PZC Packet 061385STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Lot 62, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Hazard Single Family Residence
Design Review
Continued from 5/30/85 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
Conceptual review for this project was approved on May 30, 1985 with the following
concerns being expressed to the applicant:
1. Work out covered driveway grades with Staff;
2. Provide Commission with a colored rendering of the project;
3. Provide complete landscaping plan;
4. Provide more room outside garage for turning and maneuvering;
5. Get approval from Wildridge Covenants Committee for roof material.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Applicant has provided Staff with a colored rendering of the project and a complete
landscaping plan. Both items are adequate for design review. The design of the
covered driveway is still questionable in that the grading and drainage plan in
that vicinity does not show adequate cover for the structure, or how the fill
slope will affect the lot to the west. A section through the structure shows a
fill slope of approximately 1:1 on the west side, which is unacceptable for
revegetation.
The Town Engineer still feels that the driveway qrades need some work to insure
proper drainage. The additional room for turning and maneuvering in the drive-
way has not been addressed.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Planning and Zoning Commission review of submitted materials;
2. Continue review for complete design review submittal.
Respectfully Submitted,
ht
�ngi, Bering Technician
• Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Lot 62, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Hazard Single Family Residence
Design Review
• Continued from 5/30/85 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
r•
L
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (>el
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied --( ) Withdrawn
Date Patricia Cuny, Secretary
RW/mml
aim STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Lot 4, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision
La Porte Townhomes - Triplex
Design Review
Continued from 5/30/85 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
Design review for this proposed triplex in Wildridge was continued from the May
30, 1985 regular meeting with the following concerns being expressed to the
applicant:
1. More work needed to be done on design, color scheme, and landscaping;
2. Provide 2 quest parking spaces.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Applicant has submitted a revised site plan indicating the 2 guest parking spaces
that are required. No additional landscaping has been shown. The following
design changes have been made:
1. Wood siding on garage level has been replaced by a white stucco finish;
2. Fireplace flues have been moved to the sides of the building to add a
little variety to the design;
3. A large verti,al window has been added to the east and west sides of the
building tc improve the appearance as well.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce proposed project:
2. Planning and Zonino Commission review of submitted materials:
3. Action on application with appropriate direction to applicant.
Respectfully Submitted,
right=
Engineerinq Technician
IN
O
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Lot 4, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision
La Porte Townhomes - Triplex
Design Review
Continued from 5/30/85 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (,I
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date to/%�/.IS Patricia Cuny, Secretary
T 1 1-14 . i _ i
Rls!nual
a
/40S
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Benchmark Shopping Center
Landscape Plan - Design Review
Continued from 5/30/85 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
This is a basic design review of landscaping improvements on the north side of the
Benchmark Shopping Center Buildtng. The plan shows replacement of old timber
retaining walls with reinforced concrete curb, and an area at the northwest
corner of the building to have a decorative concrete block retaining structure.
Existing concrete walkways adjacent to the building will be replaced with
interlocking brick pavers. A drainage system under the walks is also incorporated
into the plan. Sod will be used as well.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The plan, as proposed, is a definite improvement over existing conditions in this
area. The concrete curb, block, and pavers being used will be a much more perma-
nent improvement over the existing timbers. As long as the drywell that the
drainage system flows into is deep ei,ough to penetrate the anticipated underlying
cobble strata, we feel the design is acceptable. If at the time of construction
this is found to be impractical, an alternate drainage system will have to be
presented to, and approved by, the Town Engineer.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce project;
2. Review project for conformance with Design Guidelines;
3. Act on proposed design.
tfully Submitted,
ician
.?Oft,,
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Benchmark Shopping Center
Landscape Plan - Design Review
Continued from 5/30/85 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
Plannin4 and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions (Xj
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( )Den�ied ( ) Withdrawn
Date � 3�A� Patricia Cuny, Secretary (Tiili —'
e� �
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT rO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Penalty Box Restaurant in Avon Center
Patio Design Review
Continued from 5/16/85 Regular Meeting
INTRODUCTION:
This is a basic design review of a patio addition to the Penalty Box Restaurant
located in the Avon Center Building. Applicant proposes to build a patio on the
southeast corner of the building which will extend a total of 20 feet from the
building, 12.5 feet of which will be enclosed within a wrought iron fence.
Concrete will be finished to match existing walkways in the area. The existing
landscaping features will be re -positioned to accommodate the new construction,
and the sprinkler system will be relocated to the satisfaction of the Town Staff.
The plan also calls for an awning to be placed over the entrance to the building.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Applicant has addressed some of the concerns of the Town Staff by making the
patio 12.5 feet wide, with a walkway around it being 7.5 feet wide. Grading
and drainage have also been addressed in the latest plan. The concept has been
approved by the Town Center Mall Committee as well as the Avon Center Management.
The Staff recommends that specific items be finalized and made a. condition of
any building permit issued in conjunction with this project;
1. Concrete and pavers must be reviewed to insure compatability with
existing improvements;
2. Final design and construction of the wrought iron fence must be approved
by Staff;
3. Applicant must work with Staff on landscaping and irrigation to match
existing improvements.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce proposed project;
2. Review project for conformance with Design Guidelines:
3. Act on proposed design.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dight
Eng Bering Technician
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Penalty Box Restaurant in Avon Center
Patio Design Review
Continued from 5/16/85 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
•
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date 5� Patricia Cuny, Secretary
--
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Lot 51, Block 3, Wildridae Subdivision
Ray Duplex - Conceptual Review
• INTRODUCTION:
This is a basic design review of a duplex residence on Lot 51, Block 3, Wildridoe.
The lot has an assigned density of two development rights which would allow the
proposed development. The proposed building is constructed of 6 x 8 timbers treated
with a stain and linseed oil mix, cedar shake roof, and native stone on exposed
concrete areas. The roof pitch is a 5/12.
Section 5.00 Design Guidelines
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewino the design:
a. The suitahility of the improvement, including materials of which it is
to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b. The nature of adjacent and neiohborino improvements;
c. The ouality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
d. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighbroino property;
e. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be
impaired.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The submittal is incomplete for full design review. The arading and drainage
plan are inadequate for determining if the driveway Grades are acceptable, or
if any retaining structures will be necessary. The buildino elevations show
little or no relationship to proposed grades. The Commission should be aware
that Wildridae Desion Guidelines restrict the use of log construction materials
to certain lots within the subdivision. There is not adeauate room for turning
and maneuvering in front of unit B. There is very little landscaping shown with
little detail. Sufficient information is available for a thorough conceptual
review.
Specific feedback to the applicant is recommended in the following areas:
1. Overall building design;
2. Grading, drainaae and driveway size and design;
3. Landscaping.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Lot 51, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Ray Duplex
Conceptual Review
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
0 1. Introduce proposed project;
== 2. Conceptual review of project with feedback to applicant;
3. Continue review for complete design review submittal.
Respectfully Submitted,
. iencrineering Technician
Planning and Zonina Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date �L% / Patricia Cuny, Secretary
RW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Wynfield Subdivision - Preliminary Plat
A Resubdivision of Lots 29, 31 & 32, Block 2
Amendment No. 4, Benchmark.at Beaver Creek
INTRODUCTION:
This is a review of a preliminary plat
The submittal includes the preliminary
plan and profile, and a utility plan.
proposed for the above mentioned lots.
plat, grading and drainage plan, road
The plat itself is technically correct with the exception of one bearing on
`he boundary of Lot 2, which the developer has already been made aware of.
the road, grading and utility plans are complete for thorough review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Before final approval is granted, the following items must be addressed by
the applicant prior to final plat approval:
1. A letter from the affected utility companies granting the developer
the riqht to abandon the existing utility easements along the lot lines
that are to be vacated;
2. Since the approval on the replat of Lots 30 and 31 has expired, it is
recommended that Lot 30 be included in this resubdivision, as per the
previous Town Council approval;
3. Completion of a Subdivider's Agreement in reference to the construction
of the street and other public facilities, if any;
4. The design of the entrance to the subdivision from Avon Road must be
coordinated with, and approved by, the Colorado Department of Highways;
5. New utility easements must be shown on the plat;
6. There must be a completed report regarding the design of the roadway,
including pavement sections;
The Town Engineer would like to see the proposed sewer manhole moved to
the north, beyond the drainage ditch, to keep it out of the road surface;
8. A letter of approval from the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District
approving the sewer plan;
9. A letter of approval from the Avon Metropolitan District approving the
water plan.
Staff Report to Planning & Zor ommi,ssipn - 6/13/85
Wynfield Subdivision - Prelim y Plat
A Resubdivision of Lots 29, 3' 32, Block 2
Amendment No. 4, Benchmark at ver Creek
Pane 2 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce the preliminary plat;
2. Planning and Zoning Commission review of submitted materials;
3. Action on application with appropriate recommendation to
Town Council.
Respectfully Submitted,
y fight
Erinq Technician
Plannina and Zoninq Action:
Anproved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
Approved wwi,th_ Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date Patricia Cuny, Secretary
,I- v- 3
RW/mml
be
Iip
"E STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Wynfield Inn
Lots 29 & 32, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Proposed Lot 2, Block 2, Wynfield Subdivision
Conceptual Design Review
INTRODUCTION:
The proposed project generally consists of a 150 unit motel, manaaer's living
quarters, club room, spa and laundry facilities. No related commercial uses are
proposed. The total floor area of the building is approximately 76,425 SF. The
proposed structure is a 46 foot high, 4 story building with 1 story, detached
lobby/registration area. The manager's living quarters are incorporated into
the lobby building. Proposed building materials include wood -lap siding and
stucco on the exterior and cedar shake roofs. Modular building construction is
proposed.
STAFF COMMENTS:
A. Plaster Plan Issues
1. Have adequate provisions been made for pedestrian circulation within
the site and to adjacent sites?
2. What attempt has been made to provide interior and exterior public
malls, circulation areas, mass trarisportation services, cultural,
educational, or recreational facilities?
3. What attempt has been made to provide for a "distinctive" architectural
design that is cohesive with the overall townscape?
4. Are there adequate provisions for sidewalks, curb and putter and
greenbelt?
B. Site Development Plan Issues
1. Lot line setbacks and easements are not shown, but lobby and check-in
area appears to encroach into front lot setback along Wynfield Place;
2. The number of driveway entrances seems excessive. Two entrances should
provide adequate access and circulation;
3. Consideration should be given to entrance location with respect to
street intersections. Minimum distance of 100 feet is recommended
where possible;
4. Refuse bin access is somewhat questionable. It may be necessary to
angle enclosure for access by trash tuck;
Is
• Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Wynfield Inn
Lots 29 & 32, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Proposed Lot 2, Block 2, Wynfield Subdivision
• Conceptual Design Review
Page 2 of 3
B. Site Development Plan Issues, Con't.
5. Project size requires one 12' x 35' loading space. This does not
EM seem to be shown on site plan;
6. Plant sizes and numbers are not specifically stated on landscape plan;
7. Landscape plan should consider site distances at entrances and street
intersections;
8. It may be desireable to consider sign p ogram for building as a part
of landscape and building design review;
9. Site grading and drainage plan should be submitted prior to final
review.
C. Zoning Issues
Current town records indicate there are a total of 60 Hotel/Lodge
Development Rights available on Lots 29, 30, 31 and 32, Block 2,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These 60 Development Rights are the total
for all lots with no specific numb. assigned to individual lots. The
proposed development would require 150 Hotel/Lodge Development Rights
plus 1 residential Development Right, or approximately 38 fractio,:alized
Residential Development Rights. This issue shoui� be resolved prior to
final design review approval.
The proposed project is located on Lot 32 and a portion of Lot 29.
Preliminary plans and final plat for the resubdivision of Lots 29, 31
and 32 have been submitted to the town for review and approval. This
approval process should also be complete prior to final design review
approval.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
A. Introduce proposed project;
B. Presentation by applicant;
C. Conceptual review of project;
D. Provide specific guidance io applicant with regard to issues and design
concerns. Any action should include stipulations recardina resolution
of available Development Rights and approval of resubdivision plat;
40
• Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Wynfield Inn
Lots 29 & 32, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Proposed Lot 2, Block 2, Wynfield Subdivision
Conceptual Design Review
Page 3 of 3
J
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS, CON'T.:
'401® E. Continue review to future meeting date.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approveo with Recommended Conditions (\KT
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
Dat: �p�5� Patricia Cuny, Secretary��/
NW/mnl
STAFF REPC7 TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Ordinance No
Zone Change
Lots 2G, 21
. 85-12
from IC to SPA
& 28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
INTRODUCTION:
Vail Building Arts Associates and Colorow at Squaw Creek Partnerships, owners of
Lots 26, 27 and 28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, have requested a zone
chance from IC (Industrial/Commercial) to SPA (Specially Planned Area) Bed and
Breakfast Lodge. This zone change would be accomplished by the adoption of
Ordinance 85-12.
Allowed uses in the IC (Industrial/Commercial) zone district consist of:
warehouse, laboratories, electrical substation, light manufactu''ng plants,
wholesale sales outlets, show rooms, industrial, construction and wholesale
offices, accessory building. Special Review Uses in the IC zone district
consist of: residential unit when used in connection with business operation,
automotive or other vehicular sales and repair shops, retail sales and personal
service outlets, restaurants, public uses, outside storage areas, general
commercial offices.
Allowed uses in the SPA (S,)ecially Planned Area) zone district are set by adopted
plan. SPA zone districts allow development according to an approved plan
establishinn allowable densities, uses, required parking and other zoning matters
for all, or any portion of a parcel so designated.
The required notices of public hearing have been mailed and the required fees
paid. The Town Council has deferred action on Ordinance No. 85-12 pending report
and recommendations from Planning and Zoning Commission.
Schematic drawings showing a proposed project consisting of approximately 120,
300 SF motel units and approximately 130 surface parking spaces have been sub-
mitted. Two, three story buildings are indicated. Information seems incomplete
for design review or approval of SPA. development plan.
Current Town records inaicate there are no development rights assigned to the
three lots.
PRnCFniIRF
The procedure for Zone Changes is outlined as follows:
1. Written notice of public hearing to owners of property within 300 feet
of proposed zone change;
2. Public Hearine+ before Planning and Zoning Commission regardino proposed
zone chance;
,-Jt%
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Ordinance No. 85-12
Zone Change from IC to SPA
Lots 26, 27 & 28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Page 2 of 4
PROCEDURE, CON'T.:
3. Report and recommendations from Planning and Zoning Commission to Town
Council;
4. After receiving report and recommendations, Town Council shall hold a
public hearing and act on proposed amendment.
STAFF COMMENTS:
In reviewing the requested zone change, the following questions should be addressed:
1. What are the proposed "uses" within the SPA?
2. Are the proposed uses in "conflict" with the uses identified in the
Economic Development Goals and Policies for Development District Six?
3. Would a "variation" from the intended uses within the development district
substantially "change" the character of the neighborhood?
4. Would a "change -in -character" irre arabarabll alter or adversl effect the
"pre-existing" and "Master Planned' uses oto uTeve of pmentic7strict,
zone district, or neighborhood?
5. Is the property "adjacent or contiguous" with the boundary of another
planning district, and can the proposed uses be considered a "transition"
between zoning or development districts?
6. Is `.ne proposed site "accessible" by mass transportation and does it have
adequateup blit streets, sidewalks, bikepaths, and drainways?
7. Has the applicant, in writing, "defined" the nature, location, and size
of uses requested?
8. If "residential uses" are requested, can the applicant demonstrate the
ownership of a sufficient number of Residential Development Rights?
9. Has the applicant demonstrated that the proposed uses within the SPA
would not adversely effect " rp esent oroten�tial" development projects,
or that the aggregrate of—the proposed uses would not "prematurely
overburden" the "capacity" of the public service systems
?
10. Can a "standard zone district" more adequately state the intention of the
requested "SPA" zone district?
..,
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Ordinance No. 85-12
Zone Change from IC to SPA
Lots 26, 27 & 28, Block 1, Senchiiark at Beaver Creek
Page 3 of 4
STAFF COMMENTS, CON'T.:
11. If the proposed use is qenerally acceptable in the IC zone district,
would a more appropriate solution be to amend the zoning code to allow
motels as a Special Review Use?
RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES:
1. Introduce requested action;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Close Public Hearing;
4. Consider application and information from Public Hearing;
5. Possible Actions:
a. Recommend Council adopt Ordinance No. 85-12 as written;
b. Recommend Council reject Ordinance No. 85-12 as an inappropriate
zone change;
c. Continue review of requested action pending receipt of additional
information;
d. Recommend Council modify requested zone change to a more appropriate
zone designation;
e. Recommend Council reject Ordinance No. 85-12 and initiate development
of an Ordinance amending the zoning code to allow motels in the IC
zone district as a Special Review Use.
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
i•
•v
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Ordinance No. 85-12
Zone Change from IC to SPA
Lots 26, 27 & 28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
I Page 4 of 4
Planning and Zoning Actior:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions ( )
1r Approved //with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued (V) Denied ( ) Withdrawn
L ( )
Date /, 3�2� Patricia Cuny, Secretary
NW/mml
to
40'E STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Lot 56, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
mom Zone Change - SPA Plan Amendment
Ordinance No. 85-13
INTRODUCTION:
Coyote Construction and Development, owner of Lot 56, Block 2, Wildridge, has
requested an Amendment to the approved SPA development plan. The current SPA
Plan is for the development of 2 duplex units which may not be fractionalized.
The requested plan amendment would allow 4 residential units whi^h could be
fractionalized.
Per Section 17.20.070 of the Municipal Code, SPA plans may only be amended as
a zone change. The proposed zone change would be accomplished by the adoption
of Ordinance No. 85-13.
192ITir1T0.11M
The procedure for SPA Plan Amendments or Zone Chanoes are outlined as follows:
1. Written notice of Public Hearing to owners of property within 300 feet
of proposed zone change;
2. Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission;
3. Report and recommendations from Planning and Zoning Commission to Town
Council;
4. After receiving report, Town Council shall hold a public hearing and
act on proposed amendment.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The required notices of public hearinq have been mailed, the required fee has
been paid and Ordinance 85-13 has been scheduled for first reading on June 11,
1985. Second reading is tentatively scheduled for the June 25, 1985 Council
meeting pending report and recommendations from the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Information or drw.!ings are not complete for a full design review. The schematic
drawings do indicate that on-site parking and other requirements can be met.
If proposed plan amendment is approved, approval should be contingent unon
resubmittal for design review and approval.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Lot 56, Block 2, Wildridae Subdivision
Ordinance No. 85-13
Page 2 of 2
STAFF COMMENTS, CON -T.:
The following criteria is suggested for reviewing the requested SPA Plan
Amendment:
1. Compliance with Master Plan as it currently exists;
2. Compatibility of proposed plan as it relates to neighboring
properties;
3. Compatibility of proposed plan with site.
RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES:
1. Introduce requested action;
2. Open Public Hearing;
3. Close Public Hearing;
4. Consider application and information from Public Hearing;
5. Formulate report and recommendations to Town Council.
Respectfully �'i� d'
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Recommended Conditions
Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued( ) ,ppeen ed (' ) Withdrawn ( )
Date (®//.,5 Patricia Cuny, Secretary
NW/mml
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNJING & ZONING COMMISSION - 6/13/85
Ordinance No. 85-10
Amendments to Off- Street Parkino Requirements
INTRODUCTION:
Ordinance 85-10 includes recommended revisions to off-street parking requirements
as discussed at previous Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. These revisions
are expected to accomplish the following:
1. Define a mixed use project;
2. Define a large single -use project;
3. Establish parking requirements for large commercial projects at time
of design rather than occupancy;
5. Remove the Special Review Use procedure from approval of compact parking
spaces;
6. Remove the Special Review Use procedure from approval of parking
reductions and establish criteria under which reductions will be approved.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Requirements for a general amendment to the zoning code which is initiated by
Town Council or Planning and Zoning Commission are outlined as follows:
1. Notice of Public Hearing shall be posted at least 12 days prior to meeting;
2. Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing and at conclusion,
forward a report and recommendation on proposed amendment to Town Council;
3. The Town Council, after receiving report and recommendation, shall hold a
public hearing and act on proposed amendment.
The required Notire of Public Hearing has been posted. Ordinance 85-10 is
scheduled for first reading by Town Council at June 11, 1985 meeting. Second
reading and public hearing by Town Council is tentatively scheduled for June 25,
1985 meeting, pending receipt of report and recommendations from Planning and
Zoning Commission.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Introduce proposed off-street parking revisions;
2. Open public hearing;
3. Close public hearing;
4. Review Ordinance 85-10 and information from public hearing;
5. Formulate report and recommendations to Town Council.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 6/13/85
Ordinance No. 85-10
Amendments to Off -Street Parking Requirements
Page 2 of 2
Respectfully Submitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Engineering and
Community Development
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (X) Approved with Recommended Condition-
Approved
ondition Approved with Modified Conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( )
Date
flb:i,��inl
Patricia Cuny, Secretary