PZC Packet 070787STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/7/87
Lots 23 & 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Wal-Mart Shopping Center - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 21, 1987, Palmer Development
Company was granted conceptual site plan approval and preliminary design review
approval for the buildings fur the Wal-Mart Shopping Center.
Since that time, the developer has redesigned the project to stay within
Lots 23 and 75. With the exception of a pedestrian walkway and a retaining wall,
no improvements are planned on the City Market property.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The revised site plan is much the same as the previous plan. The entry dr,lve
that was located on the City Market parcel has been moved onto Lots 23 and 75,
the "Retail Shops" building has been shortened and no longer straddles the
property line, and the service drive that was behind the "Retail Shops" now goes
between the shops and the Wal-Mart building.
A review of this latest submittal has resulted in the following information:
Total Site Area
6.33 ac.
100%
Building Coverage
Shown
70,208
sq.ft.
With Future Expansion
32,2C8
sq.ft.
1.89 ac.
30%
Parking/Access Drives
2.29 ac.
36%
Open Space
2.15 ac.
340.1
Snow Storage
Shown
17,375
sq.ft.
Required
30,927
sq.ft.
Parking
Shown
373
spaces
5.31/1000
Required
281
spaces
4/1000
With Expansion
331
spaces
4.03/1000
Required
329
spaces
4/1000
The main changes in the site plan were brought about as a result of moving the
"Retail Shops" and entry drive off of the City Market parcel. An entrance to
the Wal-Mart site has been added south of the common property line and a
sidewalk and retaining walls with landscaping has been added. To improve
pedestrian circulation between the two sites, a ramped walkway has been integrated
into the retaining wall design.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/7/87
Lots 23 & 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Wal-Mart Shopping Center - Design Review
Page 2 of 3
The entrances to the project have been widened to accommodate left turn lanes
and sidewalks have been placed around the site. A bus stop is shown along
Beaver Creek Place.
Before the project can receive final approval, there are a few other items that
should be addressed. Lot lines separating Lots 23 and 75 must be vacated through
the subdivision process, and some evidence must be submitted to the Town showing
City Market's agreement involving improvements and changes to Lots 67 and 68.
The ;rDlicant is also requesting final approval for the Wal-Mart and the retail
shops. The buildings were granted preliminary approval subject to:
1. Building materials be indicated on plans;
2. Colors be approved and indicated on plans;
3. Comprehensive sign program for the project being submitted for review and
approval.
The applicant has submitted samples of the building materials and colors for
Commission review. The colors and materials, if approved, should be indicated
on the drawings prior to issuance of a building permit.
At the meeting of May 5, 1987, the Commission approved a sign program for the
project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
If the Commission feels it appropriate, Staff recommends that final design review
approval be granted for the project with the following conditions to be met prior
to issuance of a building permit:
1. Complete subdivision process to vacate lot line between Lots 23 and 75,
Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek;
2. Submittal of a satisfactory grading and drainage plan for review and
approval, that is compatible with the site plan and building elevations;
3. Supply documentation from City Market agreeing to improvements and changes
to Lots 67 and 68;
4. That specific building materials and colors be indicated on plans;
5. That letter be submitted stating that the developer agrees to remo-e snow
from the site and transport to an appropriate site when on-site snow
storage proves to be inadequate.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/7/37
Lots 23 & 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Wal-Mart Shopping Center - Design Review
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDED „CTIONS:
I. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted material;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
4ginr��
ie�ring
ht
EnTechnician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions (X) Continued ( ) Denied/ ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date
/(�- -7 c`'T Michael Blair, Secretary /�� /ro
&f /'; 7 a�1 ` lav oar Opti2 ',vv Ale.is � _44er '{ %1/pec/o�rWPY�q� o/�f
//j��'�_Qcc�ii 1 //T//�f' r'P4f U'i
e tegg r -14e cowwftcr'C, .54evf �f�s VC4C a44H
RW/mml
__e. I ..,
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONI14G COMMISSION - 7/7/87
Ordinance 87-12, Series of 1987
Motor Fuel Dispensing in the SC Zone District
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION:
The Town Council has requested that Staff prepare an Ordinance amending the
Zoning Code to allow motor fuel dispensing as a Special Review Use in the SC
(Shopping Center) Zone District. This provision was previously included in
the proposed zoning code revisions as presented to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and forwarded to the Town Council. If adopted, the Ordinance would
define "Motor Fuel Dispensing" and allow this activity in the SC Zone District
when approved as a Special Review Use.
STAFF COMMENTS:
When considering this proposal, the Commission should consider the intentions
outlined for the SC Zone District and the compatibility of the proposed use
with other allowed and Special Review Uses in the SC Zone District.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce Ordinance;
2. Conduct public hearing;
3. Adopt Resolution 87-12, recommending Council
adoption of Ordinance 87-12.
Respectfully
Submitted,
CSC/ '
(y Zy�y g ht
i£ngineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ()() Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date %—% Michael Blair, Secretary //Qce /3�'/
Y: 0144k,
R � f / 111101
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/7/87
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Hardee's Restaurant - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
Silver Eagle Enterprises has applied for design review of a proposed "Hardee's"
Restaurant to be located on Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. A
similar use and site layout was approved on this parcel about 2 years ago. The
proposed building materials include a stucco exterior (color not specified on
the plais) with a mansard roof finished with cedar shakes. The submittal
consists of a site plan, floor p ans and elevations, landscape plan, grading
and drainage plan, and color ren!ering.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The site layout proposed for this project is almost identical to the plan that
was approved in the summer of 1985, for another fast food franchise. A review
of the proposed plan has resulted in the following information:
Total Site Area
Building Coverage
Parking/Access Dries
Open Space
Parking Provided
Parking Required
Snow Storage
Required
Provided
Building Height
Approximately 21,357 sq. ft.
Approximately 3,600 sq. ft.
Approximately 12,460 sq. ft.
Approximately 5,280 sq. ft.
23 Spaces + 7 cars @ drive-through
21 Spaces + 7 cars @ drive-through
2,492 sq. ft.
2,700 sq. ft.
17 feet
The project, as proposed, appears to fall within the guidelines set by the
Zoning Code, with the exception of the building setback. The applicant is
requesting a variance that would allow a 0 setback for the drive-through canopy,
and a 12 foot setback for the building, from the Avon Road right-of-way. This
variance is being handled in a separate application.
Signs are inHicated on the plans and a summary of the signage requested is as
follows:
BUILDING SIGNS North
37
sq.
ft.
South
37
sq.
ft.
East
9
sq.
ft.
West
9
sq.
ft.
Freestanding
26 sq.
ft.
TOTAL
118
sq.
ft.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/7/87
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Hardee's Restaurant - Design Review
Page 2 of 3
The Sign Code all)ws a maximum of 64 square feet of signage for an individual
business lot. The Commission may allow as much as 50% more sign area without a EMvariance. The aEplicant should be directed to design the proposed signage to
fit within these guidelines.
Staff would also like some consideration to be given to the following suggestions:
Mae
1. That the roof material be changed to tile or standing seam metal;
2. The screening fence on the north side of the building be finished with
stucco to match the building walls;
3. More landscaping be added on the south and southeast sides of the building.
A Final Plat creating this parcel was approved by the Town Council on August 27, 1985,
subject to several conditions. These conditions were not met within the 90 day
period outlined i;, the Zoning Code and that approval has lapsed. The subdivision
process will have to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends preliminary design review approval for the proposed Hardee's
Restaurant on the southerly portion of Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek, subject to satisfactory resolution of the following items prior to final
design review action:
1. Town Council approval and the recording of Final Plat resubdividing Tract Q
in accordance with previous applications for this site;
2. Approval of a variance for setback encroachment as required for the proposed
design;
3. Approval for the change in access use if required by the Colorado Department
of Highways;
4. Submittal and approval of a detailed sign program for the project, including
dimensions, colors and lighting information;
5. The inclusion of additional information such as building material colors
by manufacturer's stock number, exterior lighting information and parking
lot runoff treatment facility details;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/7/87
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Hardee's Restaurant - Design Review
Page 3 of 3
6. Staff suggests the following design revisions for the Commission's
consideration in providing the applicant direction in developing final
design drawings:
a. Change screen fence materials from cedar to stucco matching
building and expand area to enclose gas meter and roof ladder;
b. Change mansard roof materials to tile or standing seam metal of an
appropriate color; and
Add landscaping in the patio areas on the south and southeast sides
of the building.
RECO14MENDED ACTIONS;
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted material;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
fay"',right
Engineering Te nician
Planning & Zoning Action: 4/W e
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions eM 1/s
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued II(q^) D nied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Datr Michael Blair, Secretary vLti� c r��
(�� e�iwrHar Seo{{' k�ProwwPv 11Tri9ar
A/. 4�reer'OL4,t eI
13 4e �lWY Y• /'(1 "WA WCom/ P7" �2' YOI�CtP� 4ld?. -4- 42 tow y:407r0L
pT Lt 1� {y��yfi<T 4C u �n� emA/Q nJNe' C-.+ 4,ew rY 30 rN, �n
�I IPT G4/ b e 4r\/ `P �P"�'"✓f!Y PCXiI S 1n �fl 110 QN 71ivQ Wq_tiS_!1_
lI._�... - 4...'I Le all c2 4f) 44e Hare 4N2 P.�i/ _J ILA- E'IfV9 !/0�1is •�1'r�
p oCrq-, 4e sr,L fhf�
RW/mmf, l/o)e^.Ci,lak.
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING C014IISSION - 7/7/87
Tract Q South, Cunningham Subdivision
Proposed Resubdivision of Tract Q, Block 2,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Variance Request - Front Lot Setback
INTRODUCTION:
The applicant has requested a variance from the 25 foot front setback for the
proposed Hardee's Restaurant. The requested variance is for 0 setback for drive
through canopy and 12 foot setback for building. The front lot line is along
Avon Road which has a very wide right-of-way in that area (approximately 260
feet). The site is approximately 80 feet from the edge of the existing roadway
with the area between being well landscaped.
APPROVAL CRITERIA - Section 17.36.040:
Before acting on a variance application, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance:
A. The relationship of the requested variance application to other existing
or potential uses and structures in the vicinity;
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcements of specified regulations is necessary to achieve compati-
bility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain
the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege;
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety;
D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance. (Ord. 81-0 S1(d)).
Further:
17.36.050 Findings Required:
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings
before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district;
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/7/87
Tract Q South, Cunningham Subdivision
Proposed Resubdivision of Tract Q, Block 2,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Variance Request - Front Lot Setback
Page 2 of 2
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1, The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title;
2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone;
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed Ly the
owners of other properties in the same district. (Ord. 81-9 Si(e)).
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted material;
4. Conduct public hearing;
5. Adopt Resolution 87-13, if appropriate.
Respectfully Submitted,
C
% i gh�
�Eng'�neering echnician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (x )
Approved with Modified
Date 7-7.67
�".-feI
RW/mml
Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Conditions (
Michael Blair,
>-/ 3
Continued penied ( ) Withdrawn
/Lt ' ke / S �Q�'
Secretary
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING C01.4MISSION - 7/7/37
Lot 33, Block 2, Benc:mark at Beaver Creek
Greenhouse Addition - Dezign Review
INTRODUCTION:
David Irwin, representing the owners of the duplex residence located on Lot 33,
Block 2, has applied for design review of a greenhouse -type addition to each
side of the duplex. Each addition is approximately 250 square feet in area
with a small deck attached. Building materials are proposed to match existing
finishes. A portion of each of the new roofs will be glass, with the remainder
being wood shakes.
STAFF COMMENTS:
At the time this report was written, the applicant was still refining his site
plan bacause of a potential setback problem. The deck off the greenhouse for
the east unit, as drawn, may encroach into the 7.5 foot sideyard setback.
Staff suggests that this deck be required to stay out of the setback.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
If the Commission finds this application acceptable, Staff recommends that the
following be made a part of any approval:
1. That a dimensioned site plan be submitted, showing that the new decks will
not encroach into the 7.5 sideyard setback, prior to issuance of a building
permit.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ray7xee
ht
Enging Te icia'n
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/7/87
Lot 33, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Greenhouse Addition - Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Planninq & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( X ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( } Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Date 7-7-L57 Michael Blair, Secretary yCk-ecu
R6dlninll