PZC Packet 053085STAFF REPORT TO PANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 5/30/85
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Wolff Warehouse)
Special Review Use - Retail Sales, IC Zone District
Blue Steel Gun Shop, Inc.
INTRODUCT'ON
Jerry Galle, representing Blue Steel Gun Shop, Inc. has submitted an application
for a Special Review Use approval to allow retail sporting goods store, service
center, and archery court in the Wolff Warehouse located on Lot 23, Block 1,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek. Lot 23 is located in the IC Zone District with allowed
uses consisting of:
Warehouse, laboratories, electrical substation, light manufacturing
plants, wholesale sales outlets, showrooms, industrial, construction
and wholesale offices, accessory building.
Special Review Uses consist of:
Residential unit when used in connection with business operation,
automotive or other vehicular sales and repair shops, retail sales
and personal service outlets, restaurants, public uses, outside
storage areas, general commercial offices.
The proposed use appears to be retail sales and personal service outlet which
can be allowed as a Special Review Use in this zone district.
Section 17.20.030 Rules of Procedure for Special Review Approval
A. The concurring vote of a majority of the total authorized number of
members of the design review board shall be necessary for approval
of a special review use;
1. Notice shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation
in the area at least twelve days prior to the hearing date. In lieu
of actual puV ication, the notice shall also be effective by posting
the notice in at least three public places within the town in addition
to posting at the office of the town clerk. A written notice of said
hearing shall be sent by first class mail at least twelve days prior
to the hearing date to property own3rs within the area of proposed
.ise and within three hundred feet thereof. Owners of residential
multifamily condominium units may be served by mailing a copy of
any such required notice to the record address of the manager of
their homeowners' association;
2. A fee of fifty dollars shall be charged to cover the cost of processing.
The applicant shall also pay the actual costs of providing the notification
referred to in subdivision, 1 of this subsection;
Staff Report to Planring & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Wolff Warehouse)
Special Review Use - Retail Sales, IC Zone District
Blue Steel Gun Shop, Inc.
Page 2 of 4
3. The design review board, in approving a special review use, shall make
a finding that the conditions in this section are satisfied by the
reasons set forth in the application and that granting the special
review use will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building
and structure;
4. The design review board, in approving a special review use, may pre-
scribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the
zoning laws of the town, violation of which shall be deemed a
violation of this section;
5. If a special review use is approved as outlined above, the town
council shall be notified in writing by the recording secretary of
the design review board and the town council shall take final action
granting, denying or granting with conditions identical to or
different from those prescribed by the design review board, based
upon testimony or evidence presented to either the deFign review
board or the town council. In approving a special review use,
the town council may prescribe appropriate conditions and safe-
guards in conformity with the zoning laws of the town., violation of
which shall be deemed a violat'on of this section. (Ord. 83-24 S1,
Ord. 83-15 S1; Ord. 82-17 S1, Ord. 79-12 S3.4).
Section 17.20.020 Granting of Special Review Use
Whenever a use has been designated a special review use, a permit for such use may
be issued only upon approval of the design review board and town council.
A. All applications for approval of a special review use shall be processed
pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.20.030;
B. In considering the suitability of the special review use, the board shall
determine:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements
imposed by the zoning code;
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and
purposes of this zoning code and the applicable zoning district; and
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding
land uses and uses in the area;
C. No approved special review use may be modified, structurally enlarged or
expanded in ground area, unless such modification, enlargement or expansion
receives the prior approval of the design review board and the town council,
vhich approval shall be obtained by repetition of the granting procedures
provided in this chapter. (Ord. 79-12 S3.3).
Iw
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Wolff Warehouse)
® Special Review Use - Retail Sales, IC Zone District
Blue Steel Gun Shop, Inc.
Page 3 of 4
SPECIAL REVIEW USE CRITERIA
w The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve or deny Special Review Use
request after considering certain factors, including but not limited to:
A. The adequacy of access to the site with respect to the width of the adjacent
streets, their grades, intersection safety, visibility and entrance into
the lot to be developed;
B. Whether there exists safe access and sufficient water pressure to provide
fire protection;
C. The existent water pressure in the area and the ability of the water system
to supply domestic needs,
D. Whether there will be provided sufficient off-street parking as determined
by:
1. The intended use of the property;
2. Walking distance to the downtown area; and
3. The availability of public transportation.
STAFF COMMENTS
The Wolff Warehouse consists of two separate but connected buildings. The
southerly building has a floor area of approximately 5,040 SF and is vacant at
this time. The northerly building currently houses Benchmark Cleaners cleaning
operations, approximately 2,520 SF and contains the proposed location of Blue
Steel Gun Shop, Inc., approximately 2,520 SF, as well as approximately 1,300 SF
of office space which was approved as a Special Review Use on August 20, 1980.
(Minutes of that meeting are attached for your information).
Parking requirements for the Wolff Warehouse using minimum level use requirements
are:
Benchmark Cleaners
@
1/800 SF
3.15
Spaces
Proposed Gun Shop area
@
1/800 SF
3.15
Spaces
Vacant (South building)
@
1/800 SF
6.30
Spaces
Office Space
@
3/1000 SF
3.90
Spaces
Parking Requirements -
Minimum
Use
16.50
Spaces
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
Lot 23, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Wolff Warehouse)
Special Review Use - Retail Sales, IC Zone District
Blue Steel Gun Shop, Inc.
Page 4 of 4
If parking requirements for the Gun Shop are calculated at the rate of 4/1000 SF
as reouired for shopping and convenience goods retail, the parking requirements
would be 10.08 spaces which increases total parking requirements to 23.43 spaces.
If parking requirements are calculated at the rate of 3/1000 as required for
personal services and repair establishments, the Gun Shop parking requirements
would be 7.56 spaces for total project requirement of 20.91 spaces.
The Wolff Warehouse currently has 6 parking spaces in front of the northerly
building where the Gun Shop is proposed and 9 spaces in front of the southerly
bvi ding for a total of 15 on-site spaces.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. Introduce Special Review Use request;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Close Public Hearing;
4. Make determinations and findings as required Special Review Use action;
5. Act on Special Review Use request.
Respectful Submitted,
�1111 / 41-- r�
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (�
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date 5 Patricia Cuny, Secretary;
NW/mml v v 7_A't { T 1;eD-
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 5/30/85
The Lodge at Avon, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use - Time Share
1=011111WiW
The Lodge at Avon Associates are requesting a Special Review Use to allow time
share for the Lodge at Avon. The Lodge at Avon is located in the TC Zone District
which allows time share as a Special Review Use.
The Lodge at Avon previously received design review and preliminary plat approvals
for a project containing 89 fractionalized residential/accommodation units and
approximately 12,000 SF of commercial space. Time sharing will require reapproval
of the Preliminary Plat and any exterior design changes will require design
review approval.
Section 17.20.030 Rules of Procedure for Special Review Approval
A. The concurring vote of a majority of the total authorized number of
members of the design review board shall be necessary for approval
of a special review use:
B. The design review board shall hold a public hearing on each request for
a special review use, with the following special conditions required:
1. Notice shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation
in the area at least twelve days prior to the hearing date. In lieu
of actual publication, the notice shall also be effective by posting
the notice in at least three public places within the town in addition
to posting at the office of the town clerk. A written notice of said
hearing shall be sent by first class mail at least twelve days prior
to the hearing date to property owners within the area of proposed
use and within three hundred feet thereof. Owners of residential
multifamily condominium units may be served by mailing a copy of any
such required notice to the record address of the manager of their
homeowners' association;
2. A fee of fifty dollars shall be charged to cover the cost of processing.
The applicant shall also pay the actual costs of providing the notifica-
tion referred to in subdivision 1 of this subsection;
3. The design review board, in approving a special review use, shall make
a finding that the conditions in this section are satisfied by the
reasons set forth in the application and that granting the special
review use will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building
and structure;
I
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
The Lodge at Avon, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Special Review Use - Time Share
Page 2 of 3
4. The design review board, in approving a special review use, may
prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with
the zoning laws of the town, violation of which shall be deemed a
violation of this section;
5. If a special review use is approved as outlined above, the town
council shall be notified in writing by the recording secretary
of the design review board and the town council shall take final
action granting, denying or granting with conditions identical to or
different from those prescribed by the design review board, based
upon testimony or evidence presented to either the design review
board or the town council. In approving a special review use, the
town council may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards
in conformity with the zoning laws of the town, violation of which
shall be deemed a violation of this section. (Ord. 83-24 S1, Ord.
83-15 S1; Ord. 82-17 S1, Ord. 79-12 S3.4).
Section 17.20.020 Granting of Special Review Use
Whenever a use has been designated a special review use, a permit for such use may
be issued only upon approval of the design review board and town council.
A. All applications for approval of a special review use shall be processed
pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.20.030;
B. In considering the suitability of the special review use, the board shall
determine:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements
imposed by the zoning code;
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and
purposes of this zoning code and the applicable zoning district; and
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding
land uses and uses in the area;
C. No approved special review use may be modified, structurally enlarged or
expanded in ground area, unless such modification, enlargement or expansion
receives the prior approval of the design review board and the town council,
which approval shall be obtained by repetition of the granting procedures
provided in this chapter. (Ord. 79-12 S3.3).
p Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
The Lodge at Avon, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Formerly Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
w Special Review Use - Time Share
Page 3 of 3
STAFF COMMENTS
The following conditions may be appropriate for approval of the Special Review
Use request to allow time share for the Lodge at Avon:
1. Reapproval of project design after• review for compatibility as a time share
project and the incorporation of modifications to design as required by
the commission;
2. Approval of a revised preliminary plat and related documents as required
for a time share project.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. Introduce Special Review Use request;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Close Public Hearing;
4. Make required determinations for action on the Special Review Use;
5. Action on Special Review Use.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoninq Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date t' �5� Patricia Cuny, Secretary
so
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 5/30/85
Lot 62, Block 1, Wildridge
Hazard Residence - Single Family
Conceptual Design Review
INTRODUCTION
This is a basic design review of a single family residential unit on Lot 62,
Block 1, Wildridge. The lot has an assigned density of two development rights
w which would allow the proposed development. Proposed building materials include
metal roof and gray stucco walls. Additional details have not been included
with submittal.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design:
a) The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it is
to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
c) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
d) The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
e) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be
impaired.
STAFF COMMENTS
The submittal is incomplete for full design review. Site details are incomplete,
landscaping is not shown, neither building nor site is dimensioned and materials
list seems to be incomplete. Sufficient information is available for a thorough
conceptual review.
Specific feedback to the applicant is recommended in the following areas:
1. Overall building design;
2. Acceptability of metal roof;
3. Driveway grades and concept of covered driveway.
•e
•
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
Lot 62, Block 1, Wildridge
Hazard Residence - Single Family
Conceptual Design Review
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. introduce prcposed project;
2. Conceptual review of project with feedback to applicant;
3. Continue review for complete design review submittal.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm flood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted �4 Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date Patricia Cuny, Secretary����
!/n -,ter 4"7 /I'—
NW/mml
I•
■t
!f
so
STAFF REDORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 5/30/85
Lot 4, Block 5, Wildridge
La Porte Townhomes - Triplex
Design Review
INTRODUCTION
This is a basic design review of three identical residential units on Lot 4,
Block 5, Wildridge. The lot has an assigned density of three development rights
as required for the proposed development. The three units have a total floor
area of 1,840 SF each, including a 12' x 23' single car garage. Proposed
building materials include redwood siding, rough sawn cedar trim and metal roof.
Roof color is to be light brown with redwood to be stained for color coordination.
Specific color numbers have not been provided at this time. Trim color or
treatment is not specified. Roof pitch is. 6/12 front and 8/12 rear. Roof
overhang is not specified.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design:
a) The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it is
to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
c) The quality of the materi4ls to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
d) The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
e) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be
impaired.
STAFF COMMENTS
The project as proposed appears to comply with applicable zoning regulations.
However, the following items are suggested for special consideration or
additional clarification during the design review process:
1. Roof overhangs, where they occur, shall be at least 11-, feet. This is
not specified in the submittal;
2. Roof materials shall be wooden shingles or shakes of weather resistant
qualities, built-up roofs with gravel or sod. Metal roofs or other
roofing materials may be submitted for consideration and possible approval
by the Commission;
a
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
Lot 4, Block 5 Wildridae
La Porte Townhomes - Triplex
Design Review
Page 2 of 2
Staff Comments, Cont.
3. Specific colors for roof, siding and trim should be noted in any approval
given;
4. Current parking regulations require 2 spaces per unit plus 2 guest spaces
for townhome projects consisting of 3 - 5 units. The required guest
parking spaces could easily be accommodated by widening an appropriate
section of the driveway;
5. Proposed landscaping is very limited. Additional landscaping on the
street side of the driveway may be desireable.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. Introduce proposed project;
2. Planning and Zoning Commission review of submitted materials;
3. Action on application with appropriate direction to applicant.
Respectfully Submitted,
i
Norm Wood
Director of Enaineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoning Actio..
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (� Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date .��30��5 Patricia Cuny, Secretary
rcl
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 5/30/85
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Benchmark Shopping Center•
Design Review - Landscaping
INTRODUCTION
The applicant has submitted plans for re -landscaping and drainage along the
northerly side of the existing Benchmark Shopping Center Building. In General,
the plans call for installation of a drainage system for the walkway along
the building front, replacing existing timber walls with concrete block walls,
installation of curb alone edge of parking lot, installation of brick pavers
on walkway entrances, resoddinq berms and planting miscellaneous aspen and
cottonwoods.
STAFF COMMENTS
Plans are limited in nature, but the proposed work appears to be an improvement
over the existing conditions. Applicant has indicated he will bring material
samples to meetino for consideration.
Drainage is shown as discharging to a 10' x 10' sump drywell to be located
behind the Hole -in -the -Wall Restaurant. This ma- or may not function, depending
upon run-off rate and the percolation rate of slil surrounding the drywell.
It is imperative that this drywell penetrate the anticipated urderlyinq cobble
strata if it is to be expected to function properly. The depth of this
anticipated cobble strata is unknown and may be too deep to be practical.
Because of this, an alternate discharge plan may be necessary.
RECO*1ENDED ACTIONS
1. Introduce project;
2. Review project for conformance with Design Guidelines;
3. Act on proposed design.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
0 to
;. •
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 5/30/85
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Benchmark Shopping Center
• Desian Review - Landscaping
Page 2 of 2
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date O S� Patricia Cuny, Secretary
t / .L '
NW/mml