Loading...
PZC Packet 102092STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Lube and Car wash Shop Special Review Use Pubilc Hearing INTRODUCTION Louis Medeiros and Dan Newell are requesting Special Review Use approval for a lub and car wahs shop on Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. This application was tabled at the October 6, 1992 meeting due to the lack of complete information. To date that information has not been received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends tabling this application to the November 3, 1992 meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff): 2. Applicant Presentation: 3. Commission Review: 4. Commission Action. Respectfully submitted, V� -qLv�tj Rick Pylman Director of Community Development s r- STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Lube and Car Wash Shop Special Review Use Public Hearing PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (1-�T Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date d 2.0 Patti Dixon, Secretary This application was tabled until the next meeting on November 3, 1992, to allow the applicant to provide more complete information. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Mountain Star PUD Amendment Preliminary Plat Public Hearing INTRODUCTION The proposed Mountain Star Subdivision is comprised of 683 acres of land north of Interstate 70 and adjacent to the Wildridge Subdivision. The parcel of land is currently known as the Wildwood Subdivision. The land is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and an approved development plan and final plat allow a total of 936 dwelling units on 270 lots. The proposed Mountain Star development plan would significantly alter the approved zoning and subdivision of the property by reducing the total number of homes proposed upon the site to no more than 88 single family homes. Each home would be allowed a caretaker/secondary unit which could not be subdivided or sold separately. Total density could reach 176 units. Local roads within the project are proposed to be private and would be maintained by a Homeowners Association. A complete design guideline and review process would be instituted by the same association. STAFF COMMENTS The Planned Unit Development Zone District allows for amendments to existing PUDs and specifies submittal requirements and contains criteria for review of proposed amendments. This is a large and complex project and there is a great deal of information to review. The purpose of this meeting is to introduce the Planning and Zoning Commission to the project and to provide an initial review of the submittal information. No formal Staff recommendation has been made and no formal decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission is expected. RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing INTRODUCTION This subject was first discussed in a public meeting on August 18, 1992. The request at that time was to rezone two duplex lots into two single family lots and one duplex lot. The Staff and Commission both disputed the proposed building design on the duplex lot, feeling that the design did not meet the definition of a duplex. The subject was tabled to the meeting of September 15, 1992. At that time the request was revised. The applicant requested that the property line separating lots 13 and 14 be vacated and that the ensuing parcel be zoned for multi -family development of 4 units. The Planning and Zoning Commission was not comfortable with the building siting or architecture and allowed the applicant to again table his request, to allow amendment to the siting and architecture. The building siting has been amended slightly. The architectural style remains the same. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff recommendation for this proposal has been for denial. Please refer to the attached memorandum dated September 15, 1992, to review the criteria and the Staff recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff): 2. Applicant 'presentation: 3. Commissior: Review: 4. Commission Action. Respectfully submitted, I UC _RLV� Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lots 13/14, Block 1,Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendn,Dnt/Zone Change Public Hearing PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( Withdrawn gip, Date Patti Dixon, Secretary(- ��4' +� The Commission denied approval of the vim 7nnP Change due to concerns STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 15, 1992 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing INTRODUCTION Tony Seibert, on behalf of SLB -200 Partners, L.P., is proposing to amend the Eaglebend PUD Development Plan for the purpose of changing the existing zoning and lot configuration of Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. The zoning plat for the Eaglebend PUD shows that the PUD is divided into six Subareas. Lots 13 and 14 are located in Subarea 5. The development standards for Subarea 5 are as follows: Maximum building height Maximum building area ratio Minimum open space Minimum setbacks Allowed uses Minimum lot size 35' 50% 25% 25' - front 10' - rear 7.5' - side A single family or a duplex building and accessory buildings and uses. = Although not specifically listed on the zoning plat, it is important to note that none of the 19 lots in Area 5 are less than 16,000 sq. ft. in size. Mr. Seibert's requested PUD Amendment includes both a rezoning and the replatting of Lots 13 and 14. Each of the lots are currently 0.37 of ar, acre in size (16.008 sq. ft.). The requested action would create one large lot zoned for four units. The setbacks to tho exterior property lines would remain the same, as would the rest of the development standards, however, the removal cif the interior lot line allows more flexibility in locating structures. The developer's intent is to develop four single family residences instead of two duplex structures, as detailed in the architectural drawings and site plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 15, 1992 Page 2 of 4 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing STAFF COMMENTS The fol'Dwing criteria as listed in Section 17.28.080 of the Avon Zoning Code, shall be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission when reviewing a proposed PUD Amendment/Zone Change application. A. Is the proposed rezoning Justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned? STAFF RESPONSE: On May 5, 1992, the Eaglebend Partnership received approval of a PUD Amendment for Tract B, Eaglebend Subdivision. The approved development plan allows up to 21 single family residences on the 3.19 acre tract. The average density of this section of land, located on the north side of Eaglebend Drive, is 6,600 sq. ft. each. The 19 lots on the south side of Eaglebend Drive (Filing 1) are all a minimum of 16,000 sq. ft. each. No changes in the character of the lots in Filing 1 have occurred since the Subdivision was originally annexed into the Town in 1987. B. Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan? STAFF RESPONSE: Goal #A3 and Objective AI(a) (Land Use) and Objective I1(b) (Image Design) in the Avon Comprehensive Plan seem particularly relevant to this application. They are as follows: GOAL #A3 - Upon full development of the community, all land uses should work together as a balanced system. OBJECTIVE #A1 - (a) Identify the appropriate scale of development for each area of Town. OBJECTIVE #I1 - (b) Strengthen the Town's design standards to ensure tha development will be appropriate in scale, intensity, and character. Emphasis shall be placed on architecture, landscaping, streetscape, and signage. Staff does not feel that the proposed development plan for Lots 13 and 14 serves to further any of the goals and objectives contained in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 15, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing C. Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses? STAFF RESPONSE: Although single family homes are certainly a compatible use on this parcel of land, the proposed configuration of buildings on this plan is very tight. In the opinion of Staff, the four single family homes do not fit well on site in a manner compatible with the neighborhood. If single family homes are desired on these lots, it appears that only three will fit. D. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed use? STAFF RESPONSE: Adequate facilities are available to serve the proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the requested PUG Amendment/Zone Change request for Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Consideration by Commission 6. Act on Request Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development • • ( ;STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 67, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision off Single family Residence: l Final Design Review INTRODUCTION 4 This application was tabled by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their October 6, 1992 meeting to allow the applicant to respond to several concerns. The applicant has decided not to ouild this project this fall and requests postponement of any further discussion at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends tabling this application until further notice from the applicant. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff): 2. Applicant Presentation: 3. Commission Review: 4. Commission Action. Respectfully submitted, �Cu^1J Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued( Denied ( ) Withdrawn ) Date JOUQ1 _Patti Dixon, Secretary At the aoolicant's request this application was tabled until the luff -u!' -- •• a �� STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 33, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Sharpf Duplex Final Design Review INTRODUCTION: The Sharpf duplex was presented to the Planning and ening Commission on October 6, 1992 and was tabled due to several concerns,. The issues raised by the Planning and Zoning Commission members included window sizing, garage roof pitches, garage door heights, driveway width, the landscape plan and the use of hardboard siding. The applicant responded to these concerns in the following manner: The garage roof pitch has been changed from a 3/12 pitch to a 4/12 pitch. Horizontal mullions have peen added to the large vertical windows of the south and west elevations. The garage doors have been drawn to reflect their tree opening size c� seven feet by sixteen feet. The driveway has been widened by adding three foot gravel shoulders to each side of the twelve foot paved surface, providing a total width of eighteen feet. The landscape plan has been r%produced at a larger scale and an irrigation system has been incl;Hed. The aplicant is still utilizing hardboard siding, in fact, all building materials and colors remain as described in the October 6, 1992 submittal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: All the proposed changes are in compliance with the design guidelines and the zoning code. Staff recommendation is for approval. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 33, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Sharpf Duplex Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, -?,ce- i� Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved a� mitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( Date Patti Dixon, Secretary _ The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions - 1. Driveway be a minimum of 14' paved width with no gravel shoulders. unl cc otherwise approved by Staff at a narrower width. 2. Meters he painted the color of the stucco abd all vlues, vents and louvers will be painterli 3- The applicant cibsuder a recommendation to increase the quantity of landscape materials, particularly shrubbry; 4. The siding be wood siding as opposed to masonite siding STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 6, 1992 Lot 33, Block Sharof/James Final Design INTRODUCTION 3, Wildridge Subdivision Duplex Review Lot 33, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision is a .73 acre duplex lot with an approximate slope of 15% rising from west to east. The lot is a flag lot with the building site situated about 200 feet. from Flat Point Road. The proposed duplex meets all setback and building height requirements. The site coverage is 11.5% and there is approximately 4300 square feet of driveway and parking area. Each unit is approximately 2200 square feet in size. The building is a two story hip roof form with predominant building materials of hardboard siding and stucco. The roof will be an asphalt shingle in a weathered wood color. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Zoning regulations of the Town of Avon 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: This project is suitable for the site and the neighborhood. All materials appear to be appropriate. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent Droperties. COMMENT: The improvements have been designed to work well with the adjacent properties. The relatively low profile of these buildings will minimize encroachment into views of the neighboring properties. •;t STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 6, 1992 Page 2 of 3 Lot 33, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Sharpf/James Duplex Final Design Review 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The improvements have been designed to work well with site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The design solution for this duplex is fairly simple and straightforward. The material selection and mix, the building and roof forms and the scale of the project are all appropriate for this site. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of th,e proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Starf recommends approval of this design review i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Wilke - Schneider Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision is a .55 acre duplex lot. The lot slopes up away from the road at an approximate 20% grade. The proposal is for a single family home with a two car garage in the northwest portion of the lot. The driveway starts out at an approximate grade of 6% and increases to about 11% while approaching the building site. The building materials are stucco with an asphalt shingle roof. The building utilizes a gable roof form with a 10/12 pitch. A 2 x 10 fascia and the soffit will be cedar and will be stained with a solid body cedar colored stain. The stucco will be LeHabra Miami Peach. The windows are trimmed with cedar lintels and sills and will be stained to match the fascia. A complete landscape and grading plan have been submitt.,d for review. The building height, setbacks and site coverages are all well within zoning standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As a conceptual review, recommendation. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation Stafr has no formal comments or 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Anointed Christian Fellowship Church Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision is a one-half acre lot zoned Residential Low Density, located on the north side of Nottingham Road. The lot is bordered by Town of Avon owned open space tracts on the east and north sides, and by the A -Y Townhomes on the west side. In May of this year, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Special Review Use for a church and parsonage to be located on this lot. The conditions of that approval were as follows: 1. The property be limited to uses typically associated with church activities (i.e. weekend services, sunday school, weddings). Any expansion of use beyond that discussed at the meeting (i.e. provisions of community day care, rental of fellowship hall to other groups and organizations, etc.) must be brought back to the Commission for further review. 2. No external noise making devices will be allowed (bells, speakers, etc.) and internal noise volume should be kept to a level compatible with surrounding properties. The proposed development consists of an approximate 5235 square foot church and a 4600 square foot parsonage. The church is a two level structure with a fellowship hall, three classrooms, and a kitchen on the lower level and a 1450 square foot sanctuary, two counseling rooms and a pastor's office on the upper level. The parsonage consists of a three story, five bedroom, three and one-half bath dwelling unit with an oversized two car garage. A landscape plan, as well as a preliminary engineering and grading plan has been submitted. The site plan indicates 41 parking spaces. The zoning code requires one parking space for every three se s in the church seating area. No seating plan is shown at .;is point, although discussion at the Special Review Use permit hearing indicated approximately 90 seats. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 2 of 3 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Anointed Christian Fellowship Church Conceptual Design Review The church building utilizes a combination of stucco and stone as an exterior wall material with a wood shake roof specified on the south elevation. Roof material for the north elevation is not specified. The roof form is an offest gable with a central dormer and two small hip roofs over the stair towers at either end. The parsonage is all stucco with wood shake roof on the south elevation, no material specified for the north elevation roof. Roof form is a similar offset gable. STAFF COMMENTS Although this is a conceptual review, and no formal recommendation is given, the Staff has identified some issues that should be addressed: The elevations are drawn as if the site is flat, yet the grading plan indicates over 10 feet of grade change from front to back of building. Finish floor and roof ridge elevations must be identified. The parsonage appears to exceed the maximum 35' building height by several feet. The plans indicate several retaining walls "to be designed by others". These walls should be reflected accurately on both site plan and landscape plan and should indicate wall height. The roof material, if other than cedar shake, should be identified. A seating plan must be included to allow parking demand calculations. The parsonage floor plans indicate both a wood stove and a fireplace. These must comply with Town of Avon air quality standards. The type of stone utilized on the church should be identified and a color palette brought to final review. The Special Review Use was approved, in part, because of a dense landscape treatment buffering the parsonage and church from the adjacent townhouse project. The adjacent property owner had objected to the use and was satiated, in part, by STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 3 of 3 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Anointed Christian Fellowship Church Conceptual Design Review the conceptual landscape plan, which included over 40 trees along the west property line of this parcel. STAFF_ RECOMMENDATION As a conceptual review, Staff has no formal comments or recommendation and no formal action will be taken at this time. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, �c(- {� Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 47, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Koehn Residence Landscape Revisions INTRODUCTION: The Koehn residence received final design review approval in July of 1991. The residence is now constructed, final grading is complete and some landscaping has been installed. The Koehns would like to revise their landscape elan now that the final grade is complete and they realize how steep certain portions of the lot are. A revised landscape plan will be presented for Commission review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should review and comment upon the changes. RE30MMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Ccmmission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, {C,C --RL-WA-j Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 47, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Koehn Residence Landscape Revisions PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued((��✓��/�)J, ((Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )(�'� Date j L�\( jCl Patti Dixon, Secretary �]JSL�C nri_r innsid _ hlp and ciiggi- tinnc m d,2 bf the Commi55ian this item was tabled to the November 3, 1992 meeting to allow the applicant time to present a revised landscape plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Christie Lodge Commercial Roof color and Porte Cochere Final Design Review INTRODUCTION As a portion of the ongoing building improvement program at the Christie Lodge, the management has chosen a new roof material and color for the roof areas above the commercial areas of the building. The proposed roof is a metal standing seam material with a 9-1/4" spacing between seams. The color is a Royal Lock Red #3 and a sample is available for review. The management is also proposing an amendment to the existing porte cocheres that flank the lobby area. The "point" of the existing triangular structure will be squared off and a stone base and column will be constructed for support. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff): 2. Applicant Presentation: 3. Commission Review: 4. Commission Action. Respectfully submitted, -I�YC_lAr� Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Christie Lodge Commercial Roof Color and Porte Cochere Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (-111 Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continue��d��( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date_�r 126((\ ? Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commilssion approved the roof color and the porte cochere changes, with a recommendation that the front entrance in some way reflect the battered profile of the two ends. n h le •1 1 Lm s r 1., Lm I ®i