Loading...
PZC Minutes 100692RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on October 6, 1992, at 7:30 PM in the Town Council Chambers, Avon Town Municipal Buildirg, 400 Benchmark Rd., Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Perkins. Members Present: John Perkins, Patti Dixon, Buz Reynolds, Sue Railton, Henry Vest, Jack Hunn, Rhoda Schneiderman Staff Present: Rick Pylman, Director of Community Development; Charlette Pascuzzi, Recording Secretary All members were present. Lot 4 Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivi_s_ion,__Lube _and Car Wash Special Review Use Public Hearing Chairman Perkins stated that there is a request to table this item until a later date. Buz Reynolds move to table this item until the next meeting. Henry Vest seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Lot 25 Block 2. Benchmark at Beavar Creek _Subd_iyison_,___Christie Lodge, Front Yard Setback Variance, Public__ Hearing, andRoofColor Design Review Chairman Perkins stepped down as a voting member due to a conrlict of interest. Jack Hunn, Vice President then presided over the meeting. John Perkins stated that he was not prepared at this time to present the roof color for the design review portion. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 Page 2 of 10 eek__Subdivislony__Christie c_ Heari_ng-(co_ntj Rick Pylman stated that the main entrance to the Christie Lodge is along East Beaver Creek Blvd. He stated that the Town of Avon has taken some of the property for the Streetscape work and actually moved the property line closer to the Christie Lodge building. Therefore, the need for a variance to allow Christie Lodge to install an awning that is 8 feet wide and twelve feet long, which will bring it right to the property line. Pylman then reviewed the criteria for considering a variance request, stating that the transfer of property due to the road widening project certainly presents a legitimate hardship to improving or expanding this elevation of the building. He stated that in an urban environment, such as this location, a sidewalk edge awning makes a very good connection of public and private property. He stated that staff did not feel that this would be a grant of special privilege. Pylman stated that Staff recommends approval of this request. John Perkins stated that he did not think that the awning is actually 8 feet wide. It will probably be 5 to 6 feet wide. Discussion followed on how the awning will be installed. Acting Chairman Hunn then opened the public hearing. With no public input forthcoming, Mr. Hunn then closed the public hearing. Discussion followed on the color of the proposed awning. Mr. Perkins stated that it would be a red, shaded to a rust. It will be the same as the roof color. Also they plan to bring in a new sign program for the building and they hope to have the Subway and the Iron Horse awnings to be the same color. Henry Vest moved to approve the setback variance for Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, citing the following findings: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties classified in the same district; B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; C. That the variance is warranted for the following reason: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 Page 3 of 10 1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcFment of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. Rhoda Schneiderman seconded and the motion carried unanimousl,. Mr. Perkins then resumed his seat as Chairman. Lot 16, Block 1, Wildridge__Subdivision,__ Home Occupation __Sp_ecial Review Use, Public Hearing Rick Pylman stated that Dawn Osoff Andrews is requesting a special review use approval to conduct a home occupation. There will be no client traffic, no signs of any kind, no physical alterations to the premises and no employees. He stated that staff has reviewed the criteria for a special review use approval and staff is recommending approval with the following conditions: 1. The building retain it's residential character by not installing any business signing on the property or the building; 2. This approval is for this specific applicant and this specific use only, at this particular location. The applicant reiterated that there would be no changes in the property, no client traffic, and no signs or employees. Chairman Perkins then opened the public hearing. With no public input forthcoming the Chairman then closed the public hearing. During discussion, it was suggested that a six month trial period be attached, and if no problems arise, the special review be made permanent. Patti Dixon moved to approve the Special Review Use request for a Home Occupation, for Dawn Osoff Andrews, Lot 16, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, with the condition of a review at six months. Jack Hunn seconded. Ms. Dixon amended her motion to include the two Staff conditions. Mr. Hunn seconded the amendment and the motion carried unanimously. Unless there are complaints that have to be reviewed by this Commission during the 6 months, final approval may be accomplished by Staff review. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 Page 4 of 10 Lot 35 Block 3 Wildridae Subdi_vision,_ BrustResidenceL__Design_ Revisions Buz Reynolds stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Rick Pylman stated that in May of this year Clark Brust received final design approval for a single family home in Wildridge. Mr. Brust has identified some revisions that he would like to make. Mr. Pylman stated that a condition upgrading of the landscape plan provided for your review. of the original approval was an This has been done and is Additional windows and doors have been added to the south elevation and a window replaces the glass block; River rock has been revised; The garage is now stucco, rather than cedar siding. The major revision is the change in the grading plan. Much more of the house is exposed and this could cause a height problem. Mr. Brust stated that they feel they have upgraded the project with the changes made. The grading is a problem with the survey that was received when the footprint was put on there. He stated that he thinks that the house is 34 feet. Discussion followed on the possible height problem. Concern was voiced about all the fill that has been left. The applicant stated that he put the fill in there so they would have a way to walk around the house instead of it just being a slope all the way around the house. Discussion followed on the fact that the approved grading plan does not show any of this. Suggestion was made that the applicant needs to do some more manipulation of the grades, because now it looks like a platform and very engineered looking and in no way blends in with the actual topography. Quite a bit of regrading and some retaining walls and other techniques need to be used to try to mitigate the situation. The height needs to be confirmed. Buz Reynolds, the contractor on the project, described the problem with the sewer line that caused the grading problem. It was the general consensus that the applicant must do something to mitigate the platform look and work it into the topography. A new landscape plan and new grading plan should be resubmitted. Also, the height must be verified and if necessary, the applicant will have to submit a variance request. The colors will be: stucco - similar to a Cabot 0143 Cape Cod Grey; the wood - Olympic 726 semi -transparent; Accent band and trim - Cabot Bark 0138 and the roofing material will be Timberline Ultra asphalt product - weatherwood color. Discussion followed on the placement of the river rock. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 Page 5 of 10 Lot 35, Block 3. Wildridge SubdiviE_ion, Brust Pesidence Design Revisions, (cont Rhoda Schneiderman moved to approve all five design revisions as proposed for Lot 35, Block 3, Wildridge, and the alplicant is to resubmit a new grading plan and landscape plan to address the actual height of the building, which should be measured, and to include some sort of screening and rock retaining walls put together with landscape sufficient to mitigate the excessive height, and that the applicant work with staff in determining the height and the possible need for a variance. Patti Dixon seconded. The motion was then amended to include approval of the proposed colors. Dixon seconded the amendment and the motion carried unanimously. Lot 67, Block 1, Wildridge Subdiv,ision1___Hoff Single_ Family_ Residence, Final Design Review Rick Pylman stated that this lot is about a halt acre lot located at the corner of Saddleridge Loop and Fox Lane. The lot slopes away from the road toward the northwest at a 16% grade. The building is a two story design with a two car attached garage. Square footage potential is about 3000 square feet, however the walkout basement is unfinished at this time. The roof form is gable and exterior building materials are cedar siding, stucco and an asphalt shingle roof. Building colors are asteriod grey for the siding, October frost for the stucco and white white for the fascia, soffit, windows and doors. The building meets all setback, building height and site coverage requirements. Statt has concerns with the current driveway grade and alignment. Pylman then reviewed the criteria for considering a final design review. He stated that since this project has not had the benefit of a conceptual design review, the design and arrangement of materials should be reviewed, and appropriate driveway solution must be presented and a specific shingle product should be specified. Pylman stated that with these issues identified, Staff recommends approval of the proposal. Tyler Hoff stated that he thinks that they have worked out the driveway problem. After considerable discussion it was the general consensus of the Commission that this was more at a conceptual level than a final design level. Several suggestions were made for the applicant to consider and it was suggested that this application be tabled at this time. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October- 6, 1992 Page 6 of 10 Lot 67 Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision.Hoff__Single Family Residence Final Design Review. (cont Sue Railton moved to table this application until the October 20, 1992 meeting. Henry Vest seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Sharpf Duplex.Fina_l Rick Pylman stated that Lot 33 is a .73 acre duplex lot that is a flag lot with the building site situated about 200 feet from Flat Point Road. The propoaed duplex meets all setback and building height requirements and has about an 11% site coverage and the unit sizes are about 2200 square feet. The building is a two story hip roof form and predominant building materials are hardboard siding and stucco. The roof will be an asphalt shingle in a weathered wood color. Pylman then reviewed the criteria for considering a final design review. He stated that staff recommends approval of this project. Steve Riden, representing the applicant, stated that he had the colors to be used. Discussion followed regarding concerns on the use of the hardboard siding, the width of the driveway, the pitch of the garage roofs, the height of the garage doors, the window sizes, exterior lighting, and the need of a better drawn landscape plan. Further discussion followed on the garage roof pitch and what could possibly be done and what changes could be made in the windows. Also discussed was the need for an automatic irrigation system. A massing model was also suggested. It was the general consensus of the Commission that there were enough concerns for the applicant to coisider that final design approval should be withheld until the next meeting. Sue Railton moved to table this application until the October 20, 1992 meeting. Jack Hunn seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Lot 55 Block 2 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Two Story Office Building Conceptual Design Review Rick Pylman stated that Lot 55 is now being used as parking for Avon Center. The lot has a very awkward shape to it. The property is zoned Town Center. The allowable uses include PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 Page 7 of 10 ision ` Two Story_ commercial, restaurant, office and residential uses. It is a two story office building and will share access with the Avon Center. Ken Shapiro stated that the primary purpose of the building is to create another retail opportunity for the Town of Avon on an important corner of the Town. They plan to house their newly formed Century 21 offices in the building. They desire is to have the building make an attractive and significant sta'..ement as to the commitment they have for that organization to be a big factor in the community. Since a considerable amount of the discussions were conducted away from the microphones, and several conversations were being conducted at the same time, some of the transcription is impossible. The general discussion was regarding the parking lots and the shared access, etc. There will be underground parking and surface parking. Discussion followed on the architecture of the building and the view of the building from the street. Gordon Pierce described some aspects of the roof design. He stated that they thought that even though it is a small building, they needed to have a very strong building to compliment the larger buildings. He also described the pedestrian ways proposed. The Commission suggestee a massing model be provided at final design review. Discussion followed on how this building will be integrated with the current improvements being installed at the corner location. Discussion followed on proposed signage, awnings and colors, and snow shedding, etc. Discussion followed on the possible need for a variance for the required emergency exit stairway for the underground parking area since the building is already sited at the setback. The Commission stated that they had no problem with this. The applicant stated that when they entered into agreement with the Town for the improvements on the corner they specifically restricted the Town from placing any structure any taller than 36 inches anywhere in the area without their approval. The landscaping compan;• has placed a row of 6 foot hedge like spruce along this area, which will be a shield for the building and not appropriate. They have asked the Town to correct this. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6, 1992 Page 8 of 10 Lot _55 Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver_Creek _Subdivisl_on_,_ Two-story Office Building, conceptual Desiyn_Review, _(cant) The Commission generally considered this proposed building as very appropriate for this location and encouraged the applicant to proceed. Reading and Approval_ of the Planning_and_Z_oning Commi_ssi_on_Meetin_g Minutes for September 15, 1992 Jack Hunn moved to approve the minutes for the September 15, 1992 meeting as submitted. Henry Vest seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Other Business Lot 33, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision,_ Sharpf Duplex_- Final Design Review Tony Shrapf returned to the meeting and requested that the Commission reconsider their action of tabling this item and requested that they grant final design review approval. The Commission reiterated that there were too many concerns that need to be considered before final design review could be granted, therefore, their decision to table would stand. Lots 2 and 4. Sunroad Subdivision Denny's Restaurant, Requested_ Changes Rick Pylman stated that these changes arm coming from the owner. He reviewed the history of the ownership of the proposed Denny's Restaurant, stating that there is a new owner from the one at the time of design review. The owners do not like the driveway configuration and they want to square it off a bit. They are working with Alpine Engineering and will be working with Norm Wood also to accomplish this. The Commission had no problem with this. They would like to remove the berm away from the building for better drainage. They would increase the species sizes to compensate. The Commission had no problem. They would like to add more parking. The Commission felt that if the applicant could get permission from the Highway Department to plant landscaping in the right-of-way, then the extra parking would work. The applicant would like to eliminate the wall between the entrances. The Commission feels that the wall was an integral part of the design and do not want it removed. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 6. 1992 Page 9 of 10 Lot 47, Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision, Koehn Re., uace _Landscape Plan Discussion Rick Pylman stated that the landscape plan doesn't match reality. The applicant feels that he cannot do anything with the steep slope. The Commission feels that he needs to expand on what he has already done. The Commission stated that the applicant needs basically to fill in all the blank areas. The slope could be managed by terracing and by the use of retaining walls. The applicant needs to present a completed landscape plan to the Commission for approval. Lot 25 Block 2. Benchmark at Beaver_Creek__Subd>_v_lso_n_,__Iron Horse Pizza Banner Rick Pylman stated that the sign for Iron Horse Pizza has been taken down for the installation of the new siding and now he has no signage. They have a banner that he uses as a vender in the park for special events, etc., and would like to plit up this banner until he is able to reinstall his sign. He cannot put it on the building, therefore, he would like to put it out on the street side grass. The Commission felt that he should be allowed o pus up the banner at this time. Ethics Code Rick Pylman encouraged that the Commission study the Ethics Code which has been included in the packets, as it will effect all members. The meeting was then adjourned at 10:10 PM. Respectfully, submitted. Charlette Pascuzzi Recording Secretary • I � v � 1� . , 1 7 4 T;� ". � -:. _ � 1 .. r _ z f �•� !. �G. � .�. 4��f Lf e f t } �ir� ,,. 1 }i i �` .. a }_�• �.. � r 3 ,,. t —', • . - � ,. �. .' — . A