Loading...
PZC Packet 042093STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION April 20, 1993 Page 1 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek .,utomobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Special Review Use Ronald Bifani is proposing to construct and service Goodyear Automotive Service Center gasoline sales) on Lot 4, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision. operate a full and Car Wash, (no at Beaver Creek The project, as proposed would include 8 interior automotive service bays, 1 automatic car wash, 4 self service car wash bays, office and storage space, and 2 accessory apartments for eAployees. The business would provide full service auto service ar.d repair, tire sales, limited auto accessory sales and car washing. Lot 4 is a .70 acre Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoned lot located on Nottingham Road. There are five lots along Nottingham Road that are currently zoned NC. The Pizza Hut and the Coastal Mart occupy two of those lots and the other three, between the Interstate and Nottingham Road, are vacant. Lot 4 is the western most of the commercial lots, it is adjacent to Buck Creek. The property west of Buck Creek is zoned residential and is developed with multifamily projects. The 5 NC lots were originally zoned Residential High Density Commercial (RHDC), the zoning was amended during the comprehensive rezoning in the spring of 1991. Automobile service stations were allowed as a use by right in the RHDC zone district. The NC zone district intention reads as follows: The Neighborhood Commercial Zone District is intended to provide sites for theprincipal benefit of residents of the community and also to highway oriented convenience commeLcial needs. Uses by Right in this zone district are: Retail Stores Professional Offices Car wash Restaurants Accessory Apartments, Exclusive of Ground Level Special Review Uses in this zona district are: Automobile Service Station and Repair Above Ground Public Utility Installations Commercial Printing Facility STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION April 20, 1993 Page 2 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Special Review Use This proposal requires a Special Review Use hearing and approval only for the automobile service and repair component of the project. The car washes and the accessory apartments are uses by right. This Commission recently approved a Special Review Use for a Quick Lube/Car Wash, which staff classified as automobile repair, on this lot. Were it not for the conditions placed on that approval, staff would have considered this project as being allowed under that approval. STAFF COMMENTS The following criteria as listed in Section 17.48.040 of the Avon Zoning Code, sho,:id be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission when reviewing a Special Review Use application. A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code; COMMENT: The proposed use appears to be in conformance with all the requirements imposed by the Avon Zoning Code. B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan; COMMENT: The proposed use appears to be in general conformance with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design, and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. COMMENT: With this request we are reviewing the use itself and it's associated impacts not the specific design of a project. The actual design considerations must be addressed in the design review process. At that time such factors as lighting, architecture, landscaping, parking and site planning should be reviewed. Once again, only the outommobile service center requires a Special Review Use approval, the oportarnts and carwash are currently allowed. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION April 20, 1993 Page 3 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Special Review Use An auto service center is an automobile intensive use with all repair activity occurring within the confines of a garage bay. Staff feels that the general location of the lot lends itself to this type of use. The land is very easily accessible by adequate roads. It is convenient to most citizens as well as to highway users. The general tone of this NC zone district has been set by the Coastal Mart Gasoline Station, so the use seems appropriate to it's neighbors to the east. While staff does have concerns about this projects relationship with it's neighbors to the west, we feel those concerns can be addressed through design. The current application is proposing berming and landscaping on the western side of the property, restricting trash storage to the eastern side of the property, and limiting hours of operation of the self service carwashes. The existence of Buck Creek along th- west property line raises site specific environmental concerns relating to off site storm water runoff and the potential of contaminants reaching the stream. The current application is proposing 2 catch basin for the treatment of any runoff. Staff does believe that certain design ind site considerations can be addressed as Special Review Use impacts and can be included as conditions to Special Review Use approvals. Landscaping, light, and drainage would be appropriate issues to address through conditions. With careful consideration to the design review process, Staff believes this proposal will meet the requirements of this criteria. ZTAFF RECOMMENDAT12H Staff recommendation for the request to allow automotive service and repair on Lot 4, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek as a special review use is for approval with the following conditions: 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission should enoure thatpotential negative impacts to the residential property to the west are addressed during the design review process. rectors critical to review include the lighting plan, building architecture, landscape butters, trash storage, noise lnuffero, and general site planning. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION April 20, 199;' Page 4 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani Special Review Use 2. The catch basin design must ensure that any site runoff is filtered and all oil, gasoline, soap, or suspended material be removed prior to discharge. 3. No underground storage tanks be allowed. 4. No auto repair or service will take place outside. There will be no storage of junk vehicles or miscellaneous parts outside. All trash receptacle and used tires waiting for proper disposal shall be stored in a well screened area. RECOMMENDED 1. ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISION April 20, 1993 Page 5 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Automobile Service Center and Car Wash Mr. Ron Bifani ma Special Review Use PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION ApproveC as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (Vj Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( 1 ra ) Date Patti Dixon,(Secretar _ The Planning and Zoning Commission granted approval of the Special Review Use for Lot 4; Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, with the following conditions: is The °lanning and Zoning Commission should ensure that potential negative impacts to the residential property to the west are sddressed during the design review process. Factors critical to review include the lighting plan, buildin3 architecture. landscape hufferr. trash , oraoa,. noise hijffprc, and general site planni 2. The catch basin must ensure that any site runoff is filtered and all oil, gas^line, soap, or suspended material be removed prior to discharge. 3. No underground storage tanks be allowed. 4. No auto repair will take place outside. There will be no storage of ,Junk vehicles or miscellaneous parts outside. All trash receptacles and used tires waiting for proper disposal shall be stored in a well screened area. 0 500 1000 $C'ALE I .500 LEGEND OR� MINIMVM 35• CUR$ CUT ACCESS SHEET 2 THRU 81 ^`IrML. >UeJLCI 70 AGREEMENT TRACT i - EAGLE RIVE% -DRAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION TRACT TI - FAC -E RIVS" - DRAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION TRACT I - OLD AIVEI OCE CONSERVATION TRACT K - EAGLE RIVLn - DA, .ACE USE AND CONSERVATION TRACT L - EAGLE RIVER - DRAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION TRACT N - p.R,L y RAILROAD R.O.V. EXCEPTION TO PLAT TPACT N - U.E.V.S.O. EXCEPTION TO PLAT TRACT 0 - U.(-V.S.D. EXCEPTION TO PLAT TRACT P - PARR, GOVERNMENT, RECREATION, EMPLOYEE MOUSING TRACT Q _ SHOPPIRC CENTER, PHASE I TRACT R - SHOPPING CENTER SIGN TRACT S - ACCESS, IRRIGATION DITCH, DRAINAGE, UTILITY TRACT T - PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE TRACT U - PRIVATE LANDSCA PC AND DRAINAGE TRACT V - PAIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE BLN BRASS CAI TRACT y - ACCESS. DRAINAGE. UTILITY TRACT z - P4IVA TE ACCESS U \A. to INS Y t) 3RaN 3 to Y �.. I • 7R.Cr SHEET INDEX oR DEFINITIONS 1 • Y CCrr,ERCIAL: THE (CPNIRCFal IONIC IS IRT(RD(D t0 Mp3IfX rpf M[ tf9� ►t PANC[ Of Cb3RE R(IAl OR(M';MS uA1 SERVICES R(OUIRE0 Ep1 Tr( lfpf(► AIp �. CC0 IENT fuNC!IONING or CC►elt RCtAI C(NT(ts Stfflw t $t USES P(ReIi T7[0 AR( INT(AD(D 70 iKiW A RETAIL A 1Y„( ur41 G tq C4lIh� 4 BUT NOT LIMITED TO iH ( All [ Il V SIh L( yEtc tO*t, FRC IID tRL �L,, 3• [ DLt FURNITURE. NHDI(SAI( An. R(lg!l (STVlll+at ll, 11Llult"c WII of / FARO, PE. CAGES, G. TBUILDI lURA1rjIA fj 1D. t1, Sig i"I AUfpol"t A34 FIRMA" IDUIN"al NAR;)fARC, CL DtN;AG, BUILDING DEIRG HATE REAL 1, ftE D. (.IfO(R PERSONAL SERVICE ESTASLIi•I IRICIUOING $AAI. iD(% Sd �• t0.•,►"!•, 111Rlt{ AIt PI {A• •A-fi:1 % INC, PLANT SERVING ENGIVIOUAIS ONl3, 301lUA►I, HIO IO STVC:lC,� SND►, tAN1�Y!' t►RgY►R 0R p►3 ({(Y'� / TAURANT, CO(TAIL 10UHG(, PR134T( CLUB. 1M(At(1 AI E SRO( ago;" II!tO 1•{TP, e.•ttL (3[ v11 [. 1(S. \V/ SERVICE Of AutC►(e;tEi, AUTOMOBILE S(►tl(t STA110NS,�p AIRA 10R, uvlti SF ►37Ct (St1e{ISP1t ft 13(: IC IM� HOt(L-LODGES UP 10 ISO UN!, /,11AOIRG ANO R'D)tIMG [ CLLu fjfll, 51131:( AND 1111!1 Sp1. FDR CONDUCT Of ARTS ARO CRAf1S, DERIAL AND IITDICk (CLIN ESpIt Ac`-' 'on (t OR Et OF A1IL 11 as 1b e UP 10 80 FEET. _ Gfu}to 101 ►_� •� BLOCK 2: K CORMEN OP .f N. Va, sE v. OP SECT IDN I LO LO LO' LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT WT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 171 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LD1 ; LOT LOT LOT LOT 7' LOT ; LOT Lot 3 LOT 3 LOT B LCT 3 L2• I LOT Al tot 45 tot w LOT 4I LOT 4e . LOT 69 tot So to' SI It cowato v LOT 52 tog $1 Ty ie�V:Po. Lot 34 . M n1aNR to? 1, \ TOT SI tog 11 LOT 11 c .. I] L / IC' 64f,, T- 3 - tet• Let 1 All a ¢' 113 I t+ WI f 11' 041 --• ICENTLR S(CTIONI I I I TRACT f NI S. :MOM tE W N. -O.H[R Or THE S. Or T.E I I ?• 1/• 01 SECTIO. 1 K cOM[R Iy • 9 I/, 3.v w SECTION. N .ACT a ST 37 ( b ai 43 •• •1 ® .aV F' L �. Aa w4� 33 a IN. ERSIA TL A A n D O �`RAYi D •3 Aw 33 ' TRACT C j n 17 p w \` 7 3 a N t IT � T1yC} • • _IRACT 3//w/N�� 11 12 I a3 • T as ' TR AC/ P , I .a 47 )T 34 f/ I TRACT E 3 NORT. w � u a1 T. a .0 xnRS• �. Ia hxc : `I a 43 R•CrA, 12 47' 32 All a - � it TRACT 3, at /SO rt 30 TROT I TRAC1 1. $3 A 0 I>•KT N A W N i U \A. to INS Y t) 3RaN 3 to Y �.. I • 7R.Cr SHEET INDEX oR DEFINITIONS 1 • Y CCrr,ERCIAL: THE (CPNIRCFal IONIC IS IRT(RD(D t0 Mp3IfX rpf M[ tf9� ►t PANC[ Of Cb3RE R(IAl OR(M';MS uA1 SERVICES R(OUIRE0 Ep1 Tr( lfpf(► AIp �. CC0 IENT fuNC!IONING or CC►elt RCtAI C(NT(ts Stfflw t $t USES P(ReIi T7[0 AR( INT(AD(D 70 iKiW A RETAIL A 1Y„( ur41 G tq C4lIh� 4 BUT NOT LIMITED TO iH ( All [ Il V SIh L( yEtc tO*t, FRC IID tRL �L,, 3• [ DLt FURNITURE. NHDI(SAI( An. R(lg!l (STVlll+at ll, 11Llult"c WII of / FARO, PE. CAGES, G. TBUILDI lURA1rjIA fj 1D. t1, Sig i"I AUfpol"t A34 FIRMA" IDUIN"al NAR;)fARC, CL DtN;AG, BUILDING DEIRG HATE REAL 1, ftE D. (.IfO(R PERSONAL SERVICE ESTASLIi•I IRICIUOING $AAI. iD(% Sd �• t0.•,►"!•, 111Rlt{ AIt PI {A• •A-fi:1 % INC, PLANT SERVING ENGIVIOUAIS ONl3, 301lUA►I, HIO IO STVC:lC,� SND►, tAN1�Y!' t►RgY►R 0R p►3 ({(Y'� / TAURANT, CO(TAIL 10UHG(, PR134T( CLUB. 1M(At(1 AI E SRO( ago;" II!tO 1•{TP, e.•ttL (3[ v11 [. 1(S. \V/ SERVICE Of AutC►(e;tEi, AUTOMOBILE S(►tl(t STA110NS,�p AIRA 10R, uvlti SF ►37Ct (St1e{ISP1t ft 13(: IC IM� HOt(L-LODGES UP 10 ISO UN!, /,11AOIRG ANO R'D)tIMG [ CLLu fjfll, 51131:( AND 1111!1 Sp1. FDR CONDUCT Of ARTS ARO CRAf1S, DERIAL AND IITDICk (CLIN ESpIt Ac`-' 'on (t OR Et OF A1IL 11 as 1b e UP 10 80 FEET. _ Gfu}to 101 ►_� •� BLOCK 2: K CORMEN OP .f N. Va, sE v. OP SECT IDN I LO LO LO' LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT WT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 171 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LD1 ; LOT LOT LOT LOT 7' LOT ; LOT Lot 3 LOT 3 LOT B LCT 3 L2• I LOT Al tot 45 tot w LOT 4I LOT 4e . LOT 69 tot So to' SI It cowato v LOT 52 tog $1 Ty ie�V:Po. Lot 34 . M n1aNR to? 1, \ TOT SI tog 11 LOT 11 c .. I] L / IC' 64f,, T- 3 - tet• Let 1 All a ¢' 113 I t+ WI f 11' 041 [• [• l4ft 5350 East Englewood, April 15, REGISTERED MAiL Nassau Circle CO 80110 1993 Recording Secr^tary Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon P. 0. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Vacant Land - Parcel #2105-013-01-007 Lot 51 Benchmark at Beaver Creek Notice of Public Hearing, April 20, 1993 On behalf of Kent J. Mueller and myself (Richard A. Dines, Trustee) I am hereby registering my protest to the proposed change on Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek aka 0147 Nottingham Road, Avon, Colorado. I feel that a change to commercial usage would devalue my adjacent residential property. I, therefore, request that you deny the proposed change. JAP/j Sincerely,, .J Judith A. Pozelnik Recording Secretary Planning & Zoning Cc.timission Town of Avon Avon Municipal Complex 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81620 Gentlemen: 4260 Broadmoor Bluffs Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80906 April 13, 1993 RECE!VEC APR: TOWN OF AVON RE: Notice of Public Hearing Dated April 6th, 1993 Change and Proposed Use of Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Interesting to note that Mr. Bifani, of Breckenridge, is applying for the same change, on the same lot, that Messrs. Medeiros and Newell applied for on October 6, 1992. According to a letter to me from the Town Clerk of Avon, dated December 9, 1992, their request was approved with conditions. What is the present status of that request? The same reasons as were previously stated would make the proposed use of Lot 4 as a tire shop and car wash totally undesirable. The flow of Buck Creek along Buck Creek Road from the north passes directly through Lot 4. Is it logical to subject the infusion of soapy, dirty water and who knows what else into Buck Creek and finally Nottingham Lake? I'm sure that the owners and managers of the proposed tire shop/car wash will vow that no spillage will occur and that all proper drainage precautions will be taken. One has only to review the number of disastrous oil spills and toxic waste leakages that continue month after month worldwide to evaluate the sincerity of such vows, and the very real liklihood of inadvertent pollution. We understand that new interest has developed in the marketing and sale of residential lots in Wildwood, next to Wiidridge, in Avon. The logical entry road would be Puck Creek Road. Based on the proposed development of Wildwood it klll obviously become a prestigious area. Again, is it logical to allow a tire shop/car wash to be opened directly in front of whit will surely become a. extremely attractive and expensive entry and exit to an area equal in cost and as upscale as the areas in Beaver Creek? • • C7 -2- Ownwers and renters of the townhouses and duplexes along Nottingham Road have taken time, effort and considerable expense to insure that the buildings, landscaping and surrounding_ areas are well maintained in a successful effort to present a good image of Avon residential areas. The encroachment of a tire shop/car wash directly adjacent to this residential area is not a fair response to those owner efforts, not to say what obvious effect it will have on property values. One has only to look at the glaring red roof of the Pizza Hut and the aas station/convenience store on the corner of Nottingham Road to see what a mistake any additional clutter of this type of commercial use would be. One can visualize Nottingham Road becoming a "Gasoline Alley". As President of the River Rock Townhouse Association, I speak for all owners of the River Rock Townhouses who each and collectively voice the same rejection of the proposed use of Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, and respectfully request that the proposed use be denied. Thank you. cc: - Mr. Alfredo Umansky - Mr. Jose Antonio Fernandez - Mr. Jean B. Paciuc - Mr. Alberto Fis - Mr . Gordon Adams Sincerely, William R. Abraham President River Rock Townhouse Assn. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 102, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Mike Bruen 4-Plex Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Mike Bruen is requesting a Final Design Review for a proposed 4 -flex to be constructed on Lot 102, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the north side of Old Trail Road. It is approximately 0.82 acres in size. The lot slopes to the south at about 13 percent.. The zoning is SPA with a 4-plex designation. The proposed 4-plex utilizes a repetitive facade which is given variety with a varied roof form. The structure is three stories tall with garages on the lower floor. Each unit has approximately 2000 square feet of habitable space, not including the attached garages. The structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and setback restrictions. The exterior is predominantly finished in a 'Cape Cod' gray channel lap siding. The garage level on the front elevation and the chimney will be finished in an off white stucco. Window trim will be 1 X 4 material, the facia will be 2 X 10, soffits will be T1-11, all in blue grey. A hip roof with a series of dormers is utilized; Timberline ultra asphalt shingles in the color Weathered wood blend will be used. The landscape plan conforms with the approved guidelines, a drip irrigation system is proposed. The project sign is appropriate for the area. Site lightinq has not been dis::ussed. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforss with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the impprovestent, including typ+ and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed rnd the site upon which it is to be located. ■i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 102, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Mike Bruen 4-Plex Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: These improvements, including materials used, appear to be of a very high quality and are appropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project is well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This is a relatively gentle lot, the proposed improvements have been placed in a sensitive manner and are compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: This is a well designed project t: -%1t should have a positive visual effect as viewed from neighboring properties and public ways. 6.16 - The objective that :jo improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity th?t values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria, if anything, this project will have a positive effect on the area. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in qeneral conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. RYWA ago 10 N. 131 %0: to] 'kI Approval fl• STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 102, Block 1, Wildi:idge Subdivision Mike Bruen 4-Plex Residence 400 Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended/ conditions (� Approved with modified condition( Continue ( ) Denied I ) ) Date c Patti Di Secreta:� \ The Commission granted final design review approval, with the condition of adding half a dozen trees of 1-1/2 to 2 inch caliper, with Staff approval. 33 - 67 V'o 37 36 20 69 69 19 12 n 1a _4 3 LITTLE i0 n2 -OIRT b S ..:.: .. RE CREEK TRAIL BLOCK 2 SHEET a OF 6 1-I 95 °n 56 59 93 62 57 56 71 72 73 60 70 52 51 50 A9 FERRET LAME •B 6; 69 69 ♦7 e7 52 66 •6 63 6! 64 45 44 42 40 *CTE R BLOCK 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 97 93 9. 07 n 06 10 0 9 96 7 91 105 9 ,* `19 90 104 R 5 76, _ 103 ,� TACT R 6 71 \ 0 102 52 3 Sl 0 ` `101 T . 5 50 54 • . o - 3 6 33 Y 34 y 55 S6 1T 2 — / 35 36 A, 37 291 .y/ •5 3920 22 40 26 u ri 22 A3 A \� •2 :• 23 BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 AQ let •.Orr °t rCOU&SO r&# � STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 1 Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Weiland Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Mark Donaldson, architect, representing the Weilands, is proposing a single family residence and caretaker unit on Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, and is requesting final design review approval. Lot 37 is a flag pole lot located near the end of Flat Point Road on the south side of the street. It is 1.13 acres in size and slopes down to the south at approximately 38 percent. Zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. This project received conceptual design review on April 6, 1993. The comments were generally positive, however the owner of the adjacent lot, G.M. Hollingsworth, in a letter, expressed concern over the building height and it's effect on his views. The proposed residence is approximately 3500 square feet in size, and includes an attached two car garage. The structure is a single story, with a walk out basement. The exterior is finished with wood siding with a clear finish, cream colored stucco is used for accent and as the finisa material on the basement level. Stone work is also utilized. Cream colored clad windows will be used. Fascia will be built up from 2x6 and 2x12 cedar with a clear finish, plywood soffits will be painted to match the stucco. The roof form is gabled with dormers on the front and rear elevation. A 3501 asphalt composition will be used to finish the roof, the proposed color is Heather Blend. The proposed landscape plan is adequate, irrigation and site lighting have not been discussed As proposed, the project appears to meet all setback, lot coverage, and height restrictions. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 2 Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Weiland Residence Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materials are being used throughout. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: This is a relatively steep lot, the proposed improvements have been placed in a sensitive manner, the project appears to have been designed with compatibility of the site's steep topography in mind. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: There is not a dominant design theme in this area of Wildridge, this residence should be visually compatible with the neighborhood. Mr. Hollingsworth, the owner of an adjacent lot, Lot 38, is concerned with the effect this structure would have on his views. The adjacent property owner hired a local architectural firr to do a brief study, staff believes the result was that thu neti. structure would have a very minor effect on the views from the existing structure. Mr. Hollingsworth is re^,z4sting that the Weilands reduce the height by 4.5 feet. Staff fees that this is an unreasonable request because: Both the lots existed purchased and built his adjacent lot existed and structure on it. when Hr. Hoilingswory lot, he was aware that the would ultimately have a 2. Zoning allows the Wetlands a maximum hot ht of )51 as proposed the structure is only 22• call an the side that faces the Hollingsworth rovidanco. with a maximum hoight of 32 feet on the opposite aleratloR. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 3 Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Weiland Residence Final Design Review 3. The proposed structure will be visible from the Hollingsworth residence and will encroach into their current view corridor, however, it will not totally block their view. The Weilands could be requesting approval on a structure 13" taller that would totally block the views of the adjacent lot. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Because of the lack of a dominant design theme in the area, staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted guars, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. MUK4193 i 11a 01 a 07A 6 t9i Approval, with the recommendation that system be installed. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner an automatic irrigation "i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 4 Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 0 Weiland Residence Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted (-)` Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) wit ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design approval for Lot 37, Block 3, as submitted, 14D 4M (LUCK 3 EET 2 OF 6 - 50 N3--Tr--TT 1 "\' 2 3 7 J © IL AM 9 9 r AO-NT JUNE '. AE[R TAAq 3 TE BLOCK 2 SHEET 4 OF 6 I ! BLOCK 4 SHEET 3 OF 6 s 6 7 B 9 10 II p i� 1 BS !6 !� !8 !9 S7 1 607 39 •I •1 ! / •7 » . •' sur u Ys w p .o •f � •` •r Ips f r '//.. s FERRET LANE 2 OTE R'06E BLOCK 3 SHEET 6 OF 6 `ter r r0• • To - s I 74 17 too 13 y w_ f ,r s4 M A Y • is A 14 ss f• OF r N � O I "• r� � ! N i ♦ q '( "Y' 00 ft `• + _ ritt�er BLOCK i h .y STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildr.idge Subdivision Toni & Bruce Sindlinger Single-family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Michael Baker, representing the Sindlingers, is requesting Final Design Review for a proposed single-family residence on Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Fox Lane and Saddle Ridge Loop. It is approximately 0.35 acres in size. The lot slopes to the north at about 16 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The proposed structure is a one story with a walk out be.sement. It has approximately 3500 square feet of habitable space, nit including the garage. The structure, as proposed, appears to be within all Town height, lot coverage and setback restrictions. The exterior is predominantly finished in a natural weathered 1 X 6 wood siding, with both horizontal and vertical sections. Door and window trim will be in a 1X cedar with a natural light stain, widows are wood clad. Fascia and soffits will also be done in cedar. Sandstone will be utilized on the lower sections of the walls as an accent. The roof form is a complex combination of gables, dormers and crickets that will be finished with light to medium gray asphalt shingles. At the last design review this Commission was concerned with the complexity of the roof form, the cricket draining to the front door, the lack of a landscape plan, the grades to the front door, and the changing directions of the siding. The roof form has not been changed, it is the form the applicant want and they believe that if ice dams develop that is a maintenance problem they are prepared to deal with. P_ landscape plan has been provided which is appropriate on the east and south elevation, the applicant's intent is to leave the west and north sides of the lot planted in natural grass. The variations in the siding pattern has been simplified. The grades at the front door are slightly over 2:1, which can easily be corrected. The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoninq rode and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. w w..ti r . STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Toni & Bruce Sindlinger Sinale-family Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: As submitted, the proposal corforms with Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulation o the Town comments 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The improvements appear to be suitable to the site and the materials are of a high quality. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: All site impact are contained within the lot, there should be minimal, if any, impacts to adj cent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The improvements appear to be compatible with the site topography, although, the mound at the main entrance seem:. contrived. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements are compatible with the neighboring properties. The roof form is unique to the area, but could still be considered appropriate. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff seer= no conflict with this criteria, 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This project is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town. STAFF RECOMMENDAUOff Staff feels that because the applicant ham responded to the Commissions comments and since they are willing to accept the hiq! maintenance which may accompany their roof design, a recommen!latiar for approval is appropriate. STAF: REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,.pril 20, 1993 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Toni & Bruce Sind:inger Single-family Residence Final Design Revie-. RECOMMENDED ACTION 11. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION A. -proved as submi ted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) drawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design annroval with the condition that the applicant bring back the landscape Plan for another review. LUCK i ET 2 OF 6 58 s3 !2 TI 1> /2 2 22 IJ11 Y\ 33 30 +Z q >H 31 32 31 1 S! 31 31 3! 936 37 53 36 37 30 e 39 20 / 1 6 ! 11 9 Z e 6 1 T>l[ TO 11 \ ! 1 0 i TJ 1 BLOCK 4 SHEET 3 OF 6 s 6 e 9 10 a 12 87 86 e! 8a e3 !9 !e n n 60 70 /9 51 !0 Ie 61 69 68 17 67 J ERRET LAME /-( / ` BLOCK 5 �`' SHEET 6 OF 6 1 SEC. 2 1 ' TE RIDGE t1nor 1 J 1 u 0 > o •) •1 0! f t •t LH1• •464 �> M 101 e f >y rt ss 1o3 6 TRACT R 02 1 W u >J a o ' tt 50 N _ a 454 S d If is v y !! u> _ _ 3 BLOCK 2 51" t � � .19 f TRACT b S •rEE7 t Of 6 3r I rra IrN1 ys z �! l TRACE `• ~ Io ra 1 O 1 17 _r• : • I TRACT I I' •�� I \` 1 _-SEC 2 BLOCK I \ SHEET 5 OF 6 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 1 Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Arthur Farr Single Family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Art Farr is proposing a single family log home on Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision and is requesting final design review approval. Lot 4 is located on the north side of Wildridge Road East, just to the east of Bear Trap Road. The lot is .83 acres in size and slopes down to the south at approximately 20 percent. Zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. At an earlier review the Planning Commission recommended that the applicant add dormers to the front of the bui'ding and clarify the placement of the exterior materials. The applicant has done this and added plant materials per staff's recommendation. The proposed residence is approximately 3300 square feet in size, not including an attached one car garage. The structure is a single story, with a walk out basement and a loft. The exterior is constructed of 8" logs, with off white stucco used as the finish material on the basement level. River rock is utilized on the chimney. Windows would be aluminium clad, doors a metal wrap; both in an adobe brown. Facial would also be brown, soffits will be tongue and groove left natural. The roof form is gabled. The proposed roof material is a 40 year asphalt shingle in coco brown. The proposed landscape plan is adequate, and a drip irrigation system will be utilized. No sod is planned, all disturbed areas will be revegetated with a dryland grass mix. Exterior lights are planned at the exit doors and at the garage door. The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. e Iob STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 2 Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Arthur Farr Single Family Residence Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materials are being used throughout. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The project has been designed with a minimum of grading and site disturbance. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: There is not a dominant design theme in this area of Wildridge, this residence should be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Because of the lack of a dominant design theme in the area, staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. The applicant has responded to all the recommendations of the Commission and staff, we recommend approval. ■ -IN STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 3 Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Arthur Farr Single Family Residence Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued Denied ( ) wi wn ( ) Date Patti. Dixon, Secretary���— The Commission tabled this application in order to give the applicant tune to re -study the concerns voiced by the Commission regarding the window fenestrations and the dormer sizes and placements. ■1p //aoi 7 SHEET 3 OF 6 s 6 26 25 6 I• 63 56 °q •7 7 78 IS •9 90 9 T 64 227 57 °6,: 8 IO II 2 7 , I9 20 2 T 23 29 80 75 26 2D IB ... 22 °3•• B9 ' 33 }0 °2.'COVOTE RIDGE 21 T N BB R ° al 71 3 34 72 °, 55 aT 86 . }8 54 56 Sa 59 B• 83 82 35 57 71 71 9 36 77 S1 •9 A0 70 )3 !T ]2 fl 50 'CE9RET LANE 76 38 39 °a 61 69 69 at a •7 d7 20 T 51 66 3 6 + 5 46 63 65 89 2 j� 6• 9 9 45 ,9 I. 6 4 7 °° • iN i5 70 •x ' •n •I 7 4 41 BLOCK 5 7' 34 !! •0 45 SHEET 6 OF 6 •a d• _ 32 35 •3 la !E •T '0 33 •a 52 90 7 55 IN •pq I9 ]3 2! 54 , ; 92 ;n 93 x• 94 i0T D 26 2 ° 06 10 ce a 96 87 Q5 9 NNE CREE< 93 T2{It `79 . 90 IO• a 3 00 T] �6 99 lo! 6 ,� TRACT A a: 7• n -00 W t 15 9 52 9 3 O 3 ``IOI¢ Itzg • 9 •9 l7 32 j 3• .e 17 a BLOCK 2 ,a 75 3� 7 I\\k' Z . T TR*-'T!t / SHEET a OF 6 37 .a Ss [{ N f9 2a 20 la t as 2 15 1wJIC1 ss O V � •a a0 M I � \ Se•1 f • n 22 3 li 24 23 x 1• a SEC 2 BLOCK SHEET 5 OF 6 r It 11� it ..• •o STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision John Orcutt Final Design Review INTRODUCTION John Orcutt, owner and designer, is requesting a Final Design Review for a proposed duplex residence on Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the east side of Long Spur. It is approximately 0.37 acres in size. The lot slopes down to the southeast at about 10 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex. designation. The proposed duplex in a southwestern design with a 3100 square foot primary unit and a 960 square foot rental apartment. The structure has three levels, the garage and apartment on the lower level, main living area in the middle, and the master suite is on the upper level. The structure, as proposed, is within Town lot coverage, height and setback restrictions. At conceptual review it was suggested that the applicant simplify the parapet walls, the asphalt area were to large, possibly shift the building slightly and supply a color sample. The exterior is predominantly finished in a reddish tan stucco with logs used as accents and window trim. The roof will be flat. Proposed site lighting includes a driveway post light and walkway lighting. The landscaping proposed leaves the rear and sides mostly natural with the front more generously planted. The grading plan submitted indicates all grades are within Town guidelines. Landscaping appears to be adequate and includes a drip irrigation system. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materials are being used throughout. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision John Orcutt Final Design Review COMMENT: The project appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverse site .impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Lot 28 is a relatively flat lot, the project appears to fit the topography. It will require minimal site disturbance and regrading. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: Staff does not see a problem with this criteria. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: The project, as submitted, is neither so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that it would impair monetary or aesthetic values. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. Approval RECOMMENDED 1. ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision John Orcutt Final Design Review + PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) i Continue ( Denied ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary Dam The applicant withdrew t`1s application at this time. LV VfI J ET 2 OF 6 58 53 54 POI T 26 6 63 23 24 64 227 23 22 33 P 4ew � !a 31 Ir YE '.aEE4 TR♦1, lE BLOCK 2 SHEET 4 OF 6 TM 42 7 55 BLOCK 4 SHEET 3 OF 6 95 ga 39 SB 49 60 70 51 SO 48 61 6 47 52 66 46 3 6• 45 44 40 a2 ERRET LAME BLOCK a SHEET 6 OF 6 2 E RIDGE B7 9J /4 94 107 6 n 106 IO e5 B 96 105 9 7 0 1} 104 e 99 Io3 5 TRACT R 100 6 102 4 W 7J 51 52 p 101, ` 72 so s4 c s e 6 49 33 9 p 56 =.., 3 34 7 15 36 .e 3 T TRACT Is 7 47 46 se 69 45 79 2/ 16 5 66 TRACT 67 44 40 26 1 0 f i 41 25 22 Y 43 42 24 2] 2 3A TRACT BLOCK SE' I / SHEET 5 OF 6 411 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 1 • Lot 53, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Larry and Kris Pardee Final Design Review Larry and Kris Pardee are proposing a single family log home on Lot 53, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivisica and are reque:,ting final design review approval. Lot 53 is located on Bear Trap Road and is .72 acres in size. It slopes down to the south at approximately 20%. The lot is zoned PUD with a duplex designation. This project went through conceptual design review on June 16, 1992 and received comments which indicated that with some added interest on the street side the project would be appropriate. The proposed building is two stories high, however, a substantial portion of the lower level is below grade. The maximum building height above finished grade is 291. A two car garage is located on the lower level of the house and is incorporated into the building's overall design. The living area of the residence is approximately 3,000 square feet, including the unfinished basement, but not the garage. A large deck is incorporated along the rear of the structure. Exterior building materials include los and stucco, cedar siding is utilized on the gable ends. The facia, soffits and trim will all be cedar, windows will be wood clad. The applicant will present finished colors at the hearing. The roof form is gabled with dormers, the proposed roofing material is 3 tab asphalt shingles in brown. The landscape plan is adequate and meets the approved design guidelines, a split rail fence is included in the plan. Irrigation and site lighting have not been addressed. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The ccnformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rule; and regulations of the Town of Avon. t• • 4W .L.y P -w STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 2 Lot 53, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Larry and Kris Pardee Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, appear to be appropriate to the neighborhood; staffs only concern is the ;.ype of asphalt shingle, a 300# product should be used. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The Project does not appears to require an unreasonable amount of site disturbance or regrading, the majority of the lot does not require any earth work.. 5.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: There is not a dominant design theme in this area of Wildridge and this Commission has approved log homes in the subdivision previously. This structure's appearance should be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Because of the lack of a dominant design theme in the area, staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This Proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 3 Lot 53, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Larry and Kris Pardee Final Design Review Approval, with the condition that the asphalt roofing material be at least a 300# product, and the recommendation that an automatic irrigation system be installed. RECOMMENDED ACTIO'r 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, t Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions (�3� Continue ( ) Denied ( ) ( ) DateqkUl'Patti DixonX 1-777-, Secretary^`qr� The Commi inn granted final design review approval with the conditions that the 11-1155 he added to the entran a normer and that thpnn5ts supporting the deck be 3 inch Ions, and the roofing material be at least 300a bD yb •9 e6 a) / -_ 2 39 9O i• 6 7 20 57 9 10 D 7 1 19 2 6• 2] 7 17 23 26 •C..�' 60 39 IB 0., . •a 88 7y 26 22 .3 •� 33 +I "O1rOTE RIDGE ;p 21...,. 21 T N BB I 71 3• 32 31 •. yy 87 86 • 3654 59 36 84 63 82 35 57 58 ]I 72 73 9 36 37 S3 .8 60 TO 3T y2 51 50 8 rE.RET LANE 3• . !6 ;y 61 69 6• IT 67 20 ) 52 66 6 ! •= 63 65 6f 2 6. H 9 •'/ Is I, a • 1 .� 3 M •7 •J .1 f6 \ .e �._1, a ay BLOCK 5 .y � •r�. SHEET 6 OF 6 fJ ,Is •7 .f M c 1,10 J2 .• 1J J +• G,fin y f7-09 4 u 0• 10 / N e Zell. Ir •T ��"� re• . �� �r M ICI • ry ri ` ►• 103 6 TRACT R i r .• 77 ,00 I•p r O � 10 ,p f3 >• } 3 • J l FLOCK Z \ !f w /'- (2 A 7 TR4CT N of n • off O •1 n 2J ' •► I& \ TMCT t 7 y •• BLOCK I • • STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Commercial/Industrial Building Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION T. J. Conners and Karl Bell, architect, are requesting a conceptual design review for a proposed 60,000 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road, north of Avon Auto Body and the recently approved Valley Wide Plumbing Building. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lets slopes to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning ?.s IC-Industrial/Commercial. The proposed buildings are four stories high. The exterior finish is metal in a gold color. The buildings utilized a metal mansard roof form finished in brown. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse space, the bottom two level would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. As proposed, the southern ends of the two building exceed the maximum allowed height over existing grade by a few feet, ten feet in from the ends of the buildings they do conform to the height limits. A variance would be required, staff does not see this as a major problem. The applicants would also be seeking a variance from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar variance in the area in the past, staff has had no problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. Other than the height slightly exceeding the maximum and the required parking variance, the project appears to meet Town requirements. STAFF COMMENTS Since this is a conceptual Design Review, recommendation will be provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted Tom Allender Planner no formal staff wq AR. WE 'DA. ME w. LAND USE AND LIVING UNIT DENSITI TRAL - OPEN SPACE AND COIISCRVATIOM TRACT B . OPEN SPACE ANO CONSERVATION TRACT C - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION TRACT D - I-70 R.O.V. EXCEPTION - TRACT E - AVON ROAD R.O.V. TRACT P - AYOM PO4 R.O.V. P I .RACT G - PARR ARC MUNICIPAL. SUBJECT TO AGREEMENT TRACT i - EAGLE AIlEA - DRAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION i I TRACT 11 - TA:LE RIVER - DRAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION TRACT J - OLD RIVER BRIDGE AND CONSERVATION TRACT X - EAGLE RIVER - DPAIXACE USE AND CONSERVATION if TRACT L - EAGLE RIVER - ORAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION I O 50.7 1000 TRACT M - O.R.G.V. RAILROAD R.O.V. EXCEPTION TO PLAT IPACT M - _ U.E. Y. S. D. EXCEPTION TO PIAT SULE I =500 TRACT 0 - U.E.r.S.O. EXCEPt-M- TO PUT TRACT P PARR. CJYERNMENT, RECREATION. EMPLOYEE HOUSING LEGEND TRACT O - S-WIRC CENTER. PHASE 1 TRACT R . SHOPPING CENTER SIGN TRACT S . ACCESS. IRRIGATION DITCH. DRAINAGE. UTILITY II 0 OR� (� . MI MIMUn )S• CURB CUT ACCESS TRACT T • PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE SMEEI j IHRU III TRACT U - PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE 'i TRACT V - PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE BLA! BRASS CAPS TRACT V - ACCESS. DRAINAGE. UTILITY U TRACT X . PRIVATE ACCESS ; u 13 S i°t& Il CCNTU xv.OftT t ' N) I I I I TRACT R I , U.I[• or l,1 i,! sR 'OR.[A a THE I )T v. Orf flCT.ON 7 fH "D or TME - N [w.Re VTME H A I/. or 110ION I f'�• IN.CT 71 N� I I YrLw SII � fR I I O �1 .1.f .T` N r 74 I ` NTI R{Lil M) ROR { B ° w A,` TRACT C L r f 11 17 If N ` 7 � TRA[t 1 ~ Y A NOHAN NOTTION, t {t u 17 {{ y q Na.Mw \ ft 7 TRACT , 45 f CORNER f Mil \ T. j I) u fn�Cr \ / .1 . It » , to \Is wl >o � rT.cT I T•o TR.cr H ,t ,f n34 » i All At >• to N 7 N n TACT u ro ,AYR,RNi-- ` ` . F \ \ CSR Act SHEET INDEX \ R DEFINITIONS I All COP'IRCIAL: THI C"IRCIAI TORI IS INTENDED To PROVIDE FOR THE BROAD It RANG( OF (Ct (Rl1AL OPERA';MS W SERVICES AIQUTAED FOR THE PRDrER APO \ 1f EONVLRIENT rUNC11041%C Or CCP,RER;RAL EWERS SIRVUC LAR'.( ARDS OF IN( CD,,Ti� `•` �E r '-w Lot tut .t.t VS[S PIRHI^•I] ARE IR'LND(D 10 INCLUDE All RCTA1l A%3SCfT1EE pPERAiIONS. 1RClu01RG / III \� ••. (1 BV* NOT 'LIMITED TO IH[ FOLLOW AF._ Ln101(Sal[ AR: RETAIL IS1AbC 1Slw(RT, IN_1u01TG WE OF \� STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Lot 98, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Samuel and Lisa Sterling Duplex Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION The Sterlings are requesting a Conceptual Design Review for a proposed duplex residence on Lot 98, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the north side of Old Trail Road. It is approximately 0.43 acres in size. The lot slopes down to the south at about 22 percent. The zoning is SPA with a duplex designation. Both units share the same floor plant but by turning the structure 90 degrees at the party wall and varying the roof line, a true mirror image is avoided. The structure is two stories high with a walk out basement. It has approximately 1850 square feet of habitable space per side, not including the attached garages. The structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and setback restrictions. The exterior is predominantly finished in an Omega Chenille stucco. Window trim will be 2 X 10 and 2 X 6 rough sawn cedar, door trim will be 2 X 6 RS cedar, the fas cia will be 2 X 10 RS cedar, all with a Cedar Tone stain; soffits will be natural 3/8 fir. The roof form is a gable with some dormers utilized, it will be finished with Heritage II Asphalt Composition shingle in a Rustic Redwood. The landscape plan appears adequate, however, the grades on the driveway seem to exceed 10%. STAFF COMl:,�NTS Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, recommendation will be provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application Applicant Presentation Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted Tom Allender Planner no formal staff 3LUCK 3 EET 2 OF 56 53 52 TI s. 2 } Ti 54 BLOCK 4 SI � vol T SHEET 3 OF 6 265 6 55 50 63 25 6 56 49 aB al° 7 24 5) 90 B 64 27 46 9 10 II 12 23 28 4y 22 29 .4 a3 89 33 30 - 42 21 31 N BB 4 34 g 4. 75 07 66 36 36 65 94 03 e 54 79 35 57 58 71 72 9 J6 37 53 60 70 73 36 ]7 38 52 51 4B 50 48 ' J9 61 69 68 B 47 67 62 66 69 3 6 5 -.. 46 63 65 19 9 2 64 19 1 16 ' 45 4 \ TTL[ 5 POMT 76 47 - 44 42 / x7 Jf 5J 74 / 7 T • 4't`` . 2 2S x9 JUNE :Rtt4 T*6q 4 a: 1 ! Tl s4 BLOCK 2 / SHEET 4 OF 6 7ERRE7 LANE BLOCK 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 :2 2 2' TE RIDGE _4E" 26 07 '• 9! 94 107 95 106 es 10 0 10] 9 7 O 9 \7f 9e 104 6 16 ` 10J eo 79 � 99 6 , TRACT R 4 100 102 W r5 � 73 y o 51 p 0 O 4 70 54 H 39 )2 1 59 2', 7 d !4 7 1s 1 - !S X Tr4L'T !! 46 69 45 5f 2 z0 '63 n 9 N iT 61 H 40 26 1 0 11 25 22 \ _ Se 43 !1 47 24 23 � ~ TRACT BLOCK I SEC 2 SHEET 5 OF 6 i 41 A. .14 b _,4 ISTAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 1 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Anointed Christian Fellowship Church Conceptual Design Review Erwin Bachrach, representing the Anointed Christioan Fellowship Church is requesting a second conceptual design review for a proposed church and parsonage on Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. The lot is a one-half acre in size and is zoned Residential Low Density; it is located on the north side of Nottingham Road. The lot is bordered by Town of Avon owned open space tracts on the east and north sides, and by the A -Y Townhomes on the west side. In May of 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Special Review Use for a church and parsonage to be located on this lot. The conditions of that approval were as follows: 1. The property be limited to uses typically associated with church activities ( i.e. weekend services, Sunday school, weddings). Any expansion of use beyond that disc.issed at the meeting (i.e. provisions of community day care, rental of fellowship hall to other croups and organizations, etc.) must be brought back to the Commission for further review. 2. No external noise making devices will be allowed (bells, speakers, etc.) and internal noise volume should be kept to a level compatible with surrounding properties. The proposed development consists of an approximate 5235 square foot church and a 4600 square foot parsonage. The church is a two level structure with a fellowship hall, three classrooms, and a kitchen on the lower level and a 1450 square foot sanctuary, two counseling rooms, nursery, and a pastor's office on the upper level. The parsonage consists of a three story, five bedroom, three and one-half bath dwelling unit with an oversized two car garage. A landscape plan has not been included in this submittal. The preliminary grading plan indicates 44 parking space, including 2 n the parsonage garage. The seating in the sanctuary requires 42 spaces, the dwelling requires 3, and the remaining uses on the lower level of the church could require an additional 8 spaces. Staff feels that the specific parking requirements of this project needs further explanation relative to the function of the buildings, i.e. are the fellowship hall and the sanctuary ever in use at the same time? a a• STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 2 Lot 45, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Anointed Christian Fellowship Church Conceptual Design Review The church building utilizes a combination of grey stucco and vertical T&G cedar siding, also in gray. Fascia will be 2 X 12 cedar, soffits will be wafer board, both with a blue gray finish. The roof form is an offset gable with a central dormer. The proposed roof material is a light blue metal. The parsonage uses the same exterior finishes as the church. It also has a gable roof form and has two dormers on the street elevation. The buildings appear to be within all Town setback, heic;ht, and lot coverage restrictions, a question does remain concerning parking. The special Review Use was approved, in part, because of a dense landscape treatsrsnt buffering the arsonaqe and church from the adjacent townhouse project. At finJ design review staff expects to see such a treatsent. As hole is ,% conceptual review, staff has no formal consents or recammrndation and no forsal action will be taken at this time. W i. tntroduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 1< Comisaion Review and discussion 86100CtfullT submitted. Ay� r�_ -- '+9ss A� iiru4c f l saftet 71 J. MAP CAS:.,-DRANER lB rtAI wM:.NU4ENT NO. 3, C CORNER DP THE MN 4, ME Ut- SCRIOII t I I I I I0 S00 1000 12�I SCALE 1 700 LEGEND IQ OR -1 . +r41 +UM 7S' CURB Cut ACCESS 7 iHRU 81 I BLU BRASS CAPS I �Anu uSE AND LIVING UNIT DEN; TRACT F - OIER $PALL AMO CONSC 0.VA TION TRACT t - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION TRACT C - OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION TRACT 0 - 1.70 A.D.V. EXCEPTION i RACT C - AVON OWA, O.W. TRACT i - AID, PO.;C. R.O.Y, :TACT G - PAR' ANC MUNICIPAL • SUBJECT TO AGREEMENT TRACT N - EAGLE RIVER . ORAINACE USE AND CONSERVATIOI TRACT '1 "S'E RIVER - DRAINAGE USE AND COM$ERYATI OM TRACT J - OLD RIVER BRIDLE AND CONSERVATION TRACT R EAGLE RIVER • DRAINAGE USE AND CONSERVATION TRACT L - EAGLE RIVER - DRAINAGE USE AND COMSERVATION TRACT M . D.R.G.V. RAILROAD R.O.W. EXCEPTION TO PLAT TRACT N . U.E.V.S.I TXCEPT ION TO PLAT TRACT 0 - U.E.V.S.D. EKCt`r10N TO Pt AT TRACT P - PARR, GOV[ANMENT, RECREATION. EMPLOYEE MO S TRACT D - SHDPPIRC CENTER • PHASE 1 U TRACT A - SHOPPING (EMTER SICN TRACT I - ACCESS. IRRIGATION DITCH. DRAINAGE, UTILITY TRACT T PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE TRACT U - PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE ':ACTTRACT V PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE V - ACCESS, DRAINAGE, UTILITY TRACT I PAIYATC ACCESS -- N ART SHEET INDEX\, DjVi TIONS r \ �� : P►IR -14 1'I ; Tru 70K IS f•Tf M?(0 10 "OrICE FOR THE 11040 _ . AV S11R Ir rt .I� I.,.. — - - _. I I T•ACi • I ♦ I` a 9 St ROD • I � SS $3 •L TMAR D I S IIMgT 1 Nprliftemul (IA. ♦r II u Rptiw N COM+IR SRR TON CENTER x""', n » I THAN' 1.4 14 w •oM. R Cr.1 •tt 11 O. d 1"( I I I I S• .r• pi T O U T rHM slo'cMr M!C2N./Rdw 1 I I a ifc�� Net, • h N ART SHEET INDEX\, DjVi TIONS r \ �� : P►IR -14 1'I ; Tru 70K IS f•Tf M?(0 10 "OrICE FOR THE 11040 _ . AV S11R Ir rt .I� I.,.. — - - _. I I T•ACi • I ♦ I` a 9 St ROD • I � SS $3 •L TMAR D I S IIMgT 1 Nprliftemul (IA. ♦r II u Rptiw N COM+IR SRR TON n » n » O U •a I 1 M • � ••1 •R YrI rO •p• h Y • • T•Act r q SD 1 1 • \ a � �L •/ n r \ r I • \ • P h'` tnRC1 r i P I '• I• I ••at IT •/ P 44 V 31 be I hK/ 1 •� •. r♦ �, ® • ♦ P RB � •T• _ • L ITS ........M t _1• vs." • 1 p- �•� � 11 10 e N ART SHEET INDEX\, DjVi TIONS r \ �� : P►IR -14 1'I ; Tru 70K IS f•Tf M?(0 10 "OrICE FOR THE 11040 _ . AV S11R Ir rt .I� I.,.. — - - _. I I T•ACi • I ♦ I` a 9 St ROD • I � SS $3 •L TMAR D I S IIMgT 1 Nprliftemul (IA. ♦r II u Rptiw N COM+IR SRR TON n » n » O U TRW 1 A T MAC t M • h Y SHE 7w BLOCK 1: LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT T LOT LOT l OT ING BLDCX 7: L:' I- LDr 1 AE CORRA• LOT I 01 l01 1 +E M. y♦. !1 IH OP LOT 1 SICTI ON to I LOT I COT I LOT P 13T 71 LOT 7 LOT 7! LOT 26 TOT 77 IOT 71 LOT 7S LOT g LO' LO' !: LCT )S LOT !) LOT )A LOT )6 Lot -1 lot LOT t. LOT .. LOT LOT •: LOT LOT 46 LOT 49 LOT SO Lot S[ IL CORN44 d LOT S7 i LOT 1 M It .14 Or LOT $4 1', >e alar LOT SS. \ LOT S7 I: LOT S^. C Lot $1 G \ `VT 60 H 7t OT 61 C lol 67 C LCr 67 C LOT 6+ C LOr 65. ' / LOT 67. lOi /0, IL �i I LOT 1 CON j LOT 7 CON lcr ) GEN • / LOT 4 GEN:' LOT S GENII t0T 6 CC NII 4 Ri " � Aad r STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 s Mountain Star Limited Liability Company Swift Gulch Borrow Site Final Design Review Mountain Star Limited Liability Company, the developers of the proposed Mountain Star Subdivision would like to take fill from the Swift Gulch parcel to aid in the construction of Buck Creek Road. As a grading and excavation project, this falls within the purview of the design review process. Section 1.20 of the Design Guidelines states "The Commission shall review and act upon the general design and appearance of any building, construction, paving, grading or landscaping proposed on any lot or parcel of land within the Town. The placement of the fill has been reviewed in conjunction with the Buck Creek Road plans. The issue for Commission review is the regrading, shaping and revegetation of the Swift Gulch site. There is precedence for utilizing Swift Gulch as a borrow site. The portion of Buck Creek Road tnat is already graded was built with fill from Swift Gulch. The proposed operation would remove approximately 90,000 cubic yards of material. All topsoil would be stockpiled and upon completion of the borrow, would be placed and shaped and reseeded with a Rocky Mountain Biosol native seed mix. The applicant will commit to watering as necessary to ensure complete revegetation. Water diversion ditches and sediment control devices will be constructed to ensure erosion control and maintain local water quality. The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION r April 20, 1993 Page 2 Mountain Star Limited Liability Company Swift Gulch Borrow Site Final Design Review 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This project will be completed in conformance with all Town of Avon regulations. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The revegetation plan will be compatible with the surrounding area. 6 13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties COMMENT. During construction of the project there will be visual impacts, upon completion there will be no impact to adjacent public or private properties. 6� - The compatibility of the proH-)sed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: Excavation has been limited to the toe of two hillsides which currently fade from a natural 2 1 slope to the relatively flat valley floor. The regrading plan will have the borrow area match the adjacent hillside contours at a 2:1 slope. 6 l S - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: Upon completion of revegetation, the site will not present any negative visual appearance. The regrading plan matches the existing contours very well and should present a natural appearance. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 3 Mountain Star Limited Liability Company Swift Gulch Borrow Site Final Design Review 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Not applicable 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This project is in conformance with the adopted Goals,Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff generally discourages borrow and fill operations within the Town, but due to the nature and design of this request, the recommendation is for approval. The majority of borrow/fill requests we see are located in established residential areas and are deals made in anticipation of future home construction. This generally creates an unnatural and disturbed situation on a small residential lot and has negative visual impacts upon neighbors. This request is of larger scale and is not made in anticipation of future construction in Swift Gulch. Buck Creek Road will require a great deal of fill and Swift Gulch presents an ideal borrow site. It is very close, eliminating any truck traffic through residential neighborhoods. There are no neighbors who will be impacted, either short or long term, and the regrading and revegetation plans do not leave any negative appearance on the site. a STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 4 Mountain Star Limited Liability Company Swift Gulch Borrow Site Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted, ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified condition ( ) Continued ( led ( ) Withdrawn ( ) DatePatti Dixon, Secretary The Commission granted final design review apt roval to the Mountain Star Limited Liability Company for the Swift Gulch borrow. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Avon Metropolitan District Water System Pump Stations Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Lot I, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design Review INTRODUCTION The Avon Metropolitan District is undertaking a major improvement project for the Wildridge water distribution system. The current system is fed by a pump station approximately half -way up Metcalf Road. There is an intermediate tank and pump station in Block 4 and an additional tank above the subdivision. In order to fill this tanks, the Metcalf Road pump station must create pressures that are causing undue maintenance problems to the system. New water tanks and pump stations have been designed into the existing system. these will be located on Tract C, Block 1, adjacent to the fire station, and on Lot 1 of Block 5. The tanks and all pump equipment will be located underground. The only visible improvements will be concrete wing walls, a timber retaining wall, an entry door, and a driveway/parking area. The concrete will be sandblasted and stained with a semitransparent Tammstech concrete aquastain in a salmon color. A landscape plan has been included with each site. A 4 foot high chain link fence will be located at the edge of the retaining wall for safety purposes. The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This project is a utility installation and is not subject to setback provisions. All other aspects of the project are in conformance with the Zoning Code. i0 ,-%N 1"1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 1993 Page 2 Avon Metropolitan District Water System Pump Stations Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Lot 1, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design Review 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The improvements have been designed to minimize their impact upon the environment and the neighborhood. Several different design scenarios have been investigated and the underground approach appears to be the most sensitive to the local area. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The design for each site minimizes impacts to the adjacent land. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The designs are very compatible with site topography. 6,15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENT: The visual appearance of these structures is minimal. ¢.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENT: Not applicable 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goak, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This project is in conformance with the adopted Goals,Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. to �N ,..) STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Apri120, 1993 Page 3 s Avon Metropolitan District Water System Pump Systems Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Lot 1, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for approval as submitted. RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfull bmittedlI, � CtC�I�'� Rick Pylman Director of Community Development PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as Submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions (—� Approved with modified condition ( ) Continued a d ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon, Secretary SEE ATTACHED SHEET Avon MetropoIitan District Water System Pump Stations, Tract C, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision, Final Design Review I• The Commission granted final design approval, with the following conditions: 0 1. The color for both be the salnon, in the aquastain. 2. The chain link fence be deleted, and the split rail wood fence of the park be integrated into the plan. 3. The northern most wing wall be redesigned to become an entry statement for the Wildridge Subdivision and signaqe be included on the wall. 4. The lighting for the pump station on Tract C, Block 1, be minimized and directed doom. 5. The sign be lit at night. 0