Loading...
PZC Packet 010494PLANNING AND � 43NING COMMISSION STAFF RE,JRT January 4, 1994 Lot 2, Nottingham Station Subdivision Nottingham Station P.U.D. Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Nottingham Station P.U.D. ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? Conceptual Review INTRODUCTION: Mr. Mark Donaldson, on behalf of SouthWest Partners, is requesting conceptual review of P.U.D. zoning for Lot 3 of Nottingham Station Subdivision. The property is 13.9 acres in size. The proposal consists of approximately 19,000 square feet of commercial, retail and restaurant, in two buildings, and 196,500 residential sgiiare feet comprising 153 units, which will be apartments, duplexes and townhomes. The Nottingham Station property (consisting of Lots 1,2, and 3, Tracts A and B) was annexed into the Town in December, 1981. At that time, Lot 3 received SPA zoning with no detailed development assignments. The property changed from SPA to PUD in 1991. Therefore, this lot has a PUD zoning designation but no development plan has been approved for the property. This application consists of a request to approve a development plan - thereby completing the PUD zoning designation for Lot 3. The PUD zoning process requires a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission (a recommendation is forwarded to the Town Council), followed by a public hearing by Town Council ibr final adoption. Lot 3 is a relatively flat site with the exception of the bank along the Eagle River, which has a steep pitch. The site has mature stands of cotton wood trees, aspens, some spruce and willows. There are existing structures on the site. STAFF COMMENTS: The density being proposed is approximately 15 units per buildable acre. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site development plan for your review. Staff and the Town Engineer have reviewed the conceptual plan and have identified various initial concerns that need to be addressed. These concerns are listed and briefly discussed below. TRAFFICICIRCULATI ON • In the Transportation Master Plan, Hurd Lane is identified as connecting to Stonebridge Drive. Hurd Lane, were it intersects Avon Road. is labeled as three lanes (60' ROW), but as it heads east, is labeled as two lanes (50' ROW). Further, the 1988 Do PLANNING AND NING COMMISSION STAFF RE�RT W January 4, 1994 Lot 2, Nottingham Station Subdivision Nottingham Station P.U.D. Conceptual Design Review Subdivision Improvements Agreement for Nottingham Station states that "The plan will include the dedication of a right-of-way for Hurd Lane from the western boundary of Lot 3 to the eastern boundary of Lot 3." • The plan shows one bus stop in the development. The Transportation Master Plan identifies this area as Phase II-Transit/Pedestrian System Improvements which states "Town Route 2 is a new service along the proposed Hurd Lane. corridor. Connections would be provided between US 6/West Beaver Creek Boulevard on the west and Stonebridge Drive on the east. Specific routing of this service should conform to future development patterns." • This area also includes the proposed bike path shown which the applicants intends to dedicate to the Town of Avon. The proposed bike path is it, keeping with the Recreation Master Plan concerning trails. • All Hurd Lane intersection locations within the development must meet Town standards. • The Town's maximum length for a cul du sac is 1000'. The proposed site plan shows a cul du sac which exceeds this standard. EASEMENTS • Show all existing, recorded easements, which may not be reflected on the plat map, and indicate proposed easements • Permission must be obtained from the Denver 'Rio -Grande Railroad to utilize their Right -of Way. • Permission to relocate the Metcalf Ditch must be obtained from the Avon Metropolitan District. • Is the berm along the north portion of the property located in an easement? FLOOD PLAIN/HYDROLOGY • Provide a detailed definition and description of the 100 year flood plain. • Provide a wetland delineation and report. • Show species and location of all vegetation along the river and river bank. UTILITIES • Show and indicate how all utilities will be brought to ;he buildings. PLANNING AND ,,ONING COMMISSION STAFF RE. ,SRT January 4, 1994 Lot 2, Nottingham Station Subdivision Nottingham Station P.U.D. Conceptual Design Review MISCELLANEOUS • Show all existing structures on site. (There are three structures in this area that are registered with the Colorado Histoiical Society.) • Show species and location of all vegetation on the property. • The Town will request an open space dedication along the Eagle River. Any dedication should extend along the entire length of the south property line, north to the 30' stream setback or the 100 year calculated flood plain, which ever is greater. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND &,ONING COMMISSION STAFF REt oRT January 4, 1994 Lot 2, Nottingham Station Subdivision Nottingham Station P.U.D. Conceptual Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modi3ed conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date p on, ec �i7 Y �' ✓l5� Y1Vlo✓1 As a conceptual review, no formal action was taken reqardinq this PUD. buildings; the linear look of the condominiums and the lack of interest; Hurd 1.anp d the -ilation of traffie; the-drafina , a p'.ayground. Also discussed was how the project would be perceived from I-70 , Highway 6 and Beaver Creek. Parking, site—lighting and landscaping was also discussed. PLANNING AND BONING COMMISSION STAFF REt ORT January 4, 1994 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Final Design Review - Christie Lodge Satellite Dish Placement PROJECT TYPE: Mixed Use ZONING: Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: The Christie Lodge Homeowners Association is requesting approval to place one 3' diameter, satellite dish on top of the east porte cochere roof. The dish will stand approximately 3-4' in height. Approval was granted on November 16, 1993 to place a 6' diameter dish on the north side of the property, facing the highway, which will not be utilized. STAFF COMMENTS The Design Review Procedures, Rules and Regulations, Section 6.24, (C). Communications R Satellite Dish Antennas sets out guidelines to be followed for the placement of satellite dishes, which are as follows: 1. All antennas shall be located so as to be screened from view from any public right-of-way or neighboring property. Screening may be accomplished by, or through the use of landscaping materials, fencing, existing structures, subgrade placements or other means that both screen the antennas and appear natural to the site: 2. All wiring and cable related to antennas installation shall be installed underground or be incorporated entirely within the structure: 3. The use of mesh antennas is encouraged, and 4. Color selection for dish antennae should be made with respect to the characteristics of the site or structure. Unpainted surfaces and dish antenna with reflective surfaces shall not be allowed. No advertising, logos or identification shall be allowed on any dish antenna. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the following condition: I. The satellite dish be screened from view of the public rights-of-way (using materials and colors found on the existing building). 00% PLANNING AND BONING COMMISSION STAFF REi jRT January 4, 1994 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Final Design Review - Christie Lodge Satellite Dish Placement RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully Submitted, Mary Ho den Town Planner PLANNING AND .ENING COMMISSION STAFF RE► .SRT January 4, 1994 Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Final Design Review - Christie Lodge Satellite Dish Placement PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action The Commission approved the norn l re lncatinn fn r the satellite dish with the recommendation that the dish be painted to match the building if at all possible. PLANNING AND BONING COMMISSION STAFF REt.JRT January 4, 1994 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Euba.nks/Hubers Duplex Conceptual Design Review PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD, Two Units COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES INTRODUCTION: An application for conceptual review of a duplex has been submitted. The duplex will be located on the north portion of the 1.5 acre lot, which slopes from north to south at approximately 41%. The duplex stands approximately 44 feet in height on the rear elevation. The duplex will consist of the following materials: Roof asphalt shingles Siding stucco with rock Other sidine No landscaping or exact building colors have been submitted for review. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has reviewed the proposal with the Town Engineer and following are the concerns we have identified: • The building exceeds the allowed building height; • The building is located in the front yard setback, which needs to be removed from the setback or apply for a variance; • Grading is not shown and needs to be submitted; • Retaining walls are not shown and need to be shown and detailed; • The floor elevations do not match the grades shown; • The north side of the site, in front of the building, will require fill and this needs to be reflected on the grading plan; • A foundation plan and sections need to be submitted, • The level of site disturbance needs to be shown on the site plan; • Driveway access for the west unit is not shown and should be; • Driveways for both units must have turn around capabilities, since backing out onto Wildridge Road is not allowed. • There are four fireplaces being shown with no indication of the type of fireplace, and • The total length of the building is 120 feet (could be broken at the common wall and half the duplex shifted to provide variation in massing and overall site impact). rwk, PLANNING AND BONING COMMISSION STAFF REt.1RT January 4, 1994 Lot 42, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Eubanks/Hubers Duplex Conceptual Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation. Respectfully Submitted Mary Holden Town Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) .. All / CAIM Since ther was no representative for the applicant present, the Commission ta61e tis anp kation to t e next regular meeting.