PZC Packet 120286STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 12/2/86
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use (Transfer of Residential
Development Rights from Unassigned Unit Pool)
Public Hearing - Continued from 11/6/86 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
This application is for approval of a Special Review Use to transfer eight (8)
Residential Development Rights from the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Unassigned
Unit Pool to Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Lot 12
is located along West Beaver Creek Boulevard, between Buck Creek Condominiums
(Lot 13) and Alpenflora Condominiums (Lot 11).
Town records indica'-� that the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Unassigned Unit Pool
currently contains 8 Residential Development Rights. With this transfer, the
Unassigned Unit Pool would have no remaining Development Rights.
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek was originally platted with 12
Residential Development Rights. Town records indicate that in June, 1979, 4
Residential Development Rights were transfered from Lot 12, Block 2, to Lot 7,
Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, which is currently Balas West Townhouses.
Also, In January, 1980, another 4 Residential Development Rights were transfered
from Lot 12, Block 2, to the Unassigned Unit Pool, leaving Lot 12, Block 2,
with an assigned density of 4 Residential Development Rights.
Lot 12 is located in the RHLD Zone District which allows an average of 20
units/acre. The transfer of 8 Residential Development Rights to Lot 12
would result in a density equivalent to the original 12 Development Rights
or 17.4 units/acre.
STAFF COMMENTS:
This item was continued from previous meetings so that Staff could verify the
number of units left in the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Unassigned Unit Pool.
Due to an error in Benchmark Companies records, the Unit Pool was shown as
having only 4 Residential Develcament Rights available for transfer. Benchmark
Companies records showed that 4 bevelopment Rights had been transfered from
Lot 12, Block 2, to Lot 7, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision, and 4 Development
Rights had been transfered from Lot 5, block 1, to Lot 7, Block 1. The transfer
from Lot 5 to Lot 7 never took place. As a result, when the Lot 5 area was
replatted and the excess Development Rights went into the Unit Pool, the 4
Development Rights from the Lot 5 to Lot 7 transfer should have gone into the
Unit Pool as well, resultirg in a total of 8 Development Rights in the Unit
Pool instead of 4. Staff has retraced the entire history of Development Right
transfers in the Town and has put together a complete package of documentation
to verify each transfer to date.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 12/2/86
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use (Transfer of Residential
Development Rights from Unassigned Unit Pool)
Public Hearing
Page 2 of 3
According to Section 17.20.020 of the Zoning Code, in approving a Special Review
Use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make a findiig that the conditions
outlined below are satisfied, and that granting the Special Review Use will make
possible the reasonable use of the land.
1. Determinations:
a. Does the proposed use otherwise comply with all requirements imposed
by the Zoning Code?
b. Is the proposed use consistent with the objectives and purposes of
the Zoning Code and applicable zoning district?
c. Is the proposed use designed to be compatible with surrounding land
uses and uses in the area?
2. Considerations:
a. The adequacy of access to the site with respect to the width of the
adjacent streets, their grades, intersection safety, visibility and
entrance into the lot to be developed;
b. Whether there exists safe access and sufficient water pressure to
provide fire protection;
c. The existent water pressure in the area and the ability of the water
system tG supply domestic needs;
d. Whether there will be provided sufficient off-street parking as
determined by (1) the intended use of the property, (2) walking
distance to the downtown area, and (3) the availability of public
transportation;
e. The impact of the development considering the potential for stream
and air pollution, the availability of public transportation and
other public or private services, and any other factors affecting
the overall development and the surrounding areas, including but
not limited to building height, view plane, drainage, and other
physical and aesthetical features.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 12/2/86
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use (Transfer of Residential
Development Rights from Unassigned Unit Pool)
Public Hearing
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce application;
2. Presentation by applicant;
3. Public Hearing;
4. Planning and Zoning Commission review of Special Review Use criteria;
5. Adopt Resolution 86-5, with appropriate modifications.
Respectfully Submitted,
ay right
Engineering Technician
Planning & Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (x) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued/ ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date �pt�T Patricia Cuny, Secretary L�, fz 1&4a:zle4
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 12/2/86
Nottingham Ranch - Stockyard Property
Nottingham Station
Zoning and Subdivision Sketch Plan
INTRODUCTION:
Nottingham Ranch Company has submitted a petition for the annexation of a
parcel of land on the east side of Avon Road between the D & RGW Railroad and
the Eagle River. This parcel contains 1.36 acres and is commonly referred to
as the stockyards property.
The Annexation Petition was accompanied by an Annexation Agreement outlining
conditions under which the annexation was requested. This agreement addresses
requested zoning and subdivision of the Stockyards Property as well as
Nottingham Station which is currently within the Town boundaries. This
agreement was submitted by the owners of both properties.
The Annexation Agreement and Annexation Petition were presented to the Town
Council at the November 25, 1986 meeting. The Town Council took no formal
action at this meeting but requested the applicant make specific changes to
the Annexation Agreement.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Town Council has not officially accepted the Annexation Petition for
the Stockyards Property.
Notices of Public Hearing for the zone change application have been mailed
and posted, but the Planning and Zoning Commission should not act on these
applications until the Annexation Petition is officially accepted by the Town
Council. The public hearing should be cancelled and then rescheduled after
the Town Council has officially accepted the Annexation Petition.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Cancel public hearing.
/Respectfully Submitted,
v' Norm ood
Director of Engineering
and Community Development
Planning & Zoning Action:
NW/mml
401
w;
•1