PZC Packet 090286STAFF ')RT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/2/86
Wynfield Inn
Lots 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Revised Sign Program - Design Review
Continued from 8/19/86 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
At the August 19, 1986 meeting, the Commission continued this application, pending
the submittal of revised drawings. The applicant, ADART, Inc. out of Oakland,
California has submitted revised plans for a new sign program for the Wynfield
Inn at Avon.
This newest plan calls for two building signs and one freestanding sign. The
building signs are individually backlit letters. The faces are green with gold
returns. Each building sign is approximately 32 square feet in size. The
freestanding sign is a total of 6' high and 5' wide, including the base. The
actual sign area for this sign is approximately 15.5 squara feet per side for a
total of 31 square feet. This sign will be an interior lit lexan plastic structure
with a polished gold aluminum border. This sign is approximately K *hick. The
background of the sign is dark green with white le6-tering. The base W. ' have a
stucco finish similar to the building.
STAFF COMMENTS:
This new proposal calls for a total sign area for the project of approximately
95 square feet. This total fits within the limits for a "Sign Program" as
described in the Sign Code.
Signs currently approved for the project total 122 square feet. They include
three building signs and one freestanding sign. The freestanding sign currently
approved is approximately 5' 6"high by 12' wide, compared with a 6' high by 5'
wide freestanding sign that is being proposed. The new building signs may be
slightly larger than those currently approved (31 square feet versus 26 square
feet), but they appear in only two places on the building instead of the three
locations previo,.sly approved.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
If the Commission approves this new sign proposal, Staff suggests that the
Commission require the green background color on the freestanding sign be dark
enough to minimize the amount of light that will pass through it.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Commission review of submitted materials;
Act on application.
Staff Report to Plann'ng & Zoning Commission - 9/2/86
Wynfield Inn
Lots 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Revised Sign Program - Design Review
Continued from 8/19/86 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
Respectfu%ley Submitted,
&nygi
ghEneering echnician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted � ) Approved with Recommended Conditions GkI
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date Patricia Cuny, Secretary "
r
R6�/nu it
�1
of
•1
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/2/86
Riverside Center
Lot 1, Riverside Center Addition
Design Review - Continued from 8/19/86 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
At the August 5, 1986 meeting, the Commission heard a presentation from the
applicant on their proposed project to be located on what is known as the
Selby Property. The project generally -onsists of approximately 8,800 square
feet of mixed use commercial space to be constructed on two levels. Proposed
uses consist of restaurant, retail shops, personal service shops and offices.
The building will have a flat roof with a small area near the west end having
a peaked standing seam metal roof. The remainder of the building will be
stucco. Proposed colors are Heritage Grey with Villager Red trim, and forest
green roof and columns.
STAFF COMMENTS:
At the previous meeting it was pointed out that there were many items that
needed to be addressed by the applicant, and as a result, no formal action was
taken by the Commission.
Si:ice that time the applicant has submitted additional information that includes
:clans for the proposed accel-decel lanes to be built along Highway 6, site
Elevations showing the relationship between the building and existing site
features, and additional site gradin, and drainage plans.
Staff has been working with the applicant to resolve problems with the site
grading and drainage plan which comprise most of the concerns of the Staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Since most of the items that need to be addressed are typically reviewed and
approved at Staff level, Staff recommends that, if the Commission feels that
final design review approval is appropriate, it be granted subject to the
following conditions:
1. That a grading and drainage plan, along with a fully dimensioned site plan,
be submitted for Staff to verify compliance with all applicable zoning
and design review regulations;
2. That the Final plans be approved by the Fire Protection District prior•
to issuance of a building permit;
3. That a copy of the State Highway access permit from Highway 6 be submitted
for Town records;
IP
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/2%86
Riverside Center
Lot 1, Riverside Center Addition
Design Review - Continued from 8/19/86 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
4. That a complete Sign Program be approved by the Commission prior to
issuance of a building permit;
5. That the Final Plat for the Riverside Center Addition be duly recorded.
Areas t: -.at may remain of concern to the Commission include the type of retaining
walls and finish surface , pedestrian access to the property from the east and
west, and the Sign Program. The Commiss4on should be specific in their approval
regarding these items.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Presentation ;r. applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Act on application in accordance with attached Design Review Guidelines.
Respectfully Submitted,
'
0
Ray fight
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
"i2�� �GlirL�
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/2/86
Suncrest Townhomes, Phase II
Lot 7, Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision
Greenhouse Adaitions - Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
Wydeveld Construction has applied for design review of greenhouse additions to
Suncrest Phase II Townhomes. The plan calls for enclosing deck and patio areas
in the south side of the building. Building materials are proposed to match the
existing finishes which are cedar siding and wood shingles. This proposed
construction does not encroach into any setback areas or common areas as shown
on the Final Plat for Suncrest Townhomes Phase II.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce Project;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Commission review of submitted materials;
4. Act on application.
Respectfully Submitted,
�R3y righ*
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ('KJ
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
RW/mml
^-p"",
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/2/86
Wildflower Condominiums
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
Wydeveld construction has applied for final design review of a multi -family
project to be located on Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. The proposed •
project consists of two buildings, each containing 4 - 2 bedroom units. The
applicant proposes to fractionalize the 4 Residential Development Rights
currently assigned to Lot 18 in order to construct the 8 units.
The buildings contain one level of garage parking with 2 levels of condominiums
above. Exterior finish is proposed to be smooth cedar siding with wood shingles
on the roof. Each building contains a common laundry room, and a common sauna
and spa area.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Plans submitted for the project include a site plan, floor plans and building
elevations. Grading, drainage and landscaping are all shown on the site plan.
For the purpose of review, we will address each plan individually.
SITE PLAN:
1. Parking requirements for this project are as follows -
8 - 2 bedroom units = 2 spaces/unit = 16 spaces
3 guest spaces per Zoning Code = 3 spaces
Total parking requirement = 19 spaces
The plans call for 10 garages, 5 in each building. Although the spaces
outside the garage may be counted as additional parking, conflicts may
arise as a result of guest parking being provided in front of the garages.
Consideration should be given to placing the guest parking spaces in a
different location;
2. Staff suggests that the drainage filter gallery shown along the north edge
of the drive be 2' wide and 3' deep, with some provision made for detention
of runoff. The size of the rock cover on the gallery should be specified
and a section through the gallery would be helpful;
3. The culvert under the drive should be moved back into the bank and dropped
slightly to maintain adequate cover over the pipe;
4. The plan makes note of an irrigation system to be provided. The type of
irrigation system(s) should be specified;
00%N
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/2/86
Wildflower Conaominiums
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Design Review
Page 2 of 3
5. Site plan shows no building, site or entry lighting for the project;
FLOOR PLANS: I
1. Applicant has submitted a typical floor plan for the units and calculates
the floor area to be 799 square feet. Under the fractionalization ordinance,
the Development Rights needed "or the project are calculated as follows:
Unit areas of 601 through 800 ,quare feet = 1/2 Development Right
x 8 Units
4 Development Rights needed
The applicant must follow the Administrative Procedures for Fractionalized
Projects, a copy of which is attached to tnis report.
Staff would like to have fully dimensioned floor plans submitted prior
to final approval;
BUILDING ELEVATIONS:
1. Building colors are not indicated on the plans;
2. The east elevation shows lettering on the building. If a project sign
is being proposed, details must be submitted;
3. Details of the trash enclosure should be submitted;
4. Building height calculations should be shown;
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff offers the following suggestions to be considered as conditions to be 'net
prior to final approval of this project:
1. That the guest parking spaces rec,uired for the project be situated so as
not to conflict with access to the garages;
2. That the applicant sutmit a revised grading and drainage plan, addressing
Staff coni-rns, for Staff review and approval;
3. That the type of irrigation system be specified on the plans;
4. That fully dimensioned floor plans be submitted according to the Adminis-
trative Procedures for Fractionalized Projects;
5. That sign details, site lighting details be submitted, if applicable;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/2/86
Wildflower Condominiums
Lot 18, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Design Review
Page 3 of 3
6. Building elevations be revised to show colors, building heights, and
details of the trash enclosure.
Respectfully
Submitted,
LC/ ,
a rig
En ineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
i/� . /J
Date Woe/_Kk___ Patricia Cuny, Secretary
M
RW/mml