Loading...
PZC Packet 030486STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/4/86 Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mountain Center - Informal Discussion Continued from 2/18/86 Regular Meeting INTRODUCTION: This will be an informal presentation for the purpose of receiving guidance from the Commission prior to development of final plans. The following items are brought to the Commission's attention to possibly assist in providing this guidance: 1. Proposed plan indicates 103 parking spaces including three stacked spaces which are not normally allowed in parking requirement computations. Minimum parking requirements for the 82,380 square feet floor area is 1/800 square feet or 103 spaces. Potential uses such as automotive or other vehicular repair, retail sales or general offices could increase parking requirements even more; 2. Landscaping and snow storage areas appear to be very limited; 3. Driveway at westerly end of project is located in drainage easement. Debris flow problems have been experienced in this easement within past years. Provisions for water and debris flow in this area are critical; 4. Pole mounted lights along southerly edge of project could provide light for both project and street; 5. Grading along northerly property line as shown at 112:1 slope which will require careful consideration for revegetation; 6. Plans do not indicate any provision for trash storage; 7. Specific comments regarding building design would probably be most beneficial to applicant. Respectfully Ray Ylright Engineering RW/mnl Submitted, Technician STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/4/86 Lot 3, Sunroad Subdivision First Bank of Avon Site Plan Design Review INTRODUCTION: At the February 16, 1986 meeting, the Commission gave final approval to the building design, materials, and colors for the First Bank. Final approval was also granted for the proposed signage for the project, subject to Staff review of the allowable square footage. The site plan was given preliminary approval subject to the following five Staff recommendations: 1. Future access at northeasterly corner of property be deleted or noted as "Exit Only"; 2. Temporary access from Beaver Creek Boulevard be subject to execution of agreement stipulating conditions for removal of entrance; 3. Suggested parking lot lighting be HPS pole mounted, maximum height of 25 feet; 4. Sidewalk materials be designated; 5. Site grading and drainage plan be revised to conform with revised site development plan. Concern was also expressed about landscaping on the west side of the _project, and traffic circulation. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan addressing some of the Commission's concerns. The future access at the northeasterly corner of the project is now shown as "Exit Only", parking lot lighting is shown as pole mounted, high pressure sodium lights, with bollard lighting at the entrances to the site and along walkways. A seven foot wide landscaping strip has been added between the ATM lane and the parking spaces to the west. STAFF COMMENTS: Although the revised site plan shows an area for landscaping just west of the ATM lane, no revised landscaping plan has been submitted showing plant materials, sizes or quantities proposed for this area. The radius of the circular drive for the ATM lane has been increased slightly, but traffic circulation in this area remains the same as in the previous sub- mittal. Staff was directed to check the allowable square footage for the proposed signs. If the signs are considered to be part of an overall sign program for the project, the proposed 96 square feet is the maximum allowed under the current sign code without a variance procedure. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/4/86 Lot 3, Sunroad Subdivision First Bank of Avon Site Plan Design Review Page 2 of 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: If final approval is granted, Staff recommends that such approval be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the temporary access from Beaver Creek Boulevard be subject to the execution of an agreement, satisfactory to the Town Attorney, Stipulating the conditions for the removal of the entrance, prior to issuance of a building permit; 2. That a revised landscaping plan be submitted for Commission approval; 3. That the material for the sidewalk along Beaver Creek Boulevard be concrete; 4. That the site grading and drainage plan be revised to conform with revised site plan and be submitted for Staff approval. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Introduce project; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Commission review of submitted materials; 4. Action on application. Respectfully Submitted, Ray W6�5 yht Engineering Technician Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/4/86 Lot 3, Sunroad Subdivision First Bank of Avon Site Plan Design Review Page 3 of 3 Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (HCl Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patri ci a Cuny, Secretary /I _. . 7e- , RW/mml STAFF REP' TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/4/86 Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Ricks Duplex Preliminary Design Review INTRODUCTION: Roy Ricks has submitted an application for design review of a duplex residence to be located on Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. The proposed building is approximately 5,900 square feet. Building materials include R -wall exterior insulation system with a stucco -like finish proposed to be light sage in color. Roof material is sawn cedar shingles and fascia will be rough sawn cedar. Plans submitted include a site plan, floor plans, building elevations, and a landscaping plan. STAFF COMMENTS: The site plan is fairly complete but is lacking some dimensions. No building ties or dimensions are shown, and the parking area should be dimensione as well. Parking for 8 cars is provided on-site. Four spaces are outside a each unit has its own 2 car garage. The site plan shows some minor grading for drainage but does not show a culvert at the driveway entrance. The landscaping plan shows a variety of plant materials, but no sizes or quantities are shown. No reference is made to any irrigation system on the plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: If preliminary approval is granted on this project, Staff recommends that the following items be addressed prior to final approval: 1. Site plan be revised to show building ties and dimensions, parking and drive dimensions, and culvert for drainage in the street right-of-way; 2. Landscaping plan be revised to show sizes and quantities of proposed plant materials- and reference be made to type of irrigation sy!�em to be used. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Introduce project; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Commission review of submitted material; 4. Action on application. Reectfull_v Submitted, a" Rayke ht Eng g n ri�Te hnicia Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 3/4/86 Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Ricks Duplex Preliminary Design Review Page 2 of 2 Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions X) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn nate ��5��.�C Patricia Cuny, Secretary /�rQJ Pd!nnni STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/4/86 Lot 7. Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Suncrest Phase II 2 Triplex Units INTRODUCTION: At the August 30, 1984 meeting of the Commission, approval was given to build 2 triplex buildings consisting of 3 levels per building. Each of the 6 units was to have approximately 2,200 square feet of living area and a single car garage. The design review file contains a color rendering of the approved building elevations. Colors selected and approved for the buildings were a blue -gray for the building's siding and trim with blue accent for the railings. On July 29, 1985 the building permit was issued to Steve Wydeveld for Suncrest Phase II. The plans that were submitted for the building permit review revealed the same building elevations that were approved at the August 30, 1984 Commission meeting. The building was built during the last 5 months of 1985 with completion of the structure on December 23, 1985. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued for Pnase II on December 23, 1985. During the first week of February, 1986 Ray Wright brought to my attention the fact that the building (as-builts) did not comply with the approved plans of the Commission. Further investigation revealed t�-2e areas that did not comply with the approved design review plans: 1. Roof line and roof overhangs; 2. Windows and doors at ground level and windows on 3rd level; 3. Color of building and color and style of railings. The builder was notified of these discrepancies and a meeting arrangement finally made for February 25, 1986. The builder was asked to bring to that meeting possible solutions to resolve the problems. Staff asked for and received a letter from the builder as well as photographs of the existing building for the purpose of comparison and to be presented for consideration by the Commission. ­. N Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/4/36 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Suncrest Phase II 2 Triplex Units Page 2 of 3 STAFF COMMENTS: To produce the approved building at this stage would require the builder to do the following: 1. Remove roof; 2. Reframe exterior walls to accept approved windows and doors; 3. Reframe roof with overhangs; 4. Reroof; 5. Remove and install approved railings; 6. Paint to approved colors. Staff offers to the Commission, for consideration, the following questions: 1. The definition of the existing building is less pronounced as compared with the approved plans. By adding overhangs without changing the roof lines, would the building take on a tacked -on appearance, thus diminishing the original design? 2. The color of the existing building blends with the surrounding buildings, and by going to the original color scheme, would the building stand out and appear out of place? 3. Does the option exist to have the builder build this phase as to the approved plans? 4. If this existing building is approved as a change to the .asign review, then what happens to color and design with regard to the second building? STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Staff recommends that the existing building be approved as a modification to the approved design review plans. Color blends well and by adding overhangs, the design would be diminished. 2. In regard to the second building, Staff recommends the design of this building be approved with the original design guidelines in mind, except the railings to be the same as existing building if that building is allowed to remain. Colors of this building should be the same as the first phase. i STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/4/86 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Suncrest Townhomes, Phase II, Unit B Exterior Stairway Design Review Continued from 2/18/86 Regular Meeting INTRODUCTION: The owner of Unit B, Dr. George H. Schmidt, D.D.S. has applied for design review approval for an outside stairway. The proposed stairway would provide direct access from the outside parking area to the main living area of the unit. The issues involved with this application include both design review and zoning. The design review issues are relatively simple. The design is for a stairway to be constructed from ground level to a second level balcony. The stairway extends perpendicular to the front of the building and is to be constructed from matching materials. The design issues include: z) The suitability of the imprcvement, including materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; b) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; c) The quality of materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; d) The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; e) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired. The zoning issues are much more complex. The installation of an outside stairway appears to create, or at least creates the potential for, an additional dwelling unit or lock -off unit. The creation of either an additional dwelling unit or a lock -off unit would require additional Development Rights and parking spaces, neither of which have been provided for in the application. STAFF COMMENTS: Dr. Schmidt submitted the attached letter dated February 26, 1986 in which he states the stove and microwave will be removed from the lower level along with the door between the first and second levels. These alterations would technically meet the requirements for eliminating the additional dwelling unit or lock -off unit as the case may be. However, future owners of the unit may not be as conscientious as Dr. Schmidt and the cooking facilities and door could be reinstalled at any time. These changes are entirely within the unit and cannot be monitored since the work required to reinstall the cooking facilities and doors would not require a building permit. Statf Report to P':anning & Zoning Commission - 3/4/86 Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Suncrest Townhomes, Phase II, Unit B Exterior Stairway Design Review Continued from 2/18/86 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the application for design review approval for an outside stairway for Unit B, Suncrest Townhomes, Phase II be denied based upon: 1. Potential zoning conflicts; 2. The design of the proposed improvements is incompatible with the overall building design resulting in an unacceptable level of dissimilarity between adjoining units. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Introduce application; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Consideration and action 'y Commission. Respectfully Submitted, - �� Norm Wood, Director of Engineering and Community Development Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied (� Withdrawn ( ) Date 3/Tlw Patricia Cuny, Secretary��C�;o�J NW/mml