PZC Packet 010786-14, ,40�1
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 1/7/86
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Wolff Warehouse) Special Review Use
Retail Sales, IC Zone District
Beaver Track and Trail, Inc.
Continued from 12/17/85 Regular Meeting
Public Hearing
INTRODUCTION:
This application was continued from the last meeting to allow Beaver Track and
Trail, Inc. to obtain a letter from the building owner acknowledging the fact
that parking for the project would be used up with Beaver Track and Trail and
the unrented space would have no use unless additional parking was provided.
Staff has not received any letter, but a tentative meeting with the owner, Mr.
Henry Wolff is scheduled for the week of January 6, 1986. Therefore we would
recommend action on this application be tabled until the regular meeting of
January 21, 1986.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce Special Review Use request;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Continue Public Hearing;
4. Table action on the Special Review Use application
until the regular meeting of January 21, 1986.
spectfu� S b_y� ml ed,
m Williams
Building Administrator
Planning and Zoning Action:
h
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions(/�
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( De ed ;`Withdrawn
J.> 1 'i�I9�o r�tiva�a soN ret
Date P�re'
i°an�Se
, Secretary Vol
--
t
JW/mml
,;,4�.
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 1/7/86
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Wolff Warehouse) Beaver Track and Trail, Inc.
Sign Design Review - IC Zone District
Continued from 12/17/85 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
This application was continued from the last meeting to allow Beaver Track and
Trail, Inc. to obtain a letter from the building owner acknowledging the fact
that Beaver Track and Trail, Inc.'s sign would be using 6 square feet of the 64
square feet allowed for the building owner, thus reducing his signage to 58 square
feet.
Staff has not received any letter in regard to this matter. Staff recommends
another continuance to the January 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting. Staff has a tentative meeting set for the week of the 6th of January
with the owner, Mr. Henry Wolff, Town Staff, and Town Attorney.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce application;
2. Act on design review request of sign.
Respectfully Submitted,
ium7lQQo
Vd"'Ing
liams
g Administrator
Planninq and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( I
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (� D iqQ :� Withdrawn
Date C IS►e�creta
ry�
J�rl/:m�1
A^
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 1/7/86
Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Falcon Pointe Lodge
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the November 26, 1985 meeting, the Town Council approved Ordinance 85-22
on second reading, granting ALV Venture a zone change from Residential High
and Low Density to Specially Planned Area for Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek. The requirements for the Precise Plan and the allowable uses
for Lot 45 are outlined in the attached Ordinance.
The existing structure on Lot 45 consists of 31, 3 bedroom, 3 bath condominiums
that the applicant proposes to divide into 60, 1 bedroom, 1 bath condominiums
to be sold as time share. The attached table summarizes the proposed floor
areas for the purposes of determining the Development Rights needed for the
project and the amount of parking required. Useable open space and snow storage
calculations are also listed.
Plans submitted include site plan, landscape plan,, building elevations, and
floor plans of the proposed condominiums. Changes to the exterior of the
building include the addition of several fireplace flue stacks and a porte
cochere off the main entry. These changes are proposed to match existing
building finishes which include synthetic stone, stucco, and woo? siding.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The only comments Staff has are relative to the drainage plan and the landscape
plan. The drainage plan submitted shows the parking lot runoff being directed
to a filter gallery at the south end of the parking lot. Staff would like to
see a small berm around the south, west, and east sides of the filter gallery
to insure that the runoff from the parking area is directed through it.
The landscape plan deals largely with the relocation of existing plant materials.
Due to the fact that a high percentage of the existing plant materials may not
ew
thevapplicantaandnrequestthe oth3tsaocertain n may �am untsh to rof�newtplanthe nmateridscape Is abewith
added to the plan.
All other aspects of the submittal appear to conform to the guidelines for
the precise plan and the Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and Regulations.
Any approval given, however, should be contingent on the recording of a Final
Plat for the Resubdivision of Lots 45 and 46, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek Subdivision.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 1/7/86
Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Falcon Pointe Lodge
Design Review
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Planning and Zoning Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Action on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
�g6y ylsght_
tngifieering T chnician
Planning an(. Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Condi ions (�
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) De ed ( ))� Withdrawn
Date ..� .� � l � to& Aa�p, secretary dN
2 RL�6uk-t "NIS w me4i Ob. wr
ve KtzOe+'fR0Q ---
3 #PFW*A a QP fly PC#T
RW/mml
Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 1/7/86
Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Falcon Pointe Lodge - Design Review
Attachment
The applicant has submitted detailed floor plans of the proposed condominiums
from which the following information was derived:
Floor Area Calculations for Falcon Pointe Fractionalization
TOTALS X479 5 11 1
IST FLOOR
Unit_
Caic Sq.Ft.
D.R.'s
101
880
3/4
103
710
1/2
104
646
1/2
105
599
1/3
106
681
1/2
107
682
1/2
108
705
1/2
109
761
1./2
110
592
1/3
111
672
1/2
112
781
1/2
113
766
1/2
TOTALS X479 5 11 1
TOTAL. DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REQUIRED: 30
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA = 42,242 sq.ft. a 600 = 70.40 or 71 parking spaces
USEABLE OPEN SPACE: 24,421 sq.ft. = 36% of site
SNOW STORAGE: 4,064 sq.ft. required
PAVEMENT AREA = 20,320 sq.ft. x .20 = 4,064 sq.ft.
RW/mml
2ND -4TH FLOORS
5TH FLOOR
Unit
Calc. Sq.Ft.
D.R.'s
Unit
Ca c. Sq.Ft.
D.R.'s
200
529
1/3
502
738
1/2
201
782
1/2
504
646
1/2
202
738
1/2
203
710
1/2
507
682
112
204
646
1/2
509
761
1/2
205
599
1/3
510
593
1/3
206
681
1/2
512
944
3/4
TOTALS
4,364 3
1/12
207
682
1/2
208
705
1/2
209
761
1/2
210
594
1/3
211
670
1/2
212
836
3/4
213
868
3/4
TOTALS
9,801
7
x 3
x 3
29,403
21
TOTAL. DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REQUIRED: 30
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA = 42,242 sq.ft. a 600 = 70.40 or 71 parking spaces
USEABLE OPEN SPACE: 24,421 sq.ft. = 36% of site
SNOW STORAGE: 4,064 sq.ft. required
PAVEMENT AREA = 20,320 sq.ft. x .20 = 4,064 sq.ft.
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 1/7/86
Lots 29 & 32, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Lot 1, Proposed Wynfield Subdivision)
Wynfield Inn - Site Plan Revisions
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the September 17, 1985 meeting, the Commission gave approval, with conditions,
for the Wynfield Inn's Site Development Plan. Those conditions were as follows:
1. Site grading and drainage plan and utility plan be submitted for Staff
approval prior to issuance of a building permit;
2. Approval is contingent upon approval and recording of a Final Plat for
Wynfield Subdivision which conforms with approved site development plans;
3. Approval is contingent upon assignment of adequate Development Rights to
the site for proposed development.
Applicant is currently working with Staff on the grading, drainage and utility
plan. With minor modifications, this plan will be ready for approval by Staff.
The question of Development Rights is still unresolved, and the Final Plat is
currently being reviewed by Staff for submittal to the Town Council.
The applicant has submitted a revised site plan for Commission approval. The
new site plan is virtually identical to the approved plan with the only change
being the widths of the roadway, Wynfield Place, and the pedestrian walkway
along the road. The width of the road, back of curb to back of curb, has
decreased from 38 feet to 33 feet, and the walkway width from 10 feet to 8 feet.
The landscaped areas, parking lot, and building footprint remain the same as
before.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The previously approved site plan provided for a roadway that would accommodate
three, eleven foot travel lanes along with a 21-2 foot curb and gutter section on
each side. The current plan shows three, ten foot travel lanes with a 11-i foot
curb and gutter section on each side. Staff feels that these changes will
result in the following negative impacts on the project if approved:
1. The ten foot wide travel lanes will not provide adequate width for safe
separation of vehicular traffic;
2. The 11-2 foot curb and gutter sections on each side of the road will not
provide adequate room for snow storage or separation of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic, and may result in maintenance problems due to
inability to carry drainage from the site.
V
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 1/7/86
Lots 29 & 32, Block 2, 3enchmark at Beaver Creek
(Lot 1, Proposed Wynfield Subdivision)
Wynfield Inn - Site Plan Revisions
Design Reviev
Page 2 of 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff feels the 8 foot walkway width would be acceptable, but
needed to stuq the impacts of the reduced roadway width. A
with a Staff recommendation will be presented at the meeting
issue.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project:
2. Presentation by applicant;
Commission review of submitted materials;
Action on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
��y fight✓)
Engineering Technician
additional time is
supplementary report
with regard to this
Planning and_ Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Condit'ons
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued 1) Deni e ithdrawn
Date AIJ. -711100 004, secretary
(Q11,i'H ►x-t�ct -� i0'P[�tu►►'�T �il�Y�'r 'tHtS
S�T� 14cGGP'►YlI6L� I�Nt S Lox ,
PIIJ/11,1,1,
so
40
am
•
M 7 M 0
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
Jy� I�FROM: Norm Wood, Director of Engineering and Community Development
I tll"l�' DATE: January 2, 1986
RE: Guidelines for Fractionalizing Existing Projects
The following guidelines for Fractionalization of Existing Projects have been
revised, based on input received at previous Planning and Zoning Commission
meetina:
1. Project does not create excess Development Rights eligible for transfer,
or require construction of additional building to contain units;
2. Fifty percent or more of the existing units within a building are
remodeled. Remodeling shall consist of dividing larger units into
smaller units;
3. Fractionalization of existing projects shall be approved as a
Special Review Use. The developer shall pay all costs for mitigation
of all appropriate impacts resulting from Fractionalization as
determined in the Special Review Use process;
4. The developer shall pay Capital Improvement Fees on total units in
remodeled prv_jcct to mitigate impacts on community facilities;
5. The existing Certificate of occupancy shall be surrended upon approval
of Fractionalization. Temporary Certificates of Occupancy nay be
issued to allow occupancy of existing units during remodeling if all
requirements of applicable codes are met.
Temporary Certificates of occupancy for remodeled units will be issued
only upon submittal of proof that the partially remodeled project is
within the Development Rights assigned.
Temporary Certificates of Occupancy will be issued on a building by
building, floor by floor, or unit by unit basis.
NW/rwil
A�wR
TO: Planninq and Zoning Commission
FROM: Norm Wood, Director of Engineering and Community Development
Bill James, Town Manager
DATE: December 11, 1385
RE: Guidelines for Fractionalizing Existing Projects
The following guidelines have been referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission,
by Town Council, for review and comment.
Fractionalization can be applied to existing ,rojects if all requirements are
met under the Municipal Code, and Administrative Rules for Fractionalization,
plus, the following:
1. Project does not create excess Development Rights;
2. Fifty percent or more of the existing units are remodeled. Remodeling
shall consist of dividing larger units into smaller units;
3. Fractionalization of existing projects shall be approved as a Special
Review Use. The developer shall pay for mitigation of all appropriate
impacts resulting from fractionalization;
4. The developer shall pay Capital Improvement Fees on total units in
remodeled project to mitigate impacts on community facilities;
5. The existing Certificate of Occupancy shall be surrendered and a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued for occup'ed units on a
unit by unit, floor by floor, or building by building basis;
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy designation shall be made at the
time of application for Fractionalization, and approved during design
review.
A procedure and requirements for Fractionalization of existing projects will be
developed in Ordinance form to modify the current zoning code. This ordinance
will require a public hearing before the Plannirg and Zoning Commission prior
to adoption by Council.
Nw/mml