Loading...
PZC Packet 040693STAFF REPORT TO THE '� April 6, 1993 Page 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION S' Denny's Restaurant Lot 2/4 Sunroad Subdivision Mr. Doug Dowd Design Change Request s On January 19, 1993, Doug Dowd requested approval for a modification in the approved plans for the Denny's on Lot 2/4 Sunroad Subdivision. He wished to substitute a 12x12 post for the diagonal wall at the entrance. At that hearing this Commission tabled the application until a better solution could be provided. The applicant in now proposing to replace the approved, but never built, diagonal wall at the entrance with a corner wall which would mimic the northwest and southeast corners of the building. The wall's dimensions would be the same as those corners and the walls between the southern windows. Staff feels that this is a good design solution, it responds to the existinq architecture as well as the concerns of the Planning Commission and the applicant. Staff recommends approval. RECOMMENDED 1. A TION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Cooission Action Respectfully submitted, �l l Tori Allender Planner [• [ • lr STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 2 Denny's Restaurant Lot 2/4 Sunroad Subdivision Mr. Doug Dowd Design Change Request PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti The Commission rfranted approval for the requestadchange to the entrance Post as submitted_ No is so -1, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 1 Lot 50, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Robert Lundell Final Design Review/Roofing Material POUVIts) •� This project went through conceptual design review on August 7, 1992 and final design review on March 1993. Final Design was approved with the condition that a roof material that conforms to the guidelines be presented to the Commission. Robert Lundell, architect and owner of Lot 50, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision is requesting final design review approval for the metal roof material. The proposed material is a 24 gage metal roof system by Berridge Manufacturing Co. finished in a dark green. Applicant will have a sample at the hearing. Refer to "M" Panel on attached specification sheet. STAFF COMMENTS This roofing material meets the criteria established by this Commission. Approval RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner [• [• l4w STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1997 Page 2 Lot 50, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Robert Lundell Final Design Review/Roofing Material PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Patti Dixon. SO-rli'pterv_ The Commissioh granted approval for the requested metal roof material, citing the location of the roject and the small area to be covered by the metal roof as the determining factor Berridge "R" Panel Prefinished or bare metal roof, wall, soffit, fascia, mansard, liner or equipment screen panel • U.L. 90 approved • Spans over open purlins 3 SPACES '@ 12" = 3E" NET COVERAGE 12" 1. 3/4" 1 1/4" y, 4• 4' OVER._ 381/4" OVERALL WIDTH SPECIFICATIONS Furnish an0 install Berrage 'R- Panel as marutacturea by BerrOge Marufa .. irng Company. Houston. Texas. MANUFACTURE '^rmed i^ sorunuous 'ergths !maximum SI)' ... .. .:.- .,::,—Ienaoter s LaboratoN Label UL 3C ..30. 79. aro tot. MATERIAL AND FINISH ;e 391 Berridge "M" Panel Prefinished or bare metal roof, wall, soffit, fascia, mansard, liner or equipment screen panel • Wide, 3 -foot coverage • Spans over open purlins e SPACES 06' = 36' NET COVERAGE 6. 3 1/2'- - 31 2' 38 V4' OVERALL WIDTH SPECIFICATIONS MANUFACTURE MATERIAL AND FINI$H Rye/sg Disttrlcliat Berridge Manufacturing Co. SECTION PROPERTIES BASED ON 24 GAUGE 40 K.S.I. "R" PANEL DL,(In.4/ft.) MA(ft.lbs./ft.) VA(lbs.) POSITIVE BENDING -'3 860 NEGATIVE BENDING II ?60 RECOMMENDED LOAD IN POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT Panel Weight = 1.3 p.s.f. SPAN NET VERTICAL LIVE LOAD NET VERTICAL WIND LOAD IFeet7 I SPAN 2 -SPAN 3 -SPAN 1 -SPAN 2 -SPAN 3 -SPAN NOTES: SECTION PROPERTIES BASED ON 24 GAUGE 40 K S 1. "M"PANEL DL.(In.' III) MA(n-lbs., tl) VAilbs.l PCY nVT B[NO�Nu RECOMMENDED LOAD IN POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT Panel Weight : 1 3 p s i '! . afts -kU% r. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Toni & Bruce Sindlinger Single-family Residence Final Design Review INTRODUCTION Michael Baker, representing the Sindlinyers, is requesting Final Design Review for a proposed single-family residence on Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Fox Lane and Saddle Ridge Loop. It is approximately 0.35 acres in size. The lot slopes to the north at about 16 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The proposed structure is a one story with a walk out basement. It has approximately 3500 square feet of habitable space, not including the garage. The structure, as proposed, appears to be within all Town height, lot coverage and setback res:.:ictions. The exterior is predominantly finished in a natural weathered 1 X 6 wood siding, with both horizontal and vertical sections. Door and window trim will be in a 1X cedar with a natural light stain, widows are wood clad. Fascia and soffits will also be done in cedar. Sandstone will be utilized on the lower sections of the walls as an accent. The roof form is a complex combination of gables, dormers and crickets that will be finished with light to medium gray asphalt shingles. At the conceptuf.1 design review this Commission was concerned with the complexity of the roof form, the cricket draining to the front door the randomness of the stone work, and the lack of a landscape plan. The roof form has been changed slightly and the stone work is more regular. A model of the roof will be available at the hearing. The applicant's intent is to leave the vast majority of the lot planted in natural grass with one small area of sod and another area marked on the grading plan " ..area to be planted with evergreens and drought tolerant trees..." This is unacceptable. The driveway grades are acceptable, the driveway will be paved. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider design of proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance applicable rules and regulations the following items in reviewing the with the Zoning Code and other of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: As submitted, the proposal conforms with Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulation of the Town comments 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. • STAFFREPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 58, Bloch 1, Wildridqe Subdivision Toni & Bruce Sindl.inger Single-family Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: The improvements appear to be suitable to the site and the materials are of a high quality. Staff is concerned with the lack of landscape improvements. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impact= to adjacent properties. COMMENT: All site impact are contained within the lot, minimizing impacts to adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The improvements appear to be compatible with the site topography, although, the mound at the main entrance seems contrived. 6.15 - The visuai appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The visual appearance of the proposed improvements are compatible with the neighboring properties, however staff is concerned with the lack of landscape materials. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This project is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is a little concerned with the roof form, but would still recommend approval for the bu d ding, with the conditions that: 1. The applicant submit a new landscape plan to the Commission for final design review. [• [l• itD STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 ob Lot 58, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Toni & Bruce Sindlinger Single-family Residence Final Design Review 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, J Tom Allender Planner JLjINQ AND ZONING ACTION Approved as r:ubmitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Da xon, The Comnis$ion tabled this ipplication, citing the following concerns: Roof forms Sita yradinq 5iging direction Landscaping The need to provide color and material samples to 3 OF 6 53 52 TI 3 T `' BLOCK 4 9 sl SHEET 3 OF 6 s 13 26 55 s0 6 _ 257 7e 63 56 49 46 41:.'. 6 7 29 57 46 90 9 10 II i2 7 7 a 27 IND 23 26 45,. e0 Li 29 99. 75 LL�� 22 93 99 33 30 42 - 98 R A 74 T N 34 72 j1 4. 55 B7 96 95 56 e4 9] 92 F .........,.:.,. 3e S4 Se !9 71 72 � 37 73 IO 9 36 37 S3 49 60 FERRET UNE 37 3e 52 51 S0 46 61 69 69 36 39 e 47 67 62 66 SEC 20 46 63 3 •" 6] 69 9 9 2 45 e I, 16 • 93 as 47 -.TTOL Y• u TO 42 4n 0 3 S n 41 . 0 ' 4 BLOCK 5 !1 40 •! SHEET 6 OF 6 38 39 46 34 52 35 47 34 56 33 4e 52 90 55 i' -09 54 9 n - !7 9] _ . 6 i07 n 25 26 95 106 10 0 e5 a 96 97 IOS 9 7 R 11T JUNE TRAIL r�+►er RR0.! � � \ 90 10• e ;� TRAIL `79 � 5 T6' 99 103 6 1 e0 75 77 \ 100 74 et a 102 3 53o 4 y IF S0 6 ! TC • j4 ` of O 235 32 5 34 1e I Z ss sc 3 ` 7 TRACT h ` BLOCK 2 .e 37 2' / SHEET 4 OF 6 u 193s .c 2e 6f 45 3f 20 2 15 0 . 0.6 44 40 26 I 67 r 41 25 4S 10 — ! 5° .: 2.23 ,. riucrr o SEC 2 I BLOCK I SHEET 5 OF 6 a1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 1 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Cieek Shapiro Development Final Design Review Ken Shapiro of Shapiro Development Co. is requesting Final Design Review for a two story, 10,000 square foot commercial/office building on Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Lot 55 is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Avon Road and Beaver Creek Boulevard, the zoning is Town Center. In the Town Center Zone the allowed building height is 80 feet, allowed uses include commercial, restaurant, office and residential uses. Allowed residential density is 20 dwelling units or 60 accommodation units. The proposed building utilizes a hip roof form with a central cupola. The roof will be standing seam metal, finished in a patina green. Off white/light cream stucco will be the exterior finish with metal doors and storefront windows, window glass will be light green. Exterior metal trim will be painted to match the roof. Interior spaces will be created and finished by future tenants. The building will be approximately 45 feet tall. The landscape plan is adequate and includes an automatic irrigation system. The applicant has committed to, and the site Plans reflect landscape improvements along Reaver Creek Boulevard in compliance with the Town of Avon Streetscape program. The majority of the existing trees will be removed and relocated on the site. The landscape wall at the intersection will be modified to allow pedestrian access to the site. Site lighting is provided by a number of recessed lighting discs incorporated into the exterior of the building. The site plan indicates 30 outside parking spaces and 15 structured spaces. This meets the Town parking requirements under the mixed use standard; the criteria of 75 spaces was met through a parking agreement with the Avon Center. The snow storage provided meets the Town's requirement. Staffs only concern with this proposal is the lack of an entrance on the northeast elevation of the building. Future tenants would be allowed to add entrances to the pedestrian sides of the building. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 2 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Shapiro Development Final Design Review The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the `town of Avon. COMMENT: As proposed, the project is in conformance with the Zoning Code, the Town Streetscape Plan, the Town Center/Commercial Core Design Guidelines and other rules and regulations, including height, site coverage, landscaping, parking, and snow storage. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: The improvements including the materials of which it is to be constructed are appropriate to the site and conform to the Town Center/Commercial Core Design Guidelines adopted by the Town in September of 1992. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: As proposed, some site grading will be required on the adjacent lot, Lot 56. The applicant is working on an agreement with that owner to allow the off site grading. Otherwise, there are minimal impacts to adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The design is compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. CONVENTS: Staff feels that this project will visually enhance the surrounding area. Placing it in the foreground of the Avon Center will lessen the severe verticality of that structure as viewed from Avon Road. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 3 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Shapiro Dev.lopment Final Design Review 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that vzlues, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town cf Avon. COMMENTS: As proposed, the project is in conformance with all of the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon with the possible exception of the Design Guidelines which are specific in that Lot 55 should "provide for pedestrian connection between Transit Center and the Avon Road/Beaver Creek Blvd. intersection." Staff feels, and the Planning Commission discussed at Conceptual Review, that a door on the intersection side of the structure would enhance the circulation for the structure, provide an attractive pedestrian entrance statement and a pedestrian connection to the Transit Center. The building, however has no common space, a door in this location may be installed by a future tenant. Staff recommends approval of this commercial building on Lot 55 with the understanding that the off site grading and or the construction staging will not take place without an agreement in place with the owners of Lot 56. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner t. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 4 Lot 55, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek 0 Shapiro Development Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Lin The Comfiission granted final design approval with the condition that the off site grad -ng and or Che' -construction staging will not take place without an agreement in place with the owners of Lot 56. 40 :C 4r p.A 7abl, STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNINC AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek !401 Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review . 11® INTRODUCTION Dough DeChant of Shepherd Construction Resources and Mike Etem of Valley Wide Plumbing on behalf of Thomas S. D'Agostino of Valley Wide Plumbing are requesting final design review for a proposed 18,000 square foot commercial/industrial building on Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. The zoning is IC-Industrial/Commercial. This application was denied on March 16, 1993. The exterior of the building has since been redesigned. The proposed building is a two story, 27 foot high metal, Butler type building. The exterior is finished in canyon gray with a redrock colored stucco band wrapping around the building. The stucco band varies in height, it goes over the windows, drops to the top of the "eye brows" over the doors, then rises over the garage doors. The garage doors are finished in the same color as the stucco and have exterior lights above them behind canyon gray fixtures. Horizontal sun shades have been added above the windows as an accent. The sun shades above the windows are also use south elevation, exposed concrete on the north and south elevation will be colored to match the stucco. A security fence is proposed across the center of the parking area, the color of which has not been specified. A minimum of 20 percent of the lot must be dedicated to landscaping. The applicant has provided approximately 21 percent on site, but intends to landscape a portion of the ROW between Metcalf Road and their lot line. As proposed the project meets all Town setbacks, lot coverage, and heiqht restriction. The parking provided exceeds Town requirements. The original parking plan submitted had parking abutting the front property line, which required a variance. A variance was applied for, denied, appealed, and the denial was upheld. The revised parkinqplan still proposes to pave to the lot line but moves the parking into the lot by 24 feet. Visually this should be acceptable due to the absence of parked vehicles at the property line, the grade separation between the Road and the parking area, and the landscaping adjacent to the property line. Lighting would be from 3 high pressure sodium fixtures placed in the parking area. A Valley wide Plumbing sign will be incorporated into the "eye brow" above the main entrance. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION En April 6, 1993 Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek 01 Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review � s STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal appears to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood and in some ways will enhance the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties and retains the access necessary to adjacent lots. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: As submitted, the project is compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. As proposed the building will improv_ the appearance of the area. Paving to the property line should be visually acceptable due to the absence of parked vehicles at the property line, the grade separation between the Road and the parkinq area, and the landscaping adjacent to the property line. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. .• l• = STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek • Commercial/Industrial Building Final Design Review COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. r STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) hate _ The Lor. Dixon, adopted insioh granted final design approvaT, contingent upon samples for the security fence being brought back at a later date. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 1 North Court Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mr. Mark Donaldson Final Design Review Mr. Mark Donaldson for Mr. Bruce Allen is requesting final design approval for a 7000 square foot commercial building. The project is the proposed North Court on Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek; on Beaver Creek Place, between the Medical Center and Buck Creek Plaza. North Court was originally submitted in 1990 and received Final Design Review approval, with conditions, on March 6, 1990. Conditions were met on March 20, 1990. That approval has expired. This application is the same as the one expired other than a request to change the gabled roof form and add an overhang with columns to the front facade, covering the store fronts. The roof form is a long ridge with hips on the ends. The rear of the roof is flat. A dark blue standing seam metal roofing material will be used. The Design Guidelines adopted in September of 1992, refer specifically to roof for^. It says, Roof forms are strong determinants of architectural style. Due to climatic conditions, roof forms should be kept simple, with pitches limited to 6:12 to 12:12 for sloped roofs. Flat roofs are discouraged except for limited roof areas, for the location of concealed mechanical equipment, or for architectural effect. This changed roof form appears to meet this criteria. The sides and rear elevations are an off white stucco. The faces of the support column for the overhang will be beige. Color samples will be presented at the hearing. The front of the building utilizes a black anodized storefront system. The site planning responds to the site and the use eery well, the land scope plan is also acceptable. Parking, snow storage, lot coverage, and access are all within Town requirements. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 r Page 2 North Court Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mr. Mark Donaldson Final Design Review STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal appears to be in conformance with the 'Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: As submitted, the project is compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed itsprovements with the adopted Goals, Polices and Programs of the Town of Avon. aSTAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 3 • North Court Lot 71, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mr. Mark Donaldson Final Design Review COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff feels that the site planning, landscaping, and parking are all appropriate, and that the changes to the building are also appropriate. Staff recommends approval of this application. 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Ts� d� er Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date—Patti DAxon, Secretary 2, l The C&eissien granted final Resign approval` submitted: [ O [ es STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 1 Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Weiland Residence Final Design Review Mark Donaldson, archite,7t representing the Weilands, is proposing a single family residence with a caretaker unit on Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridqe Subdivision and are requesting final design review approval. Lot 37 is a flag pole lot located near the end of Flat Point Road on the south side of the street. It is 1.13 acres in size and slopes down to the south at approximately 38 percent. Zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. This project has not gone through conceptual design review. Thepreposed residence is approximately 3500 square feet in size, and includes an attached two car garage. The structure is a single story, with a walk out basement. The exterior is finished with wood siding with a clear finish, off white stucco is used for accent and as the finish material on the basement level. Stone work is also utilized. Off white clad windows will be used. Fascia will be built up from 2x6 and 2x12 cedar with a clear finish, plywood soffits will be painted to match the stucco. The roof form is gabled with dormers on the front and rear elevation. A 350/ asphalt composition will be used to finish the roof, color has not been specified. The proposed landscape plan is adequate, irrigation and site lighting has not been discussed As proposed, the prujc^t appears to meet all setback, lot coverage, and height restrictions. The CY+mission &hall consider the following items in reviewing the dfeign of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COINk1ff': This proposal conforms with the 'Zoning Code and all othar applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.17 - The suitability of the i■pprovement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the upon which it is to be located. r STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 2 Lot 37, Block 3, wildridge Subdivision Weiland Residsancs3 Final Desiqr Review COMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materiels: are be nq used throughout. 4.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site lopects to adjacent properties. CgMIXT: The project: appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverso site Impacts on adjacent pro"rttea. 6.14 - The c=spatibiilty of the proposed improvement with site totoprephy. . tt�I�fsflTz Tble is a relatively atewq lot, the PVOVosod l m ra+r,sNsittta Mw be" p l aced In a sena 1 t i ve manner. the project weer e to Kewo tsmelr deas i rnerd with c>ctiftpa t i is i l l t y of the site," steep taspergl e4d" i r It ^*A . • p:sysl appeeroa�c.4, Of awry proposed Ifre way* rirg tmxptt1s 6ed pwi w It anM1 ss . rtVsmTV-- t' Wim, is O*tK a drnairant *seig" thoer in this are* 04 06$410444w. thts teetam* w eArrtiwId to vlse►si is rc:.s6 Vr tbiw With tsae ..e i areal s t 1 11Nw as i s re t h*1 aw 401ALr "Vemsr t M e0 *jolter ROf 4 i sr «a c we w �s N1 maul s 46 1#04 • i r t e : t y t dem t "I we , 000e4t4*r y se ere t 1hNi , •: e t i i ti ' mrlr 4 + w4 e x V10WW !°4 1ro.aeras w4 t .ler a •: a 04 # 4NAS i *Awl m6me 1 to t dt r i w 44w OWM0 0� ,'.rRd::st 0u4b 4.&6* tltte4 e s 01ka oris+ s ; Ewe 4 * W Vm0W r 04 tar SO-* i eM « apr _; J 4, *sae r'1tinl�e{ i4Y care = i! hk Y t ,• G 1i! ewit r'O'*0" oma +law 9�amMt o4 k'wr tllrsr�v 'i , s ly ' ; ! , • t • d v@!►$ wR *too I" w:w+y r r Y s - r r. .. • :. ws two sir Mara scar *4 4 *0 *were met 40"o 9"W .*" q STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 3 Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Weiland Residence Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLAUNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date Dixor), The a pp] icant;requested con4re�tudI design--ro4iew instead o� final since the owners were planning on mall. ng some minor changes, therefore no action was taken at this time.'`. a 3 21 34 32 J81 --�iM Les �68 69 19 9 2 B I 16 TO 4 LITTLE TO 42 7.; .014T 3 IS •6. 4 3' a, 3' 59� 40 45 3 51 env OTE RI 3 92 18584 59 TI T2T 49 60 TO ERRET rLANE 48 61 69 68 4T 52 G66T 46 e ' n al \ BLOCK 51 34 SHEET 6 OF 6 2427 M'49�\ 82, 9s / /1 •.. 4 94 10/ i9 2! 26 2 06 IO 6S 96 9T 10! 9 T JUNE CREEK 95 '- TRAIL !19 M IO4 8 14 ' so » s 99 los 6 rMACT t 13 N O2 N TT`' 170 9' ,w r u TE5p 94 4 •: I 6 BLOCK 2 95 x .1 = SHEET 4 OF 6 4, 7T » 9 TN * N 49 99 p 11 4 + is 60 FOULM is 42 4i A t7 II BLOCK i t� .J 6 �{ f r i March 29, 1993 Mr. Rick Pylman, Town Planner Town of Avon - Planning Department P.O. Box 975 Avon CO 81620 Re: Development of Lot 37, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Dear Mr. Pylman: T- RE?. ' iF i 1 1993 (OINN or AVON Since I am unable to attend the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 6, 1993, when the referenced project is to be considered, I would, by way of this letter, like to formally render my objection to the project as submitted. I am the owner of the duplex on Lot 38, Block 3, which is adjacent to and north of the referenced lot. From the sketches of a proposed residence submitted for review and approval, the indication is that the views from my property are going to be severely restricted by the roof of the proposed development. This restriction of the views would considerably reduce the value of my property. The basis of my decision in 1986, to build on Lot 38 was that adequate protection of the views was afforded by the Zoning Code and the Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I feel that it is the responsibility of the Planning Depart- ment staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council to disapprove the plan as submitted and require that any development on Lot 37 comply with the code and the rules as they pertain to protection of the views and the value of neighboring properties, to wit: Zoning Code - Sections 17.04.030, paragraphs 0. and P.; 17.12.020, paragraphs D. and E. and 17.12.070, paragraph C. P&Z Rules - Sections 6.13 thru 6.16; 6.22, paragraph C.; 6.25, A.3. and A.S.; 7.30; 8.10; 10.10 and 14.10. The main floor level of each of the existing duplex units on Lot 38 is at elevation 8508.5'. My request is that the uppermost elevation any part of the development on Lot 37 be limited to elevation 8510.0'. While construction to this elevation would restrict the view downward to some extent, the views from horizontal upward would be preserved. Given the size of Lot 37, there are many alternative designs possible and alternative locations on the lot available that could readily satisfy the requested height limitation. I trust that you will convey this letter to the Planning and Zoning Commission and I will appreciate your keeping me informed of further developments in this process of permitting a development for I of 37. Sincerely, -W ///' 4 G. M. Hollingsworth 203 Patrick Drive Fort Walton Beach FL 32548 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page I Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Mr. Tony Seibert Design and Construction Services Final Design Review Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend is a 16,000 square foot duplex lot that slopes south toward the Eagle River. Design and Construction Services is proposing 2 detached dwelling units connected by a breezeway. The structures have approximately 5,860 square feet of habitable space, which does not includes the attached garages. Both units utilize finished walkout basements. Including the walkouts, the buildings are three stories. Staff has calculated that at it's highest point, unit A is 38 feet tall and unit B is 37 feet tall. The structures will be finished with vertical board and batten siding in a blue grey color. Roof will be standing seam metal in a dark gray. Window and door trim will be 1X4 cedar, finished in a blue gray, the clad windows will be white. The soffit and fascia will be blue grey. The roof forms are 9/12 gables. The landscape plan appears to be adequate, and includes an automatic irrigation. system. Site lighting is provided by wall lights at each side of the garage doors and at all exterior exits. The project meets all setbacks, and has adequate snow storage and parking. The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the zoning Code and other applicable rules and requlations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal does not appear to be in conformance with the Zoning Code, the buildings both exceed the maximum allowed height and it is very questionable if the two detached structures meet the Town's definition of a duplex. That definition includes "...a detached building containing two dwelling units..." Staff believes this proposal does not fit the definition. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 2 4W4Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Mr. Tony Seibert Design and Construction Services Final Design Review The Planning Commission has approved detached duplex structures in the past. Otherwise, the project is within all other rules and regulations. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: Other than the zoning issues, these improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project's design preserves views to the Eagle River from adjacent property and does not appear to have any adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: As submitted, the project is compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: Other than the zoning issuer,, this proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. 10 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION am April 6, 1993 Page 3 Lot 16, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Mr. Tony Seibert Design and Construction Services Final Design Review STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommendation is for denial because the structures exceed the maximum allowed height and because of the detached nature of the two dwelling units. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 7.. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action Respectfully submitted, Toe Allender Planner p wNNIN . ND •ONIN A TIQZ( Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) withdrawn ( ) Date Patii Dixon, ,Secrea y Due to cfnceros regarding thf conformance Of his 13rojprt to the dpfinitinn of a duplex, the Comnis010�n tabled this application, r Qu s inQ that the applicant provide a massing model, and color and ronfina matprial an,pes STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 1 Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Arthur Farr Single Family Residence Final Design Review Art Farr is proposing a single family log home on Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision and is requesting final design review approval. Lot 4 is located on the north side of Wildridge Road East, just to the east of Bear Trap Road. The lot is .83 acres in size and slopes down to the south at approximately 20 percent. Zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. This project has not gone through conceptual design review. The proposed residence is approximately 3300 square feet in size, not including an attached one car garage. The structure is a single story, with a walk out basement and a loft. The exterior is constructed of 8" logs, with off white stucco used as the finish material on the basement level. River rock is utilized on the chimney. Windows would be aluminium clad, doors a metal wrap; both in an adobe brown. Facial would also be brown, soffits will be tongue and groove left natural. The roof form is gabled. The proposed roof material is a 40 year asphalt shingle in coco brown. The proposed landscape plan is adequate, however, some additional plant material should be added to the east of the parking area. No sod is planned, all disturbed areas will be revegetated with a dryland grass mix. Irrigation has not been discussed. Exterior lights are planned at the exit doors and at the garage door. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. COMMENT: This proposal conforms with the Zoning Code and all other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 2 Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Arthur Farr Single Family Residence Final Design Review COMMENT: These improvements, as proposed, are appropriate to the neighborhood; high quality materials are being used throughout. 6.13 - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to be well designed, and should have little or no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with site topography. COMMENT: The project has been designed with a minimum of grading and site disturbance. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: There is not a dominant design theme in this area of Wildridge, this residence should be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Because of the lack of a dominant design these in tY_ area, staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adcpted Goals, Policies and Proqrams of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. Approval, with the condition that landscape mat.i ..t. :. ;, ::. : .a: of the parking area and with the suqqastion that a drip irrigot it - system be installed. ® STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 3 Lot 4, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Mr. Arthur Farr Single Family Residence Final Design Review RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review 4. Commission Action (Rjespectfully submitted, Tom Allender Planner PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Date PAtti Dixon, etary ,. f, 'Al Oil/ The C mmission tabled this dpplication due to the f ,lowina concerns: Longer overhangs n�edeo; Perhaps a dormer or dormers need to be added tc _ develop interest and shadow na rnc• kindnw Address Landscape issue. Handwdterin not` ecorended. � fl ) 1 !. ' • N Ix i • .. I *LOCK � 0.( R103E r Si SHEET 3 OF 6 � fl ) 1 !. ' • N Ix i • .. I *LOCK � 0.( R103E as STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 102, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Mike Bruen 4-Plex Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Mike Bruen is requesting a Conceptual Design Review for a proposed 4-Plex to be constructed on Lot 102, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the north side of Old Trail Road. It is approximately 0.82 acres in size. The lot slopes to the south at about 13 percent. The zoning is SPA with a 4-plex designation. The proposed 4-plex utilizes a repetitive facade which is given variety with a varied roof form. The structure is three stories tall with garages on the lower floor. Each unit has approximately 2000 square feet of habitable space, not including the attached garages. The structure, as proposed, is within all Town height, lot coverage and setback restrictions. The exterior is predominantly finished in a light bluish gray channel lap siding. The garage level on the front elevation will be finished is an off white stucco. Window trim will be 1 X 4 material, the facia will be 2 X 10, soffits will be plywood, all in blue grey. A hip roof with a series of dormers is utilized; asphalt shingles will be used, color has not been specified. STAFF COMMENTS Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, no formal staff recommendation will be provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted 41 Tom Allender Planner 33 68 69 Ig 9 B 1 16 ]0 LITTLE A "T 3 34 S H 42 5 5• WImM T LANE BLOCK 5, SHEET 6 OF 6 E �• 8] 93 .. � 9• 101 95 106 ° 85 8 96 91 105 9 ] / E CREEK 8! TRAIL \�19 98 104 8 ! 76- TRACT X az 77 0 , W !Z ! u v E 12 50 !• o f i 3 d 5• BLOCK 2 •6 35 !c a f z 7 SHEET 4 OF 6 4 1•s sl 7919 a 69 A! p!9 66 �� •o x I 11 a \ u Zs ZZ \ 1 f n T PACT - 7 t• \� l BLOCK I \ I SHEE T 5 OF 6 !1t swam -at oC.wa• WA• 4. so STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 28, Block 1, John Orcutt Duplex Residence r Conceptual Design INTRODUCTION Wildridge SuLdivision Review John Orcutt, owner and designer, is requesting a Conceptual Design Review 0for a proposed duplex residence on Lot 28, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located on the east side of Long Spur. It is approximately 0.37 acres in size. The lot slopes down to the southeast at about 10 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The proposed duplex in a southwestern design with a 3100 square foot primary unit and a 960 square foot rental apartment. The structure has three levels, the garage and apartment on the lower level, main living area in the middle, and the master suite is on the upper level. The structure, as proposed, is within Town lot coverage and setback restrictions; the elevations submitted are not scaled so height has not been considered. The exterior is predominantly finished in a red sandstone stucco with logs used as accents and window trim. The roof will be flat. Proposed site lighting includes a driveway post light and walkway lighting. The landscaping proposed leaves the rear and sides mostly natural with the front more generously planted. The grading plan submitted show a short section of driveway at 608 and some grading taking place off the lot. With a lot this flat these problems can easily be rectified. STAFF COMMENTS Staff feels that the Planning Commission should discuss the appropriateness of a southwestern design in this area. Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, no formal staff recommendation will be provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted Tom Allender Planner 67 V!] _- � LITTLE a01y T 1 1919 BLOCK 2 SHEET • OF 6 r sb- V 9 ,�... 10 ' • - 69 T Be R A SS 87 86 B 36 Se 59 S 89 e3 57 J 36 71 li 'I/�)/J 36 37 53 49 60 70 3a - 52 SI SO •9 61 69 6e 5 FERRET LANE 7 TE RIDGE BLOCK 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 106 10 45 96 105 , 7 f OF .o. e 3 so is `6 99 103 6 TRACT 9 7• - 77 100 � u 51 8 y oil a t S So 5• 3 y y]a1' •9 34 " D Is 17. .. u x Z ! 7 i9 I •a A] 38 39 2e 16 Y ae t 15 ar •• 40 26 1 i •1 25 22 � II >• 43 42 2.23 \ TRACTY 10 I 1 7 7• BLOCK I SHEE T S OF 6 L .o SEC AVON/eENCNMARK MAO STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Michael and Lisa Guida Single Family Residence Conceptual Design Review INTRODUCTION Michael Hazard, architect, is requesting a Conceptual Design Review for a proposed single family residence, with a lock off apartment on Lot 63, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. This lot is located at the end of Fox Lane. It is approximately 1.00 acre in size. The lot slopes to the west at about 35 percent. The zoning is PUD with a duplex designation. The proposed structure is two stories high, with a walkout basement. The main dwelling is in the upper floors with 3600 square feet of habitable space, the lock off is in the walk out basement with 1000 square feet of space. The applicant is proposing a detached garage which would be buried on three sides. The structure, as proposed, appears to be slightly over the height limitations imposed by the Town, and one corner encroaches into the 10 foot side yard setback. The exterior is finished in an combination of cedar siding and stucco, finished colors have not been discussed. Clad windows with wood trim will be used, doors will be metal clad. The roof form is gabled with a large dormer on the west elevation. Cemwood tiles will be the finish roofing material. The grading plan appears to be adequate, a landscape plan has not been submitted. STAFF COMMENTS Since this is a Conceptual Design Review, no formal staff recommendation will be provided. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review/Discussion Respectfully submitted Tom Allender Planner OF 6 SEC. 26 53 52 TI -11 2 3 T} TX 54 BLOCK 4 a sl SHEET 3 OF 6 5 3 II 2 4 26 55 50 6 1 76 Is 2 3 25 SG 40 46 01 B 7 20 20 3• 46 90 9 10 a .2 7 1 I9 4 27 T 7 i 23 26 b0 75 9 26 2, 4s 29 4344 69 VOTE RIDGE 22 61 27 - SJ }0 42 TH Be R 4 74 34 52 31 4. 55 B7 66 °SZe 37 S9 .. i e• 95 62 ..... !6 3e !4 56 71 72 ' 3! 73 a9 9 J6 37 53 70 !0 60 -FERRET LANE 37 30 52 51 48 6I 69 66 36 39 e 47 ei 52 66 20 7•6 6! 6, 3 6 5 ♦ 64 9 19 9 2 45 1e 1 16 4 1 3 4J 1,1771_4 2 t0 40 41 fGIY7 , 15 4 •1 4 O \_ J5 4, 4 BLOCK 5 3 40 45 SHEET 6 F 6 >0 39 •6 34 _ 12 IS � s/ 43 r0 33 54 u .2 10 SS v .09 rP y 53 S4 9 92 ;r r 9! As- " el 2 9• i07 • _ • n n n 95 106 10 0 e5 96 7 p 10S 9 n• 113 97 aYMI .•C[4 X19 _ 90 104 e 5 r6°q � 76' 99 103 I TRACT K eo 75 6 2 74 7t�'� 100 • W °. 102 3 u o 3 TS SI 32 9 IOi — — c 4 5� Tl s2 50 y4 3! 3 4 35 $2 !6 2 •fY 17 1 5 34 16 Z 35 36 3 i_ 0 7 TRACT If BLOCK 2 40 1 ` 1 N 19 r6 \ SHEET 4 OF 6 47 37 29 •s Be as 45 39 2 20 0 15 6 e7 44 40 26 ' R{ 41 zs zi (� .1 • Ii ' S -.L_ _. i►�'� --U( 5° 42 2.23 �RACi 3 2 t4 • n SE BLOCK 1 SHEET 5 OF 6 41 4M STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONINC COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 1 Wal Mart, Temporary Greenhouse w Lot 23/75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mr. Mark Lawlor Final Design Review Mr. Mark Lawlor, representing Wal Mart, is requesting final design approval for a temporary/seasonal greenhouse operation. Tile proposal. is to create an area in the existing parking lot on the west side of the Wal Mart store that could be used during the warmer months for the sale of landscape products. An area 60x80 feet would be enclosed with a temporary fence, constructed of cinderblocks and 4x4. Within this area the applicant would erect a 21x60 foot temporary greenhouse, divide areas for landscape supplies and display plant materials. A Poly -Tex Greenhouse would be utilized, the proposed color is white. This operation would consume 27 parking spaces. The Community Shopping Center currently has approximately 363 spaces, with the additional sales area they would be required to have 285 spaces, leaving them with a surplus after subtracting the spaces lost. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of the proposed project: 6.11 - The conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. C0141ENT: This proposal appears to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and all other town of Avon rules and regulations. 6.12 - The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located. COMMENT: As these improvements are temporary/seasonal they, are appropriate to the neighborhood. 6.17, - The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties. COMMENT: The project appears to have no adverse site impacts on adjacent properties. 6.14 - The compatibility of the proposed improvement with rite topography. U 4D STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 2 Wal Mart, Temporary Greenhouse Lot 23/75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mr. Mark Lawlor Final Design Review COMMENT: As submitted, the project is compatible with the site topography. 6.15 - The visual appearance of any proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. COMMENTS: The proposed improvements appear to be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 6.16 - The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired. COMMENTS: Staff sees no conflict with this criteria. 6.17 - The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town of Avon. COMMENTS: This proposal is in general conformance with the adopted goals, policies and programs of the Town of Avon. STA_Fp RECOMMENDATION Staff feels that this arrangement will be superior to past garden sales areas in the Wal Mart lot, and will be easier for them to maintain in a neat and orderly manner. RPLYAMENnPn ACTION 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Commission Review {. Commission Action Rospsctfully submitted, 4bw Allender Planner . STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 6, 1993 Page 3 Wal Mart, Temporary Greenhouse Lot 23/75, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Mr. Mark Lawlor Final Design Review PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) the Avon Community Development Staff overseeing the project. The horizontal elements of the corral will be constructed of 4 x 4 railings_ The approval I Wel. er.1..