PZC Minutes 050686G
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINTUES OF PLANNING AND 'ONING COMMISSION MEETING
MAY 6, 1986
The regular meeting of the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission was
held on May 6, 1986 at 7:15 PM in the Town Council Chambers of the
Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon,
Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Mike Blair.
Members Present: Mark Donaldson, Pat Cuny, Mike Blair,
Tom Landauer, Jeff Maddox, Buzz Reynolds
Members Absent: Charlie Gersbach
Staff Present: Norm Wood, Director of Engineering and
Community Development - Ray Wright,
Engineering Technician - Maggie Lach,
Recording Secretary
(_irk Session
Wood reviewed agenda items of Mey 61 1986 with Commission members.
Regular Agenda Items - 7:35 PM
Blair welcomed new commission member Albert "Buzz" Reynolds.
The Commission deferred election of officers to the end of the
meeting.
Eaglebend Sketch Plan - East of Nottingham Station & North of
Eagle River (Stonebridge Area)
Wood stated that a petition had been filed for the annexation of
Eaglebend Subdivision to the Town. Town Council accepted the
petition and is scheduled for final reading May 27, 1986. One of
the conditions of annexation is an annexation agreement which
conditioned the annexation upon approval of specific zoning
requests. Wood suggested th=m review be broken down into
categories: Subdivision, SF'A zoning, which is broken down into 6
different districts, requested uses and suggested regulations for
each district, and design review. Wood explained that one of the
purposes of the subdivision is the resubdivision process and
establishes various districts in that area which would have
different zoning or use characteristics. The streets and roads
are already in place and those would be dealt with in a
subdividers agreement.
Arthur Wise, architect of project stated that he felt they had an
acceptable plan. Wise then proceeded with slide presentation of
project for Commission review.
Wise stated that the planning team for Eaglebend is Intermountain
Engineering, and the firm of Arthur Wise.
Wise then explained slides to Commission.
Area I is 2.9 acres and will be the most dense area in the
Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 2 of 5
Eaglebend Sketch Plan - East of Nottingham Station & North of
Eagle River (Stonebridge Area). Con't.
development consisting of 90 units, or 67 develo, vent rights.
This area contains a high rise building for housing and will have
some minor commercial in it, offices and retail and a community
amenity building which includes swimming pool, sauna, meeting
room, restaurant and offices for the entire development. Area II
is comprised of 10 unit buildings. It is 7.6 acres with 110
proposed units, or 03 development rights. Area III is comprised
of an existing development called Stonebridge. It is 6.5 acres
and a commercial amenity building will be built containing a spa
and managers unit. Area IV is 3.2 acres and will contain townhome
development with 32 living units with 32 development rights. Area
V is subdivided into duplex lots. It is 11.9 acres with 38 units
and 38 development rights. Area VI is the Frank Doll property.
It is a single family residence and is proposed to Piave 2
development rights to be consistent with the duplex lots and is
1.5 acres.
Wise continued review of slides with Commission, and presented a
scale model of Areas I and I1 for Commission review after slide
presentation.
Discussion followed on traffic flow, access, roads, utilities and
water.
The Commission had no general objection to SPA zoning.
Wood stated that next step of review included the proposed uses
and zoning limitations of Areas I, II, III, etc.
Wood stated that requsted zoning for Area I comes out to
approximately 23 units per acres or 67 development rights.
Commercial space is limited to 15% of building area.
Commission discussed building height with regard to structured
parking and parking requirements for proposed development.
Commission concurred that 90 foot height of building is agreeable
with condition that there be 2 levels of covered parking or a 70
foot height with no structured parking.
Discussion followed on landscaping for Area I, along with
setbacks.
Blair stated that Arev II is the next highest density and also has
multi -family type uses, and no commercial uses.
Discussion followed on setbacks.
Wood stated that key issues are development rights, building
height, and west setback line. Building height is 45 feet and
west side yard setback is 50 feet.
Wood stated that Area III develupment is going to be very similar
to what was approved through the County. Staff has suggested a
100 foot setback from the east property line. Density is less
than 3 units per acre.
Wood further explained that Area IV has key areas of building
height, development rights requested and type of development
requested. Height is 35 feet along with standard building area
percentages and standard setbacks. Area V is requesting 2
development rights per lot for a total of 3B development rights.
Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 3 of 5
E_aglebend Sketch Plan - East of Nottingham Station & North of
Eagle River (Stonebridge Area), Con t.
These lots may need different setbacks to maintain adequate
building areas. Area VI is the Frank Doll property which
currently has a single family residence and Staff is suggesting it
be zoned a duplex lot or assign 2 development rights to it.
Blair then reviewed suggested criteria for the proposed zoning and
uses.
Discussion followed.
Eaolebend - Area II & III - Design Review - Conceptual
Wood stated that Area II is the westerly area of Eaglebend, just
to west of high density area. It consists of 11 identical
buildings with 10 condominium units each and 10 covered parking
spaces in each. The units vary in size from 725 square foot one
bedroom units, to 1,450 square foot 3 bedroom units. Each
building would be 3 stories plus a loft. Proposed building
materials are redwood or cedar siding with a metal roof. What is
proposed does fall within the required development rights. Total
parking indicates 219 parking spaces would be required, which also
includes guest spaces, and it appears that 237 parking spaces have
been provide['
Wise then presented color rendering and explained concept to
Commission.
Discussion followed.
Wood then reviewed Staff comments with Commission.
Discussion followed on landscaping, pedestrian ways,
elevations, parking and access.
Blair summarized and stated that the general plan seemed
acceptable, that building materials and design are generally
acceptable. Elevations on northerly side could have more added
interest, and landscaping plan could be changed regarding
relocation of pedestrian ways and bike paths, along with some
plant materials to accommodate snow storage and to add interest to
sides of the building. Removal of some plant materials from the
roadway would be helpful along with tying Areas I and II together
visually.
Wood stated that proposed development for Area III consists of 6
residential units similar to the existing units, 2 garages similar
to existing garages and an additi.-)nal building which would contain
a resr.dential unit for an on-site manager and spa facilities for
residents and guests. Proposed development consists of a cluster
of 4 residential units and another cluster of 2 residential units.
The garages are in the setbacks.
Wood explained proposed development from plans.
Blair summarized that building design, garages and managers unit
were generally acceptable.
Blair thanked Wise for his presentation.
Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 4 of 5
Lot 72 Blh 2 BM @ BC - Buck Creek Plaza, Unit 6 Greenhouse
Addition - Design Review
Cuny stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Wright stated that Pat and Rick Cuny, owners of Unit 6, Buck Creek
Plaza have applied for design review of a proposed greenhouse
addition. The proposed greenhouse would enclose the balcony
directly in front of unit 6. Applicant has submitted photographs
showing the exterior of this area of the building as it exists,
along with a product brochure identifying the style of the
structure proposed for the addition. There is also a letter from
3 of the officers of the Buck Creek Condominium Association
granting the applicant permission to construct the addition.
Rick Cuny, applicant stated that he felt he had found a quality
company called Energy Rooms of Colorado out of Boulder. The
product is a double glazed insulated glass. Installation is
standard. The enclosure stands 41" high, and attaches to a header
beam that is already in place. The width is 5' 2" with a length
of 23' 8 3/4". It has a door entrance and 2 windows for
circulation. Cuny explained he has stored as much as 3 corJs of
wood on the deck, which can run approximately 2,400 pounds per
cord. With the addition, wood would no longer be stored on the
deck. This addition is approximately 64 pounds per linear foot,
therefore a a•ibstantial tradeoff in weight.
Donaldson asked if decks were common areas.
Cuny stated that because his unit is an end unit, he could add the
greenhouse, whereas the other units would not be able to close off
the access.
Wood stated that plat does show deck as common area. In reviewing
this with John Dunn, he requested that approval be through Owners
Association and not just the officers.
Cuny did not feel that would be a problem.
Donaldson motioned to approve the application as submitted with
condition that letter from Homeowner's Association be submitted
with their approval.
Landauer seconded.
Cuny abstained.
Motion carried.
Lot 7 Blk. 1 W.R. - Suncrest Townhomes - Irrigation System
Cuny rejoined Commission discussion.
Wood stated that this request was presented to Commission at the
last meeting and based upon an informal request by the developer
of the property. The Commission reaffirmed their position that an
irrigation system be required, based upon the original plans.
Following that meeting, a letter was received from Greg Kraft
requesting that irrigation system not be required, and based upon
that the Commission reaffirmed their previous decision. Since
that time the developer is now installing the irrigation system.
Cuny motioned that developer install the irrigation system as per
the approved plans.
Maddox seconded.
Passed unanimously.
Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 5 of 5
Reading & Approval of P & Z Mintues of 4/15/86 Regular Meeting
Maddox, motioned to approve the minutes of the April 15, 1986
regular meeting as submitted.
Landauer seconded.
Passed unanimously.
Election of Officers
Cuny motioned that Blair remain as chairman.
Landauer seconded.
Cuny motioned that nominations cease.
Landauer seconded.
Passed unanimously.
Landauer nominated Donaldson as Vice Chairman.
Maddox seconded.
Passed unanimously.
Donaldson nominated Cuny as Secretary.
Landauer seconded.
Passed unanimously.
Other Business
Concerns of Eaglebend access were discussed.
Wood suggested that Commission meet at 5:30 PM for the next
regular meeting on May 20, 1986 to discuss the Zoning Code.
There being no further business to discuss, Landauer motioned to
adjourn the meeting.
Maddox seconded.
Passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 11:00 PM.
ectfull Submitted
Marg et M. Lach
Recur, ing Secretary
Commission Approval
M. Blair x_
P. Cuny rtk�� t12
T. Landauer /
J. Maddox.
M. Donaldson
C. Bersbach
A. Reynolds
Q
Date �G