Loading...
PZC Packet 050592STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Tract B, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend SPA Amendment Public Hearing INTRODUCTION The Eaglebend area was annexed into the Town of Avon in the mid 1980's. The entire area was zoned SPA and a zoning plat assigning density and listing allowable uses was adopted. Eaglebend Filing No. 2, Lot 1, Block 1, was zoned for 32 units and the allowed uses are Duplex, Multi -family Dwellings, Condominiums, Townhouses, Apartments and accessory buildings and uses. In 1991, the Town of Avon adopted a new zoning ::ode which requires a specific development plan for all SPA/PUD properties prior to development. The Eaglebend Partnership is the current owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Filing 2. Two single family homes were built on the parcel and their lots were subdivided off. The main parcel is now legally described as Tract B. The Eaglebend Partnership would like to continue building and selling single family homes on Tract B. This requires two actions from the Town of Avon, in the form of a PUD amendment. The zoning plat must be amendea to add single family as an allowed use and a specific development plan must be approved as described in Chapter 17.20.110 of the Avon Zoning Code. The development plan for the Alpines at Eaglebend consists of a site plan for Tract B, a PUD guide, and architectural plans for four different house types. The plan calls for 19 additional single family lots. The minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet, each lot will share a driveway with at least one other lot, for a maximum of nine road cuts. The actual property lines will not be created at this time, the exact lot configuration will depend upon the unit type constructed on the parcel. Each iot will be created by minor subdivision after a building permit is issued. The PUD guide lists the allowed and special uses and development standards including building height and setbacks. The applicant has submitted four different home types for construction within the PUD, with four different; color schemes. No two identical houses will be built adjacent to one another. The developer would like to receive design STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 6 Tract B, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend SPA Amendment Public Hearing review approval for the four homes, the color schemes, and a typical landscape plan and then proceed to construction. The developer would then be able to mix and match house type and color scheme as the market allows, with no further design review approvals necessary. Any architectural revision or deviation from the approved color scheme would require aditional design review approval. STAFF COMMENTS Section 17.20.110 (14) of the Avon Town Code lists eleven criteria that a development plan must meet. The following paragraphs compare this proposal to those criteria. 1. Conformity with the Avon Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. COMMENT: This type of low density single family development meets an important housing goal for the Town of Avon. Goal #C1 of the Comprehensive Plan states "Provide for an appropriate mix of residential dwelling unit types for both permanent residents and tourists". The staff views this type of housing as a very good opportunity for local buyers to purchase a single family home in Avon. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the Town of Avon,, the Sub -Area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The density and scale of this project, are in conformance with the Town's design guidelines. 3. Design compatibillity with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. COMMENT: The single family type of development is much more c npatible with the adjacent development then any type of town,. ase or multi -family development would be. The specific architecture of the units will be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, but appears STAFF REPORT May 5, 1992 Page 3 of 6 TO THE PLANNING ANS ZONING COMMISSION Tract B, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend SPA Amendment Public Hearing to be compatible with the architecture of the area. 4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding u3es and activity. COMMENT: The uses and density are very compatible with surrounding uses. The single family development is more desirable than the multi -family development currently allowed. 5. Identificatior and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. COMMENT: There are no natural hazards which have been identified. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. COMMENT: The site plan and building design are appropriate for this piece of property. The lots are very small, but the shared driveway approach minimizes asphalt area as well as road cuts. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town of Avon Transportation Plan. COMMENT: The shared driveway concept is important to the success of the small lot concept. By utilizing one road cut for each two or three lots, the landscape area can be increased and there will be an appearance of lower density. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. COMMENT: While it makes sense to leave embellishment of the landscaping to individual homebuyers, Am., e 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 4 of 6 Tract B, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend SPA Amendment Public Hearing there is a need for a well described, typical landscape plan. This plan and description should be included with the design review approval. 9.Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. COMMENT: It is very important to have a strong and cohesive phasing plan to endure the success of this development. The Staff believes it is important that no individual lots be transferred that do not have a home under construction. The compatibility of the architecture is very important to the appearance of this development and the Staff feels the best way to ensure this is to have the developer control all building construction. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. COMMENT: All public services provided are able to service this development. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD> COMMENT: the existing streets and roads are capable of serving this development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation for this request for a PUD development plan and amendment to the zoning plat is for approval. We feel that single family homes are the most appropriate development for this piece of property, and for this neighborhood. The lot sizes are very small, but the shared driveways and compatible architectural schemes of the four units mitigate that concern. 0001% ^ STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 5 of 6 Tract B, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend SPA Amendment Public Hearing Staff does recommend that two additional statements be added to the PUD guide. 1. There will be a maximum of nine road cuts serving lots 3 - 21. 2. Individual lots will not be created nor conveyed until a building permit is issued for the construction of one of the approved house plans. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Council Review 6. Council Action RespectfuFL, l�lyy� submitted, ,C,R�ck man Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 6 of 6 Tract B, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision The Alpines at Eaglebend SPA Amendment Public Hearing PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions with Modified Conditions ( ) Continue ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted approval to amend the existing SPA zoning of Tract B Filinq 2, Eaqlebend to allow single family residences and further to grant approval of the PUD as proposed, with the following conditions: 1. PUD Item A2 -Accessory uses allowed only if fenced. 2, PUD Item A3 - Be deleted, rental apartments not be allowed. 3. PUD Item A4- Home — occupations be allowed only as a Special Review Use. 4. PUD Item C5- _ Be increased to 25% instead of 10%. 5. A_minimum 14 foot driveway width is required. 6_. Plo identical floor plans be side by side. 7. Mirror image be permitted only with architectural differentiation. 8. There be a maximum of nine road cuts serving lots 3-21. 9. Individual lots will not be created nor conveyed until a building permit is issued for the construction of one of the approved house plans /0�1, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark Faith Christian Fellowship Special Review Use Public Hearing INTRODUCTION at Beaver Creek Subdivision Church John Perkins, on behalf of Faith Christian Fellowship of Vail, is requesting a Special Review Use permit to allow for the construction of a church on Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Lot 45 is .59 of an acre in size (25,700 square feet) and is located on the north side of Nottingham Road. The property is surrounded on two sides (north and east) by the open space zoned Tract B. The AY Townhomes (tri-plex) on Lot 44 are located immediately to the west and the Nottingham Road and I-70 right-of-way are to the south. Lot 45 is currently zoned Residential Low Density (RLD). The intention of the residential low density zone district is to provide sites for single family, two family, and multiple -family dwellings at a density not to exceed 7.5 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of listing church as a special review use in the RLD zone district is to allow the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council to assess the need for imposing any additional development or performance standards (i.e. not specifically required by the zoning/building codes) reasonably determined to be necessary to meet the special review use criteria and/or mitigate against possible adverse impacts to adjacent property and/or occupants. The proposed development plan consists of a 12,600 square foot, 3 story building centered along the north side of the property. The southern 2/3rds of the lot will contain the driveway, 35 parking spaces and associated retaining walls. The building will house a fellowship hall, kitchen, classrooms, and a two car garage on the first floor; an approximate 100 seat sanctuary, offices and a guest apartment on the second floor; and a six bedroom parsonage on the third floor. STAFF COMMENTS The following criteria as listed in Section 17.46.040 of the Avon Zoning Code, should be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council when reviewing a Special Review Use application. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 4 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark Faith Christian Fellowship Special Review Use Public Hearing at Beaver Creek Subdivision Church A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code; COMMENT: The proposed use appears to be in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Avon Zoning Code. B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; COMMENT: It would appear that the proposed use is in general conformance with the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The Avon Comprehensive Plan's Urban Design Plan includes thiF, property in Subarea 12 "Nottingham Road Residential District". The Comprehensive Plan suggests that new development within this zone district be limited to three stories and provide a landscape buffer adjacent to Nottingham Road and I-70. The following goals, excerpted from the Avon Comprehensive Plan, also seem applicable to this proposal. - Ensure tha; all land uses are located in appropriate locations with appropriate controls. - Locate land uses to make the most efficient use of existing land and community resources. - Upon full development of the community, all land uses should work together as a balanced system. C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design, and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. COMMENT: Notification of the proposer+ use of Lot 45 has been provided to all property owners within 300 feet. To date, no written responses (for or against) concerning the proposed use have been received. The scale of the proposed building and wood retaining walls will be very similar to the Chambertin project on Lot 46/47 to the east. The size and location of the proposed parking area (in front of the building), however, will be considerably different than surrounding development. No parking lot lights are shown on the site plan. The plan shows that some of the retaining STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark. at Beaver Creek Subdivision Faith Christian Fellowship Church Special Review Use Public Hearing walls and the rear sanctuary exits encroach into utility and drainage easements. The application does not contain sufficient information to adequately assess potential impacts associated with noise levels (organ music, singing, bells, etc,) or intensity of use. The appearance of the proposed use would be greatly inhanced by incorporating a more intense landscape treatment than the current conceptual site plan indicates. A more detailed review of specific site improvements will be made at final design review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff feels that a church is an appropriate use on Lot 45 and recommerds that the requested special review use permit be granted with the following conditions: 1. The property be limited to uses typically associated with church activities (i.e. weekend services, sunday school, weddings, etc.) Any expansion of use beyond that discussed at the meeting (i.e. provision of community day care, rental of fellowship hall to other groups or organizations, etc.) must be brought back to the Commission for further review. 2. No external noise making devices will be allowed (bells, speakers, etc.) and internal noise volume (organ music, etc.) should be kept to a level compatible with surrounding properties. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Clcse Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action r - a i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 4 of 4 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Faith Christian Fellowship Church Special Review Use Public Hearing Respectfully su i tetl, v Jim Curnutte Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied Withdrawn ( ) Date ` Patti Dixon, Secretary This reques for a Special Review Use was denied with a 4 to 2 vote The Commission voiced concerns regarding traffic, and siting on the lot as some of the reasons for denial. n 0 401 s STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Lot 1, Lodge at Avon Avon Towne Square Request for Extension INTRODUCTION: Subdivision of Design Review Approval At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 21, 1992, Avon Towne Square Limited Partners presented a request for extension of a previous design review approval. On May 15th of 1990, final approval was granted to the Avon Towne Square project, a three story retail and office project on the Lodge at Avon Subdivision site. This approval will expire on May 15, 1992. Thi Planning and Zoning Commission voted to table the April 21, 1992 request for extension. The Commission members recalled some concerns with the project and wanted to see a more complete presentation prior to granting an extension. The applicant's representative, Al Williams, is, for legitimate reasons, unable to attend tonights meeting. In order to meet the desire of the Planning and Zoning Commission for a more complete presentation prior to a full one year extension, Mr Williams is requesting a 45 day extension of the original approval. Within the 45 day period Mr. Williams will make a full presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission with a request for a one year extension. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes this is a fair request and recommends approval of the 45 day request. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Res�su mitted, !cC Rick Pylman Director of Community Development ,lft� STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 1, Lodge at Avon Subdivision Avon Towne Square Request for Extension of Design Review Approval PLANNING AND ZONING A(,TION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date -`Patti Dixon, Secretary n' , The Commission granted an extension of design review approval for a period of fortv_five_days to allow the applicant to make a presentation to the Commission. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Lot 28, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Mackintosh Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Erwin Bachrach, on behalf of James and Elissa Mackintosh, has requested final design review for a single family res idenne on Lot 28, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 28 is 1.17 acres in size and is located on the corner of Coyote Ridge and East Wildridge Road. The residence will be accessed from either road. The building is 2-1/2 stories high and has large gable roofs. The maximum building height above finished grade is 36 feet, however, it appears to be either 38-1/2 or 41-1/2 above existing grade depending upon which site plan is used. The living area is approximately 3,225 square feet in size. A detached 3 car garage is located northeast of the house and has been designed to match the architecture of the residence. Exterior building materials include stucco siding, wood doors, clad windows and #2 cedar shake shingles. Neither the application nor the drawings indicate the proposed colors of the various building materials. The driveways will be finished with asphalt. Concrete walkways and a paved patio are also provided. A spa is located south of the garage and east of the house. It is not clear whether the spa is located inside a small building or not. A grading/drainage plan and a landscape plan has been provided for the Commission's review. The grading and drainage plan shows a 4'-6' boulder retaining wall located on the south side of the house, garage and spa. Most of the lot's drainage is handled by a swale on the west side of the house, however, a french drain is located along the east property line to handle water com4.ig off of the garage and driveway areas. The landscape plan shows that ail disturbed areas are to be revegetated with transplanted/stockpiled sage and rabbit brush, native grasses and widlflower seed mix. The entire site is to be irrigated with an automatic sprinkler system. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall co.isider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: elnN, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 4 Lot 28, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Mackintosh Residence Final Design Review 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the zoning code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. This property is zoned duplex and the applicant is proposing to construct a single family home. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are suitable with Town Guidelines. The lot itself is suitable to development, however, the most buildable portion of the lot is limited to the northeast one-fourth, which is relatively flat. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The proposed residence and garage has been sited on the lot and designed in a manner that minimizes site impacts to adjacent properties, with the exception of some minor regrading work associated with driveway construction. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: With the exception of the relatively flat portion located in the northeast corner, the lot is fairly steep, sloping toward the sou uieast at approximately 35-40%. The house has been designed with a lower level that is only visible from the south and seems to work well with existing topography. As mentioned previously, the maximum building height above existing grade on the south side exceeds 35 fleet and will have to be reduced. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The proposed reisdence presents a good face to people approaching the building from the south and the north. The east elevation of the garage, expanse of asphalt area and STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 3 of 4 Lot 28, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Mackintosh Residence Final Desing Review lack of landscaping, however, does not seem \_�ry appealing as viewed from Lot 27 to the east.. No detail has been provided for the proposed driveway pad stucco wall, columns and light fixtures. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary cr aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. The proposed building massing and materials are in character with previous approvals in Wildridge. Detached garages have also been approved throughout Wildridge. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon, with the exception of the previously mentioned building height exceedence. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this final design review application with the following conditions: 1. Adjustment of maximum building height so that the 35' maximum from existing grading is not exceeded. 2. Final Staff review and approval of grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Discussion and approval of the proposed parking pad columns and light fixtures. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 4 of 4 Lot 28, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Mackintosh Residence Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING_ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions (L_�) Continu d ( ) Denied ( ) Withdr Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1 Adjustment of maximum building height so that the 35' maximum from existing grading is not exceeded; 2 Final Staff review and approval of grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a building permit; 3. Staff approval of the proposed parking pad columns and light fixtures. 4 The applicant provide written p rmiasion from the adjacent owner to berm and plant on the adjacent property along the garage side. if permission is not give the applicant must return to the Commission with his solution of the problem. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Lot 17, Blk 1, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Fireridge Townhomes Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Dan Karzen, on behalf of KSO Development Group, is requesting conceptual design review of a proposed four-plex building (Fireridge Townhomes) on Lot 17, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 17 is .061 of an acre (26,572 square feet) in size and has frontage on both Old Trail Road and Saddleridge Loop. The units will be accessed via Saddleridge Loop. The driveway is 18' wide and 18 parking spaces are provided on the lot. A grading/drainage plan and a conceptual landscape plan has been provided for the Commission's review. The proposed four-plex building will house four four-bedroom units. One unit has 1,670 square feet of habitable area and three units have 1,640 square feet of habitable area. Each unit will include a two car garage and a gas fireplace. This building does not exceed the maximum building height requirement of 35 feet from existing or finished grade (32 maximum). Exterior building materials include channel rustic cedar siding (beige) with 2" x 8" and 1" x 4" rough sawn cedar trim, aluminum windows (white), 6 paned metal doors with side light, 1" x 4" rough sawn cedar trim around windows and doors (stained white). The redwood deck rails and builoing fascia will be stained a cocoa color. The applicant is proposing to use the Presidential Celotex asphalt shingle on the roof (no color is specified in the application). The applicant has indicated that the weight per square of this product is 370 lbs. All driveway and parking spaces will 'ae finished with asphalt. The trash dumpster is proposed to be screened on two sides by a 4' tall treated timber retai:iing wall (F." x 8" timbers). A color drawing of the building as well as material samples will be presented at the meeting. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal action will be taken at this time. However, Staff would like to point out that the project indentification sign must be located at least 10' from the front lot line. The final design review drawings should include an elevation drawing of the sign and STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 17, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Fireridge Townhomes Conceptual Design Review describe proposed construction materials and colors. Also a landscape legend needs to be added to the site plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 2, Block 1. Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Mountain Comfort Furnishings Conceptual Design Review comments: - Staff feels that it is imperative that buildings proposed for Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision present as pleasing an architectural face toward I-70 as it does toward Nottingham Road. The only fenestration on this building is on the north side. The architecture of this building (rectangular concrete block, with a flat roof) seems more appropriately located in an industrial/commercial zone district. - The proposed monument sign cannot be located within 10' of the front lot line as currently shown. - The parking space (#14) cannot be located within 10' of the front lot line. - The minimum landscape area of a lot in the NC district is 25% (5,880 square feet for Lot 2). This lot has a total landscaped area of approximately 5,080 square feet, which is 800 square feet short. - The information provided is insufficient to fully assess the proposed sign program. - Staff suggests that the applicant address the above comments, as well as those made by the Planning and Zoning Commission and return for another conceptual review. If the applicant does wish to return, more detailed drawings should be provided at that time. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitte Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Lot 2, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Mountain Comfort Furnishings Cor-eptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Joe Matyk, on behalf of the potential purchasers of Lot 2, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, is requesting conceptual design review of a proposed furniture store on the lot. Lot 2 is .54 of an acre (23,522 square feet) in size and is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The NC zone district is intended to provide sites for commercial facilities and services for the principal benefit of residents of the community and also to highway -oriented convenience commercial needs. The following uses are permitted in the NC zone district: 1. Retail stores; 2. Professional offices; 3. Car wash; 4. Restaurants; 5. Accessory apartments, exclusive of the ground level story; 6. Church; 7. Additional uses deterined to be similar to allowed uses in accordance with the intent of this zone district. The site plan shows that the building is proposed to be placed on the south 1/3rd of the lot with the minimum required 25 parking spaces and 1 loading berth occupying the northern 2/3rds of the lot. Conceptual landscaping is shown on the site plan. The 7,560 square foot building is divided into a showroom (5,460 square feet) and a storage area (2,100 square feet). This flat roofed building is 18' high. Proposed building materials are 8" x 16" concrete block (ribbed in front and regular faced on sides and rear of the building), black metal mansart roof structure at the store front, and a black metal cap along the top of the building. Store front glass will be tinted grey and the loading berth roll -up door will be metal and painted grey to match the building. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal action will be taken at this time. However, Staff would offer the following STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Lot 35, Block 3, Wildridge Brust Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Clark and Sandy Brust have requested conceptual design review of a proposed single family residence on Lot 35, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 35 is 1.16 acres in size (50,530 square feet) and has frontage on both Flat Point and West Wildridge Road. The Brust residence will be accessed via Flat Point. A 14' wide asphalt driveway and large car turn around/parking area is provided. A landscape/grading and drainage plan has been provided for the Commission's review. The proposed 2-1/2 story residence is approximately 4,000 square feet in size, including the unfinished basement, but not the 3 car garage. Maximum building height is 36-1/2 feet above finished grade. There are two gas fireplaces in the house. A large wrap around deck is located on the south and west sides of the house. Exterior building materials are as follows: - Timberline asphalt stingles, char•.:oal blend color - STK (sandstone color) and river rock (natural) siding - Oldach metal clad windows (dark brown) - Wood doors (cordovan brown) - Redwood deck with cedar rails STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal action will be taken at this time. However, Staff would like to point out the following twc items: - No parking within 10' of front lot line - Maximum allowed building height is 35' STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lot 35, Block 3, Wiloridge Subdivision Brust Residence Conceptual Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, / UA_^n L'� Jim "Curnutte Planner