.i...r..:14.... · iL-LU·'= ·"· --- -fil - -I 11 . -1-4,2261'~,1 i~· '~.~-li -zi FIXTURE (TrpiCAL) 11'1111 11111 -1 1,;1[1! '~il ; =1... - UPPER LEVEL 1 TO. DECKIN6 HALF LleWT MAN - fit i 2-17.27~ =f ~~~f-27~73- 'I~-52 POOR I GARA6E N , --- - --- . EL. 110.-I 3/4. EXISTING BRADE 7 - 2>0 CORNER TRIM - - - frrPICAL) 14 ~ 11}Q~-- 4-1- --1 ----- FINISH ORADE- --1 [ _ - t - j ·---- : - -- U 1 1 0 . 1 E--- -- -- I% 2*4 TOP RAIL }N/2X4 -4= 2.47 -1 + Al ¥ 06 21= SKIRT 4 BOTTOM RAIL IX BANNISTER / 4 3/4' Itt-l• ---- - - ---~ ' ~ ------ ---- · 21~ 1 MAIN LEVEL 432.-5/.AB T.O. DECKING -- ---- 19 - -- -- - ' LUL--m -LIEL---~-1.-----222-2---222~ F T EL 100' 1 EL. 100'-0 --------- ~100[2 E3EAM SEE STRUCTURAL LI_-itriEG=-LII --2.i f- REST ELEVATION --- - -------- 2,<12 BAND TRIM,i/TOP - ---- FLASHING SCALE: 1/4~ = 1 -O- - i -~ 6><6 »looP COLUMN r-- STONE COATED STEEL SEE STRUCTURAL ROOF - SHAKE PATTERN (TYPICAL) BASEMENT LEVEL TO, SLAB ~---- C.LAD YUNDO¥7 (E·(PLAL} go'-0. /~&/--- 2/8 11EAD TRIM - EXTEND ~ 3- BEYOND 216 JAMB 1_LI O TRIM - n·P I PliNDO»19 Z< € Di RIDeE 11 RIE)65 T O. ROOF SHEATHING iT O ROOF SHEATHINS - ---/ -7--- ----- T EL. 129'-11 5/8' =O EL. 12q -5 18' n -1 0 9 0 >- 1 0 AT-rio VENT -TYPICAL '1 'pi,1/ : - w- I eABLE WALLS ---- LCi i. 4.- dll_1[J / SKIRT TRIM --rrP o < 08 1. , 1-- . 1 / RIPPED 2X SILL 742<4 Z Id.lth..1. , ' j Ll-1.1_i i L UL[L-11111[-11 ' *---~ ~-'- ~~;-- '-~.I:-52:~-3~1Ty~~177% 5-.-. L .1 :1 / 3* 0 FIXED 61.ASS UNIT ,~~if i , I Fl ELLI[ \10 / Z 1> N/DECORATIVE GLASS L.7.=1„4% <'rer, rr ~ : il,1-1.1-1.fllth,)6£-417%%=t- 7 7. / RIDGE (LEADED OR STAINED) 1 1 '/ INSERT O INTER[OR -i- 1 T.O. ROOF SHEATHIN6 1 11 1 ---1. i !. d =--LLUL-Ll-=.L! 12 A. 2 NOOI) SHING.LE 91[PINe T EL. 122 2 1/2- ' . :11.1 11121 1 1 1 T -'ir . E GLIT-L. P RO PANEL 11 MTL ROOF AT THE ENTRT PORCH 1 449*4=L - 1 BAY TYPICAL O (IBLE 31©S ' L-£-4.1 _11+ RID6E 1 TO. ROOF SHEATHINe 2xa FASCIA nYPICAL) -- 1 1 , 1 T EL. lie'-2 5/8- - - --7- - ~-1 -] 5--i-_ -»1.- 1 -2- 5 1 4 1 ' 2x BAND TRIM »-FICAL) HECH FLUE - 1 -i-.I--- 11-11 1-01 -=«9- 1- ' 4_] LE_I I I RE 12 1.1 - 2 9 HORIZONTAL LAP .r FIBER-CEMENT BRD (4. EXPOSED) SIDINe o HALL O FRONT DOOR /O-- 1 1 11, 3 1 IPPER LEVEL 7-|,4 ral'~14111-LI'll~~~~ 11111~V~11~11]L-?-AL-' 411 - i; 'iN!10'Ap 'TI'lili~,i: ~~ 1!1" T EL. 110'-13/4' ANUGUE ENTier DOOR Br OF+ER - -- - jn --.--n SLOPED CULTURED STO,f -- | - ' CAP 4 1 -" - 1 -11- 3 --1 -- -- 1 PE) TRIM o MINPOre ~ , ~ 1 ' 11 , OULTURED STONE BASEE 05-14 -04 IN BAY-~ ' ·' ~ J ---_I~-_-.- - --- I SKETCH PLAN :16-- 6----W-1 il t' 1 1 1 1 4 i LE- ~ --_-_- - i 08-05-04 BOULDER riALL - FINAL DEE,leN NOIES: 1 --1 - 1 11 3· HIGH MAX REVIEW 1. ELEVATION 100'--0" ON PLANS ELEVATIONS AND SE[TtoNS CORRESPOND TO ELEVATION it"di" 1 1!1 , , /Vt' ,·8 4'A D,4 -ful.... 1./rac.*43 7457 ON THE SITE PLAN '721;%5#U/--- 2. SEE COLOR BOARD FOR EXTERIOR -- MATERIAL COLORS AND HAN,FAC.nRERS. FINISH GRADE - T EL. 100'-0' L.-r - + - L....8,0 MOOD.Uxtd'*1 DECORATIVE hloop ~ FLUSH kNOOD 4 eLASS SU»·[AR¥ OF= EXTER!012 MATERIALS: - EXISTING GRADE » klex4 MOOD BASE BALUSTER5 }€2X PAAELS "NEULATED Sheet Number SHIN6LE SID>IN6 221 SF = q. 5% -~ - - - 4 HEAD TRIM TOP C I3OTTOM RAIL 6ARAGE DOORS HORIZONATAL SIDING 62 SF = 2.5% - =L-- - - A3.1 - - (4. MAX. OPENING) STONES ]PINS 2.123 y = 55 0% NORTH ELEVATION SCALE, i/4. = 1'-0. '0'd 6301&35 -IBnlOELLIHOW¥ INVHGNIJ--LON IBRVIN * 302 30143(1633 C€919 Oa*30100 'Gah!*Maa 019L-grb (OLb) XY=1 6O9L-9Eb (OLb) NHd anc! NOI1916 INVHONI110 N 'GIG 103 RID>eE 1 T.O. ROOF SHEATHINe TEJEEW-32- i ,illi ti.!D'11. : ~:.......1:.!! 11 :11·11.Ll :-i,1,42... :; !11~41-,1.-1]~1)1-!.u,L.i,-.~,i, bl,-1.i'.Lfi;!· 1.-7-64;r-Aill U. TERINATION ' ill· i |4~ 'L il«4-ju-C-zi -~1- 2,V I- ! ~11~ +Li ~dilpj~.f- t. -Ii ~1 -1--I:- -~''.{( ~:'--~ P IT --L %4 1.f izt.-j -it: -2 - =9-.~? .l L tir :-i-,2 1.; I .9 2 '.~~ T-t - >:I--R? 13 0 fo·<=, RIDeE . i i' r·NI 1 TO. ROOF SHEATHIND RIDet 1 T.O. ,«>OF SHEATHINe i[BLi:·.11 1111:1.....1 - dj T EL. 1161-2 5/8 A litilm ,-1.., .:11....21.iJ~I.!~4,:,-,2,5...-:14 I ~,.....:... i,,· 1,-N i.i.!,:' /-4 ~ ~ MECH FLUE 1-[1-111411 1% - 44 't.Ti':'(:7i:tli.1:-1.~J.l!11::~.3- -+ ,--f.~.1.'!1 --- --- . --- -- . 13 w x < _ ;~: ; .. 1 L.'-al-I-L,_L_! ~ ' 1 1 1. 1,1.. _I __. -:i_'a_*~1=1='---:311 ' k - --yin .~ 7,0 1 YZ3&~22 ------------ ------------ --- ------------------------------ - - - ~ 1-- -----7-EL.HO-I-3>47 -2-22-~UJUI-JU-IUU-2--3227212-FL-~ ------ ------ - --- 2-2_IN----~- - ---- ------------- lit --JIM - - 0 0- 7-1 -- r- LJ~*==LI 1227 3= -u ~ · 1 ! 1 - 1-- --I ~P i I ~ t :~~ ~~] - rc»» 9-- ... ~ ~ ~.-~ - ----- -- 11 1 1 - >1 4 --27 :7.- If L -31 -~ 1 - 1 STRUCTURE 7 - - - i - - -- MAIN LEVEL _0~ T.O. PECKINS 1 i - T EL 100'-0• EXISTINe GRADEE ---- -- = ' F-= STEPS TO GRADE- VERIFY -3.* CONFIGURATION (INGL STRUT REQUIRMENTS) I/OMNER FINISH eRADE - -- 39==211<0611=-- --- ---------'.~ ---------- ---- ~~~ i i -- ' - i i .- -- Q BEFORE STARTINe F'loRK 21 11"·|I -11-F ----=-== --4 1 2 :1 4---- - -- 911 1-- 1. 1 - -- C : 9-1 - - / 3 TO£W 90'-O. 0 MAIN R]DeIE D -SOUTH-ELEMATIOL____.__ na~~~mviar--a -- -- ---- -- -- - ------ -- --- ---- ----TO ROOF E,HEAT}41"6 . 7Eriyimi-372 UALE.-3--3'0'--~ 1 ELEVATIONS FOR | , -.9.33.1 .---6.-th.6.~rtct ~ TYPICAL MATERIAL NOTES | , . RIDGE o DORMER 1 TO. ROOF 9·IEATHINe EL.TiERIE- 0 ~I~ ·i'·· ·i.i., :..~~:~: ~~;~~~~ ~ ~~ 1 + i ~~~:~~ ~~~1-Ft EX 1. 1,1 ~[1 111 11 ~r~- SARAGE BEYOND 11 ..111.1-~- 0 4(fI~Til: 7..L ..l i ' 1 1.-;i ·11- rb ..1-2 - .1.-1-- 1.- L -~..1-16.ri~LJ~.~7 L.:.1.---6,-1--i:.-1 -, f [ -· 2-·rr'--'--- - - - ---T977*~'y' ' -p' LOG.Ill .i.... .....1. ..: i I : . 111 'r 618 1 MAIN RIDGE ~ „.„1 1 LI Liti_ ,- .1.222-:~ , .I : .~ . ~'~„]'~ ~.~-ILL.-1112-ILIt'i- .-2-1 Zi- i A T.0. ROOF SHEATHIMe < r- 90 -TEEVERTE=- 1.4= W..Ll .----~--..~ -3~.97-=27=--1-1 ult-0-«-L[12 ' di 1 -Ttorrn' -rtj: f~ rrr-T - _-*.In.ROOE_RMEN-HING 1> EL. 116'-2 58 ·i· · Ai".4-[ Alit>94-44 441 1 1 -1.C= 24...JI.:el ·,u.Ux~..;=4~*-r_ . ·I 'I i. i. 11 - - T.-1 -f TUCCOUT-1514 fI *-~r-t:CEXEZZ[Iltil_' :2.19_ir#1'lft-i i 1,1~1Trr~ 7T-11*lEftlll=u , UPPER LEVEL -4 L~ ' -r ,_11~Urili#40 -EP«-' 11 ~ 2%12 BAND TRIM ./TOF _1 _-_-_ 1-- ~ 1 i': 1 ~ -~07-rrn:~1··rh~TL,1.4 li FLASHING _ - rri -!,1 --- 4 11 -r--1 .~ th' - -2= "i 2X4 TOP RAIL ;N/2X4 67- [J--1 - SKIRT 4 BOTTOM RAIL 11 4 i--.-- ... .. -_-- -~ L.1.-1 - ...._ - _- I IX BANNISTER 0 4 3/4' O.0. 1 1 !1,1 1-=-11 Ill I -I» [_L 11 BASEMENT LEVEL - - 1. 11 =--'i ' ( 11*JL.!.]JTO-! i. 1 0 i torri-r R 41 ==I- 1 1 M.- i MAIN LEVEL i' Te. DECKING 1 1 1 EL. 100.-0. Date: EXTERIOR LIGHT -- ------------.------.--- -- 0:4 ~ SKETCH PLAN FIXTURE (TrFICAL) -- = !714-1 J-[. 01 - - - - 06-03-04 NOTES FINAL DESIeN REVIEW 1 ELEVATION 100'-V ON A-ANS. ELEVATIONS HALF-Lle,n- ANTIGUE AND SECTIONS CORRESPOND TO ELEVATION ENTRY POOR Err OF+ER 7457 ON THE SITE PLAN - 2. SEE COLOR BOARD FOR EXTERIOR EXISTING 6RADE .--_ k : MATERIAL COLORS AND HANJFACTURERS. FINISH GRADED .-- p BASEVENi - OF EXTERIOR MATERIALS: -2--3 1 7-0. SLAB Sheet Number- SH/NeLE S/PIN6 221 SP = q. 5% T EL. 40'-0· HOR/ ZONATAL 51 PI Ne 62 GF = 2.5% AS.2 STONESIDINe 2,129 SF = 55.0% SEE NORTH 4 NEST 2221 EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES SCALE: 1/4- = 1'-0' '72 6301 14*HeNIJ.LON IhinVIN 1 N 30=1 30NaCIGAI 0196--9Eb (OLb) XVN GOeL-€ 00*2!0100 'G NHa ENkil Ol 916 JON '99 101 .W -:.r=-Id i 0301'AL ·CIm Wl NI¥,4 0 41 3..! i 31: ripS:f D ·2 /J» 4.4 C - 201 001 so n DUO lox 2440 Old Trail Road, LA <12, Block I Aildriclae, Avon,Colorado 2,1620 COLOR SUMMARY -ALT SHINGLES MARELE,€AD IRAY TI-11 SIDI,16 EO////ZE PUNI TRIM SA,SE 11NT AAIL ~-~--« H »«=f«6»»-- FAMIA, RAINFOREST Vic Ill-r~111'I'42.424. \ -SOFFIT: BOX,1000 1 ~ 4130- E - EEI Jil Efi~1f)11k,~ou~[I-3-~-E - -sTUCCO coc. GA,SE 111 lili 1 lili„11! 1~N lili 11 111112_ r- 'M 11[ 1 1 '' 1 Ii'·'14"NIN~'" 114,811819 i ..2-lili % * 1-El 4«400.1« 5 M PeR' 10.2 . 11 11 V L_L-1 1 d#N I/; ~~ ~~ ~ _ Ip ME ~ -1 11 11 COOL SIE 1 11 --STONE FARMERS STO12 r,/ RLEBLE CAP /Ae6E DOORS· COOL 56- 440 Old Trail Road, LLC. Dj,NNER rea Barnson Scott 6. Turnipseed, AIA ARCHITECT Architecture E Construction, Inc 1143 CLacito: Street, Suite 211, P.O. Box :Z2a Eagle, CO 8163 quo-226-2€00 John Ar=It, Sebau Ims. STRUCTURAL ENG,INEER 112! Broad,ag, Suite 20 Boulaer, 00 30302 303-424-3525 RECEIVED AUG 1 0 2004 Community Development ARCHITECTURAL DRAMINES STRUCTURAL DRAMI\66 41.0 SITE PLAN A5.1 ARCHITELTURAL FOUNDATION PLAN LEO LANDSCAPE °LAN All LOMER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN At.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Al.3 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Al.4 ROOF PLAN I / .· , .../ i ·7. -,E.w#Mi'%..1/"-'27 , , j -3.-D: AZ.1 ELIVATIONS ~.1 BU~BECT:ONS -- -3-1.,1.-tu *.,2.:.1 : 042 AE.2 BUILDIN6 SECTIONS 4 £' ....11.1 1 .J V / I- PROJECT : A4.1 MALL SECTIONS - . LOCATION i -/0-3... A5.1 DETAILS i p. --/'- ..·' 4,4:Al ... t< 1 ©. ~~ ' 4=e. .- 75 41 1 - t 1 :A 45.2 DETAILS 274. i..K,i Ag.1 CONSTRUCTION STAGING PLAN .7 »··M' Aa.2 POLLUTION CONTROL ©LAN f lai- / ZI.1 LOaff LE·EL ELM™]CAL PLAN - r«-- 2 1 9#E' 3 3}KL>C.,· -:-4.e~ ':' El.2 MA!.N LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN -€5432 5 3 UPER LE·/EL ELECTRICAL °LAN Ly .,3-...·»€i. ,-4' 4 2:rl.:... b- ~ I :0 '' ·1, -- .2-51., i .it r~· · U / 1 3.~ 0 U 0 -4 1 2 4 / .-:tr. DiKE-FINAL DELI- 9 43 = -f-,1, , : 1) 4 AUGUST 2004 6 : PROJECT LOCATION MAP -AVON, CO (D k 1 \ fr Scon r. Tarmobeed NA \\ ,r>P.C.·i.~aun, fv·Dau, SITE PLAN SUMMARV TABLE CURRENT ZONING· PUD 2-U NUMBER OF DP€LLING UNITS: 2 %%i% 8818 scpft. 3 FlooR AREA EAL.1 DMELLING UNIT 34·0. saft. 5%0 GATV PEP TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ALL- UNITS 1 BUILDING HEI6H-7 ALLOP€D 35FT. BUILDINS HEISH- =ROPOSED 29,-111,1 5 J, -159 Frlrn,irr· 1 - w/UNIT- 4 OFF-STREET =ARKiNS EPACE REG'D- LOT fl $ OFF-STREET PARK!146 SPACE PROPOSED· 3/UNIT - 9!TE AREA: Iq,166 Sq.Ft. 4 \ 550* STE > 40% SLOPE: 0% i i 1 11 /25-~ 1 , AREA /% OF BUILDING LOT COVERAaE 4!82 sa.Ft. / DI.5% v .- E t 1 -4 :* 3 \ - Cl i i AREA / % OF SITE LANDECAPED 188 64.Ft. / 1096 43 0 \ \. 1 1/ e \ \ AREA / 9 OF PAVED SURFACE 2350 4.Ft. / 12% CD \ ' f 16- / / 10 P.\ \ \ BUILD//5 4/ ILITY /% . 0 \ SE-K 1 G 1 \ GAS INE, ~ \\ * TELE FED r. ELED. LINE i als \ 0 \ -- \ 3 1 C = \ i \/ 14 1 I a Lu A*»ED \ 0 \ 1- 1 .. 4/ 964 , \. 0 6 1 / 4 i =11== *1 - 2 \-M M *S Yi ,-- \ \/ ir X *Ue,29- : Er l\ \ A.ES 1 - 01) ' \ \ A , .u 1 & / ~DISTURBANCE ~ T TE:T"4-f lbA 51'zif)<l,vvNJ /1 \ \/411, 1,''f 1--~ ~ 1 ~ \\ Ill 41' - R]DIE /t \1 -4; ' 4 0 212/ 9-\ P. 4. MIN r 010 *LIT·r , 0 22cl \ /\ 1\ j * a;\ .oo. $ '; 5NCy'l / 1 0 STORAGE .,~ 1~ e \ \ M<:5%4 30:%14 .. 1 1 /311 1 1, 4" 1 1 dill-DINe // 91 1 v rn ~ 4~ (140 89;L , LOTIOI 4 \ Ill h 1 0 le .0 90.1 ; 1 it 1 1 SErBACK 1 141: \1 11 \ \ T./.RIDIE. ~ ~ IT. M. 81 0 ...'*-2 1/4·· / . 01/ 6 1 633¥2· I : i 1 1\ \.\ 1\\ 1-'.f-3 ~ ~ ~1 " \ R. 3-941 2 1\ T.~M· "\ '~ ' ' i 1 i \\ 2\ i\/ 1,11 1 1 ' 1 1\ \ \\ 1 \\ 1 eeR:23>k 80,1.25' SO'OSI*G: \01.M.i\\ \ 1 1/\ *x~---~--14 --4,2 A, 4~ 1 % It \ 11 1 2\ 044.8% 1 80% 9 * 2% \\\ 1 1 1/1 , 1\ 1 1 808 \\ \1\ 1 : -91 ~ 1 % 1 , 80/le' ; B \ill \ A 45 1- \ -/ D 1»/9--LE \ e \ \ SIt\1 \ m % 7 '1 \1' 1 1 1 -21 , 1 l 2 11 1 T.ORIDGE· . I 1' 1 N.0 ' 1- 2- - le 1 +X 1 h 1 173-Tr-~,-592=26 '1 1 ¢ < 1 \ TO.IRICkS' * ae- . 80103' i <M i 1 \ 65· 1 1 \ A 1 0 C ) ASP &%£LY *A\4 11 \ v 1 // 6~ , //10- /3 7 c/ XI - lilli = !-0 ,-/ * - \ 1 Bil Z"- i ' 4 I - 0,41 2 ,£ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 9 1 61-9--1 1 \ 1 * % -1 - - \\1 04 I- I ' 251< c't \ 1 141' ch _ , CONO.'4 -naw--T~ r,|10 ill 1 111 I'\ 1 N m O.21 06£: 1 \ y 1 L/' 1 . - : 11 i SIDEP41AAKL&~~ I . i i RECEIVED < 1 2 \ 1 ~I I lutH 1160 72 4 1 /1 MA. 00 2 1 |INv 81,2.0 oUT 1/ 1 4/ 1 1 -1 1/ 1 1 1 \1 '' -0 ' 1 1 OLD 116 AUG 1 0 2004 / · 395 C 45 1 1 U. , 1 , i. 1 , , ' 1_21 1 5 LOT IDE ~ 8078\-1 811 1 1 I i £30-n 80 - 01 1 L •-5 --77 \ q O\\ 1 1 -r 1 1 1 1--4 -- i /r = 9 -7 1 l Community Development 11 -- 111 1 11- - --- T.OA 50151 r BO,LDER j C./'P MO~4M·EWT 11/2 PIN€TER A.,IMIN.1·1 REF™ TO 70»1 CP Avar i I \ r ! -43 1 1 5.all ' STAIDARD GU-VENT 1 1 1.70 1.095' | - , ..0.. 18/ ACK I ORAIN~GE EASwer ~ i j ' ' 1 ' 15530' 1 111 11 J MH 1380 \ t ~RIM 5078' INV 72.2® ]N \ 31 1 6 85·41·02· / 72.0- OUT l, M ; ~ 1 : ~ ; i ; l i j / i / / / ~ -, . . 1 1 11 . S OLD 138 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PATIM AND MILL BE -2 3 3 NQIE: . e THE ELEVATION 8092.15 FT MILL 55 THE * SILT FENCS % 1 , 1 % 4 1 / 1 1 8 HERE AS 100 FT - O IN. E5. REFERRED TO IN THE DRAMINGS CONTAINED 11\ LOP€ER LEVEL T O.CONG. 808215' 40'-0' MAIN LEVEL T.0. SUFFLOOR 8092.73' =IOO'-0' f i - F- 0 1 1 ~ BUIL'INS SETBACK 5 1 1 »082.25' ~ 1- ~ r r< f r, ED -1 '-3\ NON-STRUCTURAL BOULDER hALL DETAIL au -A, ru-L-% 2 - C Af \4 ~39~ 0 ...© SLIR.......... STAMMED LS 5441 sle, • 8118.e· //1l UPPER LEVEL T.O. SUEFLOOR 8IO2.75' =00'-0. O 1 ~71%\ cri BITE PLAN I NORTH/ CA:D/ MALE: !" 2 10'-O» Al.0 SITE PLAN loll - 0909 lOisap BIRJui~ uo!'3111;suo 33 l06£ 82£-026 1 8 006£'92£ 026 IS 11009 XE[idna t-0/tE/90 139 993hl90Hd 1 -li l. ([-10 (lt·PE te/60/20 NV-ld Hal.BMS 880 069 8 0 3 'OAY Ht)(11}!U-lit'A to/PO/80 NDIS3(] 1VNI= 8110 *0/0€/90 dd¥-3hId BM(] )0/62/ZO MBIA325 1N3:10 U Y- 60 m son Duplex 2440 Old Trail Rocio, Lot €2, =>lock 1 Mildridge, Avon, Colorado 31620 4«40 0 TE- IHI- E38 EE 112~ 101- El -- 1 IQLL.LUU' 711'T'1413 1111.1. ~ 111111111 lili v'111111~1111.lili .111111 4 ..111 1 11.---Il d @W Ve'h 1 11 1 11 14* 3%~ 11 0-- 1 H 1 11 --1-A~ 70 - LGE#$1KI=11---~ 1 4 Il & 11~ ~ 11 1 1 fC!!4- 4-9 -1 !11!1 1 U,111111 *- 1- 4./ 2440 Old Trail Road, LLC. DINNER Grag Eamson Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA ARCHITECT Architecture 4 Construction, Inc. 1143 Capitol Street, Suite 211, P.O. Box 3383 Eagle, 60 51631 4-10-328-BROO John Arnalt, Sebou Inc, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 1121 Broadway, Suite 201 Boulder, 60 80302 303-444-8545 ARCHITECTURAL DRAMINGS STRUCTURAL DRAMINGS Al.O SITE PLAN AS.1 ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION PLAN LID LANDSCAPE PLAN A!.1 LDPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Al.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Al.3 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AI 4 ROOF PLAN A2.1 ELEVATIONe A22 ELEVATIONS AB BUILPINS SECTIONS AE.2 BUILDIN6 SECTIONS A4.1 MALL SECTIONS A5.1 DETAILS A,5.2 DETAILS RECEIVED Aq.1 CONSTRUCTION STA6IN6 PLAN Aq.2 POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN El.1 LOYER LEVEL flEDTRiGAL PLAN AUG 0 4 2004 El.2 MAIN LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN El.3 UPPER LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN Community Development DRE-FINAL DEDISNI 4 AUSUBT 2004 :£: 4 - \ 1 L SITE 0-Ak SU»IAR¥ TABLE CURRENT ZONINS FUD 2-UNT 5 \- NUMBER OF Dp€LLINS UNITS: 2 EZZe.0 FLOOR AREA EACH OP€_LINe UN'- 540,1 sq.ft. . 0 \ \ 1 BUILD!Ne HEISHT ALLOPNED BEF- CATV FED TOTAL- FLOOR AREA OF ALL UNITS 68>12 sq,ft. 24'-112" BUI.PIN6 HEISHT PROPOSED. OFF-STREET PARKINS SPACE RED'D: 3/UNIT w OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE PROPOSED 3/UNIT LOT q ~ 1 SITE AREA. 14,166 Sqmt. t?08 \ 'L BOF SITE > 40% SLOPE 0% 51\\'1\ , /Jr/- 1 AREA / $ OF BUILDINS LOT COVERAGE 4,34 sq.ft. / 21.596 AREA / 96 OF SITE LANDSDAPED 1¢252> sq·ft / 10% I #ILITY *p i I u~ AREA / 56 OF PAVED SURFACE 2350 sq.ft. / 12% a) E 1 8/LDINS 19-11- / -4 \ 4 \ \ i "\ I ././. E' ./ \ I SETBNX -It -DR,114 a \ \ 4- En \/ CLEO LINr \ GAS INE ~ ~ \ ~ i. *IZE- ~ . ~ \TO- 11\ \ - \\£ \ / lu-~35' / , ~MA"S,1-00/ 4,1 +4 \ /411' . 0, STA NIE -I- 14 1 9 FEIT / \ 1 1, L 6- G. 1 1 05 0 Qfie# ELECT ·IR. 4'*ED\Te / \\\ H . -0 *34\\ / \\\ 1 \ 1 I et>. , \ \ :2 t LIMITS OF _,--JT / /\ ~DISTURBANCE ~ -r- -4 MATER J \ \ 1 - 33 \ 09«L .7'Eli \4 7 1 ~ 4 1--F ----t 5 ~ ~'~% f~t~/f \4 1\ g \ 1 1 - :2 C) -11% % 4 : 1 Lly---T-t -1.-1.1. \\0 1\94:4~9% 11 -f/.r----4\ 1 1 5// \ xl: 1 B k' b 1 1- le'ALL 1 %1 A 1 1 0 11 \ 14 FT 6 ~ . 4/ I r' Mi u . U) B\1 %\ 1 C ~ ~ 74039:.fi- 6 1 ' LOT./ \ 2 2- F 1 1 I it 1 I; 1 1 +I FT ' 4 1 1 \ "\ \\ 1 \ m J lk....2 X 1 17. /. 0, . 29'-2 1/4·· / 1 j4 4 1 R.37141 , 1 1 \ 1 ~-9 N »-« ~ T•54- % \ ¥ . 1,1 \ 1 \ i 1 3 \ il l\ r? 1 - I L •/935' i j / \, IT i \11~ I \\2 \\\ .405,2, .c 1 le • N IO'/91/ ' '2,1 1 1 1 ~GH • 6•141 16.¢1' 1 \ . Lh-2 + /2 / I \ \ \ I \ 808/ \ I l \ 1 L )4 - U 1 1 40 1 \ h I ~1 ~il\ 1 ' 1 1 1 1,1 JUFS-\ 1 Dew=?b \ 1 I NON-STRUCTURAL BOULDER WALL DETAIL X D- \\ \ 1 1>/ 1 T...IRID.. 1 N.Ti WJ < M //1 \ u \ \ 0 0 1 ASP T DRIVE'MAY Lt X i I\~,1 ~ | 1 1 | 1 9 0 =2 * :/ff- 1 11~ 1111 1 \ Z -O 8081.05' I I 1 1 1/1 ; 1 1 C/3 214\34\1 1 --1'll / 1 11 - 28 ~;I I 1 1- 1 I * ~ a j t ViAT»37=- : 3/' 1 '' 1 ~ I ~I I ~~ RIM 8120' 1 <1 1 1 1 1\11 < 0 MH 1160 79 -U 1.0. .* 1 1 ADDRESS MARKER ~ . elle.1 1 i OLD 116 4 /" 6096. 11NV 12.0' OUT 1 . t 1 1 1 1/ 1/ -8078~ T.O.. 8081' 1.0-80 ' 1 LOT W 1 92, -- 1- 11 -111 FC'•O /"ff¥ MC]I//0/' 281/ 1 1 1 1 1 11/2. 01»ErER AUIMINJM LL ---r- T. A 2.0 I BOADRE 1 !111 l 1 GNP KOHI"Rt j B A. Doll' ! RET'6 ~ALL I STAMPED iS 5441 1 To/Lke=- 1 1 1 / Trp , I---- 11 1 ' !10 -15·MUTIL-!rr A.W Bort po' 1 1 1 C ELEV • 8118.8· i ACK I PRAIN~6E EASINENT ~ r ; 1 , 4 \ j 1 .0 1 1 i e S 1 1 111 9 MH 1380 ,\ 1 NQIX: lili l// 1 9 <RIM 80-78- 3 # I ) 6%-49=. 5 l l i ; Ir / i INV 72.2' IN \ T i ' 93. 72.0' OUT 1 11 11 O OLD 138 ~ | ~ | ~ 1 1 Lor€ 9 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR DATUM AND ~ILL Et 1 1 1 Z i It'/ 1 . O THE ELEVATION 8042.15 FT MILL BE THE SILT FENA % 6 , i Sdi Z REFERRED TO IN THE DRMINGS CONTAINED M W O S 2 1 1 9 1 1 0 HERE AS IOO FT - O IN. LOVER LEVEL T.C.CONS. 8082 75' =40'-0' MAIN LEVEL TO. SUBFLOOR 8022.15' .IDO'-0" UPPER LEVEL T O. SUBFLOOR 8102.15' =liD-LOU ~<ECI:f ~:~' MALE: 1. = ID'-0 1 11 BITE PLAN 1 Al.0 SITE PLAN V I V 'Pa u 139 SSBUDOWd l£918 OPe,0100 *3 1 tz 6 t,0/62/2 0 M3IA321 1N3113 t06£-82£'0Z6 1 9 006£-82€-0Z6 Unis Op@Wil UO!;0.45102 011 0 ON lIVkil al O O++E 0818 00¥k[0100 3 9 (11 21(1 -1 i Al vo/,0/80 N91930 1VNI=1 8210 *0/0€/90 ddV-3211 9310 VO/60/10 NVld H013>IS 880 alep :anssi - Plant Schedule E 452 \ Sril.,1 Common Name bwiL # 11 1, : (,r~Iti I Our.1 517. \ \ 1.j Quakilig A.peit Populu. tremuloide, NOI~(1 35· 25 b 2 3' Cal \ 1 \4 \ i.#B Mol W.#·.· Spr» Pic•·a puli.Ki,n. 'Montgo!,wn'' Nol~l , 1,1 ual 6 KIondikc Potenwilla Putentilla Irulic,ba 'Kkulk€ Pair 0.· 272' . ' C.al 0 . 9 \ 6 59 2 . e 1 11\ 1 1\1 1 \ ~ R ) Red L,·a f Rov Rma glau:a r.. 675 12 5 Gal A t\ \ l 1t\I Unut<1 1 1 Ljog triki Red 1 wigged Connub 'Bailevi S'/10 1 5 Gal. 1 \ 1 \\ 0 Z =C I \ 1069,3 1 \ ...A.. SF:\\'t ~ ln 1 31\ 1 %% - S. Y ' \\\\ ,\ 0 e \ 1 1 \ '-*-<f \ \ / A\ 1 \ \\ '10.....d. Al! Distuph<·d Ang• 1 \ 1 \ - Native Gra,·sA\'ildlluwerbid . 2 0-1 P 1 N 74 505€- . 1 1 \ i \ ,/\\ 4\\ / Spraylrri/allon I lead .- C W \ 1 - * 0 C t- \ \ %* .™ . 1/ \\\3\ 6- 4 A.*1 I /1 / -- - - - - Drip 1rrigatiuri Lim . 9/\ , 4/ N 8 645 \ - .610 A ./ /1 4, . 0 / L LIMITS OF \ --- 1--- --- \ > S >\\ L ~DISTURBANCE 1 1 \ 'I-, € 2 -: 1 ..2---~-t le ' 1 \9\\C-4-\0 \ 1 * 1 Fa Irrigation Table 1 \ 15 r. 1 + \I Landeped Area Provided 1(r<, 01 Lot / 1988 sq./ .GO../Sq h./. F' 0 11 9 4 j ~ ~ 4 - i /V ir .1 j 111 \Itti total 1rrigated Area 9.4% O, Lot / 1800 sq.ft •. Of Landscaped Area/Sq. Footage I Spray Area 62% O L// 1192 hq tt .„ Of irrigated Atea/Sq. Footage '* 1 3~3--+C--- . ' f ,- 1, ' 1 // \1 1 1 Drip Area 0.r,OiLI/158 .q H 4 CM ]rrigated Area/ Sq hootage \ 1 Sod Arca 4.4% 011.11 /948 '411. % Ot trrivaled Area/ Sq. Fuotag€ \ a. ..P J 0-1 &., 1 1 1 1 \\ 1 \\ T• 54.85· i I / h'*Plt,2 1· 1 1 No~t·: L.®92, \ \ 1 IN \ 1 1 groul' d sprav hy.lern Ice·N e·ail· M \ 0 1.3 All nativegra,>39·don·arivillbeirrigatd M tiw /1/1 v'·ar with o limpiran' above 1 21:4 4 \\ %41\ \ \ \CHI .41 \ \ *\\ \\ /1 gif, / ~ . 11 -1, 6\ 1 i Ji 2.)Rain k·nsor tabe in„alled with new irrigation system, 1 1 1 4 \61 1 - i ;/ ~ Ill %4 6, I 1 1 11\ 1, 111 111 \ in order b ink·rrupt irrigahon in the event 01 signiheant raintall 01/0 1 U ~ \ 111 14- . €6¥j- 1 1\ 1 1 \1 r F i 1 14. 1 1 \ 1 41 \1 U.1 < M 1 1 1 1 \ \ i \40 1 : 1 1 1 9 4 1 , 1 / 1 --- 'e.- / * 1 ' 1 1 ; 3 \\ 6 %200 ~ 114 ~ i ~ | \ 1 7/--,rf' 1 1 L' · 1 1 56; 1 li 0 Z Wi p \ ; 1\W 1\.1.- 1.-Parl. 4 4,4-r. .1 -fl ·i:./ 1 ; ' 1 1 \\ 1 Z % -O 0 ZE> 7 < 0/1 1 i\1 1 : 1 ..i:- 91 1! ~ 1 \ 1 | 1 1 1 0 MH 1160 1 \1 1 ~IM 8120 1 J ~OPRE56 M.",8 1 . + % l. INV 12.0' OUT 4 , 4.-lf 1 OLD 116 .. 1,1 . 1 9/1 :Ir. 1 1/ 1 y LOT 108 -- 804. 45 i i 1 1 1 tool ./ . , .1- - illilli c,P Mo-err 33,1 1 C'' Us2 - ' r....1*ver HO..INT 0 - 0 . 1 1 1 1 1/2· DIAMETER N.ilile \\ Z.9 L tL 1 ---1- I 1 r 1 ! 1 1 1 STA,FS LS -7 1 1 18530· ,/ 1 I 1 / ' ... 0,"le 1 3 + c 4 K , \ £ 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 / 2 1 j . 0 MH 1380 I ses·*02 • IRIM 8078' 1 M 0 , INV 72.2' IN 9 3 72.O OUT ~ r. 1 OLD 138 1 ~ ~ ~ l ; 1 ~ ~ove | 1~ 11~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ C} \ to j Z dl j SiLT FEN.8 5 K%%. 6 1 i \ 3 - ~|~4 ./-~in LANDSCAPE PLAN £ NOR-4/ 43.0/ SCIALE: 1" = lor-C. Ll.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0909 -- 0208 unisap i O 017-1€ VIV,paa 1009 106£ 82£ 0L6 J 1 006£ BLE 0L6 d EM OpeJO'00. 1 1 31!ns ·10@4 10. EM *0/6Z/ZO MEIAEH 1N3 I10 029 1 8 0(1¥110~1 HDUINCI--11?A to/*0/80 N91930 -TVNLJ 880 to/PZ/90 13S SS3259OBd ro/0£/90 ddV-Elkid 8&0 40/60/LO NVld H013MS 880 e 11 1% 11 131.3 -ci- 41.-0 4.-21. 31-4. . 414 /31 a, 1 \67 957 0 2 7 a 1% C W 0 ' 1 6 62 1 1 1 4 · 1- Ef CA321 .i V Ma CRAI- SPACE a . ..: i:·t ·i s . , ·, ~* : ·· ,~:·r e'.. nl·:,* ~ · 4,·'·.'ir,·. ··. w.:. w< .1,4..7.)7,. t'.i~ :·'Il~ . .,'!7 ~ 7·•" i·/ ~·: Nt. 1 70. .' 7 ·• ·~ ·~. a 5 f ':I 1. - - f 7 MICH. ROOM - 0 181&12EY [-- , . GRAA SPACE -A ~ TO. GONO uP I R - ' t' -, - 2 ¢1 00 -0 . 6.67 7 : ·2 El~ · - MIESH. ROOM 3 - f i 0 . t n i --1 LAuNDEr . -~, U I BE./ A 9% , /\\-a -/:AG L Cties,CS B... BEDROOM I <% 1 '1- 1 1 .0,7. 90-0. A 1.-1 BATH 14 le C ~ HIGH FT OF CONS £ T.O. GONG. el'-e 1 : MUDROOM C' 4 10 1 - STORAGE 1 i %* 20- f \16 10231 BENCH,v -. L/h U.1 5 SL O...5 BELOrt A JEI),6IH_i j/ - 9 BEPROOM 1 2 - 11 b.7141 1 ® HIGH Pr. OF CONG. - '4 0 E O 1 84'-6. A < -1 \-1 # CE 22 0% PECK ABOVE %=227 28&8@Ii 9 3 i z. '- i 0 0,1 , 9 X 11, 1 ! < W ' - (*I-ETER U= / 060129 ¥V On·ER 2 , 1 1 1101 / «· LOPN Pr OF CONS. r , U. pECK ABOVE ' %74 / c eq-9' ' 18080-/. 947 , - 1 \91 21-1 ELES METER \ DISLOS~E X..4 * LOA IT 0 - LONS p- r ch ..1 0 2-0. I 4-0. / - CENTERED ON •kL 841-L 1 h f I A ii 7@37' . NIS -010 4.-13. 34• 1 2-84 3·.I· 2-4~ Al' 1 24· 8.-5. . 2.' ..0 ... 1 2-03. 2.-6. 1 ..0. 8·-5· 2-7 4-lp B'. . 9 34 3·.D• 2.6 :Mz 15'4 j 6 -0. 22.1 23-0 61. 1 .·-O- ci '344. f. E % 510 1-I-' 1 -1 A43 LOAEK LEVEL FLOUR «LANI 220/ SCALE: 1/4" = GO" j FIN!SHED SGUARE FEET (EACH UNT) -13/ GARAE SQUARE FEET (EACH UNIT): 518 Al.1 ~ LOWER LEVEL PLAN $£919 opwoloo 1 Eplk PO/62/20 MEIABB 106£'BE£'046 1 i 0068'62£'026 d Ut 91¥ OUZZIL) 1(JJ NUAV J:)UNIL-1 11./Y\ *0/*0/60 N91930 -1VNU BU 1100 S 139 SS)MD08 L (110 0*+E 40/60/10 NVJd H313 PO/OE/90 ddV-3 M. r-1 1~ udf 01 13.1 2-€1, ~ , 6·-3.; 1 1 1 1 11 4 1 1 : 4 , 1 1 1 - 01 1 6./ - 11 1 1-t i 1 1 11 1.28 ~32 Ct 1 - -r- 1 1-1 1 1 .---4-2, Elit-I L-----7 11 1 11 Lw l 4 1 co " 1 41 Aa,2 1 1 " AITUEN to v - 0 0 2!*0 0 n " FAMILY ... 11 1 1 r--V--11 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 .1 1 £0 -00- 9 0 .) (fc=Lb . , 0 QI<*!EN " O' 0 T.O. SUBFLOOR „ 1-- :00 -( 4 >a PININ# D) 21 FAMILY u ie 11 in ~ ~ -pR ~ ~ ~4 < ... 1 11 UP / R CAT ..67 4 'AS / .T BATH 2 '0 I STNE 1- cz~ iiim ® TO SUBFLOOR €r• 1 *DO· SUBPLOOR ON 18 R ...1 1001-0. 94·-O S *31 - CNIEI / /1 tr 2 R - LIVING ROOM 2 R<~9 7 . I 0 6/1 / -0 e - 1 J 1 ' 'TOVE Al; ------ UNCI 1 : 4, - C»[ 0 R * TO SUBFLOOR 4' BEDROOM B ~~ ~,.0.,~ ENTRY -1 qq'-01· U 2 -_PLUE» (=1=# BEDROOM 2 4P /2 R MiNS_EQOMI o o 1-210 + :1 3 I 11 ./ ------------ LA / I .t EL - 0 -4 = 16 / UNZhl ------- - /71 ET-[-7-1 -9 - Z 01 - -1 00 BEDROOM 3 44 4,6 4, - =2 -- BEDROOM 2. 42 -- - «O LhnE=ljo 0 - - [/D eN' a - Et - 1 . - an am - --i 1 1 ' 1 1 4 1 1 -i ~32 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 K----- -4--------------7--------1 13 1 1 1 ' 1 1 El ~1 *1 41 El ~ =fti__~_____________ftl~~ 3. El El El M El 1 49-6.L LELQLQL.62LQL-1 rih MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE. 1/4. = I'-0. FIN.BHED E>QJAR. FEET EACH UNIT). 154 I Al.2 MAIN LE'El PLAN VI¥ fpee 1 06£-2026 1 T 006£'BE£-0£6 *0/,0/80 NDIS301 (1¥Ok[ 11¥11.L (1-IO 0-ki, 0CE)18 OUVUO-IOJ 'NOAV 2[Dal 21 01-1 lA\ ko?069b ta/60/ZO NV1 *0/62/20 1 11 />1/ - A'-L~ 162' 9 4. , 5·- 1,-H. 1 H: 8414. 4·.11- PECK BELOYN ~ 1 1 CD U) - 4 296, 977 7 7 I - : LU c E = 11 !1 1 M 11 r' 4/]. /h 01 - co 2 .w =f = 2 1 3831 PECK EFIC,1 A 43 / \I T Fn~ 1 \Me 22 . 0 Fo 77 9 / - co ". V 1-2 1,----11; 11 11 11 11 R 4 ' - MASTER BEDROOM I Ch " 0 * 0 0 -r 2 R ~1--17 J [7~ b MA5TER BEDROOM 2 1 1 .®11 & , 9 «t 1 al=ES, i : all=j : 1 FNALK-IN i i MALK-IN 1 ; CLQNT J 1 CLOSET- 1 1 1 1 1 01118.---- 7 1 L.-------- j .6.-1 th---1 1 1. ' 1 1 1 f 4# I, 1 KER=th ~ E161=52.N % (H!&) | i CHERS) ~ 6 r „- :--------2 A---__--_--_...3=======DIZ~ 4(~3 mt=A / le---11 1-1 --O // f 0 1% 5% 8. Z Z A .0 PECK BELOVY t 0 3 6 2 A 1\631 0 0 C: 2 ' 6 0 1 /// 4 DECK BELOK ,~ f I i 0 0 6 3' O 3 - L- 0 - 0 1 01 90 0 0 \61 V /L-h 6 49. FiaEE 21-4. 26·-4~ 1 17'-8- 1 11-51- -31· 8 1 4 1 21.3 :5 211.1 ...,rih UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SCALE. 1/4" = 1'-0 FINISHED SQUARE FEET (EACH UNIT): 614 UPPERLEVEL PLAN VIV XH~Idn *PZ/90 13S S uAS@p Jop@ (]-10 0++E 1£919 ope,0100 PO/62/20 U 81NallO 106£482£'0£6 3 9 006£ WEE-0L6 d 029[8 OUV AV 39(12[alIAA 40/40/80 NDIS 1VN13 E]Ha :elep anssi *0/08/90 dd DO/60/20 NVld 13 MS 880 77 / 1 1 24' i Cev 9*7 0, E 1.1 1 9 11 /4 11 11 1 1, 11 Ir-----11 / \ TO. MALL 109'4 TO )~AL-1. I M ·- I/8 / ! 1 lilli 1 + W 2-4. 00 1 1- 4 1 1 ! Al Y n hi 1 1/\ .1 /3 - T C) *1-I I/8 ..~\\\ • 10 K ile'-Il Im . 0 1--),---+ 1 11, 11 A I / 24· 2 4 Ch 0 E RISEM ELEV T • 126'-2 38 1- e /1/ mitall·j 17\2 2 =ZE= \ 4. r, \ d t- 6.12 , T.5. MAL - lie -0 64 T . €,- 6,12 T 6 E 2 C / 6,12- RIC>SELINE ELEV. / \ r. *==4 - \ • 06'-2 3/8· / . - .- 7-V=al \0118•15? / -7 I 4 r==4\ /-/ i V - 0 1.0 MALL Ill'-11/0' ~b, ---- i / Ni / \041 . 2%6' ~ 4. 5,112 1. 6:0 --> 0 0 ' 5=k== -- a ' -/h Alj Lt TO./ALI 1.-11- I ED. /VALL 114'-1 1//" IR----11 41€34 TO. MALL 110'-10 1/4 TO rl,11 IOE -6- . Z ' IL. I I T , ° ° 0 0 CO 1 - 1 32. ' m .....0 .112 --> 4 0 A A 4,- - , M 0 - - <40 - TO ryALL 108'-iD 5/8· h 0 2 < 0 r - D /0 i Led h 1 5 2 4 4-60 N 642 -4 1 0 0 - 5 C 1 . T. PW..L /8 -11 5/8' 07-3- 3,1 , • i XI =2. 61 tv - 1, :2 -6. I ' r© PIALL 42'-11 5/ \82/ ~ 41 1 i 0 l. /\ t--f 1 1 . 7 4- 3 «4 - 0 E \\0 - - 1~ 1 \ 1 Z 1 1 E E 2 n 1 1 an ROOF PLAN 12/ MALE: 1/41' =lie Al.4 ROOF PLAN IMP < Ojlon.lisuco~ amINWJ.le (Ivoll -livul al k0/60/ZO NV-11 HO.13MS 8hla 1£918 ope*400 ·61 Itt @UnS 1@@46 101!de:) £,Li t,0/62/ZO M3IA3h3 1NBI13 106£-82£ 016 1 9 006£-BEE'026 d 40 ¢--6 TO. KALL 108'-6- 6.Ol'J .G-,5Ii • Ing aligeal 0(918 OUVE)-103'NOAV Elf)(11 11(IllA\ *0/*0/80 NDIS30 -1VN!3 6180 *0/0090 ddV-3hld 830 :alep Janis V I V 'Pe VO/t,Z/90 139 SS32190Ud Uinl 1 40. (-2 11 HALT WOrite , , 1:,·4·ne:.. A ./ 1 lix -1- - 2;0 CEDAR FAEGI - -/ // 1 5 sca rrEP ED· THI PLY,1009 SIDING---------------------------·----»+ 8/0 j Ilill'll'~111111 :1 EL 110'-O* 6 r - - - - I.#*SRE) a t 11 IF=]11031 9--'Ir==11'In'11 111 11 Cl _1 5 STUCCO C UJ CEDAR 'O DECK 0 A,D RAIL SrSTEM 0 - - 1~1121 1(1919 'il -OIOLlilli 'EL===lib 1' 12 11, ~Ul~U 2 ™ 18 ~ F , -----# ~ -1 T C - 0, t D /21 / 1 U . 2%E T.0 SUBELOOR $ 22 11 1 11i EL.tOo·-O £ a % 8 i T.O. DECKINS - . -.--.-- . . -- ... ------------------ - --- ---!Il----- - EL, 98'-9 - 111. f~ 1 1- ...11. . Iii 0 I 1.111; ilt. 11 1 --. -1------ 11 0 0 1 1 - c / 4' -EDAR rE) DEGI< 1 1 19 1 C C ..1 1 1 . -DE- 1 \ - .1-24{1~ ----- -- --- U) 11 ' TO CONS. SLAB \ \ 1 1» - -- .--- 21~ 2 EL.90'-0 -------1.- T.O. BAPAGE CONS. SLAB STOF·E ' #------ -- »1_ __L EL, 89 ·-6. ALUMI- CLAD 1 11 L________+ BASES db ELEG METERENG -____10_______--____U __3-_-_____ -ulb /n FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' 2 ALT ROOFINS tj 00 ».1 U 2XB CEDAR FASCIA 0. 5 Ch a 0 4 -4 iii kidj e I LO_ 1 j | 1 AINTEED r n-11 Pwr NNDOPX SCHEDULE B.OL UNIT FRAME HEAD HT. ID SIZE M x H AFF - 5-0. EL 110·-O -0-- -9_1315re-7 ® 130. x 30. 8 -0 CEDAR K. DECK < ---- AL RAd. SYS-'51 -7,0-311 ---- O-111 - 11'lili I ImiEJ 1*Abal- ~ SIU, ---- + 1 ~ ~, 31-5 ] 1.-t~r-~ 11~ 111 ill 1111111 -- - - - - - . TO SLE~LOOR - - - 1 - 4 '-. -F- - 100 -O 33%29«EfULL ---- --- -------- ----ll.OPEGKINS @ | 30'~ x 54 18 -O. -- -- - -1 ------------------ ~~ -- EL. 45·-q'· ~~~ ~~~~MIE'k' 1 1 1 741 J Lu, 4 I ur uji o: -1-- 1 1 @g~m~~ 1 2 [1.1 01 0, 0 0,1 ~~-0-Qs/*sap/1.»*#44*¢ff-3 11 ----- 1 -1222402- I - LJ 1 11 01,- /5~_2~2112222*LION MALE: 1/4,1 = 11-0· 1 -g ~ ELE€.ELL 1 V 'P XiI'-Idna NO 10916 02€10100' 40/6220 A,131 106£ 82£4026 1 9 006£ 82 t,0/*0/80 N91930 9Nt avoll livwl al 00+Z 0(91 8 OGYNO-1 'NOAV 39(!ING -IMA k,0/0£/90 ~d HO 3 //Hhi ROOFINS ' 77' "HAR FASCIA 11 11 1 11 n F U n 1 1117 1- li~ 1 1=- 1 -1.- 1,-i ; 11 1 ---- 1 -- r-1 1~ I r- --1 'F~ 0 11 le» IE_ EL. IEL- I,LI , | 1|(#11 2-_ le_1.11 IEL le_- ~ 1 r A,i.,LIP i' TI-Il PLY,•DOD SI - ens. T.O. SUeFLOOR /1 0/ EL liD'-O 0 - 31 --I------- J i 1 la===1 11<L Ki> 1® 1® --5-: ---- T O SUB/LOOR $ = - ~Flo REAR,02-0 1 ---- 1 1 - -- 1 1 11 11 11 - - 'RA~E. EL. 01'1·-6' 11 Ill =,AD<15·:IN6 bRAPE | ------------------------ -------------- -- ---- ------L ----4------------ «cur---------------------2-% I dILL--------------------22--5 1 1 -3- 1 L- 1 11 W - -232222~2~ ------ 2222- -LUILLED__22323222 --~~222222 2~22322 223 1 2-3 Ipt ch REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" ASPHALT ROOFINS»~ >< a U < 1 = U J OF 2 2 0 2XB CEDAR FASCIA----_________~ ~ ~ ~ 02= Z% O 2 2 13 Or - '....333.-- -- ./ %53 PAINTED 8· TI-,1 PLINI/D Slot 8·O.C 32/ C/) 04 -1 MINDOP* SCHEDULE Ta. SIEFLDOR UNIT FRAME HEAP HT. ~-77/---- ------- .~~42:k» 4 ID SIZE M x H AFF ~ 51.- 110'-0 21 - ' - ANC) RAIL SYSTEM -EDAR <. DECK SEE SHEET A21 -- 0 0 / ----1 -1 0 TO SUBFLOOR /0/ - 77.-=/ANN 17-=2-1--U-==1 -*- EL 100'-Dll T.O. DECKINE. * ~ ~ ~ L ] . 90 1 1 1 1 73311 :1 2 R <1/ 1 toi 9- r r#amt- - -- '17\.11 0% 2 --- - 340 5----n C~Z:D 3 -.INx - --42=G-- 7,7-7/B- - - 4 %1 W % EE 9 T.O. CONS S./8 4 - EL ID -D 2 -_ _ 0 -_ - -_--4 · TO 6/*ASE LL. LAB L-1 2 -Z==142 - .2 2 EaTING GRADE------'- -~ ....- ~- 6 1 ---- EL EM'-E' ELED METER ENLLOEME~ ----------- -2 LEFT ELEVATION ~~.~ *.3/ MALE: 1/4- = 1'-0 ELEVATIONS VIV :Paasd!Ulnl'S ilooS Unts@p JOIJ@lull uolptilluloo~ amP@1!40Je *0/60/20 NV LE@[0 Ope,0~03 'sl 83 1 LE 4.nS laeliS lo~!deo Ept L kO/62/ZO 3IA38 1 N3I13 106£'82£~OZG J ¥ 0-06£ SIC'026 d 0f918 OUVMO-103 'NOAV 219(111[(]IIAA - po/:,0/80 NDIS30 1VNI3 8HC] OOSSI 1 U CT-1 f 44.1 / 1 -\ 01 r.-3-11 - 341 1 \~ AE> 2 ) < ~« ~.t>.... j kofF - C 21/ . \9\ 1 &4 - 1 4 1 < I / 2 € .8 CENE Bal | 24- MS) &2>1 (A ne-ml &12EI 222I 1 1 0 ·g 8 - 40 TO. Sue'looR C ---- -~- - SIEE5-1-- - -1-~INES ~ r-E~ 0 1 1 . g..110.4 C U= ~~LL | | r-~7// - eN 9 Z 1 1 -/83 1 /1 1 1-E~ ~ WItt*LEQQM QAI EljILY B&IM-2 tIUL ,/AL B&]E..2 EMIEY LIM!FLEQZ 2-2EI . h 14' 6 1 .4 - CO US 23 1 1 1 -40 1 1 1-1 Fl'[immi' low Ill TA .1/Flool I 2·a - %9 46T~~1 r-i,2 1 - 4 - EZE~- - -11)NEN - i» ----- -11=!2*969 1&12444= EL 100·-0 ..I. 2 O EL 'le-01- 0 1 1 11 1 1 U) -t----- | ~8221.1 MPROOM 4-L tW&221 mKD:LJ ir ~2EQQM.J 1 1 'g\441_ 11 - T.0 coNS SL-Af3 1 &010-0- C -0, 1 1 0 1 1 /7, BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4» = 1'-0' -1 D - Z berII Ill'Ill'IlliilllIlllIHill'HINIT'll 2 Q - 1.4 /~5~=:=N - < L/3 (N O ......OR - 1 .*Al b ERAA- __ _ ___ '»2« L==31-_11 71- - It X) EL- 110~-O~ 1/ i I-=111 111 11 11 --=C ~~-1 L==]Ill 1 11 11 100 b L ! tl W IragQM..2 BOZEDgim eNEQQM..2 BQEQQM..2 m jIll 9 4 UM £E i~ ID WRFUXA - 44-2- -th ' tl ' 0-+- · 411 122111 1-11_ lillip.- 0 __- I~ ~___~______________ _~__ -' , -----1 141>1 1».4 1 116- ------------------- « L 1 /911111 @:-7 - L-j 1 cy, . S! S, 5 ., '8~ 11@*1 EL 0-1 -1 .1 „1 11 1 U 141%« = 71 EggMI ll ~~C'~~ 1-- Ill 124:11 'flili~l~*» u- -5-14 b 15 6ARA6E =Qgh= 2=EME 6ARAEE -ir-uk#L - ------ ---2-2-=6~ IezE=~22717 - CM. 4 8~*mi L ~ ~ 6..,16: C,»C 5,~5 CEZ~ CXZ· 2 El ZI & /3) BUILDINS SECTION 75/ SCALE: 1/4. = 11-0- ~ A3.1 ~ BUILDING SECTIONS /A [06£ BLE 0£6 1 9 006£ SEE 026 d 0E918 OCIVNO-103 'NOAV 39(11 11(11~IMA to/)0/80 NOIS30 1VNI=I 823(] CIVON -IIVW.L (I-10 Ott NV-ld HOfjiS I NOO-IiI'E61.0-1 to/6Z/ZO M3 IA3M iN 3 I 13 L- . 1 j f.-0. 5 1.1.1.1,".1 Al < A4.1 j 1 1 «/ 1 llAYKX 4 - ix #ix < 1 Il ~////// 1 .5 - C 621=!I a -=1 0) 1 01-063 W*iii' HIll||'imltillii®Hil~ir I U E Z I| IC NEFLOOR -11 111 1 11/- \L.:11 -\43\ 1 1 £ 1,0.# 11 .1 . 11 1 0.- .- 1,1 1 1 \ 1--li 1 1.1// c 211«- . J C T O SUF¥/C>OR 1 1 - 2/ti.2 a &289QM-,2 - 15* El 1/·-O. 11 -1 1 ---13« 3 ~c. aer/00€ I 1 1 EL 100€· WMINe-E220 A5.1 1 1 'Bt= - - T)'.-*LOCK 1 ELLI 4 EL, 100·-0- LNFSr t1528220 #&8/4£ , . t. 9.-9- CE&11.SEME T.0 CONS £AED 1 ]1 0 C.-3 ~REQ21-1 I T. 6/"Aa' U... eLAB $ 8 1 1 T.fl CON' SL,~,8 1 .L~0-0- TO *ARME U»£ SLAB * EL, 2>91 -D· /31 BUILDING SECTION -rn BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4" .I'-0 l€32 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ~ W.1 2 acm Z O 3 00 ) 11 r·NI J T 1 ---L 1 w Mailffe/982(20 hALK-IN , ) &&.221 r O S'.SFLOO~ $ EL.. 110-0- 1-1-1-1 3-U_ _ i 1 1 . TO &15-LOOR EL. 110 4 UNN ekI12 EaMILLBQQM 7 D St,lePL-00~ '' I - 1.em®®111; HM# - '7--J-- 1 -2111~ UNLE1111!11 L:dall!£ 1 C %00-0~ - /- 1 1-- --- - . ---' 1 i ·,0 -6.- ~11 - i --22£- I * . ' T.0 S.EF..©OR . I C.J SPACE E- 18/ ~-c> 1 E- 100 -0 -1 T. -%1< I EL l. I QEje.-/Eaa La a~2211 | | 1 1 C.J SAIASE M-ZRDOM , AUKOR¥ » 24 r · - * ..90'-C' - 1 1 TO .....GE CONG 1.5 - - -- - - - - - - - ----- ---- - L.--3 --212£2€MfL_+ E-9 - EL- 8,?.1 A3.2 ~ BUILDING SECTION _« BUILDINE SECTION CZE, SCA.E: 1/411 = 11-0 6. 1/- = 1-~ BUILDING SECTIONS U1 106£ BE£ 0,[6 1 ¥ 006£-8Et-02 6 d 0!1@lu uo!13045 00~ @mio@1!402 (IVON 1!Vt[.L (110 ~0/60/ZO N¥ld H313>IS 8801 Egk 9 oP J 003 ie ed 1 1Z 01!ns P@,16 leideo M 1 1 S 110 OS PO/:€/90 139 SS3219O* 0f9[8 0(1¥}10107'NOAV 3Daill(]11AA PO/PO/80 NDIS30 1VN!3 880 t0/0£/90 ddj/-3Wd aaol D-0/62/ZO AA3 IA38 1NallOJ :anssil 1 24 li 2/ ~«f-I; reOD ™86: SEE STRUCRRAL. /949/ //1 h )-ii /n 0. · h-»«~ //044>7 - ABFHALT SHINSLES NER ICE NO 'ATER SHIELI Ch/ER WILDI#S FELT -1/52 ' I. OVER , ,-\ 1 \1 90% /13/ 4 PL./.D 5•EATHIN' h\\\ /5:2 I -43// th 1,0 CEDAR FASCA-% /5 1EeR AR 5-nRAL.-~ ~~~~ 2X RS. CEDAR fAD 11UM 92TOFIT J~- ~ n-11 PCDOOD / / / CLAD ¥*CD nt©Oft teD j COL.SOFFI / / / IX4 FINISH rEP TRIM jl / IX TREATED V© NAILER / 2- ™IM 0 SIDES. 4 FL,STER STOP / 33: 1 1 2 2 # 1 J g fE * . 2 U)Z CLAP MOOD MINDOM SILL U STUCCO - ¢0 OVER SELF-RRR]le L ATH 2* RS. CEDAR OVER BUILDINS PAPER TRIM MTR ~ PLYMOOD t TI.It FLYI'©09 8'04 OVER eUILDINe PAPER /YER C FL're/D COPPER FLASI«te 2XS Rb. CEDAR BELLY- BNC FLOOR S¥STEM SEE S™ISTURAL- 79«49» z FLOOR SrsTEEM SEE STRUCTZRAL STUCCO OVER SELF-FURRING LA™ Ch-- %3 OVER BUILDIN& PAPER -C 4: CMER J. FL.¥MDOD >> 13 € S , A, A iA tA. 1, A A GRADINE AND BACKFILL PEER SOILS %11€ER ~ - .i. i ...1 0 L.11 U 2- 0 0 11==lilli --I. a M 0 -3 7 1«lilli- . € 04 90™-12 C riATERPROOFIte 3110 .: - C C FLOOR S/STEM /V i»43 h/ Y i ? *10_I 21_1_I - ·· - SEE STRIC'IURAL 1· 6·rp. BOARO Fat,~ATION „ALL AND FOOT,NS -- 2/4 En,D MALL SEE STRUCTURAL. AK. A.A LAWAA.", 6<RADIN& NO BALKMLL \ ' ~~~ 1«4·0220 PER SOILS DelhER •5 Pa,INPAT10,4 MAL.1 ne FoonNS 5= STRUGn,RN. DRAIN TILE 1 : - | -~ I r SIEETROCK LINER PAREL 1-11111» 2 / 1 -lili FER SOILS ENPEER ~ I Ilil---3;114 -lill'-Ii'll--1 FANDATION MALL AND FOOT*te | I~ 1 ~-A 1 2 - £ ~ SEE STRUCIIRk~ 11 1 -1111-7 -: 1 W F~u .. - '-·~ :0212-A +il --i ' 3, It '-141 1,1 :=--ill' »111+ A4.1 -11 Il l-1, ~11 1--1 lil i-1 1111' 1~1 @:, 1~, 1 'Al ' cm/,T. )\ Te.<'U ... 1 UL..~~J £ /4,1 7 SCALE ~0 = 1 l-911 C- \/ r A c,1 AALL SECTION THRU STU:00 - 61003 -I k 1 Fh MALL SECTION THRU DEMIENS MALL M'ALL SECTIONS 217 SCALE: P = 1'-O" %5,/ SDALE 3' = I '-o· .-I C ~? A A HY.s,~l,Nlu dil~~iMMWA A;Atf~YA~A~~rHu ybu,x,A,X~Ap,A~ A'W,;6'*W.·94¥W,VAVAdy,WN,' fix,AA,A *AM#YAWAYNARVAXAve~AWAW,UNAVI.99©RAY/#MX W, AM*M~W ~69*Yx*«UNAVU€226 LY#&VithFPLY)Ji#<37 02227"«*,Aki 44*mwibaRM#b,ww#wAv**fvd WAW~bANN+NU+Nt?+NN,UN?*N+UNNW)~t?N?~?+0,>RBPN'13ff I VIV'paasdiuj 11009 to/PZ/90 139 993290216 uals@p JoIJ@lu'l uolion.11 s av M -I[vwl G O 0++ 40/60/20 NV18 HO-13NS 980 1(918 ope,oioj '0#23 NE @PAS '18646 joi!deo Evt 1 PO/rE/ZO M)IA38 1N3I1O 106£ BLE 026 1 i 006C BEE 0Z6 d *0/PO/80 NOIS30 1 VNkl WHO '~~J lA'947/26&9676769,4'YVYVA~x,649)3»«124_~1 (k 9 [ b Ull¥UU lUJ M.)A V 40/0090 ddV-32ld BBC] .. 4 51· f r TI-11 Purhoop - 2* CEDAR ~---- ~---~--~ . ~ ~ - 5.0.0. 10 GAF 1 ,-3»< - - ~ HEADER PER STRUCTURAL , '€)· POST --- -- 3></// 2*4 CEDAR < 2 - M. RAIL \ h r ·.,· 1 :',!109 OX CEDAR - 01 I 2-1. ' .1 . ./.- 2* RE. CEDAR HEAD TRIM. /,1 --,·-- S-FATII:NE lfI - ---- ~-I~i- - ~--- --- - CLAD WOOP KINDOM HEAD. 1 - C:M·N! PIASTER SELy FURRI'.6 1 Ail I 2X CEDAR WATE. RFSSIANT MARIER. [AP OVEA lANGE *JE -= - OF META ELAS'iNG G .'' 1.1./ \ Il '\ 1 '11··:, 2X CEDNK E. JOISTS SIZE S™JCllRAL 1 1 - il '' 1, ll 1_,..f- O.15~~i. cab --- 2. CEDAR - 10. sEAM sEE s·r,wzm- L J A-- ---ELL_uj f~UITEZ~~~--- Mi IA_ 11 Al. Fi.Ar: 11NG - Ff"AN[ ~ - *-«30'11 CON Head -2* TRIM e SIDES. 1/4.. . I,xt] CED•R~ i' ' I --··- ChENT PLASTR r©.COLU·11 , E-FUER.NG LATE WATER RESEJAN BARRIER 9 rit- /.. 5 M 1 -7--:f. ---- ~b ij ~· ~- E-:r CASING BEAD BACKE. ADO AND SEAL_ANT CUTT3161 Jornb -'.-«-4 . WOOD WINDOW 4- . -2 ' 6 E 1 C <.---CLAD MOOD WINDOM SILL + 3 1 p.'/C.Ivh :' 8 % 2XIO R.S. CEDAR £49*1=La; Ii ' \4\"L--52 - WOOD WINDOW F-»R) .~ - BACKER ROD AND SEALANT ---1[ ILLI >- CASING BEAC 1 1 ROOF BELOFY PER TRIM. RIPPED TO FIT SELF- 1 URRING I ATH / STRUCTURAL cn PATIO DETAIL ' CEMENT PLASrER SCALE: 1" = 1'-O. .... -- --nA.- WATER RESIS!ANI BARRIER - 91 X 9 4 - \\--\Zan« V kia /31 MINDOM DETAILS @ STUCCO rih MIN. HEAD AND BILL DETAIL @ AD. SIDINe UE.L/ SCALE: It = I'-0' v SCALE: 11" = -0' ~REVCAL A MIL ADDRESS laMBERS - 4 -TR1M. ¥ 2)(6 KS. CEDAR - - CLAD) 0100[) MINDOR JAME _~111- 6* CEDAR - wl MIN. JAIMB DETAIL @ IND. BIDING ~ COU--4 SCALE: 11" = 1'-O' GRADE\ -41 ,ADDREES IMARKER DETA L SCALE r = 1-OIL A5. DETAILS VIV 'Paasdiuinl S 11039 Flldna NOSWVS ret€/90 139 99333908d utils @p .10!131 u ! ~ u o !;On, is uo O~ a.ln i o @114 0·le W -HVW.L (1-IO 01,+E PO/6D/20 NV1d HO-13>19 8230 1£91 8 opejoloj 91563 1 IE Buns ·gawls 101!deo £,t 1 I A JU IN C b .L <3 1 Pu/OULL' Anzal'U'C~ 11'1/1 1. :elep :ans. 5·-0' MIN. DEEP *0/0£/90 ddV-3Ed 880 jv-v R INBULAT ON *2 « TRUES PER MeR - ~-ci~ROOF~FIT 499 HALT SHINS-E ROOF 1'5 AO KL,TER SHILD RE•T Flarig -516 P.XY·OOD. S'·LATHING FLASHINS grL f-FURRINE Unk 2xe FASSIA 1 4 /,1 /,4 // \~ - U < 1 »' -ir- 4 1,1 11 WATE' RISE-k:- PARRILE l~C O.rP CASING FrAC AND [CLOW 1 ..12=\\ \ EN[, O SICATHING BOARD CK- --4{~9 4 ><VII \ 41?11 \31 1 14-II: 1 __*t- (lil ,"~ 2<>t N a, a> 1 - SCREENED VENTS U 1 1. 11 CASINO 00·0 WiT ] WEED HOLES \ 2x4 LOOKOUT. ><1 /11 \\\ Cl r \ /11- u/hll N\ - 5/8" Ti-11 PLYMOOD SOFFIT. 9 -2- - FINISH GRADE »449~1 \1 - 4. D.C - (2)2%6 HEADER - SEE STRUCTURAL At 1*4 FIN. AD. TRIM ciN STUCCO TERMINATION AT FOUND./FIN. GRADE - 58" 71-11 PLYMOOD SIDING £ SCALE: 13" • 1'-0~ 8 0.0, - E ~~\~- hATER RESISTANT el]LDIN6 PAPER O 0 - - 1/7 PL™OOP 5HEATH!N6 - INSULATION ri) OVERHANG @ 013. SIDING ".F-f'JERINS 'th SCALE: IJ' • 1'-0~ FMT' 1 k-IACIER ENAMING U.El, MiHINC WAI: 2 REE·TIAN- 8*R?£9 DER 'P - INSULATION PrIA ~LANAING & LA" ELHING CAANS 2 1 ' 11 ZZ 1 -I-- 00.IN,· HI AP (*LE O HDLE. 041,ONAL: r\-12«1 &'·CKER RCI /·.C SELe/ - TRUSS PER MER. Url•..,3/INC ~.':. srAL.A,n -\41 /- - ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF. - ROOFING FELT I.+ 1 0«49 - /<--.- ICE AND MATER SHIELD X n- - 5/8 PLY,NOOD. < 64 FLASHINS 41 STUCCO TERMINATION AT SLAB/SIDEMALK UL_3_-4_04-1-It« q -2*B FASSIA. \8/ MALE: 16' z I'-O' ~ ~ ~ ~~\ 1 1 49 PRIP KERF SCREENED VENTS 2X4 LOOKOUT. 51" TI-11 PLYhOOD SOFFIT »21 12- 4* 06. (2)2Xe HEADER - SEE STRUCTURAL - IX4 FIN. rE). TRIM ~1 - IX TREATED re NAILER 4 PLASTER 5TOP -CEMENT PLA5TER « \N-- MATER RESISTANT BUILPINS PAPER - -1/2" PLY)41000 5HZATHIN6 - INSULATION rn OVERHANG @ STUCCO SCALE: R = l'-0' A5.2 DETAILS utils@p Jo!,alll!~ WO!'0rutsuo ON 1(VU. (110 01+E K.,6DUO NV1d HO-13NS 880 1C919 opejoloo 'aib,3 i 12 alins 18@JLS lo~!deo £~~t 301H 'a.LO PO/6Z/ZO /v\3 IA3H 1N3I10 106£12£ 026 J ¥ 006£12£ 026 d 0Z918 0(1¥210-100 'NOA¥ El )(1!NallAA PO/*0/80 NDIS30 1VNId Elka lUcina NOSWVS :70/*2/90 139 993UDONd alep ·anssi t,0/0£/90 c[dv-Bad 8% 1 \ 12/ . BEE~L NOTE . 1 AL.L Ve*< SHALL CO-l¥ rUTH ALL APPLIGIBLE CODES ANED ORD~INANGEE \\ 2 CONTRASTOUS) SHALL STAKE OLIT ALL ARE,6/P ESTABLISH ELEVATIONS 1 F// AL-L rIALICS STEPS. MALLS FENGES /11/ SHALL OBTAIN TIE APPROVAL 0 \ &N% & ie , Tli LA,©SCAPE ARCHITECT PRI,2 TO PROSEED,F /TH ,DRK 0 CATV ./ 3 NImS /C) DETALS ON Stolf=10 PR,V™59 TAKE PRECEZMOE OVER \\ 1 6E1ERAL NONS /,O ™PISAL DETAILS %\ \\\ 4 CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES WTH 6RAPES SHALL BE BRa,6HT /0 DIE \ ATIENTION OF TME LANOSCAPE ARCHITEST IMI,€PIATELY ARP PRIOR TO i%,1 \ S\\ \ \ 1 1 ~ PROCIDINS MITH NORK LIST 11 . \ \ ,\'\ \ 5. GRAWS SH,el IRE FINISH 671*055 Ele6ROES NEEDED TO ATTAIN FLL CDR go #\: \ 0 TOPSOIL PLACEMENT AIRE NI REFLECTED HOLD FINISI 6RADES FOR F.ANTi/6 515\\\\\ 1 E AREAS 2' BELOI TOP OF ADJACENT PIVEMENT ~·ILESS OT}ERISE NOTED ON \ 1%1 r :/4 \ 1 1 THE DRAVINS. \ \ \ $ ,/ \ \ , i \ 1% 11 \ \ \ . 0- \\\ i L I 1 j b ROAD CUTS J.NE> ANY OTHER COF*TI~TION IN TE ROAD RIGHT-OFIM¥ SHALL \/ Ce,FORM AITH CORDILLERA REGUIREMENTS 1 1 ALL COMPACTION 5HALL BE IN ACLORDANCE WITH T)€ SOILS REPORT FREP,RED BY \\ \ \ THE 6EOTEC+INICAL ENeINEER 1 \ \,C] TELE. PEr) eAs ; ) / / % 2 0 \ TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL /0 i ; 1 A 'L\ \ ELECT. ™Ra MANASEMENT PRACTICES, 1 jill 1. THE CON™ACTOR SHALL- PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL IN CONFORMANCE MTH DEST ~ ~v-~I€NOM \, \ ~, \~ *m:« r~ ~ ~~ ~~ . ~ ~ \\ \~ 2. A 'IEOBAB SILT FENCE 15 TO St ERECTED DO,-ILL OF CONSTRUCTION AT LIMITS OF l - ~--t - ~ ~~\~f ~--~~ / ~ 9 - */1'i 1\ ~11 1 1 DIST1,RBANCE PRIOR TO EXS VATION AND KEPT IN PLACE UNTIL FINISH BRAPE IS ALHIEVED \ il 8 At THE BASE OF TOPSOIL OR FUSDIL STOCKPILED ON SITE , A '6EOFAB SILT FENIE \ 1 1 i\ OR STRAM BALE SATUIATION BERM SHALL !31 BRECTED TO CONTRA SILT ANC> SEDIMENT 4. 7% CONTRACTOR SHALL E. RESPON5181.E FOR PREVENT™6 Tf RELEASE OF SEDIP€NT- ~ /' \,STORA -1- Irl M \1 4 / 4 \\ \ \ \, 1 \\\\ 4, A -\L \ /: 4 1 + LADEN MATER MiD) FROM THE SITE NO SHALL BE REQUIRED TO 115TALL ADDITIONAL_ \ i l-\--930 \ \I \ i:AGME ~ >- A--- CONTROL FAG]LITIES AT T< PIRECTION OF ·ni€ LA,UDS,·APE ARCHITECT OR APPROPRIATE '\ hi l ; LOT 109 1 CORPILLERA OFFICIALS. IF F'ROBLEMS OCCUR \ \ /1 1 1 1 1\\ \\0 \ 953 11// 1 \ 1 1-1- 1 X 5, ALL SLOFES GREATER ™AM 2: 1 SHALL RECEIVE J.rm MESH ER05$ON CONTROL FABRIG UNTIL REVEGETATION 6RASSES ARE E5TAEBLI9ED /1' '-, 1 \ Il / 111 \1 1: Itt \ 1 li 1 \ .21 \\ 1 \1 -1.-/ 1 , liti \Ze. \ - 41 11 1 1 1 \ 1 i - . 1 , / 1\ 1 1 . 'PROPC)2) %(AEDUS 1 1 - \ 1 1 \11\\ '11,//L D,05\~ 1 11 '\ ,/ ,- , # --» 11 1 ' 1\ 1 / ill £ 'JLE--- 1/7, L Y ' 1 i '1\ It ~0ME~IQN..22§2U: 2--- 4 CONSTRUCTION START: Sapternber, 2004 EXCAVATION: Septaffiar. 2/04 \ I -16.q' 1 \ r \ \\ 11 1 1 i qi 1 \\ i FatheATION October. 2004 l \ \\ I / 1 \\ --4 _15·421 2 - ill i \ \ FRAMING: Nevember - Jkn.arg. 2005 1\ ,1.L. CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION. .Anc, 2005 I ~CON TR ' TION £ \ 1 1 \l\ 1 1 11 l/1 PAR IN j 1 0 r 4 -31 \ \\ It 1 1 \ 1 1 / i 1 1 LANPS&e~.-22£2U: 1 RESEED DISTURBED AREAS: .1,w, 3005 ><O- 1 \/ 1~ / i '' i \ 1£m \\ i ¤208 . 1:6 ::) I ASPHALT DRIVEMAY- -1,/0 2005 4 \11 1 1 1 220 PLANT,hESS .Ane, 2005 U.1 < 2 i It\It '/ \\\ 0~EANQIi n 5 4 111 § j CONST UCTION PARKI'NA„I 1> 1 £ il TGO .kne. 2005 - coz- , \I I HEMI ''AL /1 1 1/ 1 1 1 1 0 -d ON 1 TOE 1 ~ 1 1 0 ) \11 \\ \1 1 Q \ .t 0 \ 7 1 fook- 1 , r\,/ 1 1 1\1 1 l /1) - < 40 1 /1 1 1 11 #/ IY 2/ 1 r 10 C/D M J 1 1 CONSTRUCTIOI~ SISN 1 \,501\. 1 1 \1 \ LUMBER 1 Y,1, 1 2, STORA/~-1 \ 3/, 1 1 0 33; M a < 1 1 I ADDRE56M'~KER 1 4 - I r I "' r', f ; 1 *47 i W /) 1. 0 PS¢ER i 1 1 \ W- 1 \1 /' 1 807A | 70 ' 1 1 If 4 -4-9 1 i LOT 108 CONST ULTION ACaSS i 1~ 1 < ~~ '. ~-7- -1 1 4 //1 1 Or- 4--, I 'CUP) IR/tr ** -C-- - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11/7 DIAPETER ALUM#U,1 1 1 1 1 .AP MoiuME. ST*PEP IS 5441 \ 1 1 , lilli / 1 1 1 1 1 ( \ ELEV • 81160 j 1 11\ 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 7 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1/ 1/ f L 4 - - - \ ES W K \ '. 3 - . -J 1 Lare, 1 Z ~, SILT FENC~ ~ ~ ~ '~ I~ ~ | ~ ~ -1 .3 6 1 1,118 8 0 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 1 . Cklow =FAIr.E / DILT FENCE 1 1 JI-'' 1 -1. EROSION CONTROL /IN ~ CONETRUCTION EDA(BINS PLAN C NORTH/ 415/ SCALE· r = 10'-c'· 41-- CONSTRUCTION STARING I AN -- -- 0019 k£918 OpeJ £03 461003 LIZ 81'ns 16@11S 101!de) c,1 1 4 $'0/62/ZO Mal/Gal 1N311Oj VIV 'peasdluinl'S }looS I tiONZ/90 139 SSPH©Obldl C[VOM 71¥211 370 umse 10!J@Ju!~ uoilonnwolnio@'!40,1 ~ PO/60/10 NVld H313MS 8806 06£ 82£ 0£6 J ¥ 0060 82£ 026 d (M/H .09) 0E918 0(1¥1101 OA¥ 39(1121(1-11AA K 80 NDIS3 1VNI= CP V M--- 8110 1 to/0090 ddV-381 8&10~ \ 1.4 1 \. e, C C. r .-/ ." ~ 71 -../' r< .G \ : ' I 111:9 '/ 4 i.:-I' - 1\ 1 A .1.,4"40.t- A -'2,44 "IL /4.--. 1 --, .1 · '- 0~•0' . w....... CAN PEP \\\' % 1 iii\ \\\ ZLIT I (D \\\ \\\\ 0 \ 1 \ 111 1 - r 5 # 1 1&\\\\/ _ 0/343%*y'-~i--7424, ' r_ - 0 1 4.\\\\ 7 \ 0 \ \ \ 1 \\it. \\\\ /\\\ -2 JI- ..1 ......7 \\\\ \ \\\ 4 i \ i \ \ % \ \ \ , i\\ 721- T / / 1 / t# , \\ 1- 1 91 \~~ TELE PED. eAs n~« C=™ I .., }/ IN) 1 MA \ \ \ \\:\ %\21 ~~~-EE & --1 - > 3-0. 7-1'z :j ' "' 1~ 1 2, 1 1 \ . U : ; ~- Ut'./.......5 /\\ 0 \ 1 x - 7104.----,3,1, \ - £•se .1 p u.,2 j # 1 ~ * :+Y~'0 2~0 11 1 ELED·T. TRANG -4 ) ~1 1 1 li a.-7 '4;. &.,ee,~ 'r'.'.S AA->,1 9 't l \\ \\ /0 3\\ \ r \\> AOm· L I. f-el ....../.-re m...... \\ 1 11- " / , ' - ' \ A -.-_ 1 .1 I - 1 \ 1 I \ 1 ,-.:. sw,. W,••,W.=* 1 \ -4-0 f: 1~ LY€~\ -~ 7 -1 \ f ~ \\'/ \V) /, A \11 \ (.,~410 '9.1,2 -A ......; .r,le», )\1 *„ ... d. 6~24/ ..ue# - it \ 1 X \ 11 1 : i 934% p\ 66 '1 : /4\ \~\ \~4 \~ 0 11 \ 1 \ 1 -- ./ 'c·. wl. 1. ear.U .... 2'~ •1 * *)/ :*CU~, Larloq .... .--.....- ;7,• ,•-n vur.. 4 Y 5104 A,2-"=-- 12& =r"•-44':6·v- ..7 I. *- I. 1-twi € 't ./: 4,12/ X.=, ./. .•r :.. .. •--/ al I .. .... 1 / 0 $ 4 i .0•'·: 2 - -/ t,• Imix.41= 0.-42/17=: - \ 5,1 1 1 \1 1 b \ E 1# 1: \ /8 SILT FENCE DETAIL \ 1\ H \ i i i 1 j \ 1 1,- 1 1 / 1 F --9 I SDALE· N.T.S. d 1 4 /\ \1 1 1 1 ~ I \ 4 / -7 --/ 2 00,03 . 2 1 i \\ 1 11 P / - f /1 Ilt \,Al \ u /- ' 1 - n 1 \ \\ \1 1 1 1\ 1 111 \ L l i " ll '1 2/ 1 \~'i 11 \\ 2 - 1, 1 1 45 1, // // ~ i 11 1, Il ~ 5 /1 1\\ i It 111 \ 1 \\ 1 1 + 1 -' 1/ 1 \1 \ I 1 \ 1 1 1 --4 i f-r *- --- 1 \1 1 1 \ h \ 1\3 2 4 H ,-11 1 1 't : il J \\ \ I & 1: ti)\ ) 1 \ 1 X - Ul \ \ E \\ 1 \\ Il- -// P/,3 ; - 1 1 1 4 1% \ € U //1 \ 1 9\ 0 \ 1 u I /1/ /. / i /1 , t \ 0 = 1 Z 1 I 'Mi/r /1 1 1, 1-1 110\\\\ 9 0 3 1 \ 1 2 1 1 1 / 1/1 1 1 1, 0 " 3 ) E 1 (50) 1 , /1 /,1.21 ! 1 -- 8078\ i' 1 | 1 \ i 1 1 1 11# ,1 1 LOT= 1 1 1 0 j 1 1 e -- ¥alt© t,NEr //1//15" 1 1 - -1 - 1 1 1 1 1/7 91»€TER AU•119 1 IL - -1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 CAP rele€WY j 1(\ 11/1 , STAMMED LS 5441 ELEV • 8118 1 1 j / / 1 \ 1 1 1 1 r i / 1 3 g 1 , S J l 5 1 / r f / 0 s - . \ 1 1 / e O 0\ 7 YE'll 1 11 $ : 2 \ 111//'09 g Lore ;. £ lea L SILY FA % % ~ i ~ 1 9 - e LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE hi ENOR FENDE / DILT FENCE ~ - EROSION CONTROL PLACED AT THE DOWNSTREAM LIMIT :h POLLUTIONCONTROLPLAN 2, DKAL./1 X37 -.Al- 1•_,- H' ~<trf %57 3.2.4.-C: 1 - 1. -I A9.2 POLLUTION r'·INTRn· P' AN ----0019 8.110 - _- 106£ 880-026 1 9 006£482£40£6 d tiols/p Jolvalu~ uo!13„115uoo~ 0Jnlo@1143,0 (]VOW -livkl.1. a-1 Oott 1 99 .pejoloo '@1503 tIZ 61!fis }0846 101!deo ELI 40/62/20 AA31A3& 1NBI10 v paasd!Uinl S HOOS to/*2/90 139 SS321902ld 0818 001¥110-103'NOAV EIDUING-IIAA to/,0/80 NDIS3a 1¥Nld 88CI to/0£/90 dd¥-385 980 #0/60/20 NVld H313>IS dUO 0609 ___ r==79== :.:1 1 Li !:,~'.'.· A.I 1! 2 CRAP\_ S=ADE - P - M.SH ROOM ----i / 40 1 LAUNPR- : - < - DRArA_S=ADZ t O, »t ~*Jk 3-4 ..«- MIEd,1~RboM - 1111 414+ 1 1 /1/ m 1 64 ./ WU role 1 17 L I ... i 1 ABOVE El -1 MGORD -7 0 1 \==1 1291 1 1 ~ .AAED /416£#f 14 STORASE 1 3 d c W 1 ./41/ BEXH M CUMIES BEL//1 6 1 BEDROOM 1 1 ~a ) P. :11- !1 1-r»1 LP 18 R UP 6 90-C - 7.- T MuoRootzj \ 1 229ec . 23 1 --1 15 - 4 \ 03 \ BecH rl/% .·k / NA A - -\ GUEBIES IEL 161® W i F.11. ' 1 ID ID 1 . " up I· -- -Y-+ 1 1 /El -6 ST /EL, 4-1 / 1 9 2 1 BEDROOM I 4 3-I \--- 1 . @ARAGE / DECK ABOVE ·<~2227 ~ 1 / 10- 11 11 1= 66 - 1 69 / ID ' 9 1/ - I / 2 9 4 4 --i GARAaE i FIZZIT PECK ABOVE 1 * LOW PT. OF GONG ~ ~ / L==71=27- H .]f LU < M 18080 01 1 0- -2-1 .my FF=fl, ' / .9 ZED rg U r 469 00 11 --1 U 0 .O' PT. OF CONS M.2 ·· m z 'O 0/ ELECTRICAL LEeEND: 0 -1 @ SURF//2 EMB @ SARAE POOR OPER~ RECEPTACLE 6D 7 RECESS CAN 00-1/HT ® VENT/FAN RECESS rIAU.neER SNITCH ~~ SURFACE MCA,NT (OR H,4*SINS) I .... MAY ./TCH ¤4 MALL MA. , SMITCH .TH 0,%. ~41- 6©MT £042[ (AFF VERIFY IN FIELD, U,LE. h©·TED DAER„Sal ©= T¥7'16·Al amET ¤ ' "*.1. MOUNr STRIP LI6+rT 4 6RCU© PWIT NITERCEPT *~:~~z:C FUORISCENT ·neE OR lim CABIT 4, rIATER-MROOF a,TLET 0 ~ FLUOREELENT MI™ PIFTUISER *' -TC,eD am-ET LOri VATA.61 (STRIP 0 KITCHEN ¤ 4 220 VOLT GUILD PUCS I BOOKSHELVES) 1 2 @ FlooR am-Er 31, CEILII FA,1 0/ D M TELE,40,€ amIT 9101<E./126.0/ / TELEP,OE FLOCR 971./r S SELLRITY PAID T ~>- TELEVISION Ml ET 3/%%0 M FAN',16+C Ce€o O HAL©EN MATE'OF RECESSCD 'AN rd' 0."m Cl,1. SPEAKER c-n LOVVEE i F\/Fl Fl Fr.-E/,41 01 AN El.1 ;Jg- 4 c, A, = b = 1-01 | ELECTRICAL PLAN u0!sep Jo!~/lu!~ UON,nJ;Su03~@Jn;0@1143'e OH l[Vlf.L G-fO 0-t-PE PO/60/20 N¥ld H313>19 '£9t8 Ope'Oi03 :Ii;23 1 IE @IlnS 'i@@Jls lol!320 £,t k *0/62/2 0 M3 IA38 1N3ll 106£'BZE'0£6 1 9 006£ @ZE'046 d sd!Uinl'S 11009 X 1dlla NOSINVS *0/PZ/90 13S SSBU 02)18 0(1¥2101 AV 39(1121(1-1161 *0/$;0/90 NDIS30 1 VNIH ER*] Vo/08/90 ddV-32ld elep - ~ 17-11 - 1-L« 221-i-- ~%J-It=Inz12--1- 2=----- 02 -ZIZIETTZ==35-6-----T+-) 1-6 - - 111©= 1 :04, pa~ A- ~-=---rE I hi ¤ F-~ f 'u 1 1%21 RE====r=======------==7 - ~ 1 < »==2-2- 1€ 5 3 C 1 4/ 14, 31 h 1 0 11 , Lig f KI-CHEN 7 111 41 ) 11 00--0 f U) 9 8 1 · r 4.9 DINING / .i -| W r«*L 9: I. - y =P 1 , ~1 23 «144 2 11' . u / . 11 40 0- RETI' ~ h~ 11 3 04 5TOVE *T O__SUBFLOOR / | | - ON I F, - f. 10 -C . -0 771 5 W J n - 14 1 4-C ECEL' i • e./1 2* ~1 LIVING ROOM \ - 2 R L- F no dp„LI C I - /lili 4 8 1 1 Pa E . 6 UP 12> R e BATH 2 iC*1 'AS 1 STO. - - - WHEN -P W~f TO Se ~ C 3 ON 18 12 ' ~ - T.O. SUBIL-20'i .J 1 1 .61 N gq -011 1 - - - i JifT C / BEDROOM 3 , TO 53 3- - ENTRY BELOI ,· k--·~ -- --~ 4. =m/;4=2%,212 I r --~ - - V - 1 4//9,/ ~JE~ rT=-- ~ ~~AL - - 1»9/9 BEDROOM 3 , _ c _ BEDROOM 2 0, 1 1 -==2====2===.2------------ - 8'. - C 1 1 1 - 22 U 1 ROOF 51®1 - ~====2==9=1 -„--r-==============2=====7 0 -I-- U 1 0 12 52213[LoM 0 0 Jet ELECTRICAL LEGEND: 3kZ @ 51.BACE BLB S VENT/PAN R:CCES IAN DO--16HT 91'TCH O , RECE56 *IAMIER ~ PREE MAr 91,TCH ¤ BEFACE Ma NT (OR HANGING) 1 9.TCH I,i™ 01»eR ¤-1 1·W-L Mam * .Fic.A- am.ET MALL Ma»/ SCONfe (AFF VERIFY IN FIELD. LN.-ESS FILE' 0™ER~1152) * 670/0 FMT INrE'CEPT A ILL ~kOIM·T STRIP L*6# ©:· I.TER-MR£xr olmET "SFI *====C FIORESCEK' liBE OR 1»%R CABINET 14 01 3 X * 94)1(/,ED MLET E~~~~51 FLUORECENT M™ DIFFVSER * 220 VOL'r OUTLET !.1 111111 1.On VATAS/,(STRIP i KITCHA FUGS 0 200121+EL'25) @ FLOOR amET k TELEPHO'E amET CILINS FAN ~ < O W| ~| ~~ ® TELE-OE FLOO~ alnET =1 21 *11 SMOKE DETECTOR T ¢» TE-EYSION Clr-S LRLAL@LL=L_L_1 L 31 21 El El E i SECUR: rf PAS O HALOSEN ....1.'.Ce€O C]LI. SPEAI<& riATER-*'ROO•~ RIZEMP /·AN ~ MANN LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 1·-O PTI LEEE-31121_1 106£ BE£ 026 1 ¥ 006£'8CE 026 d 02918 0(1¥210-103 'NOAV 3 !)(11 21(11 IAA t,0/f0/80 NDIS30 1VNI=1980 ·S 11009 X31~Illa N ~ IVO}1 -IfVkfi a I k /60 20 NV-Ici- k /0£/90 ddV P 62/20 Mal 14®@ent 1'/ 2 ' 4/ 1 1 . 4€u:24.-G~' 1 1 1 . r---- 1-7 --- f ¥ 11 ./>1 1; I -,c /5 1 T 'i-3 1,4 / 1 11 / 1-J i < \/ 1 1 '-3, 1 11 / 1 lili --/ - 1\ HAS-5 SZORCO~ 1%% 3 f . 1 // 11 , 6* 8 - 4/1 4-7/, 1 0 11 -d 1 20 .a 0 1., \ 1 ~ 1 1 1 / '-1 b / «--14 Al I 1 -S 1 MASTER 541-4 :0 ® ™ C:-ro .0 LU r. C, - ~ ~ () * 4,5.rER 3900- - - rIALK-IN ~ 05 3; C) tILE 12 jil - ER -O 4--7 =ZE I -}» E 1/1 6- 5 u=F--1 _ 8 cn :1'2 1 i~ 1% P 9 1 -- ION 18 R -OVE 1. / i 1.,.r [ 1 - 21==8====D====:CA 1 1 111 DELk BELC» DUCKED-OR / 4 f ~ 1 0 1 u - / 67/ >< 0- W.1 2 4 U 17173 bo 0 7 Z 0 N Ch ELECTRICAL LESEND: @ -FZE ELB ® VENT/FAN O 626 GAN C>DrN-16)ff srUTCH 1, RES:59)·~LF,eEt 40 /•KEE *¥ 5,1,TcH ¤ SURF.2 ...rr MR HANS.) 4, 5,'TCH '™ DI-IER }31 .ALL,CINT ©= TYPICAL OJTLET )·tu. MOUNT SCONCE ULESS ITED OTrER/~ISE) ©z //*0 FAU rRrERGEM (AFF VERIFI IN FIE.P 6FI 1-1 ' INLL Ma,T STRIP LI// * r•*rER-PROOF OUTLC 4/1 - FREMENT·nuet OR uNPER Ce,Er RTO'ED CUTLET & 0 1 FLUSe.ENT .:114 PIF:nEER * 220 VOLT anlrr Larl VOL·re[ 8™1,4 KITS'et 0 '05 1 BOOKE'--YES; / FLOOR amrr 12 $1 TELEP,elE DUUT CE[LINS FAN 41 ® SEPIONE FLOOR anLET ~ SMOKE DETECTOR T ~>- TELEVISION CUTLET 556 .al,Tr po 0 )'1•~065, 50 FAN/LleHT ... ~ GEJ.fhe SPEAKER ~ NA·nER-PeOF RECEMED CAN El.3 9=30 I run =1 /T.,1, A vi I-\-=/ 2.1. -i.E#,R,inL PLANj '~~~ BCALE: 10 2 GO' ELECTRiCAL PLAN aasdquinl 5 1100$ T '0/2/90 139 SS3890234 UAS@P Joll 1 Il Uotioruisuou~ alnpal!40·le VOk[ liV .L (110 0 + ~.frEf.~ NV1<d H313NS %0 0E918 Oa¥110100 NOAV 39(1111(~I-HAA %#Wgo NDIS30 1VNI=I alj] :alep :enss, t,0/0£/90 ddV-abld 810 ~0/62/10 MEHA3H 1N3 I-13 - h- - -: 1-1 %---- 1 f------x .:/0 4=) -~ , u ,™ - I- -' 44\ \ 1, CA ...23.-3. 3.47): ,7 7 <\ % -- \ .-- -t N \-- - 9-1 >\212-9-h. 1 91 i' L'' r I 1 »4 /\ 1 F < - | ~ T.O.1 101'-44 1 \-1 - T.O.-tg. 13'-4 1 N. 1 \ \ \ T In / \ 1 \ 1 . \ 14 1 \ 1<11- - --IFV r 1 i 1* 1 \N \ 3 %- t» - & 4 0 _ 04 4 1. /\ -- 1 - -1 1\\ 1-\ 7 1%1\ 0 - -- --1____- -- 1 1 -\ - - · =-231-1 i T.OPL •111'-1-1 ---R....1 T.O.rt le'-Ill- 1 1 --1 1 \ \ ---. T.079. .13'-1 4-L-L I - - 1 T.0/9 8911-e· 3 --1---\ 1 1 ~ \ T.oV). 1014; -4~ . \ ~ L___a =L - ---21.-1 ---- 1 1 /71 -t ~r- - - 9 1 --- 1 - 3 - -rv-1 \ 1 ' 1. - 4,) j-- 1 -t- b- /0-2--3 --- -n.71 F-- 1 - 1-1 ------1----1- 3--1 1 ua \1 j L_<44 4 m T.0,4. 1-1'-1' - - -| T.0,1. 48'-Ill- €b. ••ul. r-«- 7.-\ T.o.f=4 25-11. 4 1 -1- ------- 11-11 1 1 1---- , .1 4 L| 1 - 1 T.O.89 8.'-B· \ -- - -d «:i_ ___1 i ~ 1_1-brt,6.1231 4· 1 ~ T// 45'-9 I 7l % ---, T.O.Ftg. 85'-11·- - - N I T.0 94'4' / - ---j- - - ----------23-3 1 1 N \ -.OF=tig 90'-1ILL._~ \ 1 1 9-7-07 - \ \ 116 19 I 1 3 1' \ 1 1 -- j I--*--4- .'11,1-1 12_3 171 \ 1 111 \ 3 -,- A I Z.0,·t q®'-·lf / - - T»™19. •tn.-Ill x 11- f i X \ N 1 \ T.O.rl. 17,1.\ . m I \U 77 - 11 - x -- . -T.09. 85,1 , 1 - A./ 1 \ \ h 1\ \1 --1 > - 1 1 - 1 -- 1 1 \ \ A _.1030~ '|tri <- x x - - T.O.M. 18'-114· 1 1%\\ T,D.Ftg. blile.- T.D.Ftg. 86'-11- -- - --- 1 \ - 1 1 \ 1\ K -- % -0--7 -Per) 41 1 1-- \ \ h 1 1 1 % 1.- --- - \< 1 1 ~ ™1 1 1 ff// \ Ton. 95'-q~ -- N 1 0 -1-Ta 41 -0-74 - 1 T.Oyl 64'11• ITA.FW. -- - - 1 7 1 1- 3 T.D.Ftg 85'-Ir 1\ / L _ -3 /4 -M L.!9-4] --- --- 1 1 FIL-71 - ,-r T 1 0,// G.6- T.OJN.]11'-1- - j 1 1 ·r.CD.M. P•*b-/ H --- E---11 1 -- 4 / 1 - 1.- 2 4.1 L94--11 1 1\ \ ~ To.pe. 1'-11 · 7. -- , 1 ,4 1 T D.M 25'1« ----f Ju f W.1 <L >< -1--_-_ikz~_ 'E --E 4,02.4- -- 2 ~6 -4- *---4- b 3, GaS- -|7 EN EFT-33) ITT.O.Mbg. 84'-11~ 1 1~-\]41 f \\ 11 0 -2 -E -E -15 -E' 1.- TOAM'-4' 3 # IN 645 ~~ - -3,\ --A M --_- ·r.0.Ft,g. 85'-UL-4- \0- -%.0 L-zE TOF* l f Z =\ 041,1. \ / I 4-je,1.5.1. - 4 1- ----- --34,1'*t * / ~, U -7.--- - # \ 0-2 L__2 X - I \ - W -Ill--- "V -"1 -,1- 3-,gruir ~~ 1 - c/D / GAS< Ve -\ 4 r 71.Lf\-\-1.--- _~ _ ~_ ~~ ~_ ~_ ~_______~ ~_~~~~~~~~~~~~ 03 ' e A x RE t 4 - -/ - - \ N « _ _ _ _ i ¥,0."Lmpm· --- lei-0. , el-10. I --1- , I 23'. * -- 640 / 1- , 1 - F .-...-.-I'el C j / 9-*-$ 0 02- I \ 1 -\\9\\\ N.--- -* \K <.4/ // 4 2 '1 ---2-5 - N - 0 1 CO y l T U - a \ 11 1 -4 4 --- X»- ---32- -- - - 19 - 0/ A~ 1 / - -- \ G» -4 9 - \ \I 1 1 1 - \ ./. N --3 liNd / - >-JI Ir\ - 0 1 1 k 0 1, \ \ \17-4-»i /4 2 f 0 -\\ 1 / 4 22 62 \ -- - - (D \F .7.Ax-/ 1 floOT x * \ 1 ---=17 ------ \ 7 rii/f, , =- -- / -u - \ -- ---6/---0 /// ------- ««f~ -- --- \ 7 -\ - N -- -- 1/ . -Al / 1, - ---- -r --- .-- h - \ --- 11-7--- --- if * l/ , 'llf f . 1 7*+ * - ©1 '11 sfi f 2034 - 0 0 --- 44\ \ I - --- / - --li tL - ~fir,·P / /7\ ARCHITECTUAAL FOUNDATION! PLAN SCALE. 1/4" = 1'-0 - Asl 0297»~ \ - 0- A - '-- \ 0 4\ 44. 4 - FOUNDATION PLAN --- 37- ~ W i VIV 'peesdlu IS 11009 AVPZ/901 las SS3BDOBd [06£'82£-016 1 9 006£ 82£'026 d ubisap Joil@juil uoitomisuoo~ ampal!41310 (1 011 -11¥11.L CI- O otti t~/60/ZO~ NVld H313>I 1£918 ope,0103 ·0#,3 LIZe,!ns ·40@Jls loideo £1.11 +0/62/ZO~ M3IA38 1Nalli 06918 00¥110103 'NOAY 39(11110-11.AA *0/,0/90J NDIS3a 1VNW 820 75 P 08/90j dd V-323