PZC Packet 071284STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12/84
Tract B, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision
Special Review Use - Microwave Antenna Site
Heritage Cablevision
This application was continued
meeting of the Commission, the
withdrawn from consideration.
to a specific date and a public
action accepting the applicants
the public hearing.
Respectfully Sub itted,
�7�7
Norm Wood
Director of Public Works
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( )
Continued ( j Denied ( )
Dated:yV4y 42.1
from the May 24, 1984 meeting. At the last
applicant requested that this application be
Since this application involved a continuance
hearing, it may be desireable to take official
request to withdraw the application and to close
Approved with Modified Conditio
Larry Kumpost, Secretary
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12/84
Lots 25 & 72, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision
Special Review Use - Christie Lodge Reduction in
Parking Requirements and Buck Creek Plaza Off -Site
Parking at Christie Lodge
This is a dual purpose Special Review Use related to parking at Christie Lodge
and Buck Creek Plaza:
1. Christie Lodge is requesting an overall reduction in parking requirements
as allowed for large lots as a Special Review Use under Section 17.24.020-
6 of the Municipal Code;
2. Buck Creek Plaza is requesting approval for off-site parking as allowed
by 17.24.020-1 & 2 of the Municipal Code.
Site plans submitted indicate that the Christie Lodge project has a total of 401
full size parking spaces. These parking spaces are as follows: Non -structured
surface parking - 116 spaces; structured surface parking - 137 spaces; structured
covered parking - 148 spaces.
Parking requirements for the Christie Lodge Project are summarized as follows:
250 1
bdrm.
accommodation units at
1 each
250
spaces
30 2
bdrm.
accommodation units at
1.5 each
45
spaces
9,498
S.F.
retail space at 4/1,000
S.F.
38
spaces
3,300
S.F.
restaurant seating area
at 1/60 S.F.
55
spaces
140 seat conference
room at 1/4 seats
35
spaces
TOTAL PARKING
SPACES REQUIRED
423
spaces
Maximum Special Review Use parking reduction for large lots is 15or 63 spaces.
This leaves a minimum requirement of 360 spaces or an existing surplus of 41
spaces if the maximum reduction is allowed. If the reduction in parking spaces
is approved, these excess spaces would be available for changes in use or could
possibly be leased to other projects in the area.
Further development in Buck Creek Plaza is currently restricted due to the lack
of available parking spaces for additional development. Buck Creek Plaza is
proposing to develop approximately 1,405 S.F. of office space in the basement of
the building, if approval can be obtained for off-site parking to meet the
additional parking requirements. Parking requirements for 1,405 S.F. of office
space is 3 per 1,000 S.F. or 5 additional parking spaces. Christie Lodge has
agreed to lease up to 7 parking spaces to Buck Creek Plaza if the necessary Town
approvals can be obtained.
[s•
[40
[•
[ a.
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/12/84
Lots 25 & 72, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision
Special Review Use - Christie Lodge Reduction in
Parking Requirements and Buck Creek Plaza Off -Site
Parking at Christie Lodge
Page 2 of 3
Large Lot Reduction - Paragraph 8 of Section 17.24.020 states that, "parking
requirements may be reduced based on the total size of a parking area based on
the following chart if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as a
Special Review Use:"
Total Required
up to 50 spaces
50 to 100 spaces
100 to 150 spaces
250 spaces and over
Maximum Reductions
No Reduction
5 °S
10%
15%
Off -Site Parking - Paragraph 1 of Section 17.24.020 states, 'Buildings or uses
existing on the effective date of this chapter which are subsequently altered
or enlarged so as to require the provision of parking spaces under this chapter,
may be served by parking facilities located on land other than the lot on which
the building or use served is located, provided such facilities are within five
hundred feet walking distance of a main entrance to the use served for industrial
uses and three hundred feet for commercial uses."
Paragraph 2 of Section 17.24.020 states, "In cases where parking facilities are
permitted on land other than the lot on which the building or use served is
located, such facilities shall be in the same possession as the lot occupied
by the building or use to which the parking facilities are accessory. Such
possession shall be by deed or lease, and such deed or lease shall be filed with
the recorder of deeds of Eagle County.
If possession is by lease, the term of the lease shall be perpetual in nature
running for the duration of the use requiring the parking."
In considering a Special Review Use, the Commission shall determine:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the Zonina Code;
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes
of this Zoning Code and the applicable zoning district; and
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding land
use and uses in the area.
l -W01%
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/12/84
Lots 25 & 72, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision
Special Review Use - Christie Lodge Reduction in
Parking Requirement3 and Bunk Creek Plaza Off -Site
Parking at Christie Lodge
Page 3 of 3
The following information may be pertinent in making the above determinations:
1. Approval of the maximum allowable reduction in parking requirements for
Christie Lodge will bring them into conformance with current parking
regulations as well as providing them with an excess of parking which will
allow more flexibility in uses within the project;
2. The spaces proposed for lease to Buck Creek Plaza are approximately 250
feet from the building entrance with a minimum walking distance of approxi-
mately 450 feet;
3. The proposed lease period is three years with options for two renewals
for two year periods giving a total lease and option period of seven years;
4. It may be desireable to act on this as two separate matters:
a. Christie Lodge - Special Review Use for parking reduction;
b. Buck Creek Plaza - approval of off-site parking to allow development
of 1,405 S.F. of office space within existing building.
Respectfully) Submitted,
' Norm Wood
Director of Public Works
Planning and Zoning Action:
a
Approved as Submitted Approved with Modified Conditi
Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Dated: i)L (Z 1
!� Larry Kumpost, Secretary
J
'5-rw 9Ee02T
44b
0 f -rA16
-4 6. �awgs; fuR N M MIWc 1 4L 4S f"f, AS RuQL GteEt _ I'-JAU SHAD..
goH_C.aicv�le►aTir/__w�Ta!
-W-14— of APO 1716*JA_L.- -off -_SRE__?44K1►Jti
-ro iu�Sv2E ApEu��As� Ib PA�.Kiu� WN�LL' �sm�,��rac, SPA�� is
NV!/nnnl
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING 'S ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12/84
Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision
Special Review Use - Lodge at Avon
Lock -off Units in TC Zane District
This requested Special Review Use is to allow construction of 31 efficiency
and one bedroom units with additional lock -off accommodation units.
Section 17.08.375 of the Municipal Code defines a lock -off unit as "a room or
group of rooms which, although built as part of a dwelling or accommodation unit,
may be locked -off from the main portion of the unit and entered without going
through the main living unit. Such room or rooms shall be conside-ed and
treated as accommodation units for density and parking requirements. All such
rooms must be capable of functioning as part of the main living unit. Lock -off
units used as accommodation unit, may include bathroom facilities, but shall
not include a cooking area or cooking facilities."
Section 17.20.040r further states, "For purposes of calculating allowable density
in any districL in which locked -off accommodation units are allowed as Special
Review Uses, each bedroom in excess of three bedrooms in a living unit shall be
counted as an additional one-third of a density unit. No more than two such
accommodation units shall be permitted to be locked -off from a main living unit."
In accordance with Section '7.2.0.010, lock -offs are permissable in the TC Zone
District., o;hJ-ct to lu,cial Review Use approval.
In considering a Special Review Use, the Commission shall determine:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise Complies with all requirements imposed
by the zoning code:
2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes
of this .>.oninq code and the applicable zoning district; and
3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding
land use and uses in the area.
The following information may be pertinent in making the above determination,:
1. The proposed unit desinn appears to conform to the requirements of
Sections 17.08.315 and 17.;10.050C for lock -off units requiring only one
density unit;
2. Lots 57-60, Block 2, Cenchmark Subdivision are currently zoned TC;
3. Lots 57-60, Block 2, Bcnr.hm,rk Subdivision have not been resubdividea
to vacate interior lot lines and easements as required to allow construction
of project as proposed;
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/12/84
Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision
Special Review Use
Lodge at Avon
Lock -off Units in TC Zone District
Page 2of2
4. Density for Lots 57-60, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision is currently
allocated as follows:
Lot
57
0
Units
Lot
58
20
Units
Lot
59
0
Units
Lot
60
50
Units
5. This project has been submitted for a Master Planning Conceptual Review only
and is still subject to a complete design review for compliance with zoning
regulations and design guidelines.
Based upon the above information, the Commission may wish to attach one or more
of the following conditions, if it makes the necessary determinations for approving
a Special Review Use to allow lock -offs:
15 Ll r�„ Teco To 31 uw r-rS WITH Nor m o2E -MAI
1. Approval .l i s
one or two lock -
off accommodat-on units per each unit hor o%*z 3 ( kol2ov 15 W*A uHrr
2. Approval contingent upon Lots 57-60, being resubdivided into a single tract
of land having a total assigned density of 70 units;
3. Approval contingent upon completion of the project design review and approval
process including compliance with zoning regulations and design guidelines.
JRespectfully ubmitted,
Norm Wood
Director of Public Works
Planning and ZoningAction:
Approved as Submitted:
Approved with Modified Conditions: I A5 MsaifleD Aft%A I AW Geuwrws Z$ 3 AGo*
Continued:
Deni
Datk, 1 VL-/ M, 19S
ry
M.�
STAFF REPORT TO PLi ANG & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12,
Lots 26-28, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision
Vail Building Arts - Project Development Sign
"Mountain Center"
The proposed sign is 7' in length and 2'x3" in height, not over 8' in height
above grade.
Section 15.28.040-H Development Signs:
Development Signs are permitted provided that:
1. Only one sign per parcel, lot, or group of continguous lots under one
ownership not to exceed sixteen square feet of display area and eight
feet in height;
2. Signs must be removed within thirty days of completion of development
cr land sales;
3. In no case may a sign be retained for more than two years unless an
extension is granted by the design review board;
4. Signs may contain only the project name and the names and addresses
of the owner, contractor, architect, engineer, and real estate broker(s).
The proposed sign appears to comply with Item H, 1 - 3., #4 states "Signs may
contain only the project name and the names and addresses of the owner, contractor,
architect, engineer, and real estate broker(s)."
Respectfully Submitted,
U
Dan Fogla d
Building Administrator
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Modified Conditio X )
Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Dated: �VL4 IZ r IQ `& Larry Kumpost, Secretary1 11
Wefz rd �N Gu,4 D To Fyn,aE S rnE o u
WkeV�SAl,� - ?�ETAIi
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12/84
Parcel 2, Swift Gulch Addition
Excavation and Revegetation - Design Review
Con't. from the 6/28/84 Regular Meeting
The applicant requests design review approval for the removal of approximately
35,000 cubic yards of earth from portions of Swift Gulch SPA site. Further,
the natural vegetation is to be removed from other portions of the site.
Revegetation of all distrubed area will be completed. The purpose of the
request is twofold:
1. To provide road fill material for the Buck Creek Road. The applicant
has stated that due to the availability of road fill from Swift Gulch
the scaring of the hillside will be minimized on the right of way of the
Buck Creek Road;
2. Recontourino and revegetation of portions of the Swift Gulch site will
enhance the marketability and short term usefulness of the SPA site.
Acquisition of fill material from an unrelated, but more distant site is
available, however such an option has been ruled out because of adverse costs.
According to Section 5.00, Design Guidelines of the Design Review Board pro-
cedures, the board shall consider the following items in reviewing the design:
a) The suitability of the improvement, including materials of which it is
to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
b) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
c) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
d) The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from any
adjacent or neighboring property;
e) The objective that nu improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to
others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be
impaired.
Additionally, the following landscape provision of the design review board
shall apply, Section 5.20:
Landscaping and Plant Materials, Basic Guide:
Trees, shrubs, and bushes naturally existing upon any lot shall not be cut, trimmed
or removed without prior approval of the Board. All surface areas disturbed by
construction shall be promptly landscaped and maintained according to approved
landscape plans. The pians shall specify the location, type and quantities of
ground cover, plants, shrubbery, trees, and similarly related natural and/or
artificial materials used and submitted inn connection with said landscaping plan.
[]
U
3�
Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 7/12/84
Parcel 2, Swift Gulch Addition
Excavation and Revegetation - Design Review
Con't. from the 6/28/84 Regular Meeting
Page 2 of 2
In summary, after our on-site tour, I believe the applicant has made substantial
progress in amending his original proposal so that it is more sensitive to pro-
tecting major view corridors.
Respectfully Submitted,
i
Jam s.F. Lamont
P n� ng Director
Planning and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted (W)
Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Dated: J VL1
JFL/mnl
Approved with
Larry Kumpost,
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12184
Lots 29 & 30, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision
First Bank of Avon - Conceptual Review
Traffic Flow - Con't. from 6/14/84 Regular Meeting
The applicant, First Bank of Avon, has requested a continuance on their conceptual
review of traffic flow until the July 26, 1984 regular meeting.
Please see attached letter.
Respectfully Submitt ,�
G'
MargalreM. Loch
Recording Secretary
Plannino and Zoning Action:
Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Modified Conditio
Continued Denied ( )
Dated: I�:f' Larry Kumpost, Secretary]
Tw E ADPL -lc -Am
/nnl
"U
STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 7/12/£4
Lot 56, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Coyote Ridge Condominiums - Design Review
Continued from 6/28/84 Regular Meeting
Conversations with Mark Donaldson indicate he will bring chances in to the
July 12, 1984 Regular Meetinq.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dan Foglan
Building Administrator
Planning and Zoninq Action:
Approved as Submitted (J ) Approved with Modified Conc
Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Dated: i; Ly IZ 111g64 Larry Kumpost, Secretary
DF/mnl 7/9/84