The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 061703June 17, 2003 . 1 , . Town of Avo n Planning & Zoning Commission Site Tour June 17, 2003 12:00 PM Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road Please meet at the Community Development Department Conference Room. Posted on June 13,2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby . On the Internet mt httn-//www m\/nn nro Town of Avo n Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session June 17, 2003 5:30 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building i 400 Benchmark Road 1. AGENDA A. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Estimated Times for each agenda item are shown for It) informational purposes only, and subject to change without notice. Posted on June 13, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby . An the Intprnpt At httnÂ·//www Avnn orr, Town of Avo n Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting June 17, 2003 6:00 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order (6:00pm) 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda Approval of the June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] VI. Sketch Design Plan (6:05pm - 6:20pm) A. Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivison 3038 Wildridge Road Suncrest Townhomes Phase 111 Applicant: John G. Martin, Architect [Tab 2] VII. Minor Design Application (6:20pm - 6:30pm) A. Lot 23, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision 2940 June Creek Trail Exterior Modifications Applicants: Michael & Tanya Warmenhoven Posted on June 13, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby . On the Internpt At httn //www Avon nrri PUBLIC HEARING VI11. Planned Unit Development Amendment (6:30pm - 7:30pm) A. The Village at Avon Planned Unit Development PUD Amendment for Zoning Plan of Tract N, Tract G, RMF-1, & Tract M Applicant: Traer Creek LLC [Tab 3] Resolution No. 03-14 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED IX. Adjourn (7:30pm) Posted on June 13, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby . On the Internet At httn//www Avnn nrri Minutes of Planning & Zoning Commission June 3,2003 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:10 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no Additions or Amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no Conflicts of Interest. V. Consent Agenda Chairman Evans opened for a motion for the approval ot the Meeting Minutes from the May 20,2003, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeti!ig Minutes; Commissioner Trueblood disclosed a typographical error on Page. 6 "Motion carries unanimously." be stricken from record. Commissioner Hirn made the motion for approval with changes to Page 6 and Commissioner Karow seconded the motion. The Consent Agenda passed unanimously with Chairman Evans abstaining as he was not present for the May 200,2003 meeting. VI. Final Design Plan A. Lot 52, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 4686 North Point Applicant: Kate O'Connor Staff recommends approval with the landscaping plan revised and clarification of the shingle color. Commissioner Karow questioned the landscape plan as he felt it was marginal at best. Staff would be happy to discuss with the client to revise the landscaping. Commissioner Karow moved to approve with Staff conditions 1-7, condition number 8 regarding shingle colors must be verified by staff and number 9 landscaping to be brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for approval prior to Building Permit issuance. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion; all Commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. VII. Planned Unit Development Amendment A. The Village at Avon Planned Unit Development PUD Amendment for Zoning Plan of Tract N, Tract G, RMF-1, & Tract M Applicant: Traer Creek LLC Tambi Katieb presented for Staff Traer Creek's amended uses and modifications to the Planned Unit Development for the Village at Avon. As well the chart on page 3 had been revised from those provided in the Planning and Zoning packets that were distributed the previous Friday. Staff does not have recommendations at this time but was open for dialogue. Tim Losa, Zehren and Associates, approached the podium to present their engineers designs for the off ramp of the highway. Per a meeting with engineers today and the size of lots were decreased. Buffalo Ridge has 244 units; Parcel M discussion of density arose. Approval for density was originally for 2400 units. Affordable housing originally on Tract RMF4 but marketing studies are currently being conducted for its feasibility Public transit concerns will remain per the original PUD Amendment. Tract N park and trail design and amenities are being devised with trails to remain in their current status. Current PUD development plan has 1 acre designated for fire protection. Discussions with the Ambulance district have increased the fire protection district's size by M acre. Questions to the applicant include from Chairman Evans regarding the school district location if it was discussed with the school district and noting their preference to be located in a residential area and not directly off the interstate highway. Applicant increased the acreage for the school from 7 to 9 acres and placed on "prime land". Commissioner Didier questioned approval of easements from the Forest Service prior to PUD approval. Chairman Evans opened the hearing to the public and closed due to lack of public comment. Chairman Evans voiced the possibility of having residential uses further off the highway location and to move commercial use elsewhere. Applicant suggested that the Village is the hub of commercial and residential and Minutes of P&Z Meeting June 3,2003 Page 2 local commercial may be best served. Applicant prefers that RMF1 remain single family residential. Tract Mls access issue will first be resolved via forest service access however Commissioner Karow voiced the possibility that the school is developed with road access but the developer is not required to developed the infrastructure to get there. Shane Bohart stated that the forest service doesn't give access easements but wants a land exchange. Commissioner Didier questioned the percentage of usable space with Mr. Bohart commenting that only 15% is usable. Mr. Bohart further mentioned that the development of the park as an amenity and attraction for the single family RMF-4. Staff presented the broad definitions of park and open space by reading the following into record. Tract N is considered the real park asset. "Community park allowed uses are equestrian, pedestrian, bicycle path, landscape improvement, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, lakes, ponds, reservoirs and irrigation ditches, parks, picnic facilities, and temporary entertainment for special events, public or private roads and utilities including but not limited to utility improvements, lines and mains, facilities, services and buildings". It is very broad in terms of what it could be use for. Mr. Losa stated that portions of the park were originally dedicated to fire protection. Shane Bohart mentioned that they are creating Swift Gulch with a 10-foot bike path to go under the road to RMF-1 and will come around, over bridge, for kids and bikers not to cross roads for their safety. Commissioner Didier comments on the 48-foot height restriction, as he believed that there was a 35-foot height restriction. Staff commented that there are two standards with commercial use having the higher height restriction. Vlll. Other Business Minor Project Approvals: A. Lot 32, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision 2643 Beartrap Road Landscaping and Retaining Wall work Applicant: Patty McKenny B. Lot 47A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision 2420 Saddleridge Loop Deletion of bellyband from final design approval ApplicantÂ» Tom Marcin Minutes of P&Z Meeting June 3,2003 Page 3 XI. Adjourn A Commissioner Trueblood made a motion to adjourn, with Commissioner Karow seconding. The motion is approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2003\060303.doc Minutes of P&Z Meeting June 3,2003 Page 4 - EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE 50J P.O. BOX 740 â€¢ EAGLE. COLORADO 81631 â€¢ (970) 328-6321 EXT. 23 â€¢ FAX (970) 328-1024 June 16,2003 Town o f Avon Community Development Department PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: The Village at Avon PUD Amendment Z-PU2003-2 Ladies and Gentlemen, The Town o f Avon Planning & Zoning Commission is hearing the Pi.ID amendment for The Village at Avon. The PUD amendment does not change the school land dedication requirement and the developer-identified 9-acre parcel in Tract M meets the dedication requirements. The site will most likely be developed as an elementary school and the developer has insured that our current elementary footprint will fit on the site. Additionally, with the identification o f all school sites, the school district requests that utilities be delivered to the school site property line and that the property have both a primary and secondary access for emergencies. Utilities include water, sewer, natural gas, telephone/data, cable and non-potable water if being used in the immediate development. The school district supports the primary access that is directly north of the interstate/river as this is the most direct route to the site. The proposed roadway that winds down the mountain from the north would be seen as the secondary access. Thank you for contacting the school district regarding this PUD amendment. I can be reached at 328-2747 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 471<11.UN, 6-OckEO-tiL> f } Karen Strakbein Director of Finance Edz<datug guet* StÂ¢64â‚¬.ct ~o,z. Sueâ‚¬â‚¬22 liiafithe-VALLEYI Staff Report -Â¥9~/- SKETCH PLAN AVON COLORADO June 17, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date June 13,2003 Project type Multifamily (Triplex) Legal description Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD - 3 Units Address 3038 Wildridge Road Introduction The applicant, John Martin, is proposing this Triplex sketch design for a piece o f a partially developed lot on Wildridge Road. The site gains access via a 30-foot easement through the other Triplex (Phase II) already constructed on the lot. Adequate development rights exist for this project, and the easement through the neighboring property has been recorded with Eagle County. This townhouse style residence features different floor plans for each unit, and proposes stucco and wood for exterior building materials. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: This lot has 6 development rights per the Wildridge Pt-ID, three o f which have already been constructed. Three development rights exist for the property. â€¢ Density: The density proposed is in conformance with the PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage. Lot coverage proposed is 19% (4,044 sq. ft.). The maximum allowable lot coverage is 50%, or approximately 10,545 sq. ft. â€¢ Setbacks-. This project has encroached the rear 10-foot setback with the placement of two boulder retaining walls. The design must be altered prior to final design submittal to keep the retaining walls within the rear setback. The proposed patio (at grade) may encroach this setback. â€¢ Easements This project is in compliance with all easements except for the retaining walls in the back of the lot. On the Site Plan, the southerly 7.5 foot "Drainage and Utility Easement" should be labeled as such. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Sketch Plan June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 P â€¢ Building Height: The building height allowed is 35 feet. Building height proposed is 30.25 feet. â€¢ Grading: Limited grading is proposed for this project. However, some of the proposed grading extends beyond the property line. Permission must be received from the neighboring property owners to grade onto their property. Additionally, proposed contour 8208 at the west side of the structure is not indicated on the Site Plan. â€¢ Parking: While 7.5 parking spaces are required for this development, adequate parking is provided with 12 spaces. â€¢ Snow Storage: Snow storage will be addressed at Final Design. It appears that on-site snow storage will be feasible. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. This project is in general conformance with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist for the proposed development. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design-. This project is compatible with the site. The building compliments the existing topography of the site. o Site Access*. Access to the site is provided through a 30-foot access easement, which has been recorded with Eagle County's Assessors office. The access gains plenty o f southern exposure, and all driveway grades are in compliance with Town standards. o Parking and Loading: The parking and loading appears functional. All parking spaces meet the minimum slze requirement of 9' x 18.' o Easements: One of the dedicated easements (rear) is obstructed with two boulder retaining walls. This portion of the Site Plan must be revised to remove the two walls out of the easement prior to submittal for final design. o Si te Grading. Grading is minimized due to the nature of the site. Permission from the neighboring property owners must be received for the grading that extends beyond the property line. All slopes are in compliance with the maximum disturbed slope requirement of 2:1. o Drainage: Drainage away from the structure needs to be provided. This is a concern at the north side of the structures. o Snow Removal and Storage.- Not reviewed until Final Design, the potential snow storage area appears adequate for on-site storage. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Sketch Plan 1 June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 o Water, Sewer, and Trash Storage: Trash storage is identified on the site plan. The design detail must be provided for this structure at Final Design. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The building is orientated to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors. The structure is designed as a composition of mass elements, rather than larger single 'blocks' that appear unrelated in form. o Building Height. The building height proposed is in compliance with the maximum allowable building height of 35 feet. All ridgeline elevations must be shown on the Site Plan with the Final Design submittal. o Building Materials and Colors: The application proposes stucco and wood exteriors. Materials and colors will be reviewed at Final Design. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The entry gables provide architectural interest. Roof ridgelines (all 8:12) are broken up to add more interest. o Retaining Walls: All of the proposed retaining walls are all less than four feet tall. The Site Plan must be revised to remove the two walls that encroach the setback. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval o f this sketch design application for a Triplex on Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for Final Design: 1. A stamped survey of the access easement grades on Phase II (already constructed) and Phase III connection must be provided. 2. The scale of the Site Plan is incorrect. 3. Proposed contour 8208 at the west side of the structure is not indicated on the Site Plan. 4. Drainage needs to be provided away from the structure. This is a concern at the north side of the structures. 5. The driveway spot elevations, the B.O.W. spot elevation of the retaining wall adjacent to the driveway, and the spot elevation near the trash enclosure are incorrect on the Site Plan. 6. A vicinity map showing adjacent lots must be included on the Site Plan. 7, The numeric elevations of all roof ridgelines must be shown on the Site Plan. 8. A written agreement from the owners of the other half (Phase II) of Lot 7 is required to permit grading on that lot. 9. The details (elevations) and materials of the trash enclosure must be provided. 10. Adjacent rights-of-way and properties should be provided on the Site Plan. 11. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions o f approval. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Sketch Plan June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, ~jec Matt Pielsticker .4 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 -HEA*t-64lie VALLEY Staff Report .7-,57 PUD Amendment AV[I N COLORADO June 17, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date June 12,2003 Project type Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment - new planning areas Q, RMF-4 and modifying RMF-1, OS-5, Planning Area G, and Area N- Community Park Legal description The Village at Avon PUD Current zoning Planned Unit Development Address No addresses assigned Introduction Traer Creek LLC has submitted an application for a PUD amendment to the Village at Avon PUD. The amendment proposes modifications to land uses on the north side of the new I-70 interchange. The following amendments to the currently approved PUD zoning plan are being proposed: â€¢ Create a new Planning Area Q for Regional Commercial development immediately adjacent to the interchange, which is currently zoned for a community park, school site, and residential development. â€¢ Included in the Planning Area Q, Regional Commercial zoning is 1.5 acres for a fire and ambulance district regional facility as a use by right. â€¢ Increase the residential development rights immediately north o f the I-70 interchange known as Residential Multi-Family (RMF-1 ) from 146 dwelling units to a potential o f 242 dwelling units. The size o f this parcel is also increased from the existing 24.2 acres to 32.0 acres. â€¢ Redefine the borders and the size o f Planning Area N (Community Park), decreasing the overall parks and open space. â€¢ Planning Area M is being revised to include new residential densities in addition to the densities (2,400 dwelling units/ 650,000 square feet o f commercial space) approved in the existing PUD Development Plan, Section (D) 2. The density proposed for this new area is 8 dwelling units per acre and is titled, RMF-4. RMF-4 includes a proposed mix of 289 dwelling units, of which 163 high-density residential units appear to be proposed as employee/affordable housing. â€¢ Relocate Planning Area G - School site dedication to Planning Area M. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 0 f 10 A revised PUD Development Plan (Amendment No. 3), and Planned Unit Development Guide will reflect any changes approved in this amendment. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution is consistent with the public interest. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The Comprehensive Plan did not contemplate the development pattern o f the Village, but instead recognized the property as a potential annexation with opportunities for future development. However, the plan does identify several policy goals related to land use and development patterns that should be reviewed with respect to the proposed Village PUD amendment. The goals and policies that pertain are as follows, each with a review comment regarding this application's compliance: Goal Al: Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community, and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Review Comments: The proposed amendment is generally consistent with the land use pattern contemplated and approved in the original Village at Avon PUD application. However, that application did make several assumptions related to the type of development contemplated for areas north of 1-70: "Very low density development on portions of The Village located north of I-70" (Original VAA PUD application, Section 2.2 Key Features of the Plan) "Proposed land use pattern for portions... located north of I-70 provides for a gradual transition from higher density residential development along... I-70 ... very low density on the upper portions of the Village" (Original VAA PUD application, Section 3.4 The Village (at Avon) Development Plan) "Planning Areas include the mixed-use development sites located south of I-70 and one area north of I-70 (Area MY'(Original FAA PUD application, Section 3.4 Land Use Designations) The proposed amendment is consistent with the representations made in the original application in terms of density. The largest changes are shifts of the location and type of proposed development, including the relocation of Planning Area G, the school site, minimizing commercial development on Planning Area M (now RMF-4) and creating a new small commercial site on Planning Area Q (immediately north of the I-70 interchange). Village at Avon - Proposed Densities and Planning Areas north of 1-70 RMF- 4 (formerly referred to as Planning Area Tract M) has densities which are not included in the total Village at Avon density approval (2,400 DU's), however, as originally contemplated was zoned Regional Commercial with 15 dwelling units per acre (and no Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 10 minimum/maximum residential to commercial ratio). The maximum allowable density per the current plan is 1,496 dwelling units. RMF-4 is now proposed as a residential development o f 310 residential dwelling units. RMF-1 is being proposed in the same general location as currently approved, however, is requested for higher density residential development at 331 dwelling units (currently approved for 145 dwelling units. Planning Area Q is a new regional commercialdesignation on both sides o f the I-70 interchange ramps that is being proposed as 7.3 acres. This planning area also is proposed with a density of 15 residential dwelling units per acre. Planning Area G: The school land dedication site is being proposed at 9 acres in size and at the center of the RMF-4 parcel. It is currently approved on the PUD Development Plan as occurring immediately adjacent to the new I-70 interchange. Planning Area N: The Community Park is being proposed in generally the same location as currently approved, shifting only slightly in location as a result o f the Swift Gulch Road extension and the creation o f Planning Area Q. Open Space and R.O.W: Open Space is being reduced by approximately 30 acres as a result of the increased Right-of-Way (R.O.W.) necessary to create the Swift Gulch Road extension and the road access to RMF-4. Goal A3: Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty of the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Planning Area RMF-4 and Planning Area G: The proposed zoning for RMF-4 (formerly Planning Area M) has been revised to allow commercial zoning as a Special Review Use. The proposed school site is located in a valley, which should incorporate the natural environment when planned and developed. RMF-1 does propose a significant increase in allowable density - a 43% increase from currently approved density. However, this application appears to further reinforce a more compact urban form and balanced system of land use that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated above. Planning Area Q: Staffrecommends increasing the potential commercial area (proposed as 7.3 acres), and deleting the potential dwelling units from this parcel as the area is not appropriate for residential uses in such close proximity to the I-70 interchange. Goal Bl: Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential community and regional commercial center. As previously stated, the application does create a logical site for commercial development immediately adjacent to the new I-70 interchange which would further enhance the year- round role of the Town as a regional commercial center. However, staff recommends that the size of Planning Area Q be increased and designed in a more functional configuration Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 10 than proposed. This will require a reconfiguration of Swift Gulch Road as well as a reconfiguration of the Community Park (Tract N). Goal B3: Maintain a balanced, diverse economic base that provides employment opportunities for residents and a sustainable tax base for the Town. Because Planning Area Q is so limited is acreage, it appears that the economic diversity may not be maximized (ie. gas station, service center), but instead provides a logical site for appurtenant uses typical to new highway intersections. Staff would recommend that more commercial space be made available to accommodate the potential for entertainment/recreation/restaurant facility within close proximity to residential densities. Goal Cl: Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. RMF-1 proposes high to medium density residential development alongside community amenities such as the Community Park (Planning Area N) and a bike path. RMF-4 proposes a mix o f high-density residential (potentially employee housing), niedium and low-density residential development adjacent to the school site. Goal C2: Provide affordable housing for permanent and seasonal residents that is attractive, safe, and integrated with the community. RMF-4 proposes the development o f approximately 163 high-density residential dwelling units on parcel RMF-4 (formerly Tract M). If constructed as employee housing, combined with the existing 244 units built on Filing 2 (Buffalo Ridge), approximately 4()7 0 f the 500 total employee housing units required would be constructed on areas north of I-70. Based upon our experience to date with deed restricted employee housing in the Town, Staff recommends that free-market for sale affordable/attainable housing units be built rather than a project similar to Buffalo Ridge. Buffalo Ridge (Filing 2) is not physically integrated with the community in terms of pedestrian or public transit. The project is further isolated from the majority of services (retail, grocery, recreation, etc.) that most employee residents enjoy. Staff recommends the interspersion o f employee or attainable housing within the core o f the Village PUD development. This would create a project that is more in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated above. Though proximity to the proposed elementary school is a logical location for employee housing, Staff believes that accessibility to employment, central shopping and Town amenities for largely seasonal employees will be drastically reduced. Seasonal residents will be made dependent upon the provision ofpublic transit facilities as RMF-4 is proposed. This may ultimately create a higher public service cost to the Town as a result. Goal Dl: Ensure cost effective development of public facilities and services such as parks, community centers, youth activities, a community college campus, and public safety services... that support the health, safety, and welfare of existing neighborhoods and new development. As previously stated, the provision of such a large amount o f employee housing on Planning Area RMF-4 is discouraged and does not appear to promote a cost-effective solution to Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 4 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment ' June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 10 public services for the Town. However, in terms o f total dwelling units, the proposal appears to comply with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated. Goal El: Create an integrated transportation system that minimizes dependence on automobile travel within the Town by making it easier to use transit, walk, or use bicycles and other non-motorized transportation. The proposal does not address the public transit demand that will be generated by Planning Area RMF-4. The public road has been significantly lengthened (approximately 2.55 miles) as compared to the current PUD approval (which provides a school pad immediately adjacent to the I-70 interchange). Further information is required on the provision o f the bike path through Planning Area RMF-4, and the application should demonstrate that the proposed trail location complies with the Eagle County Trails Master Plan. Additionally, staff would request the applicant provide (through the subdivision process) sufficient information on the proposed grading and drainage and phasing of this trail to ensure the alignment is physically possible and corresponds to the ECO Trails plan. Goal E3: Promote the development of an enhanced transit system to the Town of Avon. As stated above, the proposal does not address the public transit demand that will be generated by RMF-4. As a result o f the densities and school site being proposed, staff recommends that bus/transit services must be provided by the Traer Creek Metropolitan District to Planning Area RMF-4 that meet the Town level of service standards at the time of development o f this parcel. Goal Fl: Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to identity and structure. The community park is unplanned ai this point, and a more detailed phasing plan for this park should be submitted at such time that the Roadway and RMF-1 subdivision plans are submitted. Goal Gl: Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure-time needs of area residents and visitors. The proposed community park and trail are not submitted in sufficient detail to review the feasibility of each. The trail alignment and grading should be coordinated with ECO Trails. The Community Park will require further clarification on recreation opportunities through the subdivision process. Goal Hl: Establish and maintain a high-quality visual image of the Town. At a conceptual level, it appears that the parkway proposal for the extension of Post Boulevard and subsequent residential collector streets would help create a high quality development. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 10 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The densities proposed create a more compact development plan for the Village. The uses appear workable provided that access, public transit, and trail alignments are feasible. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. Staff will evaluate all natural and geologic hazards as part of the subdivision review process and further review of the Planning Area RMF-4. At a conceptual level, it appears the planning areas are sited to avoid known hazards. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. The circulation system and traffic will be reviewed as part of the subdivision process. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Landscaping and open space has not been planned beyond a conceptual level for the proposed amendment. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. No phasing plan has been submitted, and phasing of public improvements will be coordinated through the subdivision review process. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. The appropriate public service entities have submitted letters stating that they are willing to service the areas subject to this amendment. The roadway alignments and public transit demands have not yet been reviewed in sufficient detail to calculate the demands created by this development. Completion of the subdivision review process will allow staff to review the adequacy and costs associated with the provision of certain public services. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 0 f 10 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. The road and street improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision process. 12. Development Standards Development Standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined as part of the approved development plan with consideration o f the recommendations o f the Planning & Zoning Commission. The applicant has submitted development standards that would affect the existing PUD zoning classifications in three specific areas: Planning Area Q, RMF-4, and RMF-1 (the first two being new area classifications). Though no typical site-specific development plan has been generated with this application or is required at this time, several new development standards and zone districts are being submitted for review at this time. Planning Area Q is proposed as 'Regional Commercial' zoning, and in intent and development standards, differs from the existing Regional Commercial parcels (i.e. Area K, L, J) in the following respects: Planning Area Q (7.3 acres / Two parcels immediately off of the exit and entrance ramps of I-70) â€¢ Proposes density allowance of 15 dwelling unit per acre; however, residential uses require a special review use permit and are being proposed to have a maximum buildout ratio o f 20% as compared to aggregate commercial and residential square footage constructed on the property. â€¢ Proposes 'Gasoline Dispensing Service Station' regulations. â€¢ Proposes building setback requirements of 10' on all sides (front, side, rear). â€¢ Does not specify a minimum or maximum of commercial square footage for the zone district, however, does require that 80% o f the aggregate square footage o f the tract be commercial. RMF-1 is proposed at 8 dwelling units per acre, and RMF-4 is proposed at 8 dwelling units per acre. Both classifications differ from existing 'Residential/Multi Family' zoning standards in the following respects: RMF-1 (32 acres / Immediately north o f I-70 interchange) â€¢ RMF-1 proposes neo-traditional building setbacks (from 3 to 10 feet). â€¢ RMF-1 proposes no commercial activities as either use by right or special review uses. â€¢ RMF-1 proposes accessory detached apartments not to exceed 700 square feet in size. This type of configuration is allowed as a 'primary/secondary' dwelling unit. Parcel RMF-4 is proposed as 'Residential/Multi Family' zoning. There are currently only three other parcels with the same designation - RMF-1, RMF-2 and RMF-3. Density ranges Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PIJD Amendment June 17, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 10 are from 6 dwelling units per acre (RMF-3) to 12 dwelling units per acre (RMF-2). RMF-4 is proposed at 8 dwelling units per acre. RMF-4 (38.7 acres / Formerly Planning Area M) â€¢ Proposes commercial uses as a special review use, limits uses to those "intended to serve surrounding residential areas". However, does not specify a minimum or maximum commercial square footage. â€¢ Proposes no setbacks, but instead, proposes setbacks as a product of the Village Design Review Board review of site-specific development plans. â€¢ Proposes the relocation of Planning Area G (school site dedication) to this area rather than as currently approved immediately adjacent to the new I-70 interchange. This parcel is also being proposed as 9 acres in size. Planning Areas OS-5, G, and N are not proposed as changed in uses (other than location and size) from the currently approved development standards. Staff Comments & Recommendation The application proposed generally complies to the standards and approval criteria applicable, if approved with conditions as proposed by staff. We have the following specific recommendations in response to the application as proposed: 1/ Increase the acreage of Regional Commercial being proposed as Planning Area Q. The 7.3 acres (only 5.8 acres when deducting the Fire Protection District site) does notÂ·appear to provide an efficient site for commercial development. The realignment of Swift Gulch Road further away from the new I-70 interchange roundabout is preferred, and should accommodate a larger commercial site. 2/ The school site dedication oIl Planning Area M should be a minimum o f 10 acres in size, and have a minimum o f two public access points for circulation, whether provided from Highway 6 of other reasonable means to accommodate both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Alternately, staff would recommend that the school site (Planning Area CD be placed closer to the new I-70 interchange (i.e. northeast corner of RMF-1) to promote a more cohesive and accessible facility that is in closer proximity to the demands of increased densities on RMF-1. 3/ The Community Park, as proposed, does not distinguish between formal and informal recreation and cultural opportunities. While a majority o f the slope o f this property is prohibitive to formal recreation opportunities, a detailed park plan should be made available for review by the Town at such time that site-specific subdivision plans are submitted for RMF-1. Likewise, detailed recreation amenities should be specified for area RMF-4 at such time that a site-specific development plan is submitted for review. Recommended Motion Approve Resolution 03-14, recommending to the Town Council approval ofThe Village at Avon PUD Amendment No. 3, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado with the following conditions: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 10 1. Submit a revised Village at Avon PUD Guide, which addresses the development standards for Planning Area Q, and RMF-4 prior to the approval o f PUD Ordinance. 2. At such time as development is proposed for Planning Area Q, RMF-1 and/or RMF-4, the subdivision process will require adequate funds be deposited with the Town to secure public improvements, including but not limited to roads, bike paths, sidewalks, and utilities for the school site located on RMF-4. 3. Prior to the issuance of any more development approvals north of I-70, the Swift Gulch Road extension as set forth in the First Amendment to the Annexation and Development Agreement, Section 2(0), which requires the Swift Gulch Road improvements be completed at the time o f the Interstate-70 Improvements. This includes the extension of Swift Gulch Road from Buffalo Ridge (Filing 2) to pass through Post Boulevard and serve Planning Area RMF-1 prior to any development set forth in this PUD. 4. Submit a revised Planned Unit Development Plan prior to the approval o f the PUD Ordinance that revises the proposed Planning Areas as follows: â€¢ Delete all references to residential density for Planning Area Q. Increase Planning Area Q to a minimum of 10 acres in size excluding the Fire Protection District dedication. â€¢ Provide a minimum school site dedication o f 10 acres on the PUD Development Plan â€¢ Clarify development standards for RMF-4, as part of the site-specific development plan, that limits the amount of deed-restricted employee housing provided on this site to no more than 15% of the total dwelling units of the total for this planning area. 5. Submit a detailed plan for the Community Park (planning area N) for review in conjunction with subdivision plans for Area RMF-1. 6. Submit a road and pedestrian alignment that is designed to accommodate the potential for a continuous connection between RMF-1 and RMF-4 though the United States Forest Service parcel at such time as subdivision plans are submitted for RMF-1. The proposed alignment will provide sufficient detail for review to meet public road standards as required by the Town, be secured by the Town through the Subdivision Improvements agreement for RMF-1, and be in place prior to the construction of Planning Area G (school site dedication). 7. A continuous ECO trails bike path connection from Swift Gulch Road to RMF-1, RMF-4, Q, N and G must be provided. This path will be secured through the Subdivision Improvements Agreement, and will meet minimum trail standards as specified by the Town of Avon. 8. Public Transit services will be required to serve RMF-4 as a result of the density and school site proposed, and must be provided through the Traer Creek Metropolitan District. The extent of services will be determined by the Town, and will match service levels provided by the Town transit system at the time of issuance of the first residential building permit for R-MF-4. 9. Establish the VAA Wildlife Trust Fund prior to the issuance of the first building permit associated with residential development north of I-70 as required in the Wildfire Mitigation Plan, Exhibit D, of the Village at Avon PUD Guide. 10. This PUD Amendment approval is contingent upon concurrent approval of the Subdivision Sketch Plan for all affected planning areas (RMF-1, RMF-4, Q, N, G). Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 10 of 10 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, , C. < d \J iturn ijog*J)irector -4- j Tambi-Kitieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report SKETCH PLAN COLORADO June 17, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date June 13, 2003 Project type Multifamily (Triplex) Legal description Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD - 3 Units Address 3038 Wildridge Road Introduction The applicant, John Martin, is proposing this Triplex sketch design for a piece o f a partially developed lot on Wildridge Road. The site gains access via a 30-foot easement through the other Triplex (Phase II) already constructed on the lot. Adequate development rights exist for this project, and the easement through the neighboring property has been recorded with Eagle County. This townhouse style residence features different floor plans for each unit, and proposes stucco and wood for exterior building materials. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: This lot has 6 development rights per the Wildridge PUD, three o f which have already been constructed. Three development rights exist for the property. â€¢ Density: The density proposed is in conformance with the PUD. â€¢ Lot Coverage-. Lot coverage proposed is 19% (4,044 sq. ft.). The maximum allowable lot coverage is 50%, or approximately 10,545 sq. ft. â€¢ Setbacks: This project has encroached the rear 10-foot setback with the placement of two boulder retaining walls. The design must be altered prior to final design submittal to keep the retaining walls within the rear setback. The proposed patio (at grade) may encroach this setback. â€¢ Easements: This project is in compliance with all easements except for the retaining walls in the back of the lot. On the Site Plan, the southerly 7.5 foot "Drainage and Utility Easement" should be labeled as such. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 1 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Sketch Plan June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 â€¢ Building Height: The building height allowed is 35 feet. Building height proposed is 30.25 feet. â€¢ Grading: Limited grading is proposed for this project. However, some of the proposed grading extends beyond the property line. Permission must be received from the neighboring property owners to grade onto their property. Additionally, proposed contour 8208 at the west side o f the structure is not indicated on the Site Plan. â€¢ Parking. While 7.5 parking spaces are required for this development, adequate parking is provided with 12 spaces. â€¢ Snow Storage: Snow storage will be addressed at Final Design. It appears that on-site snow storage will be feasible. 2. The general con formance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. This project is in general conformance with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist for the proposed development. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: This project is compatible with the site. The building compliments the existing topography o f the site. o Site Access: Access to the site is provided through a 30-foot access easement, which has been recorded with Eagle County's Assessors office. The access gains plenty of southern exposure, and all driveway grades are in compliance with Town standards. o Parking and Loading: The parking and loading appears functional. All parking spaces meet the minimum size requirement of 9' x 18.' o Easements: One o f the dedicated easements (rear) is obstructed with two boulder retaining walls. This portion of the Site Plan must be revised to remove the two walls out of the easement prior to submittal for final design. o Site Grading-. Grading is minimized due to the nature of the site. Permission from the neighboring property owners must be received for the grading that extends beyond the property line. All slopes are in compliance with the maximum disturbed slope requirement of 2:1. o Dramage: Drainage away from the structure needs to be provided. This is a concern at the north side ofthe structures. o Snow Removal and Storage: Not reviewed until Final Design, the potential snow storage area appears adequate for on-site storage. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Sketch Plan June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 o Water, Sewer, and Trash Storage: Trash storage is identified on the site plan. The design detail must be provided for this structure at Final Design. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The building is orientated to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors. The structure is designed as a composition o f mass elements, rather than larger single 'blocks' that appear unrelated in form. o Building Height: The building height proposed is in compliance with the maximum allowable building height of 35 feet. All ridgeline elevations must be shown on the Site Plan with the Final Design submittal. o Building Materials and Colors: The application proposes stucco and wood exteriors. Materials and colors will be reviewed at Final Design. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The entry gables provide architectural interest. Roof ridgelines (all 8:12) are broken up to add more interest. o Retaining Walls: All ofthe proposed retaining walls are all less than four feet tall. The Site Plan must be revised to remove the two walls that encroach the setback. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval o f this sketch design application for a Triplex on Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for Final Desigrr: 1. A stamped survey of the access easement grades on Phase II (already constructed) and Phase III connection must be provided. 2. The scale of the Site Plan is incorrect. 3. Proposed contour 8208 at the west side of the structure is not indicated on the Site Plan. 4. Drainage needs to be provided away from the structure. This is a concern at the north side o f the structures. 5. The driveway spot elevations, the B.O.W. spot elevation of the retaining wall adjacent to the driveway, and the spot elevation near the trash enclosure are incorrect on the Site Plan. 6. A vicinity map showing adjacent lots must be included on the Site Plan. 7. The numeric elevations of &11 roof ridgelines must be shown on the Site Plan. 8. A written agreement from the owners of the other half (Phase II) of Lot 7 is required to permit grading on that lot. 9. The details (elevations) and materials o f the trash enclosure must be provided. 10. Adjacent rights-of-way and properties should be provided on the Site Plan. 11. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Sketch Plan June 17,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 SITE DENSITY AND USAGE -------- 374# .\\ 4Â»lil C '11 ----- I --0-0----I-- 0 + Road connection to Buffalo lit i 1 0 Ridge ind Swift Gulch. AREA N Community Park | 1 25.2 Acre, 2<Â»4 Ike path connection to ~ -,/1 11 Buffalo Ridge and 0lyond. --74-2 Accois road to future - .44 ----- ... r-dintial lotâ€¢ 1-96 and ,/ / r XÂ«\ \22 Area RMF-4, and G -Don ~7 ,\ i1, I ibrit:ZMA AREA Q Â»\ ) Regional Â« 4Â«1 447 ...7,Â»7 ~ Commercial . '2\ I 7.3 Acrem .1,1- NX \\ Convinlonce ritall buildings < \ . ,-1 ! l placed along :treit with auto accesi bihind, reinforcing neighborhood -\.-- character and promoting podistrian / 04 accoms from park. , pi. 1 , fr Pidlitrlan overpasm provides separated 1 AREA RMFA grade accism from neighborhood to park and links neighborhood and Buffalo h RESIDENTIAL 41 \ 1 Ridge to school Ilte at Area M. 32.0 Acres \ I U Râ€¢glonal Eco Trail USFS LAND alignment - / New 1-70 ' U f..f nterchang, i i Convenience retail buildings placed along street with auto access . \ behind, reinforcing neighborhood character and promoting pedestrian , 1 accll. 1 1 . . FInal alignment and connictlon to , 1 \ regional trail to be determined through subdlvillon. h. A- Dedicated for Fire Protection toit\~ 1 1\ i ~3*-//4 i IN-9 IM DIstrIct on Area Q 1.5 Acrim). 144 Â» :14 .40 %44>. \ e *Â«.1 1 \ *4%. \\--2.-E-- i X *.+:2 U-2-- ---2-N--- f RECEIVED Nolw Bor@ --1~==---â€¢-- - \2%4194 --x - -t- -- -725.4- Proposed reglonal Eco Trill allgnminl and connections to Tract: RMF-4 and G. Trail crossem US Forest Service JUN 1 2 2003 land on easimint Community Development > OS-12 - U 0.8 Acm Prepand for THE VILLAGE AT AVON 52 Â£3 Traer Creek LLC Area RMF-1 Development Concept 9/ ZEHREN Avon, Colorado ..C-T.C...."...10Â·INU.-=' May 28,2003 AND ASSOCIATES. iNC r- NOTE: Area Boundary has been adjusted to maintain previously approved total site area -$-.-,=...- coverage of 47.7 acres. RMF-4 Boundary 38.7 Acres Prevloue Mixed Medium and Low approximate ( . Density Residential property line- 1 , Mixed Medium and Low ; OOP d / Density Residential I J Erosion _ -dt-,. \ it -- - 7 1 ------- Medium Density Structure - , 1 Residential 1 4 - \\-,r , 3 (' \ 1 J 9 /1 4 4.f , i 3 T 4' -- '' 6 9 $ 0% .. 0. 0 11/ , ..4 High Density 1 t 1 Residential ~ 4 , . Possible 163 Total Units- / POnd - -' Heritage \ AREA G Park -6 t . .I Elementary School .0/ f ... / 11 9 Acres 7, 0 C 1 $,2 L. 1,f Pond ' . - ilow Density 0 . /. pa#CPONT~aoMe~~gonn~e~tk;nd . - - - m - I Â® 0,4 0 .1 Connection to RMF-1 and Beyond - - s 42-- . ~ . n Residential , 0 . L POD 04 ,lmitunI.D4.---" Â· - , E 10 Total Units UP Railroad e -O 0 Btke Path Connicts to DIEd Approximato JuncU'OV"*11/0//IMT) Wetlands Boundary 4 14-X f JUN 1 2 2003 --- /-- %*r - Community DevelopmerIt AFTERNOON ---- 0-I- SUN -N MID DAY 5- -Il- ----*- -0--- MORNING A SUN A SUN THE VILLAGE AT AVON // Prepared for Traer Creek LLC Area G/ RMF-4 - Development Concept ~~ ZEH REN Avon, Colorado May 28,2003 ARCHITECTURE Â·PLANNINGÂ·INTERIORS AND ASSOCIATES. INC RECEIVED JUN 1 2 2003 Community Development SQILEi: 1. Lot 1 is intended foruse I homeowner f/ilities and residenial cutaker unit. No additional residential use shall be allowed on " - Lot 1. - 2. 7114:re /e no lots nunbered 2 3.4 0nd 5 on I.Â£1 l- i k. . this plan 3. â€¢Total residaitial mdcommerciald,nsity pemitted wita the entire P .U .D. sh~11 be in Â· avirdance with THS VILLAGE (1 Avon) P.U.D.Guide. OS-4 4. ~~~0~~~ion!7.14.0504thÂ¢Aval ~ - RMFa " : w 1019 ac 16.3 E 1 r . Approval d thspl- cos:ituteavesled ~~~~~ 06-5 ~ Â· - " -7 ~ 184,5 st- 7.tt, , %Â°7~71:ZZ:o Artide 68 of T'le - - - t- RMF-2 A - 43.6 ac -Â·Â· :-1 in,Ecacs a Building Envelope Localion. A A edetrian . PÂ·1 1 42 Bidge~ os- OS-7 7 ac 20.5 ac - B ' #AN..I-- C E 1 3 OS- B , P.3 N 1 --- 145.2 ac J 117Â» 1.~. F H Q t- RMF-1 Trb --~â€¢, 1 K /.~ L _ 1* 1 0 32.0 ac t RMF-4 i ==mkk, RMP-4 ' '4*0 g iÂ»flu P = OS- /.Â»246. s. OS-12 -b=6=%. 0 7 ac -r~=ar--- '~X, ------.--54 ec r-~23â‚¬~ The Village Cat Avon) APPROVAL May 28,2003 This Amenhent to The Village (at Avon) P. U. D. Development Plan/Sketch dated October 9, 1998 (the Original Pho) (i) is approved as an Arnendment in accordance with The Village (at Avon) PUD Guide, LAND USE PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Section H.3(e) and the Town of Avon Municipal Code, Title 17 Chapter 17.20.110-K, this day of May 2003 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle, and (ii) amends and replaces MAX. ALLOWED MAX. ALLOWED AMENDMENT NO. 3 the Original Man in its entirety as shown hereon. Residential Residential ACRES % OF SITE DENSITY - DU/ACRE 66252 12112Ia 91:varINDLYAQEE 1~1~ Residential /Single Family 910.1 50.8% 1 plimary/1 secondary ~ Village Center 33.0 1.8% 25 dulacre CERTIFICATE OF LANDOWNER REQUEST TOWN OF AVON residenceperlot DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Know 811 men by these presents that TRAER CREEK, LLC and EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Colorado ~U.R:i-~ Residential / Multi-Family 32.0 1.8% -8 dulacre ~Ma B Cultural / Recreational 24 0.1% 10 dWacre limited liability companies, do hereby request approval of PUD Development Plan Amendment Number 3. By: Designated Representative [iiw-2-| Residential / Muln-Family 43.6 2.4% 12 du/acre ~ Area C ke Skating /Events Center 1.7 0.1% 4 dWacre |iiES] Residential / Multi-Family i Area D Village Residential 20,5 1.1% 18 dulacre OWNER: OWNER: 163 0.9% 6 dz/acre - Ruth O. Borne. Director Area E Village Residendal 5.5 0.3% 18 dulacre EMD LIMITED LIABILrr Y COMPANY TRAER CREEK LLC, Community Development Department ~RMF-4~ Residential/Multi-Family 38.7 22% 8 du/acre a Colorado limited liability company a Colorado limited liability company ST.ATE OF COLORADO) Area F Village Residential 9.5 0.5% 18 du/acre ) SS: Subtotal 1041.8 58.2% ~ School by: LAVA CORPORATION byÂ· COUNTYOF EAGLE ) 9.0 0.5% a Colorado corporation, as Manager Parks and Open Space - Name: Magnus Lindholm The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June 2003, by Ruth O. ~rea H Neighborhood Center 3.2 0.2% 15 dulacre Title: ~ Area N - Community Park 25.2 1,4% by: Manager Borne, Director of Community Development Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. ~~~~~ Neighborhood Center 5.7 0.3% 15 dWacre Wimess my hand and oficial seal. My commission expires: Natural Open Space 473.4 26.4% - N= Magnus Lmdholm 03-1 #ough 05-12 ~-4- Regional Commercial 8.4 0.5% 15 du/acre Title: President Parkland 15.7 0.9% .-- Notary Public P-1 0,rough N 29.9 1.7% STATE OF COLORADO) [Area K Regional Commercial 15 dWacre Subtotal 514.2 28.7% ) SS: Prep~ed for ~Area-L- Regional Commercial 4.0 0.2% 15 dWacre COUNTY OF EAGLE ) EMI) LIMITED LIABILITY OOMPANY = ~ Road R. O. W. 94.8 5.3% r---- Area Q Regional Commercial 73 0.4% 15 du/acre The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of April 2003, by Magnus lindholm md TRAERCREEK LLC - as Manager of Traer Creek LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and by Magnus Lindholm as President of Subtotal 94.8 5.3% Subtotal 139.1 7.8% LAVA Corporadon, a Colorado corporadon. as Manager of EMD Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES, INC Prepredby PROJECT TOTALS: 1789.9 100.0% 2400 Maximum Units liability company. â€¢â€¢Lots with detached g=ages on RMF-1 shall be allowed m accessmy dwelling mit above the ga.ge for a maxin,m density of 10 (Wacre. Wimess my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ZEHREN 01-&=5 4* Notary Public NORTH ii RECEIVED Community Development JUN 1 0 2003 U. ,#l '-t .... t. . 4... 4% . 4,14... . -1 2= , * 1Â«1- -7 1 01 ..,D. *1 1 -11 -40 4 . _- 4~1 2-5- fr *l: iii - . 4 .a\, 7.46 '. -f L, Imt- i i 41, - $ 1 - tr U-_-1 U.- ---- GRE - - 6 #h / .i .. - .Pie ....41 1 ..4:L . Im im . 1. 2 5 .1 9.1... + 1 1; lili. ~ 1,2 -1 B Â·'7':i, L .. ---- - --- *- --. il :3,44. .. ill C ... ' 1 Â· ....1 ----- . 11:44 -1 ..171 2 .- 1 10 1 1 1 .1.L -1 -- - *1.3,60*TY:j~*FAW#,Arl#*bp#- 24.9.U,-1.- 40%19- 47 42- 1 12 '. - i alf /-h PERSPECTIVE RENDERING 1 oJ 1 <1 ---0 -B-- A Ill 1 --Y /Â«Â«rEIi 9 1 1 4 - / 1 1 U Ft' 16 - .-I \ Ifflil;111 #Imislif i *m cio - ...n.. .. n-- ill - 4 ' 00 - 00 - I - I -11 -1 lili I \ . *-1- 2,1 0 - - -1-22 22 2 22 34/129.9===h r ' -- j . - W\<0 . , â„¢5*16 . .-i . , f ...'- 9-. . \ \ 1 \ i,-- -- $ -N -*-- illa - th -,--- ,-~.- - 1 . \ , 1 1-//>/\ \ I . 1 - -:el*r...: --- / 1 --Â·<*e>,SÂ·~21Â·v Â· n-- /- M . --A - 1% / \ \ m /~h MASSING MODEL loJ 0 1<1 900Z-Â¢0-90 1Â¥111M8(1S 1Nld H013)IS OPâ€¢â€¢!004-00~1'-f'PI . %15--5-5 R *.0.63 -5 -:3 - ... s-,6-f,> / 713 -<fl 2- Al j V /// / ,-2 // / / //> . 3 / /// <C>.0 \ X 9 -- - *.- ... \ *%i -24 / ..2.12*yr> I *. -L/' $ 1 .-- Â·:f.if.. .*k:%:t:.C:>S<: /./ / :- j , 1 1 - 04/9 1 O 0/2 M EEB 4 lili :2316 #:..q:A.jc,A..45-8 6 Â·Â·.. Ub.. - -8 & 8 10* F Â»Â«93Â» - - - -64-4-95 10/- 8 â‚¬5-,0-Â»Â«-N' 4 L.- U=1 00 -./-' ..4-~2- :293442.91 - - - -4 42*69%23*-- ,-// -- ..CÂ»- 4--/6.3:'.-(18,.40,4(5/. ./-191.-1 - H H *3,<Â« triÂ·-gisÂ¢-2,=r Â·, Â·~ 1 ~<110'4Â·4224%774 LeC:/15-ker,in--<L-5429*-~ut'- 3 -- M 0-19>,520,30'I,u,04.peEES /// 4. 7, - / i~.01.5.... <t . Â«MÂ·Â·C --/ , + i / -- :4 Ar--4. >Â·:t A.*Â«Â·- : 1 , .... I . I . i// /// /. . ; 4 1 ik i.-* ,/ i //. %-i - 1- I / ' / -I. 7. 1~il t . 1 I / 1 1 cb CP m -1 PloJ - MASSING MODEL 1<1 (1 1 \ SITE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE N52'53'06"E 60.46' - A- ZONING: WILPRIDGE PUD RLD LOT AREA: 2\09Â® SQ. FT. (.484 ACRES) % ., ., ma '. a~ .V;0 -- DENSITY: 3 TOUNHOUSE LNITS "-Jt3'~ ' ~ 4 1 '* SHC~I *FA/D 1 -~*. ..2/ 11. 1.ff,111,1.- BUILDING WEIGWT - a220- 11 ALLOUED: 35 MEET PROPOSED: 335 FEET - 0/ PAA<ING el"MARY - 1 -- ---_ ~ REQUIRED: 15 SPACES 3 --1 - - -# 1-~i PROPOSED: 12 SPACES Al I 440â€¢, SLOPE M tri ------. h - AREA: 142 Sa FT. \\ 0, - t.1 -N % 01: SITE: 35% OF eITE ai 2?t - \ 2 ---: 7 \ -- -- - h -640 FLOOR PLAN AREA SUMMARY - -c \'SeÂ·1**t -- . UNIT A INIT B liNIT C n-- - BT LEVEL 190 6F- 166 SF 614 SF 1- - 44' I itt<.. . - 380 LEVEL 528 SF. 558 $ 0 SF. 214Â© LEVEL 1010 SF. 1010 SF. 1482 SA - ill \ 1 \ \ TOTAL LIVING 1128 SF. 1134 SF. 2156 SF. - \ . 41'Â· 92 GARAGE/MECW 810 SF. 1308 SF. 880 SP. - ~- - - - - 8210 SITE COVERAGE AREA: 4044 S,F. 9 ~ . '444 CALLOUED 10,545 6.F) *12 0 F-\ -3 IN \ \ ~ -. - RETA'Ht,16 .,ALL Mia 2 . 4 \ 4' ~â‚¬16HT , t @â‚¬,2 E 1.349 - \ ..2 22 i ' I . . I 0, I J.h Â· ... . /015: \ Â·r ' .4 1, d J~ 1 1 .. 1. f 2' 1â‚¬IGHT . . - r \ / h\.. I BOLLDEDZ RETAININe kiALL 1 - 1 .- --4.3 ./1, 2' fleHT - -91 93#f 2 /j - 1 J.Q. 6, . 2 t .L. -- / , 4 /6190 c,avE,wr ER OF MNAT .... 1/ . \6. - - T- -- - - -- - 2-- - :i Il / / , e A I / : li 4 , A kÂ·jpMÂ· 1 . .-/ r , / I I - ..1. , 23 ~lit. I --11.ASH J , i ~25\Â·:" I -1, 61'4 -1 9, S 04-11 - ~ ; I / BEU]SWE , --1.0Â°3 , , ...~ IE; U , -0 * WA A , 9, / / ::~2 gr.r .- 16 1 - 9 -- 1- ..il T - I. - Z Z== 36", -tiÂ·Â·... .. Â·/f*ki '' U , 0 ,S52'53'06"W - 263.15' - ..I. 6. / , . G& rr / -) SITE PLAN (1) ~ j 1"= 20'-0" 3< 1 :Wea angI :Slurlin,[100 ;10] 9301Qp!Â§011 xold-f UloiSno MON YOOZ-Â¢0-90 71,11Mef'IS *P H013)IS OpE.IO!00 ' [59 'Uolv 'PH 3*.q)1!M 8[OE 2 14.2.- . i ST+ F 74\ 4 , . \ \ \ STORAGE MECil ; 416'de I. Ae,OVE .. r- \ \ 1 1 -20 Â¤06 0 0 44,16 '72-~~ 444. \ er.2/-1 14 - \ STORA~NE . 2- e Â«Â»0410.1 LAâ€ž. - / 3Â»-,7/1 Lift. 9 ~ Â©~3~ff~~ :.. W ... . c = ht-jito~14%63' . B.; 0 rt /.1-' I Â£ 74, I N /-2 3 : 4. 0 - 5Â· L >ft,5<12,<Spt#likt: 0 Dill'!lilli:.14 l it / 11 7.1 w. 4 3. d 7:72==--3- - 01711111 JIT,01 ..CM. fd 1 r, - --2 1 r- --u~; i nx,n<V>:<3:731,~--J.tÂ¢ MECH. 1 i .. k'111 0 1 4>rf-34\ ar/91 32 ggE 1/2 1241 1 1 14 1 111. 11 " 1 344"lill I e Le' 8*- r-z vt _ D . // I 1 'ity . / /09 / 1 -0 m W i ~ . ~ F~ 1-44 1 , ff -- 00~4*f W , 11 41 90 /A i 11 -:. 1 -1 j 1 ~ 1 v i L_---d_.3 ' 11/L-\-Al / 1 ffeter. , WÂ« iii/- - -- // t--~~~ ~~1 1 1 1 @,~ 431>h\\(91 Â» 9 \ 4/ 4 / I I \\ 1 1 1Â·\-34 /~ 1 . - - #. 1-< 4%11/ ../ 4. L Ii,Â£,21â€žâ€žd,i# -,=-: v : 9 C.5 533 J. 07 1,1 \4* 7=0~ * 0 â‚¬ 2 3 E 7 / i \ PÂ«Â· P-7 +13 u -4 + \ 0,4 0/3 0-01 1 -40Â·r , 4,1 - 1 / I hyt #./'fur 140, h. \ " .2 '..4 \ + K Y: / ( 3 W- 1 r le A \ 64/0.. 0 'u Lf I 1;1 - \4.'ALVE . 19, .1 40 .. ~ K.>1 6Â»7 0 f.Â© 17 / / \9444 - / / 9-- \ , . 21 / , .2 h / 4 -4 = I /--8 00 / // .- ma I 8*W / / ;2 5 / 1 / 08 3 /~~h FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL (1) meD OnssI :guols!AOH dums :.Ioi woual)!mi xald-f moign o AioN .IgqumN 13045 0198-itt-0Â£6 opwolÂ° 0 '4mtoj aIN'i 'UOAV 'PE @SPMPUM BEOE I ''2 944. . 04*45'te.,A \ /1 0- â‚¬3Â»0?2093â‚¬fritti:-f h~-1-9Â©~-:9}.: trziÂ»Â·a-i )222>94Â·J \ g -h:rÂ·% -4 .<*,0,<'r'-4>r'~-4-emp,j ,>: 1 . \ fpr-29 A .# 4 7(-49/5-4 -'~ TS:i~kÂ·-T.,t \ 1064)9Â«.k,#45.<15:4<3rJ,trJ~ \ -1.P< l /44/-toh/ Â«42 7 .3Â»Â¥ 1 2.r> 7.-3-4.34-* 4 10- 3.421Â« Â·14-<: <Y > *-1 - i /2~, >Â«r Rk'.7 1Â£- 21'Q > - --' 9-7 1 - 6.it:- $ 113*AN- J. 1,4 I >-1 ...A.4 - 4 - 92-29-(-,-41- li ?.~.-~ :,--4 1,4.-P/:1247 > 3 +40~46'~ < 2. A-,17<a ~ - 20 ~2:(.ihofie *34. /6 *br#Fl-.rilÂ« 3-2.1-('..2.4. W. 1 00 42 -21; Â»2zy>11 -,r jo ~ 2 7 0-e 9 h $ Ci-.' -WÂ·.-2{ 'G. A--2 -1 -,6=1 -- -- - -- -__ -21 'Â©eft*704>< - if.Of.: + \ ~-7. U "f:.2.Â«-id .Â»4.34 , .?1316Â»Â·9 Â»69320 1 - 11 ITe.0--imm.<&-(w:y-~~20=5 - Des ..6 - 6 -,tiskektÂ¢ 1*0 -344 4* 4/971 ! \4--11 . 0 432-1 ; t-T-1 1 E fet.. r. Â¥ / / I .-I -- IM $36--77/ 1- + + 3' 11% 84.1 2 \ \ 1: ----- 0 A . .7 tÂ» 91. \<-lut + (2 i ,# #M emis ' *,2 - * - i - Nlp 1 / C \ L_-3 L_.3 6 < 4 ouuu r_uni ---f , '-Â» \ 81 J \ 41, \ I \ \ \ liF *ClDS/r .Imve- Lil l V \\ 44 \ 1 -- , 13 ee MASTER . - 98*90/ \ 1 1 -= lEE Ek 49 r~ - -----â€ž------ mIT .fÂ©- --- 111 81= \ / -8 00 i\- \ \ / 1 / 1 \ . 0 40 - # -f~ Al =[5=2,2. - i // .1 \ 0- \ J - *mRi'0-- e,TRY trne 0-'a f L 0 -- -r--- -6 =-- i-FriBIP, / / / 4:40 demt \6 ROOM --~ / 1 - 1 \ = i41 -â‚¬ 6.9 E L h % / -> \ 9,4 4. #7 1 1 \ . \ 294/Â»A â‚¬ ti ~-fIE~ I I~f ~ ~ \ 1 \ 44. - 1/F) 4 4 \ 4 / Ly 4 1, \ 11 1 1 h -1 9 \ i N / a --- 1 1 Â» 0 V \ / 1 1 l. \ / 1 / C.D t \ 14-/ ELEE IA / i / \ i .a / ~ W 62 / 0 -g \ 75 31 *g / / 2 E- / Un /- / 1 4 0 J < h FLOOR PLAN - MAIN LEVEL n, nâ€ž 9 < 01 2i :leg ansil :s :s} Insuo) dums ;10] 93)u@P!Â§3~I xold-E moisn o ~AgE Â£002-0-2 4, 'uou,601.00 4% 01*-9Â£*-0Â£6 wor,MIN#11, Und 381) opooP)'4uno ' Av'pw @BPMPHM BED{ / / BEDROOM 1 ON ILL-- 11 1 .//1 ; r-1 3 8 , OP= TO \ 1 '6Â£* .1 BEDROOM /1 1 i //// > ~ 1/ 1 ./.1 1 A /,-,1-j, 1.L mL__1 U de 11 \ ~ 1 1 .// 1 1 F: 2 E 2 -0 LE r 9 1 1- 1% t= 1 4 1 2--1/Ardi 7 1 2.3 1 BEDROOM m + 41 HALL d aM i =7 491 n *DIIOI . 1,/6,/./6626 "iift' :239-I 0 t ~ m~To -,1 . 11---7 . ~- ro :. 14 \ 114â€¢ \ 1 1 Cl C-> p -A -4 56 --0 I 0 C.0.5 - FLOOR PLAN - UPPER LEVEL ~ * ts' 41) 1" = 10'-0" :Mea onssi :suo!Â§!Aaw :Sluelinguo) dums :10] Soouop!5211 xo i molin) AgN Dils Â£001--YO-90 7NLUMenS Wfld WO.O)IS ope.zoloo 'Xtunoo @ISFI 'UOAÂ¥'py @SpUp[!A BEOE HPIMA '1 10018 2 101 --1 - - - - - - - -- -I ' g i L. 1 Ill WAT --lm CE]*R Te 0(~YT \ #tu* 2*2 Sne<60 â€¢*4-1 ..0..CÂ®.Rs,on. 61 1 2*4 1*EXÂ»1.H 2%4 CCAS 11-4 1 t I --- 1 i ---1-.Â· ... ---12--7EENE=Â¥Euzz~;: Â·-7---Eak=S6EEEE?'2~~z~---rÂ· 0-- __295 Â·.__WL-IM -im&22~R2EE'EE?22-26=Â· --- *wl--- I _~7U~2~12*Stmnr.Â·. .-I./:;~~~aZS~UEEE.:.9~~In~f: - ~-Ak-ZUi;.~Rnr..,a,G.-7-~ . .UiU~Â»~2*rmm~,,~~-,2~rniA,G.,REZ~...... . . -- .**Ei?53â‚¬NEbfY-"e,~20: . CEE-ZE- Â¥ -11**Ff?EEE .ZEEÂ«LE=Im- -El-=-2-=i =2~: *3@535*FE;â‚¬2--- Â»-44Â©QuaD-,W-J-, iu..-/ 0 ,~0. --/ Â· -- - Â·Â· ~.7Â·LIZZLE-ZEZZEL-!32-=50" ' + -2-I_-r-IN- r:.--_U.-ZEI-- -r.-- - RIEL**#L. --2-ZINE-366E8/ ~-9.*8*J-:---+'.:~ --- t.-*#-.- -10-- . -v.~G ..kn. I.../ .*4- ... I . -,%.*/1â€žV..U.0...Â». I -U.... * --- - Â·- 1- -- --nt zz - 1 --- --- --- --- '4-- /1 -- /'â€¢Â¥ ..Â·Â·--IÂ·Â·41 Â·Â·/8 231ouzytial:vtÂ°: -3.27 - 7-9Â· r - .- 1 ='.. -". ~ 9. ....- - 1 2 0- f 'Irl .Â»00.-+xeÂ®* Â·I S.-' tit I.N.ik:*0Â« 5 ... :.- ./+ - - 1 . .- ~ a2~022Â§3-2 4 ' ~ 0 ~'*JU~ 4 -4, 1 ' . L_IL.1 on. I.=-* -1------ I . -- - >'ettEP%;Et-=9.&5221- -2- . -7-1_ 2_-2_25- y-E- -- z ...2 =ke- - - .SPS@%%888&. .6/?38881 --:2- - - - - - - .1- -4.. i:.-2-**==='--Z%2333 G------27.E-1-li./It-=t...10- V~~AMY;Â¥Wl - - il 1 , â€¢GGÂ·-Z-~r . :.... . 1; 644-el lii, i Hi .' i,4,#5444~, / - -- 1 ..# Ii' 11 --7-I- :ii:.:.Â·<161/iÂ·-'-: ~'821*-INF-- - 0m â„¢=â‚¬2 - - 101 Efi i SkEE,"L . +- Â·Â·Â·--Â·Â·-Â·Â·*Â·-Â· Â·---Â·-- Â·-Â·- - Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â· - SOUTH (FRONT, ELEVATIONI -- *111 1 0- ~-~ 3/16' = 1,Â·0' + Â· . , , ,\N. f f ~h\\ Irt=_- -, - UL '11-3 - Q . r;lit,i,;,~;,lismii IM K . 10 1 - - H/Ill 1-1 1 1 LilLI --410#- 11 bil El 1,3-1-Btllil*rl lili ' 11)1;11.r.....1,11 -, .* 1 1 11 - 17N.,41 . ~. . 4.1.-41.1J IN" 3 i-'/4 ~ J 6 Al 1 51 GBB ---- ---- - - ------- ---- - ------ -- / m / (7 NORTIH ELEVATION ~ ~ ,~ 12~ Nrld )1013)IS pay #L # 1 .i E :: 7 -1 1 - 11 10 1-J 1/i 1 -It -1,1.... 1 =ltfi.-:71 111,1 ~ Iii i lilli IlmE3Â¥F , _31!lEi:# 1 1 +4 11 I1Wlt.62Â£0.i 1 1... 1 ....1 1 11 - -El t 1 -- 1 .1 -103##mt ~ EAST ELEVATION *Ii 0 1' = 20-0" \ -- iwill 4 . . - 11 , -~*4# d 00. 1:2: 4 /%2~N w f/1 -- -9-1 %- I *gwRIL .. 30 0 ,+. VL lo~r - 1 *'-' fir--Â£- \3& - 1 3 -8 1!141 1 #' 70%> }Illim"fi Â¥ 1 Jil"â€¢9 ./.-1.7 - 11.- - --- 4--0-h L t 1Jill m - .Â·-Â·39-. 2 WEST ELEVATION ~ ~ .,~ 1. = 204)' X002-0-90 â„¢11]MWIS NAd H013)IS