Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PZC Packet 061024
AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA A MONDAY, TUNE 10, 2024 PUBLIC MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM Avon 100 MIKAELA WAY — COUNCIL CHAMBERS C 0 L 0 R A D 0 ZOOM LINK: HTTPS://US02WEB.ZOOM.us/i/85476325303 PZC TRAINING: 5:00 PM PUBLIC MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL (CHAIRPERSON) 2. CHAIRPERSON AND VISE -CHAIRPERSON APPOINTMENTS 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS 5. PUBLIC BEARINGS 5.1. MJR24003 NEW RESIDENCE 2332 FOX LANE (APPLICATION FOR TWO NEW HOMES ON APPROVED SPLIT LOT IN WILDRIDGE CONTINUED FROM MAY 13, 2024) — MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II 5.2. PUD24001 / MJR24002 / AEC24001 NEW RESIDENCE 4644 NORTH POINT (APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT IN WILDRIDGE, TWO NEW HOMES, AND NON -COMPLIANT ROOF PITCH CONTINUED FROM MAY 13, 2024) — MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1. MAY 13, 2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 6.2. RECORD OF DECISION — SRU24001 WALKIN' THE DOG BUSINESS OPERATION -MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II 6.3. RECORD OF DECISION — PUD24002 DUPLEX LOT SPLIT 2332 FOX LANE —MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II 7. FUTURE MEETINGS 7.1. DUNE 24, 2024 (MONDAY — NO PZC TRAINING 7.2. DULY 8, 2024 (MONDAY— WITH PZC TRAINING) 8. STAFF UPDATES 9. ADJOURN MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, ONLINE AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL MATT PIELSTICKER AT 970-748-4413 OR EMAIL MATT@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. • 11 QUASI- JUDICIAL WORKSHOP • Nina P. Williams, Town Attorney nina@wwfdlaw.com Quasi -Judicial and Ex Parte: De -mystifying Latin terminology Quasi -Judicial versus Legislative Legislative: Broad application, announcing policy, making law Avon C 0 L 0 R A D 0 Amending municipal code, resolutions and proclamations Examples: Amending Town Code, Short term rental ordinance; nuisance, building, zoning and land use codes Quasi-judicial: Narrow application, does not make policy, applies policy Applies existing law to a specific set of facts (and specific property) Examples: Specific land use approvals, historic preservation decisions, licensing hearings, nuisance abatement Quasi -Judicial and Ex Parte: avon De-mystifying Latin terminology C O L O R A D O Why is this so important? "No state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without Due Process of law" (14th Amendment of the United States Constitution) So that everyone with an interest in the case, and all members of the decision - making body, hear the same evidence at the same time from the same sources To ensure opportunity for fair hearing before unbiased decision makers and that each of the members have the benefit of the same input Final decisions can be appealed by anyone adversely affected by decision (with legal standing) Quasi -Judicial and Ex Parte: De -mystifying Latin terminology Impartiality is the standard. May be affected by: Avon C 0 L 0 R A D 0 Ex party Communications: defined as communications between the Council/ Commission/Board and one party, outside the presence of the other parties to the case, or affected individuals. Eg) a neighbor comes up to you at Loaded Joe's to express their concern with a certain development application Pre -judgment or bias: You gave a speech or signed a petition advocating for a specific land use approval. You posted on Facebook that you will never approve any application with affordable housing. You have made clear that all your votes will be "anti"' developer Conflict of Interest: You (or immediate family) have a personal or private interest in the matter proposed (pecuniary interest, financial benefit) Eg)Your spouse owns a restaurant seeking a liquor license Quasi -Judicial and Ex Parte: De -mystifying Latin terminology How do your cure? Either: Recusal - or Disclosure (on the record) Ask yourself: Is your ability to decide the case fairly, presented at the hearing affected? Does an actual legal conflict exist? Does a perceived conflict exist? Did you express a pre -judgment bias? A Avon C O L O R A D O impartially and based solely on the evidence Pro Tip: When in doubt, ask yourTown Attorney! Quasi -Judicial and Ex Parte: De -mystifying Latin terminology avon C O L O R A D O Suggestions to ensure Impartiality: Follow the process set out in Code - Analyze, review and apply those factors or standards in an objective manner As opposed to: personal opinions, subjective feelings or individual preferences Base your decisions on the facts, law, evidence and testimony in front of you, properly in the record Public hearing creates a complete "record// You are the fact finder/judge in QJ hearings Whatever is in the record is what is properly considered Should a decision be appealed, the District Court will review the record to determine a decision Therefore, Deliberations are important Consider "thinking out loud" during discussion and decision making so that your reasoning is included in the record Reminder: In quasi-judicial proceedings, you serve as the judge! By Carmen Seery, special counsel, and Nina Petraro, associate, with Murray Dahl Kuechenmeister & Renaud LLP A CONVERSATION ON QUASI-JUDICIAL AND EX PARTE ISSUES The following is a transcript ofa real -life (imaginary) conversation between a newly appointed municipal commission member and her municipal attorney, meeting over coffee for a little legal training. (it could happen_ And, if it did, it might go something like this_) (Commissioner) Thanks for the invitation to discuss legal issues! After I was appointed to the commission, my first thought was, "I cannot wait to delve into some ancient legal concepts. " (Attorney) Of course, I think everyone feels that way. We will even sprinkle in some Latin later. Let's start with quasi-judicial issues. f ■Ar I My son has some Nike Kwazi high -tops; loves 'em_ Right. This is a little different. Quasi- judicial issues are those that apply or vary the legal requirements for a specific project, individual or property. Quasi-judicial issues involve the determination of the rights, duties, or obligations of specific people or property by applying the code or other law to the unique set of facts, all in the context of a hearing. In contrast, think of an issue that affects the entire municipality, or a substantial portion of the population — that sort of issue is legislative — making law. Then, think of an issue that affects one homeowner, or one business owner, one particular party, or a singular piece of property — that sort of issue is quasi-judicial — applying the law to particular facts. For example, an ordinance authorizing short-term rentals in the municipality is a legislative issue. Your neighbor requesting a variance to build an addition to her home is a quasi-judicial issue. It also may help to picture your commission acting as a judge, rather than as a legislator. The commission is not making or recommending new laws when it reviews a quasi-judicial issue, but it is rather applying existing laws to specific facts concerning one person or a discrete group of people rather than the entire neighborhood. The most common quasi-judicial issues are zoning and land use decisions affecting an individual property. Other examples are 16 COLORADO MUNICIPALITIES licensing hearings, for liquor licenses and marijuana business licenses, and hearings concerning nuisance abatement, towed vehicles, and tax liabilities. I thought 1 was now a commissioner, not a 'judge. Well, think of it as if the entire commission is the judge, not just one single member. The decisions you make are important and can have a significant impact on your neighbors. Also, the commission's decision may be appealed to and reviewed by a higher court, just like a real judge's decision. So, every time that we meet, we are having a public 'hearing"? Not necessarily. Sometimes the commission can be meeting to discuss and address a larger issue affecting the community, such as affordable housing or a change to a particular portion of the land use code. Often, the governing body will seek the input of the commission on these sorts of legislative issues, even though the ultimate authority to change the laws remains with the governing body. The commission acts as the "land use advisor" to the governing body, so they welcome your input on legislative topics. Meetings on these general topics are not "hearings," but they are open to the public. All of your meetings are open to the public. But when a meeting does include a public hearing, the commission is required to give a certain amount of notice prior to the hearing; the notice period may depend on the type of quasi-judicial issue being considered. Also, all evidence that the commission considers must be presented at the public hearing. OK. So now l know what a quasi-judicial issue is. Why is it important that 1 know that? Because if an issue is "quasi-judicial," there are certain procedures required to afford due process to those individuals who may be affected by the decision. You also need to make sure that with quasi-judicial public hearings, you aren't having any ex parte communications. A party at a commission meeting? Now we're talking! Tell me more about that. Ha! I wish. It is not as fun as it sounds. Ex parte is an old Latin term meaning "from one part," or "concerning one party alone." An ex parte decision would be one decided by the judge or commission without requiring that all parties to the controversy be present. An ex parte communication is between the judge or commission and one party, and outside the presence of the other parties to the case, or affected individuals. The prohibition against ex parte contacts in quasi-judicial hearings was developed to ensure that everyone with an interest in the case, and all members of the decision making body, hear the same evidence at the same time, from the same sources. It is to ensure basic notions of fairness and justice. Wait. You're telling me that l have to block out my neighbors and friends who want to talk to me about something important? That seems wrong. 1 thought it was a good thing to talk to people, get the community sentiment — do my `homework" on an issue. I know this all sounds frustrating, especially to a well-intentioned active community volunteer such as yourself. However, it is important to remember that this rule is designed to protect the rights of everyone involved: applicants, opponents, and other interested parties and residents who may be ultimately affected by your decision. It also ensures the opportunity for a fair hearing before unbiased decision makers, and that each of the other commissioners have the benefit of the same input. I am still skeptical. What is the worst that could happen if l have an ex parte conversation? Please don't give your lawyer a heart attack. This is actually a very important rule to follow. When a decision maker engages in ex parte discussions about a case, and then proceeds to participate and vote on the matter, anyone adversely affected by that decision (with legal standing, which we don't need to get into) could appeal the decision to district court. If the appealing party proves that the commission failed to provide due process, the decision can be vacated and the matter sent back to the commission for a second look. Holding a second hearing is obviously costly, and creates a long delay for the applicant and for the community. And we did not even mention the negative press the city would inevitably receive. Yikes? l wouldn't want to jeopardize the commission's decision. But what if someone says something to me before 1 tell them that 1 cannot talk about it? l cannot "un-hear" what l have already heard. First, you would need to disclose the communication on the record, in as much detail as possible, at the beginning of the public hearing. If you truly and sincerely believe that the ex parte communication did not affect your ability to decide the case fairly, impartially, and based solely on the evidence presented at the hearing, you may be able to participate in the hearing after the disclosure. You and I should consult on this topic prior to the hearing. If you know that the ex parte communication has biased you, despite the fact that you have openly disclosed and discussed it, you should "'recuse" or remove yourself from the hearing, discussion, and the vote. What if 1 have a question before a hearing that 1 really want answered going into the hearing? Is there anything l can do to try to get it answered? You can contact staff, me, or your other municipal attorneys. We can determine the best way to address the question. Anything else you think I should know? Please know that your attorneys are not trying to be annoying or needlessly picky when we bring up these distinctions or cautions. These rules exist not only to protect you, but more importantly, they are in place to ensure the kind of fairness and due process our constitution was built upon. And I forgot my wallet. How much cash do you have? • That Commissioners and public attendees leave the public hearing feeling it was fair and their views were heard and appreciated. .-1-1 Eel • Announce the rules, order of hearing, and applicant's rights at the beginning, then stick to Conductingrules. • Assign time for public comment from the beginning. Public • Suggest speakers do not repeat prior testimony if they can state they agree with an earlier speaker. • • Public testimony is to be directed to the Commission — speakers may not ask questions to Hearinas staff or the applicant or PZC (both staff and applicant will have an opportunity at the end of the testimony to answer questions from the PZC) • Make sure that all attendees at the public hearing know they have the right to speak. • Give witnesses your full attention. • Thank all the speakers for appearing. • Don't discuss other applications that are in process. ` • • To make a full presentation • To present multiple witnesses • To respond after public comment closes Open Public Hearing Town Staff report Applicant presentation Public Comment Applicant rebuttal, closing statement (if applicable) Town Staff rebuttal, closing statement (if applicable) Commission questions Commission Discussion and Deliberation Call for Motion. Final vote/decision/action Ta ki n "I move to approve/deny ... based upon..." (and with the following conditions - You must take some kind of action (make a motion and vote on it) - Cannot refuse to make a motion or do anything, and move on (applicant has the right that their application moves on and is considered) - Amendments to motions: must be germane to the main motion; good way to add one or a series of conditions Importance of "Findings" and reasons for Approval or Denial - "[A] record of proceedings before the Board must contain details of the evidence presented and proper grounds and reasons to support its decision." Murray v. Board of Adjustment of Larimer County - Draw conclusions based upon evidence in the record and made during the hearing - Decisions should be based upon objective Code criteria, factors or requirements (compliance w/ Code) - Decisions should not be based upon preferences or personal opinions, fit Vote on the application/request before you - The Applicant is in charge of the application, not PZC - If request for rezoning to MFS, that is what you vote on. - Members of the body may not conduct separate research and attempt to enter it into the hearing record. (exparte and pre -judgment) Failed motions - Means no action or decision was made - If a motion fails, someone on the "prevailing side" should immediately move to take the opposite position Grounds for Denial of the • Failure of developer to volunteer a condition which could not independently be imposed by the Town • Commissioner's personal belief/opinion that the project is the wrong use or density, when the zoning in place allows for it Conditions of Approval. - Acceptable Conditions: Conditions which support enforcement of the technical requirements of Town Code • (eg: drainage easements) • Corrections to the plat • Land dedication requirements (eg: ROW; rely on staff recommendation) Requirements for maintenance of common elements (eg: to establish HOA) • Preservation of trees and vegetation • Redirecting traffic patterns • Conditions offered voluntarily by the applicant Unacceptable Conditions: Density restrictions (where inappropriate; where Code doesn't allow) • Matters outside scope of the applicable portions of Code • Conditions which have no Code basis • Architectural review standards, where none exist • Technical Requirements: - Town has professional staff to review drainage plans & developmt desig • Trust your staff! • Good time to ask staff technical questions: before the hearing Dnen Meet -inns Law (C.R.S. 2/-L-b-/-LC Meetings of Council, Boards or Commissions must be open to the public, and preceded by a full and timely notice "if officials use e-mail to discuss (the merits or substance) of legislation or other public business among themselves, the e-mail shall be subject to the requirements of this section. "pending "Meeting" defined as any kind of gathering, convened to discuss public business - in person; by telephone; electronically; or by other means of communication • Does not apply to "chance meeting" or social gathering where discussion of public business is not central purpose. What about members texting, or messaging, during a meeting? *With each other about issues listed on the agenda (instead of for all to hear)? • With staff? • With developers/applicants/lobbyists/interest group? "Public business" means a public body's policy -making functions, discussing or undertaking a rule, regulation, ordinance, or formal action. Executive Sessions • Exception within Open Meetings Law • Policy basis: when public interest best served if certain, limited matters discussed in private •OML specifies permitted basis (advice from attorneys; real estate transactions; negotiations; personnel matters) • Purpose: deliberate, not make final decisions • Process: announcement of lawful purpose, vote of 2/3 present Avon C O L O R A D O • Questions? � Future workshop topics? I&*�Wilson Williams Fellman Dittman TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Max Morgan, Planner II RE: MJR24003 LEGAL: L66 131 WR ADDRESS: 2332 Fox Lane DATE: June 5, 2024 A Avon COLORADO STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This application received a public hearing with the PZC on May 13, 2024, where the PZC voted to continue the application. As part of the same public hearing, the PZC voted to recommend approval to Avon Town Council regarding the Lot Split in Wildridge application (PUD24002), and approved the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for non -compliant roof pitch (AEC24002). This staff report contains one application related to the proposal for two new single-family residences in the Wildridge neighborhood, for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC'): 1. MJR24003 —Major Development Plan for two, single-family residences The applicant intends to build two single-family homes on two lots, following the split of the single lot (one structure per new lot). The property for the proposed project is currently a vacant lot (2332 Fox Lane / Lot 66) in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development ("PUD") originally platted for two dwelling units in the form of a duplex. Avon Town Council approved application PUD24002 on May 28, 2024 to split the lot into two separate parcels (ATT A — Resolution 24-15 DRAFT), and the applicant is now requesting planning review for the proposed homes. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Bobby Ladd, architect with RAL Architects, INC is representing 2332 Fox Lane LLC ("Applicant'), the entity pursuing the development of the 2332 Fox Ln ("Property"). The property for the proposed residential projects is currently a single, vacant lot in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development ("PUD"), which was recently approved for a lot split. The applicant is now requesting approval from the PZC for the design of the two homes. The residential structures require Major Development Plan Review, and the proposed roof -pitch included in the plans requires an Alternative Equivalent Figure 1- Site Map 970.748.4014 mmorgan@avon.org . vo n C O LO RA DO Compliance application and approval by PZC. Pursuant to Avon Development Code Section 7.16.020(b)(4), Concurrent Review, where multiple applications concern the same property, the Director has determined that concurrent review of the applicants is justified for efficiency. PROCESS: Applications for Major Development Plan Review ("MJR") require a public hearing with the PZC, with the purpose of reviewing and rendering a decision on the application. The Alternative Equivalent Compliance ("AEC') application was approved at public hearing at the Planning and Zoning meeting on May 13, 2024. No hearing with Avon Town Council is required for MJR or AEC applications. PZC Hearing Staff Review Public Notice June 10, 2024 An application for Major Development Plan review is subject to two sets of Review Criteria: 1. General Review Criteria for ALL Development Applications - § 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria 2. Review Criteria for Development Plans - § 7.16.080(g), Review Criteria PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 2332 Fox Lane is the only undeveloped property on Fox Lane, a cul-de-sac with ten residential lots, near the southern -most point in Wildridge. Fox Lane is only accessible from Saddle Ridge Loop. The 34,412 square foot site (0.79 acres) includes native grasses, sagebrush, and young trees. The terrain is characterized by steep topography sloping down towards the north, which presents views of the mountains and hillside in that same direction. Views to the south are limited by elevated, natural terrain and residential development of properties across the Fox Lane cul-de-sac. A residential lot to the west includes a duplex on three unique parcels. Residential lots to the northeast are separated from the project site via a steep gulch. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has submitted plans to subdivide the property into two lots and construct one single-family home on each new lot. The proposed lots are identified as 66A and 66B respectively. Lot 66A is proposed as a 19,225 square foot lot to include a 4,424 square foot home. Lot 66B is proposed as a 15,199 square foot lot to include a 5,222 square foot home. MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 2 of 12 . vo n C O LO RA DO Table 1-1 Fox Lane Proposed Residence Size Lot Level Space Type Space Size (Sq Ft) Lot 66A Lower Heated Area 1,876 Mechanical Room 205 Su btota l 2081 Main Heated Area 1,735 Garage 608 Subtotal 2343 Total 4,424 Lot 66B Lower Heated Area 1,805 Mechanical Room 74 Su btota l 1,879 Main Heated Area 1,868 Garage 900 Su btota l 2,768 Upper Heated Area 575 Totall 5,222 The project proposes a single, shared driveway access from the 66A lot, and an access easement for Lot 66B is included on the proposed plat for the site. With the exception of the driveway and snow storage, the two homes are not physically connected. The proposed home on Lot 66A includes a main level and a lower level. The proposed home on Lot 66B includes a main level, upper level, and lower level. Like many homes in Wildridge, the buildings are designed to step down or to "fit" into the hillside. MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 3 of 12 n Avon COLORADO I I � wNFt! RIvElr N1merltt_ �Ss i g�Tlpaell 3[Zilp11 2� 3!C'gN 2S y! sr s , f S(CtON 3f �wass w � 0 1 M �. f. ODA" 4— N I as • y a * R M 11 •7 ,If%s r~i [ M ar WA!P -1 n w b r M pl w M ti 14� dJ + n RP�R 4 1s t 1 _ B4K 5. `n _Zog 41 m i l• ~ y 4 w w M I 1 sk a+ v x a CL CL IwI 3 fir • 6, %% l ' W I ' + �¢x u I t ; w .+ 6 >• x . 2.MY i f4•Y q exer r i m 7• �� rpi w I Iw as r y.� ," �• f � � R' �•�W�.lf li� y -{ s. rt Y sr}} ." P. +rt,nr star . aoj r:lnri ~i 'SFtnor 36 �� w{ 1n11 pl�r7S1 ��f .rt 5a I f} r r'4 rar I yR .4F + q+IlRi'7a5Y�1.f �61rYnR a.}Y I yl4yF f � -2332 Fox Lane Figure 2 - Wildridge Vicinity Map MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 4 of 12 n Avon COLORADO � _ -�y.� , � • � w-c � ��. �• anti-, L t vie.. " � ���f� :�._ JIrC ='. 1: •.' �.•� <s �M -:fit• T - S!•.!�.3.• _ >t?}�' � ;� r• -�i� .. Jam•. : •`�i �Ss�ru:f3 +E„ Figure 3 - Project Site Looking North, with View of Gulch from Fox Lane ,�i■,,,,i■,,, ' q _�"a--'"""iii�iiiii�iiiiiriu'iiriu'iiriiinriiinri l.mnn�■• 3:` ��wri�wri�mrmnrmnrium ��=W A �� �-,•,nmmmnirmnrmr I M-1 I I MI. yg'i Figure 4 — Building Elevation for Proposed Home on Lot 66A Demonstrating "Fit" Into Hillside MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 5 of 12 . vo n C O LO RA DO PUBLIC NOTIFICATION & COMMENTS: Notice of the public hearing was published in the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code (ADC). Mailed notice is required for a Lot Split Amendment for Wildridge PUD, and was sent to properties within 300' of the proposed development site in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code (ADC). Public Comment was received via email and included as an attachment with this application. No new public comment to PZC has been received since the PZC hearing on May 13, 2024. Town Council received public comment during the public hearing for PUD24002 on May 28, 2024, some of which is relevant to the MJR application, and is included as an attachment to this report. ft Figure 5 - Proposed Homes Superimposed on Map of Existing Neighborhood GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA § 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria in order to consider approval of any development application submitted to the Town: i. The development application is complete; ii. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; iii. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and iv. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 6 of 12 . vo n C O LO RA DO development application. Staff Response: All development applications are subject to this review criteria. The application for MJR are complete, and Staff feels that the applicant has provided sufficient information needed to allow the PZC to determine if the applications comply with all review criteria. The Avon Comprehensive Plan is largely silent on goals and policies for single-family homes and duplexes, aside from a goal to "Achieve a diverse range of housing densities, styles and types... to serve all segments of the population (Goal E.1)." Demand for public services and infrastructure specific to this application are not exceeding capacity currently. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(g), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The application generally complies with the applicable purpose statements outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (1) states, "Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub -alpine environment". The architecture is compatible with other neighboring development with large amounts of stone, wood siding, and timber accents. 2. Reserved; 3. The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, "This residential area contains varying densities located on the south -facing slopes north of the main valley floor. The character for the developed landscape should reflect the area's dry climate and typically steep terrain with low water -requiring plant materials and natural landscaping. Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings." While the planning principles listed for District 11 target subdivision enhancements, this district does encourage developments that, "prohibits significant alteration of the natural environment... and steep slope development. The Wildridge PUD does not prescribe a limit of developable area as a percentage of the entire lot. Staff feels that the size of the building footprints are in scale with other homes in the vicinity. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The MJR application is consistent with the recently approved PUD Amendment MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 7 of 12 . vo n C O LO RA DO application for a lot split (PUD24002). The proposed location of the buildings matches the proposed building envelopes, and the proposed driveway matches the access easement. Aside from the original Wildridge PUD, no other land use approvals apply to this property or applications. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; Staff Response: The application demonstrates compliance with Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and all applicable use standards from Chapter 7.24. No deviation from the Wildridge PUD is proposed with this application. The following addresses compliance with Chapter 7.28, Development Standards: Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: All setbacks, easements, and height requirements are adhered to with the design plans. Typical setbacks are required for every lot are established via the original Wildridge PUD, and are platted to function like a building envelope. The triangular shape of proposed Lot 66B could make defining the northeast boundary as either a rear or side setback challenging in some instance however, the developer has platted the northeast boundary as a rear setback, consistent with Lot 66A. Setbacks in are as follows: 2332A —66A 2332B —66B Front 25' Front 25' Side W 10' Side W 10, Rear 10' Rear (NE) 10, There is no platted non -developable area present on this site although the newly platted building envelopes effectively create a "non -developable area" on the northern portion of the lot. All structures will be contained within the limits of the building envelope. Use: The Wilridge PUD permits two dwelling units on this lot in its current configuration. There is no increase in dwelling units applied for within the associated subdivision. Short Term Rentals (STR) are not permitted under the current PUD in Wildridge. Inclusionary Zoning: The Application is not subject to Employee Housing mitigation standards outlined in Avon Development Code Section 7.20.100. Building Height: The proposed home on 66A is 34' 1 ", at its maximum height. The proposed home on 66B is 34' 11 3/" at its maximum height. The maximum building height permitted for this property is 35 feet, and the designs adhere to this limitation. The height must be verified during the building process with foundation and framing Improvement Location Certificates (ILC). Pursuant to the PUD for Wildridge, 7.28.090(e)(2): Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 8 of 12 ,ovo n C O L O HA UO of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi -story building. The proposed home on Lot 66B includes plans for three levels, however, the stories are proportional and staff feels that the structure will not create a negative visual impact or overbearing presence on properties below or near the structure. Parking: The Code requires three parking spaces for single-family residential units over 2,500 square feet. The proposed home on 66A includes a two -car garage and space to park in the driveway. The proposed home on 66B includes a 3-car garage. 4-Sided Design: The side and rear elevations of all structures include equal care and quality as compared to the front of the buildings. Staff observes four-sided design requirements on both home designs included on the plans, demonstrated by the appearance of windows, doors, railings, decks, roof angles and a variety of exterior materials applied that make the proposed structures interesting from all angles. Snow Storage: Snow storage areas are identified on the plans and meet the required area however, staff is unaware of an agreement for maintenance responsibilities between the two proposed lots. Staff recommends an agreement that identifies maintenance responsibilities and a cost -sharing structure, is drafted, signed, and submitted to the Town as a condition for a building permit. The applicant has provided a sample agreement that will require coordination of responsibilities between property owners. Landscaping: The application includes a landscaping plan demonstrating the Fire -Free -Five requirement included in Avon Development Code, Section 7.28.050(f), to have all trees and plant material at least five feet from the building envelope. Additionally, plants and shrubs are consistent with water -wise, sun -intense recommendations for the area. Fences: None are included with this application. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The proposed materials include a combination of rock veneer siding, stucco, and wood siding/trim, with timber accents. Avon Development Code Section 7.28.090(c)(3), Building Materials, requires the use of "high quality, durable building materials", and "preferred materials reflect the Town's sub -alpine character such as native stone, wood siding, masonry or timbers." All of these materials are considered with this design. The colors meet Light Reflective Value (LRV) standards and are all earth tone. Both residences will have identical components. See next page for sample boards. MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 9 of 12 n Avon COLORADO ROOF SHINGLES 71M RERLINE HD WEATHERED WOOD ING/METAL ACCENTS DARK BRONZE WOOD SIDING/TRIM NEW AGE RUSTIC PALISADE PELLA - DARK BRONZE r) Ar4itects, inc f -Arm I P, I I Phannl •I I r Vec METAL ROOF DREXEL METAL COLOR - DARK BRONZE FASCIA%TIMBERS BENJAMIN MOORE ARBORCOAT COLOR - BLACK (SEMI -SOLID) STUCCO COLOR - SW 7029 AGREEABLE GREY STONE ASHLAR - SUNSET 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Lighting: The exterior light fixture selected for the project is a down cast, modern fixture style and in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. It is a full cutoff fixture and fixture is Dark Sky compliant and engineered to minimize light glare upward into the night sky. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d) (3) Roofs. Shed roof forms are presented for each building. Pitches are varied to include 2:12, 3:12 and 4:12 across the two proposed homes. The plan for the home on Lot 66A proposes a combination synthetic roofing materials only, with 3:12 and 4:12 roof pitch exclusively. The proposed home on Lot 66B includes metal roofing materials with 2:12 roof pitch, and roof areas with roof shake are 3:12 and 4:12 roof pitch. The roof shake product (Timberline High -Definition Shingles from GAF) is a composite material with a Class A fire rating that also contains LIV blockers MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 10 of 12 . vo n C O L O HA UO to prolong the life of the materials. These shingles are sealed to decrease wind -risk. Roof pitches between 1:12 and 3:12 are currently not permissible by the Avon Municipal Code, with the exception of 3:12 roof pitch for metallic roofs. The applicant submitted an AEC application as part of this proposal in order to initiate review from the PZC for an alternative design, which was approved at the May 13, 2024 PZC meeting via a public hearing for AEC. ROOF REGULATIONS: Section 7.28.090(c)(4), of the Avon Municipal Code offers the following intent and design of roofs in the Town of Avon: 1. Roofs: i. All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve (12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four -to -twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve -to -twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four -to -twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs shall have a three -to -twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building ii. All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation. iii. Large expanses of bright, reflective materials are not permitted; however, standing seam metal, copper or weathering steel (corten) may be acceptable. Staff Response: The proposed roof plan includes roofs pitched at a 2:12 and 3:12 pitch, representing a flatter roof than is permitted by Avon Municipal Code. Roof pitch guidelines within design standards are typically set to uphold a specific aesthetic, and reduce the impacts of weather, specifically snowmelt. Residential structures in Wildridge are not subject to different roof standards than the rest of the Town. An application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance, as a means to approve the roof pitch design not currently permitted by the Avon Municipal Code, was approved by the PZC at a public hearing on May 13, 2024. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services; and Staff Response: The roads, along with the existing water and sewer service were adequately designed to serve the Wildridge subdivision. Wildridge is also included within the existing emergency service districts. 7. The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole. Staff Response: The applicant is responsible for the design and construction of several existing homes in Wildridge, and the proposed design for the homes conforms with surrounding community. Community character refers to the distinct identify of a place; the collective impression a neighborhood or town makes on residents and visitors. The overall character of this development is consistent with other architectural statements by incorporating articulated building facades, terracing, use of natural materials, limiting landscaping, and by leaving a large area of natural terrain undisturbed. MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 11 of 12 . vo n C O LO RA DO OPTIONS: PZC has the following options: • Approve as outlined below; • Approve with modified findings and conditions; • Continue application to future meeting pending additional details or studies; or • Deny, or recommend denial of application(s), after formulating justifiable findings. MJR24003 FINDINGS Staff Recommended Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080, Development Plan, and the design meets the development standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. With conditions, the application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. MJR24003 RECOMMEND MOTION: "I move to approve Case #MJR24003, a Major Development Review application, based on the findings in section §7.16.080(g) as outlined in Staffs report, with the following conditions:" Staff Recommended Conditions: 1. Us are required to confirm building height. 2. An executed Access and Maintenance Agreement that includes, but is not limited to, maintenance, snow storage, parking, be recorded prior to the recording of the corresponding subdivision plat. 3. Lights in the recessed lighting fixtures shall not create a glare or nuisance from neighboring property owners. Lower wattages or diffusers are required for these fixtures if glare is detectable. Thank you, Max ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution 24-15 (Draft — To be Signed by Town Council) B. Application Materials C. Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Public Hearing May 13, 2024 D. Public Comment to Town Council for PUD 24002 Public Hearing May 28, 2024 MJR24003 June 5, 2024 Page 12 of 12 ATTACHMENT A - Resolution 24-15 DRAFT to be Signed Avon C O L O R A D O RESOLUTION 24-15 APPROVING CASE PUD24002, A MINOR PUD AMENDMENT TO LOT 66 BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION Approving the application for an amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development ("PUD") in order to subdivide Lot 66 Block 1, currently addressed as 2332 Fox Lane, into two separate lots. WHEREAS, Bobby Ladd on behalf of 2332 Fox Lane LLC ("Applicant")„ has submitted a Minor PUD Amendment Application ("Application"), for Lot 66 Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed as a "Minor PUD Amendment" pursuant to code section 7.16.060(h)(ii) and 7.16.060(h)(iii), Avon Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing May 13, 2024 after posting notice of such hearing in accordance with the requirements of section 7.16.020(d), Step 4: Notice, Avon Development Code, and considered all comments provided; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on May 13, 2024, the Planning and Zoning Commission made a recommendation that the Town Council approve the Application with conditions; and WHEREAS, the recommended conditions include the requirement for the Applicant to provide an "Access and maintenance agreement for the shared driveway and storage area to be recorded prior to signature of the Minor Subdivision plat" and "'Limits of disturbance' are assigned to the northern portion of the lot, and designated on the plat prior to signature and recording."; and WHEREAS, the Avon Town Council held a public hearing on May 28, 2024, after posting notice of such public hearings in accordance with the requirements of Section 7.16.020(d), Step 4: Notice, Avon Development Code, and considered all comments provided; and WHEREAS, the Avon Town Council considered the review criteria set forth in section 7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, Section 7.16.060(h)(ii), Minor Amendment, and Section 7.16.060(h)(iii), Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD, and found the Application in compliance with the Review Criteria. Resolution Form — 2024 May 28, 2024 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT A - Resolution 24-15 DRAFT to be Signed WHEREAS, the Avon Town Council finds that the PUD Amendment for a Lot Split in Wildridge will promote the health, safety and general welfare of the Avon community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN OF AVON that the Avon Town Council hereby approves the application for an amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development ("PUD") in order to subdivide Lot 66, Block 1, currently addressed as 2332 Fox Lane, into two separate lots with the following conditions: 1) Access and maintenance agreement for the shared driveway and storage area is to be recorded prior to signature of the Minor Subdivision plat. 2) "Limits of disturbance" are assigned to the north portion of the lot, or restrictive building envelope and designated on the plat prior to signature and recording 3) That the Findings and Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting from May 13, 2024 are approved as presented at the Avon Town Council meeting May 28, 2024 4) That the structures' design shall not exceed the building heights represented during the public hearing at the Avon Town Council meeting May 28, 2024 5) That the plat will contain a note prior to signature and recording that there will only be one curb cut available to Lot 66 Block 1 Wildridge - 2332 Fox Lane ADOPTED May 28, 2024 by the AVON TOWN COUNCIL By: Attest: Amy Phillips, Mayor Miguel Jauregui Casanueva, Town Clerk Resolution Form — 2024 May 28, 2024 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials O Box 'RAL ARCHITECTS, INC. EAGLE, CO 81631 PHONE: 970.376.4227 EMAIL: BOBBYL@RALARCH.COM March 7, 2024 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge Avon, CO 81620 Written Narrative This project entails splitting one existing duplex lot into two separate single family residence lots and structures. 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code. The application substantially complies with the purpose of the Avon Development Code. The existing density for the property is maintained falling within the previously contemplated impact on the Town of Avon infrastructure. By splitting the structure into two separate single family residences, the buildings are able to be stepped up the natural sloping terrain of the lot and maintain height and building sizes that are comparable to adjacent properties while maximizing the potential of the subject lot through view capture, building orientation, and drainage patterns. 2. Reserved N/A 3. The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other application adopted plan documents. The existing lot was conceived under the Wildridge PUD. The proposed design does not stray from the original goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and respects the existing criteria placed upon the lot for density and development intensity. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable. The existing lot was conceived under the Wildridge PUD. The proposed design does not stray from the original goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and respects the existing criteria placed upon the lot for density and development intensity. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code. Compliance with applicable Town Code development standards is demonstrated in the submitted documents. Where variances are requested, an Alternative Equivalency Compliance application has been submitted in support. 6. The development can be adequately served by city services. The development falls within allowable density and intensity that was originally used to calculate the entire Wildirdge subdivisions impact on city services. 7. The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community. The size and scale of the proposed development is consistent with the surrounding community as demonstrated on the submitted drawings. 90 \ . I Otter `c9 c r it IL 1! , +280 N ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials «w �r•ewe . w OGvdOIOO `X1NaOO d'IDVFI NOAV 40 NMOJ, ni•BuiAanrn5 dgai'daIIA1 `I NDO'IEI`99.LO'I aSuea am9 d` W OIHJV'dJOdOl U y r r r r rssr-zz "" � o QA s � F Ego N S N o -�g $yy dN S W6£j 5E•£' £ o F g I ( I II /I III 11 IA.. / �/ i�/ 8 p tl g I .i a 85 Z Q J X F U � O J O ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials Zoning Analysis Existing Proposed Density Lot 66 - 2 Units (Duplex) Lot 66A - 1 Unit (Single Family) Lot 66B - 1 Unit (Single Family) Total - 2 Units Total - 2 Units Setbacks Lot 66 Lot 66A Front - 25' Front - 25' Side - 10' Side - 10' Rear 10' Rear - 10' Proposed Envelope - 5,528 sf Lot 66B Front - 25' Side - 10' Rear - 10' Proposed Envelope - 7,555 sf Total Developable Area - 22,216 sf Total Developable Area - 13,083 sf Area Lot 66 Lot 66A No limit Maximum residential floor area - 4,000sf Lot 66B Maximum residential floor area - 5,000sf Height Lot 66 Lot 66A 35' 35', 30' for roofs less than 4:12 slope Lot 66B 35', 30' for roofs less than 4:12 slope ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials LOT 70 TRAwCT�E w. I \ \ s / LOT 696 I i�wsapua::Exims.m $• LOT 69A r.wxz s. pswAaxzl SCALE: 1" = 30' LOT 65A —F Z. Ii LOT 686 xun i pioLOT 66B \ �; LOT 68A r o c � IP ax s Ems ` 0 Q$ " WI. xaxwBcaxM mm \ s3x"�zaa� z rs'xnww�x o-- 18'07'33• a \ v N T R=285.00' I e \ \ �\ PN, I L=90.i6' c=15'19'11" V CND=N83'07'42"W R=2-00' \ \ CNL=89.79' 138,33' s x®Ax L=]6.20' .3'xsuxpx ap OVERALL CURVE CnB=N66'2a'20•W Gore Ran a :1-3326'44' CNL=75.98' 13317'07" g R=zas.aa' Surveying, uc T=85.63' R=155.0' L=t66.37' 147.07' ChB=N75'28'07"W L=9t.4o' 50' R.O.W.) rvrn:ra .r�.roN�.>9mu Ch-64.Or ChB=N75'38'19°W FOX LANE CNL=90.08' FINAL PLAT A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 66, BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO Certificate of Dedication and Ownership Surveyor's Certificate nneee nadiMcomw�rv. minp sole em^inviam exmruponro ianasu� rik«¢ee unmrme wmarinrea¢cpaorautnm ea pmwM ee¢cn°ee a¢rouw.s� m sogperr P.���nvrcri�fuumym saps. state mcaora�eo, u iw of pan.aee e� .reoace�. racn pa..v maa. rmm an wccme acmy d aia wcpawv by m. ace a m.r cn wmarq.. permegmmd I-Ic°wa omoM1.re, rsm wear pzepuon xumbarzzwsT r«ay¢now¢rne iaawn ane amenaian ormeion. wemenn «asueeua sam inrne oa«orme [«ie a«my ekm anxe¢oraer, ompbrce xnn apgmaeia rewkuonapwemngme rowiewa, imomulimaM neagmue pnumsimaout, pianae see ¢ubexpzeme ¢ama deannaq mreada.emwrm dpmmm.. uama.wd pwN no�¢waremy°dwen¢my�mxexp euee xainpika. ui monumenn ue ¢n e¢repsree W me rydFspe, esrekpeoldeaoeM tleamMarel°aormpublkinememema aM1oxn SWlvlzl«Ppulamn¢pme Twm down. dmry ane«tran eapumose¢ocy, anaaor nnet°wrernai m�¢ icwnre.a vma�.in.w my .ca..dmi. zan say cr s.wary.ao. zoza. ne. Town Certlflwte sTnrtcr 1 mb Flnd pwb Iss rydrepie.n couxrvas I pi«µmeiww mrcnrycam"tz norromrnwmaeessuwawmvadme r«nn�m °rn.ectlwu�or my pm or any a°wmecre raa°np mwd°. m. aim aan.anp.a,a«,m.�.ap.e b.rm.m.m�.a.y�°z WTxEas ra�wwo AxaaEwaF TxE Towxor."ox re, ane ue.. ederme ymnm u.pim wmwv. wmr«¢mybm ane�nimd «m. er xorery pcbm orownc mcommimb oewiopmem TIN Cemflcate «w e�i«ra as ikn¢,a«e�mra«.¢. Certificate a�na"ss ...enaer«wssrcxc.>s. nee b¢aim«mwm. neee„aeeo�Taxes Paid Clark and Recorder's Cetflcate Jen aav <i zsza ane kaax��aa am lion Ho e rh'. Dewy ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials TRACT E LOT 70 IX LOT 65 Q LOT 69 9 LOT -a T---- ----- VAN %ANT LEGEND Fa STRUCTURAL sro LANDSCAPE PLANT UST LOT 66A mM'AZ- L.OT 161 wva nsva� zz as c uxa NOTES MD SIIIAII LOT gA ==UAI%, 495�111 75�10 D M =D=. 11,F A— I S S U E 5 =D_SU ,M"Y LOT 66B 7 A 71— BUILDING HEIILT... 11 711 1�'I 71 1111 0=90 STORAGE A, A 11 (D Ftvm"A A0.1 I TRACT E LOT 70 II ' II NN � \ \ PH II � �I-�- LOT 66 �\ �.79- XCR€S- I I 2332 FOX LANE � _ LOT 66A \ 19,255 SF (0.442 ACRES) 6- L0 T 6 5 \ - 23 2-A FOX LANE - - REAR BUILDING ENVELOPE LINE 777 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE REAR BUILDING ENVELOPE LI �^ • •15'• LANDSGAFE VJILDFIkE'$ET `CH '''' '''•'' yy •BOW - 8r4,7 ��1-- I 0 151 LANDSCAPE WI1DFfRE, - -X &1-69:57- - - - ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials LOT 68 65 7 \ . o R I ....,.• ..,.......• � \ •'��:: �': •; `' • " �� -�,�_ Pam- • 0• r V \ -�8172 112 oo\s o / s \ \ 15-18 SF (0.349 ACRES) _ 2332-B FOX LANE \ -K8173.86 _ PLANT LEGEND O DECIDUOUS TREE MEN EVERGREEN TREE SHRUB ARCHITECT IN E C4 O 04 v N V C'") O L U O O 00-0 a E N CV M 00 Ci w STRUCTURAL COBBLE NATIVE REVEGETATION : ZI MULCH SOD LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST - LOT 66A KEY BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME # SIZE TREES PP PICEA PUNGENS COLROADO BLUE SPRUCE 8 8'+ HEIGHT PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 12 2.5" CALIPER SHRUBS AAS AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA NATIVE SERVICEBERRY 17 5 GALLON ATS ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA TALL WESTERN SAGE 10 5 GALLON PLANT LIST - LOT 66B N 0 T E S KEY BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME # SIZE TREES PP PICEA PUNGENS COLROADO BLUE SPRUCE 8 8'+ HEIGHT PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 27 2.5" CALIPER SHRUBS AAS AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA NATIVE SERVICEBERRY 14 5 GALLON ATS ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA TALL WESTERN SAGE 5 5 GALLON ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE NOT TO BE SODDED OR MULCHED ARE TO BE REVEGETATED WITH NATIVE GRASSES SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED WITH AN AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSOR LAND SUMMARY - LOT 66A TOTAL LOT AREA 19,255sf DISTURBED AREA OF LOT 9,379sf 48.7% OF LOT BUILDING FOUNDATION 2,121 sf HARDSCAPE 504sf DRIVEWAY 1,087sf IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 3,712sf 19.3% OF LOT LANDSCAPE AREA 5,667sf 29.4% OF LOT NATIVE VEGETATION 4,959sf 87.5% OF LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA 708sf 12.5% OF LANDSCAPE AREA SPRAY AREA Osf 0% OF IRRIGATED AREA I S S U E S DRIP AREA 582sf 82.2% OF IRRIGATED AREA SOD AREA 126sf 17.8% OF IRRIGATED AREA NO. DESCRIPTION DATE LAND SUMMARY - LOT 66B A PZC Submittal 03.10 TOTAL LOT AREA 15,199sf DISTURBED AREA OF LOT 12,971 sf 85.3% OF LOT B PZC Revisions 06.04 BUILDING FOUNDATION 2,768sf HARDSCAPE 359sf DRIVEWAY 1,776sf IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 4,903sf 32.3% OF LOT LANDSCAPE AREA 8,068sf 53.1 % OF LOT NATIVE VEGETATION 7,156sf 88.7% OF LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA 912sf 1 1.3% OF LANDSCAPE AREA SPRAY AREA Osf 0% OF IRRIGATED AREA L 0 T 67 DRIP AREA 662sf 72.6% OF IRRIGATED AREA SOD AREA 250sf 27.4% OF IRRIGATED AREA BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF HT EXISTING GR FINISHED GR HEIGHT Custom BH-1 8179.59 8145.50 8152.00 34.09' BH-2 8173.75 8144.50 8152.00 29.25' Residences BH-3 8177.64 8147.75 8152.00 29.89' BH-4 8184.48 8154.50 8168.00 29.98' Fox Lane BH-5 8180.83 8152.00 N/A 28.83' BH-6 8182.61 8153.50 N/A 29.1 1' Lot 6 L Lot 6, Block 1 BH-7 8177.42 8155.00 8165.00 22.42' Wildridge BH-8 8180.98 8146.00 8150.50 34.98' Avon, Colorado BH-9 8175.63 8145.75 8145.75 29.88' BH-10 8182.42 8149.50 N/A 32.92' BH-11 8186.00 8152.50 8152.50 33.50' F SNOW STORAGE Overall TOTAL DRIVEWAY AREA - 2,863 SF REQUIRED SNOW STORAGE - 573 SF Site Plan AREA A 148 SF AREA B 305 SF AREA C 104 SF n n rI N ntP e AREA D 146 SF TOTAL AREA 703 SF O DATE: 23-349 AO. June 4, 2024 1 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: SHEET OF _ ©2024 RAL Architects, Inc. 1 11 = 20' ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials — --- — ------ —-------- ---LOT 66A --- --- --- --- --- --- -- \ \ 19/255 SF (0.442 ACRES) \ --- --2-332-A FOX_ LANE REAR BUILDING ENVELOPE LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE � I \ \ I - \ \ \ - BOW - 8147.0 - - _ 51.0 EAVE ELEVATION 817.. --- --- 0 1 EAVE ELEVAT I Q off' 52.0 ao 8152.50 o \e I LU �a \ LU w LU \ \ _ I 8164.25 \ I � RIDGE EUYATJON a 8Q.83 _ I 8165.50 \ I ` E ELYATI01L81 ----- LIMI OTS F DISTUR - _ ----- NCE -- x-8469.57------ �70.42 SOT 68 TOW - 8165.0 \ �\ �- 8162.0 60.4 x-8170.83 B �\ �\ _ _— \ -104SF \ / 0 - '.0 72.12 �O - LOT--66B —/—\ 15,199_SF_(0.349 ACRES) A, - \ 2332-B FOX LANE \ -- T V-tr71-0 BOW - 8167.0 — \ $173.86 --�- \-- -- -x-8176.00 SOT 67 ARCHITECT I. E C4 O 04 v N V C'-) O � U O O a0-0 E CV C") 10 00 C) ,o IISTRUCTURAL I II LANDSCAPE I II NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Architectural Site Plan 23-349 DATE: AOO June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: SHEET OF ©2024 RAL Architects, Inc. V = loll ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials I I _ 41, 15'1 LANASGAPE WILDIF FE`$E%&A�K �9 ` z. ... . E .F. a��aa a F EE.FFE �. r;. �'t*"�$:a i� � :i���•r! ; Y�.c• �i1.1 \ � �" h� c �• �� 1 t.F dv�`+, •� !., •t.� ,�.t.�.• 5..�3r�������• ��V� \� • �� S/ t�i�`� �� ��!,.,.� r'��i3���t•�!.��. t�.`•i•+.,� a,�"h!.•��•,�•��• •:U.•i•��� � � /, ` ��: wx • �'i*•'�.�ir :i �••Y,••s�i ,� •�A.t��. t• Axwt •�.�.th� •fir%� x !:`ice, � �� � 1. 'z••�:•'• �UNMI • E E 40/ F FE `FPHE Ef,F - RF�.. f\ . SOT 68 \E ©% 17, F .E \�'0-1 . • x-8170.83 0" -, 172.12 / E F F E F� $173.86 x-8176.00 SOT 67 ARCHITECT CV M 10 00 Ow IISTRUCTURAL I II LANDSCAPE I II NOTES I I S S U E S NO. I DESCRIPTION 11 DATE A PZC submittal 03.10.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Landscape Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: AO.3 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: SHEET OF _ ©202d RAL Architects, Inc. ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 o 04 c � s M ' ` V I. a)M C: a 00 a, a 2 _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • � C N C V M 10 CL 00 o w LO ` a O O L °0 a Q o STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE im7 Li NOTES GUEST BEDROOM 4 c� 14' 1 52" 15'-42' 32" 18'-12° PATIO HOT TUB OFAMILY ROOM CD CD OBEDROOM 2 ® 10'_51, 31„ 31 A51„ 10,_51„ 511 2 2 34 1 1 34 2 103 2 2 2 LL 205 51„ 31 rIC`4 1 2 I o O DOa- - - - - - ^,N I S S U E S ram_ EXERCISE ROOM NO. DESCRIPTION DATE o r A PZC submittal 03.10.2 I - I r y':' — 1 LINEN 1 BEDROOM 3 1 POWDER 1 LAUNDRY I I I CV Queen MECHANICAL Custom Residences O O CLOSET 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado FLOOR AREA - 1876 SF MECHANICAL AREA - 205 SF Lower Floor Plan A PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: Al • 1 April 15, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 114" - 1 �0° SHEET OF _ ©2024 PAL Archifects, Inc. ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 o 04 c � s M ' ` V I. a)M C: a 00 a, a 2 _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • � C N C V M 10 CL 00 o w LO ` :3 O O L °0 :3 Q o STRUCTURAL DECK LANDSCAPE 0 O NOTE S GREAT ROOM rlc'4 00 MASTER BATH 1461 5, v, 2 19'-3" op rlC`4 rlc� r� M I `V I Dining TableC1O 3'-3" 10'-91, 3'6" x 8'0" MASTER BEDROOM 31„ • 2 MASTER CLOSET °—------------ DINING� ROOM co OWDER I O I rl I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE I I KITCHEN A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 I � _ rlc'V P r ENTRY o MUD ROOM LO N GARAGE 11, 1u N 01 5'-1 „ 52 5 42 21'_5„ L13 I --- O o -- SIN M I PANTRY I I Custom Residences 0 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 ❑ Wildridge Avon, Colorado ❑ ❑ FLOOR AREA - 1735 SF GARAGE AREA - 608 SF Main Floor Plan A PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: Al • 2 April 15, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 1 /4n = 1101, SHEET OF _ ©2024 RALArchifects, Inc. 14'-1 ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT N F= CV O CV C � S L o-0 ;_ • � C N C V N 10 00 m 0 a LO O 0 L m 0 Q O� aw STRUCTURAL „ 2'0° 2'-0" LANDSCAPE 2,-0 2,_0„ L. EAVE ELEVATION 8173.75 EAVE ELEVATION 8173.75 0 0 CV CV FT NOTES a w w EAVE ELEVATIO 8177.64 0 CV I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 TFFI L 1 8 .83 ri Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge 0 o Avon, Colorado CV CV EAVE ELEVATION 8177.42 EAVE ELEVATION 8184.48 0 2'-0„ Roof CV Pan A PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: A1.3 April 15, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral ©202d RAL Architects, Inc. SCALE: 1 /4" = 1 10" SHEET OF _ ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials _ _TOP OF WALL _ TOP OF BEAM (BEYOND) cvil� GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 8168.00 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8164.25 LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION 8152.50 TOP CIF BEAM _ _ East Elevation SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" ASPHALT SHINGLES METAL ROOFING 2X WOOD FASCIA 8" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING 1 " METAL REVEAL TRIM STUCCO STONE VENEER METAL RAILING ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW/DOOR WOOD BEAM/COLUMN EXPOSED STEEL BEAM GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 8168.00 --------------- MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8164.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —LOWER FLOOR — — — — — — — -- ELEVATION 8152.50 Elevation FITSouth ARCHITECT N F CV O CV C � S L 4 o-0 ;_ • � C N C N V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V m Q zs O� aw ISTRUCTURAL I LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations 23-349 DATE: A2. I April 15, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 1 /4° = 1 ,0° SHEET OF Inc. SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" RAL ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ELEV ELEV TOP OF WALL GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 8168.00 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8164.25 LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION 8152.50 _ENTRY FLOOR______________ ELEVATION 8165.50 ----------------------- West Elevation SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT N F CV a CV C � S L _ o o, �. t 0-0 ;_ • � C 4% C Cv V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V o ca 0 Q o� aw ISTRUCTURAL I LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations North Elevation SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 23-349 DATE: A2.2 April 15, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 1 /4" — 1 ,0° SHEET OF RAL Architects, Inc. ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 o 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M C: a 00 a, a 2 _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • C a% C V M 10 CL 00 o w LO ` a ° O O L °0 a Q o STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE I I NOTES CD a75 CD Ll X I I 0 I O II nano I Do c� II � II � � BEDROOM 3 O o BEDROOM 4 I BEDROOM 2 �OJ LINEN - - - - - - - - - ------- I S S U E S II NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC submittal 03.10.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 CLOSET POWDER OLAUNDRY FP FAMILY ROOM PATIO MECHANICAL FLOOR AREA - 1805 SF MECHANICAL AREA - 74 SF Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado I —�— o L - J Lower Floor Plan B PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: Al. 1 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral ©2024 RALArch ifISCALE: 114,E _ 1101, SHEET OF _ ects, nc. ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 o 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M C: a 00 a, a 2 _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • � C N C V M 10 CL 00 o w LO ` a u O O L °0 a Q o STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE COVERED DECK NOTE S --- O O ----- --- PANTRY DINING ROOM 0—fl --- -- -- 0 KITCHEN ED Cl LJ �o " >< MUD ROOM '� Cl ED Cl _ o M GARAGE POWDER I� I I COATS-1� I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC submittal 03.10.2 �L I � B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 DECK r STUDY �T 7 I �kr I - I _ FLOOR AREA 1868 SF tier GARAGE AREA - 900 SF Custom Residences GREAT ROOM J 2332 Fox Lane ENTRY Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge �kr Avon, Colorado I I I I I I Main II Floor li r �r Plan B II I I PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: A1.2 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 114 ,E _ 1 �0° SHEET OF _ ©2024 RALArchifects, Inc. ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 o 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M C: a 00 a, a 2 _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • C a% C V M 10 CL 00 o w LO ` a u O O L °0 a Q o STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE NOTES Do F- — ��7CD Li I I MASTER CLOSET MASTER BATH I I o L5 MASTER BEDROOM DECK I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC submittal 03.10.2 OB PZC Revisions 06.04.2 FLOOR AREA - 575 SF Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Upper Floor Plan B PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: A1.3 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral 2024 RALArch ifISCALE: 114,E _ 1101, SHEET OF _ ©ects, nc. ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials ARCHITECT NF= CV O CV C � S L o-0 ;_ • � C N C V N 10 00 m 0 a LO O 0 L m 0 Q O� aw STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE 2'-0" 2'-0" 2' 0" 2'-0" 2' 0° 0 CV El El 2'-0" O CV 2' 0" _ NOTES FF CV CV I E 1 8 2 CV 0 CV FM I I S S U E S M NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 0 04TV 17 `~ E 1 81 8 (V LLLLLIJ Custom Residences LLLL� IF 0 CV 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 2' 0" Wildridge 2:12 Avon, Colorado Roof CV i-0 n O Pan B 2'-10" 2'-0 PROJECT NO.: 23-349 DATE: A A June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral ©202d RAL Architects, Inc. SCALE: 1 /4,, _ 1 ,0„ SHEET OF ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials TOP OF WALL TOP OF RIDGE ELEVATION 8175.63 UPPER FLOOR PALL FI EVAMIQ 18 Z2 25 E.AM_---- _ _TOP OF RIDGE_ _ ELEVATION 8180.98 _TOP OF WALL r--loo Cm m MAIN FLOOR _ ELEVATION 8163.25 _ LOWER FLOOR _ ELEVATION 8151.25 1 /4" = 1'-0" _ TOP OF RIDGE _ _ ELEVATION 8186.00 _TOP OF WALL _UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION 8172.25 _MAIN FLOOR _ _ ELEVATION 8163.25 _GARAGE FLOOR_ _ ELEVATION 8161.25 1 /4" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT N F= CV O CV C � S L o -0 ;_ • � C N C N V 10 00 m 0 a O O r� m V m0 Q o� C�:w STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Elevations Plan B 23-349 DATE: A2.1 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 1 /A" _ 1 ,0„ SHEET OF Inc. RAL ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials TOP OF RIDGE ELEVATION 8186.0 TOP OF WA UPPER FLOC ELEVATION 8172.,' GARAGE FLOC_ ELEVATION 8161.,' South Elevation -1 L _U L - �::] T_— t� _ UPPER FLOOR _ ELEVATION 8172.25 TOP OF WALL _ MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8163.25 _ GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 8161.25 SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" I nWFR FI nnR PPER FLOOR LEVATION 8172.25 1AIN FLOOR _ LEVATION 8163.25 DWER FLOOR LEVATION 8151.25 ARCHITECT NF CV a CV C � S L _ o o, �. t 0-0 ;_ • � C 4% C Cv V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V m� Q o� aw ISTRUCTURAL I LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.10.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 Custom Residences 2332 Fox Lane Lot 66, Block 1 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Elevations Plan B East Elevation SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" RAL 23-349 DATE: A2.2 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral Inc. I SCALE: 1 /A" _ 1 10„ I SHEET OF : _ I ATTACHMENT B - MJR Application Materials WILDRIDGE ROAD TOWN BOUNDARY LAND USE SUMMARY PARCEL AREA USE ADDRESS LOT 66A 0.4420 AC. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 2332A FOX LANE LOT 66B 0.3489 AC. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 2332E FOX LANE TOTAL = 0.7909 AC. TRACT E (TOWN OF AVON) LOT 65A (BENJAMIN USATCH & ROBIN M. USATCH) FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. No. 5447 Gore Range Surveying, LLC ROBox 15 Avon, CO 81620 (970) 479-8698 • fax (970) 479-0055 7.50' y 1 �,_ I IN < TY MAP I LOT 70 (TODD LEONARD & BETH K. LEONARD) FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 J" ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. No. 5447 LOT 69B (ROBERT ISOM & MARY ISOM) A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 66, BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO GENERAL NOTES: 1) DATE OF SURVEY: FEBRUARY 2024 2) BEARINGS BASED UPON THE LINE CONNECTING THE MONUMENTS FOUND IN PLACE MARKING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 50, BEING A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP, P.L.S. No. 5447 AND THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 50, BEING A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP, P.L.S. No. 5447, SAID BEARING BEING NO2°11'29"W, PER THE PLAT OF WILDRIDGE, RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 1981, UNDER RECEPTION No. 226437. (SEE DRAWING). 3) MONUMENTATION AS INDICATED HEREON. 4) THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SUBDIVIDE LOT 66, BLOCK 1, WILDRIDGE TO CREATE LOT 66A AND LOT 66B AND THE ACCESS EASEMENT AS INDICATED HEREON. 5) THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE ACCESS EASEMENT CREATED BY THIS PLAT IS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM SAID LOTS 66A AND 66B. 6) GORE RANGE SURVEYING LLC DID NOT PERFORM A TITLE SEARCH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO ESTABLISH OWNERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. RECORD DOCUMENTS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT WERE PROVIDED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER No. V50071202, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 20, 2024 AT 5:00 P.M.. 7) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 8) ALL REFERENCES TO RECORD DOCUMENTS ARE TO THOSE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF THE OFFICE OF THE EAGLE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER. 9) LINEAL UNITS INDICATED ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. LOTS 66A AND 66B ARE SUBJECT TO: 10) RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 1982, IN BOOK 345 AT PAGE 844. 11) EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 1981 IN BOOK 330 AT PAGE 78. LOT 69A (ANNE S. DEWATERS) \ N 90°00'00" E - 18.31' PROPERTY LINE�� - \ I CREATED BY THIS PLAT LO \ / `O LOT 68B N 90`00'00" E - 72.96' L00 I \ (MICHAEL CHADWELL & BUILDING ENVELOPE ANN MARIE CHADWELL) (CREATED BY THIS PLAT) I ' Ld LOT 66A i Irt 0.4420 ACRES O �- 2332 A N o i o LOT 66B \ a LOT 68A 00 r 0.3489 ACRES O I► - O 00 (PEPPER K. ETTERS & 1 O 2332 B �\ JODIE S. ETTERS) U) \ 1 ACCESS EASEMENT 10.00' QQ- (CREATED BY THIS PLAT) \ 10.00' I N 90°00'00" W - 29.52' — = SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE& \ / SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT S 00°00'00" E - 28.40(RECEPTION No. 2265437) \ `j \ FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH Ln rn A 1 J" ALUMINUM CAP Sit I I/-L=30.30' SET A No. 5 REBAR WITH\ P.L.S. No. 5447 SCALE: 1 " = 30' 1\ I \ \� s �o II BUILDING SETBACK\\ (RECEPTION No. \\ 1 2265437) UTILITY & DRAINAGE \ EASEMENT I�(RECEPTION No. 2265437) 1 0 18*0733" R=285.00' T= 45.46' L=90.16' ChB=N83°07'42"W ChL=89.79' OVERALL CURVE 33 °26' 44" R=285.00' T=85.63' L=166.37' ChB=N75°28'07"W ChL=164.01' Certificate of Dedication and Ownership Know all men by these presents that 2332 Fox Lane LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, being sole owner in fee simple of all that real property described as follows: Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge, per the plat thereof recorded October 8, 1981 under Reception Number 226437 in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, and containing 0.7909 acres more or less; has by these presents laid -out, platted and subdivided the same into Lots and Blocks as shown hereon and designate the same as A Resubdivision of Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge, Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado and dedicate for public use the streets shown herein including avenues, drives, boulevards, lanes, courts and alleys to the Town of Avon; and the utility and drainage easements shown hereon for utility and drainage purposes only; and do further state that this subdivision shall be subject to the Protective Covenants filed and recorded for this Subdivision in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, as Document Number Surveyor's Certificate I, Samuel H. Ecker, do hereby certify that I am a Professional Land Surveyor licensed under the laws of the State of Colorado, that this Plat is a true, correct and complete Plat of A Resubdivision of Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge, Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, as laid out, platted, dedicated and shown hereon, that such plat was made from an accurate survey of said property by me and under my supervision and correctly shows the location and dimensions of the lots, easements and streets of said subdivision as the same are staked upon the ground in compliance with applicable regulations governing the subdivision of land, that such plat is based upon the professional land surveyor's knowledge, information and belief, that such plat has been prepared in accordance with applicable standards of practice, and that such plat is not a guaranty or warranty, either expressed or implied. All monuments are set as required by the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Avon. In Witness Whereof, I have set my hand and seal this 26th day of February, A.D., 2024. EXECUTED this day of A.D., 2024. Samuel H. Ecker Colorado P.L.S. No. 30091 Owner: 2332 Fox Lane LLC Address: PO Box 516 a Colorado limited liability company Avon, CO 81620 By: Title: STATE OF )SS COUNTY OF The foregoing Certificate of Dedication and Ownership was acknowledged before me this A.D., 2024 by as Fox Lane LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. My Commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public Title Certificate Town Certificate This Final Plat is approved by the Town of Avon, County of Eagle, Colorado this day of , 2024 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle. Approval of this plat by the Town is consent only and is not to be construed as an approval of the technical correctness of this plat or any documents relating thereto. day of of 2332 WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN OF AVON Land Title Guarantee Company does hereby certify that it has examined the title to all lands shown upon this plat and that title to such lands is vested in 2332 Fox Lane LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and assessments except as follows: Dated this day of A.D., 2024. Agent signature THE TOWN OF AVON By: Director of Community Development Attest: Town Clerk Certificate of Taxes Paid I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes and assessments due and payable as of upon all parcels of real estate described on this plat are paid in full. Dated this day of A.D., 2024. Eagle County Treasurer Clerk and Recorder's Certificate This Plat was filed for record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder at day of 2024 and is duly recorded at Reception No. \ A 1 4" ALUMINUM CAP \ P.L.S. No. 30091 \ �� LOT 67 Clerk and Recorder (ANDREW J. ROSICA & KATHRYN A. ROSICA) By: Deputy R=285.00' T=38.33 \�0) L=76.20' ChB=N66°24'20"W ChL=75.98' 33°47'07" R=155.00' T= 47.07' L=91.40' ChB=N75°38'18ItW ChL=90.08' FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH --A 1 J" ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. No. 5447 FOX LANE (50' R.O.W.) o'clock on this SE 512012024 DRAW BY DATE CHECKED BY SE DRAWING NO.: 22— 1451 plat 22-1451 SHEET 1 OF 1 JOB NO.: Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 12 May, 2024 To the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council: As Avon Property owners and Neighbors to the proposed development of 2332 Fox Lane, the below signed are united in our opposition to the current application for a Minor Subdivision and Lot Split Amendment for Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision (2332 Fox Lane). As proposed, the Lot Split and corresponding development should be rejected for the following three reasons. First. it contradicts the guidelines set forth in the Town of Avon Home Rule Charter ("Town Charter"). Second, it ignores the policies and goals set forth by the Town of Avon in the Comprehensive Plan (updated in 2024) ("Town Plan`) and the 2021 Community Housing Plan ("Community Plan"). Finally, it does not follow precedent set by previous successful Lot Split Amendments within the Wildridge Subdivision. Each of these reasons is explained more fully below. Regarding the Town Charter, the residences as proposed contradict section 7.16.060(h)(4) as follows: 1. There Is no evidence that the lot split results in less total site coverage. 2. There is no provision in the application that explains any attempt to restrict the building envelope to minimize site coverage. 3 There is no apparent effort to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity, as proposed, instead the lot split profoundly exacerbates negative impacts to surrounding properties. a. There is no provision to enhance landscaping along the most impactful portions of the development, and the current design precludes doing so due to landscaping setbacks. b In meeting (and exceeding) minimum setbacks within the divided lot between the new residences, the structures further encroach upon neighboring homes and view corridors. Although minimum requirements are met, there is no effort to increase setbacks to lessen the impact of the structures on the neighboring homeowners. c. Rather than restrict the building footprint, particularly in the case of Lot B, the development maxes out the building envelope. d. No apparent attempt is made to restrict building heights beyond requirements. e. No apparent attempt is made to restrict architectural massing or square footage. Rather, the current design maximizes the possible developed square footage by encroaching upon minimum setbacks, maximizing building heights, and creating an obstructive architectural mass. These contradictions conspire to excessively and unreasonably restrict the views and quiet enjoyment of the neighboring homes. Many of these issues are a result of the proposed design itself. All are specifically either driven by or exacerbated by the Lot Split by forcing the 20' setback between units. The resulting building envelopes, in combination with the developers apparent goal to maximize livable square footage, unreasonably and unnecessarily impact the neighboring lots. With respect to the Town Plan and Community Plan, the proposed Lot Split and development directly violate the following public policies and goals: • Policy A.1.5: Promote development that maximizes sun exposure and protects views • Policy B.1.3: Encourage development applicants to meet with adjacent residents, businesses, and property owners during all application phases to identify concerns and strategies to address them. • Policy CA.3: Design four sided architecture that maximizes solar exposure, protects views, and breaks up building bulk. 1 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 e Policy C.2.4: Encourage landscaping and building locations that enhance neighborhood views and view corridors. e Policy G.1.3: Work with public and private landowners to identify opportunities for conservation easements, permanent open space protection tools, and access to open space. e Policy GA A Minimize and mitigate potential development impacts to wildlife and watersheds. e DISTRICT 11: NORTHERN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT F} Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings. Encourage and support development that ■ Prohibits significant alteration of natural environment ■ This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting. ■ Provides the development of a trailhead to access the surrounding public lands. e 2021 Avon Community Housing Plan Grow the inventory of homeownership and "missing middle" inventory, in place of additional rental housing stock, to create a more balanced portfolio with a long-term goal of more home ownership opportunities Finally, the proposed Lot Split does not follow the precedent set by previously successful lot splits within Wildridge. See the attached list of known prior lot splits in Wildridge, all of which were developed while still maintaining reasonable setbacks from neighbors, limiting the impacts on existing homes' views, and sustaining the existing character of the neighborhood. For all of these reasons, we respectfully request that, as supported by the PUD, the Planning and Zoning Commision deny the Minor Subdivision and Lot Split Amendment for Lot 66. Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision (2332 Fox Lane) unless and until the requirements from the Town Charter, Town Plan, and Community Plan outlined above are met or exceeded. Furthermore. as a general matter, we request that in moving forward with development of the Lot, the developers consider the impacts of their designs on the neighborhood according to the community standards laid out in the Town Plan These Town goals are critical to protecting the unique character of all neighborhoods in Avon, including Wildridge As proposed, the Lot Split and corresponding development do not conform to the nature and character of the existing development within the Wildridge neighborhood and should be rejected. Thank you for your consideration, The Neighbors of 2332 Fox Lane: Property Owner(s) Signature Lot 9 Address Property Owner(s) Lot # Property Owner(s) Lot # Signature Address Signature -- Address Date W-:e 11111101 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Impact of Current Design on Neighboring Views L07 66 r Primary Views obstructed Iby unbroken 33 structure t - ,—r�- x A 10 4a,V {' Desrgn includes greater Uvin rrunimum setbacks between units 1 LOT 59 Structure Spans full length of lot l;g lus- under max heights k r Exacerbates imrt�paacis by encroach x • on minimum setbacks" V LOT b: I T Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Example of Impact of Proposed Design Views from Primary Living Spaces of 2413 Saddle Ridge Loop View 2: Outdoor from Master Bedroom Door View 1: Outdoor from Deck I-v Wo-oll 7 PAP, A Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 TOWN OF AVON PUBLIC RECORD REQUEST FORM REQUEST MAYBE FAXED TO: (970) 949-9139, Attention Records Custodian or E-Mailed to miaureauilaavon.ortx and btorres@avon.ora NOTE: Confirmation of receipt is required for e-mailed requests Name: Pepper Etters Date: 5r912024 Address: PO Box 353 State: CO Zip Code: 81658 City.' Vail Phone: 970 688-0790 E-mail Address: pepperetlers@hotmail com FAX Number: Italicized above information is optional unless payment is by check or delivery of copies is requested. Inspection Only Requested: Yes �] No [ ] If it would be faster. I can pick up the records or Hard Copies Requested: Yes ] No [ ] inspect -nly first in person CD or Electronic Copies Requested: Yes [ ] No { ] Desired Retrieval Method: Pick-up [ ] Mailing [ ] E-Mail . Please indicate the information desired and/or list each requester! document. Please be as specific as possible. (You may attach a letter indicating the requested public records) 1 am looking for any documentation for attempted or completed lot splits in Widndge Per Jena Skinner, I was recomended to specifially request "available plats for W Idridge, for duplex lot splits resulting in 2-single family lots." I would also love a copy of the building plans for our home at 2413 Saddle Ridge Loop if that is something you have on record [Please note — all faxed requests must be followed up with a phone call to be sure t was rece'ved All e-mailed requests must receive a confirmation of receipt e-mail from the Records Custodian.] have read the Town of Avon, Colorado P bl' Records Policy, revised October 24, 2019, and agree to pay all charges incurred in accordance with surf b[ic Records Policy and the attached fee schedule: Person requesting Public Record(s) Charges: (To be completed by Records Custodian and attached as invoice) Total $ Staff Use Only Date Received: 05/09/24 Time Received: 3:30 p.m. / BT Date Completed: Time Completed: 11am Completed By: MattPielsticker Summary of Response: See attached summary and hyperlink to plats No building plans were located for 2413 Saddleridge Loop, only permits. Avon Public Records Policy Adopted July 1, 2023 Page 8 of 8 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Duplex to Single -Family Lot PUD Amendments in Wildridge Lot 110, Block 1 Lot 22, Block 1 Lot 10, Block 3 Lot 21, Block 3 Lot 26, Block 3 Lot 31, Block 3 Lot 48, Block 4 Lot 61, Block 4 Link to Plats: Wildridge Lot Splits Atachmentc -GwcComment bPZ c forPUD&o9 Hearing 5.2.24 \ \\ !! _ a § | $ 2 o ! ■ m ~ � ( | - t R � | |! - m 7¢ #� 4 2 [ - a - , ff k2 f ! !2 ; k, a, E ! M ! \ i) / M ! {; k ) E s § § } ! § § ! f § § o w \�����#f $22222!!!!2(IKAA51 Izr`� ■tag „ 2©;;;;2¥;;;; « K 3 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Precedents Set by Previous Wildridge Lot Splits We have reviewed the PUDs for each prior successful Lot Split in Wildridge as provided by the Town of Avon. In addition, we have driven by each lot and explored satellite imagery, topographic maps, and Google Street View. Our findings are as follows: • All previously awarded lot splits have maintained the primary view corridors of neighboring properties. In many cases this was facilitated by the relative elevations of the impacted lots in relation to the split lot. o The remainder of the time, this was accomplished by locating the building envelope to allow sight lines between or alongside new structures. o All properties ensured the built mass did not overpower neighboring lots' primary views through appropriate scale and increased setbacks where appropriate. o No property as designed oriented a major axis of the buildings perpendicular to another properties primary view. • The majority of previous split lots maintained much greater than required setbacks from adjacent property lines, especially those oriented along the neighbors primary sight lines. Most were greater than 20'. • Only 2 properties with building envelopes that encroached upon minimum setbacks. * The first was limited to 15.75 ft along a single shared property line. n The second was limited to 22.64ft respectively. * Neither of these were along primary view corridors for a neighboring lot. • At least 1 of the prior approvals created a decreased setback between units of 12' total. Neighborhood Precedents In exploring presidents within the immediate vicinity of the proposed lot split, we have learned the following: • The proposed development exceeds the square footage of all neighboring units but 1. • The proposed development exceeds the average heated square footagellot square footage for the neighborhood by almost double. • All existing structures have a building envelope centered within their lot. o This facilitates a general character within the neighborhood that avoids encroachment of adjacent properties wherever possible. • Very few neighborhood properties abutt minimum setbacks When they do, the structures run obliquely so as only a corner actually abuts the setback. None run along any length of the setback. Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 26 Block 3 - 4290/4411 Wildridge Rd W. View Corridors maintained by position of building envelopes and enhanced by elevations. Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearina 5.13.24 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 21 Block 3 - 4250/4254 Wildridge Rd W Views maintained by lot elevations Views Maintained by elevation and position of development $W LLJ, 4 c co L" < Q p [[ l 6�i, a� z o OLO � o 13 fat 6,r C _ �i as K e a ;$ F# } [�� � ; :&` t 1 a,•'"' /� N�n _ �i E¢pi '1 �- I's '3FE OE � • 3 ./}� ..�a Juwo m ` � _ jig p. Kp• O\ ..fnc.�1='?� LA •� Ye� HEO ` ��g� � b y SSSSSS 1 4 � J �� �\ e `i +Ey � C�8 t �� �1 �• p �� 0 ry$.�Wo a � NR JL °f p z Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 mr Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 zqv :—w ao ■ k W-, 011r- - { E 0 Y'I V 0 :, O f °1 m O 'o IL w J o Q ' Y COdN (� Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 48 Block 4 - 5150/5163 Long Sun IWO i 1 'xl Ara- LIM M Ks ' Views of uphill structures maintained by building envelope positioning. ;S a� i =i. a �' c-A jl It q if LLI 9l3 e, z! �e , r a ! air � F OLA- OO E— O ucsuK t MAF Z 55 $ 3 O u r , 6i _ 1 dki ;sF alt f a p i 3 IY ° r `c W 8 ^$$N� i Y E pB® 9 s r n�+ k f § e�s Lu 21 sit jp g D �m PP — + O EI � ig i3 aea d; r arai� Y � .i:i 9 ee FF De W i t ids i`� yy 4 e a G 'L �� Lr^.^ 9'. o• N i c c rga .RR•� 9 'n °'s Yfj ! §§'s 11 7J s � I p I J Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 61 Block 4 - 5150/5163 Long Sun 4 ' t View corridors of neighbors maintained by positioning and elevation. Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 _0 1�411t��� � �r 1 pia !e 'I •p ! k O i�lotj�;1 p f i LO qqj[j W Zta ix •� 5 s IMP Q i3i �, 3�1i Eili3 a g� s � 37xl� ��1rfi .ram .rN' Asa ��,I 04 4 � ? m { a if if s ! �! �s: p-• 'I i4 apep 3 ;11xw- 11 .$j \�; ;l i �: y e i � �� 73�• �11x f 3. � �� 3'i2'7 � Y :S " J y� Y 1 • 9t y r O m f It CL sit I � � ��• i�e � N Y� R! Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 a 2c6 F!I All. 0.J Kw x* ib x ,. ❑f E Y N 0 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 10 Block 3 - 4010/4012 Wildridge Rd W i Lot split improves views of uphill property by maintaining view corridor Elevation further maintains views of uphill neighbor (roofline of 4010 just visible below) - . �+. .2 No major infringement of view corridors of uphill neighbors due to elevation and position of development. MLlaU 1111CI ll l.. - rUUlll. l Ul III I ICI II IV rLl IVI rUU4YUUL I Mal Illy 0. IJ.LY rz 1 l pp • ��i1 f t n 5• F � ,� 1 A 1. If � �� aRs �5�=i�•�a � � i 9 � 1 co U. r�; 1 E g } a Fn 1 n , L Y a0 f w ra O o a �Q. z w F' F aA�Py'�ii3t Fs } 1 L i i 0 O 5 d yg g� b�f°� � �. , •�S ■ lit \. W Lx a §L° ie ap#Q S a F l� n age, oEEpp `p phi lit Yry f■ •oe i n 7 � 1 r Y • ND1'0.6'26"w 16215' to a Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 38 Block 3 - 4069/4057 Wildridge Rd W 0 Views of uphill structures maintained by elevations. F] Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Mercator Projection 0.1km R]'r. 0 ; WGS84 M 1 UTM Zone 13SIV Im mi ri. 8.44 CALTOPO Scale 1:970 1 inch = 81 feet 010 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 110 Block 1 - 3091/3087 Wildridge Rd. No uphill or adjacent view corridor affected. Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Eagle County, CO 202113056 Regina O'Brien 06/0312021 Pg3: 1 04:31:59 PM t REC: $13.00 DOC: $0.00 t � � 8 n IlM i:'rV _} tjr ss r r s �(�i�1151i1 i1J11 1 i,( IT r i i i R I�1��1riliilN; 9 I f A I 1``g1 t s 4E 1tt7 jf fit( 1j{tci�{i 1 1 it tirx► ,i i i t i � lyi n.aw.l V1 U1 Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 6 i 4 _ go/ Mercator Projection 0.1 km WGS84 UTM Zone 13S y ` MN mi CA LTOPO Scale 1:1232 1 Inch = 103 feet 8.40 ❑� ;, Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 Lot 22 Block 1 - 2177/2170 Saddle Ridge Loop - � o View Corridors maintained by position of building envelopes and enhanced by elevations. Eagle County. CO 201907109 Renlna O'Brien nstis 019 Attachment C - Public Comment LO PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 EAL 1 111 03 REC-. $13.00 DOG: Is �aY 1 �' j f i t �tY}a 1 la Isit �/ Y ❑ YLd�B�e � �g;� a r E�< � �: cq � O w yy a `o Q QLL. I a [� LL. Z 0 If z ej! I i i mo 51 1) 11, 11 . 11 11Y�,� � o no z 3 66 @@ 3 qr d1 1 spa &�� yya yad = E i o Y a � 611Yy@P7kS2�1 C i�w'.;�rr f �_ ��krx IN N J .S • \ J C j! 1 k �z Sol Alf. 4 r F ~0i 1� `� ey s! PM 5/9124, 1:12 PM Attachment C - Public Comment to P2C ELTA'CrouWMA Mog 5.13.24 Eagle County GIS Viewer http://www.eaglecou^*•, — 0 100 2OOft 39.655-106.545 Degrees hUps:Hmap.eaglecounty.us/GIS_Viewer! ill Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 7.16.080 - Development plan. (a) Purpose. The general purpose of the development plan review process is to ensure compliance with the development and design standards of the Development Code prior to the issuance of a building permit or concurrent with other required permits and to encourage quality development reflective of the goals and objectives of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Specific purposes of development plan review include, but are not limited to the following: (1) To prevent excessive or unsightly grading of property that could cause disruption of natural watercourses or scar natural landforms; (2) To ensure that the location and configuration of structures, including signs and signage, are visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and structures and that there shall be conformance to the Comprehensive Plan of the Town; (3) To ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the Town's overall appearance, with natural and existing landforms and with officially approved development plans, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located; and (4) To ensure that plans for the landscaping of property and open spaces conform with adopted rules and regulations and to provide visually pleasing settings for structures on the same site and on adjoining and nearby sites. (b) Applicability. A development plan shall be required for all new development and any modification to an existing development or development plan. (c) Development Plan Categories. Categories of development plans are established and defined as follows for the purpose of determining the appropriate development plan review procedure: (1) Major Development Plan. Major development plans include all new building construction over six hundred (600) square feet; (2) Minor Development Plan. Minor development plans include the following: (i) All new building construction six hundred (600) square feet or less; (ii) Modifications to Dumpster locations; (iii) Screen wall modifications; (iv) Landscape modifications, including but not limited to removal of existing vegetation and addition of new vegetation; (v) Deck modifications, including but not limited to additions, new construction and materials or color modifications; (vi) Mechanical equipment modifications; (vii) Modifications to the exterior of an existing building, including but not limited to windows, doors, minor architectural details, colors and materials; Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 (viii) Modifications to approved development plans which result in a ten -percent or less increase to lot coverage; ten -percent or less increase to building height; ten -percent or less increase to the amount of square footage of a land use or structure and does not result in a change in the types of uses in the project; (ix) Modifications to approved development plans which do not change the character of the approved design; and (x) Other similar changes to a structure or property that do not significantly impact the site layout or design of a building. (d) Review Procedures. The general review procedures described in Section 7,16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to development plan applications. Specific additions and modifications to the general review procedures are identified below. (e) Notice and Hearing. PZC shall review and render a decision or recommendation on the development plan application after conducting a public hearing. Town Council shall conduct a public hearing when reviewing a Development Plan applicable in the Town Core. Notice of the public hearing shall be published and posted in accordance with Subsection 7.16.020(d)(1) and mailed notice is not required. The decision of PZC may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7,16,180, Appeal. The Director shall not conduct a public hearing for administrative review and decision on development plan applications. (f) Review Authority. The review authority for a development plan application shall be determined by the subdivision category. (1) Major Development Plan. The Director shall review and provide a recommendation to the PZC on all major development plan applications. The PZC shall render the final decision on a major development plan, unless the application is located within the Town Core. The decision of the PZC may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7.16.180, Appeal. If an application is located within the Town Core, the Director shall review and provide a recommendation to the PZC. The PZC shall review and provide a recommendation to the Town Council. The Town Council shall render the final decision on a major development plan within the Town Core. (2) Minor Development Plan. The Director shall review and render decisions on all minor development plan and minor sign plan applications. The decision of the Director may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7,16.180, Appeal. The Director may refer to the PZC any plan application that the Director determines warrants review by the PZC. (g) Review Criteria. The following review criteria shall be considered as the basis for a decision on development plan applications: (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in Section4 030 Purposes; Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 (2) Reserved; (3) The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents; (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20. Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations ands r 7 2 Development Standards; (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services, including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection and emergency medical services; and (7) The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole. (h) Expiration. A development plan approval expires pursuant to Subsection 7,16.020(h). (i) Revocation. Approved site plan documents shall be binding upon the applicants and their successors and assigns. No permit shall be issued for any building or structure or use that is not in accord with the approved documents or any approved modifications thereto. The construction, location, use or operation of all land and structures within the site shall conform to all conditions and limitations set forth in the documents. No structure, use or other element of approved design review documents shall be eliminated, altered or provided in another manner unless an amended site plan is approved. Any deviation from the approved development plan as approved shall be grounds for revocation of the development plan approval. ( Ord. 21-09 §5; Ord. 18-1 §6; Ord. 14-09 §3; Ord. 13-09 §2; Ord. 10-14 §3) Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 (4) Additional Review Criteria. The PZC shall review a Lot Split Amendment to the Wildridge PUD application and Major Amendments in the Wildridge PUD that include a Lot Split according the following criteria in addition to the review criteria for a preliminary PUD development plan: (i) The application results in less total site coverage and contains restrictions on building envelopes when deemed appropriate to minimize site coverage; (ii) Driveway disturbance is minimized and a shared driveway curb cut is utilized when feasible and when a shared driveway curb cut would reduce site disturbance; (iii) Areas not appropriate for development are designated on the PUD plan; (iv) The proposed development of the site avoids disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) or reduces potential disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) compared to the existing PUD designation; and, (v) The PUD plan incorporates requirements and/or restrictions as deemed appropriate to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity, including but not limited to: (A) enhanced landscaping; (B) increased building setbacks (i.e. minimum twenty (20) feet separation between buildings and a minimum ten (10) feet setback between properties); (C) designated building footprints; (D) building height restrictions; and, (E) designated architectural massing, including building square footage designation." Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Hearing 5.13.24 (iii) Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD, A proposed PUD Amendment to the Wildridge PUD to permit a lot split of a duplex lot into two (2) lots is considered a Lot Split Wildridge PUD amendment if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director: (A) The proposed duplex lot split is located in the Wildridge PUD Subdivision on a vacant, undeveloped lot, (B) The proposed PUD amendment meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment in Section 7A6-060(h)(1)(ii). (C) The PUD amendment proposes to split one (1) lot permitting a residential duplex dwelling into two (2) lots permitting one (1) detached single -family - residential dwelling on each lot, (iv) Major Amendment. A PUD amendment that is not classified as an administrative amendment, minor amendment or Lot Split PUD amendment to Wildridge PUD is considered a major amendment. (2) Reviewing Authority- (i) Administrative Amendments. The Director shall review and render decisions on Administrative Amendments. A decision of the Director may be appealed to the Council pursuant to Section 7.16.180. Appeal, (ii) Minor Amendments. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to minor PUD amendment applications. The PZC shall review all minor PUD amendment applications and shall provide a recommendation to the Town Council after conducting a public hearing. The Town Council shall review and render a final decision, through a resolution, on a minor PUD amendment application after conducting a public hearing. (iii) Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD applications_ The PZC shall review all Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD amendment applications and shall provide a recommendation to the Town Council after conducting a public hearing. The Town Council shall review and render a final decision, through a resolution, on a Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD amendment application after conducting a public hearing. Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Public Hearing on 5.13.24 Max Morgan From: Jan Cammermeyer <jan.cmc1996@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 3:12 PM To: Max Morgan Cc: Kit Cammermeyer; Allison Wadey; Jim Yager; Suzanne Yager; Jennie Wahrer; Rob Pfaff; durkeeinvail@comcast.net; dzoggy@gamail.com Subject: Land Use Application 2332 Fox Lane Attachments: 2024.05.05 Lot 66 Matrix.pdf; IMG_6782.pdf; IMG_6784.pdf Mr. Morgan good afternoon. This email is our written response statement to the request for ReSubdivision of Lot 66 Block 1 in Wildridge. We are opposed to the applicant's request to build 2-homes, greatly exceeding the Heated Area Square Footage that currently exists on our small Fox Lane cul-de-sac. As proposed the residential homes will require the demolition of a healthy aspen tree area along the west boundary and create a large south/west building front (A0.3, A2.1 Plan A South Elevation and A2.1 Plan B West Elevation) that is not consistent with our street frontage. For your review are: 1. Building density statistics: Below matrix based on Eagle County Tax Records. (Also attached Lot66 Land Use Matrix Lot Address Lot Living Area % Acre SF SFIHeated Heated SF1 Lot SF 59 2323 Fox Lane 0,67000 29185 3288.10 1117% 60 2341 Fox Lane 0.91000 39640 3318AC 8.37% 61 2365 Fox Lone 0.66900 29142 4215.00 14A6% 62 2381 Fox Lone 0.95000 41382 2620.00 6.33% 63A 2394 A Fox Lane 0.49990 21776 2992.00 13.74% 63B 2394 B Fox Lane 0.49990 21776 2908.50 13.36% 64 2376 Fox Lane 0.96000 41818 3749.00 8.97% 65B 2345 B Fox Lane 0.43200 18818 2440.20 12.97% 65A 2345 A Fox Lane 0.39600 17250 2354.00 13.65% All 11A6% Proposed 66 A S, B 2332 Fox Lane 0.79000 1 34412 7244.00 21.05% Possible Heated SFasSingle Family or DuplexA&B 66 A & B 1 2332 Fax Lane 1 0.713000 1 34412 1 4473.61 13.00° pd{) i Data obtained from the Eagle County Tax Records The applicant is requesting rezoning based on a design that almost doubles the density that was approved and built in our small community over past 30-years. In keeping with our historical surroundings the Heated SF area for Lot 66 should not exceed 4400SF +/-. Not the 7244 SF proposed. Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Public Hearin on 5.13.24 2. Aspen Trees - With the requested increased density the large healthy Aspen �Iree grove is in jeopardy. All our Aspen groves are experiencing weather related stress. This new plan will eliminate this Aspen grove. Below are some photo's, have also attached as .pdfs West Property Line Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Public Hearing on 5.13.24 View looking west from near east property corner ,r- -1` Ling� r4 1 �yL I.. F l V,. 'fir"i i'v . I Attachment C - Public Comment to PZC for PUD24002 Public Hearing on 5.13.24 We are not opposed to development of this lot, however consideration for density and protecting our natural surroundings, should take precedent over immediate monetary gains. After a review please let me know if you have any questions. Unfortunately we will not be able to attend the upcoming hearing but understand this statement will be forwarded to the review board. Thank you and have a pleasant day. Kit and Jan Cammermeyer 2394 Fox Lane B PO Box 2862 (Must be included for any mailing) Avon, CO 81620 703-966-6997 (Best # cell - OK to leave message ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Good morning, Brenda Torres Joseph Rosica; Max Morgan Jody Swoboda RE: PUD24002 Friday, May 24, 2024 8:08:16 AM Thank you for your input. Your public comment will be added to the packet for the May 28th Council meeting. Thank you, Brenda Torres, CMC Court Clerk I Deputy Town Clerk 970.748.4022 btorresnavon.ora A Avon From: Joseph Rosica_@aol.com> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 7:51 AM To: Brenda Torres <btorres@avon.org>; Max Morgan <mmorgan@avon.org> Cc: Jody Swoboda @hotmail.com> Subject: PUD24002 I live at 2401 Saddle Ridge Loop, Avon, CO, adjacent to Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge, 2332 Fox Lane. I am against the proposed build of 2 separate homes on this property, as it violates the current zoning. The lot, which is currently undeveloped, has a large impact on the open space in the area, with implications to the flora and fauna in the area. There is currently abundant wildlife including deer, prairie grouse, fox and bear in the area. From the American Bird Conservancy web site (Greater Prairie -Chicken: Although the Greater Prairie -Chicken is not federally listed under the Endangered Species Act, it is considered Threatened in several states and is listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Preservation of large tracts of native grassland is particularly important to this species' survival. Increasing the housing density in the area will have a negative impact on the area, both real estate values and naturally. ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing Joe Rosica 2401 Saddle Ridge Loop Avon, CO ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing From: Brenda Torres To: MIKE DURKEE; Max Morgan Subject: RE: 2332 Fox Lane proposed lot split and development Date: Friday, May 24, 2024 8:08:11 AM Good morning, Thank you for your input. Your public comment will be added to the packet for the May 28th Council meeting. Thankyou, Brenda Torres, CIVIC Court Clerk I Deputy Town Clerk 970.748.4022 btorresCa)avon.org A Avon, From: MIKE DURKEE-@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 2:58 AM To: Brenda Torres <btorres@avon.org>; Max Morgan <mmorgan@avon.org> Subject: 2332 Fox Lane proposed lot split and development Avon Town Council, PZC members, Max Morgan, Brenda Torres, As owners of lot 60, 2341 Fox Lane, Wildridge, and as direct neighbors across the street from lot 66, 2332 Fox Lane, Denise and I would like to express our opposition to the proposed lot split and development plan, as purposed. We respectfully hope that the Council see's, listens too, and takes into account all of the opposition (from EVERY single homeowner that adjoins, abuts, or are in close proximity to lot 66.... that is to say 22 would-be neighbors) regarding this ill-conceived plan. We Believe that this application should be denied in its entirety. We unfortunately are out of state until the end of June, but with this letter as a avatar proxy, please consider us as being present at the Council meeting. We want to have no misunderstandings, and thereby acknowledge that the applicants certainly have every right to build on this lot. We ask only that they be held to the SAME standards and development parameters, existing site integration considerations, exterior materials & low impact lighting considerations, and existing landscape design integration that every other owner/builder has had to follow, without special considerations or exceptions, and that the applicant is held to the existing allowed maximum building heights, and current zoning of 1 single family or 1 adjoining duplex unit. Precedence had been well established, for at least the last 30+ yrs, by every previous builder on every lot on Fox Lane in specific and within the general neighborhood at ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing large. Lot 66 is the last undeveloped site on Fox Lane, and this proposal's design, massing, height, site disturbance, density, lack of natural buffering from adjoining properties, lack of architectural stepping with existing original slopes, and lack considerations of neighbor's view corridors makes little to no attempt to follow these already existing well established parameters. Others have spoken in greater detail of the impacts and code discrepancies in previous letters and at the PZC meeting, so we will limit our concerns to a greater historical and precedent setting backdrop. Denise and I have the unique experience of being the last and only remaining Fox Lane residence who are original owners/builders, having owned the lot from 1994 & building in 2000/2001. Ace has been in the V. Valley construction business for over 40 years and we were the general contractors and hammer in hands-on builders of our home from designing, first dirt, through to last shingle and the final C.O. From this viewpoint we can attest to the fact that NO OTHER original Fox Lane owner/builders, which includes Mr. & Mrs. John Hazard, Michael Hazard, Randy Johnson, Mike & Lisa Guida, Chris and Michelle Evans, Paul and Kim Burns, Tyler & Tracy Hoff, and ourselves, were ever given any exemptions for building heights, increased density, or lot splitting. Without exception, we all adhered to the original zoning, intent, and character of the Wildridge Subdivision, and all of us understood and agreed with as to why it was zoned the way it is.... that it should be developed with less density, disturbance, and greater distances and natural buffers between homes that other subdivisions within the Valley lack. Wildridge was never intended to emulate a crowded overbuilt Denver neighborhood, and it shouldn't start now, at the end of buildout. As to site disturbance and staying as tight to the building envelope as possible, as evidenced by the existing current homes, built by all of the above "originals", it was "very firmly and constantly" impressed upon all of us by the Town site inspectors of that time, that we keep as much natural vegetation, and more importantly, the aspen trees, intact. This was/is in recognition of Fox Lane's unique nature of being situated within one of only 2 native north facing aspen groves found within Wildridge, most all of which is covered in south facing open sage land. The fragility of these groves was well understood back then (80s on..) and is much more in evidence today, as they are under great stress from recent drought. A simple visual estimate by walking through these trees shows there is a 75% or greater die -off of trees over the last few yrs. It was explained to us by professional arborists that aspens are colonies of clones. Within each aspen grove there are what are considered "mother -seed trees", which all of the related clone trees are connected to and sprouted from. If enough of these seed trees are killed, then it endangers the entire colony. An arborist did identify some of these trees on our lot, and we took great care to avoid as many as possible when building. We believe, based on our experience, that many of these older larger seed trees currently exist on the western 1/4 of lot 66. ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing The lot 66 development plan as put forth does not even attempt to address this site disturbance, as most of both proposed lots, as shown on the conceptual plans, will be stripped of natural vegetation, border to border, essentially wiping out the existing grove as it exists on the property, greatly increasing the likelihood of stressing/killing the connected neighbor's trees, if not the entire grove below Fox Lane. When we were done building it was commented by the site inspector that our care in keeping the site disturbance to an absolute minimum and keeping as many original trees was THE example of how it should be accomplished. This is not idle bragging, and was neither easy nor cheap to achieve, but we kept constantly vigilant with our excavator. Yes, we did remove trees to build. But did so with the utmost care to ensure survivability of the remaining ones. So, yes, precedence has indeed already been set by those of us who were in fact here at the beginning and the first to build on Fox Lane. We followed the codes and the zoning. We kept respectable distances from neighbors to avoid unnecessary and damaging permanent impacts. And at no small cost, in effort, forethought, mindfulness, planning, and implementation. We ask nothing less than the same from the last builders on Fox Lane. Based on our experience with this over the course of 24 yrs. living within this grove, we can fully attest to the fragile nature of these groups of aspen, which are existing at the extreme range of their abilities to survive. A walk around the Easy Loop at the top end of the grove will give an obvious overview as to their current stressed state and dilemma. If Council members are not familiar with this street, these groves, and the surrounding lots and homes of lot 66, it would be very beneficial to see for yourselves the proposed building sites and the ensuing direct negative impacts it will inflict on all 22 of us (and perhaps more), your fellow Avon constituents, who live in the Fox Lane "Bowl". With these concerns, in addition to all of the other impacts voiced by ALL of the adjoining property owners (one of the largest turnouts for a PZC meeting) it is our hope that the importance of the Council's decision be measured carefully, and this project is found not in compliance with the original zoning, is not given special considerations, and does not represent the overall intent/vision of the Fox Lane/Wildridge standards. Respectfully, Mike "Ace" and Denise Durkee 2341 Fox Lane ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing From: Alison Wadev To: Brenda Torres Cc: Max Morgan; matt wadev Subject: Re: Letter for Town Council May 28th re. 2332 Fox Lane Date: Thursday, May 23, 2024 1:24:57 PM Thank you, you too! On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 1:18 PM Brenda Torres <btorres&avon.org> wrote: Hi Ali, Thank you for your input. I will pass your comment to our Chief Administrative Officer Ineke De Jong. Have a great day! Brenda Torres, CMC Court Clerk I Deputy Town Clerk 970.748.4022 btorresaavon.org A ,ovon From: Alison Wadey-Wgmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 1:14 PM To: Brenda Torres <btorres(@avon.org>; Max Morgan <mmorgan(@avon.org> Cc: matt wadey M(@alpinecivil.com> Subject: Letter for Town Council May 28th re. 2332 Fox Lane Hello Avon Town Council Members, I am respectfully submitting this letter for your review regarding the Planning and Zoning approval of the lot split for 2332 Fox Lane. My husband and I have lived in Wildridge for over 22 years. We bought our first home on Saddle Ridge Loop, a townhome, and loved it so much that when it was time to upgrade to accommodate our growing family (Connor and ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing Lindsey, now 17 and 13 respectively) we moved just up the street to Fox Lane and into a duplex. When we first moved to Wildridge back in 2001, there were very few full time year round residents. We loved the views, the quiet, the wildlife and the idea that we had a little piece of rural Colorado at our fingertips, all the while being minutes away from Avon, our workplaces and all the modern conveniences. As the years passed, the secret was out, and Wildridge became a much sought after local resident neighborhood while still maintaining its charm of feeling "wild" and in nature, that so many of us long term locals covet. Today I am asking that you help us maintain that charm of feeling "wild" and in nature by not allowing the developer of 2332 Fox Lane to split the lot into two single family lots. The original intent of this lot is for a duplex build. This is in line with the look and feel of Wildridge as it stands today and has been since we moved up there 22 years ago. Splitting the lot into two smaller lots and stuffing two much larger footprint single family homes is against the look and feel of the neighborhood and gives future development and developers the perception that our planning and zoning rules and regulations can be manipulated and changed in the spirit of more density and profit. Wildridge is special, and yes that secret is out. I do not blame anyone for wanting to be able to come and live in our wonderful neighborhood but I would hope that our Town Council members and Planning & Zoning Board will uphold the original design, intent and feel of Wildridge and hold new development accountable to those guidelines now and into the future. It is much wiser to limit overbuilding now as once it is built, you can't take it away. Look at this as preserving our Avon neighborhoods for many generations to come. Thank you for your consideration and taking the time to read this email. Respectfullly, Alison (Ali) Wadey 2394A Fox Lane Avon, CO 81620 Alison Wadey ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing (970) Alison Wade (970) W& ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing 24 May, 2024 To the Members of the Avon Town Council: We respectfully request that you deny the Planning and Zoning Commission's approval of the Lot Split Amendment for Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision (2332 Fox Lane). The requirements regarding Lot Splits in Wildridge set forth within the Town Charter have not been completely honored, nor executed. Until and unless those requirements are followed, I implore you to uphold the regulations of the Charter and the guiding principles laid out in the Town's Comprehensive Plan. Before getting into those details, we would also like to impress upon you that after reviewing all prior approved Wildridge Lot splits, none have had the same impact upon the surrounding neighbors as the one proposed for Fox Lane. As evidenced by the letter previously provided to the PZC and signed by 24 impacted neighbors, and as called out by PZC members regarding attendance at the hearing, the amount of opposition and community concern regarding this particular lot split is without precedent. It is exactly these types of confrontations that rely upon the Town Council to uphold the principles and standards that make Avon a Town that its residents are proud to call home. When considering the Lot Split, we ask that you keep in mind policies set forth in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, including: • Promoting development that protects views (Policy A.1.5) • Ensuring strategies are in place to address the concerns of adjacent residents (Policy B.1.3) • Requiring 4 sided architecture that maximizes solar exposure, protects views and breaks up building bulk (Policy C.1.3) • Encouraging landscaping and building locations that enhance neighboring views and view corridors. (Policy C.2.4). More specifically regarding the Lot Split Amendment, and despite the requirements laid out in the Town Plan section 7.16.060(h)(4), 1. The lot split does not result in less total site coverage. As Mr. Reynolds admitted during the PZC hearing, if he were to put a duplex on the lot he would just squish the 2 structures together but square footage would remain the same. 2. The building envelope does not minimize site coverage. Specifically regarding lot 66B, the proposed disturbed area encroaches upon all minimum setbacks with the exception of 2 essentially unusable triangular areas. 3. Instead of mitigating negative impacts to surrounding properties, the lot split worsens them. 1. Minimum setbacks along utility easements make it impossible to reliably enhance landscaping in the most impacted area (the long access of building 66B in the primary view corridor of lots 67 and 68). 2. By splitting the lots, minimum setbacks between the new residences forces encroachment on neighboring homes and view corridors. a. Designing to the minimum setbacks from neighboring lots, rather than increasing the setbacks, shows complete disregard for impacts on neighbors, and does not align with precedents set by all previous lot splits. 3. Rather than restrict the building footprint, particularly in the case of Lot 66B, the development maxes out the building envelope. 4. Building heights are maxed out. 5. Architectural massing and square footage are effectively maxed out. ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing Section 7.16.060(4)(v) specifies the Additional Review Criteria for a PUD plan involving a Lot Split. These regulations state that a PUD plan incorporate requirements and/or restrictions to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity. The plan further calls out 5 specific areas of attention including: 1) Enhanced Landscaping, 2) Increased Building Setbacks, 3) Designated Building Footprints, 4) Building Height Restrictions, and 5) Designated Architectural Massing including Building Square Footage Designations. Despite these regulations in the Town Plan, NONE of these requirements has been included on the PUD application. Instead, regarding lot 66B, we have an example of a development that seeks to max out every aspect of the building envelope by designing to maximum heights, minimum setbacks and maximum square footage. These factors in turn result in excessive architectural massing. The negative impact upon the neighbors are compounded, severely detracting from primary view corridors, and undermining the quiet enjoyment of the current neighbors and homeowners. This impact is multiplied by the fact that enhanced landscaping along the areas of greatest impact is precluded by encroachment upon utility easements. The residences that would be supported by a lot split, not only contradict the Additional Review Criteria, but directly conspire to undermine the intent and purpose of those Criteria - to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity. Rather than enhance the neighborhood, the experience and enjoyment of the surrounding properties is degraded. Furthermore, these factors undermine Avon's Comprehensive Plan. Conversely, by enforcing the requirements of the Town Charter, the Town Council will also be upholding Policies set forth in its Comprehensive Plan To address these concerns, and protect the experience and enjoyment of the neighborhood, our request and recommendations are as follows: Decline the proposed Lot Split Amendment. If the lot split application is allowed to persist, we request this only be reconsidered if and when the standards described in the Town Plan are followed. That is, the Town not approve any future attempts for a split unless and until appropriate restrictions are put in place to satisfy the requirements laid out in PUD section 7.16.060(4)(v). Specifically, if continuing to review this application, we urge the council to ensure that the lot split only be approved IF the following are included: • Requirements for enhanced landscaping including but not limited to the entire length of the Eastern elevation of any structures on Lot 66B: o To reduce the impact upon the primary view corridors of the adjacent lots to the full height of the structure. o Acknowledging and accounting for the fact that there is a utility easement along the full length of the easternmost lot line, AND ■ Ensure that there is adequate room to support ample landscaping between the utility easements and the structure, ■ Ensure that any landscaping occurring within the easement that is disrupted due to any future access or work along the easement be required to be replaced completely and in kind following any work completed. ■ Requiring approval of any Major Development Plans for the lot contingent upon a Landscaping Plan which adequately screens the proposed structures and can be exercised in full regardless of current setbacks and utility easements. Notably, Mr. Reynolds stated at the PZC hearing that he plans to include appropriate landscaping, and that this has been his standard practice on previous ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing developments. As such, this should not be a major issue for the developers. I simply ask that this is formally acknowledged and that due diligence is done up front to ensure adequate space is allotted to ensure his intentions can be exercised. • Requirements for decreased architectural massing, especially in regards to lot 66B and in particular concerning the Eastern Elevation of Lot 66B through: o Designating a building footprint that ensures the developed structures do not encroach upon the full length of the neighboring lot in a parallel and unbroken fashion, AND o Some combination of: ■ Decreased building square footage. ■ Reducing maximum building height designations o Mr. Reynolds did state during a PZC presentation of a different lot split at another development, that his design intended to preserve neighbor's views AND avoid creating a structure with an unbroken wall along the entire length of a lot. ■ These commendable goals seem to have been thrown out the window in regards to the development proposed for Lot 66A. ■ 1 believe that by enforcing requirements for decreased architectural massing, the developer will be held to standards which he has publicly committed to for his other Wildridge development. • Approval of a DECREASED building setback between the 2 proposed units to reduce the encroachment upon the neighboring lot lines while increasing some flexibility for the developer to accommodate the above conditions. o There is precedent for this in the previously approved lot split in Wildridge regarding Lot 48, Block 4 in which the setback between units is 12' total and oriented almost identically to the Fox Lane drawings in which one unit is at a angle to the other at the point in which the minimum setback occurs. In summary, we ask that the Council deny the current application for the Lot Split on the grounds that it does not meet the established parameters of the Town Charter and contradicts the policies outlined in the Comprehensive plan. If the application is allowed to move forward, this should only be permitted in concordance with the regulations of the Town Charter and in alignment with the principles of the Comprehensive Plan by implementing appropriate restrictions to meet the goals of the Lot Split Criteria and minimize the impact to the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. 0 Avon, CO 81620 For additional reference, please also refer to: • The previously submitted letter to the PZC with 24 neighbor signatures • Documentation also submitted to the PZC illustrating impacts to view corridors and precedents set by previous lot split approvals ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing From: Jody Swoboda To: Max Morgan; Brenda Torres Subject: 2332 Fox Lane Date: Friday, May 24, 2024 11:41:57 AM Attachments: Signed Lot Split Letter 2024-05-13 161928.pdf Good Morning, Please see the attached letter regarding our neighborhood concerns with the lot split of 2332 Fox Lane Avon, CO 81620. Due to the outpouring of concerns represented by the signatures of 24 neighbors that will be directly impacted by the proposed lot split, I'm hoping it will encourage the members of the Avon Town Council to do their due diligence prior to the meeting and take a drive up to the lot to see first-hand that: Instead of mitigating negative impacts to surrounding properties, the lot split makes them worse. Landscaping setbacks make it impossible to enhance landscaping in the most impacted area. Even the minimum setbacks between the new residences encroach on neighboring homes and view corridors. Building heights are maxed out. The building envelope does not minimize site coverage. Designing to the minimum setbacks, rather than increasing the setbacks, shows complete disregard for impacts on neighbors. Thank you, Jody Swoboda Etters 2413 Saddle Ridge Loop Avon, CO #970� 12 4 ATTACHMENT D -Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing To tha Town of Ar w Plar4%inq a:td 7orinq Corrui wisian and To Yen Catun4rl" As Avtijn Property Oars and INC EFlbOrS to Zhu proposed development al = Fax Lam% the babw signed are united in " OPp&5 00n to tha currL-nl jpp1[c;Agn fqr a NLracff Subdwakiwil Mid 1_04 Son Amer dirnied%t for i_Ol 66. Blom 1 , Vddni;,e Subr gvlsion (2332 Fox Lano)_ A!; pr; 0WAd. III Lot Spiel aM corn-usponding duvu lops n-unk should b.G r ii jo rm frx M Uowhg Ihr" ransom FirsR, d con]rjodKxa !ivi guldelr'Idb wi farttx In thep Town ch Avon Horne RLAe Gr aftr (-Tovim CharWr')_ Sawed. d p'rores xra porkies ,Ind go.II% %pR jofth by ncc Tg%n c);t Avon in CzWrrp(E4Mn5rvft Ran (up6wed in i 4) (ToAn Ran') aM thu 202t Cam Tiunityr tit,sinq Ran f'C rri nyinif p!W} _ R"L� y. it do= fxR b4aw precedwil wt by prrvious sucncssful Lot SO R Am.en&nanEs vr!in de Wli Bridge SubaAsion. Each or Ux= R-swmi .�,. axplained furore full} betow. R nJinej the Town GhW;uT. Ow rati¢dhoes as proposed cam'.radn:t smbm 7.1GDW!'44) = foR]crW..' 1. Th is n O CvAencel test tht lot &.plit PR%Wta In IQ'j',L Rohl Ni'la eoM-09C. $. Them i& no prcmvior, in Ihtr aporuitucl Lh»l uxpluirva ul i y 4atrornpt 14 W=VZ1 thk bUJd "v60p i to mir'rri @ s&W covvim e. 3, lire rs no appwend dKorl� to m=nimizo or mItl92ste Frnp i= to pmperl,es In &w vicrdtyr. as 1xnposo-L4 Lrrs:am the lat spPt profound V negalrMe mpach to �amoizrd og praperdc& 1 Trwic is no provlsion no enhance IandsrapiiN along the wrest QnpacfJ poct�an of tip d drlenll� and Rhe cunt drezlrn prrdudes damp so duo Lo IarMftca Ck. b. In nx-Ri wj {and axi eeding) m irurriuw r c (backs rriLhin Oic drz;ded toll be.'reen the new reside , the situcluw , f urUic r e n=nch upW rsLrc3hb ring how-kes ad vk--w corrMirs. A]OKN gl7 min mum r LN wm"inej rlro nwit, th&re Is no align to inctc- P c wwac ,& to lcr* m vVacl -of ft stnrcttrres on the nuighbonrig homO'Dwrl-OM Ramer tkm restrict the b4Qdurig faarpruit. WrtiCur 1)F in the c.nffa cf Lot IJ. t1 o deyetopmer1t n ams oui UK; heed d4N envelope. d_ No appoicnt alicmpMt is made to restrict buiUl-69 heights ba}mnd requireffmNI& c_ No apparcvT is reiude Lo resLnct iftmtiLr;Ctl 4 ma&skkg or 5qz,�_m IroLige- Radom, #re curr--nl design m,aa,mies 1ho pas:rble developed err foolagc by Cr ,IdLng upon rFr ninnLTT% SC=C S. mpYirnIZ. W building hrc,ghb, iOW cdcat'rvd an pb---Rm iwe .WLJ'rz%Aua, , QL5a. These aorurook1ons aar<e. m to exce%wdy gold unroo able res;ricl the vcWX and quiet cniaYrracnl of the 'yC'o ] rerrI& , Varay+ oI the .0 Issuoa am a result of the Proposed d0}4n 1I.56f. PJI WC spk�fjeaVy chef drhFen by ar exary rNi M by the. Lot Split by forcing the 2IT -se-sexck beta-c" urirts- The re., j[t rig builickiiij mvOupes. ut conr,bir alien with the r:evv]oper.1,@pj :Wcn5L -gGal to ! :inizg Wable square foctage, vnreasnnabhg and ,nn sari' Impa� Jhe m ilghboring role Vj-rjh ms" to Ure Tovm vi ; rrd Conir,wlriIly Plan. Rhc prod 'd rot Soil and dCvQkPnern -cir }Y vW:itC Rhrc Ting POA:C PlAick2s and gaal5: + Polkcy AL I.$' Promote develowna nt thaj mpxlmlzes sun oxposr ro arrd prO%'-, S w • P#il:y 8.1.3: F_CQW_4 I9 dOW01OPMn1 .IppllrantS to Mack W1h ddJiDrcrhl reSider"S' Rr4rs Desses" ,Irrd fop wty awroom durirr9 all application phases to -d mlify emccrns and slrtCgpCs La aodfaiz t]IeerL • Paiigir C,1,.,�; r 'n f our s.ded srei-litre :hat m iximiz= solar expr±rrlre. Pml&= vkews, and tw up bu3drrig Mk ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing • Pow CAL Enixurago lar+dar aping mid bu.lriing Ivwt.ivn-D I�wt LrguirKo a cgl,*i xtKK)d +" am view01"Aars• ■ Po[cy G,1.3- Wark w th is and private Landowners to identify oppomait�m 'or co wvaton e - peurunerst open space prrtec;tion moss. and acce5z to open wace- t F pf GI XUr im ze and miitigaie pDtenUal development nWcts to ri^kffr"e and %-Aer5hed5, ■ DiSIRIOT 11: NORT H ERN RkSI Q ItN T IAL DIS T RIC'T -5 Duc Io lisc llim, Ord numbcr cl uxis ng trcoa and wurai arse me c9en duracwi 00 this prowl Y- L.� aal cafa stwuId bo tukum to cnsura Thal &H crucu s aru awiaaa:Ua Min Oft are mu LnU in h DFMCr+Y YoUk U10 r %lraM swrmrrd . ;.• Erbimurap L-uppm 6e4etopmant Thal s .b4s $19nifican4 alterallon of natural envirunrrem x This are :shalcl t�e highty sensitive W vL;wl impim of k%pruvemem. Wdaile prr*erivativrk and lighting, s PrnvOes Uw d"Opment oT a Craillhead to mess Me s ri-n•Yi ng pubibc Iamds_ • MI Avg umi� ti0malg Iw rl ..F Gm* It om-Aicify of mmoo wrvronlp or14 'moomg rrimazo- may. it pt oT aditkrW mi" housing stork, to cmato 3 marl balar%cm * vnin a 3 wm + rp+ rrwe tsar,$ ownersiip oppodwrislius F-WLMLIY. the Pry LUt Spiit dues not follow the P-recrll $fit by pry y Tansy lot splds %MtNa Wfildrrdje_ Sc+c the aUl shed hsl or known proms rDL tip4[s in V'idd ndge. al of ti h were dcvdf ped w'ukc sUl rrginLa.rt reasawab!Ia se'marks f om m-p hbor., L midrpg Cho Gmpacft on caasdrxj ho S' %-c.- s. wd su;stjin:ng'Jie ekiad-rg d-LPr r..t Lhe nek;hbprhoccl- For aA of UWsc re.asons, we r03jPeGlullY r0quo4i 010i. oU aUppWCd ;ttY UIC PUD, Itrc PLan°'09 Old zoi'ling CVnMd.pors Gbnsy Irre MAW SUMr iWn arMd Lot 81pr-t Ar ner-4me+rt ke kot Fla. Bloc 1. Wage ubomOon (2W Fox L¢np) uNoff4 and land the mQulmmenis from to Tr'mn Cmnar, Town Mix. and iwomrmna + Plan ouMn e+d abrnre are met or nxceadE�d. Funharmore. as a genera! rule we rf qucsl Ir+4 in rrwrirsg k rarard wish r�levebprrenl or iMe Lot. Jha developers consKter the Lrrpa= od thcu d,gns on she rreighborhoad auawdog ]n the oommundy standards !-7 ouL in ttre Town PIwrL TN'—c TuNn Vwls , arc cntw, l [o pmLedrpg 12m udniqu-ia ch aractc r o4 all in Avon, Wiidcadre_ A& Posed, the Lo, -Spit arrd {: �4p�dEn� dowelDpmunt do rro-i conf*rm la tha mW aru and Cuffs sh1 1110 eYrr t1r.g ii o v*6V hr ,N- wAhw1 *w- W44-algl+ M1r-ghhnrhnM n rwi % I i n i YIrI Ni rt-.jr- I441. ThQ k you ft r yo4r jI-On. The Nc.Sntrars of 2332 Fax Lane: LA 2 ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing Z L f �^ 4 hY i .� _ 6ZO Icts L.i s tit Lw na FNcjMrFp LW � i' Jhok Lai s Es Lw+ , m"4 D- u w Achk a . Irk �. A4-.., ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing +}_ FyiyY.aa� 3 Lacs AipI}r �4 �i�} Gy•�+ pis Lain IL • �, + LW it Dq.F&a O-dr- K- -.- P� U kAf Fig G! M ySF SDodd=y hq aft ftdhb L, M Ackkm c_— CuML&E how Lam Awn4 0--q so%-ri 4 Gr. 1601A[Mr4 W4rmkm- es* Adaus PdE d ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing Duplex to 5krn; Ir4iPrnJv I. o f PUD Am f! n arn+nnt5 in Wi I dr idgn Lat 110. Kock 1 1-0122, 6Jat3c I Lat 10. Mack La l21. Blcm:k � LOtZ5.PA%k3 Lot .31. Wock 3 Lot4s, Block 1fl161,BLock4 Link to RlaTr,: Wildridge Lot Splits ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing From: _@gmail.com <_@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 4:37 PM To: Council Everyone Group <council@avon.org> Subject: Fox Lane lot 60 lot split Please find attached a letter pertaining to the upcoming Tuesday agenda item. We hope you will consider this letter. We thought this matter was still with Planning & Zoning but apparently only one of the two Fox Lane applications is still there. We are all out of town for this meeting and perhaps we needed to have this letter submitted by noon today. Not certain about that, but this is happening much quicker than any of us anticipated. Thank you. Mary Isom ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing May 28, 2024 Via email: council@avon.org Avon Town Council Members: We are owners of both sides of the duplex located at 2421 Saddleridge Loop, Avon (Lot 69 Wildridge) and we overlook directly Lot 60 (2332 Fox Lane). We attended the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on May 13, along with many neighbors who all oppose the lot split and the proposed development of two single family homes instead of one duplex. Our opposition did nothing to sway the P & Z commission which quickly approved the lot split. This was quite astonishing because it appeared at the meeting that only ONE member of the P & Z commission (Brian Sipes) had even been to this lot site! (we may be wrong on this point but Brian is the only one who said he'd been to the lot) We view this as a very important decision that is changing and affecting the views, density, and neighborhood setting of many existing Wildridge homeowners. We do not know how a commission can make a decision like this without even seeing the lot, and we think it is a required element for planning commission members or town council members to view the lot before voting. We would urge you to please visit this lot before making a decision that is drastically changing the scope and feel of Fox Lane and neighboring lots. We supported the letter that was given to the P & Z commission at its meeting and do not want to reiterate all the strong points made in that letter. But please review this as it points out all the reasons why a lot split does not conform to the Town's many guidelines. A major concern for us is that the lot split will absolutely increase the site coverage and density on this one lot. At the P & Z meeting neither the town planners nor the P & Z commission seemed to have any problem with changing the original intent of the zoning of this ATTACHMENT D - Public Comment Submitted to Town Council for PUD24002 Lot Split Hearing lot, which was for a duplex or one single family home to be built on this lot. We are against this and against putting up homes that take up the entire lot just so that one party, the developer, benefits. The developer purchased a duplex lot, he can still build a generously sized duplex on this lot and we assume that he can make a very good profit since he purchased it knowing a duplex could be built on it and certainly would have priced it out that way. Others have mentioned the old standing aspen grove that will be cut down in its entirety if the development is built as is proposed. We would like to see at least some of these trees preserved to keep our same neighborhood feel intact, and it appears the only way that would happen is if there is less site coverage with a duplex and not two separate structures. We are upset that we cannot be at the Town Council meeting as we are all out of town, and we did not understand that this would go before the council this quickly since the other portion of the application (the approval for the structures) is still with Planning and Zoning. We urge you to not approve this lot split, or at least delay any decision so that you can all visit the site and more of us have the opportunity to come to a council meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, Annie Dewaters, 24241A Saddleridge Loop Robert & Mary Isom, 2421B Saddleridge Loop TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Max Morgan, Planner II RE: PUD24001 — Planned Unit Development Amendment AEC24001 — Alternative Equivalent Compliance MJR24002 — Major Development Plan Review LEGAL: L50 B3 Wildridge ,avon ADDRESS: 4644 North Point DATE: June 4, 2024 c o L o A a D o STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: These three applications received a public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 13, 2024, where the PZC voted to continue each of the applications to a later date in order for Staff to pursue legal counsel on details regarding "Non -Developable Areas" platted on the original Wildridge PUD, which impact the proposed development project. This report contains three applications for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC"): 1. PUD24001 — Lot Split in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development 2. MJR24002 — Major Development Plan for two, single-family residences 3. AEC24001 —Alternative Equivalent Compliance for non -compliant roof pitches proposed on both proposed residences The applicant intends to build two single-family homes on two lots, following the split of the single lot (one structure per new lot). The property for the proposed project is currently a vacant lot (4644 North Point / Lot 50) in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development ('PUD") originally platted for two dwelling units in the form of a duplex. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Bobby Ladd, architect with RAL Architects is representing 4644 North Point LLC ("Applicant"), the entity pursuing the development of the 4644 North Point ("Property"). In order to split the lot into two lots, a Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge I�I ACTION ,n WHITE RIVER NGTIONAL FOREST SECTION 2S SECTION 2'S SECTgy74 5E CTION SE ar eeY K. • I _ I Tri �6i.K.B " 02 TJ..L� � �I �%r i Yls �` } • N I IF r_ n. V 5_'EIT,04 L14w1b.— "All fr mod/. SECTION 36 oo.�r WANE I Nrcnx'7aW l•i ��alr,.. s�"r i `f WRki h . l MKS C°R - 4644 North Point Figure 1 - Wildridge Vicinity Map (970.748.4014) mmorgan@avon.org . vo n C O LO RA DO PUD approval is required, followed by an Administrative Minor Subdivision application approved by the Community Development Director. The residential structures require Major Development Plan Review ("MJR"). The proposed roof -pitch included in the plans requires an Alternative Equivalent Compliance ("AEC") application and approval. PROCESS: The Lot Split Amendment ("PUD Amendment") first requires a public hearing with the PZC, with the purpose of providing a recommendation to Avon Town Council. Council will review and render a final decision on a Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD Amendment application after conducting a separate public hearing. An Administrative Minor Subdivision is eligible for review and approval by Staff, and is not included with this application. Applications for Major Development Plan Review and Alternative Equivalent Compliance require a public hearing with the PZC, with the purpose of reviewing and rendering a decision on the application. No hearing with Avon Town Council is required for Major Development Plan Review and Alternative Equivalent Compliance applications. rStaffffLYSIS & REPORT Public Notice PZC AW PUBLIC HEARING 61412024 On May 13, 2024, the PZC held a public hearing for the lot split (PUD24001), design of the residential properties (MJR24002), and the non -compliant roof pitch (AEC24001). As part of the same hearing, the PZC voted to continue the PUD, AEC and MJR applications, in order for Staff to seek legal counsel on restrictions relative to the Non -Developable Area. Staff have since confirmed that no aspect of the proposed project should occur, even temporarily, in the Non -Developable Area. These restrictions include buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading. An application for a Lot Split in Wildridge is subject to three sets of Review Criteria: 1. General Review Criteria for ALL Development Applications - § 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria 2. Review Criteria for PUD Amendments - § 7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria 3. Review Criteria for Lot Split Amendments in Wildridge § 7.16.060(h)(4), Additional Review Criteria Review Criteria #3 was adopted into the Avon Municipal Code in 2015, through Ordinance 2015-11. To date, nine (9) lot splits in Wildridge have occurred since adoption. Staff is not aware of an application for a lot split in Wildridge following the adoption of Ordinance 2015-11, that was denied by either the PZC or Council. An application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance review is subject to two sets of Review Criteria: PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 2 of 20 . vo n C 0 L0 RA D0 1. General Review Criteria for ALL Development Applications - § 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria 2. Review Criteria for Alternative Equivalent Compliance - § 7.16.120(d), Review Criteria An application for Major Development Plan review is subject to two sets of Review Criteria: 3. General Review Criteria for ALL Development Applications - § 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria 4. Review Criteria for Development Plans - § 7.16.080(g), Review Criteria PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 4644 North Point is the only undeveloped property on North Point, a cul-de-sac with six residential lots, near the northern -most point in Wildridge. North Point is only accessible from Wildridge Road. Lots 48-59 in Block 3 of Wildridge, which Staff believes represents the "Neighborhood', include all homes on North Point in addition to several homes on Wildridge Road and are all platted as duplex lots on the original Wildridge PUD. The 40,075.2 square foot site (.92 acres) includes native grasses and sagebrush. The terrain is characterized by steep topography sloping up towards the northeast, and presents views of the mountains and hillside in PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 3 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO every direction. The lot includes 2,650 square feet of "Non -Developable Area". This area restricts development including buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading. Forest Road 779, abuts the property to the east on Town -owned property. Additional neighboring properties include three duplexes, one to the north and the other to the south. Figure 3 - View of Site from North Point Looking Northeast Figure 4 - View from Site Looking South PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 4 of 20 n Avon COLORADO PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has submitted plans to subdivide the property into two lots and construct one single-family home on each new lot. The proposed lots are identified as 50A and 50B respectively. Since the May 13, 2024 public hearing with PZC, the applicant revised application materials to include platted building envelopes. These envelopes pose restrictions to the current and future owners as to where buildings can be constructed. LOT 51A PGuxo a � s aES�� wrx l LOTN 51 B V1ILITY 3; BRNxg6f E{SENENT xo. ]16543Y1 / i.Ls.��� s44 �t SUBAN NOM BU 01) SREC=Png1 Z6'J05' 5e' atroz _ _ o LC u _ ee—xa lH _ �N AR RR643T) aLE� rA tRec. A 1 1/T P,L5, N. ALUMINUM CAP 544] ^ f S trP3'R]" c - t0.1 t' ` v -r x etze R9 w az z2 � I o� 1�, ,ass ExsEMwT }} PLAT) a0 I g, N B ' pl o75e" e - 6e.2' LOT 50B W TRACT I a.s II 6�92 x` (cnEh BEar TLZEPLA11 µoeE 41 W 9 3 ZO � I s a1vr�' ' ag, f a z a,G, i Rsar N\ 1 4 o 1�S z+ a } LOT 50A o =E3 9j s N,'56• w_ .� I N 3179'R9' W- 31.49' O.Q 1 I nC('c55 dr [ASd (6REATEB BT — Pur) R MP D uxEY (GREATER B_ PUT) /lI 5 D5'57'04" E— 54.74' ,wTM 1 N .,s W w- 1. A _ N NA 5 ,tea CAP Nw iuEpe�An P.L1— s� 1l11���� RO�Pe uuxrexwCc �{�iN_ IuixC aTMACN fY ` 1 GERnOx 22313771URA p A 48B E4 . T (RECWr0.PANE. R2,.,.) W - Zs7.i9• II _ _ ' � I 154.29 5 05'02'S6' ('A,LOT (RE6fP11CN iR6 i inn \ �non.eu a oN a BRcmvp $ LOT 48A A /R' MiwUl C CAP x1LOkI06E A , P.LS Ne. 5H7 4n Hf LL_I LOT 49A LOT 49B ' (NAM. A. g (LOT W NALCNE) , E 3, �)� Figure 5 - Updated Plat w/Building Envelopes Lot 50A is proposed as a 15,768.72 square foot lot, and Lot 50B is proposed as a 24,262.92 square foot lot. Lot 50A is proposed to include a 5,702 square foot home, with a main level and lower level. Lot 50B is proposed to include a 7,129 square foot home with an upper level, a main level and a lower level. The project proposes a single driveway access from the 50A lot, and an access easement for Lot 50B is included on the proposed plat for the site. Like many homes in Wildridge, the buildings are designed to step down or "fit" into the hillside. Included in the application for the home design are roof plans for both proposed residential structures. The proposed roofs are pitched at a degree that Avon Municipal Code ("AMC") does not currently allow. The applicant has expressed that a modified, flatter roof pitch is a better design than what the AMC allows (4:12 or greater, or 3:12 or greater for metallic roofs), and is pursuing approval from the PZC for roofs pitched at 3:12 and 2:12. The PZC has approved three separate applications for flatter roofs in the Wildridge neighborhood in the last two years, and no adverse impacts have been reported. PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 5 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO nrnnni irnnnnmrnnirnnirnnnnmrnnirnnirnnn m wnnunmuurnunuu�unmuunnnn -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --e�,�, �:�--- Figure 6 - Lot SOB Proposed Home Showing "Fit" into hillside Table -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --e�,�, �:�--- Figure 6 - Lot SOB Proposed Home Showing "Fit" into hillside Table 1-1 North Point Proposed Residence Size Lot Level Space Type Space Size (Sq Ft) Lot 66A Lower Heated Area 2,851 Main Heated Area 2,091 Garage 760 Su btota l 2,851 Total 5,702 Lot 66B Lower Heated Area 2,582 Mechanical Room 206 Garage 864 Su btota l 3,652 Main Heated Area 2,813 Upper Heated Area 664 Totall 7,129 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION & COMMENTS: Notice of the public hearing was published in the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code (ADC). Mailed notice is required for a Lot Split Amendment for Wildridge PUD, and was sent to properties within 300' of the proposed development site in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 6 of 20 ,ovo n C O L O HA UO Avon Development Code (ADC). Public Comment was received by Staff and is included as an attachment to this report. GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA § 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria in order to consider approval of any development application submitted to the Town: i. The development application is complete; ii. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; iii. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and iv. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. Staff Response: Both applications included in this report are subject to this review criteria. Both applications are complete, and Staff feels that the applicant has provided the sufficient information needed to allow the PZC to determine if the applications comply with all review criteria. The Avon Comprehensive Plan is largely silent on goals and policies for lot splits, as well as single-family homes and duplexes, aside from a goal to "Achieve a diverse range of housing densities, styles and types... to serve all segments of the population (Goal E.1)." Demand for public services and infrastructure specific to this application are not exceeding capacity currently. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA § 7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria Applies to PUD24001 The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria as the basis for a recommendation or decision to rezone a property to PUD overlay, approve a preliminary PUD plan or process a PUD amendment: L The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments; Staff Response: The PUD amendment to split the lot presents the opportunity to develop the lot under its current allowance of two dwelling units, while preserving natural elements that would be removed if a duplex structure were constructed. Duplexes can present visual "walls" to neighboring properties, and restrict drainage and wildlife activity compared to two single-family homes. Additionally, the opportunity to construct two homes rather than one or none presents increased housing stock in a time and place where housing inventory is limited. Four lots in the vicinity are underdeveloped duplex lots where only a single-family residence ("SFR") has been built (Table 1-2 Existing and Proposed Density). PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 7 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO Table 1-2 North Point Existing and Proposed Density Original Lot # Current Lot # Address(es) Plat Density Lot Split (Y/N)? Structure 48 48A 4730 Wildridge Rd W #A Duplex Y SFR 48B 4730 Wildridge Rd W #B Duplex SFR 49 49A 4620North Point#A Duplex Y Duplex 49B 4700 Wilridge Rd E #B Duplex Duplex 50 50 4644 North Point Duplex PROPOSED TWO SFRS 51 51A 4660North Point#A Duplex Y Duplex 51B 4661North Point#B Duplex Duplex 52 52 4686 North Point Duplex N SFR 53 53A 4691North Point#A Duplex Y SFR 53B 4691North Point#B Duplex SFR 54 54 4420 Wildridge Rd W Duplex N SFR 55 55 4657 North Point Duplex N SFR 56 56A 4480 Wildridge Rd W #A Duplex Y Duplex 56B 4480 Wildridge Rd W #B Duplex Duplex 57 1 571 4611 North Pointl Duplex N SFR ii. The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety and general welfare; Staff Response: The lot split promotes the general welfare of Avon by increasing the likelihood that a residential property is built to its maximum density of residential units. The lot split ensures that the property can accommodate the two dwelling units for which it is platted. Underdeveloped residential space reduces housing availability and exacerbates the housing crisis in the region. iii. The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code and the eligibility criteria outlined in Subsection 7.16.060(b); Staff Response: In reviewing the compatibility of this project with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, Staff finds that this lot split in Wildridge generally aligns with most of the cited "Avon Values," policies, and guiding principles. More specifically, the following statements reflect the intentions of the proposed development when considering location, design, and aesthetics: • Respect the Natural Environment. Enhance Avon's strong connections to its spectacular scenery, magnificent natural surroundings, and ample outdoor recreational opportunities. • Have a Distinctive Built Form. Develop a hierarchy of built forms that reflects the importance of the Town Center in the community. High quality design and finishes will exist throughout the community. • Enhance the Sense of Place and Character. Create a developed community made up of smaller residential neighborhoods and a thriving Town Center that collectively provide a unique sense of place and charm enjoyed by year-round residents and visitors alike. • Promote Diversity. Strengthen a total environment that is supportive of and attainable to a diverse community. The community is the sum of its parts and a healthy and vibrant community must PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 8 of 20 ,ovo n C O L O HA UO welcome and encompass people with a wide range of backgrounds, interests, vocations, family status, and economic means. These elements help in achieving the vision of this Plan. Future Land Use and Planning Area The Avon Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map designates the property as Residential - Low Density, and includes this area as part of District 11: Northern Residential District. Single-family homes are appropriate for Residential — Low Density areas, and this application is consistent with the proposed future land use in Avon. The lot split does not increase the density of dwelling units. The Avon Comprehensive Plan prescribes that landscaping "should reflect the area's dry climate and typically steep terrain with low water -requiring plant materials and natural landscaping. The application includes a landscaping plan demonstrating the Fire -Free -Five recommendation from the Fire Protection District, to have all trees and plant material at least five feet from the building envelope. Additionally, plants and shrubs are consistent with water -wise, sun -intense recommendations for the area. Under Planning Principles, the following statements are also relevant to this development: Encourage and support development that prohibits significant alteration of the natural environment as well as ridgeline and steep slope development. This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting. The proposed subdivision and subsequent homes acknowledge the topography sloping upwards towards the east of the site. The size of the driveway has been reduced from the original application, and building envelopes conform to the Non -Developable Area. No fences are proposed with this project, and the lighting is dark -sky compliant. Policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan The following are applicable sections of the Avon Comprehensive plan that relate to this project: Policy 8.2.2: Promote a wide range of residential uses throughout the Town. Policy C.1.2: Ensure compatible architectural features between adjacent buildings. Policy E.1.2: Encourage private development and partnerships that provide a diversity of housing for local working families. Policy G.3.2: Enforce the use of "Dark Sky" compliant fixtures. iv. Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development, Staff Response: This property is included in the Upper Eagle River Water Authority and the Town confirmed in 2023 that properties in Wildridge, including those that can accommodate duplex lots, have water allocation from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD). Gas, electricity, waste services and emergency services are all available to this site. v. Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 9 of 20 . vo n C O L O HA UO Staff Response: The lot split will not result in adverse impacts to wildlife or the air, water, noise, stormwater management, vegetation or wildlife that is otherwise present in the area. The opportunity to construct two SFRs as opposed to a duplex allows for wildlife, water, and noise to pass through the area with a less -substantial obstruction. The plans presented show proposed development, including a boulder wall, near the limits of disturbance that bound the Non -Developable Area. Staff and the applicant are aware that no activity, even with plans for mitigation, can take place in the Non -Developable Area. No building permit will be approved in the event that grading or other construction activity or development is presented in the plans. vi. Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result insignificant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Staff Response: Rezoning is not proposed with this application. If the lot split is considered a "rezoning", Staff acknowledge that the lot split is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts on other properties in the vicinity. Impacted view corridors are not considered significant adverse impacts, and Staff are not aware of significant, negative impacts caused by other, previously approved lot splits. vii. Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: The future use of the subject tract is proposed for two single-family homes. Properties in the vicinity have duplex and single-family structures that range from 6,165 square feet to 2,153 square feet of Actual Area (the size of the structure including indoor space, garages, and mechanical rooms). The largest home in Wildridge is 14,842 square feet of Actual Area. The homes proposed by the applicant are 5,702 sq ft (Lot 50A) and 7,129 sq ft (Lot 50B) of Actual Area respectively (Table 1-3 Existing and Proposed Development). The proposed home on Lot 50A includes two levels of identical size and footprint (2,851 sq ft). The proposed home on Lot 50B is comprised of three levels, with the lowest level, including the garage representing the largest footprint (3,652 sq ft) of any level. The lowest level of the home proposed on Lot 50B is likely not visible from North Point. PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 10 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO Table 1-3 North Point Existing and Proposed Development Original Lot # Original Lot Acreage Current Lot # Address(es) Structure Actual Area 48 0.51 48A 4730 Wildridge Rd W #A SFR 4,148 48B 4730 Wildridge Rd W #B SFR 4,192 49 0.58 49A 4620North Point#A Duplex 4,321 49B 4700 WiIridge Rd E #B Duplex 2,704 50 0.92 PROPOSED 50A 4644 North Point #A SFR 5,702 PROPOSED 50B 4644 North Point #8 SFR 7,129 51 1.07 51A 4660 North Point #A Duplex 3,953 51B 4661 North Point #B Duplexl 2,956 52 1.98 52 4686North Point SFR 6,165 53 1.15 53A 4691North Point#A SFR 4,073 53B 4691North Point#B SFR 2,153 54 1.78 54 4420 Wildridge Rd W SFR 3,604 55 0.71 55 4657 North Point SFR 4,298 56 0.63 56A 4480 Wildridge Rd W #A Duplex 4,139 56B 4480 Wildridge Rd W #B Duplex 4,770 57 0.43 57 4611 North Point SFR1 3,000 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA § 7.16.060(h)(4), Additional Review Criteria Applies to PUD24001 Town Council shall review a Lot Split Amendment to the Wildridge PUD application and Major Amendments in the Wildridge PUD that include a Lot Split according the following criteria in addition to the review criteria for a preliminary PUD development plan: i. The application results in less total site coverage and contains restrictions on building envelopes when deemed appropriate to minimize site coverage; Staff Response: The applicant has proposed restrictive building envelopes that result in less total site coverage than the site coverage potentially created by a permissible duplex structure. ii. Driveway disturbance is minimized and a shared driveway curb cut is utilized when feasible and when a shared driveway curb cut would reduce site disturbance; Staff Response: The associated subdivision plat presents the opportunity for a shared driveway and shared driveway curb cut, and both are present on the subsequent Major Development Plan application for the two proposed single-family homes. Following the public hearing on May 13, 2024 for PUD24001, the applicant revised the driveway configuration to reduce site disturbance (See Figure 7 and Figure 8). PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 11 of 20 n Avon COLORADO Figure 7 - Original Driveway Design - NO LONGER PROPOSED v LOT 48 �• �-��� �- Tom_ Figure 8 — UPDATED Proposed Driveway Configuration PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 12 of 20 I - . vo n C O LO RA DO iii. Areas not appropriate for development are designated on the PUD plan; Staff Response: The Wildridge PUD identifies "Non -developable Areas" on certain parcels including more than 2,600 square feet on Lot 50. Staff feel that this existing non -developable area is satisfactory and does not require expansion or modification. iv. The proposed development of the site avoids disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) or reduces potential disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) compared to the existing PUD designation; and, Staff Response: No portion of the lot includes slope greater than thirty percent (30%). v. The PUD plan incorporates requirements and/or restrictions as deemed appropriate to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity, including but not limited to: (A) enhanced landscaping; (8) increased building setbacks (i.e. minimum twenty (20) feet separation between buildings and a minimum ten (10) feet setback between properties); (C) designated building footprints; (D) building height restrictions; and, (E) designated architectural massing, including building square footage designation. Staff Response: The applicant has proposed designated building footprints. The provided landscaping plan includes water -wise plantings and thoughtful placement of new trees (away from the building envelope and out of areas with intense sun -exposure). The plat represents the minimum setbacks as required along the property lines (10 feet on each side of the shared lot line). The homes are at least 25' apart from one another and other homes in the neighborhood. The homes adhere to the current height limitations. ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE — CRITERIA: §7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Comoliance: Applies to AEC24001 Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design - related provisions of the code through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site -specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. REVIEW CRITERIA: §7.16.120(d): 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 13 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO Staff Response: The proposed 2:12 and 3:12 roof pitch is adequately sloped for snowmelt, and is likely a visually -imperceptible modification to the allowed 4:12 roof pitch for roofs 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; Staff Response: The proposed plans improve sun exposure for the home and break up building mass (Policy C.1.3) 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and Staff Response: The flatter roof option is presented partly out of consideration for neighboring properties and their viewsheds. Flatter roofs, particularly with the 30' height restriction compared to the 35' allowance for more -angled roofs, improve exterior views around the structure and can appear less formidable from the ground -level. 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title Staff Response: The proposed plans do not negatively impact surrounding properties, functionally nor visually. The PZC has approved three separate applications for flatter roofs in the Wildridge neighborhood in the last two years, and no adverse impacts have been reported. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(g), Development Plan Applies to MJR24002 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The application generally complies with the applicable purpose statements outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (1) states, "Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub -alpine environment". The architecture is compatible with other neighboring development with large amounts of stone, wood siding, and timber accents. 2. Reserved; 3. The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, "This residential area contains varying densities located on the south -facing slopes north of the main valley floor. The character for the developed landscape should reflect the area's dry climate and typically steep terrain with low water -requiring plant materials and natural landscaping. Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 14 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings." While the planning principles listed for District 11 target subdivision enhancements, this district does encourage developments that, "prohibits significant alteration of the natural environment... and steep slope development. The Wildridge PUD does not prescribe a limit of developable area as a percentage of the entire lot. Staff feels that the size of the building footprints are in scale with other homes in the vicinity. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The Applications includes a PUD Amendment (PUD24001) and resubdivision application (SUB24003) that intend to exchange the single -duplex lot and reconfigured it into two, single- family lots. These proposed homes would be consistent with those approvals and adhere to the restrictions placed on the plat. Figure 9 - Site Map with Homes Superimposed 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 15 of 20 . von COL0RAD0 Staff Response: The zoning and proposed use are compatible and compliant with the Avon Municipal Code. The following addresses compliance with Chapter 7.28, Development Standards: Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The designs adhere to all setbacks, easements, and height requirements. The universal setbacks are established via the original Wildridge PUD, and are platted to function like a building envelope. The prescribed setbacks included in the design are as follows: 4644A — 50A 4644B — 50B Front 25' Front 25' Sides 10' Sides 10' Rear 10' Rear 10' There is a "Non -Developable Area" present on this site, as determined by the original Wildridge PUD, which is represented on the proposed plat. Use: The Wilridge PUD permits two dwelling units on this lot. Short Term Rentals (STR) are not permitted under the current PUD in Wildridge. Inclusionary Zoning: The Application is not subject to Employee Housing mitigation standards outlined in Avon Development Code Section 7.20.100. Building Height: The proposed roofs are compliant with height restrictions for residential buildings in Avon. The maximum building height permitted for this property is 35 feet and building height maximums are reduced to 30' for roofs pitched less than 4:12. Height must be verified during the building process with foundation and framing Improvement Location Certificates (ILC). Pursuant to the PUD for Wildridge, 7.28.090(e)(2): Building Height on Steep Slopes: Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi -story building. The proposed home on Lot 50B includes plans for three levels however, the stories are proportional and staff feels that the structure will not create a negative visual impact or overbearing presence on properties below or near the structure. Parking: The Code requires three parking spaces for single-family residential units over 2,500 Osquare feet. Both homes include 3-car garages that adequately meet the code requirements. 4-Sided Design: The side and rear elevations of all structures include equal care and quality as compared to the front of the buildings. Staff feels that the development meets 4-sided design requirements. PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 16 of 20 . vo n C O L O HA UO Snow Storage: Snow storage areas are identified on the plans and meet the required area however, staff is unaware of an agreement for maintenance responsibilities between the two proposed lots. Staff recommends an agreement that identifies maintenance responsibilities and a cost -sharing structure, is drafted, signed, and submitted to the Town as a condition. Landscaping: The application includes a landscaping plan demonstrating the Fire -Free -Five recommendation from the Fire Protection District, to have all trees and plant material at least five feet from the building envelope. Additionally, plants and shrubs are consistent with water -wise, sun - intense recommendations for the area. Fences: None. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The proposed materials include a combination of rock veneer siding, stucco, and wood siding/trim, with timber accents. Avon Development Code Section 7.28.090(c)(3), Building Materials, requires the use of "high quality, durable building materials", and "preferred materials reflect the Town's sub -alpine character such as native stone, wood siding, masonry or timbers." All of these materials are considered with this design. The colors meet Light Reflective Value (LRV) standards and are all earth tone. Both residences will have identical components (See Figure 7). R T WEA �r- FLASHINGIMETAL ACCENTS DARK BRONZE WOOD SIDING/TRIM NEW AGE RUSTIC PALISADE WINDOWS PELLA - DARK BRONZE F_) rc6eds inc J -Arm I Figure 10 - Sample Material Board ROOF L METAL - DARK BRONZE FASCIAITIM BERS BENJAMIN MOORE ARBORCOAT COLOR - BLACK (SEMI -SOLID) STUCCO COLOR - SW 915A PERLE NOIR STONE ASHLAR -SUNSET 4644 North Point Lot 50. Block 3. Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Lighting: The exterior light fixture selected for the project is a down cast, modern fixture PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 17 of 20 . vo n C O LO RA DO style and in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. It is a full cutoff fixture and fixture is Dark Sky compliant and engineered to minimize light glare upward into the night sky. I. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d) (3) Roofs. Shed roof forms are presented for each building. The proposed home on Lot 50A includes metal roofing materials only. The plan for the home on Lot 50B proposes a combination of metal and synthetic roofing materials and includes several instances of 2:12 roof pitch. The roof shake product (Timberline High -Definition Shingles from GAF) is a composite material with a Class A fire rating that also contains UV blockers to prolong the life of the materials. These shingles are sealed to decrease wind -risk. Roof pitches between 1:12 and 3:12 are currently not permissible by the Avon Municipal Code, with the exception of 3:12 roof pitch for metallic roofs. The applicant has submitted an AEC application as part of this proposal in order to initiate review from the PZC for an alternative design. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services; and Staff Response: The Public Works department did not present concerns related to this development during the review process. 7. The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole. Staff Response: The applicant is responsible for the design and construction of several existing homes in Wildridge, and the proposed design for the homes conforms with surrounding community. Community character refers to the distinct identify of a place; the collective impression a neighborhood or town makes on residents and visitors. The overall character of this development is consistent with other architectural statements by incorporating articulated building facades, terracing, use of natural materials, limiting landscaping, and by leaving a large area of natural terrain undisturbed. PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 18 of 20 . von C C L C HA UO OPTIONS: PZC has the following options: • Approve (or Recommend for Approval for PUD) as outlined below; • Approve with modified findings and conditions; • Continue application to future meeting pending additional details or studies; or • Deny (or Recommend Denial for PUD) application after formulating justifiable findings. PUD24001 FINDINGS: Findings: 1. The Lot Split Amendment incorporates creative site design that achieves the purposes of the Town's Development Code, by promoting maximum development of a residential lot, where many lots are underdeveloped. 2. The Lot Split Amendment promotes public health, safety and general welfare by promoting maximum development of a residential lot. Underdeveloped residential lots contribute to the existing housing crisis, which in turn presents challenges to the local economy by likely reducing the available local workforce; 3. The Lot Split Amendment is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, promoting compatible architecture and increasing the diversity of housing; 4. Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; 5. The Lot Split Amendment will not result in negative impacts to the natural environment. Wildlife currently thrives in Wildridge despite residential development, and the Town has promoted assessment of native vegetation that could increase wildfire risk that this development accomplishes; 6. The Lot Split Amendment is not likely to result in significant impacts on other properties in the vicinity; 7. Future uses on the subject lots will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject lots. The proposed homes included in this application are sized and scaled to look and feel similar to other homes on Fox Lane and Saddle Ridgel Loop. PUD24001 RECOMMEND MOTION: 1 move to recommend approval of Case #PUD24001, a Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD, based on the findings outlined in Staff's report, and the following condition:" Conditions: 1. Access and maintenance agreement to be recorded prior to signature of the Minor Subdivision plat. AEC24001 FINDINGS: Staff Recommended Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to 7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance; PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 19 of 20 . vo n C O L O HA UO 2. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than the compliance with the subject standard; 5. The proposed roof design and project overall do not impose greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Municipal Code ("AMC"). AEC24001 RECOMMEND MOTION: "I move to approve Case #AEC24001, an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for roof pitch, based on the findings in section §7.16.120(d) as outlined in Staffs report." MJR24002 FINDINGS Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080, Development Plan, and the design meets the development standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. With conditions, the application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. MJR24002 RECOMMEND MOTION: "I move to approve Case #MJR24002, a Major Development Review application, based on the findings as outlined in Staffs report, with the following conditions:" Conditions: II -Cs are required to confirm building height. An executed Access and Maintenance Agreement that includes, but is not limited to, maintenance, snow storage, parking, be recorded prior to the recording of the corresponding subdivision plat. ATTACHMENTS: A. UPDATED Schematic Design Plans B. ORIGINAL Application Materials C. Public Comment for PZC PUD24001, AEC24001, & MJR24002 June 7, 2024 Page 20 of 20 SUBJECT SITE ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials 27 NORTH POINT � K> r/ WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST WILDRIDGE TOWN BOUNDARY LAND USE SUMMARY PARCEL AREA USE ADDRESS LOT 50A 0.362 AC. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 4644A NORTH POINT LOT 50B 0.557 AC. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 4644E NORTH POINT TOTAL = 0.919 AC. SCALE: 1 " = 1000' VICINITY MAPI A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 50, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE GENERAL NOTES: 1) DATE OF SURVEY: FEBRUARY 2024 2) BEARINGS BASED UPON THE LINE CONNECTING THE MONUMENTS FOUND IN PLACE MARKING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 50, BEING A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP, P.L.S. No. 5447 AND THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 50, BEING A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP, P.L.S. No. 5447, SAID BEARING BEING N08°57'04"W, PER THE PLAT OF WILDRIDGE, RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 1981, UNDER RECEPTION No. 226437. (SEE DRAWING). 3) MONUMENTATION AS INDICATED HEREON. 4) THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SUBDIVIDE LOT 50, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE TO CREATE LOT 50A AND LOT 50B AND THE ACCESS EASEMENT AS INDICATED HEREON. 5) THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE ACCESS EASEMENT CREATED BY THIS PLAT IS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM LOTS 50A AND 50B. 6) GORE RANGE SURVEYING LLC DID NOT PERFORM A TITLE SEARCH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO ESTABLISH OWNERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. RECORD DOCUMENTS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT WERE PROVIDED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER No. V50071185, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 15, 2024 AT 5:00 P.M.. 7) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 8) ALL REFERENCES TO RECORD DOCUMENTS ARE TO THOSE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF THE OFFICE OF THE EAGLE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER. 9) LINEAL UNITS INDICATED ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. LOTS 50A AND 50B ARE SUBJECT TO: 10) RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 1982, IN BOOK 345 AT PAGE 844. 11) EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 1981 IN BOOK 330 AT PAGE 78. LOT 51 A / (COLIN W. MEIRING) I LOT 51 B (JOHN R. BELL, SR. & UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT SUSAN NICOLE BUXTON) (RECEPTION No. 2265437) E _ 263.05 N 81 °02' 56 FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH g6 24' A 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP _ S 17°23'27" E — 10.11'- P.L.S. No. 5447 �— T \ N 61 °29'29" W — 62.22' I I 0 M I ACCESS EASEMENT to (CREATED BY THIS PLAT) � 11 I N 81 °02'56" E — 68.21' =r- LOT 50B I 1P 0 0.557 ACRES BUILDING ENVELOPE 4644 B 1 29' (CREATED BY THIS PLAT) z I 1 p8 2g >> S g1 °02' 56" 0 I I 24.39' NON —DEVELOPABLE AREA (REC. No. f 226437) 0 � I �— O 10.00' O I 25.00' 2 'Q c�0 1 929,. 0 w N\ Z I 11 1 \ 700 0S6• ,2929' -+ 003 I I LOT 50A w, 5' 1 0.362 ACRES W _ 45.3 Z O I 4644 A S $1'02'S6„ (D I °� I N 61 °29'29" W — 31.49' 70 O I I0 \ 0 z II 1 ACCESS EASEMENT \ L I (CREATED BY THIS PLAT) I Z`/ 1 I N 08°57'04" W — 39.48'—//� 1 I I _ — I BUILDING SETBACK SLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE I (RECEPTION No. 226437) 104.29 _ �__- & SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT _ I — ' (RECEPTION No. 2265437) 1 237.79 I 0 154•29 S 81°02 56 C I PROPERTY LINE (CREATED BY THIS PLAT) —S 08°57'04" E — 54.74' _ 1. 83.50 LOT 48B (JASON ALLEN BREEDEN & JACQUELINE DIANE BREEDEN) UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT (RECEPTION No. 2265437) LOT 48A FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH (WILDRIDGE 48 HAHN LLC) A 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. No. 5447 LOT 49A LOT 49B (DAVID A. SENTNOR & \ (ADOLPHUS W. MALONE) JAMIE S. SENTNOR) TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH A 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. No. 5447 00 TRACT I rn (TOWN OF AVON) I O O O 07 Certificate of Dedication and Ownership Know all men by these presents that 4644 North Point LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, being sole owner in fee simple of all that real property described as follows: Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge, per the plat thereof recorded October 8, 1981 under Reception Number 226437 in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, and containing 0.919 acres more or less; has by these presents laid -out, platted and subdivided the same into Lots and Blocks as shown hereon and designate the same as A Resubdivision of Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge, Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado and dedicate for public use the streets shown herein including avenues, drives, boulevards, lanes, courts and alleys to the Town of Avon; and the utility and drainage easements shown hereon for utility and drainage purposes only; and do further state that this subdivision shall be subject to the Protective Covenants filed and recorded for this Subdivision in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, as Document Number EXECUTED this day of , A.D., 2024 Owner: 4644 North Point LLC Address: PO Box 516 a Colorado limited liability company Avon, CO 81620 By: Title: STATE OF ) )SS COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Certificate of Dedication and Ownership was acknowledged before me this day of , A.D., 2024 by as of 4644 North Point LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. My Commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public Title Certificate Land Title Guarantee Company does hereby certify that it has examined the title to all lands shown upon this plat and that title to such lands is vested in 4644 North Point LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and assessments except as follows: Dated this day of , A.D., 2024. FOUND A No. 5 REBAR WITH Agent signature A RED PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. No. ILLEGIBLE Gore Range I I Surveying, LLC 0 20 40 Feet ')ROBox 15 Avon, CO 81620 (970) 479-8698 • fax (970) 479-0055 SCALE: 1 = 2 0 Surveyor's Certificate I, Samuel H. Ecker, do hereby certify that I am a Professional Land Surveyor licensed under the laws of the State of Colorado, that this Plat is a true, correct and complete Plat of A Resubdivision of Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge, Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, as laid out, platted, dedicated and shown hereon, that such plat was made from an accurate survey of said property by me and under my supervision and correctly shows the location and dimensions of the lots, easements and streets of said subdivision as the same are staked upon the ground in compliance with applicable regulations governing the subdivision of land, that such plat is based upon the professional land surveyor's knowledge, information and belief, that such plat has been prepared in accordance with applicable standards of practice, and that such plat is not a guaranty or warranty, either expressed or implied. All monuments are set as required by the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Avon. In Witness Whereof, I have set my hand and seal this 6th day of June, A.D., 2024. Samuel H. Ecker DO°o l O Colorado P.L.S. No. 30091 Q 3009.10FtiasQ• .z O , 6/4/2024.2, L LAtA Town Certificate This Final Plat is approved by the Town of Avon, County of Eagle, Colorado this day of , 2024 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle. Approval of this plat by the Town is consent only and is not to be construed as an approval of the technical correctness of this plat or any documents relating thereto. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN OF AVON THE TOWN OF AVON By: Director of Community Development Attest: Town Clerk Certificate of Taxes Paid I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes and assessments due and payable as of upon all parcels of real estate described on this plat are paid in full. Dated this day of , A.D., 2024. Eagle County Treasurer Clerk and Recorder's Certificate This Plat was filed for record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder at day of , 2024 and is duly recorded at Reception No. Clerk and Recorder By: , Deputy o'clock , on this SE 61412024 DRAWN BY.• DATE.. CHECKED BY SE DRAWING NO.: 23-1516 p1ct 23-1516 SHEET 1 OF 1 ✓OB NO.: ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials LOT 51 p' SIDE SETBACK z 0T / v y II 8573 LOT 50 0.92 ACRES 4644 NORTH POINT ow \ 11616 80W- 605 iOW-86120 \ BOW - 86090 a WILDFIRE SETBACK \ ° HOT TUB 15' LANDS�.t+ \ t p 'o8608.75 8614 \ O TO 609.5 \ \J8612 t ° BOW 8605 ]j 08605.75 \ 193.5 \ a btl ° .75a ° \ \MAI FL OR 860 \ \ --4-8610 AV - 86 S \ 5' DEFENSIBLE SPACE \ \ I \ 0 �8608 2 RIDG - 632 2 I ➢ w \ s w J1606 I "85 3.750 \ ° 3 TOW 8601 0 \O \ I \ BOW 859].0 8592. �o 8592 \ LOWER FLOOR 8594.0 \ \ I 8591.3 EAVE. 8622 3 \ I\ 8602 ° 'tea Baw. C-141 SF \ I � � I \ SLOT 50B \ 24,282 SF�0.557 ACRES) 8-145 SF I\ \ \ 4644-B N TH POINT 4.196 25 \ \ 8594 8592 590 1 \ � --`esea �8586 \ �8584 PLANT LEGEND O DECIDUOUS TREE EVERGREEN TREE a SHRUB COBBLE NATIVE REVEGETATION MULCH SOD PLANT LIST - LOT 50A KEY BOTANIC NAME TREES PP PICEA PUNGENS PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES COMMON NAME # SIZE COLROADO BLUE SPRUCE 9 8'+ HEIGHT QUAKING ASPEN 18 2.5" CALIPER ARCHITECT CN E C4 O 04 v � s N C'") O � U a� 0 � o 0-0 a E N CV C") 10 00 Ow IISTRUCTURAL I SHRUBS AAS AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA NATIVE SERVICEBERRY 21 JILANDSCAPE 5 GALLON ATS ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA TALL WESTERN SAGE 19 5 GALLON PLANT LIST - LOT 50B KEY BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME # SIZE TREES PP PICEA PUNGENS COLROADO BLUE SPRUCE 10 8'+ HEIGHT PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 15 2.5" CALIPER SHRUBS AAS AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA NATIVE SERVICEBERRY 20 5 GALLON ATS ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA TALL WESTERN SAGE 15 5 GALLON ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE NOT TO BE SODDED OR MULCHED ARE TO BE REVEGETATED WITH NATIVE GRASSES SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED WITH AN AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSOR LAND SUMMARY - LOT 50A TOTAL LOT AREA 15,784sf DISTURBED AREA OF LOT 11,994sf 76.0% OF LOT BUILDING FOUNDATION 2,851 sf HARDSCAPE 668sf DRIVEWAY 2,201 sf IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 5,720sf 36.2% OF LOT LANDSCAPE AREA 6,274sf 39.7% OF LOT NATIVE VEGETATION 5,699sf 90.8% OF LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA 575sf 9.2% OF LANDSCAPE AREA SPRAY AREA Osf 0.0% OF IRRIGATED AREA DRIP AREA 575sf 100% OF IRRIGATED AREA SOD AREA Osf 0.0% OF IRRIGATED AREA II NOTES I TOTAL LOT AREA 24,282sf DISTURBED AREA OF LOT 14,293sf 58.9% OF LOT BUILDING FOUNDATION 3,661 sf HARDSCAPE 967sf I S S U E S DRIVEWAY 2,009sf IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 6,637sf 27.3% OF LOT LANDSCAPE AREA 7,656sf 31.5% OF LOT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NATIVE VEGETATION 7,270sf 94.9% OF LANDSCAPE AREA A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA 386sf 5.1 % OF LANDSCAPE AREA SPRAY AREA Osf 0% OF IRRIGATED AREA DRIP AREA 386sf 100.0% OF IRRIGATED AREA SOD AREA Osf 0.0% OF IRRIGATED AREA BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF HT EXISTING GR FINISHED GR HEIGHT BH-1 8621.5 8598.0 8591.5 30.0' BH-2 8632.2 8599.5 N/A 32.7' BH-3 8633.3 8599.0 N/A 34.3' BH-4 8622.3 8594.0 8592.5 29.8' BH-5 8604.6 8575.5 8575.3 29.3' BH-6 8604.4 8575.0 8575.3 29.4' BH-7 8601.9 8583.5 8587.0 18.4' SNOW STORAGE Private TOTAL DRIVEWAY AREA - 4210 SF Residence REQUIRED SNOW STORAGE - 842 SF AREA A 183 SF AREA B 145 SF 4644 North Point AREA C 141 SF AREA D 189 SF AREA E 190 SF TOTAL AREA 848 SF Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Overall Site Plan and Notes 23-348 DATE: A0. 1 April 10, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: SHEET OF ©2024 RAL Architects, Inc. 1 "=20' ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials _do� I _ �_ _�4w \ A618 \ do I TOW - 8609.0 \ BOW - 8605.75 - TOW - 8612.0 \ 8616 \ _ _ _ BOW 8609.0-0000 \ dip \LIMITS OF DI>� BAo-�� \ \ \ _ _ -\ a ° HOT TUB \ \ \ \ Q ° ° \ \ I 8608.75 \ 1 \ �` 8614 - I \\� ° a _ \ 7.5 =_-_ww- a a , ---- SIDE SETBACK \ \ \ \ \ - I \ TOWI.5 \ I wwwwg 8605. ° BOW \ 1 PH . \ _ - - - \ \ \ I \ a ° a ° \� a ° -6,�605.75 \ \ \ TOW - 8580.0\ 8612 I BOW 8576.0 a ° GARAGE 8593.5 \ \ o 75, \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ MFL OR 860 \ \ \ I ------ AI- I �� I \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ ~` 8610 Q0 \ \ I \ 86 I I I I 85 7 5 �$74.5 85%5.3 \ \ E8 \ o I \ - - 4/ g \ \ \ \ I I \" \ \ 8608 8573 _\ \ \ ` \ \ E-190 SF I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 RIDG 632.LU w \ 1,8606 SF \ \ \ ° ° \ V) - 1 I A 171 ` _ \ `\ I\ \ I \ 85 3.75. \ \ \ \ w 1 CULVERF 1® I \ _ \\ ` TOW - 8586.0 \ \ \ I ADDRESS MARKER _ _ \ ` \ \ BOW - 8582.0 \ I \ \ \ TOW 8601.0 \ O \ BOW - 8597.0 \ I 8592. 8604 I \ \ I \ \\ \ \ \ 8592 \ \ 1 I I \ �♦ \ \ li LOWER FLOOR 8594.0 \ \ 8591.3 8622.3 85701( I I \ \ ° \ g 4 \ \ I \ \ 1 8602 GARAGE 858 06587.2 \ \ \ �$ 6 �`�- ,�/ \ ° ° \ \ 8600 I \ a \ \ 't` \ 0 \ \ BOW 8593.75 I I I \ \ \\ \ 0 8593.7$\° y I C-141 SF �I �I \ off• MAI FL OR 7.7 a a ° ° 8 88 \ 8598 \ ° ° 586.72 I \ I \ \ \ Q a \ �Q \ \ \ \ \ 1 � \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I�\ \ \ \ ° ° ° \ \LOT 50B I I a �\/�5�\� �° \ \ \ \ \ \ 24,282 S (0.557 ACRES) \ 1 8596 I \ \ I T 8975.25 ° \ Op I \ B 145 SF 1 \ 4644-B NORTH POINT I \ ! I Z \ \ \ a ° a a ° \° LOWER f�008587.25 R 8575.75 \ \ \E4VF8 \ / I \ \ \ I I 1 \ S 8587. \ I \ \ \ \ G7 a a I D °� ° I I II \ \� \ 6 o a \ 1 ° ° \ G�\RAGE FLOOR 8587.25 \ I \ \ \ ' OT TUB 8594 I -8592 _oso \ do don -so so \I I \ \ IVA,\ \ �� - --- f-- __- -� =mo LOT 50A o 11 WV I\ \ 15,784,SF (0.362 ACRES)\ \ - - - -\ -- - I \ \ y� I \ �18588 4644-A0 RTH POINT � �' - 8586 \8584 SIDE -0000000"0' 8582 I I \ � \ \ i8580 000000 ------- \ --- - 8578 -_-- -- - II 8576 do - _ 8574 8572 _ - 8570 8568 8566 \ 8564 \ 8562 II 8560 P H I ARCHITECT L �a N E CV 0 CV v C'D O a i -0 , o 0 -0 0 -�C E T 0 0 L o o V 0-0 0 Ow TRU TU RAL LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. I DESCRIPTION I DATE 1 A I PZC Submittal 103.07.241 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Architectural Site Plan 23-348 DATE: A0 • May 8, 2024 DRAWN BY: rah RAL SCALE: SHEET OF : Inc. 1 "=20' ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials — \dim T \ OWN— �-�" PH I __ ..... 1 r \ _ — � 1 — � I .00-01 -7 0-00 0000010 — � 1--- ------ 3 -So ww-wm LOT ARCHITECT CN E C4 O 04 v N V CY) O � U 2 � N 0 � O 0-0 s 2 a E am Ow ISTRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. I DESCRIPTION I DATE 1 A I PZC Submittal 103.07.241 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Landscape Plan 23-348 DATE: AOO May 8, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: ■ SHEET OF : ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 o 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M C: a 00 o, a 2 _ —0 o _0 49 :0 m ;_ • � C N C V co 10 CL 34'-0" . ao o a w LO ` u O O L °� GARAGE Q O a w rn N N STRUCTURAL F_ __1 F_ I I Qy Q MUD ROOM CLOSET MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE FLOOR AREA - 2582 SF 1 MECHANICAL AREA - 206 SF GARAGE AREA - 864 SF 1 of _ IIII III IIIIII— IIIIIIIII ❑LAUNDRY POWDER D STUDY 3OCOATS o 1 N O T E S ELEVAT ENTRY 12'-6O " I O = rn 1 — BUNK ROOM FAMILY ROOM I 1 I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE O A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 0 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 OO GUEST BEDROOM I Nib 12'-4" King rf� � — M IIL I I m I I� BEDROOM 3 I IL LJ— LI_ _ _ J The Hahn 17'-1" Residence L_ 4644 North Point Q a Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado PATIO PATIO Lower Floor Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 DATE: Al. I June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 3�16" = 1i0n SHEET OF _ ©2024 RALArchitects, Inc. ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 O 04 c � s M ' ` V N Ma) C: a 00 a, a 2 _ -0 ��- HOT TUB o-0 V � a t -------- PATIO Q� • o O — — — — — — — — — �— M E • � C N I I c CV MASTER CLOSET I ° 10 a • a° I o a �I T o MASTER BATH — — — V L2d I . —J------ —� a a o �T Q w King I I PATIO I I I I PATIO D STRUCTURAL II II II I IL II II II I � DECK MASTER BEDROOM O STUDY 1 co STUDY 2 POWDER LANDSCAPE FLOOR AREA - 2813 SF DINING ROOM SITTING ROOM NOTES ELEVATOR PANTRY I I O KITCHEN I GRILL F - GREAT ROOMLl — I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE �LZ A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 FILrlp - — —� �T� DECK COVERED DECK The Hahn ,� ,� Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Main Floor Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 DATE: A1.2 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 3�16�� = 1�0�� SHEET OF _ ©2024 RAL Architects, Inc. ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 O 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M p O • , U O 2 _ —0 p-0 49 m ;_ • C a% C V M 10 C L 00 o a w LO ` O O V a L m0 Q O w STRUCTURAL O� I LANDSCAPE FLOOR AREA - 664 SF I RR d King NOTES DECK BEDROOM 2 I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Upper Floor Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 A1.3 DATE: June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 3/16i = 1'0 SHEET OF _ ©2024 RALArchifects, Inc. ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT NF= CV O CV C � S L 2' 0" 2' 0" m � O • a, o t � 0-0 0 N V ri t ;_ • � C N C V C14 10 2'-0" 2' 0° 00 O 4 cc)Q) s x CA L a 4: 2 m Q O� aw 2' 0" STRUCTURAL 0 M 4 N N LANDSCAPE 1.375:12 N NOTES N TT 1.375:12 0 I S S U E S N N N NO. DESCRIPTION DATE N A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 0 M CV DECK 7 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point T T,4 Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Roof Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 DATE: Al.,4 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral ©202d RAL ArchitectsSCALE: 3/16" = 1,01, SHEET OF _ , Inc. GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION - 8592.0 TOP OF RIDGE ELE\ ELE\ ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT NF CV O CV C � S L o t � 0-0 ;_ • � C N C N V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V o ca 0 Q o� C�:w ISTRUCTURAL I ----------------- 0 LANDSCAPE I 0 NOTES I IALT SHINGLES kL ROOFING 'OOD FASCIA )RIZONTAL WOOD SIDING =TAL REVEAL TRIM CO JE VENEER kL RAILING AINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW/DOOR )D BEAM/COLUMN ,SED STEEL BEAM _UPPER FLOOR ____— I S S U E S ELEVATION 8619.0 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 _ MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION - 8606.0 ise Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION - 8594.0 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations 23-348 DATE: A2.1 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral Inc. SCALE: 3/16ii = 1 0" SHEET OF - RAL ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials PROPOSED GLASS CEILING - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEVATION8635.0 - — North Elevation Scale: 1 /4" = V-0" UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION 8619.0 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION - 8606.0 - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED GLASS CEILING ELEVATION 8635.0 East Elevation UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION 8619.0 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION - 8606.0 LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION - 8594.0 ARCHITECT NF CV a CV C � S L _ o a, �. t 0-0 ;_ • � C 4% C Cv V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V m Q z5 O� aw ISTRUCTURAL I LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 23-348 DATE: June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral RAL Architects, Inc. I SCALE: 3/16 " _ 1'0 " A2.2 SHEET OF : _ ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials TOP OFEAVE ELEVATION — _ MAIP ELEVATION D2West Elevation - Garage Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - -PROPOSED GLASS CEILING -- ELEVATION 8635.0 ARCHITECT I. E c C4 o 04 � s 'o ` V a) I` M p O � • , a U i 2 0-0 49 m ;_ • � C N C V M a10 00 o a LO ` O O V a a w 93.: ISTRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 The Hahn Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations West Elevation - Main House Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" RAL 23-348 DATE: June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral Inc. u _ SCALE: 3/16 1 '0 n A2.3 SHEET OF : ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 O 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M C: a, �. o t _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • � C N C V M ,o CL 00 o w LO ` a O O L m0 a Q O w STRUCTURAL O O ° MECHANICAL L A N D S C A P E O I I I I I I I King rl ELE OR LAUNDRY I I I o _ NOTES BEDROOM 3 I I I I I LINEN LINEN — — — — — OI I I I I BEDROOM 5 ---- BUNKS o DO FAMILY ROOM STUDY O I S S U E S GAME ROOM BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 2 I � m � m NO. DESCRIPTION DATE LL LL A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 q�7 1�7 q�7 .34 PATIO FLOOR AREA - 2851 SF Private Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Lower Floor Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 DATE: A1.1 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: SHEET OF _ ©2024 RAL Architects, Inc. 1 �4ii = 1101, ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT I. E C4 O 04 c � s M ' ` V N a)M C: a, �. o t _ —0 o -0 49 m ;_ • � C N C V M ,o CL 00 o w LO ` a O O L m0 a Q O w STRUCTURAL ° Do -,J1l -,J1l ��1l LANDSCAPE I I POWDER PATIO � I I OI I PANTRY I I I I � ELE OR I I O• I I MASTER BATH J o— — — — — — — — — — — MASTER CLOSET N O T E S L II I I I —COATS — KITCHEN 00 I I _ OEQ ill II MUD ROOM LF O GREAT ROOM II II II GARAGE II II WINE II Dining Table 3'6" x 8'0" Cl II SITTING ROOM O I S S U E S I II CLOSET NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DINING ROOM I A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 C�7 CT'f 7 DECK FLOOR AREA - 2091 SF GARAGE AREA - 760 SF L Private Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Upper Floor Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 DATE: A1.2 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: SHEET OF _ ©2024 RAL Architects, Inc. 1 �4ii = 1101, ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ARCHITECT NF= CV O CV C � S L o t � 0-0 ;_ • � C N C V N 10 00 m 0 a LO O 0 V m0 Q o� C�:w STRUCTURAL 2' 0 9L 3'-0" '-21 11'-9" 2" 3'-011 0 CV O C'V LANDSCAPE CN r— CV 0 CV NOTES 2:12 CRICKET CN CN CV CN 2 2:12 v CV r— CV CN CV I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE O A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 o LLI O QR I I CV CV 2,_ou 2'-0" El El CP Private Residence 3'-0" 4'-0" 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Roof Plan PROJECT NO.: 23-348 A1.3 DATE: June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 11411 = 11011 SHEET OF _ ©202d RAL ArchitectsI , nc. ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ---------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSED GLASS CEILING ELEVATION 8608.00 TOP OF EAVE __ ELEVATION 8601.85 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8587.75 _ GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 8587.25 ------ —A ---------------------- LOWER FLOOR - - A ASPHALT SHINGLES ELEVATION 8575.75 B METAL ROOFING C 2X WOOD FASCIA D 8" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING E 1" METAL REVEAL TRIM E a s t Elevation F STUCCO 2 G STONE VENEER Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" H METAL RAILING J ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW/DOOR K WOOD BEAM/COLUMN L EXPOSED STEEL BEAM PROPOSED GLASS CEILING -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - — - — - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - - ELEVATION8608.00 -- _—_TOP OF ELEVATION & South Elevation _—_TOP OF EAVE ___ ELEVATION 8604.36 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8587.75 _ GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 8587.25 _ LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION 8575.75 ARCHITECT N F CV O CV C � S L o t � _ —0 0-0 ;_ • � C N C N V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V m0 Q o� C�:w ISTRUCTURAL I LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 Private Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 23-348 DATE: A2.1 June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral SCALE: 1 /4i1 = 1 ,On SHEET OF RAL Architects, Inc. ATTACHMENT A - UPDATED Application Materials ------------------------------------ PROPOSED GLASS CEILING - ELEVATION 8608.00 West Elevation _ MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 8587.75 _ LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION 8575.75 Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - - - - - - - - - - _PROPOSED GLASS CEILING — ELEVATION 8608.00 DP OF EABE _ LEVATION 8604.52 IAIN FLOOR LEVATION 8587.75 — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - — - - - LOWER FLOOR— - — - — -- ELEVATION 8575.75 North Elevation ARCHITECT N F CV O CV C � S L o t � _ —0 0-0 ;_ • � C N C N V 10 00 m 0 a O 0 r� m V o ca 0 Q o� C�:w ISTRUCTURAL I LANDSCAPE I NOTES I I S S U E S NO. DESCRIPTION DATE A PZC Submittal 03.07.2 B PZC Revisions 06.04.2 Private Residence 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3 Wildridge Avon, Colorado Exterior Building Elevations Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 23-348 DATE: June 4, 2024 DRAWN BY: ral RAL Architects, , Inc. 1/ 4" _ 1 'On A2.2 SHEET OF : _ ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials LOT 51A moL�n w. Bexlne) I LOT 51B I rou FINAL PLAT A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 50, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO tru (Bscsnnax uo. zzssuT) 263.05' 146.41' s IcaLE eu�itm(i) Al _—_ S 06'08'03" E 51.56' \ — ( xEccPnon I 1 xo xzss )nT \ i LOT 50A S 61'29'29" E — 33.54' - I d o: Om \ I\ I LOT 50B I \ 1 \ Ppopsprr u a (CxEAnn et' ,xis pan \ ePo\ m m \ I 1\ 1 •+s\ I i I \ \ \ II " 1 1 ai s� _ccxinrEusevATMiI P n1\ w\ \ \ \ \ � 1 I \ \ nee gags 1 1 — \ zs w as _ Gore Range Surveying, LLC war, coefaxo Moran rose. to Mmmavu Certificate of Dedication and Ownership m.n hym«. pr«.m. mat gaga N.1h F.im uc, a cob.ao rm'u.a Vomit, wmp.ny, b owns in m..Irrq.aat mar prop.rry a.«rls.a..fdlma.: she qa maea remraea D,o e, t eat unaa exepaon number m the mice am I.J. cort' elrx ana a anger, — -I a 18B It -mare t,— nor by Ill—p l.mi biae.. Tmm a Awn, count, a EkaeVb, sat. a tobaeo ana a.m as. tar public uc. the... a mown alit, N, m unjat m is sunemaion m me anim acne cbx ana eeaaaao g coam�, comrem�aa �oocuncntrvumnItn ow aeomrzao limnea lianility company Agana Avon,eoefsza STATE OF I ss cour✓Tv of ) Tn.f .na own .dnowl.ep.a boa. na sm. za io as Iw norm pwm LLe, a CZo b omnm oanilrty aerrpany. wy�.mma,�.ne,hm TRACT I (nowt ar A—) Title Certiflcate nanny cexTy that n naseaaminea the sore t..1 Ienm anm.n upon pmhee li4 mrrpa y, I wtnix a 10, ¢0 \ LOT 48B 23779, (nECErnox xo� szes.1)"cnT ganson AUEn enEmw x 1 � S 81'0256 \ a ccumnE o1AnE exE 136.39 mm) LOT 48A pWs,%'>SL°a... �.P x' \ \ (wLonleeE � n.nn LLB) I a m�BOIE Ts. s4mTMoA w�(OT 4B E SCALE: 1" = 20' oaea th.._awe I, D., o Surveyor's Certificate nanny a.mysnot amawaes.onal Lanaswey1 urenaee anger the co„my m Ea6. sm. acoago a a�m'ie oa, qm.q a iIlIl anaso, cb Alw.. p.rryM m. ana onaar my Nab artymareo�wlage��n enha x* l o p . All monumeme ar. ces q ebyth. Town Certificate Tnic Final Pia W ov.aflm.Town of Awn, Coumy of ELL CobaM malc Ill.oun, Eae.. A qm nym. Tow monNa m%nnarob.xwnao-e.a.�n.ppr.1 otm. f«nme.ipeon.n�.R of - o�;axnr a enmm�nM oerempmem Certificate of Taxes Paid 1, the a 1.9m he,eW tA� a^ryTrea®nneawnt p w mtw.oateathn y Clerk and Recorder's Certificate y ash.ar reoar zoza one.. lul r«ora.e as a ac.0— no. aoa�oo m�a By o.pmy ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials LOT 51 \ I \ \ i� MEN. �.S �—� \ .�E " I \ L \ EE 'ir\\� \ a\ i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ zn\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \% 1— \ INA. N �N - aNssa t ^ ONE PEDE TAL \ LOT 48 (—,ANou L.N.. a•i I LOT 49 I O TRACT I GRAPHIC SCALE tah_ o)n NOTES: 1) DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: 10/10/2023 G. BRACCORDINGL TO T 3)NOT-COLORADOBIAWE•YOU MUST COMMENCE MY LEGAL ACTION BASEDR UPON ANY FO-1 ANY AUTO'R EFE A THE OAT' EAIN THIS SUPVCY SUPON ANITHIN HREE YEARS SHOWN H' T''R 1-1 BE YOU FIRST DISCOVER ESUCH RDETHAN INNNO EVENT, D 4) THE BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ARE PER THE RECORD PLAT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 5) VERIFY CURRENT BUILDING SETBACKS AND RESTRICTIONS WITH THE PROPER GOVERNING AUTHORITY. SAMUEL H. BC OF COLORADO P.L.G. No. 30— GORE"RANGE SURVEYING LLC A4a� i� 0 Q 0 0 u3¢O �17- u� 00 P.., = 0 0 0 p H a C W ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials 0 1 \ Ilr \ A- \III\ \ \ \ \85791S! I I I 1 I 46111A NORTH POW II (\ \ 1\ II\\ \ r � \ O/- ARCHITECT \ \ \GARAGE 8592 \ \ \ \ I STRUCTURAL Ic1011M.FMAM The Hahn lacks wtldridge a n, cdomdo Architectural Site Plan mil ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials O Box 133 RAL ARCHITECTS, INC. EAGLE, CO 816311 PHONE: 970.376.4227 EMAIL: BOBBYL@RALARCH.COM March 7, 2024 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge Avon, CO 81620 Written Narrative AEC request - roof slopes less than 4:12 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard. The proposed design incorporates primary roof slopes of 2:12. Flat roofs are permitted in consistent with the style of the building. A 2:12 roof slope creates a more contemporary roof design consistent with the contemporary design style of the building which meets the same degree of intent for the referenced design standard. 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard. The proposed flatter roof slope meets the intent of the Avon Comprehensive plan to the same degree as a steeper roof slope. One of the goals of the Avon Comprehensive plan states: Design four sided architecture that maximizes solar exposure, protects views, and breaks up building bulk. The flatter shed roofs are directed towards the south to maximize the solar exposure of the wall and windows and to best maximize the views from the property. The proposed plans include a slightly larger overhang on the south end of the shed roof to help with heat gain solar angles in the summer. 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard. The proposed flatter shed roofs create for a lower roof and building height to minimize impact on adjacent properties. 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with specific requirements of this Title. The Wildridge design criteria calls for a lower maximum height restriction for roofs flatter than 4:12 slope. The proposed flatter roof slopes would be held to a maximum height that is 5' less than steeper roof slopes creating a lesser impact on adjacent properties. ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT s 0 STRUCTURAL Pr YP YP 9'P b r LANDSCAPE L � ° I 2.Iz NOTES b I I ry� 2:Iz I I 202 h 11 I S S U E S I t . . . . . . . . YP rN P:1] Prival6 b wad.n<. 4644 rbnh rotor Avon, Cdorado Roof Plan - A1.3 t,...t�. .�.�. ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials O Box 133 RAL ARCHITECTS, INC. EAGLE, CO 816311 PHONE: 970.376.4227 EMAIL: BOBBYL@RALARCH.COM March 7, 2024 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge Avon, CO 81620 Written Narrative This project entails splitting one existing duplex lot into two separate single family residence lots and structures. 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code. The application substantially complies with the purpose of the Avon Development Code. The existing density for the property is maintained falling within the previously contemplated impact on the Town of Avon infrastructure. By splitting the structure into two separate single family residences, the buildings are able to be stepped up the natural sloping terrain of the lot and maintain height and building sizes that are comparable to adjacent properties while maximizing the potential of the subject lot through view capture, building orientation, and drainage patterns. 2. Reserved N/A 3. The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other application adopted plan documents. The existing lot was conceived under the Wildridge PUD. The proposed design does not stray from the original goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and respects the existing criteria placed upon the lot for density and development intensity. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable. The existing lot was conceived under the Wildridge PUD. The proposed design does not stray from the original goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and respects the existing criteria placed upon the lot for density and development intensity. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code. Compliance with applicable Town Code development standards is demonstrated in the submitted documents. Where variances are requested, an Alternative Equivalency Compliance application has been submitted in support. 6. The development can be adequately served by city services. The development falls within allowable density and intensity that was originally used to calculate the entire Wildirdge subdivisions impact on city services. 7. The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community. The size and scale of the proposed development is consistent with the surrounding community as demonstrated on the submitted drawings. ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials PLANT LEGEND oEcouoDSTgee ARCHITECT enxcxeeN mee •� - �t LOT 51 cow - _8 NAn�E xE�Ec�TATaN �-� STRUCTURAL �\ _ _ \ \ - •• \ PLANTLIST -LNOT SOA cow�a+ww� ,r su TWCS III �"YY ,� \ \ \F.. �� r .. rr roruusrxer:uwloFs auAwrvcAsv�N IF ie zs aorta As"nsia+cai�x Au+lra LANDSCAPE AT, .ar�ws.raDknrA T. wesrexN SAcf w swuoN L� X I r \ 1 \ II \ \\ \ \ ,�,,,,. \ \ • \ \—�\u" \ �� PLANT LIST - LOT 50B A cow.ni+w.vE ,r su 7 ME YES ace avAWNDAgrtN Is zs Ugrta o U- I ,urewsnra— NOTES woEV"WMmnne oge�DDDDDgMD�eDrt,oge —ER S—MMKNS—EDWTaAHAur CWN�� IAND SUMMARY -LOT 50A v ��i v�,vv v' I Lwurt-A °r JJ RakoT I .tvs — IDS T 111EA " w J oeI I.I ID,,ae I LAND SUMMARY -LOT SOB LLIT 1EA 16a,i ezocor kor LOT 48 I S S U E S wJJoswEeaEA v;oigiJI n.IaoE kor aA cc and J Oil I 150�L_AAIED 1 �.�1IR.-ATED-A LOT 49 BUILDING HEIGHT I� HIA s D wA SSTORAGE o ssn.s m.r Prrvade a.ad.nm 4644 Nw�A aoior W •N. ] :Bridge Avon, GJ..d. Overall Site Plan and Notes ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT 4 � € I STRUCTURAL A \ LANDSCAPE O 1�_ / \ \ \ '< \\ \� j� I \ \�_ _ I NOTES /\ LOT 30 \ I S S U E S I, SF10.440 R I \ db t`4-s NORTH / \ 4644-A�NOItTH POIM \ \ \ \ \ _ _ — _ — �" , ` !w. The H.hn 4644 ru.n v°m Wes,&xk3 LOT 48 Architectural Site Plan ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials 17 1 \ \ I \� C3� �� II A1— V', � � v✓ ��. �' vv �A \vv vv� �v vI - I vv vv�-- � � � w vi LOT 48 i ARCHITECT Y TE E<ti'iINUMM The Hahn e..1— <6<dN Poi w ,w.k3 a. .opdo Landscape Plan ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT s caacE ° w e STRUCTURAL LJvan aaw FLOOR AREA - 2582 SF MECHANICAL AREA - 206 SF --- aam I x�uH[Ai LANDSCAPE GARAGE AREA -8" SF mw ---- uuonr I I NOTES II ly I II I I I I I I emr II I II y I IIIIIIIII 10�*IIII II IIIIIIIII f —7 m eux caom 1 � � ❑ 1 I S S U E S vresa,uxd R I I I I I O The Hahn Raeid.nre -4 runti vom� W 'A,&xkJ wk,Jg. Awn, GJomdo Lower Floor Plan �Al.1 ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT �i 0 r rniw xmne € I I m M.srtaeAm 1-41-------� ---- °p I rAm j vAiro �yi li �i II ryP I STRUCTURAL II II II I II II II I a« »�sne emwoM LANDSCAPE FLOOR AREA - 2813 SF ur,wwamn NOTES i o 0 a-- ❑ I � =i � I S S U E S iyh II ncsa,uxd I I I I I I I I rca I amemxcK I I I n� nti n� The Hahn a maa W50,&,w xk3 L J wk,Jge Avon, GJomdo Main Floor Plan mA1.2 ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT s 0 STRUCTURAL 0 LANDSCAPE FLOOR AREA 664 SF OooO 4 �« a NOTES I S S U E S vres�wi The Hahn e..1— ma4r —, W Se, w.k J wW.Ht. Avan, Cdom do Upper Floor Plan A1.3 ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials --- — - - - -_ _—_—_—_—_--- ___ ELEVATION 8619.0 ARCHITECT �i 0V) ; STRUCTURAL - - ELEVATION�8606.0 LANDSCAPE --------- _ -__ -_ __ -_ __ -_ _ --___ _LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION-8594.0—_—___-___ GARAGE FLOOR —EIEMTUN 8592.0 ......................................... South Elevation —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—__ Garage NOTES TOPOFRIDGE - ELEVATION 86 .8 TOPOFRIDGE ELEVATKNJ 8M.2 - - A ASPHALT SHINGLES B MUM ROOFING OAIM IF C ]%WOOD FASCIA D 8' HORIZO TA WOODSIUM E 1' METAL REVEAL TRIM F SWCCO G STONE VENEER H METMRAIV 1 AE MCLADWOODWLNDOW/DOOR K WOODBEAM/COWMN l EXIOSED STEEL BEAM C ____UPPER FLOOR I S S U E S L �❑❑❑❑❑ B O EIEVAIgN8619.0 o�w PKSbaM i1 MMNFLOORThe ELEVATION 8606.0 L Hahn R eld nn 4644 Plonti Pour W 60, Blxk J Awn, OJomdo Exterior Building ---- — OWERFOOR---- EIEVAIgN 859d.0 Elevations n South Elevation -Main House &dA2.1 i sale: ,/a" _ ,._o.. .• ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT t v ❑ ❑ N - ---------- - - - - JLI 61-Ii-L] UR RFMRELEV MN 8619.0 STRUCTURAL —_—_—_—_11 ELEVAWN 8606.0 LANDSCAPE n North Elevation NOTES ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I S S U E S UPEER BOOR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ MVAMN8619.0 _ RR[sbaM ❑ ❑ The Hahn "N FLOOR Raeibnn _E"AWN-8606.0- _- 464d NwM1 Pour W 'A,&xkJ ❑ ❑ wU.Jge ❑ ❑ Awn. GU Exterioio r Building Elevations LOWER FLOOR -__ - ELEVATI11-8591.0 n East Elevation A2 2 ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials —_ TOPOFEAVE_________________ ELEVAWN 8622.8 ARCHITECT �i a� 10 "a -- --N .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ L o- E APCN-8606.0 STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE n West Elevation - Garage o e: 17 -1-0- NOTES - - - - - - - - - - - - TOPOFEN8 -- EIEVAIgN 8622.3 UPPER ROOR EU:VAIgN8619.0 I S S U E S Presv.�wi MAIN BOOR__ 0 ❑ ❑ The Hahn P.ed.nn 4644 NwM1 Form —'N.kT �U.Jge Awn, GUomdo LOWER ROOR EMVAMN 8594.0_ — -- — -- Exterior ------------- — —----------------------- Building Elevations I 1 I West Elevation - Main House A2.3 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" .. ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT s 0 STRUCTURAL �I ----� LANDSCAPE O . OLINEN MECHANIUl I I I IOWDER I �� I hb nkvl WINE LAUNDRY I I I I WNK ROOM 1 OARAOR NOTES MUD NOOM FAMILY ROOM I I A 141) I I �Y ❑ �L� tiLi I S S U E S ® I REpt 3 . R®ROOM4 FLOOR AREA-2213 SF-T vxsenn.l GARAGE AREA. 760SF I I I I RAW l I I L1� I I ❑ ❑ Private wad., -4 rbnh rotor W 50,&zk3 wUndge Avon, GUorado Lower Floor Plan �Al.1 t,4..t�. .�.�. ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT s 0 STRUCTURAL PATIO Q° O LANDSCAPE -- O O------� MDY _____ PANTRY REgt 2 RTfc r O O O NOTES dosEr MASTER c L ; OO 1 LL 000 I MASTER BATH I I NO I I GREAT ROOM 1 o��Rmw I MASTER BEDROOM DECK I I I gNING ROOM SRTING ROOM I $ $ LI E $ I I 1 I FLOOR AREA - 2758 SF Pres�a,md I I I I I i I I II I I II I I I I I K I I I II I I I II I I I "Y 411idi I I I I Privade ____________________________J1___� .44 W Point W.,& O A.m,Cd wW.2 orado Upper Floor Plan A1.2 ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT t v �; TOPOFEAVE __—_ H ELEVATON 8606.E V - �� DW STRUCTURAL -________ _ ___ __ hL11N FLOOR_____ _ _ _ _ ELEVATION 851.0 LANDSCAPE GARAGE ROOR ELEVATION 8W.0 OWER BOOR ELEVAT0485 .0_ _ A ASPHALT SHINGIES B METALROOFING NOTES C l%WOOD FASCIA II�� ��. 1 D B'MORI=ONT V=DSINNG I 1 East Elevation E I' METAL REVEAL TRIM F SIUCCO L Scale: 1/4• = 1'-D• G STONE VENEER H METAL RAI RANG , ALUMINUMCIADVO DWINDOW/DOOR K WOOD BEAM/... L E EDSTEELBEAM _ TOP OF EAVE EIEVAWN 8608.5 TOP OF EAVE ELEVATION 8W7.7 K � © ❑❑❑ OO I S S U E S 1E �O O � Prc Sbdwl E O -___ -_ - -_ _ ______-___--_—_—_ MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 85 1.0 o DODO 00 Privale Q 4644W Point k^dee Avon, OJorado ELEVATIONR 8W.0 LOWERFLOOR Exterior __ REVATION 85P9.0 Building Elevations n South Elevation Scale: 1/4• _ ,•-D• A2.1 ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ARCHITECT t < o STRUCTURAL _ MNN BOOR MVAWN 8591.0 _— LANDSCAPE _________________—_—_—_—____ _____—_ - LOWER ROOR __ EIEVAlION 85]9.0 _— NOTES nWest Elevation s�me: ,i4• - , -o• I S S U E S "N FLOOR ELEMMN 8591.0 Privcde wad., A644 rbnh rotor W 50,&zk3 wk,dge Avon, GJorado Exterior LOWER ROOR REVAWN 85]9.0 Building n North Elevation Elevations s�me: ,�4• - , -o• hm„ A A2.2 :1 7�W -11 - ii7, 11 �l I Alto dial M"� alp -0 MIN Wit -Aldo v aii. ' PON IN 4 1 di low W u11 1 fill MEW ° a iEp if? Im A 411,1" i ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials ROOF SHINGLES TIMBERLINE HD.,,,s WEATHERED WOOD r Ygg WOOD SIDING/TRIM NEW AGE RUSTIC PALISADE rc{ itects inc Architecture• Planning *Interior Design f METAL ROOF DREXEL METAL COLOR - DARK BRONZE FASCIA/TIMBERS BENJAMIN MOORE ARBORCOAT COLOR - BLACK (SEMI -SOLID) STUCCO COLOR - SW 91S4 PERLE NOIR FLASHING/METAL ACCENTS STONE ASHLAR - SUNSET 4644 North Point Lot 50, Block 3, Wildridge Avon, Colorado Hinkley Silo 8"H Black Cylindrical LED Outdoor Wall Light - #617D0 I Lamps Plus 4110/24, 9:28AM ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials LAMPS PLUS® The Nation's Largest Lighting Retailer 1*► / Outdoor Lighting / Dark Sky / Style # 617DO Hinkley Silo 8"H Black Cylindrical LED Outdoor Wall Light 1 Review $149-00 Pay in 4 interest -free payments of $37.25 with PayPal. Learn more Open Box Available FREE SHIPPING & FREE RETURNS* I Price Matching Policy In Stock — Ships in 1 to 2 Days ADD TO CART Ci SAVE '% Need help? Call 800-782-1967 or LIVE CHAT -r ® DESIGN CHAT VIEW IN YOUR ROOM Product Details •*' Dark Sky a LED https://www.lampsplus.com/products/hinkley-silo-8-inchh-black-cylindrical-led-outdoor-wall-light_617dO.htmI Page 1 of 5 Hinkley Silo 8"H Black Cylindrical LED Outdoor Wall Light - #617D0 I Lamps Plus 4/10/24, 9:28 AM ATTACHMENT B - ORIGINAL Application Materials Add soft lighting to a patio or balcony with this modern, black, energy- 8" high x 4 1/2" wide. Extends 5 3/4" efficient LED outdoor wall light. from the wall. Backplate is 4 3/4" high x 4 1/2" wide. Distance from the top of the Additional Info: fixture to outlet is 4". Weighs 1.3 lbs. The perfect addition to modern coastal exterior decor, the sleek cylindrical design of this modern LED outdoor ceiling light blends simple modern style and practicality. From Hinkley and the Silo collection, it is built to stand up to harsh climates while maintaining its bold black finish. Silo's finish is resistant to rust and corrosion with a 5- year warranty. HINKLEY [] 19 ENERGY cmawr Shop all Hinkley_ Specifications Product Attributes Finish Black Style Contemporary Brand Hinkley • Includes one dimmable 6.5 watt GU10 base LED bulb: 500 lumen light output, comparable to a 50 watt incandescent. 3000K color temperature. 80 CRI. • Modern cylindrical energy -efficient LED outdoor wall light from the Silo collection by Hinkley. • Black finish over composite _— construction. Etched lens glass. • Can only be installed with lights pointing down. • Dimmable with a CL type dimmer (SSL7A). LED averages 25,000 hours at 3 hours per day. • Voltage 120V. • Mounting hardware is hidden on the back plate to ensure a clean silhouette. • Suitable for use in both interior and outdoor spaces. • JA8, Title 24, Dark Sky compliant. California Prop 65 Warning. Technical Specifications Height 8.00 inches Width 4.50 inches Weight 1.30 pounds https://www.lampsplus.com/products/hinkley-silo-8-inchh-black-cylindrical-led-outdoor-wall-light_617dO.htmI Page 2 of 5 ATTACHMENT C - Public Comment for PZC From: Matt Pielsticker To: ian.livergood Cc: Max Morgan; Bobby Ladd Subject: RE: 4644 north pt Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2024 10:56:06 AM Hi Jan, Thank you for your comments on the North Point applications. I have Max Morgan and Bobby Ladd copied here. Max is the Planner handling the application, and Bobby is the Applicant. The next Public Hearing before PZC is scheduled for next Monday evening at 5:30pm. In lieu of attending, your written comments will be provided in the public record moving forward. Regards, Matt From: jan.livergood <jan.livergood@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2024 9:12 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Subject: 4644 north pt Hi Matt need to express my concern pertaining to lot#50. Block 3. On North Pt. Wildriidge. I know ur busy but I am very upset about the proposal on said lot. I've been on this street since 1989. When I built my house there was strict bylaws to follow. What happened to those. Aren't they recorded by the county. I understand the lot has beeb split. But each lot should have some height and square footage restrictions. Having 2 homes on one lot that are 6000 sq ft is so huge and dosen't fit the landscape that has been enjoyed over the years. Please let me k ow how I can voice my concern. In the past P& Z has tried to take care of view corridors of surrounding homes. This monstrous housing is going to be too big for everyone up here. Please tell developers to cut down this drawing. More appropriate size for this community would be 3000 to 4000 sq ft. Sincerely. Avery concerned citizen of wildriidge. Jan livergood 970.30.7163 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone ATTACHMENT C - Public Comment for PZC From: Matt Pielsticker To: Colin Meiring Cc: Nina Williams; Council Everyone Group Subject: RE: 4644 lot split proposal Date: Thursday, May 16, 2024 4:39:13 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona Colin, Thank you for your comments. The Planning and Zoning Commissioners and Town Council members are unable to meet with you because of the quasi-judicial nature of this application. All discussions will take place in the Avon Council chambers in the Public Hearing format. Your email will become part of the written record for this application moving forward. Again, thank you for the message, and see you on June 10th Feel free to reach out to me directly at any time if you have questions. Kind regards, Matt Matt Pielsticker, AICP Community Development Director 970.748.4413 mattQavon.org Avon From: Colin Meiring <colinmeiring@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 3:54 PM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; Council Everyone Group <council@avon.org> Subject: 4644 lot split proposal Dear Matt & Council members My name is Colin Meiring Live at 4660 North Point duplex A I attended the Town planning meeting on Monday, May 13th 2024 to simply find out more about the proposed lot 50 split adjacent to my house. my house is positioned on lot 51. I went to the meeting to ask questions. I spoke, and opposed the lot split as I'm alarmed at the scale, footprint and size of the proposal as well as the observation that the the east side / ATTACHMENT C - Public Comment for PZC upper home residence has a `vertical appendage' a TOWER on the third floor that looks awkward and inappropriate from every vantage point. I doubt that this element meets the height restriction. This 3rd-floor element is not integrated into the architectural character of the rest of the proposed building and it looks like an added element based on greed. My other concern is that this proposed development goes all the way up to USFS 779 road which is concerning because of all the service berry/ Sage brush clearing and instability to the soil erosion on such a steep slope as well as the fact that the USFS 779 road has a lot of summer traffic and cigarette butts that get thrown.( I pick these up on a weekly basis). These cigarettes can easily start a structure fire if the dwelling is so close to the road. Obviously my main concern is my view corridor which unfortunately will be totally blocked if these two large homes are approved for development. I know there will always be a percentage of view loss with construction & development, but this gigantic proposal seems so out of character for the Wildridge neighborhood. I'm thankful that the planning commission voted on a continuance for this decision until Monday June 10th. I will be at that meeting to once again to voice my concerns and opposition to the lot split. I would like to see this stay as a duplex lot. I'm aware that a precedence has been set with previous lot splits in Avon and especially in Wildridge, but each and every one of the lot splits in question have homes that are in scale with the lot size. They are smaller homes. The proposal attached shows two very large homes. Each home is the size of an entire duplex home. I invite anyone from the planning commission or town council to please come up and meet with me so that we can do a site walk through. I think it's so important to see the plot perspective from where I live. This decision will be permanent and everlasting. Thank you for your time. ATTACHMENT C - Public Comment for PZC 4644-North-Point PDF Document - 7.3 MB W C A RESUBDIVISIDN OFFLDT Sp, RIDCR S, WIIDRIDGE ATTACHMENT C - Public Comment for PZC From: Nicholas Borelli To: Matt Pielsticker; Max Morgan Subject: Local Support For Lot 50 Project Date: Thursday, June 6, 2024 12:02:16 PM Dear Mr. Matt Pielsticker and Mr. Max Morgan, We are writing about the Lot 50 project on North Point Road. We are homeowners at 4725 Wildridge Road, across the street and one property over from the lot. We are friends with the buyers of one of the proposed sub -divisions. They currently have a home at 4700 Wildridge Road #A, and have been good neighbors who are an asset to Wildridge. People like the Halms are one of the reasons we chose to live in Wildridge as opposed to a place like Arrowhead; there is a much more neighborly culture here. For example, when our oven stopped working, they didn't think twice about telling us to come over and use theirs. They are wonderful people, and we hope that they are able to stay in the neighborhood, while having a house that fits their needs. We've reviewed the plans and find them to be architecturally appropriate for the neighborhood. We think that dividing the lot into two with single family homes is preferable to one large multi -family unit. Additionally, we feel the size of the structures are in line with other structures nearby. Several years ago, a nearby lot was subdivided near us in Wildridge; today the properties of 4290 Wildridge Road and 4411 Wildridge Road stand there. They have not changed the characteristic of the neighborhood. We don't see how this project is any different. In fact, these new construction homes help give the neighborhood a higher end feel, and ultimately positively impact home values here in Wildridge. For those reasons, we are in full support of the Lot 50 project. Kind Regards, Nicholas Borelli & Ronald Warren ATTACHMENT C - Public Comment for PZC From: Jackie Breeden To: Matt Pielsticker; Max Moraan Cc: Caryl (Jeff) Hahn; Jeff (Caryl) Hahn; Jason Breeden Subject: Public Comment for Avon Planning Board Date: Friday, June 7, 2024 8:29:58 AM Members of the Avon Planning Board We are writing to you in support of the Lot 50 project in Wildridge on North Point Road. We are homeowners at 4730 Wildridge Road, East Unit, and share the south border of Lot 50 with the buyers, Jeff and Caryl Hahn. We have reviewed their plans for dividing Lot 50 and we support the proposed development of Lot 50 with two homesites. It is our strong opinion that the plans for constructing two separate homes on Lot 50 is both in keeping with the aesthetic of the neighborhood and the necessary orientation of the homes to maximize lot size for each dwelling. The associated lot sizes are consistent with homesites in the neighborhood. We also believe that dividing the lot into two single-family houses is more advantageous to the surrounding homeowners as it reduces the potential for one larger duplex structure to obstruct neighboring views. Furthermore, the plans depict two homes which are similar in size to other structures currently in the neighborhood. The buyers of Lot 50, the Hahn Family, are current neighbors of ours and have lived in Wildridge for 10 years. We know them to be responsible and respectful neighbors who love the area and want to provide for the future of their family. We recommend the Avon Planning Board approve their request and we can be reached at teambreeden@yahoo.com should need additional input to support the Hahn's request. Respectfully, Jason and Jacqueline Breeden JB Sent from my iPad AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 13, 2024 Avon 100 MIKAELA WAY - AVON COUNCIL CHAMBERS �, o , r, P. u , „ 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL (CHAIRPERSON) MEETING COMMENCED AT 5:30PM. A ROLLCALL WAS TAKEN, AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS KEVIN HYATT, BILL GLANER, OLIVIA COOK AND NEW COMMISSIONERS NICOLE MURAD AND BRIAN SIPES WERE PRESENT. ALSO PRESENT WERE TOWN MANAGER ERIC HEIL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER JENA SKINNER, AICP, PLANNER II MAX MORGAN, AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR, EMIY BLOCK. PROPERTY AND BUSINESS OWNERS, MARISA AND MERRILL LAHMAN REPRESENTING WALKING THE DOG WERE PRESENT AS APPLICANTS FOR SRU24001. PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT BOBBY LADD, AND DEVELOPER SEAN REYNOLDS WERE PRESENT AS APPLICANTS FOR PUD24002, MJR24003, AEC24002, PUD24001, MJR24002, & AEC24001. COMMISSIONERS BRAD CHRISTIANSON AND ANTHONY SEKINGER WERE NOT IN ATTENDANCE. KEVIN HYATT SERVED AS PZC CHAIRPERSON, IN COMMISSIONER SEKINGER'S ABSENCE. 2. SWEARING IN OF NEW COMMISSION MEMBERS ACTION: NEW COMMISSIONERS NICOLE MURAD AND BRIAN SIPES WERE SWORN IN BY DEPUTY TOWN CLERK BRENDA TORRES. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ACTION: COMMISSIONER GLANER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. COMMISSIONER SIPES SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. 4. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS COMMISSIONER SIPES SHARED THAT HE RECEIVED AN EMAIL ON MAY 6, 2024 CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR 2332 FOX LANE FROM AN AVON RESIDENT. IN A REPLY EMAIL TO THE RESIDENT SHARED WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER, AICP, COMMISSIONER SIPES EXPRESSED THAT HE IS "SNOT AT LIBERTY TO DISCUSS ACTIVE APPLICATIONS", WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BY THE DIRECTOR TO BE THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE. THE PZC COMMISSIONERS MADE NO FURTHER COMMENT ON THIS DISCLOSURE. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1. SRU24001 WALKIN' THE DOG BUSINESS OPERATION - MAX MORGAN, PLANNER 11 PUBLIC COMMENT: 1. THE TOWN RECEIVED PUBLIC COMMENT VIA EMAIL FROM PAUL JARDIS, PRESIDENT OF THE METCALF COMMERCIAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE BOARD, ON APRIL 18, 2024 IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED APRIL 22, 2024 PUBLIC HEARING FOR SRU24001, WHICH WAS CONTINUED TO MAY 13, 2024 IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICATION TO BE PROPERLY NOTICED. IN THE EMAIL, PAUL JARDIS REQUESTED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE "DELAYED", OR IF NOT DELAY, DENIED. THIS EMAIL FROM PAUL JARDIS WAS INCLUDED IN THE PZC PACKET AS PART OF THE SRU24001 APPLICATION. PAUL JARDIS SENT A SECOND EMAIL ON MAY 13, 2024 AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE METCALF COMMERCIAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE BOARD, "RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THAT THIS REQUEST FOR AN EXPANDED SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT BE DENIED." THIS EMAIL WAS RECEIVED IN TIME TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE PZC PACKET PUBLISHED ON MAY 10, 2024 HOWEVER, STAFF DISTRIBUTED A PRINTED VERSION OF THE EMAIL TO PZC COMMISSIONERS, AND MADE THE SAME PRINTED COPY AVAILABLE TO THOSE IN ATTENDANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 13, 2024. 2. THE TOWN RECEIVED AN EMAIL FROM SEAN REYNOLDS (5032 WILDRIDGE RD E #A) EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR APPROVAL OF SRU24001 ON APRIL 19, 2024. 3. DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, WILL CUMMINGS (EAGLE-VAIL) SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR SRU24001 4. DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANNE "ANNIE" DEWATERS (2421 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP A) SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR SRU24001 ACTION: COMMISSIONER GLANER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE SRU24001 WITH THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FROM STAFF, INCLUDING ONE REVISION TO RECOMMENDED CONDITION #1, TO REPLACE THE WORD "MAY" FOR "SHALL". THE UPDATED CONDITION READS "THE PERMIT IS VALID FOR TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS; AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION, THE HOLDER OF THE SPECIAL REVIEW USE APPROVAL SHALL APPLY FOR A REVIEW HEARING BEFORE THE PZC." COMMISSIONER COOK SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED 4-1. COMMISSIONER SIPES REPRESENTED THE DISSENTING VOTE. 5.2. PUD24001 I MJR24002 I AEC24001 NEW RESIDENCE 4644 NORTH POINT- MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II STAFF INTRODUCED THE APPLICATION, AND THE APPLICANT GAVE A PRESENTATION AND ANSWERED QUESTIONS FROM THE PZC AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC COMMENT: 1. DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, CHAD HOLLEMAN (2365 FOX LANE) ASKED A QUESTION CONCERNING POTENTIAL, ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. 2. ROBERT PFAFF (2345 FOX LANE B) ADDRESSED THE COMMISSION AND STAFF TO INDICATE OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. COMMISSIONER SIPES CLARIFIED THAT THIS WAS THE PUBLIC'S OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT QUESTIONS TO STAFF CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT 4644 NORTH POINT, BUT THE COMMENTS ARE NOTED. 3. MARY ISOM (2421 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP B) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 4. COLIN MEIRING (4660 NORTH POINT A) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. ACTION: COMMISSIONER SIPES MADE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE APPLICATION FOR PUD24002 TO THE ,TUNE 10, 2024 PZC MEETING IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO SEEK COUNSEL RELATED TO POTENTIAL DISTURBANCE IN THE NON -DEVELOPABLE AREA ON THE LOT. COMMISSIONER GLANER SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. THIS ACTION EFFECTIVELY TABLED THE PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO MJR24002 AND AEC24001. 5.3. PUD240021 MJR240031 AEC24002 NEW RESIDENCE 2332 FOX LANE- MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II STAFF INTRODUCED THE APPLICATION, AND THE APPLICANT GAVE A PRESENTATION AND ANSWERED QUESTIONS FROM THE PZC AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC COMMENT: 1. ROBIN USATCH (2345 FOX LANE A) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 2. JODY ETTERS (2413 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP A) PRESENTED A HAND-OUT TO THE PZC, STAFF AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, AND ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 3. PEPPER ETTERS (2413 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP A), ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 4. DANIELA DEMEILLAC (2395 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO COMMENT ON DEVELOPMENT IN WILDRIDGE AND THE PZC. 5. MATT GARNSEY (2101 OLD TRAIL ROAD C) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS SUPPORT TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 6. MIKE CHADWELL (2413 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP B) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 7. ANN MARIE CHADWELL (2413 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP B) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 8. BOB ISOM (2421 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP B) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 9. JULIE OZOG (2323 FOX LANE) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 10. ANNE "ANNIE" DEWATERS (2421 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP A) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. 11. ANN MARIE CHADWELL REAPPROACHED THE PODIUM AND ADDRESSED THE PZC TO RE -AFFIRM OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS.." 12. MARY ISOM (2421 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP B) ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS.. 13. PEPPER ETTERS (2413 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP A) RE -ADDRESSED THE PZC TO EXPRESS OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. TOWN MANAGER ERIC HEIL REMINDED STAFF, THE COMMISSION AND THE MEETING ATTENDEES THAT THEY SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES OF PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY NEW PUBLIC COMMENTS. NO NEW PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE PRESENTED. COMMISSIONERS SHARED COMMENTS ON THE APPLICATION. ACTION 1: COMMISSIONER GLANER MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION PUD24002 AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, INCLUDING CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. COMMISSIONER SIPES SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. ACTION 2: COMMISSIONER SIPES MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR AEC24001 AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, WITH NO CONDITIONS. COMMISSIONER GLANER SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 5-0. ACTION 3: COMMISSIONER SIPES MADE A MOTION TO TABLE APPLICATION MJR24003 "TO HAVE THE APPLICANT REVISIT THE OVERALL SITE DISTURBANCE IN RESPECT TO SETBACK -TO -SETBACK DISTURBANCE ON THE UPHILL PORTION OF THE LOT, AND LOOKING AT THE MASSING THAT IS RESULTING." COMMISSIONER MURAD SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-1, WITH COMMISSIONER GLANER REPRESENTING THE DISSENTING VOTE. 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1. APRIL 22, 2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 5.2. RECORD OF DECISION - TMP24003 DIVAS TRAILERS CONSTRUCTION STAGING -MAX MORGAN, PLANNER II 5.3. RECORD OF DECISION - MNR23003I AEC24003 EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT FENCE IN WILDRIDGE - MAX MORGAN, PLANNER 11 5.4. RECORD OF DECISION - REZ24001 EAST AVON REZONING - JENA SKINNER, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER ACTION: COMMISSIONER GLANER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COMMISSIONER COOK SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. FUTURE MEETINGS 6.1. MAY 27, 2024 -NO MEETING- MEMORIAL DAY 6.2. JUNE 10, 2024 (MONDAY- WITH PZC TRAINING 7. STAFF UPDATES 7.1. JUNE 10 JOINT DDA I PZC MEETING -SUBAREA PLANS 7.2. EVSE COHORT 8. ADJOURN ACTION: COMMISSIONER HYATT ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 8:28PM. THESE MEETING MINUTES ARE ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETING. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE COMPREHENSIVE OR TO INCLUDE EACH STATEMENT, PERSON SPEAKING OR TO PORTRAY WITH COMPLETE ACCURACY. THE MOST ACCURATE RECORDS OF THE MEETING ARE THE AUDIO RECORDING OF THE MEETING, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE BY SUBMITTING A PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST. APPROVED: x CHAIRPERSON ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A: ETTERS HANDOUT RELATED TO PUD24002 / MJR24003 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 12 May, 2024 To the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council: As Avon Property owners and Neighbors to the proposed development of 2332 Fox Lane, the below signed are united in our opposition to the current application for a Minor Subdivision and Lot Split Amendment for Lot 66, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision (2332 Fox Lane). As proposed, the Lot Split and corresponding development should be rejected for the following three reasons. First. it contradicts the guidelines set forth in the Town of Avon Home Rule Charter ("Town Charter"). Second, it ignores the policies and goals set forth by the Town of Avon in the Comprehensive Plan (updated in 2024) ("Town Plan`) and the 2021 Community Housing Plan ("Community Plan"). Finally, it does not follow precedent set by previous successful Lot Split Amendments within the Wildridge Subdivision. Each of these reasons is explained more fully below. Regarding the Town Charter, the residences as proposed contradict section 7.16.060(h)(4) as follows: 1. There is no evidence that the lot split results in less total site coverage. 2. There is no provision in the application that explains any attempt to restrict the building envelope to minimize site coverage. 3 There is no apparent effort to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity, as proposed, instead the lot split profoundly exacerbates negative impacts to surrounding properties. a. There is no provision to enhance landscaping along the most impactful portions of the development, and the current design precludes doing so due to landscaping setbacks. b In meeting (and exceeding) minimum setbacks within the divided lot between the new residences, the structures further encroach upon neighboring homes and view corridors. Although minimum requirements are met, there is no effort to increase setbacks to lessen the impact of the structures on the neighboring homeowners. c. Rather than restrict the building footprint, particularly in the case of Lot B, the development maxes out the building envelope. d. No apparent attempt is made to restrict building heights beyond requirements. e. No apparent attempt is made to restrict architectural massing or square footage. Rather, the current design maximizes the possible developed square footage by encroaching upon minimum setbacks, maximizing building heights, and creating an obstructive architectural mass. These contradictions conspire to excessively and unreasonably restrict the views and quiet enjoyment of the neighboring homes. Many of these issues are a result of the proposed design itself. All are specifically either driven by or exacerbated by the Lot Split by forcing the 20' setback between units. The resulting building envelopes, in combination with the developers apparent goal to maximize livable square footage, unreasonably and unnecessarily impact the neighboring lots. With respect to the Town Plan and Community Plan, the proposed Lot Split and development directly violate the following public policies and goals: • Policy A.1.5: Promote development that maximizes sun exposure and protects views • Policy B.1.3: Encourage development applicants to meet with adjacent residents, businesses, and property owners during all application phases to identify concerns and strategies to address them. • Policy CA.3: Design four sided architecture that maximizes solar exposure, protects views, and breaks up building bulk. 1 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 e Policy C.2.4: Encourage landscaping and building locations that enhance neighborhood views and view corridors. e Policy G.1.3: Work with public and private landowners to identify opportunities for conservation easements, permanent open space protection tools, and access to open space. e Policy GA A Minimize and mitigate potential development impacts to wildlife and watersheds. e DISTRICT 11: NORTHERN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT F} Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings. Encourage and support development that ■ Prohibits significant alteration of natural environment ■ This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting. ■ Provides the development of a trailhead to access the surrounding public lands. e 2021 Avon Community Housing Plan Grow the inventory of homeownership and "missing middle" inventory, in place of additional rental housing stock, to create a more balanced portfolio with a long-term goal of more home ownership opportunities Finally, the proposed Lot Split does not follow the precedent set by previously successful lot splits within Wildridge. See the attached list of known prior lot splits in Wildridge, all of which were developed while still maintaining reasonable setbacks from neighbors, limiting the impacts on existing homes' views, and sustaining the existing character of the neighborhood. For all of these reasons, we respectfully request that, as supported by the PUD, the Planning and Zoning Commision deny the Minor Subdivision and Lot Split Amendment for Lot 66. Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision (2332 Fox Lane) unless and until the requirements from the Town Charter, Town Plan, and Community Plan outlined above are met or exceeded. Furthermore. as a general matter, we request that in moving forward with development of the Lot, the developers consider the impacts of their designs on the neighborhood according to the community standards laid out in the Town Plan These Town goals are critical to protecting the unique character of all neighborhoods in Avon, including Wildridge As proposed, the Lot Split and corresponding development do not conform to the nature and character of the existing development within the Wildridge neighborhood and should be rejected. Thank you for your consideration, The Neighbors of 2332 Fox Lane: Property Owner(s) Signature Lot 9 Address Property Owner(s) Lot # Property Owner(s) Lot # Signature Address Signature -- Address Date W-:e Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Impact of Current Design on Neighboring Views L07 66 r Primary Views obstructed Iby unbroken 33 structure t - ,—r�- x A 10 4a,V {' Desrgn includes greater limn rrunimum setbacks Detween units 1 LOT 59 Structure Spans full length of lot l;g lus- under max heights k r Exacerbates ifrtr��aacts by encroachx • Orl minimum se fba ks " V LOT b: I T Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Example of Impact of Proposed Design Views from Primary Living Spaces of 2413 Saddle Ridge Loop View 2: Outdoor from Master Bedroom Door View 1: Outdoor from Deck 1�� N L;�. mbw� Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 neon TOWN OF AVON PUBLIC RECORD REQUEST FORM REQUEST MAYBE FAXED TO: (970) 949-9139, Attention Records Custodian or E-Mailed to miaureauitaavon.ortx and btorres@avon.ora NOTE: Confirmation of receipt is required for e-mailed requests Name: Pepper Etters Date: 5r912024 Address: PO Box 353 State: CO Zip Code: 81658 City.' Vail Phone: 970 688-0790 E-mail Address: pepperetlers@hotmail com FAX Number: Italicized above information is optional unless payment is by check or delivery of copies is requested. Inspection Only Requested: Yes �] No [ ] If it would be faster. I can pick up the records or Hard Copies Requested: Yes ] No [ ] inspect -nly first in person CD or Electronic Copies Requested: Yes [ ] No { ] Desired Retrieval Method: Pick-up [ ] Mailing [ ] E-Mail . Please indicate the information desired and/or list each requester! document. Please be as specific as possible. (You may attach a letter indicating the requested public records) 1 am looking for any documentation for attempted or completed lot splits in Wildndge Per Jena Skinner, I was recomended to specifially request "available plats for W Idridge, for duplex lot splits resulting in 2-single family lots." I would also love a copy of the building plans for our home at 2413 Saddle Ridge Loop if that is something you have on record [Please note — all faxed requests must be followed up with a phone call to be sure t was rece'ved All a -mailed requests must receive a confirmation of receipt e-mail from the Records Custodian.] have read the Town of Avon, Colorado P bl' Records Policy, revised October 24, 2019, and agree to pay all charges incurred in accordance with surf b[ic Records Policy and the attached fee schedule: Person requesting Public Record(s) Charges: (To be completed by Records Custodian and attached as invoice) Total $ Staff Use Only Date Received: 05/09/24 Time Received: 3:30 p.m. / BT Date Completed: Time Completed: 11am Completed By: MattPielsticker Summary of Response: See attached summary and hyperlink to plats No building plans were located for 2413 Saddleridge Loop, only permits. Avon Public Records Policy Adopted July 1, 2023 Page 8 of 8 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Duplex to Singie-Family Lot PUD Amendments in Wildridge Lot 110, Block 1 Lot 22, Block 1 Lot 10, Block 3 Lot 21, Block 3 Lot 26, Block 3 Lot 31, Block 3 Lot 48, Block 4 Lot 61, Block 4 Link to Plats: Wildridge Lot Splits Attachment A -mem Hmaa forPUD&m2 \ \\ !! _ a § | $ 2 o ! ■ m ~ � ( | - t R � | |! - m 7¢ #� 4 2 [ - a - , ff j! k k2 f ! !2 ; k, a, E ! M ! \ i) / M ! {; k ) E s § § } ! § § ! f § § o ly,:20$ccw If((kkk\� x�#f $22222!!!!2(IKkkk! a;Sa2;Q0 Izr`� ■tag „ 2©;;;;2¥;;;; « K 3 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Precedents Set by Previous Wildridge Lot Splits We have reviewed the PUDs for each prior successful Lot Split in Wildridge as provided by the Town of Avon. In addition, we have driven by each lot and explored satellite imagery, topographic maps, and Google Street View. Our findings are as follows: • All previously awarded lot splits have maintained the primary view corridors of neighboring properties. In many cases this was facilitated by the relative elevations of the impacted lots in relation to the split lot. o The remainder of the time, this was accomplished by locating the building envelope to allow sight lines between or alongside new structures. o All properties ensured the built mass did not overpower neighboring lots' primary views through appropriate scale and increased setbacks where appropriate. o No property as designed oriented a major axis of the buildings perpendicular to another properties primary view. • The majority of previous split lots maintained much greater than required setbacks from adjacent property lines, especially those oriented along the neighbors primary sight lines. Most were greater than 20'. • Only 2 properties with building envelopes that encroached upon minimum setbacks. * The first was limited to 15.75 ft along a single shared property line. n The second was limited to 22.64ft respectively. * Neither of these were along primary view corridors for a neighboring lot. • At least 1 of the prior approvals created a decreased setback between units of 12' total. Neighborhood Precedents In exploring presidents within the immediate vicinity of the proposed lot split, we have learned the following: • The proposed development exceeds the square footage of all neighboring units but 1. • The proposed development exceeds the average heated square footagellot square footage for the neighborhood by almost double. • All existing structures have a building envelope centered within their lot. o This facilitates a general character within the neighborhood that avoids encroachment of adjacent properties wherever possible. • Very few neighborhood properties abutt minimum setbacks When they do, the structures run obliquely so as only a corner actually abuts the setback. None run along any length of the setback. Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Lot 26 Block 3 - 4290/4411 Wildridge Rd W. View Corridors maintained by position of building envelopes and enhanced by elevations. Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Lot 21 Block 3 - 4250/4254 Wildridge Rd W Views maintained by lot elevations Views Maintained by elevation and position of development Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 6 if 11 lit ki 11 x V O o E-LLI0 1�� fill i � 9 0 O m Z O V? F- I3Ills. 8 �! t ling �[}Fay t66 Ts ai ! a a= ig F �R' litti��8�n 3v- 3 i i i pig9 ! _ 5 j� d pia 1 '1/j Y F n��m pLg yjy{ I � k L.� C Gb Ire flY 5 . E !7 , 0 !7 � e e jet are -# Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 lwwik moo Y er I C y, Y ■ ry IK O 'WNW�r i Air, a M� ; i c��77 E 0 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Lot 48 Block 4 - 5150/5163 Long Sun 'xl Ara- LIM M Ks ' Views of uphill structures maintained by building envelope positioning. t ,'i 6� {Jrpp �� 6R6 ;S a� i all a �' c-A jl it LLI 9l3 e, z! �e , r a ! air � F OLA- OO O �z a�� c5� R ° w ) � O ucsuK t $ 3 O u r , 6i Z 1 d ki .61 alt f 8 a p i 3 IY ss ° r `c W ^$$N� i Y E pB® 9 s r g� k f § e�s jp g D �m PP '�i — Lu 21 sit + O EI � ig i3 aea d; r arai� Y � .i:i 9 ee FF De W a �i l is tll r� i t ids i`� yy 4 e a G 'L �� Lr^.^ 9'. o• N i c c rga .RR•� 9 'n °'s Yfj ! §§'s 11 7J s � I p I J op 4 NIEMEN Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 _0 1�411t��� � �r 1 pia ie 'I •p O iif14j�;1 [ ;tip afill I �� F i LO 3 Jill IIIll II i f Il W Z p o ix •� 5 s O fitLLJ Q i3i �, 3�a Eili3 a g� s � 17xl� ��1rfi .ram .rN' Asa ��,I 04 s � x 4 � ? si till ?? x 'e' j . '! e$S �3 p tia.c� r �y m lif E [ 3�: 9 7# s !� � �! �s�: p-• � 'I i4 apep 3 ;11xw- 11 . �$j � � i`f \ ��; ;l i � �: y e i � �� 73�• �11x f 3. � �� 3'i2'7 � Y :3 " J y� Y 1 • 9t y r O I y� 5 R o r't• ;�1 � f Y � 7 A` J'• R �` � ! ./2t 01dSUEy — t�fi', I Y, { ri !wl !fi+x: '• f LG S L ee sit Y. I � � ��• i�e � N Y� Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 x 4 Fk # I' Lal - `9 Y N E C O M d •O Q (L N $Rt O Q vcoN C) Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Lot 10 Block 3 - 4010/4012 Wildridge Rd W +.aF xary r.u�sP Ss.FW..L; ems,. i Lot split improves views of uphill property by maintaining view corridor Elevation further maintains views of uphill neighbor (roofline of 4010 just visible below) - . --dP. No major infringement of view corridors of uphill neighbors due to elevation and position of development. Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 i4 ....,s.�., °i} it ia! u�c:'st oa oocwY' ;�i s f rz aea f=�•ia 9 1 CO U. 15,gill+ _ _Y_ j a . _ 1 n , L s j• - Y a F f a 0 w no o a �Q. 0 rhc 1; f' } a L i i — a 0 1#fir $ Sto od '\ \ o. 5 a \ �s it 0 nr no" t ■ \. n � o Lx �� s�#Q ��� �� �ppi phi -�+�g•��� g d� \, \ 51��rf age, No-' 11 � a i 3g as 6'y i n 7 � 1 r Y MOV46*26"W 16215' to a Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Lot 38 Block 3 - 4069/4057 Wildridge Rd W a o Views of uphill structures maintained by elevations. F] Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Mercator Projection 0.1km R]'r. 0 ; WGS84 M 1 UTM Zone 13S mi 8.44 IV Im CALTOPO Scale 1:970 1 inch = 81 feet 010 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Lot 110 Block 1 - 3091/3087 Wildridge Rd. No uphill or adjacent view corridor affected. Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 Eagle County, CO 202113056 Regina O'Brien 06/0312021 Pg3: 1 04:31:59 PM t REC: $13.00 DOC: $0.00 sill 1aii}itFt�( Pi its a !i) i{1(91 1i 2 �r.f� Ott . � : a (n IlM _� ! i r tr r r t. .1"itib115li1 i1J11 1 ii( IT r i V i 'r R I�� jiliiliN; 9 I� A I 1 i t � 4E 1tt7 jf fit( 1i{��"i#{i si1 t1 k�ee � 1 � i i tirx► i i t i � lyi w.ow.l P1 U1 Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 6 i 4 _ go/ Mercator Projection 0.1 km WGS84 UTM Zone 13S y ` MN mi CA LTOPO Scale 1:1232 1 Inch = 103 feet 8.40 ❑� ;, Eagle County. CO 201907109 nffm�h,.,o.,r e - Gfforc uo.,,i.," + fnr r) ir»dnn9 Regina O'Brien 05/15/2019 Pas: 1 :03 REC-. $13.00 DOG: LQ PQ sit 1 > e i ❑ YLdtB�e � �g;� a r E�< � �: � O w 0 ¢ y ll a `o cq Q 0LL. I a fF Z Q �� F i # Y 0 Z) ! Y e z It a atilt!! i fill O no z 3 a t I ;oil `y4 6t6 Ge 3i d �! - �Y3 ��� �((q� •��i [ir 'E 'A!YyBB @to�4i P��7k��S W 5� Ke ••'�"� i i13' 1a :;ig rx N67 VI J .S • \ J C j! 1 °in PM { A O M y PL 114L. 5/9124, 1:12 PM Attachment A - Etters H9r906�6n &fs (wer Eagle County GIS Viewer http://www.eaglecou^*•, — 0 100 2OOft 39.655-106.545 Degrees htlps:Hmap.eaglecounty.us/GIS_Viewer! ill Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 7.16.080 - Development plan. (a) Purpose. The general purpose of the development plan review process is to ensure compliance with the development and design standards of the Development Code prior to the issuance of a building permit or concurrent with other required permits and to encourage quality development reflective of the goals and objectives of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Specific purposes of development plan review include, but are not limited to the following: (1) To prevent excessive or unsightly grading of property that could cause disruption of natural watercourses or scar natural landforms; (2) To ensure that the location and configuration of structures, including signs and signage, are visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and structures and that there shall be conformance to the Comprehensive Plan of the Town; (3) To ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the Town's overall appearance, with natural and existing landforms and with officially approved development plans, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located; and (4) To ensure that plans for the landscaping of property and open spaces conform with adopted rules and regulations and to provide visually pleasing settings for structures on the same site and on adjoining and nearby sites. (b) Applicability. A development plan shall be required for all new development and any modification to an existing development or development plan. (c) Development Plan Categories. Categories of development plans are established and defined as follows for the purpose of determining the appropriate development plan review procedure: (1) Major Development Plan. Major development plans include all new building construction over six hundred (600) square feet; (2) Minor Development Plan. Minor development plans include the following: (i) All new building construction six hundred (600) square feet or less; (ii) Modifications to Dumpster locations; (iii) Screen wall modifications; (iv) Landscape modifications, including but not limited to removal of existing vegetation and addition of new vegetation; (v) Deck modifications, including but not limited to additions, new construction and materials or color modifications; (vi) Mechanical equipment modifications; (vii) Modifications to the exterior of an existing building, including but not limited to windows, doors, minor architectural details, colors and materials; Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 (viii) Modifications to approved development plans which result in a ten -percent or less increase to lot coverage; ten -percent or less increase to building height; ten -percent or less increase to the amount of square footage of a land use or structure and does not result in a change in the types of uses in the project; (ix) Modifications to approved development plans which do not change the character of the approved design; and (x) Other similar changes to a structure or property that do not significantly impact the site layout or design of a building. (d) Review Procedures. The general review procedures described in Section 7,16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to development plan applications. Specific additions and modifications to the general review procedures are identified below. (e) Notice and Hearing. PZC shall review and render a decision or recommendation on the development plan application after conducting a public hearing. Town Council shall conduct a public hearing when reviewing a Development Plan applicable in the Town Core. Notice of the public hearing shall be published and posted in accordance with Subsection 7.16.020(d)(1) and mailed notice is not required. The decision of PZC may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7,16,180, Appeal. The Director shall not conduct a public hearing for administrative review and decision on development plan applications. (f) Review Authority. The review authority for a development plan application shall be determined by the subdivision category. (1) Major Development Plan. The Director shall review and provide a recommendation to the PZC on all major development plan applications. The PZC shall render the final decision on a major development plan, unless the application is located within the Town Core. The decision of the PZC may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7.16.180, Appeal. If an application is located within the Town Core, the Director shall review and provide a recommendation to the PZC. The PZC shall review and provide a recommendation to the Town Council. The Town Council shall render the final decision on a major development plan within the Town Core. (2) Minor Development Plan. The Director shall review and render decisions on all minor development plan and minor sign plan applications. The decision of the Director may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7,16.180, Appeal. The Director may refer to the PZC any plan application that the Director determines warrants review by the PZC. (g) Review Criteria. The following review criteria shall be considered as the basis for a decision on development plan applications: (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in Section4 030 Purposes; Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 (2) Reserved; (3) The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents; (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20. Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations ands r 7 2 Development Standards; (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services, including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection and emergency medical services; and (7) The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole. (h) Expiration. A development plan approval expires pursuant to Subsection 7,16.020(h). (i) Revocation. Approved site plan documents shall be binding upon the applicants and their successors and assigns. No permit shall be issued for any building or structure or use that is not in accord with the approved documents or any approved modifications thereto. The construction, location, use or operation of all land and structures within the site shall conform to all conditions and limitations set forth in the documents. No structure, use or other element of approved design review documents shall be eliminated, altered or provided in another manner unless an amended site plan is approved. Any deviation from the approved development plan as approved shall be grounds for revocation of the development plan approval. ( Ord. 21-09 §5; Ord. 18-1 §6; Ord. 14-09 §3; Ord. 13-09 §2; Ord. 10-14 §3) Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 (4) Additional Review Criteria. The PZC shall review a Lot Split Amendment to the Wildridge PUD application and Major Amendments in the Wildridge PUD that include a Lot Split according the following criteria in addition to the review criteria for a preliminary PUD development plan: (i) The application results in less total site coverage and contains restrictions on building envelopes when deemed appropriate to minimize site coverage; (ii) Driveway disturbance is minimized and a shared driveway curb cut is utilized when feasible and when a shared driveway curb cut would reduce site disturbance; (iii) Areas not appropriate for development are designated on the PUD plan; (iv) The proposed development of the site avoids disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) or reduces potential disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) compared to the existing PUD designation; and, (v) The PUD plan incorporates requirements and/or restrictions as deemed appropriate to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity, including but not limited to: (A) enhanced landscaping; (B) increased building setbacks (i.e. minimum twenty (20) feet separation between buildings and a minimum ten (10) feet setback between properties); (C) designated building footprints; (D) building height restrictions; and, (E) designated architectural massing, including building square footage designation." Attachment A - Etters Handout for PUD24002 (iii) Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD, A proposed PUD Amendment to the Wildridge PUD to permit a lot split of a duplex lot into two (2) lots is considered a Lot Split Wildridge PUD amendment if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director: (A) The proposed duplex lot split is located in the Wildridge PUD Subdivision on a vacant, undeveloped lot, (B) The proposed PUD amendment meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment in Section 7A6-060(h)(1)(ii). (C) The PUD amendment proposes to split one (1) lot permitting a residential duplex dwelling into two (2) lots permitting one (1) detached single -family - residential dwelling on each lot, (iv) Major Amendment. A PUD amendment that is not classified as an administrative amendment, minor amendment or Lot Split PUD amendment to Wildridge PUD is considered a major amendment. (2) Reviewing Authority- (i) Administrative Amendments. The Director shall review and render decisions on Administrative Amendments. A decision of the Director may be appealed to the Council pursuant to Section 7.16.180. Appeal, (ii) Minor Amendments. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to minor PUD amendment applications. The PZC shall review all minor PUD amendment applications and shall provide a recommendation to the Town Council after conducting a public hearing. The Town Council shall review and render a final decision, through a resolution, on a minor PUD amendment application after conducting a public hearing. (iii) Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD applications_ The PZC shall review all Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD amendment applications and shall provide a recommendation to the Town Council after conducting a public hearing. The Town Council shall review and render a final decision, through a resolution, on a Lot Split Amendments to Wildridge PUD amendment application after conducting a public hearing. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE OF APPLICATIONS: PROPERTY LOCATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: May 13, 2024 Special Review Use 281 Metcalf Road & SRU24001 111 Metcalf Road Walkin' the Dog c/o Marisa Lahman A AVo n GOLOFA�9 This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code §7.16.010(F)(1) PZC DECISION ON #SRU24001: Approval SPECIAL REVIEW USE FINDINGS §7.16.100(e): 1. The application for an animal -service related business, including kennel and boarding, qualifies as a viable use to be reviewed per to §7.16.100 Special Review Use of the Avon Development Code. 2. The proposed business complies with the provisions of (AMC §7.24.060(e)- Special Review Uses — Commercial— Animal Sales and Service) with the exception of the proposed hours and proximity to the anticipated residential development on the opposite side of Metcalf Road. 3. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and all applicable provisions of this Development Code and applicable state and federal regulations as conditioned. 4. The proposed business operation represents some consistency with the purpose and intent of the zoning district in which it is located and any applicable use -specific standards in the Development Code. 5. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses in terms of scale, site design and operating characteristics. 6. There are no significant impacts to adjacent or on -site uses as conditioned, with the exception of increased dog waste, vehicle and pedestrian traffic to the site. 7. Facilities and services (including sewage and waste disposal, water, gas, electricity, police and fire protection and roads and transportation, as applicable) are available to serve the subject property and will not necessitate upgrades or cause additional demand beyond existing levels of service for this development; and 8. Adequate assurances of continuing maintenance are satisfactory. GENERAL CRITERIA FINDINGS §7.16.020(fl1): The development application for the park improvements is complete; The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; The development application for the park improvements complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. PZC Record of Decision: SRU24001 CONDITIONS: The permit is valid for twenty-four (24) months; at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration, the holder of the special review use approval shall apply for a review hearing before the PZC. Hours for outside operations and access are limited to 8am — 5pm, seven (7) days per week Dog waste is cleaned up and removed from the site within twenty-four (24) hours of its appearance; The business adheres to a seventy (70) dog limit per day; and No more than twenty (20) dogs are permitted per night for overnight or evening hours boarding services. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY: PZC Chairperson 17_19:I PZC Record of Decision: SRU24001 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: May 13, 2024 TYPE OF APPLICATIONS: PUD Amendment for Lot Split in Wildridge PROPERTY LOCATION: 2332 Fox Lane FILE NUMBER: PUD24002 APPLICANT: 2332 Fox Lane LLC c/o RAL Architects A AVo n GOLOFA�9 This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code §7.16.010(F)(1) PZC DECISION ON #PUD24002: Recommend Approval with Conditions PUD AMENDMENT FOR LOT SPLIT FINDINGS: 1. The Lot Split Amendment incorporates creative site design that achieves the purposes of the Town's Development Code. The split allows for two proposed homes, that staff considers an improvement to what could be accomplished compared to if the lot remained one, and allows for a more harmonious setting for two home -owners to co -exist without multiple shared spaces and amenities that can cause disputes previously observed by Staff in traditional duplex housing in Wildridge; 2. The Lot Split Amendment promotes public health, safety and general welfare by adding housing inventory in a time and location where housing is limited; 3. The Lot Split Amendment is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, promoting compatible architecture and increasing the diversity of housing; 4. Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; 5. The Lot Split Amendment will not result in negative impacts to the natural environment. Wildlife currently thrives in Wildridge despite residential development, and the Town has promoted assessment of native vegetation that could increase wildfire risk that this development accomplishes; 6. The Lot Split Amendment is not likely to result in significant impacts on other properties in the vicinity; 7. Future uses on the subject lots will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject lots. The proposed homes included in this application are sized and scaled to look and feel similar to other homes on Fox Lane and Saddle Ridgel Loop. GENERAL CRITERIA FINDINGS: 1. The development application for the park improvements is complete; 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; DRAFT PZC Record of Decision: PUD24002 The development application for the park improvements complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. Staff Recommended Conditions: 1. Access and maintenance agreement for the shared driveway and storage area to be recorded prior to signature of the Minor Subdivision plat. 2. "Limits of disturbance" are assigned to the northern portion of the lot, and designated on the plat prior to signature and recording. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY: PZC Chairperson DATE: DRAFT PZC Record of Decision: PUD24002