Loading...
PZC Packet 100786STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 10/7/86 Eaglewood at Vail - Conceptual Review Meyers Ranch Annexation - Highway 6 West of Sunridge INTRODUCTION: The proposed project is located on the easterly portion of the property commonly known as Meyers Ranch. This property is located on the north side of Highway 6, immediately west of Sunridge II. The parcel proposed for development is designated as Parcel 2 on the annexation map with an indicated area of 11.40 acres. This property has not been subdivided and consequently, the net developable area of the property has not been determined. Ordinance 81-29, Series of 1981 assigned RHDC zoning designation to the property subject to the following conditions and limitations: a. That the use of the property shall be limited to 140 residential units, commercial uses limited to 9,000 square feet (of which not more than 4,000 square feet shall be a restaurant unit, and not more than 5,000 square feet shall be other types of commercial units), and such non-commercial, recreational open space uses as may be specifically approved by the Design Review Board of the Town of Avon. b. That improvements on the property shall not be divided on a time-share basis. c. That no structure exceeding 60 feet of height shall be constructed on the subject property except within that area described in Exhibit "B" hereto, within which area structures may be erected up to but not exceeding the maximum otherwise allowable in the RHDC Zone District, as more specifically defined and limited on Exhibit "B". d. That the foregoing limitations shall be incorporated into the covenants running with the subject property upon the development thereof, which limitations shall be subject to the approval of the Town and shall not be amended without the consent of the Town. e. That the portion of the subject property north of the Eagle River shall be used only for park land or open space, subject to the right of the Avon Metropolitan District or its successors in interest to conduct activities thereon related to water wells or water storage on such portion of the subject property. The proposed project consists of four buildings containing a total of 195, one and two bedroom condominium units. The proposed buildings are 3 to 4 story structures with the largest containing 64 units and the smallest containing 39 units. The four buildings are arranged on the site to retain the majority of the large trees which now exist. These are primarily located along the Eagle River and the irrigation ditch which crosses the property as well as around the existing buildings on the site. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Eaglewood at Vail - Conceptual Review Meyers Ranch Annexation - Highway 6 West of Sunridge Page 2 of 5 Access to the site is from Highway 6 and two entrances to the project are indicated. Proposed parking includes 164 surface spaces and 74 covered or partially covered spaces for a total of 238 parking spaces. On-site amenities shown include a swimming pool and hot tub. Reference is made to a path to platform tennis and a possible pedestrian path along the Eagle River. STAFF COMMENTS: The following comments are in regard to zoning related matters and should be considered in the design review process: 1. Current zoning allows up to 140 residential units on the site. The proposed project would require conformance with the fractionalization procedures of the zoning code for the proposed 195 units to be acceptable; 2. Complete information has not been provided, but the proposed structures appear to meet the maximum building height limitation of 60 feet; 3. The location of the proposed development does not include the property north of the Eagle River which is restricted to park land or open space uses subject to the right of Avon Metro District use for water wells or storage; 4. The conceptual site plan indicates the proposed development conforms with all applicable setback lines and easements. However, the actual location of some setback and easement lines will not be determined until the subdivision process is complete. Also, the easterly driveway is located at the property line and the landscape buffer is located entirely on the Sunridge property. If this is acceptable, it should be confirmed in writing by the appropriate body legally authorized to represent the Sunridge owners; 5. The proposed 238 parking spaces does not meet minimum parking requirements. These requirements are: 1 bedroom units 136 @ 1.5 = 204 spaces 2 bedroom units 59 @ 2.0 = 118 spaces Multi -family guest 10 spaces TOTAL REQUIRED 332 spaces Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Eaglewood at Vail - Conceptual Review Meyers Ranch Annexation - Highway 6 West of Sunridge Page 3 of 5 If the following criteria is met, the Commission may grant up to a 15% reduction in parking requirements through the design review process: V a. No parking spaces are reserved for use (except by handicapped persons); b. The project will be served by the Town's bus system; c. The project is located within a TC, SC, RHDC or SPA zone district; d. Adequate snow storage will be provided on-site; If the maximum 15% reduction were allowed, minimum parking requirements would be 282 spaces; 6. The subdivision process has not been completed for this property and any development should be contingent upon conformance with any requirements which might be established through this process. These may include but are not necessarily limited to: a. Provisions for off-site drainage across the site; b. Establishment of setback and easement lines for the Eagle River irrigation ditch and other possible drainage features; c. Possible dedication for park land or open space; d. The availability and adequacy of utilities to the site; 7. The following items are not necessarily a part of the conceptual review but may be critical in the final design process: a. Access grades, site grading and drainage, snow storage and parking lot run-off treatment facilities; b. Access (entrance) permits must be obtained from the Colorado Department of Highways. Acceleration and deceleration lanes will probably be required and could possibly affect site grading; c. On-site water line and additional fire hydrants may be required for minimum fire protection levels; d. On-site and off-site pedestrian circulation. This is particularly important since the project is located close to, but not on a Town bus route. 4D Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Eaglewood at Vail - Conceptual Review Meyers Ranch Annexation - Highway 6 West of Sunridge Page 4 of 5 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the Commission review the available information for conformance with the design guidelines as outlined in the Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and Regulations and as attached to this report. If the improvements are not found to be in conformance with these guidelines, the Commission should identify the areas of non-conformance and if possible, provide some guidance for incorporation in development of final plans. If the proposed improvements are found to be in conformance with the guidelines, the Commission may wish to give a conceptual approval based upon limited information available with the condition that further approvals will be su ject to: a. Submittal of all materials and information as required by the Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and Regulations; b. Final development plans conform with all applicable zoning regulations including parking, drainage, snow storage, setbacks, building heights and densities, including fractionalization of development rights; c. Conformance with all applicable subdivision regulations; d. The issuance of access permit by the Colorado Department of Highways and conformance with all requirements of such permit. RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE: 1. Introduce application; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Staff comments; 4. Commission review and action. Respectfully Submitted, Norm Wood Director of Engineering and Community Development Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Eaglewood at Vail - Conceptual Review Meyers Ranch Annexation - Highway 6 West of Sunridge Page 5 of 5 Planning & Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions { ) Approved with/Mo ified Cond'tion� ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date ��' �__ Secretary Commission suggested that applicant pay particular attention to public, pedestrian, and vehicular ways; consider the possibility of including a limited commercial area within the project; and consideration be given to alternate architectural styles Applicant is to continue working with Staff on the site development plan Note: adherance to parking and on-site snow storage regulations will be required. NW/mml .n STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 10/7/86 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Special Review Use - Automotive Repair, IC Zone District Public Hearing INTRODUCTION: Robert Warner, Jr., dba Metcalf Ventures has submitted an application for a Special Review Use to allow automotive repair (body and frame shop) on Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Greek. Lot 11 is an undeveloped lot on the west side of Metcalf Road in i:he IC (Industrial and Commercial) Zone District. Plans for an approximately 7,000 square foot building have been submitted for design review in conjunction with the requested special review use. Automotive or other vehicular sales and repair shops may be allowed in the IC Zone District when approved as a special review use. The required Notices of Public Hearing for the special review use have been mailed and posted. STAFF COMMENTS: In accordance with Section 17.20.020 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Commission shall determine the following in considering the suitability of a special review use: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; 2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zoning code and the applicable zoning district; and 3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding land uses and uses in the area. In addition, the Commission shall consider: A. The adequacy of access to the site with respect to the width of adjacent streets, their grades, intersection safety, visibility and entrance into the lot to be developed; B. Whether there exists safe access and sufficient water pressure to provide fire protection; C. The existant water pressure in the area and the ability of the water system to supply domestic needs; D. Whether there will be provided sufficient off-street parking as determined by (1) the intended use of the property; (2) walking distance to the downtown area; and (3) the availability of public transportation; E. The impact of the development considering the potential for stream and air pollution, the availability of public transportation and other public or private services, and any other factors affecting the overall development and the surrounding areas, including but not limited to building height, view plane, drainage and other physical and aesthetical features. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Special Review Use - Automotive Repair, IC Zone District Public Hearing Page 2 of 3 Staff Comments with regard to the preceeding determinations are: 1. The proposed special review use complies with requirements imposed by the zoning code; 2. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zoning code and IC zone district; and 3. The design review process for building design and site development can be used to assure the proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses and uses in the area. An automobile repair shop currently exists on Lot 13 which is in the same general area as the requested special review use; A. The proposed use does not increase access requirements beyond those for allowed uses within the zone district; B. The proposed use is located on property served by Avon Metro District which provides both water service and fire protection services. Access and special fire protection measures, if required, can be dealt with through the design review and building permit process; C. The proposed use does not increase domestic water supply demands beyond those required for allowed uses within the zone district; D. The design review process should assure that minimum off-street parking requirements are met; E. The impart of the development and proposed use should be thoroughly addressed in the design review process. The proposed development is specifically designed for the proposed use. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the requested special review use for automotive repair (body and frame shop) on Lot 11, -lock 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek if the Commission concurs with the above Staff comments. If the special review use is approved, it should be contingent upon design review approval of building and site development plans specifically designed for the proposed use in order to mitigate impacts to surrounding properties. Staff recommends that action on this application be taken in the form of adopting Resolution No. 86-4. The resolution can easily be modified for any action the Commission would take. The Resolution will then be forwarded to the Town Council for final action. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Comm;ssion - 10/7/86 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creak Special Review Use - Automotive Repair, IC Zone District Public Hearing Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE: 1. Introduce application; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Public Hearing; , 4. Review by Commission (consider SRU criteria); 5. Adopt Resolution No. 86-4 as presented or with modifications. Respectfully Submitted, i s% ✓✓✓Norm Wood Director of Engineering and Community Development Planning & Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) ( Wiithdr}wn ( ) / CH4a f 64✓JS9 // ,gct.,vG fin. � '7'(,, 5'kO4�,� Date D�%��f� it�T—�+4Y� Secretary Adopt Resolution 86-4 as presented and recommend Council approve the Special Review Use. The Special Review Use complies with Section 17.20.020 findings Required, use is appropriate for the IC Zone District because there is another business of that nature currently in existence in that zone district. NW/mml STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING t ZONING COMMISSION - 10/7/66 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Auto Body and Frame - Design Review INTRODUCTION: Robert Warner, Jr., dba Metcalf Ventures has submitted an application for design review approval for an Industrial/Commercial building on Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The building is designed to accommodate an automobile body and frame shop which is allowed in the IC zone district as a special review use. A special review use application has been filed in conjunction with the design review application and to a limited extent, the two applications should be considered together. The design review process can be effective in mitigating a number of the impacts which may be created by the proposed special review use. The proposed building contains approximately 5,990 square feet on the ground level and a second floor office area of approximately 880 square feet. The proposed building will be set back into the hillside with the northerly and westerly walls also functioning as retaining walls. With a roof pitch of 2.6 to 12 the maximum building height from lowest ground elevation to peak of roof is approximately 24 feet. Proposed building materials consist of T-111 plywood siding and metal roof. Proposed colors are Olympic stain #911 on the siding with Azure Blue by Colorclad roof and trim. The site development plan shows 20 parking spaces, 1 loading space and a 20' x 36' auto storage area. Sign program includes a 10 square foot freestanding sign at the entrance plus 10" high individual wood letters on the building for project identification and direction. Total proposed sign area is approximately 58 square feet with colors to match wood siding and roof. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed site development conforms with minimum zoning code_ requirements for setbacks, building area ratio, minimum useable open space, building height and on-site snow storage. Parking requirments for personal service and repair establishments is 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet GLFA. The proposed building area of 6,870 square feet results in a parking requirement of 20.6 spaces. the site plan shows 20 parking spaces plus a 20' x 36' auto storage area capable of holding 4 to 6 vehicles. Based upon conformance with appl4*able zoning regulations, Staff suggests the Commission concentrate their review on conformance with design review guidelines as outlined at the back of this report. Particular emphasis in the design review should be placed on impacts which may be created by the proposed use which can be mitigated by design features. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Auto Body and Frame - Design Review Page 2 of 4 The following areas are noted for special consideration: 1. The site grading plan indicates approximately 1:1 slopes along the northerly and westerly sides of the building. These slopes, combined with drainage from the hillsides above will most likely result in severe erosion problems, and presents some potential for building damage under certain circumstances. Consideration should be given to the addition of retaining walls and the definition of drainage channels constructed with erosion control features designed for the flows and velocities which may occur. As a minimum, the 1:1 slopes should be accepted only upon the submission of slope stability analysis by a registered soils engineer. The analysis should also address the impact of off-site drainage; 2. The existing berming effect along Metcalf Road appears to virtually be eliminated on the site grading plan. The parking lot is shown as being about 4 to 6 feet above Metcalf Road. This grading essentially eliminates the natural screening that currently exists on the site; 3. The 20' x 36' auto storage area near the northeasterly corner of the site is not shown as fenced. The Commission may wish to consider decorative fencing to screen this area; 4. A preliminary drainage report previously submitted for this site indicates significant drainage flows from the hillside west of the site. A detailed drainage report and design to address these flows should be provided; 5. Parking lot and site lighting are not indicated on the plans. The Commission may wish to consider requiring at least minimum levels of lighting; 6. Screening or enclosure is not shown for the trash storage area; 7. Landscape plans call for seven, 8' to 10' Re(twig Dogwood and six, 10' to 12' Cottonless Cottonwood along with revegetation of all scarred areas. The Commission may wish to consider the adequacy of the proposed landscaping; 7. The 2.6 to 12 roof pitch is less than the 4 to 12 roof pitch recommended in Design Guidelines. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at BEaver Creek Avon Auto Body and Frame - Design Review a Page 3 of 4 JTAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: If the Commission finds the proposed development acceptable when reviewed for 1 conformance with the attached design guidelines, Staff recommends the following as conditions of approval: 1. Site grading be revised for a maximum slope of 11z to 1 with the addition of retaining walls as necessary; 2. A detailed site drainage plan addressing off-site flows and erosion control be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a building permit; 3. Grading plan be revised to maintain berm between parking lot and Metcalf Road for natural screening of site; 4. A 6 foot high wooden fence be installed around the auto storage area to provide additional screening; 5. High pressure sodium light fixtures be provided for parking and drive areas, particularly near the entrance; 6. Additional plant materials be installed between parking lot and Metcalf Road for added screening affect. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Introduce applicatio,i; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Commission review and comment; 4. Commission action on application. Respectfully Submitted, Norm Wood Director of Engineering and Community Development Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 10%7/86 Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Auto Body and Frame - Design Review Page A of 4 Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) e md rawn ) it ( ) ,yAe�AS ( �lS�rcl� iFdTi to yz Date ��-�-�� CPatr-4 cuay, Secretary (,� Design review approved and applicant is to provide documentation of a slope stability analysis of the site, additional plant materials are to be installed at the northeast corner (between parking lot and Metcalf Road) for added screening, and that plywood siding be of a grade that does not have any fillers, i.e., footballs or plugs. _ NW/mml STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 10/7/86 Cafe Espresso Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Greenhouse Addition - Design Review INTRODUCTION: Benchmark Companies has applied for design review for a greenhouse addition which is proposed to enclose the existing outdoor patio area for Cafe Espresso. The proposed addition will consist of a prefabricated greenhouse structure which will be mounted on a base which is proposed to match the existing woad siding on the building. The metal frame of the greenhouse is proposed to have a black anodized finish. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed addition will affect the use of the covered walkway adjacent to the building. This walkway was effectively cut-off when the patio was approved. However, there is still adequate room for pedestrian traffic to get around the proposed addition to use the main building entrance. According to Section 17.24.010(2) of the Town's Zoning Code, when the intensity of use of any building is increased through the addition of gross floor area or seating capacity, the required parking for the increase in intensity of use shall be provided for. Under this scenario, the parking requirements for the total building, with the exception of the Cafe Espresso area, may be calculated under the previous Zoning Code, while the Cafe Espresso area, along with the proposed addition, should be considered under the existing Zoning Code. These calculations are shown below: Total leaseable area for Benchmark Plaza = 20,380 sq.ft. Subtract current area of Cafe Espresso = 756 sq.ft. TOTAL 19,624 sq.ft. Parking requirements for office and bank space (19,624 sq.ft.) calculated under original Zoning Code (1 space/400 sq.ft.) equals 49 spaces. Parking requirements for Cafe Espresso calculated under current Zoning Code: Indoor seating area = 410 sq.ft. Greenhouse seating area = 380 sq.ft. TOTAL 790 sq.ft. Parking required at 1 space/60 sq.ft. of seating area = 790 sq.ft. = 60 = 13 spaces. Total parking provided on-site = 63 spaces Office and bank parking = 49 spaces Cafe Espresso parking = 13 spaces TOTAL 62 sraces Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission - 10/7/86 Cafe Espresso Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Greenhouse Addition - Design Review Page 2 of z Although the parking requirement for the addition can be provided for, it should be noted that of the 63 spaces provided for the project, 30 of them are in the underground parking structure which has a controlled access. This controlled access results in the underground parking being under-utilized, while the surface parking is often filled. If this entire project were considered under current parking requirements, a minimum of 72 spaces would be required. Since all of the parking spaces are needed to make the addition possible, the Commission may wish to consider a condition of approval that the underground parking be made available without the controlled access. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Introduce project; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Commission review of submitted materials; 4. Act on application in accordance with attached design review guidelines. Respectfully Submitted, right/ n ineering Technician Planning & Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified C/Qnditions ) Contipped ( ) Deny�gdV cnG % ( ) Date ID -7- (�4 *a+4 f( ny, Se SGT � -a-�nnp, Secretary Greenhouse design approved with the condition that Benchmark Companies submit a written program to the Town for maximizing utilization of the underground parking currently on the site RW/ml ,.tea STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 10/7/86 Avon Fire Station Part of Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Design Review INTRODUCTION: Avon Metropolitan District has applied for design review for some minor changes they propose to make to the roof overhang on the fire station in order to correct a drainage problem. Proposed work includes extending a small section of the roof overhangs on the north side of the building, removing a small section of the balcony in this area, and installation of a trench drain to carry drainage away from the building. Building materials and colors are proposed to match the existing building. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed improvements will have little effect on the appearance of the building. They are more functional than aesthetic. The improvements do not affect any setbacks or easements. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Introduce project; 2. Presentation by applicant; 3. Commission review of submitted materials; 4. Act on application. Respectfully Submitted, Ray W ght Engi Bring Jan Planning & Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted K) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( ) Approved with Modified C�dition) Conti fed ( D i ( )� With rawn ( ) Date ecr tar � RW/mml 40 Memo to Mayor and Town Council P 8 Z Agenda Items of !.0/7/86 October 9, 1986 Page 2 of 2 5. The Commission approved the roof extension for the Fire Station located on a part of Tract G, as submitted. 6. The Commission approved the landscaping and grading for the Sewer Treatment Plant, as presented, located on Tracts N and 0. Approval is contingent upon applicant filing an application and paying applicable fees for the design review. The site is to be reviewed again next year to determine if rip rap is required at the toe of the slope for erosion control. 7. The Commission discussed and reviewed conceptual plans for the proposed shipping center on Lots 22, 23, and 75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The Commission agreed that the parking ratio of 4/1000 was satisfactory and that the general site layout and building arrangement was acceptable. The Commission further stressed that the minimum requirements of open space and snow storage be met in the development of final design.