Loading...
PZC Packet 091384• lab STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lot 46/47, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Chambertin Townhouses - Landscape Plans Continued from 8/9/84 Special Meeting As requested at the August 9, 1984 Special Meeting, the Planning Commission wished to review the landscaping plans. The Commission also wished to: 1. Verify height of guardrails; 2. How the area between the walls, used for drainage, would be treated; 3. Show landscaping in conjunction with the new wall:. Applicants have submitted plans showing landscaping along and with the new walls. The area between the wall has been revised to also use a crib wall with a catch basin, and has been landscaped. The guardrails are the correct height (42") and will be located by the Building Inspector when the walls are completed. Respectful Submitted, J Dan Foglad Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as 7ibmitted ()C) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Dated: Swr, l3, 19-4;4 Approved with Modified Condit Withdrawn ( ) Larry Kumpost, Secretary STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Center Planting Revisions In discussions with Town Staff, owners of Avon Center have stated problems with the quantity and availability of the previous landscape plan materials. Staff has been promised that when the revised planting schedule is approved, construction will start immediately on the parking lot and landscaping. Representatives of the owner and landscape contractor will be available at the meetinq for discussion with improved plans. Revised plan has larger variety of plant materials and seems to be more com- patible with Avon Road and Mall landscaping. Suggested Conditions: If approved, it may be adviseable to structure approval such that it is for revised plant materials only and remainder of work shall be in accordance with previously approved plans. Respectfully Submi d, Dan Fogland Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Modified Conditi n (X Continued ,( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Dated: fir► . 13t��� Larry Kumpost, Secretaryll _ 1;j< Zoo.) -E DF/mml STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Center - Peregrine Village Co -Development Sign Applicant's Request: Co -development sign for Avon Center and Peregrine Village. The proposed sign is located on the east side of Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. In our discussions with the applicants, they have verbally agreed to remove the exist -;ng development sign located west of Avon Center on Lot B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The sign is approximately 34" x 66", at a height of 7'. Section 15.28.040 - H Development Signs Development signs are permitted provided that: 1. Only one sign per parcel, lot, or group of contiguous lots under one ownership not to exceed sixteen square feet of display area and eight feet in height; 2. Signs must be removed within thirty days of completion of development or land sales; 3. In no case may a sign be reatined for more than two years unless an extension is granted by the design review board; 4. Signs may contain only the project name and the names and addresses of the owner, contractor, architect, engineer, and real estate broker(s). The Commission may want to consider the following in reviewing this application: 1. Removal of existing Avon Center Development sign; 2. Approval not to exceed two years; Respectfully ubmitt tl, Dan Fogland Building and Zoning Administrator a 0 Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/13/84 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Center - Peregrine Village Co -Development Sign Page 2 of 2 Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( Dated: Sg" S. IJ%j Omer "Now L*j%vIN U Approved with Modified Condi Withdrawn ( ) Larry Kumpost, Secretary _ u . P TaJp►t,Qpa1.� rOOL 1HFOAMAT,04 GALA, . DF/mml STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lots 5, 6, and 9, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Conceptual Review Birds of Prey Townhomes Applicant's Request - Conceptual Review, Consisting of Two Sites: 1 project located on Lots 5, 6, and 9, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision; 2 5 plex buildings on Lot 5 and 6, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision; 2 4 plex buildings on Lot 9, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision. Applicant desires the Commission's commetiits on the design of the building,site and other pertinent comments that will help the projects when they come in for final approval. Applicant's are proposing to vacate the property line between Lots 5 and 6, to locate the building on the site without having to go too far into the hillside on Lot 6. All of the units will be of modular type construction and similar in design. The only zoning regulations that have checked out at this time are the platted density, which is correct. Eli Respectfully ubmi d Dan Fogland Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted (X ) Approved with Modified ConditiZ�l )( Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Dated: 13�19� Larry Kumpost, Secretary f02 ��i/JF•iZ L �I•s►G�►.___) l�L1FS —_ — — 1 i� STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING -ONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchma. at Beaver Creek Peregrine Village Variance Request - Parking Requirement Reduction Staff Comments: This is a very complicated issue deserving extremely thorough review by Staff and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. There are a number of overlapping and interelated issues involved with this variance request. The parking layout for this project also affects landscaped areas, and loading space numbers, size and location. To further complicate the issue, parking requirements for this project can be considered under two separate ordinances. Ordinance 79-12 was in effect while plans for the project were being developed and when initial approval was issued. Ordinance 83-36 was adopted after ti>e initial approval but prior to the start of construction, and is in effect at this time. Ordinance 79-12 generally has lower parking requirements, but Ordinar�:e 83-36 has greater flexibility allowing for reductions in parking requirements and the use of compact spaces through the Special Review Use procedure. In order to thoroughly and properly evaluate this request, the following additional information should be supplied by applicant: 1. A precise description of the variance being requested and measures proposed to make the variance compatible with other properties in the vicinity; 2. A site plan, with dimensions, showing parking, loading spaces, traffic circulation, useable open space and landscaped area; 3. Documentation regarding: a) relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity; b) degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcements of a specified requlation is necessary to achieve com- patibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain tiese objectives without grant of special privilege; c) effect of the requested variance on transportation and traffic facilities. •• • w No w'. Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/13/34 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Peregrine Village Variance Request - Parking Requirement Reduction Page 2 of 2 Without this information, it is felt the Planning and Zoning Commission cannot properly evaluate the approval criteria listed in Section 17.36.040 of the Municipal Code or realistically make the findings required by Section 17.36.050. Section 17.36.090 allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to recess a Public Hearing on a request for a variance in order to obtain additional information. Suggested Actions: Due to the complicated nature of this variance request and the lack of specific information, the following actions are suggested: 1. Presentation by applicant to explain request; 2. Open public hearing for input from public; 3. Recess public hearing for not more than 30 days; 4. Provide feedback to applicant regarding specific concerns of Plannino and Zoning Commission members including possible options which may be available to applicant. Respectfully Submitted, Norm Wood Town Engineer Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Modifie Continued ()C) Denied ( ) Dated: 450fr 13 15 Withdrawn ( ) Larry Kumpost, Secre Cowr%t4yj>rp =Q hlT ll.�k ME�'�ING_ W, A *&;g9 Q%r-,e 7—W%)&wrT UNoCK A QIeQgiAACf,,. NW/mml 4 10 STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek "Time -Share" - Special Review Use Peregrine Village • Peregrine Village Realty, Inc. as agent for P.P.L. Development, is requesting a Special Review Use for compliance with Avon Zoning Ordinances to be able to "time-share" their development which is located in the Town Center Zone, Lot 63, 40 Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. Peregrine is requesting approval for "time- share" for all 103 residential units. "Time-share" is a Special Review Use in the Town Center Zone. Section 17.20.030 Rules of Procedure for Special Review Approval A. The concurring vote of a majority of the total authorized number of members of the design review board shall be necessary for approval of a special review use; B. The design review board shall hold a public hearing on each request for a special review use, with the following special conditions required: 1. Notice shall be published once in a newspaper of general circula- tion in the area at least twelve days prior to the hearing date. In lieu PY actual publication, the notice shall also be effective by posting the notice in at least three public places within the town in addition to posting at the office of the town clerk. A written notice of said hearing shall be sent by first r1ass mail at least twelve days prior to the hearing date to property owners within the area of proposed use and within three hundred feet thereof. Owners of residential multifamily condominium units may be served by mailing a copy of any such required notice to the record address of the manager of their homeowners' association; 2. A fee of fifty dollars shall be charged to cover the cost of processing. The applicant shall also pay the actual costs of providing the notification referred to in subdivision 1 of this subsection; 3. The design review board, in approving a special review use, shall make a finding that the conditions in this section are satisfied by the reasons set forth in the application and that granting the spec!al review use will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building and structure; 4. The design review board, in approving a special review use, may pre- scribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the zoning laws of the town, violation of which shall be deemed a violation of this section; Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/13/84 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek "Time -Share" - Special Review Use Peregrine Village Page 2 of 3 Section 17.20.030 Rules of Procedure for Special Review Approval, Con't. 5. If a special review use is approved as outlined above, the town council shail be notified in writing by the recording secretary of the design review board and the town council shall take final action granting, denying or granting with conditions identical to or different from those prescribed by the design review board, based upon testimony or dvidence presented to either the desion review board or the town council. In approving a special review use, the town council may prescribe appropriate conditions and safe- guards in conformity with the zoning laws of the town, violation of which shall be deemed a violation of this section. (Ord. 83-24 S1, Ord. 83-15 S1; Ord. 82-17 S1, Ord. 79-12 S3.4). Section 17.20.020 Grantinq of Special Review Use Whenever a use has been designated a special review use, a permit for such use may be issued only upon approval of the design review boa,,d and town council. A. All applications for approval of a special review use shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.20.030; B. In considering the suitability of the special review use, the board shall determine: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; 2. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of this zoning code and the applicable zoning district; and 3. Whether the proposed use is designed to be compatible with surrounding land uses and uses in the area; C. No approved special review use may be modified, structurally enlarged or expanded in ground area, unless such modification, enlargement or expansion receives the prior approval of the design review board and the town council, which approval shall be obtained by repetition of the granting procedures provided in this chapter. (Ord. 79-12 S3.3). .AN Staff Report to Planning & Zoning Commission - 9/13/84 Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek "Time -Share" - Special Review Use Peregrine Village Page 3 of 3 1 The following information may be pertinent to this request: 1. May want to approve subject to completion of all requirements of Subdivision Ordinance; 2. Successfui resolution to parking and open space requirements as mentioned in earlier dealings with this project; 3. Impact of "time-sharing" projects on Town services and facilities; i.e., bus service and recreational facilities. (Note: this area was addressed in Subdivision Regulation with Christie Lodge). Respectfully bmitte Dan Fogland Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Modified Conditi s ( Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Dated: 'SaP . )3 Larry Kumpost, Secretary - "-�- — IM010J EKSU on j4 ' 2 ihy DF/mnl STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - 9/13/84 Lot 13 - 16, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Buck Creek Condominiums Applicants request: 1. Extension of approval for Buck Creek Condominium project, Phase IV; 2. Reaffirm project development sign. Design rules state that design approvals are valid for two years; unless a building permit is issued and construction pursued. In the case of Buck Creek condominiums, the first three phases have been built, with the fourth phase remaining. To ensure and clarify that the design approval will not expire, applicant has requested an extension of approval for Phase IV. The plans have not been changed. A review of the parking shows that they are in conformance with current parking requirements. Phase III was completed approximately two years ago. Several units remain to be sold. The development sign approval in 1980 stated the development sign was valid for one year or until all the units were sold. This sign was on our list of development signs that needed or should be updated. Therefore, the applicants have complied with our request to have the Planning and Zoning Commission affirm or reject the continuation of their sign. Respectfully Submit Dan Fogland Building and Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Action: Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with Modified Conditi`or�(X Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) / // Dated: 'Gtr ( 3 01"4 Kumpost, Secretary --- 514W #JC T / p r'�-A Cf�Ep 2