PZC Packet 031886STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/18/86
Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Ricks Duplex
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the March 4, 1986 meeting, Roy Ricks was given preliminary design review approval
for a duplex residence to be located on Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge. The proposed
building is approximately 5,900 square feet. Building materials include R -wall
exterior insulation system with a stucco -like finish proposed to be light sage in
color. Roof material is sawn cedar shingles.
With that preliminary approval, the applicant was directed to revise the site
plan to show building ties and dimensions, add a culvert for drainage in the
street right-of-way, and to dimension the parking and driveway areas. He was
also directed to show the sizes and quantities of proposed plant materials, and
make reference to an irrigation system on the landscaping plan.
The revised plans that have been submitted address the Staff concerns and appear
to be sufficient for final approval of this project.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Commission review of submitted materials;
3. Action on application.
RespectffuNllyy Submitted,
Enginee ing Technician
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Date Patricia Cuny, Secretary
RW/mml
000'°4
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/18/86
Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mountair Center - Warehouse/Wholesale
Final Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
At the March 4, 1946 meeting, Michael Nowak of Nowak -Stevens Architects of
Denver, representing the owner of Lots 26-28, Block 1, gave an in Formal
presentation to the Commission outlining a proposal for a warehouse/wholesale
project to be built on these lots. The project generally consists of a three
story building, containing approximately 82,400 square feet. The first level,
which is completely below grade, is proposed to house a mini -warehouse operation
to be retained by the developer. The main level and the upper level will consist
of warehouse space which is proposed to be condominiumized in order to sell the
individual spaces to businesses. Allowable uses in the IC Zone District include
warehouse, laboratories, electrical substation, light manufacturing plants,
wholesale sales outlets, showrooms, industrial, construction, and wholesale
offices.
Some of the concerns expressed by the Commission at the previous meeting were:
1. That snow storage was inadequate;
2. Open space was below minimum requirements;
3. Parking was below minimum requirements;
4. Landscaping around the site was insufficient.
the Commission generally felt that the building design was acceptable. The
proposed materials include a comiination of smooth face and split face concrete
block, to be a mauve color.
A revised site plan has been submitted to address the Commission's concerrs.
Some of the changes to the site plan include:
1. The layout of the parking area north of the building has been revised
to increase open space and snow stc,;,age areas;
2. 104 parking spaces have been provided on-site;
3. Some landscape islands have been added within the parking areas;
4. Landscaping around the site has been increased.
10'
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/18/86
Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mountain Center - Warehouse/Wholesale
Final Design Review
Page 2 of 4
STAFF COMMENTS:
Review of the revised site plan has resulted in the following information:
Impervious Surface
Open Space
Pavement Area
Snow Storage
Building height
Proposed
75% of site
25% of site
45,560 sq. ft.
9,400 sq. ft.
Approximately 36 feet
Allowable
75% (maximum)
25% (minimum)
N/A
9,110 sq. ft. req'd.
60 feet maximum
Parking has been calculated on the basis of one space per 800 square feet for the
entire floor area of the project. The open space is now at the minimum allowable
in this zone district. Snow storage shown on the site plan is adequate for the
amount of pavement area. Lot coverage by impervious surface is at the maximum
allowable level.
In reviewing this application, the Commission shall consider the following items:
a. The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it is
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
c. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvements;
d. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
e. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be
impaired.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The proposed design generally conforms with the requirements of the Zoning Code
and Staff recommends that design approval be given for general building design
and site layout for the project, subject to Commission concurrence with the
above design review criteria and the recommendations below. Final approval
should be subject to submission of additional plans and documents addressing
the following items:
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/18/86
Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mountain Center - Warehouse/Wholesale
Final Design Review
Page 3 of 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, CON'T.:
1. GENERAL
a. Any approval will have to be contingent on the recording of a
Subdivision Plat for Lots 26••28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek, vacating the existing interior lot lines and easements;
b. Approval is valid only for those uses which are specifically allowed
in the IC Zone District. Any application for a Special Review Use
in this project would be subject to available on-site parking.
2. SITE PLAN
a. The 12:1 slope on the north side of the property be retained with
jute -mesh, or equivalent, and at least temporary irrigation be
provided in this area to assure revegetation effort;
b. Additional screening be provided along Nottingham Road by the use
of Evergreen trees in conjunction with proposed Decidious trees;
c. Specify type of irrigation system to be used in various landscaped
areas;
d. A complete grading and drainage plan be submitted detailing facilities
for the treatment of parking lot runoff, as well as an engineered
design for the existing drainage swale on the west end of the project
to provide for protection from runoff and debris flows;
e. Consideration should be given to alternate locations for roof drain
discharge.
3. BUILDING
a. Building materials and colors be more specifically described on
the plans;
b. Lighting details including fixture types, pole heights, etc., be
submitted and approved;
c. A Comprehensive Sign Program be submitted specifying the maximum
sign size for each business, the materials and colors for signs,
the number and sizes of any project entry signs and directories;
d. Details for the trash enclosures be submitted.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/18/86
Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Mountain Center - Warehouse/Wholesale
Final Design Review
Page 4 of 4
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
(�
fight
ngineering Technician
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (1--),
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date
" _ Patricia Cuny, Secretary %
�i i--__��_/ / iii. i., ., _ii►�-.t._i✓
aAz��� ) a � . — -
RW/mm,
M
40
s
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/18/86
Tract P, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Upper Eagle Valley Regional Water Authority
Water Treatment Plant - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a design for a Water Treatment Plant
on Tract P, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek at the August 15, 1985 meeting.
After receiving bids for construction, it became necessary to reduce costs to
match available funds. A portion of the cost reduction was achieved by eliminating
construction of the administrative area. The elimination of the administrative
area results in a design change to building footprint and the north, south and
west elevations. Consequently, a new design review approval is required.
It is anticipated that this will become a phased project with the administrative
area being added with a second phase. At that time the construction would conform
with the original design approved.
STAFF COMMENTS:
All materials and colors will be as per the original approval. The administrative
area consisted of approximately 2,900 square feet on the westerly end of the
Water Treatment Plant. The remaining building area is approximately 13,350
square feet. Considering the overall size of the building, the deletion of
the administrative area is a relatively minor reduction. The major change in
appearance is the west elevation which becomes much less ornate than the
previously approved design. This may be partially offset by the fact that the
front of the building will be set back approximately 50 feet further from the
street. This would leave room for the required parking spaces without the
previously approved front lot setback variance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
This is not a regular agenda item and therefore final action is not recommended.
In order to allow proceeding with construction, the following actions are
recommended:
1. Preliminary approval of revised building design subject to the submission
of a revised site plan including:
a. Revised parking layout which does not encroach into front lot setback;
b. Landscape plan conforming to revised site plan;
Final design approval be withheld until scheduled as a regular agenda item.
�^'k
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/18/86
Tract P, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Upper Eagle Valley Regional Water Authority
Water Treatment Plant - Design Review
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce project;
2. Applicant presentation;
3. Commission review and action.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering
and Community Development
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended
Conditions (XS
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( )
Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date ,3 Patricia Cuny, Secretary
%
��n����� C �2r
�n !�d. / If - I I
_w
NW/mml