Loading...
PZC Packet 081892STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Lot 43, Block L, Wildridge Subdivision Canyon Oaks Subdivision, Unit #4 Building Color Change Request Design Review INTRODUCTION: On May 21, 1991, Mark Harrison received final design approval for four single family residences on Lot 43, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. The approved plans showed that all four buildings would have white trim on grey or brown backgrounds. Three of the four buildings include cedar scallop siding on their large gable ends. As approved, these scallops are to be painted the same color as the rest of the buildings' siding. The new owner of the house on Lot 4 has requested approval of the following changes to the home on Lot 4: 1. The building trim is dark green rather than white. 2. The scallops have been finished with a clear sealant/protectant rather than painted to match the building siding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and discussion of proposed building color change request. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, ),�� C,-�� Jim Curnutte Town Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 43, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Canyon Oaks Subdivision, unit #4 Building Color Change Request Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ") Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) \ 3' �; Date ;�h ,'�,y Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission approved this request as submitted STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for Design and Construction Services Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Tony Seibert, on behalf of Design and Construction Services, is requesting design review of two proposed single family residences. These units will be located on two single family Lots (14A and 14C) which are on either side of a new duplex Lot (14B), all of which are currently known as Lots 13 ai.d 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. Mr. Seibert has submitted a PUD Amendment/Zone Change application to rezone Lots 13 and 14 from two duplex lots to two single family lots and one duplex lot. All three of these lots are intended to function as a comprehensive compound with cross drives and walkways. Since we have not received elevation drawings of the proposed development on Lot 14B this review will be limited to the two single family residences on Lots 14A and 14C. The two buildings on Lots 14A and 14C are intended to be identical mirror images of each other architecturally. Exterior building materials and colors will also be identical. The buildings are two stories high with walkout basements. Maximum building height scales off at 35' on the elevation drawings, however, their true building height from existing or finished grade cannot be determined due to the lack of a grading/drainage plan. The size of the units is approximately 3,750 square feet, not including the two car garages. Each unit has two large decks and a gas fireplace. No basement floor plan has been provided with this submittal. Exterior building materials are as follows: - Roof - Cedar shake shingles (natural) - Siding - 8" cedar channel lap siding (grey) - Trim - 1" x 4" cedar (green) - Fascia - 2" x 12" cedar (green) - Sof'its - Cedar (grey) - Windows - Metal clad wood (white) - Doors - 8 panel wood (natural) - Deck Rails - Metal with 2" x 6" redwood cap (black) - Flues - Glavanized metal - nriveways - Asphalt with concrete walkways A landscape plan has been provided for the Commission's review, however, no grading and drainage plan has been provided. The landscape plan shows a good mixture of trees and shrubs. An automatic underground irrigation system will be provided to all landscaped areas. The plan shows that all portions of the properties will be covered with sod. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1. Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for ^ar-ign and Construction Services Conceptual Design Review STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal acticn will be taken at this time. However, Staff has the following comments: 1. Since the three lots are obviously intended to function cohesively, the Planning and Zoning Commission may want to consider delaying this conceptual review until the plans for Lot 14B have been provided. A site massing model is called out in both the PUD Amendment section and the design guidelines. 2. A complete grading and drainage plan, prepared and certified by a professional engineer or surveyor, as required by Section 2.44 of the Avon Design Guidelines, must accompany the final design application. The grading and drainage plan must include an accurate location of the Eagle River as well well as the 100 year floodplain (to determine required 30' setback). 3. The site plan shows decks within the 7.5 foor setback and utility easement zone. These decks must be removed from the setback and utility easement zone on the final design site plan. 4. Although not apart of this application staff would point out that the proposed building on lot 14B will not meet the Towns definition of a duplex. RECOMMENDED ACT1t�I1 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfu'ily submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing INTRODUCTION Tony Seibert, on behalf of SLB -200 Partners, L.P., is proposing to amend the Eaglebend PUD Development Plan for the purpose of changing the existing zoning and lot configuration of Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. The zoning plat for the Eaglebend PUD shows that the PUD is divided into six Subareas. Lots 13 and 14 are located in Subarea 5. The development standards for Subarea 5 are as follows: Maximum building height Maximum building area ratio Minimum open space Minimum setbacks Allowed uses Minimum lot size 35' 50% = 25% = 25' - front 10' - rear 7.5' - side A single family or a duplex building and accessory buildings and uses. Although not specifically listed on the zoning plat, it is important to note that none of the 19 lots in Area 5 are less than 16,000 sq. ft. in size. Mr. Siebert's requested PUD Amendment involves both a rezoning and the replatting of Lots 13 and 14. Each of the lots are currently 0.37 of an acre in size (16,008 sq. ft.). The applicant desires to resubdivide these two lots into s lots. The allowed uses on two of the new lots will be limited to a single family residence with the remainin lot allowing for a single family or a duplex building. The rest of the existing development standards for Area 5 will remain unchanged. STAFF COMMENTS The following criteria, as listed in Section 17.28.080 of the Avon Zoning Code, shall be considered by the Planning and STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 2 of 4 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing Zoning Commission when reviewing a proposed Amendment/Zone Change application. A. Is the proposed or changing conditions in the to be rezoned? OR rezoning justified by changed character of the area proposed STAFF RESPONSE: On May 5, 1992, the Eaglebend Partnership received approval of a PUD Amendment for Tract B, Eaglebend Subdivision. The approved development plan allows up to 21 single family residences on the 3.19 acre tract. The average density of this section of land, located on the north side of Eaglebend Drive, is 6,600 sq. ft. each. The 19 lots on the south side of Eaglebend Drive (Filing 1) are all a minimum of 16,000 sq. ft. each. No changes in the character of the lots in Filing 1 have occurred since the Subdivision was originally annexed into the Town in 1987. B. Is the proposed rezoning consistcnt with the Town's Comprehensive Plari? STAFF RESPONSE: Goal #A3 and ObjecLive AI(a) (Land Use) and Objective I1(b) (Image Design) in the Avon Comprehensive Plan seem particularly relevant to this application. They are as follows: GOAL #A3 - Upon full development of the community, all land uses should work together as a balanced system. OBJECTIVE #A1 - (a) Identify the appropriate scale of development for each area of Town. OBJECTIVE #I1 - (b) Strengthen the Town's design standards to ensure tha development will be appropriate in scale, intensity, and character. Emphasis shall be placed on architecture, landscaping, streetscape, and signage. Staff does not feel that the proposed development plan for Lots 13 and 14 serves to further any of the goals and objectives contained in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Toney Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing C. Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses? STAFF RESPONSE: Although single family homes are certainly a compatible use of Lots 13 and 14, the proposed reduced lot size and configuration of buildings on the three lots is very atypical of what has occurred in Filing 1 thus far. The two buildings on Lot 14B, with one by the river and one directly in front of it by the road are out of character with the existing development and not in conformance with the Town's definition of a duplex. D. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed use? STAFF RESPONSE: Adequate facilities are available to serve the proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the requested PUD Amendment/Zone Change request for Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Consideration by Commission 6. Act on Request Respectfully submitted, ),4�� c,V� Jim Curnutte Town Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Toney Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/Zone Change Public Hearing C. Is the proposed use compatible with surrounding uses? STAFF RESPONSE: Although single family homes are certainly a compatible use of Lots 13 and 14, the proposed reduced lot size and configuration of buildings on the three lots is very atypical of what has occurred in Filing , thus far. The two buildings on Lot 14B, with one by the river and one directly in front of it by the road are out of character with the existing development and not in conformance .iith the Town's definition of a duplex. D. Are adequate faciliti:-,. available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed use? STAFF RESPONSE: Adequate facilities are available to sArve the proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the requested PUD Amendment/Zone Change request for Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Consideration by Commission 6. Act on Request Re0spectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 4 of 4 Lots 13/14, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Tony Seibert for SLB -200 Partners, L.P. PUD Amendment/ZoneChange Public Hearing PLANNING AND 'ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) withdrawn Date 1 _Patti Dixon, Secretary After considerable discussion durincl which the rommicciOn voiced many _ concerns and Provided severd] suagestions..the CommissiQ.13 tabled this - pro A STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Lot 56E, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Amadee Residence Remodel/Design Review INTRODUCTION The duplex on Lot 56E, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision received final design review approval on July 12, 1984. The owner of the east side of the building wishes to remodel his unit for the purpose of adding an additional level below the twD existing levels of the building. The lower level addition will include a new master bedroom and bath, family room and small bathroom. A new 6' x 23' redwood balcony will also be added to the south side of the building. This balcony will include three double 2" x 6" diagonal braces for support and stairs to grade. The lower level addition walls will be finished with stucco to match the existing stucco on the building. New sliding glass door and clad windows will be added to the building's south side and one clad window (bathroom) will be added to the east side. The proposed addition effectively eliminates 2 and 1/3 of the arches on the south side of the building and the two arches on the east side of the building. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following ite,ns in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance witn the zoning code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The building materials proposed for use on this addition match those currently used on the building. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. STAFF REPORT TO August 18, 1992 Page 2 of 3 THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION Lot 56E, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Amadee Residence Remodel/Design Review COMMENT: The proposed addition will not have any detrimental site impacts to adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The finished floor of the lower level of the building is currently 18' to 20' above grade. The new addition would seem to have the effect of tying the building into the land rather than hovering above it. The new lower level walls will be supported on a foundation, however, no revised grading plan has been provided to show how existing grades will be altered. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this addition from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. No additional landscaping has been proposed around the addition. It would appear that the appearance of the east side of the building would benefit from the addition of a few trees. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.11 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this design review with the following conditions: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 3 of 3 Lot 56E, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Amadee Residence Remodel/Design Review 1. If existing grades are being substantially altered as a result of the construction of this addition, the applicant should provide a grading plan for Staff review when a building permit application is made. 2. Additional landscaping be added along the south and east sides of the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date_Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission tabled this item to allow the applicant time to address the concerns regarding the massive blank wall and the lack of a grading and frainage plan. _ STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Lot 50, Block 1, Schaub Duplex Building and Site INTRODUCTION: Wildridge Subdivision Design Revision Wally Schaub is requesting approval of certain building and site design revisions for his project on Lot 50, B',ock 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Specifically, Mr. Schaub would like to amend his project as follows: 1. The approved plans call for the synthetic stucco on the first level of the building to be tan. Mr. Schaub is requesting that the stucco color be allowed to remain the existing light grey. 2. Mr. Schaub would like to eliminate certain first leve. building trim. 3. Mr. Schaub feels that most of the treated timber and boulder retaining walls shown on his approved site plan are unnecessary. He is proposing to eliminate all retaining walls except those along the east side and southeast corner of the house. Mr. Schaub will regrade all areas where retainage was shown to a slope of less than 50%. He also intends to install considerably more landscaping along the driveway and north side of the house than the previous plan showed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and discussion of proposed building ans site design revisions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 50, Clock 1, Wildridge Subdivision Schaub Duplex Building and Site Design Revisions RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted: A�� CW7-4� Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary � SEE ATTACHED PAGE August 18, 1992 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Lot 50, Block ivision. Schaub Duolex. Buildinq and Site The Commission granted approval to this request with the following conditions: 1. The stucco be painted the original color of tan and the garage doors should also be painted. The tan picked should be a shade lighter than the wood trim. 2. Building trim will be installed on lower level doors and windows and around the garage doors to match upper level trim, however, trim on the corners may be eliminated. 3. Additional landscape plan will be submitted to Staff, which will include drainage plan for the north side of the driveway to eliminate drainage into the adjacent property and the addition of materials throughout the property, but most importantly along the full driveway on both sides. 4. The vertical cut along the full length of the driveway on the south side will be filled and smoothed to look like a natural grade. 7 •1 •1 STAF =PORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Augur 18, 1992 Lot 17, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Cliffrose Townhomes (formerly Fireridge) KSO Development Landscape Plan Design Review INTRODUCTION: At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 5, 1992, KSO Development received conceptual review of a proposed four-plex building (Fireridge Townhomes) on Lot. 17, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. On May 19, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied KSO's request for final design review approval. The Commission's motion for denial stated that the project did not comply with the following design review criteria: 6.13 - Compatibility of the design to minimize impact on adjacent properties. 6.15 - The visual appearance of the project as viewed from adjacent and Neighboring properties and public ways. 6.25 - Item #4 - Repetitious design characteristics are discouraged. KSO Development Group appealed the Planning and Zoning Commissi( decision to the Avon Town Council on May 26, 1992. The Council overturned the Planning and Zoning Commission by a 4-2 vote with the condition that KSO return to the Planning and Zoning Commission for final review and approval of a landscape plan for the project. KSO has submitted a revised landscape plan for the Commission's review. The plan shows a good mixture of trees (decidious and coniferous) and shrubs. All disturbed areas will be reseeded with a native grass seed mix. The plan states that automatic irrigation is riot recommended, per the soils report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and discussion of proposed landscape plan. If approved by the Commission, Staff would point out that the grading and drainage plan must be amended to reflect the approved landscape plan (limit of disturbed area, new berm, etc.) STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 18, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 17, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Cliffrose Townhomes (formerly Fireridge) KSO Development Landscape Plan Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, )�4� cz�� Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (�) Date �J� ��_Patti Dixon, Secretary The applicant withdraw this application prior to the meeting.