PZC Packet 022885STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/28/85
White/Kriz Property
East of Beaver Creek between
Highway 6 and Eagle River
Zoning Change Request - Public Hearing
Applicant has requested withdrawal of application for the White/Kriz Zoning
Change request.
Applicant has been advised by Town Attorney that such application be made
after Town Council has reviewed the annexation request.
See attached letter from Terrill Knight, applicant.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mac
argare La
Recordiri Secretary
Planning and Zoninq Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) l•lithdrawn (rte
Date 4Z2 ,S Secretary
0.
/mnl
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/28/85
Lot 88, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Satellite Antenna
Design Review
Applicants have applied for approval of a satellite dish TV antenna on Lot 88,
Block 4, Wildridge. The dish has already been installed. As you will recall,
several months ago we discussed installation and approval for this type of
antenna. Attached is the report from the meeting on the discussion which is now
being re-edited into our Design Rules.
Review - See attached rough draft of Design Rules & Regulations:
a) Location - was installed prior to Planning and Zoning approval.
Application for approval has been submitted. Applicant was requested
to bring photo to meeting;
b) Complies;
c) Verify location - should not be located within setbacks or easements.
Applicant has indicated the site location on a plan.
d) Complies;
e) Is visible from the west and north. Color is black and white.
Recommendation:
Assuming the location is approved, install landscaping to adequately screen
dish from west and north, such as green shrubs around base, and 3 coniferous
trees, or similar trees, around west and north. Paint dish to match environment.
Approval subject to revir-w after painting and installation of landscaping.
Suggest some sort of deposit for completion of landscaping.
Respectf ly Subm'tted,
Dan Fogland
Building and Zoning Administrator
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( Vf
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date zz/r�S Secretary
7` U. --'�
OF/mml �La^i� cLL�t
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/28/85
Lot 21, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Single Family Residence
Design Review
Applicants are proposing a single family residence located on Lot 21, Block 4,
Wildridge Subdivision. The home is three levels with a garage, utilizing solar
panels and window areas. The materials proposed are wood shingles, cedar siding,
facia and trim. The project generally conforms to design guideline requirements.
The following items need to be clarified:
1. Colors;
2. Type of wood retaining walls along the east and west sides;
3. Material for drive, and is it paved completely to roadway;
4. Verify driveway easement across Lot 22 for access to Lot 21.
With items 1 - 4 clarified and approved, the Staff would recommend approval.
Section 5.00 Design Guidelines:
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design:
1. The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it
is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
2. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
3. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
4. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
5. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be
impaired.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dan Foglanll
Building and Zoning Administrator
0^
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
Lot 21, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Single Family Residence
Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (x) Approved with Recommended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied
DF/mml
Withdrawn ( )
A^
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/28/85
Lodge at Avon Subdivision
(Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark
at Beaver Creek)
Development Sign - Lodge at Avon
Applicants have applied for approval to install a development sign for the proposed
Lodge at Avon Subdivision.
The sign generally complies with both the current Avon Sign Code and the proposed
Sign Code, except for the height. The sign dimensions are 12' 10" in height x
7' 6" in width. In reviewing the definitions, I believe the round area on top
of the sign is an integral part of the display, therefore should be counted in
the height requirement of 8'. Using this assumption, the proposed sign is 4' 10"
too high.
The sign location should be at least 10 feet from the property lines.
Staff Considerations:
The sign generally complies, except for the height, which should be maintained at
8 feet. Approval should be limited to not more than 2 years.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dan Fogl nd
Building and Zoning Administrator
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (--r
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date
DF/mml
Secretary
e^
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/28/85
The Lodge at Avon Condominiums
(Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark
at Beaver Creek)
Special Review Use - Parking Reduction
for Mixed Use
A condition recommended to Council for Preliminary Plat approval for the Lodge
at Avon Condominiums was that the site plan be revised to meet minimum parking
requirements in the Lent some spaces should be lost due to possible cancellation
of lease agreement with the Colorado Department of Highways. The site plan has
been revised to provide a total of 143 spaces without the Highway Department
lease and 164 with the Highway Department lease. Parking requirements for the
Lodge at Avon are projected as follows:
Accommodation Units
Office Space
Re -ail Space
Restaurant Space
89 @ 1/unit
3/1000 SF x 1829 SF
4/1000 SF x 7942 SF
1/60 SF x 1880 SF
89.0 Spaces
5.5 Spaces
31.8 Spaces
31.3 Spaces
TOTAL 157.6 Spaces
(158 Spaces)
Section 17.24 of the Avon Municipal Code allows for a Reduction in Parking Re-
quirements through the Special Review Use process.
Mixed Use Lo
The reductions accountable to any specific use may be no more than 25% of its
normal parking requirements and the total reduction for any parking requirement
shall be no more than 20% of the sum of normal requirements.
Maximum Allowable Mixed Use Reduction:
Accommodation Units 89 Spaces
Commercial Uses 69 Spaces
TOTAL 158 Spaces
25% x 69 Spaces = 17 Spaces
20% x 158 Spaces = 31 Spaces
Maximum Mixed Use Reduction = 17 Spaces
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
The Lodge at Avon Condominiums
(Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark
at Beaver Creek)
Special Review Use - Parking Reduction
for Mixed Use
Page 3 of 3
4. Pervious open space area exceeds the minimum allowable useable open space
requirement of 20% on revised site and landscaping plans as shown;
5. A mixed use reduction has been requested, but large lot reduction may
also be considered;
Recorrended Actions:
1. Introduce Special Review Use request;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Close Public Hearing;
4. Make required determinations for determining suitability of Speciel
Review Use;
5. Action regarding Special Review Use approval or disapproval.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Public Works
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (�-.
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
NW/M.1
•)1
•l
4Fi 1
4M
r �4
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
The Lodge at Avon Condominiums
(Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark
at Beaver Creek)
Special Review Use - Parking Reduction
for Mixed Use
Page 2 of 3
� Large Lot Reduction:
Parking requirements may be reduced based on the total size of a parking area
based on the following chart if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
as a Special Review Use:
TOTAL REQUIRED
Up to 50 Spaces
50 to 100 Spaces
100 to 250 Spaces
250 and Over
MAXIMUM REDUCTION
No Reduction
5%
10%
15%
Reduction in parking spaces for large lots shall not be taken iri combination
with a reduction allowed for mixed use parking requirements.
Maximum Large Lot Reduction = 10% x 158 = 15 Spaces
In considering the suitability of the Special Review Use, the Commission shall
determine:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the Zoning Code;
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes
of this Zoning Code and the applicable zoning district; and
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding
land uses and uses in the area.
The following information may be pertinent in making the above determininations:
1. The revised site plan shows 164 spaces of which 21 spaces could be lost
with the loss of lease agreement with Highway Department leaving 143
spaces in this event;
2. With maximum mixed use reduction, and based upon the projected commercial
uses, minimum parking requirements would be 141 spaces;
3. With maximum large lot reduction, and based upon the projected commercial
uses, minimum parking requirements would be 143 spaces;
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 2/28/85
Lots 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Savoy Square
Design Review
Previous action on the project by the Commission:
October 31, 1984 - Special Review Use - Time Share
January 24, 1985 - Conceputal Review Approval (See attached approval document
from the 1/24/85 meeting)
Design Review - General:
Applicants have applied for approval of a 212 unit residential/commercial project
to be located on Lots 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The building as
proposed is pre -cast concrete with 8 floor levels, and 2 levels of underaround
parking. The building is stepped back along the south and east ends towards the
middle, or northwest.
The gross floor square footage would be approximately 354,963. Approximately
28,840 SF of commercial area is proposed, and 212 efficiency units. The 212
efficiency units are derived from 71 Development Rights through the Fractionali-
zation Ordinance. The design of the efficiency units as proposed needs to be
clarified (see attached sheets, #2 & #2a). On-site recreation facilities have
been proposed consisting of pool, spa, racquet ball courts, etc.
This project as proposed generally complies with the Zoning Code for open space,
building coverage, snow storage, landscaping and use.
The building height at its peak is 95', however due to the Zoning Code application
for averaging for the height, the most restrictive interpretation woula yield a
height of 82' 3". This could be changed to 80' by increasing the exterior grade
on the west and north by 2' 3".
A good useable projection for commercial space application was given for parking.
However, the project as proposed would require a Special Review Use for compact
car spaces, and a large lot reduction.
Town Planning Consultant Jim Lamont will be submitting an evaluation of this
project with regard to the Development Plan.
Staff Considerations:
If the Commission so desires . preliminary approval may be given.
The Staff would recommend final approval not be liven until the following items
are addressed and/or approved:
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
Lots 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Savoy Square
Design Review
Page 2 of 3
1. A preliminary plat is submitted and approved, clarifying Fractionalization
Ordinance use, parking, drainage, etc.;
2. Wall sections of the building are submitted and approved;
3. The interior design of the efficiency unit is clarified and/or approved,
i.e., submit sections of the furniture separations;
Signage plan is submitted and approved;
5. Area lighting is addressed;
6. Materials clarified as necessary;
7. A plan or time -table is set up for the Special Review Use requirements
for the parking;
8. Snow retention devices on the mansard areas;
9. Perhaps a scale model would be appropriate for the project;
10. Others as may be directed by the Commission.
Section 5.00 Desiqn Guidelines:
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design:
a) The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it
is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvem^nts;
c) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
d) The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
e) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired.
Respectfully bmi to ,
Dan Fogland
Building and Zoning Administrator
10
no
f'Ibs
Staff Report to Planning & Zopino commission - 2/28/85
Lots 73/74, Block 2, Benchmar' ver Creek
Savoy Square
Design Review
Page 3 of 3
Planning and Zoning Action:
"pproved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ' ) Withdrawn ( )
7'`/ter ✓°e '000i��.
��i�n� • �-yiGC
r
STAFF REPORT TO PL".NNING & ZONING COPM1ISSION - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Peregrine Village Condominiums
Preliminary Plat
PPL Development Corporation has submitted a revised site and landscaping plan
showing surface parking layout, loading spaces, pervious and impervious open
space areas and a revised planting plan. The revised plan shows 49 surface
parking spaces, two 12' x 35' loadinq spaces and one 12' x 55' loading space.
All indicated surface parking and loading spaces appear to be useable and
accessible. Open space on the revised plan is sunmarized as follows:
Pervious Open Space 16,508 SF 11.8%
Impervious Open Space 19,104 SF 13.6%
TOTAL Pervious & Impervious Open Area 25.4%
The revised plan also shows additional decorative brick paving in the impervious
open space areas.
As requested, a letter from John Dunn, Town Attorney is attached for ,your infor-
mation regarding open space regulations.
Complete and revised drawings have not been submitted for underground parking
and information submitted to date is inadequate for completion of Preliminary
or Final Plat review.
Recommendations:
1. Review revised Landscape, Parking Plans for parking and loading space
layout, circulation, landscaping and compliance with open space require-
ments;
2. If revised Landscape, Parking Plan is acceptable, the following conditions
for approval are recommended:
a. Design review approval be modified as per Landscape, Parking Plan
dated February 25, 1985 as prepared by Intratect and with water
feature and planter details as per sheets LA -2 and LA -3 dated April
3, 1981 as prepared by Denton, Harper, Marshall;
b. Decorative brick pavers match brick pavers used in Phase I of the
Avon Tom Center Mall construction;
c. Site drainage be in accordance with approved drainage study with
modifications as necessary fnr parking layout changes and to
maintain function of existing Benchmark Road drainage structures
at westerly entrance to project.
Staff Report to Planning 8 Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Peregrine Village Condominiums
Preliminary Plat
Page 2 of 2
3. Recommend Town Council table action on Preliminary and Final Plat
approval pending submission of completed drawings and review of
parking layout by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Respectfully Submitted,
0 �4
orm blood
Director of Public Works
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Reconanended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date a�a.P�J! Secretary
MFAWA4 SAY
N41/mml
,-AVA%
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING E ZONING COPM1ISSION - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Peregrine Village Condominiums
Variance Request for Reduction in Useable
Open Space Requirements
This request is applicable only if the useable open space outlined on the
Revised Landscape, Parking Plan prepared by Intratect and dated February 25,
1985 was unacceptable to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The revised
plan shows pervious open space equal to 11.8% of the total lot area, and
impervious open space equal to 13.6% of the total lot area. The impervious
open area excludes parking int and paved service areas. If the mall type
impervious open areas are included in the useable open space calculations,
the total useable open space is equal to 25.4% of the total lot area which
exceeds the minimum allowable useable open space requirement.
If only the pervious open space area is considered as useable open space,
a variance of 8.2% of total lot area would be required for this project to
meet minimum useable open space requirements of 20% for this zone district.
Before acting on a variance application. the Planning and Zoning Commission
shall consider the following factors w"111respect to the requested variance:
A. The relationship of the reouested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity;
B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity,
or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
pr•1 a i 1 ege;
C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities
and utilities, and public safety;
D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to
the proposed variance.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings
before granting a variance:
A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district;
B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Peregrine Villuge Condominiums
Variance Request for Reduction in Useable
Open Space Requirements
Page 2 of 3
C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title;
2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to Lhe site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone;
3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
The granting of a variance may be conditioned on action by the applicant.
Recommended Action:
1. Introduce requested variance;
2. If revised site plan has been approved, request applicant withdrawal
of variance request;
3. Open Public Hearing;
4. Close Public Hearing;
5. If revised site plan not approved or applicant does not withdraw
variance request, consider the factors required for granting of a
variance;
6. Make the reouired findings for granting of a variance;
7. Act on variance request.
�Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Public Works
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Peregrine Village Condominiums
Variance Request for Reduction in Useable
Open Space Requirements
Page 3 of 3
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( j
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn —)—
Date �2�,�d��� Secretary L�C{�rJ
IE
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COPM9ISSION - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use - Transfer 30 Residential
Development Rights from Lot 63 to Lot 55
Section 17.20.170 of the Municipal Code allows the transfer of dwelling or
accommodation unit densities as a Special Review Use. Our records currently
indicate an assigned dwelling unit density of 103 units on Lot 63, Block 2,
and an assigned dwelling unit density of 0 units on Lot 55, Block 2. Lot 63,
Block 2, and Lot 55, Black 2 are both zoned TC with an allowed average density
of 30 units per acre. With the proposed density transfer, the assigned dwelling
unit densities would be 22.7 units per acre on Lot 63 and 44.1 units per acre
on Lot 55.
A letter from John Dunn, Town Attorney is attached to provide additional
information regarding the transfer of development rights and allowable zone
district densities.
In considering the suitability of the Special Review Use, the Commission shall
determine:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the Zoning Code;
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes
of this Zoning Code and the applicable zoning district; and
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surroundinq
land uses and uses in the area.
In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve or deny the
development after considering certain factors, including but not limited to:
A. The adequacy of access to the site with respect to the width of the
adjacent streets, their grades, intersection safety, visibility and
entrance into the lot to be developed;
B. Whether there exists safe access and sufficient water pressure to provide
fire protection;
C. The existent water pressure in the area and the ability of the water
system to supply domestic needs;
D. Whether there will be provided sufficient off-street parking as determined
by (1) the intended use of the property, (2) walking distance to the
downtown area, and (3) the avilability of public transportation;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Conmission - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use - Transfer 30 Residential
Development Rights from Lot 63 to Lot 55
Page 2 of 3
E. The impact of the development, considering the potential for stream and
air pollution, the availability of public transportation and other public
or private services, and any other factors affecting the overall develop-
ment and the surrounding areas, including but not limited to building
height, view plane, drainage and other physical and aesthetical features.
Recommended Actions:
1. Introduce Special Review Use request;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Close Public Hearing;
4. Flake required determinations for determining suitability of Special
Review Use approval or disapproval.
Staff Recommendations:
If this Special Revier.- Use is approved, Staff recommends tie following conditions
be attached to the approval:
1. The approval be contingent upon approval and recording of Final Plat
for Peregrine Village Condominiums, Lot 63, Clock 2, Eenchmark at Beaver
Creek and that said Plat confirm that 30 dwelling unit development riahts
are available for transfer;
2. The approval be contingent upon the execution of a waiver by PPL, binding
upon itself and its successors, of any rights it may have to development
of Lot 63 to the extent of a density of thirty (30) units per acre.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm V'ood
Director of Public Yorks
Staff Report to Planning E Zoning Commission - 2/28/85
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use - Transfer 30 Residential
Development Rights from Lot 63 to Lot 55
Page 3 of 3
Planninn and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date _ a?�����5 Secretarytr�!_A.�
NW/mml