The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 060193STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 1 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Mitchell Single Family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION: Mark Donaldson, architect( representing Gloria Mitchell, is proposing a single family residence on Lot 5, Block 2, Wil.dridge Subdivision, and is requesting final design approval. Lot 5 is located on the east side of O'Neal Spur. It is 0.65 acres in size. The lot has a prominent ridge running through it parallel to O'Neal Spur. From the road the lot slopes up at 50% for 30 feet, up at 12% for 64 feet, down at 26% for 30 feet and then down at 60% for 85 feet. Zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The proposed residence is approximately 3000 square feet in size, and include an attacned two car garage. The structure is two stories tall and is sunk into the top of the ridge. The exterior of the upper level is finished with 1X8 masonite siding in a sandstone brown, "spring blush" colored stur_co is used as the finish material on the lower level. White windows will be used. Fascia will be built up from 2X4 and 2X8 wood in the "spring blush", plywood soffits will be painted to match the stucco. The roof form is gabled with dormers on the front and rear elevation. A 350# asphalt composition will be used to finish the roof, the proposed color is a "Timberline Driftwood Blend." colors will be presented at the hearing. The proposed landscape plan is adequate, an automatic irrigation system is to be included. S`te lighting has not been discussed. As proposed, the project appears to meet all setback, lot coverage, and height restrictions. STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the sits upon which it is to be located. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 2 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Mitchell Single Family Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This lot has very complex topography, the proposed improvements have been placed in a reasonable manner, the project appears to have been designed with the topography in mind. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: There is not a dominant design theme in this area of Wildridge, this residence should be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Because of the lack of a dominant design theme in the area, staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, with the condition that the electric and gas meter be attached to the building. o► STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING June 1, 1993 Page 3 Lot 5, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Mitchell Single Family Residence Final Design Review RECOPOMDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANN.T.NG AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (lam^ Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) W' ( ) Date -�1 Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design review approval with the condition that ET 2 OF 6 SB 5 4> 23 4 49� 87 t 4 •8G BS CREEK X83 � �� TR All �79� 3 4 3 TE 1 �j `r2 50 0 t e— l e9 ;a lV1' BLOCK 2 SHEET 4 OF 6 v V, BLOCK 4 SHEEN 3OF6 85 T LANE BLOCK 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 RIDGE SEC. i I O g T o> 4t 3 � 5 Y'%ACY R 4 W 3 0 01 c 4 S ` 2 3 6 1. 7 TRACT 3 TRA"22 i `Y I 23 1 r TMACT II 4 f1A �• �� BLOCK I SEC. 2 SHEET 5 OF 6 'i� 41 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1,1993 Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Steve and Laurie Thompson Single Family Residence Final Design Review Page 1 INTRODUCTION: Sam Sterling, architect, is representing the Thompson's who are requesting Final Design Approval for a proposed single-family residence on Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This project has received a variance from the required front yard setback. The lot is located on the south side of Saddleridge Loop and is approximately 1.01 acres in size. It slopes down to the south, in some areas in excess of 40 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. At a previous final design review this Commission was concerned with the lack of a turn around in the driveway, the grading plan, the landscape plan and the windows on the south elevation. The applicant has addressed all of these issues, however, they should be aware that the parking shown in the road maintenance easement will have to be approved by the Avon Public Works Department. The structure is two stories high with approximately 2000 square feet of habitable space, not including the attached garage. The structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and, with the variance, setback restrictions. The exterior of the lower level is finished in stucco, the color is La Habra "Chablis X-1211, the upper level is 1X8 channel rustic in a cedar tone fin_sh. Windows will be aluminium with a bronze finish, trim will be 1X4 rough sawn cedar. Fascia will be 2X10 rough sawn cedar with a Cedar Tone stain; soffits will be 3/8 fir plywood. The roof form is an offset gable, it will be finished with Heritage II Asphalt Composition shingle in a Shadow Gray. The landscape plan leaves the majority of the lot natural , what is planted appears adequate, a drip irrigation system is proposed. The retaining wall will be constructed from Rynite rock. STAFF The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: With the approved setback variance, this proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. • w � ,'* STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION am June 1,1993 Lot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Steve and Laurie Thompson Single Family Residence Final Design Review Page 2 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materials are being used throughout. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The improvements should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Lot 71 is a relatively steep lot, the project appears to fit the topography as well as can be expected. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: Staff does not see a problem with this criteria. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: The project, as submitted, is neither so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that it would impair monetary or aesthetic values. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted gaals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMU:NDATION: Approval, with the condition that the electric and gas meters be attached to the building. 11 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NJune 1,1993 m4a Iot 71, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Steve and Laurie Thompson • Single Family Residence Final Design Review Pago 3 RE RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) dra ( ) Date_ Patti Dixon, Secreta The Commission granted final design approval with the condition that the electric and gas meters be attached to the building • LOCK 3 I ,111... E T 2 OF 6 ''G�IrF.T - `-�_ - SEC. 26 58 53 52 TI 't t 2 3 T _ I 54 BLOCK 4 51 SHEET 3 OF 6 A `r r. 26 55 SO 6 3 N 21 2! ' B3 56 49 49 47`:' 7 78 15 24 57 90 B 9 7 20 IC II 1x ] r , 26 2, 29 B 22_3 45. 80 I2 \ 434a B9 75 26 j1 33 30 42 TR._. BB R A at 27 _,..OWOTE RIDGE 31 74 .. Y 34 32 4i 3s 97 B6 38 34 5B 39 93 62 ...> 35 57 SB ]1 72 ]3 9 36 3] 53 60 70 49 FERRET LANE 37 52 SI 30 dB 61 36 38 i3 ti9 IiB 4] u7 20 7" 52 66 3 ^q. 46 63 59 6 ! 63 19 9 2::9. 64 18 16 •' '_. i5 i '. R01N1 u 3 IS TO _ V2 42 4 a 2 0 35 37 di 4 BLOCK 5 31 38 39 40 a5 SHEET 6 OF 6 46 J4 32 33 Q 43 33 34 v 56 •7 r...„0 4B 52 90 29 55 91 log 23 tR y1 53 54/ 1 9 27 9 1`J9, 3 \ R 24 O 2 4 a.8fi .07 11 ' i 106 ' 10 05 8 96 IDS 9 7 O / UNE CREEK 93-\ 97 s TRAIL 79 .� 90 104 8 5 �6 ' TRACT R 14 103 BO 75 \ 99 6 `-a2 74 n � Ino 91 102 U 4 w i0 73 31 52SS 3 c y TE `101 ax so 34 c 4 s 6 4 49 33 32 y 55 s6 i 3 y4 in 17 6 BLOCK 2 46 ^3! ' 36. 31 /. ( 2 ! 7 I T►q4`T / SHEET 4OF6 '...a 47 29J19 69 46 28 20 16J \� 45 J9 27 I i 65 66 68 I! \ TAT 67 44 40 26 I `, Q 1 41 58 43 1 11 4 63 42 z•x3 \, TMACT I� 2 +7 4 SEC 2 BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 W.-4 k_'A STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision John and Annie Warnke Single-family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION: Sam Sterling, architect, is representing the Warnke's who are requesting Final Design Approval for a single-family residence on Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located at the end of Long Spur, it's access is through a 30 foot easement on Lot 33. Lot 34 is approximately 0.45 acres in size. The lot slopes down to the north at about 19 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The structure is one story high with a walkout basement, it has approximately 2000 square feet of habitable space, not including the attached garage. The structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and setback restrictions. The exterior is finished in stucco, the color is "La Habra Chablis". Windows will be aluminum with a bronze finish, trim will be 2X6 and 2X8 rough sawn cedar with a Cedar Tone finish. Fascia will be 2 X 10 rough sawn cedar with a Cedar Tone stain; soffits will be 3/8 fir plywood. The roof form is a combination of gables and hips, it will be finished with Heritage II Asphalt Composition shingle in a "Rustic Redwood". Colors will be presented at the meeting. At the conceptual review roof ever the garage doors, landscape plan needed work, The applicant has added structure, added arches to amount of plant material i the garage remains a hip. this Commission was concerned with the hip that there was to much stucco, the and that the entryway should be enhanced. a raised band around the middle of the the entry way, and has increased the n the landscape plan. The roof form above The landscape plan leaves the majority of the lot natural , what is planted appears adequate. The grading plan appears to be adequate. The application indicates irrigation by sprinkler; exterior lighting has not been discussed. STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materials are being used throughout. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision John and Annie Warnke Single-family Residence Final Design Review 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The proposed improvements are compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: Staff does not see a problem with this criteria. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: The project, as submitted, is neither so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that it would impair monetary or aesthetic values. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, with the conditions that the electric and gas meters be attached to the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner ■s0 :7 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 • Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Su:.,iivision John and Annie Warnke • Single-family Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (') Approved with modified conditions Continued(( ( ) Denied ( ) With n r Date CC QIP)— Patti Dixon, Secretar` The Commission granted final design review approval with the following conditions 1. The electric and gas meters be attached to the building. _a Tha annlican trptjrn jAlith rnlnr Samples for th@ rtorrn being a light color on the ton and a darker color on the bottom, and also provide details on the column treatment at the entry arcade. 0 LOCK 3 ET 2 OF 6 58 ,.. -..-A I''r'Y 1 SEC BLOCK 4 SI Poi r . ; SHEET 3 OF 6 26 23 51 5p 6 N 21 :2 6 63 - i 24 56 49 a8 qr' 7 6 78 IS d. 51 90 9 7 20 Gq 27 •E",. - IO II 12 I i9 2 aA 28 ay 7 7 60 22` 29 43 89 B9 75 18 26 ZS 61 I tOVOTE RIDGE 21 31 TN 59 R 4 7q Z7 J2 3q ei SS 97 86 63 25 SB S• 56 84 93 82 � 59 35 57 50 71 72 9 73 36 37 53 q9 60 ]O 37 52 SI 50 'FERRET LANE 36 30 19 •e 61 69 68 a7 a1 20 7'.. 52 66 6a` 2 6q :':d 9 9 a5 As •_._ 5 TG , ..4 2aa0 4 a e 2 q 0 u 3] .e BLOCK 5 31 - 38 59 a6•S SHEET 6 OF 6 32 Jq 35 3 B 43 33 34 a 56 :...n0 48 f2 90 7 29 91 53 109 28 2'', t 54 ~ 1 89 92 106 10 85 96 ] v 8 JUNE :REEK 9! 97 105 9 TRAIL \�79 96 104 6 5 103 6� TRACT R IS 82 7q 77 \ 100 8 a1 102 b ] q u D 32 53 IDI 1 TE 51 S 72 50 sa q o S 4 6 ''2 � 36 � 5 a9 1q 6 BLOCK 2 35 6 TPAACT / SHEET 4 OF 6 X ap N _7' 2919_ 38 69 46 45 19 28 9 63 66 6e 2 S 67 •I/ i 58 47 23 22 -- 63 42 2.25 •z ii• .\ i TMGf ID SE 2 BLOCK i SHEET 5 OF 6 - V A R. 4 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 86, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Kathy and Joe Perry 4-Plex Residence Final Design Review w 4IV4:C•lbiflhl%000 1 Mark Donaldson, architect, representing the Perry's is requesting Final Design Approval for a proposed 4 -flex to be constructed on Lot 86, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the west side of Draw Spur. It is approximately 0.62 acres in size. The lot slopes down to the west at about 17 Fercent, the front of the lot is a little steeper, the back a lit' -le flatter. The zoning is PUD with a 4-plex designation. The proposed 4-plex is a modular which has a repetitive facade. The structure is two stories tall with garages on the lower floor. Each unit has approximately 1500 square feet of habitable space, not including the attached garages. The structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and setback restrictions. The exterior is predominantly finished in a 6" Woodsman lap siding. Windows will be wood clad, trim will be 1 X 6 wood, the facia will be 2X4 on 2X8 smooth cedar., soffits will be plywood. A gable roof with a series of small dormers is utilized; 350# fiberglass, GAF Timberline, shingles will be used. Colors will be presented at the hearing. At conceptual review this Commission was concerned with the repetitive facade, the amount of landscape material, that the roof line needed variety, and that the rear of the building behind the garages lacked interest. The applicant has introduced more landscape material and more appropriate varieties around the dr:veway. The rear has been altered and has additional landscaping. The vertical distance of the break in the roof line has been increased; the front facade is unchanged. Landscaping and grading appear to be adequate. STIFF COMMENTS: The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 86, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Kathy and Joe Perry 4-Plex Residence Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, including materials used, appear to be appropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project is well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This is a complicated lot, the proposed improvements have been placed in a responsible manner and are compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: This project appears to be visually compatible with the area. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria, if anything. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. ST"F Approval with the condition that all electric and gas meters be attached to the building. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 • Lot 86, Block 1, Wildri.dge Subdivision Kathy and Joe Perry 4-Plex Residence Final Design Review i RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (') Approved with recommended conditions i ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( Denied ( ) W' 7z..— as�� Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval with the condition that the electric meters be attached to the building and gas meters as near to the buildinq as nossible. SS -- 'CObOTE R 66 33 30 a2 TH BB R A 74 27: L 31 3a ]2 a 55 97 96 21 BS 5B 56 yy 64 83 82 sa 36 .' ...._. 67 a 71 72 !] 57 73 A 97D 36 37 33 417 60 FERRET LANE 37 52 31 so a6 69 6B : :� B N 67 207'e:- 52 66 3 6 ] 68 69 l 6• 19 9 2 .5 Ifi L 16 I >:'\ .2 a2 F. 01 NIT. 3 q TO a0 �\a j7 a' BLOCK 5 31 Ao os SHEET 6 OF 6 36 39 32 35 q a3 3A v 56 °T n0 33 aB ' 52 90 21 29 � 91 •09 23 eP yl 33 ,� 54 19 /vu9e .07 66 11 17 P] 6 6 96 97 105 9 7 ,JANE CREEK -B3 ' se 104 6 TRAIL `79 5 \6. b ° 99 103 TRACT R e0 13 :fl2 7a 75 77 \ 100 / 6 Iz � ..BI lo\ � ° W 7D.73 51 32 3 0 5 9 101 c 4 5 11 TE i2 so- s. a 37 32 51 SS 56 17 B 2J 10 s 09 3a IB I 6 BLOCK 2 _ +B 9 SHEET 4 OF 6 7o a7 3 19 B 7 a6 20 20 16se` _ 69 °y 39 27IS 35 66 \ 67 as 40 26 I 01a' al 23 22 s! SB a3 a z• a TRACT I D 34 '2 .4A BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 ILL Y ayl S Ili ` 11 m na 40 1H l SEE AVON/BENCHMARK MAP 5HE E' OF 6 5B 39 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 1 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Conceptual Design Review Ronald Bifani is proposing to construct and operate a full service Goodyear Automotive Service Center and Car Wash, (no gasoline sales) on Lot 4, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Lot 4 is a .70 acre Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoned lot located on Nottingham Road. It is the western most lot in that commercial area, and is adjacent to Buck Creek. The property west of Buck Creek is zoned residential and is developed with multifamily projects. The project, as proposed would include 8 interior automotive service bays, 2 automatic car wash bays, office and storage space, and 1 accessory apartment for employees. The business would provide full service auto service and repair, tire sales, limited auto accessory sales and car washing. The main level of the structure would house the 8 service bays, the office, and the automatic car washes. The apartment would be in the upper level, and storage in the basement. The exterior would be predominantly finished in split -faced block, the upper level would be finished in cedar board siding . The roof form on the front of the structure is gabled with a dormer, the roof over the service bays will be flat. Fiberglass shingles will be the finish material. Colors will be presented in the hearing. As submitted, this proposal meets all Town height, setback and lot coverage requirements. This proposal received a Special Review Use approval only for the automobile service and repair component of the project. The car washes and the accessory apartments are uses by right. The conditions placed on that approval are: The Planning and that potential residential prope during the desi critical to revie building archite storage, noise planning. Zoning Commission should ensure negative impacts to the rty to the west are addressed gn review process. Factors w include the lighting plan, cture, landscape buffers, trash buffers, and general site 10 ft STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 2 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car wash Mr. Ron Bifani Conceptual Design Review 2. The catch basin design must ensure that any site runoff is filterc-d and all oil, gssoline, soap, or suspended material be removed prior to discharge. 3. No underground storage tanks be allowed. 4. No auto repair or service will take place outside. There will be no storage of junk vehicles or miscellaneous parts outside. All trash receptacle and used tires waiting for proper disposal shall be stored in a well screened area. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff's only comments at this conceptual review would be that the landscaping in the stream setback could be bunched up in massings, the boulder wall seems unnecessary, the addition of some riparian shrubs near the stream could be added, and the angled parking in front should be squared up. Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, no formal staff recommendation will be provided. N r? ENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted D Tom Allender Planner *a 00 Q111ER 1�. CON SEC 1 C.GI — I I WATER TANK 51� I I 1 T S E R V I C E A N N E X A T I O N 1 i•.Ci P AR CEL 'A' 1 OI 1 � I I f uia O �°j w I TE R 1 VER Q" N A TI ON AL FORE 5 T I �O r..cl e QLD -RLD �� QP I '� "'v'• +.! ,osis I r y- _ I t..CT e rw« m I < w,W \ • Br+yi BENCHMARK AT WS, B BEAVER C R E E K OLD a/ouww.e L/ � a L. MtaOB t r1 � RHD r ..o. ASC .qi T F[MPWi n y, "'J WHITE RIVER a Yc •• 4A \♦ �. I NATIONAL FORES T raoY �� mNoos FA's H SUNROAD s SUSDIVSION r rf � f SWIFT GULCH ADDITION s E •vma I tJ V \ ` A'P • `f m \ \ •o Y � ` \ GE AT AVON SU ` rr'„ 7 C ! 1 r � \ nY:i I e � Cltr YYY:Ci � / .MA Si1MN f4 YOBIL[ 11PII PNAt aW COYYWT 9Kf9NC � EEa/1LR luCi • Bf MC�M� a _ j/Q't /�^T O 04 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting final design review for a 57,600 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, north of Avon Auto Body and the recently approved Valley Wide Plumbing Building. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. The proposed building is four stories high. The exterior finish is metal on the upper level, with a stucco product utilized on the lower level. Colors will be presented at the hearing. An elevator shaft on the front of the building breaks up that facade. The buildings utilized a metal mansard roof form, which has been decreased in size in response to comments at the conceptual review. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. As proposed, the two building exceed the maximum allowed height by a few feet. A variance would be required, staff does not see this as a major problem as the lot is very steep and Metcalf Road encroaches into the lot by 10 feet. The applicants would also be seeking a variance from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar variance in this area in the past, staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. This project will also require the vacation of the lot line dividing lot 14 and 15. The applicant has redesign the parking and loading configuration to enable trucks to reach the loading docks without blocking Metcalf Road. Exterior lighting, and signage have not been discussed.. Other than the height slightly exceeding the maximum and the required parking variance, the project appears to meet Town requirements. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal will be required to apply for and receive a variance for exceeding the maximum height allowed and for parking associated with the self storage units, and the property line between the lots will need to be vacated. Otherwise the project appears to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are not inappropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties and retains the access necessary to adjacent lots. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Considering that this is a steep site, the project is relatively compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is for approval with the conditions that: 1. The grading plan be approved by the Town engineer. 2. The applicant apply for and receive both a height variance and a variance fcr the required parking associated with the self storage units. A final design approval should not be construed as a pre approval for either variance. 3. The property line between Lot 14 and Lot 15 be vacated. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND 'ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) Date _U2 Patti Dixon, Secretar The Commission tabled this item since the applicant will need to apply for a variance, and the grading plan needs to be revised, and the applicant needs to provide information on the proposed retaining walls. ,unp i; Cqt gc 5 - Y III y S f WHITE RIVER 'x .+ N A TIONAL G 0 R E S T b.cl h Ia �, lu I. >r W s.crA 1j T b W rte � BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK b o ti u 1 WATER TANK SITE _ CEHiER I/1 Cl%t. SEC. if I v4 I) I OLD l��Cr v SER VI C E ANNEXATION — —�_------ PARCEL 'B' --�— b B E N C H M A R K A T B E> a Q /C x b RHD — SrOr( raR. , =,H I/4 carr. SEC , _ _- BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK 10 04 A"fi STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 1 Lot 87, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Larry Mac Neil Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION: Stephen Richards, architect, representing Larry Mac Neil is proposing a single family home on Lot 87, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision and is requesting a conceptual design review. Lot 87 is located on the south side of Wildridge Road East. The lot is .78 acres in size and slopes down to the south at approximately 30 percent. Zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The proposes' residence is approximately 2600 square feet in size, not including an attached two car garage. The structure is a single story, with a walk out basement. The exterior is finished with 1X8 channel lap siding, stained "Stone Hedge", the walk out level finish appears to be stucco. Windows would be wood clad, with 1X6 cedar trim, also in "Stone Hedge". Fascia would be 2X10 and 1X6 cedar in a "Heritage Blue". Soffits will be cedar plywood, also in the blue. The roof form is a series of gables, finished with slate gray asphalt shingles. The proposed landscape plan is adequate, however, hand watering is proposed as the method of irrigation. Exterior lighting and the placement of utility meters have not been discussed. STAFF COMMENTS: The only major concern is that the grading plan indicates that the structure is on fill supported by rock retainage. This design does not respond to the site topography, and the structure is over the maximum allowed by zoning. STAFF RECONNENDATION: Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, no formal staff recommendation will be provided. RECOiIIUMED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted Tom Allender Planner ET 2 OF 6 5B II 5• MIT 3 32 3B 20 M . r'clNr Is 70'.... y 4 0 '2 40 .C33 na�,�% 1 n �B7 9! r,l -- — BLOCK 4 SHEET 3 OF 6 za ' ObOTE RIDGE Rs Ba 83 B2 ]1 72 73 60'0 FERRET INE 61 69 W 42 % n • BLOCK 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 06 0 BS 96 �O NE :REE• :Bl ` B 97 105 9 TR 411 X79 98 104 B 14 7 7 99 103 6 B2 74 77 \ 100 BI 102 0 73 71 53 ! 7E � 9 101. 4 72 s0 !4 37 56 y 49 54 1 B 17 35 6 BLOCK 2 48 / SHEET 4 OF 6 7p 47 29 t9 46 1. I // 7 � o ' S � TRACT k 4 W + ! O 4 S ? ! 6 1 TRACr 2 r 1 / T ISEC 2 BLOCS I !/J SHEET 5 OF 6 41 3 32 3B 20 M . r'clNr Is 70'.... y 4 0 '2 40 .C33 na�,�% 1 n �B7 9! r,l -- — BLOCK 4 SHEET 3 OF 6 za ' ObOTE RIDGE Rs Ba 83 B2 ]1 72 73 60'0 FERRET INE 61 69 W 42 % n • BLOCK 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 06 0 BS 96 �O NE :REE• :Bl ` B 97 105 9 TR 411 X79 98 104 B 14 7 7 99 103 6 B2 74 77 \ 100 BI 102 0 73 71 53 ! 7E � 9 101. 4 72 s0 !4 37 56 y 49 54 1 B 17 35 6 BLOCK 2 48 / SHEET 4 OF 6 7p 47 29 t9 46 1. I // 7 � o ' S � TRACT k 4 W + ! O 4 S ? ! 6 1 TRACr 2 r 1 / T ISEC 2 BLOCS I !/J SHEET 5 OF 6 41 Ii• 10 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 1 In Lot A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Avon Center at Beaver Creek Color Change Request ■. Dean I:oll of Zehren and Associates, is requesting Final Design Review alproval for a change to the existing exterior colors of the Avon :enter. The applicant is requesting approval of two possible schemes. As both possibilities are rather complex, they will be presented at the hearing in detail. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a color change request, staff has no comments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff does not have a recommendation on this request. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom All -ender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (` Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) n Date ��_ Patti Dixon, Secretar The Commission granted apnroval fcr the color change requested with a sty-ong recommendation that Scheme 2 he pursued i C ORrsT SER VICE A w(. A T o R P A R C E L 'A' 1 i BE N ' N M A P K AT B E A V E EEK--__----___--__--______ ..'r Alt r AIL 9AROZ AT A. � M1�ti _ Rm �CIt Qb >�� RHD _• 9Aw02 AT A, comma e L •wN A 9q� . OLD pLU I I GPEH BENCHMARKVER CREEK (NUTTNCHAM LAKE) ArrA m 0 D 4 Tc SPA 9—MFNI/i COR. 9 `— -- RHD p 73 BUNRUAD SUBDIV.StON r�`.rrT o GPcH =' ow•,ry , ITC �E AT Ar v I sAn. / � E • VUNOSU rc�AQR • \ \ \ ' A \ 9 .TCR 4� � I ,j„ \ \ e WAl •c.[ raw , ' � c, \ ` \ \ — —_ -- BEAVER CREEK SUB. 6M FlUNC TR. 5 \ \ r 'AA \ CAST r/• COR YCOr 0 ..• r. c BA 1 ' T 41 C�\\ •..a rc A a BEAR w / S n%�TI�NC u \ BE A V F R CRE E+ STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 1, 1993 Page 1 Lot 1, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Sunridge Condominiums, Phase II Color Change Request INTRODUCTION Bonnie Dennis, manager of Sunridge Condominiums Phase II is requesting Final Design Review approval for a change to the existing exterior colors of that project. The specific colors of the request have not been finalized at this time. They will be presented, with samples, at the hearing. STAFF COMMENTS As this is a color change request, staff has no comments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff does not have a recommendation on this request. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved wits, modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted approval of the requested color change as submitted a r'■ 14 l..Gf NNE %ATI 0 N B E N C H M A R K A T B E A V E R C R E E K O 4} M a a a a / 0 a T IMT{0.5T^TE f RHD a RMQ _ STCIE O �__ NptIH 1 � CAR. stc Hs BENCHMARK 1 1 AT BEAVER CREEK RLD �� m Rh'DC AT A� G EIENCHMAR �' OLD!� �� TocT . gE,^ � I (NOTI o� RHD ACf . ' $IINi�'i .T .NM1 S1..N1LE ^T ^WI = CM.`6t15M q CPIN11M1,1Y' ",M 1 "AY RHDC .�., M .` T I 6 , —\ RHD p I R �r D OLD BEaVEP CREEK �� -DIVISION �N-�/^+:c 1./ -� SIXTH FILING G�E , ^swaoa TRACTACr 0 p _ TER T � � T A � E BEAVER CREEK SUBUMSiON THIRD FILING BEAVER CRE CENTQI CON 4c. 1, ;'4 EAST I/. (;pp SEC 11 I 6. BE A/LEI F4(.