PZC Minutes 061781RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
JUNE 17, 1981, 7:30 P. M.
The regular meeting of the Design Review Board for the Town of Avon was held
on June 17, 1981 at 7:45 P. M. in the Town Council Chambers of the Town of Avon
in the Benchmark Shopping Center, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to
order by Vice-chairman Mike Blair.
Board Members present were Alice Alpi, Ken Hardwick, Mike Blair and Tom Landauer.
Terrill Knight, Dick Evans and Norm Wood, Town Engineer were also present.
Item #1, Avon
vision, riie
Parkino Variances, Lot
Buff Arnold represented this project. They would like final approval, and need
these variances first. The variances involve compact spaces and loading spaces.
They are requesting two loading spaces rather than the ten which are required
for this building, based on 47,400 square feet of net leasable space, 33,000
square feet of that space will be used for offices.
LOADING SPACES: The lower level of the building is only for parking, the second
level has changed to one-half retail and one-half parking from 100% parking, the
upper levels have not changed except that the top floor has been removed. The
main level is now commercial in front and office space in the back and the top
two floors are office space.
Mike asked for comments from the audience and there weren't: any. Terrill stated
that the use of a commercial building should be addressed, and that two spaces
should be the minimum. Norm stated that it may be difficult: to back a truck into
the loading space shown, up a 120 foot ramp, the grade is about 3%, the distance
and the narrow space might make it difficult. The space is not long enough for
a semi, it is not required and they do not foresee semi's delivering there.
Dick stated that an office building with no restaurant would probably require
smaller delinery trucks. There have been no inquiries into the Town Offices re-
garding the requested variance. Terrill: the applicant must make specific rea-
sonable findings in favor of the variance for it to be approved. Tom asked if
two trucks could use the loading spaces at the same time.
Buff stated that there may be one restaurant of approximately 1,200 square feet
in the lower area, the only restriction on the property is a deed restriction
against having a bank, they do not anticipate a liquor store.
COMPACT PARKING SPACES: All of the compact spaces would be under the buiding
so that snow removal would not hinder the use of a smaller space, all of Buff's
statements in favor of compact spaces are in the report provided with the appli-
cation. There would be 20 spaces in the lower parking level, 16 in the middle
parking level, 36 total or 30% of the parking.
The number of seats in the restaurant is unknown at this time. Terrill: con-
cerned about large cars parking in small spaces will create back-up problems,
circulation problems and make other spaces unusable, a certain amount of smaller
spaces should be allowed, 30 may be reasonable, with no control over the traf-
fic Terrill suggested that the variance not be granted. The number of spaces
may not be adequate, compact cars need to be defined.
Terrill stated that with 30% being compact spaces, they are one space over the
required minimum, he is not in favor of the variance until a program to cover
control over the spaces is provided with some further work on the site plan.
Size of the parking spaces and maneuvering space was discussed. Terrill agreed
with putting the compact spaces under the building rather than outside.
on June 17, 1981 at 7:45 P. M. in the Town Council Chambers of the Town cf Avon
in the Benchmark Shopping Center, Avon, Colorado. The meeting was called to
order by Vice-chairman Mike Blair.
Board Members present were Alice Alpi, Ken Hardwick, Mike Blair and Tom Landauer.
Terrill Knight, Dick Evans and Norm Wood, Town Engineer were also present.
Item #1, Avon Road Professional Building, Loading an
56. Block 2. Benchmark Subdivision. File No. 81-6-1.
Buff Arnold represented this project. They would like final approval, and need
these variances first. The variances involve compact spaces and loading spaces.
They are requesting two loading spaces rather than the ten which are required
for this building, based on 47,400 square feet of net leasable space, 33,000
square feet of that space will be used for offices.
LOADING SPACES: The lower level of the building is only for parking, the second
level has changed to one-half retail and one-half parking from 100% parking, the
upper levels have not changed except that the top floor has been removed. The
main level is now commercial in front and office space in the back and the top
two floors are office space.
Mike asked for comments from the audience and there weren't any. Terrill stated
that the use of a commercial building should be addressed, and that two spaces
should be the minimum. Norm stated that it may be difficult to back a truck into
the loading space shown, up a 120 foot ramp, the grade is about 3%, the distance
and the narrow space might make it difficult. The space is not long enough for
a semi, it is not required and they do not foresee semi's delivering there.
Dick stated that an office building with no restaurant would probably require
smaller delinery trucks. There have been no inquiries into the Town Offices re-
garding the requested variance. Terrill: the applicant must make specific rea-
sonable findings in favor of the variance for it to be approved. Tom asked if
two trucks could use the loading spaces at the same time.
Buff stated that there may be one restaurant of approximately 1,200 square feet
in the lower area, the onl, restriction on the property is a deed restriction
against having a bank, +'.ey do not anticipate a liquor store.
COMPACT PARKING SPACES: All of the compact spaces would be under the buiding
so that snow removal would not hinder the use of a smaller space, all of Buff's
statements in favor of compact spaces are in the report provided with the appli-
cation. There would be 20 spaces in the lower parking level, 16 in the middle
parking level, 36 total or 30% of the parking.
The number of seats in the restaurant is unknown at this time. Terrill: con-
cerned about large cars parking in small spaces will create back-up problems,
circulation problems and make other spaces unusable, a certain amount of smaller
spaces should be allowed, 30""may be reasonable, with no control over the traf-
fic Terrill suggested that the variance not be granted. The number of spaces
may not be adequate, compact cars need to be defined.
Terrill stated that with 30'% being compact spaces, they are one space over the
required minimum, he is not in favor of the variance until a program to cover
control over the spaces is provided with some further work on the site plan.
Size of the parking spaces and maneuvering space was discussed. Terrill agreed
with putting the compact spaces under the building rather than outside.
sa
s
0614
For control over the compact spaces, spaces could be assigned. Terrill asked
how the commercial space was calculated, Buff stated that it was explained in
their first presentation. The request for a parking space variance does not af-
fect the outside spaces or the loading spaces.
LOADING SPACES: Tom made the motion to accept the two loading spaces presented,
although they are minimal, Alice seconded the motion. There was discussion whether
the two variance requests could be voted on separately; it was decided to vote
on each point separately. The four Board Members present voted unanimously to
grant the loading spaces presented.
COMPACT PARKING SPACES: Ken made the motion to recess or continue this vari-
ance until Mr. Arnold has time to complete his further drawings and to get with
the Town Engineer or staff to redesign his additional parking that he is going
to require at this time, for the next meeting. The staff will be able to meet
with Buff before the next meeting, Mike added the date of July 1, 1981. Ken
amended his motion to state that the motion to recess the continuance of this
ordinance until July 1, so the applicant and the town staff members can get to-
gether and further continue their design of the parking spaces. Tom seconded
the motion and it was passed unanimously. This project will meet with the town
staff to work out the problems and then will come back before the Board on July
1, 1981. The meeting will be in the Town Council Chambers in Benchmark Shopping
Center unless posted on the door of that room if the meeting is in the new muni-
cipal building.
ntain Hiqh Enterprises. Construction
Rick Bolduc presented a letter and pictures showing the construction trailerMountain
High Enterprises would like to install on their project site. The trailer will
be 14 X 40, 3/4 will house materials, 1/4 is for an office with a telephone, no
running water, white metal siding, flat roof, it will not be used for sales or
housing.
Mike asked for comments from the audience and the staff. Dick stated that this
is a common storage trailer for a construction site. Rick stated that the Board
perhaps should not be concerned with ordinary storage construction trailers and
that the fees are excessive for such a hearing. The use of the trailer will
be limited to the period of construction. Mike asked if there was any objection
to granting this request to locate a construction trailer on the lot as requested
in the application and with the stipulation that it be removed not later than
the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Town of Avon. The Board
granted approval for the trailer as stated.
Item U. Avon
ion, Lots 45 and 46, Block 2, Benchmark
No one was present to represent Avon Lake Villas; this item was continued to the
end of the meeting since it was anticipated that someone would be coming.
Item #4, Alpine Views, Alpine Development Concepts. Inc.. Four Uni
Steve Wydeveld and John Eden represented Alpine Views. Their project orginally
had clay tile roofing, because of opposition, they changed the roofing material
to shake shingles. The stucco will be beige or tan, cedar channel rustic siding,
1`1-11 stain for the trim, facia and garage doors, most of the cedar will be lin-
seeded or sealed. Earth tones will be used.
There are two interior parking spaces per unit and four outside, 12 parking spaces
total. Landscaping - kept natural, :io sod will be used, 15 lodge pines, 20
quaking aspens, 25-30 rabbit brush and 20 other pines. The material in the path-
way is bark chips. The town staff finds no problem with the project.
The stain is a CPF or CDF sealer, natural, clear, waterproof, the sturcr is i
light t, -r, apnllpd by hpnd lien stucco, not like 5,Wrn. Thn q,?rant
grant the loading spaces presented.
COMPACT PARKING SPACES: Ken made the motion to recess or continue this vari-
ance until Mr. Arnold has time to complete his further drawings and to get with
the Town Engineer or staff to redesign his additional parking that he is going
to require at this time, for the next meeting. The staff will be able to meet
with Buff before the next meeting, Mike added the date of July 1, 1981. Ken
amended his motion to state that the motion to recess the continuance of this
ordinance until July 1, so the applicant and the town staff members can get to-
gether and further continue their design of the parking spaces. Tom seconded
the motion and it was passed unanimously. This project will meet with the town
staff to work out the problems and then will come back before the Board on July
1, 1981. The meeting will be in the Town Council Chambers in Benchmark Shopping
Center unless posted on the door of that room if the meeting is in the new muni-
cipal building.
•
s
n Trailer. Lot 76. Block 1. Wild-
s10n. File N0. 61 -
Rick Bolduc presented a letter and pictures showing the construction trailerMountain
High Enterprises would like to install on their project site. The trailer will
be 14 X 40, 3/4 will house materials, 1/4 is for an office with a telephone, no
running water, white metal siding, flat roof, it will not be used for sales or
housin<i.
Mike asked for comments from the audience and the staff. Dick stated that this
is a common storage trailer for a construction site. Rick stated that the Board
perhaps should not be concerned with ordinary storage construction trailers and
that the fees are excessive for such a hearing. The use of the trailer will
be limited to the period of construction. Mike asked if there was any objection
to granting this request to locate a construction trailer on the lot as requested
in the application and with the stipulation that it be removed not later than
the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Town of Avon. The Board
granted approval for the trailer as stated.
vision, File No. /9-10-3.
No one was present to represent Avon Lake Villas; this item was continued to the
end of the meeting since it was anticipated that someone would be coming.
Item H4. A1Dine Views. A1Dine Development Concepts. Inc.. Four Units. Lot 3
Steve Wydeveld and John Eden represented Alpine Views. Their project orginally
had clay tile roofing, because of opposition, they changed the roofing material
to shake shingles. The stucco will be beige or tan, cedar channel rustic siding,
T1-11 stain for the trim, facia and garage doors, most of the cedar will be lin-
seeded or sealed. Earth tones will be used.
There are two interior parking spaces per unit and four outside, 12 parking spaces
total. Landscaping - kept natural, no sod will be used, 15 lodge pines, 20
quaking aspens, 25-30 rabbit brush and 20 other pines. The material in the path-
way is bark chips. The town staff finds no problem with the project.
The stain is a CPF or CDF sealer, natural, clear, waterproof, the stucco is a
light tan, applied by hand like stucco, not like siding. The garage doors are
EPZ
wood, stained T1-11 to match the facia and the trim. Balconies extend two feet
out above the second floor windows, a redwood deck from the loft, the stucco
goes up around the fireplace, galvanized ten line fireplaces. There is a three
inch overhang on the eaves. Mike stated that the Wildridge covenants require
overhangs to be at least 18 inches, John stated that it is trim - the thickness
of the wood - rather than an overhang. Plywood siding is discouraged, this is
1 X 8 channel rustic cedar.
Mike st,ited that the aspen might not grow in Wildridge, there are pines on the
outer sites of the aspen, there will be no problem regarding the view for other
lots aro6nd this building. The lighting for the exterior was submitted, Dick
received one isometric drawing of the front view with garages showing. Trash
will be enclosed if a pick-up area is built. There are four exterior lights.
There being no objections, the Board granted approval for the plans as presented.
#5, Sagebrush, Michael Sanner, Two Units, Lot 27, Block 2, Wild
Sion. File No. 81-6-3.
Michael Sanner represented Sagebrush Duplex. This project was approved by the
Board approximately one year ago and the foundation has been started. The build-
ing was originally approved as adobe or stucco, the cost was prohibitive, it is
now to have a double lapped siding, Cabot stain #334, it will be a wood frame
house.
Michael would like a metal roof, Cocoa Brown Duranar 200, there are no trees on
the property now, he will use pinion pines, scrub oak and bushes, the sod which
is put in will be irrigated. There are berms around the house, swales around
both sides. The trim will be the same cedar and stain as the siding. The Wild -
ridge covenants do not allow metal roofing, Michael will need the approval of the
covenants committee for the roofing.
Landscaping - 12-15 scrub oak and pinion pine, 4-5 feet in height, 50 shrubs.
The roof will be shake shingles if metal is not approved. Toni suggested that
the Wildridge committee consider metal roofs, there will not be a glare off of
this roof and metal roofs are one of the best to use. The Board granted approval
for the project as submitted including the comment about the roof material as
made by Member Landauer, a copy should be sent to the Wildridge covenants com-
mittee.
It
#6, Pagett Duplex, Two Units, Lot 35, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, File
No. R1-3-3.
Jan Kaminski, architect represented the Pagett duplex. They are proposing a com-
mon driveway for Lots 34 and 35, they are at the end of a cul-de-sac. This is
on a north facing slope, about 18 degrees, the house will bear partly into the
slope, three parking spaces per unit, about 80" will be open space.
Materials - 1 X 6 channel lap cedar, vertically, broken up at the floor and ceil-
ing by 1 X 4 beveled cedar siding, all of iv stained #917 and the trim will be
stained #710. Moss rock will be on the side and front of the building, cedar
shake shin -les. Landscaping - two groups of aspen on the south side, five groups
of pine trees on the north side, three and four of lodge pole and engleman spruce
or blue spruce.
The application is acceptable to the staff. Norm: would like more open space
for drainage between the slope and the building. Mike suggested that a condition
of approval would be that a letter would be presented to the Board from the owner
of Lot 34 agreeing with the use of that easement for access to Lot 35. If that
could be obtained then the design would have to come back for reconsideration.
If the access to Lot 34 is on Lot 33, then both of those lots would have an
interest in whether Lot 35 uses that access.
There is moss rock all the way up the chimney, the driveway lighting should be
acceptable to the owners of Lots 34 and 33, landscaping - nine eight foot aspen,
six ten foot high poles, six six fuot englemans, two eight foot spruce, the dis-
turbed area will :)e sodded. The Board Ji -anted approval based on the condition
outer sides of the aspen, there will be no problem regarding the view fGr other
lots around this building. The lighting for the exterior was submitted, Dick
received one isometric drawing of the front vie -w with garages showing. Trash
will be enclosed if a pick-up area is built. There are four exterior lights.
There being no objections, the Board granted approval for the plans as presented.
Item #5, Sagebrush, Michaei S Two Units, Lot 27, Block 2, Wildridge Sub-
division, Fila No. 81-6-3.
Michael Sanner represented Sa ush Duplex. This project was approved by the
Board approximately one year and the foundation has been started. The build-
i.,g was originally approved as adobe or stucco. the cost was prohibitive, it is
now to have a double lapped siding, Cabot staid #334, it will be a wood frame
house.
Michael would like a metal roof, Cocoa Brown Duranar 200, there are no trees on
the property now, he will use pinion pines, scrub oak and bushas, the sod which
is put in will be irrigated. There are berms around the house, swales around
both sides. The trim will be the same cedar and stain as the siding. The Wild -
ridge covenants do not allow metal roofing, Michael will need the approval of the
covenants committee for the roofing.
Landscaping - 12-15 scrub oak and pinion pine, 4-5 feet in height, 50 shrubs.
The roof will be shake shingles if metal is not approved. Toni suggested that
tre Wildridge committee consider metal roofs, there will not be a glare off of
this roof and metal roofs are one of the best to use. The Board granted approval
for the project as submitted including the comment about the roof material as
made by Member Landauer, a copy should be sent to the Wildridge covenants com-
mittee.
Item #6, Pagett Duplex, Two Units, Lot 35, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, File
Jan Kaminski, architect represented the Pagett duplex. They are proposing a com-
mon driveway for Lots 34 and 35, they are at the end of a cul-de-sac. This is
on a north facing slope, about 18 degrees, the house will bear partly into the
slope, three parking spaces per unit, about 80% will be open space.
Materials - 1 X 6 channel lap cedar, vertically, broken up at the floor and ceil-
ing by 1 X 4 beveled cedar siding, all of it stained #917 and the trim will be
stained #710. Mess rock will be on the side and front of the building, cedar
shake shingles. Landscaping - two groups of aspen on the south side, five groups
of pine trees on the north side, three and four of lodge pole and engleman spruce
or blue spruce.
The application is acceptable to the staf,. Norm: would like more open space
for drainage between the slope and the building. Mike suggested that a condition
of approval would be that a letter would be presented to the Board from the owner
of Lot 34 agreeing with the use of that easement for access to Lot 35. If that
could be obtained then the design would have to come back for reconsideration.
If the access to Lot 34 is on Lot 33, then both of those lw:s would have an
interest in whether Lot 35 uses that access.
There is moss rock all the way up the chimney, the driveway lighting should to
acceptable to the owners of Lots 34 and 33, landscaping - nine eight foot aspen,
six ten foot high poles, six six foot englemans, two eight foot spruce, the dis-
turbed area will be sodded. The Board granted approval based on the condition
1911
that the applicant show satisfactory legal evidence from the lot owners which
are involved, at least Lot 33 and Lot 34, that the platted driveway easement can
be used as access to �ot 35 as shown on the plans; if it can not be done, then
the site plan would have to be resubmitted and re -reviewed by the Board. This
would be a change for access, not a new complete subiiiission. A change in the
drainage or grading plan should also be made in accordance with the Town Engineer's
comments.
lv�m #7, High Country V aza, Commercial, Lot 3, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision
-U-Y.
Allen Butler represented High Country Plaza. The building will be 9,915 square
feet, 22 off-street parking spaces and two loading docks, lot coverage is 75%
with impervious materials. The exterior of the building will be redwood, channel
lap siding, smoothed faced with Olympic stain #911, which is now corrected to
#901. The metal roof on the front part of the building will be standing seam,
Zinc Gray in color, the rest of the roof is almost flat and will be a membrane roof,
manufactured by Carlyle, an adhered system with a light gravel covering, an ag-
gregate finish.
The windows will be Pella clad, tinted glass throughout. Landscaping - sodding,
staked on the slight slope, irrigated. The application is sufficient for review
according to the staff. Dick mentioned that the handicapped parking may be a
problem, when full, the parking may be difficult to get out of. The number of
parking spaces is adequate for chc- building size, the loading spaces meet the
requirements.
Signs - this is a separate item, two signs on the building, the signs appear to
meet the sign code according to the staff. A thick pine board will be useu,
individual letters with transparent sealer, hand carved, hold colored.
Tom suggested that the redwood siding on the sides could be broken up, Allen
stated that when buildings are constructed on Lots 2 and 4,.the sides will not
be seen, they are building up to the 712 foot setback. The redwood color varies,
it will be construction select grade. The staff requested more detailed drawings
on the drainage plan.
Landscaping - there will be Russian olives along the side setbacks, the Board
suggested poplar trees, on the south side will be blue spruce. Also used will
be white ash, two types of juniper, it will all be sprinkled, common lilacs, the
east side could use a fEw trees to break up the asphalt. Terrill suggested an
edge around the landscaping to protect it, a curb or tie wall and stated that
the snow removal areas appear minimal, the snow may have to be hauled off of
the property, it can not be dumped into 0e creek.
Point of discussion: plant material on the east side, the drainage plan and
snow removal, handicapped parking which may be resolved by exchanging the space
with one to the northeast, 54 feet away from the building. The Board granted
approval to the site plan and building as submitted with the condition that the
grade plan be submitted and approved by the Town Engineer and that the handi-
capped parking space be revised and relocated and can be approved by the staff
and that consideration be given and effort be made to add some additional plant
material to the east side of the lot.
Item 81 #7a,-7-3High Country Plaza, Signs, Lot 3 Block 1 Benchmark Subdivision F
Nu. .
The signs are attached to the building, carved letters by the Woodsmiths in Denver
of a light color which would be visible and a contrast to the building. Dick
stated that for a permit to install the signs they will need to submit a drawing
showing the square footage and the method used. Mike stated that a condition
of the approval would be that a plan be submitted to the staff. The entrance and
exit signs were previously approved, Terrill suggested that "entrance" and "exit"
be emphasized on these signs, they are planning on a one-way driveway. The Board
granted approval -•s applied for conditioned that a detailed and well -dimensioned
Sign plan he Duh ... ittr,d to the staff to determine compliance with the Sign Code.
Item #7
Block 1, Benchmark Subdivisioi
Allen Butler represented High Country Plaza. The building will b2 9,915 square
feet, 22 off-street parking spaces and two loading docks, lot coverage is 75%
with impervious materials. The exterior of the building will be redwood, channel
lap siding, smoothed faced with Olympic stain #911, which is now corrected to
#901. The metal roof on the front part of the building will be standing seam,
Zinc Gray in color, the rest of the roof is almost flat and will be a membrane roof,
manufactured by Carlyle, an adhered system with a light gravel covering, an ag-
gregate finish.
The windows will be Pella clad, tinted glass throughout. Landscaping - sodding,
staked on the slight slope, irrigated. The application is sufficient for review
according to the staff. Dick mentioned that the handicapped parking may be a
problem, when full, the parking may be difficult to get out of. The number of
parking spaces is adequate for the building size, the loading spaces meet the
requirements.
Signs - this is a separate item, two signs on the building, the signs appear to
meet the sign code according to the staff. A thick pine board will be used,
individual letters with transparent sealer, hand carved, hold :olored.
Tom suggested that the redwood siding on the sides could be broken up, Allen
stated that when buildings are constructed on Lots 2 and 4,.the sides will not
be seen, they are building up to the 7z foot setback. The redwood color varies,
it will be construction select grade. The staff requested more detailed drawings
on the drainage plan.
Landscaping - there will be Russian olives along the side setbacks, the Board
suggested poplar trees, on the south side will be blue spruce. Also used will
be white ash, two types of juniper, it will all be sprinkled, common lilacs, the
east side could use a few trees to break up the asphalt. Terrill suggested an
edge around the landscaping to protect it, a curb or tie wall and stated that
the snow removal areas appear minimal, the snow may have to be hauled off of
the property, it can not be dumped into the creek.
Point of discussion: plGnt material on the east side, the drainage plan and
snow removal, handicapped parking which may be resolved by a;:changing the space
with one to the northeast, 54 feet away from the building. The Board g,anted
approval to the si,,e plan and building as submitted with the condition that the
grade plan be submitted and approved by the Town Engineer and that the handi-
capped parking space be revised and relocated and can hp approved by the staff
and that consideration be given and effort be made to add some additional plant
material to the east side of the lot.
Item #7a, Hiqh Country Plaza, Siqns, Lot 3, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision, Fil
The signs are attached to the building, carved letters by the Woodsmiths in Denver
of a light color which would be visible and a contrast to the building. Dick
stated that for a permit to install the signs they will need to submit a drawing
showing the square footage and the method used. Mike stated that l condition
of the approval would be that a plan be submitted to the staff. The entrance and
exit signs were previously approved, Terrill suggested that "entrance" and "exit"
be emphasized on these signs, they are planning on a one-way driveway. The Board
granted approval as applied for conditioned that a detailed and well-di'rensioned
sign plan be submitted to the staff to determine compliance with the Sign Code.
-4-
JJ
Item #3, Avon Lake Villas, Design Modification, Lots 45 and 46, Block 2, Bench-
mark Subdivision, File No. 79-10-3.
Joe Krabacher represented Avon Lake Villas Phase III. This is a design modifi-
cation to the swimmming pool. The swimming pool building has changed, it is
larger, it is not easily seen. The building is about five feet below the grade
level. Dick stated that it is a practical change, the application is sufficient
according to the staff. The lot line is being vacated, there is a sewer easement.
They are adding a steam room a d an exercise room, it has a sod roof, not a
public or an habitable building.
It will have a wood interior, tile floors and walls, there are provisions for
future solar heating. There being no objections, the Board granted approval
for this modification. The siding will be like the condominium buildings, wiui
a drivet material.
Item #8, Work Session Re arding Compact Cars and Items in the Design Review Board
Procedures, Rules and Regulations.
Rick Larson, concerned citizen with Sea M;,untain Developers, Inc. mentioned the
compact car spaces and that they are not .flowed according to the present Zoning
Ordinance. Rick discussed various parking studies and stated that the Vail
parking structure will house 750 cars, Avon Center will have 961 spaces at build
out, Peregrine will have 357 spaces.
The Board will have a work session regarding compact cars, Rick and all other
interested people were invited, the meeting will be June 24, 1981. The only
items which will be considered at that meeting will be additions and changes to
the Town of Avon Design Review Board Regulations. Terrill's handout will be
discussed at that time; he explained the handout.
The work session next week will be to reorganize and clarify the present rules
and regulations compared to the existing Town Ordinances. The meeting will be
held June 24, 1981 at 7:30 P. M. and will adjourn at 9:30 P. M., Mike stated
that the Board Members must read Terrill's handout and have comments prepared,
also that this meeting will be a continuation of tonig:it's meeting for discussion
of Item #8.
After the minutes were read, Ken made the motion to approve the minutes, Tom
seconded it and it was passed unanimously. Mike stated which Meabers were present.
There being no further business to be brought before the Board, Tom made the
motion to adjourn the meeting, Alice seconded it and it was passed unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned with the exception of Item #8, which has been continued
to June 24, 1981 at 7:30 P. M.
Res ectfully ubmitted by
Ries
re Sortl c'
cording Secretary
Design Review Board