Loading...
PZC Packet 101888Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission October 18, 1988 Lot 2. Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Benchmark Condos Building Exterior Color Change Design Review INTRODUCTION Kit Williams, on behalf of the Benchmark Condominium Association is requesting approval for a paint color change to the Senchmark Condominium's exterior finishes. Mr. Williams has submitted photos of the building and will be bringing color samples to the meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Commission finds the colors proposed acceptable, approval for the repainting is recommended. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce project; 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Commission Review of Application; 4. Act on Application. Respectfully Submitted, l.i�� L� LFrit 1 Director o Community Development w a Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission October 18, 1988 Lot 2, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Benchmark Condos Building Exterior Color Change Design Review Page 2 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (�/) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date 10 1?0 Denise Hill, Secretary 6Mde", ,6/L , The Commission approved the colors as submitted for Lot 2, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek and urged the applicant to finish the work in thirty days as stated. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 18, 1988 Tract O, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Hole -In -The -Wall Restaurant Building Addition Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Tom Landauer, on behalf of L.A.L. Inc. is requesting final design review for a 206 square foot addition to the Benchmark Shopping Center Building. The proposed addition is on the west side of the building and is to be used for storage for the Hole -In -The -Wall Restaurant. The addition sits under the existing roof overhang on the west side and covers the existing walkway. The plan proposes to provide a new concrete walkway around the proposed addition that will be partially covered by the remaining roof overhang. Materials proposed are identical to those existing. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.00 - Design Guidelines Section 6.10 - Design Review Considerations - The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: Section 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. The proposal is in accordance with our zoning ordinance and will not require additional parking due to its proposed use as storage. Required parking for restaurants is determined by number of seats. The existing building, though is not in con- formance with the 7.5 foot side setback on the east. Section 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of material of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. The proposed improvement is to match style and materials of existing building. Section 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. The proposed improvement will diminish sidewalk Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission October 18, 1988 Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Hole -In -The -Wall Restaurant Building Addition Final Design Review Page 2 of 3 width and possibly compromise pedestrian inter- connection to adjacent property. Section 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements wit`s site topography. The proposed improvement does not impact site topography. Section 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. The proposed improvement is to match style and materials of existing building. Section 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. This guideline is not applicable. Section 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the sdopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed improvement will diminish sidewalk width and ,possibly compromise pedestrian inter- connection to adjacent property. STAFF RECOMMMENDATION If the Commission finds the existing setback intrusion is not a significant factor in the approval and the proposed sidewalk a suitable pedestrian corridor for existing and proposed development, approval is recommended. t'k Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commi:;sio October 18, 1988 Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Hole -In -The -Wall Restaurant Building Addition Final Design Review Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Project; 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Commission Review of Application; 5. Act on Application. Respectfully submitted, LyiSn Fri/t�zl/erl Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted (1 ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions (V/)," Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) f Date 10-IR� - i _Denise Hill, Secretary N:%N�Cik l� YQ The Commission approved the Hole -In -The -Wall Restaurant building addition with the addition to the application that the sidewalk go straight across the back. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 18. 1988 Lot 12, Block 1, Filing Eaglebend Residences South Harbor Development Final Design Review INTRODUCTION 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Jacqueline Montgomery of South Harbor Development Corporation is seeking final design review approval for a proposed duplex on Lot 12, Block 1, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend Subdivision. This proposal receifed preliminary design review approval at the October 4, 1988 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. STAFF COMMENTS Section 6.00 - Design Guidelines Section 6.10 - Design Review Considerations - The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of a proposed project: Section 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. Application is now complete and previously requested changes and information have been submitted. Section 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of material of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Proposed use is in conformance with Eaglebend SPA plan. Proposed exterior materials are compatible with those in the neighborhood. Material samples have been submitted. Section 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Site is relatively level and easily buildable. Landscape plan has been submitted since pre- liminary apps'oval. An apron of sod surrounds the building and is located at the driveway entry. A variety of trees have been proposed including spruce, aspen, russian olive and cottonwood. Areas not planted in sod are native grasses. Since this Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission October 18, 1988 Lot 12, Block 1, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Eaglebend Residences South Harbor Development Final Design Review Page 2 of 3 is one of the first duplexes in this area, a standard of lancscaping quantity or type has not been established. There are some discrepancies between the final plat contours for Eaglebend Subdivision and the topography submitted. The discrepancy is less than two feet. It is suggested that prior to building permit issuance, a grading plan acceptable to the Town Engineer be submitted. Section 6.14 - The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography. Site topography is generally compatible with proposed improvements. Refer to comment for Section 6.13. Section 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. The height and offsets in the elevations are generally compatible with existing development. Section 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. The mirror-image plan was discussed at the last meeting and it was determined that the duplication was appropriate in the proposed setting. Section 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. There are no adopted district goals for Eaglebend Subdivision. STAFF RECOMMMENDATION Staff recommends final design approval with the following conditions: Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission October 18, 1986 Lot 12, Block 1, Filing No. 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Eaglebend Residences South Harbor Development Final Design Review Page 3 of 3 Submittal of a grading plan acceptable to the Town Engineer. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Project; 2. Presentation by Applicant; 3. Commission Review of Application; 5. Act on Application. Respectfully submitted, 6Lair Fritz en Director o mmunity Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted (��) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date_ 10-IDenise Hi 11, Secretary b9ZCw The Commission approved the final design review for Lot 12, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision, as presented.