PZC Packet 091592STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Lot 18, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Railton Duplex
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION
John Railton is requesting final design approval for a duplex
to be built on Lot 18, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. The
Planning and Zoning Commission first saw a schematic concept
of this building while reviewing and approving a front
setback variance for this lot. The final design does follow
the provisions of the setback variance.
The A unit has 1658 square feet of habitable area and the B
unit has 2900 square feet of habitable area. The roof is a
metal panel, siding is 1" x 8" cedar with stucco and moss
rock as accent elements. Windows will be metal clad with
cedar trim. All colors will be submitted on a sample board
at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
There is a complete landscape and irrigation plan.
Unit B shows a deck encroaching into the Metcalf Ditch
easement that runs across the rear of the property. The deck
encroachment must be eliminated, or an encroachment easement
must be granted prior to issuance of a building permit.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: This project was granted a setback variance in
March of this year. The current design complies with the
provisions of the variance as well as with all other aspects
of the Zoning Code, with the exception of a deck on Unit B
which encroaches into a ditch easement.
6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including
type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Page 2 of 3
Lot 18, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Railton Duplex
Final Design Review
COMMENT: The type and quality of the materials are
compatible with the neighborhood and with the design
guidelines of the Town of Avon.
6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties.
COMMENT: The design is very compatible with adjacc^*•
properties.
6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with
site topography.
COMMENT: The improvements work very well with site
topography.
6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed
improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
COMMENT: The appearance of these improvements, from
private or public properties is positive.
6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar
or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary
or aesthetic gill be impaired.
COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria.
6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed
improvements with Lhe adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of
the Town of Avon.
COMMENT: The proposal is in complete conformance with
the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this design review with the
following conditions:
1. A color board be presented and approved.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Page 3 of 3
Lot 18, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Railton Duplex
Final Design Review
2. The encroaching deck on Unit B be eliminated if approval
from the easement holder is not granted.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
WC-C��
Rick Pylman
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTIONN
Approved as submitted ( — Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continue ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Date Patti Dixon, Secretary
The Commis ion granted final design approval as submitted, and included
the recommendation that the easement holder for the Metcalf Ditch grant approval
for the deck encroachment into the easement.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P.
PUD Amendment/Zone Change
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION
Tony Seibert, on behalf of SLB -200 Partners, L.P., is
proposing to amend the Eaglebend PUD Development Plan for the
purpose of changing the existing zoning and lot configuration
of Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision.
The zoning plat for the Eaglebend PUD shows that the PUD is
divided into six Subareas. Lots 13 and 14 are located in
Subarea 5. The development standards for Subarea 5 are as
follows:
Maximum building height
= 35'
Maximum building area ratio
= 50%
Minimum open space
= 25%
Minimum setbacks
= 25' - front
10' - rear
7.5' - side
Allowed uses
= A single family or a duplex
building and accessory
buildings and uses.
Minimum lot size
= Although not specifically
listed on the zoning plat,
it is important to note
that none of the 19 lots in
Area 5 are less than 16,000
sq. ft. in size.
Mr. Seibert's requested
PUD Amendment includes both a
rezoning and the replatting
of Lots 13 and 14. Each of the
lots are currently 0.37 of
an acre in size (16,008 sq. ft.).
The requested action would
create one large lot zoned for
four units. The setbacks
to the exterior property lines
would remain the same, as
would the rest o; the development
standards, however, the removal
of the interior lot line
allows more flexibility
in locating structures. The
developer's intent is to
develop four single family
residences instead of two duplex
structures, as detailed in
the architectural drawings
and site plan.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZGNING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Page 2 of 4
Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P.
PUD Amendment/Zone Change
Public Hearing
STAFF COMMENTS
The following criteria as listed in Section 17.21.080 of the
Avon Zoning Cede, shall be considered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission when reviewing a propo:ced PUD
Amendment/Zone Change application.
A. Is the proposed rezoning .justified by changed
or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed
to be rezoned?
STAFF RESPONSE: On May 5, 1992, the Eaglebend
Partnership received approval of a PUD Amendment for Tract B,
Eaglebend Subdivision. The approved development plan allows
up to 21 single family residences on the 3.19 acre tract.
The average density of this section of land, located on the
north side of Eaglebend Drive, is 6,600 sq. ft. each. The 19
lots on the south side of Eaglebend Drive (Filing 1) are all
a minimum of 16,000 sq. ft. each. No changes in the
character of the lots in Filing 1 have occurred since the
Subdivision was originally annexed into the Town in 1987.
B. Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the
Town's Comprehensive Plan?
STAFF RESPONSE: Goal #A3 and Objective AI(a) (Land
Use) and Objective I1(b) (Image Design) in the Avon
Comprehensive Plan seem particularly relevant to this
application. They are as follows:
GOAL #A3 - Upon full development of the community, all land
uses should work together as a balanced system.
OBJECTIVE #A1 - (a) Identify the appropriate scale of
development for each area of Town.
OBJECTIVE #I1 - (b) Strengthen the Town's design standards
to ensure tha development will be appropriate in scale,
intensity, and character. Emphasis shall be placed on
architecture, landscaping, streetscape, and signage.
Staff does not feel that the proposed development plan for
Lots 13 and 14 serves to further any of the goals and
objectives contained in the Avon Comprehensive Plan.
s
•
•
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Page 3 of 4
Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Toney Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. r
PUD Amendment/Zone Change
Public Hearing
C. Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding ab
uses?
STAFF RESPONSE: Although single family homes are
certainly a compatible use on this parcel of land, the
proposed configuration of buildings on this plan is very
tight. In the opinion of Staff, the four single family homes
do not fit well on site in a manner compatible with the
neighborhood. if single family homes are desired on these
lots, it appears that only three will fit.
D. Are adequate facilities available to serve
deve'opment for the type and scope suggested by the proposed
use:
STAFF RESPONSE: Adequate facilities are available
tD serve the proposed development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the requested PUD Amendment/Zone
Change request for Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1,
Eaglebend Subdivision.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Consideration by Commission
6. Act on Request
Respectfully submitted,
r--;) Iq
Rick Pylman
Director of Community Development
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Page 4 of 4
Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P.
PUD Amendment/ZoneChange
Public Hearing
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ) Denied ( ) Withdra
DatePatti Dixon, Secretary
The Commission tabled this zone change request until the October 20, 1992
meeting to allow the applicant time to revise the siting of the buildings
and architecture of the buildings and requested that the applicant pin the
locations so that the Commission can see them on a site visit.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 15, 1992
Lot 17, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Cliffrose Townhomes
KSO Development
Landscape Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
On September 1, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission tabled
this application to allow the apt'icant time to provide a more
accurate siting of the building on the landscape plan and to add
the landscaping as suggested by the Commission.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
review and discussion of revised landscape plan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Presentation of Application
2. Applicant's Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Pylman
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
Approved as submitted ( .) Approved with Recommended
Conditions (-- l Approved with Modified Conditions ( )
Cont.inueyi ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (
Date �Patti Dixon, SecretarJ
SEE ATTACHED PAGE
Lot 17, Blk 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Cliffrose Townhomes
Landscape Design Review
The Commission granted design approval for the landscape plan with the
Following conditions:
1. Add 6 dogwood bushes to the southwest section.
2. A minimum of 6' for the spruce trees.
3. A minimum of 2" caliper for the aspens.
4. A Wildflower/Hydro Seed mix be used.
5. Diversify the plan by moving some of the clumps away from the
building.
6. Use narrow leaf, 2" minimum caliper cottonwoods.
The approval also carried a suggestion that the applicant consider varying the
sizes of all plant materials, maintaining the minimuns.