Loading...
PZC Packet 040792STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Lot 9, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Sunridge at Avon, Phase I Request For Release From Previous Planning and Zoning Commission Condition of Approval INTRODUCTION: Tom Casteel, of Vail Management Company, on behalt of Sunridge at Avon Phase I, is requesting release from a previous Planning and Zoning Commission condition of approval relating to the painting of the Sunridge buildings on Lot 9, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. On June 18, 1991, the Sunridge at Avon Phase I Condominiums received approval to restain their buildings. The stain on the buildings at the time was an oxford brown colored semi --transparent stain. The applicants wished to restain with a Benjamin -Moore "buckskin" colored solid body stain. The buildings trim and doors would remain oxford brown. During the meeting Mr.Casteel was asked if the building's breezeways were going to be stained. Mr. Casteel stated that he didn't believe that the contract with the painters included the restaining of the breezeways. After further discussion of the issue, the Planning and Zoning Commission went on to approve the building color change requested, with the condition that the breezeways also be stained the exterior color. As the restaining of the buildings was completed, each of the buildings breezeways were left unstained and no further work has been done since late June. On March 19, 1992, the Sunridge Condominium Association was notified (see attached letter) that immediate action must be taken to resolve this issue. On March 31, 1992, Mr. Casteel contacted the Town and requested to be put on the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda so that he may formally request a release from the condition requiring the breezeways to be stained. Mr. Casteel has indicated that they do not have sufficient funds at this time to stain the breezeways. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and discussion of proposed release of previous Planning and Zoning Commission condition of approval. 1• STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION April 7, 1992 a Page 2 of 2 Lot 9, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Sunridge at Avon Phase I Request For Release From Previous Planning and Zoning Commission Condition of Approval RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Neview 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( Continpied( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date �-,I�Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission denied tha applicant's request for release of the condition of painting the Areezeways, stating that the breezeways must be painted to match the existing color on the building and the project must be completed no later than October 1, 1992. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Eagle River Condominiums Design and Construction Services, Tony Seibert Proposed Building and Site Design Changes INTRODUCTION: On December 19, 1991, Tony Seibert, on behalf of Design and Construction Services, received Final Design Review approval for a 21 unit residential complex (Eagle River Condominiums) on Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. The lot is 1.08 acres in size and is presently zoned Residential High Density, which allows for the proposed 21 units. The approved development plan consists of three six-plex buildings. The triplex building did not receive design review, but will be brought in at such time as the applicant wishes to proceed with its construction. At the time of approval, the units in each of the six-plex buildings were approximately 800 square feet in size. There were thirty-two uncovered parking spaces and twenty-six covered parking spaces. This scheme met (actually exceeded) the minimum required number of parking spaces which is 48. The approved site plan included two access drives to this project. In granting approval of the project on December 19, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission attached the following conditions: 1. Final staff review of the grading/drainage plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Final fire department review of hydrant locations prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Written permission from the owner of Tract L authorizing the improvements on the property be provide prior to construction of any improvements. 4. Extension of the path on Tract L to the public right-of-way. 5. Determination of proposed sign location and method of 'llumination. 6. Elimination of the two parking spaces from the 10' setback. Elimination of the three parking spaces in the landscape island not required. 7. The landscape plan be amended to match the architectural Is I No As&*, e`*. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 2 of 6 Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver C. -eek Sudivision Eagle River Condominiums Design and Construction Services, Tony Seibert Proposed Building and Site Design Changes site plan to remove the gravel buildings. A better definition of made. Additional trees and shrubs northeast corner of the site and additional trees or shrubbery be a the front of any long fences and appropriate in the front will be co currently shown between the the term shrubbery needs to be should be provided along the behind the garages. Also, dded to the landscape plan in that berming islands where nstructed. 8. Written review and approval by all utility companies must be provided authorizing the encroachment of the garage building into the utility easements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. At such time that the applicant wishes to proceed with the tri-plex building, he will return to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review. 10. Add a fourth trim or accent color. A teal has been suggested and this could be a Staff approval. 11. A Staff approval of the specific roofing manufacturer and product proposed. Recommendation is 300 lb. per square roofing product. 12. Any excess of a fence height of six feet, Staff approval is required. 13. The fourteen insh shoplap masonite sideing is acceptable. In March, 1992, Mr. Seibert submitted an application for a building permit to start construction of this project. The application was for the first six-plex building only. Also, during the review of the application drawings, it became clear that Mr. Seibert wished to construct a project that differed substantially from the one previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 19, 1991. Mr. Seibert is now requesting design review approval of his revised plans. Changes to the previously approved plans are as follows: DEVELOPMENT PHASING - With the exception of the tri-plex building no discussion of development phasing was discussed at the December meeting. It is Mr. Seibert's intention to proceed immediately ,.� 4.kk STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 3 of 6 Lot S, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Eagle River Condominiums Design and Construction Services, Tony Seibert Proposed Building and Site Design Changes from one phase to the next, however, if sales are not adequate, the rest of the subsequent phases will be delayed indefinitely. The applicant does not wish to begin construction of a new phase until all, or a certain percentage, of the units in a preceeding phase have been sold. Staff agrees that the phas,ng of building construction makes sense financially, however, we a -e concerned with the conceptual nature of the phasing plan proposed. The plan does not provide sufficient information for Staff to fully assess the project if only phase I or phases I and II are completed. Grading and drainage, landscaping, parking lot layout, trash dumpster location, etc., are all improvements that will change significantly if the nroject is halted before build out. DRIVEWAY CLOSURE - The original project was approved with two driveways on west Beaver Creek Blvd. The new proposal shows that the southern driveway has been closed. Staff would prefer that the southern driveway stay open for ease of access and improved circulation, however, the applicant has indicated that there will be a significant cost savings if it is closed. CHANGE IN PARKING LOT LAYOUT - The parking lot layout and number of parking spaces provided has changed. The applicant has separated the three six-plexes a little more than shown previously in order to attain the minimum code requirement of 10'. By moving the B and C buildings toward the northwest they encroach into the parking lot, displacing three parking spaces. Two of these spaces were moved to the west end of the lot and one was eliminated completely. Also, the three covered parking spaces at the west end of the garage have been removed as well as the two uncovered spaces previously shown in the front yard setback area. A parking space was gained by taking the trash dumpster out of one of the garage spaces. The applicant has eliminated the landscape peninsulas that separated the north and south uncovered parking areas for ease of snow removal. The site plan has also been amended to show the proposed fire hydrant locations, project sign and sidewalk connection to the public right-of-way. TRASH DUMPSTER RELOCATION - As mentioned previously, the trash dumpster has been relocated from one of the garage spaces to an area north of Building B. No detailed drawings of the dumpster enclosure have been provided for the Commission's review. The applicant has indicated that the enclosure will match the architectural style and materials of the buildings and garage. �0 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 as Page 4 of 6 Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Eagle River Condominiums Design and Construction Services, Tiny Seibert Proposed Building and Site Design Changes CHANGES IN ARCHITECTURE OF GARAGE BUILDING - The parapet wall/roof form on the garage fronts, shown on the approved plans, have been removed. CHANGES IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDINGS - The architecture of the buildings has changed as follows: North Elevastion - Fenestration and roof form changes. South Elevation - Fenestration, roof form and chimney changes. East Elevation - Fenestration, rocf for) and siding changes. West Elevation - Fenestration and roof form changes. CHANGES IN UNIT SIZES - The floor area in all of the type B units have have been increased by approximately 50 square feet. STAFF COMMENTS In addition to discussing the aforementioned changes to the previously approved plans, Staff recommends that the following issues be resolved: - The Avon Metropolitan District recommends that the new 20' wide water and sewer easement be recorded prior to the start of construction on this lot. - The applicant's water plan drawing dated 3/23/92 must be amended, to reflect the comments noted by the Avon Metropolitan District Engineer and fire hydrant locations must be changed as specified by the Avon Fire Department. - The grading and drainage plan must be amended to reflect the comments of the Town Engineer. - The site plan, landscape plan and grading and drainage plans should be amended to show the same improvements on each. The following are examples: - The landscape plan shows 8" x 8" railroad tie retaining walls between the buildings but they are not reflected STAFF REPORT April 7, 1992 Page 5 of 5 TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Eagle River Condominiums Design and Construction Services, Tony Seibert Proposed Building and Site Design Changes on the site or drainage plans. - The concrete walkway leading to the road right-of-way is not reflected on the grading and drainage plan. It does not appear that grades will allow the side walk to be laid out as reflected on the site plan (straight line to right-of-way). - The grading and drainage plan does not accurately reflect the actual parking lot layout proposed for construction. - The new landscape plan should be amended to remove gravel shown between the buildings and better define the proposed "shrubbery" as required by condition #7 of the previous approval. Discussion of proposed time frame for constructing the improvements on Tract L shown on the sit_ plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the above changes and issues be discussed and resolved to the satisfaction of the Commission. If the discussion involves changes or additions to those issues presented in this report, those changes or additions, along with those suggested by staff, must be reflected in all drawings presented for building permit application review. rr:Rw STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 6 of 6 Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Eagle River Condominiums Design and Construction Services, Tony Seibert Proposed P-ilding and Site Design Changes RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, d✓tish Cu-'LttU�%� Jim Curnutte d n Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Apr -roved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( Date H 2 Patti Dixon, Secretar SEE ATTACHED SHEET STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Design Revisions (cont) The Commission granted design approval to the design revisions with the condition that the following Staff comments are addressed to Staff satisfaction: 1. The Avon Metropolitan District recommends that the new 20' wide water and sewer easement be recorded prior to the start of construction on this lot. 2. The applicant's water plan drawing dated 3/23/92 must be amender' to reflect the comments noted by the Avon Metropolitan District Engineer and fire hydrant locations must be changed as specified by the Avon Fire Department. 3. The grading and drainage plan must be amended to reflect the comments of the Town Engineer. 4. The site plan, landscape plan and grading and drainage plans should be amended to show the same improvements on each. The following are examples: I. The landscape plan shows 8" x 8" railroad tie retaining walls between the buildings, but they are not reflected on the site or drainage plans. 2. The concrete walkway leading to the road right-of-way is not reflected on the grading and drainage plan. It does not appear that grades will allow the sidewalk to be laid out as reflected on the site plan (straight line to right-of-way). 3. The grading and drainage plan does not accurately reflect the actual parking lot layout proposed for construction. 4. The new landscape plan should be amended to remove gravel shown between the buildings and better define the proposed "shrubbery" as required by condition the previous approval. 5. Discussion of proposed time frame for constructing the improvements on Tract L shown on the site plan — _._-___--- ____ _ . STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Wildridge Townhomes Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Dan Karzen, on behalf of KSO Development Group, is requesting final design review of a proposed four-plex building (Wildridge Townhomes) on Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 46 is 0.89 of an acre (38,768 sq. ft.) in size and is located at 2530 Old Trail Road. The lot slopes toward the southeast and has an average slope of aproximately -25% over much of the proposed building site. The proposed four-plex building will house four four-bedroom units. One unit has 1,640 sq. ft. of habit;iule area and three units have 1,610 sq, ft. of habitable area. Each unit will include a two car garage ana a gas fireplace. This building does not exceed the maximum building height requirement of 35 feet from existing or finished grade. Exterior building materials include channel rustic cedar siding (grey) with 2" x 8" and 1" x 4' rough sawn cedar trim, aluminum windows (white), 6 panel therma tru doors with side light, 1" x 4" rough sawn cedar trim around windows and doors (stained white). The redwood deck rail:, buildinq fascia and garage doors will be stained a pewter color. The applicant is proposing to use the Presidential Celotex asphalt shingle (weathered wood) on the roof. This product represents a change from the cedar shake shingle previously reviewed at conceptual review. The applicant has indicated that the weight per square of this product is 370 lbs. All driveway and parking spaces will be finished with asphalt. The trash dumpster is proposed to be screened on two sides by a 4' tall treated timber retaining wall k8" x 8" timbers). A color rendering of the building as well as material samples will be presented. A grading and drainage plan and a landscape pian have been submitted for the Commission's review. The grading plan shows that the proposed berms have a finished grade in excess of 50%. The landscape plan shows a good mixture of decidious (two species) and coniferous (two species) trees, shrubs (two species) and boulder groupings. All disturbed areas will be reseeded with native grasses or a gravel (natural color) ground cover. A common Bar-B-Que area has been provided. Although not indicated on the plans, J • • STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 2 of 6 Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Wildridge Townhomes Final Design Review automatic irrigation will be provided to all areas. landscaped This application received conceptual design review by the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 21, 1992. The Commission had the following comments: 1. The parking needs to be further addressed in conjunction with access so that more of the spaces can be located behind the garage doors; 2. Some sort of play area, or picnic area be considered; 3. Consider giving the end elevations more character; 4. The landscaping be substantial, with larger materials specified to break up the massing of the building. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code. The property is zoned four-plex and proposed building height, setback, lot coverage and parking requirements ar^ being met. Certain provisions of the Avon Design Guidelines however, do not appear to be complied with: - Some finished grades exceed 50%; - Trash receptacles should be screened from public view and protected from disturbance; - No project identification sign has been provided for review. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be 0 1b � v STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNIONG AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 3 of Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Wildridge Townhomes Final Design Review constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of both building and landscape materials are in conformance with town guidelines. The proposed building materials are commonly found throughout Wildridge. The landscape plan has been upgraded in response to the Planning and Zoning Commission conceptual review comments. The applicant should be made aware that he will be expected to install the landscape materials in the sizes specified in the landscape legend. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: All grading will be contained within lot lines. The applicant has added an additional architectural element to the left side elevation and provided small roof features over windows on the right side elevation in an attempt to address a Planning and Zoning Commission conceptual review comment. Also, the play or picnic area has been added to the plan as suggested by the Commission. The design of this project would be considerably more compatible if the applicant would have redesigned the access aisle and parking areas so that two parking spaces were located in front of the garages, as suggested by Staff and the Commission on January 21, 1992, instead of scattered throughout the property Since the last meeting, the applicant removed two of the parking spaces, thereby reducing the overall number of parking spaces for this four-plex from 20 to 18 (8 covered and 10 uncovered). Any exposed foundation tails should be painted to match the building. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The project appears to be compatible with site topography with the exception that the leveling necessary to create the exterior parking spaces appears to be excessive. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of the proposed improvements as STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 4 of 6 Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Wildridge Townhomes Final Design Review viewed from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable with the following exceptions: - The two sided timber retaining wall aumpster area does not appear to adequately screen the dumpster from neighboring properties, public ways, or the residents of this project. - The amount of uncovered parking spaces appears to be excessive for a four-plex with two car garages per unit. - The gravel ground cover at the Bar-B-Que area and unit entry ways would be more attractive if replaced with sod or other landscape materials. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: As mentioned previously, the landscape and building materials proposed for this project are similar to those approved previously in the Wildridge Subdivision. The amount of impervious surface for a four-plex building and the proposed trash dumpster screening are very dissimilar to other comparable project in Wildridge. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon, with the exceptions previously noted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this final design review application with the condition that the following issues are discussed and resolved to the satisfaction of the Commis on. The amount of impervious surfaces on this property should be reduced. p .'-\ STAFF RLPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 5 of 6 Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Wildridge Townhomes Final Design Review - The landscape plan should be amended to include a reference to the proposed method of irrigation and replacement of the gravel areas with sod or other landscape materials. - A redesign of the trash dumpster enclosure should be considered in order to provide more effective visual screening. - A project identification sign must be provided which includes the project name and physical address. - Any exposed foundation walls should be painted to match the building. - No finished grades should exceed a maximum of 50%. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, .Jim Curnutte Town Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 6 of 6 Lot 46, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Dan Karzen for KSO Development Group Wildridge Townhomes Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions Contin��u��e��d((yy( ) Denied ( ) Wi Date Patti Dixon, Secre The Co Im�islsion granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. That the landscape plan should be amended to include reference to an automatic irrigation system and replacement of the gravel areas with sod or other landscape materials. Z. A project identification sign must be provided which includes a project name and physical address. 3. All 2xposed-€9ur aEion-wal-ls-sHoua-d-be-pa4eEed--te-matsH-the-bu-i-l44a}.--4 -No- f4pifY�ed_e-s+icrod=eiceeed� lna�rttwfli-39-.---Tile-barb-Que s#�a>1 - be removed and the landscaping of that area shall be moved to one side or the other. 6. That the color of the asphalt shingles will be weathered wood. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Lots 2-12, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision Jeff Spane' for Eaglebend Partnership Eaglebend ll,abhouse Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Jeff Spanel, on behalf of Eaglebend Partnership, is proposing to construct a Community Center building (Eaglebend Clubhouse) on Lots 2-12, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision. On July 19, 1990, and July 26, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council, respectively, approved the Design Review, Fractionalization, and SPA Amendment requests for the Eaglebend Apartment complex. The approved plan consisted of 20-12 unit buildings, a community center building, approximately 450 covered and uncovered parking spaces, laundry and storage facilities and various recreational and open space amenities. Since the community center building had not been fully designed at the time the rest of the project was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission, their approval included a condition that the applicant present the plans for the center for final design review prior to its construction. The community center building is two stories high (35') and will be set back 30 feet from the east property line. The building will have approximately 5,120 square feet of habitable area and will house a day care operation, social room, laundry room, offices (managers, day care, etc.) and storage space. The day care facility will be accessed on the south side of the building at grade, however, direct access to the 2nd level social room will be accomplished with berming on the north side of the building. The day care facility will have a play yard on the east side of the building. The play area will be surrounded with a 4' cedar fence. A 4' wide concrete walk will be installed along the entire south, east and half of the north sides of the building. Exterior building materials include diagonal hardboard siding (meteor color) wood doors and attic vents (norway aqua) SGD windows (Olympic white) and asphalt shingles. All wall caps, roofcaps, flashing, etc., will be painted to match adjacent surfaces. There will be two sky lights on the south elevation. 10 v STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 2 of 2 Lots 2-12, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision Jeff Spanel for Eaglebend Partnership Eaglebend Clubhouse A conceptual Design Review STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no staff recommendation will be made at this time. However, staff would like to point out the following items for further discussion. - The sidewalk, light fixtures and grading work on the far east side of the property are located in the public right-of-way. - The parking spaces shown on the site plan do not meet the Town's minimum size requirements. - The boiler flue should be painted to match the building. - No detail has been provided for the proposed light fixtures. - No detailed landscaping plan has been submit'.ed for the clubhouse area. - The final plat for this property has never been recorded. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation J. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, j;;F1, cv Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF «T TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 1992 Lot 42, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Doug DeChant for ,i. D. McKean M.D. Single Family Residence Discussion on Proposed Windows Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION On March 17, 1992, Doug DeChant, on behalf of J. D. McKean M.D. received concept�ual design review of a single family residence on Lot 42 and part of Lot 43, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. The building is proposed to be two and one half stories high and have a habitable area of approx-rately 7,600 square feet. The exterior of the building will ce finished with stucco, stone and slate. In response to a Commission comment regarding the windows being proposed for the building, Mr. De Chant brought in a sample for the Commission's review. These aluminL-T windows are manufactured by Kawneer and feature cu.;tom three part curved profile covers in various anodized finishes. STAFF COMMENTS Review and discussion of proposed windows. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentatirn 3. Commission Review/D'scussion Respectfully suumitted, Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1992 Lot 101, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Randy Johnson for Ski Vista Townhomes Material Change Request Design Review INTRODUCTION Ski Vista Townhomes (two tri-plexes) located or. Lot 101, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision received final design review approval on May 1, 1990 The approved building materials were cedar lap siding (stained blue -grey, cedar trim (blue) and stucco (tan). The approved roof material was a #2 medium cedar shake. Randy Johnson (RJ Builders, Inc from the cedar shake shingle to proposing the Timberline Ultra This product has a weight of 420 warranty. A sample of the presented at the meeting. STAFF COMMENTS ) is now proposing a change an asphalt shingle. He is to a weathered wood color. lbs per square and a 40 year proposed material will be At the October 1, 1991 Planning and Zoning Commission meetinc the Commission adopted a new policy regarding acceptabl3 roofing products in the Wildridge Subdivision. Specifically, the Commission determined that asphalt shingles will be considered an acceptable roofing material in the Nildridge Subdivision depending on their compatibility with the particular building(s) upon which they are proposed to be installed. The Commission decided that requests for the use of asphalt shingles on building would 0e reviewed for compliance with the following minimum standards: Weight - 300 lbs per square tmin.numi. 2. Texture - Appropriate relief and shadow effect. 3. Color - Darker earthtone colors with appropriate color variation and pattern. With these minimum standards in place the Commission went on to consider three requests for changes from previously approved roofing materials to asphalt shingles. The Timberline Ultra shingle on Jan Livergood's stick built home a+id the 300 lb per square (minimum) Tamko shingle on a manufactured unit fourplex being built by Richard Wahl and Tad Degen. The Commission denied Bruce Kelly's request to change from wood shakes to a 300 lb per square (minimum) STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 2 of 3 Lot 101, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Randy Johnson for Ski Vista Townhomes Material Change Request Design Review asphalt shingle on a log home. This denial was later overturned on appeal to the Avon Town Council. On November 26, 1991, the Avon Town Council approved Resolution 91-31, which established a moratorium on design review considerations of asphalt shingles in the Wildridge Subdivision. The purpose of the resolution was to allow the Wildridge Citizens to work with the other reside)ts and property owners of Wildridge to examine and refine the Covenants and Design Guidelines for Wildridge. The moratorium became effective for any design review application submitted after November 1, 1991 and continued until March 1, 1992. On March 3, 1992, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission approved Buz and Monica Reynold's roof material change request for their proposed residence on Lot 44, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. The Reynold's approval involved a change from #2 medium cedar shakes to the 420 lbs. per square, Timberline Ultra asphalt shingles. On March 17th, 1992 the Planning and Zoning Commission denied the applicant's request to replace the previously approved cedar shingles with the Tamko Heritage Premium asphalt shingle in a Birchwood color. That product had a weight per square of 340 lbs. The Commission felt that the Tamko product did not have sufficient weight and texture to be compatible with the Ski Vista Townhomes. The Commission sugge.,Led that the applicant consider a higher quality product. STAFF RECOMM€NDATION Review and discussion of proposed roof material change. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 1992 Page 3 of 3 Lot 101, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Randy Johnson for Ski Vista Townhomes Material Change Request Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully E-allmitted, an Jim Curnutte Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (-�Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdra \ r Date �— Patti Dixon, Secretary J The Commission granted approval of the requested roof material change as submitted.