Loading...
PZC Packet 040291STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Kelly Residence Revised Final Design Review INTRODUCTION In May of 1990 a final design approval was granted for the Kelly residence on Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge. The residence was a single family log home sited fairly low on the lot. A long driveway was required to reach the garage area. The Kellys are submitting a revised plan for review and approval. The project is still a single family log home, however, the architectural form and siting of the house has been amended. The house hr.s been moved up on the lot, the previous garage elevation was 8444, it is now sited at 8452. This change in siting and garage orientation is allowing a shorter access drive to the house. Architectural changes include roof form and window/door placement. STAFF COMMENTS The commission shall consider the following items iri rev. ig the design of a proposed project: 0.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of Town. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The exterior materials are hand peeled log, wood trim, stucco, and cedar shake shingles. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The residence is sited away from all required setbacks and appears to have no adverse impact to adjacent properties. Landscape plan has been submitted with the site STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Kelly Residence Revised Final Design Review plan revisions. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The owner has chosen to incorporate a walkout basement into the design of the building. This design seems to work effectively with the grade of the site. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public is acceptable. The house will sit lower than most of the adjoining lots in the area. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff recommendation is for approval of this design review application, with the same conditions as the previous approval: 1. The driveway entrance must comply with the applicable requirements for the Town o' Avon. 2. A more detailed drainage plan must be submitted for Staff review at the time of building permit application. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Kelly Residence Revised Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended 11 Conditions (V) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( Q Let ) Date q -7 --Cl( Clayton McRory, Secretary_ ion oranted final 1 with the conditions aoolicant meet staff conditions: 1. The driveway entrance must _comply with the applicable requirements for the Town of Avon; 2. A more detailed drainage plan must be submitted for staff review at the time of building permit application; 3. A new landscape drawing be submitted to the Commission showing additional landscaping on the north side of the building; and 4 The gable end of the north elevation is to be stucco with cross -hatch logs. }Yu[� STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Eaglebend Duplex Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Tony Seibert, on behalf of SLB -200 Partners, is proposing to construct a duplex on Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. Lot 8 is .36 of an acre (16,000 square feet) in size and the building coverage is approximately 2600 square feet for a building area ratio of 16%. Nearly 25% of the lot area, or approximately 4000 square feet is covered with impervious materials. The maximum building height is 37 feet from finished grade to the highest ridgeline. A landscape plan indicating plant species and size has been provided. The irrigation system as indicated on the plans will include all sod areas. The building is a 3 story wood frame building with a gable roof. Exterior building materials include 1" x 8" V -groove cedar siding with a stucco accent element. The roof material is cedar shakes. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of Town. The site plan does not adequtely detail easement and Eagle River -high water locations at the south end of the lot. Although staff research indicates all setbacks and easements are being honored, a complete site plan should be submitted prior to building permit issuance. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of both building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town Guidelines. The architectural form and materials are consistent with the remainder of the Eaglebend Subdivision. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Eaglebend Duplex Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Tony Seibert, on behalf of SLB -200 Partners, is proposing to construct a duplex on Lot 8, Block `L, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. Lot 8 is .36 of an acre (16,000 square feet) in size and the building coverage is approximately 2600 square feet for a building area ratio of 16%. Nearly 25% of the lot area, or approximately 4000 square feet is covered with impervious materials. The maximum building height is 37 feet from finished grade to the highest ridgeline. A landscape plan indicating plant species and size has been provided. The irrigation system as indicated on the plans will include all sod areas. The building is a 3 story wood frame building with a gable roof. Exterior building materials include 1" x 8" V -groove cedar siding with a stucco accent element. The roof material is cedar shakes. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of Town. The site plan does not adequtely detail easement and Eagle River -high water locations at the south end of the lot. Although staff research indicates all setbacks and easements are being honored, a complete site plan should be submitted prior to building permit issuance. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and c.uality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of both building and landscaping materials are suitable with Town Guidelines. The architectural form and materials are consistent with the remainder of the Eaglebend Subdivision. 6.13 - The mpatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. 40MN ,�, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Paye 2 of 3 Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Eaglebend Duplex Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building is sympathetic to the adjacent residential property. All grading will be contained within lot lines. The building will share a driveway cut with the adjacent Lot 7 which allows a nice landscape buffer between the street and the building. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The property slopes toward the river at approximately 7%. The design incorporates a walkout basement fronting on the river. This design seems to work well for this site. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public seems acceptable. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff recommendation is for approval of this design review application, with the following conditions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Eaglebend Duplex Residence Final Design Review 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a complete site plan be submitted for review and compliance with easement restrictions and river setbacks. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Di;-ector of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recom„n-ended Conditions (✓ ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( cc Date ` -2- R', Clayton McRory, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the conditions that the applicant return with the color scheme and a more complete landscape an. W. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Dennis Corwin/Karen Brown Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Dennis Corwin and Karen Brown are proposing to construct a single family residence on Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 49 is .55 of an acre (23,958 square feet) in size and the building coverage is approximately 1,000 square feet for a building area ratio of 4%. The floor area of the building is approximately 2200 square feet for a ratio of 9%. The maximum building height is 31 feet from finished grade to the highest ridgeline. A landscape plan indicating plant species and size has been provided. The irrigation system as indicated on the plans will be a drip system to maintain large species. The building is a two story wood frame building with a walkout basement to be utilized as a two car garage. The house has a basic gable roof form with a prow facing the street. The building materials are masonite siding and woodruff shingles. A 141 x 4" trim will be used on doors and windows. Color and material samples will be presented at the meeting. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal is in conformance with the Avon Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of Town. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The siding is proposed is a masonite product and should be reviewed for both appearance and integrity. The lower level will have exposed concrete areas. No treatment has been identified for these areas. The landscape materials appear to be small and sparsely distributed. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. STAFF REPORT April 2, 1991 Page 2 of 3 TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Dennis Corwin and Karen Brown Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The siting and landscaping of the building is sympathetic to the adjacent residential property. All grading will be contained within lot lines. The drive leading to the house is relatively long and steep (10%) and, as designed, requires cars to back out if cars are parked behind the garage. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The property slopes toward the west at approximately 25%. The house was not designed specifically for this site. The plans were designed by a commercial vender. Staff has some concern about the northwest elevation and how the lower level materials will be expressed. 6.1Z - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The appearance of this residence from neighboring properties and public seems acceptable. The siding material should be reviewed and more information regarding the relationship of the elevations and grading should be provided. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff recommendation is for approval of this design review application, with the following conditions. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Dennis Corwin and Karen Brown Residence Final Design Review 1. The driveway must meet Town of Avon design standards. 2. Material and color samples should be reviewed and approved. 3. The driveway should be designed to allow vehicles to turn around. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respfull submitted, 7��u IUA� Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved w th Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ( ) Withdrawn ( ) / Date '71 Clayton McRory, Secretary - cl The Commis_i^n denied final design approval, citing Crite 'a 6.16 - Th _ objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES April 2, 1991 Page 8 of 12 Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge,_-Dennis Corwin__and Karen_ Brown, Single Family- Residence. Final Uesign_Rev_iew,(cont) retainage and large cuts. He feels that some landscaping needs to be included nest to the house. He also would have trouble supporting this as presented. Patti Dixon stated that number one and foremost is the protection of quality development in Wildridge, and a little bit more care should be taken on the plans for this site. She definetly proposes the redwood, rather than the masonite. The retaining wall could be a problem. Landscaping needs more attention. Buz Reynolds stated that the building massing needs more work. More room will be needed for snow and turn around. The windows will need some work, and he has already voiced his opposition to the siding. He does not like the flat wall effect. There needs to be something that will provide a shadowed effect. McRory had nothing else to add. Chairman summarized, stating that from what he has heard, the Commission is not favorably disposed to this project. It might have been better for the applicant to have come in as a conceptual project rather than a final design. Jack Hunn moved, in the matter of Lot 49, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision that the application for final design approval be denied, and that the criteria cited for the denial be Criteria 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. John Perkins seconded. Karen Brown stated that, in looking around the other homes very close to this site, they are very similar to this house and that is one of the reasons that the picked out this model. They happen to be duplexes, with two peaks in the roofs instead of just one, but are similar to this design. They want to build this single family now on this side and to have the option to eventually build another single family on the other side of the lot. They felt that this design was quite similar to the other homes in the area. The applicant stated that if the only problem is the masonite, they would be quite willing to use the kiln dried cedar siding. She stated that they looked at a home in Longmont and also some in Vail almost identical to this design. They felt if it was good enough for Vail, it would certainly be good enough for Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONPNG COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lot 94, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Phil and Julie Huckaby Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Phil and Julie Huckaby have requested conceptual design review of a single family home on Lot 94, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 94 is .43 of an acre (18,731 square feet) and is located on Old Trail Road. The building has approximately 2000 square feet on its first and second floors and will include a garage below the first level. It appears that no portion of the building will exceed 30' in height. No landscape pian has been received as of this date. The building is proposed to he a two stc;'y, wood frame building with gable roofs. Building materials include 8" smooth lap siding (Masonite hardboard), stucco, masonite shingles and concrete porch slabs. The driveway will be finished with asphalt. Although still at the conceptual stage, the house appears to meet all applicable Town of Avon design criteria. Improvements within the utility easement must receive review and approval from all applicable utility companies. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, no formal Staff recommendation will be presented. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted, Jim rnutte Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lot 23, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Todd and Linda Miller Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION The Miller residence was originally submitted for conceptual review at the March 19, 1991 Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. The project consists of a single family house with an incorporated two car garage, located on 2212 Saddleridge Loop. The house is a two story with loft featuring a prow front elevation that incorporates a steep "A frame" style roof form. At the back of the house the roof pitch flattens out to accommodate the 3rd floor loft area. The Commission requested the applicant to study the driveway location/house siting as well as the combination o` roof forms. The siting of the house has not changed, however, the driveway access point has been shifted to allow a shorter. flatter driveway approach. This new access point is located directly on a curve and will be subject to review by the Town Engineer. The roof forms have been altered slightly by the addition of a dutch hip on the north elevation. In addition several window and door changes have been incorporated into the design. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, recommendation will be presented RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully s bmitted, 1CL !L Rick Pylman Director of Community Development no formal Staff !) M 41 C ••1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 2, 1991 Lots 5 and 11, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Avon Housing Authority Townhomes Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION The Town of Avon and the Avon Housing Authority are proposing to build a total of 17 townhouse units on Lots 5 and 11, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision. Lot 5 will contain a 5 unit townhouse structure and Lot 11 will accommodate two 6 unit buildings. The architectural form for all three buildings is similar, so for the purposes of conceptual review the two lots will be presented together. The architecture consists of 3 story buildings with a combination roof form of steep gables with a small shed that drops to the rear of the structure. The lowest level will consist of garage and entry areas with the upper two floors comprised of living areas. Building materials will be a wood siding material and shake shingle roofing. Conceptual site and grading plans are available for review and comment although no landscape plan will be presented for conceptual review. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a conceptual review, recommendation will be presented RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussi.n Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development no formal Staff