Loading...
PZC Packet 081589STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 15, 1989 Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Batas west Condominium Association Exterior Color Change Design Review INTRODUCTION The Balas West Condominium Association wishes to change the predominant color of a multi -family building to the same color as presently exists on a neighboring building of similar design. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon COMMENT: The project appears to meet applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. No unusual conditions occur. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are compatible with the existing structure in the vicinity. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The requested color change will bring more color compatibility with adjacent structures. Therefore, the color change improves its relationship to adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: The location of the structure, next to I-70, is an important element in the presentation of the community to the public. The color chanar� enhances the presentation. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 5, 1989 Page 2 of 3 Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Balas west Condominium Association Exterior Color Change Design Review properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of the proposed color change does not appear to pose any deleterious effects from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: The improvement is aesthetic in nature and is not so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. According to Section 6.25 Building Design: 3. Natural or earth tones are encouraged as the dominant color with brighter colors used for accent. COMMENT: The proposed color change is not in conflict with the foregoing design criteria. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The proposal is consistent with the rules and regulations regarding Design Review Consideration. •) 40 40 r., Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Balas West Condominium Association Exterior Color Change Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff); 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Staff Comments; 5. Commission Review - Action Respectfully submitted, James F. Lamont PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted (v/) Approved with Recommenaed Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn l ) `'A Date 6 �(YF✓ Denise Hi 11 , Secretary "iL- The Commission approved the painting of the building at Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Balas West Condominium, the color to match the adjacent buildi MDR • ] •1 401 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 15, 1989 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Landscape Plan Review INTRODUCTION The applicant was requested to submit a landscape plan by decision of the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant has submitted the plans which indicates some areas of disturbance which require revegetation. The location of three tree species are included. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.23 - Landscaping: A. Design: 1. Landscaping design should be compatible with other site improvements and with neighboring properties. COMMENT: Landscape design is similar to other site improvement and can be compatible with neighboring properties. 2. Not less than 50% of the useable open space area required, shall consist of pervious landscape areas. The remaining useable open space requirements may be satisfied by impervious patio or mall type areas containing seating, decorative fountains, planters, recreational amenities and similar type facilities. COMMENT: Area of useable open space is not indicated. 3. Consideration should be given to use of landscape materials for snow fencing, visual screening and windbreaks when applicable. COMMENT: No use of landscape materials has been used to create snow fencing, visual screening or windbreaks of any significance. 4. Plant materials should be adaptable to the area and selection and placement should include r -M �1 Ol ,--N Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 2 of 3 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Landscape Plan Review consideration of function and color coordination. COMMENT: Pines located in primary view may block view eventually. No identification of specific plant material or seed mix or other than sage has been indicated. No means of irrigation is indicated. 5. All lots to be covered by grass lawns shall utilize healthy sod material for complete coverage. All grass sod shall extend to the property line or, where adjacent to a roadway, to the bottom of adjacent drainage ditches or back of curb as applicable. COMMENT: No sodded areas are indicated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The applicant needs to indicate method of irrigation, suitable seed mix for native grasses, suitable revegetation material and irrigation maintenance for disturbed areas having a slope of more than a slope of 2:1. Method of maintaining re:egetated areas needs to be indicated. The applicant needs to more clearly indicate site areas which are to be disturbed and revegetated. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff); 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Staff Comments; 5. Commission Review - Action • ) G Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge Ptach Residence Landscape Plan Review Respectfully submitted, James F. Lamont PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted (,,/) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (( ) / Date 8 -IS !A Denise Hill, Secretary XI nl& AG'd The Commission approved the landscape plan for the Ptach residence,_. Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge with a letter to staff as a follow up____ on the recommendations regarding the method of irrigation and plant I STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 15, 1989 Lot 6, Filing 1, Eaglebend South Harbor Development Duplex Final Design Review INTRODUCTION The applicant, South Harbor construct a duplex residential Eaglebend. Development Company wishes to structure on Lot 6, Filing I, T!llis lot has special circumstances. Forty percent of the site is located within the 30 foot riverfront setback. It includes the water course of the Eagle River from bank to bank. Portions of the riparian habitat has been clear cut and striped from the site area. Special provisions should be considered which prevents the removal of native riparian vegetation on this or adjacent sites. According to information on the application and accompanying exhibits, the proposed structure has a building footprint of 2,530 square feet contained in a wood tramed structure. Average height appears to be within estimated height limitations of 35 feet. The site plan indicates that disturbea areas of land will be revegetated with sod. One hundred percent of the useable open space will be disturbed. An estimated 51 % of the useable open space is covered by permeable surface. The structure has wood siding, with a field stone veneer foundation. Sixty percent of the site will be disturbed. Type of existing vegetation is not indicated in sufficient detail. The building, deck and driveway coverage of the site is approximately 51% of the site. The useable open space area is not indicated on site plan. Main drainage channel for the site is located in the driveway. Driveway grade is not shown. Drainage channels and flow direction grade is not shown. Drainage channels and flow directions are not shown on the exhibits. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: Staff Report to August 15, 1989 Page 2 of 5 the Planning and Zoning Commission Lot 6, Filing 1, Eaglebend South Harbor Development Duplex Final Design Review 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon COMMENT: The project appears to meet most applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. Unusual conditions occur on the site. The location of the structure will cause tY•e demise of several mature willow trees. Rear setback should be calculated from 30 foot high water setback. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type aiid quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and tv.- site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are compatible with existing structures in the vicinity. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The maximized building footprint will cause damage to riparian habitat. Drainage from parking lot should not be allowed to enter riparian habitat unfiltered. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: The alteration of topography and removal of vegetation may be excessive. Disturbed areas should be reduced. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of the residence does not appear to pose any deleterious effects from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. The color of the structure was not available for review. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. M P'! Staff Report to the Planning and "zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 5 Lot 6, F ling 1, Eaglebend South Harbor Development Duplex Final Design Review COMMENT: The improvement is residential in nature and is dissimilar to others in the vicinity. Monetary and aesthetic values may be impaired. Excessive disturbance and use of the riparian habitat will cause long term irreparable damage. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. C014MENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon, except for the proper use and protection of the riparian habitat of the Eagle River. The need effect of improper treatment of the riparian habitat will increase stream bank erosion and contribute to a diminished water quality standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION An appropriately sized culvert be located in drainage channel at the beginning of the driveway. Coosolidation of site disturbance areas should be considered. Consolidation will reduce ;.he disturbed area of the site. Structure should be setback from root systems of trees located in riparian habitat. Heavy icing of driveway will result from using the driveway as a primary drainage channel. The applicant has not submitted materials or exterior color samples for review. The applicant has not indicated method of irrigation. Suitability of vegetation material for local climate cannot be determined. Revegetation material for disturbed areas having E slope of more than a slope of 2:1 cannot be determined. Method of maintaining reveaetated areas is not indicated. Accuracy of statistical information and dimensions cannot be •■ 7 i 1 7 Staff Report to the Planning and Zining Commission August 15, 1989 Page 4 of 5 Lot 6, Filing 1 South Harbor Development Duplex Final Design Review verified from exhibits provided for review. Exterior lighting: Noted Trash Storage: Not Shown Location of existing vegetation and rock outcroppings not shown Drainage: Not Shown Ramp Grades Not Shown Existing plant materials to be removed and retained: Not Shown RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff); 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Staff Comments; 4. Commission Review - Action Respectfully submitted, James F. Lamont • i Staff Report to the Planning and "Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 5 of 5 Lot 6, Filing 1, Eaglebend South Harbor Development Duplex Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (Vol Denied ( ) Withdrawn f((�� ) Date �- 15451 Denise Hill, Secretary glil,& Aba The Commission continued this item until the first meeting in September due to lack of information and proposed changes. --N STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 15, 1989 Lot 1, Nottingham Station Screening Non -conforming Use Design Review INTRODUCTION The tenants of the parcel known as the "Stockyard" oened by William Nottingham have submitted a landscape proposal that has been required by the Town of Avon in fulfillment of applicable provisions of the Zoning Code The applicant requests to construct a large landscape berm 8-10' high along the western boundary line of Nottingham Ranch Lot 1. The applicant has provided assurance that the site will be maintained in as clean and organized manner as their trades will allow. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consiaer the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other app icable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon COMMENT: The project appears to meet applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. No unusual conditions occur. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are compatible with those existing in the vicinity. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to min-mize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The requested landscaping and organized storage areas will bring more compatibility with adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposed change improves it - relationship to adjacent properties. 6.14 - rt -e compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: The location of the landscape berm, next Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 2 of 4 Lot 1, Nottingham Station Screening Non -conforming Use Design Review to Avon Road, is an important element in the presentation of the community to the public. The proposed landscape change enhances the presentation of the property to the public. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of the proposed landscape change does not appear to pose any deleterious effects from adjacent and neighboring properties ano public ways. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values. monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: The improvement is aesthetic and functional in nature and is not so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. 6.23 Landscaping: A. Design: 1. Landscaping design should be compatible with other site improvements and with neighooring properties. COMMENT: Landscaping design should be compatible with other site improvement and can be compatible with neighboring properties. 2. Not less than 50% of the useable open space area required, shall consist of previous landscape areas. The remaining useable open space requirements may be Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Lot 1, Nottingham Station Screening Non -conforming Use Design Review satisfied by impervious patio or mall type areas containing seating, decorative fountains, planters, recreational amenities and similar type facilities. COMMENT: Area of useable open space is not indicated. 3. Consideration should be given to use of landscape materials for snow fencing, visual screening and windbreakks when applicable. COMMENTS: The proposed berm is sufficiently high to act as a snow fence, a visual screen, and windbreak which is not in conflict with any public right-of-way. 4. Plant materials should be adaptable to the area and selection an placement should include consideration of function and color coordination. COMMENT: No identification of specific plant material or seed mix. No means of irrigation is indicated. 5. All lots to be covered by grass lawns shall utilize healthy sod material for complete coverage. All grass sod shall extend to the property line or, where adjacent to a roadway, to the bottom of adjacen'c drainage ditches or back of curb as applicable. COMMENT: No sodded areas are indicated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Seeding, maintenance, and irrigation requirement should accompany final approval of the proposal. The proposal is generally consistent with the rules and regulations regarding Design Review Consideration. Stafr Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 4 of 4 Lot 1, Nottingham Station Screening Non -conforming Use Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION I . Introduce Application (Staff); 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Staff Comments; 5. Commission Review - Action Respectfully submitted, James F. Lamont PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions (✓ ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Denise Hill, Secretary &n1m/'// d The Commission approved the landscape screening berm with the following conditions: 1. That the berm receive a minimum of 3 inches of top soil and that the berm be revegetated with appropriate seed mix, with the understanding that it is not irrigated; 2. That the finished product be Free of debris and have a clean appearance; 3. Thet this improvement be completed by September 30 1989; 4 That the stockyard materials are to removed from the site or be relocated to a position where they are screened from the road right-of-way, also by September 30, 1989. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 15, 1989 Lot 41, Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision Terence Allan Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Terence Allan wishes to construct a single family residence on Lot 41, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. According to information on the application, the proposed structure is 3700 Gross Square Feet contained in a wood framed structure which is 43 feet high from the Garage/Basement floor to the top of the rage line. Average height is within estimated height limitations. The site plan indicates that disturbed areas of land will be revegetated with carpet bugle or spreading yew ground cover on all 2:1 slopes. Approximately 40% of the site will be disturbed. Type of existing vegetation is not indicated. The building, deck and driveway coverage of the site is approximately 12% of the site. The useable open space area is not indicated on site plan. Main drainage channel for the site is located in th-s driveway. Driveway is at its steepest 14% grade. Drainage is adjacent to :'oundation on north side of the house. Height of garage door is designed to provide for indoor parking of motor home in the basement garage. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon COMMENT: The project appears to meet applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. No unusual conditions occur, except the location of the lot on a sloping corner turn of a thoroughfare. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Staff Report to August 15, 1989 Page 2 of 4 the Planning and Zoning Commission Lot 41. Block 4, Wildridge Terence Allan Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are compatible with the existing structure in the vicinity. 6.13 - The compatioility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The driveway entrance has been located at best location to observe traffic rounding the blind corner. An alternative driveway location would increase 'the disturbed area on the site. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: The alteration of topography and removal of vegetation may be excessive. Drainage is sufficient. Disturbed areas should be reduced and fill areas consolidated. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of the residence does not appear to pose any deleterious effects from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. 6.16 - The cbjective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: The improvement is residential in nature and is not so similar or dissimilar to oth�;� in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Lot 41, Block 4, Wildridge Terence Allan Residence Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION An appropriately sized culvert be located in drainage channel at the beginning of the driveway. Consolidation of fill dirt areas should be considered. Consolidation will reduce the disturbed area of the site. Snow storage areas should be designated on the site plan. Heavy icing of driveway will result from using the driveway as a primary drainage cahnnel. The applicant has not submitted materials or exterior color samples for review. The applicant has not indicated method of irrigation. Suitability of vegetation material for local climate cannot be determined. Revegetation material for disturbed areas having a slope of less than a slope of 2:1 cannot be determined. Method of maintaining revegetated areas is not indicated. Utility service locations have not been -indicated. Accurate gradelines are not indicated on building elevations. Exterior lighting: Not Shown. Trash Storage: Not Shown. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff); 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Staff Comments; 5. CommiGsion Review - Action Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 4 of 4 Lot 41, Block 4, Wildridge Terence Allan Residence Final Design Review Respectfully submitted, James F. Lamont PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date 6 6-W% Denise Hi 11 , Secretary &Mike' The Commission tabled this item due to lack of information. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 15, 1989 Lot 25, Block 2, Benctmark at Beaver Creek Christie Lodge Owners Association Lodge Pool and Enclosure Final Design Review INTRODUCTION The Christie Lodge Owners Association has applied for des,gn review and zoning approval for a swimming pool and enclosure. The enclosure will feature a removable root and side curtains. The proposed pool and enclosure would be located in the northwest corner of the Christie Lodge site near the intersection of Avon Road and I-70. A variance has been granted for thq pool enclosure to encroavh into setbacks along Avon Road and I-70. Schematic and final drawings showing the proposed pool layout and the design of the enclosing structure have been submitted. The applicant requests final approval of the pool location, a pool enclosure and landscaping. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.10 - The Commission shall consider the tollowing items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon COMMENT: Approval of the setback variance brings the project into conformance with applicable rules and regulations. 6,12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The type and quality of materials are compatible with existing structure which the proposed project abuts. 6.13 - The compatibility Of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The adjacent properties are put'ic road right-of-ways. The proposed project appeal% to have no impact. The location of the utilities •And drainage have been altered with no deleterious effect on adjacent Staff Report to August 15, 1989 Page 2 of 3 the Planning and Zoning Commission Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Christie Lodge Owners Association Lodge Pool and Enclosure Final Design Review rights -of -ways. Views from adjacent properties will not be affected. 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. COMMENT: No significant alteration of topography is proposed. Drainage appears to be sufficient. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of the residence does not appear to pose any deleterious effects from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. A screening fence will be constructed along Avon Road. A similar fence already exists along the I-70 right-of-way. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: The improvement is recreational in nature as well as common to hotel and condominium uses in the vicinity. The design of the pool enclosure is compatible with the aesthetics of the pre-existing structure which it will abut. No values, monetary or aesthetic appear to be impaired. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. COMMENT: The proposal is in general conformance with adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. h Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Christie Lodge Owners Association Lodge Pool and Enclosure Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION Tree species should be consistent with the cottonless cottonwoods and evergreen trees which are located along the northern boundary of the property. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application (Staff); 2. Presentat-.on by Applicant; 3. Staff Comments; 4. Commission Review - Action Respectfully submitted, James F. Lamont PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( 1 Continued Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) ,I Date g-1)-09 Denise Hi l 1, Secretary Al���"��`�'� — The Commission continued this application until the members could make a site visit, which is scheduled for 6:00 PM, August 21, 1989, at which time the Commission will make a decision.