PZC Packet 011894PLANNING AND .zONING COMMISSION STAFF RLs ORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Nelson Single Family
Fina! Design Review -.Modification
PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence
ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
This project received Final Design Review Approval with conditions on December 7,
1993, for a single family residence with an accessory unit. Michael Sanner.. on behalf of
Steve Nelson, has submitted revised plans for final design review approval of
modifications
Following are the modifications:
• The lower level, which included the accessory unit, has been eliminated, and will
now consist of a crawl space and a mechanical room;
• The gas, electric and water meters have been attached to the building on the north
elevation with a stucco wall screreSng the meters from view and
• On the south elevation, stairs and an at grade patio have been added
STAFF COMMENTS:
The modifications are consistent with Town regulation The elimination of the lower level
will bring the building height down from 33' to 28'.
The only comment we have concerns the optional bay in the garage The optional bay
may not be built due to the elimination of the accessorary unit, and if not, will the
treatment of this elevation be the same as shown?
i.�l II:T;y 5l'.TSLKIIuIul�1►113x� Y [I7�
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the
following conditions
1 The meters be placed on the building.
2. The shrubs oe a minimum of 5 gallons in size
3. Retaining walls 4' in height or over must be designed by a licensed Engineer and the
design submitted to the Town of Avon for approval prior to construction of the retaining
wall.
5. All flashings, flues and vents will be painted a flat dark color, or to match the color
where they are located
G. if the optional bay is not built, the treatment of the north elevation appear the same as
shown on the Final Design Review approved plans
PLANNING AND � ONING COMMISSION STAFF RL. JRT
January 18, 1994
Lot 39, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Nelson Single Family
Final Design Review -Modification
Respectfully Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PL ".NNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date" Sue Railton, Secretarye'
ine t,ommiSsion granted approval of the requested modifications, with the
Staff recommendations that the original conditions of approval remain intact
and the added condition that the side of the garage, whether the optional
NjY-i file db cipproved, per the deslgrf-TEview plan.
IJ/ wwwo
0
rh
---t- --=
z
4
a
.ul
•, r n'•Yv ,4.. a wa C.T • 'i6twfnen... M...... � .inter• .ar anati tl.a\.n .e• T av r �.r •n�. .� .r�. ..( r'F u..v 1 •.v.n! g . 'Q..
• . !M a � .y .. r �. III :. � �� '
1
f
�i
L�u
/1
PLANNING AND � ONING COMMISSION STAFF REI; ,iRT
January 18, 1994
Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Century 21 Development Sign
Development Sign Display Extension
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building
ZONING: TC - Town Center
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Chris Porter, of Century 21, has requested an ext., ,ion for display of the development
sign located on lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision until December
15, 1994. The development sign was appraved on December 15, 1992 by the Planning
and Zoning Commission with the condition that the sign remain no longer than one year,
or December 1, 1993, and if the applicants need an extension, they appear before the
Commission.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The sign is 32 square feet, contains graphics and wording, and is located on West Beaver
Creek Blvd. This is the sign that Commission granted a variance to the allowed sign size
(16 square feet) for development signs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested extension of time.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
fti
PLANNING AND i3ONING COMMISSION STAFF REV oRT
January 18, 1994
Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Century 21 Development Sign
Development Sign Display Extension
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( V� Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date lujif � Sue Railton, Secretary40, l �
the Commissi^n granted an extension to July 1, 1994 for display of the
development sign.
�
}
\
f
§
K
/
0mm
]
m%%
E
$
:
( 44
;-4
ni
\
}
6
U
$
�
�
m
4
E
_
ii
�U
ma
N
p
�
c
M53
i
a
TTjj��
o
�ST
� • \ \ eF"QLF,o
� � CRFF� ji7
I" of
i I,
4,
7/55.30'
7/55.30' /
w r..
I.O.C.
L
/ 0 7456.97
+Ik T Too .
Maiw
16 7{599.0
T.o w
a 4G F.F. /0.200' 74"44
i
Lot 56
I ,
\ �) s
WILMIA) bcqF 64AS
SECTIOt7
SECTION 34
r
BRASS CAP !/ !• M
7
I1, as
N t!
f' f3
i! tl
' f! tIN
t u
W N V ! !
IW
N !! ]I
o
WHITE RIVER NATIONAL
E -Mm_
FOREST
_ _
_ SECTION
I
26 SECT
11 2
�J
,�I
19
SECI
!
�1Z
�
70 _
!
7•ACT I ALA-
4
J/
BRASS
4
It
me //
u
•
I
>. M
[7
41
.. _
u r f
N 4 B
I ♦
to
/
R
M
it n44
wt 71
!i•YN
A IQ TRACT
L din. •r�
) A•
M
r
NO
r
a 7
n 1• tM ri
53
i0
r •
,':
TWA" If or
N
to
rr
I
If I12
N 11 h M
N t7
f1 b i 10
`.
�:r r w fG
L-{'
F9K9EJ tA4.
I
36
)7
A N f ♦T
..•alN.lt C9(flL.iR
T )le �/
a
W .
/
H
N f
7
1!
�J
,�I
19
, , '. N
w 1 Tau . K
�1Z
W 1
¢
70 _
!
o
4
It
me //
u
8 W
i
a
n
» !7 I
41
.. _
u r f
I ♦
;
R
it n44
wt 71
!i•YN
A IQ TRACT
L din. •r�
O
t/
NO
}♦
53
i0
r •
,':
3
I Z
N 11
I
If I12
N 11 h M
N t7
f1 b i 10
`.
L-{'
� r
..•alN.lt C9(flL.iR
T )le �/
a
W .
/
I
I/ M )0AC7 9
r •0 a
ti�11i1` e
o ' • C .•TRACT, 9, _r
.Z
[
/T
7I N
/ TIY01
, Ie
Yr4
[
f
I )o I t t• AIM
..L�yi(�
ail
IN-
/ N
I 1 .
;Apt
I
EILN_ 2
/ to A1`
as •e B
•N
If1
is 4 `
II
SECTION
7 l[i
12 TfICT I
SECTIOi
SECTION
Ne9•SB`iYw
2676. SS
'1159' ,y - -�•-
� 5EC7�-
cT10t
BRASS CAP
W. RN.F
w
P.QB. SW COINER f;
i
992.LA I
S I"ospS"w I
N 00.22'221•
127IL00'� [C'
W. R.N.F I
7T3.87
I
BRASS CAP
-6EGEND
OPEN DACES NOW
I eT.rcn wLct vt.-.. 'I
629.50 00'w I °°
629.80
EMPARK
DEVELOPABLE
M[Ad,
N 59040 25
;
� 1WW1yy
.............
LIMITS Of BLOCKS
I 216.2• 1,
BENCHMARK AT ty
.2
LIMITS OF SHEETB 1 N D E X 1. A l K
MAP
BEAVER CREEK x
.AUT 6 BL'RVEY I SEPTEMBER 1978
d%,JZj"r.INORTq SOLSdRV OF THE
7OWN O
-
CALE I". GOO'
PLA EO (OFT F4•PLAT -10W:1 OF AVON,
EAGLE Co
•TN FINK W"W19tON PLAT AN MOMENT N0. /,
to
U41
to
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Eubanks/Rubers Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
PROJECT TYPE: Duplex
ZONING: PUD, "Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING" YES
INTRODUCTION:
A conceptual review application has been submitted for a duplex on Lot 42, Block 2. The
lot, 1.5 acres in size, slopes from north too south at approximately 41% and the duplex
will be located on the north portion of the lot. The duplex stands approximately 44 feet in
height on the rear elevation.
The duplex will consist of the following materials:
Roof asphalt shingles
Siding stucco with rock
Other siding
No landscaping or exact building colors have been submitted for review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff has reviewed the proposal with the Towi Engineer and following are the comments
we have:
• The building exa:eds the a!lowed building height;
• The building is located in the front yard setback, which needs to be removed from
the setback or apply for a variance,
• Grading is not shown and needs to be submitted;
• Retaining w:311s are not shown and need to be shown and detailed,
• The Floor elevations do not match the grades shown,
• The north side of the site, in front of the building, will require fill and this needs to
be reflected on the grading plan;
• A foundation plan and sections need to be submitted,
• The level of site disturbance needs to be shown on the site plan,
• Driveway access for the west unit is not shown and should be;
• Driveways for both units must have turn around capabilities, since backing out
onto Wildridge Road is not allowed.
• There are four fireplaces being shown with no indication of the type of fireplace,
and
• The total length of the building is 120 feet (could be broken at the commor. wall
and half the duplex shifted to provide variation in massing and overall site impact).
j PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Eubanks/Iiubers Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation.
Respectfully Submitted
—
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date G,w /g / Sue Railton, Secretary�ua- 44 —, e—
At the applicant's request the Commission tabled this item to the F bryary
1, 1994 regular meeti
P
i
0
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
11
11
I
I
I
1
I
1
`I\
1 , 1 , 1
I l w i\, 1 1 1\ ,
1 1 1 1 1 1\ 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I i l l l l l
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 i 1 1 1
I 1 1 1
I $ I I 1 1 rl
I L I 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
i I I 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
�II 1 I i I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 I 11 1
I 1 1 I I I
1 I 1 1 I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 11 1
1 1 I I I 1
1 1 I I I 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
I
I I 1 I 1
1
1 1 I 1 1 1
1 I 1 1 I
1
1 1 1 \ 1 I
1 l y \ 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 I 1
I 1 1 I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 Y
I I I I 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 I 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 4I
I
a
I
E_
A
ll
. `^
�y
I
,p
� ,.
,�j
,` .
`,
�� � ���
1 _
�y
I
,p
� ,.
,�j
,` .
`,
�� � ���
�" \ I1.
PLANNING AND'GONING COMMISSION STAFF REPVRT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final Design Review -Modifications
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building
ZONING: TC - Town Center
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Steve Elken, with the Seasons at Avon, has submitted an application for modifications, as
follows :
1. Addition of a deck off the health club which will be 14 1/2' by 22 1/2' and 3'
high shove the roof line. There will be a railing around the perimeter of the deck
that matches the existing railing at the south entrance in style and color.
2. A roof monitor is being added in the main lobby area. It will be approximately
three feet above the roof line. The materials are predominately glass at the
sidewalls with some stucco. The roof of the monitor will be a rolled metal roof
similar to the pone cochere in material and color.
3. Open grill entry garage c,00rs will be added to the west and east garage
openings. The finish will be bronze anodized that matches all the storefront
material on the south side and the green house windows on the first floor (directly
above these garage door openings).
4. A chase for the boiler flue is being added to the east wall of the southern
building. It will be 4' 2" by 3' 8" an J will be covered with stucco to match the
existing material and color of the first level. The flue will be painted the reddish
color proposed for the other flue tops.
5. Six acrylic pyramid frosted skylights (48" x 48") aye proposed over the corridor
just to the north of the pone cochere and main lobby.
STAFF COME LENTS:
Staff feels the proposed changes are consistent with the overall modifications to this
structure.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the
follow ng condition:
1. Tha all modifications match the approved color theme.
U
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Final Design Review -Modifications
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
kw
Steve Amsbaugh
Director of Community Development
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at A, on
Final Design Review -Modifications
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted (✓) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date u� ' �
8 / Sue Railton, Secretary_�ue�
The Commission approved the following modifications, with the condition
that all mo 1 lcatlons matt t e approve co or theme.
1. Addition of a deck off the health club that will be 14-1/2' by 22-1/2'
artd-3 ` high above the rou F l i p.
perimeter of the deck that matches the existing railing at the south
PntranrP in style and color
2. A roof monitor is being added in the main lobby area. It will be
approximately three feet above the roof line. The materials are predominately
glass at the sidewalls with some stucco. lhe root mons or wl e a ro led metal
roof similar to the perte cochere in material and color.
3. Open g11jears will be added to the west and east rage openings
The finish will be bronze anodized that matches all the storefront material
on the south side and the green house windows on the first floor (directly
above these garage door openings).
4. A chase for the boiler flue is being added to the east wall of the southern
building. It will be 4' -" by 3' 8" and will be covered with stucco to match
the existing material and color of the first level. The flue will be painted
the reddish color proposed for the other fule tops.
5. Six acrylic pyramid frosted skylights (48" by 48") are proposed over the
corridor just to the north of the porte cochere and main lobby.
:„'=20'-0"
:�4029 Sa.
RETAIL
� T ET
I4692 So. FT-� TO T /
/ x935 S.F.
19"14_5
HUMAN RE5 - GORP• F' —
2928 5a. 7413 a. -
d. 749 Sa. FT
RETAIL\SERV. 3011 5a. FT -
630
� LUf1Gl-1
i
� ;\ / \ / � \\ � r' �:r il�I. �,f �•_-BaL Oti701- OV RW1I'�b m
Toil. �� _ ........... �.
MKT. 8 ADV_
5923 Sa. FT- EXST. ROOF oveRuarK� i i
6153 50. FT.
54
CLERK \
_6QOUP
44toll 1. FT.
5o
CORPORATE Loser „ •'. —
_ V.A. REaL ESTaT�E
Opo Sb a F LOB
40–/-7 5a. F 2 701 50. FT. \ f
:\I
VE5T. n�
- EnTRY
- �.- NF
W ENTR7WAY 5LAB ( 2)
T� S ASOI''IS - FFST
FL,OOI
SGAL
V
V.
m
_1
J
r
V
V.
m
_1
J
V-
v
u.l
m
v
v
l
,
U
Z
'I
Y
u
d �
•Ity
.4{
`U ywI
d •1
Usd y�
st/fjru
v
04001--
ILYllp 7.1.+N SV IMI
I
m
II
04001--
ILYllp 7.1.+N SV IMI
I
m
VA
GEGO/WINDSOR
+
MODEL GA
ROL'(5 GRILL
OR ECA)AL.
NEW TRENCH
DRAIN
TS 2x2x1/4'
IN/ BASE_
NEW b' STUD
REMOVE EXI5T'6
"ALL
TTtENGH DRAIN
/
FILL W/ GONG.
NEWT7iENGH DRAIN
(RB)5E EXIST' TRENCH COVERT
EXIST'G
3 NEW RAMP OF GONG. TOPP'E
WALLS
A
-------------
- —__ _.______---____._�
� _ _ _
.
- - -=�r'xlb 6A HTi. 5TUD5 C_
EX15T'G
LOW HT.
WALL 4
7
4' GONG. W/ 23'-.T f
bxbx!0/10 h6^F
b' GONG. CURB
NEW CARD READER NEW GONG. DRIVE
j.
PARKING
ENTRAi�dCE
MAIN f=,4RKING ENTRANCE
50 -ALE. 1/4'= P -O'
3'x'7' IN5UL.
MTL DOOR
W/ MTLFRAMF A
PANIG (EGRE' •5)
HARDWARE
3'r,'I'
MTL
NU MT
P
HA h
d
40
,MAIN PARKING EXIT
J4 O. 1/9-= I' -U
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFI
LENGTH OF EXIST'G
CONCRETE WALL
—� FLASH ® ROOF
---p PENETRATION
EXI51"&
STRUGT.
EXIST'&
OVERHANG
EXIST'& SOFFIT
OAUI K
V2" 5NGG0
5/5" TYPE "X"
&W3 SHEATH'&
3 5/5" MTL SIVDS
o 16, G.G.
��_ GPLLK
TER KA.;F '
EXI6lT'G 5Tth.T.
TO RFI-IAIN
15DII-FP P.O.'WI
SECTION
Sr -ALL, 1/2"= I' -O"
A
N �I d o I Ill s
In
J
J
d
_7
PI
X ui IQ
a_
-
--till
N 1A
w
w
utivLLl
�tl1110
N
Ili
d
X
2 I
ul
ry QL
_CRI n1-----=-
X
A
N �I d o I Ill s
In
J
J
d
t
m
PI
X ui IQ
a_
ow�
If �
N 1A
w
w
utivLLl
�tl1110
N
Ili
d
X
2 I
111
ry QL
_CRI n1-----=-
X
A
N �I d o I Ill s
In
�
I SNU I
I
N0
utivLLl
�tl1110
x- XU1-
£ £ .nG°IQQ I
2 I
A
N �I d o I Ill s
In
OWN
1,*OiN LI F� r�v►e.
EOLEK ,FLUE OF
w5l'l OVEKHANy
i
rx�xy SRCCO 5jrAQuNrlwa Ir
— 350I1 -EP, FLUE UP ENGLOSU KF—
-SU,LE: ✓21 � 1,-0,
02+r
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RFPCRT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Biock 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasonv at Avor.
Temporary Sign Display Approval
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building
ZONING: TC - Town Center
COMDLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Mr. Donald Chaplin, of Vail Associates Real Estate, has submitted a request to display a
temporary banner until July 1, 1994 to identify their sales office at the Seasons at Avon.
The sales office for the Seasons at Avon will move to permanent offices in the summer
and will have a permanent sign at that time. The banner is 2' by 18', which will have a
white background with blue lettering, and hang on we facia above the temporary office in
the east building.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Temporary signs are allowed if the, c,.nup!y �-,ich the following guidelines
I . One temporary sign, with a maximum area of 35 square feet, is allowed to remain in
place for not more than one week for any on event,
2. Temporary signs may be displayed for only one event in any 30 day period;
3. The sign administrator may issue a per -nit for a temporary sign meeting these criteria
without planning and zoning commission review, and
4 Temporary signs not meeting these criteria may be approved by the planning and
zoning commission only upon a determination by the planning and zoning commission
that a variance should be granted pursuant to Section 15.28.090 B of this code.
The proposed sign is I square foot over the allowed 35 square feet and the requested
length of display exceeds the one week, therefore, these variations from the Sign Code
must be reviewed and approval granted by the Planning and Zoning ( ommission
The following approval criteria must be considered by the Planning and 'Zoning
Commission ir, reviewing this request.
a. The relationship ofthe equested variance to existing and potential uses and structures
in the vicinity,
CommentThe banner is 36 square feet but is small when viewed with ,he surrounding
elements, such as the large expanse of buildings in the area Further, this banner location
is only partially visible from W. Beaver Creek Blvd.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Temporary Sign Display Approval
b. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatmer".
among sites in the vicinity;
Comment: This banner is one square foot over the allowed size, i located away from
vehicular traffic and is temporary.
c. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the requested
variance.
Comment None.
The following findings must be determined if approval of this request is to be granted:
a. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of speciai privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity;
b. The variance is warranted for one or more ofthe following reasons:
i. The strict r r literal ,".terpretation and enforcement of the regulation would result
in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of
this title.
ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to ciner properties in the vicinity.
iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
vicil.ity.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this request (based on the findings below)
I. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity
2. That the variance is warranted for the reason that the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed
by the owners of other properties :n the vicinity.
Staff would recommend approval with the condition that the banner be removed on July I,
1994
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Temporary Sign Display Approval
RECOMMt,NDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holu--
Town Planner
C-=3
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 18, 1994
Lot 63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Seasons at Avon
Temporary Sign Display Approval
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ✓11"
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date 4W /8 / Sue Railton, Secretaryl,*&� 164c�
The Commission approved the requested temporary sign, with the following conditions
and citing the Tollowing findings:
CONDITIONS:
1. The sign remain in piaee _ later than july �, ,�� $e reme ed–if and
when Vail Associates Real Eastate moves to the south side of the building if
before July—!. 1994,
2. The temporary sign be no larger than 35 square feet.
3. The sign be secured firmly with grommets so that there is no flapping in
the breeze
FINDINGS:
I. That the granting ef the var;anee 411net stit +, %rafft-e#--special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity.
2. That the variance iswarranted for the reason that the strict or li;.eral
interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity.
(\I I
l
tfL .
"
CD ^
I
=41
l
'5z
PLANNING AND z ONING COMMISSION STAFF RE,. JRT
January 18, 1993
Lot 63, Block °I, Wild*idge Subdivision
Guida Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
PROJECT TYPE: Guida Duplex
ZONI1 G: PUD, Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
John Railton hes submitted a conceptual re view application for a duplex on behalf of Mike
and Lisa Guida. The duplex will be located on Lot 63, which is approximately I acre in
Fize and has slopes ranging from 24-40%. Access to the property is from Fox Lane. 'The
east portion of the lot will contain the driveway access and the two proposed garages.
The building exceeds heights of 35 feet, even though the Building steps with the slope. No
landscaping plan, building materials or colors have been submitted for review.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff has reviewed the proposal with the Town Engineer and following , re our comments:
itc Plan Comments:
• A survey of the property must be prepared by a licensed surveyor.
An accurate grading plan must be submitted for Final Design Review;
The cut slope shown on the southeast portion of the site is approximately 1:1 and
in excess of the allowed grades (11 maximum);
The rock retaining wall on the southeast portion of the site, located in the
easement, will require further detail at Finai Design Review,
The required grading plan must show true limits of disturbance must be submitted
for Fittal Design Review,
The building appears to abut the setbacks, in which case, overhangs are not
allowed to extend into the setbacks;
• Snow storage areas need to be called out en the site plan due :o the tight nature of
the site at the entrance, and
Retaining walls over 4' in height must be designed by an engineer.
Design Comments:
• Indicate gas or wood burning for the proposed fireplaces,
• The west elevation -hows the building exceeding the 35' height limit. and
• A north elevation must be submitted for Final Design Review.
• Final Design submittal must include a landscape plan, building materials and
colors
PLANNING AND c ONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. ORT
January 18, 1993
Lot 53, Block I, Wildridge Subdivision
Guida Duplex
Conceptual Design Review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation.
Respectfdly Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action (�
Date�Sue Railton, Secretary
ASa—amiceptiial raviaw, nn formal artinn war taken lop 9pnpral rn!i pnsus was
that; this was a very interesting building, however, the Commission was very
adamant about their dislike of the proposed metal roof in Wildridge. They
felt t.at t ere was too much root expanse 2nd it would pro uce oo muc glare
for adjaceit properties. Also of concern were the stilts used in back and
also it warsvggested- tirat titer -a--se d
exterior material, because of the vertical height and proposed vertical siding.
00%
/ u
111n� d' Fir
(JNI7 A
1012-6 ''\
CNor rNGf., CV.l A R)
w
IA
UNIT a
6106
✓`4or IY+N. GE1GA��
� ',f'p�R �y�L FI,mF
.�
l
4'1
�11��_� ,` �.. L I L�
m�N�: �
~��. ���