PZC Packet 020387STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Christie Lodge
Christie Lodge Owners Association
Sign Program - Design Review
Continued from 1/20/87 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
This application was continued from the January 20, 1987, meeting. The
Commission requested that someone from the Christie Lodge attend the meeting
to present the program and answer questions.
The Christie Lodge Owners Association has applied for design review of a new
sign program for the project. They would like to replace the project identifi-
cation signs which are mounted on the buildings at the east and west ends of
the project, replace the existing freestanding sign by the main entrance to the
project, and replace the current signage for businesses in the project. They
are requesting that the existing signage for "The Country Store" and "Western
Sun Sports" be allowed to remain.
The proposed sign program calls for signs to be made of sandblasted redwood,
with Teal Blue tPMS #321) lettering and border, on a white background. Letter
style is proposed to be "University Roman Bold Display". The proposed program
also requires that all new signage be approved by the Owners Association as well
as the Town's Building Denartment.
STAFF COMMENTS:.
A comparison of the approved sign program and the proposed sign program is
outlined below:
SIGN TYPE CURRENT PROGRAM PROPOSED PROGRAM
Business Signs 25 sq. t. maximum Not indicate
aT
Project I.D. 56 sq.ft. existing 48 sq.ft.
Freestanding 64 sq.ft. existing 52 sq.ft.
The proposed project. I.D. signs are to be made of the same materials and colors
as the business signs. A color rendering has been submitted. The two signs
will be identical and each will be approximately 24 square feet in area for a
total of approximately 48 square feet. This is a reduction of approximately 15%
from the existing signage.
The existing freestanding sign by the main entrance is proposed to be replaced
by a directory measuring approximately 4' x 6.5' for a total of approximately
26 square feet per side. Again, this sign will he made of sandblasted redwood
with the same lettering and colors as the other signs. The total area of
approximately 52 square feet for this sign is a reduction of approximately 20%
from the existing signage.
M
•
CIO
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
h ie t' Lodge - Christie Lodge Owners Association
C r g
Sign Program - Design Review
Con't. from 1/20/87 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 3
The proposed sign program does not specify maximum letter heights or maximum
business sign areas. Discussions with the applicant have led to the following
specifications for business signs. Lettering for individual business signs will
be a maximum of 8" in height. Length of the sign will be determined by the
amount of lettering required, however, no individual business sign will exceed
12 square feet of sign area. This is a reduction of approximately 50% from the
existing sign program.
The applicant requests that the existing
"Western Sun Sport!, " be allowed to remain
It is the applicant's intent that any new
into these spaces will be made to conform
businesses in the project will have their
program is approved.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS_
signs for "The Country Store" and
as long as these businesses stay.
signs for new businesses that may move
to the new sign program. All other
current signs replaced if this new
This proposed sign program has been submitted mainly in written form. The plans
for the signs are actually color renderings, and do not provide adequate detail
to serve as the sign program itself. They are useful for seeing the letter style,
colors, and basic sign composition, but the written document will better serve as
a guide for future sign requests. If the Connission feels that this new sign
program is acceptable, Staff would recommend that, as a minimum, the following
additions be made to the written document for the sign program:
1. That the lettering for individual business signs be a maximum of 8"
in height;
2. That individual businesses be allowed one exterior sign of no more
than 12 square feet;
3. That placement of individual business signs will be limited to the
fascias directly in front of the commercial spaces that they relate to.
Respectfully �Submitted,
;W fight
ngineering Technician
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Christie Lodge = Christie Lodge Owners Association
Sign Program - Design Review
Con't. from 1/20/87 Regular Meeting
Page 3 of 3
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (�1
Approved wi h dified Conditions ( ) Continued
ed ( ) Withdrawn
Date creteal ry
r
RW/mml
4W
40
C
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mountain Center - Extension Request for Mountain
Center Development Sign - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the July 12, 1984, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the Commission
granted approval for Vail Building Arty io erect a development sign for the
proposed ""fountain Center" *project on Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek. As part of the Town's attempt to bring all development signs in the
Town into conformance with the Sign Code, the applicant was asked to either
remove the sign or request an extension, since the previous approval expired
in July of 1986.
The applicant is requesting a minor change in some of the wording on the sign,
but the size will remain the same.
TAFF COMMENTS:
The existing sign is slightly less than the 16 square feet allowed by the Sign
Code. The sign is in very good condition, and there are no problems with its
location. The applicant would like to replace the words "Wholesale -Retail -
Commercial", with the wording "Condo -Warehouse -Sale or Lease". He also proposes
to remove the realtor's name and phone number from the bottom of the sign and put
his own phone number in its place. )�,iff has no problems with the sign and
recommends that the extension be approved.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted material;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
Rayl fight✓�/1
'Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved with Recommended Conditions 1
Approved as Submitted (X} )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date
Patricia Cuny, Secretary a
-r
RW/mml
io
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Pester Gas Station
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the September 16, 1986, meeting, the Commission continued the design review
of the Pester Gas Station, and directed the applicant to consider building
design alterations to address concerns of the Commission. The Commission had
expressed concerns about the large roof area, and snow falling from the roof
onto customers. The Commission also requested that the propane tank proposed
for the site be buried.
Pester has submitted revised plans for the project addressing the Commission's
concerns. The propane tank for the site is shown as buried, and new building
plans show a lower roof peak, smaller roof area, and covered sidewalk for the
convenience store.
STAFF COMMENTS:
As in the previous submittal, the site plan provides 7 full size parking spaces
and one loading space. Based on the floor area of the convenience store, 6
parking spaces are required. The applicant has agreed to bury the propane tank
and this change is indicated on the site plan. Staff had requested that the
radius on the east side of the exit dr;,- be increased. This has been done
but only a 5' radius is shown. Possibly a 10' to 15' radius is more practical.
They are also proposing to place an "Exit Only" sign at this exit. Staff had
also requested that the area between the storefront parking spaces and Notting-
ham Road be landscaped to separate the parking area from the road and prohibit
parking in the 10' front setback. This has not been done.
The submittal includes new elevations for the proposed convenience store. The
Commission's concerns about the building were: 1) That the roof area was too
large and should be broken up; 2) That snow from the roof would be falling
onto pedestrians; and 3) That building color was too bland. The applicant feels
that he has addressed these concerns with the new building design. The new
building is approximately 20' high where the previous building was approximately
30' high; the roof now has a 5:12 pitch instead of the previous 12:12 pitch,
and the mass of roof has been broken up by the use of parapets. The main
body of the building is proposed to be light gray with a black metal roof, red
panels beneath the storefront windows, and an illuminated fascia accent band
that is proposed to be dark gray and red. The new design also provides for a
covered walkway along the front of the building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff offers the following items to be considered as conditions to design review
approval for this project:
1. That the landscaping on the north side of the building be extended
eastward to separate the parking from Nottingham Road;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Pester Gas Station
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Design Review
Page 2 of 2
2. That the radius on the east side of the drive be increased to
approximately 15'.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review submittal in conjunction with attached Design
Review Guidelines;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
r,
/Ray'Wright
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:_
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (VI
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) n' Withdrawn ( )
PPA669504 AoVkr4
Date G•P Ra+o4-e}a—Enffq, Secretary
Rld/flllllI
--N
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Pester Gas Station
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Sign Variance and Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
This item was continued at the September 16, 1986, Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting so that the applicant could explore other options for signage. The
Commission was also asked to visit the site and form their own opinions of the
effect the 30' high project I.D. sign would have on the area. The applicant
has resubmitted a Sign Program for the project and, based on the proposed sign
areas, the Sign Program will still require a variance for total signage allowed
for the project.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The new Sign Program calls for the same project identification sign as before.
The sign is approximately 74.5 square feet per side for a total of approximately
149 square feet and its height is still 30'. They propose to remove the
existing price sign, and would like to erect 3 price signs, each 18 square feet,
to be mounted on the light poles at each pump island. Total price sign areas
equal approximately 54 square feet. There is also a sign proposed for the new
convenience store that is approximately 12 square feet. The total signage being
proposed is approximately 215 square feet. A comparison of Sign Code allowance
and the applicant's proposal is outlined below:
TYPE OF SIGN
Project I.D.
Building
Price
PER SIGN CODE
64 sq.ft.
0
0
64 sq.ft.
PROPOSED PROGRAM
149 sq.ft.
12 sq.ft.
54 sq.ft.
215 sq.ft.
According to the Sign Code, the Commission has discretionary powers in approving
a Sign Prorram. The Commission may approve a 50% increase in sign areas or
heights, Jthout requiring a variance, when approved as part o a ign rogram.
The 30 height for the I.D. sign would be allowable without a variance, if
approved by the Commission. However, a variance is still required for total
sign area.
Staff recommends that the Commission review this submittal in conjunction with
the following "Sign Design Guidelines" from the Sign Code.
Section 15.28.060 Sign design guidelines.
A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design, materials,
and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs on the structure,
with the neighborhood, and with the townscape.
B. Harmonious with Building Scale. The sign should be harmonious with the
building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to which
it belongs or call undue attention to itself.
Staff Report to Planning U Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Pester Gas Station
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Sign Variance and Design Review
Page 2 of 4
C. Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or
sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit, individual
plexiglass -faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters with or
without indirect lighting, are encouraged.
Sign materials, such as painted plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic,
and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be
approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the sole
discretion of the commission.
D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should be
in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the surrounding
structures.
E. Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all freestanding signs, and
should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building
landscaping.
1. A minimum of five lineal feet out from, and around the perimeter of,
the sign shall be landscaped.
F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are nct allowed.
G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary to
make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto
adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be
directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed
in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner.
H. Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall generally
be limited to the ground level.
The Commission must also consider the following factors with respect to the
requested variance:
Section 17.36.040 Approval criteria.
A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity;
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compati-
bility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to
attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege;
C. The effect of the requested variance: on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities
and utilities, and public safety;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Pester Cas Station
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Sign Variance and Design Review
Page 3 of 4
D. Such other factors and criteria as the board deems applicable to the
proposed variance. (Ord. 81-9 SIM).
Section 17.36.050 Findings required.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings
before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege in.onsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district;
B. That .the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title;
2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone;
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district. (Ord.81-9 S1(e)).
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review submittal in conjunction with "Sign Design Guidelines";
4. Commission consider "Approval Criteria" and make the necessary findings
required before acting on the variance request;
5. Formulate action on Sign Program design review and variance.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ra��
,V W
rig
/Engineering Technician
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Pester Gas Station
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Sign Variance and Design Review
Page 4 of 4
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved
dd{with
Approved with Modified Conditions (J) Co
Date
!,W/Illlll1
Recommended Conditions ( )
tinued ( e ( ) Withdrawn
YA
ry
[40
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Beaver Track & Trail - Business Signs
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
® This application is for design review of business signs for Beaver Track & Trail,
which is located in the Wolff Warehouse. At the January 21, 1986, meeting, the
Commission granted temporary approval for the "Polaris" sign that is currently
on the building. This approval was to expire 6 months from that date. The
Commission had also requested that the building owner submit a sign program for
the building. Since that time, Beaver Track & Trail has been sold. The new
owner, Mr. Bert Dickey, is requesting that the "Polaris" sign be reapproved,
and that he be granted approval for a "Kawasaki" sign which he put on the
building during December, 1986.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed signs are already in place on the building. The "Polaris" sign
measures approximately 18 square feet in area and the "Kawasaki" sign measures
approximately 19 square feet for a total of approximately 37 square feet. The
"Polaris" sign has white lettering on a blue background and the "Kawasaki"
sign has red lettering on a white background. A letter submitted by the
applicant states that neither sign has the ability to be lit at night.
It seems unlikely at this time that the building owner will come forward with
a sign program for this project. Retail uses in the building have been approved
by the Town, and in order to provide reasonable signage for these businesses,
Staff recommends that an interim solution for signage problems at the Wolff
Warehouse be adopted using the following guidelines:
That each business be allowed the 12 square feet provided for business
signs in the Sign Code;
That, in addition to the 12 square feet mentioned above, each business
be allocated a portion of the 64 square feet reserved for project
identification signage, based on the percentage of the entire building
under lease to the particular business';
All signage for the Wolff Warehouse be reviewed and approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission;
4. If, at a later date, the building ownar requests project identification
signage, it will only be considered as part of a comprehensive sign
program for the entire project.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Beaver Track & Trail - Business Signs
Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Under this scenario, sign allocations for existing businesses in the Wolff
Warehouse would be as follows:
BUSINESS PERCENT OF BUILDING SIGN ALLOWANCE
Beaver Track & Trail 50% 44 sq.ft.
Blue Steel Gun Shop 25% 28 sq.ft.
Benchmark Cleaners 250% 28 sq.ft.
100 sq.ft.
The 100 square feet of total signage for the project does not exceed the amount
allowed by the Sign Code.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted material;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
�/ aj 4Jri g
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (X) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( Denied ( ))�� Withdrawn
Date v? 5 Patricia Cuny, Secretary Lr
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Lot 21, Block 2,
Avon Commercial
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Building - Sign Program
The Lindsey Group, owners of the Avon Commercial Building, has applied for
design review of a Sign Program for their building. Christy Sports has recently
moved into the building and the program outlines signage for Christy Sports as
well as signs and directories for future tenants. The submittal includes a
letter from the applicant, drawings of signs proposed for Christy Sports, and
building elevations showing proposed sign locations.
STAFF COMMENTS:
A brief summary of the proposed program, along with applicable Sign Code
allowances is outlined below:
TYPE OF SIGN PROPOSED PROGRAM ALLOWANCE PER SIGN CODE
Building or Project I.D.
Individual Businesses
(Christy Sports)
(Future Tenant)
Joint Directory
TOTAL
0 64 sq.ft.
67.9 sq.ft.
12 sq.ft.
28.7 sq.ft.
12 sq.ft.
12 sq.ft.
25 sq.ft.
108.6 sq.ft.
113 sq.ft.
Under the proposed program, Christy Sports will have three business signs,
there will be approximately 28.7 square feet of signage reserved for a future
tenant, and they propose two directories for other tenants. Christy Sports
proposes to move their existing sign from Avon Center and mount it on the
north face of the Avon Commercial Building (facing the Hole in The Wall).
They also propose two signs on the west face of the building. Both are
approximately 28.7 square feet in area. One says "Christy Sports" and the
other says "Ski Rental". During the summer months, the "Ski Rental" sign
would be changed to "Patio Shop". These signs are proposed to be an interior
lit, plexiglass face with blue lettering.
According to the Sign Code, the Commission has discretionary powers in
approving a Sign Program. The total sign allowance for a project may be
increased and/or reapportioned by a Sign Program approved by the Commission.
Staff recommends that the Commission review this submittal in conjunction with
the following "Sign Design Guidelines" from the Sign Code.
,•••y
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Lot 21, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Avon Commercial Building - Sign Program
Design Review
Page 2 of 4
Section 15.28.060 Sign design guidelines.
A. Harmonious with Town Scale. Sign location, configuration, design,
materials, and colors should be harmonious with the existing signs
on the structure, with the neighborhood, and with the townscape.
B. Harmonious with Building Scale. The sign should be harmonious with
the building scale, and should not visually dominate the structure to
which it belongs or call undue attention to itself.
C. Materials. Quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed
or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit,
individual plexiglass -faced letters; or three dimensional individual
letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged.
Sign materials, such as painted plywood, interior -lit box -type plastic,
and paper or vinyl stick -on window signs are discouraged, but may be
approved, however, if determined appropriate to the location, at the
sole discretion of the commission.
D. Architectural Harmony. The sign and its supporting structure should
be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color with the
surrounding structures.
Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all freestanding signs, and
should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building
landscaping.
1. A minimum of five lineal feet out from, and around the perimeter of,
the sign shall be landscaped.
F. Reflective Surfaces. Reflective surfaces are not allowed.
G. Lighting. Lighting should be of no greater wattage than is necessary
to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily
onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should
not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should
be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a
disturbing manner.
Location. On multi -story buildings, individual business signs shall
generally be limited to the ground level. (Ord. 86-3 S1(part))..
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Lot 21, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Avon Commercial Building - Sign Program
Design Review
Page 3 of 4
Section 15.28.070 Design review criteria. The Planning and Zoning Commission
shall consider the following items in reviewing proposed designs:
A. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the
sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
B. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
C. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
D. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
E. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will
be impaired;
F. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quantity of signs generally
complies with the sign code, and are appropriate for the project;
G. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian
traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined
orientation. (Ord. 86-3 S1(part)).
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review submittal in conjunction with Sign Design Guidelines;
4. Formulate action by Commission.
Respectfully Submitted,
C
aV 1 ght
"Engineering Technician
^00)
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Lot 21, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Avon Commercial Building - Sign Program
Design Review
Page 4 of 4
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( } Approved with Recommended Conditions (>4
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date ��3�.%� % Patricia Cuny, Secretary 6���
RW I/ [III nl
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/3/87
Zoning Code Interpretation
Allowed Uses - Gasoline Dispensing in
Conjunction with Convenience Store in
SC (Shopping Center) Zone District
INTRODUCTION:
Vacation Properties Network Real Estate, on behalf of Mr. Don Crouch, has
requested an interpretation of the Town Zoning Code as it relates to allowed
uses in the SC (Shopping Center) Zone District. The specific request is for a
determination of whether gasoline dispensing would be allowed in conjunction
with, and incidental to, the operation of a convenience store in the SC Zone
District. This use is not specifically addressed in the Zoning Code and
whether it would or would not be allowed could be based upon interpretations
from different portions of the Code. Section 17.16.020 of the Avon Municipal
Code states, "any person may apply to the design review board, as established
by ordinance of the town, for a determination as to whether a specified use
is an allowed or special review use, which determination shall be made on an
analysis of the intention for the district and the compatibility of the proposed
use with allowed and special review uses."
The Zoning Code lists the intent of the SC Zone District as, "Shopping Center:
Areas primarily for major retail establishments requiring large store areas
for larger items, but including retail, personal services, offices, and limited
apartments or condominium type dwelling units."
Allowed uses in the SC Zone District are: Department stores, grocery, drugs,
appliance, carpet, furniture, hardware, automotive supply, related retail
establishments; smaller retail stores; offices; personal service outlets such
as a bank, beauty shop, retail bakery, laundromat, dry cleaning, bowling alley,
medical center, restaurants and condominium units.
Special Review Uses in the SC Zone District are: Outdoor recreation; pedestrian
rest areas; indoor recreation; public uses; lock -off units.
Section 17.20.090 of the Avon Municipal Code states, "Accessory buildings and
uses shall be permitted in every zone district." An accessory use is defined
as a use that is naturally and normally incidental to, subordinate to, and
devoted exclusively to the principal use of the premises, and does not change
the basic character thereof, as determined by its principal use.
RHDC (Residential High Density and Commercial) is the only zone district which
specifically lists automobile service stations as an allowed or special review
use. Section 17.08.080 defines an automobile service station as, "a place
where gasoline stored only in underground tanks, kerosene, diesel or motor oil,
is sold directly to the public on the premises, including minor accessories and
services for automobiles, but not including automobile repairs and rebuilding.
When the dispensing, sale or offering for sale of motor fuels or oil is inci-
dental to the conduct of a public garage, the premises shall be classified as a
public garage.
•
rr 1
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/3/87
Zoning Code Interpretation
Allowed Uses - Gasoline Dispensing in
Conjunction with Convenience Store in
SC Zone District
Page 2 of 3 too
STAFF COMMENTS:
In order to make a determination concerning the requested ii.terpretation of
the question, "is gasoline or motor fuel dispensing allowed in conjunction with
a convenience store in the SC Zone District", the Commission should consider at
least three key questions:
1. Is gasoline or motor fuel dispensing included as an allowed use such as
personal service outlets in the SC Zone District?
2. Is gasoline or motor fuel dispensing an accessory use to a convenience
store?
3. Is gasoline or motor fuel dispensing only allowed in conjunction with
an automobile service station or public garage?
When responding to these questions, the Commission should consider the intentions
outlined for the SC Zone District and the compatibility of the proposed use with
allowed and special review uses in the SC Zone District.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce requested interpretation;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission determinations and action.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering
and Community Development
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning
Zoning Code Interpretation
Allowed Uses - Gasoline Dispensing
Conjunction with Convenience Store
SC Zone District
Page 3 of 3
ACTION:
Commission
in
in
2/3/87
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado has considered
the intent outlined for the SC Zone District and the compatibility of the
proposed use with allowed and special review uses in the SC Zone District, and
hereby determines that the dispensing of gasoline or motor fuels in conjunction
with a retail convenience store is
/:LAS VMff
Date—444t7 Patricia Cuny, Secretary&�__
NW/mml
•
•