Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
PZC Minutes 022189RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was
held on February 21, 1989, at 7:30 PM in the Town Council
Chambers of the Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark
Road, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by
Chairwoman Pat Cuny.
Members Present: Frank Doll, Pat Cuny, Denise Hill,
Buz Reynolds, John Perkins, Tom Landauer
Clayton. McRory
Staff Present: Lynn Fritzlen, Department of Community
Development; Charlette Pascuzzi,
Recording Secretary; Norm Wood, Director
of Community Development
Rgt uest.
Wood stated that the owners of the proposed Riverside
Subdivision, which was previously Riverside Center which
was previously subdivided and zoned Neighborhood Commercial
and the adjoin.ng property immediately to the west was
approved for zoning SPA and known as the Yacht Club parcel is
being proposed for resubdivision and rezoning, with the
entire parcel to be zoned SPA. He then described the location
of the property. He stated the Riverside Center Subdivision
was 5.69 acres and the Yacht Club Portion was 3.57 acres.
This proposal would zone Lot 1, which is the main core of
what was previously the Yacht Club and Riverside Center,
which is 2.5 acres. The requested zoning is to allow
development of a 150 unit hotel, lodge, or motel and up to
5000 square feet of related commercial.
Wood stated that Lot 2 is the area that was previously
defined in the Yacht Club zoning and is at the far west end
of the parcel, containing approximately .37 acres and
previously zoned for 8 residential development rights with
allowed uses of dwelling units. He stated that no change is
being requested for this particular parcel.
Wood stated that the other area that would be divided with
this proposed zoning and related subdivision is Tract A,
,-w
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 2 of 14
which basically follows the Eagle River and contains a total
of 6.4 acres. A large portion of it is either river bank or
in the river, but at the far east end there is approximately
1-1/2 acres that is suitable for development as a riverfront
recreation area.
Wood stated that the intent of the owner is that if the
approvals are granted, they will try to find a developer.
Wood stated that in addition to the basic zoning information,
there are some schematics that shows at least the general
type of building that would accommodate the proposed uses.
Wood stated that Staff has reviewed the proposed zoning
request in accordance with the Evaluation to Working Goals,
Policies and Strategies. It was decided to ask the applicant
to make his presentation and then go through the review
points.
Peter Jamar, representing Golden Buff Enterprises, summarized
their request, pointing out on the map the site and
describing what they are now reouesting. He further
described the past history of the parcels. He stated that
the essence of the proposal is to take the two previously
platted Lot 1's and drop the lot line and combine the two
into one developable lot and remove the commercial zoning and
remove the twenty residential development rights and
basically consolidate it into one comprehensive development
of a lodge up to a maximum of 150 units, with the accessory
commercial space within the lodge, such as a restraurant and
bar etc. He proceeded to describe the benefits of this type
of project. He stated that the current zoning on the
property allows for strip commercial development And he
doesn't feel that that is very desirable for Avon in that
location. It makes mu h more sense to consolidate the
commercial and retail type of businesses into the core area
of town. He stated that the asthetics of the site are much
more conducive to a lodge use. He feels that the proposed
development would be much more in harmony with the
surrounding adjacent properties, in terms of their
residential character. He stated that he had met with the
property owners that abut this project on each side and from
the discussions they feel that it is a positive upgrade.
Jamar stated that while some of the seven staff
recommendations are things that he would rather not have to
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 3 of 14
Proposed Riverside Subdivision SPA, Zone Chance RecLuest,
Public Hearin s (cont)
go along with, he doesn't think they will be anything that
will destroy the projec... He stated that the majority are
good suggestions and he has no problem with meeting any of
the seven conditions for approval.
Chairwoman Cuny then opened the public hearing. She called
for any comments from the audience. Receiving no :omments,
she asked if any correspondence had been received. The
Secretary stated that a letter had been received, and a copy
was included with the Staff Report. Cuny proceeded to read
the letter from Robert Wiegel, asking that thQ project be
denied, as he feels that any development alo,ig the river
would create dangerous on-off traffic to Highway 6 and that
he felt that anymore development along the river was not
needed. Cuny then closed the public hearing.
Wood stated that the property is located in Development
District Five. Wood then proceeded to review the point by
point evaluation to working goals, policies and strategies,
as presented in the Staff Report.
Wood stated, based upon the Staff reviews, Staff has
recommended the following conditions for approval of the
ordinance as presented: 1. The Town of Avon be provided an
access and maintenance easement from Lot 1, to Tract A as
part of zoning and subdivision approval - This can probably
be best dealt with on the subdivision process; 2. There
shall be no intrusion into the rear setbacks for built
recreational facilities as proposed - In the initial proposal
there was a request to be able to build a spa or swimming
pool or some type recreational amenities in the 30 foot
setback from the Eagle River. This is not in conformance
with the subdivision regulations regarding stream setbacks
and it is recommended that this request not be allowed; 3.
Maximum building area ratio shall be reduced to 50% to
realistically reflect the area within the proposed setbacks
that is suitable for development - The ordinance as presented
requests a building area of 60% lot coverage on Lot 1, Staff
recommends maximum building area ratio be limited to 50%; 4.
In order to accommodate the underground parking, the request
is for a variance from our parking regulations for a portion
of the front setback, which requires parking and dr•ve areas
be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the front property line,
in order to accomplish access to underground parkins. Wood
stated that Staff is recommending that an exception to the 10
foot parking setback, be granted for a maximum length
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 4 of 14
Proposed Riverside Subdivision SPA Zone Change Request,
Public Hearing. (con't)
of 200 ft, which should allow a ramp to underground parking;
5. Zoning approval be contingent upon approval and recording
of Final Subdivision Plat conforming with proposed zoning;
6. Staff recommends that under assigned density, in the
ordinance, that it be revised to read: No Residential
Development Rights are assigned. Development shall be
allowed in accordance with Allowed Uses; 7. Allowed Uses
for Lot 1 will be revised to read 150 Accommodation Unit
Hotel, Lodge or Motel, with a maximum of 5000 net square feet
of commercial use, which may consist of retail shops,
restaurants, personal service shops, cocktail lounge and
office. Wood stated that a Resolution had been prepared for
the Commission to consider. He asked the Commission to
notice that the Resolution also included a number of findings
to be used as criteria for reviewing this application.
Cuny asked if Staff is saying that rather than assign the 38
residential developement rights that can be fractionalized,
that the applicant is asking for, the Staff is giving them
150 accommodation units. Wood stated that Staff feels the
best way to approach it is to provide allowed uses, which
would allow the development. The accommodation units could
not be transferred.
Cuny stated that the Town Attorney, John Dunn was present to
answer any questions the Commission might have.
Reynolds asked if, in a SPA zone, the Commission has the
right to grant conditional residential development rights?
Mr. Dunn replied that the Commission did have the right.
Discussion followed on this matter and if this would be
considered as spot zoning.
Discussion followed on the conditions. Jamar stated that he
was concerned with the building height of 60 feet, when they
are asking for 65 feet. He stated that the request to reduce
the building coverage to 50% is also a concern. They would
prefer the 60% coverage that they are asking for. Further
discussion followed regarding this condition. Discussion
followed on Exhibits "A" and "B". These will be included
with the ordinance that goes to Council. Further discussion
followed on the conditions and especially on condition number
4. regarding the parking setback to allow for the
construction of access ramp to the underground parking
facilities. Cuny then reviewed the findings as provided by
Staff in the Resolution.
Planning and mooning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 5 of 14
Proposed Riverside Subdivision SPA Zone Change Request,
Public Hearing (con't)
Jamar stated he felt that condition 6 and 7 should be worded
differently. He feels that condition 6 should be clarified
to state 150 accommodation units is the assigned density.
Dunn suggested changing the language in condition 6 to read
as follows: the assigned density for Lot 1 be revised to
read: 150 accommodation unit development rights are
assigned, which may be developed only in accordance with
allowed uses. Mr. Jamar agreed.
Perkins stated that he feels that the applicant should be
allowed to use 60% for coverage. Doll agreed. Discussion
followed.
Perkins moved to recommend to the Town Council to adopt
ordinance 89-5, Series of 1989, with the conditions 1 through
3 as presented, condition 4 to remain at 60% developable
area, and condition 5 to remain as stated, and condition 6 to
be revised as per the Town of F,von Attorney, and condition 7
to remain as stated.
Doll seconded.
Cuny stated that basically the motion is to adopt Planning
and Zoning Commission Resolution 89-2 as revised, which
recommends Council approval of Ordinance 89-5.
The motion carried unanimously.
Lot 8 Block 3 Benchmark at Beaver Creek, 24 Unit
Pro.iect
Fritzien stated that Tony Seibert of South Harbor Development
Corporation is requesting preliminary design review for a 24
unit residential complex on Lot 8, Block 3, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek. She stated that the lot is zoned residential
high density and commercial. She stated that the design
review application is in conjunction with a request for
approval for fractionalization. The lot has 16 residential
development rights assigned to it , 12 of which are to be
split in half to create a total of 24 residential units not
exceeding 800 square feet each. The development consists of
four buildings with six units each. The buildings are three
levels high and aligned with the southwestern or river edge
of the property. Fritzlen then pointed out on the map where
the site is located. She stated that there are carports
proposed Planning
February 21, 1989
Page 6 of 14
and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Project, (coni
on the north side and at the previous meeting the applicant
received a variance for encroachment into the back setback.
She then described the elevations provided.
Fritzlen then reviewed the design review considerations. She
stated that it appears that the individual units may exceed
the 800 sq. ft. limit for 1/2 of a residential development
right by 20 to 40 sq. ft. and additional dimensional
information is needed to make an exact determination. She
also stated that the balconies of the east side units of the
easternmost building appear to be encroaching into the 25'
front building setback. She stated that the staff has
concerns that the westernmost buildings may not be accessible
to fire protection and additional onsite fire protection may
be required. She stated Staff was getting input from the
fire department on that issue. She stated that compact
parking spaces are indicated in an exterior location.
Fritzlen stated that the proposed development is similar to
adjacent Sunridge in regards to height, type of exterior
materials and fenestration. The buildings themselves though
are not as large as those of Sunridge and are probably more
desirable in terms of scale for a residential project. She
stated that the site is relatively isolated by the river and
the railroad and the project has no unusual or significant
impacts on adjacent properties. She stated that the applicant
has shown improvements, including a gravel path and picnic
area as part of the proposal on the adjacent openspace tract.
Permission of the owner of the tract should be obtained prior
to approving site development as presented.
Regarding the compatibility of proposed inprovements with
site topography, she stated that the site is gently sloped
and easily accommodates the proposed improvements. Proposed
buildings sit behind the beginning of riverbank. Regarding
the visual appearance as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties, this project will be screened from the north and
south by the railroad fence and the river vegetation
respectively. The primary view of the project will be from
Beaver Creek Blvd. Landscaping is proposed at the drive
entries. She stated that the carports are enclosed in a long
uninterrupted structure and may benefit from varying the
parapet height or some other means of creatirj visual
interest. She stated that the proposed buildings are
Planning and zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 7 of 14
identical to each other, but are offset and angled which will
mitigate the regularity. Fritzlen then reviewed the general
conformance of the proposed improvements with adopted Goals,
Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon.
Fritzlen stated that in addition to the above described
design guidelines the Commission must consider the criteria
for fractionalized projects and reviewed the criteria. She
stated that the access does appear to be adequate. The site
is immediately adjacent to a Town of Avon bus stop aithough
there is no service at this time. She stated that there does
not appear to be any unusual or significant impact on public
or private services by this proposed development.
Fritzlen stated that this is a preliminary design review and
no formal action will be taken. She stated that there are a
number of items that must be submitted prior to final design
review which include: drainage plan, information on exterior
lighting, proposed irrigation system, detailed dimensioned
floor plans and permission of the adjacent property owner for
the proposed improvements in the openspace tract. She stated
design modifications to the proposed carports are recommended
and lastly, compact parking spaces are not allowed in an
exterior location and proposed spaces on the west should be
redimensioned.
Tony Seibert stated that because of the unique shape of the
site they had to come up with some very specific designs in
the buildings and what they have tried to do is to utilize
all of the amenities available. They have made virtually the
entire south face of the buildings, all living room, dining
room and kitchen areas approximately 75% glass to enhance the
southern exposure aspect. Also, all the decks are placed on
the south side, so that every unit overlooks the river.
Relative to size, he stated that th,y are very conscious of
size and the specific square footage in the units is designed
to be just less than 800 square feet. He stated that the
plans submitted to staff were not well dimensioned. When
they submit for final they will be within the 800 square foot
requirement. He stated that they will work directly with
Lynn and the fire department to make sure that the correct
access lanes are provided for the westerly building.
Regarding the compact parking spaces, he stated that this
would be resolved before the final design review. He stated
that he was not aware that the openspace was not owned by the
-q,
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 7, 89
Page 8 of 14
Lot 8, Block 3. Benchmark at Beaver Creek, 24 Unit
Residential Complex, South Harbor Development Corporation,
Tony_ Seibert, Preliminary Design Review, Fractionalized
Town of Avon, therefore, they have not approached the owner
of the tract, but they will do that before the final design
review. He stated that he agreed with Fritzlen regarding the
current design of the carport and feels it does need
something better in the way of design. He stated that the
drainage plan would be provided tomorrow. Relative to
exterior lighting, this will be shown on the final review.
He stated that an irrigation system will be included. Floor
plans will be detailed and parking spaces modified as
requested.
Discussion followed on the marketing of these units. They
are structuring this so that the units can be legally
condominiumized. They will then offer the buildings to local
employers, with specific deed restrictions that prevent them
from deeding these out as condominiums for probably five to
seven years. Discussion followed on the marketing range.
Seibert stated that they are shooting for the high 50's, but
preliminary economics are showing the low 60's.
Discussion followed on various design features.
Seibert stated that the buildings could be shifted to
accommodate for the encroachment into the setback.
Hill asked if the fireplaces are to be used as a heat source?
Seibert stated he thought they would be a heat source.
Although no formal action was taken, the Commission agreed
that this was a desirable project once the staff concerns
were met.
Fritzlen stated that John Railton is requesting final design
review approval for a detached duplex proposal on Lot 16,
Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend. She stated that the east and
west residences are 2200 sq. ft and 1800 sq. ft. respectively
and share a common drive and interconnecting deck. She stated
that included in the staff report is a site plan and an area
plan showing lot 16, lots 15, 17 and 18.
Fritzlen then reviewed the design considerations. She stated
that the application appears to be in conformance with
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 9 of 14
Lot 16, Block 1 Filing 1, Eaglebend. Detached Duplex
Residence John Railton Final Design Review. (con t)
'che zoning code.
She stated that the site slopes moderately from the road down
to the Eagle River bank. Building design does step with the
slope. She stated that it appears that approximately 100 sq.
ft. of deck encroaches beyond the edge of the river bank.
She stated that, given the limited site depth above the river
bank on the west side of the property, it would be difficult
to pull the west building behind the river bank without a
front setback variance. She then pointed out the colored
elevations provided. She stated the colors would be a light
grey with a teal trim and roof. She stated that it is
recommended to limit all new grading and landscaping
improvements to the area behind the bank.
Fritzlen stated that the design has no unusual or significant
impacts on adjacent properties and the proposed improvements
appear to be compatibility with site topography.
Fritzlen stated that all four elevations have visual interest
and variety. She stated that the two sides are neither
identical in size or elevation, but are complimentary in form
and detail. She stated that there are no adopted goals for
the Eaglebend Subdivision.
Fritzlen stated that staff recommendations are: Approval of
exterior material samples and colors, approval of exterior
lighting, the inclusion of adequate hosebibs on the building
nermit plan to maintain the approved landscape materials and
all finish grading and landscape and building improvements
with the exception of the western deck, be located behind the
top of the Eagle River bank.
John Railton had some concern about the designation of the
top of the river bank as shown by Fritzlen. Fritzlen stated
that since it is under snow it was hard to accurately
determine and there is a potential for discrepancy.
Discussion followed on the various projects that Mr. Railton
is involved with in Eaglebend.
Railton described the colors and material that will be used,
stating that the stucco will be white and the stone work will
be the moss rock. He stated that the only landscape lighting
will be on the stone wall. The other lighting for the
exterior of the building would be lights that would conform
wii.h the code and will be shown on the drawings. They will
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 10 of 14
be lights that will be on the building, but over the
stairways that lead down to the front entrances and also
lights over the doors that come out onto the deck. He stated
that he has tried to achieve consistency in street
landscaping and ear*h berming.
Discussion followed on the metal roof and the relocation of
the fireplace chase. Mr. Railton stated he could move the
fireplace chase and described where he could locate it.
Discussion followed on whether an exit would be needed on the
third floor.
Doll moved to approve final design approval subject to staff
recommendations and to the comment regarding placing the
fireplace stack.
Reynolds seconded.
The motion carried unanimously.
Lot 25 Block 2 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Christy Lodge
Unit C-19, Subway Subs Canopy and SAgn. Sign Variance and
Design Review Jim Comerford
Wood stated that Jim Comerford has requested design review
approval for the canopy and signage for Subway Subs entry.
Wood stated that one of the problems in dealing with this
particular request is that the Christy Lodge does have an
approved sign program and the proposed sign is not in
accordance with that program. He stated that Section
15.28.080 of the sign code states that proposed signs not in
accordance with an approved sign program will only be
considered upon receipt of written evidence that the proposed
sign is acceptable to the owners of the building or the
owners association. Under the current circumstances, it
appears that the only way the Commission can consider this
application is from a variance request. He suggested that
the Commission listen to Mr. Comerford's presentation and
then possibly table action on this item until the next
meeting when the application can be modified to specifically
address the variance procedure.
Jim Comerford stated that Subway Subs is in a space that is
owned by Sun Vail Development Corporation. He stated that
Sun Vail Development is currently having a dispute with the
Christie Lodge Board of Directors and as a result Subway has
been caught in the cross-fire. They have refused to provide
the letter of approval so a proper application can be made.
He stated that he had appeared before the Board at Christie
Planning and
February 21,
Page 11 of 14
Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
1989
Lodge on October 28th and they did not refu,.e the
construction for Subway. He stated that there had been full
support from the Lodge for Subway. The problems are with the
company that owns the space. He stated that he would like to
come back and go through the variance process.
Doll asked what type of variance is being sought.
Dunn replied that it would be a variance from the requirement
of a letter of consent, because the sign is not conforming.
Dunn stated that it was his understanding that the Christie
Board is not objecting to the sign, they just do not want to
give the letter of consent because they are owed some money.
Comerford stated that Christie Lodge knew before had that the
sign would have to be approved. Carson Wright commented
regarding the pizza restaurant awning and asked if there was
an approval granted on that awning. Cuny stated that they
had provided a letter of approval from Christie Lodge.
Discussion followed on the concept of having a sign program
and why the Town urges owners to have a sign program. Cuny
stated that she can't remember ever approving a sign without
the consent of the building owner. Discussion followed on
the problems of the building itself. Wright stated that
Comerford had agreed to pay a portion of the money owed if
the building owners would take care of the problems that
exist over there.
Cuny asked if the Town's position is to enforce the repairs.
Wood stated that that would be followup building inspections,
similar to fire inspections, etc. Wood stated that this is
an administrative matter.
Wood stated that the stated purpose of the variance is that
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall have authority to
grant variance from this regulation to prevent or lessen such
pratical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships
inconsistent with the objectives of this Title as would
result from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement. Wood stated that the granting of a variance
should be based upon the findings. This is why it was
suggested that this item be tabled until the next meeting.
Cuny asked Dunn if this would cause a legal problem if the
Commission approved something that the 'landlord is not
approving. Cuny asked if the Commission had the right to go
ahead and tell the applicant that he can do it. Dunn stated
he thought the Commission has the right. Discussion followed
on whether the sign program was supposed to be revised.
r�
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 12 of 14
Lot 25 Block 2 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Christie Lodge
Unit C-19, Subway Subs Canopy and Sign Sian variance and
Perkins moved to table this
sign until the next meeting.
McRory seconded.
item of Subway Subs canopy and
The motion carried unanimously.
Doll moved to approve the minutes of the 2/7/89 Regular
Meeting as presented.
Perkins seconded.
The motion carried unanimously.
Other Business
Lot 8 Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek, John Dunham
Informal Review
Fritzlen stated that this item came in after the agenda was
set. It is an informal review request and the applicant is
represented by John Dunham. She stated that the site plan
and three of the elevations are included with the staff
report.
John Dunham stated that they are here to get comments from
the Commission on a fractionalized project of 16 units 800
square feet each.
Fritzlen described on the map where the site is located.
Considerable discussion followed on the proposed design of
the project. It was stated that these would be
condonciniumized. The matter of all wood and windows was
discussed. Also discussed was the grade of the entrance. It
was suggested that something be done with the stairwells.
The Commission agreed that the concept was good.
Fritzlen stated that Buz Reynolds had submitted drawings
today in response to comments from the last meeting.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 27, 1989
Page 13 of 14
Reynolds stepped down as a voting member of the Commission
due to a conflict of interest.
Cuny asked why this item is not on the agenda. Fritzlen
stated that the drawings were submitted today and there is no
staff report.
Monica Reynoldsstated that they had done the changes that
had been requested by the staff. The changes included the
lowering of the buildings to create a 10% grade or less in
the driveway, the lowering of the driveway to create a 4% or
less grade in the right -of -•!ay, the stepping of the building,
including the berming of the west side of the building,
lowering of the garage slab level to create a more definite
change in the linear effect and also they are providing a
three dimensional color rendering. She stated that tti y have
been informed by staff that the 7.5 foot easements are not
the building setbacks of 10 feet. She stated that they have
started work for the granting of the variance. They believe
that there is a hardship on the lot as 50% of the lot is
unbuildable. She stated that if the variance is not granted
they will be willing to move the buildings within the 10 foot
setback, but they feel strongly that this would be a
detriment rather than an asset since it would close up the
view corridors for the adjacent properties.
Cuny voiced concerns that there was no staff report showing
that these changes are as requested.
Reynolds stated that they need approval tonight as they have
a contract with a prospective buyer that expires on Friday.
Discussion followed on the size of the lot, and the design.
Landauer asked if Reynolds had been to the Wildridge
Association yet? Reynolds stated that he had not.
Doll stated that he felt that this project was not any better
or any worse than any of the other projects in Wildridge.
Discussion followed on the material to be used for the
shingles.
At this point, John Perkins asked to be excused and stated
that he would like to cast a nay vote on this project.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 21, 1989
Page 14 of 14
Continuation of Item
Further discussion followed on the proposed colors and
materials.
Doll moved to approve final design with the condition that
the staff finds the exceptions that were noted in the last
meeting to have been correcteC and that the applicant appear
at the next meeting if necessary to ask for a variance for
the building setback.
Landauer seconded.
The motion passed with Perkins voting nay.
Doll moved to adjourn.
Hill seconded.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Charlette Pascuzzi
Recording Secretary
Commissi
P. Cuny
T. Landa
F. Doll
J. Perki
D. Hill
C. McRor
A. Reync
- t -
of
4W
•