Loading...
PZC Minutes 030392RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on March 3, 1992, at 7:30 PM in the Upstairs Conference Room at the Avon Fire Department, Avon, Colorado. the meeting was called to order by Chairman John Perkins. Members Present: John Perkins, Buz Reynolds, Clayton McRory, Patti Dixon, Sue Railton, Henry vest, Staff Present: Jim Curnutte, Town Planner; Rick Pylman, Director of Community Development; Charlette Pascuzzi, Recording Secretary Chairman Perkins stated that all members were present. Lot 1 and part of Lot2y__Nott.ingham Station Subdivision, Diamond Shamrock Cornerstore._Speqial Review_Use,_ Public, Hearing Jim Curnutte stated that there is also a design review associateo with this special review use, which will be discussed later. Davaid Gallowy and David Moore are present representing Diamond Shamrock. Currently as platted the lot line is about 30 feet short of what is shown on the site plan shown at this time. in conjunction with the special review use and design review, the applicants have submitted a minor subdivision request to move the lot line over. The lot is around 27,000 square feet as platted and by moving the lot line it will be about 31.000 square feet. The property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and this application is not a use by right in the Neighbcrhood Commercial district, therefore the need for a special review use permit. The intention of the Neignborhood Commercial District is to provide facilities and services for the principle benefit of residents of the community and also to highway -oriented convenience needs. The reason for listing automobile service station as a special review use is to allow the Commission and Town Council to assess the need for imposing any additional development or performance standards. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 2 of 14 m Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Nott__ingham_Station _ Su_bd_ivis_lon, Diamond Shamrock, Special Review Use, Public Hearing__(cont) The development consists of about a 1500 square foot convenience store, the rendering provides the best view, There are four dispenser islands, and a canopy over all of it. The canopy is about 49' x 103'. There are some site lights on the property, adequate turn lanes, and a handicap parking space has been located on the south side of the building. There are four underground petroleum storage tanks. Three of them are 12,000 gallons and one is 8,000 gallons covered with 8" reinforced concrete slab. The rest of the property will be surfaced with 5" reinforced concrete slab. There is a turnaround area projecting on to Lot 2 which is to be a turnaround for the trucks it there are too many cars that they couldn't maneuver properly. The signage consists of a freestan:ing monument sign, 12'10" high. Other site improvements are phone pedestals, and air stations. Back to the signs, there is a Diamond Shamrock sign on the north and south facing sides of the canopy and a Corner Store sign on the south side of the building. The signage being proposed is in conformance with the sign code. The allowance is 84' and that is what the applicants have proposed. The applicants are installing a retaining wall on the back side of the property and are proposing to match the Town's retaining wall and will also copy the fence. Curnutte then described the materials to be used and the colors. He provided photos of similar buildings showing both day and night. He stated that one difference from the photos is that the lighting will be recessed rather than dropper as shown in the photos. The site lighting will also be recessed. Curnutte discussed the spanners which are supposed to be internally lit. Curnutte then reviewed the criteria for reviewing a special review use: A. Whether the proposed use complies with all the requirements imposed by the Zoning Code: Staff feels that the proposal is in compliance with portions of the zoning code, dealing with building heights, setbacks, sign code allowances, turning radius, site coverage, minimum landscaped area, etc. B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town's Comprehensive Plan: Staff feels that the proposal is in conformance with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. This piece of property falls into Subarea 4, which is "Town Gateway . It is critical that properties within this Subarea are developed in a manner which creates an attractive appearance. Curnutte then reviewed some goals and objectives excerpted from the Comprehensive Plan which seem applicable to this project, as follows: The Town would like to enhance their role as a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 r Page 3 of 14 Lot 1 and part of Lot 2. Notti_n ham Station Subdi_v_ision_ �— D_ amond Shamrock , Special Review Use, Public Hearing, (cont principal, year-round residential and commercial center in the valley. The Comprehensive Plan suggests that the Town provide for increased opportunities for development of service-oriented commercial and light industrial uses, as long as there are proper controls. Protect and enhance the water quality of th Eagle River and Nottingham Lake. C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Compatibility may be expressed in architecture, site design, dust, light, impacts on traffic and safety. Curnutte stated that the applicant has meet with staff over the last several months and Staff feels that the application is now complete. Staff's biggest concerns were the level of lighting and the protection of the Eagle River. Curnutte stated that the applicant has provided a lighting plan showing the footcandle footprint that shows a contour lighting plan. In order to reduce possible contamination to ground water and/or the Eagle River, the applicants are proposing state-of-the-art secondary containment fuel product equipment (double walled tanks and piping systems) and all surface runoff will be treated, first entering a 750 gallon sand and grease trap and then move on to a 10,000 gallon oil and water separator treatment facility. Staff feels that an automobile service station is an appropriate use for this property. Staff feels that the applicant has addressed the environmental concerns. They have demonstrated that the proposed use can be designed and controlled to miticste the potential for contamination of the Eagle River in the event of a minor or major spill incident. Curnutte stated that the monument sign being proposed is an internally -lit white plexiglass sign. Staff has suggested to the applicant that they use indirect lighting. The internal's illuminated spanners are also of some concern of the Staff. David Galloway, represen�,ing Diamond Shamrock, introduced David Moore and John Scales of Galloway, Romero and Associates and Dan Landers of Diamond Shamrock. Mr. Galloway provided a Fuel System report comparing Government Requirements and Diamond Shamrock's proposed system. He then reviewed this report (See attached Exhibit "A"). Buz Reynolds voiced concern about the monitoring of the 10,000 gallon storage tank to insure that what comes out into the catchbasin is clean. Mr. Galloway stated that it is the same tank as the fuel tanks, except it is a single wall. It is a no moving part treatment device, with racks and baffles, etc., and provides 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 4 of 14 rtaLion Subdivision. Diamond Hearing_ cotn_Z effluent of fifteen parts per million. They did a drainage report for flows expected and designed this facility to take roughly the 10 year storm. Reynolds stated that part of his question was answered, but what will be, done for maintenance on this system. Mr. Galloway stated that there are no moving parts. The oil storage capacity for this to still function is approximately 80% of the nominal capacity, which would be 8,000 gallons in the 10,000 gallon tank. He went on to describe the oil/water separator functions. Also the 8,000 figure is roughly equivalent to an entire tanker truck that might rupture on site. The maximum any tanker truck can haul is 8500 gallons, but they have five compartments in them and the maximum size of each compartments is 2500 gallons. Mr. Galloway's response to Mr. Reynolds was that they have ,.he ability to store 8,000 gallons, there is an electronic sensor in the tank and when it gets so full, a light comes on and then a licensed disposal company will haul it off. Mr Reynolds stated that he was worried that the tank would be at 80% capacity and then there is one of those spring storms. Mr. Reynolds stated that he is still not feeling comfortable with this one containment. Also, what happens in the double walled tanks, if the second tank is filled up. Mr. Galloway said he is sure that there is a way to pump it out, but he is not sure how it is done. He stated that what they were trying to achieve is to meet all the concerns of the public. The monitor can be set on the storage tank to pump out at any amount wanted. It doesn't have to be set at 8.000 gallons. Henry Vest asked if Diamond Shamrock puts this equipment in all their stations. Mr. Gallo -way stated that he has never gone to this extent on any station he has ever put in. Vest then asked why Diamond Shamrock would go to such expense for this particular property. Mr. Galloway stated that he feels that Diamond Shamrock is very excited about becoming part of this community. They think it will be a good location, and also they have tried to put together a project that the people of this community can support and be comfortable with. Discussion followed on the monitoring of the tanks. Mr. Galloway stated that the biggest problem with leaks are with line leaks. He went into considerable detail ragarding the construction or tanks and why line leaks are more apt to happen than tank leaks. He stated that until December 1988 there were no rules on the books for the monitoring, etc of tanks. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 5 of 14 Lot 1 and part of Lot 2. Nottingham Station Subdivision. Diamond Shamrock, Special Review Use, Public H-earinq, cont) Next, Mr. Galloway reviewed in detail tanker truck requirements and regulations for loading and delivering fuel. He reviewed the methods of a handling spill when delivering fuel into the tanks. He stated that there are many safety factors in the whole delivery system. Next to be discussed was the lighting. He stated that the lighting will not be similar to the Conoco in Edwards. He stated that the site lights will be recessed lighting. They will be 16' high, about half of what the ones at Conoco are. The canopy lights will be 400 watt metal halide recessed lights. He stated that Coastal mart has one canopy light per about 106 sq. ft. of area, Conoco has one light for about each 140 so. ft. and Diamond Shamrock is prcposirg one light per 291 sq. ft. of canopy area. The building lights are also recessed. Mr. Galloway then provided a -ebuttal to the letter received from Mr. and Mrs. Weiss, stating, regarding federal regulations, that Diamond Shamrock has doubled what the federal regulations require. Regarding the question of the Town of Avon's commitment to paying for any cleanup, Mr Galloway stated that the company will have to have enough insurance or cash in a separate account to pay for claims. The amount required depends on how many tanks the company has, therefore the Town of Avon would not be on the hook for any spills that might occur. Regarding the Weiss's concerns about pollution from leaks, Mr. Gallowy stated that the tanks are testea when they put them on the truck and again when they are placed in the ground, then the piping is installed and also air pressure tested. Then after all the concrete is put in it all is tested again. The tanks and line tests are also inspected by the fire department. Regarding the freeze or thaw matter. The tanks are deep enough that this would not be a problem. Mr. Galloway stated that, with the proposed double wall system and the monitoring systems, leaking connections will be less of a proolem. He reviewed some of the aspects of the monitoring system. In response to the Weiss's statement about the rupture of a tank within six months in Springfield, Mass., Mr. Galloway stated that he called the fire marshall in Springfield, Mass. regarding this matter. In January, 1987, a tank was installed and in March of 1987 it had to be taken out. Their records indicate that it was an 8,000 gallon tank. The key date to remember is December 1988. This is the first date that laws were on the books for these things. Also there is no record of the tank in Springfield of the tank being double walled. Regarding the matter of surface spills, Mr. Galloway stated that has already been covered in the discussion on the storage tanks. Mr. Galloway stated that a study was done to locate the water table and they did not encounter PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 6 of 14 _Station Subdivision,__ Diamond Hearing,__(contJ water to the depth of the test pit. Diamond Shamrock intends to meet all EPA regulations concerning de -watering. Mr. Galloway stated that they are providing a state-of-the-art system that they Nope will become the standard for the Vail Valley. Mr. Galloway then read into the record a rebuttal letter to the Vail Associates/Beaver Creek Resort letters. First, Diamond Shamrock feels that this is an appropriate location for this type business, as the success of this type business depends on accessibility. However, they feel they feel that they have used site design techniques to minimize the impact by: increased setback, (75 ft. instead of 25 ft.), Continuation of design techniques (use of colors, styles and materials used for the bridge/underpass and retaining walls along Avon Road and other buildings in Avon), Heighten sensitivity to other impacts (the lighting and environmental controls for this project will set new standards for this use and any other traffic intensive type of uses in the area.) Mr. Galloway responded to Vail Associates concerns about fuel storage tanks being located close to the Eagle River, stating that Vail Associates, as the owner and/or operator of some 40 fuel tanks in the area along the Eagle River watershed, having the ability of storing approximately 150,000 gallons of fuel with an average tank age of over 11 years, is very aware of the risks associated with underground storage tanks. He stated that the proposed Diamond Shamrock project incorporates state of the art techniques to minimize the risks by: I. Providing complete secondary containment; 2. Providing continuious monitoring of all fuel related equipment which will immediately detect leaks. 3. Providing full collection and treatment, along with storage capability, for the entire range of fuel spills which may be encounterd from the slightest fuel overspill by the customers to an unexpected catastrophic spill of a tanker truck. 4. Providing daily inventory reconciliation at 5 different corporate levels. 6. Providing for monthly independent corporate inspection of all equipment and irr.^ntory records. Mr. Gallowy stated that Diamond Shamrock has met the requirements for signage. He then reviewed the lighting, and the canopy colors as mentioned in the Vail Associates letters. Chairman Perkins then opened the public hearing for public input. Mauri Nottingham stated that he owns the property immediately east of the proposed site. He stated that he is not a proponent of gas stations. He stated that this was a better proposal than the one presented a few years ago, however, it still isn't good enough to satisfy him. He is concerned about the thirty year life of the tanks, what happens after 30 years? Also, monitors do fail, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 7 of 14 Lot 1 and Dart of Lot 2, Nottingham Station Subdivision,_ Diamond Shamrock, Special Review Use, Public Hearing, cont sometimes they are not even turned on. He is concerned abolat the water coming out of the storage tank and going into the Eagle River, how often is that monitored '.o make sure it is not contaminated. He stated that he is concerned with the traffic problems that it will cause. He feels that this is the wrong location for a gas service station. He questioned the compliance with the master plan. Rick Rosen, representing the Beaver Creek Property Owners Association, stated that this a wrong site for a gas station. He was in some discussions with the Town regarding the Sunroad property and they clearly did not want a station along Avon Road. This is the same situation. A gas station on Hurd Lane and Avon i. no more than visible pollution. Being so near the Eagle River is clearly a problem. He stated that his law firm handles spill claims for two oil and gas retail companies and spills happen more frequently than reported by Mr. Galloway. The committee needs to look closely at the potential damage that this could do to this valley in the event that there is a spill. Considerable damage could be caused to Vail Associates recreational activities and Vail Associates is a much larger tax base than the Diamond Shamrock is going to provide this community. Also in the summer tho Eagle River is the water for the golf courses, the fishing, the boating etc., and drinking and agriculture water down valley. Mr. Rosen stated that the tank design is only as good as the installation and the maintenance. To have something that close to the river without guarantees that they will be installed properly and maintained properly is a risk. He was also concerned with the proximity of the train tracks. It cou-d be a major disaster for the community if there was a train accident that near to a gas station. Also the Town just approved on first reading a 2.1 millon dollar landscape plan for Avon Road and this doesn't fit in that plan. He resents paying for landscaping on one side and visually polluting it on the other side. The Beaver Creek Homeowners do not want to see this project for the entrance to their community. He encourges the Commission to turn down this project on this site. He feels there are better sites in town for this type of business. Erb McIlveen, Director of the Beaver Creek Resort Company, is concerned with location and the proximity to the entrance of Beaver Creek. He is concerned with the planning for that particular area. He doesn't feel that there is any. He feels that this type facility should be closer to I-70. The planning and thought process should be geared to how the Town will deal with the corridor from I-70 to Beaver Creek entrance. The Town should look to the future. --*N PLANNING AND ZONING March 3, 1992 Page 8 of 14 COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES y_lslon1__piamond Jerry Arnold, representing Vail Associates, and as a member of the cc^munity, stated that despite the precautions, the basic risk is still there. The equipment sounds good, but the requirements for such equipment has not been with us very long, therefore we do not know what the long term effects will be. Vail Associates still has concerns with possible spills. The equipment is only as good as the management and installation, and the monitoring of the equipment. Is there any guarantee that there will always be a trained employee to monitor and handle any spill? Vail Association is opposed to the location, not the service. Jack Hunn, an employee of Vail Associates, who has been heavily involved with the development of Beaver Creek, stated that as a former member of this Commission who adopted the comprehensive plan that the Town is using to consider such projects, he has a few comments. He thinks the introduction of another gas station in the Town is a great idea, but this is the wrong location. He feels that this project at this location will detract from the image. He feels: that this project is contrary to the goals set out in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is identified as a "Town Gateway". It is a first impression site. This use is not identified as a use by right. He also feels that there is a traffic challenge with this project on this site. He sees major problems for people trying to turn left to utilize this facility that would block one of the lanes of traffic flowing to Beaver Creek. There is a real challenge in making a left turn of) of Hurd Lane to go south. If this project is to be considered further, it should be conditional on a traffic study. He does not think that this project is the type of development that the authors of this type of plan visualized for this portion of the Town. Two of the most important assets of the Town are the Eagle River and this major traffic corridor and this project threatens to violate and compromise the goals of both of those assets. He reminded the Commission of the problems experienced by the developer of the Gateway Plaza in Vail. He encouraged the Commission to use the Comprehensive Plan as a tool to say no to this project. With no other public comments forthcoming, Chairman Perkins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comments. Patti Dixon stated that she thinks that the general location is what matters most. She did not feel that it was a good site. Some things that might ':)e done to improve the proJect would be lowering the site, but then there might be a problem with the water table. Also considerable landscaping to mitigate the concrete mass would probably help. She also has a problem with a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 9 of 14 Lot 1 and part of Lot 2. Nottingham Station Subdi_v_i_sj_on,__Diamond Shamrock, Special Review Use, Public Hearing ._cont the traffic. Even now there is a problem. Sue Railton stated that she appreciated the applicant's e•,'forts in working with the staff on the design of this project, however, she feels that this is an inappropriate site for this type of project. She does not want to see a gas station at the ga6eway to Avon. She also has concerns about the traffic conjestion. Clayton McRory stated that he would support this project if the applicant could move the Eagle River. This is his greatest concern. For this reason he cannot support this protect. Buz Reynolds also has a problem with the site being r:ext to the Eagle River and he feels it just doesn't work at this site because of the traffic problems it would cause. Henry Vest stated that he thinks another gas station is needed, but this site is not appropriate. John Perkins stated that he takes exception to the staff comment in criteria B. He feel that this development does not ersure a high quality visual image of the Town. He does not feel that this development will minimize the degradation of the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas or protect and enhance the water quality of the Eagle River and Nottingham Lake. Also in item C of the criteria, the compatibility of an urban gas station at the entry to Beaver Creek is dubious. The Town is, step by step, spending a lot of money to improve the image of the Town and he feels that they have to continue in that direction and he feels that this project on that site would be a step in the wrong direction. Dave Galloway stated that they have no idea where another piece of property would be in Avon that would be considered appropriate. Diamond Shamrock has worked for a year and a half trying to find a location. A site has to meet criteria so that they can recoup the investment to put in the double wall tanks, etc. He stated that the Town needs to set down criteria for developers of this type project. He stated that he has never, in all the similar projects he has worked on, had to go to the ends that they have here. He stated that the first that he has heard about traffic is tonight. If a traffic analysis is needad they will continue the project and get a TIA done and come back for approval. Diamond Shamrock feels that this is indeed the only location in Avon that will support the kind of investment to do this. With this site there is very good traffic and very little competition. PLANNING AND March 3, 1992 Page 10 of 14 ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Lot 1 and part of Lot ?._Nottingham Station Subdivision. --Diamond Shamrock, Special Design Review. Public Hearingconal Chairman Perkins reviewed the concerns voiced by the Commission. Clayton McRory moved to deny approval for the Special Review Use for Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Nottingham Station Subdivision, Diamond Shamrock, for the reasons listed in criteria B, that it does not ensure a high quality visual image of the Town is established through both public and private sector activities; and that it does not minimize degradation of the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas; It does not protect and enhance the water quality of the Eagle River and Nottingham Lake, and as listed in criteria C, it does cause considerable traffic problems. Patti Dixon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Diamond Chairman Perkins stated that due to the denial of the requested Special Review Use for this project, this application is withdrawn. Lot 44, Block 3. Wildridae Reynolds Residence, Material Change Request Buz Reynolds stepped down as a voting member of the Commission due to a conflict of interest. Jim Curnutte stated that the Reynolds received design review approval for their residence on February 4, 1992. At that time there was a moritorium on a the consideration of asphalt shingles. The applicant proposed #2 medium cedar shake shingles and informed the Commission that he would be back with a rooting material change when the moritorium ended. He is proposing the Timberline Ultra 400 lb per square product. Curnutte reviewed the background for approvals of asphalt roofs: On October 1st the Commission set guidelines for approvals of asphalt roofs. Livergood's and Wahl's asphalt roofs were approved, Kelly's was denied because of his home being a log home and this denial was o��erturned by the Council. On November 26, the Town Council approved resolution number 91-31, calling a moratorium on approval of any asphalt shingles until March 1st. The idea was to allow the Wildridge citizens time to reconsider their design guidelines and determine whether or not they felt that asphalt shingles were acceptable. The moritorium expired on March 1st, therefore, Mr. Reynolds has the right to request the material change to asphalt shingles. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 11 of 14 Lot 44, Block 3. Wildridge Su.bd_iv_is_,on,____ R@_ynolds ._Res_idence, Material Change Request, Design Review. (cont) Buz Reynolds described the product to be used as a 420 lb per square and has a class A fire rating. The color is a weather wood color. He provided a sample of the product. He stated that this is the heaviest product ever presented. Jack Hunn asked to comment. He stated that he owns several properties in Wildridge and is the chairman of the Wildridge committee and is trying to survey the residents as to what they would like to see up there. He stated that he would like to first remind Buz that he purchased his property while they are subject to the covenants. The covenants do not allow this product, therefore his proposal threatens to violate the covenants. He stated that the Committee is in the process of surveying the property owners and that survey will be mailed this Friday. They hope to have the survey back by April 3rd. If the majority of the property owners want to allow this product, it is likely that the covenants will be amended. He stated that until the rules are changed, they are the rules. He realizes that the Town has no obligation to enforce the private covenants, however, he does not feel it is appropriate for the Town to encourage applicants to violate the covenants. He asked that the Commission deny this application. Buz Reynolds stated that there have been a few meetings between the concerned citizens and other concerned citizens in Wildridge. He has heard both sides and has seen the questionnaire. The covenants are there, but there has been so many violations. There is not one residence that has not violated the covenants. He is coming to the Commission with a product that has already been approved in the Wildridge area. He realizes that he will have to go and meet with the concerned citizen group. With all the applicants that have been before the Commission lately, there hasn't been any requests for shake shingle roofs. That should tell the Commission what people really want. Henry Vest stated that the covenants committee had sufficient time to put together the survey prior to the end of the moratorium. Sue Railton moved to grant approval for the material change request for Lot 44, Block 3, Wildridge, to the Timberline Ultra asphalt shingle roofing. Henry Vest seconded and the motion .tarried with John Perkins opposing. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 12 of 14 Lot 25, Block 2. Benchmark at Beaver CreekSubdiv_ision,Pro.posed Building Modifications, Conceptual Design_Revi_ew_ Buz Reynolds resumed his seat as a voting member of the Commission. Chaiman Perkins stepped down as a voting member due to a conflict of interest. Clayton McRory resumed the position of acting Chairman. John Perkins stated that largest aspect of this proposal is to re -side the building in steel siding. Accompanying that proposal they propose to re -design the entryways and the porte cocheres. Also they would chose to consider re -roofing the pitched roofs with a metal roof, re -doing the commercial entry walls which are just around the protruding lobby and the front walls and enclosing the wood columns that hold the awning over those areas with something other than just exposed cedar posts. He stated that Steve Johnson, from Alside Inc., is present to present a sample of the steel siding. Perkins then turned the meeting over to Mr. Johnson. Mr. Johnson provided samples of the steel sidings that they offer. The type that Christie is considering is a 10" panel with a 5" reveal. The nails are all hidden. The color Christie is considering is the Mist Grey, a light tone grey. He described how the trim work was done. Buz Reynolds asked about fire rating. Mr. Johnson stated that the building had to be fire rated prior to installation of the siding. Also, they are planning on taking the old siding off because it is in such bad condition. Discussion followed on the accent colors. Discussion followed on how the product is installed. Clayton McRory stated that he would like to see this product combined with some other type product, i.e. stucco, just so it is not one hundred percent steel siding. John Perkins stated that he doesn't think that this building lends itself to that kind of material change. Perkins stated that the accent trim would be on the railings and the stucco surfaces that are there and he hopes to increase either to stucco or stone the wails around the commercial space. Discussion followed on the areas to be trimmed. Discussion followed on the porte cochere changes. Some of the work will be phased. Perkins stated that the railings will oefinately stay a darker color and the areas that are stucco. He suggested a darker green for the stucco and the proposed metal roofs. A stone veneer and stucco above will be used on the commercial frontage: Perkins stated that he will provide a color rendering at final design review. Perkins stated that he gathers, from the discussions, that the Commission is basically in agreement with the material as long as it is intergrated with other materials and accent colors that PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 Page 13 of 14 Lot 25, Block 2. Benchmark at Beaver_C_re_ek,Subdjvision, Christie Lodge, Conceptual Design Review--Ccontl will make a cohesive presentation. As this was a conceptual design review, no formal action was taken at this time. Perkins resumed his seat as a voting member of the Commission. Meeting Clayton McRory moved to approve the minutes for the February 4 and February 18, 1992 meetings. Sue Railton seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Other Business Rick Pylman stated that on April 3rd of 1990 Robert and Ruth Gosiewski received approval for a very nice single family log home in Wildridge. That design review approval is good for two years and will expire on April 3, 1992. There is a provision in the design guidelines allowing the Commission to grant a one year extension and the Gosiewskis are asking for a one year extension, as they are planning on building this summer. Buz Reynolds moved to grant the extention. Clayton seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Clayton McRory asked if there had been applications for the vacant Position caused by the appointment of Derek Pysher to the Town Council. The Secretary stated that the Town Clerk had received two applications, one from Jack Hunn and one from Chris Ekrem. With no further businees, the meeting was adjourned at 11 PM. Respectfully, submitted. Charlette Pascuzzi Recording Secretary - •r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 3, 1992 M Page 14 of 14 s Commission approval � Date — ---- J. Perki S. Railt C. McRor A. Reyno P. Dixon H. Vest