PZC Packet 031485. -"N
F.WA_
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/14/85
Applicant: Grace Jenkins White/Edward F. Rodqers
Eagle River Townhouse Association, Ltd.
Nottinqham Associates
Location: Portion of SW 1/4, NE 1/4 and N 1/2, SE 1/4, Section 12,
T5S, R82W and NW 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 7, T5S, R81W of 6th
Principal Meridian, all in Eagle County, Colorado as further
described on attached Legal Description.
Application: Rezone property formerly located in Eaale County to SPA
(Specially Planned Area; said property to be used for office,
commercial, lodge and residential uses.
Staff Commen
A. Per Section 17.28.050 of the Avon Municipal Code, an application for
rezonina shall include:
1. Names and addresses of all owners of real property in the area
of proposed change;
2. Names and addresses of all owners of real property within 300
feet of the area of proposed chance;
3. Signature of the applicant, who shall be an owner of real
property in the area of the proposed change;
4. Fee of $100.00 plus publication costs;
B. Procedure:
1. Planning, and Zoning Commission shall hold a Public Hearing on the
reauested Zone change;
2. Following Public Hearing, Plannina and Zoning Commission shall
forward a report and recommendation on the proposed arendment to
the Town Council;
C. General Information:
1. Town Council has approved Resolution 85-9 approving Petition for
Annexation to the Town of Avon of the above described parcel of
land;
2. Town Council has approved on first reading Ordinance No. 85-2,
Annexins the above described Parcel of Land to the Town of Avon.
Second readina of this Ordinance is scheduled for March 26, 1985;
Staff Report to Planninq & Zoninq Commission - 3/14/85
White Annexation
Rezone to SPA
Pace 2 of 2
3. Town Council has approved on first reading Ordinance No. 85-3,
Zoning the above described property SPA (Specially Planned Area).
Second reading of this Ordinance is scheduled for Ppril 9, 1985.
Staff Recommendations:
A. Present requested Zone change;
B. Open Public Hearing;
C. Close Public Hearing;
D. Review proposed Zone District for compliance with Master Plan at its
current stage of development and for compatibility with existing uses
in the area;
E. Formulate report to Council recommending approval of SPA zoninn for
parcel, or recommending other Zone District as determined to be
applicable by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Respectfully Submitted ,
Norm 1-!ood
Director of Public Works
Planninq and Zoninn Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditionp, ( �'
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date-im.I1, /y Patricia Cuny, Secretary
NW/mml
u
mi
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/14/85
Lot 63, Block 2, BM @ BC
Peregrine Village
Preliminary Plat
After many hours of discussion, plans and review, the Staff has the following
report and recommendations.
Current plans for parking have been accepted by the Staff for 349 parking spaces.
This figure utilizes the 35% compact car variance, and we feel is reasonable
and fair, given the irregular shapes and constraints in the building. P.lthough
this does not address use, we feel it is the first step in simply determining
exactly how many spaces exist...
The next step will be to propose uses and accomplishing parkins requirements.
Respectfully Sybmitted,
Da foglan
Building & Zoning Administrator
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date /y��� Patricia Cuny, Secretary -� J
T �
DF/mml
Wil
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING R ZONING COMMISSION - 3/14/85
Lot 63, Block 2, BM @ BC
Lot 55, Block 2, BM @ DC
Special Review Use
Transfer of 30 Residential Development Rights
from Lot 63 to Lot 55
This item is continued from the February 28, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting. In addition, Staff was asked to provide information on impact of
transfer including impact on Master Plan. Impact on the Master Plan is
evaluated as follows:
A. The transfer of residential development rights is within the same
planning district, as well as the same zone district. This is proposed
as a high density district and the proposed transfer does not affect the
overall district density;
B. Construction of the residential units on Lot 55 would be continnent upon
approval of a specific development plan which must address other zoning
matters such as:
1. Building area coverage and height;
2. Parking, lot coverage and open space;
3. All other items as may be addressed in the design review process.
Recommended Actions:
A. Reintroduce proposed Special Review Use request;
B. Reopen Public Hearing;
C. Close Public Hearing;
D. ;take required determinations for determining suitability of the Special
Review Use approval or disapproval. (See February 28, 1985 Staff report
for determinations and factors to be considered).
Staff Recommendations:
If this Special Review Use is approved, Staff recorimends the following conditions
be attached to the approval:
A. The approval be contingent upon approval and recording of Final Plat for
Peregrine Village Condominiums, Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
and that said Plat confirm that 30 residential development rights are
available for transfer;
w+
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/14/85
Lot 63, Block 2, BM @ BC
Lot 55, Block 2, BM @ BC
Special Review Use
Transfer of 30 Residential Development Rights
from Lot 63 to Lot 55
Page 2 of 2
B. The approval be contingent Upon the execution of a waiver by PPL binding
upon itself and its successors, of any rights it may have to development
of Lot 63 to the extent of a density of thirty (30) units per acre.
Respectfully Submitted,
Worm Wood
Director of Public Works
Planninq and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( v)
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( )
-
NW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 3/14/8.r,
Lots 5 & 52B, Block 1, BM @ BC
Holiday Inn - Hotel/Coimnercial Space
(A proposed replat of the same)
Applicants have submitted a formal design review of a 150 unit hotel complex
which would include restaurant/lounqe and limited commercial space.
The proposed project would be located on a Tract to be revised and platted on
Lots 5 and 52B, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek.
The site is zoned SPA and is approved for 200 hotel/motel units. The proposed
building would be four stories with 150 rooms, 3,600 SF of restaurant, 5,200
SF of retail space and approxirately 3,000 SF of meeting rooms. Parking is all
surface parking with about 206 spaces. The project as proposed, would require
Special Review Use for parking reduction, or a variance to meet the parking
standards.
The current site plan shows 206 parking spaces with 254 required, or approximately
48 short. A Special Review Use mixed use would yield a reduction of 25% of 104,
or 26 spaces. A Special Review Use for large lot would yield a reduction of
15% of 254, or 38 spaces.
Current plat of this property would have Buck Creek Road going through the
middle of the building as proposed.
Some time ago a revised plat was prepared as a Preliminary Plat, but was never
finalized. A revised plat for this project is being developed and will likely
be submitted before the Commission meeting.
Due to this situation, I would recommend only conceptual review be given at this
time. I have attached, for your reference, the minutes of the February 14, 1985
Commission meeting at which an informal discussion took place regarding the
Holiday Inn project. These minutes were also forwarded to the applicant for
consideration.
The following items of concern were brought up at the informal discussion of
February 14, 1985.
1. Parking:
a. Too much parking adjacent to Nottingham Road;
b. Too much asphalt in view;
c. Massive outdoor parking;
d. Is snow storage adequate;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/14/85
Lots 5 E 52B, Block 1, BN @ BC
Holiday Inn - Hotel/Commercial Space
(A proposed replat of the same)
Page 2 of 4
2. Site:
a. Is there enough greenspace;
b. Expansion needs should be addressed;
c. Parking lot and access and traffic flow;
3. Building:
a. How does it relate to other buildings in Avon;
b. Building appeared very boxy;
c. Building needed to be a little more unique;
d. Does it fit into the alpine community;
e. Sterility of architecture, shape and appearance concerns.
Staff feels the following items need to be addressed prior to final approvals:
1. Typical unit plan;
2. Accurate site, plat and plan;
3. Approval of drainage plan by Town Engineer;
4. Percentage of site in pervious materials;
5. Plan for approval of parkino requirements;
6. Building materials, colors;
7. Design and type of signage, (clarity);
8. Lighting;
9. Items as directed by the Commission.
Staff Recormendations:
Give applicant specific and clear direction to proceed with preliminary building
and site design in the following areas:
1. Site plan;
2. Parking layout, screening, etc., parking in general - required amount;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 3/14/65
Lots 5 & 52B, Block 1, BM @ BC
Holiday Inn - Hotel Commercial Space
(A proposed replat of the same)
Page 3 of 4
3. Landscaping plan, natural grass, sod, trees, etc.;
4. Traffic flow, egress, etc.;
5. Building, i.e., shape, design, materials, colors, etc.;
6. Other items by Commission.
Section 5.00 Design Guidelines
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design:
a. The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it
is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
c. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
d. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighborina property;
e. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be
impaired.
Respectfull ubmitt d, ,
Fogl nd
Building Zoning Administrator
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Da to