Loading...
PZC Minutes 041582RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING APRIL 15, 1982, 7:30 P. M. The regular meeting of the Design Review Board of Avon was held on April 15, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., in the Town Council Chambers of the Town of Avon Municipal Complex, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Pierce. Let the record show that members present were: Jim Meehan, Jerry Davis, Mike Blair, Bill Pierce, Tommy Landauer. (Members Cheryl Dingwell & Bob Zeeb not present). Staff present: Terrill Knight, Norm Wood, Dick Evans & John Dunn. 1. Hieh Country Warehouse Employee Housing, Four (4) Units, sinal to t Eddie Daniel made the presentation. Proposing four (4) units for employee housing. Will be brick and wood siding. Roof to be cedar shake. Brick will be "Autumn Gold" and siding will be cedar stained dark brown. Terrill stated the zoning allows four units. The Board felt that the landscaping was appropriate and liked the offset. There will be 14 ponderosa pines (4' - 81) and 3 low evergreens. Jim motioned to grant final approval based on the submittal of a colored rendering for the files. Motion seconded by Tommy. Jim amended his motion to include that the siding will be the dark brown color. Tommy seconded the amendment and the motion was passed unanimously. Dennis Cole - representing U S Home Corporation and also representing the Colorado Investment & Realcy Company (a Colorado Corporation) who is the prospective purchaser of 100 units at the Christie Lodge. Requesting a Special Review Use permit to convert 100 units of the Christie Lodge to a deeded time share program. The special review use permit to be received from the Design Review Board is to be subject to further action of the Town Council specifically the approval of an amended plat and the approval of a time share subdivision. Contract contingent upon U S Home receiving approval to convert 100 units to a deed time share program. 3 items to be outlined in presentation: how program is to be used; benefits to the Town and the review criteria. John Dunn stated that the Board should ask if anyone is present to protest. Terrill also stated that there are letters of protest on file. Jackie Montgcmery/Ski & Shore Real Estate - explained the time share procedure. She stated that Vail is the number one requested place for time share. Would like for Avon to be that also. Pat Montgomery/President and Broker for Ski & Shore explained that the Town would benefit by the sales. Approximatelv $140,000.00 revenue would be generated. Would like to make time share available to all owners. Apoligized for not sending the proper information to all the condominium owners. (The letters and telegrams of protest are a part of the hearing and are on file and copies are available for anyone to look at.) Comments from audience: Dorothy Gould representing The Websters/Unit 402B, wanted to know if the Lodge was designated as a condominium or hotel. Terrill stated condo/hotel. Condominiumized as separate units. She stated she didn't think the Websters had any objections to the time share but they don't want to be left out. Steve Isom/i-plan, inc.- representing Sunroad Investment Corporation/Units 403,404, 405,507,408,409. Suggested U S Home buy back the condo units from the owners who might want to sell. If this couldn't be done, then Sunroad requested that the application be denied. (letter on file) Dennis Pisch representing David Bennoit/Unita 354,355 & 356. (letter on file). suggested the Board table this matter until the next regular meeting. Has not had cnr 4 Li:I1L Lc s ccs '-1-1L F.;L tllc grop4r. ccun:cl front his Let the record show that members present were: Jim Meehan, Jerry Davis, Mike Blair, Bill Pierce, Tommy LandaLar. (Members Cheryl Dingwell & Bob Zeeb not present). Staff present: Terrill Knight, Norm Wood, Dick Evans & John Dunn. Four Eddie Daniel made the presentation. Proposing four (4) units for employee housing. Will be brick and wood siding. Roof to be cedar shake. Brick will be "Autumn Gold" and siding will be cedar stained dark brown. Terrill stated the zoning allows four units. The Board felt that the landscaping was appropriate and liked the offset. There will be 14 ponderosa pines (4' - 8') and 3 low evergreens. Jim motioned to grant final approval based on the submittal of a colored rendering for the files. Motion seconded by Tommy. Jim amended his motion to include that the siding will be the dark brown color. Tommy seconded the amendment and the motion was passed unanimously. 100 Units Dennis Cole - re;resenting U S Home Corporation and also representing the Colorado Investment & Realty Company (a Colorado Corporation) who is the prospective purchaser of 100 units at the Christie Lodge. Requesting a Special Review Use permit to convert 100 units of the Christie Lodge to a deeded time share program. The special review use permit to be received from the Design Review Board is to be subject to further action of the Town Council specifically the approval of an amended plat and the approval of a time share subdivision. Contract contingent upon U S Home receiving approval to convert 100 units to a deed time share program. 3 items to be outlined in presentation: how program is to be used; benefits to the Town and the review criteria. John Dunn stated that the Board should ask if anyone is present to protest. Terrill also stated that there are letters of protest on file. Jackie Montgomery/Ski & Shore Real Estate - explained the time share procedure. She stated that Vail is the number one requested place for time share. Would like for Avon to be that also. Pat Montgomery/President and Broker for Ski & Shore explained that the Town would benefit by the sales. Approximately $140,000.00 revenue would be generated. Would like to make time share available to all owners. Apoligized for not sending the proper information to all the condominium owners. (The letters and telegrams of protest are a part of the hearing and are on file and copies are available for anyone to look at.) Comments from audience: Dorothy Gould representing The Websters/Unit 402B, wanted to know if the Lodge was designated as a condominium or hotel. Terrill stated condo/hotel. Condominiumized as separate units. She stated she didn't think the Websters had any objections to the time share but they don't want to be left out. Steve Isom/i-plan, inc.- representing Sunroad Investment Corporation/Units 403,404, 405,507,408,409. Suggested U S Home buy back the condo units from the owners who might want to sell. If this couldn't be done, then Sunroad requested that the application be denied. (letter on file) Dennis Pisch representing David Bennoit/Unite 354,355 & 356. (letter on file). suggested the Board table this matter until the next regular meeting. Has not had enough time to discuss this and get the proper counsel from his attorney. -1- Dennis Cole stated that by amending the plat this would allow any owner to go through the same process to convert their unit(s) to time share. John Dunn reviewed the zoning ordinance as it pertained to special review use. The Design Review Board needs to determine whether the proposed use will be compatible with surrounding units as well as land uses and uses in the area. The Board should consider the parking and the overall impact of the development and surrounding units. Also stated that it would take the vote of only four members of the board to approve the use. Terrill felt the adjacent property owners should have more time to review this matter so that they can understand exactly what is going on. Dennis stated they are only asking for special review use permit for 100 units because they only have legal authority to that number. Recommending to the Town that the amended plat grant this right to everyone that may want to go through the procedure. John Dunn stated that the issue before the Board is the impact of this use not the legality of it. Dennis suggested mailing each owner of a Christie Lodge unit all the Information that was presented at the meeting. This would let the owners know where they are in the procedure. Would like to avoid coming back to the Design Review Board. Jerry Davis felt that time sharing is good for the town. Does agree that the owners should have been given more time with the notice. John commented that time sharing is limited to RHDC zoning only. Dennis Cole - approximately 80 units or less have been sold. U S Home is currently working with the sale of 100 units to another partnership, and Colorado Investment is under contract to buy 100 units if they can be time shared. Mike Blair - approval is required by both the Design Review Board and the Town Council. Suggested the Board consider this matter at a later date in order to give the owners more time to find out what is going on. Tommy Landauer felt that the owners bought the units because they were not time share. Feels it benefits the Real Estate company and the town but the people really don't benefit at all. Doesn't agree with it and would be against it. Bill Pierce - concerned with the impact on the remaining owners that are not a part of time share process. Feels that a total building as time share might be valid. Comments from audience: Doug Mayes/Manager of Christie Lodge Management Company - stated there are 20 to 25 owners that elected not to go into the rental program. Only about 55-58 people are in 1t. Dennis Pisch stated the owner (Mr. Bennoit) has not had enough time to review the matter. Would like to see this item tabled so that the Board and the owners could obtain more information. Jerry Davis made a motion to table the application for Special Use Permit to a later date and that the Board direct the applicant in the areas that we have the most concern which are 1) the problem with only 100 units being included and the time limit should be set (May 20, 1982). Mike seconded the motion and added that the applicant notify all owners that are appropriate to be notified and send appropriate information from the meeting and any other place to each member of the Board and also to the Secretary of the Board. Jerry accepted the amendment. Mike seconded it. The Board voted in favor of tabling the matter until May 20, 1982. No. 3. Mevers Ranch (Cottonwood), Final Approval for Phase I Jim Morter/Morter Fisher Arnold -Architects made the presentation. Project has been reviewed by the Board two times. Several items that needed to be worked out with Norm Wood. Due to not being able to work out a deal with the Highway Department a new snow removal plan was submitted. Two matters needed to be discussed with the Council 1) a variance for 12 small car spaces and 2) approval for 80' tower. There was also a problem from the last meeting with the parking across the street. Phase I does nit require off-site parking. Norm wants them to go through the w • Terrill telt the adjacent property owners should have more time to review this matter so that they can understand exactly what is going on. Dennis stated they are only asking for special review use permit for 100 units because they only have legal authority to that number. Recommending to the Town that the amended plat grant this right to everyone that may want to go through the procedure. John Punn stated that the issue before the Board is the impact of this use not the legality of it. Dennis suggested mailing each owner of a Christie Lodge unit all the information that was presented at the meeting. This would let the owners know where they are in the procedure. Would like to avoid coming back to the Design Review Board. Jerry Davis felt that time sharing is good for the town. Does agree that the owners should have been given more time with the notice. John commented that time sharing is limited to RHDC zoning only. Dennis Cole - approximately 80 units or less have been sold. U S Home is currently working with the sale of 100 units to another partnership, and Colorado Investment is under contract to buy 100 units if they can be time shared. Mike Blair - approval is required by both the Design Review Board and the Town Council. Suggested the Board consider this matter at a later date in order to give the owners more time to find out what is going on. Tommy Landauer felt that the owners bought the units because they were not time share. Feels it benefits the Real Estate company and the town but the people really don't benefit at all. Doesn't agree with it and would be against it. Bill Pierce - concerned with the impact on the remaining owners that are not a part of time share process. Feels that a total building as time share might be valid. Comments from audience: Doug Mayes/Manager of Christie Lodge Management Company - stated there are 20 to 25 owners that elected not to go into the rental program. Only about 55-58 people are in it. Dennis Pisch stated the owner (Mr. Bennoit) has not had enough time to review the matter. Would like to see this item tabled so that the Board and the owners could obtain more information. Jerry Davis made a motion to table the application for Special Use Permit to a later date and that the Board direct the applicant in the areas that we have the most concern which are 1) the problem with only 100 units being included and the time limit should be set (May 20, 1982). Mike seconded the motion and added that the applicant notify all owners that are appropriate to be notified and send apprupriate information from the meeting and any other place to each member of the Board and also to the Secretary of the Board. Jerry accepted the amendment. Mike seconded it. The Board voted in favor of tabling the matter until May 20, 1982. Item No. 3 Meyers Ranch (Cottonwood) Final Approval for Phase I only, File No. 82-2-3. Jim Morter/Morter Fisher Arnold -Architects made the presentation. Project has been reviewed by the Board two times. Several items that needed to be worked out with Norm Wood. Due to not being able to work out a deal with the Highway Department a new snow removal plan was submitted. Two matters needed to be discussed with the Council 1) a variance for 12 small car spaces and 2) approval for 80' tower. There was also a problem from the last meeting with the parking across the street. Phase I does not require off-site parking. Norm wants them to go through the subdivision review process first before approval is granted. Bill Pierce told Jim Morter that his opinion was that the Board might be able to grant final approval for Phase I subject to getting through the subdivision review process. Jim Morter stated they would like to get final approval on the first phase subject to the final resolution of the subdivision review process. Another matter of concern was -2- G a water agreement regarding the irrigation ditch across the property. Jim read a letter from Arrowhead who has the water rights to the water, stating there are no objections to the development plans with the understanding that Cottonwood Condominium Association assumes full responsibility for maintaining Arrowheads required water flows in the existing irrigation ditch on the Cottonwood property. Jim also read a letter from the developers of Cottonwood, stating that they would i comply with Arrowheads request. Requesting that the Board grant final approval contingent upon the following matters: work out the small car variance with the Council; the tower allowance to be 80 feet; going through subdivision review process. INorm commented on drainage study. The pipe to be used for detention, concerned with how the pipe is to be cleaned out. Doesn't feel that each end is adequate means. The detention basin drywells located behind the Phase 3 building were moved and are now located directly over the sewer line. Feels the subdivision review is still important. Jim Morter stated that construction will not start this Spring. Terrill stated that his major concern is the parking. Should be put on the record that additional phases of the project are not approved yet. Should not allow the overall plan to go further. Phase I should stand on its own. Would recommend that the Board retract any conceptual approval or that the owner be aware that it is not approved and it will take changes before the next phase is approved. Jim Morter stated that if the parking situation across the street couldn't be worked out then the parking could be provided for under Phase 3 building. Only requesta:ng approval for Phase I. Jerry Davis stated that he wanted to see where the parking spaces will be before he would approve'it. Also concerned with how the parking will be provided for lockoff units. Wants to know how many lockoff units and how many parking spaces. Terrill stated the parking requirements are 2 spaces per dwelling and 1 per accommodation unit. The proper form would be a variance application to be reviewed on its own merit. Bill stated he recalled Art telling them that if there was a parking problem with lockoff units then it becomes a revocable right and the Town can say not lockoffs. John Dunn stated that Art sent a letter to the Town Council regarding lockoff units. It will be addressed at the Town Council Work Session on 4/27/82. George Rosenberg/Avon Metro District requested that plans be sent to them. Also feels that the Town should make a decidion on allowing the lockoffs or not allowing them. Tommy stated that he was concerned with the snow removal area, whether it is large enough and practical. Mike stated that the property was zoned for a certain number of units. Lockoffs create new units and the Board should not approve a project that allows more units than -the zoning allows. Should not be considered or allowed. They increase the parking requirements and overcrowd the site. Jerry Davis felt that the lockoff units and parking are a major problem and should be settled before any approval is granted. Tommy stated that the Board doesn't know what the other two phases of the project will look like if the parking doesn't fit. Wants to se,_ the entire project as originally submitted, not in phases. Jim Morter stated that they were doing the project in phases due to pu6sible economic problems. Tommy motioned to disapprove the application for approval of the first phase until the Board sees the entire project presented showing how it wil- all fit and look together. Motion was seconded by Mike. Jim Morter asked if the Board could table this. John stated that someone could make a motion to table which would take precedence. Jerry stated that the Board should vote on it. Mike stated that he would recommend that if this application is denied that it be allowed to come back in some revised state without a new fee. John suggested that the Board postpone 1.:-'.-.f)1,! C". H_ th-n z*i"d:. tcd that th" Boerd d^ D-Ith 1Cgyr to rr'"Ie T.401nrlt i..., 'L:- . Norm commented on drainage study. The pipe to be used for detention, concerned with how the pipe is to be cleaned out. Doesn't feel that each end is adequate means. The detention basin drywells located behind the Phase 3 building were moved and are now located directly over the sewer line. Feels the subdivision review is still important. Jim Morter stated that construction will not start this Spring. Terrill stated that his major concern is the parking. Should be put on the record that additional phases of the project are not approved yet. Should not allow the overall plan to go further. Phase I should stand on its own. Would recommend that the Board retract any conceptual approval or that the owner be aware that it is not approved and it will take changes before the next phase is approved. Jim Morter stated that if the parking situation across the street couldn't be worked out then the parking could be provided for under Phase 3 building. Only requesting approval for Phase I. Jerry Davis stated that he wanted to see where the parking spaces will be before he would approve'it. Also concerned with how the parking will be provided for lockoff units. Wants to know how many lockoff units and how many parking spaces. Terrill stated the parking requirements are 2 spaces per dwelling and 1 per accommodation unit. The proper form would be a variance application to be reviewed on its own merit. Bill stated he recalled Art telling them that if there was a parking problem with lockoff units then it becomes a revocable right and the Town can say not lockoffs. John Dunn stated that Art sent a letter to the Town Council regarding lockoff units. It will be addressed at the Town Council Work Session on 4/27/82. George Rosenberg/Avon Metro District requested that plans be sent to them. Also feels that the Town should make a decidion on allowing the lockoffs or not allowing them. Tommy stated that he was concerned with the snow removal area, whether it is large enough and practical. Mike stated that the property was zoned for a certain number of units. Lockoffs create new units and the Board should not approve a project that allows more units than -the zoning allows. Should not be considered or allowed. They increase the parking requirements and overcrowd the site. Jerry Davis felt that the lockoff units and parking are a major problem and should be settled before any approval is granted. Tommy stated that the Board doesn't know what the other two phases of the project will look like if the parking doesn't fit. Wants to see the entire project as originally submitted, not in phases. Jim Morter stated that they were doing the project in phases due to possible economic problems. Tommy motioned to disapprove the application for approval of the first phase until the Board sees the entire project presented showing how it will all fit and look together. Motion was seconded by Mike. Jim Morter asked if the Board could table this. John stated that someone could make a motion to table which would take precedence. Jerry stated that the Board should vote on it. Mike stated that he would recommend that if this application is denied that it be allowed to come back in some revised state without a new fee. John suggested that the Board postpone indefinitely. He then suggested that the Board deny with leave to refile without any additional fee. Tommy withdrew previous motion. Mike withdrew second. Tommy motion to deny and refile, second by Mike. Unanimous approval. Applicant is permitted to re -file under the same application. -3- Frank Slessman/Warner Properties made the presentation. Requesting approval to put up a six foot chain link fence. It will be cemented/permanent while the project is under construction. Also would like to put construction trailer on the site. It will be used for an office. The trailer has been painted recently (green and white). Construction for Building A to be completed by mid-August. Buildings B & C to be phased. Building A has 12 units. Trailer will have phone and electric only. Should be paving front section of Building A sometime in June. Parking will Le on-site. Mike motioned to approve application as submitted, the application be subject to review one year from this date. Motion was seconded by Jim, passed unanimously. Properties). Sien. Lot 34. Block 2. Benchmark Linda George made the presentation. Requesting approval to put up a development sign for the Greenbrier Condominiums. The sign is 15.95 square feet. Background color will be cream and the lettering will be forest green. Will be mounted on two 4 x 4 posts stained a wood color. Mike motioned to approve the sign as submitted in the application, that it be more clearly marked on the site plan and kept on record in the building department. Must be removed at completion of the last building of the project. Must be kept in good condition. Motion was seconded by Jim, passed unanimously. M Kay McAfee made the presentation. Requested approval for the sign (it's already up). Presented some pictures of the sign. It is 12 square feet in size. Same as all others on the building. Terrill stated that is the allowable size. Jerry motioned to approve the sign as is. Motion seconded by Tommy, passed unanimously. Item No. 7, Nottingham Station, Approval to move three (3) houses. Mauri Nottingham made the presentation. Requesting conceptual approval to move three houses (1 barn, a guesthouse and a 2 -story frame house). Presented a site plan showing the location of these houses and where they will be moved to. This was approved earlier by the County and Building Permits were obtained. The foundations for the buildings were installed and backfilled in anticipation of moving the buildings during the following Spring. There is no water or sewer available to the site. Requesting to move the buildings so that the project can get underway. The Barn has a metal roof which will probably be replaced in the future with a new metal roof. Terrill stated that SPA zone is based on the plan shown. Would meet zoning if the plan is approved. Tommy motioned to approve the application as submitted. Seconded by Jim. Mike commented that he appreciated the effort that is being taken to preserve some of the historical and pioneer type buildings. Jerry and the other members agreed. Motion was approved to move the buildings. Mauri asked what the next approach would be; if he needed to go to the Town Council or just obtain a permit. Terrill stated that the Board granted conceptual approval only, so therefore the applicant would need to come back with actual final plans. Mauri stated he only wanted to move the house. Terrill stated that he should not have asked for conceptual approval. He will need to obtain a permit tc. move '_ne houses. The Board decided that the applicant does not have to come back but does have to obtain a permit to move the houses. 2 units. Lot 33. Block FilecNo. plwue anti electric unly. Should oe paving front seCL1,11 of Building A sometime in June. Parking will be on-site. Mike motioned to approve application as submitted, the application be subject to review one year from this date. Motion was seconded by Jim, passed unanimously. Item No. 5, Greenbrier (Warner Properties), Sign, Lot 34, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision, .File No. 82-4-5. Linda George made the presentation. Requesting approval to put up a development sign for the Greenbrier Condominiums. The sign is 15.95 square feet. Background color will be cream and the lettering will be forest green. Will be mounted on two 4 x 4 posts stained a wood color. Mike motioned to approve the sign as submitted in the application, that it be more clearly marked on the site plan and kept on record in the building department. Must be removed at completion of the last building of the project. Must be kept in good condition. Motion was seconded by Jim, passed unanimously. Item Ivo. 6. "Our Place" Restaurant Sign. Benchmark Sh000ing Center Kay McAfee made the presentation. Requested approval for the sign (it's already up). Presented some pictures of the sign. It is 12 square feet in size. Same as all others on the building. Terrill stated that is the allowable size. Jerry motioned to approve the sign as is. Motion seconded by Tommy, passed unanimously. Item No. 7, Nottingham Station, Approval to move three (3) houses. Mauri Nottingham made the presentation. Requesting conceptual approval to move three houses (1 barn, a guesthouse and a 2 -story frame house). Presented a site plan showing the location of these houses and where they will be moved to. This was approved earlier by the County and Building Permits were obtained. The foundations for the buildings were installed and backfilled in anticipation of moving the buildings during the following Spring. There is no water or sewer available to the site. Requesting to move the buildings so that the project can get underway. The Barn has a metal roof which will probably be replaced in the future with a new metal roof. Terrill stated that SPA zone is based on the plan shown. Would meet zoning if the plan is approved. Tommy motioned to approve the application as submitted. Seconded by Jim. Mike commented that he appreciated the effort that is being taken to preserve_ some of the historical and pioneer type buildings. Jerry and the other members agreed. Motion was approved to move the buildings. Mauri asked what the next approach would be; if he needed to go to the Town Council or just obtain a permit. Terrill stated that the Board granted conceptual approval only, so therefore the applicant would need to come back with actual final plans. Mauri stated he only wanted to move the house. Terrill stated that he should not have asked for conceptual approval. He will need to obtain a permit to move the houses. The Board decided that the applicant does not have to come back but does have to obtain a permit to move the houses. Item No. 8, "Gemini Duplex", Final A, -pro -.!al 2 units, Lot 33, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision, Fileallo. 82-4-6. David Irwin made the presentatic-a. Requesting approval to building a duplex. The lot is located at the entrance to Avon Lake Villas on the corner. Norm stated that the major problem is the 25 foot setback on the front. Appears to be closer than 10 feet. Terrill stated that the setback is not something that can be adjusted. -4- The entire building would have to be reorganized,. It doesn't fit on the lot properly. Norm commented that it looks like it would have to be moved back about 15 feet. Terrill stated that this this a very substantial change and it would be appropriate to re—design and then come back to the Board. He could however discuss the design issues so that he knows where he stands. David stated that he could turn the building somewhat to get it to fit the lot. Mike stated that the building really did look good and "healthy". Building materials will be 1 x 12 cedar siding. Trim to be Clympic stain Cocoa color. Proposing to have a metal roof. Bill stated that the Board could not take any action due to there being a serious zoning problem. Applicant requested that this be tabled to the May 6, 1982 meeting. OLD BUSINESS: WildridQe Fire Station. Tract C. Wildridge Subdivision (Bill stated there is a conflict of interest due to providing architectural services, he passed the chair on to Tommy . Mike stated he may have a conflict also due to being a member of the Board of Directors for Avon Metro, but has no monetary interest in the project. Requested that he be allowed to be part of the discussion but would abstain from voting.) Lynn Fritzlen and George Rosenberg made the presentation. George stated that in January 1979 the Town Council handled the master plan for Wildridge Subdivision. It is an SPA area. The Town Council agreed that Tract C would be appropriate. He read a letter from Jay Hosburgh, Fire Chief of Eagle Vail Metro Fire Department, (copy of letter on file) which stated that this particular lot was the most appropriate for a fire station. The Board was concerned with the ownership of the fire station. George stated that they anticipate a similar situation as with the present fire station. The original owners of the fire station site, which was Benchmark Company, gave a 99 year lease on the fire station site, which is within Tract G, which is Park. Later the park was donated to the Town subject to the lease for the fire station. The District has arranged for the funds and this should be dealt with this year. Jerry stated that the Board needs to get the Town Council to agree with this as part of the record. Tommy asked what is the next step. Terrill stated that the Board is only giving design approval. Concerned still with driveway and who pays for it. Feels this lot is more level than others which would make it more appropriate for a park. George stated they may have to phase the building. George stated that the Town will ultimately come into ownership of the remainder of Tract C. Jerry stated that he would like to see the remainder of the lot become a park area. There are four parking spaces for two apartment units and one parking space for fire station. None for the park because they aren't developing the park yet. Terrill stated that the Wildridge Covenants designate this as a park which doesn't allow the use for a fire station. Thit would need to be changed. Jim Wells stated that the Plat describes what the park can be used for. Jim Meehan made a motion to grant final approval for the design of the fire house as specified on the drawings submitted. Motion was seconded by Jerry, passed unanimously. (Chair was turned back over to Bill Pierce). Tommy motioned to approve the minutes of 4/1/82, seconded by Jim, passed unanimously. Tommy motioned to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Jerry, passed unanimously. Really submitted by: M — Melody Cumm -------may Recording S retary