Loading...
PZC Minutes 090192RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on September 1, 1992, at 7:30 PM in the Town Council Chambers, Avon Town Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Rd., Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Perkins. Members Present: John Perkins, Patti Dixon Sue Railton, Jack Hunn Rhoda Schneiderman, Henry Vest Buz Reynolds Staff Present: Jim Curnutte, Town Planner Rick Pylman, Director of Community Development, Charlette Pascuzzi, Recording Secretary All members were present except Buz Reynolds. Mr. Reynolds arrived at 7:37 PM. Jim Curnutte stated that this aplication was tabled at the last meeting to this meeting and the applicant has requested that this item be tabled once again, as they are not ready with a revised presentation. Sue Railton moved to table this application to the next meeting, Henry Vest seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Lot 8, Block 2, WildridgeSubdivision. Jorck Residence Material_ Change Request Jim Curnutte stated that in August 1987, Connie Behmlander received final design review approval for a single family home on Lot 8, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. The approval included a concrete block foundation with river rock face. The applicant would like to eliminate the river rock facing on the concrete block foundation wall. He did install it in the front on either' side of the garage. The applicant would like to leave the rest of the foundation the way it is or possibly paint it. Curnutte stated that another change is the stairs. They were supposed to go right up the front, right off the driveway, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 2 of 8 Lot E Block 2. Wildridge Subdivision.,orck Resi_d.ence�_ Material Change Request (cont) directly up to the deck. Due to the topography, it did lend itself to a natural stone stepping stairs going ap and around to the side, so the front stairs have been eliminated. Curnutte reviewed the history of this house, stating that it has not yet received a CO, although it has been occupied for five years. Mr. Jorck called for a final inspection, and that was when it was noticed that the siding on the concrete block isn't done, the stairs are not as approved and the driveway is not paved. The applicant would like approval on the change for the foundation wall and the st4irs, and will provide a letter of credit for the driveway paving. Rhoda Schneiderman moved to approve the applicants request to eliminate the river rock with the condition that the concrete block be parged and painted ar Arizona Clay color, and that the removal of the stairway be approved, and that a letter of credit be provide to assure that the driveway will be paved by June 30, 1993. Henry Vest seconded, and the motion carried with John Perkins and Jack Hunn voting nay. Jim Curnutte stated that Hector Montero is requesting permission to run a business out of his home. The buisness involves computer repairs, programming and upgrades, software sales, and troubleshooting. The sales would not happen in the home. All packages related to the business are received at mail boxes, no customers come to the home, and there are no employees. Work at the home is limited to a few comp iters, and a small workbench. The owner of the property, Damon Pap, signed the application for this request, therefore giving his consent. Curnutte then reviewed the criteria for reviewing a home occupation special review use. Staff recommends approval of the home occupation special review use with the condition that the applicant not install any business signs. Chairman Perkins then opened the public hearing. With no public input forthcoming and no letters or phone calls received, the Chairman then closed the public hearing. After some discussion, Patti Dixon moved to approve the special review use request for a home occupation at Lot 8, Block 1, Wildridge Subcivision, with the condition that this special review PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 3 of 8 i use applys only as long as the applicant resides in this particular home, and based on criteria A, B,and C., and also with the condition that the applicant not install an; business signing on the property or the building. Sue Railton seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Lot 6 Block 1. Wildridge Subdivision Sunflower Townhonies Final Design Review Jim Curnutte stated that this application is for two tri-plexes. The driveway is 18' wide. There are 24 parking spaces. Each of the units are 4 bedroom units with about 1600 sq. ft. of habitable area, 7 car garages, and gas fireplaces. Building height is about 35' above finished grade. Exterior building materials are similar to the o`.her two projects that this applicant has done (Lots 46 and 17). A landscape plan has been provided, and a grading plan. An automatic sprinkler system is proposed on this lot. Curnutte then reviewed the comments made by t;ie Commission at conceptual design review. He then reviewed the criteria for considering a final design review. Staff recommendation is for approval with the following conditions: 1. The landscape legend must be amended to include the minimum material sizes specified by the Planning and Zoning Commission at conceptual design review. 2. Spot elevations must be added to each of the units highest ridgelines in order to more accuretly assess maximum building height above existing or finished grade. Dan Karzen stated that there would be no problem in complying with the staff conditions. Discussion on the colors followed. They will be a heritage blue for the siding and a navajo white. The roof will be the weathered wood asphalt shingle. Discussion followed on the types and amounts and sizes of the landscaping. Discussion followed on the placements of the utility meters. Discussion followed on the driveway grade and possible need for a retaining wall. Sue Railton moved to grant final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The landscape legend be amended to include the minimum material sizes of 2" caliper for decidious trees, 6' evergreen PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 4 of 8 Lot 6, Block i. Wildridse Subdivision, Sunflower Townhomes, Final Design Review,(cont) trees and 5 gallon shrubs. 2. Spot elevations must be. added to each of the units highest ridgelines in order to more accurately assess maximum building height abDve existing or finished grade. 3. Fin, -,l approval by Town Engineer of the grading and drainage plan. 4. The garage doors be painted to match the siding color. 5. The gas meters be ganged between the buildings and the electrical meters be covered. 6. The roof projections be painted to match the color of the roof. Patti Dixon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Jim Curnutte stated that the applicant will be back at a later date regarding the color change. At this time, only the landscaping will be discussed. He stated that this proposal received conceptual design review on May E,, 1992, and on May 19, 1992, was denied final design approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. That decision was overturned by the Town Council on May 26, 1992, with the condition that the applicant return to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a final review and approval of a landscape plan for the project. The applicant has provided a new landscape plan for the Commission's review. Dan Karzen stated that the soils report recommended against an automatic irrigation system. Discussion followed on the need for more landscaping than what is proposed, due to the site being so visible and the types of plants to be used. Discussion on where mowable sod should be placed followed. Discussion followed on the topography as shown, and the fact that the placement of the building on the site/landscape plan doesn't reflect the actual siting of the building. Buz Reynolds moved to table this application. Jack Hunn seconded and the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 5 of 8 Jim Curnutte stated that this is a very conceptual design review. At the time of writing the staff report, no plans had been submitted. Curnutte reviewed the sizes of the two lots and the zoning which is Industrial/Commercial. He stated that the first two levels of each of the buildings is comprised of warehouse and office space and the third level will be mini storage. There will be two three story building, each about 22,000 sq. ft., 41 foot building height. The building is similar to the Mountain Center building in terms of having first lave] access at grade on the front side of the building and access to the second story on the back side. There are 60 parking spaces on the site, in two parking areas. There is an access aisle between the two buildings that is at 12% grade that will be heated. The purpose of this review is to get a feeling from the Commission regarding the proposed project, before closing on the property. Mark Donaldson stated that there is approximately 46,000 square feet of gross enclosed building area. Also, there are about 72 parking spaces on site. He stated that they are not trying to attract any retail. They are looking at shops, warehousing storage, subcontractor type spaces, etc. Mr. Connor is going to offer about. 60-70% of these spaces for sale on a condominium basis. Mr. Donaldson proceeded to describe the concept of the project. He described how they calculated the parking. T. J. Connor stated that they believe that they can build this building and office/warehouse condominimize it and sell it, to the user so that he can be put on s monthly payment plan that will allow him to own his space in ten years. They feel it will be good for the economy of Avon. So far he has strong interest from several people. He feels that there is a demand for this type of project. Considerable discussion followed on the types of businesses to ue allowed; parking for large trucks; the possibility of berming to hide some of the parking; possible signage; the roofline; snow shed; snow storage; the possibility of covering between the buildings; and the access, etc. Due to many conversations being conducted at the same time, transcription is difficult. Discussion followed on the turning radius for trucks; the retaining walla; and site lighting. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 6 of 8 Lots 14 and 15, Block 1, Benc Business Center/Storage Facilit Conceptual Design Review (conil As this was a conceptual design review, at this time. The Commission did seem appropriate project for this site. no formal action was taken to feel that this was an Lot 56E, Block 2. Wildridge Subdivision, Amadee Residence. Remodel Design Review Jim Curn!!tte stated that this application was reviewed at the last meeting. At that tine, the Commission had some concerns and therefore tabled this item and asked the applicant to consider the following: 1. Look for ways to break up the massing of the large south wall; 2. The east wall is very plain, consider adding windows and/or landscaping; 3. Consider stepping the building down the hill to provide more relief The Commission felt that it is an acceptable idea to fill in the arches, but not a: shown at the last meeting. Also the Commission would strongly urge the west half neighbor to consider doring the same. Curnutte stated that in response to the above, additional landscaping has been added to the east and south sides of the building in the following sizes, 10 - 3" caliper aspens, 2 - 6'-8' Spruce, 20 - 5 gallon shrubs, and an automatic irrigation system Vas been added. Also, two additional windows have beer added to the east facing wall, the stairs have been partially enclosed and a roof has been added over the stairwell to help break up the massing of the south wall, and the deck railings have been changed from being enclosed with siding to horizontal metal rail. Due to the discussions being conducted awa; from the microphones and with several discussions going on at the same time, it is impossible to transcribe clear information. Jack Hunn stated he would like to see the applicant work with the neighbor to do the same to get rid of the archr.s. Mark Donaldson stated that the applicant has been tryin; to work with the neighhor since June, and the neighbor is refusing to do anything. They have given the applicant permission to do what they want to do, but they will not participate. It was suggested that some -d..." PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 7 of 8 Lot 56E Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision, AmedeeResidence, Remodel Design Review,(cont) trees be planted along the other side to cover the arches, but as that is private property this idea is not feasible. Considerable discussion followed on how they would get equipment down to do the work, and how much natural vegetation will be distu,-bed. Discussion followed on the changes on the south wall. Some concern was voiced about remodeling o,ie side of a duplex and not the other. Sue Railton moved to approve the remodel request, with the conditions: 1. If existing grades are being substantially altered as a result of the construction of this addition, the applicant provide a grading plan for Staff review when a building permit application is made. 2. A minimum of on and off site disturbance and revegetation. Rhoda Schneiderman seconded. Discussion followed on what will be done with the soil to be removed and the Commission felt it would be alright to put it around the sides. 3. The underside of the deck be stained. 4. The irrigation system to cover existing and new landscaping. Rhoda Schneiderman seconded the amendments to the motion. The motion carried with Henry Vest voting nay. Reading and Approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 18, 1992 Patti Dixon moved to approve the minutes of the August 18, 1992 meeting as submitted. Buz Reynolds seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Other Business Jim Curnutte stated that the owners of the Benchmark Mobile Home Park is proposing to install a new fence arou!id the park. He provided a photo of the type of fence it would be and stated that it would be painted grey. The Commission agreed that this would be a considerable improvement. Discussion followed on it being stained and treated so that it doesn't rot out. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES September 1, 1992 Page 8 of 8 Other Business. (cont) Curnutte then stated that the residents of Gosshawk have requested that a fence be installed to block the view of the Wildwood Townhomes from their complex. The cost of the fence will be shared with the Town. Curnutte stated the fence will be 4 x 4 posts, with 3- 2 x 4 horizontal rails and 1 x 6 cedar uprights. The fence will be on the Gosshawk property, with the good side facing the back of the Wildwood Townhomes. The Commission had no problems with this project. Buz Reynolds moved to adjourn, Rhoda Schneiderman seconded and the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 PM. Respectfully submitted. Charlette Pascuzzi Recording Secretary Commission Appr v 1 J. Perkins ReynoldsA. P. Dixon JZ Hunn to CLAQ'/�