Loading...
PZC Packet 071994PLANNING A.,D ZONING COMMISSION STAFF _.:PORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: 96 Units ZONING: RIIDC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION: Riverview Park Asso., has submitted an application for Final Design Review of 96 units on Lot 1 of the Eaglewood Subdivision The applicant is proposing 4 buildings standing approximately 60' hi. -h. The lot is 4.709 acres in size and is bounded by the Eagle River on the north and Hwy. 6/24 on the south. Following is a list of building materials and colors for the four proposed buildings: Roof Siding Other Fascia Soffits Window Window Trim Door Door Trim Hand/ Deck Rail Flues/Flashings Chimney Trash Enclosure Materials Co' -off standing seam metal forest green stucco bull/darker value buff cedar metals/trim opaque cedar metal cedar .1 metal aluminum N/A aluminum N/A brown forest green frame Brest green frame aluminum buff metal forest g.een stucco chimney/cedar trim/metal cap stucco bufF The plant list for the Brookside landscape plan has been attached to this report. The developer is proposing thirteen, 12' high lights for the parking area throughout the site. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application as a Conceptual at the May 17, 1994 and informally at the June 7, 1994 meeting and made the following comments: • Impacts to the site as townhome project, • Setbacks, • Covered parking, • Height, and • Taller, denser buildings to preserve site features. PLANNING n.41) ZONING COMMISSION STAFF .:SPORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, F,agle.vood Subdivision 9F Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan ('omments; _Water Line Extension: Water service is not currently available at this site. The developer must provide evidence that potable water will be provided to the site PRIOR to the application of a building permit. Drainage Ra?ort: The applicant has provided Staff with the drainage plans, however, no report has been submitted. A drainage report, coinciding with the plans, must be provided to the Town for approval PRIOR to the application of a building permit. Irrigation Easement: The developer is proposing to pipe a portion of the irrigation ditch on the site. Permission must be provided to the Town of Avon from the respective agency for the piping PRIOR to the application of a building permit. Colorado Division of Iran.sportation: The developer must provide to the Town of Avon, PRIOR to the application of a building permit, permission from CDOT for HWY 6/24 access. Hike Path: The developer is proposinh a 10' wide paved bike path along the south portion of the river. The Recreation Master Plan recommends a 3-6' soft surface path Staff is still discussing the path and will have a determination on the type of path at the meeting Interna/ Circulation. The applicant has met with the Fire Department and discussed concerns for emergency vehicle access. The applicant has agreed to reduce the size of the circular island at the entry way and straighten out areas in the site The backout space of 24' is also the internal drive for the site 1-risnng 1ree_s The developer is proposing to remove 7 Spruce trees that stand 25'+ high and 10-15 cottonwood tree 40'* high. Is the proposed landscape plan adequate to mitigate the cutting of the trees' The developer will be saving a large portion of the existing trees on site Eagle Rive: Corridor Comments: 30' Stream hefhack The site plan vaguely reflects the 30' setback from the mean annual high w4ter mark. Staff would like to applicant to be aware that no site disturbance is allowed in the .30' setback Further, Eaglewood Subdivision plat note q 3 states "Drainage, public pedestrian, park land and open space easement shall be for use of the general public which use shall not be limited or interfered wuh by declarant or its assigns. Perman;,;u structures, other than bike paths, will not be allowed with the 30' stream PLANNING n.iD ZONING COMMISSION STAFI .tEPORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review setback on the south side of the Eagle River, including the 30' strearn setback area on both Lot 2 and Tract W." The site plan does not indicate any ,.ublic access. Tract W: The property line for Tract W disappears in the western portion of the site. The on site plan needs to reflect the property line for Tract W, which must be dedicated to the Town of Avon. by April 1, 1997. Miscellaneous Comments A construction/erosion control fence will he required to be placed at the 30' stream setback line PRIOR to ANY site disturbance. r The proposed signs are not approved since no detail has been provided. They must receive approval at a separate meeting. Building lighting has not b --en indicated, which is important due to the size of the buildings. Building lighting must be brought back for approval at a later meeting. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes and guidelines The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent wtth Town guidelines. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The design minimizes impacts to the site. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. r. PLANNING A.D ZONING COMMISSION STAF1 APORT Judy 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements are not out of context with surrounding properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this final design review with the following conditions: I. No site disturbance or grading may take place on the 30' stream setback, except for the construction of the bike path. 2. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed at the 30' stream setback. 3. Plans for the water line extension be approved by the Town of Avon and tho Avon Metropolitan District PRIOR to the application for a building permit. 4. A drainage report be submitted to the Town of Avon and approved by the Town Engineer PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 5. The developer provide to the Town of Avon permission from the respective agency for the piping of the irrigation ditch PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 6. The developer provide to the Town of Avon, Colorado Division of Transportation permission for the access onto HWY. 6/24 PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 7. The developer will install the bike path prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy of the first constructed building. 8. The flues, Flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 9. The building lighting be approved by Planning and Zoning Commission. 10. Revegetation include native bushes. 11. Meters be placed on the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application r, PLANNING A,iD ZONING COMMISSION STAFI,-.EPORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted C� 4-t Mary Holde Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( -1 Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date __Z -s 2, / lq_Sue Railton, Secretary PLANNING AND ..ONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 3, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Big Sky Townhomes Condition of Approval PROJECT TYPE: 5 Units ZONING: PUD, Five Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Big Sky Townhomes were approved on March 15, 1994 with conditions. The conditions being addressed by this submittal are: 1. Revised site plan; 2. A roofing material sample; and 3. A revised landscaping plan. They are changing the elevations slightly by supporting the decks with posts instead of braces. STAFF COMMENTS: The changes proposed meet the Town of Avon Codes and Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes with the following condition: 1. Grading be revised to maintain existing drainage pattern along Wildwood Road. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING ANA, LONING COMMISSION STAFF Ru: OR.T July 19, 1994 Lot 3, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Big Sky Townhomes Condition of Approval will PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (v'� Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date / / Sue Railton, Secretary �xkEi�exu4asiz ' �d The Commission approved the modifications as submitted. /1 /' a •�?. �'_ _'I_/ - - i/\ / •�-/ _\ I / 1 / / In IKI✓1it 151) 11 r l I / /• 1 ;'r 1 / / l zjo cr �`A \a I I 11 I I m 2.e 1 1 11 111 11 1 1 I 1 1 \ I \ Va �(\ I�10rp \ I 111 1• �7' _ �_ _ i \ 'mss I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 111 1 � I � I•. 1 � � \�1 ..�;:�.:. � ..: / % \\ / i Ini 1111 , \ \.., �I`, ' I I :I 1 1 IJ i 14-2t 1 I I I, 1 I II 1 M sC c`: I' I I I , I I �H1 ��' `I o � ISI I T � � /�4 •\ .� N \ U 1 o�Ynil' I II .t rr) I i 9I III 1 I I I I 1 1' 1 W //11®/ 1 It I n / , 1I I 1� v )o 1: ^u t° �o limim I ii i v 4 I �n Q e'1 i; PLANNING ANL ZONING COMMISSION STAFF Ri-.,ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision (Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge) Spiegel/Tracey Duplex Variance - Side Yard Setback PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD -- Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? No, Requires a Variance to Side Yard Setback Requirements This is a Public Hearing for a variance to the front and side yard setback an Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision. INTRODUCTION: Chris Spiegel is requesting a variance to both 10' side yard setbacks for the allowance of a 4.5' encroachement in the north side yard and a .3' encroachment into the south side yard. The request, based on the application for a variance, is due to improper pin placement by surveyors and continuing construction of the residence based on the placement of the pins. STAFF COMMENTS: Before acting on a variance application, the Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: Section 17.36.40, Approval Criteria' A. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Comment: The requested variance is in keeping with the surrounding uses and structures in the area. B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibly and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. Comment. The degree of' relief being sought is minimal. Encroachments are 4.5' and 3' and already exists. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Comment,. The effect of the request will have no negative impacts on light, air, population, transportation, traffic facilities, public facilities, utilities or public safety. D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. W PLANNING ANVEONING COMMISSION STAFF R ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision (Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge) Spiegel/Tracey Duplex Variance - Side Yard Setback Comment Staff has not identified anv other factors for the Commission to consider. FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance wi!I not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other propertirc -^ 'he vicinay. B. That the granting of the variance wii' not be detrimental to 'he public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to puoperties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; iii. The strict or lit: ral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval of Resolution No. 94-13 , A Resolution .Approving a Variance f om the Side Yard Setback Requirements, as Stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon municipal Code for Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision, Town of' Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. If following the public hearing, the Commission does not concur with the findings, Resolution 94-13 should be amendee .ccordingly prior to adoption. 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation RECOMMENDED ACTION: PLANNING ANL ZONING COMMISSION STAFF Rt.. ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision (Lot 2, Block 5, Wildridge) SpiegeVfracey Duplex Variance - Side Yard Setback 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, --" � a'Lr Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Dc?e / �` — Sue Railton, Secretary Please see attached sheet for conditions. ,'N Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision Conditions July 19, 1994 P&Z Meeting Page 1 of 1 The Commission approved Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 94-13, A Resolution Approving a Variance From The Side Yard Setback Requiremants as Stipulated in Title 17 Of The Avon Municipal Code, citing the following findings. A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vincity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimentalto the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinty. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficluty or unnecessary physical hard- ship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3.Bg,g A4ochmwnA- Bowl 0 l5 A ON TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 13 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 2, FOXX 4 SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Chris Spiegel and Greg Tracey, owners of Lot 2 , Foxx 4 Subdivision have applied for a setback variance from the "Side Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Side Yard Building Seiback Variance application and has considered: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity, 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement's of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility an;! uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege, 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transporration and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; 4 Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed 11.uIw,4 rvV. 94- iJ SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AS STIPULATED IN TITLE 17 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR LOT 2, FOXX 4 SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Chris Spiegel and Greg Tracey, owners of Lot 2 , Foxx 4 Subdivision have applied for a setback variance from the "Side Yard Building Setback" requirements as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Side Yard Building Setback Variance application and has considered: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity, 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement's of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege, 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety, 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. WHEREAS, the Planning andT_on:ng Commission finds: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That tf a variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: I. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the 4.5' setback variance from the north "Side Yard Building Setback" and .3' setback variance from the south "Side Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado as further shown on Attachment A. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF Secretary .., welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves the 4.5' setback variance from the north "Side Yard Building Setback" and .3' setback variance from the south "Side Yard Building Setback" requirement of Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 2, Foxx 4 Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County Colorado as further shown on Attachment A. ADOPTED THIS /—DAY OF Secretary 1994 PLANNING AN►, ZONING COMMISSION STAFH R. , ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 56, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Cre^k Vail Bank Center Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Bank and Offices ZONING: TC—Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Dean Koll, on behalf of Vail Bank Center, has submitted an application for final design review of 18,031 gross square feet of bank and office space. The building will contain four levels, one being a basement, and stand approximately 43' high and the tower will be 56'. The building will contain the following materials: Roof Other Fascia Soffits Window Window Trim Door Door Trim Flues/Flashings Trash Enclosure Materials Color metal copper stucco cream metal/wood not indicated stucco clad/aluminum bronze metal wood11 n not indicated A plant list for the Vail Bank landscape plan is attached to this report. Three wall wash up -lights are proposed on the east side of the building, four tree up -lights are proposed on the west side of the building and four parking lot lights are proposed for the northwest parking area. Mechanical equipment will be placed on the roof, however, a roof pit has been provided so the equipment will not be visible. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the May 17, 1994 meeting and commented on the following: • metal roof, • being all stucco; • combination of colors to break up stucco, • color of roof being copper; • Metcalf ditch and sewer line relocation, PLANNING AN ii, LONING COMMISSION STAFF RL: ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 56, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Vail Bank Center Final Design Review • question short term parking; • snow shedding on east elevation, • trash enclosure location, • snow storage; and • setbacks. STAFF COMMENTS: Lot i6, Block 2 is located in 1. Town Center Zone District; 2. Comprehensive Plan Subarea 14, which designates this lot as having primary Streetscape development and public pedestrian space, and 3. Specifically addressed in the section on Urban Design, B band Uses -General, in the Design Guidelines. • This lot contains the Nletcalf Ditch and a sewer line. The applicant is working with the respective agencies on relocating both Permission from the agencies will be needed on the location of the lines prior to the application of a building permit ♦ The site plan has a note stating " All site improvements outside property line to be supplied and installed by the Town of Avon " On the site plan, two Streetscape improvement street lights are shown as provided by the Town and a note indicates the sidewalk as the Town of Avon's Staff would like to make the applicant aware of' their responsibility to supply and install these improvements, as is the case with other developments in the Town. • Forty-one (41) parking spaces are provided based on 13,049 square feet of gross leaseable floor area The 13, 049 square feet does not include the 893 square feet of lobby area in the basement Staff is including the basement area in the parking requirements due to the use it will receive in the future phase 2 and the potential for storage use in phase I Including the basement area, 42 spaces are required by the Code, which the applicant is lacking one space. • The Fire Department has specified that stand pipes will be needed if the building is not sprinkled. Further, the alarm system must be addressable, which means there is a master LED read out at the main panel that indicates the location of the fire in the building • The applicant must address any issues or concerns the To%: i Engineer identifies regarding drainage, grading and access. [�w PLANNING AND aONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 56, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Vail Bank Center Final Design Review Mr. Jerry B. Landeck on behalf of Shapiro Development, wrote a letter stating they have no objections to phase 1 of the Vail Bank Center, however, he suggested the Town require the Vail Bank to dedicate the 10' wide pedestrian strip through the property. o DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project. Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes, Design Guidelines and the Comprehensive Plan with the condition that one additional parking space '-e provided. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with all Town guidelines. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: Al: impacts will be contained on site. The design of the project coordinates with the project to the north. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment: The project is compatible with the site. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed trom adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. PLANNING AND a ONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 56, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Vail Bank Center Final Design Review Comment, The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approve this application with ,ne foilowing conditions: 1. The developer address and receive approval concerning issues identified by the Town Engineer regarding drainage, grading, and access PRIOR to the ; pplication of a building permit. 2. Approval of technical corrections identified by Staff. 3. The flues, flashings, vents and roof top mechanical equipment have a finished surface to match the color scheme of the building. 4. The meters be placed on the building. 5. The streetscape improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, walkway/street lights, as required to complete connection with Avon Road and Avon Town Center Mail facilities, be supplied and install by the developer at no cost to the Town of Avon be supplied and installed by the developer. 6. One additional parking space be added, for a total of 42 parking spaces. Should there be substantial changes to the site plan due to the addition of one parking space, the applicant will need Planning and Zoning Commission approval. 7. The developer provide to the Town of Avon permission for the respective agencies for the relocation of Metcalf Ditch and the sewer lines PRIOR to the application of a building permit. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce .Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND � ONING COMMISSION STAFF RnRT July 19, 1994 Lot 56, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Vail Bank Center Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (—'� Continued ( ) Denied { ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action r Date / / Sue Railton, Secretaryvd riz� A The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The developer address and receive approval concerning issues identified by the Town Engineer regarding drainage, grading, and acess prior to the cation of a building permit. 2. Approval of technical corrections identified by Staff. 3. The flues, flashings and vents and roof top mechanical equipment have a finished surface to match the color scheme of the building. 4. The meters be placed in the building. 5. The streetscape improvements, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, walkway/streetlights, as required to complete connection with Avon Road and Avon Town Center Mall facilities be supplied and installed by the developer. 6. The developer provide to the Town permission for the respective agencies for the relocation of Metcalf Ditch and the sewer lines prior to the application of a building permit. 7. Sign program be brought back at a later date for review by this commission. 8. The trash dumpster have some sort of cover, to be approved by Staff. V, scape Material Vail enk Abbrev Botanical Name/ Quantity Size Remarks Common Name Deciduous Trees FP61 Prastnus Pennsyivanica 'Marshall" 19 3" cal. Matching, R&B _ Gregn Ash __ PA Populus angustValia 13 ---_-- 2 1/2" cal. --Matching, B&B Norrowleof Cottonwood DeciduousrnarMental TrePS MPS Malus 'Radusnt" 2 3"cal Matching, B& Radiant Crab Evergreen Trees ACO Abies ooncolor 6 6' Hgt. B&B White Fir PP Picea pungens 7 6H9t—`— 8&Fi ------ Colorado Spruce Deciduous Shrubs cc Caryopleris 2 clandonensis 64 5 gal. 3' ox _ Blue Mist Solreo CL Cotoneaster acutifolia 13 --_--5 gal —._—_ 4' Peking Coloneaster o.c Evergreen Grourldc vers JHP ✓untper horizontalis 30 5 gel 4' o.c. Prince of !tholes" Prince of Whales Juniper JBU Juniper sabina 'Buffalo' 20 5 - Buffalo Juniper Perennial Groundcovers CT CerasHum torn naosum Snow -In -Summer 2850 2 1/4" pot 10' ox, Grosses BG Kentucky Blue Grass 3250 s.f. Sod Sod NS NativeGrass c..w 2880 s.f. Seed Annuals PPE Pelargonturn peltatum 'Sybil Nolmea 333 4' pot 1!,' a.- SPii Holmes Ivy Geranium MVE I O O S PLANNING AND�ONING COMMISSION STAFF RART July 19, 1994 Lot 7, Blo-,k 5, Wildridge Subdivision 10 Units Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: I O Units ZONING: PUD, 10 Unit COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Units Proposed -- Yes I TRODUCTION: ACL Limited Liability has submitted an application for Final Design Review of 2 triplexes and I fourplex on Lot 7, Block 5, Wildridge. The lot, 2.52 acres in size, slopes down to the west at + 34%. The buildings will contain three levels and stand 32' high. The duplexes will consist of the following materials: Roof Siding Other Fascia Soffits Window Window Trim Door Door Trim Hand/Deck Rails Flues/Flashings Chimnev Materials Colors celotex presidential weathered wood masonite I x 12 lap Not Indicated Stucco " 2x10 rE " masonite bronze aluminum Ix4 r. s. cedar steel six panel I x4 r s. cedar redwood galvanized, painted " stucco " Following is the plant list proposed for the landscape plan. Aspens 33 1 1/2" caliper Blue Spruce 30 C high Cottonwood 3 2" caliper Serviceberry 65 1 gallon Pyracandta 35 1 gallon A drip irrigation system is proposed Various fescues are proposed along with revegetation REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application at the June 7, 1994 meeting and commented on the following. try PLANNING AND BONING COMMISSION STAFF R.L. JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 7, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision 10 Units Final Design Review • Handling of trash; • Full circle drive being for the Fire Department; • Colors; • Height of boulders wall being 4'; • Type of fireplaces, • Width of driveway; and • Problem with width in winter. STAFF COMMENTS: ♦ The boulder walls shown on the site plan do not coincide with the sections provided. Staff has concerns that since the plans do not coincide, the boulder walls will not work on site with the proposed project. Further, the site still has slopes in excess of 2 1, (slopes are at I :1) which at the conceptual review was pointed out as not being allowed. • At the Conceptual Review, it was stated by the applicant that the boulder retaining walls would not exceed 4', the Final Design Review site plan shows boulder walls 16' high. • The sections do not correspond with site plan. The site plan shows much taller walls and steeper slopes, with some in excess of 1 1 in the Roadway Slope Maintenance Easement. ♦ In the Conceptual Review Staff report, it was represented that the slope of the driveway could not exceed 10%, which is not correct for this project. For residential projects of three or more units, the slope of the driveway may not exceed S%. ♦ There is no indication of how revegetation will occur. As a condition of approval, native bushes be used to revegetate all disturbance, in addition to native grasses. This is due to the steep nature of the site and the extensive disturbance that will occur on the site ♦ The applicant will be required to place a construction and erosion control fence on the site prior to any site disturbance • The applicant has not given a perspective of the site, has not indicated colors of the materials, and has not provided a material sample board ♦ The Design Review Considerat on.s have not been included because of inordinate discrepancies in the submitted material, PLANNING AND BONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 7, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision 10 Units Final Design Review • The landscape material does not comply with the Town of Avon minimum standards, which include a minimum 2" caliper for deciduous trees and 5 gallons for shrubs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Due to the nature of the site, the potential impacts of the ;project on the site, and adjacent roadway, substantial discrepancies between sections and site plan, and the outstanding items, Staff recommends the Commission table this application until consistent information has been provided and the grading plan has been revised to eliminate slopes steeper than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical in Roadway Slope maintenance Easement.. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1 . Introduce Application 2 Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4 Commission Action Respectfully Submitted ak,'-r Mary Holden Town Planner Ao PLANNING ANL ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RL_ ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 7, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision 10 Units Final Design Review PLANNING A ND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn (✓S Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date < <494 Sue Railton, Secretary 4L This Item was withdrawn from the agenda at this time, ,I G i . r, P I, cr" y r ii •' �. o T i r t � r i M J [c• I� 1_ t 0 0 o , -----�- ,-----� - .7 py I LR Fl r p FF p� F r � PLANNING AND zONING COMMISSION STAFF RE, JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: 96 Units ZONING: RHDC COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Yes INTRODUCTION: Riverview Park Asso., has submitted an application for Final Design Review of 96 units on Lot I of the Eaglewood Subdivision. The applicant is proposing 4 buildings standing approximately 50' high. The lot is 4.709 acres in size and is bounc.'ud by the Eagle River on the north and Hwy. 6/24 on the south. Following is a list of building materials and colors for the four proposed buildings: Roof Siding Other Fascia Soffits Window Window Trim Door Door Trim Hand/ Deck Rail Flues/Flashings Chimney Trash Enclosure Materials Color standing seam metal forest green stucco buff/darker value buff cedar metals/trim opaque cedar metal/cedar " metal brown aluminum forest green frame N/A aluminum forest green frame N/A aluminum buff metal forest green stucco chimney/cedar trim/metal cap stucco buff The plant list for the Brookside landscape plan has been attached to this report. The developer is proposing thirteen, 12' high lights for the parking area throughout the site. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this application as a Conceptual at the May 17, 1994 and informally at the June 7, 1994 meeting and made the following comments: • Impacts to the site as tow Thome project, • Setbacks, • Covered parking, • Height, and • Taller, denser buildings to preserve site features PLANNING AND &,ONING COMMISSION STAFF RE► JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan Comments: Waver Line Exten iron: Water service is not currently available at this site. The developer must provide evidence that potable water wili be provided to the site PRIOR to tht application of a building permit. Drainage Report: The applicant has provided Staff with the drainage plans, however, no report has been submitted. A. drainage report, coinciding with the plans. . ae provided to the Town for approval PRIOR to the application of a building permit. Irrigation Easement: The developer is proposing to pipe a portion of the irrigation ditch on the site. Permission must be provided to the To -.:,,n of Avon from the respective agency for the piping PRIOR to the application of a building permit. Colorado Division of 7 v Ovation: The developer must provide to the Town of Avon, PRIOR to the application of a building permit, permission from CDOT for HWY. 6/24 access. Bike Path: The developer is proposing a 10' wide paved bike path along the south portion of the river. The Recreation Master Plan recommends a 3-6' soft surface path Staff is still discussing the path and will have a determination on the type of path at the meeting. Interna! Circulation: The applicant has met with the Fire Department and discussed concerns for emergency vehicle access The applicant has agreed to reduce the size of the circular island at the entry way and straighten out areas in the site The backout space of 24' is also .he internal drive for the site. I:xicntrr Tree, + The developer is proposing to removt: 7 Spruce trees that stand 25'+ high and 10-15 cottonwood tree 40'+ high Is the proposed landscape plan adequate to mitigate the cutting of the trees° The developer will be saving a large porti-)n of the existing gees on site Emile River Corridor Comments: 30' Stream .Setback: The site plan vaguely reflects the 30' setback from the mean annual high water mark Staff would like to applicant to be aware that no site disturbance is allowed in the 30' setback Further, . iglewood Subdivision plat note 0 3 states "Drainage, public pedestrian, park land and open space easement shall be for use of the general public which use shall not be limited or interfered with by declarant or its assigns Permanent structures, other than bike paths, will not be allowed with the 30' stream PLANNING AND �OMNG COMMISSION STAFF RE. JR7' July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review setback on the south side of the Eagle River, ir.:luding the 30' stream setback area on both Lot 2 and Tract W." The site plan doers not indicate any public access. Traci W: The property line for Tract W disappears in the western portion of the site. The s site plan needs to reflect the property line for Tract W, which must be dedicated to the Town of Avon by April 1, 1997. Miscellaneous Comments A construction/erosion control fence will be required to be placed at the 30' stream setback line PRIOR to ANY site dist,rbance. The proposed signs are not approved since no detail has been p ovided. They must receive approval at a separate meeting. Building lighting has not been indicated, which is import?at due to the size of the buildings. Building lighting must be brought back for approval at a later meeting. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in revie ving the design of this project. Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes and guidelines The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines. The compatibil;ty of the des:en to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment: All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment. The design minimizes impacts to the site. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring pr,perties and public ways. dS • 1, PLANNING AND zONING COMMISSION STAFF RE, -jRT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Eaglewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex — Brookside Final Design Review Comment: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements are not out of context with surrounding properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others iu the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this final desig, ieview with the following conditions: I. No site disturbance or grading may take place on the 30' stream setba:k, except for the construction of tie bike path. 2. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be piaced at the 30' stream setback. 3. Plans for thL water line extension be approved by the Town of Avon and the Avon Metropolitan District PRIOR to the application for a building permit. 4. A drainage report be submitted to the Town of Avon and approved by the Town Engineer PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 5. The developer provide to the Town of Avon permission from the respective agency forthe piping of the irrigation ditch PRIOR to the application of a building permit. 6 The developer provide to the Trwn of Avon, Colorado Division of Transportation permission for the access onto hWY. 6/24 PRIOR to the application of a building permit 7 The developer will install the bike path prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy of the first constructed building 8 The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color ^cheme of the building. 9 The building lighting be approved by Planning and Zoning Commission. 10 Revegetation include native bushes. I I Meters be placed on the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I. Introduce Application PLANNING AND zONING COMMISSION STAFF RE: JRT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Englewood Subdivision 96 Unit Complex -- Brookside Final Design Review 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( } Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date Sue Railton, Secretary ,,L X mma towAym) X*XD(l(t`Altw)6 Xt6XoXxxxl(X The Commission tabled this item at this time due to concerns about where the buildings would be located on the site and how many trees would be lost. The Commission asked the applicant to pin the corners of the buildings so the Commission could see where they would be. a 7r � - - _---��_a,QwY•Ra�t-F-moi.-1�N1^�' \ I .10 1 go °\, 10 010 ` °o 61 \ \ v ° �1 •Oe 9 8 e R t 1•,\ t i C J O r d" ls STANDNG SLAM HE7AL 1 ROOF 10 MATGM 15ULD04GS WOOD FASCIA TO MATGM TTP. DIAANGS WOOD 5DNG OVER 2,4 FRAMED WALLS 5'-ONx10'-O'V WOOD PAR OF GATES W/ DIAGONAL BRACING AND HEAVY DM HARDWARE. DUMPSTEP ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE - 1/4'.1'-O' 1L4• 41 L TWO C2> STEEL PIPE STOPS. 7'-0' HIGH x 4' WOOD STUD WALL W/ WOOD SIDING AND PAINT, COLOR TO MATCH BUILDNG. CONCRETE SLAB. SLOPE SLAB. G DIA. x 4,5' M. 57EEL PIPE BOLLARD FILLED W/ GONG. (FAINTED) GATE5 TO BE HELD OPEN AND C1-05ED W'/ A 5PRPJG LOADED PIN. Z d �, z 0 vp a DESCRIPTION OF PRO�— es entia c i— ami y The following information is required r r submittal by the apolicant to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be fiven: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Roof Standing !eam metal root- Forest Green Fie u Siding Stucco Base [rim: darker value buff Other Wall Materials Cedar metals/trim Opaque cedar Fascia Metal/Cedar Opaque cedar Soffits Metal Brown Windows Aluminum Forest Green frame Window Trim N/A Doors Aluminum Forest Green Frame Door Trim N/A Hand or Deck Rails Aluminum Buff Flues N/A Flashings Metal Forest Green Chimneys Stucco chimney/cedar trim/metal cap Trash Enclosures Stucco Buff Greenhouses N/A Other N/A 3. LANOSCAPIAG: Aame of Designer: Dennis Anderson phone: 303 926-2433 PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical lame Common `lame Ouanity Size* PROPOSED TREES Picea Purgeus Blue Spruce 63 6'-12' Populus Tremboloides Quaking Aspen 52 2" Populus Augustifocia Cottonwood 22 2" Prunus Virgini.ana Shubert Canada Red Cherry 3 2" EXISTING TREES TO _ BE RE"OVE7 Spruce 7 25'+ Cottonwood 10-15 40'+ -Indicate caliper for ae6diclous Crus. ie,inc •nr -on �9 �r.eri PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical 'lame Common ':ame in i ty Size (con't) SHRUBS Amelanchier Alnifolia Serviceberry _ 20 5 Gallon Cornus Stolonifera Red Twig Dogwood 20 Potents a ru>_ticosa Jackimanni Potentilla 20 Ribbed Alpinum Alpine.Current 10 Rosa _Woods Woods Rose 10 Dwarf EXISTING SHRUBS Salix Purpurea RI,+P Willow In TO BE REMOVED Spirea Nipponica Snow Mound Spirea 10 Type GROUND COVERS Perrenials/Wildflower; SOD Bluegrass SEED TYPE OF Automatic Spray — sod/perrenials/shrubs IRRIGATION Automatic Drip — all trees TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL Square =ootaae gcnn bullu C. OTHER LANDSCAPE r i�iTURES (retaining ,galls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please spec;-,. \ � ❑ // 000 /�1 \� ■ k E • !`E$:» � fk� \ 2% �.�)22n\ �- - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It �r R 3 Ei Eq R w M ig Z 94 14 IL Limit building heights to three stories, and require developments to demonstrate preservation of views to the Town Center through the strategic placement of open space or the further limitation of building heights. Encourage new development and redevelopment of existing buildings to be in conformance with the overall design theme established for the Town. Require a minimum 15' landscape buffer between the interstate right- of-way and parking areas, and 40' landscaped setback from the I-70 right-of-way for all residential structures. Subarea 7: Much of the River Residential District has been developed, but River Residential future residential development that will occur along the river District beyond the boundaries shown on the Urban Design Plan should be developed in accordance with the recommendations for this subarea. The major design influences are U.S. 624, the riparian environment along the Eagle River, and public access to the river. The character of the river and its associated natural habitat should be preserved by sensitive site planning, architectural detailing, and appropriate setbacks, color, and scale of structures. Recommendations: Develop Beaver Creek Boulevard and any other future major access roads, as defined on Figure 5-1, to residential development as secondary streetscapes. Develop the intersection of U.S. 624 and West Beaver Creek Boulevard as a secondary intersection. Within building setback areas adjacent to the Eagle River, provide a public access easement for public enjoyment of the river and construction of a public recreational trail. Require a minimum 30' building setback from the Eagle River. iA 5.17 Require development to provide reasonable public access through their property to the river, and provide public parking and signage at strategically located trailheads. • Buildings should be oriented to capitalize upon the Eagle River as an amenity. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, and other uses which could potentially disrupt the quality of the r'ver environment should be located and designed to have the least impact on the river corridor. Set buildings back from the river to preserve its natural character. • Limit building height to three to four stories. The intent is to establish a scale of development that is subordinate to the Town Center and compatible with the river environment. Buildings should be designed to step down in height as they near the river 2nd in response to the natural topography. • Require new development and reds relopment of existing buildings to be in conformance with the overall design theme established for i the Town. • Where possible, buildings and parking areas should be located to E preserve and promote the health of existing quality trees. • Plant trees to screen existing large residential buildings along E U.S. 6/24. • Provide berms and landscaping between residences and U.S. 6/24. t Subarea 8: Nottingham Park is bordered to the west, north, and northeast F Nottingham Park by existing high quality residential development. The structures F Residential are a visual asset to the Town. Missing, however, are provisions District for pedestrians and bicyclists along West Beaver Creek Boulevard and F adequate screening of parking areas. Landscaping around the perimeter t of the buildings could be enhanced. F f 5.18 t PLANNING ANb'LONING COMMISSION STAFF RL TORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Four Plex Final Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Four Plex ZONING: PUD, Four Unit COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: Laddie Clark has submitted an application for final design review of a four plex on Lot 1, Block 2, which is 1.39 acres in size and slopes to the south at 16-34%. The four pley will contain three levels and stand approximately 32' high. The four plex will consist of the following materials: The landscape plant list will consist of 12 Pinion pine at 4-6' high, 8 R;,cky Mnt. Juniper at 4-6' high, Potentilla and sod. An automatic drip irrigation system is proposed to all trees. Revegetation will occur with native grasses and shrubs. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this as a conceptual at the June 7, 1994 meeting and commented on the following: • Connecting device and any heated space, • Solid wall and a full roof connection; • Railing on the lower balcony going down steps, • No windows on the east and west elevations; • Mirror image and not enough change in elevations to offset mirror image; and • Amount of wall mass on north elevation connection. Materials _ Color Roof asphalt colonial slate Siding r.s. cedar brown/natural Other stucco buff/natural Fascia rs cedar brown Soffits rs cedar faced plywood buff Window casements and fixed Window Trim alum clad brown Door steel Door Trim Hand/ Deck Rail rs cedar/cedar natural Flues pre -fab metal Flashings metal -painted buff Chimney stucco buff The landscape plant list will consist of 12 Pinion pine at 4-6' high, 8 R;,cky Mnt. Juniper at 4-6' high, Potentilla and sod. An automatic drip irrigation system is proposed to all trees. Revegetation will occur with native grasses and shrubs. REVIEW HISTORY The Commission reviewed this as a conceptual at the June 7, 1994 meeting and commented on the following: • Connecting device and any heated space, • Solid wall and a full roof connection; • Railing on the lower balcony going down steps, • No windows on the east and west elevations; • Mirror image and not enough change in elevations to offset mirror image; and • Amount of wall mass on north elevation connection. PLANNING AND "ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RLL -ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Four Plex Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS: • The site plan refects grading in the 10' Slope Maintenance, Snow Storage and Utility easement, which could jeopardize the integrity of Old Trail Road. Further, this area, among other areas on the site, is indicating slopes in excess of 2:1, which is the limit for slopes. The applicant must address all concerns of the Town Engineer, which may include no grading in the easement. • The landscape plan must include plant material that meets the minimum size standards that include a 6' minimum height for coniferous trees. DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town. Comment: This proposal is in conformance with Town codes. 7 he suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. Comment: The type and quality of proposed building and landscape materials are consistent with Town guidelines. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. Comment. All impacts will be contained on site. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography. Comment The design minimizes the impacts to the site.. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. Comment The visual appearance of the proposed improvements will not negatively impact neighboring properties or public ways. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. I" PLANNING AN k, ZONING COMMISSION STAFF R...'ORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Four Plex Final Design Review Comment: The proposal meets the objective of this guideline. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Comment: The proposal is in conformance with the goals, policies and programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this final design review with the following conditions: 1. The applicant address all Engineering concerns prior to the application of a building permit. 2. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 3. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Meters be placed on the building. 5. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion control fence be placed on site. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING ANL. ZONING COMMISSION STAFF R. OORT July 19, 1994 Lot 1, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Four Plex Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: A, -;,proved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (4 Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date / / Sue Railton, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the following conditions: 1. The applicant bring back color renderings showing the color differences. 2. The applicant bring back a revised landscape plan. 3. The applicant address all Engineering concerns prior to the application Tor a ouiiaing permit. 4. The flues, flashinqs ani vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 5. The building lic building permit. 6.. Meters be placed on the building. 7. Prior to any site disturbance, a construction/erosion fence be placed on the site. i all ,y \ RM ve A i ve 1< - A 1< - F- L0% 0 01 /"N