PZC Packet 040787r'w
STAFF REPORT TO PLPNNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/7/87
Lots 23 & 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Wal-Mart Development Sign
Variance and Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has applied for design review of a development sign that
they propose to erect on the shopping center site, Lots 23 and 75, Block 2,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The proposed sign measures 4' x 8'. The applicant
has submitted a copy of the graphics for the sign along with color information.
The sign is generally comprised of a brown background with 2 diagonal orange
stripes. The lettering stating Future Home of Wal-Mart" is proposed to be
white, and the remaining lettering is proposed to be yellow.
STAFF COMMENTS:
This sign is approximately 32 square feet in area. The Sign Code allows 16
square feet for development signs without a variance.
Section 15.28.080(H) (Development Signs) states:
1. Only one sign per parcel, lot, or group of contiguous lots under
one ownership, not to exceed sixteen square feet of display area
and eight feet in height;
2. Signs must be removed within thirty days of land sale or upon issuance
of a certificate of occupancy;
3. In no case may a sign be retained for more than two years, unless an
extension is granted by the planning and zoning commission.
There is already one development sign on this parcel, and that sign would have to
be removed in order for the Wal-Mart sign to be placed on the property.
Section 17 36 040 Approval Criteria, states:
Before acting on a variance application, the design review board shall consider
the following factors with respect to the requested variance:
A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity;
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compati-
bility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to
attain the objectives of tihis title without grant of special privilege;
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities
and utilities, and public safety;
D. Such other factors and criteria as the board deems applicable to the
proposed variance. (Ord. 81-9 S1(d)).
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lots 23 & 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Wal-Mart Development Sign - Variance and Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Section 17 36 050 Findings Required, states:
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following written firuings
before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a. grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district;
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title;
2. 'There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone;
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district. (Ord. 81-9 S1(e)).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If the Commission approves the Wal-Mart development sign, the Commission should
specify the size, colors, and location of the sign and stipulate that the existing
sign be removed prior to placement of the new sign.
RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE:
1. Introduce application;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of criteria and findings required for approval of variance;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
C�� a
yght
Engineering Technician
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lots 23 & 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Wal-Mart Development Sign - Variance and Design Review
Page 3 of 3
Planning & Zoning Action: -
Approved as Submitted �>'-,j Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )17 Withdrawn ( )
Date Patricia Cuny, Secretary /
RW; minl
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/7/87
Lot 56W, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Beartrap Duplex - Variance Request to
Allow Parking Within 10 Feet of Beartrap
Road Right -of -Way
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION:
Philip Koski of Vail Builders, owner of Lot 56W, Block 2, Wildridge, has requested
a variance to allow parking within 10 feet of the Beartrap Road right-of-way.
Section 17.24.020 of the Zoning Code states that no off-street parking spaces
may be located in the front 10 feet of the required front yard of any lot.
The applicant has submitted a site plan for a duplex residence which he proposes
to construct on the lot, and the building footprint and parking spaces are shown.
STAFF COMMENTS:
This variance request does not appear to pose any particular problems for the
Town. The applicant has been able to meet the required 25' building setback, but
due to the steep slope on this lot, he cannot practically move the house farther
back to meet the parking setback. The duplex on Lot 56E currently has the same
situation with parking spaces being only 5 feet from the front property line.
Section 17 36 040 Approval Criteria, states_:_
Before acting on a variance application, the design review board shall consider
the following factors with respect to the requested variance:
A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity;
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compati-
bility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to
attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege;
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, and public facilities
and utilities, and public safety;
D. Such other factors and criteria as the board deems applicable to the
proposed variance. (Ord. 81-9 S1(d)).
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lot 56W, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision - Beartrap Duplex
Variance Request to Allow Parking Within 10 Feet of Beartrap
Road Right -of -Way
Public Nearing
Page 2 of 3
Section 17 36 050 Findings Required, states:
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings
before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district;
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title;
2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone;
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district. (Ord. 81-9 Si(e)).
RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE:
1. Introduce variance request;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Public hearing;
4. Commission review of criteria and findings required for approval of variance;
5. Adopt Resolution 87-9 with appropriate modifications.
Respectfully ht�/Submitted,
Ray Wrig
//� k
R
Engineering Technician
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lot 56W, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision - Beartrap Duplex
Variance Request to Allow Parking Within 10 Feet of Beartrap
Road Right -of -Way
Public Hearing
Page 3 of 3
Planninq & Zoning Action.
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions { ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date — 7 Patricia Cuny, Secretary tel} /1/ir% �Ltir
#4�7-
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/7/87
Lot 56W, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Beartrap Duplex - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
Philip Koski has submitted an application for design review of a duplex residence
to be located on Lot 56W, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. The proposed building
is approximately 4,770 square feet. Building materials include 1 x 8 channel lap
redwood siding wi`h a grey finish (Benjamin Moore #080-72) and a 3 coat stucco
system colored to match the siding. The exterior trim is proposed to be
finished with Benjamin Moore #080052 (Blue). The roof is proposed to be a slate
grey, "Stile" metal roof. A sample of the roofing material has been submitted
for review.
Plans submitted include a site plan, floor plans, building elevations, landscaping
plan, and a color rendering of the project.
STAFF COMMENTS:
This submittal is fairly complete and can be considered for final design review
approval. There are some dimensions missing from the site plan, such as building
ties to the side lot lines and parking and drive dimensions, but these items can
be taken care of at the time of application for a building permit. The site plan
is dimensioned enough to show that, other than the parking spaces, there are no
setback problems.
Adequate parking is being provided with each unit having its own 2 -car garage, as
well as parking in front of the building.
The Commission should be aware that metal roof materials are not allowed in
Wildridge unless approved by the Wildridge Covenants Committee. The Commission's
response to this, in the past, has been to approve of the metal roof, if it is
acceptable, as well as an alternate roof system. The Commission has required
that applicants get approval from the Wildridge Covenants Committee for metal
roofs.
The landscape plan is complete and outlines a variety of plant materials, their
size, and quantities. An underground, automatic irrigation system is also being
proposed for the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
If the Commission concurs, Staff recommends final design review approval for this
project. The Commission may wish to approve an alternate roof material in the
event the metal roof is denied by the Wildridge Covenants Committee.
At such time as the applicant applies for a building permit for the project, a
fully dimensioned site plan, along with grading and drainage information, must
be submitted for plan check.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lot 56W, Block 2,Wildridge Subdivision
Beartrap Duplex - Design Review
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
/,Rayright
:
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date�J
Patricia Cuny, Secretary
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/7/87
Lots 67 & 68, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
City Market Garden Center - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the April 14, 1983, meeting, the Commission approved the City Market Garden
Center. That structure consisted of a redwood frame with an 8 mil. plastic
covering. That �nproval was for 5 years as long as the design was not changed.
Mike DeOnier, manager of the Avon City Market has submitted plans for a new
Garden Center greenhouse. This new structure is a Quonset Hut type with a tubular
frame and a plastic covering. The two ends of the structure are proposed to
be 3/4" plywood to accommodate entry doors and air vents. The size of the
structure is 22' x 48' compared with the currently approved structure of 36' x 72'.
The new greenhouse is proposed to be located in the same area as the previously
approved greenhouse.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The current approval carries 5 conditions with it. They are as follows:
1. A cedar fence no higher than 6' is to surround the greenhouse;
2. Exterior covering to be 8 mil. plastic;
3. Structure to be located at least 4 feet from the existing building;
4. Add another entrance on south side of greenhouse;
5. Construction of greenhouse to start no earlier than May 1, and structure
to be removed no later than October 31.
The Commission may wish to impose these same restrictions on this new proposal,
with minor modifications. The requirement for an additional entrance on the
south side should be changed to require an additional exit on the east end of
the stru(.rure, for safety purposes. The Commission may also wish to approve
a specific length of time for this approval, i.e., 5 years.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Act on. application.
Res ectfully Submitted,
righ r
Com" "/
Engineering Technician
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lots 67 & 68, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
City Market Garden Center - Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (>O
Approved //with Modified Conditions ( )
Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
n�+v
Patricia Cuny, Secretary--
RW/mml
F"
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 4/7/87
Lots 67 & 68, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
City Market Garden Center - Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions OKI
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued
( )) -Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date ��?/�7 Patricia Cuny, Secretary
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 4/7/87
Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Pester Gas Station - Color Sample Approval
INTRODUCTION:
At the February 3, 1987, meeting, the Commission granted final design review
approval for the Pester Gas Station renovation. At that time the Commission
requested that actual samples of the proposed building colors be submitted
for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Those approved colors
include a matte black finish for the metal roofing, red insulated store front
panels, and a light grey finish for the stucco exterior. Actual samples of
these colors have been submitted for review and approval.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed color for the metal roof is a "Matte Black", Kynar 500 finish.
The applicant has supplied us with a piece of the red storefront panels.
The stucco finish is proposed to be "Stocolor" #11406 light grey.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Commission review of color samples;
3. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
,
righ
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (X) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Date % Patricia Cuny, Secretary
RW/mml