Loading...
PZC Packet 040489STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 4, 1989 Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Appleby Single Family John Appleby Owner John Railton Architect Final Design Review Page 1 of 4 INTRODUCTION Eaglebend Subdivision Residence John Appleby is requesting Final Design Review for a single family residence located on Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision. Eaglebend Subdivision is zoned Specially Planned Area. Filing No. 3 is currently platted for 49 townhouse units. Of those 19 units twelve have been developed and are commonly known as the Stonebridge Townhomes. There is one Residential Development Right assigned to each of the lots. Lots 1 through 19 as platted represent the area directly beneath the existing and proposed townhouses. The area outside of the lots is Tract 8 and is owned in common by the Stonebridge Condominium Association. At the March 21, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting John Appleby and John Loughridge requested a sideyard and frontyard setback variance, in conjunction with a replat of Lots 17 and 18, for two separate residences located within Filing No. 3 in the Eaglebend Specially Planned Area and Subdivision. The relocation and reconfiguration of Lot 18 is within the applicable setbacks but Lot 17 is not. The proposed location of Lot 17 required a variance of 6'-0" from the 16'-0" front building setback, locating the building 10'-0" from the public right of way, and a 20'-0" variance from the 100'-0' building sideyard setback locating it 80'-0" from the eastern property line. The variance was approved and the applicants are pursuing Final Subdivision approval for the proposed replat from the Town Council. The newly platted lots 17 and 18 will allow for two detached residences with a common driveway rather than the townhouses as originally proposed. Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission April 4, 1989 Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision Appleby Residence Final Design Review Page 2 of 4 Mr. Railton provided schematics of the proposed site improvements for the development of Lot 17 and 18 at the March 21, 1989 meeting. Those schematics have been developed for this Design Review application. STAFF COMMENT 6.10 DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: 6.11 THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF AVON COMMENT: The application appears to be in conformance with all applicable regulations. 6.12 THE SUITABILITY OF THE IMPROVEMENT, INCLUDING TYPE AND QUALITY OF MATERALS OF WHICH IT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND SITE UPON WHICH IT IS TO BE BUILT. COMMENT: The archit^ctural style and massing is complimentary to the Victorian character of Stonebridge Condominiums and the similiar development on the adjacent lot, Lot 19, Filing No.1, the Railton residence. 6.13 THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE DESIGN TO MINIMIZE SITE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. COMMENT: Design of the driveway access is integral to the development of Lot 18 on the west. The site plan presented addresses configuration of the driveway access and building location for both Lot 17 and 18. Proposed driveway improvements are located on Tract B, which is common area owned by the Stonebridge Condominium Association. It is suggested that Design Review Approval be contingent upon approval of the Condominium association for the application as submitted. 6.14 THE COMPATIBLILITY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH SITE TOPOGRAPHY. COMMENT: Site and building design incorporate minimal regrading. The rear deck is suspended over the bank that slopes to the river. Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission April 4, 1989 Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision Appleby Residence Final Design Review Page 3 of 4 6.15 THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AS VIEWED FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC WAYS. COMMENT: All elevations of this residence have an equal level of architectural detail and interest. 6.16 THE OBJECTIVE THAT NO IMPROVEMENT BE SO SIMILIAR OR DISSIMILIAR TO OTHERS IN THE VICINITY THAT VALUES, MONETARY OR AESTHETIC WILL BE IMPAIRED. COMMENT: The architectural design is not identical to any other in the vicinity but similiar in style. 6.17 THE GENERAL CONFORMANCE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE ADOPTED GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS OF THE TOWN OF AVON: Eaglebend Subdivision has not been included in a Town of Avon District therefore there are no applicable goals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Commission finds that the application, is in conformance with the aplicable goals Final Design Review Approval is recommended subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the replat of Lots 17 and 18, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision as presented with the application for Final Design Review. 2. Any further conditions imposed by the Stonebridge Condominium Association in regard to the design of the driveway access and site improvements on Tract B as presented with the application for Final Design Review. Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission April 4, 1989 Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision Appleby Residence Final Design Review Page 4 of 4 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Presentation by Applicant 3. Consideration by Commission 4. Act on Request Respectfully Submitted, Lynn Fritzlen Department of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved t,ith Conditions (t Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Deniod ( ) 4,ithdrawn ( ) Date `i fl-ff Denise Hill Secretary ,A/ou.142t 'C4 See Attached P�, The Commission granted final design approval to Lot 17, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Subdivision, as presented and including staff recommendations as follows: 1. Approval of the replat of Lots 17 and 18, Filing No. 3, Eaglebend Sub- division as presented with the application for final design revic.w. 2. Any further conditions imposed by the Stonebridge Condominium Association in regard to the design of the driveway access and site improvements on Tract B as presented with the application for final design review.