PZC Packet 0405881
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Expansion of Existing Special Review Use
For Automotive Repair and Storage Lot
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION:
On May 26, 1987 the Town Council granted final approval for a Special Review
Use to allow Automotive Repair (Auto Body) on Lot 36, Bloc• 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek. A fenced storage lot was also approved as a part of the project.
At this time the applicant is requesting approval to expa:id the Special Review
Use in conjunction with the second phase of development on Lot 36. They would
also like to have approval to perform mechanical repair on automobiles. The
existing auto body shop is proposed to be expanded by approximately 1150 square
feet and the storage lot will be expanded to accomodate an additional 12
vehicles. Additional paved parking spaces are being provided in order to meet
the increased parking requirement for the expansion. A site plan and building
elevations have been submitted for Commission review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Additional parking for the auto body and repair shop is being accomplished by
paving a portion of the existing storage lot behind the existing building. With
the expansion,the auto body and repair shop will total approximately 2570 square
feet, parking required at 3 spaces per 1000 square feet, a total of 8 spaces are
required.
In addition to the auto body and repair shop expansion, the applicant proposes
to construct an addition to be used by Benchmark Cleaners as their cleaning
plant. This use is an allowed use in the IC Zone District and only requires
Design Review approval which will be addressed in a separate application. It
is being mentioned here because this addition is shown as being the screening
for the expanded storage lot. Staff would recommend that approval of the
Special Review Use expansion for the storage lot be subject to that addition
being built and any deviation from the approved plans be brought back to the
Commission for further review.
In accordance with Section 17.20.020 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Commission
shall determine the following in considering the suitability of a special review
use:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the zoning code;
7.. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of
the zoning code and the applicable zoning district; and
^�Ow
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beave; Creek
Expansion of Existing Special Review Use
For Automotive Repair and Storage Lot
Public Hearing
Page 2 of 3
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding
land uses and uses in the area.
In addition, the Commission shall consider:
A. The adequacy of access to the site with respect to the width of adjacent
streets, their grades, intersection safety, visibility and entrance into
the lot to be developed;
B. Whether there exists safe access and sufficient water pressure to provide
fire protection;
C. The existant water pressure in the area and the ability of the water
system to supply domestic needs;
D. Whether there will be provided sufficient off-street parking as determined
by (1) the intended use of the property; (2) walking distance to the
downtown area; and (3) the availability of public transportation;
E. The impact of the development considering the potential for stream and air
pollution, the availability of public transportation and other public or
private services, and any other factors affecting the overall development
and the surrounding areas, including but not limited to building height,
view plane, drainage and other physical and aesthetical features.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The attached Resolution is a draft based on the Commission approval of this
Special Review Use and should be modified to reflect the findings and desired
action of the Commission.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted material;
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Expansion of Existing Special Review Use
For Automotive Repair and Storage Lot
Public Hearing
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (Cont.):
Conduct public hearing;
5. Adopt Resolution 88-3
Respectfully submitted,
k�-a�yWright
Engneering Technician
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (X)
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( )l D,eni�;d ( n) Withdrawn
Date S7/9 q/ 88 Mi chael Bl ai r, Secretary�4-�-1'
This application was approved in accordance with Resolution 88-3. Series of 1988,
including the conditions that "No wrecked or damaged vehicles will be parked
on-site unless they are confined to the designated storage yard for the project".
and "The expansion of the previously approved Special Review Use conform with the
approved site plan for the project.
.0,
el
401
•1
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Variance to Allow Parking Within 10 Foot
Front Yard Setback
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION:
The owner of Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek has requested a
variance to encroach approximately 18" into the required 10 foot front
yard setback for parking. Currently, there is approximately 25 to 26 feet
of paved area in front of the auto body shop located on this lot and the
applicant feels that an additional 18" of pavement, encroaching into the
setback will widen the existing asphalt enough to accomodate three full size
parking spaces. Additional parking is being provided to accomodate the
proposed expansion of the auto body shop. A site plan has been submitted
for Corr,idssion review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
A check of the parking requirements for Rich's Auto Body shows that the existing
building, along with the proposed expansion will total approximately 2570 square
feet. Parking for this use is calculated at 3 spaces/1000 square feet. The
minimum parking requirement, based on these figures, is 7.71 or 8 spaces. The
site plan shows 9 paved parking spaces, including one for which the variance is
required.
Section 17.36.040 Approval Criteria, states:
Before acting on a variance application, the design review board shall consider
the following factors with respect to the requested variance:
A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity;
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privilege;
C. The effect cf the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities
and utilities, and public safety;
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Variance to Allow Parking Within 10 Foot
Front Yard Setback
Public Hearing
Page 2 of 3
D. Such other factors and criteria as the board deems applicable to the
proposed variance. (Ord. 81-9 S1(d)).
Section 17.36.050 Findings Required, states:
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before
granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district;
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1.. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title;
2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone;
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district. (Ord. 81-9 Sl(e)).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Once the Commission has reviewed the required approval criteria and findings
for this variance request, Staff recommends that the Commission continue the
application to the next meeting, and direct Staff to prepare a resolution for
adoption by the Commission reflecting the decision and the reasons for approval
or denial.
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Variance to Allow Parking Within 10 Foot
Front Yard Setback
Public Hearing
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE:
1. Introduce Variance Request;
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Public Hearing;
4. Commission Review of Criteria and Findings Required for Variance;
5. Direct Staff to Prepare Resolution;
6. Continue Application to Next Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Wright
Engineering Technician
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (k)
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Date - /I &:�e jq6e. Michael Blair, Secretary ` S 7s -'4 c
The Staff was directed to prepare a Resolution approving this application for
variance and including the findings of Sections A B, C and 1, 2 and _3 of C.
of Section 17 36 050 - Findings Required.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Addition to Existing Project
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
The owner of Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek has applied for Design
Review of the second phase of development on the property. The first phase
included construction of the building that houses Rich's Auto Body, along with
a fenced storage lot.
The proposed second phase consists of an 1150 square foot expansion of Rich's
Auto Body, a 3280 square foot facility proposed as a cleaning plant for
Benchmark Cleaners, and an expansion of the existing storage lot. All new
construction is proposed to match existing, which is painted stucco with a wood
accent band at roof level. A site plan, building elevations, and floor plans
have beem submitted for Commission review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
A review of this submittal has resulted in the following information:
Site Area: 25,265 square feet
Building Area = 6078 square feet or 24% of site (5046 allowed)
Open Space = 6340 square feet or 25% of site (25% required)
Building Height = 14 feet '(60 feet allowed)
Parking Requirements:
Auto Body and Repair Shop (3/1000 square feet) = 2570 square feet = 7.71 spaces
(d spaces provided)
Benchmark Cleaners (1/800 square feet) = 3280 square feet = 4.10 spaces
(7 spaces provided)
The plan indicates sign areas for each business, but no details are provided.
Staff recommends that the applicant submit a sign program for the project
for Commission review and approval.
A fully dimensioned site plan and a grading and drainage plan must be submitted
for review and approval prior to obtaining a building permit.
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Addition to Existing Project
Design Review
Page 2 of 3
Staff recommends that the Commission review this application in conjunction
with the following design review guidelines.
1. The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and
regulations of the Town of Avon.
2. The suitability of the improvement, inc uding type and quality of materials
of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be
located.
3. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent
properties.
4. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography.
5. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent
and neighboring properties and public ways.
6. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others
in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
7. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted
Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If the Commission approves this application, Staff recommends the following
conditions be made a part of that approval.
1. Applicant is to submit a fully dimensioned site plan and a complete
grading and drainage plan for review and approval prior to obtaining a
building permit.
2. Applicant is to provide sign program, conforming to the requirements of
the sign code, prior to obtaining a building permit.
Staff Report to Flanning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Lot 36, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Addition to Existing Project
Design Review
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Introduce Project;
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Commission Review of Submitted Materials;
4. Act on Application.
Respectfully submitted,
(�—
righ14�t
Engineering Technician
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION.
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (x )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) De1'd:(,) Withdrr/awn ( )
Date /�� lcic9 5Michael Blair, Secretary 1�z
This application was given final approval providing the applicant mgEts the
Staff recommendations of a submittal of a fully dimensioned site plan and_a
grading and drainage plan prior to obtaining a building permit and also provide
a sign program conforming to the requirements of the sign code prior_t4 the
issuance of a building permit
41
i
•1
To: Town of Avon
From: JF Lamont
RE:Project Review:
Benchmark Cleaners/
Rich's Autobody Addition
Lot 36, Block 1 BMS
Date: April 1, 1988
The following Design Guidelines have been reviewed and
are offered for consideration by the reviewing authorities
and the applicant.
Section
6.00 Design Guidelines:
6.10 Design Review Considerations:
The commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 The conformance with tiie Zoning Code anc'. other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of :von.
Comment: See Staff Report
6.12 The suitability of the improvement, including type and
quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the
site upon which it is to be located.
Comment: Proposed and existing materials are of a
suitable type and quality for an industrial/commercial use
zone. Existing structure on the site and in the immediate
vicinity are of similar materials. Extreme signs of
deterioration of exterior finish materials on the existing
structure is not apparent. Proposed materials on building
addition should match existing quality, type, and color.
6.13 The cor'.patibility of the i3esign to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties.
Comment: Design and location of structure is compatible
with adjacent properties. The proposed addition structure
will further screen automobile maintenance and storage areas
from public view. Vehicular access and circulation are
acceptable.
M
r
�r
page two
6.14 The compatibility of proposed improvements with site
topography.
Comment: The applicant has failed to provide appropriate
information to determine the impact of drainage on the site
development plan.
6.15 The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as
viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public
ways.
Comment: The execution of the existing landscape design
is less than desirable. The purpose of the landscape design
is to improve screening of automobile storage areas, to
provide an inviting appearance from the street, and to
enhance the appearance of a stark industrial structure.
Considerable effort has been expended in the immediate
neighborhood to improve the quality of landscape. similar
standards should be not be avoided for this project.
Minimum parking should be provided in front of the
structure. Significant improvement should be made in
quantity and quality of landscaping materials as well as
greater attention to design and construction details.
Increased quantities of evezjreen trees and shrubs should be
incorporated into the landscaping.
A non -transparent fence with gates should be constructed
between the north side of the auto body shop and the north
property line so as to adequately screen vehicular storage
and maintenance area.
6.16 The objective that no improvement be so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
Comment: If the quality of landscape is improved and
proper drainage is provided the proposed improvement should
not be so similar of dissimilar as to impair the monetary or
aesthetic values of the vicinity.
6.17 The general conformance of the proposed improvements
with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of
Avon.
Comment: The proposed project is in substantial
compliance with the adopted development goals, policies, and
programs of the Town of Avon.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - 4/5/88
Part of Lot 46/47, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Phoenix Discovery Group
14 Unit Condominium Project
Preliminary Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
The Phoenix Discovery Group, owners of the eastern portion of Lot 46/47,
Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, have applied for Preliminary Design
Review of a 14 unit condominium project they propose to construct on the
existing foundation located on the site. The proposed three story building
has a stucco exterior, clad windows, and a flat roof design. Parking is
being provided by a combination of surface parking and carport parking
which is incorporated into the building. The Applicant proposes to utilize
the Town's Fractionalization Ordinance to build the 14 units. A site plan,
building elevations and floor plans have been submitted for Commission review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
A review of the plans submitted for this application has resulted in the
following information:
Site Area = Approximately 38,332 square feet.
Building Area = 7260 square feet or 19% of site (50`," allowed)
Open Space - 60 square feet or 55% of site (250% required)
Building Heignc = 30 feet (60 feet allowed)
Parking Requirements:
14 - 1 bedroom units (d 1 1/2 spaces/unit = 21 spaces
4 guest spaces per Zoning Code = _j_spaces
Total 25 spaces required
(25 spaces provided)
Parking consists of 11 surface parking spaces, and 14 parking spaces in a
carport incorp;rated into the building design. Two of the covered spaces
meet minimum size requirements for compact car spaces (8' x 16'). According
to the Zoning Code up to 30`/ of covered parking spaces may be reduced in size
for use by compact cars.
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Part of Lot 46/47, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Phoenix Discovery Group
14 Unit Condominium Project
Preliminary Design Review
Page 2 of 4
A summary of the proposed units including unit size (in square feet), fraction
of development right used for each unit, and total development rights used is
listed below.
UNIT
Vs
AREAS
FRACTIONS
TOTAL RDR's
1A,
1E,
2A,
2E,
3A,
3E,
598 sf
each
1/3 RDR
each
2 RDR
1B,
1D,
2B,
2D,
3B,
3D
449 sf
each
1/4 RDR
each
1 1/2. RDR
2C,
3C
447 sf
each
1/4 RDR
each
1/'2 RDR
14 units 7,176 sf 4 RDR 4 RDR
Town records indicate that there are 4 residential development rights assigned
to this parcel.
The submittal apoears to cunform with the requirements outlined in the Planning
and Zoning Commission Design Procedures, Rules and Regulations for Preliminary
Design Review.
Staff recommends that the Commission review this application for conformance
with the following Design Revie,. Guidelines:
1. The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and
regulations of the Town of Avon.
2. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials
of whi%n it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
3. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent
properties.
4. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography.
5. -he visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent
and neighboring properties and public ways.
6. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others
in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Part of Lot 46/47, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Phoenix Discovery Group
14 Unit Condominium Project
Preliminary Design Review
Page 3 of 4
7. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted
Goals, Policies and °rograms for the Town of Avon.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If the Commission finds that this application conforms with the above Design
Review Guidelines, or can be modified to be brought into conformance, Staff
recommends that Preliminary Design Review approval be granted, subject to:
1. Final design include an emergency access between this project and the
adjoining project to the west that is acceptable to the Department of
Public Safety.
2. That the previously agreed upon "Roadway Easement" along Nottingham Road
be incorporated in the Final Plat for the project.
3. Final design must conform with the requirements of the Zoning Code, Planning
and Zoning Commission Design Procedures, Rules and Regulations, and other
modifications requested by the Commission.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Introduce Project;
2. Presentation by Applicant;
3. Commission Review of Submitted Materials;
4. Act on Application.
Respectfully submitted,
Ray Wright
Engineering Technician
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 4/5/88
Part of Lot 46/47, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Phoenix Discovery Group
14 Unit Condominium Project
Preliminary Design Review
Page 4 of 4
PLANNING AND ZONING_ ACTION:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (j() Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Date��° � Michael Blair, Secretary�/t-t�, 4F s
This item was continued until the April 19 1988 Planning and Zoning
Cow, ssion Meetin
To: Town of Avon
From: JF Lamont
RE:Project Review:
Phoenix Discovery Group
Condominium Residences
A part of Lot 46/47, Block 1 BMS
Date: April 1, 1988
The following Design Guidelines have been reviewed and
are offered for consideration by the reviewing authorities
and the applicant.
Section
6.00 Design Guidelines:
6.10 Design Review Considerations:
The Commission shall consider the following items in
reviewing the design of a proposed project:
6.11 The conformance with the Zoning Code and other
applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon.
Comment: See Staff Report
6.12 The suitability of the improvement, including type and
quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the
site upon which it is to be located.
Comment: Provided that sufficient investigation has been
conducted of soils conditions the site is suitable for a wide
variety of residential structures. The type and quality of
materials of which the proposed structure is to be
constructed is consistent with standards for multi -unit
residential structures.
6.13 The compatibility of the design to minimize site
impacts to adjacent properties.
Comment: The design does not appear to adversely effect
the distribution of light and air of adjacent properties.
The access of Fire Safety equipment to adjacent
properties may be adversely effected by the site design.
Site drainage and landscape plans are of insufficient
detail to determine there compatibility with existing or
proposed site plan of adjacent properties.
�n
page two
6.14 The compatibility of proposed improvements with site
topography.
Comment: Insufficient information exists to determine
the impact upon soils movement and landscaping of retaining
wall on north side of exterior parking lot.
6.15 The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as
viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public
ways.
Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed
improvement does not inhibit principal views nor block the
solar exposure of adjacent and neighboring properties.
Insufficient information exists to determine if
landscaping will have an acceptable visual appearance from
the public ways.
Exterior and unenclosed parking areas are not located in
principal views from adjacent and neighboring properties and
public ways.
6.16 The objective that no improvement be so similar or
dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or
aesthetic will be impaired.
Comment: The apparent mass of the three story flat roof
structure is consistent with two and three story structures
on adjacent properties.
Building offsets on the south elevation are significant
enough to be similar in appearance of structure on adjacent
properties.
Exterior materials, architectural detailing and color
can be modified to emphasis wood siding which is the
prevalent siding material in the vicinity.
Provision should be made for adequate fire safety access
to adjacent properties.
Landscape improvements should be qualitatively and
quantitatively increased and maintained to the standards
consistent with existing improvements in the vicinity.
No information or standards are available that indicates
that either the proposed use nor the aesthetics of the
improvement are so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be
impaired.
page three
6.17 The general conformance of the proposed improvements
with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of
Avon.
Comment: The proposed project is in substantial
compliance with the adopted development goals, policies, and
programs of the Town of Avon.
TA033188
MEMO
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission Members ,,,
FROM: Ray Wright, Engineering Technician 1.l
RE: Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek,
Derby Station, Design Review
Costal Mart, Inc., owners of the Derby Ga:; Station has submitted a letter
requesting that their application for design review of a storage building
be withdrawn at this time. Staff requests that the Commission move to
accept the withdrawal for the record.
Coastal Mart, C.IC. 771,.. ast Arapahoe Road 303/850-7636
a subsidiary of The Coastal Corporation Suite 180
Englewood, Colorado 80112
March 8, 1988
TO: AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: JACK SCURLOCK, ZONE VICE PRESIDENT, COASTAL MART INC.
SUBJECT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK, DERBY
STATION, DESIGN REVIEW.
It is requested that the application for 6. design review be
withdrawn at this time.
so�10 0f Avon