PZC Packet 101993W
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot 14, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Duplex Residence for Siebert Investments
Final Design Review Modifications
PROJECT TYPE: Duplex
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
This residence received final Design Review approval on January 5, 1993. John Railton,
the agent representing the owner, has submitted an application requesting various changes
that include:
a one story addition, which will consist of one bedroom and bath to be located on
the northeast portion of the residence;
location change of driveway entrance; and
changing the siding and roofing materials from log siding and metal roofing to
cedar lap siding and cedar shake shingles.
SITE PLAN:
The building footprint has changed by extending the northeast portion of the building east.
The orilrmal garage location is now the addition with the garage further east.
The driveway location has moved from the northern comer of the lot to the southern
comer of the lot. The change is to accommodate the new location of the garage.
BUILDING CHANGES:
Due to the addition of the bedroom and bath the north, east and west elevation have
changed as follows:.
• The east elevation includes two, one car garage doors and a residential door.
• The west elevation will have one door and a set of triple pane windows.
• On the north elevation, the original garage doors will be replaced with siding and a
window.
The applicant is further requesting a change in materials. The request is to have cedar lap
siding with cedar shake roof shingles instead of the approved log facade with a metal roof.
t0
11
e'1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
a October 19, 1993
Lot 14, Block 1,Subdivision
anResidence for Siebert bent Invevestr,vents
Final Design Review Modir-tcation
STAFF COMMENTS AND
The driveway relocation is appropriate to allow access into the revised garage location,
but must be built to Town standards, which includes having a 4% sloped driveway for 20
feet from the driveway cut extending back onto the property. .
In this location there is a meter pedestal which should be removed and the meters placed
on the buildings (see conditions of approval).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission approve this request with the attached conditions:
1. The slope of the driveway, where it meets the right-of-way and 20 feet onto the
property, shall be no more than 4%.
2. The meter pedestal shall be removed for the front of residences and placed on the
buildings.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
40
J
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot 14, Block 1, bent I Subdivision
0 Residence for Siebert Investments
Final Design Review Modification
u
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (v�
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date _Sue Railton, Secretary
The Commission approved the proposed modifications with the Staff
recommendations that the slope of the drivewav, where it meets the right-
of-way and 20 feet onto the property shallbe no more than 49, and added that
the Town Engineer would sign off on the driveway; and the meter pedestal
shall be removed from the front of the residences and placed on the
buildings.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Final Design Review - Cassidy's Addition
PROJECT TYPE: Mixed Use Commercial
ZONING: Town Center
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Mark Donaldson, representing the applicant, has submitted a request to enclose
approximately 58 square feet of deck area on the southeast portion of the building, where
Cassidy's is located. The enclosure of the deck will add to an existing storage area, which
will then be converted into a retail area. The new materials will match the existing
materials on the building.
BUILDING:
The most visible change will occur on the south elevation, which will have a new window,
to match the existing windows.
SITE PLAN:
The building foot print will not change since the new area will be enclosing a portion of
the existing deck, under the existing roof line.
STAFF COMMENTS
Staff had a concern with existing and potential future parking as a result of this
application. In February, 1992, during an analysis of a remodel for Cassidy's, this building
was assessed at the mixed use parking calculations, resulting in the need for three
additional spaces. These spaces were provided. The proposed 58 square feet does not
require an additional space.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
to
ENE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
�� October 19, 1993
•0 Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Final Design Review - Cassidy's Addition
!im 4. Commission Action
Respectfully Submitted,
41qa,t 4jok di v,—
Mary Holden
Town Planner
C
0
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
i•
Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
• Final Design Review - Cassidy's Addition
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION
^■ Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (4/
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn O Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date /0 i Sue Railton, Secretary
i
k The Commission qranted approval of the proposed addition, with the condition that
i
the esisting plywood on the deck gets replaced as the same finish as the
exterior of the building.
n
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
W
Lot 6, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
i Final DesignReview - Request to Modify Color for Approved Buildings
PROJECT TYPE: Residential, 6 Units
a � ZONING: PUD
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
These plans were originally approved on September 1, 1992, by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. The applicant is before you tonight, requesting a change in the approved building
colors. (Heritage blue was originally approved, and the northeast building is painted in this color.)
The applicant wishes to paint both buildings with a gray color that has a green hue (Sherman
Williams SW 2086), utilizing an off white for the trim (Sherman Williams SW 1018), and a dark
gray with a green hue for the facia (Sherman Williams SW2089).
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant has painted one of the buildings heritage blue and is not pleased with the outcome.
He has picked the proposed colors due to their muted nature. Staff has looked at the surrounding
buildings and these colors would blend well with existing colors in the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Final Design approval of this application.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
00
:c:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
409M October 19, 1993
Lot 6, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
an Final Design Review - Request to Modify Building Colors
�W im PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted (v� Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date—/0/1Q&3 Sue Railton, Secretary yr P 4te,
The Commission granted approval for the proposed color changes as
submitted.
PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Avon Center
Final Design Approval - Re -Roofing of Second Level Walk Out
PROJECT TYPE: Mixed Use
ZONING: Town Center COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
W. Roley Greer, agent for the owner of Avon Commercial Center, is requesting the
Commission approve the re -roofing of a portion of the building on the south side of the
structure. The area in question is a roof -top patio area on the second level. The material
will be Tamko Awaplan 170 rolled roofing, black in color. The process for application of
the material utilizes a cold process adhesive. The material contains a spunbond polyester
mat which resists punctures and tearing.
BUILDING CHANGE:
Currently, the roof has a white finish with black showing through in areas where the finish
has been damaged. The new material is proposed to be black.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Design Guidelines require the maintenance items over $1,500 in value utilizing new
materials be approved the Commission.
The use of a dark roof material will minimize the effect of the seams. Included in your
packet is an example of how the roof will look once completed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Final Design app: oval of the re -roofing as submitted.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
•
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
- October 19, 1993
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creed
_ Avon Center
Final Design Review - Re -Roofing of Second Level Walk Out
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
-olai,AT
Mary Holden
Town Planner
A�1
r.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
. October 19, 1993
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
WNAvon Center
Final Design Review - Re -Roofing of Second Level Walk Out
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( V) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date /O ! 3 Sue Railton, Secretary
The Commission granted approval for the re -roofing of a second level
walkout, as submitted.
c
M
e
'
c
M
PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
•
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Avon Center
• Final Design Review - Garage Door Addition
•
PROJECT TYPE: Mixed Use
ZONING: Town Center COMPLMS WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
The applicant, Bob Roman, is requesting the Commission approve the addition of a white
garage door, a white pedestrian door, fresh air intake vent, and a pad for an electronic
card operator in the drive, which will open the garage door. The garage entrance is
located on the west portion of the building.
The applicant has requested other changes, but has provided no detail. Therefore, Staff is
not reviewing the other requested changes.
BUILDING CHANGE:
The only elevation change will be on the west, where the garage entrance is located. The
proposed changes have been included in your packet.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Existing building trim is green.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Final Design approval of the addition of the garage door, pedestrian
door and the fresh air vent with the following condition:
1. That the garage door, the pedestrian door and the fresh air intake vent be painted to
match the existing building trim color.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
C
r
PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Avon Center
Final Design Review - Garage Door Addition
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
40
PLANKING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
- October 19, 1993
Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
� Avon Center
Final Design Review - Garage Door Addition
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (✓f Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date /d ! 3 Sue Railton, Secretary
At Staff's reouest, the Commission tabled this item until further information
was received from the applicant.
'*)1
40
40
r
r
N
Q
iJ
q
*r
�t
I
I
I I
q
*r
�t
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
North Court
Condition ofApproval - Video Drop Box
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Building
ZONING: TC - Town Center
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
At the September 21, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the Commission
approved the Sign Program for North Court and asked the owner of Box Office Video,
Jim Benson, to return with pictures of the proposed drop box for review. It was further
stated by Mr. Amsbaugh that he would like to review the vehicular circulation in the
parking lot in relation to the drop box location. The applicant has provided a picture and
is requesting approval of a video drop box at North Court. The box is proposed to be
reflective blue with the name, number, location of the video store and instructions in white
lettering.
Additional parking lot circulation information has not been provided.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staffs concerns are as folluws:
Circulation: The applicant has not addressed circulation.
Color of Box: The color is proposed to be reflective blue and is not consistent
with approved building colors.
Proposed SignaSe: The proposed drop box contains signage that was not
approved with the Master Sign Program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this application with the
following conditions:
1. That the video drop box be painted to match the building and/or trim color. Drop box
shall not display additional advertising and be -ked for "video cassette return" only.
2. The video drop box be located by the store entrance so as to encourage people to park
in a stall and not hamper vehicular circulation.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
W3 North Court
Condition of Approval - Video Drop Box
w
REC0MMi NDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
--Y� cl�lr Vk-K
Mary Holden
Town Planner
io
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RIsPORT
October 19, 1993
Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
North Court
Condition of Approval - Video Drop Box
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued (✓� Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date ICY -16,3 Sue Railton, Secretary
Due to considerable Commission concerns regarding the location of the
drop box and possible circulation problems, and some concerns about the color
and additional signage, the Commission tabled this item, suggesting that
the applicant work with the Town Engineer on the best possible location for
the box.
••
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
M October 19, 1993
Lot 39, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Nelson Single Family
Conceptual Design Review
PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence
ZONING: PUD, Duplex COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
INTRODUCTION:
Michael Sanner, on behalf of Steve Nelson, has submitted plans for a single family
residence, with an accessory apartment, on Lot 39, Block 2 of Wildridge Subdivision.
The lot slopes at approximately 149/o from north to south., The residence is located on the
southwestern portion of the site. There will be three levels, and will stand at
approximately 33' in height at the tallest point. Landscape and building materials have not
been called out.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The slope of the driveway is shown at 2% and 3%, which is within the guidelines. Detail
on the boulder retaining wall will be required when plans are submitted for Final Design
Review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As a conceptual review, the Staff has no formal recommendation.
Respectfully Submitted
Mary Holden
Town Planner
I6•
EZ
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
M401 October 19, 1993
® Lot 39, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Nelson Single Family
Conceptual Design Review
it
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( -11� n!
Date / O / 3 Sue Railton, Secretary� i�� .
As a conceptual design review, no formal action was taken at this time.
The general consensus of the Commission was that this has the potential to
be a very nice nroject.
LDA® MEMO
TO: Steve Amsbaugh, Director of Community Development
FROM: Norman Wood, Town Engineer/A/
DATE: October 27, 1993
RE: Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Proposed Video Drop Box
11:.1ve reviewed the parking lot layout as constructed for North Court and the proposed
audition of a video drop box. The parking lot is very compact with less than desirable
traffic circulation in some areas. The addition of a video drop box as proposed will not
improve this situation, and may in fact increase traffic conjestion within the parking lot.
BLUGK 3
SHEET 2 OF 6
Je 36
�uME RGA 1 ��
S•
10 IB 1•
VTIEE
1�.. aOwT .]
4 .6
J
9•
] i • `6
- es
n
VE CREEK ..nJ
eo IJ
ei I•
e�
73
fE r= J0
•9 ]J
3•
BLOCK 2 '] J
•e
SHEET 4 OF 6 •1 JI
1 _
•6
6! •]
BLOCK I
SHEET
BLOCK 4
SHEET 3 OF 6
61
t
ERRET LAME
RIDGE
BLOCK 5
SHEET 6 OF 6
i
1 O
e /
f
TRACT p
• W
C
4 s {
2`.
1
TRACT 11
1f.1
u ":lA �� TRAC1 10
SEC. 2
I
e