The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 060303June 3,2003 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Site Tour June 3,2003 12:00 PM Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road Please meet at the Community Development Department Conference Room to join Town Council, Planning and Zoning Commission members, and Town staff for a Site Tour of Attainable Housing Projects in Eagle County. Posted on May 30,2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ Citv Market, main lobbv Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session June 3,2003 5:30 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. AGENDA A. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Estimated Times for each agenda item are shown for informational purposes only, and subject to change without notice. Posted on May 30,2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ Citv Market, main lobbv Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting June 3,2003 6:00 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order (6:00pm) 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda Approval of the May 20,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] VI. Final Design Plan (6:05pm - 6:15pm) A. Lot 52, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivison 4686 North Point Applicant: Kate O'Connor [Tab 2] PUBLIC HEARING VII. Planned Unit Development Amendment (6:15pm - 7:15pm) A. The Village at Avon Planned Unit Development PUD Amendment for Zoning Plan of Tract N, Tract G, RMF-1, & Tract M Posted on May 30,2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ Citv Market, main lobby , Applicant: Traer Creek LLC [Tab 3] PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Vlll. Other Business (7:15pm - 7:20pm) Minor Project Approvals: A. Lot 32, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision 2643 Beartrap Road Landscaping and Retaining Wall work Applicant: Patty McKenny B. Lot 47A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision 2420 Saddleridge Loop Deletion of belly band from final design approval Applicant: Tom Marcin IX. Adjourn (7:20pm) Posted on May 30,2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby Minutes of Planning & Zoning Commission May 20,2003 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Chairman Evans. Commissioner Karow acted as Chairman for this meeting. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There was an Addition for Chapel Square Master Sign Program and under the Consent Agenda, Lot 16, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend and Lot 42A, Block 4, Wildridge. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Hirn stated a conflict of interest with Lot 75, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Sketch Design. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Karow opened for a motion for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the May 6,2003, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes; Final Design Review for Lot 16, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision; and Lot 42A, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision be approved. Chris Ekrum who resides at Lot 15, Eaglebend, approached the podium to discuss the Final Design of Lot 16, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend. She was concerned with the lack of notification on the Lot 16 project. Vice Chairman Karow reviewed the legal process regarding Final Design Review approval. Commissioner Hirn made the motion for approval and Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. The Consent Agenda passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING OPENS VI. Special Review Use Applications A. Lot 13, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 411 Metcalf Road "Fiasco' - Bar/Tavern Owner: Dave Svabik Resolution No. 03-07 Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report for this Special Review Use Application by Dave Svabik for the use of a tavern/restaurant. This Application was tabled at the April 15th and May 6th planning and Zoning Commission Meetings. The lot currently has an unimproved parking area and per the interior size of the proposed facility, adequate parking of 65 spaces is required per the Parking Standards of the Town of Avon's Zoning Code. A revised site plan was submitted on May 13th that provided 34 parking spaces and not forty as mentioned on the Staff Report. Staff is recommending denial of this Special Review Use Permit Application. Dave Svabik, applicant, presented his project and its positive impact on the community. Mr. Svabik introduced Terrell Knight, land use planner in the area. Mr. Knight presented change of use to daytime lunch use from nighttime nightclub with entertainment. Mr. Knight feels the fit is good as it would be sited in an industrial area as opposed to residential, isolated, stated the changes which occurred in Eagle Vail (as being similar to this Application), addressed the parking issue, retaining wall issue, feels it is neighborhood oriented, and believes it complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. He believes this concept supports the town. Jim Bottomly gave a positive personal reference for Mr. Svabik and his concept. Terry Goush supports the restaurant in the area. Personal reference stating Dave's experience as positive. T.J. Connors developed the warehouse where restaurant is proposed. And offered the areas for overflow parking. Mr. Connors referenced Mr. Svabik as a good neighbor. Rob Davis, Avon business owner, approached the podium as a business on Nottingham Road and feels this is a good opportunity for the Town of Avon. Liz Matthews, known Dave for 22 years, agrees to a restaurant in the area. Brad Wyatt, Paul Benecot, property owner in the area, were both in favor. Jim Lawrence, property owner in area, and Dave Lott, friend and mechanic, were both in favor. Tom Bachus, owner of 4 Eagle Ranch, gave a positive personal reference. George Rosenberg, applicant's attorney, discussed the changes in the area, from industrial to primarily commercial, referenced other food establishments that had been in the area, used the Gashouse as an example, felt that the basic three standards were adequately addressed. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Smith questioned parking, concerned with an "acceptable use for the neighborhoods", voiced concerns by other neighbors regarding access. Commissioner Hirn had easement, parking and access concerns; approved of the need for lunch and dinner use, but concerned on impact of a nightclub and the situation it brings, and didn't feel this is the location best suited for this use. Commissioner Neville commented that the access road is not pedestrian oriented. Commissioner Didier thinks use is good, Minutes of P&Z Meeting May 20,2003 Page 2 concerned with parking, access and nightclub use, and thought they should make it smaller in order to comply with parking. Commissioner Trueblood was concerned with building's conditions, referenced the good support for the project by locals, but the zoning and parking issues are primary concern and would like the opinion of Wildridge residents. Vice Chairman Karow focused on the criteria for approving special review use. He commented that the application does not support the technical requirements of the Town of Avon Zoning and Municipal codes. Mr. Knight addressed the parking issue, as it is an equation with seating. Mr. Rosenberg looked for a consensus on use. Commissioner Karow voiced that a Special Review Use must meet the Town Code for parking. Technical issue of parking needs to be addressed sufficiently. Commissioner Smith made motion to deny the proposed use, as it does not conform to the Town of Avon's Comprehensive Plan or parking codes. Commissioner Neville seconded the motion for denial with all three conditions as stated in the Staff Report. The denial of this application passed 5 to 1 with Vice Chairman Karow opposing the motion. B. Lot 18/19, Block l, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 281 Metcalf Road Walkin' The Dog - Extension Applicant: Marisa Cantrell Resolution No. 03-13 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED No members of the public approached the podium for comment on Resolution No. 03- 13 which extends this Special Review Use for three years. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Hirn moves to approve Resolution No. 03-13 with Commissioner Didier seconding. The motion passes unanimously. VI. Planned Unit Development Amendment A. The Village at Avon Planned Unit Development PUD Amendment for Zoning Plan of Tract N, Tract G, RMF-1, & Tract M Applicant: Traer Creek PUBLIC HEARING OPEN This is a Public Hearing for the PUD Amendment designed to give an overview of the proposal to modify the zone districts on the north side of 1-70. They are creating an additional six acres of regional commercial which are immediately adjacent to the 1-70 interchange which should be opening shortly, relocating the school site to Tract M and Minutes of P&Z Meeting May 20,2003 Page 3 increasing the planning area of the school site by almost two acres, reconfiguring community park, designating the fire district regional facility that was approved in the Annexation and Development Agreement, increasing the planning area. At this time, Staff continues to review the information and merits of the proposal. Tim Lhosa of Zehren and Associates, representing applicant, Traer Creek, provided details of the proposal. The applicant revisited the areas for changes that would benefit the road and parcels, and access. An analysis of sites with slopes, geo hazards, and devised a plan of development to include higher density residential, duplex areas, school site revisited for housing type and move it to Tract M as the school district would prefer a residential location. Community Park will remain at 29 acres. Fire and ambulance districts prefer direct access. Staff interjected a site tour to review other locations for reviewing the similarities with other communities already developed. Shifting of density of 8 to 10 units per acre. Tract M has 15 units per acre and applicant is proposing reduction in this number. PUD approved 2,400 units and 650,000 in commercia Shane Bohart, Traer Creek, asked that the memo be disregarded due to several inaccuracies, and suggests a work session to thoroughly discuss this proposal. Vice Chairman Karow agreed with Mr. Bohart that a work session would be beneficial and staff suggests the tabling of this issue for the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Commissioner Hirn moved to table this PUD amendment to the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor of the motion. The motion carries unanimously. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING VII. Sketch & Final Design Plans Matt Pielsticker presented the Chapel Square Master Sign Program(MSP) Amendment for the WaIMart building. Four signs for three national tenants have been requested. The signs vary from the MSP for Chapel Square for the WaIMart building as they relate to materials and size, however, comply with the size requirements of retail frontage as proposed for the three tenants. Lighting is all back lit, and plans do include hours of lighting of the signs to reduce light pollution. Commissioner Dider moved to approve the Master Sign Program with the three staff recommendations and with the signs being turned off one hour after and lit one hour before posted store hours. Commissioner Trueblood seconded the motion. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. A. Lot 16, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivison - Final Design 4040 Eaglebend Drive Applicant: Eric Johnson, Architect Minutes of P&Z Meeting May 20,2003 Page 4 Moved to Consent Agenda B. Lot 42A, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design 5101 Longsun Lane Applicant: Gregory Macik Moved to Consent Agenda C. Lot 17, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Sketch Design 5670 Wildridge Road East Applicant: George Plavec Tambi Katieb presented the staff report. Applicant seeks both Sketch Plan and Final Design Approval at this time. George Plavec availed himself at the podium for questions. Commissioner Hirn voiced concerns on elevations. Commissioner Smith motioned to accept plans as presented with minor modifications to the front elevations to be worked out with staff and with Conditions 1-7, as listed by staff in their report. Commissioner Neville seconded the motion. Motion passes unanimously. D. Lot 75, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision - Sketch Design 2465 Saddle Ridge Loop Shaw Ste-Marie Duplex Applicant: Bob Mach Commissioner Smith questioned the keeping of aspens in order to minimize site disturbance. Commissioner Didier voiced concern for its lack of conformity to existing structures. Unit checked for lock off by staff was requested by Vice Chairman Karow requested review of the structure at 2170 Longspur as it is in violation of code. Vice Chairman Karow expressed concerns that this building is being designed with lock off units in mind just as has occurred by the applicant at 2170 Longspur. Vice Chairman Karow does not feel building conforms well to the site. Roof is clipped to conform to code. Vice Chairman Karow feels this home does not comply with guidelines, forced relief on the north side, and the bay window does not conform with any architecture in the area. Cindy Shaw, daughter of developer involved in project, questioned the unit numbers and was advised that lock offs are illegal and that the architect has created ancillary units (lockoffs) in his past projects. Mr. Richard Ste. Marie, applicant, approached the podium and asked what the Commission is looking for in this duplex location. Vice Chairman Karow would like to see the door eliminated or perhaps a deck off the back. Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the Sketch Plan with Staff's 7 conditions and Motion dies for lack second motion. Commissioner Neville made motion to table application and Commissioner Trueblood seconded. Motion passes unanimously. Commissioner Hirn returns to the meeting. Minutes of P&Z Meeting May 20,2003 Page 5 IX. Sign Design Application A. Lot 67 & 68, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 0008 Nottingham Road Swift Gulch Professional Bldg. (Petro-Hut) Master Sign Program Applicant: Tom Banner, Banner Realty Matt Pielsticker presented to the Commission the Staff Report. Staff was seeking approval with the removal of the monument along with the Staff's listed 4 conditions. Tom Banner provided new signs, which shrinks the tenant signs and allows for the monument sign to remain. Commissioner Didier moved to approve the Application with all staff recommendations except of Condition No. One and to allow the monument sign. Commissioner Trueblood seconded the motion and it carries 5 to 1 with Commissioner Hirn dissenting. X. Minor Projects A. Public Art (busts) in NW corner of roundabout #3 Applicant: Town of Avon Bob Reed, Director of Public Works, addressed the art in the roundabout and on pedestals. Roundabout Two improvements, other sites staying with stucco and caps, town money will be used for these improvements. Peter Buckley addressed the issue of the pedestal busts being installed illegally and wants procedure to be followed as the Planning and Zoning Commission was bypassed in the installation of the art. Vice Chairman Karow motioned to give the Avon Arts Council the authority to approve the type of art installed in Town, with the Town approving the locations only, Arts Council would like to have the art remain at its current locations particularly the busts. Peter Buckley voiced his concerns that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not approve the busts located in the 1 st Bank of Avon. He is seeking the removal of the busts and reapplication by the Arts Council to the Planning and Zoning Commission for the busts to be installed. Commissioner Neville made motion to allow the Avon Art Council to provide art at their discretion with Commissioner Hirn seconding. Removal of heads will be at the discretion of the Arts Council. Motion was made to add specific locations to list of sites approved art locations. Commissioners Hirn and Trueblood dissented the motion. Commissioners Smith, Neville, Didier and Vice Chairman Karow approving. Motion carried. Motion carries unanimously. Minutes of P&Z Meeting May 20,2003 Page 6 B. Minor Design Approvals: Lot 12, Block 1, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision 4420 Eaglebend Drive Addition of deck and expansion of master bedroom Moved to Consent Agenda. C. Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 48 East Beaver Creek Boulevard Resurfacing Benchmark Plaza concrete with "Everstone" Applicant: Everstone of Western Colorado XI. Adjourn Commissioner Hirn made a motion to adjourn, with Commissioner Trueblood seconding. The motion is approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 Pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Andrew Karow Vice Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2003\052003.doc Minutes of P&Z Meeting May 20,2003 Page 7 ZEHREN AND ASSOCIA1 ES, INC. May 28,2003 Town of Avon Department o f Community Development RECEIVED P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 MAY 3 0 2003 Attn: Tambi Katieb Community Development Re: Village at Avon PUD Amendment Tambi: Enclosed are submittal materials as discussed last Friday for an amendment to the Village at Avon Planned Unit Development. A summary of the proposed revisions to the approved PUD is as follows: 1. Re-name Area-M (Regional Commercial) to RMF-4 (Residential Multi-Family). 2. Relocate Area-G from RMF-1 to RMF-4 (Area M). 3. Increase the size of Area G. 4. Design vehicular access to Areas G and RMF-4 (Area M). 5. Reduce the total allowable density on RMF-4 through decreasing the developable acreage and allowable density per acre (as compared to Area M). 6. Increase the size of RMF-1. 7. Increase the allowable density of RMF-1. 8. Indicate the Swift Gulch Road alignment. 9. Redefine the borders and decrease the size of Area-N to reflect alignment of Swift Gulch Road and Area Q. 10. Create a new Area-Q, Regional Commercial, between the Swift Gulch Road alignment and the interstate on and off ramps. This area also allows for land dedication for a fire district station. ARCHITECTURE â€¢ PLANNING â€¢ INIERIC)145 â€¢ LANDSCAPE ANCHITECTURE 11("). 80\ 19,7, â€¢ Â·\von. Colorado 8 1620 â€¢ (970) 9-19-0237 â€¢ 1-,\X (970) 949-1000 â€¢ 0-111,ill: r ,]ilollcOD/(Â·111-cti.c oin â€¢ u\,.,1.7('hrpti.coin It is not our intention to increase the overall, approved number o f residential units or commercial area above what is currently approved at this time. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the materials submitted. Sincerel~, Timothy R. Losa, A.I.A. Senior Associate Zehren and Associates, Inc. CC: Shane Bohart Enclosures Planning Area RMF -1- Residential Multi-Family (a) Purpose: To provide sites for a variety o f residential uses. (b) Uses by Right: (i) Residential uses including but not limited to single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings including interval ownership. (ii) Temporary real estate and construction offices. (iii) Public or private roads and utilities including but not limited to utility improvements, lines and mains, facilities, services, and buildings. (iv) Recreational facilities. (v) Parks and open space. (Vi) Additional uses, which the Director of Community Development determines to be a use by right. (vii) Accessory Uses and Structures customarily appurtenant to uses by right. (viii) Accessory (detached) apartments not to exceed 700 square feet. (c) Special Review Uses (i) Churches, museums, libraries, and public buildings. (ii) Day care facilities. (d) Building Setback Requirements: (i) Front lot line - 10 feet (ii) Side lot line (traditional neighborhood) - 3 feet (iii) Side lot line - 7.5 feet (iv) Rear lot line - 10 feet (v) Rear lot line (traditional neighborhood at public right o f way) - 3 feet (e) Maximum Building Height: 35 feet. (f) Density Allowance: 8 Dwelling Units per acre- primary dwelling units. 10 Dwelling Units per acre including accessory dwelling units. (g) Parking Requirements: As defined by the Village (at Avon) Parking Requirements. (h) Minimum Landscape Area: 15%. (i) Accessory dwelling unit regulations: (i) Accessory dwelling units shall not exceed 700 square feet. (ii) Accessory dwelling units shall be located within detached, accessory structures served by a separate identifiable entry. (iii) Accessory dwelling units are accessory to the primary dwelling or use of the lot and may not be sold or conveyed in any way to separate ownership. Planning Area O - Regional Commercial (a) Purpose: To provide sites for a variety of regionally oriented and commercial and service oriented uses and activities in order to serve the needs and uses o f residents and guests o f the Upper Eagle River Valley. (b) Uses bv Right: (i) Commercial Uses including but not limited to any activity for the purpose of generating retail business or consumer services with the intent of producing a financial profit including but not limited to; retail stores, professional offices and businesses banks and financial institutions, personal services, and food and beverage establishments. (ii) Service commercial uses including but not limited to auto fueling and service stations, auto repair, auto repair, and car washes. (ii) Public or private transportation, transit or parking facilities including but not limited to bus and rail stations. (iii) Public or private community service facilities including ambulance and fire stations, storage and repair facilities, buildings including but not limited to residential uses that directly serve those specified uses. (iv) Temporary real estate and construction offices. (v) Public or private roads and utilities including but not limited to utility improvements, lines and mains, facilities, services, and buildings. (vi) Additional uses, which the Director of Community Development determines to be a use by right. (vii) Accessory Uses and Structures customarily appurtenant to uses by right. (c) Special Review Uses (i) Churches, museums, libraries, and public buildings. (ii) Day care facilities. (iii) Parks and open space. (iv) Recreational facilities. (v) Residential Uses not directly associates with community service facilities. (d) Building Setback Requirements: Front: 10' Side: 10' Rear: 10' (e) Maximum Building Height: 35 feet. (f) Density Allowance: 15 Dwelling Units per acre. (g) Parking Requirements: As defined by the Village (at Avon) Parking Requirements. (e) Minimum Landscape Area: 5%. (f) Gasoline dispensing and service station regulations. (i) All fuel storage tanks shall be completely buried beneath the surface of the ground except where such burial conflicts with applicable laws and regulations. (ii) All fuel pumps, or similar devices shall be located at least twenty feet from the right of way. (iii) All servicing o f vehicles, except the sale o f fuel and oil services customarily provided in connection therewith, shall be completely within a structure. (iv) All storage of goods shall be completely within a structure. - Planning Area RMF -4- Residential Multi-Family (a) Purpose: To provide sites for a variety o f residential uses. (b) Uses by Right: (i) Residential uses including but not limited to single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings. (ii) Commercial uses intended to serve surrounding residential areas including any activity for the purpose of generating retail business or consumer services with the intent o f producing financial profit including, but not limited to retail stores, professional and business offices, personal service shops, food and beverage establishments, and club and recreational facilities to support and provide service to the residential development. (iii) Residential Management Offices. (iii) Temporary real estate and construction offices. (iv) Public or private roads and utilities including but not limited to utility improvements, lines and mains, facilities, services, and buildings. (v) Recreational facilities. (Vi) Parks and open space. (vii) Additional uses, which the Director of Community Development determines to be a use by right. (viii) Accessory Uses and Structures customarily appurtenant to uses by right. (c) Special Review Uses (i) Churches, museums, libraries, and public buildings. (ii) Child and Day Care facilities. (d) Building Setback Requirements: To be determined by sub-division and design review criteria except as necessary to accommodate utility improvements, lines and mains, facilities, services and buildings. (e) Maximum Building Height: 48 feet. (f) Density Allowance: 8 Dwelling Units per acre. (g) Parking Requirements: As defined by the Village (at Avon) Parking Requirements. (h) Minimum Landscape Area: 20%. . 1 Zehren and Associates, Inc. The Village at Avon 5/28/2003 021509.01 PUD Amendment Proposed Amendements Land Use Residential Tract Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Lots 1-96 Residential/Single Family 910.1 50.8% 1 p/1 s 182 RMF-1 Residential/Multi-Family 33.1 1.8% 10 331 RM F-2 Residential/Multi-Family 43.6 2.4% 12 523 RMF-3 Residential/Multi-Family 16.3 0.9% 6 98 RMF-4 Residential/Multi-Family 38.7 2.2% 310 Sub-Total 1,041.8 58.2% 1,444 Parks and Open Space Tract Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Area N Community Park 25.3 1.4% 0 0 OS-1 through OS-12 Natural Open Space 473.2 26.4% 0 0 P-1 through P-6 Parkland 15.7 0.9% Q Q Sub-Total 514.2 28.7% 0 Roadways Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Public Right of Way Road 94.8 5.3% 0 0 Other Uses Tract Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Area A Village Center 33.0 1.8% 25 825 Area B Cultural/Recreational 2.4 0.1% 10 24 Area C Ice Skating/Events Center 1.7 0.1% 4 7 Area D Village Residential 20.5 1.1% 18 369 Area E Village Residential 5.5 0.3% 18 99 Area F Village Residential 9.5 0.5% 18 171 Area G School 9.0 0.5% 0 0 Area H Neighborhood Center 3.2 0.2% 15 48 Area I Neighborhood Center 5.7 0.3% 15 86 Area J Regional Commercial 8.4 0.5% 15 126 Area K Regional Commercial 29.9 1.7% 15 449 Area L Regional Commercial 4.0 0.2% 15 60 Area Q Regional Commercial 6.3 0.4% 1.5 95 Sub-Total 139.1 7.8% 2,357 Project Totals 1789.9 100.00% 3,801 Total Allowable Units 2,400 Page 1 Zehren and Associates, Inc. The Village at Avon 5/28/2003 021509.01 PUD Amendment - Existing Conditions Land Use Residential Tract Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Lots 1-96 Residential/Single Family 916.4 51.2% 1 p/1 s 182 RMF-1 Residential/Multi-Family 24.2 1.456 6 145 RMF-2 Residential/Multi-Family 43.6 2.4% 12 523 RM F-3 Residential/Multi-Family 16.3 0.9% 6 98 Sub-Total 1,000.5 55.9% 948 Parks and Open Space Tract Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Area N Community Park 29.0 1.6% 0 0 OS-1 through OS-12 Natural Open Space 499.9 27.9% 0 0 P-1 through P-6 Parkland 15.7 0.9% Q Q Sub-Total 544.6 30.4% 0 Roadways Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Public Right of Way Road 66.0 3.7% 0 0 Other Uses Tract Use Acres % of Site Density (du/acre) DU/Tract Area A Village Center 33.0 1.8% 25 825 Area B Cultural/Recreational 2.4 0.1% 10 24 Area C Ice Skating/Events Center 1.7 0.1 % 4 7 Area D Village Residential 20.5 1.1% 18 369 Area E Village Residential 5.5 0.3% 18 99 Area F Village Residential 9.5 0.5% 18 171 Area G School 7.3 0.4% 0 0 Area H Neighborhood Center 3.2 0.2% 15 48 Area I Neighborhood Center 57 0.3% 15 86 Area J Regional Commercial 8.4 0.5% 15 126 Area K Regional Commercial 29.9 1.7% 15 449 Area L Regional Commercial 4.0 0.2% 15 60 Area M Regional Commercial 47.7 2.7% 12 716 Sub-Total 178.8 10.0% 2,978 Project Totals 1789.9 100.0% 3,927 Total Allowable Units 2,400 Page 2 Zehren and Associates, Inc. The Village at Avon 5/28/2003 021509.01 PUD Amendment Open Space Calculation Open Space Proposed Existing Difference OS-1 2.7 2.7 0.0 OS-2 2.7 2.7 0.0 OS-3 1.4 1.4 0.0 OS-4 101.9 101.9 0.0 OS-5 184.5 215.5 -31.0 OS-6 1.6 1.6 0.0 OS-7 20.5 20.5 0.0 OS-8 145.2 145.2 0.0 OS-9 0.5 0.5 0.0 OS-10 5.4 5.4 0.0 OS-11 2.5 2.5 0.0 OS-12 0.6 Qll 0:6 Total 469.5 499.9 -30.4 Page 3 8 0 C 21 5020038 %10Â°o go 20Â©00000Â©0000=519 U tm g @ 0 01 21 21 69 4 2 g ow -21000 %0 liSM Ang}EÂ© 5%6982011 0.1 U.11 LILI U -21 al-An#%1 i ooo 10 2 8 & A M g E o 5 % 3 5 2 Â° RA 0- N 19 u Â£1-1 d 8 8 2 0.0000 :000 ao moÂ©0000000000!29 h te 5 6 5 01 9 81 0 8 C C ;| * 0 -* CO CO 00 0 - LO M W LD â€¢0 O 61. -a (O 2 0 0 0000 20 .et Wr - -r Â·Â·- ------ El - m In 11 0 1 : 1 22 2 <0 w JÂ¤ 01100-Cococo,-101.0-1010-43 a|(N - N .-r- r- w rÂ·- .- ,- â€ž r.vÂ¥- a. a X 1% IM&42 916 80Â¢#gy#Xy##ytign X 0 0 0 : 0 0 " *35Â§141= 00-00000.-1. 9 5 c.l N gl 9 9 01 â€¢7 W - =10 0 00Â©doododep c:St 91 I =g 6 61 al 51 2 2 El 01 ,- 91 -41 1 e e g &11 01 0 9 0,1 1 SA .6 9 r m ur) , MI (Â¥) 1-0 NCNINO :14. 32 32 32 2 32 32 0 32 32 2 0 01 32 9-dowoododorÂ·oNc:~2 & w 0 4 N 5 61 6 ~1 4 4 51 2 3 + w 032~tae< 4 El,e ll,3,32323232&taeyae,eaeh~~132 MIN E 61 6 21 M Â® co - â€¢- v- (9 If> 1,0 N M lo h NO -1 CO Al- 00 ,Â· 0, N ~2 4 c# d NIM J N n 21 Iri a d a.1 C> 81 19 2 2 2%~W 1 44 21% I R /222 2 22 5 22 2%2Q 21% O .5 01 oi .51 x N W m o~ 2 20... u'UDU~le) 1~1905 01% M El E %9 9 (A g /2 i :1 1 11 E & AN - gloc>Ke M co *1501- W - wi 3~a a 2 2 mIR EAE BLE %* Zi Nrgu,a,cim~]IN 810 4- - '4 0 Mo 1 0 Â° 2 21 i 2% 4 > >. 6 ET--- b j m ie 2.4 :~ 0 Â· 88*EE* itc 1%*222Epp Els E a A 1 54 & 3 GES 5:1 2 2 2,71 8@ 815%6@,maaffâ‚¬ 9 0 CE i E En. E=,6&&&0 22 2.21 583225 14*2*-*11 12&22 8 zzeosta:QI 0) :g 8 f M /2 - - il A N m ~1, zE .2 #I.e 21_<MOOLULLDZ--,F-1~0|3 2 3 1 //3 81 ~ .- IN B :| 1~ El i i # * @i 2 51 m E I .6 8 5 -tl :I E E 2 0 2 0 2 2 E % 0 2 F Fl 4 Â¢6 dg 31 ~1 #1 -, kmmeiu, 2 #14 62~ 42 01#14*44%44*44Â·24<40 2 and Associates, Inc. 5728/2003 ' Nowable DU/Tra 941- St 52 0 960.001 %0-00 1 00 66814 6'681' L 1 Paloid Proposed Existing Difference 1% 0.0 le!0Jall,lu00 ential/Mui identiavdl'~i onal Com rcial + le!010 00 leuo! e 54!un el OS-12 N 20 03 03:13p AL ME ENGINEERING 9709263390 EAGLE RIVER ~ WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 646 Forest Road â€¢ Vail, Colorado 81657 (970) 476Â·7480 â€¢ FAX (970) 476-4089 April 28,2003 Mr. Shane Bohart Traer Creek Development Company P.O. Box 640 Vail, CO 81658 Subject: Ability to Serve Tract M - Village at Avon Dear Shane: I have attached copies of the Ability to Serve letters for water and sewer for the Village at Avon PUD. It is my understanding that Tract M is included within the scope of the original PUD and the 2,440 proposed units. As such an additional Ability to Serve letter is not necessary as Tract M is covered by the attached Ability to Serve letters. The Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority and the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District can provide water and sanitation services to Tract M provided that engineering documentation of hydraulic considerations fall within District specifications and that the engineering design is submitted and approved by the DistricUAuthority Construction Review Team. Sincerrl' Linn Schorr Engineering Manager Enclosures Cc Dennis Gelvin Glenn Porzak Tom Willianisen Mike Sliper Fred Haslee LS/niein ~ F:\15WS D\SREGS\Lellers\2003\AtoBTractM.doc WATER, WASTEWATER, OPERATIONS & MANAGEMENT SERVICES ./IA.' MaW 20 03 03:13p Al ME ENGINEERING 97n9263390 P.3 D ..61,lujvt HELTON & WILLIAMSEN, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN WATER RESOURCES 384 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 115 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 PHONE (3031 792-2161 FAX {303] 792-2166 January 23,1997 James P. Collins, Esq. Collins & Cockrel, P.C. 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 400 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Subject: Water Service Agreement for the Nottingham Ranch Property - Eagle-Vail Metropolitan Dis trict Dear Jim: This letter responds to your request for an opinion concerning the adequacy of certain water rights owned by EMD LLC to provide water service to the Nottingham Ranch property under a proposed water service agreement with the Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District. Under such an arrangement, EMD LLC would obtain a plan for augmentation from the Water Court. The historical consumptive use resulting from dry-up of irrigated fields and reservoir storage water would be used as replacement sources for EMD LLC's out-of-priority depletions. The development would consist of 2,000 residential units, 950,000 square .feet of commercial space, a school with irrigated athletic fields, and irrigated parks. The potable water supplies would be provided by the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority (UERWA). We have reviewed an April 1995 report prepared by Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc. entitled "Avon Village Water Supply Plan" and have interviewed Mike Saylor, the author of that report. We also have relied on UERWA's diversion records and our knowledge of the Eagle River basin to develop the opinions presented herein. The depletions caused by the development, excluding reservoir evaporation, would average abour 182 acre-feet annually of which about 160 acre-feet would occur during the irrigation season and 22 acre-feet would occur during the non-irrigation season. The plan for augmentation would rely on EMD LLC's interests in the water rights for the 1) Nottingham and Puder Ditch which diverts from the Eagle River, 2) the Nottingham Ditch System which diverts from Nottingham Gulch and 3) the Traer Ditch Nos. 1 and 2 which divert from Traer Creek. Nottingham Gulch and Traer Creek are tributaries of the Eagle River. The historical consumptive use averaged 252 acre-feet annually of which 193 acre-feet were derived from the Nottingham and Puder Ditch, 45 acre-feet from the Nottingham Ditch System, and 14 acre-feet from the Traer Ditch. Pending inspections of the aerial photographs, we concur with Bishop-Brogden that the historical consumptive use from these water rights should provide adequate water supplies during the irrigation season to replace the depletions caused by EMD LLC's development in average and dry years. There is always some risk that the Water Judge may not entirely rely on our opinions for a final judgment and may impose unfavorable terms and conditions. We expect that EMD LLC would bear that risk rather than UERWA or Eagle-Vail. Mai 20 03 03:14p Al NE ENGINEERING 97n9263390 P.4 James P. Collins, Esq. January 22,1997 Page 2 The water right yields and water demands set forth in the Bishop-Brogden report are based on "average-year" conditions. We recommend that the actual dedication of water rights be based on the dry-year water demands of the development and the dry-year yields of the old irrigation water rights. As described above, the development will include irrigated parks and athletic fields. We encourage EMC LLC to use raw water for irrigation of parks and other large tracts wherever possible in order to reduce the treated water demands and treatment costs. Bishop-Brogden shows that the non-irrigation season depletions would be replaced with water released from two reservoirs on the Nottingham Ranch. We understand that EMD LLC instead may obtain and use a portion of Eagle-Vail's 85 acre-feet allocation of Eagle Park Reservoir water. The allocation is equivalent to 2 times the non-irrigation season depletion set forth in Eagle-Vail's plan for augmentation in Case No. W-3289. The depictions described in that decree were intended to reflect Eagle-Vail's build-out conditions. We inspected UERWA's records for deliveries to Eagle-Vail for December 1995 and January through April and November 1996. We found that Eagle-Vail's water uses during these months represent about 70 percent of the projected demands. We understand that the current level of development within Eagle Vail's boundaries represent over 90 percent of the projected development based on SFE count. In addition to the Eagle Park Reservoir water, Eagle-Vail can use 42.4 acre-feet of contract water from Green Mountain Reservoir pursuant to the decree in Case No. 92CW291 to make-up its non-irrigation season depletions. We conclude that Eagle-Vail can spare at least 25 acre-feet of its Eagle Park Reservoir allocation for EMD LLC. The wastewater from EMD LLC's development will be treated at the Avon Wastewater Treatment Plant. Dennis Gelvin told us that the recent expansion of the facility was based on the expected build-out projections of the upstream districts and included projections for EMD LLC's development. We understand also that UERWA's Raw Water Treatment Plant was expanded to meet the build-out demands of the service areas within the high pressure zone and that EMC LLC's development was anticipated. I will meet with Mike Saylor at Bishop-Brogden's offices on Friday to inspect the aerial photographs. I will promptly notify you if the inspection of the photographs or discussions with Mike cause me to change my opinions. Please call if you have any questions or additional concerns. Sincerely yours, HELTON & WILLIAMSEN, P.C. f WVA PA. Thomas A. Williamsen TAW/mic CC: Dennis Gelvin C.\5501\012397.TAW Mau 20 03 03:14p R ME ENGINEERING 9709263390 P.5 HELTON & WILLIAMSEN, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN WATER RESOURCES 384 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 115 ~ ER-* 2-OVEÂ·t - ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 PHONE (303) 792-2161 FAX (303) 792-2165 *R; 11 i I i to-l-.. December 30,1997 ~ Ms. Kathy Eastley Eagle County Community Development P.O. Box 179 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Mr. Steve Lautenschlager Colorado Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Subject: Water Supply for the Vail Valley Centre Dear Ms. Eastley and Mr. Lautenschlager: This letter was prepared on behalf of our client, the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority (UERWA) concerning water service to the Vail Valley Centre which adjoiMs the Eagle- Vail Metropolitan District. UERWA has agreed to provide water service to the Vail Valley Centre pursuant to the "Water Service Agreement" executed on May 15, 1997. The development of the area now known as the Vail Valley Centre was included in UERWA's 1994 master plan and was considered for the enlargement of the raw water and wastewater treatment plants in Avon. These plants have sufficient capacity to meet existing system demands as well as the demands by the Vail Valley Centre. Water rights for the Vaii Valley Centre are leased to UERWA pursuant to the Water Service Agreement. The water rights include interests in relatively senior direct flow water rights decreed for irrigation purposes and interests in the storage rights for Eagle Park Reservoir, Nottingham Reservoir, and Vail Valley Centre Lake Nos. 1 -arld-2.-Th-e enclosed May--~- --------- 1997 report by Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc. documents the historical use of Vail Valley Centre's water rights, provides estimates of the future water demands and depictions, and describes a plan for augmentation. I have reviewed the report and have advised UERWA that the proposed plan for augmentation could be developed without causing injury to other decreed water uses. The Vail Valley Centre and UERWA will submit a joint application to the Water Court this month for a plan for augmentation involving these water rights. Mau 20 03 03:14p Al--ME ENGINEERING 9709263390 P.6 Ms. Kathy Eastley - Mr. Steve Lautenschlager December 30, 1997 Page 2 Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, HELTON & WILLIAMSEN, P.C. Thomas A. Williamsen TA\N/m Ic Enclosure CC: Dennis Gelvin wo/enc. Glenn E. Porzak, Esq. wo/enc. James P. Collins, Esq. wo/enc. Richard A. Johnson, Esq. wo/enc. Michael A. Sayler wo/enc. Peter Jamar wo/enc. C:\U 101\123097.TAW Mat, 20 03 03:15p Al ME ENGINEERING 9709263390 P.7 Owe<Â¥ RG 29-0102 Rcv. 3/99 LETTER OF INTENT 1-1,0 Federal Communication# Commission (FCC) provides guidelines for tÂ©lephonc serving arrangements. This letter serves as documentation ofthc intended building use and of the scrvke configuration to be provided by Qwest. Serving CO NNX: Date: 4/28/03 Building Owner or Designee: Building Address: If )\4 f r. (1 Avoi (Prâ€¢Atal Address) ~ O City: AJ o. Countyt. f:2451C' State: Zip: Planned Use. Please Â©heÂ¢k appropnate designation Muld-Tenant/Unit ~ _ Single Tenant/Unit (Options 1,2,3 or 4) (Options 1 or 4) The hemiscs Owner or Designee must select onÂ¢ of the serving arrangements described below. 1-93 1. Qwcst facilities will terminate at one mutually agreed upon localion upon entry into or on the. building, normally at the lowest cornmon serving point. The bui;ding owner and/or tenants will provide. manago and- maintain building cable and wire placed beyond the Dgmarcation Point location. ~-~ 2. Qwest will terminate facilitics at common locations mutually agreed upon by the Premises Owner or designee throughout the building (terminal rooms, utility closcts, etc.). Qwest will provide, manage and maintain the building cable and registration jacks that denotc the Demarcation Points. The Demarcation Points will be accessible lo cnd-users at thesc locations. (Option 2 is nean option for single tenant buildings.) Fl 3. Qwest will terminate facilities at one mutually agreed upon location, within ihc individually occupied space/unit(s), or within 12" or a similarly reasonable distance of cable/wire entry. Qwest will provi<k manage and maintain the building cable, network terminating wire end registration jacks thar denote the DemalÂ·cation Point (Option 3 is M an option for single tenant buildibgs.) ' ~~ 4. Qwest will terminate facilities at one mutually agreed upon location on the property. The premiacs owner and/or tenants will provide, manage and maintain building wire and cable ptaced beyond the Demarcation Point Location. It is the responsibility of the Premises Owner to provide and maintain adequate tcrmination space and Supporting Structwes for telephone cable/wire Within thc building or on private property, as stated in the local tariffs. If a building designation changa from multi to single tenancy, a PBX orswitch is installed, and Qwest has placed regulaled facilities after the effective dale of the tariff, Qwest owncd facilitics will bc purchased by ilic Premises Owner for a fair market price, removed and/or disabled at the Premises Owner 's expense. This is to certify that the person signing below is the campus or building developer, owner, or their designee and this document accurately reflects the intended use of this building at the time and will be relied uppn by Qwest in its provisioning and any regulatory or legal proceedings related to this property. Signature: Printed Namc: (Please Designate - Building/Property Owner - Designee) Company: Telephone Number: C Address: Qwst Eng,neer, ~5(10 06 // 47*l 0 1 --42 Engineer District: 52 U.Â·fln.*.;#- Telephone Number: 87* , 765'- GE.60 Mag 20 03 03:15p AL--ME ENGINEERING 9709263390 P.8 COMCAST CABLE CO lip. -April 25,2003 Town of Avon Dear Sir or Madam: I have seviewed the plan you tent for the proposed development Comcast Cable can severance thQ development if the developer proY;des the conduits throughout the development. The conduits would be run, as specified by our engineedng department. Comcast would bear the cost of,labor and materids to construct CATV faciliries throughout the development using said conduita. Sincerely, i Â£ \ 1 Floyd Salazar Consuuction Supervisor 281 METCALF ROADâ€¢ AVON CO,â€¢81020 PHONE: 970-949-1224X 112 Â· FAX: 970â€¢549â€¢9138 Maki 20 03 03:15p Al ME ENGINEERING 9709263390 P.9 APR.24.2003 12:22PM CROSS VAIL NO.823 P.2 ~ROSS 84 3799 HIGHWAY 82 Â· RO. DRAWER 2150 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5491 Â· FAX (9701 945-4081 +3 9 5 0,9 April 24,2003 Mr. Michael Sliper Alpine Engineering Inc. P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO. 81632 Re: The Village @ Avon; Single Family Lots (6-96) (north of I-70), Tracts M &G RMF-1, RMF-3, Parcel N&Q Dear Mike: The above mentioned development is within the certified service area ofHoly Cross Energy. Holy Cross Energy has existing power facilities located on or near the above mentioned project. These existing facilities have adequate capacity to providÂ© electric power to the development, subject to the tariffs, rules and regulations on file. Any power line cnlargcments, rclocations, and new extensions necessary to deliver adequate Power to and within the development will be undertaken by Holy Cross Energy upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements. Please advise when you wish to proceed with the development of the electric system for this project. Sincerely, Holy Cross Energy 4-110.4113 Michael A. Mikolic Engineering Department CC: W/O#: N/A Location # 55-70,07,08,09 RECEIVED ZEHREN MAY 3 0 2003 AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Community Development May 30,2003 Town of Avon Community Development Attn: Ruth Borne P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Re: Village at Avon PUD Amendment This statement is to address items one through twelve as listed in the Planned Unit Development Review Criteria as outlined in the application requirements. Nothing in the following statements shall be construed to supercede any existing agreements between the developers o f the Village at Avon and the Town of Avon. 1. Conformity with the Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives. The Town ofAvon Comprehensive Plan did not specifically address the details of the land now known as the Village at Avon at the time of the last revision. The plan did anticipate development in this area, but it was not yet part of the town. Although the Comprehensive Plan has not been amended to include this property, we believe that the annexation process and subsequent PUD that was approved by the town constituted an interim development plan and that this plan outlined what the Town agreed was the proper development. The proposed amendment is consistent with both the previously approved development plan and the goals and objectives stated in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. This proposed amendment further clarifies the development in a few specific areas based upon further study ofthe topography and unique site characteristics. This amendment also revises the PUD to incorporate several new requests by the Town and the School Board including the Swift Gulch Road extension and the relocation ofthe school site away from the highway interchange. These opportunities will allow the applicant to identify specific opportunities for clustered residential development, public facilities, schools, and commercial activities. The overall residential densities, commercial development, and dedicated land for open space and/or public facilities remain consistent with those previously approved as part of the overall Planned Unit Development. 2. Conformity and Compliance withthe overalldesign theme ofthe Town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. This statement is not applicable because The Village at Avon maintains its own design review authority. ARCHITECTURL- â€¢ PLÂ·\1\INCI â€¢ INTERIORS â€¢ LANI)SCAPE ARCI IITECTUR[ 11(). 110~ 1930 â€¢ Â·\\'citi. Colorado 81620 â€¢ Ic)7(1 1 949-0237 â€¢ El\\ (97{)1 949-1080 â€¢ e-mail: vaik )tic@zehren.com â€¢ wwn'.it'lireti.i-(,in 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. This statement is not applicable because The Village at Avon maintains its own design review authority. 4. Uses, activity, and design, which provide a compatible, ejficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The uses, activity and design modifications of the proposed amendment relate to adjacencies o f existing circulation systems and are intended to buffer less intensive residential and park uses from those higher intensity uses directly adjacent transit systems. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. The identification and/or mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards are addressed in the appendix of the approved Village at Avon Development Plan and remain unchanged. Further, more detailed study is currently being conducted. Development has been located out of hazardous areas and/or will be mitigated by proposed infrastructure improvements. It should be noted that the previously agreed upon location for the fire station facility on the parcel o f land between the Swift Gulch Road extension and the Westbound I-70 on ramp is not feasible due to the nature o f the debris flow hazard in this area. The current designation does not allow any use akin to a residential occupancy. Because fire personnel often live in their building while on duty, this is not an allowable use. 6. Site plan, building design, and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive to natural features, vegetation, and over all aesthetic quality of the community. The site plan, location and open space provisions are responsive to natural features and avoid natural hazards, are in locations convenient to residents of each respective neighborhood, and are responsive to proposed vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and offsite traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation plan. The location of higher density residential near the soon to be completed I-70 highway interchange will place traffic impacts close to transportation nodes rather than within existing communities. Higher density residential in these locations are also linked to the proposed ECO regional trail alignment and an extensive network of internal pathways and trails providing a convenient alternate means oftransit and linkage between the neighborhoods and the school site and community park. Village at Avon PUD Amendment May 30,2003 Page 2 of 5 The design o f these new trails, including the currently planned and approved trail paralleling Swift Gulch Road, will meet current ADA standards and provide uninterrupted access without the need for road crossings. Tunnels and bridges will cross all arterial roads providing a safe way for children to travel to school given the recent modifications to the school bussing standards. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to maximize and preserve natural features, recreation, views, and function. The open space provisions o f the approved PUD remain largely unchanged. The slight reduction in Area-N is as a result of the Swift Gulch Road extension. The town requested the extension of this road and its alignment at Area N is the result o f CDOT standards and the Federally mandated distance o f intersections away from highway interchanges. The resulting isolated parcel of land will now be many feet below the grade ofthe park and not well suited for park-like activities due to its proximity to the highway and the road. To mitigate the loss ofparkland an additional 1.5 acres was gained due to a new alignment of the road accessing lots 1-96. We have recently been informed that CDOT has rejected the current alignment of Swift Gulch Road because a portion o f the curb radius is too close to the highway interchange. They are requiring that the intersection be moved further to the northeast. This will cause a larger impact to Area N and Area Q and may have an impact on RMF-1 as well. Because we have only now become aware ofthis we are unsure of these impacts for this work session, but wish for the town to be aware of the changing conditions. We will have this resolved prior to the first approval by P&Z of the PUD amendment. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and ejficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional, and efficient without relying upon completion offuture phases. Each o f the proposed amendments or parcels can be phased as an individual subdivision based upon the availability and completeness o f utilities, roadways, and infrastructure. The phasing and infrastructure requirements o f the approved PUD will not change. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, police, and fire protection. Public utilities such as water, sewer, electric, and gas are adequate for the proposed amendments to the PUD as identified in the attached letters. Public services including fire protection and schools are being accommodated in accordance with guidelines and in locations discussed with each specific district. Transit systems, parks, and open space are more clearly defined, identified, and incorporated in this amendment. 11. That existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated tramc within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. Village at Avon PUD Amendment May 30,2003 Page 3 of 5 The proposed roadways are designed to standards anticipated to accommodate proposed traffic volumes, speeds, and parking requirements within each subdivision as well from anticipated future development according to the approved PUD. 12. Describe the proposed development standards. Provide justifications for the proposed standards and describe the benefits to the Town if they deviate from the proposed standards. The proposed development standards for RMF-1, Area-Q, Area G and RMF-4 are outlined separately below: RMF-1; designated as Residential Multi-Family, and is intended to be developed primarily as single family homes on small lots with mostly detached garages on alleyways using traditional neighborhood principles. Some larger corner lots may have duplex homes designed to look like larger single-family homes. Higher density multifamily units will be used to buffer the neighborhoods from the arterial streets and provide a mix o f housing types. Reduced setbacks are anticipated to allow the homes to reinforce the character of the street. Small accessory apartments will be allowed above detached garages to promote a diversity of residents within the community. The resulting increased densities are located nearest to arterial roadways and the new I-70 interchange. A network o f internal neighborhood streets forming a grid and two entrances into the neighborhood will diminish the traffic load on any one individual street. Area Q; designated as Regional Commercial, is also located nearest to the highway interchange. This allows the greatest access to major roadways without generating unnecessary traffic through residential areas. Commercial uses located on these parcels will be encouraged to build close to the northern property line and place automobile oriented functions (such as parking and auto circulation) along the south portion o f the property. This building placement will help to reinforce the pedestrian nature of the neighborhood by making the buildings approachable for pedestrians walking and biking from the regional trail and the RMF-1 neighborhood. Parking, signage and potential gas islands located south ofthe buildings will then be located where they will be most visible to highway motorists and buffered from the residents. Area G; designated as the School Site, has been relocated away from the highway interchange at the request o f the school district. The new location will be central within the RMF-4 residential community, which was also a request o f the school district. The current access shown is via the upper road, but negotiations have begun to secure an easement or a land exchange ofthe forest service parcel of land between Area RMF-1 and RMF-4 allowing for a more direct road alignment. This access issue will be resolved before any development commences. The proposed ECO regional trail alignment also crosses this forest service parcel and serves to connect the Area-G and the surrounding residential communities. Village at Avon PUD Amendment May 30,2003 Page 4 of 5 Area RMF-4; designated as Residential Multi-Family, and is intended to surround the school site (Area-G) with residential units in accordance with the wishes o f the school district. This area was previously designated as Regional Commercial with an allowable density of 15 dwelling units per acre. The new designation results in a reduction in overall density while still providing for a variety ofresidential housing types to suite regional demand in an attractive setting. Village at Avon PUD Amendment May 30,2003 Page 5 of 5 HErART0ithe VALLE'~ Staff Report .i//3///"""///m'r& >. PUD Amendment AV[IN COLORADO June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 28,2003 Project type Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment Legal description The Village at Avon PUD Current zoning Planned Unit Development Address No addresses assigned Introduction Traer Creek LLC has submitted an application for a PUD amendment to the Village at Avon PUD. The amendment largely proposes modifications to land uses on the north side of the new I-70 interchange. The following amendments to the currently approved PUD zoning plan are being proposed: â€¢ Relocate Tract G (School site) from the north side ofthe interchange to Tract M (RMF- 4), currently zoned as Regional Commercial. Also, the site is increased from 7.3 acres to 9 acres. â€¢ Create an additional 6.3 acres of Regional Commercial immediately adjacent to the interchange, which is currently zoned for a community park, school site, and residential area (RMF-1). â€¢ Included in the Regional Commercial zoning is 1.5 acres as a proposed fire and ambulance district regional facility. This facility is proposed as a use by right in the Area Q zoning. â€¢ Increase the residential development rights immediately north of the I-70 interchange (RMF-1) from 146 dwelling units to a potential of 242 dwelling units. The size of this parcel is also increased from the existing 24.2 acres to 33.1 acres. â€¢ Redefine the borders and the size of Area N (Community Park). â€¢ Provide a mix of 289 dwelling units on RMF-4 (currently zoned Regional Commercial), ofwhich 163 units appear to be proposed as employee/affordable housing exclusively. Though currently zoned as Regional Commercial, the densities proposed for this Tract are reduced from the original PUD approval. As proposed, the density is 8 dwelling units per acre versus the currently approved 15 dwelling units per acre. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 8 ' PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution is consistent with the public interest. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The Comprehensive Plan did not contemplate the development pattern o f the Village, but instead recognized the property as a potential annexation with opportunities for future development. However, the plan does identify several policy goals related to land use and development patterns that should be reviewed with respect to the proposed Village PUD amendment. The goals and policies that pertain are as follows, each with a review comment regarding this application's compliance: Goal Al: Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community, and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Review Comments: The proposed amendment is generally consistent with the land use pattern contemplated and approved in the original Village at Avon PUD application. However, that application did make several assumptions related to the type o f development contemplated for areas north of I-70: "Very low density development on portions of The Village located north of I-70" (Original application, Section 2.2 Key Features of the Plan) "Proposed land use pattern for portions... located north of I-70 provides for a gradual transition from higher density residential development along... I-70... very low density on the upper portions of the Village" (Original application, Section 3.4 The Village (at Avon) Development Plan) "Planning Areas include the mixed-use development sites located south of I-70 and one area north of I-70 (Area M)" (Original application, Section 3.4 Land Use Designations) The proposed amendment is consistent with the representation made in the original application in terms of density, and actually proposes lower density ranges than currently approved. The largest changes are shifts ofthe location and type of proposed development, including the lack of commercial development on Tract M and the proposed small Commercial site on Tract Q (immediately north of the I-70 interchange). Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment . June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 8 The following table summarizes the potential build out as approved compared to the proposed amendment: Village at Avon PUD densities as compared to approved PUD (Area north of I-70) Application/ Tract N RMF- 1 RMF-3 RMF-4 Tract M Tract G Lots 1-96 Total Parcel Density Current 29 ac. 145 DU 98 DU N/A 716 DU 7.3 ac. 192 DU 1,151 DU PUD Proposed 29 ac. 331 DU 98 DU 310 DU (RMF-4) 9 ac. 192 DU 931 DU* Amendment Notes: 1/ OS-5 currently 215.5 / Proposed at 188.2; Total Open Space reduced from 499.9 acres to 473.2 acres (Road R.O.W increased from 66.0 acres to 94.8 acres). 2/ Total Densities based on DU's per acre, not on conceptual plans as proposed or approved. * Tract Q is proposed as, Regional Commercial, however, carries a density allowance of 15Du's/acre. This would increase the proposed density by a potential of 95 units to total 1,026. The application as proposed will substantially lower the potential densities of this planning area (north of I-70) by approximately 577 dwelling units in total. The Village at Avon PUD is vested with a maximum build-out o f 2,400 dwelling units (242 of which have already been constructed on Filing 2 as "Buffalo Ridge"). This application appears to further reinforce a more compact urban form and balanced system o f land use that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated above. Goal A3: Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty of the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Review Comments: The application as proposed will substantially lower the potential densities of this planning area (north of I-70) by approximately 577 dwelling units. The Village at Avon PUD is vested with a maximum build-out of 2,400 dwelling units (242 of which have already been constructed on Filing 2 as "Buffalo Ridge"). This application appears to further reinforce a more compact urban form and balanced system of land use that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated above. Staff would recommend that the proposed zoning for RMF-4 ( formerly Tract M) be revised to create a maximum commercial square footage to ensure the uses created are appurtenant and appropriately scaled in character to the residential area. Staff also recommends increasing the potential commercial area (Tract Q), and removing the potential 95 dwelling units from this Tract entirely as the area is not appropriate for employee housing. Goal Bl: Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential community and regional commercial center. Review Comments: As previously stated, the application does create a logical site for commercial development immediately adjacent to the new I-70 interchange which would further enhance the year-round role of the Town as a regional commercial center. Goal B3: Maintain a balanced, diverse economic base that provides employment opportunities for residents and a sustainable tax base for the Town. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 8 Review Comments: The anticipated commercial uses for Tract Q would not substantially provide economic diversity for the Town (ie. gas station, service center), but instead provide a logical site for appurtenant uses typical to new highway intersections. Staff would recommend that slightly more commercial space, or, a limited commercial area in close proximity to Parcel RMF-1 be considered by the applicant to provide for a potential entertainment/recreation/restaurant facility within close proximity to residential densities. Goal Cl: Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. Review Comments: The application proposes a mix of high-density residential (potentially employee housing), medium and low-density residential development on parcel RMF-4. It further proposes high to medium density residential development on parcel RMF-1 alongside community amenities such as the Community Park (Tract N) and a bike path. Goal C2: Provide affordable housing for permanent and seasonal residents that is attractive, safe, and integrated with the community. Review Comments: The application proposes the development of approximately 163 high- density dwelling units based on Buffalo Ridge footprints on parcel RMF-4 (formerly Tract M). I f constructed as employee housing, combined with the existing 242 units built on Filing 2 (Buffalo Ridge), approximately 405 of the 500 total employee housing units required would be constructed on areas north of I-70. Based upon our experience to date with deed restricted employee housing in the Town, Staff recommends that free-market for sale affordable/attainable housing units be built rather than a project similar to Buffalo Ridge. Buffalo Ridge (Filing 2) is not physically integrated with the community in terms of pedestrian or public transit. The project is further isolated from the majority of services (retail, grocery, recreation, etc.) that most employee residents enjoy. Staff recommends the interspersion of employee or attainable housing within the core of the Village PUD development. This would create a project that is more in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated above. Though proximity to the proposed elementary school is a logical location for employee housing, Staff believes that accessibility to employment, central shopping and Town amenities for largely seasonal employees will be drastically reduced. Seasonal residents will be made dependent upon the provision ofpublic transit facilities as RMF-4 is proposed. This may ultimately create a higher public service cost to the Town as a result. Goal Dl: Ensure cost effective development of public facilities and services such as parks, community centers, youth activities, a community college campus, and public safety services... that support the health, safety, and welfare of existing neighborhoods and new development. Review Comments: As previously stated, the provision of such a large amount of the required employee housing dedication on parcel RMF-4 is discouraged and does not appear to promote a cost-effective solution to public services for the Town. However, in terms of total dwelling units, the proposal appears to comply with the Comprehensive Plan goal as stated. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment . June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 8 Goal El: Create an integrated transportation system that minimizes dependence on automobile travel within the Town by making it easier to use transit, walk, or use bicycles and other non-motorized transportation. Review Comments: The proposal does not address the public transit demand that will be generated by parcel RMF-4. The public road has been significantly lengthened as compared to the current PUD approval (which provides a school pad immediately adjacent to the I-70 interchange). Further information is required on the provision o f the bike path through parcel RMF-4, and the application should demonstrate that the proposed trail location complies with the Eagle County Trails Master Plan. Additionally, staff would request the applicant provide (through the subdivision process) sufficient information on the proposed grading and drainage and phasing o f this trail to ensure the alignment is physically possible and corresponds to the ECO Trails plan. Goal Fl: Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to identity and structure. Review Comments: The community park is unplanned at this point, and a more detailed phasing plan for this park should be submitted at such time that the Roadway and RMF-1 subdivision plans are submitted. Goal Gl: Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure-time needs of area residents and visitors. Review Comments: The proposed community park and trail are not submitted in sufficient detail to review the feasibility of each. The trail alignment and grading should be coordinated with ECO Trails. The Cornmunity Park will require further clarification on recreation opportunities through the subdivision process. Goal Ill: Establish and maintain a high-quality visual image of the Town. Review Comments: At a conceptual level, it appears that the parkway proposal for the extension o f Post Boulevard and subsequent residential collector streets would help create a high quality development. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The densities proposed create a more compact development plan for the Village. The uses appear workable provided that access, public transit, and trail alignments are feasible. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 8 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. Staff will evaluate all hazards as part of the subdivision review process. At a conceptual, it appears the planning areas are sited to avoid known hazards. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. The circulation system and traffic will be reviewed as part of the subdivision process. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Landscaping and open space has not been planned beyond a conceptual level for the proposed amendment. The Village Design Review Board governs design review for the entire PUD. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. No phasing plan has been submitted, and phasing of public improvements will be coordinated through the subdivision review process. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. The appropriate public service entities have submitted letters stating that they are willing to service the areas subject to this amendment. The roadway alignments and public transit demands have not yet been reviewed in sufficient detail to calculate the demands created by this development. Completion of the subdivision review process will allow staff to review the adequacy and costs associated with the provision of certain public services. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. The road and street improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision process. 12. Development Standards Development Standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Standards were already approved for the Village at Avon PUD for all zone districts. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment i June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 8 The applicant has submitted development standards that would affect the existing PUD zoning classifications in three specific areas: Tract Q, RMF-4, and RMF-1 (the first two being new area classifications). Â· Though no typical site-specific development plan has been generated with this application or is required, several new development standards and zone districts are being submitted for review at this time. Tract Q is proposed as 'Regional Commercial' zoning, and in intent and development standards, differs from the existing Regional Commercial parcels (i.e. Area K, L, J) in the following respects: TRACT Q (6.6 acres / Two parcels immediately off of the exit and entrance ramps of I-70) â€¢ Proposes density allowance of 15 dwelling unit per acre; however, residential uses require a special review use permit. â€¢ Proposes 'Gasoline Dispensing Service Station' regulations. â€¢ Proposes building setback requirements of 10' on all sides (front, side, rear). â€¢ Does not speci fy a minimum or maximum o f commercial square footage for the zone district. RMF-1 is proposed at 8 dwelling units per acre, and RMF-4 is proposed at 8 dwelling units per acre. Both classifications differ from existing 'Residential/Multi Family' zoning standards in the following respects: RMF-1 (33.1 acres / Immediately north of I-70 interchange) â€¢ RMF-1 proposes neo-traditional building setbacks (from 3 to 10 feet). â€¢ RMF-1 proposes no commercial activities as either use by right or special review uses. â€¢ RMF-1 proposes accessory detached apartments not to exceed 700 square feet in size. This type of configuration is allowed as a 'primary/secondary' dwelling unit. Parcel RMF-4 is proposed as 'Residential/Multi Family' zoning. There are currently only three other parcels with the same designation - RMF-1, RMF-2 and RMF-3. Density ranges are from 6 dwelling units per acre (RMF-3) to 12 dwelling units per acre (RMF-2). RMF-4 (38.7 acres / Formerly Tract M) â€¢ Proposes commercial uses as a use by right; however, limits uses to those "intended to serve surrounding residential areas". â€¢ Proposes no setbacks, but instead, proposes setbacks as a product o f the Village Design Review Board review. Tracts OS-5, Tract G, and Tract N are not proposed as changed in uses (other than location and size) from the currently approved development standards. Staff Comments & Recommendation Staff proposes that given the size and complexity of the proposed PUD amendment, the application be discussed at length and in context to this report. We further recommend a site tour prior to taking any formal action on this application. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 The Village at Avon, PUD Amendment June 3,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 8 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi~leff#CAICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 â€¢2 MQIES 1 Lot 1 I intended for use as homeowner facilities and residential caretaker unit. No -*Ill- addiuonal residential use shall be allowed on ---Qer#T Lotl -- -=m- 46 -w 2 There /C no lots numbered 2.3,4 and 5 on 4.1 this plan. â‚¬34 7. ~il.E# 3 * Total residential and commercial densit> Pennitted withincheentire PU,D shall be m ..Â·.#b-' . ... 0.03 di Â·29.14Â¢*f accordance with THE VILLAGE Cat Avon) 26 .24 1 , 1 1,8. 4 Punuant to Section 17.14.050 ofthe A.on 9 1Â· ' RMF-3 P U.D Guide OS-4 fflt'* r. V 101.9â€¢c 163 ac ?22 - M E a Â·.4 Municipal Code: 1 - property right. pursuant to Article 68 ofT,tle 184.5 " Approval of this plan costitute, a #,sted OS-5 24, C R. S.. as amendled. ; ~,4 - RMF-2 . 8 F - 1 -4 1,41 i 0 ..2../ L j 43.6 ac 1 3 This Embol: ~ â‚¬ indicates a Building Envelope Location. A A OS-7 111 .1.-e ~~ 4 2 20.5 Â£ \P -0 2-naL ~ f -,~ ~~ ~ B D C E OS- 8 ,â€ž.J:, pa N .. 1452 ac - r?<79-- 3 9 --- 0 P â€¢ Â·4 E :.-;..2-5-:iP: 1.-- 0 H -4 4/~ 0 11 RMF-1 1 K Q 33.1 ac *1 2212 ~ RMF-4 "E ells**t -I :+ =e lb... .: al, .41"1 - L --- - 0. N. RMF-3 / 0/ RECEIVED 06- â€¢ 49% 5 ac 0S42j c6~__--iri,=,4 MAY 3 0 2003 ---.__ O 6 ac *~81 -42*7~ n'..9 - XXJ~-=---ea*_14= Community Development r==C== The Village (atAvon) APPROVAL May 28,2003 This Amendment to The Village (at Avon) P. U. D. Development Plan/Sketch dated October 9, 1998 (the Original Plan) (i) is approved as an Amendment in accordance with The Vmage (at Avon) PUD Guide, LAND USE PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Section H.3(e) and the Town of Avon Municipal Code. Title 17 Chapter 17.20110-K, this day of May 2003 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle, and (ii) amends and replaces MAX. ALLOWED MAX. ALLOWED AMENDMENT NO. 3 the Original Plan in its entirety as shown hereon Residential ACRES % OF SITE 0,2ism:.912&18/ ,Residential ACRES % OF SITE DENSITY - DU/ACRE M l. 96 residence per lot .442 M L DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Residential / Single Family 9101 50 8% 1 primary/1 secondary ~ Village Center 330 1.8% 25 du/acre CERTIFICATE OF LANDOWNER REQUEST TOWN OF AVON Know all men by these presents that TRAER CREEK, LLC and EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Colorado ~*UK;i-~ Residential/Multi-Family 33 1 1 8% "8 du/acre #WI-~ Cultural /Recreational 2.4 0.1% 10 du/acre By: Designated Representative limited liability companies, do hereby request approval of PUD Development Plan Amendment Number 3 ~MF-2-~ Residential /Multi-Family 43 6 24% 12 du/acre Area C Ice Skating /Events Center 1.7 0.1% 4 dulacre Area D Village Residential 20.5 11% 18 du/acre OWNER OWNER ~KMR-3-~ Residential /Multi-Family 16 3 0,9% 6 du/acre - Ruth O. Borne, Director Area E Village Residential 5 5 0.3% 18 du/acre EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRAER CREEK LLC, Community Development Department ~*MEI~ Residential / Multi-Family 38.7 22% 8 du/acre a Colorado limited liability company a Colorado limited liability company STATE OF COLORADO) Area F Village Residential 95 0.5% 18 dulacre )SS Subtotal 1041.8 58.2% - ~G School by LAVA CORPORATION by COUNTY OF EAGLE ) 9.0 0,5% a Colorado corporation, as Manager Parks and Open Space - Name The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June 2003, by Ruth O Magnus Lindholm Area H Neighborhood Center 3.2 02% 15 du/acre Title Manager ~ Area N - Community Park 25.3 1,4% - by Borne, Director of Community Development, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado Witness my hand and official seal, My commission expires Area I Neighborhood Center 5.7 03% 15 du/acre N-ail Natural Open Space 473.2 26.4% Name Magnus Lindholm 05-lthrough 09-12 Area J Regional Commercial 8.4 0.5% 15 du/acre Title- President ,9--1 Parkland 15.7 0.9% - Notary Public Area K Regional Commercial 29.9 1.7% 15 dWacre STATE OF COLORADO) Subtotal 514.2 28.7% ) SS. Prepared forÂ· Area L Regional Commercial 4.0 02% 15 dWacre EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY COUNTY OF EAGLE ) ~-~ Road R. O W 94.8 53% Area Q Regional Commercial 6.3 0.4% 15 dulacre The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of April 2003, by Magnus Lindholm and TRAER CREEK LLC - as Manager of Traer Creek LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and by Magnus Lindholm as President of Subtotal 94.8 5.30/0 Subtotal 1391 78% LAVA Corporation, a Colorado corporation, as Manager of EMD Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Prepared by: PROJECT TOTALS: 1789.9 100.0% 2,400 Maximum Unit,â€¢ liability company. â€¢â€¢Lots with detached garages on RMF-1 *all be allowed an accessory dwelling unit above Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires, Of+AMP gili the garage for a maximum density of 10 du/acre. <~93Â·= Notary Public NORTH ~14~_Y ~ approved total site area - NOTE: Area Boundary has been adjusted to maintain previously coverage of 47.7 acres. SITE DENSITY AND USAGE AREA RMF-4 RESIDENTIAL 38.7 ACRES High Demity Residential 163 Units ~ (based on the Buffalo Ridge Footprints) Medium Density Residential Â· Pod 01 40 Unia (28) 3 Bedrnom Units at 1,250 8.f. each (12) 2 Bedroom UnitÂ» at 1,000 i.f. each Mixed Medium and Low Mixed Denlity Residential - Pod 02 35 Uniti . Density Residential (14) Duplex Unit, at 2.200,1. each Pod 03 (12) 3 Bedroom Uniti at 1,250 il. each Previous (09) 2 Bedroom Unlt, at 1,000 1.1. each approximate property line -- Mixed Medium and Low 41 Total Units Mixed Den:Ity Reaidentill - Pod 03 41 Units Pod 02 1 Density Residential ; OCP 1 1 (10) Duplex Units *12,2001.f. each ~ 1 * .A - 35 Total Units- Loâ€ž ~n,i~t~ ~,~i~JIi~ 0~'~~~~ ~I~,~feach , unit, I -- ------ I. -- - - --- .---- , ~ 1 1 (27) 2 Bedroom Units at 1,000 s.f. each ' 8 Uniti 189 Total Units ~~Ilduemnt~a~nsity Erosion . RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 8.0 UNITS PER ACRE Pod 01 Rem : 3%44,4 . 40 Total Units bcÂ«"0-8 ,(. + L '. /1,#::1 AREA G SCHOOL SITE 9 ACRES r . /0 Similar in program to footprint provided by xhool ditrict. Becaule of , -- 7 - 6 1 , .\ grade change, a 2-,tory school li miumed and recommended. * ~-- ""I*~ ' ~ ' - 1 . #n I !0 1-1 e 7*% L.2 -04 e<ia ~â‚¬> High Density f Residential ,074 1 -- . Possible 163 Total Units- 7<rb Heritage - %44 AREA G Park . Elementary School . fe, , i Fel b. . 9 Acres ~F~3 l - 11 1012 50 6 ECO Trails Regional Blke .,2 1. .4 (: 1 ILI~~Â£--il Path proposed Alignment and .~~~.j~,Ad'b ~ Low Density Connection to RMFÂ·1 and Beyond . 0,~ Residential - /2- - .*MIL#r..#- 0 . i POD 04 h 11111\,(1/11 ' '~,Â·Â· 3 el 11 - -310mu~-w.â€ž__. UP Railroad . AA -45 1 - -- 65 10 Total Units T 0 Bike Path Connects to Dowd Approximato Junction Path Per ECO Trails Wetlands Ma*ter Plan Boundary 1 -1- *-- --- AFTERNOON --- ---- SUN --1 --IN MID DAY De~ - - MORNING SUN Prepared for THE VILLAGE AT AVON /X Traer Creek LLC Area G/ RMF-4 - Development Concept ~~ ZEH RE N AND ASSOCIATES, INC Avon, Colorado May 28,2003 ARCHITECTURE Â· PLANNINGÂ·INTERIORS SITE DENSITY AND USAGE M AREA RMy.1 RESIDENTIAL 33.1 ACRES Â« 9In,Iâ€¢ Fâ€¢mlly, Aic-lory D.â€¢elll,Â¢, (Tr,ditlonal 4,ighborho.d) 142 .. 1.100.f .1,400,900.f .ch . 31.1/ hmily (Lo- D-Ily) 10111/, Hom, ../. 1.DOOLf -3,000,C â€žCh Duph:.1't, 1 Unit 1,100,Â·fÂ·-2*... 44 MaÂ· ...4 Townh,me ../. 1.100,f.. 3.Ne,f. 331 To.Unit RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 1(10 CNITS PERACRE AREA Q REGIONAL COMMERCIAL 6.3 ACRES P.1.1/ .1 A.. F..*13 11 Am, ,/ 1 1 -----0-- PIrcel C 1.5 AC- P-p-nr,/Ao.bul,-DI~rictR,001â€¢IFâ€¢dlity ' 43 I .1 -------- R<â€¢cl connection to Buffalo ~~~\~~ 0 Ridge and Swift Gulch. AREAN Community Park L ~ 25.3 Acrin \ Ike path connection to ~ 2>62 + -, /1 \\ Buffalo Ridge and boyond. ' meintial lots 1-96 and Accou road to future - Area RMF-4, and G. 4/ 1 \02 . 4 1 ~ 44 -n\\0 1 .,4 f k 1 Commercial . Â»1 6.3 Acm: ~~~~d~i~r~a~n~d~~~m~l~n~g~~di~l~t~4~a~n~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~ Convinlince retall buildings , < 0 - behind, reinforcing neighborhood / ./ e.7 accies from park. , , j L/5/ Pidlitdan ovoil9aim provides liparatid . i . '4541)*I grade accil from neighborhood to park ./ 11 and links neighborhood and Buffalo .-----~r v359Â«..4 AREA RMF-1 Ridge to schoolilte at A- M. RESIDENTIAL 33.1 Acrls Reglonal Eco Trail 1-,1 Ott. /1. 1 USFS LAND alignment -=p 941-- -1 l .\ - New 1-70\ \ .\ 5-Â« 1 nterchange\\ ,>< Convenience retall buildings placed along â€¢trlit with auto access behind, r,Inforcing neighborhood character and promoting pedistrian 1 121>.4 RCCISI 11 \ . \ 9 40 Alia Dedlcated for Flri Protection \ r--51 /9 District on Area Q (1.5 Acres). \\4Â» \\23\ \\0\ ..rii/tr'.12.. ..22.Tr:- .........22/2.. ..I-/.....---- - 22----2321~ Â«444IfÂ«f - - ------4 Nol- B ./-0. - Proposed regional Eco Trail alignment and connection, to Tracts RMF-4 and G. Trail crolles US Forest Service land on ea,ement Prepared for THE VILLAGE AT AVON .2 Â£3 Traer Creek LLC Area RMF-1 Development Concept 4, ZE HREN Avon, Colorado May 28,2003 AND ASSOCIATES. INC â€¢mc 1='â€¢ PU~-Â»-0 â€¢ IN~ R*' EQIES -1,1 1 L/2 1 is intended for use as homeowncr facthucs and residential caretaker unit. No --- additional residential usc shall be allowed on Lot 1 C 3 this plan. ,-0 1<.31#iÂ»NU ..Fi *>f .~~ E ifj ./1, 2 There are no lots numbered 2,3,4 and 3 on X . 1-1121~ permitted within the entire PU.D. shall be in 15*r O ~.1 3. â€¢ Total residential and commercial dcnsityÂ· 4*42 accordance with THE VILLAGE (at Avon) .,8 91& P U.D. Guide, -/ m i. r OS.4 :k#Â»429 4-(. -Ak A34& 4 Pursuant to Section 17.14 030 of the Avon ~ RMF-3 -i 101.9 ac I~*g: Municipal Code: . 16 3 ac ?U i.3 ~ ~~ Approval of this plan costitute, a pisted 2 Aot 1/ OS-5 ./ 3 propert, right pursuant to Article 68 ofTitle * / 184.5 - 9 0 24, C R. S., as emended. 43.6 ac ~ - ,9 ' '0 ' -3 42 * 0' J 5 This eÂ·mbol ~ SU> indicates a Building Envelope Location M '21 91â‚¬ A A --Â· edestu Bridge N J 1 20.5 ac OS-7 ,- 4.- P.1 2 .- KÂ· 46- - C E OS- 8 ... 1 N 1452 ac 9vt-- '.I.. -,-1-'-0- 3 .-- F - E 4 6,Â· H .. - ,;p..tle. 4 Â· ?612% RMF-1 1 Q 33.1 ac . 4~ & 59*,a,b --Â·of L -- RMF-1 / --I R M FL G L OS- 5 ac OS-12, .... 1 6*.*--73,=F~~.-22 08= --Â·Â«L. .2:.-*-+u'.,ab. n"- . -=e-Â»A -------..-14= The Village (at Avon) APPROVAL May 28,2003 This Amendment to The Village (at Avon) P. U D Development Plan/Sketch dated October 9, 1998 (the Original Plan) 0) is approved as an Amendment in accordance with The Village (at Avon) PUD Guide, LAND USE PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Section H.3(e) and the Town of Avon Municipal Code, Title 17 Chapter 17.20.110-K, this day of May 2003 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle, and (ii) amends and replaces MAX ALLOWED MAX. ALLOWED AMENDMENT NO. 3 the Original Plan in its entirety as shown hereon Residential ACB.Ei liQ[-imi DENSITY - DUNACRE 82&i. 9.6 OES[IE PFÂ·)9!TY- nil/ACRE Residential 1-7~2 Residential / Single Family 910 1 50 8% 1 primary/1 secondary 1~ village Center 33.0 1.8% 25 du/acre CERTIFICATE OF LANI)OWNER REQUEST TOWN OF AVON residence per lot DEPARTMENT OFCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Know all men by these presents that TRAER CREEK, LLC and EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Colorado ~RM~Ki-~ Residential / Multi-Family 33 1 1.8% -8 du/acre Area B; Cultural / Recreational 2 4 0.1% 10 du/acre By: De,ignated Representative limited liability companies, do hereby request approval of PUD Development Plan Amendment Number 3 |RMEi| Residential / Multi-Family 43.6 24% 12 dWacre Area C Ice Skating / Events Center 1 7 0.1% 4 dulacre Area D Village Residential 20.5 11% 18 du/acre OWNER OL#WER [*UP-i] Residential/Multi-Family 163 0.9% 6 du/acre - Ruth O Borne, Director Area E Village Residential 55 0.3% 18 dulacre EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRAER CREEK LLC, Community Development Department ~RMF#~ Residential/Multi-Family 38.7 22% 8 du/acre a Colorado limited liability company a Colorado limited liability company STATE OF COLORADO) Area F Village Residential 95 0.5% 18 dll/acre )SS. Subtotal 10418 58 ZA by. LAVA CORPORATION by COUNTY OF EAGLE ) Area G School 9.0 0.5% a Colorado corporation, as Manager Parks and Open Space Name Magnus Lindholm - - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June 2003, by Ruth O Area H Neighborhood Center 32 0.2% 15 dWacre Borne, Director of Community Development, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado ~ Area N - Community Park 25.3 1.4% - by Title Manager Area If Neighborhood Center 5.7 0.3% 15 dulacre Witness my hand and official seal My commission expires [~~71 Natural Open Space 47342 26.4% Name. Magnus Lindholm Area J Regional Commercial 8.4 0 5% 15 du/acre Title: President g-9--1 Parkland 157 09% Notary Public UM#%41 P-] th.gh P/ Area K Regional Commercial 29,9 17% 15 dulacre STATE OF COLORADO) Subtotal 514.2 28 7% )SS Prepared forÂ· Area L Regional Commercial 4.0 0 2% 15 dWacre EMD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY COUNTY OF EAGLE ) = ~ Road R. O W 94.8 5.30/0 6.3 0.4% 15 du/acre The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of April 2003, by Magnus Lindholm and TRAER CREEK LLC Area Q Regional Commercial - as Manager of Traer Creek LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and by Magnus Lindholm as President of Subtotal 948 5.3% Subtotal 1391 78% LAVA Corporation, a Colorado corporation, as Manager of EMD Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Prepared by PROJECT TOTALS: 1789.9 100.0% 2,400 Maximum Unitsâ€¢ liability company. â€¢â€¢Lots with detached garages on RMF-1 Rall be allowed an accessonÂ· dwelhng unit above Witness my hand and official seal My commission expires U.11:a.Fly the garage for a maximum density of 10 du/acre 0 41 4, Notary Public NORTH j. 41 NOTE: Area Boundary has been ' adjusted to maintain previously approved total site area *.--.'-...-'0.-.- coverage of 47.7 acres. SITE DENSITY AND USAGE AREA RMF-4 RESIDENTIAL 38.7 ACRES High Density Residential 163 Uniti Chased on the Buffalo Ridge Footprint,) Medium Density Residential - Pod 01 40 Units OB) 3 Bedroom Units at 6250 i.f. each (12) 2 Bedroom Unitiat 1.0001.r. each - Mixed Medium and Low Mixed Den,ity Residential - Pod 02 35 Uniti Density Residential (14) Duplex Uniti at 2,200,1 each (12) 3 Bedroom Units at 1,250 1.f. each Previous Pod 03 (09) 2 Bedroom Units at 1,000 d. each approximate 1 ~~~5~~~xed Medium and Low 41 Total Units ~ property line- Mixed Dendtj Residential - Pod 03 41 u# 1 , Density Residential (10) Duplex Uniti at 2.200 81 each & Pod 02 (01);Bedroomunitiatt,2501.f, each Â· 35 TOtal Units- (27) 2 Bedroom Unit, at 1,000 81 each 1, . Low Density Residential (duplex uniti) SU*Â§ --1 -- ' 1 : - 243(7 77 742>27,7 8 Uniti Medium Density : / - 289 Total Uniti Residential Erosion .. Ai / 11 RESIDENTIAL DEAS In': 8.0 UNTrS PER ACRE Pod 01 Structure .-00~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ --L- --00<r -414>1 40 Total Units -7 Â©44,2. --A i \ -ilf li /=,---,/ bl 1 AREA G SCHOOL SITE 9 ACRES L.. E- 2. .\ 2%. 4,4,0 Similar in program to footprtnt provided by school di,trict. Beeause of - 0- . / 1, ) f hi 1;1 /2 1*,#fw-Df-L-0./. f 4 grade change, a 2-,tory,chool i, -sumed and mommended. U - // ~~ ~ INK-f.7 *0 19 -0/0.4 . -- 4 172-7 1 Afl w --4--*-94,-- y.7 -pr'4 -cu a.; . e High Density , t. -/PS f Residential 46- - -0....V,1- ie Possible 163 Total Units---~~~~~~~~~ f~k \0 AREA G , MA: / Heritage Park 1#1&4 .i . + I -0, Elemet~t~~~chool . 1/ f L 0 1, i. Â«Â«=Â«Z:Â«:' / 25) \ v- r 1Â® 472,1,1 4 /6 . i ECO Trails Regional Bike _ . C1 * 45, f J 00 . 1 Low Density co~necuronURd;:dTZ';;eay~dnd 5. 1-;t*333*,~~ ' ... JIL Residential . 0 . Â£ ty-POD 04 5-4** i e 10 Total Units 0 111 1 T 0 ... 0 Bike Path Connicts to Dowd -Approximate Junction Path Per ECO Trails Mast,r Plan Wetlands Boundary --- - --- AFTERNOON --- --- ---- SUN --- --_ -2~ MIDDAY Ybe~ MORNING A SUN jr SUN THE VILLAGE AT AVON /. Prepared for Traer Creek LLC Area G / RMF-4 - Development Concept ZEHREN 4. L Avon, Colorado May 28,2003 AND ASSOCIATES, INC ARCHITECTURE Â· PLANNING Â·INTERIORS SITE DENSITY AND USAGE AREARMF-1 RESIDENTIAL 33.1 ACRES 91.1. r.=14 6"--7 Dâ€¢,nia*, Cir,dia-1 *hborh-} 20 tall 1.100/f-/400"ll...h in:6 ,â€¢mlly (Le-- D-â€¢ly).11,1.1, Hom- 56 C.. 1,000 J Â· ),000 â€¢C â€žch Dupln nolt, .Ul. 0 1.100/r.-1000/C -h MullÂ· ./.14 Townhom- 25 'alt, 1.100,f..1.300,1. 331 T-1 Ualt~ RESIDENTIAL DENSIT; 1&01-NITS PERACRE AREA Q REGIONAL COMMERCIAL 6.3 ACRES P.-lA 17 ACT" Il B 1, Am, . -/3# P--1 C . Acm Pv,p-d. /Am....DI,trlt.*/11.-14 ~ ~~ 4\ \ 0 0 Road connection to Buffalol~ 0 4 Ridge and Sw~ Gulch. AREA N 1 Community Park 1 1 25.3 Acns Ike path connection to Buffalo Ridge and boyond. . - PAT.. ccons road to future - \\ 6 ---- 9/1 midintlil lots 1-96 and Li--- 42*<Cn_z=ZI--0 Â«) r Area IMF-4, and G \~\\11 0 - \<7 r./ 1 J 411\14 ~ Commercial ~ '~ ~ 0. 8.,AC.. ST '' Convenience retall buildings ~~ , placed along street with auto accell i 0 . ~ . I ' ~ behind, reinforcing neighborhood character and promoting podistrlan . access from park. ' 42 9 I / h Pedestrian overpali provld. separated ,-'/' lili,1 gr,de access from neighborhood to park AREA RMF-1 and links neighbomood ind Buffalo RESIDENTIAL 5 Ridge to school Ilte at A- M. ..<1- 1 11 33.1 Acmâ€¢ Regional Eco Trail alignment USFS LAND ~S I.â‚¬5' N;. 1-70 <., ntirchange Convenlince retall buildings placed along st-t with auto access behind, ~inforcing neighborhood character and promoting pedestrian 1 1 - : 8 CC*SÂ§ ' 1 \1 Aria Dodicated for FIre Protection DIstrict on Area Q (1.5 Acres). \141 \.\\\\\ 11 \\ \ \\2. \42$ Â»014*4042 \. 95776441 -m==2 ----- --- ------ - Proposed regional Eco Tnll .-W alignment ind connictions to Tracti RMF-4 Ind G. Trail crosies US Forest Service land on eawment --224 THE VILLAGE AT AVON 52 Â£3 Prepared for Traer Creek LLC Area RMF-1 Development Concept 9/ ZEHREN Avon, Colorado May 28,2003 AND ASSOCIATES INC â€¢ac-'ICT-Eâ€¢P6-~-OÂ·,~n"04. . 0 22 U 1- 0Â£vO S Â¥8E 65 8 THE THARP REOIDENCE UO 0 ..1 8 3 LOT 52, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE 5UDDIVI5ION 4686 NORTH POINT RECEIVED MAY 2 8 2003 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Community Development SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS: GENERAL NOT[5 INDEX OF DRAWINGS: 5Y5TfM NOT[5 A.01 COVER AND INFORMATION 5/iffT WALL SIST[MS LOWER LEVEL LIVABLE= 1374.1 5F 1 - DO NOT 5CALf DKAWING5. MAIN LEVEL UVABLf= 2007.8 5F 2- VERIFY ALL DIMEN5ION5, CONDITIOND AND UTILITY LOCATIONS ON 2 TOPOGRAPHIC 5UKVfY Intenor lab Lo"t,Ort CEIUNG 5Y5TEM5 Locate, UPPER LEVEL LIVABLE= 646.2 9 TME JOB 51TE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WE)KK OK ORDERING ANY 3 51Tf PLAN , TOTAL LIVABLE 5F= 4220.1 9 MATERIAL,5. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICT5 OR DIXK[PANCIED 4 LAN[Â»CAFf PLAN vvi *Â·ty./.,-=hs.e.2.4 'yl<'r,8../.l'Â»10 , 4,c w ./.â€ž -.= Pets - . t~Â£,18,~ fÂ¥-h, UND s~a,-,ded Ir-r-Â·9 -~h R. 19 -t - Z = 2.lood sh#-ly *.n bct.eenpels. - IN THE DOCUMENTS IMMEDIATELY. 05 CON5TRUCTION 5TAGING AND POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN -L.>brt-- stu./ ~6~441-,p.*trkee GAKAGE= 1085.0 5F 3- AREA5 OF CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES MUST BE FULLY A2.0 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 24. hew 01 23,4 st.d, - re.xed 02 *typel,Fbd-Imb,por .. cdroof .0/ Kdeâ€¢ 10,4-s h,r *eâ€¢,t k,a-,â€¢s ..,1 -re c. &..L, W./36 .. 20 MECHANICAL ROOM= IOG.G 5F RESOLVED WITM WRITTEN APPROVAL fROM TME ARCHITECT DEFORE A2.1 MAIN LEVEL- FLOOR FlAN ,-. A2.2 WFTER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (23 Substeck-aree-* 9,â€¢pbd 2 EU TOTAL NON-L]VABLE= 1191.65f CON5TKUCTION CONTINU[5 W TMO5E AREA5. 4- PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF 5TUD, FACE OF CONCRETE OR 42.3 ROOF PLAN V/2 * t>ye .gyp. kl. o.= G â€¢â€¢1 .0 Ty.,al ...de I.ce I &7.vtÂ»don.1.C:2,0 0 H .- brer iÂ» 24 *002 stulh .. K- 19 b,tt a...r ./*5 UND _.1 Â£ F TOTAL BUILDABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE= 5419.7 5F TO CENTERLINE OF LOG UNLE55 OTH[RW!5[ NOTED. 5ECTION AND AB.0 BUILDING EL[VATION5 ./"tu= bet-le= StLI.I. CA 24 146 deck-â€¢a (,*-e 9,0.**r Ty'la. c.to-or-e * I,el to be =Fa- 01* tÂ»â€¢d â€¢01 p. 2- ELEVATION DIMEN5IONS ARE TO TOP Of CONCRETE, TOP' OF PLYNOOD A.3 1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS *~â„¢,i {e-.â‚¬s./- %02 WE; *ty,c.Â®y.1,3.câ€¢â€¢eâ€¢Gâ€¢â€¢1â€¢,ap.â€¢ Ty,â€¢01-,1*./6,0hcd OR TOI OF WAil PLATES OR BEAMS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5#' X 11' 5TRUCTURAL 5UFFLEMENT5 -nerÂ©Â»~2Â»Glo~â‚¬â€¢~~ud-.1/IÂ·|1 u........./0 05 24 TG â€žat oâ€¢ Ihen-1 -i - ..... c=*Ve-ed./.* ZD ~t*,1- b-r= O/ ske--4 C..D~ Â»It ....lon ba-ccm 'twd' 5- PROVIDE All NEC[55ARY DLOCK]NG IN 5TUD WALLS AND pets *-b=*UP.3,5-t,ed,te. 5UMMARY TABLE OF CEILINGS. LOCATIONS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CEILING AND - Ifi.,c,-ey,k, -tt>Â¥eper Arlie.c-=.3 = 000 bet. een the.... 4 LD O CG 2.5 TOG soft - tb,Â¢,W Â».1 - .'pâ€¢.1.... WALL-MOUNTED FIXTURES, TOILITTO, TOILET ACCESSOUS, CABINETRY, bae.~rl-,g,~orb-r-~tru#. .,ar*. ,-r-u..a - 2.12 MATERIAL5 AND COUb[TERTOF'5, SHELVES, CLOSET RO[)5 AND FAKE BEAMS. 2,6 -cd st.Id,-th K. 19 ,a,Alk:r Â»et-:cm R., 9 ,-.40. ./.ce- pacÂ· 0 CD lu stu,1, -h R- 19 -e.4,t,oâ€¢ bet-= st-* ow, -*2 5Â¥~IC-* COLORS: LOCATIONS. REFIR TO DOOR 5CMEDULE FOR DOOR TYF[5. *5 5.*.*4.*c*v.,ter.eset-te,p. b,1 TyÂ·pu . b.ue. ~ta.....1 Koof 5Y5TEK/IS Locabon G- ~ DENOT[5 DOOR5: KEFIR TO FLOOR PLANS FOR DOOR - 04--J __1 CD 7- ~~ D[NOTES WINDOWS: REFER TO FLAN5 FOK WINDOW lor/*p ba.--e.wl.Â¥2.-a - 'Ur=. . 40,-r ~aph- 51-,6 0- wâ€¢Â»7-,F Typm:~ rÂ©10 ./.8 U-1 ED ~ ROOFING: TO BE 40 YEAR ASP'MALT - LocMIONS. REFER TO WINDOW 5CMEDULE FOR WINDOW TYP[5 9/3.to>4'-07'0111â€¢,e~*:d~0~. re-*-- I. rce,1 -~h-, In ..pab #. 5MINGL[5 8- COORDINATE ALL ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL FIXTURES TO FIT *S f.-rt/,te riÂ· #55 ~,esh mt,r - FOr *..'I-U. ..38..bt- bet--I:ets e 40 yet- A,0.~ 9-â€¢*s - -Iceâ€ž-4 Ty'.'ce,i -"i.,c..."'.- L ROOF WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM: TO DE WITMIN CEILING. fLOOR AND WALL 5PACES. VERIFY WITM ARCHITECT fo.*p. bd -0..co.~e. WI.*quÂ¥3. me,Â®r-c â‚¬,1 ,Â£>01 she--g " 2/ ", , CEDAR, COLORÂ· alliE 5MADOW WMEN DIVERTING FROM DKAWING5. ca- de,-3 -66- te be e~Â»osece Â¥7 t~Â©,ed crnaeut .,b I Lâ€žblri~ed k-, .- =de, be-~. C,82, I.-W -. r~teâ€¢Â·-. 5[MI-TRAN:5FARINT 5TAIN 9- IN TME EVENT THAT ADDITIONAL DETAIL-5 OR GUIDANCE 15 NEEDED B 40 ye- *+1- Shâ€¢*- â€¢-F-1 T.d. f.4. -t ROOF TRIM 5OfFIT5 AND GARAGE SY THE CONTRACTOR FOR CON5TRUCTION OF ANY OF ANY ASFIC-1-5 OF PROJECT SUMMARY: *. le Upe I Fl to*-lorproper-*C- wa 'MIÂ®,Dd-240~2â€¢4â€¢ood Typ~=,1 . *. 'ce / c}-wey â€¢=7*â€¢- 0/ roci *-hâ€¢,9 - 2,4 bloan, lix=ue DOOR5: TO Be I xG TÂ¢G 5TAINED BLUE TM]5 PROJECT5, TME CONTRACTOR SMALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY TME , 5MADOW ARCMITECT. FAILURE TO GIVE AMPLE NOTICE 5MALL RELIEVE ARCHITECT- R-3: SINGLE FAMILY Rf51DfNCE FLOOR 5Y5TEM5 Lo</tion OF REPON5IBILITY. TYPE V CON5TRUCTION - 5#DEWALLS: 5TUCCO (EXCEPT WHERE WALL 5Â¥5TEMS 10- TME CONTRACTOR 5MALL St RePON5IBLE FOR 5ATI5FYING ALL ONE-HOUR FIRE RATING txter,or W.b Logtion . ' I conc,ete #*-*/0â€¢ Typâ‚¬11 / 1~-er ...d G,0* 5TONE VENEER OR LOG CON5TRUCTION) - AFFUCATION CODE5 AND 0[3TAINING ALL PERMIT5 AND REQUIRED h.:.*,0 Â·,ye- c. +~,*r./. coâ€¢,-rd oth. R=k, to str-,gl -b COLOR: PAR]5 WHITE Â¥9 Coâ€¢,poeÂ®e *--,6 1,1 -th -r 1-.= .a./.ele-*I.U. .0./.se I. re/Tbc/9 of ....... AFFROVAL5. TMI5 PROJECT 15 GOVERNED BY TME UNIFORM BUILDING on 2- ./cm -,r *. -ar,â€¢u06.0 00 6--ra---9-8 5TONf VENEER AND 5TONE FILLAR5: TO CODE, 1997 EDITION. CODE COMPLIANCE 15 MANDATORY. THE .7 e *c-: -,6.,w~-1--â€¢,8 w * %- c,Â«ae -ae e,~ed G-, RÂ«>, 6-.h k./.... ancrae - Weet -arâ€¢Â·006,5 to col....= rkxor 1.- to be c, pa = ,â€¢â€¢d. cer-~c tic (R.Â£Â·rk:Â©.F~Â»10. M 'CMINK MOUNTAIN LEDGE 5TACKED CON5TRUCTION [DOCUMENTS SMALL NOT PERMIT WORK THAT DOE NOT lo cc-.: :0 -I I ..le ) ... h, to be t,câ€¢-1 ~-h Â»th ~o#ded,0-LS â€ž.uot- to 04â„¢1 I . 0. t.ek- 6-h .,de 5TON[ WiTM 5AN[)5TONE LEDGE. CONFORM TO ALL RELEVANT COD[5 INCLUDING UX AND All LOCAL . 4 . beÂ».v -h,â€¢*} .2 4' s-,pe coÂ»7Iele *= $ 11 c., cc~*lai e-~ Re*,10 34,â€¢ctâ€¢,1 WINDOW5: VINYL, COLOR: TORREY FINE AND REGIONAL CODE5. .) O Co~Â¥4-t=,*Â·-gge bd -h Nter- A-c - ............=. Jn--6,4 k. t-c~-=-s ./-9 . 27 r,d .-te, o.er d-, p.rook' - 0..... h-Moordoe-e- C- LOG CON5TRUCTION: TO BE 51-AINED 1 1 - TME CONTRACTOR 5HALL FIELD COORDINATE AND OBTAIN d (d-, P+00~,9 . coâ€¢t-le te k, 01 0,Â·108:te .-.PIC -*c W to .* / bek,- 6ch â€¢pae ) . Un,011*/Wa~â€¢-,~~*gka, .â‚¬ MEARTWOOD TRAN5FARENT 5TAIN APPROVAL FROM TME ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER BEFORE ANY CUTTING, ...d.....0 toc=câ„¢, k....ck-6.,h :.at,,1. .p cc~..Scl e.... 1 ISSUE DATE NOTCMING OR [)~LLING OF ANY CA5T-IN-PLACE CONCRETE, 5TEEL .-e te 4'48 0-h-,kle) S.te -i -*,C~wâ€¢, 1-6 lor det* | REVIEW 01.02.03 DECK5: FRAMING OR ANY OTMER 5TRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WHICH MAY AFFECT ~~~*-1-â€ž~/Ip*s~~cÂ©vele c.-cr-adek- FINAL 05.16.03 W 1 1 Ce,~:v.t~e*xe atuÂ¢,0 = al -d - ' ' F. 1 # c=:rac topp,-0 â€žth r,-,t Iker - TME STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY Of THE BUILDING. -b bheet -ter,N-6, ko- W] 0 â€¢41 COâ€¢~-C â€¢-~ he=â€¢â€¢ls,-- p t T. ,6-od - A- ALL TiaM AND RAIUNG5 TO BE 5TAINfD . 2-47 -0.â€¢e 6.-h,â€¢dc.j P- .Iert/00..ets./.0*W~ 12- TME CONTKACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING GRADES AND floor ,-1 te be c.pet-1 $ C, ce,-~ 91.=MI.- WITH 5OFERDECK HEARTWOOD. Â¥12 0-~c~t~.0-stu=>cml~-â€¢al=W= Ars, .... *.occe' ~ 5TAKE OUT THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR OWNER AND ARCHITECT te ....-1.-ectlyteern.rate .-6/.- .a,*c, 0.1 PlyÂ·ood she,-0 - 24 0 'll'-b... .-, FRAMING TO BE 50. YELLOW PINE ..r=,st.~h ishect 9 6- wl)- 1 AFFROVAt FRIOK TO BEGINNING ANY 5ITC WORK .:ont-c to ./. ,*o.e*,~,h ,â„¢le J TRJMMED WITM RED CEDAR . .segle.4 c=:r etc topp-3 -h râ€¢â€¢- 1. p=.*dc'. 13- IT 15 Ttlf INTENT AND MEANING OF TME5E DOCUMENT5 TMAT TIle .13 5,-s v.Â»ecrcne=-1=1 - -1~1*c- â€¢rce .le ve b:, f-â„¢Sys- - --Prool â€¢vit~-C DEC]UNG TO St STAMPED AND HEATED CONTRACTOR AND EACH SUBCONTRACTOR FROVIDE ALL LABOR b-â„¢. c. c==T~te ..1 Â¢thret -cm.E*â€¢, Iam on .,0,5,.sie-Â·a On %0..4 -h Ic~ bace~ - W 10 -0 cot.1-., to ..C ,bo.e .. -) RÂ· 19 =S-U,n Da==~plseâ€¢. Sk- toppâ€¢Ma CONCRETE MATERIALS, TRAN5FORTATION, SUFFU[5, EQUIPMENT, ETC.. TO OBTAIN | 9 14 Stone Vaâ€¢â€¢cer - t}Â¤s,-1 -1 - â€¢.f6*Â£Â»â€¢ ~,e,elle.M RAILINGS: TO DE CEDAR MTH 3' 0 TOP COMFUE JOE; WmlIN THE RECOGNIZED STANDARDS OF TME INDUSTRY. -rer I. concrete ./ 0-9, proo~ 6- Wâ€¢ 1 -Col*-CtokÂ¥.c=,crele-IL) AND BOTTOM RA115 AND Ixl 14- ALL BUILDINGS TO FIT WITMIN PROPERTY UN[5 VATMOUT COVER AND WI' 5-2.enecront~9-1-d-,ilar,1- ~4e~~bo.â‚¬W130rW14 BALLU5TERS MIN, 4â€¢ 5FACING CKO551NG EASEMENT5. NOTIFY ARCHITECT Of ANY DeCREFANCI[5. ......Â»,4-=' sâ€¢=U...... 20...od.t=. INFORMATION 5MfET ALTERNATING WITM LOG FO5TS AD PER 15- PROVIDE EXTER]OR UGHTING FIXTUR[5 AT ALL MEAN5 OF EGRf55 .......9-) bheet â€¢,t~rO,4â„¢ /0- .1 2 -1 cc,1-Â¢ 10 2--GÂ· DRAWING5 PER CODE. ONI 1 'NOAÂ¥ GEZZ O, L d 0â‚¬2.2 92.Â£ 02.G-,1 NOIGIAICIGAG 390 ' 2 9 101 00Â¥301 ZIONJOIâ‚¬ZIE JEVI-ll C ( TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOT 52, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado WHITE RIVER NAnONAL FOREST FOUND SURVEY MOIJMENT FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT 1 1/2- ,4-UWINLÂ»1 CAP ON ~ REBAR PLAST*~ CAP CN ,5 REBAR PLS 26967 7 PU 5447 S 8958'46" E 355.86' f ~390:::::'::-A.ritÂ»A: 80,l,piNG..6~19A~Ifw**Pokftj,A+JOAA*>6 \A Ap:Ii \\--\ 41 \\ - 1.~11\\\\\\\\:\\~\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ :. \\\~ \\\\\N\\\\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\\\ \ \\\ \\\\\\\\.\\,\ \ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\N \\\ \\\ \ \\ \\ 9 iN \\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\ \\\\ \\U \\\ \\\\ 1\\ \-- \\\\\\\ 10 L - \\\ ,\\5,4 \\\\\\\\\\\\1\4 aritz:.*::.004:.4~0.:204:0.0):,~' i,. \~~ ~~ '' $ 1 1 1 ji 'i ii \ 5 , , ' ' i ' , 1 ; 1 . \ \\ \ \\ \ \ i \ \\ \\ \\ WI : 1 Stephen R. Wu jek, o Registered Professional Lond Survey,r in the State of - 60!orado, hereby certify that this TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY wos done by me or under- my direct supervision, ond that it wos perÂ·formed using thi stondord cm and \ .\ \ \\ \\.\ \\ \\ \\ \ .\\,\ i \ fi \\\\ proctice used In the ore at the time of the survey. This Survey does not constitute o boundary survey. The Notes hereon cre o par of this certificotion. \ \\ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 14 \\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\Ar-- -- ~ -\<-44?f 14\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\ ~5-,4.03~ TRACT I 940' 14I \N. \ / / 1 \ 1 1 ~ ' \ \ ~ \ \\0\ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \\ i \\ \\ 49419 Stephen R. *jek P.LS. 22589 LOT 53 Professional Lend Surveyor /\\\/\ \\\\ Registered Colorado \)\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ i \\ \\ '. \\41 47\\ \F\\ \\\\ litifilil\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\~945,1 1 9019Â«43 \ \1.PE; ab. \ f )\ i i \ \~ i \; \' i i Â£ 6, tf 0. 4---N SURVEY NOTES: 1<\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ \\\\ \\\ \\ \\\ \\\ \\ \ ,\\\\\ ; 9 \ 14<64%*2'4 ;'16 ' 4' A.\ ... 4\\\\\.\\ \\\\~#\\\\~~\\-- - \14 1) Survey Date May 16, 2002. \\\\ 1 Plat of A Resubdivision of Lot 52, Block 3, Wildridge, Town of Avon, and Survey 2) Location of improvements, lot lines, ond easements ore based upon the Flnol â€¢ 4 \t \1 \,6 ;* I; "I; 'ii ";I \\ 1 \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ 1 ,\\\ 4\\ Wil \\ \\\\\\ :1\\ Monuments found at the time of this survey os shown henon. This Survey does \\\\\ \1 1 i i i I 1,1,1,1,-1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ not constitute o boundory survey nor any investigation intc record eosements or 1 \ 1 \ I \ i -- encumbrances associated with this property. \\\ 1 1 1 1 \ 3) BENCHMARK ELEVATION DATUM: 8584.00' for the rim ol thus Sewer Monhole cs shown hereon. \\ \\ .\ \\L - 4) CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 foot 1 .'""" '%1 -; \ . \\ \/ \ ~~lll~~1ill~lli~~.- 'S 5447 j 3 1 1 \ j i \ \ 1 \ \ 1 X '1#1',AF, \ M \ \ \ 1 1 1 Dota suppited h con/nction with thls map ond survey. \ FOUND SUR'Er MONUMENT \ \ , 4 & I I : I PLASTIC CAP ON A REBAR 6) STREET ADDRESS: Not posted 5) Marcin Engineering LLC does not wurant or certify to tie integrity of ony Digitol i I \ I. I \ \ . 7) Building setbocks were derived from the Fk,al Subdivision Plot of mâ‚¬*idge, recorded October 08, 1981, in Book 330 at Page 78 at Reception No. 226437. A \ the Office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder. Eagle Caunty Colorado. 1 - ' 1 , \ b \ \/, 0 \1 ;9 5 ' \ 1 lit \ i \ /< //5 1 3 \T:\, \ i \ i \ >-2>.fi- \ ~ / ~ . \ \ X \ \ \ 25 FRONT BUILDING i 1 SETBACK LINE (TYP) EDGE OF DRIVEWAY ~~ i\. i i ht i i i i C i li \~~ \ iii-VE&*dp : \ 1\1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'f j \7 \i k.i \~. 4i~' :.i:: 34Â«I- ':I :. <r.4,~ \ \ CABLE PED GRAPHIC SCALE E FED I FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT 1 1/T ALUMINUM CAP ON Â® AR Tire.. *1336-- 94 1: I , , I (INFEEr) Ptl 26>967 .*b== ~ 21~- \\ \\Nlt 08 - 1150'26'27'W LOT 51 CH - 5724 EDGE OF ASPHALT 1/2- ALUMINUM CAP 0,1 4 REBAR PLS 33655 STA-ED 19 Â¥,c TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ~N ~0: SIZAINNBIANCE. DRAINAGE I LOT 52, BLOCK 3, hRAI.SF SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT WILDRIDGE MARCIN ENGINEERING LLC 1 1 NORTH POINT Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado PO. Box 1062 P.O. Box 5018 JSM 05/13/03 AVON, CO 81620 EAGLE. CO 81631 DRAWN Br 0,1 . NO,CE Ac=-g to C-,do - . MUST 0-mence 4 !4 0 870) 74j<474 (970) 328-1900 action bosed upon ony difict h this sur.iy /tha three >ecry after >â„¢ Mit <scovered such defect. en no 0-14 may any BDIONARK: SRW DRA-4 NO- 03001 VTOPO (970) 748-9021 FAX (970) 328-1901 FAX oction bc-d upon ony delect h thi sur/ey be comma,need more SEWER MAÂ»ICLE OEKED BY: than ten >,or, from the dote of eartific/tion ahown hereon. RI-8584 00~ JOB Na 03001 V SHErr 1 OF 1 -seso. -8650- S 00'01'144Â» W -0#99 - M .+0,Â£9.80 N \86,1// Sq.ttl \ i \ t.\ , b \ 1, \ I \ I \ I \ \ + 1 \ / \ \ \ I . \ 0 \ k iii ~~ '~, \., S*IE_PLAN_SUMMARY TABLE:~ I ./ i I x I. ' I '' ir i. (4686) I , 1 '1 CURRENT ZONIm i Single Family ;.1.98 ackes : \\\ \\\ e ... . \ . i \\\.'\'.\ -\ 1. \ \ \ , . 1 1 Do ~NOT GRADIh ACRbss \ \., ~, 'Â·, \.\\,\, \\\,\\\ \ , \ 4, \ \ , \ 1 ..~ .. BUILDING RESTI~TION LINE TOW j.0 'Â· \ 6 25 9 5-74 .,BOW 10.0 -6w 141 ',, 'i ~\r- LiMIT O DEVELOPABLE ~1 '' \ \, BUILDINI~3*T (4'. 9, \ PROPOSED ' ~ ~ ~ :,~ i\, :, ,~ *, TOW 04.0 BOW 12.4 2--\3 /4 Al#A (i~C. NCik 2264~7) '\ \'.~ \\ \11 \.1.~ \41\ \'\ \\ .i. Â·10.F SlREETrARKING \ \ O \ BOW 00.01, A / a 1. 1 '1 \ Â£ 1 --p-7 \3 \~ TOW 05:5 \, %,,W , '\. \ \ i ' ~ : . . ' ' ~ ~ ~ 6 2 1~ ~, ~, ', ~. ~ 11 *AGE PARKÂ»~ AVAILABLg TAw 11.6 ~\: I~f*< 5 7948'25' \ BOW 01.5 ' - , TOW 30.0 ' 6 8 SukFACE PARKING AÂ¥4*82Â·, Z -1 \, TO'#,00. ~ '7.33.-74' e-1 ( Â· . Bow 07.5 U.- , r . a 1. 1 1 - \ 1 j BOW 9?.0 \ 9 \ 11% ~17 \\\ \ \ \ \ \ TOTAL\SITE AREA USA). 34. ft.'~ 86.27~ ROW 2-7.0 \ i; ,,. \ ; \ ~ SITE > '40% SLOPE \ AREA (sq. ft.)\ Z 1, ' 1 X j i. , 1 0 * 1, Â£ 0* - r h \ N r 0 9% 94/Wi\\\ 34#1- /7 , -/ -' 11 2% ' TOW 15.5 ', ~t l, TOW 32.90 ~ \ . 1 \ 1, \ . \\ 1 \ 1 BOW 13.5 ' ' '-iLDING ~ COVERÂ« . > BOW 30.0 %, . 1 ~ AREX,(sq. ft.) ' , 2.538 i a \ % TSA, Â· 19% en \ \ . ' h . \\ PNED=lift) ,'' 7.847 \ - ~32-~)~ -c '~ 1 -7 '.,~ .{ ' \ gTE LANDSCAPEDI \ ~ \\\4Â»- \' 1 , 11 \ 5 1 \ %17 92%1 \i>. \ \ \ \ *REA ( sq. N \ 15.290 .1 \ 9.572 i ' / \ ,Â· i .TSA 17.7% \ SNOW STORAGE \ \ \ O.1 4AXIM 4054 HORE \ K. 6-29-- 7-/4Â£-.4-- - - 1 1 -. -.. â‚¬â‚¬]3-~DIAA/ j~ UD fb.16 -1, \11 \.\.\ .....\. ' \ E)qERIOR ~l-IGHT Fit<TURE \ 1 ' 1 VEL, 8 I \ O R \TAINING 'WALL Â¢Rm) r 4 \ 0 I Ea l,4 - -,- -- -- - , , BOW 12.0 1 2 J \ \\ \ \ P~OPOSE'G BOULDER \ 1 A- \ \ I. \ I , 01 \ 1 1 3 ' 1 ~ YSER St 1 4\ , TOW 35)5 k 1 - ; - t . cz-L . 1 1 \ Â©W 31.5 90 \\,\ Â·Â· O -\ \ 9\ \ \ \ \ 4\ \ ..B -1. f ----- - . COCVERT. .. . j , 4.- 1 \ 1 , _ -\ , \1\ 6-\1966~ EVET \ J ~ VAN \~ \\ \ - 8617. 0 \ 19 . \ I / \ I - CP f \ \ Y \ 1 . \ 1 1 7 . \ I . h e \\ \\, \\\\\\\ Ly I \ \ I \ R ''\ \ I . \ \ \ 1. 1 z 4 EXTERIOI~LIGHT ~IXTURE . &1--- ENUj!Â·/F' 1 - / . OW 1\2. , TOW 28. t, ; \, \MAXIM \054 HOPE i, ' OW 9. 4 '" , -- -1 I.\\ X \\ N \ \ . Bbw 16.5, ; mil \\ flp. ,\\ \~ \ \ \ \ 1 u z ..t- . ' \ \ \ ' ' N \ MAXIM \4654 \ , i i i \R. \ \ -7- 6 'ZE-! ' ~. P- P~~~bA L -t 2 Y HO@kfd \ _~~C,-23]2 <f-- r-2-EE ..: ... 1 ./ gALLS OVER 4% SHALL BE DESIGNED'WY k O 0 0- ' - /Â· TrA â‚¬ = V 4 ' .- 1- . ~=Â£m--Al "-14=k- r -- 5 ' \ EtÂ¢Ffi- FIX TORE 2.. --- -- - --~=~*E-%=Ii#Â£Â» 4----'---'\ /\ t \ A 'LICENS*ED STRUCTURANT ENGINJEER \. -1 '- mI--_-4:-1 ./.lk * . . \ \ I - \ \ I . 1. I '' ' 1 /-- . ~~~3 .-2,/ *~-- 1 - \ 1 ' \ ' . '22 c -2- /it J \/24 \ \ \ \ \ 1 C. 1-- al -' 62!L r_*- -- - %5*-. =-I - - \ 0-\ \ I \ \ I \ 1.. - 1 -- - '- \1\ I\\. . I 1 -tl.- . r. I \ . \ i- \ N \ N --1 - Ep= 2* \ .V \ 4 'wL+3 1 \ 1 c J ~MIT OF DISTURBANCE (TYP \ \ - ped \ \ N \ --\ i Ar.k- -==-I=~=i'*3 I ,-â‚¬*ST*#52=ei2 /\ 4. \ \ \ . -~ . -2 -S# - E-f=,Â·--m 22 El'* - (307 - . 2 - 11-Â£- == \ \ I N \ I \ \ \ \ N \ -2m~M[2:fLED:Ef:tr~'~r- Â· -1- 4 \ g \ \ 7 \ 1 \\\ 1 4 1 \ \ I \ \ \ I . \ \ \ :%11 ig- < #*I-â€ž=..4- -1 1 -\ . \ \ --./ . 9-MI'~-~- i' Â·Â·r-Â·'- 1 ,- - 1.1 \ i \ \ \ 1-, \ \ \ i N \ - I \ \ \ - - Â¥ 7--Â·7'1 "~'~Â·kct</j~:1 L.1 ~ I._=F===LA =6 t~_ 1 It \ 1 \ \\\\ . - \ Al.\ \ \ I \66\6: - 3*--./ .. O, 00, \\ i \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ IL==237-=r=Ir /1 '1 Toy,fÂ·28.5 \\ - -- , \ , . BOW 26,0 th / / .- Â· '1 - i -- 1 \\ \ \ 25' FRONT BUILDING ~ .. .. , -,4-0-%. 'TAT: . SETBACK LINE (TYP) .- - - -- - 1 --- 36 I #1 =="- I- --M / . 1 S 4 7 -Â·----4--- IuAL 4 .... .1. . \ \ - I .~ j j~f - _~_ ~ 1 1 -n 111 . 1. \ - \ \ \ e \ \ ~â€¢~-'"'~14-7. r'h. . Â· , \ I 1- T \ +6 -- - -l it' . DGE OF DRIVEWAY . 2\ -- 1 . 16 1-yj~ . - a \ 1 10*/0 42Â¢.46*,I .tf -tr~ .-- j - - 6 SA T~4 1 -: 1 CABLE PED 1 , 1 'r . - - .\ . - - \ 1 ~4~*~~- 25, <FRONT fTBACK Â· ~ i JOB: 03001 TEL PED -. -/P. 02 Z \ - - - -~- 7-<,4 DATE: 5/16/03 TOW 13.0 BOW 14.0 =11-12 i -9. r ke:% \\ 06 0% SHEET ~NOW S-~pRAGE . " 41 \ -f --I- --. ... .1 ..1:'2x ... ~ -* ' MONUMENT = ~OUNDARY LINE (*P) 3 M CAP ON #5 REBAR F=5/ .\ \\\ \\ \\ \\\ s -jf~/ Dr ./ r \ \ . 1 % 0-1-1 0Nly)3N 3 NIOWVW NÂ¥-Id 31 IS 039 18 00* 1 :EW .EFF-,0 L Z9OL X 300161 30078 'Z *LZO-9*4-0Â£6 'NOAV .:10 NOTEÂ· 2 -EXISTING 5ITE 15 COVERED IN u WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST FOUND SUR~EY MONUMENT - FOUND SURVEY MIUMENT 5AGEBRU91 AND NATIVE GRA55E5 0Â£ C 1 1/2. ....... CAP ON #5 REBAR PLASTIC CAP ON 05 REBAR PLS 26967 PLS 5447 0 , S 8958'46- E i ~ 355.86' \. i \ I \ h \ 1 I k / ./: > Ii--J -Jl .-Il-. - WIrJ -Jl /~ \ GENERAL NOT[5 FOR [RO51O14 0 -Er-* -. ~-~E .1 3. ,, .. ... \, 11: REA~ BO'U?,NG-STTE~~64 LINEJf*E-~--J~~~ t--~~Â·i~-R~ t-t... ti--5\.fl- F, "i-,.r--ii R.7..\=F~ ~-, ec_ :~ \ I .il \\....\ . \ ..\ \. \\ . \ \ . I 1- CONTRACTOR 5HALL RECED ALL DISTURBED h CONTROL AND REVEGETATION: 4 I ..1..:f..:i:.001\ 5 \ \ IÂ· \~\\\\\\\~.\...\.\\\\~\\~N\\\:::g :\. \\, \\\\ \\\~\\\\~ \\\\ \\\\ \1\~ \\%,~ 1.\\, 1\\\ 1\,\ .\\\ \\\~, ~\\''. 1- AREAD \\\\\ \\ 2- ALL_ 5Â£[DED ARfA5 ARE TO Bit LIGHTLY RAKED O 3- 51LT FENCES TO DE PLACED AT LIMIT5 OF 4442.22.2.3. \\\\\~ \\\ \\\ \\\\\-: :I, \\\ '1\ r ,\~ .,1, \~' \%, ,\\\ \\ \.\\. \\\\ \~4\ \\\\ .\.4.,\ \\4. \\\ .~,\\~ \\\\ h\\\J\.\\~- r* INTO THE 5011 AND GENEROU5LY MO)5TfNfD \\ DÂ¢5TURBANCE TO FK[VENT ~ ~ ~ ' ~~~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~~~ ~1 ' ~~) ~' ~ ~~lot~52, ~'Â¢3!oc~,3~ ~Â· ~ ~r ~ ~ '* ~~ ~i ~'\ i ~\ ~,~ ~1 \ [K05ION AND 5[DIMENTATION \\\ GENERAL NOT[5 FOR - 2v PLANTING AND IRRIGATION: \ \ % .k 10 1 - AUTOMATIC DRIP IRRIGATION 51-IALL BE 1 \ 1 9 14- 4 .1 - If) ~ *i ., ~Ur-<' A AREA (REC NO~ 226457) 1 '. I ,, '1 .., \2 PROVIDED AT ALL NEW TRE[5 AND 5MKUB5 '\ j \11 ./ .\ t..1. I \ \ \\ \% ' \\ .\\ \\ \\ \\\ .... \ 6- DI TRACT 1 PLANTING LEGEND Â·Â·1 - 1 . 9.04 ., 4 \ 1 \ \\ \\ \ \ N \ Â® 5 GALLON 5AGE \/\-- CP 1 ' LOT 53 , i 1 / -):.:...~~~ 1 1 ... Â£ \ 1 , 1 \ ' \* . U.-1 3 Ua \ l.,-i :-:\ \ -- ~n .AN .- 22:Ag -95, ; .1 2 -2.2. \~ \ \ G TALL COLORADO BLUE 5FRUC[ (FiCIA FUNGEN5) I \ \\\\ I. \ Z[O DO NOT GRADE INTO 111 -=3' 94, rrEP. 2 â‚¬ FfÂ·224 ,=\- -4 7.31 Â£~ ,, %. i<~. 4. : . 'T 1 11-1 21- \ NEIGHBORS PROPERTY ilb. , ~ \ ~ O Z g 1\ 1 1* 2 ...tive 13 - i . i ,~ .* ~ / 1 .- A M LO 2 CALIVER QUAKING A5rtfN (FOPUL.l)5 TRfMULOIDE5) 02 0 H LU Â£10 ~Â·,16. - J [12 2 \ CL k u 2 .....*.*2 All DINURBED AIREAa RESffICD VAM Ff5CUE MD( al .ZD 1 \ \\\ \ \.\ < ro cD O \ \ \1 ./ CO U \\ \\\\1 SURVEY MONUMENT *mle-U..14. 4 3 -~-} -~ Fi=.462*4. \.B i \ 1.....: L \\ 1 1 i (25 L\\ \ ., 3,23.m' 1 . ~ LU U.1 -- :.: .:. Na 'i' ''' .1Â«<4-~%1.06 ''. ' ~ 25 FRONT BULDING r. - I :Ir. :-C/4 .. - - I : %t -:~i:~ ,~:~1 :. ~6 +~b ej -- --..~-Â·:f"55, :Jil/:.-7-3/ f % SETBACK UNE (TYP) pe ' 1 1 â‚¬ :32 :Eti- -581:?$&Â§Â·.* - : .--I - . ..F \ \ 1 -- . I \ 1 ' 2\ / \ \ I EDGE OF DRIVEWAY I .1 ........,1.-; 1 CABLE PEI> TEL Pe FOUND SURVEY MOIUIENT ~ .- # \6.. I U. FT&&[DPL...grÂ· --~2~2-~-,~~66â‚¬ -11\, 1 1/2- ALUMINUM CAP ON #5 REBAR PLS 26967 .-4.:vi':.,1,41 - 9-f-- 2, # i 7 - 79Â·0133- \ \\ \ \\ /\S/* -\ \ ' LOT 51 R - 45.001 DO NOT GRADEINTO 1- 57.0 4 :<1' \2 1 'FaJN[~ ~ M-,Al,IT NEIGHBORS PROPERTY L - 62-07- ; Iyl . --+~-4- PLS 33655 STAMPED 10' IC , I. 1 1/2~ AUJWIMMJM CAP ON 5 REBAR I55Ut DATE ce - Hs,26'27-W \ Â£ . \\)>=S RfEVIEW 01 02.03 01 -57.21 i \5, 10 FT SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE & PTRA~ISF SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT FINAL. 05.1 G.03 EDGE OF ASPHALT DUSNORâ€¢*1â€¢,P@*44- BENCHMARK: SEWER MANHOLE RN=8584.00' LAN[)5CAPE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 4 C IN FEEr) 1 inch - 20 1 1206 9VL OLS-W OELE DLE 0Â£6-d ONNOD,O 210 40019 '29 101 NI 'N91â‚¬30 0210 ONE>intin â€žÂ¥O,LS.80 N NO 1' S 0070 '144' k 00~Alol to GLZ NORTH POINT (50' ROW) - WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST FOUND SURVEY IONUENT FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT 1 1/2- All-4ul CAP ON 15 REBAR PLASTIC CAP ON #5 REBAR PLS 26967 -1 PLS 5447 S 8958'46- E , 355.86' h --- -- I i \ lb\\ \, / i \ 1 \. \ I . \ I, I \\ \\ f :-1 1< Ti- 1-1. -1_~'*. -A->' _1,_~~tl. 1~7., 44 \\ r[7 ~C----1 x -1-1'.--1.K:-,--' I ......C- 1,~i~-RMR BOIU)ING\Sf TBKEK ONE.(174- ' <--=Q ... \ \I-1-EJ -. \ 1 \ 1 ..\\\\ \ \\\\ \ \./\ . \ \ .\ \ \ \ \\ \. .. \\'. ~\\ \\ i ..\ \\ \* \. \. \: \ :\ 6 \\ \\\ \ \\ \\ *1 \\ .1\\ \14 , \\ ; 1, X lit - \ \ \ O \ .. I. .. .C ...:::..2.j.2.:.... : :. i#.1..5.: ::#isi'': Â£: i i':2.: 1< i / I '' 't ' - \\ \ \\ \ ~1 ~2 ~ ' ~ ~~ 1 1 f \ ~ t.6 'Lot 52. Block, 3 1 , \ \ .:\ \ \\ 2 \ 86,277 44.ft-, , , \ 7 \ 1.98 oakes t. \ \ 1 \ \, DoÂ»16-r GRADÂ¢1.ACRess N ~ 1 S Â· ~~ ~\ ~, \ ' * 'Â· .' 1 1.. '' t \Â· \ ", 1 % , â‚¬1 -1 41 ~.7'To 4:ST~NE \ 1 , \ \ \ \ 1 \ 1.1 , \ \ \ \ \ \ . .. . I ..\ \\\ %\\ ' 1 'K i. -TRACT I , -- 1. .4-'. 1 \,\, \\\\\ 1 \.. h. \ \ I.\\ I\%.4.- k . 1 1 1% 664.. , 4~ ~. 1. \ 1 2 $ ~ r .* 4<Â·, ~ \ '~ ~ \ \ %\ 41-% - -9 .Â£ Â£ Â· 4?k>. ' \ \ \ ,\\\: \ 9' 1 4, 1 70* 1 1 ' I , \./ I \ - LOT 53 ~~~ ------- - ' 8 w \ f i ... 1 U) ---- - -- , N \\ \ \ DO NOT GRADE INTO . Â· \ Â· ~ ~ 1 1 NEIGHBORS PROPERTY %.-*lit- 3-3-=-3.-' t:-il \ .~'t\\ \\ \\'9~\\ '~&, ~I \ 1, ./ \ S , \ I ./ I. \\ \\ Z \ 1.- * A ... ----.--- 0--52516 5-1.1,\ i -\ . 0 L \ &5LLS~QVER C SHALL1BE DESIGNEE)l@Y 11 ~ 1 . r ht -? 1 1 , , j - 1 CTURA& ENGINEER \ . 1 \ f.\\ \ A (fICENSED STI~ H 1 22 1 \ LKE~ -- ' -~ \ \1 ; 20 821 , . ..1 \ . \ h. 1 \ Â· \ Z ~ 4 x \ UNIT OF bISTURBANG (TYP> ~ t . \ E - : L. \:0 -\\\ < oricDO I \\\./. ./ 00 U V.IcÂ».. Â· / I r Â£\ / I. . \\ ~ r '. : '1 \ PLASTIC CAP ON 0 REBAR \ 1\ OUND SURVEY MONUMENT E K U U.1 \ O ....4 '1 9 1 *2 2,2 I x \ J .\ I. \\ \\ -\ . 1 / 1 PLS 5447 rt -J 00=1=~21= 1 - , -- -..r-:'-,-:f: C.. . Â·' >r- Â·~ -3 0 z.:4 1 ~ \\ 9% 5 B Rt . -5>i-7-53-3-:.-5-:.53- '01 \ \ IN \ a Â«-~2. &5 â‚¬ 1- 8 8 -r 0 11 d \ \\ --r \ -:. t.. ,p . \ .4 \ 1 \<00'll0' 1 ~ I \ I \ -- 5 -r :fi 1\ \ ,\ - .. -- \, ~ ----~:i. 4, 1-:.j:--~ ~-,-2Lf---0.â‚¬{>-4.- ~ ~ :\ \ 1 -\ \ ---2,/ENÂ»'\. \I 25' FRONT BUUING . \ \ / 4, 0-\I \ SEIBACK UNE (TYP) 1 \\ 1 \ -/ 44>$f* . I . - 4.- - .- . . . Â£ . .- \ I 2\ EDGE OF DRI~WAY 4 1 ' Â· '. \ t.2 - CABLE PED 10. PED : :2 IMT)< 2r 25Â·,RONT +BACK \ ~ -- --- --*Ic----IX/... \ ..\. . 1. i1 FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT . 1 1/t AWMINUM CAP ON #5 REBAR PLS 26967 4 \ s 19054 1 - 79'01'33' , , LOT 51 ::2w 4 % #1 3 'l ,Fou,2 GRA :l DO NOT GRADEINTO L - 62.07- \ P 1 la- ALUMINUM CAP ON #5 REBAR NEIGHBORS PROPERTY PLS 33655 STAMPED 10' IC I55UE DATE (28 - NWW27-1 FINAL 05.16.03 CH -57.26' , 4 . 10 FT SLOPE MAINTENANCE. DRAINAGE & REVIEW 01.02.03 4%*SF 56 SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT EDGE O. ASPM.T BENCHMARK SEWER MANHOLE RIM-8584.00 CON5TRUCTION 5TAGING AND POLLUTION CONTROL F'LAN GRAPHIC SCALE . (5 C IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 f. 10NN00,0 11Â¥31 NOIâ‚¬IAIGGIng JOCINdl 00 9 '29 101 1206 OKÂ£ OLA Oâ‚¬ZE SLE 0Â£6-4 NI 'NOIâ‚¬30 03-LVN 02919 03 'NOAV GELL OU 13*il=111> *EGRI ZO'92 e ' .0 lin "R.y I 5 3vg# M .Â¥0,LS.20 N Oggg JIONZICIâ‚¬37 3W1 00Â¥30100 'Al.NA NORTH POINT (50' ROW) 52 52 '' 2 : 2 47 0 2 I 5 54 17.-4 f --f Dr.4-L 10 . , J L- 1 51-7 F 9// Â·-4 GAS== 11Â»45- 1 L- h 14Â·-4 7 - L-7 10 (7 I 3 4. _EZ//224*-_ 1 145? - 2.- co.~ rIOOK5 71 1-% L-mui I MUDROOM 7T BATM 51*TE eA-* CM BEDROOM j GAME 0 z ROOM Â§ LO 5LATE 41.~TI;t DZ 85 MALL I -prv <5 ~ firl 0â‚¬23.52 1 T.O. CONC :AP Â¥ 1 4 t: 1- 00 GAME KM CL~~~| 5TAIR 'A' ALA- h-n D || LE[.tyâ€¢-*51,~Tr -ll-1 lf) ~ - DN 9K @7F 4%.* -1- 11 4/ : 099 i i E LU ~ -1----------------k- 1 1 1 ROOM WOKK- AREA 2 IE || | MECHANICAL. , IDC<31 1- 2 11- 0 FOYER CLODET I -. 9 U ! T I tv ./ 12Â·-1Â· .. 2 9 '. . LAN - f 5TOJ& kn- 5 *12.Ifiri-1 2 2 -r I 10 . . 11 1 b 1 + FOrt K b hz 00 11 4 0 CD ILI D~02Â£@ 15'-- 8 in k afv: 86 17.896 l==2~YED-' Â°ONC L O 1. 772 - N 1 r.O. CONC id E LOCATION Of GAS . M UTILITY MEIRS 11 SLATE \ -4, b ..k' # I L- . 0 0 1-0 CqNC GARAGE 'Cr 30' 2- 5QUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION5: + LOWER LEVEL LIVABLE= 1374.1 5lf MAIN LEVEL LIVABLE= 2007.6 5F UNCOFDECKABOVE--I/| ~_ ~ UPPER LEVEL UVABLf = 846.2 5F TOTAL- LIVABLE ST= 4228.1 5F 155Ut DATE : GARAGE= 1085.05f ~ REVIEW 01.02.03 in *CLEV: 86 1 6.646 MECMANICAL ROOM= 109.6 5f | FINAL 05.IG.03 TO CONC TOTAL- NON-LIVABLE 1191.G 5F 1 1 1 41 3 TOTAL BUILDABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE= 5419.7 9 . 0.- 0. 4, 1 31 (7 1 13' g ,/ 37 4 ,- LOWER LEVEL FLOOR FLAN LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN DCALE: t"= 1'-0" A2.0 0~101 0 '11NROD 30=1 NONJOIGAI V ' 2 G 101 52Â· 5/ I 1 9 U ,6-- 4. .2 UN~ Or STRUCT- Mtlow 7 \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 .1 7 -1-7 1,1. J BEDROOM 2 4 3ATH 2 BEDROOM 3 0 00 1 1 I CF'l ~ CLEV: 24C ~ ~~ .1,1 ~ __- 11 TILf / 4. l. 1 TO- 3UBFL00K SLATE+-4->Crr.'\ L*.'3ATn 3 .5Nv0IR. 4. 19- 4,4- 1 1Â·.4 ....dne,9 up OR A-11 514.. 3.4.1701 [%Â« .1 . 971 â‚¬C===Gle 7 Â¥ 1 4 -- 9 FANTRY L __-_ re 31-1. ---Â·-UOKJ-'--1 Mb 9 POWDER 1 0 ROOM 1 DEN ' 4 5TAIR 'A' 1 - ~9 *K--4-T- 1 4ITY 9 <3 IN ~' ~ @7t WOO[ /' 1 i Â£ Tlf & - U._1 4 U _.1 CÂ· i.adneR 4 1+1 7 'k 1 --1 6 T---1 V / 0 7â„¢DOD ~ ~ O 12 Co 2 11,1~ 0Â¥ flOOK AB~~~ - 7 ~ rg 1 _Â®T-_5629.I46 6 n ZOED T.O. 5UfFLOOK b LU 9 k - 0 0 - LINE CF STRUCTURE ABOVE lf) 4 m ' - ll-.1 u) Â£ b - < U 442=a GREAT ROOM 9 DINING AREA 4 " -t 5QUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION5: 4... LOWER LEVEL LIVABLE= 1374.1 5r - MAIN LEVEL LIVABLE= 2007.8 9 UPPER LEVEL LIVABLE= 846.2 5F 1 \\ C \ TOTAL UVABLE 5F= 4228.1 5F I ve \ GARAGE= 1085.0 5f ' 1 MECMANICAL ROOM= 1 OG.G 5F 1 It 1, J. TOTAL- NON-UVABLE= 1191.65F ~ CONC L co'.c L co,c UNE Of 5TKUCTUK~ en-CUÂ· / ~0-0 10 0 17 DECK b TOTAL BUILDABLE 5QUARf FOOTAGE= 5419.7 5F 1155UE DATE ~ CLEV: 8â‚¬28.GAG ~D REVIEW 01.02.03 T.O. CONC FINAL- 05.IG.03 1 000000\00 L- STAh,!rED CON/FUTE DECK 1 1 1 57 4 . MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~~ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4Â·= 1'-C' A2 . I ONI 'N91â‚¬30 021*bl NONNO O 1 NOIGIAIOGIng 3901 g OD '173 % I 20GQ~~~ 026-2 0(ZE 9LLLEO~ZG-a INIOJ W â‚¬~cINVI-Il ill-Il >10=J 06Â¥30100 'Al.NAO; 31Â©Vil 52' * ' .... 1/3- 7 - 642 ' --1 UNE Of 5â„¢UCTUK[ 0 Z 0- 0 02 83 1 1 I. 1 ra F fLEV: 8934.146 - -5 1 4 81 0 7 V STAIR 'A' f al< 0 7 Y r=~// 1 f ..4-: r uJ T.0 SUMOR N LU lf) U F FLUE 014 . I. 41:: - Â» 2 2 2 1 .21--2--1 9 Or 02 2 r U LOG ~ OreN TO n 015 - 5[Al.45 AZe/'t 1. :=~ b r 1 1 2 MASTER. 1 M WC G M 41*K L *zz 41 + WALK IN 1 - 1 7\4 r + b 6 #1 111 11 / -IM M * U CD ,-- UNI Or 4 9 T.O. 5UIN=LOOR 7- .-4--7.2.-0 4 11, , o I-014 I k I ~~~==rh e <7 1 0 2Â«y_-12] 1 ClaTOM SAINED b OF'EN Toi I hz--ee-y____ - GLA:50 *1NDO# 1 ~ BY 0,/IrK u 1 GL455 WINDOW 1 - CUSOM ITAINID /1\ 1 /YOWNER / 111 \ 1 . 9 5 11 1 /lili I 11 / \ 1 311 \\ 1 11 1 t 1 -â€¢- LINEÂ· i 5QUAKE FOOTAGE CALCULATIOND: b 11 9 = 6 LOWER LEVEL UVABLE= 1374.1 5F - 111 UFFER LEVEL LIVABLE= 846.2 9 MAIN LEVEL UVABLE= 2007.8 5r lilli 1 1 Iii TOTAL- LIVABLE 5F= 4228.1 5F Ill 1 1 111 1 , - .Â· . . GARAGE= 1085.05f â€¢ I r LINE OF DECK 'ELOW 1 76- 1 7.0 1 MECHANICAL ROOM= IOGG OF 155UE DATE 12-2* TOTAL NON-UVA[3Lf 1191.G 5f REVIEW 01.02.03 FINAL 05.1 G.03 TOTAL BUILDABIf SQUARE FOOTAGE= 5419.7 ST 30' sy - 1 1 UPPER LEVEL FLOOK PLAN ~~ UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4'= 1'-0" A2.2 'ONI 'Nelâ‚¬30 031Â»I NONNO 0 1 019 '29 101 120%*Yfj; 1,flfuLG-2 Oatrs A00 319Â¥J ZION;101â‚¬3'31 V Cd 0 0% LD 9- h 680 =8&; ~ i uL 0>0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ MEV: 8G51.75 1 1 / 1 | 6- 12 SLOPE G: 12 5LOFE 1 1 1 1.1 1 G: 12 5LOF'f \4 1 BDGE VINT (TY,9 ~ 1 \ I ..4----- ---------- -1 ill 1 1 1 Z _ J L___- --_L_ -7 8 6 L_ u 00-0 L ' L 9 1 U) A //1 - 1 86% N al U G UNE OF OUILDING BELOW (EYP) -/' ~ f LEV: 8651.75 A. ELEV: 8651.75 | R Z RIDGE VENT COn - / RIDGE veNT (TYP} IL' 6 u / 1 0=00 1 1 ZOLD I ELEW ~50. 146 1 all-EY CAP 1 ~ 7 RIDGE Ul 1 6:12 G: 12 0, m 11_1 61 1 {2 ' ---7,4-1 U 1 111 1 | RIDGE VENT (T'rf, --~~ | 1 1 G: 12 5LOFE / G: 12 SLOPE | ~ CUV: 8649.2â‚¬ 1 ~ CMIMNEY CAP / 7 RIDGE / 1 L____ -T------------ 9 ----3 UNE Or MCI BELOW 1 1 : 1 ISSUE DATEi 4 L_- 1 . 1 KEVIEVI 10. t 7.02 ANAL 05 16 03 1 1 L__________________________________3 GENERAL NOTES | 1 - ALL OVERMANG5 TO DE 2'-0â€¢ ROOF FLAN UNLE55 NOTED OTMERWI5E 2. ALL SLOPES TO BE G: 12 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (f) ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4'= 1'-0â€¢ A2.3 'ONI 'N91â‚¬30 0311%41 :f 1%Â£Â£ Â° EZE 94â‚¬ ~12,6-4 G: 1 2 5LOrt â‚¬~AIVI-Il JI-Il '30=I NOIâ‚¬IAICIenG '26 101 0(In!01 NAOD 319*ZI G. 12 5LOPE DUMMARY TABLE Of: ---- CLEV: 8â‚¬50.1 ------ --- ------ ---- ----~ ------- MATERIAL5 AND RIDGEI -. 9.26+~ - -12 COLORD: - JUDGE-_---- G - - -12- - ASMÂ·tAU 5MINGUf5 ROOFING: TO BE 40 YEAR ASPMALT '' ~~~~~ 5M1NGLE5 03 o_Â«_ LL ~-222= 5[MI-TRANSPARENT STAIN ROOF WINDOW AND DOOK TRIM: TO BE CEDAR, COLOR: BLUE 5MADOW ROOF TRIM SOFFITS AND GAKAGE - DOOR5: TO BE 1 xG TÂ¢G STAINED BLUE FAUX lOG COLUMN MAXIM 4054 noft - k ful: 0639.1.46 ./ COKNEK Daâ„¢JOR UGÂ¢,TING f Dat,RE 5MADOW -l- - --- ------- ----- 1- -IL===23 ---- ------- 7 T.O SUBROOR XWOM 4054 MIl EXTERIOR UGMTING rD(TVR~ FAUX LOG COWMN 5IDEWALLS: 5TUCCO (EXCEFT WHERE AI COI~K - STONE VENEER OR LOG CONSTRUCTION) 5TUCCOVIN/K / \ , ~ ~ COLOR: FAR;5 WHITE WOOD WINDOW TIM 1 I LOG FICK[75 WN# 4' SPACING 5TONE VENEER AND 5TON[ FILLAK5: TO \ Ot'rV.UN MAX ~ [flfv: 0,34 146 DE Â·CMINAÂ· MOUNTAIN LEDGE STACKED = 7 T.0.5UDFLOOR . / - COSTING GRADE STONE WITM SANDSTONE LEDGE. \ - VANDOW5: VINYL, COLOR: TORREY FINE /*. 4054 HOPE 1 1 - LOG CONSTRUCTION: TO 82 5TAINED 11 1 510Â»4 TPLED CO,KErt' MEARTWOOD TRAN5FARENT 5TAIN -06112iae.1-46Â· EXT[K,OR UGM'[iNG FIXTURE KETANING WALL= 20. 1 7 T.O SUBFLOOR - 4686 - DECKS: - ALL TRIM AND KNUNGS TO BE STAINED CONOITE WALL MTM STONE rACING FER STRiICTUKAL DRAWINGS WITH SUPERDECK HEARTWOOD. CUSTCÂ», FRONT DOOR WriM S,DE ' - FRAMING TO Ff 50. YELLOW PINE LIGMS EITMEK 51/ - 1 xâ‚¬ â„¢3 (ZDZ 51[>ING APFUED 9 TKIMMED WITM RED CEDAR GARAGE DO<56 -kgRE&&23,52 r - - - - - - - - - DECKING: TO BE STAMPED AND HEATED I 2- 0 LOG COLUMN ON 42- MIGM STONE PILASTER V~H STONE CAP _ CONCRETE - 42Â· MIGM 5T0Nf VENEER W,TH RAILINGS TO DE CEDARMTM 3" 0 TOP 570/ or AND 4â€¢ 0 BOTTOM RAILS AND 2 0 PROP05â‚¬D GRADE dkarv: aG 17.899' - " BALLU5TER5 MIN, 4' 5FACING 6 ALTERNATING WITH 10" 0 LOG FOSTS A5 FI -77.6.-COIC - 10 7 L FER DRAWING5 Z ---- CD 6 06 [Lm: 8616.6,6 OLO 7 T O CONC. BOTTOM or ITONE /A(ID , CON... RrTAINING WALL- 1â‚¬5 Â£ ir C-)5OUTH ELEVATION 9 62 LfiCALL:94'=1'1 29 06 CD -,6..EELE!Â·75 - NUDGE 'aNT g 00 7RIDG[ -E- - ---- 4, FE=zz~:EEZE*22*22*EEZ~AN-~Mt ASPMA[J SMINGUS -229Â«Â«[Clu \IlÂ«3*J-~- ePMALT/MINGL[5 41 VA-- WOOD TRIM ------Â¤4ZL J)[in,:8639.149_____ ------ 31--il-----------/------4----- -[L -41-- 111 1 fAUX LOG COUMN AT CONK - | 4 1 -4------ WOOD WINDOW 5UKROUND 1 11 1 11 - STUCCO VENEER FAUX LOG NEWEU @ DECK.CORNEK - | ~ 4~E~FE[Ill i F'ROFC)5Â¤D 55UE DATE GKâ€¢Â£>t Knne" 01.02.03 -- ---- --- FINAL 05.16.03 .k nfv: 8G29 J 4G' -1~W--~ - COÂ¢RRIZ-~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7- T.o. SUMGR 1 1 1 DISTING GRADE 1 1 1 | | BUILDING 1 1 ELEVATIONS UNr Or OUILDNG | â€¢k ELEV: 86 17.896' T.O.-CONC. -----U----------------------------------------- .6 [trv: agl gee A3.0 7 T.O. CONC. r-) EA5T ELEVATION i 2- ~_.../ 5CALE: 1/4Â»= 1'-CY 'ONI 'N91â‚¬20 ' 20%~~:~12'OG~< NcS%ffelltzE,Â£=-2 GANÂ¥ Wl 31-41 10=I ZIONJOIGZIN Â¥ NOIGIAICIgnG ZI 0019 '29 101 00~lol 3 'Al.NAOO 319*2 - --------------------................------------------------------------------------------------------~ ELEV: 8651.75 SUMMARY TABLE OF RUDGI - - MATERIAL5 AND - COLORE - - 10 - ~ -~ IZ - ROOFING: TO BE 40 YEAR A5PMALT Z '0111/T 91'NGLES - - till 8 0 - 5111NGLE5 - - ROGE-ENDOW-ANEDCOMIRJM: TODE 012*Â° 1 - CEDAR, COLOR: BLUE SHADOW 2113 Bm 5[Mt-TRANSFNKENT 5TAIN H h - FOOLE-EM-ROmIQ-AND-GARAGE 2 DOORS: TO BE I AG TÂ¢G STAINED BLUE 5TUCCO VENIER SHADOW 1 1 F 111 \111 rÂ«=1 1 1 SIDEWALL.5 5TUCCO (EXCEFT WMERE ELEV 809 144â‚¬_ 5TONE VENEER OR LOG CONSTRUCTION) - J~JIL- kill- --- - - - - - T.O. SUBFLOOK | 12 COLOR: FAR}5 WMITE MAXIM 4054 MOFE | -- c ~ SIONE_VE-11&2%62&2IONE-FILLARS TO Drrat,OK UG,irING Forn~ y i 1 - -______IJF---~- ~ BEE 'CHINA' MOUNTAIN LEDGE 5TACKfD flf\: 8691.14â‚¬ | - - - - - - - - - - - WINDOWS: VINYL, COLOR: TORRNY FINE 5TONE WITM SANDSTON[ IfDGE. 1-32-I ) T.O. SU[3FLOOK ~ - LOG CON5TRUCTION: TO BE 5TAINED WOOD TIUM MCARIWOOD TRANDFARENT 5TAIN / SVCCO - DECKS: flfV: 8629.149_ - - - - 72 -- -- -1 - ALL TRIM AND KAILINGS TO Bf STAINED (~~ T# oF-Eibutla 9~*IIA&*truck- -- - --------I.02 -1- --------- T.O. 5UNLOOK N , WITM 5UFERDECK MEARIWOOD. Z /1 I.. ' f:UMING TO M 50. YELLOW FINE L O 1 / - , DOTTOM Of BOt.RDER RrTAINING - ~ WAil- 27-0 ~ / *- | TRJMMED WITH RED CEDAR / â‚¬ 0 PICKING: TO BE 5TAMPED AND MEATED eXIS,ING GRADE - 9 3 ELEV- 8â‚¬23.521 CONCRrrE --------L--1------------------ ---------4---------- T.O. CONC. RAIUNG5. TO 52 CEDAR WITM 3Â» 0 TOP AND 4' 0 BOTTOM KAILD AND 2' 0 1-l E DAL LUSTER5 MIN, 4' 5rACING ALTERNATING WITH 10" 0 LOG PO5T5 A5 LU tr) U 6/- PROPOSED GRADE PER DKAWINGS E 1Lt - CLEV: 86 17.896 -- -----------------------------------------.-C- - -7 - TO CONG. -_________ _-___________ -____-_--__-_______ >_ -3 _ f- 1 CLEV: aGIG.Gle , TO CONC -1 NORTH ELEVATION 4.2-Eam-Â»49----~ L k z RIDG' INT LU (4 CD ELEV: 8â‚¬51.75 COPPER IMIMNEY C,V O g CO RjDGE - 12 / ZOLD LU 9 1 A5rrl/T SHINGUI- O[0 to ai ~~* PA - U_1 1-0 - -| ASPMALI SMINGLES al b - WOOD T.. <= â€¢k Etrv: 8639.149 i2 -7-TOJEIWIZk FAUX LOG COLUMN 5TUCCO Vf/[K Gr- - 1 | AT ODKNER x - WOOD WlNDON SURROUND - 11 --- - --fIXÂ£15 - - ,|7 ELEv: 8634.149 MAXIM 4054 MOPE EXTER,OR UGMTIG 7L--1 - sn,CCOVDNEER 7-EE-KERBB~ WOODâ„¢1. - l55Uf DATE L 1 42 mrW 01.02.03 ANAL 05.16 03 STUCCOVENEE â€¢k ELEv: 8629.146 -/71 --1 --- WOOD WINDOW SURROOLND -772%= LOG COWMN ON 42- STONE ALASTER Â¥/ml STONE CAP 1 nev: 8623.52 I -- T T.o. CONC. FKOFÂ·OSID GRADE BUILDING ElfVATION5 EXINING GF/DE ---- e SONE VENEER WITH / KONECAP L_Â» E- 7 L_Jl_.7 u 1-3 -- A- â€¢k EL-gv: aG 17.899 TO-CONE- 1 â€¢KELEv: 8616.649 AB. 1 7' T.O. CONC. /-1 WE51- ELEVATION 42 r--54=JTM'=1'-1 'ONI 'NOIG 09 1206 ~9%7 LE OZG-d uuvaul iu INI IUJ B 1-JV=I