PZC Minutes 030690RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING
MARCH 6, 1990
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was
held on March 6, 1990, at 7:30 PM in the Town Council
Chambers of the Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark
Road, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by
Chairman Frank Doll.
Members Present: Frank Doll, John Perkins,
Jack Hunn, Terri Jeppson
Denise Hill, Buz Reynolds
Clayton McRory
Staff Present: Rick Pylman, Director of Community
Development,
Charlette Pascuzzi, Recording Secretary
Chairman Doll, at roll call noted that all members, except
Buz Reynolds were present.
Mr. Reynolds arrived immediately after roll call was taken.
n.cr„ccinn -
Rick Pylman stated that what is felt to be the final draft of
the Master Plan has been completed. He stated that the
changes that were discussed in previous joint Planning
Commission/Council meetings, and public hearings have been
included and it is felt that the Plan is now ready for
adoption. He stated that it will serve as the guideline for
growth decisions,and development decisions for the next ten
to twenty years or so.
Pylman then introduced Peter Jamar, who has worked on the
Plan since the beginning.
Mr. Jamar reviewed the changes made in the final draft:
1. The issue of fractionalization and development
rights. This is the first thing that needs to be tackled in
the implementation phase of the plan in terms of looking at
the existing plan development regulations, the zoning and
subdivision as they relate to a number of issues.
2. Wildridge and Wildwood: a couple pages of text
-%� .Ipft.
Planning and Zoning
March 6, 1990
Page 2 of 15
Commission Meeting Minutes
has been added that deal with goals and policies for these
areas, and have included those on the overall map that
designates the subareas.
3. Height limitations - The core area should
basically be the highest in terms of building heights,
basically in the four to eight story catagory ano then all
the other areas surrounding that with lower heights,
especially along the Eagle River.
4. Architectural Character - It was felt that an
overall architectural theme or character needs to be
developed for the Town.
5. Changes in Setbacks in River Corridor - the
proposed 50' public access easement along the river should be
30'.
6. Map Revisions - Jamar described the changes to
three areas on the map.
Jamar stated that various other changes have been minor.
He stated that the plan is not meant to be set in stone or
inflexible. There is an amendment procedure that is outlined
at the end of the Plan which states that two different types
of amendments are possible; one that is done by the
Community Development Department, and they are encouraging
that this happen every three to five years; and two a
private sector amendment where anybooy can come in and make
an application to amend any portion of the plan if they feel
it is in error.
Chairman Doll stated that when the document is read, people
have to realize that it is not a document that everything in
it will. be implemented within the next five years or so.
There are many items that are very expensive in the plan and
at this time there are too many other projects. Doll stated
that he felt that the plan is good for the Town of Avon.
Chairman Doll also congratulated Mr. Jamar and his associates
on the time and work put in on this Plan.
Jack Hunn stated that he felt it would provide a good
framework for the Town. He asked if there was any conflict
with the river setback of thirty feet and the Corps of
Engineers requirements. Jamar stated he knew of none.
Denise Hill felt that the Plan would be a good tool for the
Planning and Zoning
March 6, 1990
Page 3 of 15
^ 10�
Commission Meeting Minutes
Comprehensive Plan - Discussion - Planning and Zoning
Resolution Recommending Adoption (cont)
Town and she had no problems with it.
John Perkins stated he disagrees with the thirty foot river
setback, but that doesn't keep him from adopting the
resolution.
Terri Jeppson stated she is comfortable with the Plan.
Buz Reynolds stated he feels it is a great guideline, but it
will take a lot of work to make it work.
Clayton McRory stated that it was a great job, but he is
concerned about the amount of time spent talking to the
Wildlife Division. Jamar stated that they had two different
meetings with the Wildlife Division and they feel that the
Plan is a good Plan.
Discussion followed on the cost to develop a more
comprehensive and detailed design guidelines.
Perkins stated that since the Commission he's determined that
the Comprehensive Plan is essential to conduct the designated
duties of the Commission, he moves to approve Town of Avon
Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 90-3, Series of
1990, "A Resolution Recommending Adoption of the Town of
Avon, Colorado, Comprehensive Plan"
Hill seconded.
The motion carried unanimously.
Rick Pylman took this opportunity to thank the Commission
members for their work and time spent on this Plan.
Lot 23, Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek. ---Wolff Warehouse,_
Review of Special Review Use.
Rick Pylman stated that the applicant was not able to make it
to the meeting and had asked that this be continued to the
3/20/90 meeting.
Jack Hunn moved to continue this item to March 20, 1990.
Buz Reynolds seconded. The motion carried unanimously.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 4 of 15
Lot 3 Block 3. Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Conceptual Desi9_n
Review
Pylman described the location. of Lot 3, Block 3. He stated
that the applicant is back with another conceptual review to
show his response to the comments made by the Commission at
the previous conceptual review. He stated that the project
has been broken into phases, with phase one being the main
building and phase two being the small convenience store that
sits in the corner. Pylman then introduced the applicants
Steve Riden and Jeff Gibson.
Mr. Riden stated that they had reduced the size of the main
building and limited the number of tenants. Since the number
of tenants has been reduced, so has the resources to build
out completely, therefore, they plan to phase the project.
The convenience store and gas station will be built at a
later date. Also, they have increased the turn in lane
according to the highway department regulations and provided
a secondary access to improve the circulation. In the
meantime they will continue an access off Beaver Creek Blvd.
He then described the possible tenants,
Discussion followed on the landscaping to be used as a buffer
area along Sunridge; the possible access through the Sunridge
parking lot; the parking requirements, the revised
architectural design and colors; and the access off highway
6. A more detailed description is not possible due to
several individual conversations being conducted at the same
time.
Hunn suggested that, at the time for final design, the
applicant provide a massing model and also a signage program.
Chairman Doll reiterated that what needs to be discussed the
next time they come in is parking, a model of both phases,
and a sign program.
Rick Pylman stated that this lot has an existing foundation
on it. There was a building approved sometime ago and
construction was started and then stopped and they have
redesigned the house and would like to build on that
foundation. The structure is more like a primary/secondary
residence. There is a two bedroom unit located in the lower
level and the main level and upper level of the unit consists
of the primary residence. The lot is apporximately 16,000
square feet, the building footprint is about 3,300 square
,. 1_4N
Planning and Zoning
March 6, 1990
Page 5 of 15
Commission Meeting Minutes
Lot 7 Filing 1, Eaglebend South Harbor Development. _Q -up -lex
Design Review (cont)
feet for a building area ratio of 20%, about 16% of the site
is paved with parking or sidewalk, and the landscape area is
approximately 63% of the site. This includes the riverbank
and the part that drops down into the river. The building
height is within the zoning regulations of 35 feet. Primary
materials are a one by eight cedar lap siding, and cedar
shake roof. The color scheme is a woodland green for the
siding, a cypress moss for the trim and a cottonwood for the
windows. Pylman stated that the applicant indicated that
they wanted to utilize the landscape plan that had been
approved with the existing foundation.
Pylman stated that the project is in conformance with all
regulations with the Town of Avon. The type and quality of
building materials seem to be suitable. With the exception
of the absence of the landscape plan, architecturally this
house meets the criteria of compatibility to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties. Regarding the visual
appearance as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties, the architecture of this building meets that
criteria. Pylman stated that this project is in conformance
with all the goals of the Town of Avon.
Pylman stated that architecturally the application is
complete, However, he has a problem with using a landscape
plan for a site when the building design has been radically
changed. He feels that a landscape plan needs to work with
an architectural design. He recommends that the applicant
come in with a landscape plan that works with this specific
design.
Jackie Montgomery stated that they will be massing more
landscaping around and she stated that she will bring a
landscape plan that is more compatible for this house.
Pylman described the entries to the secondary unit. He
stated that there needs to be a walkway that comes around to
the entry in the back. Jackie Montgomery stated that they
have been working on this and there will be a walkway. She
described on the plans where a glassed -in air -lock will be
constructed. Discussion followed on this. It was suggested
that when she brings in the landscape plan she also include a
sketch of the proposed glassed -in air -lock.
Hunn stated he was concerned with the amount of exposed
foundation in the area that steps down the hill and several
other areas. He suggested introducing a stucco finish to the
Planning and
March 6, 1990
Page 6 of 15
tIMIN 1-1
Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Lot 7 Filing 1 Eaglebend. South Harbor Develo�ment,_uupelxy
Design Review (cont)
foundation. Ms. Montgomery stated they had discussed using
stone for this instead of stucco. Also discussed was the
matter of the awkward windo�q groupings, especially the
kitchen window.
Jack Hunn moved to grant final design review approval for Lot
7, Filing 1, Eaglebend, with the following conditions:
1. The applicant bring a. final landscaping design
back to the Commission for approval.
2. Any modifications to
secondary unit be brought back to the
3. The applicant study
specifically the kitchen window in the
4. The applicant reconsider
th next meeting.
the entrance
Board.
the window
main residence.
the colors and
them at e
5. No exposed foundation walls be
ait.hpr stucco or stone be used to screen those.
to the
design,
discuss
present and
Terri Jeppson seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously.
Lot 3 Filing 1 Eaglebend South Harbor Development. Single_
Family Design Review
Rick Pylman stated that this is a 16,000 square foot lot, the
building footprint is 1250 square foot, so the building area
ratio is 8%. The building height is 32 feet and all the
building setback requirements have been met. It is
essentially a gable roof form, with an exposed truss system
other South Harbor
that has been seen on some of the
buildings. T;?e primary building material is a cedar siding
with stucco used as a minor accent element, and cedar shake
roof. There is a landscape plan that is fairly complete and
a color scheme has been provided.
Pylman stated that the project is in conformance with all
Town of Avon zoning regulations. The type and quality of
both building and landscape materials are consistent with
Town guidelines. He stated that with the aspen trees, he
would like to see them specified with caliper width instead
of height. The site is at the extreme eastern portion of Lot
3, so some particular attention i>hould be given to the east
elevation. The reason for that siting is that this is part
of the same complex of homes looked at at the last meeting on
Lot 4. The applicant's final goal is to do some
resubdividing and create three single family houses on the
Planning and Zoning
March 6, 1990
Page 7 of 15
Commission Meeting Minutes
Lot 3 Filing 1. Eaglebend South Harbor Develoamen�t Single
Family Residence Design Review (contZ
two duplex lots. This is a single family home on a duplex
lot and that is what was presented with Lot 4. The applicant
should come through, if he intends on preceeding with the
three single family home concept, for a subdivision. That,
will need an amendment to the zone district.
Regarding compatibility with site topography, with the
exception of the proposed deck that extends out over the bank
of the river, the structure itself is well sited into the
topography. The visual appearance is compatible with the
adjacent neighboring properties, again with the exception of
the deck which will have a lot of underside exposure. There
is no conflict with the improvement being so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity. Pylman stated he
considered this a complete application.
Chairman Doll echoed the comment made by Mr. Pylman regarding
the subdivision of the two lots. This needs to be done
before the applicant gets too much further along.
Jackie Montgomery stated that they have made a change in the
floor plan from the ones presented prior to this time. The
west side will not have much fenestration, so they plan to do
a lot of heavy landscaping on that side to break the building
up. Most of the orientation is over the river and to the
east. The lot is a short lot like Lot 2 and Lot 4, but the
redesign is such that they did not have to come in and ask
for a variance. There would be no problem in addressing the
deck overhang with some sort of latticework.
Doll suggested that the latticework be put up on Lot 2 also.
John Perkins suggested a little more stucco other than ,lust
in behind the truss elements might help the house some. He
suggested a railing on the deck area.
Reynolds stated he has a concern about the property lines
when the subdivision is done. He likes the idea of the
single family homes.
Further discussion followed on the possible subdivision of
the lots.
Hunn stated that during the site visit they noticed three
very large spruce trees in the back. He suggested that the
trees be protected from construction activity. He stated that
he agrees with the staff that the encroachment of the deck
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 8 of 15
Lot 3 Filing 1 Eaglebend, South Harbor Develppment,_____Single
Family Residence Design Review (cont)
off the bank seems to be in conflict with the topography and
unless this is handled very carefully he would not be
comfortable with it. Also, There are only two species of
trees proposed and there are no shrubs proposed, the location
of the sod is not indicated and neither is the native
vegetation, and neither is irrigation shown. Jackie
Montgomery stated that there is irrigation. He requested
that the landscape plan be brought back to the Commission for
approval. He suggested that the landscape designer try to
screen the utility boxes, als.). Hunn also feels that the
colors that are proposed appear to be a bit dark. Jackie
Montgomery stated that they can go lighter on this house as
it is not presold.
Hunn moved to grant final approval to Lot 3, Filing 1,
Eaglebend Subdivision, with the following conditions:
1. That the applicant reconsider the landscaping
plan, taking into consideration the comments made at this
meeting, and bringing the plan back for Commission approval.
2. The applicant reconsider the use of stucco as a
second exterior finish material, and bring this back to the
Board.
3. That the applicant agrees to install a railing
on the exterior deck and provide a 'lattice system to screen
the underside of the deck.
4. That the applicant understand that there is no
endorsement at this time of any subdivision of this lot to
allow the third unit.
5. The applicant, during construction, protect the
existing spruce trees with whatever techniques recommended by
staff.
Denise Hill seconded.
Perkins stated that the applicant needs to show more detail
on landscape plans then what has been submitted, i. e.
ground covers, walkways, and maybe a more variety of
material.
The motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Doll suggested that the applicant may want to
consider hiring a landscaper to do the landscape plans once
the elevations etc on the house is done.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 9 of 15
Lot 14 Block 3. Wildridge. Goddard Single Family Residence1
Design Review
Rick Pylman pointed out the location of this project on the
map. The lot is a little over 21,000 square feet, the
building footprint is 3,200 square feet, for a building area
ratio of 15%. The building height is varied, but at no point
does it exceed the Town of Avon height regulations. The site
plan includes a complete landscape plan, snow storage and
usable open space. There is a color sample, the primary
material is stucco, with wood accent trims. The project is
in complete conformance with the zoning code. The type and
quality of the materials are consistent with Town guidelines.
The stepped roof forrai and profile will minimize impacts to
adjacent properties. The building is compatible with the
existing topography. The visual appearance of the proposed
improvement should present a positive image from adjacent
public and private properties. The improvement is not so
similar or dissimilar to others it the vicinity. It is in
conformance with our goals policies and programs. Staff
feels that this is a complete application.
Denise Hill stated she noted several fireplaces and asked if
they are gas and if so is the applicant aware that there is
no gas. Eric Vogelman, representing Kristen Goddard, stated
that they plan on burying a tank and also there is a rumor
that within a year or so there should be gas there.
Discussion followed on the types of windows used, the colors
of the trim of the windows and the color of the beams and
garage door. Vogelman stated that the only color will be the
trim on the windows and they will be some sort of muted Santa
Fe type of blue, or green, or mix etc. The commission asked
that a sample be provided. The garage will be a brownish or
greyish wash. The roof material will be gravel.
Discussion followed on the width of 'the driveway. Discussion
followed on the landscaping plan. Vogelman stated that there
will be an irrigation system.
Hunn commented on the remote meter out near the street and
suggested that it be screened. Vogelman stated that the
solution is to stucco the vhole thing in and this is what
they have in mind.
Perkins moved to grant final design approval to the Goddard
Residence, Lot 14, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, with the
recommendation that the driveway width be considered and that
the remote meter box be screened, and the trim color be
presented to staff for approval.
Planning and Zoning
March 6, 1990
Page 10 of 15
commission Meeting Minutes
Lot 14 Block 4 Wildridge Goddard Single Fami_1y- Residence
Design Review (cont
McRory seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Lot 71, Block 2. Benchmark at Beaver Creek Desi n Review
Rick Pylman stated that at the conceptual review the
commission had made some suggestions and the applicant is
present to respond to those comments and for final design
review if so warranted.
Pylman stated that Allenbrook Enterprises Developers is the
applicant and they are proposing a commercial building, a
total of 10,730 square feet, counting both stories. The
building has a footprint of a little over '7,600 square feet.
It is an almost 25,000 square foot lot for a building ratio
of 30%, parking and sidewalk area is approximately 50% of the
site and the landscape area makes up the remaining 20%.
There is 7,500 square feet of leasable retail space and 3,230
square feet of second story loft space. There are 32 parking
spaces and a loading berth. Pylman stated that at the
conceptual review the Commission identified four main areas
of concern with the proposal. Those areas of concern were:
Sidewalks across the site; Sidewalks from the prcierty line
to the building front; parking configurations; and the
design of the gable end on the west elevation. Pylman
stated that the applicant has addressed those issL-es, they
have changed the parking configuration, they have added
sidewalks and the gable end has been modified. The staff
does have some issues mainly oriented toward engineering
issues. The si`.e plan has three access points on the site.
The shared access point with the Buck Creek Plaza building,
and two additional acceF. points. The Town Engineering Staff
feels strongly that there a -e quite a few access points along
this road already, that this is a fairly short frontage and
there should be no more than two access points onto this
site. Those access points should line up with the access
points to the Annex building that are located across the
street from this project. An additional concern is related
to the design of the loading facility. Previously that was a
drive through loading facility and now with the shared access
being blocked from continuing on through Lot 71, there is a
concern with the functional ability of that loading space.
With the traffic counts on that road, Staff would not like to
see a loading design that forced trucks to back out onto the
road. An additional concern goes back to the construction of
the Annex Building and a staff determination and Commission
decision that was granted at that time regarding some loft
space. The applicant is asking for a similar interpretation
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 11 of 15
Lot 71 Block 2. Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Design Review
cont
for this site. The Annex building incorporated some second
story loft spaces into their building and those were approved
with the condition that access by the public not be made
available to those spaces. Those spaces could be used as an
office for the particular retail business or for storage.
With those conditions, there was no parking requirements for
that footage. There is no parking provided for the loft
space on this application. Staff interpretation on 'the Annex
was that parking should be required for the loft areas, and
to be consistent, Staff should take that same position here
and say that space does create a parking demand and parking
should be provided for that square footage. If Commission
makes a decision that is consistent with what happened with
the Annex, he requested that the same conditions that were
put in place with the Annex, be applied to this project. One
additional engineering concern was offsite drainage. At the
present time there is located on the site plan a culvert that
enters into a storm system that goes through the Annex
property. He stated that in more detailed building plans we
should see a drop structure that continues that storm sewer
system.
Pylman stated that the staff interpretation is, that with the
loft spaces, this proposal would require 43 parking spaces,
the site plan indicates 32 space. Other than that this
proposal does meet Town regulations. The type and quality of
both building and landscape materials is consistent with Town
guidelines. Staff recommends that a type of ground cover be
specified is some areas where larger species are indicated,
but no ground cover. Staff has no concern with the impacts
of this project on adjacent properties. Regarding the
topography, the parking lot grade is shown at 5%, but that is
within acceptable standards for a parking area. Pvlman
suggested landscaping the back of the building to make it
look more presentable. ith the exception of parking
regulations and the access points, this proposal is in
conformance with the Town Goals.
Chairman Doll stated that he would recommend that this
project be approved the same way the Annex building was
approved, with the condition to the owner that every one of
the spaces that is leased, include in the lease that the loft
space will not be used for office space or any other
commercial space that requires additional parking. Doll also
addressed the matter of the entry ways. He stated that he
will not recommend approval of anything that requires backing
trucks off of or into the street from this parking area.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 12 of 15
Lot 71 Block 2 Benchmark At Beaver Creek Design Review,
cont
Mark Donaldson, representing Allenbrook Enterprises, stated
that they have dealt witFthe four issues mentioned at the
conceptual design review. Donaldson stated that they do have
a way to deal with the loading berth concern which includes
modifying the site plan back to a way that was acceptable tc!
the staff before. He stated that the largest issue is thf:
third road cut. He stated that they do have on the south
road cut, alignment with the adjacent property. He proceeded
to describe the reasoning for the three access po-nts. I -e
stated that the drainage design is something they are fully
prepared to deal with. They are trying to get through
preliminary or final design approval so that they can get the
civil engineering and preliminary plating done at the same
time. He stated that they have spoken with Norm Wood about
his thoughts on the drainage and are fully prepared to deal
with it. They will bury the culvert continuously, landscape
it etc. Regarding the parking requirements, the spaces in the
loft are only suitable for storage and they would like to
have the same interpretation as far as the parking
requirements as the Annex received. Regarding the ground
cover, that will be the snow and summer cover. They have no
problem increasing the caliper of the aspens and they feel
the idea of putting landscape in the rear of the building is
well founded. The darker color stucco will be #11113 of the
Sto Color System and the lighter stucco color is #10710 Sto
Color System. The metal roof will be a forest green.
Jack Hunn inquired about the curb and gutters and snow
storage. Donaldson stated that the snow storage will be the
landscape areas and that the excess will be hauled off.
Hunn also stated that he would be comfortable with the
interpretation that the lofts do not contribute to the
required parking as long as those standard conditions are
imposed. Hunn questioned the concrete columns in the parking
lot. Donaldson stated that they feel it is a protective
measure. Discussion followed on the back elevation and the
lack of doors. Discussion also followed on the possible
solutions to the loading berth problem. Further discussion
followed on the alignment of the access points. Discussion
followed on the possible time frame of Beaver Creek Place
becoming one way.
More discussion followed on the colors.
Reynolds stated that he too has problems with the snow
storage and the loading berth. As to the road cuts he will
leave that to the staff to determine.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 13 of 15
Lot 71 Bock 2 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Design Review.
cont
McRory stated that he thinks that the architectural scheme is
along the lines of the neighborhood, but he is concerned with
trying to tie the colors in a little more gradual. That is
why he has a problem with the roof.
Jeppson stated that she likes the building and she is ok with
the color, but she still has a problem with the parking in
that she feels it is a lictle tight. Discussion followed on
this matter. She also has a problem with the trucks that
will be coming into this parking area. She also has a
problem with the landscaping. She would like to see more
mature landscaping and more evergreens so that in the winter
it won't look so barren.
Pylman stated that given past actions, the interpretation on
the parking is appropriate and he would like to work with Mr.
Donaldson on the loading and the access to try to get those
matters addressed.
Lighting was then discussed.
Discussion followed on the matter of any conditions to be
imposed and the fact that approval could probably be handled
by staff. Pylman stated that he would like to bring back the
site plan that shows the agreed upon access points. The
other issues can be handled by Staff. Denise Hill asked if
the applicant will be back with a sign program. Mr Donaldson
stated that they would.
Jack Hunn moved to grant final approval to Lot 71, Block 2,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek, as presented, with the following
conditions:
1. That a final site plan indicating solutions for
loading, access and site drainage be brought back to this
board.
2. That a final landscape plan, including site
lighting be brought back to this board.
3. The applicant reconsider the colors selected
and presented, based on the comments made tonight and come
back with his final color proposal.
4. The sign program be brought back to the board
at a later date.
5. That the Commission approve the applicant's
request that lofts not require additional parking provided
that lofts are restricted to storage or office use
exclusively for the use of the tenant and that those loft
areas may not be sublet by the tenant for any reason.
Planning and Zoning
March 6, 1990
Page 14 of 15
Commission Meeting Minutes
Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Design Review,
jcont
McRory seconded.
Further discussion followed on the colors.
Chairman Doll then polled the Commisson and the motion
carried four to three with Jeppson, Reynolds and McRory
voting nay.
Reading and Approval of P & Z Minutes of 2/20/90 Regular
Meeting
Denise Hill moved to
of February 20, 1990
Perkins seconded and
Other Business
approve the minutes
as submitted.
the motion carried
of the P & Z Meeting
unanimously.
Rick Pylman stated that at the last meeting, during the
setback variance in Wildridge, there was some confusion. The
plans he was given didn't show a roof overhang and when the
applicant made the presentation he explained about the roof
overhang, which meant that he needed a 14 foot variance
instead of an 11 foot variance as the resolution 90-2 was
written. Pylman asked for approval of the corrected
resolution.
Perkins moved to amend Resolution 90-2 to read a 14 foot
variance rather than an 11 foot variance.
Jeppson seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Denise Hill moved to adjourn.
Perkins seconded.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Charlette Pascuzzi
Recording Secretary
r,
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 6, 1990
Page 15 of 15
V /
Commissio vaZ Date 3 -do HLA
F. Doll _
T. Jepp
D. Hill IM
—
C.
A. Reynolds