Loading...
PZC Minutes 062079RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 20, 1979 The regular meeting of the Design Review Board for the Town of 02 on June 20, 1979 at 7:45 P.M. in the Town Council Chambers of in the Benchmark Shopping Center, Avon, Colorado. The meeting by Chairman, Hugh Price. Avon was held the Town of Avon was called to order 03 Board Members present were: Mike Blair, Hugh Price, Cynthia Jordan, Ken Richards, Tom Landauer. Alice Knipe arrived late. John Wheeler was absent. 05 The Chairman deferred the reading of the minutes until the end of the meeting in order for all members to have a chance to read them. 09 The first item of the agenda was not presently represented so it was moved to the last on the agenda. 10 Represented by Robert Edwards, the builder. Edwards Condos had been presented previously to the Design Review Board and certain requirements were set forth. Mr. Edwards was here to present the items. No. 1, was the slope of the driveway, they simply flattened it out on the top and allowed for a maximum of 10 grade. Overall they have less than a 6"' grade. No. 2, was the lighting. They have two incondescent lamps placed among the trees. The type of lighting is #A, they are translucent spheres. They are a cluster of four lights with a 20 inch diameter sphere and is 200 watts per sphere maximum. The height is approximately 12'. Ken Richards stated that it be put on record that there maybe a request for the developer to reduce the glare either with a amber color globe or change of wattage. The developer noted that the sphere lights are approximately 30' from the road. It was also noted by the developer that he would agree to put amber color globes in or reduce the size or wattage of the lamps. It was noted that the drainage may have to be rerouted. Ken Richards noted that the developer should be commended on the overall berming of the area, the landscaping and that this project will be a very good assest to the area. Final approval was unanimous. 100 Item #3, Alpen Flora, Lot 11, Block 2, File No. 79-6-6, 12 units. Represented by Joe Krabacher. This project was presented previously to the Design Review Board. The last presentation they were given preliminary Review. ?hey are asking for final approval at this presentation. The building location of the project was moved to a 15 degree angle on the lot so as not to block the view of the owners of the adjacent lot. They have tightened the parking lot up some and are keeping the grade to 8'i. There is a 23 car parking area. The snow removal areas are all around the perimeter. Mr. Landauer asked Mr. Krabacher how far back they are from the rear lot line and it was stated that it was 104'. The elevation has not been changed. After a lengthly discussion they proceeded with the lighting of the project. They are using the ooen lighting, square posts that have the reverse dimmi-dim-wit reflector and lights the ground around it. They are on 6' posts. The landscaping budget is $3,338.00 and that is without the sprinkler system. The sprinkler system is being bid separate. They will be sodding the whole lot line in front of the project. They are going to install a small hot tub. The budget for• the hot tub, the deck and equipment is $20,000.00. The deck composition is of concrete. The hot tub is flush with the concrete and is accompanied with a cover to be used summer and winter. It was noted that the party walls are running to the top of the roof. in the iienchmark Shopping Center, Avon, Colorado. The meeting way c.i-led to orl` - by Chairman, Hugh Price. 03 Board Members present were: Mike Blair, Hugh Price, Cynthia Jordan, Ken Richards, Tom Landauer. Alice Knipe arrived laze. John Wheeler was absent. 05 The Chairman deferred the reading of the minutes until the end of the meeting in order for all members to have a chance to read them. 09 The first item of the agenda was not presently represented so it was moved to the last on the agenda. 10 Item #2, Edwards Condominiums, Lot 17, Block 2, File No. 79-5-3, 6-plex. Represented by Robert Edwards, the builder. Edwards Condos had been presented previously to the Design Review Board and certain requirements were set forth. Mr. Edwards was here to present the items. No. 1, was the slope of the driveway, they simply flattened it out on the top and allowed for a maximum of 10% grade. Overall they have less than a 6% grade. No. 2, was the lighting. They have two incondescent lamps placed among the trees. The type of lighting is #A, they are translucent spheres. They are a cluster of four lights with a 20 inch diameter sphere and is 200 watts per sphere maximum. The height is approximately 12'. Ken Richards stated that it be put on record that there maybe a request for the developer to reduce the glare either with a amber color globe or change of wattage. The developer noted that the sphere lights are approximately 30' from the road. It was also noted by the developer that he would agree to put amber color globes in or reduce the size or wattage of the lamps. It was noted that the drainage may have to be rerouted. Ken Richards noted that the developer should be commended on the overall berming of the area, the landscaping and that this project will be a very good assest to the area. Final approval was unanimous. 100 Item #3, Alpen Flora, Lot!l'k 11, Block 2, File No. 79-6-6 12 units. Represented by Joe Krabacher. This project was presented previously to the Design Review Board. The last presentation they were given preliminary Review. They are asking for final approval at this presentation. The building location of the project was moved to a 15 degree angle on the lot so as not to block the view of the owners of the adjacent lot. They have tightened the parking lot up some and are keeping the grade to 8%. There is a 23 car parking area. The snow removal areas are all around the perimeter. Mr. Landauer asked Mr. Krabacher how far back they are from the rear lot line and it was stated that it was 104'. The elevation has not been changed. After a lengthly discussion they proceeded with the lighting of the project. They are using the open lighting, square posts that have the reverse dimmi-dim-wit reflector and lights the ground around it. They are on 6' posts. The landscaping budget is $3,338.00 and that is without the sprinkler system. ThF sprinkler system is being bid separate. They will be sodding the whole lot line in front of the project. They are going to install a small hot tub. The budget for the hot tub, the deck and equipment is $20,000.00. The deck composition is of concrete. The hot tub is flush with the concrete and is accompanied with a cover to be used summer and winter. It was noted that the party walls are running to the top of the roof. The color material will be flat black for the chimney caps and flue screens, the chimney fascia and trim and hand rails will be Olympic No. 712. The field or siding will be Olympic No. 705. The stucco will be a patent Lambert color called "Fawn" and the texture No. is #4724. They are using shake shingles. They are using Spruce siding. The trash area will be in one area and it will be located at the south side of the building. The trash enclosure fence is the same material as the siding of the building and is 6' high. The exterior lighting will be at the parking area, one at each stair landing and at each door, they will be of a cylinder type - down lighting. Request was made for final approval of this project which was unanimously approved by the Board. Item 41, A -Y Townhouses, Lot 44, Block 1, File No. 79-5-4, 3-plex. 381 The architect was not present so Mr. Al Alpi presented the project. The first oresentation of the project of the last meeting was an conceptual approval. It was stated that instead of a 10' retaining wall they have cut it down and now is a 4' wall and have gone back 8' and then put another 4' wall in. It was stated that this is being designed and was not ready for the presentation of June 20. It was also stated they weren't sure of the contours because they were taken off of an original ,AA Benchmark Fi,rl,survey, so they have to get the right contours before they know what s �'1 to do on t A retaining wall. After lengthly discussion this project was tabled pending further material. Hugh Price noted that there were a couple of errors in the minutes of the June 6th, minutes. The name of the trees that will be used on Lot 44, Block 1, is "Hopi" crab instead of "Hoopi". It was also noted that Alice Knipe was present at the June 6th meeting and was not recorded in the minutes. Tom Landauer moved the minutes be approved as amended, seconded by Alice Knipe and approved unanimously. The Chairman noted that the Town Council, in a special meeting, on the 19th of June 1979, passed a Resolution No. 79-9 making the following Amendment to the Rules and Regulations of the Design Review Board. The Rules and Regulations are hereby amended to include the following additional language: "That in reviewing projects presented to it, the Design Review Board shall consider the effect of any proposed improvement upon the outlook of any adjacent or neighboring property". This was approved as of June 19, 1979. It was noted that the Resolution takes effect immediately. The Chairman proceeded with the reviewing of Ordinance No.79-14, amending Ordinance No. 79-2, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2, SERIES OF 1979, ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE 79-2; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN REGARD TO THE FIRE RATING OF PARTY WALLS AND SEPARATION WALLS". 707 Section 505(d)2. Ordinance number 2 of the series of 1979 shall be and is hereby amended 13 read: "Area separation walls shall extend to the outer edges of horizontal p-ojecting elements such as balconies, roof overhangs, canopies, marquees or architectural projections unless the building plans specifically require the same fire resistive constructior for the walls on each side of, the floors, and the roofs above, beyond the termination of said area separation wall for a width equal to or greater than the depth of the projecting elements. Wall openings within such widths shall be protected by assemblies having a three- fourths hour fire protection rating." After lengthly discussion there was no objection and this was recommended by the Board. ,*IN 'A"" Section 1302(b) is hereby amended to read: "Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, more that two stories in height or having more than 3000 square feet of floor area above the first story, which includes all finished basements as defined in the Avon Zoning Code, shall not be less than one-hour fire - resistive construction throughout." There is no change in the Exception, but "corridors" shall refer to all entry ways, passageways and exits, when two or more dwelling units are served by said "corridors", regardless of size, enclosures, or length. Openings to such corridors shall have not less than 3/4 hour fire rating, with automatic closures, and all walls shall be 1 -hour fire -resistive to the roof, or ceiling, whichever is applicable. Fire Alarm systems shall be provided for every building which contains 15 or more dwelling units, regardless of separation walls which are required, and in any size building which has a common entry way serving three or more dwelling units; wiring for alarm systems to be in metal conduits. After lenghtly discussion there was no objection and this was recommended by the Board. Section 1710 Add to paragraph 3: When projections from walls of Type III, IV, and V construction are extensians of fire -resistive walls, they shall have the same rated protection as the walls from which they are extended. There was no objection and this was recommended by the Board. It was noted that the next regular meeting would fall on July 4th, 1979, the Board agreed to move the meeting to Thursday July 5th, 1979. With no further business the meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted: i Patricia J. Doyle Design Review Board Recording Secretary Approved: