Loading...
PZC Packet 080691STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Avon Center - 2nd Story Egress Stairway Addition Michael Hazard for Avon Center Homeowners Association Design ne:iew INTRODUCTION On July 16, 1991, Michael Hazard, on behalf of the Avon Center Homeowners Association, received final design approval of a proposed hot tub room addition at the Lodge at Avon Center. In order to meet code requirements related to the hot tub addition a new egress stairway must be added to the west side of the second story deck. The Planning and Zoning Commission had some concerns regarding the finish treatment of the stairway and asked Mr. Hazard to return with elevation drawings of the stairway which incorporated their suggestions. Specifically, the Commission recommended that the stairway match the architecture of the building as such as possible, i.e. tan stucco finish, rather than exec -sed metal. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Hazard has provided elevation drawings of the proposed egress stairway addition for the Commission's review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for review and approval of proposed stairway addition. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application ?. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 2 THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Avon Center - 2nd Story Egress Stairway Addition Michael Hazard for Avon Center Homeowners Association Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (L-bmApproved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn Date Cl Patti Dixon, Secreta _ The Commission approved the agrect Stairway as ¢,hmitted with the condition that the owners use agreement be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 1-% STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 23, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Todd & Linda Miller Revised Landscape Plan Design Review INTRODUCTION On April 16, 1991, Todd and Linda Miller received final design approval for a single family residence on Lot 23, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. One of the conditions attached to the Commission's approval was that the applicant provide a more complete landscape plan for Commission review. A new landscape plan has been submitted for the Commission's review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for review and discussion of new landscape plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner . • ■ 401 401 Awl 401 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Lot 23, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Todd & Linda Miller Revised Landscape Plan Design Review PLA14NING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( V} Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn Date CA Patti Dixon, Secretary _ The Commission approved the landscape plan as submitted. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONINU COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 5, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision John Railton for Buz Didier and Chris Morrison Revised Drainage andLandscape Plan Design Review INTRODUCTION On June 4, 1991, John Railton, representing Buz Didier and Chris Morrison, received final design approval for a duplex on Lot 5, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. The Commission's approval included the following three conditions: 1. The landscape plan and the drainage plan come back to the Commission for approval; 2. The asphalt shingles be a minimum of 300 lbs per square; 3. No trees be planted in the pubiic right-of-way. The new drainage and landscape plan submitted on July 29, 1991, in response to condition #1 has been reviewed by Staff. Our concerns were relayed to Mr. Railton on July 30th for revision. Unfortunately, as of the writing of this report, the new plan has not been provided for Staff review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION StaFF recommendation is for review of the new 11 ipe/drainage plan with the condition that the drainage p _.. oe reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Presentation of Application 2. Applicant's Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, J i m rnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Lot 5, Filing 1, John Railton for Revised Drainage Design Review n THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Eaglebend Subdivision Buz Didier and Chris Morrison and Landscape Plan PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( rlContinue( ) Denied ( ) WithdrawnDate « Patti Dixon, Secretar The Commission granted approval for the revisions as presented. -"�N STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 50, Wildridge Subdivision Schaub Duplex Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Wally Schaub has requested final design review of a proposed duplex on Lot 50, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 50 is .81 of an acre (35,264 square feet) in size and slopes toward the north, northwest at approximately 22%. The lot is one of the few "flag" lots in Wildridge. The buildable portion of the lot is accessed by a 45' wide, 150' long strip of land adjacent to Saddleridge Loop. A 16' wide asphalt drive will be provided. The proposed building is a two story, with loft, log home on a concrete foundation. Maximum building height is 31 feet. Each unit has approximately 1,800 square feet of floor area. Exterior building materials are as follows: - Cedar shake shingles - 9" log exterior walls - Stucco - Anderson wood windows - 1" x 4" cedar trim around windows and door - 1" x 12" horizontal skirtboard - Metal exterior doors The house also has a large wood deck on the south side. No fireplaces are proposed in either of the two units. A grading/drainage plan and a landscape plan have been provided for the Commission's review. The grading plan shows that a combination of boulder and timber retaining walls will be used around the house and driveway. The landscape timbers will be pressure treated. Railroad ties will not be used. The landscape plan has been prepared by a professional landscape company (Land Design by Ellison & Co.). The entire site will be irrigated with an automatice sprinkler system. All disturbed areas will be revegetated with a high altitude seed mix which will be broadcast and mulched with 3" to 4" of straw. All planting beds will be covered with 2" to 3" of shredded hardwood mulch and edged with 4"of galvenized steel edging. This application received conceptual design review on June 1;D and July 16, 1991. STAFF REPORT TO August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 4 THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Lot 50, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Schaub Duplex Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the --oning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules regulations of the Town. The driveway grade is nearly 12% which exceeds the 10% maximum grade recommended in the Avon Design Guidelines. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of both the building materials and landscaping materials are suitable with Town guidelines. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building appears to be sympathetic to the adjacent residential property. All grading will be contained within lot lines. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: The house design appears to be sympathetic to the topography of the lot. Staff is concerned that there may not be adequate spa.:c; between the retaining wall and the driveway to accommodate the proposed drainage swale. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. .—N, 00*1k /^s STAFF REPORT TO August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 4 THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Lot 50 Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Schaub Duplex Final Design Review COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. The applicant has redesigned the house as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission to eliminate the mirror image of the duplex on 3 of the 4 sides. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. Staff will require that the water service line(s) be shown on the site plan when a building permit application is presented, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. The applicant should consider additional width between the timber retaining wall and driveway in order to avoid erosion and undercutting of both. 2. The site plan submitted along with a ouilding permit application must show water service line locations. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 50, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Schaub Duplex Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, )'6� Jim Curnutte Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdraw Date Pattt Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design review approval with the condition that the applicant include the water service lines on the plans submitted for building permit. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNiNG AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 38-B, Wildridge Subdivision Rhoda Schneiderman Single Family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION The applicant wishes to construct a single family residence on Lot 38-B, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 38-B is zoned single family and is approximately .36 of an acre (15,680 square feet). The lot slopes to the south at approximately 20%. The lot coverage is 19%, leaving 81% as useable open space. The building height is 25 feet at its maximum. The driveway enters the site at the extreme east end and moves southwest to a two car garage. The garage apron area should be enlarged to allow vehicles an adequate turn around area. The residence consists of a 2150 square foot log home with attached garage. The log size is 10" round and will be stained a light oak color with dark brown windows. A woodruf masonite product will be used for the roof material. All exposed concrete will be stucco in an off white color. A landscape plan has been included for Planning and Zoning review and comment. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Lot 38-B, Wildridge Subdivision Rhoda Schneiderman Single Family Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The residence is a log home, to be supplied by the Rocky Mountain Log Home Company of Hamilton, Montana. The logs will be a 10" round log stained in a light oak color. The placement of log homes in Wildridge has been a sensitive issue with the Planning and Zoning Commission. In general, the log homes are preferred in the areas of Wildridge with the existing aspen tree cover. The Planning and Zoning should review this proposal carefully and determine if a log structure is appropriate for this lot. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: There is only one design issue which impacts adjacent properties, and that is the driveway location. the drive is located at the extreme east end of the lot and encroaches into the road right-of-way in front of the neighboring lot. This does not negatively impact the current development plans for the adjacent lot. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The residence utilizes a walkout basement design which works very well with the topography of the site. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of this residence as viewed from neighboring properties and public ways appears to be positive in all aspects. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 38-B, Wildridge Subdivision Rhoda Schneiderman Single Family Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval, assuming the Commission is comfortable with the log home in this area of Wildridge. Staff would recommend that the driveway apron be enlarged to allow adequate vehicle turn around area. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 38-B, Wildridge Subdivision Rhoda Schneiderman Single Family Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION / Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Contin ed () Denied ( ) Withdr Date ` Patti Dixon, Secretary_ The Commission qranted final design approval with the condition that the apron be widened. 0 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 38-A, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Maroney Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION The applicants wish to construct a single family home on Lot 38-A, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 38-A is .45 acre (19602 square feet) and is zoned single family. The lot is sloped to the south at about 15%. The proposed building height is 30 feet. The lot coverage is 11% and 84% of the site remains as useable open space. The driveway enters the site at its extreme eastern end and curves into the center of the lot. The Town Engineer is in the process of reviewing technical requirements related to the driveway and drainage. The residence itself is a two story iog home with a two car garage, utilizing 10" round logs, with a woodruf roof and brown aluminum windows. A landscape plan has been included for Planning and toning review and comment. STAFF COMMENTS As a conceptual review, been made. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation no formal Staff recommendation nas 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, 7 /J Rick Pylman ,(3 Director of Community Development a STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Corwin -Brown Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Steve Riden, on behalf of Bob Kedrowski, is requesting final design review of a single family residence on Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision. Lot 4 is 0.60 of an acre (26,083 square feet) and is located at the far west end of Shepherd Ridge. Lot 4 is the largest lot in the 12 lot Wildridge Acres Subdivision. The proposed building has a floor area of 2,225 square feet and a maximum building height or 34 feet above finished grade. Exterior building materials include 8' cedar siding, clad windows and masonite shingles (Woodruff). The driveway will be finished with asphalt. Color samples will be presented at the meeting. The proposed landscape plan for this lot substantially complies with the overall landscape plan for Wildridge Acres. Drip irrigation will be provided to all trees. On July 16, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this application in order to allow the applicant time to re-evaluate the driveway location, previously shown adjacent to the south property line. The applicant has raised the garage floor elevation in order to have the driveway come in straight off of Sheperd Ridge. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town, with the exception that that portion of the driveway within the right-of-way may have a grade in excess of 4%. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. / \ 10's /-N 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Corwin -Brown Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The type and quality of the building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town Guidelines and the same as those used on all of the previous buildings in Wildridge Acres. No stucco is proposed to be used on this building. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The design of this residence would not appear to have any adverse site impacts to adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The property slopes toward the west at approximately 30%. The house has been designed to step down in the direction of natural grade. The plan shows a 10% maximum slope for the proposed driveway, however, staff calculations indicate that if the 4% maximum grade is maintained within the public right-of-way the driveway grade would exceed the 10% maximum. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence trom neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. The architecture and building materials proposed for this lot seem to be a logical continuation of the Wildridge Acres theme. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. -*11 10*, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Corwin -Brown Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. Final Staff review and approval of the driveway/road intersection design prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Discussion and resolution of apparent driveway grade problems. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Corwin Brown Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions i ) Continu d (. ) Denied ( ) Withd awn Date () Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the Condition that the grade question be resolved and approved by Staff ori4x--tq h_ iL_ldin T _ it issua r. ^ STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 2, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Barron Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Steve Riden, on behalf of Bob Kedrowski, is requesting final design review of a single family residence on Lot 2, Wildridge Acres Subdivision. Lot 2 is 0.16 of an acre (7,141 square feet) and is located on the north side of Shepherd Ridge. The building has a habitable floor area of 2,000 square feet and a maximum building height of 27 feet above finished grade. Exterior building materials include stucco, 1" x 8" cedar siding, clad windows and masonite shingles (Woodruff). Asphalt is proposed as the finish treatment for the driveway. Color samples will be presented at the meeting. A landscape plan has been submitted which complies with the overall landscape plan for Wildridge Acres. Drip irrigation will be provided to all trees. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town, with the exception of a possible front yard setback encroachment. The site plan shows a patio within the front yard setback area, however, the floor plans call it a deck. Patio, sidewalks, driveways and other "at grade" improvements may encroach into setbacks, whereas decks, overhangs, or other above ground structures may not. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, 'including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZON':NG COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Lot 2, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Barron Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The type and quality of the building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town Guidelines and in conformance with previously approved buildings in Wildridge Acres. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building is sympathetic to the adjacent residential property. All grading will be contained within lot lines. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The property slopes toward the northwest at a very nominal grade. The proposed building appears to work well with site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of this residence as viewed from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. Although the east side garage door helps to break up the monotony of the building's siding, the future owner may find it more functional on the west side of the garage. The addition of a window in the garage and/or bedroom #3 would help to break up the continuous feeling of the siding. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 2, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedru,.-,ski Barron Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: This proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. Discussion and resolution of the discrepancy regarding the patio/deck within the front yard setback area. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner U STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 2, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Barron Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Apprcved with Modified Conditions.( ) Contin ed.( ) Denied ( ) Withdr Date. Patti Dixon, Secretar The .Commissior_granted final design approval with the condition that a window be added to the east elevation bedroom. --N el�s STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 6, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Long Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Steve Rider, on behalf of Bob Design Review of a single Wildridge Acres Subdivision. square feet) and is located on and Shepherd Ridge. Kedrowski is requesting Final family residence on Lot 6, Lot 6 is .17 of an acre (7,405 the western corner of Ked Spur The house has a maximum height above Tinished grade of 30 feet and a floor area of 2,340 square feet, not including garage and crawlspace. The exterior of the building will be finished with 1" x 8" cedar siding, masonite shingles (Woodruf) and clad windows. The driveway will be finished with asphalt. Proposed building colors will be presented at the meeting. The proposed landscape plan for this lot substantially complies with the overall landscape plan for Wildridge Acres. Drip irrigation will be provided to all trees. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules regulations of the Town, with the exception that the entryway c;erhang encroaches into the front yard setback area and the :site plan shows regrading on lots 5 and 7. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement., including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of the building materials are in conformance with those approved on all of the other buildings in Wildridge Acres and comply with Town guidelines. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1 )91 Page 2 of 4 Lot 6, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Long Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building is sympathetic to the adjacent residential property, however, as mentioned previously, the site plan shows regrading on Lots 5 and 7. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: The property is nearly flat over much of its area with only the southwestern 1/4 of the lot having any substantial slope to it. The house has been designed to step down in the direction of the natural grade. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public ways seems acceptable. Adequate landscape clusters have been provided throughout the property. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. As mentioned previously, the building will exhibit the same materials (with the exception of stucco) as other buildings in Wildridge Acres, however, the orientation and architecture differs. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. It should be noted that the floor plans show what appears to be a woodburning fireplace in this building. In accordance with Avon's fireplace ordinance, the apolicant will be required to pay a fee in the amount of $1,500.00 at the time a building permit application is made. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 6, wildridge Acres Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Long Residence Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: 1. Removal of the entryway overhang from the front yard setback area. 2. Letters of authorization must be provided from adjacent property owners regarding proposed regrading. 3. Payment of $1,500.00 for the woodburning fireplace must be made at the time a building permit application is made. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, ,i Jim Curnutte Planner 40 ft a STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Lot 6, Wildridge Acres Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Long Residence Fi,ial Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of this design review application with the following conditions: Removal of the entryway overhang from the front yard setl,ack area. 2. L.tters of authorization must be provided rrom adjacent property -)wners regarding proposed regrading. 3. Payment of $1,500.00 for the woodburning fireplace must be made at the time a building permit application is made. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commi.sion Action Respectfully submitted, Jim Curnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Lot 6, Wildridge Acres Subdivision Steve Riden for Bob Kedrowski Long Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTIOONN / Approved as submitted (- ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continuey ( ) Denied ( ) Withd awn NN C� e Date v �1 Pattl Dixon, Secretar The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The entryway overhang is removed from the front yard setback; 2 Payment of $1500 for the woodburning fireplace be made at time of building permit application if they wish to keep it as a__ woodburning fireplace. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Lot 83, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Mountain View Townhouses Richard Wahl and Tad Degen Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Richard Wahl and Tad Degen are requesting conceptual design review of a proposed fourplex building on Lot 83, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 83 is 0.96 of an acre (41,818 square feet) and is located near the end of Draw Spur. A fifty foot Holy Cross Electric easement runs across the northern portion of this lot. The buildable portion of the property slopes toward the southwest at approximately 17%. This two story fourplex has a maximum building height of approximately 23 feet. Each unit has a one car garage and a gas fireplace. Exterior building materials include 8" cedar channel rustic siding, Woodruf shingles, aluminum clad wood windows, insulated steel doors, concrete walkways and steps, and asphalt parking areas and driveway. Two guest parking spaces are provided. The applicant has contracted with BFI for individual unit trash piuckup. A grading and drainage plan and a landscape plan have been provided. The grading plan shows that a treated timber retaining wall (6' maximum height) will be provided along the west side of the driveway. The landscape plan has been drawn by a professional landscape architect. -he plan shows a good mixture of plant sizes and species. Formal sod lawn areas wil, be provided in the front and sides of the building. Although not indicated on the plan, the applicant has stated tha*L an automatic irrigation system will be provided to all sod areas with drip irrigation to those trees outside of the system area. A project sign is ind cated on the plan, however, no elevation drawings of the sign have been provided. This application was first presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 16, 1991. In response to the many comments from the Commission, the applicant has completely redesigned the building. The most substantial changes are that the repetitious gable roof form has been more creatively designed and the east and west unit entryways have been moved to the sides of the building. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 6, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Lot 83, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Mountain View Townhouses Richard Wahl and Tac Degen Conceptual Design Review STAFF COMMENTS Since this is a conceptual review, no formal Staff recommendation will be presented at this time. Staff, however, is somewhat concerned with the apparent lack of adequate turnaround/maneuvering space on the lot and the applicant has agreed to consider alternate driveway/parking lot designs. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, 6� Jim Curnutte Planner